TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MyLOLNameWasTaken Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by MyLOLNameWasTaken on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

100%. A total and complete misread of our situation to believe men can make IDPOL work for us. IDPOL was constructed with men, white straight men specifically, as the 'eternal enemy'. It will never happen. Evidence based argumentation and contending the legal system is far more likely to succeed.
/r/MensRights07/08/26 12:56 AM
2

He wants a BLM to happen for MRA. Which it won't, ever, but it is a nice dream I'd support. I agree with what you said earlier, that evidence based legal challenges are the best vehicle for recourse.
/r/MensRights07/08/26 12:52 AM
3

I have no nice things to say. The fact this is still permissible in 2025 is a type of supernatural evil; and I’m an atheist.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 11:46 AM
12

No they dont lol people just dont want to feel bad and lie to themselves
/r/MensRights05/12/25 09:09 PM
25

Frankly, hateful. Nobody gives a f that little boys are strapped to a board and flayed as one of their first life experiences in the US. How can you not hate a civilization like that? Especially when the reasoning to permanently maim their sons is because they’re too stupid to find a pharmacy for condoms or to provide treatment for sexual related illness. The most serious cases still live full lives w/ treatment; literally meaningless. Even worse are the religious reasons. Might as well brand th…
/r/MensRights05/12/25 09:04 PM
13

Doesn’t help if you’re in USA they’ve totally normalized routine infant genital cutting. Causing a range of issues from ed, death, desensitization, keratinization, literally stunting your development (multiple cm divergences, p 0.01 iirc), doing untold developmental psychological damage, etc. Women do not deal with the belittling in their genital integrity movement. Mgm is only ever brought up to be stepped on by fgm opponents who’ve already won their fight here. Nothing more perverse than handi…
/r/MensRights16/09/25 01:17 AM
5

Very likely makes your dick smaller too. No way a part suffering amputation trauma before hitting the point of actually developing the related secondary sexual characteristics does anything good to how your package turns out. Beyond the obvious moral and ethical issues, who wants less dick? I think neither haver nor receiver lol.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 12:47 AM
9

Not enough considering it is an awful practice
/r/MensRights25/08/25 12:32 AM
3

Restoration using devices is near 0 time.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 12:30 AM
7

I’d suggest preparing yourself for repeatedly reiterating your intentions to not. They will push for it repeatedly. The anecdotes where they do not are few and far between. In USA, at least.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 12:28 AM
4

Never let anyone gaslight you about men having an abundance of “extra” rights. We have the fewest.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 09:35 PM
1

Highly recommend avoiding circumcision. Be the hero for your son others were not aware enough to be; please try all alternatives before allowing for such an extreme, irreversible, procedure. And if all else fails and it is sincerely necessary be actively pursuant of something more minor like a dorsal slit rather than anything that’d remove tissue. Thank you for being concerned about your son and resisting panic, wisely considering alternatives before something that cannot be undone.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 01:37 AM
7

If the letters of the law are as much and nothing mentions the exception of, you’d rapidly see legal cases citing the dictionary definition of mutilation spring up. Hell, I’d file one. Least these med est dirtbags could do is foot the bill for Foregen.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 04:46 PM
0

If there are so many cite one that hits the requisite parameters. Breast cancer would go down if you were squared for a mastectomy ASAP. Won’t get glaucoma without eyes. No study is going to prove people are having better sex with less nervous tissues. That conclusion would determine the study’s invalidity. I’m not sitting with you for coffee to talk theology. Infants are being mutilated, their sensorial experience defaced in the name of pseudoscience. We can tend to the poor urologists later. A…
/r/MensRights02/10/24 02:35 PM
8

If you won’t even reply to the fact you got rolled on ‘there is not bias in west medicine’ I don’t really think you’re serious. Sounds like you’re probably biased yourself, or harboring an agenda. Rather than telling me something you don’t actually know. Refute any of it or concede like an adult. Wrong and smarmy is a disgusting look on people.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 08:31 AM
10

There is no such thing as no bias. Ideological capture is as old as history. The inverse is true in this instance. Most studies do not follow scientific methodology. You’d have to have an enormous sample size of men and have them consent to be circumcised; having controlled sexual activities pre and post. It must also be a lifetime study. I’ve yet to see one which reaches such criteria. And I’d presume such likely would not be performed as the consequences of any sufficient study, if circumcisio…
/r/MensRights01/10/24 06:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter