MundaneSir Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	A large % of women who are in relationships today who would've never swiped right on their SO if they came across them online, what conclusions can we draw from this? The majority of time women do not want to be bothered while at the grocery store, etc no matter how attractive you are unlike the movies would lead you to believe. But if you felt the need to, it should be very natural. Don’t walk across the store to talk to them. Maybe you are both looking at the oranges, so you make a joke or comment relating to that. What happens next is very important. Read their body language. If they don’t seem engaged, leave them alone. Don’t force it. Pay attention to th…	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/09/20 01:54 PM
1	CMV: Men are far more into casual sex than females as noted by casual sexual outlet ratios with far more men than females I don’t think that’s true. Every other post on PPD is about how women who have had above a certain number of sexual partners are less desirable as a potential wife or LTR. And that idea isn’t exclusive to Reddit users. And it’s definitely not exclusive to western society. It’s pretty much universal.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/08/20 01:41 PM
3	CMV: Men are far more into casual sex than females as noted by casual sexual outlet ratios with far more men than females I think that women are less likely to pursue casual sex because there are more societal expectations placed on women not to engage in casual sex. There are other reasons that you haven't discussed. The main one I can think of is that casual sex is rarely satisfying for women because men are often not very good at sex or attentive during sex with a woman that they do not plan on dating. I think after a few of those you would write off casual sex too. Also, regarding men being unable to secure cas…	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/08/20 06:40 AM
1	What is the appropriate body count? Ew to having 4 to 6 kids. What are you Mormon? Is this the 1950s? Who even does that anymore? Good luck with that.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/07/20 09:01 PM
1	What is the appropriate body count? Ew. Once you have one, you will change your mind.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/07/20 06:54 PM
1	What is the appropriate body count? I am a woman, and I’m married. But as you can imagine, it would be strange for a woman almost thirty, like myself, to exclusively date men in their early twenties. I think the same should apply with the genders reversed.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/07/20 06:45 PM
1	What is the appropriate body count? That’s creepy.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/07/20 05:07 PM
1	What is the appropriate body count? I'm assuming you only date women in their early twenties. Less than 5 partners would be a ridiculous requirement for a person your age. I don't see how that is even possible unless they have only had one or two long term relationships, or they are sexually undesirable.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/07/20 05:30 AM
7	CMV: Women are almost never used for sex. Imagine you find out a woman you are dating was actually using you for free meals. Imagine you find out a woman you are dating was just using you to fix things around her apartment or for free rides or to make her ex jealous or for money. Okay, now imagine that a woman was used for sex by a man she is dating. This isn't a task or favor that she would do for a friend. This is something that she saves for someone special. That she cannot earn back unlike money. He used her body and robbed her of d…	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/07/20 01:24 PM
1	Could you explain why you think women that have casual sex don't "value themselves"? So what your saying is, it’s okay to use a woman with a high count by adding more to her count and making her further more unworthy of marriage?	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/07/20 10:48 AM
1	CMV: Just a slightly interesting moral distinction here. I would marry a widow but I would not marry an ex-wife. Is it possible that you haven't met all women? Your personal experience with a few women doesn't make you an expert. I don't think making generalizations about half the world's population is something a very self aware person would do. No? I think it's more likely that you are scared of women. Maybe, they hurt you or you've never had enough confidence to interact with one in a meaningful way. But I can assure you that there are women who have much more desirable qualities than men. And there are…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/06/20 07:02 AM
2	CMV: Just a slightly interesting moral distinction here. I would marry a widow but I would not marry an ex-wife. Are you concerned that you wouldn't be able to find a woman who has those qualities or that you wouldn't be worthy of receiving those qualities?	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/06/20 06:38 AM
1	CMV: Just a slightly interesting moral distinction here. I would marry a widow but I would not marry an ex-wife. Expecting what exactly?	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/06/20 06:33 AM
1	When you wear a revealing shirt, do you get upset when men stare? I don't think women are always asking for attention when wearing revealing clothing. Some clothes are revealing without intent. For example, I have a larger chest, and I have to choose between wearing a smaller top that fits my waist or a much larger top that fits only my chest making my outfit look baggy and frumpy. I almost always choose the tighter fitting shirt. With that being said, I also often wear clothing that is purposely revealing. I think it looks nice. I am not trying to get hit on,…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/06/20 06:13 AM
13	Is the obsession with male height cultural? As a short woman, I would say that the vast majority of men, of all heights, I have encountered are more attracted to my height (5'2) than to other women who are considered average or taller than average. This has been my personal experience. But everyone has their thing. And I think that this is due to the very things you mentioned - men like to feel like the provider and protector. I think it makes them feel more masculine to be next to a much smaller woman. Shorter women are perceived as bein…	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/06/20 03:37 AM
1	Women don't understand why promiscuity is undesirable because men who are able to cheat are high-value, whereas all women can cheat and those who do are low-value Are you not triggered? You felt the need to comment on my original response. Seems like you are the one that feels threatened. Do you not see the hypocrisy? I'm not going to argue with you anymore because you clearly can't keep up. You are unable to hold an intellectual conversation. The terms males and females are not used at the same rates in our society. That is general knowledge. I've never heard anyone refer to men as males. Also if you have to resort to name-calling, you have no point. It …	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/20 06:55 PM
1	Women don't understand why promiscuity is undesirable because men who are able to cheat are high-value, whereas all women can cheat and those who do are low-value Normal person? Thanks. "Females" reduces women to their sexual organs and removes the fact that they are human. Men are rarely called males. Do you not see the difference? Like I said, it is hardly a new concept. I don't know what circles you run in, but the majority of educated people are more than aware of the connotation of the word. Nearly every person I know sees the issues with the term and chooses to not use it in that context.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/20 05:22 PM
1	Women don't understand why promiscuity is undesirable because men who are able to cheat are high-value, whereas all women can cheat and those who do are low-value I don't feel that most men and women are attempting to oppress women by using the term. I don't think that they are aware of the connotation of the word as it is used. This is why I wanted to start a dialogue on the subject.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/20 05:09 PM
1	Women don't understand why promiscuity is undesirable because men who are able to cheat are high-value, whereas all women can cheat and those who do are low-value Again, that isn't necessary considering that it is not very likely that you would encounter a group of women some of which are biological and others who are trans women. On very rare cases would you need to specify. And we both know that isn't why or how people are using the term.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/20 04:52 PM
1	Women don't understand why promiscuity is undesirable because men who are able to cheat are high-value, whereas all women can cheat and those who do are low-value You felt strongly enough about the topic a few minutes ago that you introduced it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/20 04:43 PM
1	Women don't understand why promiscuity is undesirable because men who are able to cheat are high-value, whereas all women can cheat and those who do are low-value This is hardly a new concept. The term as it was used in his comment, which has since been removed, has been viewed as offensive for decades. I am not "looking to be offended." I think you have the right to be informed.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/20 04:39 PM
1	Women don't understand why promiscuity is undesirable because men who are able to cheat are high-value, whereas all women can cheat and those who do are low-value I didn't realize that social progress was a "crazy" idea. Why would you need to differentiate a biological woman from a trans woman in a casual conversation when referring to a group of women, who are more likely statistically to be biologically women? That doesn't make sense. Why does it bother you that someone wants to be called a man or woman? Is it really that big of a deal to you? And if so, why?	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/20 04:27 PM
1	Women don't understand why promiscuity is undesirable because men who are able to cheat are high-value, whereas all women can cheat and those who do are low-value How is that even remotely related?	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/20 04:16 PM
1	Women don't understand why promiscuity is undesirable because men who are able to cheat are high-value, whereas all women can cheat and those who do are low-value Well, you are using it improperly. Female is almost always an adjective. There are very few instances that it is appropriate to use women and females interchangeably.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/20 04:15 PM
0	Women don't understand why promiscuity is undesirable because men who are able to cheat are high-value, whereas all women can cheat and those who do are low-value Nobody is trying to reinvent the definition. It is inappropriate to refer to women as females in casual conversation. You never hear anyone call a group of men males. Female is only appropriate when it can be used as an adjective. Female animals, female plants, female participants, female patients. The only time a woman should be identified as female is scientifically. When you refer to a woman as a female in other settings, you are reducing her to reproductive organs and removing the fact that …	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/20 04:08 PM
1	Women don't understand why promiscuity is undesirable because men who are able to cheat are high-value, whereas all women can cheat and those who do are low-value Are you purposely trying to make your reply even more offensive? You do realize that the word hysterical/hysteria is a historically oppressive term that was used as a medical diagnosis for women who were deemed too emotional. Obviously this idea continues to hinder women’s progress in society. Example - women wouldn’t make a good president because they are too emotional.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/20 03:42 PM
5	Women don't understand why promiscuity is undesirable because men who are able to cheat are high-value, whereas all women can cheat and those who do are low-value Can we stop referring to women as "females"??	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/20 07:38 AM
7	If all men were "up front" with their intentions 24/7 most would never get laid. Chili's is a date. I would start to develop feelings too after sharing a Molten Chocolate Cake.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/04/20 05:21 AM
1	What’s your opinion on people who leave their partner for another person? I don't feel that people who cheat are always pieces of shit. Relationships are very complex.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/04/20 04:47 AM
39	If all men were "up front" with their intentions 24/7 most would never get laid. I think you have a very strange way of looking at things. You are complaining that a woman that you were casually seeing started to like you enough that she wanted to be with you exclusively. The appropriate response would be to be flattered. Instead, you are suggesting that she is doing something wrong. If you don't want to be with someone that will develop feelings for you, you should probably make that clear from the beginning and reinforce that throughout your relationship. A woman isn't goi…	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/04/20 04:38 AM
1	Q4W, is a larger penis important to physical attraction? Yes. I'm a woman. I just picked one of the usernames suggested when creating the account. And I thought it was the least terrible of the few recommended, and that it would be personally amusing to me because I am a woman. As far as aesthetics, I think a penis that is proportional in length and width would be preferable. One that has more girth than it is long would be pretty off-putting, imo. I have encountered this. If I personally had to choose between the two on appearances alone, I would def…	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/04/20 02:03 AM
2	Q4W, is a larger penis important to physical attraction? I find a large penis to be repulsive. I think the whole bigger is better thing is complete bullshit and for whatever reason, our society decided this to be true. Most women, IMO, do not want to have a huge dick crammed inside of them. That is painful and just unnecessary. Besides, the vast majority of women can only orgasm through clitoral stimulation. Keep that in mind.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/04/20 08:44 AM
2	I want college Greek life and "Hookup Culture" to die a slow, painful death Generally, dating indicates more than one person at a time. At least, that is how it is defined in this generation. Dating is not a relationship, and it's rarely exclusive in the beginning. And wouldn't "casual encounters with guys you barely know" be the potential beginning of a relationship??	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/04/20 08:15 AM
3	Women who regularly use make-up to conceal/enhance their natural facial features do not have the right to reject a man because of his physical attractiveness. I don't think women see makeup as concealing their appearances. We aren't exactly trying to look like a different person. Some just prefer the way they look with makeup, and it often has nothing to do with attracting a partner. Makeup is more of an embellishment, like clothing. It's fun. It's not always that serious. There are definitely women that do feel insecure without makeup. And some apply more than others, but that is because of the higher expectations placed on women's appearances in our…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/04/20 08:01 AM
3	I want college Greek life and "Hookup Culture" to die a slow, painful death Stop worrying about your daughter's sex life. As a college woman, I can tell you that there's nothing wrong with "hooking up." That's dating, and it's not exactly new. College kids are going to drink. There is absolutely nothing you can or should do to prevent your daughter from having sex. The best thing to do is to provide your adult children with support and acceptance and respect. And the whole concern with a woman's partner count thing is demoralizing and completely irrelevant to a woman's …	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/04/20 07:32 AM