TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MushroomTaco Archive

View 0 posts and 106 comments by MushroomTaco on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Because what you said was pointless. In every thread like this there's always someone like you to come in and say "wElL Im GlAd Im CuT!" and it adds nothing to the conversation. Do a thought experiment with me here: There are some people in the world who have fetishes for body modification. Modification that many people would consider strange and even mutilation. I'm sure you can imagine something that would qualify for this description. Let's say, amputation of the pinky finger. Now imagine tha…
/r/MensRights02/04/20 04:46 AM
4

Well at least you're logically consistent, if nothing else.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 12:48 AM
4

The penis is not still 100% functional. You're assuming that the foreskin has no function, it clearly does. And no, we do not routinely preemptively non consensually remove "skin defects" to prevent cancer. We remove them only when they develop a problem and usually when there's no alternate less invasive treatment, and with the consent of the patient. And regardless, the foreskin is not a "skin defect." But all that aside, is your argument that, if the body part is "decimated" then that's the l…
/r/MensRights27/03/20 12:46 AM
13

Do you extend this same logic to female circumcision? After all, the parents are making the choice for they feel is in the child's best interest.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 09:40 PM
3

Thank you for having an open mind, and thank you for taking care of your future children. You should know that, while attitudes are changing and circumcision is becoming less common every day, there's a possibility you will meet with fierce resistance if you choose not to circumcise. Everyone from your spouse, to your family, to doctors, may attempt to bully you into doing it. Even right after giving birth, sometimes Doctors will literally try to trick the mother into signing for it while she's …
/r/MensRights26/03/20 09:33 PM
4

Anesthetic is generally used these days when done by doctors, BUT it's only relatively recently that it's common. As recently as the 80's most circumcisions were done without any anesthetic at all, because they believed babies don't feel pain. And even today, the baby is only given a much less effective local anesthetic, not a general anesthetic, because that can kill a baby. And the baby is given no post operation pain relief. Men who say they were circumcised as adults can get general anesthet…
/r/MensRights26/03/20 09:24 PM
6

Amazing how men and animals have survived for millions of years without modern hygiene and this deadly smegma hanging about. I assume you circumcised all your pets right? After all, they never clean their foreskins.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 09:19 PM
4

... wut. Show me a single instance of smegma that required surgery to remove and I will literally eat a shoe. You know that you have smegma all over your body right? Everyone does, men and women. Next time you're in the shower, scrape your nail across your skin. See the white stuff under it? That's smegma. It's just dead skin cells. It can accumulate in every little crevice of your body if you aren't hygienic. A little water, that's all it takes. And if it's such an in issue when it accumulates …
/r/MensRights26/03/20 09:17 PM
3

True, some places even consider consensual genital cutting to be FGM, but still, all non consensual cutting is FGM. IMO it's also foolish to label consensual cutting as FGM. People have the right to their own body. Telling women they can't even if they ask for it, then forcing it on men, is absurd.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 09:13 PM
12

Obviously we can't directly compare breasts and penises. If reduction in cancer risk is a valid reason to circumcise children, it should be able to stand on its own, regardless of other factors. So if it's a valid reason to amputate the foreskin, why is it not a valid reason when applied to any other body part?
/r/MensRights26/03/20 05:31 PM
26

How is it a horrible comparison? People say we should get circumcised because it reduces cancer. So why not preemptively remove breasts, to reduce rates of breast cancer?
/r/MensRights26/03/20 04:58 PM
16

You should educate yourself before you speak. Any non consensual cutting of female genitalia is illegal and labeled Female Genital Mutilation in first world countries. This includes something as simple as poking the clitoris to draw a drop of blood, up to something as severe as cutting off the clitoris. It's all FGM. And it's all illegal, because we understand that there is Zero amount of acceptable cutting that you can do to female genitals. But we strangely think it's OK to cut off 50% of the …
/r/MensRights26/03/20 04:56 PM
16

theres no difference in condom effectiveness on an intact penis you just roll the skin back before you put the condom on how can you say its a "health benefit" if you admit its never been studied?
/r/MensRights26/03/20 04:51 PM
36

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCuy163srRc&t=3s http://www.cirp.org/pages/parents/FAQ/ Instead of asking why NOT to do it, ask, why TO do it? The "health benefits" are ridiculously small. In the very unlikely event your son's foreskins ever have a problem, there are many alternate treatments that don't involved amputation. The only "health benefit" that could even apply to a child is reduction in UTI's, which again, a very small % of boys ever get anyway, and can be easily treated with antibiot…
/r/MensRights26/03/20 03:45 PM
26

Person: "wHy ArNeT mEn LoBbYiNg fOr AcTiOn?" same person, when men lobby for action: "Shut up"
/r/MensRights24/03/20 12:24 PM
42

Oh my sweet summer child. I'm assuming you're not American? Basically Americans have been brainwashed to believe that the foreskin is somehow automatically "dirty" and makes a man guaranteed to suffer from a host of maladies, including but not limited to, AIDS, urinary tract infections, hpv, herpes, phimosis, "dick cheese," excessive masturbation, cancer, ballinitis, offensive smell, and that it serves no function, and that it provides no sexual feeling, and that the mere presence of it should d…
/r/MensRights14/03/20 03:34 AM
6

More: Further criticism of the African RCTs: Sexually Transmitted Infections and Male Circumcision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis HIV/AIDS and circumcision: lost in translation Sub-Saharan African randomised clinical trials into male circumcision and HIV transmission: Methodological, ethical and legal concerns Critique of African RCTs into Male Circumcision and HIV Sexual Transmission How the circumcision solution in Africa will increase HIV infections Sexually Transmitted Infections and…
/r/MensRights02/03/20 05:28 AM
7

Some more: Refutations of alleged benefits of circumcision The commonly claimed benefits of circumcision are that it reduces the risk of getting UTIs, penile cancer, and prevents STDs. These claims are based on reports made by the American Association of Pediatrics. But there is a lot of criticism regarding their research. The important points are mentioned below. According to the AAP report, it takes over 100 circumcisions to prevent 1 UTI. UTIs can be treated easily in other, less invasive way…
/r/MensRights02/03/20 05:28 AM
8

First I must say, you sound like an open minded and compassionate person, and it's good that you are seeking more information. If you are seriously considering circumcising your future son, I strongly urge you to watch video of an actual circumcision being performed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLhEoOQhsVw&list=PLSrzsYVegJBRmTV_WW5zMGYFq6iiOcwQd&index=63&t=0s Warning, this is not easy to watch, but it's important to see if you think this is something you want to do your child. Also please wa…
/r/MensRights02/03/20 05:26 AM
4

In biblical times it was their method of controlling the bleeding. Keep this in mind whenever anyone talks about how in ancient times it was for "sanitation purposes."
/r/MensRights27/02/20 01:37 AM
6

Oh but it is. As long as the child is a male. Hell, you don't even need religion as an excuse. 99% of circumcisions in the US are done in a hospital to non Jews.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 01:35 AM
7

Women complain that guys get pissy when they get rejected, but if you've ever rejected a woman's advances you know the average guys response ain't got shit on THAT.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 12:05 AM
5

Yes, I'm speaking hypothetically. I know all the arguments for and against. There are no valid justifications for routine infant circumcision. We would understand this, if we apply the same ethical standard that we all collectively understand for every other part of the body, except for the male (and only male) genitals.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 05:26 PM
10

What's the purpose of removing the foreskin? Pros and cons please. Our common understanding of morality, in the Western world and medical community, compels us to regard very seriously the non consentual amputation of other people's body parts. Thus, there must be clear and compelling reasons for the procedure, usually in a matter of life or death, with no alternative methods of treatment, for it to be considered ethical. This is the standard understanding of ethics in the Western and medical wo…
/r/MensRights17/02/20 04:08 AM
2

One time I was staying in a hotel. Got on the elevator to go down to the lobby, before the door closed a naked little girl runs into the elevator. I just kinda froze like "WTF," the door closed, elevator went down to ground floor. I RAN out of that elevator, away from that kid, went straight to the front desk, said "hey there's a naked little kid alone back there," and left. Could that kid have been in danger? Probably not, probably just a kid being silly. But it's possible. At the time I was li…
/r/MensRights14/02/20 08:34 PM
3

you're a real piece of work man.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 10:44 PM
3

Boys "requiring" circumcision is entirely caused by improper care. Doctors and parents who think they need to clean inside the foreskin forcibly retract it prematurely, when it should stay attached through adolescence and into puberty or even later. This causes the infections and phimosis which make the circumcision "required." There is no such thing as phimosis for a child. Again, it's entirely preventable, but unfortunately happens due to misinformation. And the root cause of the misinformatio…
/r/MensRights07/02/20 02:42 AM
5

but you're not any more entitled to better feeling masturbation or whatever the fucking assumption is and y'all are all so salty about, and at least you can still cum. So, people are not entitled to live with their own body? The most basic, natural right every creature is born with, and you think it doesn't exist? My point is that we currently aren't doing enough for the boys already dealing with botched surgeries. And they are absolutely still boys who are mentally scarred well into adulthood. …
/r/MensRights07/02/20 02:23 AM
5

Then what is your point? My point is simple, ban infant circumcision. No equivocation. No nuance. There is no reason for it, there are no benefits to it, and there is massive amounts of harm from it. So, what is your point? You started off with some completely misinformed comparisons to fgm, a favorite tactic of mgm advocates. Then you went on to the equally false assertion that it's somehow "more painful" later in life, again a favorite line of mgm advocates. And offered examples of uncut men w…
/r/MensRights07/02/20 12:33 AM
6

I'm still trying to understand your though process here. Because of all the bullshit rationalizations for circumcision, men not being happy with their dicks has to be near the top of the list. The solution in that case is simply, they can get circumcised. They can, as an adult, with full knowledge of the costs and benefits, and full consent to the procedure, go get it done to themselves. That is always an option for them. And if they get it done, and end up not liking it, well it was entirely th…
/r/MensRights07/02/20 12:11 AM
6

Literally no one is saying that cases of medical need shouldnt be properly addressed. What I am saying is that every circumcised man will inevitably suffer from reduced sensation. And you are wildly innacurate with your estimation of the prevalence of phimosis. But let's roll with it, and be generous and say 25% of men will suffer from phimosis. First, standard medical practice is to use least invasive methods first, and escalate as necessary. There are many treatments for phimosis, including st…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 11:45 PM
12

In ancient times, circumcision only removed the very tip of the foreskin, leaving 90% of the foreskin. This was the Biblical circumcision until the 2nd century AD, when Jewish men living with the Greeks and Romans were practicing foreskin restoration to fit in with them while participating in nude public events. This angered Jewish leaders, who then created the Bris Milah, which is identical to the modern medical circumcision. This style of circumcision was explicitly designed to make it impossi…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 11:33 PM
8

I've known 3 of those men personally and another that just has permanently uncontracted foreskin. It's basically just stuck to his head so he lasts forever bc he prob can't feel as much. How is it possible for you to get this close and still be so far from understanding. Every single dude who is circumcised is exactly like your friend you just referenced there. How is this not obvious to you?
/r/MensRights06/02/20 11:25 PM
4

I agree completely. I'm trying to look at it from the point of view of the average moron who doesnt know anything about rights and how they work. Well, most people agree that fgm isn't covered under "religious freedom" right? So get their neurons tingling, ask them why mgm is.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 10:56 PM
4

If "religious freedom" is the proposition, then they need to explain why legalizing fgm is not also an issue of religious freedom. If it is not, then there is no religious freedom argument to be made.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 09:48 PM
3

And 100% of those that survive will be sexually crippled for life.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 08:08 PM
3

Wow, so if I move to Africa I can have a 1.5% lower chance of getting HIV. Amazing. The 80% of nerve endings in my penis I lost were totally worth it, thank you parents and doctors.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 08:04 PM
2

a chance to prove his innocence THAT'S NOT HOW IT WORKS REEEE
/r/MensRights28/01/20 10:25 PM
2

The American Academy of Pediatrics is full of shit and so are you.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 11:42 PM
3

yourwholebaby.org
/r/MensRights26/01/20 08:43 PM
3

Ok, that's good, your comment You are also correct. It's a maddening paradox which has no simple solution. If MGM was outright declared illegal, you can bet there would be an underground network developed to provide the service. had led me to believe you were proposing this same logic.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 01:39 AM
2

Ok, I agree. But you can make an argument for physician assisted suicide without that line of reasoning. It should be legal because it is a person's life to choose to do with as they wish, including ending it. My point is that "x should be legal, otherwise it will be more dangerous if it's illegal" is not a valid line of logic, because we can imagine examples were that would not be valid case. If something is immoral and damaging to another person, it should be illegal. It should not be legalize…
/r/MensRights26/01/20 12:40 AM
2

Let me rephrase then: Are you seriously saying that you don't have a solid opinion on whether murder should be legalized?
/r/MensRights26/01/20 12:21 AM
10

Yeah, it's a complete deflection. "FGM is worse!" FGM is legally prohibited in literally any way, in America. Not even a single pin prick can be done to a female. If you argue that fgm is worse, you are taking the position that there is literally no amount of tissue that can be removed from the female genitals, literally not even removal of tissue but a single pin prick, can be done without permanently damaging the woman's sexuality, but also that there is no ill effects from removing fully half…
/r/MensRights26/01/20 12:13 AM
3

Are you serious?
/r/MensRights26/01/20 12:00 AM
3

Would that be a justification for anything else? Murder is illegal, but there's plenty of underground networks of people providing that service. Should we legalize it so we can legal and regulated criminal murder gangs?
/r/MensRights25/01/20 11:40 PM
6

A baby cannot voice it's objection to circumcision. And a dog owner speaks on behalf of their pet, giving the necessary permission for every other health related procedure the animal must have. Why do you have this arbitrary distinction for this one single issue?
/r/MensRights25/01/20 11:38 PM
15

Not just on hygiene? Ok, what else you got buddy? UTIs? Easily treatable with antibiotics. STDs? Babies aren't having sex. Edit: Penile Cancer? Effects exclusively elderly men. What else you got?
/r/MensRights25/01/20 09:19 AM
13

Definitely true. The idea of women as delicate flowers who couldn't work was largely from aristocrats, and even then it wasn't all women, it was just the upper class ladies. The servants of course were scum who could do whatever shit jobs they got, but a lady could never sully her hands. For the working class people of history, women toiled alongside men, albeit with some separation of duties due to biological differences in strength.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 12:30 AM
2

Why is it your concern what others do? Yeah my dude, because we don't have any other laws or cultural norms about what other people can or can't do to each other, right?
/r/MensRights22/01/20 11:57 PM
2

Record everything. If you don't live in a single party consent state, seriously consider moving.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 11:38 PM
13

Don't forget, reduces your ability to give women vaginal orgasms by 50% 🤡🌍
/r/MensRights09/01/20 04:21 AM
12

It has never been about hygiene, that is a post hoc rationalization, the same way saying that it "prevents STDs/cancer/masturbation etc" were all post hoc rationalizations for circumicision at different times. Why does every animal have a foreskin, live outdoors in the dirt and never wash it, but never has any issues with it? Does that make any sense, that in an era before modern sanitary surgical practices, that inducing a bleeding open wound on the penis would be more hygenic than just leaving…
/r/MensRights04/01/20 04:53 PM
3

Moral arguments aside, it's just a dumb idea all around. I've been there, done that, and I sure as hell wouldn't want to share a foxhole with a guy who didn't want to be there.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 03:50 PM
2

Damn, those would be some powerful fucking kegels.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 03:45 PM
10

Congratulations, you have a functioning brain and sense of empathy, unlike the people who mutilate infants genitals.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 03:40 PM
20

Baby cries for the pain of having it's dick split open and half the skin cut off. Nobody cares.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 03:40 PM
6

Good on you, thank you for fighting to protect your children. I hope you are able to bring her around. Please show her things like the movie "American Circumcision" and actual videos of the procedure. I think once people actually see the cutting and hear the screams, it can jog their brain into being like "HOLY SHIT, this ain't right!"
/r/MensRights30/12/19 04:39 AM
8

Because tradition is a hell of a thing. This is two hours, but it's worth a watch. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCuy163srRc&list=PLSrzsYVegJBRmTV_WW5zMGYFq6iiOcwQd&index=47&t=3s TLDR is it started thousands of years ago as a tribal custom meant to reinforce group bonds and identity and subservience to the tribe. Over the years the justification for it has shifted to whatever was the scariest issue of the day (oneness with God/the tribe, preventing masturbation, STD transmission, etc). The med…
/r/MensRights30/12/19 04:06 AM
7

Let's pull that thread a little more. "It's not as bad!" Ok, first off, if you're admitting that it's bad, why are you defending it? Second, when has that ever been a justification for anything? If some culture cut the left arms off all little girls at birth, but only the left hands of all the little boys, does that mean we should only stop the arm cutting but not worry about the hand cutting? Third, you're imagining the worst possible case for fgm, and the best possible case for mgm. Because fg…
/r/MensRights30/12/19 03:58 AM
5

Reminder that most routine infant circumcision are carried out without or with minimal anesthetic.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 02:51 AM
11

But that's a silly argument because sexual dimorphism in the human animal exists precisely because 1 sex has to carry and birth children. And our natural biological sexual dimorphism is the basis for our traditional social paradigms on gender.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 02:50 AM
3

Haha, you see, there's no lack of sensation in the remaining fingers! (never mind the missing finger) (this is the actual logic used to justify infant male genital mutilation)
/r/MensRights28/12/19 02:42 AM
2

The difference is, they can get all the peer pressure in the world, but no woman (in the Western world) is getting their vulva surgically altered without their consent.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 02:41 AM
24

If my grandma had balls, she'd be my grandpa. If men got pregnant, they'd be women.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 02:12 AM
50

But no, you see it's wrong, because that's a cultural ritual not a religious ritual, so that makes it different somehow. /s
/r/MensRights28/12/19 02:12 AM
1

There are no cultures that practice female genital mutilation that do not also practice male genital mutilation. The idea that fgm is done solely to control female sexuality is a complete lie. They repress everyone. The difference in the West is that we only do it to men.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 05:25 AM
3

Right? "My body, my choice!" "Unless I make the wrong choice, then it's still everyone else's fault!"
/r/MensRights26/12/19 05:08 AM
1

Frankly, I don't give two shits what anyone thinks about how my dick looks besides me and the person I'm currently fucking. Especially my parents. That's so fucking creepy it's beyond description.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 05:07 AM
2

Yup, and I'm cut and I've had a UTI. So fucking lot of good that did me. Oh and btw, all i did was take a some antibiotics and it cleared right up. And not once did the doc ask me if I was cut. Almost like it doesn't make a fucking difference at all. Haven't gotten an STD, but that's probably cuz I still gotta wear a condom during sex, which kills what little sensation I have left.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 05:00 AM
13

"Men aren’t allowed to complain about being mutilated against their will at birth and, if they do, are widely mocked, further reinforcing the fact our society views male bodies as expendable and male sexuality something to be feared and reigned in." "If you have one of those hardcore intactivist sons demanding an apology for his circumcision, he’s an asshole. That’s crueler than the procedure itself. " 🤔 Literally shaming men just paragraphs after he condemns it. And his hypothetical dude is jus…
/r/MensRights26/12/19 04:54 AM
3

And most of the women in Africa, Indonesia, and the Middle East who are victims of fgm will tell you their genitals are fine too.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 03:59 AM
1

Also consider that there are no cultures in the world that exclusively practice fgm. In fact, America (and Israel) are rather unique in only limiting the genital mutilation to one gender. Everywhere else that does it, boys and girls get cut.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:55 AM
0

Why are you operating from an assumption that it will need to be done at all? For 99.999% of intact men around the world it's a complete non issue. I'm gonna go galaxy brain level reasoning here, but maybe, JUST MAYBE, if it's too horrible to do to an adult, we shouldn't do it to an infant?
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:53 AM
3

"Female circumcision is way worse" Why are you making this a contest of who can damage their children's genitals the most?
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:50 AM
11

There are plenty of women, victims of fgm, in Muslim and African countries who would tell you that fgm is fine, and would give you, nearly word for word, the exact same arguments used to defend male circumcision. Does that mean it's ok to start circumcising baby girls? If no, then why does your argument hold any validity?
/r/MensRights22/12/19 12:01 AM
1

ha, prude
/r/MensRights13/12/19 11:30 PM
29

Making false accusation CREATES real victims. Unless you think innocent men being prosecuted aren't being victimized.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 01:29 AM
10

Honestly, I don't understand what the big deal is. It's cleaner, it smells better, it looks better, less chance of cancer, UTI's and STD's, there's no loss of sensation, you get it done when they're a kid so they won't remember it, and guys like it. I plan to circumcise all my daughters.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 04:55 AM
8

User name definitely does not check out.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 04:53 AM
1

Like all of feminism, it's a shit test, meant to weed out the weak.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 06:42 PM
18

Holidays of feasting are one of the oldest human traditions, to celebrate the bounty of the harvest, so I'd give Thanksgiving a pass. However in the old days a feast actually meant something because you couldn't stuff your face on a daily basis and no one was fat. Nowadays we can feast every day so it's meaningless.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/19 09:51 PM
2

Men have unrealistic standards of female beauty! Also: Women rate 80% of men as ugly and that's A GOOD THING
/r/TheRedPill12/06/19 05:59 PM
0

What the fuck is this shit.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/19 06:25 AM
7

lmao, and even in that admission, there is still the implicit acknowledgement that men are responsible for taking charge in a relationship
/r/TheRedPill08/05/19 01:58 AM
72

" And once young Americans become more used to their more equal gender relations, they might re-embrace the degree of ambiguity and risk that romance entails. That is the hope, at least. Meanwhile, they might try putting down their phones, talking face to face a bit more, and even flirting. " gag me with a fucking spoon
/r/TheRedPill08/05/19 01:58 AM
41

"I am not your babe/Don't call me that, asshole!" "Whatever you say, babe."
/r/TheRedPill09/04/19 02:36 PM
2

Don't you know? Tolerance requires that we don't tolerate the intolerant.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/19 01:05 PM
1

This article is older than sliced bread.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/18 01:02 PM
13

Shown me a man who's never failed and I'll show you a man who hasn't reached his true potential.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/18 01:15 PM
1

You text like you have autism.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/18 05:32 PM
32

"They wont remember it!" If you tried that line with a judge after roofieing and raping a chick i doubt he would take it very well.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/18 02:47 PM
23

Yep, its not common knowledge, but you can find articles about it on all the anticirc sites of course, but even cuck sites like Huffpo and Jezebel have written about it. And the sucking baby dicks thing hasnt gone away either. There was a baby a couple years ago in NYC who got herpes from it. Sick.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/18 02:37 PM
76

Nice one bruv. Routine infant circumcision is evil. Its a Red Pill in its own way. The practice in America was started by people who hated male sexuality so much they were willing to mutilate infants. And it continues because its a great way to scam a couple more bucks out of childbirth, and sell the foreskin for cosmetics. And nobody really gives a fuck. There are no health benefits in 99.9% of cases. If you think it looks better or you really dont care about the thousands of lost nerve endings…
/r/TheRedPill01/08/18 01:09 PM
1

Solid Snake?
/r/TheRedPill31/07/18 04:38 PM
3

Hot girl with bad personality Vs homely chick with good personality is the gender swapped version of Douchebag Chad Vs Nice Guy AFC. If youre an Attractive Douche, its because you can get away with it. If youre a Nice Chump, its because you have to be. The difference is women are far more likely to remold their personality once they get pulled into the orbit of a powerful man.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/18 02:27 PM
2

I disagree about why women have not formed institutions comparable to male ones. I dont think its anything as complicated or vague as the sexes willingness to create hierarchies and enforce rules. Its far simpler than that. Remember that through most of history men and women inhabited completely different spheres, because of our biology. Women tend to the family, men tend to the tribe/clan/nation. Because women are burdened with pregnancy they are natural for their familial role. Because men are…
/r/TheRedPill30/07/18 02:12 PM
5

This but dont just ask questions. Friends talk in statements, strangers ask questions. Its ok to make declarative statements and get her to respond to you as well, pulls her into your frame and creates a sense of connection if your not just interrogating her.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/18 01:28 PM
2

Nobody is saying that it shouldnt be an option for men who are old enough to consent to it. They just dont want it done routinely to infants and children.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 05:20 PM
25

Wrong. You're comparing the safest form of mgm to the most extreme form of fgm. Add to that the fact that fgm is only performed in third world shitholes, not clean Western hospitals. But let's go the other way. Any form of fgm, even the slightest prick with a needle to draw a drop of blood, is illegal in the west. Yet mgm is routine. Kind of invalidates your argument.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 12:33 PM
3

Supplements: Creatine is good. Whey protein and vitamin/mineral supps are useful if you arent getting enough in your food. Steroids are great if youre willing to deal with everything that entails. Almos everything else is garbage. For programming, you need to understand that its individual, and tailored to you and your progress and current fitness. Anybody who says you can 2x a week same as 5x a week is full of shit. You're a novice. 2x a week may work well for you. Once youve been lifting for a…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/18 02:40 PM
12

The absence of my white dick is considered oppression ahahaha.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/18 02:04 PM
3

Do not ever fire warning or even "wounding" shots. You open your ass up to a world of legal hurt. Shoot to stop the threat (center mass until he stops being a threat).
/r/TheRedPill28/12/17 02:50 PM
-1

What are you, Little Dicky getting your hair cut at a salon? Just go to a barber for fucks sake.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/17 04:41 PM
1

Not really, you're training your CNS just as much as your muscles, and its just as important.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/17 01:30 PM
3

When i die, Crom will ask me "what is the riddle of steel?" If i do not know, Crom will laugh at me, and he will cast me out of Valhalla!
/r/TheRedPill13/09/17 05:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter