TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mycroft033 Archive

View 34 posts and 2,636 comments by Mycroft033 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
455

DiscriminationMycroft033/r/MensRights22/02/21 08:34 AM
239

Mycroft033/r/AntiFeminists18/07/21 11:18 PM
126

HypocrisyMycroft033/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 04:28 PM
120

GeneralMycroft033/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:08 AM
89

Edu./Occu.Mycroft033/r/MensRights23/07/20 05:43 AM
71

Mycroft033/r/AntiFeminists08/12/21 09:55 AM
67

FeminismMycroft033/r/MensRights09/10/20 11:39 PM
67

EgalitarianismMycroft033/r/AntiFeminists25/03/22 07:11 AM
60

GeneralMycroft033/r/MensRights16/01/21 05:00 PM
51

Social IssuesMycroft033/r/MensRights23/07/21 11:16 PM
50

HumourMycroft033/r/MensRights16/01/21 04:42 PM
39

DiscussionMycroft033/r/AntiFeminists25/02/22 03:24 AM
36

DiscriminationMycroft033/r/MensRights26/01/21 04:47 AM
29

Mycroft033/r/AntiFeminists26/12/21 01:28 PM
27

social mediaMycroft033/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/26 08:20 PM
22

GeneralMycroft033/r/MensRights27/07/21 09:50 AM
20

DiscriminationMycroft033/r/MensRights12/03/23 04:25 PM
19

GeneralMycroft033/r/MensRights20/09/21 02:19 PM
18

Mycroft033/r/AntiFeminists22/01/21 12:01 AM
17

GeneralMycroft033/r/MensRights08/03/22 05:35 PM
15

HumourMycroft033/r/MensRights12/06/20 02:19 AM
14

Legal RightsMycroft033/r/MensRights20/07/21 08:04 AM
13

Anti-MRMMycroft033/r/MensRights14/06/20 08:30 AM
11

Mycroft033/r/AntiFeminists11/09/21 06:39 AM
6

FeminismMycroft033/r/MensRights23/09/20 04:19 PM
5

ProgressMycroft033/r/MensRights15/06/20 06:01 AM
5

GeneralMycroft033/r/MensRights03/12/24 09:34 PM
4

GeneralMycroft033/r/MensRights29/09/21 07:29 AM
1

FeminismMycroft033/r/MensRights01/07/20 02:12 AM
1

FeminismMycroft033/r/MensRights10/10/20 11:13 PM
1

HumourMycroft033/r/MensRights16/01/21 04:39 PM
1

ProgressMycroft033/r/MensRights06/11/20 11:00 AM
1

False AccusationMycroft033/r/MensRights05/08/20 03:24 AM
0

Mycroft033/r/AntiFeminists06/07/21 09:02 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,636 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

“Believe the Bible” she says… Genesis 5:2 (NIV) “He created them male and female and blessed them. And he named them “Mankind” when they were created.” Soooo… I guess she’s just picking and choosing what parts of the Bible to “believe”, which definitional means she doesn’t believe the Bible. Which is fine. But the Bible says to accept the whole thing or not at all. Picking and choosing ain’t a thing. But don’t use a text as proof of your conspiracy theory if the book you’re quoting from as proof…
/r/EverydayMisandry25/07/26 02:42 AM
3

As a kid, I grew up listening to the Focus on the Family audio dramatizations of Narnia. I’d heavily recommend them to anyone as the most faithful and reliable audio dramatizations, they were basically done by CS Lewis’ nephew. They’re so good.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/07/26 03:07 AM
4

Ooookay? You asked for the source, there’s the source. I’m not going to debate you, you asked for the source, there you go. Need me to link the 2024 NISVS results?
/r/EverydayMisandry09/07/26 11:56 PM
5

Sure thing. <image> See the latest CDC NISVS data if you have any questions.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/07/26 11:38 PM
33

The issue is that the definition of rape is designed, still, to have a majority of the perpetrators be male. The primary method women rape men, made to penetrate, is classified as “sexual assault”, ya know, the same category as catcalling. If you add in “made to penetrate” to rape statistics, then it’s actually more like perpetrators are 52% male, 48% female. And that’s before you account for the fact that men are, statistically speaking, far less likely to report sexual abuse perpetrated agains…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/07/26 05:10 PM
1

As Gobber once said: “You can’t stop him. You can only prepare him. I know it seems hopeless, but the truth is you won’t always be around to protect him.” You can’t stop any of this. You can only prepare your kid for it.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 11:40 AM
14

I wish it was fewer, but I know women who are genuinely different. It’s not an insignificant number, but it’s not all. I think the ratios of good to bad depend on where you live and your local community.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/04/26 12:14 AM
3

This is a difficult topic. On the one hand, you have the reality that men are not allowed to show any emotion besides anger, really. But on the other, you have the reality that men are different than women, and about 80% of us process things very differently. The ‘men should be allowed to cry’ movement can be very dangerous to men, because it very frequently treats men as defective women. And that’s simply untrue. Most men retreat inwards to process things. And we shouldn’t call it unhealthy. Bu…
/r/MensRights29/03/26 02:18 PM
6

Depends on if it’s the point or not. If it’s the point, I won’t support it. I might pirate it to laugh at it, but that’s all. If it’s not the point but just in there, I usually don’t care too much.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 07:07 PM
2

I bet he thinks queens are more peaceful and less bloody than kings lol
/r/MensRights26/02/26 06:21 PM
33

Incel is defined as “a man I don’t like or disagree with” now, so that’s how you become one lol
/r/MensRights21/02/26 05:51 AM
21

nose ring theory lol
/r/EverydayMisandry18/02/26 09:59 PM
3

Seems pretty sensible. Don’t know if I agree with everything, but I’d agree on most points. Lots of people don’t necessarily realize how feminism is just another label on the antifamily movement started in the US by the USSR and other communist powers. They got women to attack men, because if you attack the men directly they’ll just fight back. But if women attack men, on the whole, men will bend over backwards to accommodate them. And that’s what happened. Women, deceived by certain militant ac…
/r/MensRights14/02/26 05:39 AM
34

What’s most likely happening is she’s interrupting the parent child bond between her husband and her kid. He doesn’t know what to do, not because he’s clueless, but because nothing he does is right to her, and everything is a lecture. If it wasn’t for her, the bond would probably be a lot stronger. She’s causing the problems she’s blaming him for.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/01/26 04:52 PM
2

Dadvocate rocks, and she’s pretty funny. As a guy, the “womansplaining men to women” series is deeply entertaining.
/r/MensRights18/01/26 11:27 AM
13

Yeah not everyone comprehends things lol
/r/EverydayMisandry18/01/26 05:52 AM
25

Honestly I think both are hilarious. Stereotypes make great jokes. I like that there’s a gender reverse joke though lol.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/01/26 10:20 PM
4

Or block all the bots they use to scan your comments
/r/MensRights05/01/26 04:01 AM
3

r/menkampf
/r/EverydayMisandry02/01/26 01:03 PM
0

Way to show that you didn’t bother reading past the title rofl
/r/MensRights28/12/25 07:44 PM
8

Whaaaaaaa that’s crazy! /s
/r/MensRights18/12/25 04:51 PM
1

Watch All’s Fair. Or if you’re like me, watch Disparu reacting to it. The main problem with the show is that it’s too true to life for the attitude towards marriage.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 12:08 AM
7

I was cold-shouldered for being a man. Obviously they maintained plausible deniability “oh, we’re trying to find hours for you” while my female coworkers were overloaded with hours. I just quit.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 09:34 PM
2

Oh they banned me a while ago lol, I still occasionally look in there to laugh at the craziness. But if you’re not kissing up to all women all the time, they’ll ban you
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 02:57 AM
3

Here’s a list of bots to block so they can’t scan your account for comments in communities they don’t like: https://www.reddit.com/r/Simidolian/s/GG8Ttx8YJk
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 02:56 AM
21

r/menkampf
/r/MensRights16/11/25 09:33 AM
1

Which bots specifically? Is there a site where they’re listed in a database or something?
/r/EverydayMisandry06/11/25 06:51 AM
6

This guy makes decent points but the AI “footage” is very distracting because it’s rather disturbing
/r/MensRights15/10/25 02:52 AM
18

Definitely not because she asserts that men are pedophilic inherently in said comments, no it couldn’t have anything to do with her blaming men, it’s clearly just because men are horrible.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/10/25 03:58 PM
2

Because, fundamentally, humans will try to get away with 105% of what you allow them to. And like it or not, we allow a lot today in that area. Women don’t lie about it because they’re women, they lie about it because they’re human, and humans are flawed. Don’t make the mistake that this “why” absolves anyone of responsibility for their actions, if anything, it increases their responsibility for their own actions. I ask you, who has the greater strength of character, the one who refuses to do th…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 12:47 AM
3

Yeah what’s crazy is I used to actually have my novel on wattpad just to get feedback, and one day I went poking around to see what else was out there, and what I saw was rather awful. I never went poking around again. I got some good solid feedback on there, but to imagine young girls being exposed to some of the stuff I saw on there (with little to no age verification) that’s gotta be awful for them. Personally I’d wish pornographic scenes in movies would just be “fade to black, the next morni…
/r/MensRights29/09/25 09:35 AM
27

Yeah. I’ve long held that women are just as messed up as men, but I never realized exactly how true that was. I’ll be the first to admit that there are men on the internet looking at horrible stuff. But hearing some of the stuff on booktok? Wow. I… geez. It’s horrible.
/r/MensRights29/09/25 04:08 AM
37

Recently saw an excellent video essay on the topic, discussing how it has many of the same negative effects on women as porn does on men. I, as a men, found it eye opening. https://youtu.be/ffvRhsViyIQ?feature=shared
/r/MensRights29/09/25 03:24 AM
28

If what she’s saying is true, she’s saying that men solve problems and that women do not. She’s saying men would take charge of the problem and women just complain about it. That’s the implication of her logic, and I find that funny.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/09/25 11:45 PM
3

See that’s the thing that makes us guys so happy, like that would make me want to marry her all over again if she was my wife
/r/EverydayMisandry10/07/25 05:42 PM
1

You gotta approach men. But don’t do it like a man would. Since most women simply don’t have the guts to do what they require men to do, here’s a more subtle way to approach guys and let them think they approached you. Take inspiration from ‘dropping the handkerchief’. What was that? Back in the 1800s, women actually used to approach men more than men approached women, but they did it subtly. One popular method was this. If a woman saw a man she thought was attractive, she’d walk in front of him…
/r/MensRights21/04/25 05:04 PM
13

Reminds me of the time when I googled something containing the word misandry and Google goes “did you mean: misogyny?” LOL
/r/EverydayMisandry19/02/25 06:30 AM
8

Personally I’d bet she unironically believes everything on that card.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/02/25 10:28 AM
0

Welcome to the sensible center.
/r/MensRights30/01/25 09:58 PM
14

Not even veiled insults anymore honestly, it’s just insults and, well, hate speech.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/01/25 07:52 PM
14

“I did some research after our debate and came to realize that I was right all along and you were a moron all along. In fact, I’m so right and you’re so stupid, I’m actually surprised at how right I am.”
/r/EverydayMisandry19/01/25 10:24 AM
12

This is a sub specifically dedicated to addressing misandry. It’s going to be negative. Deal with it. If you want positive stuff, look for r/menaregood and r/masculinity_rocks. Those fit what you’re after.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/01/25 04:56 PM
0

Aaaaand you’re incapable of looking at the sidebar because…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/01/25 05:51 PM
3

no lol, that’s literally it
/r/EverydayMisandry02/01/25 05:20 PM
3

I think the main poster and sub owner is female lol
/r/EverydayMisandry02/01/25 05:18 PM
0

I strongly disagree with afab, I prefer ahab lol But jokes aside, I’m sorry that happened to you and I hope you live a happy life and get to break the cycle of abuse.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/25 02:17 PM
2

I’d advise that you teach your daughter not just the respect to expect, but also the respect to give. The method of “teach girls to expect respect and teach boys to respect girls” is actually behind that very behavior you’re so mad about. You don’t seem to know it, but you’re raising your daughter to be just like those girls. Be the change you want to see.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 06:11 AM
1

OP, ignore this troll.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 06:08 AM
1

r/womenareviolenttoo
/r/MensRights31/12/24 12:28 PM
12

Yup, you have discovered what is known as “the soft bigotry of low expectations”.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/12/24 06:41 AM
20

I haven’t met anyone who says that, and I wouldn’t be friends with people who would
/r/MensRights07/12/24 09:12 PM
5

Lol
/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/24 07:57 PM
4

Seems to me like it’s just an excuse to arrest political opponents. But men in SK are paying the price for his actions.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 09:51 PM
4

I would’ve thought it would be obvious, but who’s being drafted to enforce this? And South Korea is already quite misandrist, and rights get stripped in martial law, so guess whose rights are being stripped here?
/r/MensRights03/12/24 09:49 PM
4

I appreciate your post and your honesty. For me, I just largely stopped caring about others’ opinions of me based on my gender. Rape is horrible, and I believe rapists should be castrated. But rapists are a tiny fraction of 1% of men at large, if you go by CDC statistics. Women rape men at a similar rate to men raping women, actually, according to those same statistics, but “forced to penetrate” (the primary method of female on male rape) is defined by them as mere “sexual assault”. Women get ra…
/r/MensRights03/12/24 04:38 PM
11

That’s an interesting argument and usage of the in-group bias data. I might steal this for use later.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 03:33 PM
1

Yeah. The baby in the womb is steeped in either estrogen or testosterone, and it affects your entire life basically. You can’t undo it. You can get kinda close but you can’t fully undo it. That shouldn’t be considered transphobia to say, IMO. I disagree with bathrooms generally because of all the horror stories of exposure. If people behaved themselves then I would think the rule could be “use the bathroom as the same gender you look most like” but as of now it seems to be a behavioral problem. …
/r/MensRights03/12/24 05:59 AM
2

That sounds fair. So what would then be your stance on trans women in sports?
/r/MensRights03/12/24 05:46 AM
8

Never even mentioned therapy, because frankly, at that point, if she’s in therapy and still doing that immature garbage, that makes it actually worse. Thanks for pointing that out. Also never said that anyone was awful, and I wasn’t talking about one specific person. But since you like specifics, let’s take specifics. My sister and I were severely mentally, verbally, and physically abused by my mother for most of my childhood. Is that my fault? No. Is it my responsibility to deal with the trauma…
/r/MensRights01/12/24 03:09 PM
6

Trauma is like a zombie virus. Getting it is not your fault. But once you get it, if you do not seek healing and help, you will inflict the same trauma on others. I have no sympathy for these bitter women, not because they have trauma, but because instead of dealing with it, they chose to be awful people. If you refuse to heal, you will stop being able to see your own flaws. That’s a problem.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 02:44 PM
11

Having higher emotional intelligence doesn’t mean they use it lol. It’s like men and strength. They have a massive natural advantage… but no advantage can overcome laziness, and laziness is often the result of knowing you have a natural advantage lol.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 09:23 AM
14

PsycHacks did a good video on this topic
/r/MensRights30/11/24 09:04 PM
20

I’ve long held the opinion that both masculinity and femininity can go toxic. But feminists use one as a blanket criticism of everything men do.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 08:53 PM
21

Peak fallacy. There have also been practically no women on oil rigs, and the jobs with the highest rates of workplace injury and death are overwhelmingly male dominated, and men are 75%+ of the unemployed population, but you don’t hear Reddit complaining about equalizing that.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 04:59 PM
1

I get this, but I tend to lean towards both men and women covering up more in public spaces. So I’d generally agree that it would be a good thing for these guys to put on shirts. Same would go for if there were women running around shirtless.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/11/24 05:04 PM
24

Therapy is designed for and beneficial to women. Not men. I would try to find a mentor in a guy you really respect.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 06:47 AM
6

You might follow the Dadvocate on YT. She has some sensible takes.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 07:26 AM
26

That’s only if you discount “made to penetrate” which is rape by every definition except the one that feminists use
/r/MensRights18/11/24 04:57 PM
2

Why are the rules in the sub description instead of… ya know, the dedicated rules section?
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 05:02 PM
15

Wow, you can copy AND paste? Impressive. Now if only you could comprehend what you pasted, you’d stop getting your panties in a bunch… But go ahead, continue to be entertaining.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 02:55 PM
20

Cry more, be my guest, embrace your softer side. And then delete this comment like you deleted your previous one. You wish I was an incel because I said something you don’t like lol. Kinda inconvenient that I’m not, and that I don’t actually hold the opinions you want me to hold, eh?
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 02:50 PM
17

I did look up projection, but there was only a picture of you in there, with a note mentioning your poor spelling.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 02:36 PM
29

If I had that attitude, I might be struggling, but thankfully there are normal people outside the internet, which you might figure out if you ever left your mother’s basement.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 02:28 PM
4

Course it does. Difference is that they get owned in the comments, whereas there they get praised in the comments lol
/r/MensRights15/11/24 02:26 PM
28

If OP had been remotely advocating for MGTOW, I’d maybe agree with you lol
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 02:23 PM
67

I find it hilarious that feminists are now using gender flipped MGTOW logic that they called sexist and bigoted just a few months ago… not saying either one is right, but it’s funny to see the tune change
/r/EverydayMisandry14/11/24 03:04 PM
3

I don’t think it’s zero women, but it’s definitely not as widespread as they want everyone to think. I just find it hilarious when the “women are not a monolith” crowd tries to speak for Women (capital W) in their entirety. They’re just not a monolith until you want them to be lol
/r/MensRights12/11/24 11:05 PM
17

Based on the research I’ve done, this is my official conclusion: The trash is taking itself out, there’s no need to be worried.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 11:02 PM
3

Leaning democrat… a rarity on this site? Roflmao this site is primarily leftist, what are you talking about? checks profile Oh. You’re just a troll. You are just here to stir up division.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 11:01 PM
2

Both lol
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:28 PM
2

Don’t apologize for others’ bad behavior. Just focus on your own, you’ll find that to be plenty of responsibility without need to add to it. The sentiment is nice, but you’ll find that it helps nobody to try and be apologizing for others who are themselves unapologetic. Feminism requires each man to apologize and “take responsibility” for the sins of their entire demographic throughout all of history, that’s not right. Each man and woman is responsible for his/her own actions, nothing more, noth…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 09:56 AM
2

And you don’t realize how arrogant that statement is lol. The irony.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:34 AM
7

Would’ve been funny if you would’ve gone “ohhhh you must be trans then, I get it!” And then when they get mad and insist “they’re women”, just agree with them and talk about how inclusive you are (“yes I absolutely agree that you are women, I’m a very inclusive person”, or something like that). For some reason no matter how much a woman claims to be inclusive and progressive, every single one will get massively offended if you call them trans women, but they can’t say why they’re mad without con…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:45 PM
8

Right, but the others aren’t real feminists, but you are.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 09:21 AM
8

Oh I think they do. I see them quite regularly. But if you have an unshakable root level assumption that you are the gold standard of feminism, then all the arguments in the world have about as much effect on you as water does on a duck’s back. It’s because this particular type of “feminist” combines ignorance (ignorance of both the genuine history of the movement and of how actually hateful they themselves are towards men) with arrogance (arrogance that says they know what feminism is better th…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 05:07 AM
1

Best data we can find indicates roughly a 48-52% split between violence against women and violence perpetrated by women
/r/MensRights08/11/24 04:37 AM
25

Ah yes, the bi-monthly “no true Scotsman” fallacy post. I was wondering when it would be time for that
/r/MensRights08/11/24 03:59 AM
1

The number I hear is 52%, did you hear a lower one?
/r/EverydayMisandry08/11/24 02:54 AM
3

The natural consequences of their choices are more than enough. OP is saying to step out of the way of those natural consequences and just let them make their mistakes without telling them they’re making mistakes, and the natural consequences will follow.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 07:22 PM
2

Here’s a Wikipedia article to explain the basics
/r/MensRights07/11/24 02:43 PM
9

I think 4B is just going to remove the toxicity from the dating pool, the trash takes itself out, so if they wanna go have a misandrist pity party, I say go have fun, the rest of us will be better off without them
/r/MensRights07/11/24 02:40 PM
4

It’s because they have the blanket rule requiring “good faith posting”.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:45 PM
3

No but remember, you’re the fascist for not supporting Kamala
/r/MensRights06/11/24 08:07 PM
2

I was marginally okay with him though disliking his methods until I saw Candace softball an interview and then saw a couple researchers do a minute by minute breakdown of her interview and actually go over the evidence of his sexual abuse in a three hour video and that convinced me. I stopped watching Candace after that. I hadn’t ever watched the T, and now I also believe he’s a criminal.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 07:58 PM
4

I mean what did you expect from Gemini… the AI that literally made headlines for being so woke?
/r/MensRights06/11/24 05:31 PM
3

I don’t particularly see them saying all men are pedophiles nor blaming men for it, I do see them despairing about how many there are though. Which is correct, there should be fewer, even one is too many.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/11/24 09:27 PM
26

Almost like the purpose of feminism isn’t actually to destroy harmful gender norms or get equality
/r/EverydayMisandry01/11/24 09:12 PM
4

Feminism is not about equality and has never been. Just abandon the label and go full egalitarian, you’re already most of the way there. Feminism was historically designed by Soviet infiltrators around or before the time of World War I (I forget exactly when) as a tool to destroy the family unit in western societies, dropping the birth rate. You don’t have to kill as many people of your enemy if you can ideologically convince the society that they shouldn’t bear kids. It worked far slower than i…
/r/MensRights31/10/24 06:05 PM
15

I agree with the commenters that the original post comes across as rather transactional, and that is bad. BUT. The same people here who are calling out the transactionality of the post are simultaneously advocating for transactionality in the other direction. That’s my issue with them.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/10/24 08:38 PM
2

I don’t like her. I used to, but she has become very extreme.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 06:47 AM
3

The Internet revealed the cruelty inherent to humanity, that we were able to naively deny up until a decade or so ago. Feminism is a product of that cruelty, not its cause. But make no mistake, feminism has stayed true to its roots from the beginning, though most deny it. Feminism was a tool deployed to destroy the family unit, to divide men and women, to focus everyone on their enmity with each other, rather than their united enmity with the forces seeking to destroy humanity. It has largely ac…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 09:07 AM
16

No no don’t you understand it’s the conservatives and antifeminists who are fascist! Radfems just want state-sponsored discrimination! That’s not fascism, you fascist!
/r/EverydayMisandry20/10/24 07:07 PM
5

What a wonderful analyst who definitely isn’t biased or pushing an agenda!
/r/MensRights20/10/24 04:42 PM
5

I mean he’d be laughed out of the police station so it’s not like he’s got any good options
/r/MensRights19/10/24 02:08 AM
-1

What about the US?
/r/MensRights19/10/24 01:39 AM
4

It’s kinda funny seeing this post in my feed directly under this post where women were actively celebrating male suicide
/r/MensRights17/10/24 07:51 PM
17

Yeah when the reality is more like “who cares about men” lol
/r/EverydayMisandry17/10/24 04:28 PM
4

Spoilers!
/r/MensRights16/10/24 07:42 PM
7

Daily Mail just a right wing hate outlet ROFLMAO that’s hilarious
/r/MensRights16/10/24 06:16 PM
5

Underwires can also burn the wearer when subjected to large currents like that
/r/MensRights16/10/24 06:11 PM
19

Probably the best record of this phenomenon is the book Self-Made Man by Norah Vincent.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 06:06 PM
-1

Dang, I call my dad bald frequently… because he’s bald and it’s fun to tease him about it, cause he teases me so I tease back.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 12:48 AM
-3

Former porn addict here. The absolute best thing that helped me kick my addiction was not needing it anymore. And I started not needing it anymore by surrounding myself with people I cared about. For a long time I didn’t access my stash but I sure as heck couldn’t get the strength to delete it. I’ve got strong suspicions this is happening here. Given that he has a stash, I’d guess that he used to be an addict. The “earlier this year” access date tells me the “used to be” part. If you’re not addi…
/r/MensRights08/10/24 10:43 AM
2

You forgot: women are good by default
/r/MensRights06/10/24 02:07 PM
6

We care about female voters more, obviously lol
/r/MensRights05/10/24 10:25 AM
12

Usually hours worked is the biggest factor, job choice is another, you have a secretary wondering why she isn’t paid the same as her boss and claiming they do the same job
/r/MensRights29/09/24 01:44 PM
244

There are many reasons There are no acceptable reasons LOL
/r/MensRights29/09/24 01:05 PM
2

They mean re-indoctrinate yourself lol
/r/MensRights18/09/24 06:56 PM
12

No but you don’t get it: it IS always the man’s fault, remember Drake? He put hot sauce in his condom, how dare he try and destroy his semen? The woman putting it in her coochie should have been protected from his horrible hot sauce habits
/r/MensRights12/09/24 12:39 AM
39

I get it. But you can’t let her win. You gotta take your dream by force. There are other places and methods to get into music as a business. Take those, and your best revenge will be to have a happy and fulfilled life while she slowly destroys everyone who cares for her. Never back down, never surrender.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 08:26 PM
1

You my friend need to watch this channel and maybe write in to him for advice. He is absolutely not for everyone, but you need a strong dose of reality, and he will provide that.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 02:57 AM
1

Lol all the comments calling out her bad behavior have one downvote, which I undid, I think the wife found this thread
/r/MensRights07/09/24 02:55 AM
4

Yeah we can just revert back to the good old “condescendingly explained” which was co-opted to blame only men lol
/r/MensRights06/09/24 06:10 AM
6

Yeah because I totally said I liked JD Vance. The thing is though, JD isn’t now being shoehorned into being the republican presidential nominee. That’s the problem. Before Kamala was shoehorned in as VP, which I didn’t say was an issue, she showed her inelectability, which I did say was the problem. Now, instead of holding a proper primary without incumbent President Biden, as he dropped out, she just replaced him as the nominee without anyone voting for her. The republican equivalent, since you…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/24 06:57 PM
8

Well she won like 5% of the vote until she magically got VP, and was defactoed into being the candidate despite nobody actually voting for her in the primary, and they’re already deploying the “vote for Kamala because she’s a woman” campaign, so that definitely checks out to me
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/24 06:35 PM
2

That’s a very good observation. It’s because emotions are almost never logical, and because women think primarily with emotions (no, Reddit, I’m not saying that’s bad) and men think primarily with logic, which is relatively emotionless. So, as I’ve noticed, with women, it’s about the feelings, and they use completely illogical scenarios to produce the same emotion in another woman, thus communicating that emotion to that woman, essentially encoded. Now, men never got the decryption key to this c…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 05:21 AM
2

Turn it into motivation to forge your own path. Use it to educate yourself so that if you do enter a relationship, you’re not taken for a sucker. But right now it’s okay to feel frustration, betrayal, horror, and even anger. Most of us here have had a very similar moment of realizing how much we’ve been lied to. You’ve been lied to all your life pretty much. About men, about women, about feminism, about anti-feminism, about gender equality, and so many other things. You caught a glimpse of the t…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 12:27 AM
79

I’m really tired of the pearl-clutching and the overuse of the word “safety”. Now, when I hear a woman talk about how they are worried about safety, my default is to inwardly roll my eyes, not sympathize with them
/r/MensRights01/09/24 07:41 AM
-3

I generally don’t like the way “I’m proud of you” sounds even from my dad
/r/EverydayMisandry31/08/24 10:38 PM
1

I would definitely not be comfortable with the game described in the screenshots. But I’m not sure how this one game is representative of men or gamers as a whole lol
/r/EverydayMisandry29/08/24 10:58 PM
10

They don’t. Feminism is a plot to destroy the traditional family (which resists government oversight and produces strong interdependent communities) and they happened to use the left. It’s not about politics as much as it’s about destroying the family. If the left had been focused on preserving families over individuals then they would’ve used the right.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 04:12 PM
1

Ya I don’t exactly like him either, but I gotta vote policy over personality.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 02:05 PM
27

minors 18, 19 years old Now I’m not one to say you’re incredibly mature at 19, but minor is a legally inaccurate term there lol
/r/MensRights27/08/24 12:47 AM
7

Jordan Peterson put it best. Women are attracted to competence and success. What dark tetrad personalities do imitates success, and does so in a much flashier way than actual successful men do. So young, naive women tend to fall for the trap of the appearance of competence. It tends to fall apart in the long term, so those dark tetrad types are rarely able to sustain long committed relationships. And those women who learn usually learn through significant trauma. So they end up going for the saf…
/r/MensRights25/08/24 01:25 AM
15

confused unga bunga
/r/MensRights24/08/24 06:10 AM
1

It’s deliberately ambiguous in order to be harder to counter with any form of logic
/r/MensRights18/08/24 03:00 AM
0

Look, I’m not a big fan of Ben, but he’s Jewish. It’s built into his religion. So regardless of how messed up we may see it as, his teachers and almost all resources available to him are going to minimize circumcision, and even promote it. So I’m not really sure I can blame Ben for falling for the same stuff we used to fall for, with the added issue of if he were to oppose circumcision, he himself might be completely kicked out of his religion, and according to his beliefs, condemned to an etern…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 10:52 PM
11

Nah I think they mean picture filters to make you look taller
/r/MensRights15/08/24 04:57 PM
1

How did you shift the goalposts? I refuted your standardized talking points blaming men for the lack of DV centers for them, and then you shifted the goalposts to talk about the suffragette movement and pretended what they faced was similar, implying the suffragettes had it worse. I refuted that, and you start generalizing about “the history of women’s rights”. I call you out on your fallacious argumentation, and you respond with a No True Scotsman fallacy. You’re really quite predictable. Sally…
/r/MensRights14/08/24 10:29 PM
5

Oh you love shifting the goalposts don’t you? Soon as you lose one point “oh well I was actually talking about this other thing”. Sure. Let’s talk women’s DV shelters. You kinda can’t avoid Sally Miller Gearhardt, who was instrumental in setting up the first women’s DV shelter, and who came up with the Duluth model of DV, which is horribly misandrist, yet pushed by feminists as the gold standard for analysis of DV. She didn’t believe men could be DV victims, didn’t believe men could be raped, an…
/r/MensRights14/08/24 01:28 PM
4

No, it didn’t. The main opposition to the suffragette movement came from women, not men. The reason was because most women saw how men had gotten the right to vote that same year, by agreeing to mandatory conscription, and didn’t want to vote if voting meant conscription. But the suffragettes campaigned for the right without the responsibility. Feminists rewrote the history books to make it seem like men opposed the women’s right to vote. Nothing could be further from the truth. The suffragette …
/r/MensRights14/08/24 01:12 PM
4

Oh they did set up male DV centers. They immediately got swamped by women protesting their very existence, then got attacked, sabotaged, and threatened. One of the founders committed suicide as a result of the horrific treatment. Men don’t need to set up DV centers, women need to stop torturing the men who do.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 01:05 PM
6

wat
/r/MensRights13/08/24 03:55 PM
1

This reads like a comment. Since it’s a post, I’m a bit confused.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 07:24 PM
9

This study has a fundamental problem and bias. It’s asking what should be done with “misinformation” and “hate speech” without considering who gets to define what exactly constitutes misinformation and hate speech. The problem lies in the fact that politicians and bureaucrats use the terms “misinformation” and “hate speech” to de-legitimize information they find inconvenient. Speaking truth to power is misinformation now. Speaking facts is now hate speech. This will continue to be a problem, and…
/r/MensRights11/08/24 04:39 PM
4

Be careful asking for people to comment or provide input. This subreddit is pretty worried about accusations of brigading, so they tend to not like it when people could be construed as asking for others to follow a link and then comment.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 11:34 AM
9

Society tends to go running about with fire extinguishers whenever there is a flood, so probably not lol
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/24 06:58 AM
4

I’m really really tempted to say “the mirror” because I find it entertaining but I know you’re being sarcastic so it doesn’t work lol
/r/MensRights08/08/24 11:17 PM
1

Oh dang. They don’t work for me either
/r/MensRights07/08/24 06:28 AM
0

I would agree with you on that
/r/MensRights06/08/24 09:23 PM
13

And the fact that it’s almost indistinguishable between humans and bots should scare everyone way more.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 12:46 PM
2

The bots made by the supermassive billion dollar corporations for their and other supermassive billion dollar corporations’ benefit are agreeing with and defending them to the world. But they’re the ones speaking truth to power.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 12:44 PM
3

You do realize that the feminist definition of “attack” means “call me out” or “say something I disagree with” right?
/r/MensRights05/08/24 04:12 PM
0

What, so we can go from Marie Antoinette to the Robespierre Reign of Terror? Before calling to reenact the French Revolution, maybe look up the ending…
/r/MensRights03/08/24 03:06 PM
1

Found Kamala’s alt lol
/r/MensRights03/08/24 03:02 PM
3

Yeah it kinda feels like he’s probably gonna be the only choice. Personally I prefer other candidates, but they aren’t on the list of choices.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 03:01 PM
1

It’s pretty arrogant to presume yourself the voice of reason. You’re directly assuming that something never happens, and while I agree it’s rare, I have seen it happen. You don’t need to assume that just because you haven’t experienced it, nobody experiences it. That’s really quite an assumption you’re making there.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 03:54 AM
1

It’s unfortunate to see you completely miss the point of my comment. My comment is specifically saying that while it does happen, it’s not anything like common enough to be a massive threat in everyday interactions. To deny that it does happen at all, as you have done, is to ignore the plight of thousands upon thousands of innocent men. It’s just as bad as catastrophizing, if not worse. I agree that more men need to make an effort to socialize in spite of this risk. But men need to also be wary …
/r/MensRights01/08/24 01:25 AM
1

Yep. It does happen. It’s rare, but there are women who legitimately believe that a greeting from a man who they find unattractive to be an assault on their dignity. There are also women, who, out of delusional fear from biased media, believe that in order to remain safe from the men they reject, they must act as though the approaching man is a societal pariah. They also usually believe that any interaction is to be viewed as an approach. False accusations come from these types of people. They c…
/r/MensRights31/07/24 10:17 PM
3

It can, if she cries rapist, but it isn’t tremendously likely. But the fact that it can happen at all is a serious problem. You don’t seem to understand that. You’re just condemning the men who are worried about the risks.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 07:06 PM
3

If you see hatred of all women, report it. It will get banned.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 07:01 PM
7

No. Suicide isn’t the answer. If you think it is, you’re looking at it the wrong way. Misandry is a problem to be overcome, not an overwhelming inevitable force. Guess who wants you to be discouraged and not do anything about misandry? The misandrists. The more impossible it seems, the more impressive the victory.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/24 11:26 AM
2

Yeah you still don’t get it lol
/r/MensRights29/07/24 01:22 AM
0

The act of sex being forced or criminal doesn’t make the life it creates any less sacred. It doesn’t give the child any inherent quality that makes their life less valuable. Why make the child pay the ultimate price for the sins of their fathers and mothers?
/r/MensRights29/07/24 12:02 AM
1

Fair lol
/r/MensRights29/07/24 12:00 AM
4

Pro life and pro choice are the two sides of the abortion debate. Both sides, when using that term, aren’t referring to life in general, but abortion specifically. You’ve injected your own meaning where there was none, gotten mad about it apparently, then blamed the entire world for it.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 11:59 PM
4

Bro if you wait for humans to stop being hypocritical, you’re gonna be waiting for eternity. That’s like saying you’re not a fan of gyms because lazy people who only go once a year exist. That, in itself, is hypocritical. Don’t believe something because you think you like other people who believe it, believe something because it’s right in your view, and encourage others who believe similarly to chase hypocrisy out of their lives. Don’t make your belief system dependent on humans. Humans will al…
/r/MensRights28/07/24 11:54 PM
17

We’re a long way from the “safe, legal, and rare” days
/r/MensRights28/07/24 11:52 PM
10

Because everyone has value, and it’s what I would like others to do for me, so I can do no less than wish happiness on others whom I know nothing about.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/24 04:54 AM
15

She looks like a normal girl. The title was too much of a wreck to be legible, so I’m just going to assume she’s a normal girl. I hope she’s happy.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/24 04:46 AM
2

No, I think that OP, like the bechdel test they’re referring to, is arguing that an excessive focus on the womanizing aspects of a character is bad, as is the complete absence of womanizing. Which, depending on your definition of womanizing, is something I could agree with. Arguably, the original intent of the bechdel test was to show the extremes being touted as normal. Extreme focus on men by women. We have now moved to the opposite extreme, but it can be reasonably assumed that Bechdel didn’t…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 08:24 PM
3

No, they don’t. It’s just a very good weapon against opposition because they can then claim that whoever opposes them is actively destroying children, and that makes good headlines for the sympathetic media
/r/MensRights20/07/24 05:34 PM
1

The soul pre-exists conception “Before you were formed in your mother’s womb, I knew you”. So I don’t think that biblically, you can use the “it’s not a person” or “it’s not alive” argument. Outside the Bible, there’s really no way to know if there is such a thing as a soul, which means that you can justify abortion, but it can’t be justified using the Bible lol
/r/MensRights20/07/24 05:16 AM
1

Oh so a person who is knocked out is fine to kill then because they aren’t conscious
/r/MensRights20/07/24 05:12 AM
2

Found the genius feminist who purposefully misrepresents everything in the worst possible interpretation and then plays dumb when you counter their arguments
/r/MensRights20/07/24 05:09 AM
3

Er, it doesn’t lol. Don’t know about other religious books, but the Bible doesn’t
/r/MensRights20/07/24 05:02 AM
13

Well, didn’t you know that women live longer because they’re just inherently better than men? It’s so obvious to anyone non-bigoted /s
/r/MensRights19/07/24 03:19 PM
8

Sigh. It’s getting boring to see that unaffiliated website being used as ammo against Trump, who never endorsed it. Like if Trump is that bad, surely you can find actually relevant evidence.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 07:38 AM
2

Same exact thing. Reddit’s algorithm influences what posts you see and you choose what communities to follow. Social media is a fundamentally unreliable source of truth.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/07/24 02:49 PM
2

Yeah it is just you, unfortunately. I have the exact opposite experience, but I recognize that the YouTube algorithm changes search results and recommendations based exclusively on what it thinks I’ll like, so there are plenty of cases of viral videos that I just never even see and obscure videos that I do see, and videos that randomly pop into my feed a few years after they’re uploaded. You’re not going to get any reliable data just based off YouTube searches. Not even signed out searches anymo…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/07/24 12:41 PM
2

Well yeah. It’s a taboo topic, just like anti-white racism, which is really just racism. Neither one is very popular to be talking about and those who do get lambasted.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/07/24 12:15 PM
5

People do talk about it. Just because you don’t see it doesn’t mean it’s not happening. And no, anti white racism discussion is laughed out of the building to a similar level (and usually by the same people) as discussion of misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/07/24 11:55 AM
1

Eh. My personal opinion is that you solve the problems he lays out by doing this: stop placing so much importance on a relationship. Sure, it might be nice, but it’s not like you’re ever going to get them to change. You may feel like you can’t find happiness without them, but let’s be realistic, there’s not a lot of good prospects anymore, so it’s not like you have much choice. Learn to be content where you are. I don’t think a manifesto is going to do anything.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/07/24 06:33 PM
13

I’m personally a bit tired of people saying men aren’t allowed to show [insert emotion here]. Most women I’ve seen who say that still don’t realize that the problem isn’t that men aren’t allowed to express emotions, the problem is that men express every emotion very differently than women do, and because of this, the emotions they do show are misinterpreted negatively. Primarily by women. So it’s not that the emotions are suppressed, it’s that how men express emotion is always interpreted negati…
/r/MensRights14/07/24 04:30 PM
10

It wasn’t. He was falsely accused. And the accusers, yet again, face no consequences. He was not sued. His family sued the college after the college automatically branded him a sexual predator. That’s the lawsuit that was won.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 08:00 AM
15

Kinda dumb, but not for the reason you might think. First date should be like a walk in the local park in the afternoon or early evening when it’s cooler. It’s in public, so she can feel safe, it’s still pretty private so conversation can occur, and it’s free. First date should be free. Once a relationship is established, that’s when going Dutch or ping ponging paying should be the standard. Up until then, keep the dates free. Meh. Demonstrate your protectiveness if you have to, and protect her …
/r/MensRights12/07/24 07:47 PM
5

Sure, $2 gas was definitely only beneficial to billionaires lol
/r/MensRights12/07/24 01:00 AM
2

So let’s say you’re dating this girl and you tell her something minor like this, and you later find out she told her friend about it. You confront her about it and tell her that because she gossiped about this small thing, there’s no way for you to trust her with the large things. She responds by apologizing and saying that she was trying to find a way to help you. You respond by telling her that she should have asked you if she could bring it to her friend. She acknowledges this, admits it was …
/r/MensRights11/07/24 09:41 PM
3

Predictable.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/07/24 08:54 PM
-8

And they say lwma is definitely not controlled opposition
/r/EverydayMisandry11/07/24 07:52 PM
2

It’s a free app (sorta). Why would anyone care?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/24 08:25 PM
1

I believe so
/r/MensRights07/07/24 11:39 PM
1

Honestly if you want a lighthearted child friendly comedy, I recommend inside out 2
/r/MensRights07/07/24 04:49 AM
2

I haven’t seen the movie, mind linking me a clip of this line or something? I’m curious now lol
/r/MensRights07/07/24 04:48 AM
1

based lol
/r/MensRights07/07/24 04:46 AM
7

how to say you have daddy issues without saying you have daddy issues
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/24 09:07 PM
7

Sexual assault and harassment is not something to be dismissed. Just because a man is the subject and because you’re screwed up enough to wish you’d get sexually assaulted doesn’t make it right.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 08:55 AM
-4

Oh right, that’s why they protect feminism and women from legitimate criticism, because they’re so independent. Got it. And yes, I know who I’m talking about. Yes, I know the difference between criticism of feminism and over generalization of women as a whole. No, the fact that you have a different experience does not invalidate mine. That sub is not what you think it is.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 05:29 PM
-5

LWMA doesn’t actually stand for men. It’s what’s known as “controlled opposition”. It’s a puppet opposition sub controlled by feminists, so that they can point to it and say “okay but we allow and even encourage opposition and free discussion”. Much like mainstream media, the mods know they’re walking a thin line between the truth and what feminists want them to believe. This line moves closer to what feminists want them to believe each day. It’s not a pretty place. Controlled opposition never i…
/r/MensRights03/07/24 04:32 PM
2

That’s a good point that I had forgotten to include
/r/MensRights02/07/24 05:33 AM
2

Good on ya, I’ll delete my comment
/r/MensRights01/07/24 11:24 PM
19

If he wants an abortion but you want to keep the child, then keep the child but don’t sue him for child support. The key concept behind abortion is supposed to be the idea that nobody should be forced to be parents. So if you believe you get a choice in parenting, then so does he. If he doesn’t want you to get an abortion but you do, then perhaps consider giving birth and giving him full custody pending whenever you finish college. You’ll regret not being involved, but it’s better than abortion.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 11:23 PM
1

It’s true, just doesn’t apply solely to men as she seems to be implying. People on the whole tend not to change.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/07/24 03:34 AM
17

I don’t think an apology would help any reputation damage done. The accusation always gets orders of magnitude more attention than the exoneration, the same would apply to an apology or retraction.
/r/MensRights27/06/24 01:08 AM
12

The presence of one fault doesn’t justify another. Assuming it was underage drinking, which it wasn’t, what you’re saying would imply that because the guy was drinking under the legal age that it was fine for her to rape him. Sure, underage drinking is wrong, foolish, and puts people in danger, but that has nothing to do with the fact that it’s wrong that someone else took advantage of their lack of maturity and discipline.
/r/MensRights24/06/24 05:41 PM
4

This is probably one of the most unhinged messages I’ve ever seen
/r/EverydayMisandry21/06/24 02:48 PM
2

I would suggest perhaps a compromise. You could always just go for a walk in a park, still relaxing, but much safer because you guys won’t be fully alone whilst still being functionally private.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 03:41 PM
6

Who’s gonna paste in the Karen straughan quote? (I forgot how to spell her last name)
/r/MensRights18/06/24 02:26 AM
2

Okay, but wouldn’t having too few women have the same problem? The kids would still be half-siblings if there were only a few women
/r/MensRights08/06/24 04:21 PM
3

Hang on. What study is that and what conclusions did they draw? I’m really taken aback by that. Why is it generally better to have more men than women in a given starter population sample? I’ve always heard the reverse is true, and when I say always, I mean literally always. If what you’re saying is true, that would have fairly major consequences.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 09:37 AM
1

Interesting, when was this election?
/r/MensRights04/06/24 08:32 AM
5

More of a “calling men narcissistic for x while calling women ’qween’ for the same thing” but you get the idea
/r/MensRights02/06/24 11:25 PM
3

That would be pretty true, yeah, but I’m explaining the impacts the double standards have on society and statistics and why statistics is not appearing to represent society
/r/MensRights02/06/24 11:24 PM
4

Look at it this way. Men and women, both being human and being more the same than we are different, tend to usually start out with the same chance of being a narcissist or other psychotic type. Then factor in the fact that we tend to, as a society, encourage and glorify narcissistic behavior in women and condemn the exact same behavior in men. This makes women, as a baseline, more likely to exhibit antisocial behavior like this, not because they’re women, but because they’re human, and humans co…
/r/MensRights02/06/24 11:14 PM
11

Yeah I’ve been told similar things. I just think about it this way. The Bible says in Proverbs 26:2 (NLT): “Like a fluttering sparrow or a darting swallow, an undeserved curse will not land on its intended victim.” You’re probably not Christian, I don’t know what you believe, but look at the mindset you can adopt based on that verse. A curse can be thought of as wishing harm on someone. That’s a bit of a mild interpretation, but wishing someone would commit suicide is probably pretty close to th…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/06/24 01:59 PM
5

In my opinion, nobody should be advocating to earn any approval, we should be doing this because it’s right. So it doesn’t especially matter what OP means, because it’s pretty clear from the post that “male approval” doesn’t mean “because it’s the right thing to do” and that’s what’s important
/r/EverydayMisandry30/05/24 06:23 PM
8

post in question where OP says she’s no longer going to “fight for men’s rights” because it didn’t bring her the male approval she was looking for.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/05/24 10:39 AM
10

Look. Frankly, I don’t care if you post here. I just care that we not be hypocrites. I’m not glad to know you’re “back” if you’re still only in it for approval. I didn’t see you specifically disavow that problem, so I’m not really convinced. If you advocate for anything, advocate for it because it’s right. Advocacy for the sake of approval is something nobody needs. Doing that makes you no better than the male feminists who are just in it to get laid. Advocating for the right thing for the right…
/r/EverydayMisandry30/05/24 10:37 AM
5

Hang on. I’ve heard that one before lol
/r/EverydayMisandry29/05/24 03:42 PM
14

I’ve learned that mods are not the arbiters of virtue I subconsciously thought they were when I innocently first made my account. If anything, they’re like the Greek pantheon in the actual legends, not the Disney movies. Seriously messed up, and gifted with power far beyond their ability to distinguish right from wrong. The Greek pantheon was way more flawed and horrible than we like to think. Exhibit A. I was permanently banned from r/justguysbeingdudes because I participated in another meme su…
/r/EverydayMisandry28/05/24 12:02 PM
3

Dangit they found out
/r/MensRights28/05/24 03:30 AM
14

Blue pill typically stands for acceptance of the status quo as reality, and passively believing what you’re told. Red pill typically stands for challenging the status quo and rejecting what you’ve been told, preferring to compile your own research Purple pill is typically defined as a middle ground or as a place where self-proclaimed blue pill and red-pill communities come together to have questionably healthy debates. Black pill is typically defined as people who have given up on society comple…
/r/MensRights28/05/24 03:24 AM
1

Ryan long is a kinda a hit or miss for me personally but this was definitely a hit lol
/r/MensRights26/05/24 02:16 AM
2

I think it’s fine because it’s talking about female penguins, not women
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/24 05:11 PM
4

That’s pretty accurate lol, the ai did a good job portraying how they talk
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/24 04:57 PM
2

Someone needs to do the math on the number of people who were mauled versus the number of people who could’ve been mauled
/r/MensRights22/05/24 11:54 PM
17

Kevin dealt with hundreds of women like the average at best lady, so while it could’ve been her, it’s statistically unlikely
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/05/24 01:06 AM
-1

Yeah, there’s a lot going on that you don’t understand lol. I like how you instantly assumed that I was saying everyone must have kids. If you genuinely don’t want kids, you shouldn’t have them, for the simple reason that you will be a bad parent if you view children as something negative. But enough people in societies usually want to have children to keep the society going. That’s how civilizations work. People die, new people have to be born at an equal or greater rate if the society wants to…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/05/24 06:19 PM
3

The term “toxic masculinity” grammatically means that the masculinity is the thing that is toxic. It objectively does NOT mean “toxic standards for men”. Saying that allows misandrists to hide their hatred. If you mean toxic standards, then say toxic standards. Don’t use a term that definitionally applies the adjective “toxic” to masculinity. It’s not complicated. Toxic standards for men is not, never has been, and never will be “toxic masculinity”. Even if they happen to be perpetuated by men. …
/r/EverydayMisandry19/05/24 08:07 PM
2

Very interesting video. While I don’t agree with absolutely everything, most of what you say in the video is very sensible and clearly laid out. Thanks for posting.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 03:13 PM
16

Uh, that’s harassment by exclusion, hostile work environment Yes this has actually been said and guys have actually gotten in trouble over it
/r/MensRights19/05/24 01:42 PM
2

Legally the fact OP was too drunk to drive could be a factor, one could very well argue that because OP was too drunk to want to drive, therefore OP was inhibited in their decision making, therefore unable to consent, and unable to see the signs that usually betray a person who is lying due to drunkenness. So you might have a case. Problem is OP happens to be born with the wrong genitalia, and the alleged perpetrator is a member of the most legally and socially protected classes in existence, so…
/r/MensRights19/05/24 01:07 PM
2

Modsss we got a troll over here calling people a transphobe for not wanting to be lied to!
/r/MensRights19/05/24 01:01 PM
3

Biggest female allies? I wasn’t aware of this person having a significant following, is that the case?
/r/EverydayMisandry18/05/24 09:28 PM
64

I uh, didn’t know we were supposed to be doing this for male or female approval, I thought we were doing this because it’s, ya know, right…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/05/24 01:50 PM
11

Wikipedia says MGTOW is misogynistic so therefore it must be true! Since when did Wikipedia become a remotely reliable source for anything lol
/r/MensRights16/05/24 08:14 PM
1

I mean it only hurts like hell for an hour instead of for fifty years lol
/r/MensRights16/05/24 03:49 PM
5

Yah that’s a very common line
/r/MensRights15/05/24 08:40 PM
488

…when the rights of half the population are a forbidden topic lmao…
/r/MensRights15/05/24 10:19 AM
-2

lol no, but congrats on misunderstanding it
/r/EverydayMisandry13/05/24 12:05 AM
0

Thanks for contradicting and then agreeing with me lol
/r/EverydayMisandry13/05/24 12:02 AM
-4

That’s…. what I said… it’s a satire sub…
/r/EverydayMisandry13/05/24 12:01 AM
6

Yup, hence the “troll” in the name. I’m not a fan of how deep they go with their trolling for that exact reason, it becomes indistinguishable from the real thing. And then well meaning people who call it out get this treatment from the actual misandrists: “they made a parody of us and then got mad about their parody”. It ends up becoming a straw man. I personally don’t think this type of trolling helps anyone.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/05/24 07:37 PM
5

This is gonna be weird, but that’s a parody sub. It’s parodying TwoX, but sharing posts from there is a great way for the actual misandrists to discredit our commentary by saying “they parody us and then criticize us based on their parody”. I personally am not a fan of parody subs like that, I don’t think they help, but I don’t control them. I do control myself though, and so I don’t go there and I don’t share anything from there.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/05/24 07:18 PM
8

Er, that’s a parody sub, they do a really good job of imitating TwoX, but they are a parody sub
/r/EverydayMisandry12/05/24 07:15 PM
4

Look closely at the linked subreddit
/r/EverydayMisandry11/05/24 07:38 AM
1

I’d definitely agree lol
/r/EverydayMisandry11/05/24 07:02 AM
3

Nah you have no idea how much they hate it because they know they’re being mocked but they can’t stop it
/r/MensRights09/05/24 02:37 AM
2

Or identify as a woman and go in anyway
/r/MensRights09/05/24 12:39 AM
1

Ah, I see. I was confusing the Rebecca person with Becky. My bad lol
/r/EverydayMisandry07/05/24 06:35 PM
1

Wait, hang on, exactly who is Becky? What tag am I looking for exactly
/r/EverydayMisandry07/05/24 05:19 PM
0

I’ve seen it get said but only ironically in dark joke competitions
/r/EverydayMisandry07/05/24 05:07 PM
0

I sided with Becky on the first post, but on this post, in all the screenshots she’s definitely seeming pretty misandrist herself lol Edit: never mind, I thought Rebecca was the same person as Becky
/r/EverydayMisandry07/05/24 05:06 PM
1

Gee I gotta find me someone like you
/r/MensRights07/05/24 02:20 PM
2

I mean obviously your girl has never encountered a bear. I still remember the story of the poor female hiker who had a bear decide she was a snack, and he literally started eating her feet while she was asleep, she was conscious enough through the entire thing to call 911, her family, and tell them what was happening. By the time medics arrived there wasn’t much left of her. Bears are very powerful, sadistic creatures. They actively enjoy your screams and your display of pain. They treat humans …
/r/MensRights07/05/24 02:17 PM
2

I mean I do agree that kids start out bad, and we all have to be trained not to do those things, like for example my mom never had to train me to lie, she trained me to tell the truth. Kids start out as flawed because we are all flawed. But then to take that general life concept and apply it to only little boys is just… soooo ignorant… Ignorance combined with Arrogance, as CS Lewis said, is unassailable. Ignorance alone can be outthought. Arrogance alone can be outmaneuvered. But together, there…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/05/24 01:56 PM
5

Yeah… that’s not what the term “patriarchy” means. It’s not a descriptive term. It’s specifically entailing men oppressing women. Don’t use it as a descriptive term because it is not descriptive in any sense. You wanna know why it’s overwhelmingly men in positions of power? It’s not because of sexism or bias or anything like that. Claiming that is a cop out. The real reason boils down to the general nature of women versus the general nature of men. Statistically, about 80% of women are more inte…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/05/24 08:18 PM
3

And they still say “Misandry merely annoys, misogyny kills.”
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:10 PM
4

That I actually have less of a problem with. At least they’re being consistent and honest. While I don’t think OP is intentionally lying or anything, the contradiction of saying we live in a ‘patriarchal system’ and that men supposedly suffer from it too really irks me. It feels condescending like “oh yeah sure we’ll acknowledge that men have it hard but we’re still the biggest victims” and I find it highly ironic. If we were actually the patriarchal society they think, none of the man-hating ty…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/05/24 05:05 PM
13

I find it depressingly entertaining how people can look around, see the misandry rampant literally everywhere in society, and go “yeah we live in a patriarchy and men have all the power”… Just… oh dear…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/05/24 01:57 PM
15

men suffer too in the patriarchal system Sigh.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/05/24 01:39 PM
5

Everyone is horrible and perverted either at some level or at some point in their life… in other news, studies show that water is wet, and we think the sky might be blue.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 02:05 AM
22

Probably because he was DA BOMB ba-dum-tssss okay I’ll see myself out
/r/MensRights02/05/24 11:03 AM
4

Yeah that just makes it more weird lol
/r/MensRights21/04/24 01:54 PM
17

Which is a bit weird considering TS is in her thirties still making songs like she’s in highschool
/r/MensRights21/04/24 01:22 PM
1

but you can’t be trans-racial
/r/MensRights21/04/24 04:50 AM
8

And how it has gone lol
/r/MensRights21/04/24 04:32 AM
8

Parrots are also cute and affectionate
/r/MensRights14/04/24 11:48 PM
2

Does anyone have like a translation or something? I uh, can’t read japanese
/r/MensRights13/04/24 05:18 PM
1

While I do believe this is a church choice issue for you personally, as I can attest there are good churches out there… …I do have to agree with you that we, as a wider Christian community, have a problem. We need to somehow fight the rot in the Church. I just finished watching Time Changer, coincidentally. It really convicted me on a number of issues. I don’t know what the solution. But I do know that you can vote with your feet, and this I recommend as a minimum. Find a better church, and you …
/r/MensRights13/04/24 06:35 AM
2

Yeah I’m generally extremely happy with my church’s stance on marriage and men. But at the same time I agree with the OP. We, as a Christian community, have a problem. We should be taking biblical methods with which to hold accountable those who use the Bible to abuse men.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 06:29 AM
2

Y’all really gotta get a handle on those “bad ones” if that’s the case. They need to be confronted by feminists and held accountable.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 09:49 PM
14

Don’t worry, OP is a feminist troll who is trying to get dirt on people in here by trying to get people to say that women are objects. This happens all the time. Report the post and move on.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 06:59 PM
3

Definitely. And to be clear, the withholding of sex isn’t usually intentional. Studies show that the woman’s sexual desire in a relationship, if unaddressed, almost always decreases significantly over time, while the man’s desire stays the same. But, if the problem is recognized and the couple deals with it, or prepares for it, it goes away rather completely. But few couples deal with it and most tend to avoid addressing their issues. Consent is important, but we as a society also need to unders…
/r/MensRights08/04/24 10:50 PM
4

I would generally agree with this. I’ve never seen alcohol do anything positive for any romantic relationship. I don’t think the guy was malicious in his attempts, but definitely he wouldn’t know his own strength while drunk enough to be disinhibited. While he shouldn’t be blasted for sexual assault, he should be told when sober that his actions while drunk were not appropriate. I think a discussion needs to happen about whether or not alcohol is something the relationship allows for. That being…
/r/MensRights08/04/24 05:02 PM
3

Yeah, that’s why Vivek started his own index fund investment company to combat it. Which I’m all for some competition
/r/MensRights28/03/24 03:52 AM
2

BlackRock made the ESG system as a spring point to determine who best was worth investing in, so ESG is driven by BlackRock, not the other way around.
/r/MensRights28/03/24 12:30 AM
1

Well if it ain’t the consequences of my own actions
/r/MensRights27/03/24 07:21 PM
4

It’s really just money. Massive investing companies like BlackRock will only invest in you if you meet their quotas
/r/MensRights27/03/24 07:21 PM
7

Yeah, the problem with being against conscription is that it’s only a belief that works in time of peace. Wars are won with numbers. The instant a war starts, conscription becomes necessary to win. It’s an unfortunate reality of war that you need people to win, and nations who keep their fighting forces volunteer-only lose on numbers very quickly.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 05:29 PM
33

But doncha know, misandry merely annoys, being arrested must’ve just been an annoyance!
/r/EverydayMisandry20/03/24 05:11 PM
2

Yeah I have it saved because it’s so darn useful
/r/MensRights19/03/24 02:45 PM
7

Right, because men care about a woman’s money
/r/MensRights18/03/24 07:23 PM
15

Try this
/r/MensRights18/03/24 04:21 PM
1

That could be a contributing factor
/r/MensRights18/03/24 04:18 PM
22

I mean his wallet definitely has nothing to do with it…
/r/MensRights18/03/24 04:17 PM
6

And they’ll arrest you lol If you think cops are on your side, you got another think coming
/r/MensRights18/03/24 02:32 AM
2

Doncha hate typos in titles cause you can’t edit titles?
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/24 10:38 PM
2

Man I want to be optimistic but years on the internet makes me exceedingly skeptical.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/24 10:37 PM
2

That’s not going to help, women are allowed to live in delusion far more than men are today, so you’ll mostly hear that “oh it’s just a select few women who do it and can’t be generalized, and those who do generalize are incel virgin misogynists and only generalize because they seek to destroy women.” You’ll probably find very little deviation from that line of thinking, especially on Reddit, which is already a heavily left leaning platform. This isn’t to say that more women live in delusion bec…
/r/MensRights14/03/24 07:28 PM
3

The problem is that it’s used against men most commonly in the context of romantic relationships so removing that removes the problem you’re asking about.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 05:13 AM
8

Welcome to the wonderful world of men. If it sucks for you, imagine how much it sucks for him.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 03:57 PM
17

Found the twoXer lol
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/24 06:28 AM
4

Uh-huh, so you basically disagree with OP that there’s even a problem
/r/MensRights29/02/24 10:21 PM
10

Great way to interpret everything with the maximum possible malicious intent. So how would you solve the problem if you’re so concerned about “tattling”?
/r/MensRights29/02/24 04:09 PM
23

As we always say, if you see genuine sexism here, report it to the mods and the Reddit admins. The admins are definitely not going to ignore anything that could be construed as misogynistic so they’re basically guaranteed to deem whatever you report from here as delete-worthy
/r/MensRights29/02/24 11:08 AM
2

I mean I wouldn’t mind if it killed a bit of libido too, having this ravenous hunger all the time sucks, especially because the rational side of me has sworn off relationships for the foreseeable future. I just want to stop wanting it so much. It feels like it’s not worth anything anymore.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 07:40 AM
6

Good for you. I used to buy into that stuff too. Personal growth is hard.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/02/24 07:37 AM
1

My first thought lol
/r/MensRights20/02/24 05:58 PM
2

That’s not what OP said even in the uneditable title
/r/MensRights20/02/24 05:58 PM
-3

And the irony is that none of them see it
/r/MensRights10/02/24 09:46 PM
14

This is my question too
/r/MensRights10/02/24 09:44 PM
4

This has been studied. IQ is a bell curve with the majority of both in the middle. That middle is the same for both genders. Men’s bell curve is flatter than women’s, meaning there are more men at both ends of the spectrum. This means there are fewer dumb women than men and also fewer smart women that men. That’s just how to numbers work out.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:08 PM
0

This is not a well-researched take at all
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:03 AM
3

I think she made a good point about an ai girlfriend being broken via an update. That’s a far more likely scenario than anyone seems to realize or acknowledge.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:02 AM
2

Hey it won’t hurt if you get kicked there
/r/MensRights08/02/24 04:56 AM
2

And they say it’s not a cult lol
/r/MensRights08/02/24 04:55 AM
8

There’s the age-old story of a wife who had her friends catcall her husband to “show him what it’s like” and he came back glowing and on cloud nine, and she couldn’t bear to tell him
/r/EverydayMisandry05/02/24 03:16 AM
17

r/womenwritingmen
/r/EverydayMisandry03/02/24 02:24 PM
4

Poverty is temporary. Stupidity is forever
/r/MensRights02/02/24 04:51 AM
8

I see this so much and it’s so bad. “Guysssss generalizations are badddddd!” No, generalizations are how humans process information. It is in fact over-generalizations that are bad, usually referred to as “hasty generalization” if you’re thinking about the logical fallacy. It is in fact a hasty generalization fallacy to assert that generalizations are bad. It’s a conclusion based on vastly insufficient evidence. Now, I do agree that there is nothing inherently bad about women or men, just inhere…
/r/MensRights30/01/24 02:34 PM
1

Then it should have been posted as a reply to those comments, not as a top level comment.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 01:11 AM
3

Oh that’s a good point. I hadn’t even thought of that. That’s straight up illegal
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:50 PM
1

No he shouldn’t use her for sex, and you can report any comments you see saying that. Nobody should use anyone. Using her isn’t right, but knowing his worth is right. Edit: the reason why people are downvoting you is likely because your statement is worded in such a way that it appears to assume that everyone here thinks he should use her, which is obviously not what most people here think. Those generalizations make you look like a troll.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:48 PM
1

According to feminists, if you’re a man, then yes lol
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:46 PM
11

I’ve seen a 24f-30m relationship criticized by Reddit as “predatory” even though they’re kinda struggling financially together (so she’s probably not there strictly for the money) and I personally think it’s a bit ridiculous.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 03:34 AM
21

Obligatory note to report bad faith trolls so the mods can deal with them
/r/MensRights27/01/24 08:29 AM
2

That’s hilarious. Figures they don’t have a sense of humor.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/01/24 01:45 PM
11

You’ll find the world is a LOT colder once you present male. Once fully presenting male, you’ll get pulled over more often, don’t call 911 unless you absolutely have to because they’re likely to assume you’re the perp, and definitely don’t call about domestic violence because they’ll automatically assume you’re the sole perp. Nobody’s going to smile at you on the streets, and nobody’s going to randomly engage you in conversation. You’re far more likely to get mugged or robbed, so lock your doors…
/r/MensRights23/01/24 09:48 PM
0

No, here’s the best summary I’ve got. The supposed ineligibility is based off allegations of classified documents found in a secure safe at maralago, his mansion. Except it’s completely ignoring the fact that the president has the right to unilaterally declassify documents, and Trump had done that, and also ignores that he was already in communication with Congress about getting the documents back to them the day before the raid. That Colorado court case was actually brought by an obscure runner…
/r/MensRights22/01/24 02:27 PM
2

Spoken like a true CNN fan lol
/r/MensRights22/01/24 02:11 PM
1

I used to think Nikki was a moderate. Then the debates and the primary happened. Now I kinda buy the whole democrat plant thing, not fully, but she definitely behaves exactly like a woke person does.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 02:10 PM
4

Learning to enjoy your own company is one thing, isolation is another. At a purely biological level, humans need positive social interactions of some kind to avoid things like depression. It’s extremely deeply ingrained in our biology and our delicate hormonal balance. I know from personal experience that self isolation can work for a bit but over the years it will wear you down into silent depression and despair for almost no reason. Pets are like a hack to that. They are not nearly as unreason…
/r/MensRights19/01/24 08:47 PM
5

My dad still works in the cybersecurity industry, they’re hurting for programmers and scientists right now, you might enjoy that
/r/MensRights19/01/24 08:40 PM
3

Watch out, I’ve seen countless stories where she completely agrees until that magical 3 combined with that magical 0 is around the corner, and suddenly the whole game changes. So don’t be complacent, keep an eye out for changes.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 08:35 PM
1

Maybe a few pets might help stave off the inevitable loneliness that social isolation produces
/r/MensRights19/01/24 08:29 PM
5

Internalized misogyny, they say it every day. It’s like flat earthers. Nothing can ever disprove their worldview, not because no proof exists to the contrary, but because there is no proof to the contrary that they will accept.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 08:00 PM
2

I personally like Lauren Chen
/r/MensRights14/01/24 08:30 PM
4

I dunno, some of her viewpoints are kinda criminal lol
/r/MensRights14/01/24 08:29 PM
2

Kinda ironic that everyone knows what misogyny is but so few people know what misandry is lol
/r/MensRights14/01/24 08:27 PM
1

I dunno. Roma does good work, but I don’t agree with all of her takes
/r/MensRights14/01/24 08:25 PM
2

I understand why you think that. There’s widespread misinformation spread by mainstream news outlets in a unified attempt to demonize the pro-life side of the debate. As evidence, look at Idaho. According to reproductive rights dot org, Idaho made abortion straight up illegal. But, if you read the actual text of the law, you will find out that actually, abortion is banned outside the first trimester, with explicit exceptions for if the life of the mother is at stake, or in the case of rape and i…
/r/MensRights14/01/24 06:14 PM
0

No states outright banned all abortions. They just put a limit of 15+ weeks on it, which is not the same. Insisting that abortions shouldn’t have sane limits is essentially saying that you can kill a baby right up until the second it’s born, then it’s murder, but not ten minutes ago when it hadn’t come out yet. There have to be reasonable limits on abortion, which I might point out, the EU has been doing the same limits for decades and nobody batted an eye. But the good thing about it not being …
/r/MensRights14/01/24 09:59 AM
4

This reminds me of the Lego study they did a while ago to figure out how boys and girls play so they could market to each and make more money. They found that if you gave a boy a superhero toy like iron man, they would pretend to be iron man, and pretend to do iron man stuff, and tell stories around the character they were given. Then they gave girls superhero toys anc found that a girl would usually take the toy and force it into her plan of play, say making Batman go to a tea party. They didn’…
/r/MensRights12/01/24 08:18 PM
4

The downvotes are encouraging but it’s sad because that’s a really cute kitty
/r/EverydayMisandry10/01/24 11:36 PM
2

cherry-picked study lmao
/r/MensRights07/01/24 09:09 PM
6

Preach qween
/r/EverydayMisandry07/01/24 08:35 PM
11

Blatantmisogyny is kinda low hanging fruit at this point
/r/EverydayMisandry07/01/24 08:33 PM
1

Wolves and Finance I believe mentioned being gay, he’s a lawyer who makes surprising factual deep dives into all kinds of current issues. Good watch
/r/MensRights05/01/24 01:00 AM
15

I think it’s a case of “the nolifers who have no clue how humans work replied first and harassed OP” and then they kinda got overwhelmed by the slightly more reasonable responses that came along later.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 08:35 AM
5

The best way to be fair is to include forced to penetrate as rape.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 08:07 PM
6

Well yeah. It’s a caricature. Feminists have come to expect caricatures from real people and assume the caricature is how they really want to act and they’re just doing something different because of social pressure.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 08:04 PM
7

Think ‘male feminist’ and you got the idea. Or Hal from Megamind, and they’re as scared of people like him as if all of them have his powers
/r/MensRights31/12/23 04:00 PM
2

If you see genuinely sexist posts or comments, please report them like the rest of us
/r/MensRights31/12/23 12:36 AM
5

No, it’s worse. She and her husband definitely didn’t, under any circumstances, make their millions off of insider trading based on information not available to the public. Definitely all reported on their tax forms and definitely not anything shady.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 02:54 PM
4

That’s not a high standard, and probably the best candidate policy-wise is desantis but he’s kinda completely failed to stand out in communicating anything. Sad. Personally I’m rooting for Vivek. I love the idea of axing the unelected middle management bloat and trimming out the fat
/r/MensRights25/12/23 01:34 PM
23

Nikki is a hypocrite, it’s not surprising she kinda low key hates men too
/r/MensRights25/12/23 01:31 PM
1

If you are looking for an image, it was probably deleted
/r/MensRights21/12/23 01:22 PM
1

I appreciate your input. I totally get feeling like a cool philosopher only to insert foot directly into mouth, I do that all the time. The upside is that it’s really taught me to think five times before saying things, and when writing, carefully rereading my text to make sure it’s not tremendously stupid, as far as I can manage.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 07:02 PM
3

IMHO, not really, sorry. It doesn’t really make a ton of sense simply because it’s talking about insanity. Your best bet is probably to talk about fighting fire with fire if you want to make a point that’s not easy to turn back on you. There are still ways to refute that analogy, but at least it doesn’t get handed to whoever is arguing against you.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 03:26 PM
2

No you don’t. That’s how you become insane. If your goal is sanity, going insane will never help move anything at all towards sanity. The whole point is to move back towards sanity, so the more insane the world gets the more sane you have to be.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 02:49 PM
3

Look, we’re not gonna get rid of all this crap by acting just like the feminists. They’re not willing to extend sympathy, we should be, but we do have to be careful about it. However, acting just like your enemy is not a good strategy if you’re not on a physical battlefield. Even then, copying your enemy is a stupid strategy. We can’t afford to do the same thing with gender.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 02:43 PM
6

They still playing middle school games in adult marriage
/r/MensRights18/12/23 03:13 AM
3

Just like any evil movement, there’s a core of evil people that are protected by the massive wall of stupid people who buy into the lies of the evil people.
/r/MensRights17/12/23 08:43 AM
1

And they even did it in this comment section
/r/MensRights17/12/23 08:41 AM
2

I appreciate your post. It’s nice to know that there still are clear-headed women out there who don’t completely subscribe to the message and aren’t interested in shoving it down others’ throats.
/r/MensRights16/12/23 06:05 PM
2

Way to misrepresent everything. Most dishonest paragraphs written this year. If you view kids as a parasite, you are a horrible person.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 08:44 AM
2

That’s good. I do want to point out that I did not blame you for the problems with your movement. It’s not your fault and you’re not contributing to it. I’m sorry if it seemed like having a pop at you, my intention was to say, hey, as an outside observer, the problem with this movement goes way deeper than you appeared to realize. I cited old issues to illustrate that this is not a new phenomenon, since just about every feminist I’ve talked to about this, if they admit any problem at all, just s…
/r/MensRights15/12/23 03:24 AM
1

Right, so why can’t you bring in the focus in egalitarian circles, what exactly does feminism do good that egalitarianism does not?
/r/MensRights14/12/23 01:06 AM
1

Why be under the gendered one?
/r/MensRights14/12/23 01:02 AM
1

If you don’t want to be associated with stuff people under the same umbrella say, then maybe it’s time to switch umbrellas. Why not call yourself an egalitarian instead? Why does it have to be feminist when the movement at large hates men so much that you’re solidly in the minority? Unless the fact that men are still to this day defined out of rape because apparently being forced to penetrate is just sexual assault, directly thanks to feminism as a movement means nothing? Or maybe the Duluth mod…
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:58 AM
1

Unfortunately with feminism the problem runs far deeper than just a few bad apples. The deafening silence and frequent applause that misandrists are met with has grown misandry exponentially. The problem even dates back to Sally Miller Gearhardt, who specifically advocated for men to be reduced to AND MAINTAINED AT 10% of the global population. Nobody gave a peep. Just like they didn’t when the Duluth model of domestic violence was crafted with the specific and very public intentions to erase al…
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:53 AM
2

Oh yeah and the fact that men’s health support is laughed out of existence by feminists has nothing to do with the problem, and the fact that every time men’s bodies are mutilated, women actively approve of it
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:46 AM
2

Call it out in feminist spaces. Acknowledge it’s a problem with your movement. Tell them to their faces they’re not real feminists. Stop telling other people who point them out that they’re not real and tell the actual problematic people they aren’t real feminists. Instead of attacking the problem, you attack the person who points out the problem. If they really aren’t feminists and if your movement is genuinely not based on hatred of men, then prove it by advocating against hatred of men in fem…
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:43 AM
2

I know right, and it’s misogynistic to say otherwise!
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:34 AM
1

You kinda missed the point. Pay stubs are nothing more than proof of a connection. The pay is an economic connection, but the pay stub isn’t. While there might be an economic connection between “feminists” and misandrists, that’s also not the point. The point isn’t the type of connection. It’s the existence of a connection. It’s showing that misandrists aren’t acting out of rebellion to feminism. They’re acting on its orders because feminism is fundamentally misandristic.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:33 AM
4

True true
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:30 AM
3

Hence the emotional story told here
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:30 AM
2

Exactly. The white feather campaign is a great example of that.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:29 AM
1

This community is pretty hardcore on the self-policing front. If you see something awful, report it, as the mods always say. But feminism is fundamentally misandristic. So any true feminist, far from being willing to work with us, is rather out to destroy us. If feminism wasn’t fundamentally misandristic, they wouldn’t have participated in the white feather campaign so enthusiastically. They wouldn’t advocate for MGM. They wouldn’t deny men’s historical oppression while overstating women’s. Thei…
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:29 AM
2

Being on payroll has nothing to do with gender, you’re reading a bit too deep into it. It’s not incredibly deep cause remember we’re dealing with feminists lol. Lemme clarify. Payroll is when a company pays you to do something. When a company pays you to do something they implicitly declare their approval of that action, in a legal sense. Basically you’re not gonna pay someone to do something you don’t want them to do or that won’t benefit you. So it’s taking that “wow that person who is a reneg…
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:23 AM
1

Yup, couldn’t find it though
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:16 AM
5

Feel free to copy/use it whenever you like, I’m hoping it can be a somewhat useful to to help people understand what we’re saying.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:48 AM
16

Well yeah as soon as I twirled her analogy against her, she suddenly “didn’t have time to engage with me” and kept commenting long essays about how it would be a waste of her time so she skipped my essay and it was all wrong and repetitive anyway. Extremely predictable. I just laughed and pointed out her hypocrisy until she left in a hissy fit
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:46 AM
6

I like the idea of using the Conservative Party as an illustration since most any feminist is significantly predisposed to hate the conservative movement by pretty much default, so you get them agreeing with you and don’t spring it on them until they contradict themselves.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:44 AM
6

Right, but I’m trying to illustrate it with an analogy. A good story can often communicate a point that the most impressive logical argument ever could, since they deal with different systems of thought.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:41 AM
3

Okay, granted your professor might be a feminist, but that criticism you posted isn’t from a feminist perspective. It basically contains two things, one, very valid slang critiques, slang does not belong in college writing, and two, she’s telling you you didn’t back up your point very well. There’s really nothing saying “you can’t say men have these struggles” it’s just saying “okay, prove it.” You have two choices. One, assume that she’s just being a horrible feminist who hates men and change n…
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:54 AM
38

This post was the result of my discussion with a feminist who made the We Love Puppies Inc analogy and then completely disengaged upon seeing my reply, pretending it was too long to read, after having posted essays themselves. I’d love to hear any feedback on how to improve this approach, and make the analogy better and more effective. I want to make the analogy as effective and emotionally impactful on the side of the feminist, in other words restate their point as strongly as possible and as e…
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:24 AM
8

I did address it, extensively. You’re the one who is refusing to even acknowledge my reply. Thanks for exposing that you are arguing in bad faith. Go back to the feminist forums you crawled out from, and back to hating men. Or just a wild idea, you could actually read and respond and have a decent discussion with me, because contrary to your beliefs, my response isn’t actually argumentium ad vercundiam nor is it malicious. I’m simply calling out the substantial flaws in your analogy. You really …
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:16 AM
6

Let me illustrate the problem for you. Take this reprehensible puppy-punter who’s wearing the We Love Puppies Inc. shirt. Here’s what happens today. We Love Puppies Inc. keeps the guy on payroll. The media rightly calls them out for it, and the representative from WLP Incorporated says “no, that guy is not representative of We Love Puppies Inc, he’s not an employee and we hate him because he kicks puppies.” The journalist publishes this quote, along with the paystubs the puppy-punting guy freely…
/r/MensRights13/12/23 04:49 AM
1

It’s possible, but given that he’s an extremely studied psychologist, I think it’s much more likely that he’s talking about something that you or I don’t understand. Plus when he mentions those things, he’s expressing general concepts, which will be generally true but have plenty of exceptions. He usually backs up what he’s saying with studies, so I would submit that he’s more than likely talking about things that are subconsciously attractive to people, that they don’t really control.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 02:58 PM
3

It’s because, as Jordan Peterson often says, competency is sexy in men, so the dark triad traits imitate competence. Inexperienced women can’t tell the difference between true intense competence (like you get with older guys) and its imitation (like you get with dark triad traits in all ages). Hence the “women go for bad boys” trope emerged. This cheap imitation stays at about 5% of the population because when it reproduces over about that limit, people start getting wise to their antics, so few…
/r/MensRights11/12/23 03:17 AM
2

I dunno to be honest, I’ve seen soooo many women go exclusively after men with wedding rings, the homewreckers, so it might actually be garnering you more attention.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 06:09 PM
3

Just remember what happened to Drake, stay safe out there, Mike Pence rules (never alone with any woman and never in a closed room without extra witnesses) are a decent start
/r/MensRights10/12/23 06:06 PM
4

Yeah you have to be really careful with getting close to any woman romantically with that kind of money. The vultures circling will invent anything to allow them to get their claws into you.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 06:02 PM
2

Tennessee and Florida seem to be better
/r/MensRights07/12/23 03:37 AM
1

I'm not commenting on the current discrimination, I fully agree with you. I'm merely saying that the current law has a provision for religious reasons, so presumably a very simple change to be fair to both genders would likely not impact that provision. The gender provision and the religious provision should be treated as two separate things, and things like that often are.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 06:03 AM
1

Wow, that’s amazing. I got the notification it was added to the men’s rights classics list, glad I clicked on it
/r/MensRights04/12/23 06:21 PM
1

Fun username. But if you wanna tell them, just say you’re more conservative, and they’ll start to get it. It’s one of those things that you gotta slowly establish over time
/r/MensRights03/12/23 04:10 PM
1

“I’m not like those other girls”
/r/MensRights03/12/23 04:08 PM
2

A predator too? Dang, I wish that was more unusual
/r/MensRights02/12/23 03:46 PM
4

sure buddy
/r/MensRights02/12/23 03:44 PM
1

The psychological reason is that women have a massive in-group bias, and men have almost no in-group bias, and usually a fairly strong out-group bias. The reason behind that reason would be called the “women are wonderful” effect. The wikipedia article is actually pretty interesting and informative. This effect probably stems from ancient evolutionary biology, that in a small community, men were disposable and replaceable, while women were essential. This is because a tribe with 100 men and one …
/r/MensRights30/11/23 02:51 PM
1

It already has exceptions for religious reasons
/r/MensRights30/11/23 02:28 PM
3

The CS Lewis quote comes to mind: “The use of fashions in thought is to distract men from their real dangers. We direct the fashionable outcry of each generation against those vices of which it is in the least danger, and fix its approval on the virtue that is nearest the vice which we are trying to make endemic. The game is to have them all running around with fire extinguishers whenever there’s a flood; and all crowding to that side of the boat which is already nearly gone under.” (Emphasis mi…
/r/MensRights30/11/23 08:41 AM
3

43 is incorrect, DV is fairly symmetrical across genders, women actually perpetrate slightly more, contrary to popular belief
/r/MensRights29/11/23 01:56 AM
10

awkwarddd…
/r/MensRights28/11/23 05:52 AM
5

Things that come to mind include negotiating job offers, negotiating pay raises, bargaining, etc
/r/MensRights27/11/23 05:26 AM
1

Gonna have to watch this later when I have time I do think if you’re going to take on the black pill, you should maybe make a video with better bachelor
/r/MensRights27/11/23 03:04 AM
26

Ah yes, the classic “girls can’t be inspired by men but boys can be inspired by everyone”
/r/MensRights16/11/23 06:15 PM
1

Interesting. Thanks for the information and the downvote.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 08:18 AM
-2

enrol Oh dear.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 12:58 AM
2

I mean some guy friend groups have really dark humor. Some is too dark for me, some is awesome. You just figure out what level of dark humor you’re cool with and you’ll probably manage to find a friend group. Most of the “mah misogyneeeeeee” that we see pushed today is people with no sense of humor misunderstanding (purposefully or otherwise) some of that dark humor. Stereotypes make for excellent jokes. Some humor will be genuinely mean spirited, most will not. But being poked fun of and poking…
/r/MensRights13/11/23 01:20 PM
1

I understand your distrust but you seem to be making the mastermind fallacy, which is ascribing an overly complex negative motivation to every single thing in a category. Are some posts wolves in sheep’s clothing? Maybe, but the majority of posts are much more likely to be simple in their motivation. Women think much more emotionally than men do, and as a direct result, the sympathetic and genuine ones respond in the way feminism taught them to when they see the actual plight of men in our socie…
/r/MensRights11/11/23 03:53 PM
1

Right, thanks for the downvote just because I don’t agree with you politically
/r/MensRights11/11/23 12:39 AM
3

Yeah I’ve seen him say some great stuff regarding men’s issues, but I mean if he shuts down the IRS and the DOE (education not energy) that will make life a lot better for men because those agencies primarily negatively target men
/r/MensRights10/11/23 05:06 PM
2

Personally in this election I’ll probably be throwing my two pennies behind Vivek if he wins the nomination. If the gop nominee is someone else, I might be willing to vote for them but it’ll depend on who it is
/r/MensRights10/11/23 07:41 AM
2

Right, glad to know you’re using the same illogical shaming tactics as the feminists. The only risks that reasonable people take are calculated risks. There’s a difference between bravery and stupidity. Many times, interactions with women fail a cost-benefit analysis. Not like you’d know anything about that, you’re too busy trying to shame men and boys for having the sense to know that you shouldn’t be alone with a woman unless you’ve been dating her for a long time.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 09:11 PM
9

That’s what TwoX is for lol
/r/MensRights09/11/23 07:34 PM
15

Heh. They tried to sell it and failed.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 07:33 PM
3

Wow, your reading comprehension is really spectacular lol. What part of There were no witnesses did you not understand, lol? End of story indeed. Living in fear is not what anyone should teach. Neither is it what I advocated. But it figures that with your spectacular reading ability, that’s what you’d read into it. Fear is not the same as prudence. Also it’s highly entertaining that you’ve never heard of the Mike Pence rule, which lead you to conclude that somehow I admired him. He just made the…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 02:33 PM
7

What a teachable moment means is something the kid could’ve done better. What this kid could’ve done better is make sure he’s not alone with a person of the opposite gender. It’s completely not his fault that he didn’t know it yet. But now this moment is a perfect opportunity to teach him the one thing he can do to prevent such things in the future. Fuel it with the sense of unfairness. That’s what a teachable moment is. It’s not his fault for not knowing what he didn’t know. And he shouldn’t ha…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 04:25 AM
23

It’s a teachable moment about the state of society. It’s a teachable moment about how you should never be alone with the opposite gender so you’ll have someone to back you up if you’re accused again. Teach him the hover hug, the Mike pence rule, and the concept of plausible deniability. That’s how you use the unfairness of the situation to help him learn how important it is to protect himself.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 12:20 AM
5

I agree with you
/r/MensRights08/11/23 09:43 PM
15

This comment is genius
/r/MensRights08/11/23 06:39 AM
7

It’s a specifically feminist based dating site where the women have to message first because “it keeps women safer” apparently
/r/MensRights07/11/23 07:11 PM
2

No, I’m not saying you need to have an “I am the prize” mindset, you’re absolutely correct, that would be extremely arrogant. I’m saying HE should have a “she’s the prize mindset” which you want him to have because you want him to pursue you. I’m saying your mindset actually needs to be the mirror image of his. Your mindset needs to be “he’s the prize”, because healthy relationships require BOTH people to be pursuing each other. You both need to see the other as the prize, that will build the re…
/r/MensRights07/11/23 01:03 AM
2

It is good. Where your brother in law was coming from is asserting that the man who is unwilling to pay is unwilling to fit into the provider role that women typically want men to fit into. And a man who won’t be a provider is someone most women will run from. Refusing to pay for the first date used to be a decent indicator, but is no longer a correlation. Now, there are many men who are willing to be a provider but are finding that most women in western countries do not want to fit the feminine…
/r/MensRights07/11/23 12:38 AM
3

That was uncalled for. If you genuinely want to know what is going on with this belief system, you genuinely can’t start out by insulting every single person who subscribes to it. If you’re inquiring into the subject of Islam, a great way to make sure Muslims are completely unwilling to do anything positive for you is to start your search by saying “I highly doubt any Muslim has been to college.” Same here.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 12:12 AM
5

Viewing women as an oppressed class and men as oppressors is demeaning and reductionist to both men and women. Viewing men as an oppressed class and women as oppressors is just as demeaning and reductionist. It’s way more complicated than that. Women were never “oppressed”, life was just super hard for everyone, and men didn’t complain about it. It’s not that women were banned from working, it’s that they genuinely didn’t want to work because work meant literal 14 hour factory jobs. On homestead…
/r/MensRights06/11/23 12:56 PM
7

That’s kinda what “certified historian” MEANS
/r/MensRights06/11/23 12:19 PM
3

Probably lol
/r/MensRights06/11/23 11:10 AM
1

No, not really. Tell a woman what she wants to hear all the time and she will lose attraction for you. It’s knowing when to tell her what she doesn’t want to hear that makes you stand out. See, women are human, and humans have this bad habit of wanting things they’ll regret in the long run. So say what she wants to hear, and she’ll eventually just regret you. But a competent and confident man will know when to say what she doesn’t want to hear. The dark tetrad imitates that competence and confid…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 06:40 PM
2

Great way to rid yourselves of the shallow ones at the first date, say something like this at the start: “Here’s what’s gonna happen. We’re gonna get two separate checks, and if your check is under $50 (or whatever you think is reasonable given the restaurant and a standard you yourself could meet), then I’ll cover it. If you go over, you’ll be covering your entire check.” When inevitably challenged, just say “Look, it’s my money. You are free to spend your money how you like, and I am free to s…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 06:38 AM
3

I’m not gonna comment on the poor dude, but I did just want to take a second to laugh at the AI putting two fireplaces right next to each other
/r/MensRights24/10/23 08:16 PM
18

It’s like what Better Bachelor is, figuring society is too far gone, not worth rescuing, and they generally disengage from society and culture. In BB’s case, he’s building an off-the-grid men’s community on about 20 acres he won in the daily wire raffle.
/r/MensRights23/10/23 05:03 AM
31

It’s dependent on women, just like femininity is dependent on men (now there’s a hated concept if I ever saw one) because, shocker, men and women need each other to continue the human race. Remember, feminism destroyed femininity before they came for masculinity. Men and women should need each other. We absolutely make each other better.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 11:42 PM
-21

Maybe read the article lol. It has a few somewhat useful tips at the end
/r/MensRights14/10/23 10:50 AM
2

Oh yeah, I love how pragmatic and brutal it is. It’s like a win at any cost kind of martial art, the best way to survive is to make sure the other guy can never hurt you again. I only got the opportunity to get a little past my yellow belt before our local dojo closed, but when I was in Krav, I was at my best physical shape, I learned all the basic knife and handgun defenses they’d teach me, and the yellow belt test was probably one of the harder things I’ve ever done, and that was just the yell…
/r/MensRights13/10/23 06:35 PM
6

Oooh a fellow Krav Maga enthusiast!
/r/MensRights13/10/23 07:36 AM
11

I think that’s fair, positive motivation and positive feedback are typically more effective than negative
/r/MensRights13/10/23 07:35 AM
53

No, women had rights back then. It’s a feminist lie that women were slaves to their husbands.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 07:49 PM
7

I understand where you’re coming from, and while I personally haven’t experienced this, I have DEFINITELY seen relationships where this happens and then when the guy inevitably is human and can’t do everything, guess who gets demonized. I’m genuinely glad you haven’t experienced it. But I would submit that, just because you and I haven’t directly experienced it, it doesn’t mean these things don’t happen, and even one relationship like that is too many relationships like that. Exactly the same as…
/r/MensRights02/10/23 10:23 AM
17

Ooh can you link it? I need it
/r/MensRights02/10/23 09:45 AM
2

I love that both of y’all stayed super polite and well articulated. In feminist subs I think the slurs and buzzwords would be flying already
/r/MensRights01/10/23 02:35 AM
3

I dunno, I feel like they’d be fractured, the ones who like it would parade it as the key to world peace, and the ones who hate it would probably list it as a cause of WWIII. I don’t think there’d be anybody in between
/r/MensRights01/10/23 02:33 AM
13

Welp you just got cancelled because that’s tRaNSpHoBiA
/r/MensRights01/10/23 02:31 AM
1

2A, even Depp lost a defamation case regardless of money because Amber had the judge in her back pocket
/r/MensRights29/09/23 05:23 PM
1

We have Vivek, he’s way better in my opinion. I was hooked when I saw him first on Jordan Peterson
/r/MensRights29/09/23 05:22 PM
1

Let’s be real, it’s been time for anyone who isn’t a leftist extremist to get out of California since the bug hit.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 05:19 PM
6

Apple lost its luster for me a long time ago. -- A former Mac-Head
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/09/23 05:14 PM
2

Awesome
/r/MensRights29/09/23 12:48 AM
6

Excellent post, but the other post you link to in it is from a subreddit that fell to one of the Reddit purges, so it’s no longer there
/r/MensRights28/09/23 06:39 PM
1

Here’s a screenshot of the prices and I really don’t think it’s worth that much. I’ve gone to way better conferences that were free because the organizers believed that the conference was a gift to the community. Now I don’t expect that from them, but I would expect reasonable prices like, I dunno, 40 bucks a day or something like it. I could go to like 2 NFL games for the price they want. It’s insane.
/r/Male_Studies28/09/23 01:53 AM
1

Holy cow that’s expensive. I was in until I saw the freakin price.
/r/Male_Studies27/09/23 07:56 PM
4

Like I said, I’m not engaging in your mudslinging, name calling, and verbal attacks. I’m gonna block you now, since you refuse to stop attacking me for simply disagreeing with you. Good day to you.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 02:19 PM
4

Those are some very typical feminist talking points, it’s still all about feelings apparently. I don’t know if you’re a feminist or not, but one day you might learn that if you’re trying to fight feminism, it’s really not smart to use their propagandistic talking points to fight against them. I know you’re looking for a fight, but I’m not interested in fighting. I’m never going to convince you to change your mind, so I’m not wasting my effort on that. One day you’ll see, but you’ll only see when…
/r/MensRights27/09/23 02:12 PM
5

Toxic masculinity doesn’t exist lol. There’s nothing toxic that’s exclusively masculine. But sure go ahead and believe the lies. I used to. You’ll eventually understand.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 01:57 PM
7

Cause it’s a lie and feminism’s method to blame men for their problems.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 01:32 PM
1

I wish you much happiness in your watching marathon 😂
/r/MensRights27/09/23 12:18 AM
3

Brooooo Disparu is so sarcastic, it’s GOLD Here’s his She-Hulk review series
/r/MensRights27/09/23 12:03 AM
10

I for one loved She-Hulk, because without it I would’ve never found the beautiful British sarcasm that is Disparu. Oh, wait, was I supposed to enjoy the show for the show’s sake, not because of how funny the people making fun of it were? Pshhhh… where’s the fun in that?
/r/MensRights26/09/23 11:50 PM
7

And one wonders why the woke types are de-stigmatizing pedophelia…
/r/MensRights26/09/23 07:54 AM
1

LOL
/r/MensRights25/09/23 07:37 PM
6

Oh I made I typo. I meant to say “but not a boyfriend”. Whoops
/r/MensRights25/09/23 03:54 AM
8

The lower one is in life the more one needs a therapist and healthy friendships, but not a boyfriend. In fact romantic relationships do the most damage to people the lowest in life, and they damage everyone around them.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 03:39 AM
0

Yeah pretty much the same here
/r/MensRights25/09/23 03:21 AM
8

That’s how most of us feel lol
/r/MensRights23/09/23 03:43 AM
1

Yes, I’ve been to plenty, but I’m definitely not basing my opinion on my subjective experience. That’s not gonna work. Here’s an article explaining the basic concept and theory behind the idea that after a certain point (the theoretical revenue maximization point) tax increases no longer lead to revenue increases, and tax cuts no longer lead to revenue cuts. This also obviously goes alongside concepts like deregulation etc. I remember there was a country that had a bloated government like the US…
/r/MensRights21/09/23 01:39 PM
0

Hmm. I don’t use twitter much, but given the built in shortness of tweets, I would seriously doubt she considers all taxation to be theft. I’m fairly sure she’s said as much in her YouTube videos. I do definitely agree with her that right now, the current level of taxation is thievery legalized. My state has a $1 tax per gallon of gas. How insane is that? It has been proven time and time again that the fewer taxes (to a point) a government has, the more revenue it makes. And the more taxes you h…
/r/MensRights21/09/23 01:13 PM
1

I’ve watched most of her videos and I don’t think I remember seeing that. Can you maybe link me something to refresh my memory?
/r/MensRights21/09/23 12:41 PM
1

Like?
/r/MensRights21/09/23 12:33 PM
4

While I understand she has two main points in the voting thing (1. Men received the right in exchange for responsibilities, and 2. It was supposed to be one vote per household. The woman would definitely have a huge say in what that vote was, but it was still the household voting. Now, it’s 2 votes a household, they’re split.), I do strongly disagree with her on it. I don’t know how to fix the problem of inequality but I don’t really like her method of “trigger people into talking to you”. I rec…
/r/MensRights21/09/23 12:33 PM
1

If you want a more balanced (in my opinion) creator, look up Lauren Chen
/r/MensRights21/09/23 12:28 PM
4

Oooh speaking of subsidies, what about male sports leagues forced to subsidize female sports leagues? Or did I miss that?
/r/MensRights21/09/23 12:25 PM
4

I personally would just have a separate section for life outcomes, since life outcomes aren’t really the same as positive rights, while still being important. But if you’re insistent on keeping it the same, then don’t add the availability of reproduction etc, because that’s definitely not a right. Feminists are wrong when they claim women have a right to sex (wonder where all these female perps came from a decade ago) and we would be just as wrong to claim the gender reverse scenario. Is it a di…
/r/MensRights21/09/23 12:24 PM
1

women don’t hold other women accountable noooo women are vicious to other women Lol those are definitely not the same
/r/MensRights20/09/23 11:19 PM
1

Decent people wouldn’t cheat, that’s who. If you cheated and she found out, breaking up with you is not extreme at all. Men’s rights is about accountability, that doesn’t mean men get a free pass.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 05:34 PM
3

So wait, did you cheat or not? I’m confused.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 04:06 AM
6

Exactly. You can’t teach boys and girls the same things, you’ll just end up favoring one and destroying the other.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 02:00 PM
12

Congratulations on missing the point entirely. Nobody was saying the girls could never be mentored, just that OOP should not be required to mentor girls, just like you shouldn’t force an older woman to mentor boys. Women are best at mentoring women, men are best at mentoring men. We are different, women and men are complementary, not identical. What works for mentoring boys will destroy a girl if used on her, and what works for mentoring girls will destroy a boy if used on him. You cannot approa…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 01:37 PM
1

No offense but I do have a hard time believing that Wikipedia is honest about it, especially when the next paragraph is about how straight white men who are incels are basically the devil incarnate. Got any more reliable sources?
/r/MensRights17/09/23 09:10 AM
2

I’d be definitely interested in seeing if you’ve got any sources to back up your claim that it was a term originally made for women. Got any links or anything?
/r/MensRights17/09/23 07:44 AM
2

Facts
/r/MensRights17/09/23 07:36 AM
4

No, it’s just something you use when anyone disagrees with you or your feminist friends. After all, how could any group possibly call an oversimplified generalization people make about them an insult?
/r/MensRights17/09/23 07:35 AM
1

Okay, I generally agree with you, but let’s pretend for a moment that all your modifications were codified into law. I’m going to assume all your laws are enacted and enforced completely gender-neutrally. Here’s where I see a few potential issues. How does one prove that the mother is acting against the fathers wishes? What happens in the event of a father saying that he doesn’t want her in his life and agreeing to child support in person, then changes his story in court to say it was against hi…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 10:51 PM
1

Lol nice
/r/MensRights13/09/23 12:10 AM
6

It’s not the traditional political left that’s the problem. It’s the radical ideologues who have taken over the left and are now running it so extremely far left that it would consider traditional leftism “right wing extremism”. When someone here talks about Leftism as a thing, that extremism is what they’re saying. You’re not sure how they got associated with leftism? That’s what we don’t entirely understand either. I don’t think anyone here recognizes that extremism as traditionally leftist, a…
/r/MensRights13/09/23 12:09 AM
4

What you can do is treat your future or current boyfriend the way you wish these guys could be treated, that’s about the best anyone can do on their own
/r/MensRights27/08/23 04:19 PM
1

Naysayers: revoke his clinical license Jordan: fights back This guy: “I don’t like how much he’s fighting back.”
/r/MensRights27/08/23 04:18 PM
5

She’s not in prison because we have a gynocentric court system, to be honest
/r/MensRights27/08/23 04:16 PM
4

I recommend following Jordan Peterson on YouTube, he’s very solid
/r/MensRights27/08/23 02:39 PM
5

Just wait till they hear about the 15 year old boys who are forced to pay child support to their rapist, that’ll really rock their world
/r/MensRights27/08/23 02:38 PM
14

Just wait until they nail you for a “hostile work environment” for refusing to go out with them
/r/MensRights17/08/23 02:14 PM
1

Bruh how do you have Reddit for four years and not know that lmao
/r/MensRights11/08/23 04:16 PM
3

I’ve literally seen a woman do all the things op did and more and everyone thought it was ‘adorable’.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 11:57 AM
2

The problem is not that it looks objectively wrong. The problem is that it’s okay for women to do but not men. I have personally seen women do exactly that, take pictures with other people’s kids, offer them candy, etc. and nobody batted an eye. Not even the mom. If it’s objectively wrong, why do we only ever condemn one gender? Child trafficking rings often have women in the rings as their primary kidnappers for that exact reason. There was literally a story on here of a woman who walked up to …
/r/MensRights11/08/23 11:52 AM
3

…you do realize Reddit doesn’t let you edit post titles, right?
/r/MensRights11/08/23 11:39 AM
4

Truth, but I mean they’ve been doing this since the dawn of time lol In other news, the sky is blue
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:00 AM
1

You can also ask, over there they’re actually honest about it
/r/MensRights07/08/23 03:59 AM
16

Hopefully it turns into more of a Cassie Jaye thing than a Cathy Newman situation.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 09:46 PM
6

Only by killing the person bit by bit lol Kinda makes the analogy more accurate though
/r/MensRights23/07/23 05:54 PM
2

Jordan Peterson is awesome.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 05:52 PM
3

And they’re the ones talking about tolerance the most as if it’s some sort of virtue
/r/MensRights23/07/23 05:51 PM
39

It’s because the police believe exactly what google says, that women are the victims, men are the perpetrators, despite the facts actually being that men and women are victims and perpetrators equally across the board. So the institutions are all built to protect women from men, and the idea that men need protection from women is a “conspiracy theory”. So that basically explains it.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 05:30 AM
13

This is neither well-researched nor is it close to reality. You’d be shocked at the amount of hard numbers in this sub alone. TwoX is also not necessary to look at. That cesspool is basically what happens when you give feminists the power to censor anyone they want, and it resulted in, surprise surprise, an echo chamber. I used to be in your spot, dude. I was a hardcore feminist. I saw it as standing up for the little guy, being fair, and following the science. But slowly I found out that nothin…
/r/MensRights17/07/23 01:57 PM
3

Dang, I didn’t know A&P responded to it! Imma definitely have to watch that when I get home
/r/MensRights14/07/23 04:07 PM
2

I think you’re pretty screwed either way. If you’ve been with your partner for any length of time, (especially if you’ve ever cohabited, but that’s not required) a judge can, in the event of the end of the relationship, declare you “common law married” and still hold you on the hook for alimony/child support. The only option where you don’t get screwed over is by basically not dating. But since you’re already here, you might as well go all the way since nothing you can do at this point can stop …
/r/MensRights12/07/23 02:11 PM
13

Found the girl op was talking to… “No offense, you’re just the literal scum of the earth, and you belong in jail. Haha just kidding, don’t get offended that I just said horrible things, if you get offended then you’re the horrible one!”
/r/MensRights11/07/23 11:39 AM
12

Most of Reddit does lol
/r/MensRights11/07/23 11:36 AM
11

Or they discounted the more serious replies they received, only going for the fluff ones
/r/MensRights11/07/23 04:00 AM
8

That’s probably because most journalists understand men’s issues at a highschool level or lower, whereas they’ll become a collegiate scholar about women’s issues lol
/r/MensRights11/07/23 03:58 AM
9

It’s not that. It’s the double standard that’s the problem, doesn’t matter what the standard is if it’s double.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 07:48 PM
2

I dunno. I think that the issue is not the extras, but the main characters. They used to have ugly female extras to make fun of, or to make the lead actress stand out, until the backlash. I think the same is currently happening to men now. I would suggest that perhaps it’s more of the ‘main character is super buff’ especially in movies marketed to women (think the hundreds of trashy vampire/romcom type shows) and it’s just as unrealistic as when they did it to women in movies marketed towards me…
/r/MensRights09/07/23 07:47 PM
1

actors who use asteroids Gave me a chuckle, thanks
/r/MensRights09/07/23 07:40 PM
10

Oh and don’t forget that when they join, they change the spaces to fit their ideologies.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 02:12 AM
2

Law: gets changed People who were blatantly taking advantage of the original law: “This is unfair! My life will be ruined! I’ll have to be productive!” People who were taken advantage of by said law: “Finally, we can actually live our lives for once!” Media: “The second group are bigots! In other news today, water is still wet!”
/r/MensRights08/07/23 05:12 AM
2

Or if they get deceived, feminists like to be chameleons and pretend to value men until the honeymoon phase is over.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 04:50 PM
2

No, you’re just making excuses that let the feminists in power (who are killing men by the way) off the hook. The ideology is fundamentally flawed and wrong, it assumes that men and women were never equal when they actually were until feminism began. Women and men both suffered equally. Feminists then proceeded to base an entire movement off pretending that women suffered alone, and that men were oppressing them. Then they proceeded to attack men, who were already suffering, and add to it, then …
/r/MensRights01/07/23 07:46 PM
10

Good for her!
/r/MensRights01/07/23 12:05 AM
1

Whoops.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 11:53 PM
2

No Germany does that too except more extremely in favor of women
/r/MensRights12/06/23 12:47 AM
1

Hot dayum
/r/MensRights05/06/23 03:16 AM
7

Yeah. You have to be ready for the vitriol and you can’t back down, so it’s hard to do
/r/MensRights04/06/23 05:16 PM
5

Don’t mean you can’t take it to Olympic levels
/r/MensRights04/06/23 05:09 PM
1

I agree.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 05:07 PM
14

That’s pretty much it, we should appreciate the support they give and not try to dictate the way we want to be supported
/r/MensRights04/06/23 05:06 PM
76

Guys, she invites feedback on her business email. Wouldn’t it be nice if maybe we could flood her with some positivity and thanks? I know I’m definitely gonna send her a positive email, she’s genuinely wanting to help, and that’s rare. I’d encourage y’all to do the same, but be careful, we don’t want to overwhelm her.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 01:36 PM
-7

I’m gonna get downvoted for it, but you might give it a shot. Firstly, women have such a massive leg up in the dating market, you can’t really expect any of them to not talk to multiple dudes at once. It’s just a reality. So it’s not really something that you can afford to worry about. And it’s good she was up front, and wants to go exclusive, that’s how those things are supposed to work. You should be worried if she refuses to stop talking to multiple dudes. But she’s using it as a selection me…
/r/MensRights28/05/23 01:58 PM
3

I’ve posted and not been banned as a result of this sub
/r/MensRights26/05/23 12:59 PM
4

This is part of why I refuse to use the title “technician” in the same phrase as “nail” or “eyelash”
/r/MensRights10/05/23 08:43 AM
1

Never said they wouldn’t. Because I wasn’t talking about that.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 10:14 PM
2

Yeah that’s a bit of a different issue to what I was tackling, but I do agree with you that we need to keep all identities secret until the verdict. Will be harder with public figures but we can do as much as possible to keep it secret
/r/MensRights09/05/23 07:01 PM
7

Dude there are still hundreds of thousands of people who still hate Kavanaugh because they still believe his accusers. You’d hope, but that doesn’t happen today.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:26 AM
10

You’ve got a point. We don’t want to punish legitimate victims for false accusations. I’m thinking it would probably be in cases like this where it’s proven she was lying. Now that does let some liars get away with it, but it’s better that ten guilty people should go unpunished than for one innocent person to get punished, yeah? I think possibly why you’re getting downvoted (I didn’t downvote you myself) is that your comment, while it mentions a good point, fails to recognize the fact that right…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:23 AM
11

I don’t think that’s even safe because if you mess with girls before you’re high profile, they swarm like ants to sugar when you become high profile. Look at Justice Kavanaugh.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:01 AM
12

They don’t trumpet it from the rooftops, that’s how you know
/r/MensRights07/05/23 08:21 PM
4

Dunno why you got downvoted, that’s facts
/r/MensRights07/05/23 08:19 PM
33

“Independent” is code for “I’m not grateful for the help that anyone gives me, and I don’t acknowledge the help I receive”
/r/MensRights07/05/23 08:17 PM
9

Your gender isn’t pathetic. Women are great. The reason this happens is because women are human, with faults, and as a society, we ignore women’s faults. Because they’re human, the ignored faults are greatly increased, since humans will do anything they can get away with, generally. The problem is society overlooking faults, not the gender. All humans are flawed. Women are human. Don’t blame the gender, we don’t want to be as sexist as the feminists.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 06:38 PM
47

Oh yeah I was wondering because if the crazy spoiled feminist college students are boycotting it, it’s probably a good watch lol
/r/MensRights06/05/23 05:07 AM
11

Facts
/r/MensRights28/04/23 04:45 AM
9

What their mathematical data show and what is written in the abstract are two different things. You really should’ve read the post or the data. Edit: also yes I’ve already done my own exhaustive research, stop acting like the meme by assuming I haven’t just because you don’t like the conclusions or buzzfeed told you I’m wrong.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 04:39 AM
10

Feminism when they have a study that conforms to their agenda, no matter how cherry-picked: “Trust the SCIENCE! How could you belittle women by daring to question it?” Feminism when a study contradicts their agenda, no matter how authoritative: “Do your own research, don’t jump to conclusions that belittle women!”
/r/MensRights28/04/23 02:57 AM
16

Feminism when they have a study that conforms to their agenda, no matter how cherry-picked: “Trust the SCIENCE! How could you belittle women by daring to question it?” Feminism when a study contradicts their agenda, no matter how authoritative: “Do your own research, don’t jump to conclusions”
/r/MensRights28/04/23 02:57 AM
12

Also ruins your body’s natural proportions, plopping you right in the middle of the uncanny valley (ruining most potential attraction), can only add a few inches max, and has a ridiculously long list of nasty long-term side effects. Limb-lengthening surgery is a terrible idea, and should not be pushed as anything but a last resort of the desperate. In reality, nobody should go for something with that many horrible side effects, but some people are exceedingly desperate and don’t care about what …
/r/MensRights16/04/23 12:51 PM
5

Not because one gender is inherently better but because of interest. Men are reliably (80%) more interested in things than in people. Women are reliably (80%) more interested in people than things. That’s why men tend to, on the whole, excel more than women in things (think chess), and women, on the whole, excel more than men at people (think nursing). People only tend to be good at the things they’ve become interested in, shocker. Thus, female chess pros are much rarer than men, but not insigni…
/r/MensRights15/04/23 03:18 AM
8

50/50 quotas make no sense precisely because the assertion is that both genders are equally qualified. If we actually had a chance to fairly test it, we would know. But quotas completely ruin merit-based hiring.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 11:35 AM
5

You… you do know what a pp is, right?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/23 05:00 AM
1

It was a joke, do you not know what a pp is lol
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/23 04:57 AM
10

Maybe because there’s a pp and it got denied?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/23 02:17 AM
3

Dumb question: what does FWIW mean?
/r/MensRights10/04/23 06:12 PM
3

end- (ab)user I chuckled at this, clever play on words there haha
/r/MensRights10/04/23 09:55 AM
17

Might wanna ignore the woke troll
/r/MensRights09/04/23 10:01 PM
1

Exactly how badly do you want this stuff? You might just need to give it up for lost
/r/MenSupportMen06/04/23 04:24 PM
19

Sure. Your numbers are dead wrong, and taken out of context, but it’s not like you’ll accept any opposing statistics, so we’ll just have to ignore your close-mindedness unfortunately. You gotta stop saying your emotions are backed by statistics, they aren’t.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 02:12 AM
16

You must not be a man lol
/r/MensRights03/04/23 02:01 AM
37

I think I like the 3,000 years but cmon she shoulda got at least 1,500
/r/PussyPass29/03/23 06:50 PM
1

No lol, the other one is
/r/MensRights25/03/23 07:20 AM
4

They’re a feminist troll account, you’ll learn to recognize them eventually. They’re not on the side of men.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 11:57 PM
7

It’s the lobsters in a bucket analogy. As soon as one lobster starts to make progress towards crawling out, the other lobsters try to crawl out using the first lobster as a ladder. The result is that any lobster that is mildly successful at climbing the bowl gets immediately pulled back down into the bowl.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 11:56 PM
9

Here’s how you counter their point: “It didn’t work for them.” Easy. Just look at the tactics they employed before the mask dropped. They were kind and caring and fought for the little guy. They didn’t create echo chambers, they destroyed them. They didn’t bully people, they stood up for the bullied in some sense. Their current tactics are only possible because they’re already dominant in cultural spaces. But it’s not how they got to be so dominant. In fact, it’s causing them to lose their influ…
/r/MensRights21/03/23 08:42 AM
5

You go enjoy splatoon, and ignore the Reddit troll
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/23 05:51 AM
22

I don’t care if he’s feminist influenced or not, it matters what he does not what he says, and he convicted her of rape, that’s the important thing.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 05:54 AM
2

That’s exactly my question
/r/MensRights13/03/23 08:17 AM
1

Excellent points
/r/MensRights13/03/23 03:30 AM
1

That’s my thoughts pretty much. I was told the name of the guy they were quoting but I don’t remember it. I wasn’t happy with how it was quoted and not really cited. I would have really liked to see the paper they pulled from.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 03:29 AM
2

I think that’s a perfectly healthy dynamic, I just have problems when people start to say that one gender is always more disadvantaged by cohabitation than the other. That’s where I take issue. I’m glad your relationship is mutually beneficial, that’s an excellent thing to keep going
/r/MensRights12/03/23 08:24 PM
2

Interesting. I think I understand better now. Do you know of a source for it or nah?
/r/MensRights12/03/23 06:18 PM
1

Yeah, my issue is that it’s got some anecdotal examples, not statistical information, that’s all.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 06:16 PM
2

I read those articles, it doesn’t seem to really discuss who has more benefits. I’m looking for sources that say like “men give x% of the household income in cohabitation, women give y%” or something similar, ya feel me?
/r/MensRights12/03/23 05:30 PM
2

Nah we’re talking about cohabitation without marriage I generally agree with you though, but it’s a slightly different topic
/r/MensRights12/03/23 05:27 PM
20

You can only afford to be feminist in a first world country. Most countries in Africa can’t afford that level of decadent narcissism. It’s pretty simple.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 04:37 PM
2

Wow that thread is toxic
/r/MensRights09/03/23 01:56 PM
4

Child support is not equal responsibility in today’s society. That’s what the default should be, but women win custody and child support in over 90% of custody cases today, so that needs changing.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 04:15 AM
4

Nope, incorrect. In order to avoid it, one would have to never have sex, never reproduce, and never be even close to intimate with a woman. There have been cases where a woman says a man who she didn’t even have sex with was the father, and with no evidence, they popped him on child support. Alimony, all you have to do is live together for a few months, and courts can and have define you as ‘common law marriage’ and peg you for alimony. All it takes is the word of a woman. Since we believe all w…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 11:09 PM
13

OP appears to be referring to child support/alimony. You can’t just leave that.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 09:12 PM
6

I think OP means child support and alimony, which carry the forced aspect and the threat of jail.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 09:11 PM
6

Yeah that wasn’t their question, good on you for intentionally misinterpreting it though
/r/MensRights24/02/23 05:13 PM
4

Not by most modern countries’ legal standards, as forced penetration is merely sexual assault, and is not nearly as severe in the eyes of the law. It fits the dictionary definition of “forced sex” but not the legal one, despite the gender-reverse scenario (penetration forced on someone) being in the definition as long as anyone can remember
/r/MensRights24/02/23 04:40 PM
3

Just asking a question does not mean they’re sexist. Let’s try to answer questions without assuming things like that, hey?
/r/MensRights24/02/23 04:36 PM
9

I lean right in my views but I do still have issues with a lot of the establishment right Used to lean left, now I lean right, who knows, it may change in future, I just try to follow the facts
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/23 04:16 AM
10

It’s okay, it’s surprisingly hard to spell ;)
/r/MensRights19/02/23 03:37 PM
2

No, I’m talking about before that. Thank you for pointing it out though.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 03:48 PM
2

Well, trump was basically portrayed as the devil in every single media outlet so it’s not surprising. I’m no fan of the guy but I found out recently that he brokered the Abraham Accords, which are giving peace to the Middle East. Literally nobody reported on that, no news coverage, nothing positive. So yeah. Trump may not be awesome but that’s kind of second fiddle when the media, Twitter, and Google basically all started promoting only negative things about him specifically. So Americans have r…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 03:08 PM
1

I wondered haha EDITED TOO
/r/MensRights13/02/23 03:43 PM
1

I’m not sure if you meant to reply to my comment as this is totally irrelevant to what I said. I suggest you double-check. Edit: you saw it and edited your comment, so here’s a brief reply to your edit: I understand needing proof. I have already seen proof, and it convinced me. I don’t really have it available at the moment so I understand that you may not be convinced.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 03:39 PM
1

Well, on top of people slandering all the guys that get posted regardless of if they know who they are, there’s been tons of times where an angry ex-gf posts her ex-bfs picture when he finds a new, mentally healthier girl, sabotaging not only his current relationship but also nearly all future relationships. Men fight with blows, women fight with reputation destruction. And this makes reputation destruction ridiculously easy for sour women to misuse. It’s not the original intent that’s the probl…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 03:15 PM
1

Equity is bad, equality is good. They sound similar because the people behind equity want to confuse well meaning normal people
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/23 03:55 AM
1

Good, they at least changed it to be equal. Wish they would’ve opened up both, it’s male jokes were legit funny, but oh well at least it’s consistent now
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/23 03:53 AM
6

Fair point, even if the guy was wasted I know it would be at least perceived differently. We for sure wouldn’t have dozens of people (who are thankfully downvoted in this thread) talking about how it’s a ‘missed opportunity’.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/23 07:02 AM
8

That’s facts honestly. It’s not something that people seem to think about. I think it’ll be cool when the roads are 95% self driving cars, personally. Then it’ll be safe, even if there’s unhinged human drivers, the AI will still minimize injury
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/23 07:00 AM
6

It may be, but it sure ain’t what gets talked about, nor does it really go viral like the bad cops
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/23 06:58 AM
2

Apparently she refused a breathalyzer at the station, was informed that refusal was legal admission of guilt, acknowledged that she knew this, was offered again, and still refused it.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/23 06:53 AM
3

Go to the YouTube video, the police summary is in the description
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/23 06:50 AM
3

Ya know, the officers were super calm and professional, it’s refreshing to see
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/23 06:46 AM
2

Hey, it takes being honest about yourself, which you’ve got down, so you’ll find someone
/r/MensRights12/02/23 01:52 AM
-3

I agree. I ask you to realize that while every movement has its extremes, the thing that so far sets this one apart is that the extremes haven’t taken over. If you see something you think is genuinely hateful, please don’t reply, downvote it, report it to the mods and to the admins. It’s a good way to correct behavior without engaging too much and getting yourself labeled a feminist troll lol
/r/MensRights09/02/23 09:12 AM
1

That’s a smart idea
/r/MensRights09/02/23 09:02 AM
1

Well now you know not to go arguing in those subreddits
/r/MensRights08/02/23 06:07 PM
1

Good heavens man that was two years ago
/r/MensRights08/02/23 03:04 PM
1

Dayum, that’s so interesting there’s a technical name for it, I always thought it was just slang, and it is, but my English nerd side loves that there’s a whole subtype of slang labeled that
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/23 07:02 PM
0

Are you actually interested in listening to my perspective or are you just going to do what you usually do, purposefully misunderstand, insult, and spew hatred? Genuine question. I’m willing to explain but I am not interested in engaging in a mud-slinging match. My comment was largely for others who might read your comment and not realize the misinformation it contains, purposeful or otherwise. I’ve engaged with you before so I know what you typically do. Really not down for an insult fest. So i…
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/23 06:27 PM
-1

You’ve forgotten what submission actually is
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/23 05:55 PM
4

Yeah it’s kinda funny how people have forgotten the true meaning of submission. There’s way more power in submission than in domination, but we’ve forgotten it and now equate submission with slavery. Side note: what’s AAVE? I figured it was a typo in OPs post, but then saw you use it
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/23 05:52 PM
15

Western society at its core is freer and more individual than previous societies. That’s why it comes under attack from people who don’t realize they have the old point of view. Western society was originally built on a dream of taking the old bricks of family, church, and classic morality, and use them to provide checks and balances against each other, to give everyone a huge incentive to work together, to use greed against itself. It has largely been dismantled now, but that was the dream.
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/23 08:45 AM
11

Not exactly what I was going for, FGM is banned, MGM isn’t
/r/MensRights01/02/23 06:07 AM
75

of minor males* Fixed it for ya ;)
/r/MensRights01/02/23 03:27 AM
9

Appreciate you!
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/23 07:50 PM
0

Well it’s not morally wrong for them to work, but the Rockerfellers kinda started the whole women in workplaces thing because they didn’t like that half the population wasn’t paying taxes and getting to build homes. Women weren’t working in a time when jobs were 14 hours a day in a factory that never heard the word “safety” cross its threshold. Once they joined, they made jobs more cushy, which is arguably both good and bad. But it’s not morally wrong to have women in the workplace. Also there’s…
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/23 04:12 AM
2

That article’s dirty
/r/MensRights27/01/23 05:37 PM
1

They seem to mostly stick to trolling commenters
/r/MensRights24/01/23 04:34 PM
3

The antiwork troll crowd is out in force today, goodness
/r/MensRights24/01/23 03:47 PM
33

I’ll tell you why. It’s really quite simple. Feminism and other harmful ideologies have been quietly working in the background for decades, assembling influence, creeping into laws, media, schools, everywhere. It hasn’t always been so obvious that it’s a movement of hatred. For decades they’ve been working to make their ideology look like the voice of reason and truth to your average human, and it’s worked. So now, in the last few years, when they’ve upped the misandry considerably, the normal, …
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 01:44 PM
1

Who are you to gatekeep people? OP, ignore this troll please Edit: yeah sure blocking me to prevent any reply, definitely troll behavior. Very mature. Nobody gets to dictate who is or isn’t welcome here, except maybe the mods. There are lots of women in the mens rights movement, we are not like feminism which requires any male participants to basically sacrifice their identity to the machine. Now, I do believe that OP is slightly misinformed about the true nature of feminism, she believes it to …
/r/MensRights19/01/23 06:42 PM
3

I heard that a Rockefeller came up with the idea of putting women in the workplace because he didn’t like the fact that half the population was happy as a clam at home and not paying exorbitant income taxes.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/23 10:46 PM
14

Walking planet hahahaha
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/23 10:43 PM
13

Ikr. And don’t forget, anything others do is your fault too, apparently lol
/r/MensRights16/01/23 04:10 PM
21

Ignore the newly created feminist troll account, created expressly to hate on men in this and several other subreddits, because the person behind it is allergic to accountability.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 04:08 PM
2

Oof
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/23 01:19 AM
3

Matt Walsh is hilarious with his sarcasm, but you really should check out Jordan Peterson for some really brain-teasing stuff
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 01:21 AM
12

Haha look at the feminist troll who thinks that men didn’t build the world. Okay, as Kevin Samuels would say, buy a dog (or cat if you want) and die alone
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 01:19 AM
2

According to them… every man haha
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 05:45 AM
0

Hmm I couldn’t possibly figure out the real reason!
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 03:45 AM
1

They feel inadequate… giiiirrrrrrrlllllll you really finna… I… I just can’t…
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 03:44 AM
2

dammit they found out
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/23 09:02 PM
6

Definitely, it’s still less than a hundred too many
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/23 09:01 PM
5

That’s crazy. The school has no business doing that at all. I will agree with the feminists on this, this is bad, and the stated reason that “it will excite men” is not just a lie, it’s an anti-truth. It’s pretty much impossible to get farther from the true reason. It won’t excite most men, and the few that it does, that’s not something to be blamed on the girls.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/23 08:59 PM
24

When the standards are so good, you just can’t help but double them
/r/MensRights12/01/23 08:56 PM
4

Oh and the men who have just a tiny bit of the dad bod are championed as “just as inclusive” as the women’s page which has straight up obesity on it, like massive women and the men are either jacked or skinny fat.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 08:53 PM
34

Well… I dunno anymore haha
/r/MensRights10/01/23 07:37 AM
8

The true Naruto run
/r/MensRights10/01/23 07:37 AM
6

Okay if you wanna get really scientific, then you can easily define what the computer does as work, and since you’re making it happen, you are by extension doing the work. Every input changes hundreds of bits, which require the transfer of energy to do anything, and you’re driving the whole machine. So, if you really genuinely want to get technical, you’re still doing work through the computer as a tool.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 07:35 AM
2

I like how Jordan Peterson put it. He basically said this. Let’s take gender out of it entirely. Let’s say that Jordan goes up to Shaq and punches him in the face as hard as he can. Would you then feel bad if Shaq punched him right back? The answer is usually no. When asked why, the response is (rightly) that well, you shouldn’t start what you can’t finish. And the same applies here. No matter the gender, nobody should hit anybody, especially if they’re stronger than you. It’s a fundamentally st…
/r/MensRights06/01/23 07:46 PM
30

Oh I’ve been banned from there for almost as long as I’ve had this account
/r/MensRights04/01/23 04:48 PM
15

I mean, she got picked, so if I was her I’d view it as a compliment
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 01:53 AM
2

Came here to lol at that
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 01:53 AM
9

They’re a feminist troll, from 2X.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/23 05:11 PM
13

That article was almost self aware, and then it went “it’s much harder to impress an equal than an inferior” 🤦‍♂️
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/23 05:05 PM
6

The ideology is the problem, not the gender.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 10:04 AM
2

Probably lol, it appears to be trackmania, totally related to street interviews
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/23 04:33 PM
4

I know right
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/23 03:35 PM
1

I’m sorry, I like hearing things when people are talking to each other
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/23 02:22 AM
58

Could do without the annoying background music Bit tired of tiktok doing this
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 09:17 PM
3

Man, so many feminist trolls in this comment section
/r/MensRights31/12/22 06:06 PM
7

Yeah I’ve engaged with you multiple times. I know you’ve twisted things to be anti-men, so I’m speaking from personal experience. Your comment above is so filled with lies and delusions that have already been refuted, that I just am done dealing with it. Yet you act as if every other warning about you to other users must include a comprehensive analysis of everything you’ve ever said in order to be valid. Here’s why you get classified as a troll: no matter how many times your points are refuted,…
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 05:57 PM
1

Could you explain further?
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 05:16 PM
1

I dunno. The earth’s core is way too pure. The sewers have sewage, so it should feel right at home to them
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 05:16 PM
7

Er, no. I’m calling attention to the irony that is them accusing everyone on subs like this of “violence against women” and then turning around and instantly saying you deserve to be pretty much stabbed. I don’t know how you managed to come up with what you did
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 05:15 PM
3

Here’s how one feminist put it that has stuck with me: “Because debate is a patriarchal, oppressive, white supremacist institution, and the very act of allowing it reinforces the patriarchy” I find that take highly entertaining
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 04:41 PM
8

“Said I promoted violence against women” “Said that I was scum and deserved to be physically harmed” hmmmm
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 04:39 PM
1

Found the woman from the screenshot
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 04:36 PM
2

Man you almost got the inside scoop on that
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 04:36 PM
2

Upvote the poor mod, he’s trying his best
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 04:33 PM
2

What’s the shogun method?
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 04:32 PM
0

Yeah sure blame the victims of these women
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 04:32 PM
2

I disagree. I think some should be put below the streets, in the sewers.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 04:31 PM
3

Oh yeah note down the account name, you’ll soon start seeing her everywhere, twisting the narrative to be pro-women and anti-men. Quite the dedicated feminist troll.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 04:30 PM
10

Wouldn’t it be hilarious if she removed your comment?
/r/MensRights28/12/22 08:17 PM
28

Yeah, that’s why human trafficking rings use small, well-put-together women in minivans to steal kids, because they know and encourage those biases.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 05:39 PM
16

I remember reading this story. It’s simply horrible.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 05:34 PM
3

I didn’t know you invested in Applied Molecular Transport!
/r/MensRights28/12/22 08:26 AM
8

dammit 😂
/r/AntiFeminists25/12/22 04:15 PM
8

Look, JK Rowling may be a man-hating nut job, but in this one aspect, she is right. The trans movement is destroying women only spaces and that’s a bad thing. Just because I agree with her on that doesn’t mean that I disapprove of how she’s attacked male safe spaces. I recognize she’s a hypocrite. Everyone is a hypocrite about something. But the same people who destroyed male safe spaces are now coming for female safe spaces, and the only way to convince the normal people who aren’t tied to any …
/r/MensRights24/12/22 11:00 PM
17

There are no feminists in foxholes or so the saying goes lol
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/22 06:38 AM
2

Absolutely, female on male predatory actions do not happen but if they did, it would not be a bad thing! /s since I’m basically quoting arguments I’ve heard
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 11:34 PM
1

I appreciate you acknowledging that.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 11:32 PM
1

I appreciate you acknowledging that.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 11:32 PM
2

Which they did but it’s not exactly an excuse, the insanity defense hardly ever works
/r/MensRights22/12/22 04:41 PM
4

Except she said he did ask and admitted she lied to him
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 04:14 PM
3

Not only are you committing the sunk cost fallacy, you’re blaming him for stuff she intentionally hid from him. He asked around about her, nobody told him before he got married. He asked her, she flat out lied, over and over again. Then suddenly one of his buddies reveals it and you blame him when her lies are exposed. He’s supposed to vet her, but he’s not a mind reader, it’s not like he’s incapable of being deceived. This is part of why marriage is a bad deal for men. Back in the day multiple …
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 04:13 PM
24

Honestly she’s probably cheating. That’s such typical behavior from cheaters, it’s quite possible. And of course it has to be all his fault.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 03:59 PM
9

Oh but it’s okay when women do it, doncha know
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 06:24 AM
6

That coverage totally isn’t biased at all
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 06:33 PM
3

Thank you, I plan to, but I gotta be super careful about it, if I wasn’t in a good community, I would be so out of marriage. But her family appears to be genuinely awesome and kind, and she herself is so kind and considerate that sometimes it makes me wonder how she does it. That’s what I first noticed, and it’s so far held up. But I gotta take it slow, vet her, have her family vet me (and her vet me too later when I make my move) and I sure as heck can’t be too quick with it
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 06:16 AM
1

Thanks. I’ve only met like two, and the one I currently know I’m hoping to wife up, and am currently vetting her. Here’s hoping, cause it feels like the good women are few and far between. I’m even luckier because I have very good reason to believe that she liked me before I even noticed her.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 06:12 AM
2

I would agree, I think that’s a reason you brought up that I didn’t touch on. Your comment is clear and well thought through. I don’t think our perspectives are mutually exclusive, it probably is a combination of all of these. People are complicated.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 06:09 AM
2

I think marriage (successful marriages anyway) tend to mellow some women
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 05:55 AM
3

I think the reason it’s more frequent in female bosses nowadays is because a lot of them are hired to fill quotas, not because of competence, and they know it deep down. So they do all the things humans do when they know they can’t do the job right but don’t want to give up the pay: deflect, go on power trips, take everything super personally, etc. The male bosses are by and large there because of competence, since nowadays it’s especially hard for men to get those positions, and makes competiti…
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 05:51 AM
8

To add on to your comment, maybe just stop the complaining and life will get better, complaining and self focus destroys your mental health.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 05:46 AM
6

Fair point
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 05:45 AM
15

Lol every feminist comes in here acting like each and every comment is the worst thing they’ve ever heard in existence, and you must be equivalent to hitler… ROFL The guys probably appreciate you. Every girl I meet who isn’t “girls first” automatically becomes very trustworthy (subject to change pending actions, behavior, and all the other stuff we know affects trust) and most of my guy friends are so relieved to meet one like that too.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 05:44 AM
8

I feel ya on that… at least you won’t have to be the one putting up with their stuff for the rest of your life, you don’t gotta reproduce with one lol I think the birth rate and soon the population will plummet more than it already has. Destroy the nuclear family and you see population collapse.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 05:37 AM
1

Clearly.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/22 01:56 AM
56

My mans joked so well that Reddit thought he was serious lmao (or she, I dunno)
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/22 08:06 PM
15

Pretty hilarious but it’s a good reflection of the times
/r/MensRights07/12/22 05:46 PM
15

Same here. Misogyny banned? Great. But every male support sub is brigaded by misandrists at one point or another, so if misandry isn’t against the rules or classified as hateful, then you don’t really have a justification to ban them.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 10:00 AM
1

Yeah I’m a strong proponent that the only way to meet any possible spouse is through your local community. Online is just terrible for meeting anyone for romance. In person isn’t great, but at least you have a better chance for someone to be decent to you
/r/MensRights05/12/22 03:22 PM
7

I know right, I can’t believe the sheer amount of privilege men have like wow how amazing it must be /s
/r/AntiFeminists28/11/22 09:18 AM
1

I personally don’t find an abortion to be morally neutral. I believe it is a bad thing. And thus, I also believe a man shouldn’t legally abort a child either. HOWEVER This only really applies to me, it is pointless for me to attempt to force others to comply with moral standards I have for myself. So, my general view that I vote off of is that you can’t have one without the other, and if you believe one is bad, then you believe both are bad. Either have both or neither. None of this halfway bull…
/r/MensRights26/11/22 06:10 PM
5

Off the default list? What’s that?
/r/MensRights25/11/22 04:41 AM
-1

Which is exactly why I said it’s not applicable in all cases. I’m talking about the average family, where abuse isn’t that extreme and the family generally cares for each other, not edge cases where abuse is that horrible and there’s no real way to show that anyone cares for anyone else. In those cases, you are right, it takes a different approach. Hence why I included that “this is general, not specific” phrase.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 08:12 PM
3

Some women*
/r/MensRights22/11/22 07:51 PM
-1

Then you should know just how skewed your views of those impacts are when you’re suicidal. Calling them selfish is part of driving that impact home. It is so totally the opposite of the sympathy and attention they expect to receive that it comes to the system like a shock, allowing an opening to actually talk about that information and show them the real impact. Because ultimately, deep down, the suicidal person thinks of this act as altruistic, doing their family and friends a favor by sacrific…
/r/MensRights22/11/22 04:08 PM
3

As someone who was suicidal, “hey we really do care about you” will be immediately met with “yeah sure. You’re just saying that once you found out that I was gonna suicide. You don’t really give two chickens about me.” If they don’t say it aloud, they will think it. It fails fundamentally and actually in my case made my condition far worse. It came to an element of “oh yeah? You don’t want me to do this? Well, watch me do it anyway!” You need something they haven’t thought about before, like the…
/r/MensRights22/11/22 03:58 PM
-5

Sometimes that’s the only thing they’ll listen to. You can’t tell them how bad it’ll be for them, they already don’t care about them. You can’t tell them it’ll get better, even though it will, cause they won’t believe you. You can only refute their misguided notion that “everyone else will be better off/happier without me”. Which is where the selfishness argument comes in.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 03:53 PM
-6

Nah, suicide is selfish and short-sighted, regardless of the gender of the suicidal person. I know a family who had a son who hung himself. His dad found him. The family was never the same. As someone who was suicidal, I know what it’s like, you think nobody cares about you, which is false, and that things will never get better, which is almost always also false. This is just the majority of suicides, not necessarily applicable to all cases.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 03:50 PM
24

I think he’ll also appreciate her savagery
/r/AntiFeminists22/11/22 03:44 PM
8

Those people who claim “it’s just a pile of rocks she’s standing on” just live under a rock. Also they don’t understand the damage human feet do.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/22 12:36 AM
1

Looks to me like her review got wiped
/r/MensRights21/11/22 02:51 PM
2

I don’t think it’s a simp. It’s merely like an escort service to the man, but it says a lot that Seeking Arrangements, the site for sugar daddy/baby relationships, has 4.74 women on it for every single man, and only one or two sugar mommas. So it’s purely transactional, and women are pushing it, not men. Men who are well to do simply sometimes see it as a worthy investment. I don’t get it but it’s not a simp.
/r/AntiFeminists20/11/22 09:23 PM
4

I appreciate you acknowledging that it was what it was, and I totally sympathize with not liking to say the word.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 10:22 PM
2

How are guys so dumb to fall for it? It’s deception, the point is hiding the truth, and limiting the other person’s information so they have no contradicting sources. I’m not sure what makes you think “dumbness” has anything to do with it. If dumbness is a factor, then being so daft as to assume that only dumb people are deceived by baby trapping is precisely how you get baby trapped.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 10:19 PM
4

I mean I would much rather have it open so we know what we’re up against rather than having things like that be hidden under the radar
/r/MensRights18/11/22 10:08 PM
1

I suggest posting this on r/mensrights and see what they have to say, maybe it’ll be helpful. Other than that I recommend r/menaregood for wholesome content about good men
/r/MenSupportMen12/11/22 04:11 PM
3

Subreddit link: r/menaregood
/r/MenSupportMen12/11/22 04:10 PM
2

Ah yes a fellow nerdrotic enjoyer
/r/MensRights03/11/22 09:13 PM
28

No, no, the goal is that 100% of all people killed should be men
/r/EverydayMisandry03/11/22 12:30 PM
1

Feminist troll account detected
/r/AntiFeminists31/10/22 08:10 PM
2

Ah, yes, the way most marriages turn out
/r/MensRights30/10/22 05:04 AM
2

I think Elon taking Twitter and hopefully promoting free speech on there would be a good first step, if it happens
/r/AntiFeminists29/10/22 10:47 PM
2

Ah yes thank you for proving my point. As you said, clearly it’s all the guy’s responsibility to prevent children, not the woman’s. Edit: hmm yes blocking me is definitely going to show how I’m obviously the fragile one…
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:39 PM
2

If a woman doesn’t want to make babies, she should go on hormonal birth control or get an IUD, not force the guy to do anything. See how it sounds when the same logic is applied to women?
/r/MensRights27/10/22 03:55 PM
2

As Joker would say: shooooocking
/r/MensRights27/10/22 03:42 PM
0

I would suggest to continue the cold shoulder, and maybe react with disgust when she touches you like that (don’t overdo it or you’ll look stupid) and just avoid her as much as you can
/r/MensRights23/10/22 10:59 PM
6

Interesting take, but that’s not really the case. Incels aren’t some coordinated movement like y’all seem to think. Radfems are absolutely coordinated.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 04:07 AM
15

I really appreciate your understanding of men’s issues, but please don’t apologize for your entire gender, there’s no need to. First, as you know, women aren’t a monolith, so it’s pretty hard to apologize for all of them. Second, you seem to be quite the kind and decent person, so I don’t see why you should apologize for things you didn’t do. I could kind of get your point if you were saying something like “I used to hate all men and now I realize how I was cruel to them because of my hatred”, e…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 07:42 AM
2

It’s horrible management but I’m not sure it’s sexual harassment, I do think though that she absolutely needs to report it, this is not her fault for wearing shorts, management can’t just do that.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 07:33 PM
1

Legal marriage status is advantageous for taxes and a few other things though
/r/MensRights18/10/22 03:28 PM
2

True true
/r/MensRights10/10/22 02:16 PM
1

No, we stand up for people affected by feminists, regardless of who they are. Feminism is ultimately out to destroy both men and women, destroy their interpersonal relationships, destroy our sense of community, destroy the nuclear family unit, and make everyone reliant on the state. The absolute best way to fight back and prove them wrong is by embracing the women who aren’t brainwashed, proving that a nuclear family unit is still a good goal to shoot for because it is the only thing that can sa…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 02:15 PM
2

“Women prefer women over men” This is evidence of women being a hyper privileged group, not inherently evil. French nobles back in the day preferred hanging out with other nobles. The occasional commoner who worked up to becoming a noble soon preferred nobles over their former peers. In-group bias is a result of privilege, and the privilege is the result of feminism, which has always fought for female privilege. It does not mean that women are inherently bad people. You have failed to prove that…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 02:11 PM
26

So you’re the reason everyone says this sub hates women. Remember, we stand against feminism and not against women. None of your evidence even remotely proves your point. Edit: apparently the mods agree with me
/r/MensRights10/10/22 12:28 PM
14

Fear not, she did you a favor.
/r/AntiFeminists10/10/22 01:21 AM
2

Very true lol
/r/MensRights03/10/22 06:36 PM
8

MAA. We are now become sheep.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 12:21 AM
1

They don’t, they just do Reddit in bed all day
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:35 PM
13

He said that too lol
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/22 08:37 AM
4

People who think a humanitarian movement to help half the population is awful show themselves to be awful people. In other news, water is wet.
/r/AntiFeminists30/09/22 08:34 AM
5

What an excellent self-description
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:17 AM
14

The number of feminist trolls in this comments section going ‘bUt MuH pAy GaP eXiStS’ and trying to redefine it into completely ridiculous and unprovable terms is really a bit concerning.
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/22 05:00 AM
1

I wondered why you seemed to be unable to understand basic logical arguments, so I checked your profile, and it makes total sense! Brand new account, no posts, no karma, and tons of hateful bad faith arguments almost exclusively in this subreddit, now it all makes sense, you’re a feminist troll account.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 05:28 PM
1

Y’all really think she was the first feminist princess? Lol
/r/MensRights25/09/22 04:30 PM
3

No, that’s feminist logic, applying their own logic to their own movement is a legitimate logical argument
/r/MensRights25/09/22 04:30 PM
1

That’s quite possible, but unfortunately we can’t know unless he responds lol
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:03 PM
1

Which was my initial impression but look at their profile, clearly not a feminist lol. So I’m confused about what they mean
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:35 AM
2

What
/r/MensRights25/09/22 12:40 AM
28

Sounds like a very mentally healthy and stable person lol
/r/EverydayMisandry23/09/22 03:20 PM
7

I mean she’ll probably just tell the boy he’s a girl “we knew he was a girl since before he could talk” I’m only half joking and I wish I was completely joking
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/22 10:12 AM
311

But isn’t that what She-Hulk is supposed to be?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/22 06:29 PM
2

You might like the pepperoni stuffed crust papa John’s is doing, I absolutely love it lol. Genius idea in my opinion, but I’m not exactly a good critic
/r/MensRights20/09/22 09:09 AM
1

I almost got myself when writing it, lmao Almost downvoted myself
/r/MensRights20/09/22 09:07 AM
1

every time I rub my eyes I look like a wet raccoon LOL
/r/MensRights19/09/22 05:36 PM
22

Well yeah, obviously the other women are only doing that because men made them only able to see a certain standard and took away those womens’ ability to appreciate natural beauty through centuries of social and biological conditioning… duhhh /s It’s ironic that I can make up realistic sounding talking points for feminists while simply chilling and eating pizza, no research, nothing
/r/MensRights19/09/22 05:33 PM
4

You might look at r/circumcisiongrief
/r/MensRights16/09/22 01:15 PM
0

Understandable, but I think nobody responded because they make good points, they just apply those points to all women. I’m with Lauren Chen on this: what the above person said is 100% true for a certain subset of women. They exist and need to be called out. But there’s also plenty of women who don’t fit that comment at all. I’m nobody to speak on ratios, but I know that humans are diverse and they don’t all go around doing the same things. Best things to do in this situation is report and don’t …
/r/MensRights14/09/22 06:38 PM
9

Haha it took me a second to figure out what you did there lol, I upvoted ya
/r/MensRights14/09/22 06:33 PM
1

Don’t engage them, they’re entrenched in their worldview thanks to pain.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 06:32 PM
98

Tinmen is always a good read
/r/MensRights11/09/22 04:36 PM
9

Hey if even they can’t deny it exists, then that’s gotta count for something…
/r/MensRights11/09/22 12:43 AM
1

Holy cow that based thread got nuked. I see no rhyme or reason as to why anything got removed, comments calling her crazy got removed, comments calling her crazy were left up, her comments defending herself were nuked, as were all the replies. But it was surprisingly based for 2X. Majorly impressed.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/22 03:01 AM
1

Lmao, it’s a thorny issue so it’s important to be clear, if I had more time I would have probably written something shorter lol
/r/MensRights06/09/22 05:19 PM
3

Just wanna clarify that it is a generalization (which is a logical tool) but not an over-generalization. Generalizations aren’t bad, in fact they’re the basis on which science is built. But they’re fundamentally different from over-generalizations. Here’s a quick difference. Generalizations are when >50% of population y does thing x. It breaks down to if you picked a totally random person in population y, there’s a greater than 50% chance they did x. Generalizations are evidence based and statis…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:36 PM
3

I’d like to point out that what you’re criticizing is a generalization, which is fine logically, not an over-generalization. If 51% of population y does x, then it is a generalization to say that “y did x”. Nowadays people don’t seem to understand that generalizations are essential to doing anything. Everyone seems to get offended as if generalizations are saying that every member of y did x. No, that’s not how generalizations work. It’s just an observation that on a population-wide scale, if yo…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:19 PM
4

Oh yeah man that lisp is gonna drive some dudes up a wall, but they’ll probably try and give you as much slack as they can, however it’s probably not a great idea to lean into the stereotypes of lisps and all that. I think it’s better to just be a guy who just so happens to like guys, rather than a gay person who happens to be guy and isn’t happy about it, which is the tradition the lisp is born out of. It’s how guys start to sound like women, and not just women, the lisp specifically goes for t…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 04:38 PM
1

Awesome, bro!
/r/MensRights03/09/22 04:29 PM
-1

Value = scarcity Basic economics. This guy just doesn’t get it. That’s okay tho
/r/MensRights01/09/22 03:40 AM
2

I, too, wish to know
/r/MensRights31/08/22 09:47 PM
5

brigading is taken seriously they banned first without a single care You basically just contradicted yourself. You also seem not to understand the severity of the problem. If the Reddit admins see that they don’t insta ban “brigadiers”, then the sub gets a knock. When the admins are breathing down your neck looking for you to screw up, then of course that’s how you’re going to operate, because you have to. Why would you blame the mods for something that is extremely clearly the admins’ fault? Th…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/22 04:26 AM
0

Exactly! And the mods are not here to defend themselves so the thread basically becomes an anti-mod circle jerk. Let’s be real, who is gonna say “I was banned justly”? It’s gonna be the people who talked to the mods, heard them out, apologized, and got unbanned. It’s not gonna be the crowd that threw a tantrum when they’re banned. They’re pretty good at pretending to be reasonable (ironically just like feminists are) and then they get banned (usually for brigading because that’s an instant permb…
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/22 07:51 PM
1

Yeah, here’s the thing. Everyone who gets banned is going to say it’s over nothing. The usual reason is they posted something actually against the rules (usually encouraging brigading) and then the mods instabanned for it because the sub cannot afford to encourage brigading at all or even seem like it (despite being the target of so many brigades) or Reddit will shut it down immediately. Reddit admins are keeping a very close eye on them, looking for an excuse to knock the sub. So then the perso…
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/22 07:45 PM
8

What a beautiful post!
/r/MensRights29/08/22 07:33 AM
24

Yeah, feminists are really making concerted efforts to invade and infiltrate the sub. I honestly feel bad for the mods, their hands are essentially tied by Reddit while the whole community blames them for “allowing” the trolling that will get the subreddit banned if they take action against it. There’s really no good winning situation. Sad. Edit: and for those saying “oh I got banned for no reason” yeah sure. I’ve seen your type around. I’ve also been banned, talked to the mods, was civil to the…
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/22 07:29 AM
6

I mean according to them, this place is so anti-women it’s dangerous, which begs the question “why are they here” if going here is as bad for them as a Jew wandering into a nazi camp in world war 2. If they’re so oppressed and if this sub is so horribly anti-women, the most sensible thing would be for women to avoid it… but no they’re here to pick fights and then report comments they think will get banned, despite them saying deliberately inflammatory and hateful things designed to trigger users…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 07:09 AM
13

Don’t worry too much about the feminist troll. They’re just here to call everyone misogynistic and pretend they aren’t misandrists. Best not to engage.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 06:33 AM
10

I don’t really care if it has women on it personally. I much more worry about there being feminists on it. And unfortunately feminists come as both men and women. I think that’s a far bigger issue. Just as men can be knowledgeable on women’s issues, so too can women be knowledgeable of men’s issues. Take Candace Owens for example. If she started a panel like that, I would definitely be happy about it. I worry much less about the gender of the people on the panel, and much more about their belief…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 01:18 PM
6

In other news: Water turns out to be wet!
/r/MensRights24/08/22 05:02 PM
4

I mean I was for that breakup, I don’t think any man deserves to put up with that for a lifetime lol. If that was my girl, I wouldn’t really care if she thought she was breaking up because she thought I was psychotic, the feeling would be mutual
/r/MensRights19/08/22 07:29 PM
1

Well yeah. Thats common sense. However, that’s not immediately obvious though since the comment you replied to was deleted. The issue I’m trying to communicate is that your ‘or is that only for men’ phrase which is fine in context looks like a troll comment out of context. So, I’m just suggesting adding a phrase at the start saying “edit for context: the guy above me was saying women shouldn’t get prenups” or something like that, whatever is closest to what they said.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 03:14 PM
1

Lol rip
/r/MensRights16/08/22 03:07 PM
2

Why’d you reply like 4 times
/r/MensRights16/08/22 03:04 PM
2

Why did you reply like 4 times?
/r/MensRights16/08/22 03:04 PM
1

It basically makes you look like a troll trying to bait people into saying something only to cry sexism. But you don’t have to edit it if you don’t want to
/r/MensRights16/08/22 03:03 PM
1

It basically makes you look like a troll trying to bait people into saying something only to cry sexism. But you don’t have to edit it if you don’t want to
/r/MensRights16/08/22 03:03 PM
2

Okay, I suggest editing your original comment since theirs is deleted it makes yours look bad lol
/r/MensRights16/08/22 02:59 PM
12

This sounds like something that’s pretty reasonable. Look if we’re gonna go down the ‘free stuff’ route, this isn’t a bad extension of it just on face value. I wouldn’t consider it a special privilege either, since periods are a special burden to women, and it makes sense that this goes to alleviate the strain of the burden. Both genders benefit, not equally, but the benefit that both genders get is proportional to the amount of trouble they are caused. Dads no longer have to pay for their daugh…
/r/MensRights16/08/22 02:25 PM
2

Statistically women have the same mean iq as men do. However the bell curve for women is tighter than it is for men, meaning there are far fewer women than men at both the extremely smart and extremely dumb ends of the spectrum. Women are more closely grouped around the mean iq score.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 02:16 PM
2

I’m just gonna assume your question is in good faith and try to explain it. After all, it does seem confusing from the outside. I mean it pretty much has become mostly for men, but on the rare occasions where the woman has more, then yeah the same applies to her. There have been a few times where it happened. There are many reasons for this, but a large one is hypergamy. Statistically, women don’t tend to date or marry men with fewer resources than them, so they don’t tend to lose resources in a…
/r/MensRights16/08/22 02:13 PM
4

I mean artificial wombs would probably solve a problem or two that men have, but I doubt feminists would be a fan
/r/MensRights15/08/22 07:48 AM
2

Sleep well lol
/r/MensRights15/08/22 07:45 AM
-1

Ikr, why should it? Men are obviously subhuman and unworthy of having any benefits from marriage (obligatory /s)
/r/MensRights15/08/22 07:43 AM
1

Troll post, breaks rule one. Make sure to report, people!
/r/AntiFeminists14/08/22 01:42 PM
0

Came here to say that
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/22 03:16 AM
1

69 comments on the post, nice
/r/AntiFeminists14/08/22 03:13 AM
3

Poe’s law my friend, Poe’s law…
/r/AntiFeminists14/08/22 03:11 AM
29

Notice how also she’s like “MY family would be screwed” not “OUR family would be screwed”
/r/AntiFeminists14/08/22 03:08 AM
6

Gender bias is nearly 3-4 times worse than racial bias in the courts statistically speaking
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/22 04:10 PM
10

Yeah happy spouse happy house goes both ways and I think it’s much better.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 04:16 PM
0

You might believe those things about women, but I do not. Women are amazing and wonderful human beings. Feminine energy compliments and supports male energy in the best way possible, as male energy does right back to feminine energy. Feminism takes women away from femininity. That’s not good. I hate how feminism is destroying women. Women are not the same thing as feminism. Feminism stems from Russian Marxist ideology. Women happen to pre-date that.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 03:58 PM
-1

Even the bans have exceptions for rape/incest/survivability issues, etc.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 12:58 PM
3

Lmao you almost had me going for a second
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 05:40 AM
2

I’ve actually run into quite a few vicious trolls recently on here, usually running about in packs of two, so one starts an argument and another pretends to find it and join in but they reply to comments you make to both accounts and use both accounts to downvote, then upvote each other. It can be kinda sucky. Didn’t used to, but recently there been an uptick
/r/MensRights04/08/22 06:14 PM
5

Have we ever stopped being in their sights?
/r/MensRights04/08/22 06:12 PM
2

Meh, I’m not really interested in a debate, I just wanted you to know that I appreciated your post since a lot of the community seemed to be jumping on ya.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 05:46 PM
3

I appreciate your post, I would take the title of egalitarian though
/r/MensRights04/08/22 05:54 AM
17

dangit
/r/MensRights03/08/22 01:18 PM
2

Good bot
/r/MensRights31/07/22 09:34 PM
1

Lol yeah they say they get it but dayum rereading this thread they sure don’t
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:22 PM
6

I think the point is bullying and lording it over people never leads to genuine happiness and satisfaction long term. OP was saying that they will be depressed in the future when they realize bullying men isn’t fulfilling. Not necessarily that they’re unhappy now, although a case could be made for it because suicide rates are on the rise.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:18 PM
1

Yes. I’m well aware of what I wrote and what the sources I cited say. Thank you. However, I’m not taking all day to rehash the exact same discussion that I had yesterday. So, after this comment, I’m not going to reply to this thread. It’s absolutely nothing you’ve done, I just don’t have the personal patience for a thorny Reddit debate today. If you wanna have the last word here, by all means, be my guest, call me whatever names you fancy, I really don’t care. Enjoy your day.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:06 PM
3

Okay, obviously that’s a misrepresentation of my comments, and not what I said about planned parenthood or the midwife, but if you have stuff to do, I’m happy to mutually drop the conversation. I have other things that need doing as well. I don’t really consider it a ‘win’ because it’s not really an official debate, but we clearly BOTH feel like we’re re-hashing the same points over and over again while talking to a wall, so the conversation is kinda pointless by now. Farewell, and I wish you we…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 08:49 PM
2

This whole thread is about birth control. OP is wondering why his wife doesn’t want to have sex with him and is calling him selfish for having a desire for her. Sex is and always has been much more risky for women than men, I’m not sure where you’re thinking I denied that. That’s the entire basis of sex having high value, that the woman is risking more than the man. Which is why they don’t generally have sex with men they don’t want to procreate with, except apparently you. Edit: as stated befor…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 08:39 PM
3

You still don’t have any points lol. I was referring to the other post. I know you meant that one. Also according to you I’m not playing stupid, I just am stupid
/r/MensRights30/07/22 08:35 PM
3

Why exactly are you having sex with someone you don’t want to procreate with? I thought sex was supposed to be valuable, the woman giving everything she could, and now you’re telling me you’re just throwing it out to the masses?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 08:34 PM
3

Heh. You don’t even have any points lmao
/r/MensRights30/07/22 08:32 PM
2

Okay so let me get this straight. You’re saying that the only acceptable form of birth control for you is something with zero side effects and zero costs and zero failure rate?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 08:32 PM
3

Right, I’ll go engage with the one where you call me names lol
/r/MensRights30/07/22 08:30 PM
2

Okay, please tell me how I did that
/r/MensRights30/07/22 08:08 PM
3

Sure, you’re so reliable that you completely ignore the effectiveness of birth control, strawman my argument to assume that I said there were never gonna be any side effects, and then decide that ignoring facts isn’t enough, you instead have to get your high from insulting some random person on the internet. Oh and you never specifically said what I “lied” about because it would be too hard to find it. You think that somehow just accusing someone of lying means they did it. Right. Let’s ignore t…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 08:05 PM
2

Oh yeah I’m the one arguing from emotion. How dare I cite sources. How dare I point out that insurance exists and the vast majority of birth control is covered by insurance. How dare I realize that socialized free medicine exists and never state my stances on it (I happen to support it, but you don’t care because it’s more convenient for me to hate it) And of course the existence of negative side effects is completely disproving to everything I’ve ever said, never mind that I went out of my way …
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:54 PM
3

Yeah, you’re right, you never did use logic. It really information for that matter. I concede that. You did pretty much go into this assuming everything about me and then judging me based on your assumptions. And then you wanna pretend that I’m telling you how to do your job when I commented how it’s ironic that you have this much time to argue on the internet, while simultaneously complaining about how hard your job is. Sure. You sound fun at parties. Oh right you don’t really go to any cause y…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:48 PM
2

Yeah sure. Medicare and Medicaid which you conveniently forget to realize exist totally aren’t targeted at low income people. I’m just gonna ignore the other ad hominem attacks, you don’t know shit about me, and assuming just makes you look silly.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:42 PM
1

You did say it causes long term pain, stop denying when you run out of arguments. Stop using edge cases to ‘disprove’ the absolutely overwhelming majority. And let’s just ignore the fact that most anti abortion laws jail the doctor performing the abortion, not the women getting it. Yeah sure. Still waiting on you to acknowledge that I’m more than happy to undergo temporary and extreme pain to my genitalia to make my partner happy, when you tried to “gotcha” me.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:38 PM
3

You do realize that RNs hardly ever get weekends, unless you’re working a very cushy gig, in which case where do we mere mortals sign up… I was not asking why my girl won’t sleep with me. Don’t confuse me with the OP. And also stop ignoring that OP has a kid. I really think you are an asshole so I don’t think it’s just an ad hominem attack You need to retake high school logic if you think that. Yeah sure. Run out of actual logic because it’s all very easy to refute, and keep resorting to assumpt…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:35 PM
2

Oh wait, there’s something called insurance that you keep forgetting about that’s guaranteed to everyone who wants to take advantage of, suddenly making abstinence not a requirement… and who the heck thinks that there’s only PIV and abstinence, and NOTHING in between, like come on ya daft flower.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:28 PM
3

I’m circumcised. That’s wayyyy more than a few minutes of severe pain to your genitals. So yeah. I am willing to do it. Your point is? And whenever my gf and I don’t want kids, we’ll both get snipped, as we’ve agreed. You still ignore the fact that I said the pain is temporary. Only a few minutes. And you’re over here acting like it’s a life sentence to misery eternal. I never denied pain. I denied long term pain, as do the professionals you so kindly cited.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:26 PM
3

Right. And you run out of arguments so you move to ad hominem attacks. After, of course, you refute your own point. When you have friends, and family, and you’re attached to where you can’t move, you have people willing to support you. You can easily ask a friend to drive you to get birth control or an abortion. And let’s ignore the fact that I was saying move only if you didn’t have a support system that could help you get these things. You know for a RN, you sure have a lot of time to argue on…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:22 PM
2

Sure. Of course most women are forced to get IUDs. Whatever you say. Let’s just ignore the fact that your source literally says the pain lasts for a minute or two, and any other pain can be medicated with ibuprofen.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:18 PM
2

You do realize that planned parenthood said that, not me, as I listed in the source. You think they’re wrong, take it up with them, not me. But the fact that you think I’m citing fake sources is pretty good proof that you didn’t click the link. I wasn’t actually gonna include breastfeeding but they said it’s effective so I included it in the interests of accuracy. And no, again according to planned parenthood, IUDs are anywhere from 0-1300 bucks, never thousands of dollars, only a thousand max, …
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:16 PM
3

Yeah I’m sure charging a woman for crossing state lines is gonna fly well in courts. And yeah. You ever heard of ‘voting with your feet’? COVID made almost every job able to be done remotely, the number of jobs available has almost never been higher, so yeah if you’re so oppressed, you do have the freedom to move. And if they come after you, your new home state has the constitutional authority to kick your old state to the curb. States cannot dictate what happens in other states. You might be pl…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:09 PM
2

Thanks for listing the sources that disprove your point for me. Saves me the trouble.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:06 PM
2

The four kinds of birth control available that are 99% effective are (and you’re welcome to follow along) implants, IUDs, breastfeeding, and outercourse/abstinence. It doesn’t have to be PIV to get both of you off, in fact women are often more stimulated by other methods. That’s completely free. That’s 100% effective. That’s available to literally everyone. Happy? Now I’d love to see you try and discredit planned parenthood
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:06 PM
3

Of course nobody owes anyone sex. Why in earth would you think otherwise? That wasn’t even ever a part of the point I was making. Also you do know that they literally say they’ll help you get to an abortion state if you need help getting it? Right? Oh and birth control like that is available at crisis pregnancy centers, which the pro abortion crowd is for some reason rioting outside of. Nobody’s touching those. Still taxpayer covered. Still available and increasing in funding.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:00 PM
2

Nope, we were just talking about sources. Not about resources or about people who live in red states. I said planned parenthood is an authoritative source. You countered with ‘but they’re closing clinics in the states that outlawed abortion’ as if somehow that makes them not credible at all? You should try reading, like at all.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:56 PM
5

Yeah no, planned parenthood disagrees with you there. If it’s that painful it wasn’t done right. If you went to a doctor who did it wrong, you didn’t spend the five minutes googling them to see if they’re a reputable clinic at all. And no, you started this discussion because you’re against looking at things from an unbiased perspective. So of course you’re unable to accept the truth even when cited from credible sources.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:54 PM
2

IUDs are 99% effective and the hormonal ones actually have beneficial side effects. You do realize that Medicare and Medicaid are literally there to help specifically young single women who otherwise can’t afford much birth control, right? All they have to do is ask a professional who is paid to be sympathetic to their situation.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:51 PM
2

Yeah sure. We’re talking sources, and now you wanna say planned parenthood doesn’t know what they’re talking about because they’re closing clinics in states that ban most abortions? How does them closing clinics invalidate all the research they’ve done? It’s pretty clear you don’t understand much about reality if you’re constantly bringing up red herrings
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:48 PM
3

It might shock you but not all birth control has those side effects. Planned Parenthood has some good resources to get you started.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:46 PM
4

You’re talking about the pill? That’s one of the most dependent on flawed humans. Why not get something removable like an IUD, which according to planned parenthood is over 99% effective, can actually make your periods lighter and less painful, and is covered completely under most healthcare plans and Medicare. Why wouldn’t you use multiple forms at once if you’re so worried?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:44 PM
2

Sure. I’m sure planned parenthood is totally inexperienced in birth control and helping women. Right.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:40 PM
6

It’s also a diaphragm, male and female condoms (before today I didn’t know there were female condoms) and they cost between 0-250 bucks if your insurance plan doesn’t cover it, which most insurance plans are required to by law, per planned parenthood And according to the same clinic, there are at least four temporary methods of birth control over 99% effective, you still really wanna argue that, huh?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:39 PM
2

Okay, let me rephrase something I thought was obvious. The hormonal side effects of non-hormonal birth control are statistically negligible. Happy?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:34 PM
4

It’s 99% and 1%. Given the population of America, which I’m assuming you’re referring to since you seem to think the women are catapulted back to the dark ages, that’s about 3.29 million people.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:33 PM
3

It’d shock you to know that one anecdote does not disprove anything.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:31 PM
2

“I’m not a misandrist” immediately assumes my sex life because she hates that I use facts and not feelings
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:30 PM
3

Men are already obligated to pay child support. That’s completely irrelevant. Who the heck said I get mad? Again, QUOTING someone ELSE here, do you not know what that means? And no, it’s a less than 1/100 chance of getting pregnant, so you know how percentages work? Sounds like you just want a bunch of excuses to leech off a man. Unplanned pregnancies happen because someone wasn’t responsible with their birth control, you should know this by now. But it doesn’t fit your agenda. So of course you’…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:29 PM
3

Nope, doesn’t. Non-hormonal birth control has no statistically significant hormonal side effects. Because it doesn’t deal in hormones. You’re a nurse. You’re not supposed to be this dumb.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:24 PM
3

Sure. I’m the toxic one, when you go to hunt down all of my comments in this thread just to call me names because you don’t know how to use facts in any argument. Whatever. My girlfriend will get a big laugh out of this one.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:23 PM
2

And now the thin veil comes off the misandry. I never said there are no unplanned pregnancies. But of course that’s what you read, because you wanted to read it. I quoted a midwife, and SHE said there are no excuses for unplanned pregnancies. Every single one is due to one or the other partner not taking proper precautions with birth control. And of course you decide that because you’re a nurse, and you see a disproportionate number of accidental pregnancies, that therefore this must mean that t…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:22 PM
5

Sure. Go ahead and assume my gender, meanwhile completely ignoring the existence of non-hormonal birth control like a cap, spermicide, male and female condoms, etc. None of which have the side effects you’re claiming. And of course you must know everything about all birth control because you’ve taken some birth control. You’d much rather have your agenda and be a victim than have the truth and actual freedom, because that would mean taking responsibility for your actions. Again, to quote a midwi…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:04 PM
5

You do realize that it’s all over 99% effective and that the majority of birth control has exactly zero side effects, right? But no that’s just too inconvenient to admit, you’d much rather bring up anecdotal edge cases and pretend like it’s the norm, huh?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:44 PM
6

Yeah sure. Whatever. You can just ignore that most birth control costs next to nothing and protest with a $30 dollar a month thing like it’s expensive. You can’t find a phone bill that’s that cheap, 30 buck is extremely inexpensive even if no birth control costed less. But luckily, most birth control is extremely cheap. And available literally everywhere. Oh and guess what, there are women’s organizations giving out birth control for free. But it still doesn’t fit your narrative. Guess what, the…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:33 PM
4

Yeah lol but it’s not as good as getting to love a whole other human, but of course the top level commenter doesn’t get that lol
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:24 PM
2

Birth control is literally extremely cheap. Women have over 30 options that are all over 99% effective, but of course you like to bring up the less than 1% edge cases and pretend that they are the norm. Men have like one option for birth control but it’s still completely effective, provided she doesn’t sabotage it. Birth control costs literal cents and you’re over here making excuses pretending that it’s too expensive and not available to everyone. The reality is that the facts of how ridiculous…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:21 PM
6

You do realize that birth control is a thing right?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:14 PM
15

Clearly you’ve never seen the original mulan or beauty and the beast lmao
/r/MensRights30/07/22 11:33 AM
-1

Nope, just someone who happens to know the facts. You might try it sometime. Works much better than making assertions that fly in the face of reality and then insulting anyone who dares have an informed opinion.
/r/AntiFeminists28/07/22 04:54 AM
0

Reddit is privately owned, as is twitter, Facebook, YouTube, etc. This protects them from the laws restricting the government. Reddit and other platforms are not legally obligated to allow free speech. They are absolutely not public platforms. This has been argued in court. You really should do more research before assuming.
/r/AntiFeminists28/07/22 04:53 AM
-2

Again, incorrect. Reddit isn’t a public forum, which is why it has site wide rules, like Facebook and Twitter. Failure to censor usernames when posting feminist comments here is asking for brigading. Which violates this subreddit’s rules, as well as Reddit’s rules at large. The mods and admins have been clear on this time and time again. Downvote me all you want, still won’t change reality.
/r/AntiFeminists28/07/22 04:25 AM
0

Because everyone does. Feminists are the ones arguing against protecting people. Why would we adopt the same stance?
/r/AntiFeminists28/07/22 03:49 AM
0

Bruh. OP. Censor your screenshots to protect usernames
/r/AntiFeminists27/07/22 11:55 PM
18

Meh it can make a funny joke in the right context and with the right people, let’s stick to the ones who use it unironically
/r/MensRights27/07/22 06:05 AM
2

Nah that just means you’re a modern person lol
/r/MensRights26/07/22 09:31 PM
7

I lurk here because it’s a source of useful research sources, content creators I would’ve otherwise never found, and good logical arguments to refute the many feminist talking points that are thrown at me day to day. It helps remind me of what’s going on that never gets talked about
/r/MensRights26/07/22 04:39 PM
6

oof
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/22 06:23 AM
3

That’s an exceedingly good idea. I might just do that
/r/MensRights24/07/22 09:15 AM
30

Wow this book is amazing. I wanna buy it Edit: found it but geez it’s spendy Same price on Amazon
/r/MensRights23/07/22 05:53 PM
2

Straight to jail
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/22 07:44 PM
0

Considering it’s in the freaking title, that’s a dumb assumption to make, since it’s directly against what OP said in the actual freaking title.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/22 02:31 PM
1

Here in this episode of You Completely Missed The Point we have a random redditor who thinks that simply posting in here is the reason OP got banned!
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/22 02:20 PM
2

Musta been too unpopular lmao
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/22 02:17 PM
18

Jordan Peterson put it this way, it’s an excellent analogy. Let’s say that some random man off the street decides to pick a fight with Mike Tyson (or any top tier boxer/fighter known to you and the other person you’re talking to). He starts punching Mike out of nowhere. Mike tried to restrain him but the man will not stop. So Mike beats the guy up. Who exactly is gonna be sympathetic to the random guy? He was physically weak. He absolutely should not have picked that fight. He paid the price. Ev…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/22 02:15 PM
2

Holy cow that’s expensive
/r/MenSupportMen20/07/22 09:30 PM
4

I could see maybe it happening in an open marriage, just playing devils advocate. But on the whole I think the distinction needs to be legally made because intent Carrie’s weight in court. Manslaughter (accidentally killing someone) is not the same thing as premeditated murder. Although the majority of cases may in fact be intentional, we should account for all possibilities. Accidentally defrauding someone should carry consequences, but it’s definitely not as bad as intentional deception. Inten…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 07:02 PM
43

You sound fun at parties
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:54 AM
1

I think she was looking for someone to get mad at, and you just conveniently came along to be her hapless victim.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:10 AM
1

So get out there and do something about it, run for office, start a rally, stop whining on the internet begging for the attention your mom never gave you. Oh wait, that would be too sensible.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:19 PM
1

Yeah if you hate America, go live in the Middle East or something and join them. We have too many people who aren’t even remotely grateful for the things and freedoms they still have, that their ancestors fought for, and so far deceived that they don’t even know current events from an objective standpoint. Don’t like America? Go move somewhere else, like North Korea or Russia. They hate America too there. Vote with your feet.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:13 PM
5

This is funny because you think that people have abortion on their mind at any given time.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 02:49 PM
3

So much copy-pasta. So lazy. You’ve used the exact same comment with the exact same typos like five times now. At least check your spelling if you copy and paste all your comments.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 02:23 PM
8

So a person in a coma has no will either, and can therefore be killed without consequences?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 02:17 PM
11

Bruh the Supreme Court made a national ban on abortion impossible. They barred the feds from legislating on it. Whoever is crazy enough to talk about that hasn’t read the actual opinion.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 02:10 PM
10

This is encouraging after running into so many Reddit feminists, one said “I dare you to say we live in a matriarchy, I fucking dare you, make my day” and they all get very discouraging after a while
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:19 AM
19

I’m not sure, could be Russia, could be just about any other country, like India, the UK, any Scandinavian or any Middle East country, you name it.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:17 AM
2

Yah ain’t judges great? It’s their job to make sure justice is served but they don’t give a shit In most cases I’d agree with you, but in this one area I have to point out that the situation is not as you seem to think it is. The judges are actually less powerful than the prosecution in our courts, so in over 95% of the cases we process each year, the judge’s hands are tied, and it’s all the prosecutor’s show from beginning to end. That’s done through a process known as plea bargaining, wherein …
/r/MensRights15/07/22 07:02 PM
3

Erm… what father?
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 09:41 PM
3

Hey if you wanna troll, at least be mildly creative about it. Take some pride in your work lol
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 07:10 PM
58

Ultimate chad
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 07:01 PM
9

Geez, no need to go into so much detail about what you see in the mirror every morning
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 06:55 PM
4

So privileged that they have 37 different forms of birth control, all of which are 99% effective bare minimum. There’s no excuse for an unexpected pregnancy unless the woman is being extremely irresponsible.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 03:36 PM
-7

If he forgives the money it makes him look better too
/r/MensRights14/07/22 03:10 AM
5

In a freakin heartbeat, but in theory we already have that. It’s supposed to be the 14th amendment. The problem is the enforcement of such laws. They’ve ended up adding gender quotas in fields that are one sided in which gender likes or chooses to work there, resulting in many fields a shortage of men, which is regarded as fine, and other fields have a shortage of women which is apparently the worst evil in the world. So when a woman applies for those positions, companies fall all over themselve…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 05:07 PM
0

We don’t need to do that here. We need to take the stand for what’s right, not for what will just be the inverse of feminism. That’s never gonna help anyone who’s hurting.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 02:24 PM
2

I’m trying lmao but I lost my voice, now what?
/r/MensRights10/07/22 11:16 PM
24

Nope, never believe all anybody. You should have to prove things in order to have any court (even the court of public opinion) rule in your favor. How about we go back to “innocent until proven guilty” huh?
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:22 PM
2

I believe these studies were done in two parent households. I haven’t got time to check all over again, but I’ve seen these studies before and the same issue came up last time, and I found that they were looking at households where both parents were significantly involved in the child’s life, i.e. both parents had more access than simply visitation. Hope that helps.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:17 PM
1

It’s not moral, really. Its pretty separate from morality. It’s a fair concept, but I prefer to live a life of generosity. I don’t support people because they supported me, I support people because I want them to succeed. If everyone who was unsupported in their life stopped supporting others, eventually nobody would support anyone at all. True maturity in my belief? Doing for others what you wish had been done for you when you were in their spot.
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 04:02 PM
2

Ack, I had my comment typed out and accidentally canceled it (on mobile over here). Let’s start again, sigh. Okay. So almost all western countries operate on a legal principle dating back to the 1800s or earlier, known as ‘innocent until proven guilty’ in general. These are the legal courts. The court of public opinion runs on ‘guilty until proven guilty even if proven innocent’. I’ll address that in a second. For now, let’s stay in the court of law. There are two types of rape cases. Those that…
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 03:17 PM
14

And that doesn’t account for the cases that were never taken to court, but tried in the court of public opinion.
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 02:25 PM
2

Lol, it’s okay, just post some cute pet pictures to r/aww and there you go. Karma isn’t super hard to get. Everyone loves cute animals, myself included
/r/MensRights06/07/22 10:09 PM
2

That’s why you make burner accounts to make dumbass posts like this lol. Excellent information source, terrible karma source. But joking aside, it’s probably the best way to get information out of people on the internet these days, telling them they are wrong. And I fall to it as well, not like I’m the exception. I do find human nature entertaining at times though lol
/r/MensRights06/07/22 10:02 PM
5

I think this was actually a genius way to ask for information about circumcision because if this was an anti circumcision or neutral post, half of y’all wouldn’t have composed essays lmao
/r/MensRights06/07/22 09:56 PM
2

The feminist trolls are strong in this comment section
/r/AntiFeminists05/07/22 11:44 PM
5

Oooh go get ‘em! Teach em a lesson!
/r/AntiFeminists05/07/22 11:44 PM
13

We’d appreciate y’all speaking up, then, the silent majority has been a lil too silent, unfortunately. Not you specifically, but if they don’t represent y’all, then it would be great to hear people who speak out against them, ya know?
/r/AntiFeminists05/07/22 11:36 PM
7

I would say the soldiers were very noble. The problems were with the ones who gave the orders, not the ones forced to carry out the orders
/r/MensRights03/07/22 01:08 PM
0

I agree let’s just nuke Russia, which would start world war three thanks to alliances and the assurance of mutual destruction, end humanity, and start over lmao
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:49 PM
8

gottem
/r/MensRights30/06/22 05:07 AM
10

Never thought I’d hardcore agree with a hardcore feminist lol Take my upvote
/r/MensRights30/06/22 05:03 AM
10

You should look at this comment
/r/MensRights29/06/22 05:54 PM
2

Does anyone wanna do it? The old KS?
/r/MensRights29/06/22 05:51 PM
10

Found the twox troll
/r/MensRights29/06/22 05:50 PM
1

So if there were allowances for rape, incest, and financial issues, would you be okay with restrictions on abortions?
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 01:35 AM
1

Fellow pilot here. That’s hilarious.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 09:56 PM
17

Not men, apparently lol
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:51 PM
15

Username checks out lmao
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:50 PM
1

Sure. Don’t believe someone who went to law school. Whatever. Here, if you really want to study, look at Marbury V Madison which is the origin of the idea of judicial review. That’s the basic concept I attempted to break down in detail for you. But there, do your own homework.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:44 PM
1

It pretty much does. I completely understand where you’re coming from, but that’s not how constitutional matters work. Allow me to explain. The law that was challenged was a state law in violation of the already existing federal laws. A state passed it arguably in an attempt to get it sued and taken to the Supreme Court. The state law won. Here’s the thing about constitutional power. The government is explicitly limited to the powers given it by the constitution itself. The national government c…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 05:23 PM
5

Yeah I got banned there too, they have like someone who’s watching the sub and waiting to ban people lol
/r/MensRights25/06/22 04:32 PM
1

*cannot. The whole point of the ruling is that congress cannot touch the topic. Only states can.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:31 AM
1

All the laws in the works that ban abortions have specific provisions for just those situations. They cover incest, rape, risk to the mother, and some of them even allow it if the parents are financially unable to provide. The bans target the 90%+ of abortions that are purely elective. Abortion is not contraception and should not be treated as such.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:22 AM
1

One small point of issue. Can’t be done nationally, just at the state level. That’s what this decision bars. The federal government cannot legislate in favor of or against abortion. The only thing to do that on a national level is a constitutional amendment. And I seriously doubt either side can get a ⅔ majority on any side of the issue. I think abortion is horrible. But I agree it needs to be handled at the state level. The federal government must get its hands out of this. Each state should do…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:13 AM
1

Apparently, according to Google, aborted fetuses are/were harvested for organs that got trafficked on the black market if you’re interested in reading about it.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:53 AM
0

Mods take a VERY hands off stance. They only really come out of the woodwork when Reddit notices a post and the feminists try to get us banned again. Regardless, it’s a necessary discussion to have, regardless of your stance, so hey I personally don’t have a problem with it remaining.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:50 AM
1

Okay but like what is a woman
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:46 AM
1

Zilch
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:35 AM
1

Now, the question is bigger. What is a person?
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:34 AM
3

I mean I was told “no uterus, no opinion” soooo I don’t really have an opinion cause uh, no uterus.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:22 AM
4

Agreed.
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/22 08:40 PM
10

Ooooh shoot, he can’t argue with a black man
/r/MensRights20/06/22 08:49 PM
-3

Y’all. It’s a one word comment asking for clarification. Come on, I know this account is usually a feminist troll account, but we don’t gotta be so trigger happy with the downvote button that even one word comments get nuked. If they’re up for genuinely encountering new information, then good on them. A lot of the downvotes were well earned. This is, after all, a feminist troll. But not this time.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 10:13 AM
5

We absolutely need more feminists like you, but I don’t think you’re as close to the “original” feminists as you might think. Many of them believed that men should be reduced to and maintained at 10% of the population. However, this is a good thing, if you’re seeking to distance yourself from horrible people. Just maybe don’t glamorize the “og feminists” and perhaps just say we’re starting anew? Fresh starts are always great, let’s just throw away the mistakes we made after we learn from them, a…
/r/MensRights19/06/22 10:07 AM
16

They think the “poisoned skittle or M&M” argument is horrible when trump uses it, but turn around and use it to overgeneralize men lol
/r/MensRights19/06/22 10:02 AM
82

Huh, one of the top comments is saying how “male teacher privilege” exists lol
/r/MensRights16/06/22 03:07 AM
14

You might also like r/egalitarianism
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 06:14 AM
5

Look the meme isn’t wrong, per se, but you really should have put at least some effort into making it funny or witty
/r/AntiFeminists10/06/22 07:14 PM
5

Here for the obligatory “that’s because it took 15 men to do anything with her” cringe but all too hilarious jokes
/r/PussyPass10/06/22 09:20 AM
8

Women like you give me hope for this world.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 09:16 AM
7

I always tell anyone that I can that pick-me isn’t an insult. Sure, they wanted it to be one, but guess who gets picked for relationships and not casual sex? The pick-me’s. I just tell them to laugh from the window of their husband’s mansion then get back to their happy family lol
/r/MensRights10/06/22 09:15 AM
6

Heh. Just laugh at them out the window of your husband’s mansion
/r/MensRights10/06/22 09:13 AM
3

Was initially gonna downvote because at first glance it looked like another feminist troll, but this is more or less a genuine question, so I removed it. Take my updoot instead
/r/MensRights10/06/22 09:11 AM
4

“So I supposed to settle for like an average type dude?” Good God, average at best, meet below average at best
/r/MensRights10/06/22 09:10 AM
1

No, it highlights nothing. Do you even know what a post being “locked” means? Locked means you can’t comment. Locked can only happen after comments are posted, because no comment can be made after a post is locked. This post is not locked, as you claim, because you can and have on multiple occasions commented. That makes the claim it was locked before you commented completely false. Your comments are badmouthing the mods. You’re ascribing motive. You assume you know why they deleted your post. Y…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:41 PM
1

No, you don’t. And no, they aren’t obligated to explain every little thing they do, because surprise surprise, they’re volunteers. Not paid staff. I seriously doubt you understand where they’re coming from, given your multiple toxic comments calling the mods cowards, corrupt, horrible, and assuming their motives. Those are not the words of someone interested in a rational discussion or understanding of an alternative viewpoint. You straight up badmouthed them, are shocked when they locked the po…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:35 PM
1

Looking at your comments, I’m not surprised it was locked, geez
/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:23 PM
1

It says your title
/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:19 PM
1

I scrolled through like 15 comments and in all of them, you were badmouthing the mods. You have such a problem with them, why not message them instead of going around screaming about how horrible they are to everyone except the mods, trying to break up the community. You don’t seem to understand the difference between badmouthing and being critical. So I’ll explain it for you. Being critical means that you don’t always agree with what the mods do, but you communicate that to them, and you give t…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:18 PM
1

This post isn’t locked
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:58 PM
1

Hmm. I don’t see that, but sure I’ll take you at your word for it. But you’re in literally every single comment badmouthing the mods and ascribing intentions to them. You do realize that’s disingenuous, right?
/r/MensRights07/06/22 08:04 PM
2

Yeah lol, definitely not a perfect community over here. Recently I’ve seen a significant uptick in people posting screenshots of their bans, displaying them like trophies. One was talking about “here’s another one to add to my collection” and several others were saying the same thing in different words. I’m not really okay with that, and I’ve been thinking about making a post regarding it, but I think I’ll want to talk to the mods first (not this sub). It’s not really something that will be popu…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 05:04 PM
2

Oh yeah. Usually I just disengage when they start throwing person insults and attacks. I can’t link it here, but if you look at my comment history, you’ll see the… interesting… discussion I got in with one such person on r/antifeminists I just don’t like double standards, regardless of whether or not they happen to agree with me. Edit: don’t comment on it if you find it, cause that technically counts as brigading and the mods will absolutely be mad about that
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:52 PM
0

It almost certainly got removed by admins, not mods. These mods don’t remove much of anything, I’ve known that from extensive personal experience. The admins, on the other hand, are very alive to whatever the alphabet community deems offensive that day, and have clearly been shown to be so. Unless you can prove it was mods, and not admins, you really don’t have a leg o stand on here
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:47 PM
2

I think you have a good point. I can’t tell you the number of times that I’ve been called a feminist because I don’t think that going to a feminist sub, posting something intentionally triggering, getting banned for trying to start a fight, then saying “look how horrible they are, they banned me” is a good thing to do lol
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:42 PM
3

Everyone agrees trolling should be banned. Problem is, nobody can agree on a definition of trolling lol
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:40 PM
-1

Sure. Keep acting like the feminists. You’ll make it harder for us to actually fight for men, but hey you had your little squabbles, that’s what really matters
/r/AntiFeminists07/06/22 03:57 AM
-1

No, you can’t go poking an elephant and then crying victim when the elephant gets mad. You don’t seem to realize this isn’t about the veracity of your statements. So let me reiterate. It DOESN’T matter if it’s factual or not, it’s about the intent to trigger people. It may seem factual to you, but guess what? Their viewpoint is factual to them. Yours is not, or they would agree with them. I don’t know in what world Reddit started thinking that starting fights was the same thing as having healthy…
/r/AntiFeminists07/06/22 03:45 AM
0

It’s not about factual or non factual. The intent is still to provoke. That can and will get us permanently shut down. To suggest that “it’s not brigading, it’s posting facts” is a disingenuous argument, because you’re presenting things you see as factual that you know they will never believe. You’re just there to start a fight. You’re acting exactly like those women who slap a man and then act surprised when he slaps back. The sheer astonishment they show that a deliberate attempt to provoke a …
/r/AntiFeminists07/06/22 03:22 AM
1

Let’s not encourage brigading
/r/AntiFeminists06/06/22 12:59 PM
1

Yeah the last one was 29 years ago and it’s been illegal for like 60 years
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 05:09 PM
3

Nope lol
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 02:04 PM
12

Summoning u/deleted cause I wanna hear his thoughts on this Edit: apparently he’s not on Reddit anymore But come on. India is so rife with corruption and violence, the feminists then simply pile on top of it and do zilch to stop actual violence, even encouraging it against men. Men can be jailed with a simple false allegation, no evidence needed. Only the word of a woman. That’s quantifiable worse than the US and other western countries. Men here may have their lives destroyed, but at least they…
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 01:51 PM
19

I mean it’s not hard to find, here you go, I tracked it down for ya: “Editor’s note, June 2, 2022: In 2019, Johnny Depp sued Amber Heard for defamation arising out of this 2018 op-ed. On June 1, 2022, following a trial in Fairfax County, Va. Circuit Court, a jury found Heard liable on three counts for the following statements, which Depp claimed were false and defamatory: (1) “I spoke up against sexual violence — and faced our culture’s wrath. That has to change.” (2) “Then two years ago, I beca…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 05:47 PM
17

For those curious, this is the editors note they added: “Editor’s note, June 2, 2022: In 2019, Johnny Depp sued Amber Heard for defamation arising out of this 2018 op-ed. On June 1, 2022, following a trial in Fairfax County, Va. Circuit Court, a jury found Heard liable on three counts for the following statements, which Depp claimed were false and defamatory: (1) “I spoke up against sexual violence — and faced our culture’s wrath. That has to change.” (2) “Then two years ago, I became a public f…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 05:46 PM
4

Username definitely checks out
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/22 05:11 PM
1

Chad move lmao
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/22 05:10 PM
6

Okay, but it’s still reasonable to ask for you to link evidence. You yourself can say anything, but if you have the proof to back it up, that’s way better
/r/MensRights03/06/22 04:40 PM
13

This study shows how women have a very high in-group bias, whereas men do not. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165176519303428 From the abstract: “Our results suggest that women (female recruiters or firms with a high share of female employees) favor women in the recruitment process. In contrast, we do not find much evidence that men (male recruiters or firms with a high share of male employees) favor men.” So does this study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/ Fro…
/r/MensRights03/06/22 04:39 PM
4

While I agree that saying “it’s feminism’s fault” won’t help OP at all, I do think it’s important to realize and acknowledge that we got to where we are. I think acknowledging that feminism is the primary force behind this push is important, because refusing to acknowledge that feminism is largely responsible for this is essentially blaming the person who is pretty much a victim of circumstances for their position. And that’s only going to make things worse. However, where I agree with you is th…
/r/MensRights03/06/22 03:14 AM
2

I personally prefer the term “sexual marketplace value”
/r/MensRights01/06/22 02:32 PM
1

Good for you, unfortunately she has made her choice, now she needs to lie in the bed she made. That’s her choice. She’s not interested in taking any responsibility for anything, and she is still blaming you for everything. That’s not something you can fix, so there’s no point in trying. And really, trying to help her will only convince her of how right she was to leave you, it’s truly screwed up.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 02:24 PM
2

I mean if the daughter agrees to it, then it might be good
/r/MensRights01/06/22 02:21 PM
3

She must be in Egypt, because it sounds like she is up to her eyeballs in “Da Nile” lol
/r/MensRights01/06/22 02:18 PM
4

Let’s take that as factual. I saw a source the other day rebutting that same claim, but I can’t find it either. So for the sake of argument, let’s pretend we don’t disagree and that we both know for a 100% FACT that men leave their sick spouses at a… I think you said 7x rate? Yeah. But given the additional fact that women initiate over 80% of all divorces, sometimes for just about no reason at all (that they’ll publicly say anyway) thanks to no-fault divorce, that kinda makes it way more importa…
/r/MensRights31/05/22 06:16 PM
20

Over 80% of all divorces are initiated by women, up from 60% a decade or so ago. Men aren’t more likely to end the relationship period.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 03:17 PM
4

The pressure cooker bomb was already done
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 04:56 PM
4

This comment is gold, I’m saving it
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/05/22 07:45 AM
5

This is true! So the disciples cramming all into one accord (Acts 2:1 “they were all in one Accord in one place”) was just to show off their sheer power and talent of cramming into one car, amazing discovery!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/05/22 05:48 AM
19

And all the biblical disciples were all in one accord, so those things can haul a lot of people, considering there were like 12 of them /s
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/05/22 05:14 AM
3

Bruh don’t troll or brigade
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/22 09:14 PM
2

Did you miss the term “baby-trapping”?
/r/MensRights28/05/22 04:54 PM
1

No, because the man has no choices after inserting his member into her, his control ends there, resulting in many women who attempt to baby trap their man, i.e. lock him down by forcing him to be a father, and the man just runs. If the man isn’t worth marrying, don’t have a kid with him.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 04:24 PM
3

I’m gonna let OP explain that one. Point is, stop assuming just because she got in that it means they let her in. That’s really not a reasonable explanation.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 02:16 PM
4

Truer words were never said. Blood can sometimes mean less than nothing. It’s all good, though, it’s easy to assume, I’m just trying to help others avoid the pitfalls I’ve fallen into of assuming it’s always the woman’s fault, or being too quick to condemn the woman, because it feels like society does that to men. But I learned the hard way that doing to women what feminism has done to men is the worst way to go about it. We can’t compromise, and we have to uphold actual equality of opportunity.…
/r/MensRights28/05/22 06:12 AM
8

I was gonna answer you but OP already did. Here’s the thing though. Don’t be so quick to fault the GF. Just because she had the poor luck to be distantly related to the psychopath doesn’t mean she has any control of her. Given her extreme displeasure at that cousin showing up, and how the cousin berated the GF too, there’s no reason to assume she was in control of the situation.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 04:28 AM
24

The GF isn’t friends with this cousin, it’s fairly clear from the post
/r/MensRights28/05/22 03:05 AM
22

I don’t think it’s her fault. She can’t control her cousin.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 03:00 AM
4

Hardly a disappointment lol, Johnny & co need all the help they can get
/r/MensRights27/05/22 10:04 PM
5

A better case for homeschooling was never made than today’s school system
/r/MensRights27/05/22 06:35 PM
10

Please do NOT go and brigade them. That won’t help anyone.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 04:29 PM
1

Wary, maybe, but not hateful. There’s a difference. She was hateful. And really that would only be a temporary thing until my therapist helped me out with my trauma, unlike the feminist who thought she didn’t need a therapist to heal the trauma, and left it to fester. Trauma makes you pick dates from the opposite gender that are far more likely to hurt you, further increasing your trauma. It’s called trauma-bonding. How do you break that? Therapy. They need to go to therapy to get their mental i…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 04:02 PM
14

That is also a very entertaining sub lol
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 03:57 PM
1

You do realize that condescending, according to the Merriam Webster dictionary, means “showing or characterized by a patronizing or superior attitude toward others” and you were SHOWING a superior attitude towards the OP. I was referencing the tone of your comment, but I can’t believe that you think that me calling your tone condescending means I somehow think you’re intelligent? Do you even know English? I don’t know who you think died and made you king, but you’re making them look really bad.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 03:56 PM
1

So not only do you pretend to be smart and act horribly condescending to everyone you deem dumber than you (which is everyone according to you), your reading comprehension is also awful. The only thing I ever pointed out was that you were being horribly rude and condescending to OP, while saying how condescending she was. I never brought up how smart you think you are, you called yourself superior all on your own. All you did was prove how actually dense you are with your replies. Pride goes bef…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 02:58 PM
37

I believe the sub you’re looking for is r/nicegirls
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 02:24 PM
4

An old way of referring people who do the name calling, slander, etc.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 11:55 PM
6

I mean, the way I always tell women to deal with it is to take it as a compliment. Because guess who gets picked for relationships? Pick-me women lol And they all tell me it works. It usually takes the mudslingers a while to figure it out, if they ever do. Meanwhile you’ll be laughing from your mansion with your family by your side
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 11:49 PM
3

You know, C.S. Lewis once said: “A man is not usually called upon to have an opinion of his own talents at all, since he can very well go on improving them to the best of his ability without deciding on his own precise niche in the temple of Fame... [Man] did not create themselves... their talents were given them, and they might as well be proud of the colour of their hair.” He also once said: “A proud man is always looking down on things and people; and, of course, as long as you are looking do…
/r/MensRights25/05/22 08:57 PM
3

“Don’t be condescending” they said as condescendingly as possible
/r/MensRights25/05/22 04:35 PM
6

We have cookies
/r/MensRights25/05/22 04:33 PM
3

And a feminist was just telling me yesterday how feminists aren’t allowed here and how her hatred of men was “a normal perspective”. Ironic lol
/r/MensRights25/05/22 04:32 PM
2

Lemme see how this sounds: “99% of black people have treated me and other white people terribly, so now I never trust any black people.” You start to see how that sounds? Or do you just not care and embrace your sexism? What you need is therapy, not embracing sexism. Edit: and apparently Reddit admins actually agree with me, because I reported the above comment to see if it fit the definition of hate speech by admin’s standards (not the mods of this sub, the site wide admins) and I got a message…
/r/MensRights24/05/22 09:24 PM
5

repeats points instead of refuting anything You do realize your experience is subjective and not the absolute truth right? Also what you call reasonable consists mostly of man-bashing, based on your posts, which is definitely not normal.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 04:02 PM
8

I know several reasonable feminists here who are highly upvoted because they’re interested in understanding things and furthering collective knowledge, not ad hominem attacks like you. But yes, the place that doesn’t ban people of the opposite viewpoint is an echo chamber, never mind that feminist subreddits ban you for even slightly disagreeing with the current narrative.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 11:23 AM
9

It’s ironic. girls massively failing in school as a demographic “the system is biased against them! Change the system!” boys massively failing in school as a demographic “lmao they must be stupid”
/r/MensRights24/05/22 11:19 AM
-4

Got downvoted to hell for saying something pretty mundane lol Reddit moment
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:40 AM
5

Not sure why you got downvoted lol, that’s the truth. Gynocentricism is deeply biological, and to some extent, necessary for society to function. Now before y’all downvote me, hear me out. Why? For the simple reason that if the human species was reduced to 100 men and one woman in a theoretical scenario, it would be doomed, whereas if the species was reduced to 100 women and one man, it would have recovered a population out of the extinction danger zone in a few generations. Men can spread their…
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:38 AM
5

Nah fam, genuine learning is welcome here! If you disagree there might be some fierce debate, but that should be it as long as you avoid ad hominem attacks.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 09:09 PM
26

I’m really hesitant to use the word ‘incel’ about anyone now, given feminism’s vast overuse of the term, and the term has effectively lost all meaning
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/22 05:50 PM
10

Look, this is a pretty old example, and not really a good one. A much better one is where the mom was given custody despite social worker’s concerns that were registered in court, and then she murdered her son. This is not really as clearcut, and doesn’t really give the message the title of the article says. It’s misleading, and it does us no good to mislead anyone
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/22 05:25 PM
10

heffalumps Good name for them, I’m gonna steal that lol
/r/MensRights22/05/22 06:31 PM
1

That’s exactly what I was saying the whole time. Did you not read it? Society, men AND women, prioritize women. Women prioritize women. Men prioritize women. That was my entire point, that acting like it was only women prioritizing women is to put a bandaid over a stab wound. The problem is deeper than just women.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 05:02 AM
0

Yeah, but I’m really not sure I could dig them up, it’s been a hot minute.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 11:43 PM
1

in your ideal society Did you miss that part in your eagerness to incorrect me?
/r/MensRights21/05/22 11:42 PM
2

Thanks! Get some sleep, sleep well!
/r/MensRights21/05/22 09:02 PM
1

I’m curious to see what you think of my comment on the topic, and hopefully I clarified it pretty well
/r/MensRights21/05/22 08:20 PM
3

I think you’re confusing the fact that society at large pretty much exclusively reserved sympathy for the female gender, while denying it to the male gender, with women’s general treatment you’ve seen and experienced. That’s extremely understandable, but it’s an important distinction that you really might want to rectify. Society at large (i.e. men and women both) sympathize almost exclusively with women. This is an issue known as an empathy gap which is a major problem. I have two issues with y…
/r/MensRights21/05/22 08:16 PM
10

He lost overseas because the judge is friends with Amber. That judge should have recused himself but he didn’t.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 07:33 PM
1

Fuck you asshole Please don’t, that would constitute sexual assault. Don’t conflate disagreement with attraction lol Edit: hahahaha I reported this genius to Reddit and they took disciplinary action actually quite promptly. Good for them for once.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 07:32 PM
5

I mean I think abusive people have a high correlation rate with feminist beliefs, but to say that all abusers are feminists is a stretch indeed lol. One doesn’t need to be feminist to be an abuser. And abusers can change, my dad is living proof of it. Generally it seems feminists are less open to change than your average abusers, ironically. But that’s never gonna be an excuse to treat feminists as subhuman.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 07:30 PM
9

Yeah, you’re gonna need better statistics. Oh and legally women still cannot rape a man because in order to have committed rape, you legally have to have a penis. So even the current statistics can’t show the full picture, but at least it’s better performed and more backed up by actual evidence than the horrendously biased and sloppy work you cited.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 02:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter