TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MyNameIsSaifa Archive

View 6 posts and 230 comments by MyNameIsSaifa on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

That's my point, you can't get the data to compare it to and even if you could it'd be low quality. Facial recognition as a problem is basically solved, it's unconstrained facial recognition (i.e. This case) that's significantly harder.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/20 11:04 AM
53

I did something similar to this for my Hons thesis, where I tried to match a given face against a social media profile. Couple of points that make it unfeasible; I've never been on OnlyFans but given its a porn website I doubt they will expose an API that will let you search profiles, particularly images, so the only way to get photos is through scraping. Difficult to keep reference set up to date, since we can't match against live data. It's difficult to get faces in the first place. While I'm …
/r/TheRedPill16/12/20 12:10 AM
1

http://pastebin.com/ELJbaPDh Copy that into notepad and save it as meal_plan.csv, it should then open up in excel without formatting (on Linux so don't have excel native, sorry). I'm a reasonably large man so you'll probably want to edit it for your needs.
/r/RedPillWomen28/07/20 10:55 AM
3

Don't leave meals in the fridge more than 4 days or you'll become ill, they taste like crap as well. Make sure everything you're using to cook has been thoroughly cleaned. I cook 4 days worth on a Sunday then 3 days worth on a Thursday. As far as what you're cooking, I'm probably not the one to go to. I'm really boring. I'll upload the spreadsheet I've used this week in the next 10 minutes or so once I get a break from work.
/r/RedPillWomen28/07/20 10:43 AM
13

Fair enough, I'm in the same boat. I've started meal prepping recently because I just don't have time to cook every day, one thing I've noticed is that dishes seem a lot easier to do in one big batch rather than a few every night. Possibly something to look into if you really hate it that much? Side benefit of helping you eat healthier as well.
/r/RedPillWomen28/07/20 10:19 AM
14

One of the reasons our society is progressing at an exponential rate is our ability to automate. We automate simple, repetitive tasks to allow us more time to automate etc, etc. Get a washing machine.
/r/RedPillWomen28/07/20 10:09 AM
2

Lots of good recommendations here, but for absolute beginners you can't go wrong with the Army fit app. It's designed to take you from obese couch slob to ready to enter basic training (by which time hopefully the gyms will be open again and you can move on to an actual strength training program). It uses bodyweight only and includes a healthy dose of cardio which is nice at the moment because I'm sure you're getting cabin fever like the rest of us.
/r/RedPillWomen03/05/20 08:05 PM
–

If you work, Beef stroganoff in a slow cooker for 8 hours is an absolute hit.
/r/RedPillWomen25/02/20 08:04 PM
11

Think that's about as overt a signal as you can get. Best of luck!
/r/RedPillWomen24/02/20 09:20 PM
45

Commenting because most people swallowing the pill are blind, the male friend in that story 100% wants you. If you want him back, wear the perfume he mentioned.
/r/RedPillWomen24/02/20 06:10 PM
2

Take interest in something, anything, that doesn't involve sitting at home after work watching netflix for 6 hours a night. Can be anything, so long as you're actually passionate about it. I have gym and politics for example.
/r/RedPillWomen05/02/20 08:09 PM
12

feminist believing in equal rights or any kind of justified violence against women I'll have some of what you're smoking please.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/20 07:46 AM
0

Is it really redpill to say its not your fault? None of us can tell you why he cheated or even if it was your fault, but it would be a good time for some introspection right now.
/r/RedPillWomen04/01/20 05:17 PM
2

Was lifting, have small brain. Thanks.
/r/RedPillWomen20/12/19 10:02 PM
3

Ideally, yes. In reality, no. The breakup of the atomic family in favour of degeneracy is the social adaptation to reliable birth control/abortion/White goods/the internet. Seriously, look at all the things which feminist "academics" say have liberated women and then look at the empirical change they've had on society. Not to say that we shouldn't innovate etc. but to solve the problems these things cause requires society as a whole to at least acknowledge that they're not panacaeas
/r/RedPillWomen20/12/19 08:13 PM
3

As a young man, I'd value both of those roughly equally. I know the plural of anecdote isn't evidence but my view and the view of every friend of mine that isn't a full on Billy beta is that the only real reason for a relationship right now is the sense of companionship and intimacy with another person. The biggest reason I've found for men rejecting relationships and just sticking to one night stands or staying single is because the women that offer the above are so few and far between, and are…
/r/RedPillWomen20/12/19 08:05 PM
21

Having a career as a physician is rewarding both financially and spiritually, it's an excellent choice. Trp doesn't recommend that you don't go to higher education, just that if you do go you have a plan for later in life so you don't get stuck studying some bullshit Liberal arts degree. You're young enough that just practicing your social skills will make your smv go through the rough, most boys your age are borderline autistic retards. Go lift.
/r/askTRP05/12/19 11:44 PM
7

Type 1 error, you don't see the unwashed hordes of fat neckbeards. Source: I was one. Look at the CS or MEng students, I guarantee the majority of them will be borderline subhuman.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/19 03:23 PM
1

Atomicity isn't necessarily a 'trap' as I see it, just the logical endpoint of being completely self-sufficient. If you don't need anyone else in your life, why would you go out of your way to include them? They're just distractions in the way of your goals. The real truth is that humans are social animals. There is a healthy balance to be struck between being completely alone and using all of your energy and resources to complete your goals, and having other people around you to enrich your lif…
/r/TheRedPill16/11/19 04:47 PM
3

Tell him you want him to be assertive and lead rather than just assuming he'll automatically know.
/r/RedPillWomen24/10/19 11:06 AM
4

Being a genuine and caring person and not a total headbanger that's a pain to deal with will put you in the top 10% easily.
/r/RedPillWomen04/10/19 04:09 PM
2

You've gone a bit far off the deep end there goy
/r/TheRedPill16/08/19 08:13 PM
6

I have a different perspective I think - some "self-loathing" is necessary to grow as a person. Reflection and self-criticism allows you to identify your faults effectively, which in turn allows you to work on them.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/19 01:27 AM
2

I could give you a massive amount of knowledge about software architecture, if you're not at least familiar in the field it would be absolutely useless without example analogies.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/19 03:14 PM
20

Since we can assume most natural alphas don't need a sub like this, we can infer most people here are not natural alphas and are in fact somewhat beta. The whole point of trp is to change that. So yeah, the video game analogy is probably super useful to get your point across to basement dwelling virgins who do nothing with their time other than masturbate and game.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/19 11:23 AM
2

Best PvP in the entire series by far.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/19 11:21 AM
1

My goal at the moment is to get down to 16 stone and graduate with a distinction, I've quit video games and any food not cooked by myself, I focus almost exclusively on those two goals. I just don't feel any strive to socialise, and I'm stuck in a city where I know nobody until my studies end.
/r/askTRP26/07/19 08:02 PM
1

Never had a physical. I live in the UK, I don't think we really have those here? I've been cutting for a few months but I've deliberately eaten at least 60g of dietary fat per day to keep normal hormone production. I need to make an appt anyway because my skin is horrendous right now, so I'll bring it up.
/r/askTRP18/07/19 08:19 PM
1

Haven't had the first since Christmas, do the second at most once a week. It doesn't interest me, that's why I'm worried.
/r/askTRP18/07/19 08:15 PM
30

Of course he's against it, it's essentially cheating the system. It's not a good long-term solution as far as society goes.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/18 12:51 AM
6

And if I still haven’t convinced you that it’s discrimination, think if insurance companies collected stats on race, and found that Asian drivers cause more accidents. If the insurance company adjusted their rates based on that, that would be racist. Agreed that insurance companies shouldn't discriminate based on gender, but that is very technically a false equivalency. You can show psychological differences that would lead to higher risk of having to pay out between men and women, not so much b…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 10:17 PM
1

its agreed.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 02:41 PM
9

Except it's not, it's a bastardisation of "mankind" which literally means all humans. It comes from a time when "man" meant any adult, male or female.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 10:12 AM
4

That would be 1st of January, 1970 at 00:00:11.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 07:14 PM
48

They are synonyms of each other. If you look at the etymology of mankind it stems from the time where "man" was used to refer to any human.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 07:12 PM
5

Surely it's a fairly obvious "this job involves running and fighting with dangerous people, we impose these tests to make sure you have the ability to catch people and to make sure you don't get killed by a 6ft 20st bodybuilder when you're a 5ft 8st woman".
/r/MensRights17/01/18 11:29 AM
12

traditionalist cuckold gynocentrist Lol.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 11:22 AM
3

Raspberry pi costs £25
/r/MensRights09/01/18 11:00 AM
4

Good luck finding an unbiased jury for that
/r/MensRights09/01/18 10:58 AM
1

Depends if the senior management really has bought in to the progressivism cult, I can see them dragging it out in court to cost him as much as possible just to spite him.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 10:57 AM
14

Always feel a little sad when I have to put "prefer not to say" over male on any form I'm filling out.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 10:42 AM
21

If I can pontificate a bit, for your edification, one of the rules of the Internet is "there are no girls on the Internet". This rule does not mean what you think it means. In real life, people like you for being a girl. They want to fuck you, so they pay attention to you and they pretend what you have to say is interesting, or that you are smart or clever. On the Internet, we don't have the chance to fuck you. This means the advantage of being a "girl" does not exist. You don't get a bonus to c…
/r/TheRedPill29/12/17 03:11 PM
5

I'm saying that if you're going to cite something you should do it correctly. That's great, but data doesn't lie which is why it's nice to have the actual source so you can see their methods and the data they've gathered as opposed to just their conclusion which is what you get when you cite news sources.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 08:14 PM
3

Progressive* I really dislike how the meaning of Liberal is changing.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 07:42 PM
23

Why are you downvoting him? He's correct, there's only 1 academic source and the other sources aren't exactly from entirely unbiased sources are they? Hence the headlines Clever girls, stupid boys and the abhorrent hiring practices. If you don't cite it properly with things that back up what you're saying you're just as bad as the feminists spouting the wage gap nonsense and justifying it with incorrect statistics.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 07:32 PM
2

That would go against feminist intersectionality Would it though? Girls are higher than boys in the oppression stack, I would've thought that removing boys from a male dominated stem subject would have mass approval of intersectional feminists
/r/MensRights27/11/17 10:46 AM
7

It's because one of the writers is heavily in to his intersectionality, hence the poor attempts at political allegories that almost ruined season 3. The other writer is classical liberal and apparently they're having lots of creative differences for obvious reasons, almost bad enough that they're considering not making season 4.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 10:44 AM
-39

Hard to work together if your goals are binary opposites
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:37 AM
72

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/30/study-blind-recruitment-aimed-at-boosting-female-hires-actually-does-the-opposite/ I've not heard of quotas being scrapped when men benefit, but there's an article about merit-based employment being discouraged because it doesn't benefit minorities.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 04:09 PM
4

Stay scientific, friend.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 07:47 PM
8

http://www.cirp.org/library/pain/anand/ Newspapers are shite sources, they always skew it one way or another. The study linked deals with pain response in newborns.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 12:08 PM
4

Internships in my field are usually paid, our skills are in high demand. They're also highly competitive, so not being able to apply to a decent amount of them because of membership to a group that I can't change feels pretty fucking bad. I earn <£500 a month. I have no savings. If I have privelege it isn't helping much.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 05:42 PM
16

Good thing my male privilege means I don't need an internship /s EDIT: Edit to point out that this email is from a fairly prestigious university that I attend.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 03:47 PM
3

Oh sweaty...
/r/MensRights18/10/17 03:32 PM
3

They could actually make use of the statistics of known unknowns to draw conclusions about a population... but we both know that's not what happened.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/17 09:35 AM
2

He... Talks to his therapist about his depression, and avoids the subject around his friends? That is kind of what a therapist is for.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/17 09:22 PM
15

Downvote him all you want, the man speaks the truth. Nobody likes hanging around with unhappy people. The best thing you can do is speak to a therapist.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/17 07:50 PM
1

Huh! Well, the more you know.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 10:38 PM
1

Yeah, I could've sworn we start off with female genitalia though? Roughly around the time we grow our tails? Either way happy to be corrected :)
/r/MensRights22/09/17 08:19 PM
1

Cassie Jaye Synonym for the female genitalia. Useful for piercing thin skin. Who cares? It's like those videos of people getting in to massive car crashes, you only watch it out of morbid interest. You, lover. I live in the UK and have no life so I can frequently check on the sub, mod me up buttercup ;)
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/17 05:45 PM
6

According to a new study, men are freaking out about this way too much by Gabby Bess I'll freak out about it as much as I want, thanks. The article is total horseshit, shown below: Studies have shown, however, that circumcision comes with health benefits The evidence is obviously scant, most of it seems to come from this study and is then endlessly re-quoted. There are several flaws, including the timescale of the study (participants were only studies for 2 years), the lack of proper controls (u…
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:55 PM
1

The delicious, glorious irony of defending Islam and condemning the actions of the characters in the handmaids tale. I love it. How these people don't realise that they are closer to the Christian right than they are to the oppressed in that book I'll never know.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 05:48 PM
3

You're forgetting the ever-present and under appreciated MALE GENOCIDE IS MORALLY JUSTIFIED AND TO NOT ADVOCATE FOR IT IS IMMORAL feminism. I've just realised as well, having a sex to be eradicated is probably the best use of the word genocide because you are literally trying to remove part of the human genome.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 05:45 PM
2

People who are distracted and have other things to do than argue on Reddit about the virtues of Communism. I'd be more concerned about getting the formal definition correct. Please stop personally insulting me. Communism has been tried, and it has failed. The utopian Communism you have in your head simply cannot exist perpetually in human society. Even if the necessary preconditions for a successful Communist society were in place, it would still fail because it relies on every member of that so…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 12:30 AM
0

Whoops, thinking of Lenin. Do continue to ad hominem myself and the other commenters without addressing any of their points though.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 12:11 AM
0

That second part, office of the state medical examiner, that refers to coroners. If the body bag is opened for some amount of time it can skew his / her findings. The coroner decides whether a death is natural or not, therefore interfering with their findings is just as serious as interfering with an investigation. I'm well aware. OP said they couldn't see anyone being charged with an offense, I linked an offense that could apply.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 01:22 PM
3

I can see how someone could be found guilty under point 6 of that ruling. There's a reason cadavers are kept in body bags.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:57 AM
-2

I know :) Picture your 80 yo Grandmother or 18 year old son being laughed at Happens all the time.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:49 AM
24

Who cares? You do it for yourself, not for them. I've played plenty of physical sports and there's still nothing that comes close to the rush you get from actual combat. Also just because they might not want to watch it, plenty of women are attracted to a scrapper.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/17 11:47 AM
1

Redistribution of wealth is not communism, abolishment of wealth is.The core principle of Communism is not that every person should be equally wealthy, it's that every person should have only what they need and give what needs to be given, hence "to each according to his needs, from each according to his ability". This is why what you think of as "wealth" becomes controllers by the state in every Communist society. Marx himself was a prominent member of the Soviet government for several years, m…
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:30 AM
-2

Not saying the nurses are in the right here, but if you ever check out documentaries on CID when they first find a body or similar roles you'll find there's a lot of gallows humour goes on. Helps them to deal with the job apparently.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:20 AM
1

http://law.justia.com/codes/oklahoma/2014/title-21/section-21-1161.1
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:17 AM
15

"There was music playing, and people were walking around in front of the garage" God I hope it actually was his car buds coming round to celebrate him getting shot of this spiteful, hateful bitch. Those late night BBQs with the car squad are some of my best memories.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/17 05:39 PM
2

I thought it was Pocket Pasta Days, where people are free to carry around spaghetti in their pockets?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/17 05:34 PM
59

Low effort troll.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/17 05:19 PM
2

Mustaka fails to deliver, again
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 06:30 PM
5

Hey man, sometimes you just need to do the needful.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/08/17 08:24 AM
2

Fuck up Mustaka you fat dick, trolling mongs is half the fun give me my fucking flair
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/17 10:04 PM
11

It's comments like this highlighting the comedic irony which make this sub worth browsing, thanks for the insight friend!
/r/MensRights29/08/17 06:30 PM
1

I think leftist is just used as a synonym for authoritarian left these days. Might as well get used to the identity politics my friend, there are plenty of people who will think you're a sexist misogynist pig just for following the sub.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 11:18 AM
1

Pussy pass was denied after Philip Davies MP appealed it to the Supreme Court and she got 4+ years.
/r/PussyPass21/08/17 03:45 PM
2

I know it was, I'm agreeing with you.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 02:53 PM
1

Hitler was in favour of common law over Roman law, the worth of an idea does not depend on the person who has it.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 10:18 AM
2

Boils my fucking blood. I'm still at uni studying CS and the amount of women-only things that get peddled is infuriating.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 02:16 PM
2

You know you're literally the person feminists point to when they want an example of misogyny in the MRM, right?
/r/MensRights18/08/17 12:20 AM
2

so you learned a lot about some "set" data you can retell at some exam. When did you go to school? It was certainly my experience in the last 10 years with all the curriculum changes they focused a lot more on applied facts over rote memorisation.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 12:19 AM
7

The ones at my uni pretty much just went over the legal definition of consent, told students to drink responsibly then gave us some fluff about the advice centre and the taxi service. Seems reasonable since we're supposed to be amongst the most intelligent in the population.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 12:16 AM
1

That's a false equivalency if ever I've seen one. I'm pointing out that Ferguson is obviously not representative of the US in the same way that national studies done are, because if Ferguson were representative of the rest of the country then there wouldn't have been a report done. it takes massive protests to have gov't bear witness to injustice or you could, you know, vote? continue to pretend like it's not representative of the entire US I only have the scientific method, scepticism and the e…
/r/MensRights16/08/17 08:27 PM
1

Because there's no evidence of actual racism occurring. Here's a thought; if Ferguson is representative of the higher levels of the US government, why did they bother ordering an investigation at all?
/r/MensRights16/08/17 08:06 PM
1

Because the regional authorities were acting outside of their remit. As the report shows. That's kind of the entire reason for the report.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 07:46 PM
1

The FBI released a report about racism in Ferguson Ferguson is not representative of the entire US Let's see you give it a go now.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 07:40 PM
1

The federal agency went out of it's way to report about the issue with Ferguson.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 07:33 PM
1

No, you idiot, I'm expecting you to provide evidence for your claim in the form of a report on the totalilty of America and not just Ferguson.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 06:44 PM
1

No, I said that the report you linked doesn't say that. Which it doesn't. I'll be waiting with bated breath.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 05:11 PM
1

At this point I'm almost certain you're trolling, but I'll bite. you'd know about the disproportionate rates of whites in government and in policing The ferguson report mentions nothing about government or the US as a whole. how that leads directly to disproportionate arrests of minority citizens In Ferguson. any subset of crimes is committed at a higher rate in one demographic without any data to back it up That's a strawman that I haven't posited, but in any case https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-t…
/r/MensRights16/08/17 04:33 PM
1

Of course, but that's an obvious false equivalency. What you're saying is that we should see single parents as worse parents on average, where the statistics disagree with you. The actual equivalent of what you're saying use the prior example would be saying that it's wrong to say black people commit more crime even though the statistics say they commit more crime.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 01:36 PM
5

can't wait So there aren't any now then? Wonder why. The Ferguson report statistics only apply to the population of Ferguson, because the sample is only representative of Ferguson. If you think the population of Ferguson is representative of the population of the US go and find me a study that proves it. Having dickheads rioting in more than one place does not answer OPs question.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 08:54 PM
5

And my autism will lead me to point out the burden of evidence :) Ferguson is not representative of the entire US. The second link has the disparity OP described and nothing in the way of root cause analysis. In fact, it just makes baseless claims and doesn't answer the question. Please do continue to insult me though.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 08:38 PM
4

I take an interest in global politics, particularly Western politics. The cognitive dissonance and willful blindness to fact that some people have in America is of interest to me. Also, that's really fucking creepy.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 08:27 PM
6

That's the entire point of statistics, to draw conclusions about a group. You wouldn't point at Neil deGrasse Tyson and say "oh hey, he's definitely not a criminal so black people on average must commit no crime!"
/r/MensRights15/08/17 08:23 PM
14

Yep, an anecdote relying on pseudoscience and acceptance of mental illness as fact from the huffington post of all places proves he's wrong. To be a father you must be biologically male. The thing you're conflating is father figure.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 08:21 PM
3

Personal experience is not a source; the plural of anecdote is not data. Can you link the actual DoJ statistics you're quoting? I can't find them anywhere.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 08:16 PM
4

http://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/107-children-in-single-parent-families-by-race?loc=1&loct=2#ranking/2/any/true/573/10/431 Not racism if it's true. EDIT: Didn't read the part about causal link between crime and fatherlessness, OP doesn't know what he's talking about.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 08:03 PM
1

I'd say implementing stazi-level surveillance and selling off the info to the highest bidder is pretty bud but ymmv.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 04:30 PM
1

The same way we aren't free from the consequences of people choosing to become fat etc, it's the price you pay for have a cooperative society.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 01:55 PM
1

The opposite is freedom. I'd rather not have only the government sanctioned rich breed thanks.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 12:51 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=om7O0MFkmpw Fucking triggering right?
/r/MensRights14/08/17 11:38 AM
1

Google has never been the good guy, they're just really good at getting the general public to perceive them as such.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 11:16 AM
2

Or clever people that cannot seem to grasp the difference between correlation and causation.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 11:02 AM
1

I would rather have any number of children abused than give up our collective right to bodily autonomy. What you're talking about involves having the state be able to make men and women infertile.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 10:59 AM
3

Wear that label with pride, who wants to glorify a mentally ill child rapist anyway.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 10:46 AM
2

Seeing as most male soldiers today fail the physical requirements for the sniper training, I'd say that's unlikely. If you had any friends that were soldiers you'd understand why having combat serving women is a bad idea.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 10:00 AM
4

Having the accused remain anonymous until convicted seems a good middle ground.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 09:58 AM
32

Yeah, they're sure to listen after firing one of their employees for speaking out about their intersectional echo chamber /s
/r/MensRights14/08/17 09:56 AM
1

/r/cringe would like a word.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/17 08:46 AM
1

Eh? The ratio of non-women-haters to women haters is maybe what, 1:30? This sub isn't women hating, it just has the occasional dickhead that is a women hater. Never heard of KIA and TiA just showcases people that should be sectioned with people laughing at their stupidity / hypocrisy. EDIT: Spelling
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/17 08:35 AM
1

Oh shit, I actually thought you left off a /s A sub dedicated to women expected to be treated differently than men, then showcasing their reactions when they are treated as equals. Sounds like egalitarian justice porn to me.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/17 08:32 AM
8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2HQaF_vfes relevant
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/17 08:27 AM
3

Can I have some of what you're smoking please? Not giving up your seat for somebody less abled than yourself is a dick move, especially if that person has chosen to become less abled to continue the human race.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/17 08:24 AM
12

I'm a member of the outright movement, we find your hyphen to be unneccesary and incorrect.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 11:31 AM
2

So... we should support young boys being molested by paedophiles? That doesn't sound right.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:09 PM
2

Seeing as that study hasn't been done yet I'd hold judgment, if I were a betting man I'd definitely agree though .
/r/MensRights10/08/17 06:31 PM
5

You're* The point he's making is that all presidents will have used media that is sympathetic to them, including Obama. Is that really so difficult to believe? Obama didn't have the entirety of the traditional media in opposition to him. In fact, I seem to remember them sucking him off for being the first black president of the US at the beginning of his first term. I can see how Trump would justify appearing on the Alex Jones show. All of this doesn't matter though. I care far less about Obama'…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:31 PM
-1

Well, for a start: This has nothing to do with men's rights You're generalising them in to a single entity, similar to how most feminists view MRAs Feminism as a movement has intolerant views of transgender people Not all special snowflakes are feminists Not all feminists are special snowflakes And to finish off, it's a shit meme.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:18 PM
2

It's a shame there hasn't been any really large root cause analyses on what factors specifically contribute to disadvantage. Using your first example, are black people more disadvantaged than white people because they're black, or is it because black people tend to be poorer / less well educated?
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:15 PM
4

Completely ignoring the fact that programming and computer science are completely different fields with only a small amount of overlap. Proof: Ask a professional programmer to prove that quicksort runs in O(nlog(n)) and watch them squirm.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:11 PM
58

and completely ignored the 40% of poor men that couldn't vote
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:01 PM
2

Glad to hear it :) The sub has taken a downturn for sure, but I don't think it's about women-hating just yet. A lot of what used to get posted were threads where men had suffered obvious injustice which were pretty easy to get behind. Now though, I'd say at least half of the content has gone from being pro men's rights to anti feminism. A lot of the "women hating" threads I can still kind of justify because they seem to be calling out women in positions of actual privilege and pointing out obvio…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:54 PM
2

You've put a smile on my face friend. For what it's worth I definitely agree that women were less privileged than men historically, just perhaps not as much or in the same way as is commonly thought. Was this the same for all of the Allies? I know those were the voting laws in the UK, I'm not too clued up on my American history. I know that American women managed to achieve suffrage without resorting to terrorism in contrast to the UK, that's pretty much it. 1) Very true, and a good example of i…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:31 PM
1

To make myself clear, not supporting OP's stance that everything you Google is true.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:26 PM
2

No, Obama just advocated racial division and condoned terrorists and rioters. I get that Trump is not exactly likable but perhaps you should take issue with his policies rather than his person. And before anyone starts calling me a right-wing regressive shitlord, I didn't vote in the US elections because I don't live there, and if I did I would've abstained.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:25 PM
1

Viewing it another way, a politicised walkout of left-leaning feminists working at Google because somebody dared to speak counter to their narrative?
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:01 PM
57

For what it’s worth, I think that almost all of the Google memo’s empirical claims are scientifically accurate. Moreover, they are stated quite carefully and dispassionately. Its key claims about sex differences are especially well-supported by large volumes of research across species, cultures, and history. I know a little about sex differences research. On the topic of evolution and human sexuality, I’ve taught for 28 years, written 4 books and over 100 academic publications, given 190 talks, …
/r/MensRights09/08/17 05:53 PM
7

Back around the time of the first world war, the only people allowed to vote were those that owned land and returning soldiers. Women saw this as an unequal and so first wave feminism was born, completely ignoring the 40% of men that still couldn't vote or the fact that the vote was earned in one of the largest wars in recent memory (where service was mandatory). Care to provide any evidence for the wage gap point? As far as I'm aware the first time that women were accepted in to the work force …
/r/MensRights09/08/17 05:43 PM
1

A woman who is part of society. Our society does view women as less than men in some respects and superior in others, which makes sense considering the differences between them.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 05:29 PM
4

And the rebuttals: A society should represent all of it's members, not just those able to wage war Women aren't a monoculture, they did not vote unanimously, their views should not be dismissed because you believe them to be wrong Move to a swing state or different country, advocate for proportional representation systems, support independent candidates and the system will surely change if enough people want it to.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 05:27 PM
1

^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>by</sup> ^<sup>dismissal</sup> Maybe it's because I'm still a student but I meet women who feel that being "slut shamed" is a bad thing all the time, even when the number of men they've slept with is in triple digits. Can't exactly argue that it's not prevalent in the media either.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 05:17 PM
15

You really don't think the left is up to some wacky shit at the moment too?
/r/MensRights09/08/17 05:03 PM
2

|She cannot waive his rights for him. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm fairly sure had she not decided to give the father full custody and instead give the daughter up for adoption there's not much the father can do about it? Something about 24 hours to sign something and lengthy, expensive legal proceedings. Don't think the guy you're replying to is on the money with the absolving financial responsibility but the lack of male reproductive rights is still a discussion worth having.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/17 10:23 AM
1

Yeah stop loosing you're mind
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/17 10:06 AM
3

reminder that Emily Davidson was a terrorist and women suffrage was obtained without violence elsewhere in the world
/r/MensRights22/07/17 09:30 AM
2

Drawn attention to your cowardice?
/r/MensRights21/07/17 04:38 PM
4

I reckon it's a step up, our hate is so badass we have to encrypt it to hide if from them lest they sic the admins on us.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/17 04:45 PM
1

You mean to tell me that the "Dad strength" grip of death has a basis in science? Neato.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 05:47 PM
1

Maybe back in the good ol' days, not so much any more.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 04:49 PM
9

He just did the needful
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/17 11:16 PM
3

He didn't even finish his first sentence before the booing began.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 08:59 PM
3

Well hard. Perhaps if you advocated free speech in a way other than "do it or I leave you disabled" the rest of us wouldn't see you as such an utter retard.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 04:49 PM
5

Come on man, at least let the rest of us see the retarded shit s/he's writing so we can laugh at it as well.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/17 11:59 PM
-3

Prejudice: Prejudice is an affective feeling toward a person or group member based solely on their group membership. The video makes me want to not live next to those people in particular, not all black people.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/17 11:58 PM
2

Yeah I edited my comment, that's horseshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/17 10:17 PM
2

Where do you think the fund comes from, friend? EDIT: What sort of arbitration lets the defendant off scot-free? Give me judge judy for my insurance claim, that's bs. https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/dispute/essay/syndicourtjustice.authcheckdam.pdf
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/17 10:09 PM
6

When both parties agree to arbitration, the results of said arbitration are legally binding.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/17 07:26 PM
8

Techincally not true, contestants agree to it as arbitration so any judgments made on the show are legally binding. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judge_Judy#Inner_workings
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/17 06:13 PM
12

They may not be feminists, but they are trying to use their pussy pass... which was promptly denied.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/17 06:05 PM
18

This is like the 20th time that's been posted, it's starting to get old.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/06/17 07:24 PM
1

I'm a student living in student housing, just because I disagree with his position on tenants vs landlords doesn't automatically make him wrong or evil.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:58 PM
1

I'd still much rather have him occupying a seat than, for example, Amber Rudd.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:54 PM
2

It's a good thing that they decided to nominate a thoroughly decent person in Philip Davies then.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:16 PM
3

https://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/11816/philip_davies/shipley One of the very, very few decent tory politicians.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:12 PM
6

Which have been amplified by the sudden negative attention of choosing to mutilate yourself / deliberately postpone puberty. The sad, sad truth.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:07 PM
8

In the same way men earning $AMOUNT more than women is because of sexism in the workplace, women owing $AMOUNT more than men is because of the sexism in lending companies even though women actually get lower loan repayment and insurance rates because they're less of a risk.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:04 PM
5

Have an upvote for pedantry and precision, it's severely underrated.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 04:57 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asexual_reproduction
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:05 AM
1

First wave feminism wasn't exactly much better, at least today's feminists don't try to assassinate politicians or pipe bomb buildings.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/17 05:53 AM
1

CS major here, I think he's doing an excellent job. The entire point of the humanities is to attempt to study humans using logic, otherwise it would just be pointless pseudoscience.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 05:33 AM
2

If you compare the money spent on malaria research to the money spent on cancer research, it very much looks to me that curing disease is more selfish than selfless. The point was to point out that even though the person you were replying to is a bit of a dick, he does kind of have a point in that STEM subjects are much more beneficial to mankind as a whole than the humanities.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:16 AM
1

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090108131525/http:/dcsf.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/rtp01-07.pdf Check out page 66, I'd say that looks like overall better grades to me. People that are apt in linguistics and abstract thought should excel in computer science, it's dominated by men because women are simply not interested.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:11 AM
2

Am I the only one amazed that even beginners couldn't understand that a would be mutable when it's called a variable? Interesting that you found women are better able to understand program flow and structure though, I've always had the opposite experience. I would've thought the spatial reasoning would've given men the edge there.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:05 AM
2

One of us cures cancer, the other talks about people's feelings. I know which one I'd choose.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 10:07 PM
2

Empathy doesn't really require studying for 4 years though, and arguably doesn't help when optimising human survival. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/figures/m829a1f1.gif Slaying one of the 4 horsemen on the other hand...
/r/MensRights17/06/17 10:04 PM
6

I'm far too used to assuming everyone on reddit is American. Apologies friend :)
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/17 11:50 PM
2

Except I didn't dismiss the study, I quoted it in it's original form which is a much more interesting and trustworthy source than the Washington Post. I've lost all credibility because I find the newspaper that brought you this virtue signalling gem to be untrustworthy? Ok then.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/17 11:41 PM
1

MODS ITS A REPOST AND NOT EVEN A PPD FUCKING REEEEEEEEEE That video is actually disgusting though. Glad it worked in the guy's favour, apparently he's a moderately famous star in India now.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/17 11:27 PM
1

Whoops, thought I was commenting I'm the uni student selection thread. Not that I don't still think the decision is flawed. There's a reason any certification worth having involves a test under academic conditions. As others have pointed out to you, many resources exist online which you wouldn't otherwise have access to. This makes the test significantly less... well, significant. Their reasoning behind it is that females tend to do worse in exam conditions. If you're arguing that a closed book …
/r/MensRights12/06/17 10:55 PM
4

The phrase "never attribute to malice that which can be attributed to stupidity" really is lost on you isn't it?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/17 10:34 PM
1

Original research for those who are interested. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/kykl.12017/abstract You do yourself no favours by quoting A. A Google AMP page B. The Washington Post.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/17 10:28 PM
13

In the same way that the meaning of feminism has changed over the years, liberalism no longer means what it used to
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/17 10:09 PM
4

Firstly, your attempt at sounding condescending makes you sound like a child. Secondly, if a selection process is not based purely on merit then some proportion of people will be selected over those more deserving. These people will then perform worse than those who would have been selected based on merit alone. The OP fears that this will cause a downward trend.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 09:00 PM
20

You're really, really overestimating people's ability to form a cogent, logical opinion here friend.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/17 05:43 PM
5

There is a reason the jury voted for "Not Guilty" instead of "Factually Innocent".
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:53 PM
0

I'm not saying they don't, just that it's insignificant in comparison to their grievances. Perhaps I'm just too much of a selfish person to empathise.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:46 PM
2

Completely ignoring the variable that Hepatitis C can be contracted through use of shared needles, which funnily enough might be commonplace in a prison environment. The proper way to estimate the prison rape rate would be to perform either: A. An anonymous, randomised trial. This is unlikely to be successful since the prison population is predisposed to lying. B. A statistical analysis on already existing data. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIG3bdDj1ps
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:42 PM
2

Not disagreeing, some questions: If rape is one of the most traumatic things that can happen to you, is a victim really going to give a shit about getting a rapist in to trouble? That seems like something that could be corrected by spending several millions on consent and rape education oh wait
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:37 PM
5

I know right, it's enough to make someone loose they're minds.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:10 PM
0

Hanlon's razor applies. What more do you expect from a woman who can't understand the difference between men debating issues, and debating men's issues.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 06:59 PM
9

This was clearly just horseplay
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/17 01:10 AM
3

Username checks out.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/17 12:55 AM
2

Step 4.5: Redo as soon as you get home putting grease between wheel and hub so you don't have to take a sledgehammer to it to get it off when it gets changed
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/17 12:53 AM
1

No, me!
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/17 12:48 AM
7

So because he's a dickhead everything he says is automatically wrong? See: ad hominem. He does have a point, why should we believe anyone if there's no evidence? Without the rape kit it's his word against hers.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/17 12:25 AM
5

1:10 sounds pretty rare to me.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/17 03:04 PM
2

The funny thing is most of them aren't even socialist in the classical sense of the term. The hypocrisy on that sub beggars belief. EDIT: I wanted to get banned from the shitty subs and instead I was added as an approved submitter to POTUSWatch. This site confuses me.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/17 01:02 AM
0

Same
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/17 12:53 AM
2

I thought I'd post this here, this website lists the policies of the main political parties in the UK and shows you which party you are most in line with based on your selections. In particular, it allows you to select a party based on a single issue (e.g. gender discrimination). It was certainly eye-opening to me to see what was on offer. If any of you take the survey, post your results!
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:36 PM
1

You pretty much just quoted the top 3 comments
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/17 02:49 PM
3

Yeah I realise, just thought I'd point it out. Just because it wouldn't happen, doesn't mean it shouldn't.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:58 PM
16

That means if a teenager attempts to obtain a photo of sexually explicit conduct by requesting it from his teenage girlfriend, the judge must sentence that teenager to prison for at least 15 years for making such an attempt. If a teenager goads a friend to ask a teenager to take a sexually explicit image of herself, just by asking, he could be guilty of conspiracy or attempt, and the judge must sentence that teenager to at least 15 years in prison. I like how the quote used assumes sexes.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 05:57 PM
101

Beat me to it, just found this on facebook. Funny how all of that aggression just leaves her body after that right hook.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/05/17 04:30 PM
0

Win stupid prizes.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/05/17 04:26 PM
63

Why unfriend? Excellent chance to expose some ignorance.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 12:41 AM
1

"You wanna die punk" No I want to knock you the fuck out with a chair, belter.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/17 08:51 PM
0

Well that seems needlessy rude.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 06:48 PM
-1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation Read and be enlightened my friend.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 01:26 PM
0

And you know this... how? The study doesn't mention causality. For all we know most men could give 50% of their income to their family and keep 50% to themselves. You know the adage about assumptions.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 10:10 PM
1

I'm not disagreeing, I'm pointing out that the reasons why men are (on average) better off in divorces than women is unknown.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 06:46 PM
4

https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/files/iser_working_papers/2008-07.pdf Linking to the study that the article quotes in case anyone else wishes to read it, it infuriates me when people use newspapers as sources. If you look at page 9 figure 2, it shows that a man's income increases by roughly the amount that a woman's and child's decreases. Make of that what you will.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 02:09 PM
1

Don't know about going nuts, I'd still rather swallow my pride than have to deal with a crazy bitch and her friends/family/boyfriend
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/17 12:45 PM
7

Actually, I can't imagine MensRights responding in kind because they're rational people interested in having a debate.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/17 11:47 PM
1

Not really a PPD though is it, just a psychopath angry at a cyclist.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/17 04:42 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIG3bdDj1ps Not entirely on topic, but the video gives a good overview on how known unknowns can be estimated by the use of statistics.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 05:40 PM
10

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00623.x/full I can't link the full study because it's behind a paywall, but the findings are essentially that girls are marked significantly higher than boys given equal academic prowess.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 04:30 PM
2

Oh so we're back to the original point? Excellent. Your argument is, again, that we given two candidates that are suitable for a job you should hire the one that gives the workplace more diversity. You haven't bothered to really defend why you think that's a good thing, nor have you clarified whether or not the woman should be hired over the man even if the man would be a better fit / is more qualified / will work longer hours for the same pay / whatever. The fine people of this subreddit then r…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 05:53 AM
2

Actually, I'm at work and incredibly bored. This helps to pass the time. I'm genuinely unsure why you're angry now. In what world is having what you've said repeated back to you supposed to piss you off? It's not even like I'm misrepresenting it either, I've literally quoted it verbatim. https://youtu.be/CsFjcIchyKw Unsure if that specific example is a troll or not, kind of irrelevant since it is reminiscent of the most radical of feminists. Lurk a while longer, I'm sure you'll come across one e…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 05:28 AM
2

Except I'm not, I'm dictating to you the literal meaning of what you have said, which also happens to be a not uncommonly held view by other people in this subreddit. If you'd bothered to read my last reply, that was made quite clear in the 'THIS MAY OR MAY NOT BE WHAT YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE' part. I've quoted what you've said and explicitly shown that it can be misconstrued, yet you're still accusing me of dictating your thoughts to you. I can dictate what you've said to you because you've said i…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:53 AM
1

Looking through other threads that you've commented on I'm almost certain you're trolling, but I'll bite. If I'm dumb enough to need a qualifier then so is the rest of this subreddit. It's more likely you're being ambiguous than all of us misinterpreting what you've written. You quoted my accusation of you using ad hominems above the section where you said I was putting words in your mouth / telling you what you think. I didn't ask you to explain every little point, I asked you to be precise in …
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:06 AM
2

On mobile, can't quote. As in, I took the literal meaning of what you said because it is a viewpoint which is not uncommonly expressed, which I have just explained. Again, your assumption that all people have the same point of view as you is what's letting you down. As I have just explained twice, people genuinely believe women should be hired over men solely because of their sex, which is what I and everyone else interpreted as what you were saying. If you wish to differentiate your view from t…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 03:33 AM
1

Didn't realise Boxxy was a MRA
/r/MensRights07/05/17 03:15 AM
4

I'm assuming that I can interpret literal statements, like the other comments (and presumably like the people that are downvoting you). I'm not trying to make you sound like a sexist, I'm interpreting the literal meaning of what you've written. If you don't want to sound like a sexist not just to let but to the other people of this subreddit, it wouldn't be difficult to add in a qualifier to any one of your statements. All it would've took is an "all other things being equal" on your first post.…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 02:59 AM
3

Projecting all the way over to /u/JimGusa 's brain apparently. I'm not the only one that's had trouble understanding what you're trying to articulate. If I'm so sore that I couldn't twist your words (really?) why am I still replying?
/r/MensRights07/05/17 02:05 AM
3

Because they're factors that any employer would already be looking for, depending on the job. Why do I have to painstakingly write it out? Should it not be obvious that an employer is supposed to look for the best qualified candidates for consideration? There's faulty assumptions, and then there's just brutally lazy thinking. That's like me asking for orange juice, and you returning to me with a handful of pulpy dripping slop and chiding me for not also asking for a cup. Get real. Fallacy of fal…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 02:02 AM
5

Your ire is not just directed towards me it seems. Getting angry at people because you aren't precise in your language is not a good way to win an argument.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 01:48 AM
3

Putting words in your mouth by... quoting you? "hiring a woman because diversity in the workplace improves the atmosphere of the workplace and in order to increase diversity, more women are needed". You make no mention of any other distinguishing factors, only that you should hire a woman because of her sex if it improves diversity. If this is not what you meant perhaps you should be more clear in your use of language. You know the adage about assumptions. Oh, the number of times I've said this …
/r/MensRights07/05/17 01:37 AM
15

"hiring a woman because diversity in the workplace improves the atmosphere of the workplace and in order to increase diversity, more women are needed". In other words, hiring a woman because she's a woman and not because of any other trait she may possess. Apologies on the second point. Replace "productive" with "diverse". Point still stands. "or because you're prejudiced against men makes no difference" Was given as an example of obviously sexist behaviour that would cause you to hire a woman b…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 01:10 AM
26

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/sexism "Prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex." How on earth can you argue that hiring someone solely on the basis of their gender is not sexism? Whether you hire them because you think women make the workplace more productive or because you're prejudiced against men makes no difference, you're still only hiring them because they are women. It is by definition sexist. If it does actually make the work…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 12:24 AM
30

Explain it for two of us then. The user above me brings up a valid point in that people should be hired based solely on merit, regardless of gender. Your response to this is basically to insult them without rejecting the point, or making a valid counterpoint. Hiring a woman just because she's a woman is sexist - you're not hiring them because of their aptitude at the job, you're hiring them because of their sex. Equally, your response to the lack of scholarships and other support for male studen…
/r/MensRights06/05/17 11:45 PM
9

Or it could be because you have an active interest in men's rights, and see more MRM issues in the media because that's what appeals to you. Personally, I see it losing traction - not only because the shite hardcore feminists peddle is frequently spouted by all mainstream media outlets, but also because of the chilling effect that their censorship and demonization has had on particularly the younger generation. When my friends and I (all students) read the stories of people losing their jobs and…
/r/MensRights06/05/17 07:00 PM
1

That scientific research which isn't cited in the article from the shitrag you linked?
/r/MensRights04/05/17 07:01 PM
1

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-28564984 I call horseshit on that one, the niqab is not optional in several Muslim countries. Difference there being that when Christians / Jews cover their faces they're viewed as extreme. It doesn't get any less stupid when you point out other faiths do it as well.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/04/17 08:04 PM
3

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-28564984 I call horseshit on that one, the niqab is not optional in several Muslim countries. Difference there being that when Christians / Jews cover their faces they're viewed as extreme. It doesn't get any less stupid when you point out other faiths do it as well.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/04/17 08:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter