TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MyOtherProfile Archive

View 3 posts and 30 comments by MyOtherProfile on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

sperm-jacking?? Thats a real thing with an actual term for it?? How the hell do you go about and do that? Woman decides she wants Alpha Juice. Lies to said Alpha about birth control, and he pumps her full of it. Often it is a one night stand, but it might be a plate he's spinning or any other situation where an Alpha pumps and dumps. There are all kinds of crazy AWALT stories about poking holes in condoms, taking condoms out of the trash and "harvesting" them, even blowjobs where she goes to the…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/15 07:22 PM
1

The child is apparently 7 now, and there is absolutely no mention as to whether or not he is excelling in school, Aryan in appearance, got the mole that was photoshopped out of the sperm donor's pic etc. Nothing at all about whether or not even the sperm side of the equation is working out. In the feminist world we live in now, you can't even think to ask about the mother's side of the equation. A girl I went to school with was a turkey baster baby and her mom shopped around for her Alpha Juice.…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/15 07:07 PM
2

It just screams entitlement to me. As lesbians, they have chosen a lifestyle that rules out procreation, because men are gross or whatever their reasoning is. Then they decide that they want to have a child and they will have to acquire the other half of the equation, so they go right to the top. They want terminal degrees, MENSA IQ, and to win the genetic lottery and for some reason seem shocked that those men aren't lining up at sperm banks. Instead of Alpha Juice they get Beta Brew, and shrie…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/15 07:00 PM
1

"Modern womyn" have no idea, and the few that do think they are going to be the exception to the rule. Or they've read a bunch of tabloid BS where some movie star got pregnant at 47, which conveniently leaves out the fact that they spent millions on making it happen. But just in case they do have some idea that their biological clock is ticking, Facebook and Apple pay for freezing your eggs and finding those independent womyn sperm donors. Choice quotations include: It potentially addresses the …
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 12:10 AM
6

Academic MRA's almost exclusively got their start in feminism/women's/gender studies programs because Men's Studies programs are not allowed to exist. They then saw the light and came over. Warren Farrel, Erin Pizzey, and Janice Fiamengo come to mind. When feminists feel the need to say we have no research/academia behind our movement, they like to leave out the part where some of the biggest voices the MRM has are former feminist scholars, or people like Christina Hoff Sommers who identify as f…
/r/MensRights16/02/15 07:19 AM
7

Don't bother with /r/askfeminists As someone who wanted to believe in the definition of feminism instead of the practice of feminism, I used to post there. I was banned for not blindly spewing dogma, and banned from /r/feminism simultaneously (having never posted there) presumably because of the overlap in moderation.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 04:45 PM
2

They do have the chance of "losing" if it goes to an investigation and Ghomeshi is cleared or there is not enough evidence to convict him. By not going to the police and not allowing an investigation, then he has very little chance of proving his side of things. He said-she said in the court of public opinion tends to side with multiple accusations instead of innocent until proven guilty. I agree that if this was a smear campaign even in part, the goals have been reached. He lost his job and his…
/r/MensRights01/11/14 12:27 AM
6

This was what shocked me. I just assumed because he had been fired, because multiple accusations had been made publicly, PR firms have been hired etc. that there was a legal case happening. Call me naive, but I was actually surprised to hear the police chief say we aren't investigating this because no one has come to us with any information or to press charges. Then I finished watching the story and reading a few articles, and noticed CBC was hiring a "third-party" to "investigate" but there was…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 05:44 PM
2

Name another healthy and functional body part that we cut off babies because: religion, tradition, or "it just looks weird". Or, ask people how they feel about you cutting off a baby's little toe, because it's not that important, it would be cleaner, my dad had it done to him and he's ok, some book written thousands of years ago thinks it's a good idea, or any other "good" reason for doing so. Ask yourself why we treat the highest concentration of nerves on the male body differently. Do you real…
/r/MensRights18/10/14 12:50 AM
2

So they'll sue over the waiver then. How do you word a waiver saying "you agree to take advantage of this perk we are offering, as long as you don't turn around and come after us when it turns out to be an empty promise because while technology is great, you're trying to play god here and have a child after your childbearing years." Somehow, it will turn into a fight between the companies that offered this, and the women who can't have children because they had unrealistic expectations. Not only…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:39 PM
3

If you want to freeze your eggs and try to cheat biology so you can have a kid at 50, that is your decision. If you want to go through fertility treatments and any of the other procedures that people are going through now to delay parenthood, I am not going to stop you. But this is a huge lawsuit and PR disaster waiting to happen. 5-10 years (or longer) down the road, some woman who took advantage of this "perk" is going to try to have a kid with her frozen eggs well beyond her body's fertility …
/r/MensRights15/10/14 05:58 PM
22

"But 60472963 rapes went unreported in the amount of time it took you to write out your rape-apologetic misogynistic drivel, false accusations never happen because women obviously never lie about anything, so "false" accusations are just evidence that the patriarchal justice system is bias against women." There should be consequences. Many jurisdictions have various laws in place for lying to the police or false claims, and if it makes it as far as court falsifying evidence etc. which rarely are…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:28 PM
3

I used to contribute to /r/AskFeminists as a person who believes that both Feminism (at least in theory) and the Men's Rights Movement do share some commonality. Equality is good, discrimination is bad, all of those things. I was also openly critical of the movement, and this one as well at times, because there are issues and problematic individuals. Eventually, I got called out because I wasn't drinking the Kool-Aid enough. Someone asked if I was a feminist, and I said that I do strongly agree …
/r/MensRights20/09/14 02:09 AM
16

Looking "halfway decent" isn't a requirement at all. How many real beauty, or real women campaigns have you seen where everyone is in some crazy uproar because "the media has such a narrow view of beauty!" so they feel the need to redefine beauty and move the goal posts, because not everyone can be well... attractive.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:44 AM
8

In a perfect world, I would tell you to fight the good fight, arm yourself with the statistics and a few compelling anecdotes, and go to town. Sexual Harassment with a male victim, especially with a female perpetuating it is very real, and very often ignored or not taken seriously by the law, or by HR departments and anyone else who is supposed to handle those situations. I personally know a man who went to his (female) supervisor, and then their boss to report harassment and his experiences wer…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 04:02 AM
1

I think it would be fascinating as well, but in a lot of countries it is still too soon for any meaningful long-term results. Marriage (I absolutely hate calling it "gay marriage"... it's marriage, I don't get up in the morning and take a "straight shower") is still a very recent occurrence, and there are even jurisdictions that have not caught up enough with the other necessary laws/legal benefits that correspond with it, in some cases divorce being one of them. I read an article a while ago ab…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 03:36 AM
2

I agree that HR should get a more complete picture of the situation before it starts handing out pink slips. Assessing social skills and professionalism will be done during a conversation of "so what happened and how do you feel about it?" which will help HR determine how much it affected the person and isn't necessarily going to be an interrogation. If OP is socially awkward, was deeply affected by this and extremely professional/just trying to go about his work in a safe environment, then that…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:10 PM
16

It made a couple of my friends and I consider how the policy worked. If one of our teenage siblings was to come as the token child, how many adults would be allowed to supervise? The next logical conclusion was "what if it isn't even ours?" Surely we could find some teenager who wants to go to Legoland who would accept free admission, free lunch, and $20? Then it started to sound a whole lot like child trafficking and that we were taking advantage of a minor, (in a non-sexual/predatory way) and …
/r/MensRights05/07/14 05:07 PM
27

This takes you to Toronto's (well, Vaughan Mills) Legoland's ticket information. Here's the juicy bit: We are a family attraction. Please note that children 17 and under must be accompanied by an adult supervisor 18 years of age or older. Adults (18+) will not be admitted without a child, with the exception of Adult Only Nights. There has been plenty of backlash, with this article highlighting a case where a 63 year old cancer patient and self-described "Lego-fanatic" was elated to find out Lego…
/r/MensRights05/07/14 04:23 PM
2

There definitely are a lot of holdovers and given the governing structures of most colleges, students have very little influence on policy. The student government at my college (one of the largest in the country) was largely a feel good puppet show, that did little more than collect fees from all of the students while hosting a few events like the clubs fair. Not attending college does close certain doors. If you want to be a doctor, lawyer, engineer or teacher you need a degree, but when I sear…
/r/MensRights05/07/14 06:31 AM
2

How did we let it get like this? Just about anything could be considered under that umbrella of "they aren't required, so if you don't agree with their terms you don't get to use that service." There are some options out there for you if you do not have a college education, but it closes a lot of doors. The college can say "well we didn't force you to sign" but they are effectively holding your future over your head when they say that. How is that legal? How can "we are going to throw you out of…
/r/MensRights05/07/14 04:00 AM
2

I really don't understand how that works though. In your selling drugs example, your landlord has made a baseless accusation. Unless your landlord proves you were selling drugs, how is that even possible? That logic could be applied to anything: "We have a strict policy against invisibility cloaks. Since I invited myself into your apartment the other day and didn't see you in there, it's obvious that you were invisible, violated our policy, and now I get to kick you out." Sounds crazy right? But…
/r/MensRights05/07/14 03:14 AM
3

Sorry, the way I read it the first time it seemed like there was still a college aspect to it on top of a legal one. Even if the school has a "policy" of "we believe womyn at face value because reasons" it should still be treated as a legal issue. I give her saying she doesn't want criminal charges filed about as much weight as I give her saying it was consensual sex: it is, until it isn't anymore. This is why I still stand behind lawyer up, because it could get even more ugly than it already is…
/r/MensRights05/07/14 02:13 AM
2

School policy or not, he has been accused of rape. That's not a college kangaroo court "sexual assault panel" issue, it's a legal one. Even if there is some sort of policy, law trumps the fine print in your school handbook. Lawyer up. If he gets dragged into one of those BS college trials (some of which even forbid his lawyer from being present) say nothing. Getting damages from the college for dragging his name through the mud and attempting to deny him due process is a lot better fight to be h…
/r/MensRights05/07/14 01:33 AM
2

No. And if you show up to the office in a nirt you should be refused severance pay.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:11 AM
12

Dress codes, especially in work environments, are often highly gendered and unfair as a result. From the bottom up, men are usually told what type, material, and colour of footwear, pants, belts, shirts, jackets, ties, even things like facial hair, hair length, piercings etc. are all dictated. While some places are a little more lenient about certain things, plenty of dress codes tell men what colour of shirt they have to wear everyday. I have seen men told that their belt buckle, hair, shirt, a…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 10:47 PM
2

Women don't buy it. Every woman I know who has ever said "you're beautiful just the way you are" has thought to herself "I'm glad I don't look like that" and every woman who has heard "just the way you are" has thought to themselves "you wouldn't have to qualify it if you actually thought I was beautiful". There are a few who lie to themselves about it, but by and large it is feminism that wants everyone to keep drinking the Kool-aid because gurl power! Women are particularly gifted at being nic…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 03:19 AM
2

I completely agree that the Dove ads were more diverse and did use a wider range of body types, but they still cherry picked those people to be as good looking as they could be while "real" women. This site was one of the first that popped up when I searched for an image, and while the women pictured aren't what would be considered models, they aren't ugly looking women. Some of the ads did feature heavier women than the picture above, but we've also created this whole big is beautiful mentality…
/r/MensRights02/07/14 10:56 PM
4

You have a case. If they are asking for gender, photos and age, it is discrimination. The laundry list of age, sex, gender, race, religion, country of origin, if you have a cat instead of a lizard etc. applies to any employer. Even if they are not specifying gender, if a photo is requested outside of modelling/film, it is potential discrimination. I'm honestly surprised we haven't seen a huge outrage by feminists on this one because "they didn't hire me because I wasn't sexy enough" but I'm gues…
/r/MensRights02/07/14 10:29 PM
6

It is a step in the right direction to show men that don't have 5429 abs bulging out of everywhere. I would say that those bodies are far more realistically attainable than the models that they are juxtaposed against, but they definitely aren't the average Joe types. If you take a look at the ads that are directed at women along the same vein, they are still using good looking people. The Dove ads used plus sized models, not some frumpy looking fat lady. The Aerie "no photoshop" ads still featur…
/r/MensRights02/07/14 10:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter