TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MrToM88 Archive

View 0 posts and 106 comments by MrToM88 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

In Organo chemistry if the functional groups of a planar molecule are on the same side they are in cis configuration and when they are on opposite side they are in trans configuration.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 06:57 PM
0

I always thought that the trans prefix in transgender was related chemistry, especially because of the use of the prefix cis in cisgender. Or maybe it's the other way around, from transgender came cisgender by analogy with chemistry.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 05:15 PM
8

Foods for thought, here is a source that goes against your first source. we failed to confirm an effect of power posing on testosterone, cortisol, and financial risk taking. We did find that power posing affected self-reported feelings of power; however, this did not yield behavioral effect
/r/TheRedPill18/08/15 07:19 PM
0

That's the point. Sadly we would be wrong if we were to think that it was hard. That's the meaning he was trying to make.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/15 09:05 PM
0

Alas is the wrong word to use here, it's basically a synonym for "sadly". You just said "you guys may be thinking that this sort of thing involves too much effort, but sadly, it does not". Edit it to happily. Sadly for us it does not involves too much effort. Indeed we are wrong in thinking that and we are making a mistake. That's the way you should be understanding his sentence.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/15 08:42 PM
1

God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, The courage to change the things I can, And the wisdom to know the difference.
/r/RedPillWomen10/01/15 05:55 PM
9

I agree with you, this article was the blue pill inside the red. Kinda like ying yang symbol...
/r/TheRedPill20/09/14 07:49 AM
14

She was baiting you to harvest your organs ! That's basically what I would think was happening in your position ... It's too good to be true.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 02:30 PM
10

It didnt change nothing, it changed his biceps size.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 11:02 AM
5

It's not practical because if you cant practice it you are very unlikely to be able to use instinctively in a fight situation. You can practice throws a thousand times on a tatami and be able to use it on concrete with great result, you won't be able to train putting your fingers into someone's mouth to throw them down. That's the problem with krav maga, you need to be already a confirmed martial artist to have any chance at using it if you ever need it (especially as, for most of us, it will on…
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 06:01 PM
5

Not very practical to learn though. It's far too focus on "destruction" to be able to spar with.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 05:27 PM
4

What's more just a reminder that the ground is in concrete most of the time which will hurt like hell when being thrown upon.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 05:26 PM
46

Arent these statistics biased ? Afaik there are a lot more fatherless homes than motherless homes so the statistics are bound to be higher for the fatherless homes. Maybe we could see some normalized statistics. For instance what is the propensity for an high school student to drop out depending of being in a fatherless or motherless home.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 08:22 AM
7

You know there is a lot of cultures and people that will mistake kindness for weakness. That's not a women specific thing.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/14 03:09 PM
2

The author tries to validate his findings by accommodating his results we all get that. But what the example is here to say is only that already in the 18th century the change had already started .
/r/TheRedPill17/08/14 06:49 AM
10

It's written you just have to read carefully : Hagakure. If you want to hear some of it you can watch the film Ghost dog with Forest Whitaker. In this film he plays the part of a modern day samurai during a mafia war. His master ask him to die for him and he will do so. There is one of his quote that kind of explain the "outcome independence" that we strive to achieve. “There is something to be learned from a rainstorm. When meeting with a sudden shower, you try not to get wet and run quickly al…
/r/TheRedPill17/08/14 05:54 AM
-4

It seems you haven't been reading the side bar straight from the very first one "Introduction" The Red Pill is men's sexual strategy. Reality is happening, and we need to make sure that we adjust our strategy accordingly. So yeah you're wrong.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 10:23 PM
-9

That's fascinating because that right there shows why she (and perhaps many women) fundamentally miss the point of TRP. That it's to make yourself better and happier, independent of what other people think. Self-improvement is a goal in itself and a path to happiness, irrespective of any other external validation. As if people didnt come here to get the "recipe" on how to get women. Please stop the delusion.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 08:24 PM
25

Heroes and villains have moral values attached to them. Protagonists are the main character, antagonists are against the main character. Basically he is right you should only see yourself as the main character of your life.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/14 08:04 PM
30

There is no heroes nor villains. There is only protagonists and antagonists.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/14 07:24 PM
1

It's probably more a question of smell than body language.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 06:18 AM
2

That's fucking cool. I bet you are proud when he says that he figured it out.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 05:04 PM
6

That was the pre internet in every home / mobile in every pocket days. I was always out all afternoon with only my bag with a swiss knife, a lighter, something to eat and some fireworks. Those days were fun.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:51 PM
29

She might not be ready yet. Emotionally and financially. Once she is, he will feel the hatred. At least he would have deserved it unlike most people.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 03:33 PM
11

You must care a lot about your coworkers because sharing is caring and you just share your virus(es) with everybody ... Stay at home get healthy and come back to work. We don't want to be sick because of your misplaced hubris.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 12:30 PM
8

You don't need to force other people down with your feelings of insecurity and oppression. Ad hominen already so basically you have no real arguments ? don't try to bring me down to your level. I'm not trying to bring you down to my level whatever that means. I'm trying to open your eyes to what really happenned. You've been mutilated because of a thousand years old tradition and your only argument is "if I weren't I wouldn't fit in". Talk about confidence after that... Anyway whatever suits you…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 05:52 PM
30

I'm happy I was circumcised. Hamstering it away won't change the fact you got screwed by that useless tradition. If the red pill is about accepting the truth (or reality), then this is a truth you need to accept.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 05:30 PM
43

"The loudest one in the room is the weakest one in the room" --Frank Lucas, American Gangster
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 09:52 PM
10

Disney told everyone we could have anyone. Not really, the prince is always handsome and the girl always pretty. Quasimodo didn't get Esmeralda. Phoebus did.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/14 09:38 AM
5

The correct course of action is calling the cops. It's easy and you don't put your life at risk.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 08:41 PM
6

violent or extreme sports [...] those girls are more rational You understand that your argument isn't very convincing right ?
/r/MGTOW17/05/14 02:20 PM
3

You are an oasis in the desert. (I'm glad someone wrote that).
/r/MensRights17/05/14 01:16 AM
4

You don't need to accept the risk of divorce rape because you don't need to get married to have children.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 06:01 PM
5

Oh I'll have to reread his alphabet of manliness. Thanks for reminding me.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 01:50 PM
6

I've been having those naps after work or school for years. They are the difference between being a brain dead zombie for the rest of the evening to being fresh.
/r/becomeaman07/05/14 10:57 PM
6

It's not in France to start but in Belgium.
/r/PussyPass04/05/14 12:26 AM
3

The only reaction that comes to mind is /facepalm.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 08:05 AM
10

I just broke this bitch's hamster. FTFY
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 12:50 AM
4

The problem is people outside of you cannot see intention and as weakness and niceness are expressed in more of less the same way we tend to mistake one for the other.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 08:51 AM
1

Nice read. I'm saving this.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 08:47 AM
11

I thought MGTOW didn't advocate pure celibacy ? That is to say you can still have girlfriends. In that sense your dichotomy isn't exactly spot on. As far as I understood MGTOW choose to not have your value as a man defined by women. On the contrary TRP says that your value as a man is somehow your SMV. I'm paraphrasing but that's the gist of it. The teaching overlaps but I think this is where they are different. The problem with both strategy is if you want children. Neither help you with that..…
/r/MGTOW22/04/14 03:39 PM
1

The real question is how the fuck a guy like him has a lack of self confidence ?
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 04:06 PM
2

Obligatory motivational speech.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 04:03 AM
3

He played the role. Here is the famous tirade.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 12:39 PM
11

Well it's Cyrano de Bergerac.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 07:04 AM
1

the utter impossibility of maternity fraud. Surrogate mother would like to have a word with you.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 05:34 PM
-1

Having a sperm sample does in no way provide probable cause to test everyone (500+ men) on the basis that they also have an XY chromosome. Whether they have "probable cause" is irrelevant because this is not the US. The justice system works differently. It's within the "juge d'instruction"'s prerogative to use it so she did. In this case she justified using the large scale DNA testing because they have reason to believe that nobody except people from the school could be inside the school. My poi…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:26 PM
-2

Firstly, no judge had carefully reviewed each one of the 500 men being told to hand over DNA samples here. So nothing you have said in any way diminishes the massive double standard that has been pointed out. DNA sample is either XX or XY anyway so it makes sense to test only one sex. (Here it's a sperm sample) You say that it's a privacy concern, but that concern is clearly not being respected here, where 500 men are being forced to turn over DNA for no reason other than their gender. You are r…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 02:17 PM
1

would they attempt a blanket DNA check on a massive group of women? Hasn't happened yet, but as far as this process is concerned, and from what I gathered, it has only been used 4 times including this one. December 2003, 75 DNA tests following the kidnapping of a 9 years old girl October 1997, 400 DNA tests following the murder and rape of a 13 years old girl November 2004, 2300 DNA tests following the kidnapping of a 11 years old boy On 3 of those occasions it was on men. But when your evidence…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 01:56 PM
-1

What I was trying to say is that this is more of a human's rights issue than of a men's rights issue The double standards that MRA are about are one where men and women are not treated the same. Here that isn't the case.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 01:15 PM
1

TL;DR : What you live determines who you are, who you are determines what you live.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 12:24 PM
6

Copy paste from my comment on MRA 3 threads about the same story and this is the top comment 3 times, and 3 times it's about as wrong as when feminists say "women make 77 cents for every dollar a man make". It's misinformation. The point is you can't have a DNA test without a judge ordering one (that means a lawyer has to make a case) and even then you can refuse (if you refuse the judge have the right to interpret it how he sees fit according to the case he has on his hands). That goes for men …
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 12:01 PM
-1

in the story they are trying to do exactly that. Untrue. Parents have to give consent. Anyway there are debates (and even an AMA from one of the student) about this on /r/france. From those thread it seems that if you refuse to give your DNA, you may be put in "garde à vue" (they can keep you up to 48hours). Some advocate that this is a better alternative as they are required to provide a lawyer. Even in GAV you can still refuse to give up your DNA either way.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:59 AM
17

3 threads about the same story and this is the top comment 3 times, and 3 times it's about as wrong as when feminists say "women make 77 cents for every dollar a man make". It's misinformation. The point is you can't have a DNA test without a judge ordering one (that means a lawyer has to make a case) and even then you can refuse (if you refuse the judge have the right to interpret it how he sees fit according to the case he has on his hands). That goes for men and women alike. You can't take th…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 10:53 AM
0

The biggest betrayal here isn't a woman betraying her man, but a man betraying is own principles.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 07:24 AM
2

Everywhere it said "persons" so it's not clear whether it was both gender or not. I don't know if they try to find and exact match in these cases (aka they look for only one gender because it's either XX or XY in the sample) or if they look for anyone who would be affiliated with the sample (aka parents, so both sexes) For the Caroline Dickinson case (400 DNA test, rape and murder) the police found a sperm sample so they only tested men. For the boy (Jonathan Coulom) the articles I found said th…
/r/MensRights14/04/14 07:28 AM
-2

And it no value as a legal proof anyway.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 07:11 AM
-8

Yes. The child can ask for one up to his 28th birthday.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 10:32 PM
-1

It can only be men or women but not both at the same time anyway ... You either find XX or XY.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 10:28 PM
-17

Mother's consent has nothing to do with this. Please remove your MRA's goggles and at least check the law. Only a judge can order one.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 09:11 PM
11

if in fact it was for any other crime but rape, this almost certainly wouldn't happen. Are you an expert on French matters ? Because you are wrong ... December 2003, 75 DNA tests following the kidnapping of a 9 years old girl October 1997, 400 DNA tests following the murder and rape of a 13 years old girl November 2004, 2300 DNA tests following the kidnapping of a 11 years old boy
/r/MensRights13/04/14 08:54 PM
3

There is a thread on /r/France where a student of this school is doing an AMA. Come and ask your question here (google translate is your friend). Anyway this is more of a human's right issue than a specific men's right issue.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 08:39 PM
8

Hypothetically speaking, if I had the balls and the hatred to kill someone, I wouldn't kill her. I would throw acid on her face and let her live with a deformed face.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 08:21 PM
2

Miniskirts, heels. Pretty sure there might be more.
/r/RedPillWomen05/04/14 05:36 PM
0

Actual value" is bullshit. Value is always relative to a goal, situation, and/or role. You just have to read the first part of the article to see where it will fail. Do you trust modern women, being the way they are, with their arbitrary criteria to be able to accurately define SMV in a way that measures a man's true worth? The SMV measures just that, your value on the market, and nothing else. If you use it in any other way you're going to have a bad time.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 10:21 AM
6

I don't know what SRS is about but TRP is about a theory trying to explain the dynamics of relationships between men and women and how to profit from it. TRP isn't about exposing inequalities of rights or responsibilities between the sexes so I wouldn't say it's an offshoot of Mensrights.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 08:25 PM
2

That's why I said it's technically correct.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 01:22 PM
8

If you are determined (and rich) enough you can change your height too. As the internet as taught me, technically correct is best kind of correct.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 01:50 AM
1

At six foot three and over 100 kilos a BMI calculator shows that I'm borderline obese. But in reality my body fat is about 12%, I do strenuous exercise six days as week and my overall fitness is very high. It's like a maths student saying this integral gives funny results while not bothering to check if the integral even exists in the first place. Formulas exist with conditions to apply them, if you are not checking if you meet them of course it's not going to work. The point is if you use the B…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:04 AM
4

Do you want her spitting in your food ?
/r/MensRights24/03/14 07:44 PM
2

I worked for a transport company a few years ago. Every year they would edit a book about the stories of those everyday heroes of the past year. Then they would have a ceremony where the CEO of the company would give read some of those and give some kind of awards to these people. I spent some time reading those stories it was hard not getting emotional.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 03:06 PM
16

The reason is not giving them pageviews and ad revenues.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 03:36 PM
2

How is that not a complete win ? She admitted that the disparity is because of different life choices and not because of discrimination. That's a complete win to me.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 09:46 AM
2

Not block outside of the US would be great too.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 02:14 PM
2

For the lazy.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 01:59 PM
2

To reinforce your point with a source here is a quote from a report on violence from the WHO (page 23/360) Violence is : The intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, that either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment or deprivation. So we can't really say it's bad faith from their part. It's just the definition.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:18 AM
40

Well it could be argued that when you form a family it becomes more than romance. It's like a little company on its own.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 02:50 PM
6

it would be assault with a deadly women This typo is kinda funny.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 01:35 PM
-10

I don't see how this is a men's right issue to be honest. Shit like this happens all the time. And it's more of an international law problem. From what I've seen it doesn't happen more often to fathers than to mothers. And mothers are as powerless to do anything when it happens. The only lesson I've drawn from all of the cases I've read is this one : don't have children with someone from another country...
/r/MensRights18/02/14 09:20 PM
1

Basically there are innate differences between boys and girls that point them towards different interests. Societal norms only reinforce or weaken those interests. One of the scientist, an evolutionary psychologist, explains that our interests stem from evolution. For instance children whose mother like doing what a mother do were more likely to survive. And as they were more likely to survive they were more likely to pass on their genes. In this case passing on the propensity to like being part…
/r/MensRights31/01/14 02:27 PM
0

I sure as hell DON'T understand why that would ever possess somebody to harm another human being. It's either bad faith, or you have no understanding of the human heart. Even Sun Tzu (and i'm paraphrasing) knew not to corner your enemy because he will fight to the bitter end. This man was desperate and felt he had no way out so he acted in desperation. Maybe this will shed some light as to why he did what he did.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 10:50 PM
1

And it's gone like the other one...
/r/MensRights29/01/14 07:40 AM
2

Came here to post this. Have an upvote instead.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 10:49 PM
-1

Please dont put words in my mouth. I never said that it was justifiable. What i said is that most of us understand why he did it. Understand, if you want the definition, means that we see the thought process that went through his mind that allowed the actions to unfold as they did. Nothing else nothing more. Once again nobody is condoning forceful abortion.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 07:37 PM
-1

Nobody is condoning what he did. But everyone here understands why he did it.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:41 PM
5

You misunderstood my 2 words question. From his point of view what were the other avenues available to him ? Everything you listed isn't in his control whatsoever.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:17 PM
4

There were a lot of other avenues available which although not perfect did not involve violating someone else's body. Which are ?
/r/MensRights28/01/14 05:37 PM
3

To give some context it was a denial of pregnancy not some cold blooded murder.
/r/PussyPass18/01/14 05:34 PM
1

If she messes up HER kid dies which is essentially the world. If you are a parent you know this.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 07:33 PM
8

A number of sympathetic Canadian courts have already exonerated such women de facto. Sheehy would like the practice to be entrenched de jure. This is the most frightening piece of the article. Canada what the fuck are you doing...
/r/MensRights23/12/13 12:24 PM
10

Never felt that in France as well.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 07:06 PM
5

How does it go against what he said ...
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:25 PM
2

Lol because it seems it would be the most efficient way of handling things...
/r/MensRights08/12/13 10:17 AM
5

Instead they have Quatar and Bahrain as the top...
/r/MensRights31/10/13 12:39 PM
2

but you've declared that nothing should even be done about it, as it is perfect, noble and good. First I've never said such allegations. This is why this sub is pointless. If MRAS agree with him, then there can be no way to go forward as a movement. Only if you value individual based on their value for the species and their ability to make it grow. Personally I value individuals based on their character and behaviour.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 07:07 PM
3

It makes sense if you go back the original comment which is "true from a biological standpoint" which it is. If you cant see that after all that has been said this is sad.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 05:16 PM
2

Well no ... Let's get back to my thought experiment. 1 man impregnate all of the women, in a reasonable amount of time you have as much babies as there are women. 1 women can only get impregnated once every 9 months whatever the number of men may be.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:48 PM
2

The point was that if you want your country/city to survive you need your women to make babies. You could probably find policies that encouraged building big families after a war. For instance in ancient Sparta Spartan women were highly encouraged to produce many children, preferably male, to increase Sparta's military population. They took pride in themselves for breeding a brave warrior. Being the mother of a popular warrior was a high honor for a Spartan woman. The fastest way to repopulate i…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:12 PM
3

You completely missed the point indeed.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:56 PM
6

thought experiment : 2 cities had an epidemic, in the first city all but 1 woman died, in the second city all but 1 man died. Come back 100 years later which is more likely to be alive ? Throughout history as a species and societies we valued woman higher than men. We still do protect women and children before any man. Man were/are just seen as expandables. Were women exploited ? I dont know I'm not knowledgeable enough. But one can see that once something is valuable we try our hardest to prote…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 12:19 PM
3

I'd rather have those inequalities and be sure a fireman can carry my ass out of a building in fire, than allowing women that cant do it be firemen for the sake of equality.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:25 PM
9

It's societal. There are marriage outside of religion
/r/MensRights21/05/13 12:58 PM
3

That's stupid man, do you think it takes less effort to get a not so attractive girl than the most attractive one ? Do you think they have lesser expectations because they are not the prettiest ?
/r/MensRights24/02/13 08:08 AM
1

Excision doesnt give any "LEGIT" disability, one can still have children plus it's traditional so it should be ok /s Any argument made based on tradition or "cultural sense" is utter bullshit.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:38 AM
6

Damn why did I read that. Gave me nausea ...
/r/MensRights08/02/13 03:01 PM
1

It's true and false at the same time. While child support is always calculated based on the income of the parent that is giving it (the judge of familial affairs that orders child support always make sure that at the present moment the parent can afford it). If your situation suddenly change for the worse and as the system is really slow, one can be force to pay more than one earns.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter