MyFaultIHavetoOwn Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
26	Male Body Attractiveness is Maximized at 23.2 BMI Leanness matters too. 6’0” 170 lb can be fairly developed if lean, or unremarkable if skinny fat. I prefer a bigger look too, but studies always show that on average, the female gaze prefers less muscle than the male gaze. However, I think there’s a good amount of variation. Woman to woman. Also, women’s rating of a man’s attractiveness isn’t as good a predictor of his body count as other men’s rating of his formidability. As always, there’s nuance and grains of salt	/r/BlackPillScience	16/02/26 03:05 AM
5	Enough With the Incels! A Literary Cry for Help From Female Insings (Involuntary Single) My other comment got filtered, idk if you can see it. I'll give the short version. Basically, women hold the power in dating, the only entity with more power is a Chad. Women have no use for blue-pilled guys, so they don't really care what happens to them. They'll never change themselves for a blue-pilled guy. The only pain point women have in modern dating, is not getting the loverboy treatment from the Chads they want. If Chad's didn't tear through women, women would have no complaints and not…	/r/BlackPillScience	31/05/25 11:04 PM
2	Enough With the Incels! A Literary Cry for Help From Female Insings (Involuntary Single) Yeh. Word vomit vs buffet, lolz. Guess you can't tell the difference between regurgitation and quality.	/r/BlackPillScience	25/05/25 08:47 PM
2	Enough With the Incels! A Literary Cry for Help From Female Insings (Involuntary Single) I'm not lacking points, I just don't want to get in the mud with you. I loved debating in my early 20s, but now I don't give a fuck about changing people's minds. Especially not when they're obviously bad thinkers. There’s about a 0.2% chance you can still meaningfully engage, so let me spell out my issues with you and your thinking: Word vomit. It’s faster and easier to spew BS than it is to make relevant, accurate, nuanced points. This is why I am hyperdefining the scope of my initial point. N…	/r/BlackPillScience	25/05/25 03:28 PM
1	Enough With the Incels! A Literary Cry for Help From Female Insings (Involuntary Single) You're absolutely confirming my position that you have very defined views on this topic. I made a statement with narrow scope, and you're coming in with a debate mindset about points I didn't make. I'm not looking for a debate. I will defend my point, and only my point. This could've been a laidback discussion, but to me it's insufferable when people just spaghetti blast strawmen and stray points. First let me clarify what I'm not saying. I'm not saying porn is addictive. I'm not saying it isn't…	/r/BlackPillScience	24/05/25 06:14 PM
1	Enough With the Incels! A Literary Cry for Help From Female Insings (Involuntary Single) Eh. It sounds like you have a super narrow/defined conception of how struggling with porn works. I'm sure what you're saying applies in some cases, but it's definitely not applicable to all, nor is it the only contributing factor. Ease of access always matters. And that's the parallel I was drawing. An easily accessible supernormal stimulus will desensitize you to a normal stimulus. It happens to women who get run through by Chads, and to guys who binge porn. If you were to say it's an unequal c…	/r/BlackPillScience	23/05/25 02:13 PM
7	Enough With the Incels! A Literary Cry for Help From Female Insings (Involuntary Single) I’m open to the idea that having too much access to sex from elite men miscalibrates women. But that’s the same issue as men struggling with porn, and that’s something that always gets mocked and laid at the feet of their own lack of self-control. I support Chads tearing through hordes of women, because it’s the only point of leverage we still have. The same way girls support porn stars out of freedom of expression or whatever.	/r/BlackPillScience	23/05/25 02:19 AM
12	When women believed they were hooked up to a polygraph (lie detector), their mean reported number of sex partners rose substantially, from 2.6 to 4.4 sexual partners. Nah bro, I gotsta uhpdate teh multiplier in my hoeflation quackulator from three to five!🤓 Figurative language means mathematical figures, right??	/r/BlackPillScience	21/05/25 09:14 PM
9	When women believed they were hooked up to a polygraph (lie detector), their mean reported number of sex partners rose substantially, from 2.6 to 4.4 sexual partners. I mean I don't even ask usually. And if they offer a number, I usually don't believe it. I do assume they're lying, because for them it's all gain no loss to lie (though technically we can't know that for sure either). And I watch what her attitude/lifestyle/friends are like now. I just think the math rules are silly.	/r/BlackPillScience	20/05/25 08:35 PM
20	When women believed they were hooked up to a polygraph (lie detector), their mean reported number of sex partners rose substantially, from 2.6 to 4.4 sexual partners. Those rules are all silly tbh. The truth is, you can never know. There’s no reason there would be a universal rule, it’s just a misguided attempt at feeling some kind of certainty. She can say 3 and the real number can be literally anything.	/r/BlackPillScience	20/05/25 01:21 AM
23	The relative importance of looks, height, job, bio, intelligence, and homophily in online dating: A conjoint analysis I’m surprised height didn’t matter compared to attractiveness	/r/BlackPillScience	11/01/25 05:51 PM
1	TW - Male Suicide British residents only, or any 18+ man globally?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	18/04/21 10:40 AM