TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MrWholesomeDad Archive

View 0 posts and 33 comments by MrWholesomeDad on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Maybe the right wing cares more. In my opinion right wing ideology is based on exclusivity and a superiority complex and it tends to achieve these things by aggressively means of exclusion. Paired with these are a love for authoritarian regimes and hate for minoritiy groups. The left wing should be more inclusive and tolerant. That is a better basis for conversation and understanding. For example men‘s mental health. The right wing would instantly tell you who’s to blame for poor mental health a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/22 09:38 AM
1

Hard Rock, poprock, folk rock… wich one is it? I’m a metal type personally
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/22 07:19 PM
5

But It maybe helped to build the victimhood/opression narrative by opressing and victimizing them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/22 08:04 PM
0

Opression and victimhood is one thing but may I ask who sees women as inherently wonderful/good?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/22 08:01 PM
2

Yeah I guess the church did mostly bad things for women…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/22 07:44 PM
-2

I would guess with the catholic church in western society. The new testament and mother Mary.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/22 05:44 PM
2

Yeah I agree with you, and I‘m sorry because the triggered part was out of provocative intent on my behalf. I understand that the term femicide is problematic and would go with intimate parner homicide or whatever equivalent there is in germany.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/22 08:36 PM
-1

I get what you write. I guess I should swap definition with understanding because I didn’t want to give a different definition for femicide but a clear classification for these kind of killings. From a pure sociological approach it’s not unusual to look at specific numbers from different angles and to look at correlation. And the numbers show that under these circumstances mostly women are killed by their partners or ex-partners. I believe that bein victim of such a crime by an intimate partner …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/22 07:56 PM
-3

Yeah it’s difficult to prove that. I would accept a neutral definition like: killings by a person of opposite sex in close proximity (family members, partners, step-parents, in-laws, etc).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/22 05:25 PM
-15

I haven’t heard this argument by feminists. I often heard the claim that women are often victims of femicide, killed by men (mostly in their families) and the most numbers seem to prove this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/22 09:51 PM
7

Are they on average? Why not, I like socialism all the way…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/21 11:56 PM
12

A male-only party… wich economical agenda would they support?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/21 09:36 PM
1

I absolutely get what you are saying. I just would like to move away from the „good guy bad guy“ mentality. There are two very similair causes and two groups fighting for them. And everytime in a conversation or a post you frame this like „I know we are the good guys, why do they think we are the bad guys, they must be the bad guys.“ you passively strengthen the narrative of the duality, that this is a cause men against women, wich is an unbelievably simple and strong narrative. With it you can …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/21 12:59 PM
1

Strangely this model is for what I’ve read only used in the US as and is highly critisized by many organisations. Half the articles I‘ve read are strong critics of it. If a model is highly criticized and the studies did not show any sufficient evidence for it to work it should be redesigned trough the scientific approach alone. Clearly there are some people doing their work wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/21 03:54 AM
1

Maybe because they refuse to do the right thing, reforming this whole mess from the base on equal rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/21 12:09 AM
1

I am indeed naive because I could not believe how stupid US legislation could be. Seriously who on earth can support the Duluth Model. Reading on these issues is depressing. I hoped I’d never to say this but germany is lightyears ahead of you on these issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/21 12:06 AM
1

Reading the last hours about your fight against feminism is truly depressing. It’s like legislation in the US is without rhyme or reason on these issues. It’s like the dualist party system, whoever is not with our cause is the enemy. I initially did not get the last sentence about the real world, but the world you are living in must be a struggle with such crappy laws and poor decison making by legislature.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 11:46 PM
1

Nope, just because they invented it does not mean that the whole feminist movement of the last 200 years is bad. There will always be black sheep and bad ideas in every movement. The only way to adress these issues constructive is by discourse with those who believe it’s a good idea.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 11:27 PM
2

What I read about it, it‘s total crap. The base assumptions are completely bonkers already and I don’t know why a country should use it. I believe there is a better way to prevent domestic violence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 10:25 PM
-1

It saddens me that you still stongly oppose feminism as possible ally. I will read the material on this sub and still want to support both. Maybe I can‘t grasp the legislatives shortcomings in the US or India or the political influence of feminism in these countries or even the political atmosphere in these topics. I don’t know where I struggle to grasp your fight. In germany rape laws are not gendered, they only talk about perpertrator and victim without any specification. Also maternity leave …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 10:20 PM
-4

That’s an easy way to generalize the whole feminism movement by the behavior of a few extremists. Shure legislation is a complicated thing but violating mens rights is obviously wrong. But fighting with feminists just because you see them as their enemy or they see you as their enemy is also plain wrong. There is a cause here that unites us all, fighting rape, it should not matter wich gender or sexuality the victim has.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 07:07 PM
-3

How about this elevator pitch: There must definitely be a better discourse on unequal laws against rape, I totally agree. But while avocating for better lawas why not ally with feminism and lgbtq+ to eredicate the cause of rape and sexual abuse. Lobby togheter for more studies in the scientific field to better understand the causes. Lobby for therapy of victims of child abuse and mistreatment, wich may be a cause to becoming a perpertrator. Lobby for better mental health care, wich may also be a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 07:00 PM
1

Jep this one works better. I totally agree that circumsision is mutulation of genetalia.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 04:39 PM
2

Absolutely! I totally agree with you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 04:37 PM
-6

Yeah I know about the issues but I would like to differentiate between ideological opposites and political. That feminist groups advocate against equal rape law may not help men but their agenda is not based on hurting men but saving women from pressure in law suits. My understanding of laws and their effect on men or women is not great but I can understand that they may have a valid point even if it’s hurftul for men. Also reducing domestic violence to a womens issue is plainly wrong, but I can…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 04:36 PM
1

Legislature is not my strongpoint, so I won’t trust myself dissecting rape laws and the outcomes for men and women, especially the criticism of feminist groups that equal rape laws can lead to more pressure for female rape victims. And I do believe that men and women are opressed in society, my experience is more like first hand being a family counselor and seeing different individual issues. I know what issues exist but framing mens rights as the opposite as feminism as ideologies is in my opin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 03:56 PM
1

Shure it is. But it massively lacks context.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 03:40 PM
4

Ok this made a lot of things clear, thank you. I totally agree that there are assholes in every group of people who justify their shitty behaviour by covering it with ideology. It‘s also clear that the 200 year old movement of feminism will never completely adapt MMH but I believe trough discussion and reason we can gain a better understanding and find help. I just did not get why you should divide groups that have the same core believes pysical and mental health and safety. PS: Congrats, being …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 03:13 PM
-1

Shure, I believe the OP of that post is not wrong but they overlooked one major issue. I believe that criticism is the most important part and improves feminism as a whole. And it did. Since the feminist movement fought for it‘s place in academia it’s constantly changing and evolving through criticism and it will change and evolve in the future. But most people fighting for or against feminism are not scientifically literate. In my opinion the problem starts when you choose the anonymous battle …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 02:59 PM
3

Thank you! This is indeed quite interesting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 02:19 PM
-5

I don’t know where you’re from but in most part of europe policies like cutting counseling and support goups weren’t pushed by feminist lawmakers but by neoliberal and conservative lawmakers who wanted to save some money. And I still don’t get it. Can someone give me some context on feminist groups attacking mens issue or mental health groups? I have not encountered such things and can’t stand the victimization.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 02:11 PM
13

I can support women’s rights and support men‘s rights. I can vote for policies supporting women and engage with mens issues. I can talk to my feminist friends about mens mental health issues and find validation and support, they are very open about it. I cannot post „mens live matters“ online and hope to get a positve response because it is not a widespread political topic of our time. I don’t know in what circles you move but these people oviously did not understand the core idea behind feminis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 02:04 PM
-11

Nice research you did there but I believe you missed the point on this one. Feminsm on social media is an easy topic to stand behind and engage with because women are opressed differently than men. In their fight for bodily autonomy message like „my body my choice“ are simple and readable and fuel the social media machine. In their fight for equal pay you can also engage with simple messages because it is an obvious cause. This can engage a lot of people of all genders and every sexuality. Male …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 01:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter