TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MyGodWhat Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by MyGodWhat on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
28

She probably wasn’t educated on what happen to David Reimer, or thinks her child will be different. In any case I hope the child grows up healthy and successful.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 03:46 PM
0

Video doesn’t work.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 12:10 PM
2

Never heard of it before, so I clicked. Yeah your right that is bad. First article was about how 1 and 4 men are virgins by the age of 30, because men are undesirable.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 04:16 PM
2

Agreed. We a basically turning into r/feminist and one could claim that we a worse and that person wouldn’t be necessarily wrong.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 03:56 PM
10

I like the mention that he “denies the allegations” against him at the end. He won the case against him in November.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 04:41 PM
7

This. This is what we are all about. Right there!
/r/MensRights10/04/19 04:09 AM
152

I really don’t understand her post. Is she trying to say that because of inequality women do not ride bikes as much as men? Or men are more invisible than women while riding a bike, and therefore in less danger? That is what I am getting but I do hope I am wrong.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 08:19 PM
-9

No, I think she has a point. After Mike Zimmerman and Trevon Martin case, Trevon who in my eyes was wrongfully killed under the claim of self protection, self protection cases are harder to prove. I believe (if I remember right) after that case many states change to self defense laws. Rape cases are also hard to prove, and those who do commit the act are sometimes never truly punished (Baylor and Turner) which gives the wrong messages to people. It gives wrong messages about men if those who do …
/r/MensRights13/03/19 01:14 PM
19

That is not what they are saying. Perpetrate meaning to carry out. It is saying, 6.4% of the 100% of college men, commit rape while the other 93.6% of 100% of college men do not commit rape. The second statistic shows supports this by being so high, because it indicates rapist rape multiple times not just once. Now are these statistics correct? Doubtful. Many statistics display self report surveys online, which typically condition people to report at a higher rate prior to beginning the survey. …
/r/MensRights27/02/19 01:34 PM
1

You sound like a very sweet, and very caring woman. Probably because you are, and it’s not a bad thing at the slightest. My suggestions are either he needs to stop, and solely focus on you and your needs; or you need to leave him. Non-monogamous relationships are difficult even without the jealousy. It is just as natural as his instinctive nature to want to experience more, as it is for you to want to be monogamous with him. Three years, and at 24 & 25, that is a lot of dedication by you to let …
/r/RedPillWomen21/02/19 02:41 AM
1

Hey, probably out on a limb here but: Self acceptance is the hardest thing to know that you are doing without trying to know that you are doing it. You aren’t accepting who you are, and casting that same doubt on to him when truly he is probably worried on how to keep you as well. You are looking at the materials that shape you and him to the outside world, rather than seeing the materials that make up you and him. Listen to his laugh more, and figure out what made him do that; stare into his ey…
/r/RedPillWomen21/02/19 02:27 AM
3

True.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 01:22 AM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 12:45 AM
4

Thank you for taking an interest. It is small thing that can lead to bigger thoughts to some, but really how it’s also something we can use to get a good laugh in as well.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 02:28 AM
2

Yeah, that kind of has been the whole point of both of my comments. Did you actually read my comment or just the opening one or two lines?
/r/MensRights28/01/19 02:24 AM
3

Indicating that men should be “sweet and decently rich” is what is wrong, and is the same as saying women should be “cute and a good cook”. Something that would infuriate the female population. To be honest, I don’t understand the point of your comment. Nothing in my comment indicated outrage, or that men should be outraged. The main focus of my comment is reflecting that men are willing to find the “sliver lining” or “turn the cheek” towards things like this because we care about other and more…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 01:14 AM
4

It’s not, though most men will find a silver lining about it to give them a laugh. Sadly it’s something men just come to accept because life is easier if we simply accept the flaws in ourselves and others, and respect their opinions. Men have shown throughout history we are willing to bite the bullet and turn the other cheek for salvation and harmony for our children and women. However, that same curtesy is not given, or reciprocated, typically from our female courted parts.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 12:30 AM
8

I understand what you are saying and yes, the last proration of the ad does reflect great values that everyone, even those who you call liberals and conservatives. What the problem that many men have is with the opening of the ad. It is a consistent blame of men for complications throughout the world, and that some issues they designate as men’s issues are not strictly a men’s issue, but a world issue. Example: Bullying in school is higher among females than males. (Source: https://www.pacer.org…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 06:04 AM
0

Doubt it. Gillette is apart a big organization that is apart of the group that dictates our lives. To think we are going to do anything to by “boycotting”, or being angry, is insane. They might take a hit for a quarter or two, but they will be right back to wear they were sooner rather than later. What we do, us low- and middle-class people, will never truly affect the high-class or the actual political make up in America or respected countries. We are pawns and sheep. They control it. All we do…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 02:09 AM
3

Bad publicity is publicity nevertheless. In the world of 6 second memories we are just rats in a cage. Pawns on a board. Sheep. NPCs.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 10:11 PM
33

You can’t lose friends if you don’t have any. 7/9 would recommend.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:12 AM
3

Thank you good sir! I appreciate it! I am looking for specific wording, so I am hoping that someone can lead me to articles that I haven’t read or seen. Obviously there are a lot, so help to narrow down things is great. This is great! Thank you again!
/r/MensRights16/01/19 06:49 PM
3

Could you link a source to these? Either the masculinity is being defined by feminists, and feminist saying it’s not up to men to define feminism. Whether is a news video/article, feminist group, or a march were it was said. Sorry for the request. I would love to use it as a source (if legitimate) against feminism in upcoming reports.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 05:36 PM
2

It’s Malnificent!
/r/MensRights15/01/19 05:01 PM
5

I think going the route of “your children will reenact your actions” would be a better slogan and campaign. That would draw interests from both sides of the toxic masculinity argument. This, to me, sets a target towards men, suggesting the opponents against the #metoo movement, the ideology of true masculinity, and the 1950s father, are the reason boys have with bullying and other things. They should have shown times of a man stepping up to set a good example, basically the last 15ish seconds of…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:15 AM
-2

Not sure if this is a men’s rights issue. I know it involves a young man, but it is not challenging his rights or giving women more rights than anyone. I can see the maybe, that in the title of the article it does not mention rape. Typically, if the role were reversed, the title would probably read “Teacher accused of raping his foster daughter faces new charges.” Also, if a male was charged for rape I do not believe they would have the opportunity to be at home on a computer. Many questions abo…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 11:19 PM
1

Correct. The only thing would be that the University even mentioning he poses a threat due to his size is wrong. Other than that, I do not know what is wrong or right in this case. I do not who is at fault or who is is lying even if anyone is lying because it could be about the perception of who it is all involving. Truly, I know nothing.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:26 PM
1

The way I would take that quote would be since he is working to achieve a PhD, he is more than likely a Teaching Assistant, Graduate Research Assistant, or in a position that supervises student’s education. Therefore might have eventually have a position in giving grades to her or teaching her. However, I don’t know the context on the quote, because I don’t feel like rereading the articles. This is for you, NiceandRespecrable, and hopefully makes you happier. I understand the rage, we all have b…
/r/MensRights06/01/19 05:49 AM
13

3 years probation with 1500 hours community service.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 10:08 PM
3

We aren’t r/TwoXChromosomes. We are not a woman hate group. There are two sides of a story that should be heard, but doesn’t mean one side is right and the other wrong. In this case it could be a huge miscommunication. I believe the Title IX Office is at fault on how they are and have handle this situation. The University of Missouri is terrified about not handling things correctly still stemming from the racial issue and professor misconduct from a few years ago.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 05:04 PM
3

I understand your passion, and it is appreciated. I just want to make sure we don’t become r/TwoXChromosomes and become a woman hate sub, so I like to bring up the opposite opinion from time to time. With that said, this could be an issue of the ugly fat guy vs hot fit guy, in which the ugly fat guy flirting is seen as harassment while the hot fit guy is not. Not saying he is ugly, but the age difference could be seen that way. And if it is, it is not a Title IX violation. The three page note is…
/r/MensRights05/01/19 04:56 PM
6

This comment is giving the female student the benefit of the doubt, and is blaming wording of the Title IX Office: Could this be an issue of terrible wording done by the the Title IX Office at the University of Missouri? The male student is being subject to a violation because he is consistently and seems to have repetitively asked her out instead of his size. She declined all the offers when he asked her out and he possibly increase the amount of contact towards her thus scaring her. Scared bec…
/r/MensRights04/01/19 11:44 PM
5

No, it’s called being childish. Do you think anyone would give Jordan Peterson, Karen Straughan, or Ben Shapiro, the light of day if they cussed, or displayed “emphasis”, in their talks? No. Just like this sub won’t do it either.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 05:43 PM
5

Don’t put “dumbass” in the title. Your title displays a whining and childish tone. Be more mature, don’t whine, and don’t cuss. Edit: As for your other posts, the YouTube ad was the best am I actually saved that post. Just be more constructive in your titling, and add more a mature tone. It’s a sub about Men’s Rights, one on the things we are up against is people consider us to be “crying” over our now inability to assert power over women. Staying away from titles that you see on Facebook and Tw…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 05:22 PM
1

I don’t see where it says she hopes to receive the same sentencing as her brother, but I like this article about her too. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-46263183?intlink_from_url=https://www.bbc.com/news/topics/cg3mqk48yr5t/fiona-onasanya&link_location=live-reporting-story
/r/MensRights28/12/18 10:38 PM
3

No really. He hates people previously and who are currently in power in the United States, because of what they have done to those in lower classes. His real point is about a handful of people causing issues on all sides of the argument.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 04:36 AM
15

Annoying personalities and voices? I was going to say they are all do-able, but then I realized the last one is a cow and beastality is illegal.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 04:28 AM
2

This will be an interesting case. If he did indeed continue the acts with her while she was asleep like he confused to the police (last paragraph), then he seems to be claiming Title IX craze even though he actually raped her. I am not a legal person, but if that last paragraph is true, and if he did disclose that, is that self-incrimination? How does that play into determining whether he raped her or not? I worry about this case. Rape unfortunately does happen, and those who do that act should …
/r/MensRights07/12/18 03:17 AM
3

The “fragile” male ego. People, men, have tried to discuss these matters, and they get attacked.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 05:39 AM
22

She received the minimum jail time for a rape crime in North Dakota. The news article does not say rape, which it should, but since she did not actually encounter the second victim then she is only being charge for one it seems. Source: https://apps.rainn.org/policy/policy-crime-definitions.cfm?state=North%20Dakota&group=3
/r/MensRights15/11/18 07:20 PM
49

If Durham is not paying their women staff and faculty equally, which I doubt, wouldn’t it be better to increase their pay interested of giving them a discount in the school store? It’s, hey we are giving a discount for not receiving equal pay, so spend your lesser amount of paycheck here at the school? Pay us for not paying you!
/r/MensRights09/11/18 11:26 PM
7

It’s a bold strategy, Cotton. Let’s see if it pays off for them. Wait. It didn’t.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 12:15 PM
6

Sources man. 95% of statistics of fake 20% every time. Remember that.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 02:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter