| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Woman who want marriage should make it clear from get go and not give him years waiting for him to pop the question. There's no dearth of guys who would drag you for yearsEither you’ve known men and women or you live in a cave. I don’t need to cite literally every study that’s ever been done that show men and women have different outcomes in almost every measurable thing there is. Youre arguing against yourself here. I said it’s not a moral argument I’m making. Nobody is permitting anything. “Permissibility” may have not been the most suitable word choice, but my question was for you to provide evidence that women having premarital sex is detrimental to marriage … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/24 06:04 PM |
| 1 | The vulnerability paradox.How often do you think this even happens? I said above or if not here recently elsewhere that if I lost an arm or my immediate family died I’d likely cry. How often do these situations happen though? Lmfao. You are moving the goalposts. Your original claim was that men crying under any circumstances is “so fucking lame”. Also, again, where is the proof that all instances of not crying is repressive? Your prior proof in terms of that definition did not support the claim. There are many ways to ha… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/24 05:55 PM |
| 1 | Woman who want marriage should make it clear from get go and not give him years waiting for him to pop the question. There's no dearth of guys who would drag you for yearsMen and women are different Citation needed that the differences between men and women have any meaningful impact on the permissibility of premarital sex. But it’s frankly moronic the women who engage in premarital sex with the goal of getting married Why? Is there anything moronic about assessing sexual compatibility beforehand? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/24 04:58 PM |
| 1 | The vulnerability paradox.Nowhere does it mention crying And how does a man not cry in highly upsetting situations? By repressive coping. Proof consent matters? I’ll put forward the notion that all pain can lead to emotional growth. You citing examples of positive painful experiences which have the common factor of consent. That’s the proof. If we are to define “emotional growth” as a positive term, let’s say for the sake of argument you were brutally tortured tomorrow. Do you think you would be more likely to experience… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/24 04:55 PM |
| 2 | On the dating book for women "Why men love bitches"As a man I think this book will be extremely useful for you… as bonfire kindling. This is almost the exact opposite of what I’d want in a relationship. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/24 03:37 PM |
| 1 | Woman who want marriage should make it clear from get go and not give him years waiting for him to pop the question. There's no dearth of guys who would drag you for yearsYou admit to engaging in behaviours that you criticise women for engaging in. Either you violate your own moral standards, you think that different moral standards apply to men and women, or you think that different moral standards apply to yourself and others. Which is it? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/24 03:23 PM |
| 1 | The vulnerability paradox.Proof? The definition of repressive coping. People get tattoos, they also participate in physically painful and taxing things like marathons, why do you assume reducing pain is of utmost importance? Firstly, you are citing consensual painful experiences. Most pain is non-consensual and is not conducive to mental health. Secondly, I am a utilitarian and ultimately all worldviews are utilitarian in terms of maximising pleasure and minimising suffering if you dig deep enough - that includes Christi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/24 03:22 PM |
| 1 | Woman who want marriage should make it clear from get go and not give him years waiting for him to pop the question. There's no dearth of guys who would drag you for yearsLack of objective arguments against premarital sex aside, you have admitted elsewhere in this subreddit that you have had enormous amounts of premarital sex and you have made Reddit posts about how you don’t want to marry. Care to address the contradiction? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/24 02:54 PM |
| 1 | The vulnerability paradox.The suppression of crying on the basis of it being “weak” and/or “unmasculine” tends to amount to repressive coping. Crying also has a direct self-soothing effect and relieves physical and emotional pain.. And even if there was a benefit to crying, it’s a female centric model to only care about say health. Do men who cry make more money? Do they have more social respect? Do they have better access to women they want to date? Give me a minute to finish laughing at this take. You think that object… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/24 02:41 PM |
| 1 | The vulnerability paradox.Here’s your evidence. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/24 01:48 PM |
| 1 | The vulnerability paradox.That’s not an argument - “annoying” is also subjective and I personally find your refusal to answer my previous question annoying. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/24 01:24 PM |
| 0 | The vulnerability paradox.Any actual harm caused by men crying being accepted? “Lame” is a completely subjective and arbitrary term, and I’d argue that you being such a suckup for the emotionally destructive fantasies of shallow women is so fucking lame. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/24 02:21 AM |
| 2 | The Redpill and Bluepill are two sides of the same coin- both are equally gynocentric, just in different ways.Let’s say for the sake of argument that I wasn’t currently dating a wonderful person who I can happily be my authentic self around. If, hypothetically, I successfully practiced redpill advice, sacrificed my identity to force myself into a hypermasculine mould and experienced a significant increase in dating success as a result, it would quickly become apparent to me that most of these women only love me for sacrificing my identity, being jacked and rich and engaging in manipulative “game”. This … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/07/24 11:07 PM |
| 1 | CMV: It's good advice to never settleYes, hererosexual women who want a long-term committed relationship have the right to have extremely high standards and refuse to settle for anything less, but the consequence of having such high standards and never settling is that you will NEVER find a long-term committed relationship - there is no such thing as a perfect partner. An action you take can be morally within your rights and a horrendously bad idea that is actively detrimental to your goals at the same time. Morally I am well withi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/24 03:03 AM |
| 2 | Women/bluepill men here downplay the relevance of women's online discourseUnfortunately I have come across many people who identify as “redpillers” who literally believe that women are a monolith (I am NOT saying all redpillers are like this). Also this is just personal, but while I do agree that many women have very shallow dating criteria, I find the idea of dating such a woman absolutely miserable and would feel genuinely insulted by a woman who effectively only loves me for being physically attractive and/or changing my personality to exhibit the traits the redpil… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/06/24 06:57 PM |
| 2 | Women/bluepill men here downplay the relevance of women's online discourseI partially agree, but I would like to add some caveats: People produce unequal amounts of online discourse, and extremists of any stripe tend to be more terminally online and tend to produce far more online discourse per capita than the average person. The internet is also an extremely potent tool for disinformation. Many of the most virulent takes from misandrists online may be rage bait or at worst sockpuppets operated by some Kremlin shithead. P.S. Can’t say I’m keen on the ableist comment. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/06/24 06:47 PM |
| 1 | Relationships are pointless if you EXCLUDE sex or starting a family as the primary reason/motivator (this is my perspective)Contrary to a common misconception, many asexual people can and do experience romantic attraction to people without experiencing any sexual attraction to them. Non-asexual aromanticism is simply the inverse of non-aromantic asexuality - many aromantic people can and do experience sexual attraction to people without experiencing any romantic attraction to them. There are also intermediate orientations on both spectrums, such as demisexuality (only experiencing sexual attraction to other people af… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/05/24 02:31 PM |
| 2 | Q4W: For those that care - What do you think of Bumble allowing men to send the first message?I looked up the gender ratios of different dating apps and, while the results I’ve found vary too wildly for my taste, the most reputable-looking source I found was a 2023 Ofcom report containing data on the gender ratios of UK users of different dating apps. Here’s the results of all the dating apps they surveyed: PURE Hookup: 46% male, 54% female Match: 49% male, 51% female Hinge: 50% male, 50% female Happn: 51% male, 49% female Bumble: 57% male, 43% female Plenty of Fish: 57% male, 43% female… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/05/24 11:14 PM |
| 1 | Dating advice by men, for women?Calling a pre-sentient foetus a “baby” is incorrect at best and a fallacious appeal to emotion at worst. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/05/24 01:53 PM |
| – | Polls results from UCSB students (from yik yak)If you think I’m the woman in this situation… no, contrary to the fact that my profile picture is of the antagonistic doppelgänger of a trans woman, I am a cisgender man. The woman I rejected was the antivaxxer and the one who was first to mention their vaccination status. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/05/24 01:39 PM |
| – | Polls results from UCSB students (from yik yak)Having family members who have lived under communism doesn’t make you a political scientist by any means, but it does give you a better understanding of Marxism than someone who only knows Marxism through caricature. For the record I oppose Marxism-Leninism, but at least I have a basic understanding of actual Marxist doctrine and don’t hold the ridiculous idea that Marxism is primarily concerned with race relations of all things. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/05/24 01:33 PM |
| – | Polls results from UCSB students (from yik yak)Didn’t answer what? I provided my honest answer to what I think when conservatives ask “what is a woman?”, since that talking point became stale over a year ago. If you want me to answer the question of “what is a woman” itself: a woman is a person who identifies with the particular social role assigned to certain adult humans that is traditionally associated with female sexual characteristics. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/05/24 01:28 PM |
| 2 | Relationships are pointless if you EXCLUDE sex or starting a family as the primary reason/motivator (this is my perspective)Sexual and romantic attraction are not the same thing, and what you are romantically attracted to can differ greatly from what you are sexually attracted to. Asexuality/allosexuality and aromanticism/alloromanticism are two separate spectrums, and you can be any combination of the two. I personally am demiromantic and allosexual (I experience romantic attraction but not until I’ve already built a strong emotional bond with the person and I don’t experience crushes, while I experience sexual attr… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/05/24 05:01 AM |
| 1 | Polls results from UCSB students (from yik yak)Being forced to carry a pregnancy and give birth is a much grosser violation of your autonomy than being forced to pay child support. This is coming from someone who supports paper abortion. As someone whose mother grew up under the Soviet Union and who has spoken to actual Marxists, I can say that you have absolutely zero idea what you are talking about. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/05/24 11:55 PM |
| 2 | Relationships are pointless if you EXCLUDE sex or starting a family as the primary reason/motivator (this is my perspective)Are you aromantic or somewhere on the aromantic spectrum by any chance? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/05/24 09:27 PM |
| 1 | Polls results from UCSB students (from yik yak)Given how innocuous many of the things that get described as “woke” are, no, most people do not know what “wokeness” refers to. It’s an even stupider form of red-baiting. What I think when conservatives ask “what is a woman?” is “boring question that I can answer in approximately 15 seconds”. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/05/24 07:42 PM |
| 1 | Polls results from UCSB students (from yik yak)Congratulations on being the second conservative I have talked to out of hundreds who actually provided a concrete definition of “wokeness”! Most of the time I hear the term used, especially from politicians, it’s as a meaningless and thought-stopping snarl word. I’ve heard everything from female supremacy to respecting trans people’s right to exist to providing ATACMS to Ukraine described as “woke”. The clips are actually fairly reflective of reality, believe it or not. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/05/24 06:19 PM |
| 5 | Polls results from UCSB students (from yik yak)The term “wokeness” tends to be nebulously defined at best and not defined at all at worst by the people who use it as part of an argument. If you want your argument to have any substance, I would advise you to provide a concrete definition of what you consider to be “wokeness”. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/05/24 03:56 PM |
| 5 | Polls results from UCSB students (from yik yak)Most of the commonly cited examples of the world being “a giant testament to male achievement” come from societies and time periods that were legitimately patriarchal. Gee, I wonder why women didn’t achieve much of a tangible legacy under such conditions. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/05/24 03:44 PM |
| 0 | Polls results from UCSB students (from yik yak)To be fair, women may be hesistant to date people who think they should not have the right to reproductive freedom. That said, there are probably many cases of such women prioritising physical attractiveness over political alignment. P.S. To demonstrate you have any idea what you are talking about, please define Marxism. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/05/24 03:35 PM |
| 1 | Polls results from UCSB students (from yik yak)Don’t worry, she brought it up unprompted. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/05/24 03:15 PM |
| 7 | Polls results from UCSB students (from yik yak)Nope. I have personally rejected attractive antivaxxers on the basis of their beliefs. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/05/24 09:26 AM |
| – | If a woman has the right to an outing to pregnancy, a man should have access to that same outing with no problems.How is it a “dumb ass blanket statement”? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/05/24 10:16 PM |
| 3 | How likely are you to believe someone who says they've been raped? What factors would influence your judgement?Absolutely. The reasons I stated are far from the only reasons a rape victim may choose not to report. I’m so sorry for your childhood friend :( | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/05/24 07:00 AM |
| 7 | How likely are you to believe someone who says they've been raped? What factors would influence your judgement?Rape kit evidence collection procedures (especially vaginal and anal swabs), and in some cases general police reactions to reporting a rape, may be highly retraumatising for genuine rape victims. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/05/24 01:56 AM |
| 1 | If a woman has the right to an outing to pregnancy, a man should have access to that same outing with no problems.2016 United States presidential election EC results: Trump: 304 (306) Clinton: 227 (232) Texas popular vote: Donald Trump (Republican): 4,685,047 Hillary Clinton (Democratic): 3,877,868 Gary Johnson (Libertarian): 283,492 Jill Stein (Green): 71,558 Evan McMullin (Independent): 42,366 Other: 8,895 Electoral College results if Clinton won Texas and all Texan electors voted for Clinton: Trump: 268 (268) Clinton: 265 (270) Such a result would be.. politically interesting, but yes it IS Texas’ fault … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/05/24 12:00 AM |
| 2 | If a woman has the right to an outing to pregnancy, a man should have access to that same outing with no problems.Electing orange clowns who stack your Supreme Court with anti-abortion ideologues is not an inherent physical risk of sex, it is a voluntary political decision. Your risk of having an unwanted child from sex is not an inherent sex problem, it is a poltical problem. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/05/24 11:35 PM |
| 9 | If a woman has the right to an outing to pregnancy, a man should have access to that same outing with no problems.The reason I suggested a shorter window for paper abortions than conventional abortions is so the carrier of the foetus has ample time to decide whether to continue with the pregnancy after being informed of the paper abortion and prevent situations where the sperm donor has a paper abortion after or right before the conventional abortion limit, the carrier of the foetus cannot get a conventional abortion in time after being informed of the paper abortion and deciding not to continue with the pr… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/05/24 11:29 PM |
| 2 | If a woman has the right to an outing to pregnancy, a man should have access to that same outing with no problems.We are medically capable of stopping an unwanted pregnancy from becoming a baby with effectively 100% reliability, with the only limitations being moral and legal. We do live in a world where the risk of an unwanted child from sex can be reduced to effectively zero for the carrier. Do you think a foetus has a right to existence that overrides the carrier’s right to bodily autonomy? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/05/24 11:22 PM |
| 3 | If a woman has the right to an outing to pregnancy, a man should have access to that same outing with no problems.You’re correct and it’s definitely not airtight. It’s a step up from the current state of affairs though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/05/24 10:05 PM |
| 1 | If a woman has the right to an outing to pregnancy, a man should have access to that same outing with no problems.The fact that abortion procedures are safe and widely available completely decouples the act of sex from any risk of the person with the uterus having an unwanted child if they live under a jurisdiction where abortion is legal. There is no physical law of the universe making it impossible to establish a legal system of “paper abortion”. If an unintended consequence Y of an act X is entirely preventable via the prevention measure Z and the only barrier to access to Z is its arbitrary legal status… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/05/24 09:59 PM |
| 11 | If a woman has the right to an outing to pregnancy, a man should have access to that same outing with no problems.While I support the legalisation of paper abortion, I think the legal limit for paper abortion should be a few weeks earlier than the legal limit for elective conventional abortion in order to provide a buffer zone where the carrier of the foetus can decide whether they want to have the resulting baby now that the sperm donor is out of the picture. Most arguments I hear against legalisation of paper abortion by self-described feminists are virtually identical to conservative arguments against co… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/05/24 09:45 PM |
| 18 | How Much appeal does being a Policeman give you?Positions of authority such as police careers are unfortunately very appealing to abusers. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/05/24 09:16 PM |
| 3 | Men are entitledJesse Kempton. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/05/24 04:08 AM |
| 2 | Men are entitledWhile I don’t think you can pin yourself on some kind of objective scale of morality, there are cases where you definitely can morally judge yourself to be better than someone else. I have personally seen men with multiple reports of physical and sexual abuse have far more sexual/romantic success than myself, someone who has never engaged in any form of physical or sexual abuse and who, while platonically getting on well with women (so I doubt the “emotional vampire” comments in circulation are … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/05/24 03:41 AM |
| 2 | Why is the danger sense of women very confusing.That’s a general problem people of all genders have with risk perception - they falsely think that activities they are more familiar with are safer and vice versa. The answer to your question is the same as why many people act as if nuclear energy is more dangerous than driving. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/05/24 12:49 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter