TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mrmonster225 Archive

View 0 posts and 83 comments by Mrmonster225 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Y’all don’t get tired of this? Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 01:49 PM
1

He just gotta play to his strengths & use his social intelligence. Get offline & approach in person. If he decides to continue to do online he’ll have to sell on his lifestyle or something about him that makes him interesting not him liking to sleep lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 03:48 AM
2

I would disagree, there’s a specific group of men that complains online & it’s usually another topic they complain about more than being single. When they do complain it’s usually the sexual aspect they complain about. Women report around the same rates of being lonely as men & unfortunately are more ill equipped to handle it then men. because they require more attention & emotional stimulation it’s straining their relationships with each other as they try to substitute that attention they used …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 03:39 AM
4

It’s obvious OP is speaking as if all men & women are white or they don’t really rate oppression of minorities either way it shows just how uninformed most of these arguments are constructed
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 01:39 PM
4

You saying anything. Only someone who doesn’t actually deal with oppression uses the term “oppression Olympics” or even claim being oppressed gives benefits & better treatment
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 12:51 PM
5

I get what you’re trying to say but I think it’s more so men raising their self-esteem is the answer to having a better time dating. When you think highly of yourself, that tends to project outward in your appearance, actions, & even how you approach dating. Instead of being in the mindset that you have to perform, what you do & say, gets out of the realm of trying to impress women & being natural around them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 04:10 PM

No industrialization is why. Primary reason for lots of kids was labor & the mortality rate. More industrial means more kids live til adulthood meaning bigger population. That also leads women going to school more to get these jobs meaning kids later & less plus higher costs means overall less kids for society
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 03:28 PM
4

It isn’t only thing it’s doing is shrinking an already empty pool. 0+0 is zero. Gotta put water in the pool to swim. This makes a lot of assumptions. First appealing to women & bringing what they want to the table two different stages. She won’t know what you bring to the table til she gets to know u on a deeper level. It’s vice versa for men as well meaning men appealing to more women means he’s more likely to find a woman who has what he wants. Your last point again makes a lot of assumptions …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 03:20 PM
6

Have to disagree, appealing to a variety of women is absolutely the way to go lol. I think the problem is the average man is confused & unable to figure out how to successfully do so. You can’t narrow down a pool of options you don’t have. I do however agree that you have to bring what people want to the table
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 03:47 AM
3

How do you y’all be coming to these ridiculously obnoxious conclusions lmao. Like even your comparative example falls flat in most men’s anecdotal experiences. Men gonna call you evil for giving a nice guy a chance is crazy lol. I’m not sure exactly how people not caring about abuse( a lie) is directly a punishment for having empathy. If anything it would be people being unempathetic
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 04:30 PM
0

Your main point seems to be an issue with feminist & not women in general. I disagree it’ll be more accurate to say men’s issues are only considered issues when it starts affecting white men & women aren’t the main culprits
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 06:08 PM
0

I don’t think it’ll happened or it’ll move towards liberation for all. Reasoning being that it’ll have to revisit & address some of its racist origins. There’s tenets& writings that’ll have to be addressed & rectified in order for the movement to position itself as a liberation for all. That a big shake up & a lot of people’s money being messed up. It’ll more than likely die on that hill as it continues to ignore the elephant in the room & other movements address it
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 09:00 PM
0

You approaching a man or him not approaching doesn’t equate to him not being confident though & it’s just an approach, you not jumping into a relationship so why would u be settling? lol especially since it’s someone u already attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:29 AM
0

A man that pursues women can & do the same thing. Also just because you approach a man doesn’t mean it’ll lead somewhere & u still reserve the right to change your mind & leave the situation. Honestly that sounds more like a reasoning to protect the ego
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:43 AM
1

It’s not that deep, it’s usually not attracted to her or shes not enjoyable to talk to
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:31 AM
0

I mean u initiating would mean there’s attraction already right? I’m pretty sure a man simply being confident enough to approach isn’t the main deciding factor right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:27 AM
1

It honestly depends. If you already have women lined up & enjoy actually having conversation with her, that’s cool but if it’s just only out of the hope of getting sex, move on. Most times it’s usually the 2nd for a lot of guys so it wouldn’t be optimal
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 04:55 AM
1

This is why I recommend Dr Curry brother he does the best job explaining it. Here’s another great paper he wrote that highlights some of the issues https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349589709_Decolonizing_the_Intersection_Black_Male_Studies_as_a_Critique_of_Intersectionality's_Indebtedness_to_Subculture_of_Violence_Theory
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/25 07:30 AM
1

Of course they’re within their right & no they shouldn’t be excluded. As I’ve stated before bell hooks didn’t even do good job nor was her analysis even grounded in empirical or historical data & as you stated she’s the main one people can identify. My opinion is based on what is & has been produced by feminists compared to black male studies scholars such as Dr Curry. Comparatively it isn’t close on top of that, the field continues to grow & produce more on the specific genre hence my opinion o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/25 07:11 AM
2

To much internet idk at this point. I thought this sub was gonna be fun banter lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 05:49 AM
3

Funny thing about that to is that it doesn’t even do a good job at it nor is it backed by empirical or historical evidence. Honestly I feel with the emergence of black male studies, there’s not a need for feminist to touch on the topic of black men at least.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/25 05:35 AM
1

You should read Dr Curry the man & other black male study scholars so u can clearly see what he talks about black feminist have not & that he doesn’t straw man bell hooks or Kimberly crenshaw. Honestly they deride him because he exposes a lot of faults & fallacies in their theories with papers such as this: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tommy-Curry/publication/323981799_Killing_Boogeymen_Phallicism_and_the_Misandric_Mischaracterizations_of_Black_Males_in_Theory/links/5be05ce74585150b2ba0a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/25 05:18 AM
5

Come on this is getting ridiculous
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 04:57 PM
2

Cold approaching is when you initiate a conversation or interaction with someone you don't know, without any prior connection or established context. There isn’t some set time limit to it. What you personally prefer or don’t doesn’t change that cold approaching is a better option than what OP recommended for men. It’s that simple
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 04:47 AM
2

Also become appealing over time what do you mean by that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 12:05 AM
2

The first example is exactly what cold approaching is according to the definition which you just confirmed has a chance at success. Now compare that to trying in your words become appealing over a long period of time it’s obvious the first choice is better.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 12:04 AM
2

“Cold approaching” is a better option than slowly getting to know woman over time. This isnt to say it’s the only method nor did most men claim it to be but it is better than the alternative than OP suggested.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 10:56 PM
1

“Cold approaching” is a better option than slowly getting to know woman over time. This isnt to say it’s the only method nor did most men claim it to be but it is better than the alternative than OP suggested.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 10:56 PM
3

We’re talking about OPs last post which I seen. I didn’t see all the post but most men including myself explained why “cold approaching” is better than what the OP recommended.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 10:36 PM
7

No one stood on “cold approaching” is the only way to go. It was clearly that cold approaching was a better option than the whole slowly getting to know a woman over time.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 10:12 PM
11

I’ve never really seen this before tbh. The article sounds like projection & even if they did prefer fictional men in a relationship there’s 4 billion women on the planet & all u need is 1. Personally I’m gonna get mines still so i wouldn’t worry about it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 08:55 AM
3

A lot of men or rather people in the sub don’t have what they call “game” hence the out of touch takes all the time. I’m not familiar with the term cold approaching but yes approaching women & being direct is better for most men than what you recommended respectfully. The whole purpose of approaching & trying to initiate a date is to get to know her & doing what you recommended would just be a performative way of delaying the inevitable & wasting energy that could of been spent on another woman.…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 08:43 AM
-5

This quite the leap of imagination about a fake scenario asking a guy you like out lmao. But this makes more sense
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 08:22 AM
6

This doesn’t make any sense. Asking a man out doesn’t equate to sex nor is a man approaching you an indicator that he’ll be more invested in a relationship. You have the right to not want to ask a man out but the reason doesn’t really make sense
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 07:50 AM

Aye man I’m not trying to be funny but you might be uk….. nothing wrong with it but from what u said yeah that’s what it’s lookin like
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 03:32 AM
1

You can’t lol sounds like OP ego talking
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:54 AM
3

This is gonna ruffle some feathers but western white people led by white men chose to demonize masculinity. Since slavery ended, black men were the vehicle white society drove to demonize masculinity & it has spread to include all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 04:07 PM
1

Women being the gatekeepers of sex is more of an observation than a stigma. That also plays a role into why men bedding a lot of women is “impressive” but not so much for women. The pickup guys aren’t even 5% of men. I do agree though that a lot of men issues with women are self inflicted. The whole shaming thing is more communal something societies in general use to stabilize themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 11:45 PM
0

I wouldn’t say so much caring less but rather being frugal with your time
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 01:53 PM
3

“There’s no point in going out on a date, and even wasting money, if there is no intention to actually date.” Taking a woman out on a date is dating. It’s not for you to say if it’s a waste or not. We human too & want to have a good time & spend time with a woman we’re interested in “Would you think it’s deceitful if a woman took an interest in you, and made you think she wants to date you, then you took her out, only to learn she was giving you attention solely to get a free meal out of you.” B…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 08:52 AM
10

So because a man only want sex means hes not supposed to take a girl out on a date? How is that being deceitful?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 07:27 AM
1

By people who don’t know what it is which is my point lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 09:38 PM
1

I know you don’t because you associating it with the RP & PUA jargon. You probably heard it through those spaces & never actually went further into it. It’s bullshit because you don’t know what it is
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 05:32 PM
2

You don’t know what game is or its origin but ok if thats what you say
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 03:48 PM
1

Ehhh I wouldn’t say that. The “Red Pill” is just watered down Game. You better off getting laced(game)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 05:01 AM

Just like how you couldn’t bring yourself to call out white women directly & use terms like “maga women”, there’s way more out there like that than there is that call them out directly. Also why it’s “Maga women” when it’s white women but when blaming, it’s just plain “men” even though there a group of men that voted blue more than them? Why no distinction there?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 12:30 AM

The polls don’t say over 50% “maga women” voted for Trump it says white women
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 12:11 AM

You using terms like “Liberal women” “Maga women” as smokescreens proving a point I made on here. Using Terms like that to avoid confronting the fact that majority of white women voted for Trump. People are confused how y’all point the fingers at everybody but that demographic
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/24 10:27 PM

In my opinion it’s a smokescreen for white women. It’s a good one because men in general did mostly vote for trump & women for Kamala til you start accounting for demographics. Once you start looking at the demographics theirs specifically, things start to get contradictory to the popular thought especially on here
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/24 07:07 PM
3

No it’s not lmao “Game” came before PUA. PUA is nothing but watered down game put into a context for people outside of the community it originated in
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 08:35 PM

I agree with men needing to understand the rules of the game but why recommend incomplete & inauthentic which PUA over the complete & authentic game?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 06:26 PM
1

I agree but what I would say is a lot of the stuff is either incomplete or bastardized info from the “Urban” community. Can & does come off as unauthentic sometimes
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 10:14 PM
1

Since you seem to be either being disingenuous or having trouble understanding the question I’ll engage a point you added into the discussion out of the blue( your original point was gender roles). How did sexism permeate through slavery & from whom?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 11:59 PM
1

That’s clearly not what is being asked or discussed lmao once again My question was clearly to point to(events, writings, dates, tools etc)where within US history sexism was the MAJOR tool OVER slavery & Jim Crow in dominating outgroup people(black specifically). How was sexism the MAJOR tool OVER slavery in dominating outgroup people. It’s a simple question. Nothing wrong with conceding the point if you can’t provide material proof(historical events, letters, writings, dates etc) of your claim
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 11:53 PM
1

I never said anything about not believing in sexism lmao You deflecting once again. My question was clearly asked to point to(events, writings, dates, tools etc)where within US history sexism was the MAJOR tool OVER slavery & Jim Crow in dominating outgroup people(black specifically). Something you still clearly haven’t pointed to.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 10:34 PM
1

Once again you’re being disingenuous, moving the goalpost & trying to derail lmao I’ll state what I said again. You made a statement that you haven’t put anything behind about historical events lmao you havent even explained how exactly sexism permeated through slavery or Jim Crow let alone any historical events sexism was more responsible for towards outgroup people. My question was clearly asked to point to(events, writings, dates, tools etc)where within US history sexism was the MAJOR tool OV…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 09:49 PM
1

you’re being disingenuous you haven’t pointed out anything. You made a statement that you haven’t put anything behind about historical events lmao you havent even explained how exactly sexism permeated through slavery or Jim Crow let alone any historical events sexism was more responsible for towards outgroup people
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 09:29 PM
1

Come on, now you just being disingenuous smh. Let’s go off that then, so point out where within US history sexism was the major source of dominating outgroup people over slavery & Jim Crow
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 09:17 PM
1

Sexism isn’t gender roles…….. just because you claim something doesn’t make it true. Point to where within US history gender roles was the major source of dominating outgroup people over Jim Crow & Slavery.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 11:49 PM
1

Sexism doesn’t equal gender roles. You gotta be trolling because this is an insane take & you still didn’t explain how gender roles plays a bigger role than slavery & Jim Crow
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 10:26 PM
1

Still how does your reason why address the specific context of the point I made? I’m talking about something historically with material data behind it. Would you argue that gender roles played major role over dominating out group men & women(black in this case) more so than slavery, & Jim Crow? Based on what you said & the context of the point I made, one can conclude that’s what you’re saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 09:02 PM
1

What does that have to do with the specific context of the point I made? Are u disagreeing with what I stated because im not understanding the point you’re trying to make
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 06:47 PM
1

That’s a possibility but it’s not a major way in what I stated earlier. In the US historically gender roles weren’t the major way in-group male kinships dominated outgroup men & women(black specifically)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 04:51 PM
3

Yep at the end of the day you still have to talk to her & give her a reason. Best thing for him would be to work on his conversation with women & learn how to take a woman on a mental Safari.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 02:42 AM
1

Can’t speak globally on patriarchy but in the US, Patriarchy hasn’t been a class antagonism between the genders but kinship between in-group men who seek to dominate outgroup men & women. In general you’re correct because the men designated as the outgroup(this case black men) aren’t favored over women
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 02:29 AM
1

Some ways yes but when it comes to ghosting, not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 05:37 AM
2

Comparable is average. I don’t know to many dudes ghosting a girl who could suck peanut butter through a straw. Yeah emotional connection is important but for a lot of people sex keeps u involved with people u shouldn’t be.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 05:18 AM
4

Respectfully where in my response do you feel I made a double standard?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 05:12 AM
1

What point you disagreeing with?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 05:02 AM
8

Because it’s true most times. Most women don’t go to far once you give them good sex. It’s the same with us, no way in hell we ghosting a women that’s a head monster. It’s only natural to think the sex is the issue if she disappears as soon as it’s brought into the equation
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 04:53 AM

Lot of dudes on this sub seem to not have experience with women so I want to give advice. Ask away gentlemen any advice u need?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 12:12 AM
9

Caleb seems to have respect from his peers though. I don’t know a lot of women who would have respect for Adam let alone like seeing their own progeny being a mark & letting people run all over him
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 06:15 AM
1

I agree with the first part he could have asked before but in the end she waited til he was away doing something else to come at him with that energy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 05:03 PM
3

The way you’re interpreting is wrong. Pumping & dumping, cutting off non sexual attention isn’t really a punishment but rather taking your attention somewhere else. Idk the flow of the convo doesn’t sound like something someone would actually say. Why tell him to stop taking her on dates & paying attention to her if he’s already doing that? How she cheating on him if they casual?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 04:41 PM
1

In my opinion Whoever pursues pays for the first date.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 07:15 AM
1

Perception is always subject to change. I knew plenty ugly dudes who stayed with a pretty woman
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 06:30 AM
1

Women don’t really look at men they friendzoned as friends lol they are there to provide her attention not friendship
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 06:20 AM
1

Nah definitely not nothing to worry about
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 06:10 AM
1

I mean Crenshaws idea of intersectionality is built off white racist criminologists like Curtis & hooks has said some vile & untrue things in regards to black men. It’s not only them but they are definitely contributors.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/24 06:57 PM
1

The man-not is a good start
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/24 04:38 AM
2

Yep they shunned Curry for it & yet Black male studies has proven to be the field that has the language to describe what is going on with Palestinian men
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/24 04:38 AM
1

She said the Central Park 5 were performing a weird patriarchal sex ritual which was false & on another occasion asserted George Jackson wanting to use guerilla warfare tactics to liberate his people was expressing his allegiance to white supremacy
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/24 04:18 AM
1

Bell hooks isn’t a good one to use. She rarely uses actual evidence & said things that were just flat out untrue
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/24 03:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter