This one is in favour of men's rights. They're saying 'is the tomboy aesthetic the only way that most men can explore their sexuality without being harassed and attacked for doing so?' there's no negative connotation, it's a way to start an important conversation. Besides, it isn't a statement, it's asking others if they feel this way.
Well I can see both sides, one is mad at how youth has been fetishized, the other is mad that blame is being placed on 'patriarchy' despite 100%of these costumes being bought and worn by women. these frustrations are not connected, one is targeting sexual deviancy, the other is targeting misinterpreted oppression. Y'all are shooting each other instead of the target
?? There was never anything I spoke of regarding violated rights. The statement is saying that beliefs that are not hers are inherently wrong. What are you referring to?
I can see what you mean, second-wave feminism could not have been a better step in the right direction, but it seems a better idea to approach statements on politics as agreeing with its ideology's contemporary state.
