TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mysterious-Solid-646 Archive

View 0 posts and 63 comments by Mysterious-Solid-646 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, there certainly isn’t a fine line. You just see your abuser lover through rose-tinted glasses. Or you have a savior complex and think “I can change him.” Abuse is often obvious to anyone but the victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 07:16 PM

So, given that situation, if you finally find a woman, do you think it will be bad relationships or good relationships? What are your chances for latter? Well obviously not all of the good ones are taken, just the majority of them. And all at a relatively young age too. The strategy is just to ignore dating completely and focus on the self. Then if a woman comes along you see if she’ll be a good match or not. It’s not hard to tell, it’s just that desperation and desire gets in the way of logic. …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 03:17 PM

this is high tier projection lmao, there is no data that suggests what you are saying is true, quite the opposite in fact
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 03:07 PM

“If men are lonely and struggling with women, why don’t they just become gay?” This is basically the same logic you’re using right now, just without the gay part.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 03:06 PM
3

I’m not mad at all. I’m just astonished that someone could be this bad at logic. But good attempt at projection. It doesn’t matter if it’s “the topic at hand,” it makes no sense to single out a specific group for an action not limited to that specific group. If you want to criticize a group for something, blame them for something they specifically do i.e. prove that older men are more nefarious men in general when they date younger women. Which you haven’t done. At this point in just going to as…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 01:03 PM
1

Everyone of all ages and both/all genders could be. So WHY are you singling out older men? I’ve already made multiple counter-points and you just refuse to acknowledge them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:50 PM
-5

Behind every single mom is a single dad. And yet you don’t here women bitching online Because fathers are either more likely to leave the child or less likely to get custody of the child. It is much easier for men to hide the fact that they are single fathers and more easier for women to accept them due to the lack of baggage that the children bring. Women are the gatekeepers of sex and relationships. Landing the majority of criticism on women for the outcomes of those relationships is ALWAYS va…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:47 PM
5

Your lack of basic understanding of logic is astounding. Let me spell the argument out here for you: Why blame specifically older men for an action that is NOT specific to older men? You’re trying so hard to blame older men for something that is not limited to older men. THAT is the issue. THAT is not whataboutism. Either A: you have a problem with men dating younger women in general, regardless of age. Or B: you don’t have a problem with men being nefarious as long as they are young.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:26 PM
4

I don’t have a problem with personal experience (anecdotes) being used as an argument. My problem is you shutting down discussion simply because OP isn’t a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:19 PM
3

The point is that fuckboys come in ALL ages, not just “older men.” You just inadvertently admitted that you have a problem with men dating younger women in general, even men who are relatively young as well
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:16 PM
1

You don’t know what whataboutism is. You made the argument that older men are being “nefarious.” I counter by saying that men being nefarious is not an age-specific issue, they come in all ages. This is NOT whataboutism. You are attempting to blame a specific group for a specific action. I counter by claiming that the action is prevalent regardless of the group you are conditioning on. This is like you trying to claim that blacks commit more crime, so it must be a race issue. I counter that less…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:13 PM
3

“You don’t know what you’re talking about because you’re not a woman” So why even engage with the post if you’re going to shut down all discussion simply because OP isn’t “qualified” to speak on the topic? Appeals to authority are not good arguments. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 11:57 AM
1

Where is all these single mothers in their thirties? The way people talk about them it's like they're at every corner. Go on any dating app. There are single-mothers in their 20s. People I knew from grade school are having kids out of wedlock already. It is far more prevalent than you would think. With that said, have you ever been a girl/young woman who've received attention and come-ons from men older than you? Have you ever been a young woman and was at the mercy of older men trying to date y…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 11:50 AM
1

arguments supporting the red/black pill: facts, data, charts, analysis, which corroborates anecdotal evidence/lived experiences arguments supporting the blue pill: “I don’t like what the red pill says so it’s wrong, here is an article and a TikTok that agrees with me”
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 09:32 PM

This. I think we need to specify that it is single mothers who had children out of wedlock that men despise the most. They make the rest of the world suffer for their terrible decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 04:40 PM
11

Because women are the gatekeepers of sex. They choose who and who they do not have sex with. And if out of all of the men you could have sex with you choose to have sex with trash, you deserve the majority of the blame. Single-motherhood isn’t always the mother’s fault. But single mothers who had their children out of wedlock are the ones that drive the majority of the contempt men have towards single mothers as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 04:38 PM
2

considering that a lot of women think Cbum in his off-season bulk is a “dad bod” I don’t really blame men for swinging the pendulum back but bravo to you for correctly identifying what a dad bod truly is
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 07:59 PM
50

Strength.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 09:49 PM

Arguments like this prove the red-pill talking point about how women date opportunistically. “Men are in love, women are in business.” I don’t necessarily agree with the above but you’re making it very hard to argue against.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 08:32 PM

She’s being intentionally deceptive. Women not choosing the best among their options isn’t a new thing. What IS a new thing is the opposite: women are NOT choosing the best among their options. If a woman wants a 9 or a 10, but her best option is a 7, she’ll (un)happily stay single until a 9 or 10 comes around, then play battle royale with the other 80% of women trying to get him to commit to them. Then when they fail to secure Chad, they become your typical so-called “post wall” woman who is bi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 08:19 PM
1

they are “libertarian” say things like “strong crush the weak!” …what kind of “libertarians” are you talking about? Libertarians advocate for personal freedom and individual liberty. In fact, Libertarians argue against the “strong” violating the rights of the “weak,” or more specifically the collective/state violating the rights of the individual (as commonly seen in socialist/communist states). “Strong crushing the weak” is authoritarian, which is the exact opposite of libertarianism. So either…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 01:39 PM
3

I mean I don’t particularly care for the term, but Chad’s just easier to get my point across than typing tall rich attractive “alpha” male every time. It’s a lot less subjective than “attractive” and “alpha.” we all know what it means when someone says “Chad,” and there’s a lot less room for bad-faith, intentionally deceptive arguments using equivocation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 11:54 AM
3

and yet they are still less happier than they would be in a loving, stable relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 01:57 AM
3

That’s because these women don’t realize that Chad-chasing flips the market on its head. Now it’s Chad who gets to demand all of the young, hot women while the bottom 75% are left outraged and bitter. The exact same market women impose on men via Chad-chasing is the exact same market Chad will impose on women. Just like how dating is a losing game for the majority of men, Chad-chasing is a losing game for the majority of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 01:40 AM
4

the average man is still quite attractive That doesn’t make any sense. The average man is of average attractiveness. Statistics have shown that women do not find the average man attractive. that doesn’t mean she doesn’t or cannot find the average man attractive Yes, it does. Women don’t want a man who makes enough, is tall enough, or is attractive enough. They want a man who is makes more, is taller than, and is more attractive than other men, especially her friends’ boyfriends and husbands. If …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 01:34 AM
2

Sigh… that’s not the point. Men aren’t saying that women should date men they find unattractive. Men are saying that women need to stop having unrealistic standards for men. Of course if women’s idea of an attractive man is limited to 6ft+ men with a 6in dick and makes six figures, telling them to lower their standards will sound like telling them to date men they don’t find attractive. There are only so many of those men to go around, and over 75% of Chad-chasing women will fail in doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 12:29 AM
4

And yet people will still claim that the majority of men throughout history didn’t reproduce due to “biology” and that women “selected the best genes for survival.” People in history died due to war and disease, not because they weren’t 6ft tall. Life expectancies were low. Infant mortality rates were high. Society absolutely could not afford having women hold out their prime years for historical Chad. It’s such a stupid fucking claim that gets repeated ad nauseam. I’m tired of people trying to …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 05:27 PM
1

Please stop using “nature” and “biology” to justify women’s poor choices in dating. Face, height, dick size, and other physical standards that women select men for were NEVER naturally selected traits that allowed humans to thrive. None of those will be able to predict which societies will thrive and which will fall. The reason why most men didn’t reproduce in history is NOT because they weren’t selected by women. It is because men constantly put themselves in danger, ESPECIALLY in war. War is f…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 04:58 PM
5

I don’t agree with OP in the slightest but as someone else said I truly do pity the men who have to date you. The funniest part about all this is you disprove OP’s claim and prove red-pillers right about how women reinforce toxic masculinity by how they react to male displays of emotion.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 04:53 PM
3

“If your woman broke up with you because you displayed emotion, you either A. Are dating an unstable lunatic B. Displayed a violent, dangerous emotional reaction C. Are lying about your experience.” I’m strongly inclined to believe this guy is trolling based on his post history.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 04:43 PM
0

Ah, this argument again, where women are somehow the arbiters of good and appropriate behavior, but whether or not an action is “good and appropriate” is only ever defined by women’s reaction to it post-hoc. Men really need to start identifying this specific type of blue-pilled argument more often. Blue-pillers can constantly amend this argument at will whenever it fails. This is exactly how they keep up the gaslight. It’s so ridiculously common, and once you are able to spot it, you can easily …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 04:33 PM
3

I am so fucking tired of these appeal to nature arguments. There are other species, including mammals, where the female is larger and more dominant. Just because things do or don’t exist in nature doesn’t make it so or right in human society. We don’t live in the fucking Stone Age anymore. Since the 1900s the human population has exploded due to technological and medical advancements. We’ve risen above our biology. No one’s bloodline ever ended because they aren’t 6ft tall or don’t have a 6in di…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:37 PM
1

He didn’t say nudes, chill out bro lmao. People post pictures of people they know all of the time, why does it being an ex suddenly make it not ok? She literally has an IG and isn’t uncomfortable with pictures of herself being online anyway. Getting offended on her behalf is wild she ain’t gonna date you bro
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 11:47 PM
2

No, but they would revert relatively quickly. Social media disappearing means that women no longer have instantaneous access to legions of men providing free attention and validation, from which she can filter out for the richest/tallest/most attractive men. She would actually have to go outside, meet real men in real life where it’s significantly more difficult to find her “dream” guy. Today her dream guy is a swipe or a text away. You underestimate just how much easier social media and dating …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 11:24 PM
8

Women are entitled to safety, just not at the expense of men. Men are not obligated to protect women and women should stop judging men if they choose not to. You’re more than welcome to learn martial arts, self defense, carry a firearm/weapon, or hire a bodyguard though
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 11:42 PM
10

it has more to do with women not being entitled to men putting their body in line for the safety of women
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 11:40 PM
1

you know you’re unhinged when even the bluepillers and leftist/feminist women are in almost universal disagreement with you
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 08:32 PM
6

This is particularly damning considering the whole “ick” trend among women
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 03:07 PM
5

Because I can think for myself? Has the concept of thinking independently ever crossed your mind? Women post shit like this and wonder why men say AWALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 03:06 PM
2

The only person on this list that is attractive is Goggins. Peterson and Musk may have been attractive when they were younger. These three are all 50+. Rogan is short, bald, and stocky. The Quartering is fat and balding. Fresh n’ Fit are mid and I don’t even know why Tim Pool is on this list. The women calling fucking David Goggins unattractive are absolutely delusional. He looks incredible for his age. If Goggins is unattractive it truly never began for any of us
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:12 PM

Women refusing to date anyone under 5’10” is NOT the same thing as men who will only date superfit women. Height is a completely immutable trait. It has absolutely no bearing on how suitable a person is for a relationship. Your level of fitness is 100% controlled by you. Someone who is fit has dedicated years of their life to taking care of their body. It doesn’t tell the whole story, but it speaks a lot about their character. I don’t want to date fat chicks for the same reason I don’t want to d…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 01:37 AM
4

apathy contempt, based on the way you talk about men
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 08:14 PM
21

Women like her genuinely do not believe the majority of men are capable of basic human function. According to this list, most (over half of) men are Assholes Incompetent Bad at communication Immature or unstable Lack basic hygiene Basically most of us are ogres/cavemen
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 07:22 PM
5

<image> no further comments your honor
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 04:19 PM
1

Huh, a surprisingly not deranged take from u/Windmill_flowers. Good for you. The only reason I agree with this is because of the key word “enough.” If you can’t provide to support a family, you don’t need to be getting into relationships and potentially having children. Usually the men who fall into this category are ambitionless losers drifting through life with no plan for the future. If this is the type of man you are talking about, then yes, I agree. But the same should go for women. Not tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 09:49 PM
-1

The gender war is not a “deflection” from the class war, the gender war IS the class war.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 12:07 PM
11

Absolutely not. This type of misandrist rhetoric from OP is exactly what Marxist principles are all about. It doesn’t just stop at the rich vs the poor. Marxist principles apply to ALL forms of hierarchies, whether that be race, gender or class. Here, OP just replaces “bourgeoisie” with “men” and “proletariat” with “women.” OP uses this exact same rhetoric to blame everything on the ones who supposedly have power (men) while removing any responsibility or accountability from those who are suppos…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 12:05 PM
28

Educated, mentally stable adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 11:38 AM
9

Ahhh, more blatant misandry
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 11:35 AM
11

This sub fucking sucks now. It used to be you’d have the odd post that creates good discussion or makes a good point. Now it’s just nonstop ragebait troll posts
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 03:58 AM
1

That just isn’t the case anymore. The failure rate is too high, and the gains associated with approaching just aren’t worth the risk anymore. Approaching may lead to rejection, which leads to Lowered self-esteem Humiliation Rejection by that woman’s entire social circle as well Accusations of sexual harassment Awkwardness in future social interactions This goes for both cold AND warm approaches. I’ve had such negative experiences with approaching that I simply won’t ever do it again. The only ti…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 05:12 PM
4

Ignoring the numerous studies that corroborate it, this fact is self-evident if you are a man. You’re not, so it’s obvious why you would be blind to such an overwhelmingly supported phenomenon. Also it’s funny how one woman claims “no evidence provided to support this claim” when another claims “it’s an obvious fact of life.” The complete failure of logical justification from women when it comes to men’s issues is always amusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 04:52 PM
5

The fact that you don’t even remember what you call such an obvious fact of life is solid proof that you are arguing in bad faith. I will no longer be responding.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 04:43 PM
7

But PUAs and TRP attracts guys who struggle with social cues and relationships, so it’s only logical that they are oblivious to certain facts of life. More bad-faith conjecture unsupported by evidence. First you pull a Motte-and-Bailey fallacy, and now you’re pulling a just-world fallacy. At this point I’m sure you’re just rage-baiting. You’re not even trying to form a logical argument anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 04:40 PM
3

If “attractiveness threshold” leaves only 20% as desirable, that’s never been a secret. Why? Because you say so? Women have denied this for years and still do to this day. OP literally mentioned how they still get downvoted by pointing out what you call such an obvious fact. If it were so obvious from the very beginning the red pill, PUA, and manosphere communities wouldn’t even fucking exist. We wouldn’t need a thousand podcasts and YouTube channels teaching men what women find attractive. Ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 04:29 PM
7

The point completely flew over your head. Men don’t have an issue with women finding attractive men attractive. Men have an issue with women only finding 10-20% of men attractive. So of course when we say “lower your standards” or “give the average guy a chance,” it will sound like we are telling women to date unattractive men. If I’m only attracted to the daughters of CEOs, leaders of nations, royalty etc., telling me to date the average girl in my middle-income neighborhood will sound like you…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 04:10 PM
7

The secret isn’t that women aren’t upfront about the fact that they like attractive men. The secret is that they find 80-90% of men unattractive. Men DO understand that they have to be attractive to women. What men DON’T understand is that the vast majority of them are unattractive to women. THAT is the secret. THAT is why men are confused. Based Courtney Gears pfp btw
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 03:46 PM
1

What a load of bullshit. blue hair Most women with outlandish colored hair tend to be incredibly neurotic and emotionally unstable. It’s not the hair that makes them unattractive, it’s just pattern recognition at work. Short hair Depends on what you mean by “short.” I like short-haired women, and most guys don’t care. Now once you start getting to crew-cuts and buzz cuts, again, more pattern recognition at work. Facial piercings Pattern recognition. Overweight and obesity Uh yeah? Men not liking…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 03:19 PM
3

Except when it comes to women dating abusers, cheaters, thugs, serial killers, murderers, and literal Nazis. Then it’s men’s fault for being “manipulative assholes” and tricking women into having sex with genocidal maniacs. Hypoagency is a worse trait than hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 12:43 PM
3

Bluepillers really cannot make an argument without using faulty examples or reasoning errors can they
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 12:29 PM
3

Translation: “I want men’s lives to be convenient specifically for me.”
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 12:28 PM
9

put more effort into their attractiveness [just like women do], they would have less problems in dating. I’d argue that most people who actually work hard into improving their attractiveness are men. It’s men who go to the gym and workout to improve their strength, size, and physique. It’s men who I most often see at running events. Men put a significantly far amount of time into their fitness and overall attractiveness. Women don’t struggle in getting dates. The reason isn’t because they “put m…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 12:02 PM
1

like in America that started with genocide and was built with slavery That’s rich coming from a Brit. What’s even funnier is your complaining that your NHS is “so slow.” Pretending like government isn’t the most wasteful, inefficient organization of all time. Then arguing for MORE government control over the people. The layers of irony here is insane.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 08:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter