TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mysterious-Ad5785 Archive

View 5 posts and 105 comments by Mysterious-Ad5785 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Political differences between and women are overexagerated and exacerbated buy phone and internet addiction. Hook up culture is participated in by an extremely small number of people, even less so than previous generations. Third spaces aren’t necessarily just the physical locations, but how people actually used them. Parks, libraries, malls/ arcades, designated local hangout spots, collage campuses, bars ect- are dead and people statistically don’t use these places as much as before.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 08:41 PM
1

And what social and environmental conditions have changed which have killed that effort and drive? I’m making observations on a societal level, no within individuals. This isn’t about individual effort, this is about observing things which have changed in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 08:36 PM
1

It takes two to tango. Firstly, “trying to get laid” is infinitely harder when the social and environmental conditions of that place ur in aren’t congruent to socialisation or connection with others. Theres a reason why for example people get laid more on collage campuses then after.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 08:33 PM
1

And yet their is no evidence that is actually true
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 08:29 PM
1

Like I said before I understand what she is said, is simply does not contradict anything I’m arguing, step ONE for creating emotional connection and real sexual intimacy is created real organic situation where people regularly interact and socialised with each other, which is something this society and culture has decimated
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 08:26 PM
0

I’m not saying what ur saying isn’t true, I’m simply pointed out it contradicts nothing I actually said. Again it just seem like ur going on a rant about a topic I don’t actually disagree with step ONE for creating emotional connection and real sexual intimacy is created real organic situation where people regularly interact and socialised with each other, which is something this society and culture has decimated
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 08:24 PM
3

Third spaces aren’t necessarily just the physical locations, but how people actually used them. Parks, libraries, malls/ arcades, designated local hangout spots, collage campuses, bars ect- are dead and people statistically don’t use these places as much as before.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 08:20 PM
3

Ofc attractive people can go on tinder and have sex. This is an irrelevant comment that has nothing to do with what I’m talking about. Women for the most part don’t even use dating apps no where near as much a men. Before online dating you had to be in proximity to another person already to have sex/ know them. After online dating people have to compete with not only others, but the added effort barrier of time, distance and money.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 08:17 PM
2

This sub constantly talks and discusses gender and sex issues that’s why I’m talking about it I think you are projecting a whole bunch of stuff onto my post that have nothing to do with it. I have ever suggested the cure to loneliness or whatever is to have sex with men. That is something you have purely made up and has nothing to do with any of the things I have stated. In fact, what I’m am stating is that REAL socialisation and interaction between people is what organically allows people to ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 01:47 PM
-3

I talking about people in general not you specifically. Why are you making this about you. The things you list have been true for most of human history. What have changed now ? Well it’s the things I have listed, the alternatives are easier and relationships are put in the too hard basket.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 01:44 PM
1

Yes that is literally exactly what I’m saying
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 01:34 PM
2

And your other point is my argument. Why go on a date with someone take a 30 m train ride and spend 2 hours with someone, and take the risk that it could be a bad date when you can just sit a home and watch Netflix. And it’s not like slut shaming is higher than it was in the past either
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 01:33 PM
1

But it’s not because they are making the right decisions to choose not to have sex… it’s because they are socially isolated, anxious, under socialised: these things aren’t good and it’s shortsighted to see what is happening as a good thing. Also this applies not just to teens, but to young adults who should be having fun and getting into relationships and not being shut ins
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 01:30 PM
1

The not being fat part is doing the heavy lifting here fr
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 04:30 AM
1

Could you please explain the situations 17-18 year old girls are hitting on you ?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 04:19 AM
1

Look up nuance pill, date psy blog(by Alexander), for a start
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 09:09 PM
6

The reason why posts like this are posted is because it’s a common red pill talking point. That’s the point of this sub. It’s a lie many men belive
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 07:45 AM
2

No I’m a mid twenties man
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 07:16 AM
1

Both men and women in rare circumstances can increase their attractiveness as they age. But there is a point where both just become wallets
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:56 AM
2

These are friends and extended friends. There bfs and situationships aren’t hidden
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:19 AM
1

I clearly referenced stats in my post
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:18 AM
2

Being 25 is not the same as being 30+ or 35
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:06 AM
6

Maybe in the past, but I’m in my mid twenties now and not a single woman I know is dating a man in his thirties
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:03 AM
1

Even if a man puts a lot of effort into self improvement, often times they are really just only making up for losses in looks and age with some status and wealth. So the net SMV is the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:00 AM
1

Please state what you mean don’t be vague
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 02:59 AM
2

What exactly do you mean by “interest “
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 02:55 AM
6

Men’s biological clock is young women’s preferences for age in men, you can’t out earn that
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 02:54 AM
13

Well yes it is one of the first times in recorded history where women didn’t have to rely on men for economic survival for the most part
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:31 PM
3

I was specifically using an example of someone who isn’t as conventionally attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:26 PM
12

What I’m saying is statically true and I’m also not a women so this isn’t a revenge fantasy
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 09:57 PM
21

Statistically, a 20s man is far more likely to be in a relationship with a 18- 20s woman, than a 30s man is with at sub 27 year old women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 09:56 PM
6

Lots of young men have crushes on people like gillian anderson as well. They exist in the context of the person they are talking about not necessarily their age
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 09:51 PM
9

Yeah exactly
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 09:48 PM
23

It’s been a common talking point for decades that men peak at 30-35?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 09:34 PM
2

Well if they are ignoring iois and getting rejected then that makes sense. But I’ve done this plenty of times and never have been rejected this way because I make sure to actually read the iois
/r/seduction24/05/26 10:02 PM
5

Ok a lot of you guys aren’t seeing the nuances here. Firstly you aren’t just going up to random women and doing this, they are doing this to women that give IOis . Women will put themselves in front of you in the dance floor and rub against you. Take and step back move away, dance a bit, if she moves back in front of you again then she probably wants to hook up. Bonus points for similes/ glances/ dancing together etc
/r/seduction24/05/26 09:46 PM
14

Ok a lot of you guys aren’t seeing the nuances here. Firstly you aren’t just going up to random women and doing this. Women will put themselves in front of you in the dance floor and rub against you. Take and step back move away, dance a bit, if she moves back in front of you again then she probably wants to hook up. Bonus points for similes/ glances/ dancing together etc
/r/seduction24/05/26 09:44 PM
1

Your marrying an 18 year old you have known for less than a year?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 11:38 PM
2

You aren’t even accurately interpreting the study you are referring too
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 11:22 PM
1

First of all don’t listen to the people who are telling you this shit takes years. If you are willing to put in the effort it takes months to get some real progress. But the most glaring problem I see is your attitude. You talk and talk about how impossible it is to get women. Yet you have had a gf previously, and you have detailed a total of 0 things you are doing to actually get women. All you have done is be friends with some women and expected girls to just fall in your lap. No advice is act…
/r/seduction12/04/26 01:53 AM
–

This is not true at all. Theres at least a dozen different reasons why a women either didn’t see her attacker, or may only get a vague description, or many be genuinely mistaken. The police could gather a list of suspects of men who were in the area, working around that time or whatever, from cctv ect. Form an early suspect theory based on circumstantial evidence, reputation, or witness suggestion. Present photo lineups or in-person lineups after having already implied who they think did it. Fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 03:48 AM
–

Your point about DNA exoneration is incredibly misleading and it tell me you are operating in bad faith or you don’t know what u are talking about. Misidentifications from the police are not the same as false accusations from women. Most of the DNA exonerations occur due to the the police not doing their due diligence with dna evidence. That is when the dna of the man accused is compared to the dna at the crime scene there isn’t a match. This means that there IS A REAL attacker. Just not the man…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 03:25 AM
2

I’m not evading the question if ur missing the target
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 10:59 PM
1

I never specified “good” before the personality part for a reason. Because that’s not my argument
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 10:48 PM
0

Finding a good woman is not necessarily the same as just finding sex or a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 10:34 PM
1

Because personality describes those things. Also what some random person catchphrase says changes nothing about the definition of personality or its misuse by dudes on here
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 10:06 PM
2

Ya I do. 40 year old man who thinks he’s 30 posting on ppd, goes to event alone and observes women (girls 15 years younger than him). While ur peers are dropping ur kids off at soccer practise.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 01:47 AM
4

“41 but look 30“ Sure bud. So ur a 40 y/o dude walking around Octoberfest realising that attractive women are actually hanging out with mates their own age and not sitting around waiting to be swooped up by some 40 y/o “high value male.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 09:58 PM
2

I have to too appeal to the chuds sorry
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 02:46 AM
0

Self reported data is mostly accurate. Date psychology did a long post about this I. His blog
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 02:45 AM
18

That includes having casual sex once or twice. Doing something once or twice doesn’t really reflect being into that activity. To elaborate, women regularly participating in regular or even semi regular casual sex is rare. Even one casual encounter per year for ten ish years is rare. Women could hypothetically have one attractive guy a week if they really wanted it. If women actually like causal sex they would be doing it a lot more.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 10:58 PM
10

Do u understand that any sex, even sex while in a relationship or sex with a single men can cause pregnancy right?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 10:55 PM
7

An attractive dude the puts himself out in places where women are more likely to want casual sex gets more sex? Wow amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 10:51 PM
0

Yeh I used chat to elaborate on my notes. I ain’t writing 1500 fr
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 10:50 PM
13

Not enjoying casual isn’t the same as waiting for marriage. Nice strawman
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 10:50 PM
4

Women caring about feeling safe is illogical? Lmao your off the deep end buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 10:49 PM
2

“”Many women seem to have both more sex, and sex with questionable men that is less safe, meets their emotional and other needs less, etc.”” This is because women who r into casual sex are more impulsive, less safe, etc than women how don’t participate in casual sex (the same is true for men). They are the minority. Most women rarely or if ever participate in casual sex. Women who don’t Ike to participate in casual sex need safety etc for it to happen, women who regularly participate don’t feel …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 10:02 AM
0

I have not once suggested straight men should be gay. In fact my argument is saying that women benefit from options of sex from men they don’t desire, is just as ridiculous as saying that straight men benefit from the option to have sex with gay men. It’s called a internal critique
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 07:05 AM
1

My central point isn’t a false eq because lack of desire is lack of desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 01:52 AM
0

Lack of desire is lack of desire regardless of sexuality. What straight women feel towards men they have no desire towards is the same as straight men to gay men. No desire. That is precisely the comparison I’m making
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 01:03 AM
2

You guys have extremely extreamly poor reading comprehension. Like christ. I never once said people can choose their sexuality. My entire argument is that the ability to have sex you don’t want isn’t an advantage. So I used the example of men and gay sex, to contrast women’s lack of desire to most men. Men could have gay sex if they desired it, except they don’t desire it so they don’t have it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:55 PM
1

You guys have extremely extreamly poor reading comprehension. Like christ. I never once said people can choose their sexuality. My entire argument is that the ability to have sex you don’t want isn’t an advantage. So I used the example of men and gay sex, to contrast women’s lack of desire to most men. Men could have a sex is they desired it, except they don’t desire it so they don’t have it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:54 PM
3

Read my post more carefully next time bud
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:45 PM
5

Completely missing the point. The entire point is that men have no desire to sleep with other men, gain no advantage because of it. Likewise women who have not desire to sleep with most men gain no advantage because of it. The lack of desire is precisely the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:28 PM
2

You have missed my point entirely. The lack of attraction is precisely part of the argument. You have failed to understand my argument at all
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:26 PM
2

How one feels about the situation is precisely the equivalence. If neither group desires their large amount of hypothetical options then the lack of “advantage” is the same. Neither group benefits from men (gay or straight) desiring them strongly)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 08:39 AM
3

False. The analogy is about desire, not sexuality. So both groups having large amounts of people who are undesirable to them is a valid comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 08:35 AM
5

Missing the point entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 08:33 AM
3

Ok Smarty pants what is wrong with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 08:31 AM
2

Neither are women attracted to most men… are you finally understanding the argument or do I need to hold ur hand
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 03:15 AM
5

Not with people you don’t desire….
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 02:24 AM
1

You have ignored the central point of my argument which is that options don’t equal an advantage. And you haven’t actually make any arguments refuting my point. Do straight men being able to sleep with gay men and have the ability to have regular sex an advantage?? Yes or no ?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 01:48 AM
0

What is wrong about it then ? Go on enlighten me
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 01:42 AM
1

The amount of Supply and demand is different, men can go on grinder and get gay sex easily. also men could do that if they wanted too
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 01:41 AM
7

Women sleeping with men they have zero desire for is like sleeping with the opposite sex you have zero desire for. Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 01:39 AM
2

Yep ignore the actual argument. There are lots of men who think that because women have options that it must be advantageous.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 01:36 AM
-2

Then why don’t men take advantage of that like they claim women can do ?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 01:35 AM
8

But you’re ignoring my point. MEN also have access to all the sex they want, in the same way women do. Is that an advantage for men too? Yes or no ?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:37 AM
5

If more options always equal more advantages, does men being able to fun gay men equal an advantage? Men could have a lot more sex with other men just as easily as women can. So why don’t men sleep with other men? Oh because they aren’t attracted to them right? !
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 10:28 PM
4

Is straight men being able to a gay sex with men an advantage?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 10:25 PM
8

It’s not a basic need if you don’t desire it. That’s the point of my argument
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 10:25 PM
1

There have been follow up studies where if you control for confidence and physical attractiveness, ie when you compare a group with low triad traits but are highly attractive and confident, and high triad traits but also attractive and confident, there is no difference between the two groups. Meaning on a broad population level individuals with dark trait traits having more sexual success seems to be due to the fact they are physically attractive and confident not because of the traid traits the…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 11:46 PM
–

Lmao what are u on about. Touch grass
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:17 AM
–

“I know what u are but what am I” type argument lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:12 AM
–

For a debate sub reddit you dudes are so trigged about debate and arguments against you. Buddy, someone making an argument against you isn’t a violation of your Freedom of speech. That IS freedom of speech. It not about not holding women accountable for their “nature” or whatever. It’s about red pill and male hypocrisy. This list seems to really have hit a nerve.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:11 AM
–

Most of the posts on PPD here are whinging?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:06 AM
–

I can’t be bother rebutting every single point you have made here. You seem to be trying to argue a narrative instead of arguing against my points. Your third paragraph is quite a strange argument. Women are naturally more nurturing, so their more nurturing nature so be disregarded in a discussion about who’s more loving men or women? What? Your fourth paragraph is also mostly irrelevant and argues from narrative. Sure those things are horrible and unjustified, but unless u want to argue that mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 01:44 AM
7

This is like saying hypothetically “men commit the vast majority of theft, but the extreme minority of women who commit theft steal theft a slightly higher number of items per theft”: Ok sure, but the absolute greater number of thieves are men and the absolute greater number of thefts are committed by men. The women who commit theft are already a minority and an outlier among women, and a minority of theves among all men and women. Because of this the random cherry picked comment you spend this …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 08:22 PM
2

Technically the fbi mandates the UCR definition. However the fbi estimates as per the studies do not do that. Refer to my post. They list “unfounded” cases
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 02:01 PM
-2

No she said she couldn’t find any reference to it in the study. It clearly mentions 2 and 8 at the points mentioned
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 09:33 AM
1

The assumption that all accused should be considered innocent is only true for the court of law. Outside of the court of law any individual is free to believe what they want. That is freedom of speech. Sure, should people act with caution and diligence when individuals are accused. So why is that only awarded to the accused and not the accuser. why according to you should the accuser be “scrutinised”, but not the accused? Innocent until proven guilt applies to both individuals. You point to the …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:41 PM
1

The problem with is is when op imagines a 8/10 or 9/10 woman he’s most likely thinking of an exceptionally beautiful young instergram model or like one of the hottest girls in his uni class or something. Young, not fat, childless women are less than 3% of the female population. An “8/10” is likely in the 80th percentile of THAT subgroup. So an 8/10 woman is actually probably well less than 1%.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 12:50 AM
1

No it seems you don’t understand or failed to actually read the article or any of its sources. I also understand the the difference between state and fed law. I said the “law” because martial rape was largely legalised in all states prior to the 1970s. Yes, one of exceptions was if 2 people were living apart, in some states. That is hardly a slam dunk since that sill gave the right for rape in cases where they were still living together. Secondly the notion that marital rape was simply less stri…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 07:28 AM
5

Throughout history rape was more seen as a crime against a woman’s purity and a man’s property than our modern understanding it is a violation of bodily autonomy. A man violating a slave or his wife wasn’t considered rape legally or morally. Even during our modern period, if a woman was a “slut” it wasn’t consided rape because it wasn’t “real rape”. Rape was only “rape” in a narrow set of circumstances that had nothing to do with violating bodily autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 08:31 AM
3

No buddy you don’t understand. The law allowed for a man to rape his wife, without exception. That’s how the law was written and how it was followed. Only until the late 1970s was the first case of spousal rape was even attempted to be prosecuted
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 08:07 AM
6

Except, those laws quite literally meant men were able to rape their wives. Being married to a woman was quite literally a defence for rape
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 08:04 AM
6

Nope the law abesloutly protected rapists. The court case Oregon v. Rideoutin 1978 was the first in which someone stood trial for raping (in the USA) his spouse while they lived together.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 08:02 AM
1

“Getting to know someone” isn’t the same thing as personality. Your personality is interacting with someone from the moment you meet them. Your level of extroversion, body language, humor, Risk taking levels etc ect. The very fact you had sec quickly to with most these women is indicative of a number of personality traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 12:34 AM
1

You could say the exact thing about women. Rich men are rare. And every woman, unless they are attractive can’t just switch to a richer man. As per the data in point one most women stay at their own man’s level for life.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:02 PM
7

Ratio of men and women on dating apps
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 11:31 AM
7

As per your point 3, nope. It does not undermine OPs point. U guys don’t understand data sets. If you literally just look at figure 2, 90% of men and women have functionally the same body counts at 1 and 1.3 ratio* meaning most men and women have the same amount of sex. The larger variations in body counts only exist for the top ten percent. Meaning that 80 percent of men are not having sex with 20 percent of women, but 10% of men are having lots of sex with 10% of women. The the point of the ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 07:07 AM
3

I mean too most normal men no, but heaps of red pill guys legit believe that 30-40 y/o guys are most attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 06:26 AM
1

Even in this single example you give, this woman did not advocate for violence at all. “Gearhart, a dedicated pacifist, recognized that this kind of change could not be achieved through mass violence. “ in the same wiki article
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:12 AM
1

This is by far one of the most stupidest and delusional comments I have ever seen. Feminist is one of the most popular and widespread political movements in history and the amount of notable feminists who have advocated for genocide can be counted on one hand (most were said 60 years ago as well). I don’t think there ever been a case of a mass casualty attack ever been committed against men by a feminist or a women with the intent of killing as many men as possible. Feminist terrorist groups and…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:08 AM
3

Chivalry is not the same as being a simp.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 11:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter