TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Murgie Archive

View 0 posts and 485 comments by Murgie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Peaceful marches don't end in 15 cops being hospitalized, one being murdered, and two killing themselves within less than a week days after sustaining severe injuries.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/21 09:47 PM
1

A Dalton spokesperson was quoted by the Post as saying, “As part of Dalton’s comprehensive Health curriculum for students, a lesson on Gender & Bodies included two evidence-based and age-appropriate videos approved for students 4 years and older. These videos align with nationally recognized methodologies and standards.” “We consistently review our Health curriculum, making sure that the content is developmentally appropriate and, if necessary, we adapt our curriculum accordingly,” the spokesper…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/21 09:42 PM
4

A Dalton spokesperson was quoted by the Post as saying, “As part of Dalton’s comprehensive Health curriculum for students, a lesson on Gender & Bodies included two evidence-based and age-appropriate videos approved for students 4 years and older. These videos align with nationally recognized methodologies and standards.” “We consistently review our Health curriculum, making sure that the content is developmentally appropriate and, if necessary, we adapt our curriculum accordingly,” the spokesper…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/21 09:42 PM
1

If it's universally recognized What do you mean "if"? You insisted it was, and called individuals with contrasting experiences biologically flawed. Which is it? Do you not actually know? I don't think you understand the basic idea that owns views on a piece of information is not the same as the piece of information itself... Oh? So does that mean redpill views on that piece of information significantly vary from what you described it as, and you're just capable of reading minds? Or does it not s…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 11:20 PM
1

Can you show me what I'm missing? I believe I just did; either masculinity is a single universally recognized set of criteria which people are biologically hard-wired to be attracted to unless they're defective, as you initially claimed, or it's a personal and subjective concept which would require mind-reading to understand from other individual's perspective. These are mutually exclusive stances. Either one or both of them are false.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 10:15 PM
1

How do you know their existing ideas of masculinity? Can you read minds? Deep down you don't find traditional masculinity unnattractive unless there is something wrong with your biology. Seems we've got some inconsistent standards being applied, here. 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 09:24 PM
1

Seems like an extremely shallow defence for not reforming the Act if the court system is actually using this as reasoning. The courts don't have any control over it, mate. That's entirely up to the legislators, and for better or worse representing their constituents is ultimately what they're tasked with. That said, I think it had less of a role in the decision not to reform the act, and more of a role in how it got to be that way in the first place. Wasn't aware of this and also not really sure…
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 01:22 AM
1

It looks like the source of the New York Post article is actually the "21 Reasons Not To Believe Christine Blasey Ford’s Claims About Justice Kavanaugh" from the Federalist that it links to, and you pointed out afterwards. So no worries, you already found it. It's just that the Federalist has unfortunately had a rather spotty reputation in regards to politically charged subjects. Though the recent 2020 elections and COVID period is when it really started to become an issue outside of opinion pie…
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 11:52 PM
1

For starters, “there is no evidence” that Ford and Kavanaugh “ever met.” Other than her allegation, there is zero corroboration for “the party she described” having occurred, “much less” the assault. Plus, her own supposed witness and childhood friend Leland Keyser “came to lack confidence in the tale” Ford told. All other “alleged witnesses strongly dispute the claim.” Alright, so this is an opinion piece, and one that doesn't appear to be strictly accurate, either. For example, there have been…
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 11:30 PM
1

I did some research and you’re points still don’t explain why there is a discrepancy in the Act under s1 such that the section doesn’t qualify female rapists. Well, it really just boil to their lack of a penis, and that men and women alike tend to view sexual penetration with something like an object or another part of the body as distinct from penetration with genitalia. If that were to change I'm confident that the law would too, but as it stands it's really just a reflection of societal conse…
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 10:52 PM
1

Even though Ford was later proven to have lied about the entire thing? Would you be willing to point me a link to where that was established? I don't seem to recall that happening, and honestly find it a little hard to believe that the entire thing was made up, given the contents of her 2012 and 2013 psych eval notes which were among the submitted evidence.
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 09:12 PM
1

It effectively is the case already. The reason it doesn't technically fall under rape is because rape was originally defined waaay back in the day, and in order to avoid the risk of disrupting existing rape convictions, and the costs associated with existing convicts petitioning for things like meritless retrials that they might be entitled to in the wake of a sweeping redefinition, the UK simply established another near-identical law which covers victims who are made to penetrate someone else -…
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 09:02 PM
1

Are there any articles on men being raped in the UK but couldn't go to the police because of this bullshit that "women can't rape"? No, because that's not actually the case. The reason it doesn't technically fall under rape is because rape was originally defined waaay back in the day, and in order to avoid the risk of disrupting existing rape convictions, and the costs associated with existing convicts petitioning for things like meritless retrials that they might be entitled to in the wake of a…
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 09:01 PM
1

So unless she's got a strapon it's perfectly legal. That's not the case by any stretch of the imagination. The reason it doesn't technically fall under rape is because rape was originally defined waaay back in the day, and in order to avoid the risk of disrupting existing rape convictions, and the costs associated with existing convicts petitioning for things like meritless retrials that they might be entitled to in the wake of a sweeping redefinition, the UK simply established another near-iden…
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 08:59 PM
1

women can rape men ‘legally’ That's not the case by any stretch of the imagination. The reason it doesn't technically fall under rape is because rape was originally defined waaay back in the day, and in order to avoid the risk of disrupting existing rape convictions, and the costs associated with existing convicts petitioning for things like meritless retrials that they might be entitled to in the wake of a sweeping redefinition, the UK simply established another near-identical law which covers …
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 08:58 PM
1

Only on a purely technical level. In order to avoid the risk of disrupting existing rape convictions, and the costs associated with existing convicts petitioning for things like meritless retrials that they might be entitled to in the wake of a sweeping redefinition, the UK simply established another near-identical law which covers victims who are made to penetrate someone else -as is the case in female on male rape- with the same maximum sentence of life imprisonment. It's called "Causing a per…
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 08:55 PM
1

Edit 2: for those who are confused the SOA 2003 here requires that “penetration/ penetration by a penile object” be done to constitute an act of rape. What this means if that you have to have the object attached to you whether it’s a penis or a strap on to rape someone. That's because Section 2 of the SOA establishes the "assault by penetration" offense, which applies to anyone, using anything from their fingers to an object, to any other person, and carries exactly the same maximum sentence. Th…
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 08:42 PM
4

There is good evidence the lack of natural selection makes females more selective for antisocial and beautiful males. No, there isn't. You didn't bother reading what you're citing: Male counterparts to these non-reproducing females we soon dubbed the 'beautiful ones'. They never engaged in sexual approaches toward females, and they never engaged in fighting, and so they had no wound or scar tissue. Thus their pelage remained in excellent condition. Their behavioural repertoire became largely con…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 12:28 AM
0

Women's oppression is just another outdated & wrong piece of info that school teaches just like they taught us Edison invented the lightbulb! Lol, and from an Indian, no less.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 02:50 AM
2

Most of you must be aware that the transgender kids and teens are almost all female bodied and becoming trans men. That's not actually true, though. Actual population stats on the matter put the ratio at around 60-40 in favor of MTFs.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 02:47 AM
5

They have NEVER been through male puberty and have never experienced life as a biological man. What?
/r/MensRights09/12/20 12:00 AM
1

I doubt the scrotum being pulled up slightly causes issues for intact people It absolutely does, it just hasn't reached that point yet in the under five year old patients that you've linked to. The issue is that once the patient reaches puberty the shaft of the penis is going to grow significantly more than that scrotal webbing is going to, which means that the webbing is going to become a painful constraint during erection. and if it does, foreskin lengthening would alleviate it. No, it wouldn'…
/r/MensRights08/12/20 11:49 PM
0

Context clues suggest that's not what you intended to spell. 😉
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/20 06:37 PM
1

Out of curiosity, do you hold any beliefs that you actually believe in, rather than simple talking point that you repeat whenever prompted so that certain groups will praise you as "high value" and "one of us"?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/20 04:42 PM
1

Lol, don't blame Reddit as a whole for the likes of pussypassdenied.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/20 05:51 AM
1

Did you not realize what subreddit you were on?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/20 05:51 AM
0

You misspelled "copebuilder", my friend.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/20 05:49 AM
1

What subreddit do you think you're on? The entire prompt for rage here is that she dared to be a sex worker and a woman at the same time.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/20 05:48 AM
1

STEM feilds. Lol, just like MrHallmark does.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/20 05:46 AM
1

Why do you think? She was probably harassed by the people these screenshots had been passed around to for being a sex worker.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/20 05:45 AM
1

Shhh- you're not supposed to say it out loud.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/20 05:10 AM
2

Stop disrupting the narrative!
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/20 05:07 AM
6

How exactly is that even possible if they're married? Their assets are shared, anything that either of them make belong to the household by definition.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/20 11:05 PM
2

Inclusive Gamers is a parody/troll account by the same group of people that run "Journalist Excellence Worldwide", "Feminists Against Trolls", "The Heroes of Transgenderism", and a couple of other accounts which pretty much solely exist to ask stupid questions in polls and then take screenshots of the predictable outcome.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 01:16 AM
1

Inclusive Gamers is a parody/troll account by the same group of people that run "Journalist Excellence Worldwide", "Feminists Against Trolls", "The Heroes of Transgenderism", and a couple of other accounts which pretty much solely exist to ask stupid questions in polls and then take screenshots of the predictable outcome.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 01:16 AM
10

Inclusive Gamers is a parody/troll account by the same group of people that run "Journalist Excellence Worldwide", "Feminists Against Trolls", "The Heroes of Transgenderism", and a couple of other accounts which pretty much solely exist to ask stupid questions in polls and then take screenshots of the predictable outcome.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 01:15 AM
4

Inclusive Gamers is a parody/troll account by the same group of people that run "Journalist Excellence Worldwide", "Feminists Against Trolls", "The Heroes of Transgenderism", and a couple of other accounts which pretty much solely exist to ask stupid questions in polls and then take screenshots of the predictable outcome.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 01:14 AM
6

That's the biggest shame of all, tbh.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 01:13 AM
2

Inclusive Gamers is a parody/troll account by the same group of people that run "Journalist Excellence Worldwide", "Feminists Against Trolls", "The Heroes of Transgenderism", and a couple of other accounts which pretty much solely exist to ask stupid questions in polls and then take screenshots of the predictable outcome.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 01:08 AM
2

Inclusive Gamers is a parody/troll account by the same group of people that run "Journalist Excellence Worldwide", "Feminists Against Trolls", "The Heroes of Transgenderism", and a couple of other accounts which pretty much solely exist to ask stupid questions in polls and then take screenshots of the predictable outcome. Were you not aware of that, /u/Geeekus?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 01:01 AM
1

https://i.imgur.com/v2LLJXb.jpg
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/20 12:12 AM
1

https://i.imgur.com/v2LLJXb.jpg
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 10:56 PM
1

https://i.imgur.com/v2LLJXb.jpg
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 09:21 PM
2

What do you mean? There are no actual journals associated with any of them. Aside from the NPC Daily, they're all just Twitter accounts.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 05:41 PM
1

It's really not something that takes a whole lot of effort to unearth or copy and paste.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 05:10 PM
1

Of course not. That's why I had to inform you that you were falling for their bait.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 05:07 PM
1

You're stupid for thinking my comment had anything to do with the submission which I specifically chose to post it in reply to. I'm puzzled by the way you seem to think that by pretending to not understand how basic communication works, you'll somehow come off as smarter and manage to save face.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 04:10 PM
1

And that's the part that gets me. I'm not opposed to these guys doing their own thing as satire or whatever, but the part where they actively try to deceive people into believing that it's real is just really shitty of them.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 04:05 PM
1

(￣\<sup>￣)ゞ</sup> That's an interesting salute. I appreciate it.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 03:33 PM
1

It isn't propaganda made by feminism, though. This one was made by one of your own under the guise of feminism/journalism/whatever, and you fell for it. That's the point.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 03:31 PM
1

Yeah, fucking lazy-ass women, faffing around on Facebook all day rather than doing their actual jobs. Am I right?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 03:28 PM
2

Could you fill me in? I just included it because it was a stupid thing to say that would obviously never be retweeted by any kind of legitimate organization. I know absolutely nothing about the original poster, though.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 03:26 PM
2

That's a fair point; I realized it was "satire" before looking it up to confirm as much.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 03:25 PM
1

Almost seems as though it was by design, doesn't it?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 02:20 PM
0

It's almost as though the entire account is obviously bait, isn't it?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 02:18 PM
1

Use their words against them You'd be targeting your own side, though. OP has openly admitted that it's a troll account.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 02:17 PM
1

As though it wasn't obvious enough, OP is openly admitting that it's a troll account. Stop being so easily manipulated.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 02:16 PM
1

As though it wasn't obvious enough, OP is openly admitting that it's a troll account. Stop being so easily manipulated.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 02:16 PM
1

As though it wasn't obvious enough, OP is openly admitting that it's a troll account. Stop being so easily manipulated.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 02:16 PM
1

As though it wasn't obvious enough, OP is openly admitting that it's a troll account. Stop being so easily manipulated.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 02:16 PM
0

As though it wasn't obvious enough, OP is openly admitting that it's a troll account. Stop being so easily manipulated.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 02:16 PM
1

Them you're too easily manipulated, mate. OP has openly admitted that it's a troll account.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 02:13 PM
0

You have to be literally retarded to believe their propaganda. It's irrelevant that I fell for propaganda. 🤔
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 02:12 PM
1

You're gullible as fuck, my friend.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 02:10 PM
6

No question about it. Here's the /r/JournalistEW subreddit. Notice the creator and head mod based_lindsey is also mod of /r/NPCDaily. Why? Because Friends of Journalism @JournalistEW is a troll account run by the same group of people who run Friends of Feminism @FeministsASH, The Heroes of Transgenderism @TTransgenderism, Young Antifa @AntifaYoung and of course NPC Daily @npcdailysite. Now let's move on to some examples of painfully obvious bait and trolling, because a disappointing amount of pe…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 02:09 PM
3

Because it's a troll account. Here's the /r/JournalistEW subreddit. Notice the creator and head mod based_lindsey is also mod of /r/NPCDaily. Why? Because Friends of Journalism @JournalistEW is a troll account run by the same group of people who run Friends of Feminism @FeministsASH, The Heroes of Transgenderism @TTransgenderism, Young Antifa @AntifaYoung and of course NPC Daily @npcdailysite. Now let's move on to some examples of painfully obvious bait and trolling, because a disappointing amou…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 02:09 PM
1

Because it's a troll account. Here's the /r/JournalistEW subreddit. Notice the creator and head mod based_lindsey is also mod of /r/NPCDaily. Why? Because Friends of Journalism @JournalistEW is a troll account run by the same group of people who run Friends of Feminism @FeministsASH, The Heroes of Transgenderism @TTransgenderism, Young Antifa @AntifaYoung and of course NPC Daily @npcdailysite. Now let's move on to some examples of painfully obvious bait and trolling, because a disappointing amou…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 02:08 PM
1

Seems that Reddit is as gullible as ever. Here's the /r/JournalistEW subreddit. Notice the creator and head mod based_lindsey is also mod of /r/NPCDaily. Why? Because Friends of Journalism @JournalistEW is a troll account run by the same group of people who run Friends of Feminism @FeministsASH, The Heroes of Transgenderism @TTransgenderism, Young Antifa @AntifaYoung and of course NPC Daily @npcdailysite. Now let's move on to some examples of painfully obvious bait and trolling, because a disapp…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 02:08 PM
1

I'd like to see that law from the era Dembara is referring to. I'm sure it will be no issue for you.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 04:51 AM
3

Come now, put some effort into it! If you're gonna deny reality, you've gotta be more convincing than that.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 09:26 AM
2

If your actually going to go that far back in history, then you're entering a period at which even the common man often effectively owned his wife. I don't think OP intended their king picture to by anything more than allegorical. It would pretty clearly be a losing battle as far as even basic autonomy and self-determination are concerned.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 06:36 AM
8

Nah, it's just history you find inconvenient to your worldview. The good news is that if you start basing that worldview on history rather than expecting history to conform to your personal narrative, you won't need to be upset about learning these kinds of things anymore.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 06:29 AM
1

It means OP lied through their teeth, and as usual the sub bought it hook, line, and sinker.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 03:15 AM
1

Shit, it must suck to have written all this, only to find out that actually reading the study blows that delusional claim out of the water.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 03:14 AM
-32

Literally the only thing in this submission other than the giant bold numbers surrounded by pretty colours is a clear and explicit definition of what they define as sexual violence. And you still somehow managed to miss it.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 03:05 AM
1

Literally nobody so much as suggested any such thing. You know that perfectly well, so why would you embarrass yourself like that?
/r/MensRights01/04/20 07:47 PM
3

Just because he has been caught blatantly lying for money in the past doesn't mean he shouldn't be listened to when he says the kinds of things I want him to.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 08:04 AM
-2

Nobody; it's true regardless of whether or not they say it. The stadium and the teams are both private property. The streets are not. It's that simple. If you wanted to have a rally and had the attendants, you would not have been prevented from doing so at the time due to covid-19 either. Not to mention the fact that attending soccer games is by no means an exclusively or inherently male activity to begin with.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 08:02 AM
-1

It's not a matter of allowing it. The streets aren't private property, and the game wasn't canceled due to movement restrictions by the government. If either of those things weren't true, then you'd have an argument that the rules are being applied differently. But that's not the case, so you don't. There was nothing stopping all of those would-be attendees from holding a rally of their own if they wanted to, they just didn't, because political rallies and soccer games are entirely different thi…
/r/MensRights01/04/20 07:56 AM
-1

It's pussypassdenied, what were you expecting? How else are they going to feel powerful without badmouthing a literal fifteen year old from behind their keyboards for overreacting to being accidentally touched in a crowd and then owning up to it?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/20 03:01 AM
1

Exactly, voting in the United States is a privilege, not a right.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/20 10:51 PM
1

Given that the American transgender population has been just over twice as likely to serve than the general population since before Obama had even lifted the original ban, it seems that they're already pulling your weight for you, chap.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/20 11:08 AM
-5

Voting isn't a right in the United States, though.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/20 11:03 AM
0

Deliberately avoiding the question on a topic they themselves brought up. 🤔
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/20 11:02 AM
-1

Right, because when Conservatives call suicide victims cowards and preach that they'll burn in hell for it, they're doing it out of compassion.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/20 11:01 AM
2

Do you really think they'll be able to outpace American soldiers in that regard?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/20 10:57 AM
-1

This is /r/pussypassdenied, lol. There's nothing remotely surprising about it.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/20 10:56 AM
-1

Are you implying they weigh the scale down toward more male victims than female in the United States? Because if so, you'll find that the actual numbers don't support that theory.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/20 10:53 AM
0

That's absolutely true but they certainly didn't campaign to do anything about it, either. They've literally taken it to court on multiple occasions.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/20 10:50 AM
0

How does this have this many upvotes. Welcome to /r/MensRights, I hope you enjoy your stay.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 06:40 PM
-4

Because one was filled with people openly advocating for violence, while the other is white people making fun of white people.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/20 01:45 AM
1

You essentially made my point thanks for the help. Are you admitting to having deliberately lied about your math? A NVAW Survey found that 0.1 percent of men surveyed had been raped in the previous 12 months, compared to 0.3 percent of women. These findings equate to an estimated 302,091 women and 92,748 men who are forcibly raped each year in the United States Which is obviously before the 2013 legal redefintion of rape (without accounting for incarcerated rape) is much closer than feminists wo…
/r/MensRights17/02/20 10:10 AM
1

140K males in 1996 vs 67K345 females in 2012 (FBI) First of all, that comparison doesn't work, because the 140,000 doesn't refer to an annual figure. That's what's called a lifetime figure (though in this case it technically only applies to their time incarcerated, "lifetime" is more of a technical in this context, so it's still used in statistics), so it can't accurately be compared to an annual figure. It doesn't refer to 140,000 inmates being raped every year, it refers to 140,000 inmates hav…
/r/MensRights15/02/20 06:29 PM
1

TwoXC was a sub built on the intended premise of male exclusion and alienation. It quickly picked up in popularity specifically because the idea of gender segregation, male exclusion With all due respect, their sidebar and the link it provides on the matter seems to quite explicitly state otherwise: Respect: No hatred, bigotry, assholery, misogyny, misandry, transphobia, homophobia, racism or otherwise disrespectful commentary. Please follow reddiquette. Grace: No tactless posts generalizing gen…
/r/MensRights02/02/20 12:18 AM
1

Sure they would, because that's what the math says. Like, use your head. The number of men willing to engage in homosexual intercourse is so incredibly small in comparison to the inverse that you can't rationally expect there to be as many -let alone more- rapists within the first population than the second. This isn't even a matter of politics or ideology, it's just common sense.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 12:14 AM
0

Lol, you're a joke. Here's a guy serving a 37 year minimum for a single murder, for example. A city, what a load of garbage.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 12:07 AM
1

The 30-year minimum lifetime sentence is considered to be the starting point for sentencing multiple murders. Harry Roberts, for example, received a 30-year minimum after murdering three police officers. Bluntly put, there is absolutely no chance of a single rape charge landing a 30-year minimum sentence. NerdGuyLol is just blowing smoke to try and feel oppressed without even bothering to put fourth the effort to learn where the actual problems are.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 12:05 AM
0

Isn't it more cruel to keep him in a cage for the rest of his life because of the danger he poses? Who gives a shit if it is? The point of abolishing the death penalty is to protect innocents from being executed, which is an inevitable and unavoidable outcome of permitting sentences of execution. Hasn't even been a decade since it last happened in the US, for example.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 11:55 PM
1

Eh, I can't really be arsed to do all that, given that would prevent the links from working and all. I just went ahead and removed the section entirely.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 03:02 AM
0

What are you trying to demonstrate here? The fallaciousness of their reasoning? They're saying that problem is the substance of the overlap between 2X and FDS (misandry), not the overlap itself. Bigotry is the problem, not redundancy. I think you're misinterpreting what I intended to convey. When I said MensRights and Egalitarianism, I was giving two examples comparable to TwoX, not holding either one up as the FDS or GC counterpart. With all due respect, I think we all know perfectly well that …
/r/MensRights01/02/20 01:13 AM
2

The feminist Global Gender Gap Index (by the World Economic Forum, the Davos guys) ranks Nicaragua 5th while the Basic Indicator of Gender Inequality ranks it 95th. Women doing naturally better. So, Nicaragua is a feminist wonderland even more than Finland. The Basic Indicator of Gender Inequality also seems to rank Saudi Arabia at 3rd, and claims that women there are better off than men. 🤔 Common Questions about BIGI: Why is income not included in the BIGI? After all, the total income of all wo…
/r/MensRights01/02/20 01:10 AM
15

Then what's he being jailed for life over?
/r/MensRights01/02/20 12:21 AM
0

the breakdown of marriage is why we have so many kids questioning their gender in the first place Twin studies say otherwise, but I'm sure your social science is every bit as rigorous as actual biology.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 12:20 AM
3

Lol, you're citing Mark Regnerus' widely debunked New Family Structures Study. In 2014, the Dean of the College of Liberal Arts at the University of Texas-Austin, Randy Diehl asked University of Texas sociologist and associate dean Marc Musick to review the controversy around the NFSS article as part of Regnerus' seventh-year post-tenure evaluation. Musick summarized many of the prior criticisms, then stated that the survey itself was designed to ensure the conflation of family structure and the…
/r/MensRights01/02/20 12:18 AM
-1

By that reasoning, you could say the exact same thing about /r/MensRights and /r/Egalitarianism, no? Where's the difference between what they post and what you post?
/r/MensRights31/01/20 09:43 PM
2

Sure, mainstream visibility is what has served as the catalyst on virtually every other occasion, but that doesn't align with the desired narrative, so you're expected to disregard it.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 09:34 PM
2

That's not what the word explicitly means. Implicitly is the term you're looking for.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 09:31 PM
1

If they're not equivalent products, then you weren't pointing out any flaw. Without a valid equivalence, your argument holds no water.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/19 09:05 AM
1

The point is that your rebuttal is laughable, and that the equivalent products you specified aren't even remotely close in importance? Yeah, no. You're backpedaling to try and save face now that you've realized how unbelievably foolish it is to compare the "embarrassment" of not having beard oil to being covered in menstrual blood.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/19 07:30 AM
1

Once the government puts a price tag on something That's not how socialized healthcare works anywhere else in the developed world, so exactly what point are you trying to make?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/19 04:29 AM
-7

The upvote count suggests otherwise.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/19 12:42 AM
75

What kinda neckbeard sub do you take this for? The one that it is at this point, as evidenced by all the upvotes the submission has garnered.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/19 12:40 AM
1

I want everyone here to take a moment and imagine what it would be like to unironically compare blood and chunks of tissue running down your legs and soaking through your clothes to an unoiled beard, and not realizing how much of a joke you are.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/19 12:39 AM
1

Now once again no one is shaming anyone for bleeding. What planet do you live on?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/19 12:34 AM
34

just Yeah, about that...
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/19 12:30 AM
3

Overrated how? He’s one of the most famous I mean...
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/19 02:18 AM
3

Big words for such low T.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/19 02:17 AM
1

It doesn't matter, though. Ice is going to get what he paid for.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/19 02:15 AM
1

The data collected for the study indicate significant gender disparities in the situation of children deprived of liberty. Altogether, there are far more boys deprived of liberty worldwide than girls. Throughout the source it quite blatantly and repeatedly states that the majority of children deprived of liberty worldwide are boys. It did, indeed. Though I would point out that "altogether" in this context is still referring to the boundaries of the study, which excludes some of the major situati…
/r/MensRights25/11/19 06:49 PM
2

Nothing stopping you from wandering into the woods and living off the land right now as it is. And hell, if you can't manage that, then you'll be dead if you ever got your wish, anyway.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 06:58 AM
0

I'm betting on you never actually reading what they publish either way.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 06:56 AM
7

In the administration of justice and in the contexts of armed conflicts and national security, 94 per cent of all detained children are boys. That's almost specifically who the study counts.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 06:55 AM
1

Both of those things are true, but also entirely irrelevant to the given figure. What the source actually says is: In the administration of justice and in the contexts of armed conflicts and national security, 94 per cent of all detained children are boys. Men may be better suited toward hard physical labour than women, but not nearly to the point of a 94%-6% split. A strong plurality of industrial labour related slavery takes place in clothing and small goods manufacturing, anyway. Armed confli…
/r/MensRights24/11/19 06:52 AM
2

It is a good source, but that doesn't do much good when not even the OP takes the time to actually read what it says: In the administration of justice and in the contexts of armed conflicts and national security, 94 per cent of all detained children are boys.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 06:40 AM
-2

Ehh, not really. In the case of the former there's literally no reason to do it, but in the case of the latter there's a reason which you don't feel is good enough. Now that's a perfectly valid opinion to have and all, but it doesn't change the fact that there is indeed a disparate factor involved and isn't simply a matter of societal hatred toward males.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 06:37 AM
1

Chattel slavery in Africa through to debt slavery In the administration of justice and in the contexts of armed conflicts and national security, 94 per cent of all detained children are boys. Your source explicitly says that's not what the 94% figure refers to at all. It refers people in jail for reasons pertaining to armed conflict and national security, such as prisoners of war. That's why it's so overwhelmingly male; they're the ones most likely to engage in such conflicts, or be suspected of…
/r/MensRights24/11/19 06:32 AM
5

Is this the comment where people who actually read the submission are supposed to bring things to the attention of the rest of Reddit? I'll give it a shot, then: In the administration of justice and in the contexts of armed conflicts and national security, 94 per cent of all detained children are boys. I'll tell you what, there's going to be quite a few people here left embarrassed later on when they go and claim that 94% refers to the whole, then gets disproven by someone who bothered to look i…
/r/MensRights24/11/19 06:28 AM
1

I can tell you right now that you have to be aroused in order to engage in something like that. Otherwise the vagina will tear. It's an organ that's made to expand far enough to allow the passage of an infant's head, but that doesn't mean it can be stretched to anywhere near that degree out of the blue. Without the right hormones and signals, the skin will rip apart.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 04:18 PM
2

I'm glad we've got people dedicated enough to put themselves through medical school and get a real evidence-based understanding of the issues before telling us who we should be lynching.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 06:49 AM
2

I can pretty much guarantee you that it's not actually hormone therapy, but rather hormone suppression. Allowing the choice to be made at a later date is essentally the entire point. And, well, at the end of the day it's got the statistics backing it as yielding the best outcome rates for persisters and desisters as a whole. That's just the math, you know?
/r/MensRights29/10/19 06:45 AM
0

"I already said X" isn't a defense when X is a blatant refutation of the reasoning you're still holding on to. Would you accept someone insisting that all the complaints about modern school systems in this subreddit are bullshit, on the basis that they attended such a school and did just fine so the problem must be others failing to take responsibility? Would you accept someone insisting that all the complaints about the family court system in this subreddit are bullshit, on the basis that they …
/r/MensRights28/10/19 01:40 AM
0

Your comments simply parrot the mendacious misandry of the original material I'm sorry, I'm a misandrist because I suggested you actually read the studies that contain the answers to your questions? Well then, allow me to apologize for my grievous microaggressions toward you, oh eternally offended one. Next time I'll be sure to provide you with the blind validation you so clearly deserve. the accused was indeed known. According to the administration, not according what was actually written. The …
/r/MensRights26/10/19 10:48 PM
0

You know, almost every single question you just asked could be adequately answered by actually taking the time to read the multitude of "studies" that apparently you've already deemed invalid without having bothered do. All you're doing with this post is seeking out emotional validation from people who are likely to agree with you. What you should be doing is showing where you believe the employed methodologies to be flawed, and asking for feedback on that. Distinct but for some reason under the…
/r/MensRights26/10/19 06:23 PM
-1

Guess what? Im not a fuckin criminal. Neither are the majority of people in both cases. Dropping out of elementary school before the probability unit was taught is a personal choice, too.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 01:49 AM
4

I said nothing remotely pertaining to any of that. Have you ever wondered why your worldview requires you to resort to this sort of dishonesty so readily?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/19 10:55 PM
6

You genuinely need to understand that you are not a licensed and registered pop psychologist. That's okay. I didn't issue you a formal diagnosis, I recognized your inability to comprehend an objective reality placed before you to be a clear indicator of mental illness and recommended you consult a professional. Not surprised to see that you have a go-to defense for this, though. If you believe the British government does not arrest people for Tweets while covering up information they consider "r…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/19 10:45 PM
5

Are you implying that every major medical organization in the developed world might know more about the issue than some fuckwit with no medical education beyond high school?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/19 10:37 PM
-1

Because the nature of this subreddit attracts a certain demographic of people.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/19 10:34 PM
2

Not knowing that the patient's symptoms have been deliberately induced isn't a crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/19 10:31 PM
3

It must be tough, being rejected by your own society, and knowing that they'll win no matter how hard you bitch on the internet.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/19 10:27 PM
4

A tyrannical government can perpetuate/allow lawless anarchy Anarchy refers to the state of a society being without authorities or a governing body Nope. They literally can not. Words have definitions, why do you refuse to acknowledge this?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/19 10:26 PM
5

The British government covered it up. That's the anarchy. Anarchy refers to the state of a society being without authorities or a governing body You genuinely need to consider seeking out professional medical assistance if you believe the things you're saying right now, as you appear to be suffering from delusional beliefs in the purely clinical sense of the term.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/19 10:25 PM
2

The person I replied stated that we can find plenty of men and women who have done the exact same crime. Yeah, it's not hard when you're not deliberately screwing up the google search. Here are three: [1], [2], [3] I say that 100s of men and woman have not killed, burned, then buried their newborn. No shit?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/19 08:45 PM
1

And suddenly his comment score drops into the negatives... 🤔
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/19 08:03 PM
1

Only women listed in the first couple of pages. That's because you copied the headline word for word, you dip. Excluding the one from 1999, every single result on the first page is about the same person, and the second page does return a result for a man. Why are you resorting to dishonesty like this? Like, fuck, you don't even need to. Postpartum depression and psychosis virtually guarantee that women would still have the majority had you used an honest method.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/19 07:58 PM
-19

Sounds like you don't know what sub you're in, lad.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 01:35 AM
-1

Please, you know damn well that other men are the loudest advocates for it. Even got a few in the comments, here.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/19 02:30 AM
1

I don't know how things work wherever you live, but over here in North America grade school refers to kindergarten through 8th grade. Not high school, like you said.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/19 07:58 PM
0

I'm pretty sure that 14 is still grade 8, mate. It even says that she's a middle school teacher.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/19 10:00 AM
1

RTFA
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/19 06:21 AM
2

RTFA
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/19 06:21 AM
1

Because it was her husband who walked in on them while she was attempting to coerce the child into sex, prevented that from happening, and presumably reported her. Just read the article next time.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/19 06:20 AM
2

Wasn't raped. What does that comment say? Does it say that it's not coercion?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/19 06:17 AM
0

Literally all it takes is a google search for "male teacher rape" over the last few months to see that's not anywhere near true.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/19 06:16 AM
3

Admitting that you fucked up doesn't change the fact that you fucked up. Maybe if you weren't such an asshole while fucking up, they would have been nicer to you in turn.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/19 06:14 AM
1

Probably because the vast majority of grade school teachers are female.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/19 06:12 AM
2

They're the ones who have access to children on a regular basis as a component of their job, so they're the ones most likely to have their job mentioned if they commit sex crimes against children. Same goes for doctors, priests, police officers, etc. Think about it, when was the last time you heard it specified that the accused or convicted individual was an investment banker, or a mechanical engineer?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/19 06:09 AM
1

it's free sex Could you quote for me where the article says sex of any kind occurred?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/19 06:05 AM
5

No, they don't. If you'll read the article, it's quite clear that no intercourse of any kind occurred. The closest thing to actual contact involving genitalia was her touching him over his clothes, also known as groping. She unambiguously committed a number of sex crimes, but none of them would qualify as rape anywhere in the United States.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/19 06:04 AM
1

Nobody actually knows, but just think of all the things we can imagine!
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/19 03:55 AM
-2

MGTOW has been like that since before the first /r/incel subreddit was created and banned.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/19 06:46 AM
4

It's /r/MGTOW and /r/TheRedPill rhetoric, so I doubt they particularly care. You know, unless the same thing it done to guys.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/19 06:42 AM
2

and is a legitimate use of deadly force in self defence/ defence of others. So is shooting someone who's pulled a gun on someone exclaiming that they're after their baby. If you think for a moment that the rib kicker wouldn't have taken that shot had both of them been armed, then you're fooling yourself. And he would have done so with the full protection of the law, at that, because he'd be under a genuine and reasonable belief that they were preventing deadly and unlawful harm from coming to an…
/r/MensRights11/01/19 12:21 AM
-2

What does it say about or legal system if the first response of the law is to scrutinize the harmed party more than the party doing the harm? Exactly what alternative do you propose when the culprit isn't in custody? You can't ask questions to someone who isn't there, and it's obviously in both the public interest and the parent's interest for officers to try and ascertain the culprit's likely intent. You even pointed out exactly the reason why yourself: I'd at least think that the police should…
/r/MensRights11/01/19 12:03 AM
2

I'm pretty sure that both adoption and abortion are easier than covering up a homicide, never mind dealing with the consequences once you're found out.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/18 07:50 PM
4

Not a whole lot of other reasons why otherwise sound individuals up and commit infanticide, TBH.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/18 09:37 AM
1

That's literally the exact opposite of the reality of the situation.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/18 09:29 AM
0

I never understand why people do things like this. Postpartum depression and/or postpartum psychosis ultimately serve as the cause in the overwhelming majority of cases like these. You're absolutely right, there are no shortage of easily available alternatives, but this sort of infanticide does not typically come from a place of rational thinking. As for abortion, it's important to understand that prior to the point at which chemical imbalances begin to affect their judgement and perceptions, su…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/18 09:21 AM
2

I don't think that's the kind of context the notion of patriarchal-anything is generally brought up in to begin with, though. I mean, short of delving into a full on anthropological analysis of the phenomena. I'm sure there's probably an argument to be made that those sorts of expectations likely stem from the days in which young and grown men in general were tasked with things like defending their village, and other sorts of physical conflict centric matters.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 06:39 AM
0

...Are you sure you replied to the right comment?
/r/MensRights31/10/18 12:53 AM
1

Oh, I have no doubt that you see regular exposure to mental illness. I mean, just look at the hours of effort your expended coming up with excuse upon excuse to not answer the question. Any rational person would simply share the answer and be on their way.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 10:18 PM
3

I was chased, tackled, and kissed by a girl in 1st grade. True. But women aren't being demonized, so who cares? Literally anyone who has a problem with being chased, tackled, and kissed when they don't want to be? Why are you conflating normal sexual attraction with assault? We are talking about attraction and sexual desire. Not sure why you and others insist on conflating that with assault...oh wait, yes I am: you're either not very bright or a brainwashed ideologue. Are you serious? I'm a brai…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 10:15 PM
1

Literally anyone who has a problem with being chased, tackled, and kissed when they don't want to be?
/r/MensRights30/10/18 09:06 PM
0

Why don't you just address their argument instead of playing dumb? You're smart enough to know that if your statement holds true for this situation, then it holds true that situation. Why keep wasting time bickering when you could just shut them down with your counterpoint?
/r/MensRights30/10/18 09:02 PM
0

As obviously absurd as it is, I'd have a lot more faith in the sanity of the subreddit's user base as a whole, were they not circle-jerking themselves raw over SJWs, feminists, and the LGBT for some reason, all in response to an obscure 2015 news article that doesn't actually involve any of those groups, but rather centers around the alleged statements of a principle.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:49 PM
2

Like what, you insufferable whiner? Only whining I see in this chain is coming from you, mate. You decided to put your ideas out there, and now you're throwing a fit in response to them being challenged, dedicating a comment just as large as your initial one to nothing more than belittling them and making excuses for why you can't/won't address their entirely respectful and reasonable response.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:45 PM
21

Are there any updated stories to how this panned out? No, but that's hardly unexpected when all that was actually reported on were the claims made by one of the parties involved in the dispute to the media. Most situations like that have no followup.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:34 PM
6

Who's complaining? Every article published on this is one of outrage, and they're all from 2015.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:28 PM
8

Where? This all happened back in 2015, you'd figure they'd have said something by now if they actually gave a damn.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:22 PM
-3

because male genital mutilation is far worse than female genital mutilation if you weighed all the male pounds of flesh next to female pounds. and then compare nerve endings lost. Gotta say, that's a pretty foolish metric, mate. By that reasoning, you could just as easily claim that circumcision is worse than complete emasculation. After all, more pounds of flesh have been lost to circumcision than to the complete removal of the penis and testicles, and therefore more nerve endings have been los…
/r/MensRights25/10/18 08:20 PM
2

Why are you under the impression that I want to know more about her? I don't care about her like you do.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/18 09:40 AM
1

Theirs? For acting like NPCs?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/18 09:28 AM
-2

Maybe they're trying to bait someone into pointing out it's projection, so that he can say the same thing again? #4dchess
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/18 07:20 AM
1

DON'T DO IT, UTOPISTA114! YOU HAVE SO MUCH TO LIVE FOR, JUST THINK ABOUT YOUR KARMA!
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/18 07:19 AM
4

You seem to have forgotten about the part where you explain how it's an example of a pussy pass being denied, my friend.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/18 07:17 AM
5

Which is kinda strange, seeing as how the total sum of my knowledge about this woman comes from the same three or four lines they've been repeating about her for the past three or so years at this point.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/18 07:15 AM
0

Could you quote exactly where the OP in the submission said anything even remotely pertaining to staring? The image specifically references staring... Don't know that I can make that bit any clearer than it already is. Why are you pretending to be illiterate?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/18 10:53 PM
0

That preaching double standards makes all third wave feminists look like jokes. Could you quote exactly where the OP in the submission said anything even remotely pertaining to staring? Or feminism, for that matter?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/18 08:12 PM
0

I'm sorry, that question isn't allowed. It disrupts the fragile narrative.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/18 07:59 PM
0

Lol, no. Low quality shit is just low quality shit, it's got nothing to do with gatekeeping.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/18 07:56 PM
-43

Guy wears boxers....feminists: SEX OFFENDER!!! Alrighty, so it's just about feeling like a victim. Thanks for clearing that up. Like, beyond all shadow of a doubt, lol.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/18 09:44 AM
1

Ooooh shit! I'm adding this comment to /r/moderatorpassfail!
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/18 09:36 AM
-45

Who the fuck is this woman that speaks for so many? And when did wearing nothing but boxers and a shirt become a thing that people do? Or is this just about feeling like a victim, regardless of the actual circumstances?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/18 09:32 AM
1

I don't know why I believe what I believe, you'd have to ask someone smarter. If that's the case, then you shouldn't have opened your mouth to begin with.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/18 02:38 AM
1

Yeah, I know you've got no counter argument. If one existed, reality wouldn't reflect what I said. A fact which obviously pisses you off, but remains a fact nonetheless.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/18 02:32 AM
1

Your right shall not be infringed also means MY right shall not be infringed. You have no right to have your speech hosted by private entities like Reddit. That's why your communities are being banned, dipshit. Have you not caught on to that yet? It's the reason why you're losing, and will continue to lose. If you are using your right to try to take away my right, you have forfeited that right. Wrong. I can talk about how you should lose your rights all day, and never lose my right to free speec…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/18 02:16 AM
1

If you insist, Mentalacrobat.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 09:49 PM
0

Freedom doesn't give you the freedom to take away others freedoms. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED Get out of here, disgusting fascist hypocrite. You couldn't even go a single comment before breaking your facade.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 09:46 PM
2

Sorry Mustaka, but you're actually a secret admin and Insomnia is on to your shenanigans.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 09:39 PM
2

Lol, you believe the creator of /r/pussypassdenied is actually an undercover administrator?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 09:37 PM
1

That's demonstrably false. Then demonstrate it. Acknowledge a private entity's right to choose whatever speech they'd like to issue or host, free of any legal coercion, beyond the obvious matters of speech not protected by the first amendment or commercially owned by somebody else. I would be every bit as up in arms if left leaning subs and accounts were being silenced. Alrighty then, feel free to start with the banout2018 sub. https://i.imgur.com/nanFnno.png
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 09:34 PM
-2

Then why are anti-white racist subs still active? That has absolutely nothing to do with the comment he just posted, and because Mustaka isn't an admin, ya bloody dip.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 09:15 PM
-1

but they had insider power to ban and silence people who didn't support the narrative they're pushing They didn't, though. Have you not seen the edit they've made to the sub, about how the admins made them stop claiming they had anything to do with the bannings? I suppose you must have, seeing as how you seem to have moved on to claiming that the reasons they were banned were actually false flags. I'm am totally in support of free speech. Then why are you claiming that a private corporation does…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 09:11 PM
-2

And what a huge loss that would be after those subs themselves are banned, just like /r/milliondollarsupreme, /r/billionshekelsupreme, /r/chadright, /r/sjwhate, /r/greatawakening, and /r/NiggersRebooted were, because you failed to defend them based on their content. You know I'm right, it shows in your 11 day account age, and that's why it hurts your delicate feelings so much.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 08:34 PM
1

Make sure to use "I'm just using this as a super downvote" or "Violates the White Knight Code Of Honor" as your report reason.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 08:33 PM
1

I'm gonna exercise my free will and call you a cunt.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 08:21 PM
-21

You should know by now that nothing comes for free, mate.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 03:27 PM
-23

By all means, you're Free to decide that you're okay with censorship so long as you don't like what's being said, but that just means they're going to beat you when they do the same thing. Because like it or not, the fact of the matter is that they're bigger and stronger than you are. The moment you drop the pretense of defending free speech and actually have to defend subs like /r/BillionShekelSupreme based on their content, you've lost.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 02:51 PM
-11

Are you seriously implying that everything right of center is racist? My dude, the entire point of his comment was an attempt to oppose the association between the racist subs and everything that is right of center.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 01:23 PM
-38

Then you need to get your hearing checked. All they ever used was their own speech, with no force behind it at any point. You can't be both for free speech and in favor of restricting the speech of anyone who calls for your speech to be restricted. Yes, even if it makes you mad.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 01:20 PM
0

Your words mean nothing after watching you openly claim that you wouldn't contribute to your own children's well being unless you got to live with them. If companionship without responsibility is what you're after, then go hire a prostitute to play board games or throw a baseball around with. But if you're going to have children, then you have a responsibility to care for and provide for them to the best of your ability, even if you don't like their mother. Thankfully you don't actually have any…
/r/MensRights16/08/18 08:12 PM
-2

If someone kidnaps your children do you agree to keep paying them money for children you never get back? What the fuck kind of question is that? With that kind of "If I don't get to see them, then they may as well be dead to me" reasoning, I'd be pretty hesitant to grant you custody myself.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 09:27 PM
-12

Why then would he not have custody of one of his sons as well? Are you trying to say that she is 3x the parent he is. No, I'm pretty sure they were trying to say that we know next to nothing about the actual facts surrounding this case, as demonstrated by the need to ask that perfectly valid question in the first place. Most likely answer is that the daughter is either legally an adult, or came from another relationship. Because I'll tell you right now that the court isn't going to recognize the…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 09:20 PM
-18

I'll bet one of my kidneys right now that you couldn't even manage to read the article.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 10:03 PM
4

I'm not joking when I say this, but I fear intimacy with women I casually date and/or end up sleeping with. Then you should stop?
/r/MensRights04/07/18 10:02 PM
2

Yeah, fuck self-defense.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 10:01 PM
2

What if I told you that Chad and Tyrone are men, and likely the target of their comment?
/r/MGTOW12/06/18 12:31 AM
1

This is one of those data points that really makes me look at some conspiracy theories with a bit more credibility. Of all the data points to prompt such a reaction, it really shouldn't be this one. The claim being made by submission requires one to interpenetrate data on pet ownership as though every pet owned in the United States belongs to a different person, which is quite obviously not the case. It's like claiming that every single man, woman, and child in the United States owns a gun, beca…
/r/MGTOW12/06/18 12:28 AM
1

Where did I say that? Right here? The problem with a lot of safety shit is it's designed to prevent a complete moron from killing themselves. I mean, what other meaning did you intend to convey by that, given the context of the discussion centering around workplace fatalities and all? If that's not what you meant, I'll certainly take your word for it. But surely you can see where I was coming from.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 08:04 PM
1

By all means, feel free to explain to the sub that work related injuries and fatalities only happen to morons. I'm sure you'll be well received.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 06:34 AM
0

Right, because working a hard physically demanding job means it's your own fault you died. Nah, failing to wear your safety equipment, failing to seek medical attention for injuries that aren't immediately threatening, failing to ask for help on jobs that you can struggle through on your own, toughing it out when you're sick or tired and in no condition to be operating heavy machinery, and other such bullshit means its your own fault you died, or ended up killing one of your coworkers who was de…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:34 AM
1

Yeah, prostate cancer is totally an occupational hazard.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:09 AM
1

a stupid person who drives abnormally slow in front of you and randomly changes lanes in front of you If they're driving slowly in front of me, then I can't possibly hit them as a result of them shifting over to another lane unless I both follow them and decide to speed up for some reason. Don't drive faster than someone in front of you without adequate breaking distance, or else you will hit them. No matter how much skill you think you possess, the laws of physics aren't going to give a damn. I…
/r/MensRights03/05/18 05:42 AM
6

the men who rear end them because they drive faster because they have better driving skills That's not how skill works.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 09:16 AM
13

As far as prison goes, it ultimately comes down to your medical history. An MtF who has been hormone replacement therapy long enough that they've been rendered sterile and had their muscle mass decrease can be placed in a woman's prison provided that their history and the nature of their crime doesn't present any red flags. Similarly, an FtM who's been on hormone replacement therapy long enough that they've been rendered infertile and have had their muscle mass has increase would usually be elig…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 09:10 AM
1

Then why don't you do just that and stop whining about how oppressed you are?
/r/MGTOW08/03/18 10:21 AM
-1

Experts are called in to consult and provide their expertise to the court That's very clearly not what this discussion has been about. The whole thing is about whether charges are even going to be issued, the court hasn't even entered the equation yet. These are 'experts' you can't challenge No different from any other police investigation. So long as their actions adhere to the law, you don't get to challenge them, either. you cannot counter with your own experts, Of course you can't, there's n…
/r/MensRights09/12/17 07:34 AM
0

What protected class is it discriminating against? And is every reopened case also an instance of discrimination in your mind?
/r/MensRights09/12/17 07:11 AM
1

Maybe she'll marry their king and we can start an empire again.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 06:11 AM
1

It took a good hour of you following me to every comment I made in the submission, but it sounds like you finally got the gist of the article!
/r/MensRights09/12/17 06:08 AM
6

Wow, that was hard.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 06:03 AM
-1

And in Saudi Arabia they jail women for being raped. But thankfully the legal systems of nations on the other side of the planet have absolutely no bearing on our own. Have a good night, mate. I don't have time to waste on your unrelated distractions.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:56 AM
2

Under the model, experts from outside agencies are given access to police case files to determine if there were any missteps in the investigative process, and to alert investigators to any worrying trends. In Ottawa, it will be implemented in the fall of 2017 and could potentially involve hundreds of cases, CBC News has learned. One way would be to always recommend the police bring charges. Which would result in absolutely nothing. They get to recommend that the police peruse certain routes of i…
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:39 AM
4

That's okay, male is still a sex, and sex is still a protected class.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:24 AM
-5

Only the police can press the charges, but you're free to think they'd do that without evidence -even though they already refused to once- if you want.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:23 AM
2

By all means, go for it.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:23 AM
1

That can't be true, because we literally don't even have dedicated rape laws. They all fall under the definition of sexual assault, which does not have a gendered definition. Unless you're referring to the fact that "He" is used as the default singular pronoun throughout the entire Criminal Code, which is true. But if that was actually considered to exempt women from applicability of the law, then they'd also similarly excluded from the protections specified within it, such as the presumption of…
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:15 AM
-1

Do these women's shelter organisations then conduct investigations too? No, of course not. Here's the article.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:01 AM
0

That's not true, though. Panels of experts are assembled to review cases all the time, particularly regarding matters of forensics, medical science, even intercommunal relations. Hell, wasn't one just recently assembled in regards to those killings of Native women?
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:00 AM
0

The very first time x shelter decides that charges are warranted where the police have decided they are not, there should be a lawsuit Wouldn't they have to, you know, do something first? They don't have the power to make arrests, or anything ridiculous like that.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 04:41 AM
-2

Well, since these people are civilians with absolutely no expertise They do have a measure of relevant expertise, though; the careers they've built working with victims of such abuse. That's why they're explicitly referred to as "an outside panel of experts who work with survivors of sexual and domestic violence." just because, you know, for political correctness? How about because more thorough and effective police investigation is a fantastic way to help differentiate between premeditated fals…
/r/MensRights09/12/17 04:39 AM
0

They control their own findings of their "investigations", and I suspect will almost always find a man guilty no matter what. Whoa, whoa, whoa. Just to make sure we're all on the same page here, you realize that they don't actually get to conduct an investigation investigation, right? Like, they don't get to find anyone guilty or innocent of anything. They're not being deputized or anything, they're still just private citizens without any sort of legal authority beyond that. Here's the article i…
/r/MensRights09/12/17 04:16 AM
2

Ehh, it might. At least, it probably wouldn't be disqualified on the specific grounds that you're referring to. Remember, the additional scrutiny you mentioned doesn't come from any portion of the government. If someone were to be subjected to any, it would be coming from private citizens just like them, who would still be required to adhere to the same laws that everyone else does regarding privacy, trespassing, stalking, and the like. If this program were to run into any trouble regarding cons…
/r/MensRights09/12/17 03:56 AM
6

Well, not transgenders. They're who adding "gender identity or expression" to the existing list of "sex, sexual orientation, race, marital status, creed, age, colour, disability, political or religious belief" is intended to cover. So now they're covered under the Canadian Human Rights Act, but prior to Bill C-16 they weren't. Unless their rights were violated on the basis of some other aspect of their identity which was already on the list, of course.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 03:48 AM
5

sex, sexual orientation, race, marital status, gender identity or expression, creed, age, colour, disability, political or religious belief Those are our protected classes, and I'm pretty sure that male is a sex, my friend.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 03:43 AM
6

If I am in possession of a 10/22 Long Rifle calibre magazine, how do I comply with the law? A 10/22 platform magazine permanently altered, or "pinned", so that it cannot hold more than 10 cartridges, is no longer considered to be prohibited. Subsections 3(4) and 3(5) of Part 4 of the Regulations as outlined below describe the acceptable methods of altering or re-manufacturing a cartridge magazine so that it cannot hold more than the legal limit. 3(4) A cartridge magazine described in subsection …
/r/MensRights09/12/17 03:40 AM
3

Most countries actually have a special subset of laws for dealing neonaticide/infanticide committed by recent mothers. Like, it's not even a recent development or anything, even Rome and the Catholic Church had special rules for such situations. The possibility of postpartum depression, psychosis, or delirium is just part of our human biology. And I guess even back then they eventually figured out that who suffers from it didn't have anything to do with how good or bad a person they were.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 03:19 AM
1

Which cancers receive less funding than prostate cancer. Uh, well, most of them, actually. Like, the overwhelmingly vast majority. [1], [2]. Generally speaking, prostate cancer research funding tends to be just shy of on par with that of lung cancer, these days. Which is a pretty big deal, considering that even though prostate cancer is the most common type in men, lung cancer still accounts for three times as many deaths in men alone. That said, there's another major deciding factor other than …
/r/MensRights06/12/17 08:54 PM
1

The real problem here is that prostate and breast cancer are both overfunded. Breast and prostate cancer are the two most frequently occurring cancers in humans by a very wide margin, mate. The only ones that comes even close would be lung cancer, and colon cancer after that, but those are also both extremely well funded. Pancreatic cancer is certainly much more likely to be terminal than breast or prostate, that is true, but it also occurs at only a fraction of the rate. We need to put our brea…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 08:47 PM
1

To be fair, breast cancer takes more "life expectancy". Actually it's simply more lethal altogether. I was skeptical about the poster's claim due to some of the figures I recall seeing during my father's recent bout with prostate cancer (Gleason score of 4+5, so we're lucky we detected it so early) and breast cancer's status as the most frequently occurring type of cancer there is, so I did a bit of digging, and found the poster to be rather misleading. Long story short, this was a poster by the…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 08:23 PM
1

I assume the vandal thought that the message was "Prostate cancer is more important than breast cancer because there are more incidences of it". Which is 1, not what it means and 2, not guilting women into doing something (what she thinks they are trying to make women do is anyone's guess). I'd also like to add a 3, which is that it's not actually a true statement. There are more deaths due to prostate cancer than there are due to any other cancer in men, primarily due to its high rate of occurr…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 07:24 PM
-2

That might be a wee bit of a substantial exaggeration, mate. It's not even a matter of this whole 'war of the sexes' issue, it's untrue primarily due to unrelated sociopolitical and economic matters. For example, though I couldn't tell you much regarding how these rates are distributed by race inside the United States, I can tell you that America's maternal mortality rate is pretty damn high for a nation spending more on healthcare than anyone else on the planet. As of 2015 the US was batting 14…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:54 PM
2

They haven't said anything like that in nearly a decade, though.
/r/MGTOW08/11/17 04:03 AM
54

Question? Legal Rape? What is that? Exactly the same as the physical action of rape, but committed in the absence of laws prohibiting rape. I suppose I'm against forcing someone to do anything unless absolutely necessary, and sometimes it is. Wouldn't making a private organization host something that they don't want to -even if the reasons they don't want to are flawed, stupid, biased, and frivolous- fall under that, though?
/r/MGTOW08/11/17 03:58 AM
61

He said, on the week old account he cared enough to create for the umpteenth time.
/r/MGTOW08/11/17 03:53 AM
16

Voat has enough trouble staying online as it is. Hell, the Reddit admins probably could shut them down just by banning a few more /r/incels equivalents to trigger a migration.
/r/MGTOW08/11/17 03:52 AM
6

“I was wrong there, though,” he told The Guardian. “Sexism against men is not something I should have really said. I think what I meant was, being objectified. At that time, I did feel objectified, and now I’ve learned how to control that and just shutting it down.” “Look, I do think men can get objectified. I do feel I have been objectified in the past, sexually as well, in pieces that have been written about me.” I’ve seen a couple, I say, thinking of one article that highlighted the bulge und…
/r/MensRights03/11/17 03:58 PM
1

Oh, I've no doubt about that, lad.
/r/MGTOW17/10/17 03:18 PM
5

Occam's razor dictates that the man's metal health problems are to blame. We know as a matter of objective fact that he had them, we know that she literally went out of her way to ensure he had transportation to his appointments, and we know that he also cut his own son from a previous relationship of his out of the will in the text message before killing himself. The golddigging whore hypothesis fails to explain why a golddigger would be ferrying an apparently suicidal man to his mental healthc…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/17 10:53 PM
4

thought she could hound a man into committing suicide "It should be said, notwithstanding that the applicant had moved out, she still made arrangements to take the deceased to his mental health appointments and that they spent the weekend prior to his death together, cleaning garden clippings and boxing books for Lifeline," the judge said. Way to validate kehlan_reddits' accusations, mate. Christ, how am I supposed to tell them off for being an aggressive asshole about it when you're literally i…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/17 10:45 PM
1

The man gave his bank details before signing off "my will" with a smiley face. The man's widow, supported by his son from a previous relationship, argued the text message should not be treated as his final will.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/17 10:39 PM
1

No darling - this is a CIVIL case, And? What relevance does that have to what I said? and the evidence of zero media coverage until it's concluded says more of the Negative attitudes of the UK press to men. Nonsense, if such attitudes were preventing the publish of such stories, then news of the outcome wouldn't have come to light to begin with. "Man issues suit" isn't news. "Man issues suit, is successful/unsuccessful" can be. It's as simple as that. UK law also does not prohibit the coverage o…
/r/MensRights07/10/17 02:21 AM
1

Well, then you'd be wrong, plain and simple. As evidenced by the lack of any article regarding this case, until it had concluded.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 12:10 AM
2

If the police/prosecutors are pursuing a criminal case, No Civil Case can proceed. ...Against the person or organization the criminal case is being pursued against. The man wouldn't be the target of any criminal case, and the clinic wouldn't be the target of any criminal case, therefore the fact that the man initiated a civil case against the clinic does not prove that a criminal case is not being pursued against the woman.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 08:26 PM
3

Downvoting an entirely accurate explanation as to how the judicial system actually works in the name of combating lies. Sure thing, mate. That absolutely makes sense.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 06:55 PM
3

I'm wondering why the Police have not charged the woman with FORGERY and Fraud? What makes you think they haven't? Only thing that could stand in the way of that happening would be if he declined to press charges.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 06:51 PM
6

He argued that the clinic should pay for the cost of her upbringing, including private school fees, holidays, refurbishing her bedroom and her wedding. This is the part mensmod is referring to. It doesn't appear to be the same thing as child support obligations, to be honest.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 06:49 PM
5

Nah dude, that's just how society looks at men who claim to be going their own way, yet almost exclusively concern themselves with women. I mean, I'm sorry if that offends you or whatever, but that's just how it is. Maybe consider getting a hobby, or something
/r/MGTOW03/10/17 02:19 AM
3

Dude was this close to being just fine, then he had to go and use solipsism like that.
/r/MGTOW02/10/17 12:21 AM
5

You really believe everyone on MGTOW can't get girls? Ohh, you don't need to be siding with MusicTheoryIsHard to know that much.
/r/MGTOW02/10/17 12:20 AM
1

Bipolar disorder can be some pretty wicked shit, but I guess you already know that. It's like somebody following you around and periodically drugging you in your sleep with either downers or uppers for the rest of your life.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 05:41 AM
-5

It's impressive to see acting skills so great that they allowed her to travel back in time and plant the numerous recorded correspondences which took place between the two girls long prior to the attack.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 06:24 PM
1

I felt betrayed by the justice system cause if feels like if I had hurt her I would have got the book thrown at me. You seem in complete control of your actions and fully aware of the consequences of choosing to do such a thing, though. I'm not in a position to know anything about your exes situation or likelihood of authenticity, but as far as you're concerned, you're right. You probably wouldn't be ruled mentally ill, and so it wouldn't factor into your sentencing.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 06:19 PM
1

But not represented in the actual data for any of the nations listed.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 05:41 PM
2

It's not that the news itself is "fake", but rather, they cherry pick half-truths that fit their narrative. Keep in mind, you're commenting on a submission which is ranking nations on safety for men based solely on what the male to female homicide ratio is. By that logic, a nation where nine men and one woman have been murdered in a year is more dangerous than a nation in which one thousand men and five hundred women have been murdered. It's simply not sound reasoning. You'd need to incorporate …
/r/MensRights12/09/17 02:11 AM
-2

You know whenever they use mansplaining as a "point", they're wrong and you're right. That's strange, physics seems to disagree. Of all the examples you could have chosen, you managed to pick one where the dude was in fact objectively incorrect. Well done.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 02:31 AM
1

Well his point was that what little charge actually makes it to the phone thanks to the voltage droop might get eaten by the screen. Then he's wrong, plain and simple. There are hundreds of videos on this. It won't get your phone beyond 10-15%, but it absolutely works in principle. In no way will your phone lose more energy than it receives.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 02:29 AM
1

Obviously she did need it "mansplained", because her stupid ass was giving people bad information Except it actually wasn't bad information, and you can literally go do this to see it for yourself right now, you gullible fuckweasel. The people listening to this vapid idiot should be grateful this guy came along and kept them from fucking up their phones. You don't know what you're talking about. A car charger is literally designed to step down high voltages to around 5V for use with a USB chargi…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 02:26 AM
1

Your 9V battery isn't going to hold out for very long charging your phone, maybe 5-10% charge... probably closer to the 5% number. In my experience it's more like 10-15% in exchange for the entire 9 volt, but that's more than enough to contact emergency services in a disaster situation, which is exactly what the original tweet suggested. The dude was full of shit, it's really that simple.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 02:17 AM
2

And you know what the best part of it is? He's not even fucking correct. I've personally done this myself. It's extremely inefficient and will drain the entire 9volt for only around 15% of your typical cellphone's charge, but that's more than enough to contact emergency services with. Here's a video for anyone to watch for themselves, one of hundreds of them. This isn't a difficult thing to verify, most people here are just gullibly buying into it because they want it to be true.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 02:12 AM
2

Someone posts factually incorrect information. Man posts corrected information. Except for the fact that he didn't actually post factually correct information. The dude is simply wrong. I have literally done this myself, and you can too. Here's one of hundreds of videos demonstrating it. It's extremely inefficient because of all the power loss you'll have due to stepping the voltage down, but it will absolutely give you sufficient charge to contact emergency services if you need them. Draining t…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 02:06 AM
1

Scar tissue still experiences inflammation when exposed to abrasive surfaces. Not that the victim in question was white to begin with, or anything.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 11:53 PM
1

Well, that's how my skin works...but okay. Punch that wooden pole there a few times, tell me you don't see a significant difference. As it stands, your knuckles are no redder than your wrist. Have you never left your house or scraped your knuckles on anything? Of course, abrasive action makes them red, that's the whole point. But they don't stay scraped like that for the rest of forever. No matter how many times you do it, even if you've reduced your entire hand to nothing but scar tissue, the i…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 06:55 PM
1

What's that? Circumstantial evidence is circumstantial? My knuckles are permanently reddened That's not how skin works, but okay.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 05:30 PM
45

If you beat the shit out of someone, the skin of your knuckles is going to be reddened.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 07:44 AM
67

The first occasion was excellently pulled off, right down to the reddened knuckles on the accused.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 07:03 AM
0

Yeah, I suppose it is a pretty sad country to live in. Glad I don't.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 09:00 PM
4

Whatever you say, man. Fix your country's legal system then, I guess.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 08:59 PM
5

You keep posting comments saying I posted two, but whatever. What if he was properly served and he didn't understand the import of the paperwork or flaked on appearing for other reasons? Well, in that case he's a moron, because the papers themselves are quite clear about their importance. They literally have what they are written on them. If you get served and actively choose not to show up, then frankly, the consequences of that foolishness is squarely on you. I'm not running a daycare, here, g…
/r/MensRights22/07/17 08:56 PM
15

Does the article mention that he did that though, i didn't notice it ?? No. The paternity claim was put forward by his ex in 2003, he wasn't served with the appropriate papers, and so the window for contesting that claim passed without his knowledge. So what's going to happen is that he's going to file a separate suit contesting the paternity claim on the grounds that he was not properly served, if that's found to be the case then the paternity claim will be invalidated, and then he will appeal …
/r/MensRights22/07/17 05:56 PM
7

>Implying this came about as the result of remotely recent laws. For anyone who cares, the reality of the situation is that the paternity claim is going to be retroactively invalidated once he files a separate case disputing it and demonstrating that he was not properly served when it was originally filed. But, until that's done, the judge presiding over this case does not legally have the option of deeming the paternity claim invalid. That's simply not within their purview to deem valid or inva…
/r/MensRights22/07/17 05:48 PM
1

If you find yourself setting alarms for every three hours in the middle of the night so you can wake up and take a fucking protein shake, you have body dysmorphia. Probably, yeah. If you resist taking rest days because you think your muscles with atrophy away in 24 hours, you have body dysmorphia. Absolutely, yeah. That's, like, the epitome of textbook BDD. Body dysmorphia, like alcoholism, is an addiction. Eeeehhh, this part, not so much. I do get what you're saying in regards to the two or thr…
/r/TheRedPill18/07/17 06:36 PM
1

The post assumed men develop body dis-morphia before they even start seeing results. Ha! Quite the contrary, the only people who develop body dis-morphia are advanced lifters who have been lifting and going on bulk/cut phases for several years. With all due respect, they're kinda right in that regard, what you describe isn't really how BD works. Body dysmorphic disorder is something that drives people to do things like engage in absurd amounts of lifting, undergo constant plastic surgeries, inje…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/17 07:15 PM
1

Where there does it say it's not a real thing? It doesn't. It says that it is a real thing.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 06:23 AM
1

You. Again, thank you for further validating my point by continuing your display of feigned ignorance. It really does say a lot about a person when they demonstrate the belief that pretend stupidity is the most effective way to make their point.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 09:56 PM
1

I like the way you validated my point by pretending quoted text is too difficult a concept for you to comprehend.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 07:11 PM
1

Hey everyone, look at me! Look at how retarded I am, pretending I don't know how basic communication works! Give me attention! Give me attention!
/r/MensRights14/07/17 06:34 PM
6

if they want to have any respect as a news outlet, they should believe in every story they publish. Far be it from me to argue in defence of Cosmopolitan of all things, but I'm pretty sure that's not how it works. Particularly in regards to opinion pieces. I mean, Cosmopolitan will print whatever the fuck they believe will earn them the most money, that goes without saying. But there's no shortage of genuine news sources unrelated to them which will gladly publish multiple opinion pieces simulta…
/r/MensRights14/07/17 05:47 PM
2

If I didn't know any better, I might even begin to suspect that it's a profit-driven corporation rather than an ideologically oriented activist organization. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ But hey, whatever feeds the victimhood circlejerk. We like those, right?
/r/MensRights14/07/17 05:37 PM
6

No it's not. Come on, three seconds of research is all it takes to know for sure.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 05:35 PM
-4

Sure I do. Do you? Because if there truly doesn't exist any no evidence against you, or better yet if there's actual evidence of fabrication on the part of the prosecution, then there's no reason for you to ask for a plea agreement.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/17 12:23 AM
-3

the girls in question are proven liars I honestly don't want to come across as particularly devoted to any one side here, but uhh, that's not actually true. None of the texts in that video demonstrated any kind of falsehood or dishonesty, so where is this proof you referred to? sex with two minors, while he was a minor. are you just picking and choosing things that align with your narrative? I am literally reading off the exact words written in the bloody article. Tone down your persecution comp…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/17 11:06 PM
-2

put on sex offender list. mandated to inform anyone they date that they are predators and not allowed to live next to schools I mean, that's kinda what happens when you literally admit to groping three girls without consent and trying to have sex with two minors. I mean, rape is obviously much worse, but what he openly admitted to doing would have got him on the list anyway.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/17 10:01 PM
2

I agree that watering down the terms 'sexual assault' and even 'rape' to include unwanted kisses or drunk sex is something that needs addressed. By all means, why don't you tell /u/WickedClassy a little bit more about that?
/r/MensRights30/06/17 12:26 AM
5

I'd bet my own kidney that it's more the reported assault rate that's rising, rather than the actual assault rate.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 12:21 AM
35

glad to see my trigger bait still works two years later. Can't wait till you're saying the same about this whole exchange.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/17 10:54 AM
42

The Red Pill doesn't have to be reasonable grounded in reality or relevant to the interests of it's community. Well folks, I guess that's that. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/TheRedPill23/06/17 10:52 AM
124

but you sound like an angry teenager. Have I got a surprise for you!
/r/TheRedPill23/06/17 10:51 AM
9

People fucking hung and burned Obama in effigy and none of that shit happened. Sounds like you're just looking for a reason to feel oppressed.
/r/PussyPass03/06/17 07:35 AM
0

Who's trolling? You're the one having a triggered meltdown over mean words, not I.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 08:51 AM
1

Nah, it's mean words on the internet that don't matter, yet here you are bawling as though they hurt you in some way. Poor baby, it's alright! None are willing to be near you, so you should be safe from the scary women.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 08:28 AM
1

Aren't you both, though?
/r/askTRP11/05/17 08:21 AM
2

endangering an unborn child That's not even a law, mate.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 07:52 AM
1

Shhhh...
/r/MensRights11/05/17 07:50 AM
7

Dude, when /r/MensRights considers you bitter, then you're probably at the point where you could teach olives a thing or two.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 07:48 AM
1

"KillAllMen" This is rich, the dude getting triggered by twitter hashtags seems to think he's in a position to be lecturing others.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 07:45 AM
7

Between the two of you, I'll bet there's enough experience with actual relationships to fill entire libraries. And what libraries they would be.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 07:41 AM
2

I'd assume it's that they're getting desperate for soldiers, much like the nazi regime who ended up having nothing more than boys and old men by the end. I'd assume that assumption probably isn't correct, seeing as how unlike the Nazis, North Korea isn't actively fighting and suffering losses on any front right now.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 12:45 AM
2

I'm pretty sure what she's saying is that it's better to have nobody being conscripted than it is for everyone to be conscripted. Equality through raising everyone to the same level is preferable to equality through lowering everyone to the same level. It's weird, if not surprising, to see people actually taking issue with it in the lower comments.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 12:43 AM
1

I'm only vaguely familiar with that name You're a regular at /r/sjwhate. There's no way in hell you don't know who Richard Spencer is. Breitbart, assuming you're not unfamiliar with them as well, has also described his website as "a center of alt-right thought." Are they lying? (as if he's some kind of smoking gun proof that conservatives are secretly Nazis) You're the only one applying what's said about him to conservatives, here. Everyone else is referring to the alt-right. A term he coined, b…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 07:31 AM
-13

Of all the things that have never happened, this never happened the most.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/17 04:22 AM
1

What else can I do though? Might I suggest not being a flaming hypocrite? If all you've got is anecdotes, then be a fucking adult about it and acknowledged the fact that all you have is anecdotes. Just be honest, having some integrity. It's not a difficult thing once you let go of the whole "winning the argument is more important than presenting sound information" mindset.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/17 03:26 AM
1

How oppressed we are for having penises, haven't you been paying attention?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/17 03:21 AM
0

Other than that why should we be content dictators, pushing our agenda and promoting what we want? Implying that's not the entire reason why the post is being ruled acceptable despite almost every top level comment calling it out on not being ppd. You're free to run your sub however you want, man. You're the ones who put the time in to keep it up and running, so you're the ones who get to make the decisions without owing anyone else diddly-squat. But please don't lie to my face like that. If you…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/17 03:19 AM
1

TFW you realize the entire point of the submission of getting your panties twisted.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/17 03:09 AM
2

Why does the women not have the autonomy to take a medication like thalidomide She does. Same as she has the autonomy to drink bleach, or ingest radioisotopes. But nobody has the obligation to provide any of those things to her, and possession of those things may be illegal in and of itself without the right authorization. Do you see the point I'm making? Serious question. In one case we are saying that we need to protect the fetus from harm, but on the other hand, killing it is ok. What is the …
/r/MensRights25/03/17 02:57 AM
2

I'm curious how you are certain that a fetus doesn't have consciousness? Could you point me to the study that proves that? The short answer is because we've taken them out of the womb at that stage of development before, and there's just nothing there. A longer, though still simplified, explanation is that we know this due to the presence of certain chemicals such as pregnanolone which the mother's body naturally produces and delivers into the fetus, keeping it permanently sedated and anesthetiz…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 02:12 AM
1

No worries. Honestly I'm just speculating, but it seems a pretty likely explanation.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 01:43 AM
1

Then why was she convicted of negligent homicide, brotha?
/r/MensRights25/03/17 12:11 AM
1

In all fairness, the shaved head was almost certainly preformed by first responders in order to assess her cranial injuries, and the stitched wounds are obviously the result of the crash.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 12:10 AM
1

Reckless endangerment is for when the kid is still alive. After that point, it's negligent homicide, which is exactly what she was tried and convicted of.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 12:07 AM
-1

So, why is the bundle of cells suddenly not life, when it is a fetus? Nobody said it's not life, but because its continued survival is dependent on the body of another person, and the United States government does not have the power to compel someone to violate the bodily autonomy of an individual on the sole basis of saving another individual's life. For some reason, I doubt it will change be your mind. That's a pretty safe bet, given that I'm sure we're all perfectly aware that when most layme…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 12:06 AM
2

(I bet the driver is most certainly a felon now) Convicted of automobile homicide and driving under the influence, yes.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 11:54 PM
2

Input on what? Had a burglar jumped in and shot the kid to death instead, the family wouldn't be in any position to alter the sentence. What makes this situation different, other than the lack of technical murder and such?
/r/MensRights24/03/17 11:53 PM
1

Was said guy driving, though? Because the driver in this case got convicted of automobile homicide and driving under the influence, and is also a felon as a result.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 11:50 PM
6

In fact, one might go as far as to say that the only reason this isn't a more newsworthy topic is that men are the primary victims. The article you cited was on the front page of /r/all literally yesterday, March 20th. Hell, it even says "The vast majority of cases never reach trial, according to the figures. Since 2014 about 74% of investigations have been wound down due to problems with identifying perpetrators, or victims being unwilling to press charges."
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:50 AM
2

They're the only group with a risk of pregnancy. That doesn't happen to men, through rape or otherwise.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 06:16 AM
0

at a greater risk for pregnancy Lol.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 05:24 AM
2

You know, there's already a subreddit for your brand of objectively incorrect crazy. Did you get lost? UN heads are anti-males to the core. Lol, the UN doesn't even get a vote, chum. Only nations do. The same nations that voted for Toilet day on this day, like yours.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:27 AM
0

even the non-harmful types like a symbolic pricking. Bullshit, people get piercings done all the time. That claim is objectively untrue.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:11 AM
0

Whiny excuse making SJW it is, then. This entire submission is evidence that you folks don't actually know how the UN works to begin with, so mass contact with your representative certainly isn't going to happen. Have fun not being recognized, I guess. But I suppose that's what you want, so you can keep playing victim.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:13 AM
1

The petitions I'm talking about are then sent to UN representatives to show there is support behind the idea. Just one representative, which is your country's representative. The UN itself doesn't even get a say, the only people who's voices matter are the representatives, one vote per nation. And honestly, nobody ever votes against "make today X day". Again, like I already told you, you have a new representative now. One you haven't petitioned. So stop making excuses for your sorry ass and do s…
/r/MensRights09/03/17 03:24 AM
-1

So you're just going to keep glossing over the right to genital integrity Yup. Because females don't have that, either. Certain procedures are banned from being preformed for non-medical reasons, and we have that too. Go to a doctor and try to have your child's glans removed for non-medical purposes. They won't do it, same as they won't remove a clitoral glans anymore. We've pretty much always had the "right" to be free of the direct biological equivalent of clitorectomy. and the right to call u…
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:52 AM
1

Not an "everyone sign this petition" kind of petition, that's a totally different thing. What I'm referring to is more like bill, it's a proposal formally submitted to the UN by the representative of a given nation, which the floor then votes on. Unless you're referring to getting in contact with the representative, in which case that is 100% your problem. I don't even know where you live, how am I supposed to know why past attempts didn't work? Hell, if you're an American, I'd hope you already …
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:39 AM
1

Did I cite a comment? Yup, you cited your own, which you wrote in reply to someone who was talking about sexual violence. So, why did you center the discussion around violent acts in reply to someone that said "sexual violence"?
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:25 AM
-1

and expressed confusion over what rights are lacking for men. Maybe you should try alleviating that confusion by actually providing some examples of rights which we lack, rather than listing problems that you can't tie any absence of rights to. But ok, sure. The UN has recognized International Women's Day for years, has a whole separate entity for addressing women's issues around the world, Yeah, maybe venture outside your cozy little first world bubble once and a while, and you might pick up on…
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:20 AM
-2

I'm not, that's a quote from the comment you cited. As though the lying wasn't bad enough, now you're accusing me of your own actions.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:09 AM
-5

You're absolutely not justifying exactly what they said about the subreddit by flipping out in response to an imagined slight like this. But I suppose that's to be expected of MGTOW. You kinda drag this sub down by using that account, to be honest. Only reinforcing a negative stereotype, given that they really are as whiny as fuck.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:04 AM
1

You are indeed correct. First Men's day was 1999, and the first Toilet day was 2001.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:00 AM
11

I don't think you know what disingenuous means, and I know you have no idea how the UN works, so let me lay this out in a nutshell for you: The UN can't just do whatever the hell it wants because it feels like making a statement. It's a lot like parliament, someone needs to introduce a motion before a vote is going to be held and a conclusion reached in either direction. You want the UN to recognize Men's day? Then go petition the representative of whatever country you happen to live in to propo…
/r/MensRights09/03/17 01:59 AM
3

When they say "particularly women's and girls'", this is completely correct, as women and girls are particularly targeted for sexual violence as a consequence of a lack water, sanitation, and hygiene infrastructure. Why are you lying through your teeth when we can all read what the comment actually said?
/r/MensRights09/03/17 01:43 AM
4

It doesn't need to be divisive. You're right, it doesn't, so why the fuck are you treating it like a competition?
/r/MensRights09/03/17 01:39 AM
-1

For fuck sake, do you think the UN can just up and decide to do something on it's own? It's like parliament, someone needs to introduce a motion before a ruling in either direction is going to be issued. You want the UN to recognize Men's day? Then go petition the representative of whatever country you happen to live in to propose that the UN recognize Men's day. Until that happens, the fact that they don't is on you, not them. Not even the fucking General Secretary himself can just up and say "…
/r/MensRights09/03/17 01:38 AM
1

So, uhhh, what does that tell us about the fact that you're still here?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 08:34 AM
0

Shhhhh, this is a safe space.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/17 05:23 AM
0

Don't tell nobody, but I heard that deukhoofd might be some kinda pansy.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/17 05:22 AM
1

So about the same age that these kids look to be?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/17 05:21 AM
-1

The pain build as the blood flows in. Must not have a pair if you never experienced it. That is an interesting accusation to see leveled by somebody who apparently has no idea how the nervous system works.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/17 05:17 AM
0

No. The author is ironically suffering from the same biases she imputes to researchers who claim traditional peasant and hunter-gatherer societies are "male dominated." Then how are we to trust that portion of their claims? Sounds to me like you're picking and choosing what fits the conclusion you'd like to arrive at. Males have out-group bias toward females, whereas the same is not true in reverse. This is why, in the 19th century, a mere letter writing campaign by a handful of women convinced …
/r/MensRights12/02/17 06:30 AM
5

Well, there's the fake Shutterstock protest sign, for one.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 04:49 AM
2

In conclusion, the transformation of male dominance from myth to reality during the process of industrialization is briefly explored. Is that your final answer?
/r/MensRights12/02/17 04:48 AM
2

Given that the pictured protest sign is actually from Shutterstock and no actual street protesting has taken place? Yeah. I might even go so far as to say it's deliberately misleading for the sake of drawing in clicks.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 04:45 AM
-13

Is that really what you're watching? I took the time to look at the source cited by the submission's cited source and all I'm seeing is complete reasonability, with them even going so far as to explicitly state that their disagreement is not intended to reflect negatively on the professor of the course in question. What exactly did they do wrong, here? Dare to hold a different opinion than mine? I don't have to agree with their argument to acknowledge that she does have a valid point behind it, …
/r/MensRights12/02/17 04:40 AM
1

"Waaah! The SJWs won't let me into their clubhouse, that means they're dominating meeee!" Get it through your head, man. Nobody on Reddit is under any obligation to associate with you. That's the way it's always been, and always will be.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 11:35 PM
2

Nobody cares; someone they're aligned with was banned, which inherently make the action unjustifiable.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 11:04 PM
9

They're not doing anything, son. Why in high holy fuck would they want the admission that the whole thing was made up not to be seen? That doesn't even make the slightest bit of sense. Now it's at 70% with only 152. What, this submission? The one we're talking in right now, at 154 points and 70% upvoted? This submission didn't even exist when you wrote that comment. It's seven hours old, yours is eight. Just stop with the excuses.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 03:59 AM
10

Opinions? Sure, that's plenty reasonable. "REDDIT ADMINS ARE SILENCING THE EVENT BY PUSHING THE THREAD VOTE COUNT TO 0!!!"? Not so much on that one.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 02:55 AM
6

and stop the hassle the admins are getting. How thoughtful of you. Almost makes you forget that hassling people for made up reasons was the original goal, here.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 01:23 AM
20

FUCK THAT!!, IT'S A SHOP!!1! That was pretty much you, two hours from posting this. You know, it's strange how little of the SJW domination we actually see, particularly in comparison to anti-SJWs who just want to play victim to imagined conspiracies and falseflags like this one.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 01:18 AM
5

"We didn't think we'd be caught."
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 01:10 AM
7

/r/HateCrimeHoaxes
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 01:09 AM
16

Again, I wasn't asking FOR any of the users personal information, just that the users information had not changed And again, that's still information about the user. You want to argue that im asking for personal information but im not What a convincing and well thought out rebuttal. as the question is literally is his account still secuee and the way you view how reddits tules are is so broad its unreal. How high are you right now? cause what better things do you have to do. I've got a busy sche…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 12:59 AM
25

I didn't ask for anything about the users IP address. All I wanted was clarification is that it DID NOT CHANGE from the usual users addresses. A yes or no answer Yeah, that's information regarding a user's IP address. When you ask a yes or no question about an IP address, you're requesting information about that IP address. not sure how if at all that violates any policy I've read through in Reddits policies. This part of the privacy policy: "We will not share, sell, or give away any of our user…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 10:23 PM
6

There are 12 mods on the sub, I guess they were all hacked too?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 06:54 PM
2

The lack of a mod purge seems to be a pretty good indication. There's no way every single account was compromised at the same time, especially if they already carried out the dox on /u/Mustaka. What reason would he have to hand over his account if he was already fired?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 06:50 PM
81

Of course they didn't respond, the Admins won't give out any information regarding a user's IP address just because someone asked them to. That would be a direct violation of the privacy policy. Come on, man. Put those detective skills of yours to work.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 06:48 PM
17

And more importantly, nobody should ever be siding with the Daily Mail.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 12:31 AM
48

There's a reason this sub has such an enormous user overlap with /r/TheRedPill, and a fucking shame, too.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 12:30 AM
21

Yeah, you tell them all about who's weak, dragonfangxl. Maybe pose threateningly with your five pound eight bladed mall ninja katar.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 12:28 AM
7

Was a conclusion ever reached as to whether or not that was sarcasm? There were some pretty lengthy debates going on about that the last time this was posted.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 07:28 PM
1

Dogs, probably.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 12:57 PM
2

18 day old account.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 12:55 PM
-5

Actually no, this particular instance wouldn't qualify. Similarly to how the ad hominem fallacy doesn't apply to statements which pertain to the credibility of the argument's source, the no true Scotsman fallacy doesn't apply to statements regarding membership in a given group based on said group's actual requisite characteristics. That's why claiming -Beth- isn't a flightless bird on the basis of their lack of wings wouldn't be considered an instance of the no true Scotsman fallacy, but claimin…
/r/MensRights30/12/16 12:54 PM
3

feminism has more often that not took rights away from men. Examples?
/r/MensRights30/12/16 12:48 PM
1

No child support to begin with. He refused to pay, even says so in the note.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 12:47 PM
3

I mean, according to the note, that's still more than he was actually paying in child support.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 11:41 AM
-1

Let's be realistic; that may have been the idea at one point, but that was a looong time ago. Now it's a place where not being conscripted and seeking to voluntarily serve in the armed forces are both simultaneously examples of pussypass.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/12/16 01:19 AM
-3

Do you often find that pretending to be ignorant to basic conversational concepts, such as hyperbole, serves as an effective means of debate? I'm willing to keep an open mind, but where I come from, pretending to be stupid is typically regarded as an extremely ineffective tactic.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 06:31 AM
4

They're hypocritical like this on purpose because they're a bunch of feminists You know what they say about the Daily Mail; it's full of feminists. Please, they're extraordinarily well known for printing virtually anything that might attract clicks.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 03:34 AM
0

Correct them all you'd like, it's the part where you cry "THIS IS WHAT PERSECUTION LOOKS LIKE" that causes the rest of society to roll their eyes at the mention of the term "Men's rights advocate". It's the Daily Mail, for fuck sake. They exist to convince you to click on their article, and absolutely nothing more. They don't give a shit about women or men. Go ahead and give that last one a read, tell me how it compares to the oppressive travesty that is this submission. All the Daily Mail they …
/r/MensRights21/12/16 03:25 AM
2

I don't know where "here" is.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 06:24 AM
1

I knew being married gave you certain privileges, but that seems like a major oversight, doesn't it? Absolutely, sounds like the perfect opportunity for this sub to make a real-world difference against a problem well within it's power to see changed. Of course, the first step to that would be not contradicting the article in the submission title.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 03:22 AM
5

I love the men's rights movement for using facts when it comes to their arguments, because facts are the truth. With all due respect, that's probably not the best route to take when the title of the submission is a blatant and objective lie. As the article clearly and explicitly stated, it doesn't matter what she's crying: Regardless of consent, state law forbids sexual acts with children under 16, “except where the persons are married to each other.” I don't even understand why this sub is so i…
/r/MensRights16/12/16 03:19 AM
1

She's only 13, so what does that matter?
/r/MensRights16/12/16 03:06 AM
3

Because neither one would be considered acceptable legal defenses in real life. Grooming is just a tangentially related buzzword that the guy is throwing out, it has no relevance to whether a minor would be charged with distributing child pornography or not.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 03:04 AM
1

In the domain of the family, fathers or father-figures hold authority over women and children. Yes, that's part of the definition which was provided. Is it something you'd like to contest?
/r/MensRights05/12/16 04:56 PM
1

Have you noticed how lots of people believe that the average man oppressed the average woman for the bulk of history? No, I haven't. The definition makes no mention of average men or average women. In fact, it explicitly specifies leadership positions. Did you really not already know what I just explained? What you explained doesn't appear to be supported by fact. That's why citations are important, see? Or were you just trying to prevent honest discussion by starting a debate over the absurdly …
/r/MensRights04/12/16 07:04 PM
1

Uh, your own source even makes mention that "guns and fountainpens" are concordant given its methodology. That affects absolutely nothing more than pthe colour of the dot used](http://www.jacobsilterra.com/subreddit_map/network/index.html#) to represent the subs, mate. Specifically, the dark yellow modularity named EveryDayCarry. It has absolutely no effect whatsoever on the degree of overlap between two or more subreddits, nor on the placement or size of the indicators. With all due respect, yo…
/r/MensRights03/12/16 07:50 PM
1

That's quite an overlap for groups that have nothing to do with one another, but you knew that.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 07:06 PM
1

It is sexist to claim all men are this and that But "all X is Y" isn't the reasoning which was just used, though. The reasoning -which I think most reasonable people would agree with- is that "it's an understood implication the term X as it was used here describes the type of X that Y." If I said black people are tall, you'd understand that the implication of the term black people as it was used here would be specifically describing the type of black person that is indeed tall. No?
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:55 PM
1

Sounds likely enough, though I guess it would depend on exactly what one considers to be a feminist sub. Let's go take a look! Well, one of the first things I'm noticing is that it actually appears to be really small, given the extent of it's reputation. Granted, TRP has a hell of a reputation too, but even they had approximately five times as many commenters over the period of time the data was recorded. Of course, that's really not all that relevant to our discussion. To get back on track, it …
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:34 PM
1

Furthermore, if you're willing to go to TRP, see what the rhetoric is like, and then come back here and watch the same rhetoric get downvoted to hell, you'll see that the crazy misogyny and nonsense is not tolerated here, or generally in men's rights circles. Absolutely, without any question whatsoever. While often quite combative in tone, it is only with extreme rarity that anything one could reasonably deem to be outright hateful pops up in this sub. But the argument isn't that TRP is a direct…
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:44 AM
1

Group A being worse than Group B is decidedly relevant to whatever retarded equivalence you'd like to make between them. The equivalence LucifersHammerr made isn't in question, either. But if you've got a problem with it, feel free to go take it up with him. Uh sure it is. If a nation of millions commits genocide while some dude and his kid somewhere accidentally step on the shoe of an old lady, Group A being worse than Group B is decidedly relevant to whatever retarded equivalence you'd like to…
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:36 AM
2

You be sure to call be up when Cosmo or whatever is publishing shit like this, or this, or even this.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:23 AM
1

Oh fuck off with your persecution complex, you know perfectly well that the overlap between the two subreddits is significant. Even regulars acknowledge it. Hell, your buddy up there doesn't even think it's a bad thing, wonder what that tells you. This is exactly the kind of refusal to deal with reality that I referred to, but if that's the kind of safe space you demand, then so be it. Just don't be surprised when you find that your movement is powerless outside that safe space as a result. But …
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:09 AM
1

No worries.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:23 AM
1

Now I get what you're saying, but There are areas that all schools of feminism agree on though, like patriarchy theory, and even that is an oft abused concept that is incompatible with real equality IMO. That there sounds a hell of a lot like you're talking about an academic ideology, my friend. You even specified that it can be abused.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:19 AM
-6

Is some random motorcycle gang as bad as the KKK, for example? It's not about whether group A is as bad as group B, it's about realizing when a subset of a designated group is being referred to based on the context of the statement, and whether or not it's worth raising a fuss about if one thinks the designation in question is over-broad. The truth is, feminists as a group are far more toxic than anything MRas have done. One key difference is we have proof of feminisms bullshit, while there is z…
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:11 AM
1

Because the number of men vs women on raw data was higher. Where are you getting this raw data from, though? Nobody linked a summary of the last five years worth of data they collected, or anything.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 04:13 AM
0

The typical interpretation of patriarchy within feminist theory is that all problems that stem from gender of both men and women, are a product of the patriarchy. If you're at all familiar with marxist rhetoric it's very similar in that many marxists just blame every form of human suffering on capitalism. Alright, I might know fuck all about the academic aspects of sex and gender and how they relate within society and all that, but I actually do know a fair bit about socioeconomics, a good amoun…
/r/MensRights03/12/16 04:10 AM
-1

I don't post here often enough to be included in 'you guys'. EDIT: worth noting Emilybam's comment has been upvoted, so at least no one is downvoting the comment. You won't see that on a feminist sub. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights03/12/16 02:15 AM
1

I'm saying that unless the population of Canada diminished by such that the female population shrank by a decent%, then they have to have rounded up from 3.5% or down from 4.4% in order to appear as 4% of the population. It's a respective figure, meaning ~4% of males, and ~4% of females. The female population could have literally shrunk to one hundred people, so long as four of those hundred reported being victims of spousal violence, it would still give them a 4% figure. If they weren't respect…
/r/MensRights03/12/16 02:07 AM
1

like patriarchy theory Could you, uhhh, define what you understand that to mean? Because I'm not actually getting any results for "patriarchy theory" as a term in either Google or Wikipedia. All I'm seeing is the definition of the word ("Patriarchy is a social system in which males hold primary power and predominate in roles of political leadership, moral authority, social privilege and control of property. In the domain of the family, fathers or father-figures hold authority over women and chil…
/r/MensRights03/12/16 12:45 AM
-1

Then you may be in the wrong sub, mate.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 12:34 AM
5

It's just a way of speaking using fewer words. So then why does this sub reliably lose it's shit when the same statements are made with the parties in reverse? I'm not disagreeing with you, but you guys can't have things both ways.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 12:33 AM
1

The 4% figure comes from the past five years of results, not this years figures. The statement is: In 2014, equal proportions of men and women reported being victims of spousal violence during the preceding 5 years (4%, respectively).
/r/MensRights03/12/16 12:31 AM
0

That would actually make perfect sense, 50% is 50%, even if one group has 10 members and the other has 10,000. It's just not the case, here. I mean, that's just how percentages work. It's not misleading, it's basic mathematics.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 12:21 AM
1

Sounds like you want them to place your feels over their reals. 45% for, or 55% against, they're both facts. Ditch the persecution complex.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/16 12:01 AM
0

>Pointing out given reason doesn't constitute an inconsistency. >Mental gymnastics Whatever you say, man. Not entirely sure why you're getting so angry. Keep up this same line of thinking and you will keep losing. Losing what?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/16 09:19 PM
1

She is full of hate and does not even think about "mend, heal and restore". "So much work ahead to mend, heal and restore." But hey, whatever you say. "Nice looking words were in the first one and not-nice ones were in the second" is the closest thing to an explanation anyone has been able to provide thus far.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/16 08:13 PM
0

She is part of why we're broken and need to mend and heal. She never actually said otherwise, though?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/16 08:05 PM
-7

Fuck, she wasn't even wrong. She literally demonstrated that fact.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/16 07:47 AM
-16

I don't really understand that's inconsistent about these two messages, to be honest. The first one seems perfectly accurate. If Trump wins, she flips out. If Clinton wins, Trump supporters flip out. She was right on the fucking money. America is clearly broken and divided.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/16 07:46 AM
6

All the information we have has been filtered through these people. I mean, other than all the stuff that was just video of Trump speaking, I guess.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/16 10:21 PM
1

In that case, I really have no problem with her punching the dirty fucking cop killer. ^^<sup>/s</sup>
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/16 10:13 PM
1

"Man"
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/16 10:12 PM
1

That, or the anti-SJW version of being triggered. Help! Help! The colour of this cartoon offends me!
/r/MensRights04/10/16 11:06 PM
2

For sex-reassignment, you're addressing a psychological condition with physical treatment. How do you properly diagnose gender dysphoria in a 9 year old? Best case scenario, you get it right and the child grows up passing as his/her gender. Worst case scenario, you fuck up a child's hormones and they grow up miserable with a bunch of other health problems. I'd say it's definitely worth much more research. You know what? You're absolutely not wrong. Dealing with a problem in which the practitione…
/r/MensRights24/09/16 02:08 AM
2

I'm not trans myself, but over the years I've been inspired by a friend who is to learn a fair bit about the medical and biological aspects of transgenderism. From what I know, I can tell you unequivocally that the use of hormone suppressants in minors who believe themselves to suffer from gender dysphoria is far more than a potential; these days it's standard practice in such cases. The international standard on these matters, published by the World Professional Association for Transgender Heal…
/r/MensRights24/09/16 01:36 AM
-1

"Ad hominem (Latin for "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a logical fallacy in which an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself." The only argument you provided was calling names rather than addressing the points I raised. I simply pointed that out. By the literal definition of the term, that makes your comme…
/r/MensRights14/09/16 05:03 PM
0

"I don't have to address your points because you called me names. Also, here's a bunch of names that I'm going to call you." Lol, you sure showed me.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 02:49 PM
-1

You have literally zero comprehension of herd immunity or vaccine science. Thanks for your analysis. I value the professional opinions of individuals who don't even know how to properly use a condom extremely highly, especially on these matters. You don't care about abolishing the disease? Why does your opinion even matter then. Because it's my country, not yours. If I want to advocate for the most cost effective method of saving lives, I'm free to do just that, and it directly influences govern…
/r/MensRights14/09/16 04:12 AM
0

You're right, I'm sorry, I should have said it's not as cost effective.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 03:55 AM
0

If one of your college boys comes down here and unknowingly infects a few ladies You guys have no government provided HPV vaccines for men or women. Our college boys are held to the same standard literally every American is, which is buy your own. You completely made this up. Dude, most people won't even have sex with someone carrying an obvious STD. What the hell are the health standards like where you live? You have to get a specialized lab done and the last time I had one at the state health …
/r/MensRights14/09/16 03:20 AM
-1

Don't care about poor woman, Unlike you savages down south, we socialize the cost of these vaccines, so no worries there. ;) or woman with compromised immune systems Women with compromised immune systems generally don't have unprotected sex with people who have genital warts, so that's not much of an issue, either.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 02:05 AM
1

penile cancer isn't the only one caused by HPV, Understood, that's just the one what Brickmaj asked for. The number estimated to be caused by HPV is 18,000 for women and 7,900, so men face less than half the cases, but still a sizable amount. Don't get me wrong, nothing is stopping us from getting a vaccination if we're really worried about that 0.000049375% chance, but it's not cost effective for the government to fund them for both sexes. And given that female HPV related cancer rates are over…
/r/MensRights14/09/16 01:57 AM
-1

Every boy you vaccinate is a person who will not carry or infect other people who aged out of the vaccination, or had a compromised immune system and couldn't get the vaccination, or came from another country where it wasn't available, or he goes to another country where it's not mandated or available. You understand this is a sexually transmitted disease we're talking about, right? One with an infinitesimal chance of actually causing cancer, as demonstrated by the fact that only 1.3 out of over…
/r/MensRights14/09/16 01:40 AM
1

Yeah, I found it.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 12:26 AM
4

Instances of HPV attributable cancer between 2004-2008 within the US: Cervix: 11,500 Vulva: 1,600 Vagina: 500 Penis: 400 It kinda sorta looks like it matters, yeah. Were that same money toward prostate cancer, on the other hand, I can guaran-fucking-tee it would prevent a hell of a lot more than the 1.369 cases of HPV attributable penile cancer which occurs in British Columbia every year, going by the rates provided by the available US statistics. There are approximately 3150 instances of prosta…
/r/MensRights14/09/16 12:16 AM
0

Look at the end of the day we aren't that equal, Whoa, whoa, whoa. You're only allowed to say that in the right contexts, man. What on earth were you thinking?
/r/MensRights14/09/16 12:00 AM
14

We don't really know, just know that it's old.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/16 12:20 AM
1

The Red Pill has some serious nihilism going on. That would require a belief that right and wrong do not exist in the first place. Belief that morality does exist, but that women are simply incapable of understanding it, is in contradiction the concept of nihilism. Unless you were referring to something else? I still fear feminism for its capacity to utterly destroy the society I grew up in (not American, everything happens later over here). Where might that be? UK? Red Pill, well, not so much. …
/r/MensRights01/09/16 11:15 PM
0

Alright, it's not anything like what animals do. Is it a purely human way of not being able to distinguish between right and wrong, then? And out of curiosity, why did you bring up sexual selection if you knew it didn't have anything to do with either comment?
/r/MensRights01/09/16 10:40 PM
-1

Amorality in sexual selection is not the same as not differentiating between right and wrong I don't disagree. The comment, however, does not pertain to sexual selection. Here, let me quote exactly what I'm referring to: how on earth can you think it's okay to want to trap a guy into having kids? Morality is a male concept. As far as a woman is concerned ... "I want it therefore I do it". She wants it, the law says it's fine, and the only thing stopping her is some neckbeard babbling on about mo…
/r/MensRights01/09/16 10:21 PM
1

That's the trouble with you young ones, you think the world begins with you. I'm not sure you quite understand. /r/TheRedPill goes quite a bit further than "Hey guys, it turns out a lot of women like men who act all manly and shit!". Honestly, I don't think anyone would have even the slightest problem with them if that's all they did. Here, for example, is the most heavily upvoted submission on their front page right now.](https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/50hgka/feminazis_hate_men_co…
/r/MensRights01/09/16 07:40 PM
1

He is quite literally the head mod of the subreddit.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 07:03 PM
0

Grats on being one of that, what, four or so people who actually read the article.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 06:24 AM
2

It doesn't. The submission title is bullshit: One potential solution to this worrying state of affairs is to do away with jurors in sex crime trials, and appoint a specially trained judge. This kind of dishonest conduct is the reason why /r/MensRights is viewed as nearly on par with /r/TheRedPill throughout so much of the site. It's sad really, because it poisons a lot of legitimate issues by extension.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 06:23 AM
3

You can just open the console on your browser and change the text of the page itself (on your end, anyway), if you really wanted to. There's be absolutely no way for us to tell, so I don't think it's worth bothering with an inquisition, mate. I'd say just give him the benefit of the doubt.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 12:18 AM
79

I know this probably isn't a question many people want to hear right now, but did you verify with your professor that C was indeed the intended correct answer? I can't speak for anyone else, but I've always found this testing format to be almost inherently plagued by those kinds of mistakes. I have a feeling it's attributable to older professors making the transition to giving tests in an electronic format, but that's just me. Either way, do your best to get it in writing, or recorded, or at lea…
/r/MensRights25/06/16 12:15 AM
-3

Yeah, that's it. The fact that his family declined to be interviewed or provide a picture of him must be a coincidence. This is clear and unquestionable persecution. The notion that his family has chosen to mourn privately is absurd.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 01:26 AM
-1

You need exactly one fuck up for all of that to no longer matter. (Hell, some of it didn't even matter to begin with, unless she happens to drink the bath water.) It's as easy as the person who prepared your food at a restaurant having been on vacation at some point in their life, and getting some eggs under their fingernails at some point in the previous week. You've got a lot of extremely porous flesh under your fingernails that those eggs love to hide within, and the reality of the situation …
/r/MarriedRedPill20/04/16 05:55 AM
1

It's total bullshit that mothers were automatically somehow better parents. That was never assumed in this case. He was the first to file for custody, and he received that custody before they had even been found. They were in Washington somewhere, but for all intents and purposes they were off the map for two years. He searched with few results. However, he filed for custody at the Douglas County Courthouse and was eventually awarded custody in March 2015.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 10:51 AM
1

You're right. The "everyone else's fault but mine" thing was uncalled for on my part. It's not the child's fault for being mistreated by their parents, and I apologize for what I said. I've kinda got to stand by the latter part though. You do seem to be under the mindset that what she did was an act against you, and I'd urge you to reevaluate that, particularly seeing as how you were the young adult at the time. I don't condemn you, fooling around between adolescents of that age who aren't biolo…
/r/TheRedPill16/04/16 08:13 AM
1

a little cautious You'd probably at the very least be cautious Source: Am very racist towards both races until the person proves otherwise. Whatever you say, mate. Typically when someone describes theirself as "very racist", they're not referring to simply refraining from giving their trust freely. Maybe it was just an unfortunate choice of words.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/16 08:04 AM
1

Well, you know, when you can't see each other, anyway. A lot of people might even interpret that as evidence that race doesn't matter as much as we think it does. Source: am mixed. Have had shit discrimination from both races. Am very racist towards both races until the person proves otherwise. I don't understand; as a result of experiencing discrimination, you chose to embrace discrimination yourself? Do you really have any right to resent it, in that case?
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 07:40 AM
1

TL;DR: Everyone else's fault but mine, and my stepsister betrayed me by not hooking up with me, she owed me that.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 07:33 AM
1

After we carved out shelter, made crops out of forests and gave our lives for safety(all in the name of family), we expected the local women folk to value the genes that perpetuate that sacrifice and desire a family with a (delta, beta - you make the call) man. Buddy, with all due respect, you didn't actually do any of that. You're not frikkin' settler of the New World, and confidence does not stem from taking credit for the actions of others.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 07:12 AM
0

Ha! Richard Lynn. Many of the data points in Lynn's book IQ and the Wealth of Nations were not based on residents of the named countries. The datum for Suriname was based on tests given to Surinamese who had emigrated to the Netherlands, and the datum for Ethiopia was based on the IQ scores of a highly selected group that had emigrated to Israel, and, for cultural and historical reasons, was hardly representative of the Ethiopian population. The datum for Mexico was based on a weighted averaging…
/r/TheRedPill12/03/16 12:05 AM
1

Are you genuinely surprised? Take a good long look around, mate, these are your compatriots.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/16 11:57 PM
3

Because back when he was 20, this totally isn't the way such a case would have turned out. Why? Because it wouldn't have made it to court in the first place. You and I both know that.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 06:10 PM
-8

Yeah, seeing that at the top comment really reinforces the reasons I don't come here when I'm not coming from /r/all. I mean, I don't mind when a sub has a really heavy focus on one specific sociopolitical issue, but when it's clear that the circlejerk is going to win out over even the most basic critical thinking every time, that's when it's clear that a sub is beyond help. I mean, for fuck sake /r/MensRights, did none of you actually read his link there regarding the changing of laws before up…
/r/MensRights05/10/15 06:05 PM
1

You know, it's a funny thing; for all you just wrote, not even a single sentence actually furthered your argument against the claim that men had far greater control during these times. Rather, what you just wrote was almost exclusively justifying who had the control, and in order to do that, you must first acknowledge that one group had disproportionately greater control over the other. Quite frankly, you're are a liar. You went from -and I quote- "Men were never privileged over women" to "women…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 04:10 AM
1

Horse shit, son. When one group can vote and own property while the other cannot, that group controls the other group, because they can exert control over the government. That's how a democratic government works, now I would kindly ask you to fuck off with your revisionist bullshit, and go join the TERFs and rad-fems. You guys deserve each other.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 11:32 PM
0

but if you ask a 2nd-waver "Has society traditionally been controlled by men in such a way that it privileges men over women?", you'll get a yes 9/10 times. Wait, was the not realistically the answer 9/10 times in relation to what was then considered "traditional society" during the rise and height of second wave feminism? I mean, we're talking ~1960-1980s here.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 05:11 PM
2

There are few active equality based feminists, so the radicals have become the mainstream feminists and are the ones who run the popular websites, the events, and the conversation. Is "activity" truly the issue here? Based on everything I've ever seen on how these kinds of issues pay out in American media, I'd argue that the actual problem is that the crazies are the only ones anyone cares enough about to discuss. Can you name some Feminists known specifically for being rational and reasonable o…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 11:50 AM
11

What... What species are you?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/15 07:50 AM
4

His comment history suggests that he's taking the criticisms routinely leveled (for some strange, unknowable reason, of course) against his political demographic, then parroting them back against people he doesn't like without much in the way of an understanding as to what the words themselves actually mean. Hope that clears things up. :)
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/15 05:55 PM
2

there's nothing the judge could have legally done to punish him. That doesn't actually matter, though. Not in America, anyway, thanks to the magic of Judicial immunity. As established in Mireles v. Waco (1991), he can not only issue a bench warrant for his arrest for his failure to comply, he can also outright instruct the police officers sent to arrest him to "rough him up a little" to teach him a lesson. Total immunity from all civil and criminal repercussions, so long as the actions take plac…
/r/MensRights09/08/15 02:51 PM
1

Sad to see people downvoting as though this hasn't already been found to be happening in America, and on far lesser charges at that.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 02:27 PM
0

Way to go /r/MensRights, one of your users was almost a social egalitarian for a second there.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 02:26 PM
1

Because that's not how the American Justice System works, and any further action on their part -regardless of the outcome- is going to cost them more money. They obviously cannot afford that fee, so no justice for them.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 02:24 PM
1

“He offered me fifteen days in jail and that would have been fine and I asked if I could call my job [to let them know],” said Bundy. “The judge told me ‘nope, that’s not how this works.’” This sounds like a situation in which the commenter did not read the article, but want's to preform an analysis for us anyway.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 02:21 PM
5

>looks at account page >second comment is arguing that anyone with one fourth or more African blood possesses "the same ideologies, thoughts, and behavior" Yes.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 02:17 PM
2

Reddit needs to make money, because they're currently operating at a loss, so they're getting rid of the subs advertisers don't like. This is the fault of women.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 11:59 PM
3

First time poster here. Largely just looking around to determine how much of the stereotypical depiction of this sub elsewhere on Reddit is based in reality, how much is grossly exaggerated nonsense, and how much is outright bullshit. I'm probably not aware of things which would go without saying to a regular, so try and go easy on me, mates. I don't intend to do much more than ask some questions regarding the rational behind given stances, but you know, just point out if I do something wrong, e…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 08:29 PM
1

But the law didn't specify mental illness, just that she be a woman. Actually, it specifically does: Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46, s 233 www.canlii.org/en/ca/laws/stat/rsc-1985-c-c-46/latest/rsc-1985-c-c-46.html#sec672.1 Infanticide: 233. A female person commits infanticide when by a wilful act or omission she causes the death of her newly-born child, if at the time of the act or omission she is not fully recovered from the effects of giving birth to the child and by reason thereof or of the …
/r/PussyPass26/08/14 07:43 PM
1

Read the article again, son. It's pretty clear in pointing out that the infanticide law is entirely separate from the murder one. This means it can be used in really heinous situations where the accused is proven to have been in full control of their faculties, but went ahead and did it anyway, in order to extend their sentence past the sentencing cap on murder. It also means it can be used in situations where the accused is proven to have lacked full control over their mental faculties (in this…
/r/PussyPass26/08/14 03:58 AM
1

Honestly, my biggest problem is the justification you normally get which amounts to poor people, sick people, and then unwanted people are better off not existing. It sounds like you need to take some time to consider if "better off not existing" and "better off not having been brought into existence" is the same thing. The former can be achieved with a holocaust. The latter can't. To me, that's a significant enough distinction to draw a stark line between the two.
/r/PussyPass26/08/14 03:48 AM
0

Well fucking said.
/r/PussyPass26/08/14 03:44 AM
1

You should tighten up your definition, mate. Because what you just described occurs in every sexually reproducing species ever.
/r/PussyPass26/08/14 03:43 AM
3

You should tighten up your definition, mate. Because what you just described occurs in every sexually reproducing species ever.
/r/PussyPass26/08/14 03:43 AM
1

If you read the article, the exemption explicitly applies only to women. If you read the law, you'd know it applies only to women because only women can experience postpartum depression. There was a far better article explaining the situation which was circling back when this was in the news for the first time a few years ago, and I really wish I could find it again for you. To give you the jist of it, under the way standard Canadian law deals with demonstrable mental illness in relation to crim…
/r/PussyPass26/08/14 03:36 AM
2

Your reply is a non-sequitur in the sense his your words discredit his character rather then focus on discrediting his claims. Did you not read what /u/alexdrac's claims actually are? Because they're virtually identical, the only substantial difference being that /u/Serenad3 used statistical data covering the entire population, instead of an isolated case, making his counter-accusation far better supported.
/r/PussyPass26/08/14 03:20 AM
1

Oh, so it's only widespread persecution of specific ethnic groups, pervasive to such an extent that attempts have been made to justify it on record by your government officals. No big deal, am I right? After all, it's never explicitly mentioned as a "sin" like killing infants is. You know, except for when the god of all three Abrahamic religions explicitly tells you too: Ezekiel 9:5-7 "Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, "Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is no…
/r/PussyPass26/08/14 03:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter