TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mysterious-Floor-909 Archive

View 0 posts and 182 comments by Mysterious-Floor-909 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Another question is wether that extended leave will lead to tax increase.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 10:52 AM
1

Yes. I believe birth is a morally significant event. Once again, it's super convenient to believe that birth is significant while conception is not. Oh my god, so expensive. I am not contributing towards $20,000 - $300,000 per inmate per year to keep the weirdo pro-lifers happy. Not all murderers go to prison and some murders might be prevented, also some crimes are punished with fines - therefore more money in budget. I am not a lawyer(probably you aren't too) to decide legal process around it.…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 07:37 AM
4

Wait, so you want a woman to consider a fetus to be a child, thereby putting the man/state on the hook earlier? That would actually give her even more leverage. Then it would be appropriate to call an abortion a murder. And then everyone's on the hook equally, man, woman and state. I am for equality=) For the most part, child support payments begin at birth, not during pregnancy. A man isn't on the financial hook at that time. That's not what I wrote about and you know that. A man has no way of …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 01:37 PM
4

It is in a women's best interest to not consider fetus a human being - then abortion is an acceptable thing. It is also in women's best interest to start advocating for a kid's rights once it is born - then a man and/or state cannot opt out of supporting it. With this approach women gain the most leverage on the situation. By the way, why can't a man opt out financially before "kid exists in the world"?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 01:15 PM
-1

Pretty convenient for you then to not consider fetus a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 12:38 PM
1

You severely underestimate amount of men who had actually experienced those things.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 08:30 AM
6

Yep. Different planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 02:38 PM
1

We're talking about adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 10:00 PM
1

We're talking about adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 10:00 PM
-9

Are you saying a man is a scumbag because of how his attraction to women works?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 11:53 AM
3

But it's not just the cost, it's often denying the opportunity to have an offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 06:30 AM
1

Let's just say that feelings can do crazy stuff with your decision making process.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 06:23 AM
1

Because you don't see that line, because initially you have no idea what you are getting into. And it's only after you learnt some hard lessons you can make better decisions and actually go look for another burger.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 12:20 PM
1

Good for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 12:13 PM
3

No need to ask. If you have doubts, it has to be a "No". At least if there are options, which unfortunately is not the case for a lot of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 12:11 PM
2

The horror is because you've been denied to have an offspring. And you can't even do anything about it because you're not aware about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 01:04 PM
3

Every man who is unknowingly raising a child that is not his, trusted his woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 12:58 PM
1

I have an idea. Only men should pay taxes for mandatory paternity tests. Perfect solution, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 08:49 AM
1

Because it is useful to someone. That's how taxes work. Let's say you are perfectly healthy and you don't need healthcare but some other person is really sick. Then your taxes will help pay his medical costs. If your country has only private healthcare, there are plenty of other examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 01:20 PM
3

What if he buys another phone? Then your whole scheme falls apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 12:44 PM
1

Believe me you waste your taxes on a lot of stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 12:41 PM
7

Women are generally more valued in any society because they are able to produce babies. You can kill 95% percent men in another stupid war, and then quickly restore population if you have women. I don't think abortion and birth control add anything to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 01:07 PM
–

It's kinda strange to ask "how much money do you earn so that I may judge you and determine if you are worthy of xyz". Everyone judges everyone, all the time. And yes before entering a relationship you better pick a person who's worthy your time, effort, feelings, money, whatever else. You seem to be because you're asking people to quantify how much sex they've had. I wouldn't care how much sex any adult person have had. People could participate in porn, have orgies, have whatever extravagant se…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 07:47 AM
–

I didn't expect to change your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 07:33 AM
–

If your partner asks you how many partners you've had, internet community would tell you to dump his/her insecure ass. It's kinda strange to do that over something that doesn't matter, isn't it? So it simultaneously doesn't matter, and also something that a partner can't ask without a backlash. It's fairly obvious that most adults have sex. I've never debated that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 07:31 AM
1

The smartest ones actually do behave pretty modestly and don't have large count. They are also usually married or in really long relationships so it's hard to meet them while dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 10:29 AM
3

If it doesn't matter, it shouldn't be a problem telling it to your partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 10:26 AM
1

You have just made a big assumption yourself. I did. Didn't like it. Never again. Found a woman who actually meets my standards. Married her. The difference in how she's treating me and overall relationship experience is night and day. And then women like you will say that I apparently don't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 10:25 AM
1

So both can be bad just for different reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 10:05 AM
1

So there are at least two variables which influence divorce rate. I would say any man should try to optimize both. Maybe PhD from my previous comment is too extreme but low partners count and bachelor's degree should be feasible to get.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 11:29 AM
1

I actually followed that link, education is not discussed there. And most of the 0-1 bc women are very religious or low libido. I am not sure about 0-1, those are rare cases. In my experience women with low count, are usually really good in maintaining relationships. Even if they break up they are quickly snatched into another looong relationship or marriage with kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 11:08 AM
4

No idea. By the way, that first graph will probably work the same for educated women. So while education lowers chance of divorce, number of partners would still make it bigger. So ideally a man should look for a woman with low number and a PhD.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:32 AM
3

What percentage of women have that level of education?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:02 AM
0

You still have no right to shame it unless it becomes a crime. At which point law enforcement should act upon it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 02:13 PM
8

count may tell you quite a bit about values
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 07:34 AM
27

There's a pushback against slut shaming, but there's no pushback against seeing male sexuality as a threat. That's the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 07:33 AM
1

With this approach your happiness in relationships depends on not knowing small specific piece of information. It's kind of a shaky foundation for something meant to be long term. How about "ask all questions leave if you don't like answers, stay otherwise" approach?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 08:34 AM
6

And that's easier if you look among more modest women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 07:21 AM
4

Why would I change your view? It's okay to be insecure. You're most likely insecure about something as well and that's fine. So even if you're right and guys care about women's past only out of insecurity(which I believe is definitely not the only reason), it's perfectly fine for them to care.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 07:19 AM
3

It's just occurred to me that my wife has never called me husband material or anything similar. It was always more of "biggest love of her life" material.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 09:00 AM
2

Once again. Probably quite a lot of them are, but not really comparable to how many such men are out there. You're not even debating my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 08:32 AM
1

Why resort to that if you can find a woman who is down?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 01:12 PM
1

There's also poop sack.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 10:15 AM
2

I never wrote it couldn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 10:01 AM
2

Man, it's not comparable. How those "some chicks" like sex is equivalent to how an average man likes sex. And there are not nearly enough of those chicks for all men out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 09:28 AM
2

Nah, if one of those women meets "marriageable" man by her standards, she is going to want the good old marriage. Its just that it is almost impossible to find(or to keep) a man fitting all their standards, so they decide to settle for other arrangements.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 09:25 AM
2

A man might simultaneously have PhD in math(or some other achievement indicating that he is smart) and be easily manipulated by women. Happens all the time. Does that make said man brainless ape? Well it actually might.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 09:19 AM
–

So how many guys did you have? Regarding the second question a guy would know, out of his experience when he was younger. He either was able to get girls or he wasn't. Come on, girls are sometimes eager to discuss past. Especially if theirs past was eventful. There are some who are smart about this, but it eventually comes up.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 03:59 PM
–

No, you can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 02:46 PM
–

I just mentioned that apparently people don't care about "love count". No challenge really. By the way I think that you also didn't really challenged the comment that you replied to.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 02:23 PM
–

Of course an attractive woman would be able to pull someone at any age. The question is - whom? Could she still pull the same the same quality of men? And how often could she do it? A celebrity, who is beautiful, famous and rich would be able to find a boyfriend no doubt about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 02:14 PM
–

So woman good, man bad? Nah, you can't really extrapolate this dynamic from relationships onto everything else. Plus your logical chain is not perfect. So women have intrinsic value that can be taken away by men, while men don’t have intrinsic value, and they need to take some from women? Like this for example: it's not general value, it's value in terms of building a relationships. Without details like these of course you can come to any conclusion that you like.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 02:10 PM
–

hell yeah, she deepthroats Doesn't strictly depend on partner count. You may be her first and she might be willing to learn it with you. That's the best kind of women by the way. And with those women lack of experience is a thing of first couple of years of relationships. If you plan long relationships anyway those couple of years don't mean much at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 02:05 PM
–

Why use psychic powers when you can ask? Or she can tell herself. Obviously the woman could lie, but now she's a liar and that's not good too.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 02:02 PM
–

Nobody's here talking about "love count". Although I would say that that's important too.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 01:59 PM
–

If a man didn't have much experience he won't be able to tell the difference. You can do it because you've seen both sides.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 01:58 PM
–

Because at some point she's 35 and it's suddenly not that easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 01:57 PM
-1

She said that to not hurt your feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 08:20 AM
1

What USSR did was as communist as real life countries could get. In the end they were left with poor as shit country falling apart plus millions of people dead or left the country. If the country which came furthest in its implementation of communism was that bad and collapsed in about 70 years it should tell you something about communism. And yes, hitler seems awfully similar to a socialist but I am going read a bit more on this. By the way in my original comment I was responding to someone who…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 06:19 PM
3

This is called no true scotsman fallacy. USSR was literally the most communist country you can imagine, their goal(literally) was to build communism as defined by Marx, and it was stated by them that socialism has been already successfully built. They made private business illegal. They had no free market. I remember various things made in USSR with their price stamped upon by the factory.(The price of most goods was decided by state, factories knew those prices and so it's just convenient to st…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 02:35 PM
4

Really? Capitalism again? Do you think it's different in modern socialist leaning Scandinavian countries? Do you think it's different in China? Do you think it was different in USSR?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 01:18 PM
2

Why can't a person combine periods of relationships with ONS between those?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 11:02 AM
2

Really depends on a man. For example I sometimes consider my own standards ridiculous(which have caused a lot of heartbreak for me and for several women I must admit), and somehow I managed to find a woman who fits most of them. I would assume that any guy who is popular among women could have those standards. Although for me that's only for relationships. Regarding casual sex different things happened when I was younger...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 11:00 AM
0

Once women start value that, men will start caring about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 07:12 AM
4

That's why EVERYONE should care about their partners past. Not just "those insecure men" or however you call them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 07:10 AM
–

It's not pretending, everyone just treats different people differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 07:17 AM
2

So I've been studying stem at uni, and there were like 2 girls in my class. One taken, another one surrounded by guys trying to get their chance. Studying load was massive, so no free time if you are trying to study well. It's either you don't have sex until graduation or you go for those transactions once a month. I had no problem with girls once I actually graduated and was able to change that environment.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 07:26 AM
–

TI believe those posts are about the situation in general. If anything red pill is going to improve the odds even if the difference will be small.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 05:34 PM
–

"Nabbing some 5's, maybe a 6" is more than 90% of the red oill men on here could ever dream of. I'm mot saying that as an insult. It's their own posts saying this. Or you choose to read only those posts. Laws of attraction work for red pill men the same way they work for other men. If a man is tall and decently looking he will have women interested in him irrespective of pills. Or are you implying that an attractive man would never be red pilled?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 02:27 PM
7

No idea, really.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 07:44 AM
2

I don't think that “I’m strong and independent” statements are correlated with a specific background of poverty. At least that's not my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 07:21 AM
8

Well, usually society doesn't see it that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 07:18 AM
19

Correct. But the problem is that the most badass, masculine men(I don't like the word alpha) aren't going to be interested in doing much talking online. On the other hand there is a demand for kind of masculine opinions in the internet so some half baked narcissists fill that niche.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 07:18 AM
2

Yet when they do, they prefer men of their own age or older.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 12:00 PM
9

If even these standards are high because of demographics in USA, then you cannot shame passport bros really.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 11:51 AM
2

I never denied that. If anything it's strange that older women rarely have kids with younger men. Looks like they value other things more than fertility.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 06:09 PM
1

Even if a man also has fertility problems as he age, he can't change his own age. He can however choose younger woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 02:32 PM
2

Most women don't put much effort into their value as well, yet expect a man who does it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 09:05 AM
-1

If it's called "anger phase", then by definition you are not stuck there.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 12:20 PM
1

What do you contribute by being rude from the beginning and through the whole conversation? What do you contribute by asking for quantitative measure of pair bonding ability which I think is yet to be invented? You are also probably(!) smart enough to realize that such measure isn't there and yet you keep insisting on exactly that. And after that you expect proper answer with links to sources. No, dear, put some effort. You will find research about positive correlation of high sexual partners am…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 02:08 PM
1

which number cock breaks our pair-bonding ability? Is there a "pair-bonding hymen?" I gave you an answer to this question, you just didn't like it. But science tho Is this how one is supposed to ask for a link to a research backing up some claim? Sorry, english is not my first first language so I didn't know that that's how you do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 10:35 AM
1

Well there are some research that red and black pill guys usually link in such discussions, you can easily google that. There are some numbers even but mostly correlations. There is also for example my own life experience, and comparison of "sexually liberated" women that I've met to more modest ones in terms of being suitable partner for me is really not even close.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 08:36 AM
1

Please, elaborate.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:42 AM
1

It depends on a person and there is no formula. Sorry to dissappoint you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:38 AM
9

How exactly does money decrease it? Maybe only in the sense that women usually refuse to date poorer men than them. But that's up to women's choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 08:20 AM
1

Scientific research can be of varying quality, that doesn't invalidate the method itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 12:38 PM
1

In my perception there are billions of women with pretty strong opinions on what men should be. Especially what 'Real Men' should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 12:27 PM
0

Perhaps they perceive your inability(or unwillingness) to build non-abusive relationship as a failure.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 12:07 PM
1

No they are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 02:15 PM
2

As a red pill man I have to say that no influencer has ever tried to shame or police me into any "red pill standard".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 02:04 PM
1

Women just tend to not pick those who wouldn't cheat in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 07:47 AM
-3

Following your logic: if a man doesn't want to pay child support(to be trapped) he shouldn't have sex. If a woman doesn't want a baby, she shouldn't have sex instead of having it then doing an abortion. But also you do realize that paying a bill you caused and having bodily autonomy are very different things? Well not too different, if a man has to work more to be able to pay child support then that's infringement on his autonomy or if he is put to jail for not paying. And as far as I understand…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 04:05 PM
-4

Shall we remove child support if child lives above poverty level with just his mothers income?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 02:55 PM
-5

Can we use the same sentiment to forbid abortions? Like a woman new that heterosexual sex can lead to pregnancy so now she has no right to kill an unborn child?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 02:54 PM
–

The truth is that you will be judged for everything for being good, for being bad, for being guilty, and for being innocent, for being victim too. That's just what people do. My advice is to be strong, to tell the truth and to be ready to lose the person who won't accept that truth. It's everyone's choice to tell the truth or not and to judge or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 11:52 AM
1

I've never hid this information from anyone who asked including my wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 02:27 PM
1

But that's different from "Most men above 70 attracted to most women above 70".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 01:34 PM
1

I think it's cool that you've mentioned Joey twice.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 11:29 AM
0

What about above 70 age group?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 11:28 AM
2

Or maybe there were just not enough women of that kind to begin with. Or maybe women who liked the idea tried it and found it too difficult to initiate and so they left.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 12:49 PM
2

I do believe that a lot of women don't prioritize dating. I didn't doubt that anywhere in my comments. However I don't see how's that connected with that particular Bumble policy. Bumble was never an app for desperate women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 12:33 PM
2

Because the successful couples that met on the app aren’t using the app anymore, obviously. They’re reaching out to target a new audience of people. That might be valid but that would mean they run out of women willing to take initiative. Yes, that’s why we’re opting to enjoy our lives rather than messaging every single man on a dating app. No one’s desperate for a date, that’s all this change shows. If anything woman who are not desperate would be more likely to use Bumble before. No unwanted f…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 12:17 PM
3

If women are turning away from apps, there must be some complaints, maybe women just voice them less and just silently stop using them. A lot of men are exiting too, MGTOW has been a thing for a long time although you won't find articles about it in any mainstream media. From looking at my friends I would say that a lot of men do not even enter.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 11:04 AM
5

The entire space is changing. You can justify literally anything with this statement. . Women have made the first move just fine on bumble for a decade— whole generation. Maybe not so fine if they decided to change it. Maybe decade ago it was a novel cool thing and now it turned out to not be very profitable thing for whoever owns Bumble. I am not even stating it as a fact that's just an opinion I have, but I have an issue with "they changed it because generation has changed" argument because it…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 10:45 AM
5

That's one possibility the other is that women don't like or are unable to make the first move. My(albeit very limited) experience with Bumble supports the latter. It was something like "I wrote you 'Hi' now please take the initiative because you're a man"..
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 10:04 AM
6

If bumble has been so successful, why change the policy? In 2024 women are supposed to be stronger and more independent than ever. Surely an app that defies those gender roles shouldn't change it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 08:30 AM
0

If a lot of leaders are men, there of course going to be certain amount of bad male leaders. Although this guy is a scammer, not only a bad kind of leader.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 07:47 AM
4

But one could make some reasonable standards. Like being obese or not, having a job or not, being productive member of society or being a criminal, being educated etc. If you share a lot of those characteristics with the other person you may assume being on the same level.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 10:52 AM
3

The problem arises when that girl says that all men who wouldn't buy her a new Gucci bag are losers and not 'real men'.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 09:18 AM
1

there is no point of recording against a bear Cameraman never dies though
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 01:15 PM
1

Pet bear
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 01:13 PM
1

Sure, but what about the first date?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 08:10 AM
2

Since huge amount of dates I've been on and talked with women who are like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 12:03 PM
1

I think that they genuinely believe in being disadvantaged. I had a personal conversation with a feminist(my ex) who is educated and pretty smart woman and she really believed feminist rhetoric. It was like "yeah, mens on average die earlier and that's fine, retire later and that's fine but some men raping women is a problem". Edit: I hope this comment wouldn't be interpreted as me supporting sexual violence. Those things should be dealt with according to criminal law.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 08:28 AM
2

I started by saying that a name of a movement for gender equality should have a different name. You're just confirmed that it is not actually about gender equality and shouldn't be promoted as such.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 08:23 AM
8

idc if you're delusional That's some good quality argument, not touching any of my points but trying to insult me. And that's unfortunately the usual way feminist arguments go.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 08:02 AM
5

I have never looked much into those movements, but I suppose that black power states that it's purpose is connected with black peoples problems, while feminism states that it's purpose is equality. That would erase whose rights need to be advanced. I think that rights of those who have lesser life expectance need to be advanced, those who retire later(in my country), those who get incarcerated for longer with harsher conditions(my country) or of course rights of those who get drafted and/or bein…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 07:12 PM
7

It should've been called equalitism if it was supposed to be about equality of genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 11:08 AM
–

Let's say Russia decides to invade your country(it might be geographically impossible but let's imagine). Are you okay with just surrendering in case there are not enough volunteers to fight and die? Are you okay with Putin then being your president or with your country being ruled by some puppet regime set by him?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 01:09 PM
1

Is refusing to date or marry equal to treating like a worthless human?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:03 AM
1

How dares he?!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:01 AM
9

You conflate different types of men. Those who barely have had any luck with women and would be happy to have anyone. Those who don't even know what it's like to be sincerely loved by woman. Men who are have things going in their lives and who fail to find equals(at least equals to some degree). Let's say a man has a career and is fit but women who are interested in him are all obese and jobless. Those men may or may not have experience with women in contrast with the first type.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 02:24 PM
5

Is wanting a woman who doesn't have a dick a double standard? Because a man usually has one.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 09:14 AM
1

If the number is 2 she will probably remember it however many years has past. If it's 78 then probably not, but then again it would be too high for those who care. Also I think that approximate number is fine for those who care. "Less than 10" is a fine answer, "more than a 100" is also a fine answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 09:11 AM
2

You definitely can get a good split of "societal burdens" in your particular relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 11:41 AM
2

As a red pill man I want to say that we definitely should not go back to 1950's.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 11:39 AM
0

I'd say children's education and life trajectory is based on the presence of the father. Also I am yet to see one man who's married a woman specifically because of "education and life trajectory" of potential children.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:32 PM
–

You exaggerate their sexual activity. In my experience women are rarely truly alone but they may not be having too much sex either. Friends, dms, socializing but often not too much sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 01:26 PM
1

It is not easy but it's possible. Good looking mid 20s woman are hard to get and hard to impress, but it is possible if you look decently, have your shit together and you are confident. By comparison women in their 30s are suuuuper easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:43 AM
5

Is fat an insult nowadays? Because some people are just objectively fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 12:13 PM
1

At one point I thought I am jealous and insecure. That was until I found woman who didn't give reasons to be jealous and insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 11:37 AM
4

Or maybe it is hard to find quality women and it is hard to distinguish them especially if you're young and inexperienced. Or it's him.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 11:34 AM
–

I don't think that death of a husband is a very common reason for a woman to become single mother. And unhappiness often comes from narcissism, entitlement and stuff like that. My mother treated my father like shit so she became a single mother and then couldn't get any man to commit to her, she viewed it as those men being not good enough anyway. I believe that there are a lot of women like her and that's why men are unhappy with single mothers besides all the stepping up thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 10:19 AM
2

Nah, I'd better look like a gorilla.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 10:04 AM
2

Once again, WW2 and WW1 caused economic recession in Europe, that doesn't help to create anything. Destruction of whole cities doesn't help to create anything, deaths of millions of young men who could've become scientists or otherwise participated in the economy doesn't help to create anything. And what about money spent on making tanks that got blown up on the battlefield instead of research? Yes there are examples when people invented something useful to civil economy while working on weapons…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 06:09 PM
2

A lot of men also know that they will almost always lose in a fight, there are a lot small or weak men. Men are just less afraid for themselves and less nervous overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 02:00 PM
3

How much of modern technology was NOT created because potential creators had died in war? Modern wars cause economic recession, not growth.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 01:58 PM
2

In different situations really. I almost got into a fight while trying to buy a bottle of water in the shop because a man thought that he should be in line before me. Although, since I gained some more muscle and became bigger than average guy I have never had such encounters.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 01:55 PM
0

Why are some women get soooo insecure about how fat they are? Or over the fact that their friend looks better in the same dress?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 09:20 AM
3

Well I consider it to be true. Quite a lot of people do actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 12:00 PM
3

It's claimed to be, but it's not. In 2024 it's about privileges for women and bashing of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 10:36 AM
3

As I understand it forbidding abortion is about protecting unborn child. And yes that protection conflicts with woman being able certain things with her body.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 10:20 AM
3

Yeah and after all that misogyny women still live longer than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 07:28 AM
13

Because it seems like most women actually do enforce those roles upon men they want to date and marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 07:25 AM
3

Men don't like to work in a corporate environment too. They just have to.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 08:00 AM
4

Or to being killed in prison for opposing the regime.
/r/MensRights11/03/24 07:53 AM
2

But that's what men usually mean when they're talking about lowering standards. Also I have no idea about the percentage of women with this behavior but probably there's enough of them to make an impact on the dating scene.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 09:17 AM
2

High standards is when you are 6, had sex with 9 a couple of times because he was horny and had no better options at that moment and now you won't settle for a 7.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 12:00 PM
3

Is there any research supporting that claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 11:00 AM
2

So he didn't feel the need to ask. At this point I think that the moment you want to ask woman's count it's over.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 10:02 AM
–

There are also people who don't do one or both of those things. Or do it extremely rarely. Although I think if you play in a punk band you are required to do those things.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 02:35 PM
–

There's one in Ukraine. There are also plenty of foreign volunteers fighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 07:39 AM
1

Are you saying that in order to not be consider woman-hater I should disregard my own lived experience and continue to repeat a behavior that was harmful for me? By the way, dialogue with you made me realize an important thing. I am decently smart and decently educated person with rich enough life experience. I can discriminate my own feelings. I know how hate feels like. I hate a bunch of people in my country who started and are supporting war with Ukraine. I hate one of my relatives for family…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 02:46 PM
1

a) kind of, for the guy who has his shit together, I tried - learnt my lesson b) it's entirely your assumption, I do not think that c) Obviously, I for instance(I am 32) have way more problems now than when I was younger. See that's how you(and others like you) conflate men's disliking certain type and behavior of women with hating women in general. I do not hate even the women I described, I just don't want to deal with them again and really wish I hadn't wasted my time and feelings on them bef…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 11:21 AM
2

30 is old Bro. It's your words, not mine. I never ever wrote that. I have just cited my own life experiences. I know couple of women literally like that. I have no idea if they considered themselves old, but late twenties just happened to be the time when they decided to find a guy to have kids with after years of dating alcoholics(one case) or deadbeats(another case). Now would please elaborate how writing about what I saw first hand makes me woman-hater?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 05:24 PM
3

It's not always trashy women. Maybe this player guy is an ex(or even current) bf of nice guys crush. It's really average women who sleep with those players and then trying to settle down around 30 but now having inflated standards and baggage.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 08:22 AM
2

Who props up single plumbers and brick layers?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 07:25 AM
2

Now are they most successful because they are not single? Or are they not single because they are most successful? Buy the way here you are moving the goalposts from all men not being able to do anything without their wives to most successful men only. Buy the way the original comment I believe was about "core building blocks of society" which would be more about plumbers or brick layers not the most successful guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 07:30 AM
-1

To you maybe, while he may have been rejected before for being too boring.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 12:56 PM
0

I just have to add that crime rates been going down everywhere. It's the safest time in history.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 12:53 PM
-2

Should men be as distrustful towards you as you are towards them?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 12:52 PM
-3

And the guy have had probably searched the whole internet for "creative date ideas".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 12:51 PM
1

Oh my god. You wrote: Men wouldn't get anything done without their wives. If this is true then all single men would be jobless. Or at least underperforming significantly which doesn't correspond with reality. They would also lose their jobs in the case of divorce.(Which isn't usually the case) So you basically denied the existence of single men. So I wrote: Are you saying that single men don't exist? (Pointing at a contradiction in what you wrote) Then you go: Bad faith! I'll pass. Cool. You wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 10:39 AM
1

2 + 2 = 5 Are you saying that math doesn't exist?!(/s !!!!!!!!!) Your argument is in a bad faith and I'll pass.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 08:37 AM
1

So you agree that single men can do their jobs despite not having a wife. Because of that I assume that married men would also be able to do their jobs without their wives in their lives therefore your statement about men not having time or energy if not for their wives is false. Is it too bad faith for you? Or you just didn't see what I implied? Should I have also added "/s" to my previous comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 08:24 AM
3

Are you saying that single men don't exist?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 07:58 AM
2

What about the first date?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 07:54 AM
2

the fact that men could never have had the time and energy to do the "paid" labor if they didn't have a wife managing the operations Are you saying that single men didn't exist?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 07:53 AM
-3

Stay at home - maybe. Obey the man - absolutely not.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 07:32 AM
4

That's cool, but would you address other "privileges" that russian men have? Like draft, like shorter life expectancy, like later retirement? the callous actions of the Russian government may reflect a larger political strategy of praising masculinity in the name of traditional values Well they MAY or MAY not reflect that. Edit: By the way do they pay extra to bots who know english?
/r/MensRights07/02/24 12:24 PM
4

Russia has a bunch of jobs restricted for women because of high physical demands or being considered too dangerous(like some jobs involving strong chemicals). That's it. That's nowhere near "strong division of labor". My mother was what you can call a detective(следователь in russian, literally means investigator). Investigating murders and stuff like that - not very feminine profession. Also domestic violence laws have been changed so that the man is seen as the head of the household. Lol find …
/r/MensRights07/02/24 11:49 AM
3

What are exactly the benefits of being male? Could you please elaborate? Maybe it's draft? Maybe it's later retirement? Maybe it's longer prison sentences for the same crimes? Maybe way shorter life expectancy?(60.7 years for men, less than retirement age)
/r/MensRights07/02/24 10:45 AM
4

Some conscripts in Russia are basically forced to volunteer. You draft 18 yo guy, then you either force him to sign a contract with russian army(after which they are free to send you wherever they want) or start persuading him that he can earn money that way, that his motherland needs him, that that's what real men do etc. It might be hard to not give in if you are young, already in the army serving your mandatory service, and you are pressured. Also, they often refuse to terminate contracts upo…
/r/MensRights07/02/24 10:41 AM
7

What about women whose sons and husbands are getting killed? They are pretty indifferent as well. It's not men it's the whole society that doesn't care.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 10:33 AM
15

It's one thing to defend a country that values you and another - to defend a country that not only doesn't value you but also considers you a member of oppressing, privileged gender bringing harm to society.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 01:58 PM
3

There's a cluster of people who may or may not be "bots" paid by Kremlin who believe that Ukraine is fighting only because NATO and US in particular forcing them to. And not because they're unwilling to become Russia's puppet state. I am russian and I am so used to see lots of those in russian-speaking social networks/websites.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 01:55 PM
2

I don't know if it is possible for them to do it, but if they will do it, they will really prosper.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 07:29 AM
5

But isn't it strange that a person becomes incompatible to you because of something that doesn't matter to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 07:21 AM
4

I don't see any problem with people being incompatible.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 08:03 PM
3

Yeah, if my assumption is true then definitely.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 08:01 PM
19

If N count doesn't matter, then no woman should have a problem with telling a guy her count. Why not answer a question about something that doesn't matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 08:16 AM
2

What about damage done to older generation of men by involving them in wars?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 10:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter