TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mynameischad01 Archive

View 5 posts and 62 comments by Mynameischad01 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Er...you haven't even mentioned the fact she was a teacher, so there's an abuse of trust and power issue here too. It's not just about the age difference, which is why in many countries teachers can't legally have sexual relationships with pupils until they're 18, no matter the age of consent (and in practice would be sacked even if they were 18 anyway).
/r/MensRights26/11/19 11:07 PM
5

The supposed issue was they didn’t have time to plan for retirement, which ideally one does across decades. Which would’ve been fine, except the policy came in in 1995. Their complaint is they weren’t personally informed of it by letter back in 95, but that’s never happened for any similar policy ever. It’s basically a flagrant attempt to whine, hand-wave, and get one final generation of UK women to unfairly get 6 years more of retirement cash than men.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 08:56 PM
36

Women would make that argument in a heartbeat if the stats were reversed.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 08:53 PM
6

The other major argument against the sentencing disparity being sexist is that, for violent men the sentence is supposedly often after multiple previous offences. This case pretty much kills off that theory.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 08:49 PM
1

I knew someone at college this happened to. Same setup, his step mum would sleep with him while his Dad was out, this was when he was a teenager. No charges ever pressed, in fact afaik he never even told his Dad, but he was a sad, confused guy, as well he might be. I had a friends mum in her 40s try and arrange a secret meeting with her when I was 17. She’d told me she liked me sexually beforehand, I was intrigued as you might be but ended up freaking out and not meeting up, thank god. She actua…
/r/MensRights22/10/19 01:02 PM
2

I don’t know in the US but this is the London Underground and I can well believe people would just eye roll and not say anything.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 06:40 AM
1

It may be they don’t have the data but I note no outlets are reporting the relative results between sexes.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 02:11 PM
3

Influential, respected female allies are vanishingly rare. 2nd wavers like Paglia need our support to be honest, although I understand your point.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 06:46 PM
1

Agree with much of this except that school was safer 100 years ago! Kids were physically and even sexually abused by teachers all the time back then.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 06:31 PM
6

Hardly surprising. She admitted to sexually assaulting her own sister for years and has faced no consequences whatsoever, either professional or legal.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 04:54 PM
6

Funnily enough if you follow the comments there’s one with loads of upvotes where people claim they’d be completely fine with it the other way round. To which I’d say: bollocks.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 09:39 PM
2

Oh totally, it’s the 200+ upvotes for people saying they wish people did this today that I’m taking issue with. Although they could be joking I guess? Sure doesn’t read like that though
/r/MensRights26/07/19 09:37 PM
5

Eh? It’s not a question of the consent (clearly the attempt to kiss is wrong here), it’s the proportion of the reaction. Where do we draw the line? If she’d killed him would that be OK? If not why not, and why is permanent facial disfigurement any more acceptable?
/r/MensRights26/07/19 09:19 PM
1

I mean physically disfiguring someone that badly 100% will scar them for life quite literally, but sure. And I’ve had women try to kiss me when I didn’t want it. Pretty sure if I’d bitten their noses off people wouldn’t have upvoted me for it on Reddit.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 08:21 PM
1

I must just come from a different planet to a lot of people. It seems wildly disproportionate to me.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 08:17 PM
3

This very study is evidence of it, in fact they state it explicitly: “The finding that IPV is more frequently perpetrated by women and is more likely to result in injury when perpetrated in the con- text of reciprocal IPV can best be understood in the context of a conflict-based theoretical model, which suggests that conflict leads to increasingly coercive interactions that may spi- ral into violence.”
/r/MensRights01/07/19 02:39 PM
2

I’m not refusing to debate male/female homicide which is why I specifically responded to it. My point was to point out the double standards of feminists when it comes to interpreting data. That’s an entirely fair, consistent and logical point and I can use DV just fine in that context. I’m not saying you necessarily should explain away Male/female homicide ratios by male physical strength. I’m simply pointing out your double standard in using your list of excuses for women murdering more childre…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:58 PM
4

You’ve already conceded elsewhere that worldwide 55% of child homicides are committed by women. So who’s the liar here?
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:52 PM
11

I didn’t say domestic homicide, I said domestic violence. Close to 40% of significant injuries are inflicted on men, and more than 50% of the time the violence is initiated by the female party incidentally. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2f5d/c513c9a2355478ef5da991e6e6aced88299c.pdf More broadly the “60/40” DV split is widely recognised even by feminists, although they (inaccurately) argue that females causing significant injuries are neglible, and that (also wrongly) women are only defending …
/r/MensRights24/12/18 12:53 PM
6

Absolutely right.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 12:46 PM
4

I agree, and have discussed in detail elsewhere on this thread. Still, this graph is in the context of a study which broadly speaking is finding in favour of the usual stats that support feminist arguments. For that reason alone it’s worth taking seriously, although one study should always be taken cautiously.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 12:45 PM
2

No probs. I’m not that experienced at starting reddit posts so (silly as it may sound) I actually don’t know how to include it on a “link” post as opposed to a text one.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 12:43 PM
3

Sure, but it’s still way disproportionate to what you’d expect even then. Any one study is to be taken cautiously, but this graph is incredibly striking nonetheless.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 12:41 PM
8

If you think the collecting methods of crime stats aren’t susceptible to political bias then you’re the naive one I’m afraid. Sure if you take the most charitable possible reading for women’s motives in committing these murders then you can hand wave them away. I wonder if you take that approach for domestic homicides by men though? In any event, in my link in Europe it’s noted 60% of women are committing child homicides. Is that also a “minuscule” difference? Because that’s the agreed male/fema…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 11:41 AM
18

I immediately posted the source which has been upvoted and is easy to find. Nobody is using the melodramatic word “conspiracy”, but I am suggesting a crime agency is going to be less used to controlling for cultural biases than scholars in an academic study. You might want to look up the definition of “neonatal” before claiming those figures include abortion (which would be utterly absurd incidentally and would quite obviously render the study completely pointless). The report is quite clear it’…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 10:17 AM
27

Yours is a bulletin by the FBI which doesn’t even (for that specific fact, along with many others) give a time range for its data. Mine is an academic study looking at a near 30-year period. And dare I suggest an FBI bulletin is going to suffer from the usual biases against men in interpretation of crime data too? The biggest metastudy of worldwide data did conclude women killed significantly more children incidentally: https://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com/content/1/1/e000112
/r/MensRights24/12/18 09:24 AM
52

Source: https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/vio.2017.0016 Page 5
/r/MensRights23/12/18 10:46 PM
20

Just so you all know, the data showing women do more work than men (when you factor in housework etc.) is complete bunkum. There's no reliable evidence for it, and the best studies show it absolutely isn't true. Source: https://imgur.com/a/hwc2YKC This is from Roy Baumeister's excellent "Is There Anything Good About Men?" which is available in its entirety here and is pretty much required reading in my view: https://gendertruce.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/baumeister-roy-is-there-anything-good-ab…
/r/MensRights23/12/18 09:30 PM
2

Cameron also announced he was standing down before the next election during his last term. Perfectly standard procedure. I’d guess she just doesn’t know a lot of politics.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 07:36 AM
2

I’ve said it my whole life - it was women who taught me they wanted me to “man up”. Not a single one of my male friends could’ve given two shits.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 07:32 AM
2

You reap what you sow.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 11:31 AM
6

It's a complete shifting of the goalposts that makes no sense, yet you see it brought up all the time. It's because they play the victim card, but when they no longer can suddenly they're not interested in any other victims.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 01:59 PM
4

It's funny, I was young but I remember the story, especially when he died so soon after being released. Something about the whole story haunts me to this day. Tragic, and the evidence against him being an attacker was so clear.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 01:57 PM
3

Most stats show assaults in a public place are significantly more likely to happen to men, and overall violent assault is roughly equal, with the most serious cases a lot more likely to happen to men.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 02:55 PM
8

37% of millennial women admit to having coerced a man into sex. The extent of female coercion is astonishing in the light of popular perception.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 09:42 PM
8

Relevant bit from the article (about 2/3rds of the way through): "As for the current industry upheavals, I ask if she expected to live through the #MeToo movement in her lifetime. There is the longest silence. Then she says quietly, “I think I was really ignorant of what was happening. I have always been a really strong, forthright woman and never considered myself any less than a man, and that’s not out of arrogance. I think that’s just because I was brought up by two nice parents. So I just ha…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:18 AM
8

Imagine a male director who's first directed a girl age 7 then kept in touch until she was 17, then had sex with her in a country/state where she was still a minor, and he was in his late 30s. He'd be crucified and you know it.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 12:39 PM
3

The point is you could say the same thing about any number of similar cases with the genders reversed, but men are never given the benefit of the doubt. Why should we be any more nuanced about this than the multiple men who's careers have now ended? #metoo set the rules and now must live by them.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 12:37 PM
1

They're both feminist issues, and the Guardian is the leading pro-feminist broadsheet in the UK? The point is the Argento story is massive news but because it doesn't suit their agenda they're ignoring it. Instead we're getting articles with no particular immediate relevance at all. For comparison, when a well-known male figure was accused of sexual harassment, let alone rape of a minor, there'd average at least 2-3 columns by major Guardian writers on it.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 06:02 PM
2

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/feb/21/us-more-men-raped-than-women Decent place to start.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 09:26 PM
4

Wow that's an incredible one. Is there a source, just so I can quote/link to it in future?
/r/MensRights23/08/18 09:15 PM
2

I mean there are legally several different types of murder, and that's a significantly more serious crime than rape. Nobody howls with outrage about that AFAIK.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:47 AM
25

"37 per cent of millennial women admitted to coercing sex" And yet it's men who're lectured endlessly on consent (literally at schools and Universities). The crazy lack of parity with reality is frightening, especially given the political push is all the other way. I'd guess that percentage is only going to go up as the sisterhood feels more and more empowered.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 12:53 PM
14

Which she starred in and directed. They met when he was 7 years old FFS. Everything about this is creepy af.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 12:41 PM
1

Right, seconded. Marriage to the right woman is actively a great thing.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:22 PM
31

This is priceless: " ‘The Pankhursts became stridently anti-male, ruthlessly dropping even the most loyal of their male supporters from the WSPU [Women’s Social and Political Union], and claiming, as Christabel did in her 1913 book The Great Scourge, that men were “little more than carriers of venereal disease”.’ Their contempt was not restricted to men. When Sylvia Pankhurst set up her East London Federation of suffragettes, which engaged in valuable social activity as well as more questionable…
/r/MensRights06/02/18 10:04 PM
1

A public bar (as opposed to private club) where men regularly put their hands up barmaids skirts couldn't even exist. The first couple of times it happened the men in question would be kicked out and probably beaten up. This happened so regularly to men in the Scottish bar that there was a news story about it.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:54 AM
7

Maybe "calling out hostile or offensive speech"? I agree with your OP, I just also agree with the poster above that "shutting down discussions" sounds a little too like what feminists do at the moment, but I don't think you meant it like that!
/r/MensRights13/01/18 07:44 PM
24

So true. Even the supposedly more nuanced attacks claim that's what he "really meant", even though he really didn't.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:26 PM
3

at least it wasn't Naomi Campbell Yet.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 05:06 PM
3

This is an amazing and very sad article. As ever, the Lady Macbeths in history are forgotten.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 11:15 PM
3

Yes he does have other conservative views, in fact his memo was only partly about gender. As much as anything it was about the culture of not being able to provide contrary points of view, hence the massive irony of the reaction. The gender bit was simply seized on by the SJWs, inevitably.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 11:04 PM
19

Eugh, I swear Ellis is the most insufferable SJW on the whole fucking internet.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 11:29 PM
1

Massive own goal by the airline. This is as absurd an overreaction as I've heard and i wouldn't go anywhere then now myself.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 01:58 PM
1

Articles like these are horrendously sexist to men and yet if we take them seriously we're told to lighten up. But at the same time we're told we're supposed to punch any man in the face who makes a rape joke or we're one of the bad guys.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 01:54 PM
4

I read the Guardian (don't hate me - it is good on everything except the insane feminazi stuff) and trust me, it's literally 0.1% of articles on gender that give the other side. Even that might be an overestimate.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 07:53 PM
3

Sounds like he got some sort of right to reply. Either way it's incredibly rare in The Guardian.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 07:52 PM
6

Which is equally offensive and equivalent to "it can't have been rape because she was wet".
/r/MensRights01/01/18 08:52 AM
4

Margaret Thatcher is the best example of this. An oft-overlooked reason why women haven't exponentially risen as fast (in job terms) in the modern era is that women who get into positions of power don't want to help younger women through the ranks, even though they'd be obvious role models and supporters.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 08:05 AM
2

Well also men aren't allowed to make rape jokes, that's part of the fictional rape culture. Simple double standard as usual.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 07:55 AM
2

Can't for the life of me understand why it was admissible in the first place. Blatant misleading should (I believe) fall at the feet of the judge.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 01:51 PM
7

It's here, the only known recording of a castrato. One of the saddest and eeriest things you'll ever hear. It doesn't sound like any other sort of voice, which is perhaps why it was so sought after.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 11:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter