TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MyAfricanChild Archive

View 7 posts and 82 comments by MyAfricanChild on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

*Voyeur
/r/MensRights08/03/16 10:23 AM
2

Honestly, I find the pandering to SJW's was unnecessary. But watching the trailer I simply don't see why so many people dislike it. If you overcome the fact that it does pander to SJW's, the trailer didn't look terrible. The trailer looked 'ok', I've watched most of the youtuber's opinions on it, I simply believe it's blown out of proportion. What do you think?
/r/MensRights08/03/16 07:11 AM
3

I thought the repetition of arraignment in the article was just a serious case of bad spelling. But it turns out after good searching, it is a genuine word.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 02:12 PM
1

Sorry about that! In editing I accidentally removed it, here it is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLc7Iab0vtk
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:29 PM
1

Thanks! I had some free time and I felt he had a good point, but simply didn't articulate it well.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:23 PM
2

The difference between belief and delusion ... the idea that beliefs seem to be things which do not cause marked distress while delusions do. Delusions are things which are misreading of interactions or experiences, coming to a fallacious conclusion. I think your first portion is not true, but the later portion is acceptably true. I think we must accept that delusions 'are' beliefs (elaboration of what sort of belief is not necessary). It is simply so, that a delusion is something which for some…
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:00 PM
6

He clarifies in the comments that he was mistaken. So we cannot say that he believed that Pepper is a "gray rapist" because he didn't understand what a "gray rapist" was.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 12:23 PM
0

Worst of all, a woman only has to claim to be abused first (using whatever terms she likes, physical, emotional, sexual), and she will be considered to be a more reliable claimant. I think you have an excellent point. But I'm wondering if you affirm the claim "men suffer domestic violence as much if not more at the hands of women, than women do at the hands of men." (I would even go so far as to include male on male, and female on female domestic violence). I personally think suffering is partic…
/r/MensRights26/02/16 03:54 AM
2

I simply make fun of the entire issue. For instance I do have a friend who is a bit on the nazi side, so when we talk or are with groups I turn genuine feminist statements into jokes. For instance "it's the patriarchies fault!", "You better be careful I might need a safezone', ask everyone their pronouns and when it is my turn I say "my pronouns are nig, nigger, and master of the house", or I will premise my statements by making elaborate tangents on how I'm an oppressed man of colour. She may h…
/r/MensRights25/02/16 11:45 AM
4

Niether belief nor disbelief are justified here. The 'only' justified position is suspension of believe. Simply the evidence does not fit the conclusion, even weakly, for belief or disbelief (irrespective of statistical assumptions). You can say you 'believe in' Kesha's testimony, but that does not concern a proposition but a commitment or trust. Many people state that in believing in Kesha they further believe that Kesha was raped, they are unjustified, since what they are saying is that 'this …
/r/MensRights24/02/16 02:16 AM
6

Perhaps from where you are from this is common. But where I live this is unheard of. It would probably make headlines. However your case doesn't demonstrate a rape culture, which is a culture which a large portion of a society systematically condone and in certain respects support rape. For instance what ISIS do to the poor ghoats could be considered a rape culture (this is humorous).
/r/MensRights23/02/16 07:30 AM
1

Well, let's have a look at this. I can't come to understand what happens to all of you that made you think this is a progressive way of moving forward as people. ok, so I expect you to elaborate on why you don't think this is a progressive way of moving forward. Since we are focused on (ripped from the FAQ) male issues - including but not limited to custody, alimony, reproductive health and rights, and education. Do you mean moving forward as actively doing x? Because you would have a point, tha…
/r/MensRights16/02/16 07:20 AM
0

The first quote points out your claim was false as 'at least one case' is sufficient to logically disprove your categorical claim. That's all, nothing more. Interesting quote! It is important to acknowledge that torture may sometimes lead to the disclosure of accurate information. (182 )(however it notes that often then were half truths or not accurate.) Yeah, right. It seemed intuitive that if you were to accuse a person of being immoral and a hypocrite then you would provide a quote that clear…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 09:24 AM
0

You may have a point, torture does result in 'unreliable information', and that is not what is assumed by the apologist, but in Sam's defense his 'reply', which is far later than his actual text, was in (June 21, 2014), your most recent link (and other relevant literature) is December 2014 (in the 2014's region). It's entirely possible that he could have changed his mind, or possibly new arguments might have come to light which he could present. "The tortured subject will only ever tell you what…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 02:37 AM
0

Did you just go through your own link and find the quotes? Or didn't you actually read and comprehend what he said? It seems that you only quote mined here buddy. His argument for profiling is that it is efficacious and that it costs less. Obviously profiling is widely used by surveillance-based jobs, being a bouncer for instance it is almost a necessity. He also notes that we should scan all luggage 'just in case' someone had a bomb placed in their luggage. It seems like a perfectly rational an…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 06:57 AM
2

You could reduce many of these arguments to prudential principles, saying it is prudent that one act in such a way that they do not receive physical harm. It is known by the agent, and also voluntary that they did so-and-so which was not the prudential choice and it resulted badly for them, then they're blameworthy (they could still be blameworthy regardless of the outcome some may say). However if someone did act prudently and still came to a bad fate then they would be blameless. (simply the d…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 06:20 AM
0

Maybe you should do some further research on those gems. A quick Google search on them all can rid you of your delusions.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 02:19 PM
8

During the debate she seems quite sure of herself, i must have not noticed her conceding the point then. This was incorrect. St Louise did not lie in the reporting of the Tim Hunt sexist comments. I wish that she would give an account of why she only quoted what could be construed in such a way to push her narrative and that she knowingly omitted certain portions of his speech to purposefully give no context. It reminds me of those Muslim's awhile back that would constantly quote Sam Harris and …
/r/MensRights25/01/16 03:23 AM
3

a decision has been made to prosecute [her] and a 43-year-old male," police said. This seems relevant.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 05:54 AM
10

There was a comment to the same sort of post a few days ago. It was that Reddit supposedly removed inactive members, which could roughly account for 3% to the total pop. That would be roughly 3-4k disappearing. Additionally, there just has not been any interesting news going on. Lines are pretty dead at the moment if you desire controversy.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 10:17 PM
4

It would be interesting if someone in the next few weeks were to have a case analogous to this but crucially it did not concern a husband but a wife wishing to stay home. It would be a very interesting to discover what they would say. I believe many of us would have a rough idea of what 'would' be said, but I'm also interested in their replies possibly surprising me.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 02:05 AM
10

I think have maintained non-consciously an environment where I would never turn down sex. Although she did not make any explicit pressure upon me, I was always willing. Although you are interested in a female perspective I had a similar experience with my girlfriend awhile back. I've been in a relationship for a few years now. Historically, it has been perfectly fine for her to not be interested in having sex for no reason in particular ("I'm not in the mood" is a common utterance). But in one n…
/r/MensRights14/12/15 02:18 AM
2

That's true, but within the interview she goes into more depth on why they are more valuable. Here is the youtube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRHHjUEaEtA
/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:50 AM
3

Theres a huge focus of circumcision... I don't feel passionately about this issue at all... i was circumcised.. I don't feel even the most remote concern on the subject, but i don't discount why others might I guess. The problem MRA's have with circumcision I believe comes down to the lobbying against Female Genital Mutilation as impermissible whereas Male Genital Mutilation is permissible (FGM is more severe of the two, but they are still a form of genital mutilation). The reasons for circumcis…
/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:39 AM
0

That's not quite what he said, he stated in his interview I’m not going to play whack-a-mole with every accusation and do to their reputations what they are trying to do to mine. He does not simply allow himself to be slandered either, the entire point of his interview was to defend himself from the accusations. He finally notes in his interview that: I want to remind people that I am not the subject of any lawsuits, I am not under criminal investigation, and at this moment I have no intention o…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 09:59 AM
3

During Deen's interview I remember him stating that he would not retaliate in a character assassinating manner.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 05:29 AM
4

Just as you can talk about feminism, we can talk about manhood. Yep, this would not go well (and had not gone well) when men criticize femalehood or toxic feminism. I believe she is probably being accidentally careful with her phrasing of 'you can talk about feminism'. You can talk about it, but in reality they will silence you if you say anything on the matter whatsoever (You hold no weight). The difference between us and them is that we won't actively silence/censor you for saying what you bel…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:53 PM
3

Hey OP, it would be excellent if you could point us towards the focus essay in question, I would be interested in reading it. I'm not the biggest fan of philosophy of feminism or even feminists epistemology, but it seems if there are grounds for disagreement it would be a worthy read.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 08:12 AM
15

Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20151201102722/http://www.9news.com.au/national/2015/12/01/17/27/clementine-ford-unrepentant-about-causing-troll-to-be-fired
/r/MensRights01/12/15 10:28 AM
3

He probably means that mandatory leave in itself is unnecessary. Availability of leave solves the men's rights issue, but as MRA's we are not concerned with equality in the sense of equity which you advocate but opportunity and equal rights. The fact that a man under your ruling could be forced against his will to not work could result in long-term financial problems for him. This would become a men's rights issue. Additionally not having the choice in duration of leave so that he may return to …
/r/MensRights30/11/15 04:10 PM
14

I do sympathize with her, if the rape did occur public slander or condemnation would be one of my goals. But my primary one would be to follow this up with the police. I would tell the public my course of actions and would'nt disappear simply after accusing. What is truly disgusting I believe is condemning on the accusation alone, this is another incident of prosecution before the hearing. I have also seen article after article with feminists throwing Deen under the bus. The viciousness of their…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 02:54 PM
6

We will never know...
/r/MensRights30/11/15 02:45 PM
1

Thank you for the correction. My mistake.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:31 PM
4

I really don't wish to be skeptical about this case, but with what she has said there are a few holes in her narrative. Firstly, where was everyone! If he sexually assaulted her shortly after her scene where were the crew or cast members etc. Although I'm not an expert I would think that they would hang around for a short while after the shooting (even if it were the last one, and the sets are rarely very large). Secondly, with him asking aggressively on the second time it suggests he had a loud…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:36 AM
6

I wanted to comment on 6 to, but 5 is enough bullshit for now. Number 5 is nonsense. The article is wrong that "they didn't actually consent to sex with you" and the link that is provided says nothing about this point, it only elaborates on the punishment for not disclosing an STD (which can result in being sued for negligence or personal injury). Uniformed consent in the cases provided is 'still' consent, it is simply that they have not informed you of something that would/is relevant. Strictly…
/r/MensRights29/11/15 01:14 PM
4

I predict that they will claim that the interview process was influenced by the internalized sexism/Bias' of the interviewer/group.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 09:54 AM
4

By watching her it seemed that not much was going on up there. Listen to her confirmed this.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 01:28 AM
2

I wonder if this is satire. It must be satire because if it isn't what she has done is basically pull the pin from a grenade and shoved it up her ass.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:45 AM
6

Yeah I caught that as well. It reminds me of that Atheist+ man who looks more akin to a cowboy than anything. Earlier in the year he said, "if you are not a feminist you are sexist, by definition". People in the comments section pointed out he was mistaken. I believe he removed comments for that particular video also. (I cannot remember the exact video)
/r/MensRights09/11/15 12:23 PM
2

Rape is comparable but is in no way equal to torture. Torture in many many ways exceeds rape on a pain scale/duration scale/potential for death etc. All of the psychological effects from rape i believe are transferable to cases of torture survivors. It is very difficult to live a normal life if one's fingers are missing, or one's knee caps have been irreversibly damaged, or perhaps one has one's tongue cut. Also rape could be included as a form of torture, but it is by no means torture itself. I…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 11:21 AM
0

I don't think you have made any cogent point here. I said that everyone would affirm this, but 'obviously' united in the original statement supposes that we must come under some umbrella title for example feminism. The OP is misleading and I pointed it out. So I have no clue what has gotten you all riled up. What I think is interesting however, and wonder if the OP would be able to give a little light on is what is and would be woman's suffrage in the world world.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:15 AM
-1

How am I making you look bad exactly?
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:01 AM
0

I think everyone would affirm the claim that we should end women's suffrage, but that doesn't mean we have to stand together. We could stand together 'formally' with that statement alone, but what method we would use is always up for debate. What I'm curious about is, what is woman's suffrage in our modern day? The obvious answer is to point towards 3rd world countries, but I'm interested in first world suffrage with this question.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 04:48 AM
3

It would probably be in your best interest to delete this after discovering the truth.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 10:52 PM
1

I greatly doubt that people would act in that way based on what she said. I have the sneaky feeling that some variables were left out of her account. I would'nt put it past her to purposely construct the story in a favorable light. We need more witnesses to get at the truth I guess. This reminds me of that Muslim woman who claimed people were being vicious/discriminatory towards her over an unopened coke can (Which later had counter testimony that her story was a lie).
/r/MensRights03/11/15 01:16 PM
1

I was just browsing through checking the old OP's comments. I found one innoculous one "What do you mean be ready for the consequences? Of having a vasectomy or of not having one?". It had -111 votes. What the hell is going on here.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 10:57 AM
4

I'm not so concerned with the article itself, it's clearly nonsense. But my real dislike stems from the en-mass agreements with the article itself on social media. The fact that people consider MRA's to be even remotely what is described within the article reflects the exerted media and feminist misrepresentation, slandering for disagreement with feminist doctrine.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 06:40 AM
7

"I know it may be tough taking up space in a movement that isn't about you" good to know that feminism doesn't give a fuck about men.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 01:22 PM
7

It must fry the brain to live in a cave with such an echo.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 11:25 AM
3

It's just the most peculiar thing. Sometimes they are willing to admit that men get the shit end of the stick in things such as disposability in violent situations, draft, court cases etc. When you succeed in getting them to agree with these facts, you further state that is what the MRA movement is about. I've seen this a fair few times. She nods in agreement and then later talks to her friends and claims that "This friend of mine is misguided and is actually a feminist in denial, MRA's are real…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 11:21 AM
2

I understand that feminists have a warped sense of what is considered "hate speech". I think you are right, what I was intending on meaning was that we should not be prohibited from saying certain things, the things which I would considered worthy of being actively combating would be the hate speech of a white supremacist member against a minority. That would be an instance were I would tell him to shut the fuck up. But since 'hate speech' is rather vague, I could include some form of psychologi…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 09:14 AM
3

Please use trigger words when engaging in such mansplaining language. Oh man, this is hilarious.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:17 AM
18

Although it is definitely a serious issue, I don't condone banning prison rape jokes. For the same reason that don't condone banning ordinary rape jokes. We are adults and can say what we wish, insofar as it's not hate speech (or other harm clauses).
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:14 AM
1

Who says i cannot do more than 50+ push-ups? I usually do sets of push-ups for it is simply a better workout. If you have a break of approximately 10 seconds between sets as it's a better workout in whole. But this is something which I do everyday, so I wouldn't attempt to do anything particularly strenuous as it's a ritual rather than a genuine workout. But if I were to do push-ups it would very much depend on the type of push-up. If it were wide spaced 100 push-ups would not be too strenuous. …
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:59 PM
1

Wow, I had a look at the average number of pull ups and push ups by each of the genders. I would say it would be a better measure of a person's physical strength for them to do multiple sets rather than one large set. For instance, 3x sets of 8 (10) pullups with 10 second intervals between sets would probably be fine as a minimum. And possibly 3x sets of 20(25) push ups should be the minimum with the same 10 second intervals between sets.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:05 PM
1

I have a bar out the back which each morning I wake up and do a set routine. I usually do 3 sets of 20 pull-ups and then continue on to do 3 sets of 25 push ups or 2 sets till failure. Then I do a couple of sets of squats till the legs burn a bit. And then maybe do a plank for a couple of minutes (I'm rather inconsistent on this one, the side planks I'm even more inconsistent). Since pull ups are generally using the shoulder-back muscles and core you can transition to push ups afterwards. 30 pul…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 10:46 AM
1

So let me get this straight. If I were to have sex with someone and we were quiet in the sense that it was directed via body-language. If that other person were to accuse me afterwards of rape, stating that verbal consent was not obtained, what would I do then? It seems to put me into a bit of a hole as I would have to say, "well, we didn't talk, it seemed fine at the time". Since no verbal interaction was made, and only through bodily cues we mutually established consent. She could easily deny …
/r/MensRights14/07/15 07:00 AM
0

It's a little disgusting how low the standard is if you are correct. Hell, at a bare minimum I would say 20-30 pullups, 50+ pushups and 30-50 squats with slightly over the median run time for a 3 kilometer run.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 05:31 AM
2

"Major ("feminist") organizations have claimed for a long time that we’ll start with ("Women's rights") and then get to everything else, that we need visibility to achieve wider rights. That trickledown logic is both a lie and a distraction. Incorporating ("Men") into institutions like ("Heforshe") and the ("Yesallwomen") does not decrease ("Male related") violence. It does nothing to address root causes of ("Men's issues") and violence: racial, economic, and gender injustice." Oh, this is price…
/r/MensRights12/07/15 10:01 PM
2

I think this is excellent news. I think at least in those blurry cases were "he thought it was consensual, she felt she couldn't say no" is used as a condemnation of a young man could be resolved if the girl speaks up about it. If they are taught to be overly sensitive and are indoctrinated into calling rape at the mere mention of butt play, it could have twofold significant effects. 1) They will quickly realize that many men simply don't want someone who is so concerned about rape. They would o…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 05:59 AM
2

I thought the same thing. If people here believe that the guy was in the right or there should not have been ramifications for his action I would be genuinely disappointed. That second hit was damn good, but it was unneeded.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:22 AM
2

I like to think of this analogy. There is one wound with two gashes, one is larger than the other. If you put a large bandage on the largest one, some of the bandage itself will cover adjacent smaller one. But you have to realize that you have still have failed to patch the entire wound.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 05:29 AM
5

This profound ignorance just makes me livid. I just wonder what their parents would say if they were to read their child's post online and know that what they are saying is absolutely rubbish.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 05:25 AM
5

For number 12. clearly you can see you are picking at straws with this one.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 04:04 PM
6

not a single ad on that page If you go into that page, the first thing you can see is an ad. Please change it to an archived one. And please don't lie.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 01:59 PM
1

I don't know why there are dislikes, I think what you have said is on point.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 07:11 AM
7

Honestly if I were to do a hand grip test and be told that I was equal or less than the female average I would call BS on the whole thing. Age of 20-24 Male hand-grips are normally between: 36.8-56.6kg Female hand-grips are normally between: 21.5-35.3kg To say you 'GRIP LIKE A WOMAN' is really saying your hand-grip is less than just about every other male. It's embarrassing because the truth is, no one wants to be on the lower end of just about any scale to do with a gender as an average. I woul…
/r/MensRights02/07/15 02:36 AM
2

This doesn't say much, what do the numbers at the bottom represent? total percentage?
/r/MensRights01/07/15 09:00 AM
0

I'm not saying any of that. I'm saying that there is an investigateable difference in how people act or feel when it comes to suicide. There are people who take the lethal route(hanging etc) , and those who take most probable methods (OD etc). You are oddly proving my point that it is biologically wrong to feel the need to kill oneself, for if someone were fully intent on killing themself I would expect a lethal method. On the other hand, I have the suspicion that if someone does not have the sa…
/r/MensRights01/07/15 06:34 AM
4

You further deny that E is cogent evidence, and say there is no evidence for A. But if there is no evidence for A, it doesn't follow that A is false. And you present no evidence for B, you only suggest that E is not evidence for A. So you have presented absolutely no reason to believe A is false. We also have no reason to believe A is true either. We must remain agnostic unless the evidence tells us otherwise. If that's his argument then his counter claim is irrelevant as he is criticizing your …
/r/MensRights01/07/15 01:32 AM
2

I've found the usual perspective on suicidal genders as categories is that women are typically seen as in needing of nurturing and psychological help, and men are seen as being potentially dangerous and needing psychological help.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 01:19 AM
3

It's not hindering anyone who is suicidal nor is it preventing them from getting treatment. If you are adamant about killing yourself, then why would you leave the possibility of survival present. That's why people question further when people take half measures. Because often it is simply nihilistic depression or a cry for help.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 01:16 AM
16

Spot on.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 01:09 AM
12

If you could find that link, it would be interesting to have a read over.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 01:07 AM
6

I've never been a fan of surveymonkey. I just don't think it is scientific. Surely, you have a great deal of people giving their opinion, but what region are you studying? There is no accountability or follow up after the statistics. Since this is something which people actively participate that already invites a bias. (as many other surveys of a similar nature are accused of)
/r/MensRights30/06/15 01:51 PM
1

It's because they have an agenda which necessitates a victim-hood narrative. For instance, if there is a rape culture which is predominantly perpetrated by men, therefore there is a social patriarchy which men control all the power with the conscious, non-conscious, sub-conscious and unconscious threat of rape based violence. I think this can also be seen in gaming generally as bitches get raped in multiplayer matches, so gaming is patriarchal. Women also get raped in martial arts vs men(mostoft…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 02:14 AM
3

This I believe is mainly for caregivers by the looks of it. They do a considerable amount of work and receive shit all pay for it. I've several friends who work in this sector who comment that they frequently are expected to do more than what a person could reasonably be expected to do. (on top of often unreliable co-workers) The main reason is that there is so little being given into the healthcare sector they either reduce the total staff or just don't increase the wage they earn. What I'm int…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 07:08 AM
1

Hm, I was interested in hearing Feminists opinions on the matter and upon linking the same article I was subsequently banned. Why is this so? I checked their rules, it doesn't seem I broke anything. But what i'm earnestly interested in is to see if they are interested in this case to the same if not more of an extent that we are. Clearly, they have been spearheading the lynchmob towards a man who seems at least upon new evidence (I believe that regardless of this, what they did to him was unacce…
/r/MensRights25/06/15 10:21 AM
-11

Imagine that though... You throw her purse and cellphone and lock her inside with you. It's like you are attempting to tell a thief to call the cops and save you. If there were an incident were this actually happened. I would most likely have to re-evaluate my life.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 09:19 AM
1

I've heard from some people that MRA's and PUA's are 'basically' the same by the mere fact that they are part of the manosphere. I usually proceed to slap the stupid out of them. But that is their reason for conflating the two.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 11:54 PM
2

I would interpret "fainting couch" to be a dramatic display of existential nihilism with an accompanied long sigh. I think I can see this sort of behaviour especially in those who are the most idle. But I think the practical understanding of this phenomena would be from the Feminists who are mentally incapable of considering or confronting facts by an opposition. Since they dwell in echo's of their own opinion it must be a nightmare to learn that perhaps someone does not believe what they believ…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 08:45 AM
7

Bane666au covered this rather well the other day, it's appalling TYT's lack of journalism. I doubt anyone would hold TYT them as factually correct anyway. Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eziz4l9C-Go
/r/MensRights23/06/15 08:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter