Aha! The spammer spams again! This is why nobody can have a debate with you. Whenever your point is debunked, you spam the same thing to overwhelm them. We already covered the mastectomies part, so stop spamming it. Breast tissue has a function, unlike the foreskin. More spam about vaccines. The fact is that not all vaccines are medically necessary. Otherwise people wouldn’t be able to survive without them. Once again, the spammer knows this, but instead of admitting he’s wrong, he spams. How ir…
And the spammer continues to spam. The fact that many people are fine without getting certain vaccines means that they are not medically necessary. The spammer knows this, but he doesn’t like to admit it, so he spams. He also makes the silly mastectomy claim, even though we’ve already discussed that breast tissue has a purpose, unlike the foreskin.
LOL! So you’re allowed to accuse others of attacks (falsely, I might add), but when I do it’s an attack? Oh, the hypocrisy! You got an explanation for that?
Aha, you spammed again! I already answered your nonsense about mastectomies. Breast tissue has a purpose, unlike the foreskin. As for vaccines, we already know not all vaccines are medically necessary. If they were medically necessary, how are plenty of people surviving without them? Hmm? I assume the spammer will just spam again because they don’t have an answer. So again, medical necessity is not the standard.
LOL! Oh the hypocrisy is hilarious! You’re the one that relies on spamming. And of course, it follows with the typical false accusations of attacks, projection, and gaslighting, which is an attempt of gaslighting from the spammer.
Hey we already covered this! Medical necessity is not the standard. This is proven through vaccines, of which not all are medically necessary. I assume you’re going to spam me again about how vaccines are medically necessary (which some of them are not).
Watch again as the spammer ignores the fact that the foreskin is useless, unlike breast tissue. He still ignores the fact that sexual pleasure exists without the foreskin.
The spammer hypocritically accuses me of spam and attacks. It’s okay for him to accuse me of gaslighting, yet when I say that to him it’s an attack? It’s okay for him to spam, but when I make two comments it’s not okay? Hypocrisy at its finest. Too easy to see through.
And the spammer goes back to spamming! Lovely. Nice job posting misleading statistics. The fact is that circumcision is medically beneficial, and that’s all that’s needed to justify circumcision.
I appreciate that you’re not spamming this time, but that still doesn’t mean you’re right. Circumcision is medically beneficial, and that is enough reason to do it. The fact that Jews require it in infancy is even more reason for it to be allowed.
Watch as the spammer falsely accuses me of spam when he’s spamming himself. Hypocrisy as usual. As stated before, many Jews would be unhappy to not be circumcised as infants. Yet the spammer ignores that because it doesn’t suit their narrative.
Watch as the spammer continues to falsely accuse me of red herrings. No, the medical ethics do not limit it to medical necessity. Otherwise the CDC wouldn’t allow circumcision. Of course, the spammer ignores that because it doesn’t suit their narrative.
Falsely accusing me of spam just makes you look more and more hypocritical. As I’ve already said, being circumcised as an infant is very important to Jews. Many Jews would be upset with their parents if they didn’t circumcise them. But of course, the spammer doesn’t like this fact.
Nope. Medical ethics do not say medical necessity is the standard. Otherwise the CDC wouldn’t say circumcision should be left up to the parents to decide. You say I ignored your addressal of the flu vaccine, but it is actually you who ignores my response and spams as a result. And of course, you falsely accuse me of spam. No, these are not red herrings, and nice false accusation of logical fallacies.
More false accusations of spam. As stated before, many Jews would be unhappy if they weren’t circumcised as infants. By not circumcising them, you are violating their religious beliefs.
Ah more spam. While you accuse me of spamming? Oh, the hypocrisy. Medical necessity is not the standard, as we have seen with the case of vaccines. What about wisdom teeth removal? Many teenagers get their wisdom teeth removed by their parents’ decision. Are you against that too?
Hey we already covered this! UTIs can be deadly. Circumcision is a good preventative. Medical necessity is not the standard, as I have shown with vaccines. Not all vaccines are necessary, such as the flu vaccine. You will almost certainly be okay even if you don’t get the flu shot. So both your points have been debunked. Are you going to spam again?
Why not just treat the flu instead of giving children the vaccine? What about chicken pox? There’s a reason it’s better to prevent diseases than having to wait to treat them.
God required this in the Old Testament as a way of making Jews distinct from other people. It’s the same reason He used to require the dietary and dress laws.
It is you who is triggered by basic medical information. Basic medical information says that circumcision is beneficial. Also, falsely accusing me of bullying and gaslighting when it is you doing those things reveals your hypocrisy.
To anyone reading this, u/intactisnormal is a spammer who ignores the fact that circumcision has health benefits. He also claims that UTIs can easily be treated with antibiotics, even though UTIs can be deadly.
