TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mr_Civil Archive

View 0 posts and 110 comments by Mr_Civil on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

The whole thing is ridiculous, but why would she want him to have only single male friends? Single guys are a lot more focused on finding women. If anything, I’d say that being surrounded by that would increase the chances of him cheating on her. Then again, I guess he’s not even allowed to go out without her, so none of it really matters.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 04:27 PM
5

If that was the case, then with all the "re-education" that's going on these days to wipe out this toxic masculinity, wouldn't the rates be going down instead of up? Why wasn't it as much of a problem 40 or 50 years ago when nobody even heard of that term.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 05:27 PM
10

To be fair, I didn't watch it. I'm on my mobile at work and I couldn't. But yeah, that definitely undermines his case. I was under the impression that it was an issue about his ability to cut hair in specific ways. There should be no practical difference in cutting men's or women's hair in a men's style. If he has a problem, in principle, with female customers, that's a whole other kettle of fish.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 02:14 PM
39

Seriously, he could have just said he only knows how to do men's style cuts. If they insisted then he should have cut her hair in whichever of those styles they chose. Then she would have nothing to complain about.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 12:44 PM
2

But is it surprising that it's surprising (to some people)?
/r/MensRights10/07/18 11:52 PM
-1

Yeah, so she won the party vote but she never won a federal general election. That's what I thought, but I was pretty young at the time so I wasn't sure.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 01:16 PM
4

Well, if that's the case, they have a funny way of showing it. The Sun has been talking about this for weeks (months?) while the CBC has been oddly quiet. If anything I'd say the CBC's hand was forced because, at this point, to not say anything would remove the last shred of doubt about it being a Liberal funded shill.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 01:12 PM
1

Also, I don't believe she was elected. Wasn't she just appointed to the position as a temporary "acting" prime minister for some reason?
/r/MensRights07/07/18 01:06 PM
12

That and the fact that I heard about this months ago from the more conservative leaning but still mainstream newspapers, but the left wing papers/media refused to mention it until just the other day. In fact, I read an article about a couple weeks ago about this fact in particular. I wonder if that was what it took to force their hand. I wouldn't wish this on anyone either, but the hypocrisy of it all is news worthy on its own.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 12:56 PM
13

It's just all about unrealistic standards. I'm sure there are hundreds of guys in china would be willing to date any one of them.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 05:10 PM
15

I think a lot of women have unrealistic standards. Maybe they watch too many movies. I think this might explain a lot of the mathematical paradox. There are guys available who would marry them. I guarantee it, but if you tried to set them up, they would laugh at you. They're too good for those guys. But are they really? What are they bringing to the table that's so great? It's a free market economy. If you were a good enough package to marry a millionaire male model, with a little work you shoul…
/r/MensRights02/07/18 04:56 PM
5

It's good that they were able to take some action. In my experience here though, it seems like the mother can get away with just about anything. I have another friend who's ex wife tried to move to the other side of the country without telling him. He found out by other means because she wasn't very smart, and he did take her to court. Keep in mind that both parties had grown up in the same town their whole lives and raised their two kids there. He was a great dad and would have his kids over ev…
/r/MensRights01/07/18 12:22 AM
9

I have a friend who's ex-spouse moved to another city and refuse to tell him where she was and basically broke off all contact between him and his son for two years. He went to the police and they basically told him that there was nothing they could do about it. I'm pretty sure that if he tried something like that, he'd be in prison for years, and he would probably never see his kid again.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 11:39 PM
2

The issue isn't even the suggestions that pop up in he first example. It's that it's not offering any suggestions at all for the second example. That's deliberate. Presumably because the suggestions that would pop up would be "sexist". They didn't extend the same courtesy to men though.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 11:13 AM
0

I've thought about this and I think it will happen eventually. My idea is that they will process the insects into some sort of protein powder which can be used to fortify less nutritious foods. With the right flavoring, it probably wouldn't be too bad. It might start out in the poorer countries where the alternative might be starving to death.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 10:31 PM
1

Well, I think we're going to have to disagree on that one. You can't have it both ways. Either it's a fixed amount that only increases for inflation, or it's based on the current income of the payer. Not whichever is greater. Personally I agree with the former.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 07:11 PM
0

And if the parent doesn't get a raise, they should still pay more anyway, by default?
/r/MensRights15/06/18 06:54 PM
0

So if it's based on the child's cost of living, then if the father gets a new job with a significant pay increase, should that affect his support payments?
/r/MensRights15/06/18 06:23 PM
1

And he lost his pet dinosaur. That would have been a fun addition to the movies. I'm still waiting for Chewbacca's wookie family series of action figures to come out. I need to get an Uncle Itchy for my collection.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 06:47 PM
3

Don't forget the Christmas special. I think he had quite a few lines in that one. Actually, it's probably best if everyone did forget the Christmas special.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 11:06 AM
1

I agree. It's still judging though. Somebody gets arrested for possession of weed? My opinion/judgement is I don't care. Somebody is a convicted child molester? I don't care if it was 40 years ago and they "payed their debt to society". I don't want anything to do with them.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 03:03 PM
1

People have no right to judge? There's no law saying you have to have to think about someone a certain way.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 10:58 AM
-1

Fair point, but I'd say that, just because someone has paid their debt, all should be forgotten. If you do bad things, people have the right to judge you for it.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 11:14 PM
3

Um, no they don't. They still have to be accountable for their actions. That's why we have criminal records.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 10:07 PM
1

I honestly don't even get it. I take it as him joking that he'd want to be there to witness Michael Caine embarrassing himself. I don't see another way this could be taken.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 02:40 AM
8

The slippery slope is absolutely not a fallacy. Special interest groups use it all the time. They use words like momentum or wedge, but it's all the same thing. As soon as they get the first thing they want, they immediately start working on the next issue. Often using the first issue as justification.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 09:55 PM
1

Manipulate is such a loaded word. Technically, anything you do to get someone to do something you want them to is manipulation. Convincing them it's a good idea, trying to appeal to their sympathy or generosity, offering them something in exchange. It's all manipulation. The world runs on it.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:53 PM
12

Same thing happened with SNL. A bunch of people were crying that they didn't have enough black women and so they immediately hired the first two that they could find. Neither of whom are funny. Leslie Jones is a big girl and that's the only premise she can use to be funny. Sasheer Zameta was never funny. Not even once and did best as a piece of scenery. They still kept her on for a few years.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 01:51 PM
148

And if you're a white male, you apparently never will.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:22 PM
4

Do they know that the majority of us actually enjoy looking at vaginas? I thought we'd always been pretty open about that.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 05:16 PM
20

I wouldn't say they aggression, competitiveness and protectiveness are inherently toxic. These are roles that need to be filled.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 05:11 PM
1

She'd better get some ointment for that burn.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 12:36 AM
12

Yes, HR is a thing and it is there to protect people HR is there to protect the employer, not the employee.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 11:06 PM
1

I was banned a few months ago and I never even posted in their circle jerk of a sub-Reddit.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 03:39 PM
3

It's not even like you can compare the two. A totally nude woman in a standing position is still typically not really showing that much below the waist. With a man, it's all out in front on display. That being said, I'd say it's already pretty equal.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 04:02 AM
1

That's bullshit. Someone needs to fight that charge all the way to the top until it gets thrown out. Put an end to this stupidity.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 03:07 PM
2

How would they even quantify what constitutes a "manspread". Would they measure your legs with a ruler? Maybe you have s medical condition that requires you to sit a certain way, maybe you don't. Who's to say? Not to mention, in much of North America, a police officer would have to witness "the act" first hand to be able to do anything about it. It's not a felony/inidictable offense. If some transit bylaw officer came up to harass you, you could basically tell him to suck a bag of dicks, refuse …
/r/MensRights24/06/17 07:37 PM
3

Try boxer briefs. I think they might be just what you're looking for.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 02:24 AM
1

There was a stabbing in Toronto today by a woman with an Isis flag. There were also a couple of female attackers in the London incident but it seems like the media tried to play them of as something other than terrorists.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 09:31 PM
4

For starters you should probably not buy anything from them. Or you could identify as whatever gender gets you the best deal.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 09:19 PM
2

That's correct. The former takes less effort because they're held together mechanically.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 11:17 AM
1

Just wait until they perfect the sex robots.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 03:41 AM
16

Yeah. I've already got a title. "The Social Justice Warrior". It's perfect. I'm sure it will make billions.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 03:39 AM
11

Men's legs don't naturally sit together like women's because our hips are shaped differently. Women's relatively wider hips allow their legs to sit naturally at an angle where their knees are together. It doesn't even have anything to do with your balls.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 03:36 AM
1

You seem to have a certain preoccupation with the idea of sex with underage people. I'd rather not talk to you any more.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 03:32 AM
1

It is illegal to have sex with 14 year olds. If that's what you're into, that makes you a pedophile. End of story. There is no such thing as consent with a 14 year old.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 03:09 AM
2

That sounds like something a pedophile would say.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 05:24 PM
1

In the woods, no less. Doesn't sound sketchy at all.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 05:20 PM
1

Whoever they were they just deleted their account again. Nice story.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 05:19 PM
4

You're probably right. I'm not familiar with the case in that level of detail, just what I remember from back in the day. The whole thing really goes to show how women get the benefit of a double standard when it comes to criminal convictions.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 05:30 PM
9

She basically threw him under the bus before all the facts came in and she got off easy. Then as we started to learn more about the specifics of the case, it was clear she was a lot more involved than we first thought. But by then it was too late.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 04:40 PM
8

She's been using an alias for years. She wouldn't last 5 minutes in the world using her real name.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 04:39 PM
5

It's not about where she needs them to be. It's about where she needs them to not be.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:38 PM
8

That's the way it's supposed to work, but juries don't always follow the letter of the law. People get convicted on insufficient evidence all the time.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 08:22 PM
1

It may have been a little much to tack that on. You might be right. But it's hard to gauge sometimes who you're dealing with. I do usually try to give people the benefit of the doubt though.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 04:09 PM
1

Because he/she is only shooting down ideas in a condescending way without offering any suggestions of their own. It's the appropriate response to that behavior. How is the word 'ridiculous' helping the conversation.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 04:00 PM
6

It is. That's why I'm saying we have to look at other options. What do you recommend then? If you're so smart.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 03:29 PM
5

So we should stop prosecuting rapes altogether because of lack of evidence? Maybe both parts of this equation should be looked at.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 03:22 PM
26

The difference though is that most crimes can be proven definitively, and therefore disproven definitively. With rape it turns into one persons word against another's and therefore it's very difficult to defend against. Therefore (arguably) the penalty should be higher. If two people gave consenting sex and then one later claims it was rape, there is no physical evidence whatsoever supporting this claim. And yet people still get convicted. What other crime is like that?
/r/MensRights19/05/17 03:00 PM
9

It's a very ambiguous statement but the fact that she uses the word proof leads me to believe that she's referring to the police and criminal proceedings. In any case, as other posters are mentioning, it's a common goal in feminist communities to reduce the burden of proof in sex crime cases.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 06:00 PM
34

Except that's not what is being asked for these days. They'd prefer to have anyone accused sentenced and put in prison within an hour if possible.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 04:59 PM
3

They deleted their comment, but before they did, I checked it out. And yes, just an endless stream of negative garbage and poison. Their name was cesspool something-or-other and it's a pretty appropriate name for what's going on inside their mind.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 10:15 PM
20

I'm really getting sick of hearing words like "creepy" or "gross" to describe men. It seems to be used as a way for women to ridicule and dehumanize men and make them feel like shit about themselves. They often use this strategy when men are doing things that they are genetically programmed to do like looking at women, flirting with women. Maybe I think it's creepy to ask someone to be monogamous or it's gross to want to get pregnant. How much would the feminists start freaking out if we took th…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 09:38 PM
91

I used to know a guy who had ass burgers.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 09:36 PM
4

I don't feel like getting into a semantics argument, but these terms are very similar in this usage. My point remains the same.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 02:46 AM
3

Where would I find actual news reporting?
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:58 AM
77

The news should be neutral. Their job is to report facts and it's up to you to form opinions based on that. Unfortunately, these days, the news likes to tell us what to think. Between that and the selective reporting they also tend to do, it's a catalyst for many of the problems mentioned in this sub.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 09:54 PM
3

You really have to listen carefully. Try putting your headphones on and turning up the volume.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 11:27 AM
2

My favorite part was the shrieking.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 01:38 AM
11

I don't necessarily agree with the message or the tone of the comment you're responding to but, for the record, Canada fought in both world wars (doesn't get more major than that) and has also fought in Afghanistan and Iraq. There's no need to be calling Canadians pussies just because one guy is a little rude.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 04:19 AM
1

See, that's how it's done. Very specific.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 12:56 AM
5

Fine, you want to be vague, I'll assume it's because you don't have a real point. How about I'll just say whatever I want to and if you're embarrassed you can deal with it. I can see that you are nothing but a feminist troll anyway so why don't you go back to twoxchromosomes with the rest of the nutjobs.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 12:56 AM
3

How am I embarrassing you?
/r/MensRights05/05/17 12:37 AM
6

As someone who leans more towards pro life, i can tell you that I absolutely feel I should have a say in what happens to my unborn child.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 12:10 AM
2

It doesn't matter where they got the quote from. They didn't include the context on the poster, therefore the context is that this is just an absolute statement. That men's opinions are invalid. Period.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 12:06 AM
27

I guess I could get a uterus. It's a little messy but, if that's what it takes, they're not that hard to find.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 10:54 PM
1

You could be right. There's no shortage of people like that.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 01:11 AM
3

Yeah, and then boys like I was have to grow up surrounded by only female authority figures and no good male role models. Can you imagine the situation being reversed? How much outrage there would be. This is ok though, they don't want boys to grow into men. They're easier to control as emasculated man-children.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:28 PM
2

It almost makes you wonder who's in charge of that sub and what their intentions are. If I wanted to discredit a bunch of feminists, one good strategy would be to try to round up the most extreme of the bunch, get them riled up and record them saying a bunch of terrible and indefensible things. Not that they need my help for that anyway.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:23 PM
6

As kids we used to collect money for UNICEF at Halloween. That was stopped when it became known how corrupt they were and how much of the donations went to fund huge salaries and perks. One time when I was about ten years old, someone put $5 into my UNICEF box. I should have kept it. F@?$ them!
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:01 PM
13

Again I think you're missing the point. Unless you're arguing that he's wrong in believing that false accusations have been happening for thousands of years. In that case, I'd have to point out that the Bible is arguably as reliable an account of that period as any other documentation you're going to find. Unfortunately we don't have legal records going back that far. And I have no doubt that people have been lying for almost as long as they've been speaking, so I certainly wouldn't be surprised…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:36 PM
24

His point, if you read it in context, seems to be that it's been going on that long that it could be referenced in the Bible.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 07:47 PM
1

Yeah. It's not easy to find anywhere, I think. The only place I ever even heard about it was Reddit.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 01:05 PM
2

I had to download a torrent.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 12:50 PM
1

So much ugliness. Fucking humans.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 01:58 AM
3

I don't know how he could stand by and watch that happen to his kids. It would take a lot more patience than I've got.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 01:55 AM
6

What the fuck did she just say? I won't even try to make a statement with some genders switched around to prove a point, because it would sound too fucked up and I wouldn't want to be quoted saying it. Even ironically. I feel terrible for that kid. It's a fucked up world we have to live in.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 01:33 AM
10

I've had it in the back of my mind for the last few weeks to watch this documentary and because I saw this post, I ended up watching it tonight. I was very impressed with the way it explores men's issues and how clear headed, fair and rational the tone of the movie is. I know a number of men that have suffered in many of the ways hi-lighted in this movie, from suicides, to terrible family court bias, female on male violence, male victims of sexual assault, and I even know someone who had a botch…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 01:27 AM
4

Yeah plus with an older kid you don't have to carry them or push them around.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 01:08 AM
7

So I guess the solution is to kidnap a small child. Boom, you're in.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 10:48 PM
7

Any female I'm dating will sure be gaining a penis soon enough. Sorry. Had to say it. I do agree that women don't have penises. I thought this was common sense but apparently I'm a cissexist.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 10:43 PM
1

Here you can only be sued for it. I'm not saying I necessarily agree with mandatory minimums. But they do exist and aren't uncommon. For some crimes I think they are appropriate. Specifically violent crimes, not victimless drug crimes. They are in place to counteract judges being too lenient, which I believe is too often the case for violent crimes. I'd say if you mug someone with a weapon or hold up a store and get caught, you deserve to spend decades in jail. Or worse.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 12:12 AM
18

Slander isn't a crime. It's a civil offense. And as for perjury, drumming up a fake story to get someone locked up for decades goes beyond just lying in court. This is its own crime, in my opinion it's on par with extortion or major fraud. And lots of countries have minimum sentences. US, Canada, I'm sure many more.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 11:41 PM
2

I'm so glad I don't use public transportation any more. Humans like this don't get to bother me ever again.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 09:45 PM
1

Oh. Is that what they said? Bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 09:31 PM
1

I've seen that before. That's all fluff opinions. Anyone can try to redefine terms all they want to suit an agenda. It doesn't change anything. It's just propaganda. In any case I do believe in equality and treating people equally but I disagree with giving special privileges to supposedly "disadvantaged" people. Everyone should receive equal treatment, and yes there are advantages and disadvantages that everyone has. Nothing you can do will ever completely eliminate that You can disagree if you…
/r/MensRights16/04/17 04:10 PM
1

No. Read it again, I said that men and women are equal but different. At no point did I ever say they were identical. If men are the ten dimes women are the dollar bill. It's a pretty simple concept to understand. Then you came in and starting hurling insults and being wrong. I made the mistake of insulting you back and lowering myself to your level. Now you're trying to go back and change what I said. Either way, you'll never win this argument, because you're wrong. I'm not sure what you're try…
/r/MensRights16/04/17 01:34 PM
1

Also from google. "Identical- similar in every detail, exactly alike." Notice that the definition is not the same? That's because they don't mean the same thing, moron. Let me put it in terms that you can wrap your little mind around. Ten dimes is equal to a one dollar bill but is not identical to a one dollar bill.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 12:50 PM
1

I'll take that as your admission that you can't prove your stupid point.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 01:50 AM
1

Source? dumbshit.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 12:55 AM
1

Again "equal" does not mean "identical". Google it yourself if you can manage it.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 12:46 AM
1

Because you don't know what words mean and "equal" doesn't mean "identical".
/r/MensRights16/04/17 12:42 AM
0

At least I can speak English, loser. These words get changed every day. It's definition is "the quality of being fair or impartial" in other words, "nothing to do with what I'm talking about". Moron.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 12:40 AM
1

An apple and an orange are different. Does that mean that one is inherently better than the other?
/r/MensRights15/04/17 11:02 PM
3

That is basically what I'm trying to say. I'm just clarifying my position on the issue because I wasn't sure what the other poster was implying.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 10:59 PM
1

So what are you trying to say then? Men and women aren't equal? How so?
/r/MensRights15/04/17 10:57 PM
1

Not sure what you mean by that. These are words that have real meanings but have now been redefined to suit someone's agenda. I do believe they men and woman are equal in the sense that neither is superior to the other. They are very different for sure, and typically each has a set of strengths and weaknesses, but overall they are equal in my mind.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 09:04 PM
34

Double standards like this are exactly why I DONT consider myself a feminist. I believe in equality, but not an artificially enforced superiority of women.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 05:47 PM
5

I think that all bathrooms should have completely isolated little rooms as stalls that don't have huge openings where people can see/hear everything you're doing. The added benefit is that it won't matter who the fuck is in there by themselves. Let's hear it for privacy and dignity. And as for the urinals - not necessary. I don't have one in my house and I still manage to get by somehow.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 07:22 AM
21

How about not being allowed to form a club?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter