| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | This is a top post on /r/feminism. I don't understand why the define these things as 'feminism'. Shouldn't it be defined as BASIC human rights and not only concern women?Women hating on women according to the cultural expectations that centuries of male dominated society have created | /r/MensRights | 02/07/15 01:53 AM |
| 3 | Radfems like to talk about "toxic masculinity". So what examples are there of "toxic femininity"?Toxic masculinity, if I understand it, isn't just "ways men behave poorly." It's the aspects of masculinity as defined by society that harm men, instead of just women. Men being viewed as aggressive, sex-starved animals often causes distrust of men, especially when dealing with women and children. Men being pigeonholed into the breadwinning role, or being forced to withdraw emotional expression to prevent appearing weak, etc are all examples. Redefining masculinity and the way it's equipped by m… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/14 01:46 AM |
| 9 | Why are men not allowed to sit in comfort and promote male sexual health? I suppose guys bicycle seats will be considered sexist soon too. ""‘Man Spreaders,’ There’s No Excuse for Not Closing Your Legs on the Subway"The point of the article is to illuminate how some men do this in public spaces, asserting their comfort as more important than the comfort of others in that public space. How you sit in your home is irrelevant. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/14 03:21 PM |
| 5 | Support "The Sarkeesian Effect": An Investigative Documentary About 'Social Justice Warriors' in the MediaThis graphic (courtesy of 4chan, obviously) is perfectly on point. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/14 03:46 PM |
| 0 | Erin Pizzey, founder of one of the first Women's Refuges, determined violence among partners was roughly equal in rates. After which her and her family received death threats from militant feminists, had her dog killed, and fled to North America.I don't know if it was feminists or not So, not only is this post title misleading, but it's also an unfounded accusation. See, this is why people perceive us as a hate group. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/14 12:21 AM |
| 0 | Punt!Different time, different standards. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/14 08:59 PM |
| 0 | Punt!For a different angle; do you think a black person would agree to act in a movie if it carried egregiously racist themes/morals? | /r/MensRights | 24/06/14 05:00 PM |
| 0 | Punt!I think the humor of that scene is meant to come from two things: The context, i.e. it's a very serious moment in which Schmidt shoots a person for the first time. The meaningfully delayed gunshot is a trope of action movies, and the reverse is a comedy trope as old as the genre itself. The emasculation, i.e. losing one's penis is equivalent to losing one's manhood. This would not be the first time in film history that emasculation was played up for comedy, it's just that it was taken to an extr… | /r/MensRights | 23/06/14 02:37 PM |
| 1 | Punt!Didn't a woman get punched in the boob in that same movie? | /r/MensRights | 20/06/14 04:25 PM |
| 1 | "Yeah, I agree. Women have some serious challenges in today's society. Oh, by the way - do you have 100% of your genitals? Because I don't."I've done some reading and there doesn't appear to be a consensus on male circumcision. There are reported benefits and detriments from a few thousand studies and studies of studies. The negatives, especially on sites with a clear anti bias, seemed trumped up. Granted, it's clearly an issue that ought to be studied, but it's not something that we should be presenting into the arena of feminism and equalism when there are so many more pressing issues for men. I'm a circumcised man and I feel no r… | /r/MensRights | 31/05/14 05:04 PM |
| 1 | "Yeah, I agree. Women have some serious challenges in today's society. Oh, by the way - do you have 100% of your genitals? Because I don't."Female circumcision is nowhere near comparable. From the WHO: Long-term consequences can include: recurrent bladder and urinary tract infections; cysts; infertility; an increased risk of childbirth complications and newborn deaths; the need for later surgeries. For example, the FGM procedure that seals or narrows a vaginal opening (type 3 above) needs to be cut open later to allow for sexual intercourse and childbirth. Sometimes it is stitched again several times, including after childbirth, hen… | /r/MensRights | 30/05/14 07:05 PM |
| 0 | "Yeah, I agree. Women have some serious challenges in today's society. Oh, by the way - do you have 100% of your genitals? Because I don't."No, more that it doesn't negatively affect the social position of men. Your penis still works after being circumcised, as does mine and his and his. Penises are still completely fine after being circumcised. Obviously it's an antiquated practice that needs to be observed critically by medical experts. I agree that it's mostly pointless now since the supposed hygienic benefits are pretty much covered with a routine shower. Feminists mostly argue that women aren't given the same opportunities to s… | /r/MensRights | 30/05/14 03:47 PM |
| -3 | "Yeah, I agree. Women have some serious challenges in today's society. Oh, by the way - do you have 100% of your genitals? Because I don't."I would hardly say that having a fully functioning penis is equivalent to underrepresentation in government. Also, the argument could be made that women don't have 100% of their genitals either, given the loss of the hymen and the limited amount of eggs. This is a really weak detrailing argument. If we're going to argue with feminists, we should do it from a position of reason. I've seen dozens of us remark at "thought terminating cliches" that feminists use, and this really sounds like that. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/14 05:57 AM |
| 28 | /r/TwoXChromosomes has been made a default subredditDiscrimination I have a hard time believing this is discrimination when most of reddit is already male. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/14 06:07 PM |
| 2 | I was raped last night. I'm engaged. I'm a man. (x-post /r/sex)I'm seeing a lot of people claiming he wasn't raped. That needs to stop. Legally, consent can't be acquired while drunk, so he was raped. Consent can't be acquired for anything while drunk or otherwise impaired, ranging from sex to signing a contract. Whether or not it'll hold up in court is a matter of how drunk he was and how coherent he was at the time. He clearly said he had no intention of having sex with her before he was drunk, therefore we can take it to mean that the alcohol was the det… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/14 10:20 PM |
| 1 | [Xpost from r/Feminism] " 'But What About False Rape Accusations' is a good litmus test" - Protecting the innocent? Ain't nobody got time for that!Hi there, You seem to be confused as to Malcolm X's assassination. Malcolm X was killed by the angry mob he helped fire up for changing his attitude. Malcolm X did change his attitude, but that was not the motivation for his murder. Mujahid Abdul Halim, one of the four gunmen, stated in an affidavit that the reason behind the murder was revenge for criticizing Elijah Muhammad, leader of the Nation of Islam and Malcolm's former mentor. The criticism was directed at Muhammad's marital infidelity, … | /r/MensRights | 27/04/14 04:18 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter