TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NAWALT_VADER Archive

View 1 posts and 945 comments by NAWALT_VADER on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

NAWALT_VADER/r/MGTOW14/07/17 07:08 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Feminism is very useful when it advocates for true egalitarian equality. I would prefer to say it is not just useful, but imperitave in that regard. Feminism only becomes problematic when it demonizes men or engages in other systemic misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/26 07:17 AM
1

I am in Canada.
/r/MensRights31/03/26 07:26 AM
0

In my experience, some of this has already changed. In my divorce, for the custody battle I was easily able to get full 50/50 shared custody. I was the primary caretaker for my two children, so I also receive child support monthly. I was even able to get a lump sum spousal support payment that was considerable. I agree with many of your complaints, but want to reassure you that many changes have already taken place, and men can and should expect better outcomes these days, at least in divorce co…
/r/MensRights18/03/26 09:12 AM
13

This might be a good place to start: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/rycnyd/on_the_gender_empathy_gap_and_its_correlates_a/
/r/MensRights18/03/26 08:26 AM
12

Yes, I agree. One would reasonably assume that equality means that women are included in traditionally males spaces, and men are included in traditionally female spaces. If the government or other institutions are financing initiatives to support women in this regard, it should be expected that men would likewise be supported in similar ways. Of course, we know that in reality, men are not given the same supports. This is not new. This has gone on for decades and generations in various ways.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 08:58 AM
1

Good point. Those figures would likely not be included in this data. It is likely that the people who were running those aid programs count those people, and not just to tabulate their data, but to also value them as individuals. It is unfortunate that the current US administration does not seem to agree.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 07:12 AM
13

Perhaps if this sort of thinking continues too long there will eventually be a backlash of some sort ... oh ... wait ... What is happening now in reality..? Pendulums swing. Now Trump is president.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 06:35 AM
38

I didn't ask what women feel. I don't care. I will perhaps care when they decide to ask what men feel, and they care about that. They have told us time and again for decades now that they don't give a shit about us or our feelings. Until that changes, then I see no reason to care about their feelings.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 06:10 AM
45

Here are relevant findings from credible sources in the U.S.: A study of U.S. death certificate records (33 states + DC; 2010–2019) identified “pregnancy-associated deaths” (i.e., deaths during pregnancy or within 1 year of end of pregnancy, from any cause). In that dataset: 11.4% of those deaths were due to drug-related causes. PubMed+1 5.4% were due to suicide. PubMed 5.4% were due to homicide. PubMed+1 The remainder (~59.3%) were due to obstetric causes (i.e., complications related to pregnan…
/r/MensRights21/10/25 05:51 AM
6

I agree to 50/50 splitting of household chores so long as there is also a 50/50 splitting of household expenses. Otherwise, the arrangement needs to be varied based on the reality to be fair. This is not gendered. If the man is staying home with the kids and not working while the wife goes off to work, it should be expected that he'd also do more of the household chores than his working wife. And vice versa. That is fair.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 05:20 AM
1

I have a great mother and great daughters. You do not know me. You hate men and lump us all together.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 01:17 AM
1

No woman I know in person is both, but if you are a woman, then yes I agree.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 07:50 AM
1

Alternate title: How many mothers teach their daughters to use a guy who likes them..? Answer: Every single mother like you! You create the dystopia you imagine and likely live in.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 07:42 AM
1

What is your idea?
/r/MensRights30/09/25 07:33 AM
2

Since I will never have the finances to make this happen, I will put the idea out there for those who may. Man Caves. There are many abandoned malls or other large under- utilized spaces where some buildings can be repurposed for greater purposes. I imagine a repurposed abandoned mall, or better yet, a purposely created facility that provides a place for men to gather and be better. It should include a place for exercise, for hygiene, for nourishment, for mental health, for relaxation, and for a…
/r/MensRights30/09/25 07:16 AM
5

Read the magazine Cosmopolitan. Women have taught girls to do similar things to men for generations now. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 06:50 AM
208

The face of someone who is confident they will never be forced to be accountable for their atrocities.
/r/MensRights15/09/25 08:03 AM
9

Unfortunately, thanks to social media and sites like this, I have been able to be a veritable fly-on-the-wall, and have sat through many conversations that seemingly average women have had amongst themselves when they are speaking freely. They don't speak well of men or relationships. Sure, not every woman is like those we see in the popular Reddit forums, but there sure do seem to be a lot whom are like those misandristic radical feminists. To use feminist logic, how can we men know the good wo…
/r/MensRights15/09/25 07:14 AM
-2

She is absolutely correct.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 04:03 AM
14

I agree completely that if a school with 100 students and a school with 1,000 students both got the same grant, the smaller school is getting proportionally more support. That’s exactly the kind of proportional difference I was trying to highlight. In the context of gender-specific cancer research, the available government data shows that funding for research benefiting women is almost twice as high as funding for research benefiting men. This is only counting cancers unique to each sex, not can…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 07:39 AM
15

The argument is that feminists and other women often suggest that more federal funding is spent on men's physical and mental healthcare than is spent on women's physical and mental healthcare. This is something that is easily debunked. It is provably false. The argument here is that the opposite is true.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 05:54 AM
6

I showed where I got the figures from. All information and calculations should be clear, hopefully. The $10,500 figure is based on .... umm ... blah blah blah then "In summary again, the total federal research funding for women's conditions, specifically breast and ovarian cancer, amounts to approximately $1.04 billion, allocated to a combined total of 54,900 estimated annual deaths. This translates to an average investment of roughly $18,998 for every woman who dies from one of these diseases. …
/r/MensRights09/08/25 05:43 AM
5

I like data. Here is more info, for those who don't want to dive into the links above: Based on estimated figures for Fiscal Year 2024, an analysis of NIH research funding reveals a significant disparity in investment for certain gender-specific cancers. By dividing the research funding by the estimated annual deaths for each condition, we can calculate a "funding per death" figure that offers a clear comparison. For women, breast cancer received approximately $779 million in funding, with an es…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 05:32 AM
9

Sources: National Institutes of Health (NIH) Funding Data NIH Research, Condition, and Disease Categorization (RCDC) System: This is the official source for the NIH's funding allocations. The data for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 is available and can be used to verify the specific amounts for each cancer type. https://report.nih.gov/funding/categorical-spending American Cancer Society (ACS) Mortality Statistics ACS Cancer Facts & Figures 2024 Report: This is the authoritative source for estimated cance…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 04:53 AM
8

I have seen many Children's Hospitals and Women's Hospitals. I have never seen a Men's Hospital. We only have the General Hospitals. Maybe there are some Men's Clinics I am not aware of yet.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 04:46 AM
24

Another way to look at it: Based on an analysis of NIH research funding for major gender-specific cancers, there is a significant disparity in investment that favors conditions affecting women. For fiscal year 2024, the combined research funding for breast and ovarian cancer totals approximately $1.04 billion, while funding for prostate and testicular cancer is about $382 million. This gap becomes even more pronounced when measured against mortality rates. The average research investment per dea…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 04:04 AM
1

Abortion can be a necessary part of healthcare, and can be used to save lives or prevent suffering. In those cases, it is difficult to argue against and in my opinion that needs to be allowable. However, I do agree that abortion should not be used as a form of after-the-fact birth control. Nor should it be so flippantly referred to as merely a "choice", as though whether one person lives or dies should be decided by the whim of someone else.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 06:49 AM
2

I appreciate your thoughtful engagement here, and enjoy that you are doing so respectfully and not antagonistically. I also appreciate your honesty at pointing out these individuals within the feminist movement who have put forth what many men would consider distasteful ideas, in the least. My original comment was meant to express that I would not want to have the entire MRA movement maligned by the opinions of one man. Similarly, we should not take every individual woman speaking out as a repre…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 05:07 AM
1

You're right. I'm not sure what the hell I was talking about.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 04:49 AM
2

You're right. That was a stupid comment from me. I'm not sure what I was thinking at the time. I agree with you. There are very many "official" feminists that espouse the ideology that the nuclear family should be destroyed. The point I was attempting to make was that we should not accept a singular voice from the feminist side as being definitive of feminist ideals, much in the same way that I wouldn't want any individual man to be considered the spokesperson for the MRA movement. However, you …
/r/MensRights03/06/25 04:47 AM
3

Fair. June is officially recognized as Men's Health Month.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 12:19 AM
1

I agree that both can be celebrated, but it is worth noting that while Men's Health Month started in 1994 for June, Pride Month started in 1970. November is already recognized as Men's Health Month in many regions, as well as having International Men's Day fall within that month. To me, it makes more sense to celebrate in November. It would be good to have a month where there is not competition for attention to the issues that affect men.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 11:50 PM
3

We should be hesitant of accepting any singular voice as being representative of an entire movement or as anything more than the opinion of an individual. This is the same that we cannot accept the opinion of any celebrity or politician as anything other than their own individual opinions. I do not know if feminists collectively agree with Linda Gordon. Feminists are only such by self-identification. Just like Men's Rights Advocates. MRAs are MRAs if they say they are, but that doesn't mean all …
/r/MensRights01/06/25 07:51 AM
-2

I'll be honest that I haven't delved that deeply into feminist lore to know where they suggest destruction of the nuclear family, instead of suggesting alternatives. I know I've seen some quotes from noted feminists who say that the "traditional" family structure is either no longer necessary or worse, "toxic". I will admit my ignorance on deep feminist doctrines. Maybe this is a good place to gather a few sources on this. Can you give a few links to sources of feminists who actively call for th…
/r/MensRights01/06/25 07:34 AM
4

I agree with several points you've made here, and I think it's important to openly discuss these kinds of issues without fear of cancellation or dogmatic backlash. Misandry is real, and yes, some corners of feminist theory have drifted into outright absurdity or hostility toward men. That deserves to be called out. And yes, the normalization of 'man-hating' in certain media and academic spaces is unacceptable—just as misogyny would be if the roles were reversed. That said, I have to push back on…
/r/MensRights01/06/25 06:53 AM
2

While I fully support raising awareness for men’s mental health, it’s worth noting that November has long been the globally recognized Men’s Health Awareness Month, with campaigns like Movember (started in 2003) and No-Shave November raising awareness for both mental and physical health issues like suicide prevention, prostate cancer, and more. These campaigns are highly visible, supported by major charities, and have cultural recognition around the world. On the other hand, June was claimed dec…
/r/MensRights01/06/25 04:11 AM
11

I disagree with a point you presented. In my opinion, being vocal about and communicating your personal problems that you have in your life is not something that women are good at and men are bad at. That seems like a crazy way of framing it. Instead, it seems to be the difference between being acceptable for women to do, and not acceptable for men to do. Men do not need to learn to communicate our personal problems to women. As men, the lesson we overwhelmingly learn, is to NOT communicate our …
/r/MensRights16/05/25 07:40 AM
1

Sorry for my delay in responding. You stated: "... if it is allowed for boys than it should be allowed for girls to." I instead believe the better way of arguing this point, and the laws we should be advocating for, would align more with the notion that: "... if it is illegal for girls, then it should also be illegal for boys." We both seem to agree that circumcision is wrong. Why make it legal for both? Why not just make it illegal for both instead..? Equality doesn't mean bringing girls down t…
/r/MensRights05/05/25 08:06 AM
9

Female circumcision practices vary greatly. Sometimes it is nothing more than a pin prick to the clitoris as a sort of ritual compliance, and other times it is quite more horrific involving complete removal of the clitoris and labia. It is not a good thing and should always be condemned, in my opinion. Male circumcision is fairly standard, in that the procedure does not vary much. The purpose is the same though, when applied to men, which is to reduce sexual stimulation and desire. I agree that …
/r/MensRights06/03/25 08:43 AM
2

This guy fucks couches. Nothing he says matters.
/r/MensRights02/03/25 12:12 PM
6

You can look at male-only conscription throughout history. That is misandry. It kills men. The alternate accusations of misogyny in those times, supposedly suggesting women shouldn't fight in wars, only coddles them. Maybe it annoyed some..? Doubtful, or I'd suspect few enough that they'd remain a statistical anomaly. This is a clear example of when misandry kills and misogyny, at worst, annoys. Misandry said men must fight. They died. Misandry killed them. Misogyny said women couldn't fight. Th…
/r/MensRights01/03/25 08:27 AM
4

Misandry tells men they need to sacrifice their lives for women. Misogyny tells women they should make dinner for their husband. More men have died every single day, for all of human history, because they were pressured to save someone else, risk their own lives, simply because they are a man ... than women have died because they are women. Simple comparison of yearly deaths of men to women for any or all years of human history. Why no equality there..? Misandry obviously.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 08:15 AM
20

What are you seeking..? If you are just seeking sex at a price, then dating might not be the answer for you. There are massage parlors in your neighborhood, I'd bet, who could satisfy your needs for the same or lesser cost. Prostitutes might also be a suitable option based on your cost limitations and outcome expectations. Maybe you don't actually want a life partner, and instead you just want sex? Nothing wrong with that. That is what it sounds like. Prostitutes, call girls, escorts, massage pa…
/r/MensRights17/11/24 10:30 AM
26

Definitely different times. This isn't the fifties. We split the bill now. Remember that, and your problem is mostly solved.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 09:11 AM
5

I agree with you. That was the argument against abortion, too. "If the woman didn't want the child, she shouldn't be having sex." Nobody should be forced to become a parent, even in the event of accidental pregnancy. Parentage is something that needs to be enthusiastically consented to, but never forced. I would argue that if women should have that choice, men should too. If it is accepted that this is a human right, to choose to be a parent or not, then men need similar rights. Men are human to…
/r/MensRights13/11/24 12:47 PM
3

In the event of an unplanned accidental pregnancy, men have zero choice. If a woman becomes pregnant, the man does not get to decide if he wants to become a parent or not. It does not matter what financial or emotional impact this will have on the man. That is irrelevant in the eyes of the law, and in the eyes of society at large. This is inequity. Men are essentially told that if they don't want to deal with the risk of having children, or if they are not prepared to raise a child, then they sh…
/r/MensRights13/11/24 11:55 AM
3

She has kidnapped them. What she is doing is illegal and immoral. Contact a lawyer immediately and perhaps advise the police as well.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 09:46 PM
1

Sounds like you pulled through when needed. Still good. It is ok not to enjoy work, so long as you still do your best regardless. Raising kids is hard work.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 05:51 AM
2

Don't be sorry. It worked out for the best in the end. My daughters are the two most amazing people I have ever met, without exaggeration. I would endure any torture or pain to ensure they can thrive. I would be willing to experience any horror to save them. Even their mother. As I did. Hyperbole..? Perhaps.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 03:06 AM
1

"It’s nice you come with other situations." And with that trite comment, you disregard everything I said, as though you have no arguments against any of it. You agree to all of what I said? Cool. Me too. It is important to note that you stated: "Household chores has not 50/50 but more like women 90/10 men. It sucks when you have to work full time still pay half and next tot that still have to do all of the household chores, clean up after the other and do most of the cooking and shopping for gro…
/r/MensRights10/09/24 01:40 AM
8

Totally understandable. It isn't easy to do, raising two young children. The biggest part though was the trust, as you mentioned. In the end, I had misplaced mine and now I am paying the price for that. However, I still don't regret my time with my girls, even though I struggle financially now. I have incredible children and we have a very strong bond. It was worth it to me.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 10:42 PM
69

I was a stay at home dad for two daughters, until the youngest entered kindergarten. I highly recommend doing it if you can. Best years of my life so far.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 08:53 AM
7

"Most women these days are only after money..." .... I truly hope that isn't the case. "...they [men] want the easy way of everything. 50/50 on paying bills..." ... How is that the easy way? 50/50 is equality. "But when it comes to household stuff, all men slack off as soon as we live together. Not even one man I’ve met pulled of their weight on household stuff. Not with me nor other people I’ve known." ... Do you believe this is a problem with men as a gender, or with the men you and your frien…
/r/MensRights07/09/24 02:47 AM
5

I would argue that everyone, man or woman, should give up a seat for disabled, elderly and pregnant. Those in need first. Those in want second.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/24 01:57 AM
4

Canada here, eh. We don't do that here either, ya hosers. Sorry.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 01:27 AM
7

I was the stay-at-home father who raised my two children while my ex advanced her career. We now have 50/50 custody, and she pays me child support each month in an amount that covers the cost of my mortgage. It doesn't have to work against men. Sometimes it can work for men too. Times are changing.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 01:17 AM
5

It is just a new slur. It became useful because men react to it in a way that amuses those who use the slur. Stop reacting. Accept it is a slur. Not different than calling a woman a slut. She will react. Your goal is to refrain from being annoyed by a slur, and do not react to it. The word only has value to those who use it if you react to it. Your best bet is to ignore and disregard anyone who would try to call you an incel. Alternately, you can inversely call them a slut. That is the female se…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 05:25 AM
2

That is a good resource.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 10:07 PM
3

This is a good example of why gendered laws are ridiculous. All laws should be gender-free. For anyone who feels he should not be able to become a she to avoid harsher sentencing, they should recognize the same goes for any she who is already a she. Nobody should receive a more lenient punishment simply due to their gender or sex. That is insane. Everyone should be equal under the law. Do not treat women as if they are children. Women deserve equal punishments for equal crimes. Close the punishm…
/r/MensRights25/08/24 03:35 AM
4

If it was truly happening, then they can sue. Since there is not a deluge of lawsuits happening , then we can ascertain from that fact that there is no wage gap. If there was a wage gap, those affected can sue to rectify the situation. In the USA of all places, arguably the most litigious nation on the planet, we should see cases every day of every year for the past however long they think this has been happening. We don't. There is a good reason we don't see that. In 2023, the Nobel Prize in Ec…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 10:20 PM
36

The only reason that I was happier when I was married was because I saw my kids every day, my dog was with us every day, I had a nice big house and a business with a rental property. Now, divorced, I see my kids every second week, and they bring their dog with them. I live in a condo now, and work in an office for someone else. I suspect that for most men, the difference in their happiness from being married and divorced or single has little or nothing to do with anything the woman is bringing t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 05:01 AM
98

/r/MensRights02/08/24 01:43 AM
20

The term "incel" is a sexualised slur in the same way that the term "slut" would be considered a slur. Both are terms that define an individual's perceived amount of sexual activity. Males are negatively referred to as "incels" for low sexual activity, because socially males are pressured to have high sexual activity. Likewise, females are negatively referred to as "sluts" for high sexual activity, because socially females are pressured to have low sexual activity. I think it is fine if someone …
/r/MensRights31/07/24 07:52 AM
4

It would be preferable, in my opinion, to tackle this sort of problem in a non-gendered way, and maybe create an egalitarian declaration that seeks to "eliminate violence", full stop. Little boys and yes, even adult men, all deserve protection too. This is an example of the systemic sexism against males that permeates the social and political discourse of the world in general now. The Feminist Hegemony? The Matriarchy? Toxic femininity? Whatever it is, whatever the reason, it is no longer justif…
/r/MensRights31/07/24 07:30 AM
13

"I don’t think there is anything particularly wrong about hitting a woman- although I don’t recommend doing it in the same way that you’d hit a man. An open-handed slap is justified if all other alternatives fail.” – Sean Connery, Playboy, 1965. Equality. If she can hit you first, then surely you can slap her back. Wouldn't want to infantilize the women who attack like that.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 01:41 AM
13

I agree, it won't work on most. I still think that doesn't matter. They still need to have that mirror held up for them, because they will often not otherwise have a chance to see themselves for what they are truly. More importantly, it isn't those who spout such idiocy that we are trying to convince. As you correctly stated, they have internalised their beliefs. They are devout in their misandry, and are unlikely to see what they are doing as wrong. In their minds, they are heroes. Instead, spe…
/r/MensRights23/07/24 08:18 AM
50

"Teach girls to treat men properly." In my opinion, it is often a good idea to echo their sexist statements back to them, with genders reversed. Immediately after they utter their nonsense. Hopefully they can learn the idiocy of viewing the world through such a cracked lens, when they themselves feel needlessly and irrationally targeted simply due to their sex. Using their own words, and their own warped ideology. I agree with you. Everyone should treat each other properly, regardless of gender.…
/r/MensRights23/07/24 08:04 AM
1

I thought for a moment you were calling me out for something, but then realized (I think) that instead you were just using the acronym appropriately. Cool. For me, the many that you claim do not outweigh the majority that I see. At least online, where people often seem more willing to casually speak (or more accurately 'type') their true opinions without fear of reprisal. It is true that many women disapprove. Far too many women, however, do not. Should we compare this to a bowl of chocolates..?
/r/MensRights22/07/24 07:38 AM
15

None of the options thus far presented seem even in the least adequate. None seem competent or capable. Yet here we are now. Seriously..?! How many million people in the USA and THESE FUCKS are who you choose to be leaders..?!? The best of you all..? Wow.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 08:13 AM
1

I agree with your views on toxic masculinity. We don't have to buy into it. I don't. Patriarchy Theory is just a dog-whistle for misandrists, androphobes, and other crazy sexist man-haters. I generally just refer to them as Feminists, as that seems to be what they always call themselves when asked. Nothing they say matters to me. I do, however, have to recognize that their hate filled tirades against half the world's population do affect a very large segment of society, who seem unfortunately to…
/r/MensRights21/07/24 06:32 AM
1

We have been told for decades now that to do those things is patronising, infantilizing women, acting out toxic masculinity, all because of The Patriarchy. So, no. Not interested in your solution.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 05:18 PM
2

How do you define chivalry? Why, and for who, is it important?
/r/MensRights20/07/24 07:41 AM
4

The difference here is that a puppy was stabbed, which generally evokes sympathy in women, versus the man who was stabbed, which truly seems to only ever evoke joy in many women, or at best apathy.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 07:38 AM
114

Don't sweat it. None of those rules apply anymore. Men owe women nothing.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 09:56 PM
10

I agree. UTIs are relatively rare and can be effectively treated with antibiotics. Circumcision is not required to prevent that. Also, as you've noted, circumcision is no guarantee to prevent it. Likewise with the other purported health benefits, there is simply no scientific proof to back up the claims. Each potential ailment is generally rare even in uncircumcised individuals, and many health professionals argue that proper hygiene and antibiotics can effectively prevent or cure each condition…
/r/MensRights15/07/24 01:18 AM
17

Male circumcision and female circumcision share many similarities in terms of their justifications and impacts, and both should be considered with equal scrutiny. Historically, both practices have been promoted as ways to control sexual behavior by reducing sensitivity and sexual desire. In the case of male circumcision, figures like John Harvey Kellogg advocated for the practice to prevent masturbation, mirroring the justification for female circumcision in reducing female sexual desire. Both p…
/r/MensRights14/07/24 07:34 PM
5

I don't know about the history of voting rights in other countries, but in Canada, the time from when the average man was able to vote (1917) to when the average woman was able to vote (1920) was only three years time. The average man only received the right to vote largely due to the conscription crisis of the time and the First World War. The average woman did not need to make any such commitment to sacrifice her life in order to receive the right to vote. For most of Canada's history, voting …
/r/MensRights13/07/24 04:31 AM
2

When shelters were made for women, the rate of wives killing their husbands went down dramatically. They had an escape from the abuse, and no longer had to resort to violence to solve their problem. I suspect that, if there were shelters available for men, the rate of husbands killing their wives would take a similar dramatic downturn. Violence is often a response of desperation from someone who feels they have no escape and are cornered. Give these abused men an escape. It will protect women.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 12:26 AM
21

I believe a child has an inherent right to know their own parentage, and to deny any child that should be seen as a crime. How do you define "a child's rights to be free from genetic discrimination"? What does that mean to you, and how would that take away from a child's inherent right to know their own true parentage?
/r/MensRights03/07/24 09:55 AM
289

Absolutely. DNA should be tested and verified at birth as a standard part of the process. Paternity should also be verified as a requirement in order for the mother to receive child support from a man who has not been proven to be the biological father.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 03:02 AM
1

Thank you for the source. Wow. I hope that remains an anomaly and is not a new trend. Sad and wrong.
/r/MensRights21/06/24 01:58 AM
14

I hope that doesn't happen. I would have loved to have had a son, even in these current times. I like to think that knowing the problems that boys face would help me as a father to protect and strengthen my son against some of the obstacles that he will inevitably face. Instead, I have two daughters, who are both amazing individuals themselves. My girls are truly two of the most incredible people I have ever met. I wish I could have kept having more kids, but the choice was not mine. All childre…
/r/MensRights20/06/24 06:36 AM
2

Source? I haven't heard of that happening.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 06:29 AM
12

Feminism, as we see in practice all over the world, is Sexism. We are not confused about that. The confusion seems to be your own.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 10:04 PM
8

Source: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1108312/women-national-basketball-association-interest-gender/
/r/MensRights15/06/24 12:26 AM
25

I find it funny when feminists try to demonize MGTOW types or anyone who would genuinely choose celibacy voluntarily. They call it "misogyny". They often claim these men must either be incapable of attracting a woman or they must just hate women. Women have been marching with signs and posting in all media for decades that they don't need men in their lives. Many men are coming to realize that they, too, do not need women in their own lives. If it is misogyny when men make that choice, then it m…
/r/MensRights15/06/24 12:11 AM
7

He should now be legally allowed to stab her twice.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 11:32 PM
9

This is yet another great example of why feminism must always be opposed. This seems to be the universal feminist method. Just a couple weeks ago in Italy, the feminists were up to the same tactics: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1cv5bwi/90_feminist_groups_and_130_womens_shelters_sign/ Feminism is anti-male.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 12:43 AM
6

We need to stop listening to women who insist on telling men how to be men. We know that women do not tolerate when men attempt to tell women how to be women. It is the same. We need to adopt their disgust at this same behaviour when women do it to men. Those who would do this deserve only derision and contempt.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 12:33 AM
60

I think that is an apt comparison. Instead of The Handmaid's Tale, men have had The Soldier's Tale for all of human history, but unfortunately it isn't a fiction.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 11:59 PM
5

The Patriarchy Theory as presented by feminists is a conspiracy theory that acts as a dog whistle for misandrists. It is not something that should be taken seriously. Those who attempt to present it as reality are self-identifying as delusional man-haters. Use it as the red flag that it is.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 09:18 PM
53

This is a great example of why feminism must always be opposed.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 09:02 PM
72

If this mythical Patriarchy existed, Feminism would not be allowed to persist. The simple existence and hegemony of Feminism over public discourse for so long disproves Patriarchy Theory.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 01:20 AM
2

Excellent example of systemic sexism against men.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 03:43 AM
2

Very true. Some do, and they have proven that every nation can do the same. There is no reason to continue the sexist policies regarding selective service and conscription.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 03:41 AM
1

Men in general are also not competent warriors, until they have been trained. Training exists.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 03:38 AM
66

We need to stop listening to women who insist on telling men how to be men. We know that women do not tolerate when men attempt to tell women how to be women. It is the same. We need to adopt their disgust at this same behaviour when women do it to men. Those who would do this deserve only derision and contempt.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 04:56 AM
19

Feminists keep talking about how we need to "be an ally" to them. They seem to forget that allies support and defend each other. It is not meant to be one-sided. What they seem to mean is that we need to "be servants". They continue to dismiss, disregard, ignore and actively work against the interests of men in general. They can not be our allies, and therefore, we can't be theirs..
/r/MensRights09/05/24 03:36 AM
28

To quote the feminists: "A man needs a woman like a fish needs a bicycle." You don't need women in your life. Women are optional. There is no need to fear them, but there is also no need to interact with them in any way if you choose not to do so. You have no obligations towards women. There are many good women out there. Maybe you can find one. There are also many bad women out there. I don't blame you if you view the mix of them "like a bowl of chocolates where half are poison", to quote the f…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 11:25 PM
28

Someone please teach these women to stop sexually assaulting all these young children. There are so many cases like this. They apparently need to add a course to their teaching practicum so that they learn that little boys are not sexual toys for adult women. A little boy did not "make out" with his 24 year old teacher. She sexually assaulted him.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 08:50 PM
8

You describe it as whining about how good women have it, which seems very dismissive. I instead see much of the discussions in forums such as this as pointing out the obvious hypocrisy and inequality against men that is systemic at nearly all levels of government and society. We cannot enact change without first identifying the areas which must be changed.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 06:35 AM
3

It is possible that much of the insistence on tall men that most women have now is due to the fact that many of them grow up in fatherless homes, or otherwise alienated from their dads. This seems to be a father fetish. They may be seeking the protection and support that they were deprived of as children. Any time I see a woman who suggests she refuses any man under 6', I just realize she has a father fetish, and treat that as the red flag that it is. You don't want to be a part of a relationshi…
/r/MensRights24/02/24 09:41 PM
16

Not all feminists are women, and not all women are feminists. You can't oppose feminism by opposing women. Women are not the problem. The feminist ideology is the problem. Women are not the enemy. Don't boycott a business just because it is owned by a woman. That is sexist and wrong. Support all humans. Oppose ignorant and bigoted ideologies.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 05:08 AM
3

"Patriarchy theory" is just a sexist conspiracy theory. A dog-whistle for misandrists.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 04:58 AM
2

Just be. There is no "real man" just as there is no "real woman". There is just a "real you". Be that. Ignore anyone else who attempts to define you. Define yourself. A "real man" is whoever you want to be.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 03:56 AM
31

Your experience there sounds nearly identical to mine. That is how I found spaces like this instead. I am sure many men ended up here and other places for similar reasons. It would be interesting to do a poll to determine how many men here started out on their journey believing they were feminists, and so engaged with the feminist communities here, only to find out that in no way can we identify as feminists because of the misandry we have encountered. That is how I discovered what they derisive…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/24 03:44 AM
1

They only want to talk about bad things that other people did years ago, instead of the bad things they are doing today. "Stop looking at me! Look at THEM!:
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/24 01:23 AM
1

Marriage is toxic.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 01:20 AM
5

She is a hippo-crit.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 01:08 AM
17

Men deserve to have Reproductive Freedom, defined as the right to choose if and when to become a parent even in the event of accidental impregnation. Women have many options in the event of an accidental pregnancy. Men currently have none. Men also deserve to be certain and have it proven, at birth, that the child that is being presented as theirs is in fact biologically their child. There are many rules in place to ensure babies born in hospitals leave with their biological mother. There are no…
/r/MensRights17/02/24 01:01 AM
7

What are your definitions of "right" and "left"?
/r/MensRights10/02/24 04:17 AM
12

This fully incentivizes false accusations. Anyone accusing now should be suspect.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 03:31 AM
6

I agree. Monkey see, monkey do. Men will generally try to emulate those who are most successful, in order to repeat that success for themselves. Men as a group will try to behave more like those men who women choose, and less like those men who women reject. Women play a large part in shaping male social behaviour.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 01:07 AM
5

Pendulums swing. Eventually, we can have their granddaughters stand up to apologize for this.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 01:01 AM
4

Lookin' good, Susan.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 05:12 AM
10

This seems like panhandling for respect, instead of earning it.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 01:49 AM
8

TO SAVE A HUMAN LIFE. That is why they aren't helping. To save a human life. Their own.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 03:56 AM
-2

He is a good bad example.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 04:51 AM
23

They actually call it rape. That is a good thing, because that is accurate. That is what she did.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 04:48 AM
3

This should be Rule #1 for every young man to remember. Very important advice. Marriage is toxic. "Toxic Matrimony".
/r/MensRights20/09/23 04:59 AM
1

Oh, I do realize. They don't date down for the same reasons I am suggesting men should not date down anymore too. They know. We need to be aware as well. Or, settle and date down, then lose half your shit eventually. It is nearly inevitable.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 12:23 AM
0

Current stuff might not yet matter, but then you haven't yet bought the house. Or the next ten years worth of assets and investments. That is the stuff to protect. If possible, get with someone who earns more than you. Then, you get the alimony. Income gets "equalized". Otherwise, assets are split evenly. The one with the most assets or highest income in a divorce is the one who loses. Things to consider.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 06:26 AM
22

Everyone needs to remember that in a divorce, which happens at least 50% of the time, you will potentially lose half of your assets. Do not get into any committed relationship with anyone who does not have equal assets to you, otherwise you lose every time. Like flipping a coin on your future financial health.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 06:13 AM
13

it's actually VOLUNTARY celibacy Yes, the volcels. It is just like the feminist movement in the early days, talking about how no women needs any man. Likewise, no man needs any women. It is purely optional now.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 06:06 AM
1

I agree. One random woman is not representative of all women. There are lots of videos of random men being idiots out there too, and I don't want to be lumped in with them either.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 05:49 AM
11

Unless and until we also frame femininity as "toxic", "fragile", or "healthy" then we should refrain from describing masculinity in such ways. That is a feminist lens, to only define masculinity in these negative and controlling ways, and that lens is cracked. I agree with you that this phrasing is misleading .
/r/MensRights15/09/23 05:38 AM
2

Thank you very much for all your work. It is appreciated.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 05:21 AM
66

Boys were not so much allowed to do whatever they want. They were punished. And they were generally punished more severely compared to the girls. Both the boys and girls were told to sit and be still and quiet. The girls complied, as they were mostly submissive and docile. Women seem more inclined towards in-groups, and seek to be part of the in- as opposed to being out. The boys continued to challenge authority. They fought for what they believed was right, regardless of the punishment. Boys ar…
/r/MensRights31/08/23 06:55 AM
35

Femsplaining masculinity ... again..? Are they trying to control our bodies?
/r/MensRights31/08/23 05:19 AM
1

Yeah. Based on observations, it seems accurate. It should be easy now for any man, any time a woman tries to shame him because he is less than six feet tall, he can turn it around. She is just being very creepy and weird. Did she not have a dad in her life growing up? Did she have a crush on her step-dad? Ick! You don't want to be that replacement for her. Thank her for revealing her oddity, and walk away.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 05:12 AM
27

It is generally just feminist bullshit. The sort of myths up there with classic "old wives tales". Depending on which feminist you talk to, they will defend or define the argument in different ways. I have seen the idea defended in a couple different ways so far: physical maturity or mental maturity. It is arguable that girls usually are physically maturing more obviously at a younger age than boys. Girls generally begin developing breasts before boys begin growing facial hair, for instance. The…
/r/MensRights31/08/23 04:08 AM
2

You can live together, but anytime over 12 months and you are considered "common-law", which is very similar to married. Likewise if you have kids. There are many differences regarding the financial and legal aspects, though. Your property is far safer when you keep to common-law instead of the more formal legal marriage. If someone is considering partnering with someone, it is advisable to refrain from the traditional marriage and stick to common-law only. You might like this website for more i…
/r/MensRights28/08/23 10:33 PM
10

The BankAmericard came out in 1966. Before that, the only available cards were Diner's Club and American Express but they were not true general purpose credit cards. By 1970, only 50% of households had credit cards. They were still new. The BankAmericard changed its name to VISA in 1976. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act was introduced in 1973, and signed into law in 1974. This act prevented discrimination based on gender or marital status when applying for credit. For most of the 1970s, women we…
/r/MensRights28/08/23 01:09 AM
6

All the search results are there at my link. If you actually are interested in truth, you have it available to you in what I have already provided.,
/r/MensRights27/08/23 05:24 AM
29

It is possible that much of the insistence on tall men that most women have now is due to the fact that many of them grow up in fatherless homes, or otherwise alienated from their dads. This seems to be a father fetish. They may be seeking the protection and support that they were deprived of as children. Any time I see a woman who suggests she refuses any man under 6', I just realize she has a father fetish, and treat that as the red flag that it is. You don't want to be a part of a relationshi…
/r/MensRights27/08/23 04:08 AM
3

According to Bing, prenuptial agreements are overturned 50% of the time: https://www.bing.com/search?q=how+often+are+prenuptial+agreements+overturned&form=QBLH&sp=-1&ghc=1&lq=0&pq=how+often+are+prenuptial+agreements+overturned&sc=8-46&qs=n&sk=&cvid=3CE6DE8BF4F74674A9BFD251859AF88E&ghsh=0&ghacc=0&ghpl= That is like flipping a coin.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 03:45 AM
40

More than fifty percent of marriages end in divorce, initiated by the woman seventy percent of the time. Marriage is toxic. Even when divorce doesn't happen, many stay together with people they hate simply because divorce is too expensive. If there was a bowl of candies on the table, and you knew that half of them are poison, would you still reach in and take one? Willing to risk everything on a coin flip?
/r/MensRights26/08/23 09:12 PM
7

Such disgusting women. Vile. Using the children as pawns to abuse this man. They are physically preventing him from leaving. He should be allowed to defend himself and move them if they do not allow him to leave.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 10:50 PM
5

I was responsible for my ex gf cheating on me. Lies, of course. No man is responsible for the shitty behaviour of any bad woman.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 11:12 PM
52

"A man needs a woman like a fish needs a bicycle."
/r/MensRights23/08/23 06:08 AM
0

Women don’t attempt more. They attention seek more. This is the answer.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 12:39 AM
20

More than fifty percent of marriages end in divorce, initiated by the woman seventy percent of the time. Marriage is toxic. Even when divorce doesn't happen, many stay together with people they hate simply because divorce is too expensive. If there was a bowl of candies on the table, and you knew that half of them are poison, would you still reach in and take one? Willing to risk everything on a coin flip? It is pushed, but it should not be. It benefits women and society in general, to the detri…
/r/MensRights23/08/23 12:29 AM
8

It is only customary for the man to pay for everything if you keep maintaining that custom. Women who expect that or insist on that are not women you want. Immediate red flag. Just as it should be a red flag for a woman if a man expects the woman to be barefoot and pregnant staying in the kitchen. Always split the bills. That is equality.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 07:14 PM
3

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3954798/ Scroll down to table 3. It does show that there are excess deaths for women that exceed those for men. However, in ever other aspect, there are far more deaths for men than for women. It is only during the heatwave that there are "excess" deaths, meaning more than average. There are otherwise always more deaths of men. Women die far less frequently than men.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 03:49 AM
3

"Just following orders." Has that ever been the wrong thing to do..? "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph in the world is that good men do nothing." Or, in this case, "for good men to just follow orders".
/r/MensRights19/06/23 03:42 AM
55

"A man needs a woman like a fish needs a bicycle."
/r/MensRights17/06/23 11:41 PM
2

Yes, I know. I hope you are right and it is a sign. During my divorce, I was told that 50/50 is the new trend and what the courts want to see now. Hopefully that is true, and more men will get treated fairly.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 02:13 AM
5

She took the kids..? That is kidnapping. She isn't allowed to do that. I divorced this time last year. I was in a very similar situation as you. I was the stay at home parent, taking care of our two daughters since the first was born, until the youngest was ready for school full time. Then, I started a business. You should be able to easily get 50/50 custody, especially since you were the one raising them as the primary parent already. I have 50/50 custody of my kids. They live with me alternate…
/r/MensRights16/06/23 01:59 AM
-1

She then got mad at me and moved out with the kids and is now holding them hostage. That sounds horrible. It also sounds like kidnapping. It is illegal for her to do that. She does not own the kids. Hopefully your lawyer advises you to contact the police immediately regarding that.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 01:42 AM
3

An awesome example of feminism! THAT IS FEMINISM!
/r/MensRights11/06/23 08:12 PM
24

Pride Month first happened in 1970, while Men's Mental Health Month first happened in 1994 for June, so they had it first. Men are still a part of LGBTQ+. There is also another Men's Mental Health Month in November, which first began in 2003. I personally prefer November for the month, since it also includes International Men's Day on the 19th of November. Bonus points for not conflicting with Pride Month.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 01:24 AM
5

I'm looking forward to it. Planning a day out for lunch with my two daughters, then maybe check out the latest Spiderverse movie in the theatre, then home for pizza and video games.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 11:52 PM
11

In general, society is far more misandristic than it is misogynistic. Misogyny is more interpersonal, whereas misandry is systemic. Every day of every year since the dawn of humanity, more men die than women. Misandry kills far more than misogyny, every day. Misogyny apparently keeps women from becoming computer programmers.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 12:38 AM
3

In the article, the mother mentions "that the girl started having behavior issues when 'she was put back on a medication she was off for over a year,' adding that 'it wasn’t psych meds.'"
/r/MensRights02/06/23 02:23 AM
1

I have zero interest in watching the new Aquaman movie now.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 02:10 AM
9

Because feminism.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 09:50 PM
3

You can not trust her. Walk away.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 09:41 PM
17

Standard. The child is male.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 09:04 PM
4

I hope the dad gets ahold of her then.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 09:03 PM
2

I agree. The way I see it is that you can always make more money but you can never make more time. Take the time when it is available, and worry about the money later.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 06:34 PM
1

Can you share which systemic programs you are not allowed to access with your children because you are aman? Oh, I was referring specifically to the subject of OP: Affordable housing in Canada but only for single mothers. That seems to be a good example.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 03:25 AM
1

Well it has happened here in Canada for many, many men. It is good to hear that means that the whole of patriarchy has ended in Canada,
/r/MensRights26/05/23 02:57 AM
3

There are sacrifices made for sure, being the stay at home parent. Now that we are divorced and I have gone back to work, I am basically at an entry level job now. The big gap in my resume has made job hunting very difficult. Being the primary parent is often isolating as well, since you stay home with the kids and miss out on the socialization that is so easy when you are out working. Those are the two biggest problems being a stay at home parent, in my opinion. But all in all, it is a great ex…
/r/MensRights25/05/23 11:30 PM
1

I have 50/50 PPC with my ex. We alternate weekly. Hopefully more people get that. As it stands, my ex can get access to resources and services that I cannot, simply because I am a man.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 11:25 PM
8

I'll be 50/50 come July. Awesome! Sounds like good news. How'd you pull off spousal support? Did you stay home with the kids for a while? Yes. I was a stay at home dad to raise my two daughters until the youngest was in school full time. Best years of my life. Highly recommend it for anyone who can make it happen. It worked for us at the time since I was able to invest money I had from before the marriage into property that could be rented out that provided an income that covered our mortgage pl…
/r/MensRights25/05/23 06:14 AM
2

Exactly this. It would solve the problem for both sides. Pro-choice people would get to have the fetus removed so the woman does not need to be pregnant if she does not want to be, and the pro-life people would know that the fetus was not killed.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 05:26 AM
1

What happens when it is PPC 50/50 alternating weekly?
/r/MensRights25/05/23 05:13 AM
8

I am in what seems to be a relatively unique situation. I have my kids 50/50, alternating weekly. My ex-wife pays child support to me monthly, and paid a large sum as spousal support when we divorced, which equated to almost $10k per year of marriage. Not sure if I was lucky or had a good lawyer. Just putting this out there so men realize there can be better alternatives. Sorry for your situation. *Edit: I'm in Canada too.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 04:58 AM
5

It isn't just men alone, and it isn't all men.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 03:40 AM
3

Do you have a source for that? Not really disbelieving, as it seems to be the ways things are generally done. Do you have a link that shows where it is stated in their rules that I can read, without me having to research it on my own..? I haven't heard of that before.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 03:35 AM
46

We are told gender is fluid, and fluctuates on an irregular basis. I see no problem with you feeling like a woman when it is economically advantageous to you.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 03:29 AM
59

As a single dad, I would love to have even half of the benefits that single moms receive.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 03:27 AM
32

Get a lawyer. It is generally in the child's best interest to have both parents in their lives equally.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 10:58 PM
1

I would laugh, talk back similarly to them, and watch them get enraged. We should really do that with all their language. Any time they start talking about "toxic masculinity" automatically bring up "toxic femininity". Same for things like "men are trash" parrot them with "women are trash". We need to stop defending ourselves from their attacks, and instead just throw their own words back at them. It is all about the goose and the gander, and what is fair.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 06:57 PM
2

I second this. Get a lawyer involved. Media too.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 10:05 PM
17

Attractive actress in big movies? That equals fame.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 02:59 AM
1

Do any of us actually do it, or do we just keep thinking it?
/r/MensRights18/05/23 02:57 AM
6

I have often seen examples of what she was saying to you, regarding "a majority of men are rapists or commit violent crimes" which is false. What she meant to say may have been "a majority of rapists are men" or "a majority of those who commit violent crimes are men" which would have been more palatable and perhaps open to debate and further discussion. What she did say was offensive and completely wrong. That sort of thing seems to happen often among feminists, and whether that is purposeful or…
/r/MensRights18/05/23 02:51 AM
49

I am not a fan of Brie Larsen, but her response seemed fair. It was an odd question to ask her in that moment. Clearly the person asking was seeking controversy. I don't believe there is a possible bridge between feminism and even egalitarianism. I highly doubt feminism will ever accept men's rights as being legitimate. The media, entertainment, educational and also governmental institutions are all to blame, as they have fully succumbed to the feminist dogma. I doubt many people would agree wha…
/r/MensRights18/05/23 01:55 AM
1

You're right. I was wrong. It isn't a standard yet. It should be.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 01:44 AM
1

Sueing isn't going to work I disagree.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 01:38 AM
2

Interesting story. Good news for sure. The sentencing is far shorter than I think would be appropriate, but it is a good start seeing this sort of thing even resulting in any sort of conviction. I noticed that among the falsely accused victims were three women. I hate that my first thought is that the only reason this false accuser was convicted is because some of the falsely accused were women.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 12:52 AM
3

We should collectively infiltrate those groups, get screenshots of the defamation, then assist anyone affected by providing evidence for their lawsuits. These women should be sued. Every one of them who posts anything defamatory in that group, sue them.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 09:38 PM
123

They are constantly doing this sort of thing now. They could have simply made it a bill to prevent online abuse. Period. They are so blatantly sexist, and exclude all men.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 03:11 AM
2

No, it does not.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 11:38 PM
6

I agree, it was because of the crowd I was hanging with at the time. It has only ever happened to me in feminist forums on Reddit. Once I stopped going to the feminist forums, this abuse stopped.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 10:23 PM
11

Its got absolutely nothing to do with insecurities. I agree. It was why I stopped associating with feminists.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 09:15 PM
14

Here are mine: "I think the phrase Kill-All-Men should not be used by people who claim to want equality." "It sounds like hate speech to say All-Men-Are-Trash. Would you find it acceptable for people to repeatedly say All-Women-Are-Trash?" "Men should be allowed to know if their babies are biologically related to them."
/r/MensRights14/05/23 08:45 PM
9

Where was that said in this thread? Or are you making things up?
/r/MensRights14/05/23 08:39 PM
14

Exactly.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 08:24 PM
67

I guarantee she is not seeking the child's consent before touching him. Feminism is crazy.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 08:16 PM
21

They do that when they know you are right. Any time a feminist starts accusing you of having "insecure masculinity" or "fragile masculinity", they lost the argument and are resorting to name calling.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 08:12 PM
21

Feminism regularly engages in and encourages hate speech against half the planet, based on genitals.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 07:58 PM
2

You are right. It does happen, and it can hurt. I am not one of those guys, so I can't speak for them. I don't know why they do it, and suspect for each it is a different reason.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 11:55 PM
2

Yes, I agree that both women and men have the potential to be bad.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 10:07 PM
3

No, I don't, and now that I've Googled it, I may be mistaken that it is the standard in Canada now. I can only find reference to it becoming a trend in Canada, not necessarily the default standard. My lawyer and the judge had told me it is generally the way it is done now, so I may have misunderstood.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 10:06 PM
13

To her defense, she is a comedian. Not that this was a good joke, but it seems to have been a long drawn out joke. It also seems to have been a desperate cry for attention, by baring her breasts and oh-so-controversially passive-aggressively attacking men. I wouldn't take this as the stance of an average feminist.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 05:46 AM
7

I have had 50/50 custody of my kids from day one of my divorce without debate. It is the standard now in Canada. Hopefully that becomes the standard everywhere if it is not already.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 05:34 AM
4

Call a lawyer right away. Now if you can. They will advise most appropriately for your situation and region. Get your extended family to assist as well, or at least be sure to make them aware.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 03:50 AM
8

We should stick to criticizing ideologies and avoid denigrating people based on race. Ideologies are a choice and can often be wrong. Someone's race is not something that is chosen, and it can't be wrong to be any race.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 03:44 AM
1

You have different views than me on the fact that most men are trustworthy? You don't think that most men are trustworthy?
/r/MensRights09/05/23 10:42 PM
136

Teach women not to murder little children.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 10:01 PM
13

https://www.reddit.com/r/FeMRADebates/
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:48 AM
4

Are there no feminists in Ukraine?
/r/MensRights09/05/23 01:44 AM
3

Most men are trustworthy and I’ve seen a lot of women be bad to men before.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 12:59 AM
3

Do you want a commited relationship and if so why are so many men into hookups? What I want has little relation to what so many men want. No, at this time, I am not looking for a committed relationship. Many men also probably are not looking for committed relationships. That probably explains why so many men are into hookups. What’s the long term goal like which do you want/prefer? My long term goal is to continue to improve on myself. What has completely destroyed modern day dating? Dating apps…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 12:54 AM
12

It is time that men start enlisting the help of their mom or sisters. Get a trusted woman in your life to monitor these FB pages. We need to start the lawsuits rolling. What they are doing is highly unethical and very illegal.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 12:25 AM
6

This happens in the majority of media now. It has been going on for many decades. Thanks for noticing. Be sure to point it out to others when you see it. Make it a point of conversation with your peers.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 09:43 PM
1

The behaviour is bullying. The gender is only relevant to the ways in which each group bullies others, but the base behaviour is the same regardless of gender. The base behaviour is genderless.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 12:25 AM
5

Be honest and show her right away. Explain that you have no idea how it got there, who did it, and you have no way to have it taken down yet. Then, contact the site in question and their support should act quickly to disable the account.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 11:55 PM
6

The term "toxic masculinity" is being misused. It is generally misused, outside of academic papers. Many people also find the term offensive in how it is generally (mis)used. These reasons should be enough reasons to encourage others to find alternative ways of discussing the concept. Well, some extremes of both masculinity and feminity are toxic. How else can we describe those extremes besides toxic femininity and toxic masculinity? For a long time, I had read feminists who refused to accept th…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 10:21 PM
5

Yes, I would suppose I am currently like that. I am not actively attempting to find a relationship. I find myself at peace while single. There is far less stress, workload and expenses now. If I meet someone and fall in love organically, I would not oppose that, but I do not feel I am missing anything by not having my "other half". I am already complete.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 09:19 PM
107

Why are feminists so violent? Somebody please teach women not to be violent.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 03:35 AM
1

I agree with you. The article writer is sexist, and suggesting an all female crew is a part of that agenda. It is possible that it would be more economical to send a crew of lower-than-average-sized astronauts, but there is no reason they all need to be women.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 10:00 PM
1

An average astronaut is not an average person. I believe that anyone who qualifies to be an astronaut has a great deal of relative training, regardless of gender. Average people do not generally get to be astronauts, unless they are millionaires paying a ticket price to go into near Earth orbit in some other billionaire's private spaceship.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 10:10 PM
2

You can select a mixed crew based on size and needed specialties. This would be the smartest way of doing it.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 02:56 AM
3

I agree, except this isn't exactly about their anatomy, but instead about the fewer resources they would need. It is a cost savings. Yes, other solutions are possible. That article writer definitely sounds biased towards women and sexist against men. Clearly anything they state needs to be fully examined and investigated before accepting anything they say as truth. If the information they provided has any truth to it, then I don't see a problem sending an all female crew (or smaller-than-average…
/r/MensRights03/05/23 02:49 AM
9

"Making the first mission to mars all female makes practical sense. A new study shows the average female astronaut requires 26% fewer calories, 29% less oxygen, and 18% less water than the average male. Thus, a 1,080-day space mission crewed by four women would need 1,695 fewer kilograms of food." If this information they provided is true, then I agree that it makes practical sense to send an all female crew for the first mission to Mars. It would be a far more efficient way of using limited res…
/r/MensRights03/05/23 01:11 AM
29

"Criticism of the Duluth Model has centered on the program's sexist insistence that men are perpetrators who are violent because they have been socialized in a patriarchy that condones male violence, and that women are victims who are violent only in self-defense. [...] Furthermore, some critics point out that the model ignores the reality that women can be the perpetrators of domestic violence in heterosexual relationships, as well." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duluth_model Further info from …
/r/MensRights03/05/23 12:42 AM
9

The systems that enrich people still do so mostly for men. What systems do you believe are in place that specifically enrich men alone?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/23 12:05 AM
1

Laws can change.
/r/MensRights02/05/23 11:54 PM
139

If this is true, then non-fathers need to start suing the hospitals and government and anyone else who would adhere to the abhorrent practices. If it is illegal to give random babies to women and claim those babies are theirs, then it needs to be illegal to do the same to men.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 10:29 PM
1

The difference is that Modern Women don't feel the common courtesy to be polite anymore. Maybe it is progress that men are no longer being stuck with hatpins. I know, my point is that "Women don't owe you attention" is a slippery slope argument, anyone can decide they don't owe Society XYZ. I disagree that this is a slippery slope. There are some appropriate boundaries, and other times there are social obligations. This one is a particular boundary that goes both ways. Men don't owe women attent…
/r/MensRights25/04/23 02:11 AM
2

If they were consistent, then yes. But they aren't. I heard on the news today about a new government program coming out that will support "mothers and other parents". They avoid to even say the word "father", but insist on using "mother". They could have just said "parents".
/r/MensRights25/04/23 01:09 AM
3

I find it to be a far stretch to attribute these things to feminism. Most of these can as easily, and likely more accurately, be attributed to the growing acceptance of the LGBTQ+ movement, and the hippies with their counterculture movement. Through the past few decades, there has also been a greater understanding of mental health issues, which has helped educate people of the need for many of these listed changes. I would need to see citations for each item to believe it is a direct result of f…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 03:34 AM
1

Women don't have to put any effort in to get the interest of the opposite sex, it just happens to them. Whereas men have to try their 100% just to get somewhere. Yes, it generally works something like that, since traditionally men are the suitors and mostly do the approaching. It has been that way for most of history, I'd bet. I don't see that changing any time soon. Do you think that can be changed? They totally are. The likely reason why Women would ignore him is because they already got like …
/r/MensRights24/04/23 01:48 AM
1

I don't go to there stores to talk to these women. I go there to buy tools to finish my off-road go kart project. I hadn't seen her for weeks, and when the last time I did she greeted me first, and then I talked for a second and walked away towards my objectives. When I experience something like that, I generally assume that the person was either busy or preoccupied with other things on their mind. If I only go into that shop every few weeks, I'd doubt she'd even remember me. Maybe it is a fear …
/r/MensRights24/04/23 01:26 AM
3

I agree with you. Many of these such groups seem to use "diverse" in place of "no white men". I disagree with how they handle it, how they are defining "diverse", and I don't generally agree with those sorts of programs. It still stands that white men can create non-profit start-ups. They just won't get the benefits of the certification as being diverse. It is discriminatory, to be sure.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 12:47 AM
6

This is not for all non-profit start-ups in Massachusetts. These are the requirements only for the SDO (Supplier Diversity Office) certification of a non-profit. White males can still create non-profit start-ups in Massachusetts, but they will not be able to get the SDO benefits unless they comply with their conditions. According to their website: "The SDO’s mission is to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in state contracting for businesses owned by minorities, women, Portuguese, veterans…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 01:54 AM
13

It should be easy to support men, I hope. Recognize that men's rights are human rights too. When men ask "what about men", we aren't attempting to derail a discussion or engage in "whataboutisms", we are instead just wondering why we aren't included in the conversation that affects us also. Don't use gender slurs (eg: mansplaining) when non-gendered words (eg: condescending) work better. Help us address the inequalities in social system supports for men vs those provided to women. Wonder why wit…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 01:36 AM
1

If you keep returning to the same shops and stores, hoping to have a small chat with the workers, and specifically those who are women, then they may believe you are attempting to flirt with them. It sounds like maybe you are doing that, and they likely recognize that. The feeling you experience, that the interaction "goes cold" when you attempt to repeat it, is likely accurate. They could be showing you they aren't interested in your attempt to flirt, and they don't want to lead you on. It can …
/r/MensRights23/04/23 01:07 AM
4

No, there should not be any law stating a "right to flirt". That sounds crazy. I would agree that harassment laws may need to be refined to ensure people are not being overly prosecuted for behaviour that is not damaging. If you ever feel you are unreasonably accused, contact a lawyer.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 09:35 PM
4

Sorry, I don't fully understand your comment. Are you implying it is only men in that linked article that are criticizing the science of the study being discussed there? And that they only have passion for "shit like too skimpy clothing"..? I perused the comments, and most are debating the validity of the data in the report and how it is presented, instead of being concerned with the clothing part. You linked a "damn essay" as well, and that was clearly written by a woman. I am confused by your …
/r/MensRights07/04/23 11:31 PM
14

These people who complain about regular gendered words that did not demean anyone (policeman, fireman, postman, manhole, mankind, etc) and insist that such words get changed because they insulted an entire gender have been spending the past 20 years creating new gendered words that are essentially used as slurs, like this new "himpathy". Every one of them should be ignored. Their arguments are insane. They are dumbing down humanity, and we waste our time indulging their vanity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/23 08:12 PM
2

The word "incel" is a sexualized slur, in the same way that "slut" is a sexualized slur. Both are words that refer to a person's sexual behaviour, whether that is considered to be in excess or to be entirely lacking. Sexual slurs are a form of sexual harassment. Unless a person identifies themselves as either an incel or a slut, then anyone using such a term to describe someone else is sexually harassing that person. Both men and women are victims of sexual harassment when sexualized slurs are u…
/r/MensRights22/03/23 12:55 AM
2

Paternity verification should be standard procedure for all hospital births.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 08:21 AM
6

If women were truly oppressed and in constant fear of men, the meme of a Karen would not exist. Women are not afraid of men in general.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 10:32 PM
14

I noticed when they did the same thing last year. I haven't even bothered to look at it for this year, since it is obviously going to be heavily censored again. It provides no value to me.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 08:23 PM
3

Thank you for your posts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/22 11:11 PM
4

In the age of hookup culture and dating apps, romance is dead. There is no need to woo a one-night-stand.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 07:13 AM
27

...my science teacher is now secretly misandrist... I dunno. Doesn't sound like she is being secretive about it at all.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 11:29 PM
3

When women have sex, they are not explicitly consenting to get pregnant and raise a child. This is why abortion is sought as a remedy to accidental pregnancies, to hep women. When men have sex, we also are not explicitly consenting to become parents and raise a child. This is why financial abortion is sought, as a remedy to accidental pregnancies, to help men. Nobody should be forced to be a parent unless they enthusiastically consent to do so.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/22 08:09 PM
2

You say: "Stop derailing the conversation. We are attempting to address real issues. Please stop interrupting with your insane man-hating fantasies."
/r/MensRights24/09/22 08:05 PM
1

I’m a dude... Oh..? As a female cis here... Typical.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 01:07 AM
10

You are justifying sexism.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 06:34 AM
2

Now you see. Welcome.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/22 07:34 AM
1

You want to make the hospital responsible for something they have no hand in at all. They have had a hand in it, as they are the place of birth, and therefore they have a responsibility to ensure the baby goes to the proper biological parent. It is not acceptable to give a random baby to a mother. There are rules in place to ensure the mother gets her proper baby. I suggest the same should be done for fathers. If they give the wrong baby to a mother, and the mother takes that baby home and begin…
/r/MensRights24/01/22 06:53 AM
4

The term "toxic masculinity" is generally used as a dog-whistle for feminists and other misandrists. Nothing more.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 06:20 AM
5

No, the hospital has a responsibility to ensure the baby born in their facility leaves their facility with the biological parents. This is generally easy to prove for the mother without genetic testing, simply due to monitoring the baby from the moment of birth through various means, such as bands on wrists. For fathers, of course, determination is different. For fathers, it can only be accurately determined by a DNA test. That doesn't at all reduce the imperative of it. It is still just as impo…
/r/MensRights12/01/22 10:39 AM
3

I want to tell you that all hospitals make great effort to ensure that all babies are given to the right mothers. This is due to lawsuits that happened when mothers were given the wrong babies and sued the hospitals. When mothers were made to raise babies that are not their own biological children, it was seen as criminal. I want it to also be seen as criminal when a man is unwittingly raising a child that is not his own biological child.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 10:31 AM
5

No. It is exactly as I present it. Why do you think it is important if the hospital switched the kid? What the fuck difference does it make if the woman leaves the hospital with her own child or some random switched child? Should a woman be upset that the child she is raising is not her own child if the hospital gives her a random baby instead of her own biological child? Should the mother in this case be able to have any complaint, raising a child she thought was hers when in fact it wasn't? Sh…
/r/MensRights12/01/22 10:23 AM
3

There is a cost for men, both societal and financial, to have their kids tested to verify they are their own biological children. Women have no such obstacles in their path to verify that their children are their own biological children. It is mandated by law that the provisions be in place to ensure women leave hospitals with only their own biological children. There needs to be provisions mandated by law to ensure that men know that the children attributed to them are their own biological chil…
/r/MensRights12/01/22 10:06 AM
5

What all of you guys constantly ignore is that there are laws in place for paternity testing…. What all of us are saying is that there need to be laws in place for paternity testing. They are not yet mandatory. Just because they don't yet exist as mandatory doesn't mean such laws shouldn't exist. This is the fight. Paternity testing is currently done as a personal cost. I looked into it because I found my wife was dallying. Initially, ten years ago, the cost for paternity testing was about $2500…
/r/MensRights12/01/22 09:55 AM
9

but that’s actually not how genetic diagnostics works…..to make sense of genetic data regarding mutations/disease you need extensive medical data from the parents/family. This point you are making is in support of the need to ensure that biological parentage is determined. It is just as important that maternal parentage is accurately determined as that of paternal parentage. It isn't a matter just for the potential parents, but for the children as well. Everyone should know biological truth, whe…
/r/MensRights12/01/22 09:38 AM
13

The hospital verifies that the baby is with the biological mother. The hospital does wrong by not also verifying the biological father.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 09:27 AM
13

Exactly the same thing that a woman would sue a hospital for in such a case. Emotional trauma would be the easiest to prove, I would expect. There is precedence when women are affected. Some similar cases: https://fox59.com/news/national-world/california-women-carry-birth-wrong-babies-due-to-fertility-clinic-mix-up/ https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-58474478 https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local/daily/may99/baby25.htm https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/la-couple-sue-reproductive-…
/r/MensRights12/01/22 09:21 AM
35

To me, this is one of the biggest issues for Men's Rights. Mandatory DNA testing for all newborns should begin immediately. There is no reason to deny this, other than to cover up for infidelity. Rules are already in place, and have been for decades, to ensure that the biological child leaves the hospital with the biological mother. The same needs to be done for biological fathers. No man should ever be named the father unless DNA results prove it. In the past, women have successfully sued hospi…
/r/MensRights12/01/22 12:08 AM
2

“fuck off with your womansplaining” Are you suggesting that someone using a term such as "womansplaining" proves that they are woman-haters? Explains all the usage and defense of terms such as "mansplaining" I've seen in all the feminist subs. So you appear to be saying that all feminists are man-haters then? Same logic.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 10:33 PM
1

Your argument was fine, from what I saw. Those arguing against you in that thread just seem to be upset because they likely feel targeted. There is nothing wrong with having standards, such as you have identified. There is nothing wrong with having a preference for the women you would be in relationships with ever. I have never met a man who would knowingly choose a promiscuous woman as a long-term relationship partner. You are correct.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 10:20 PM
12

No, of course that would not be appropriate. I would generally argue against law enforcement making assumptions of guilt or innocence without further investigation. I would argue against women being assumed to be guilty during a domestic violence incident, just as I would argue against men automatically being assumed to be guilty in a domestic violence incident. Nobody should assume either the man or the woman is automatically guilty during a domestic violence incident. Who is at fault should be…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 01:07 PM
17

I am sorry if I was unclear. I hope you understand that is not at all my view. Nobody should be blamed for violence done to them unless they have themselves initiated the violence. My argument is best summarized as "Violence begets violence."
/r/MensRights30/12/21 12:26 PM
16

No, I didn't state that. I said that if someone doesn't want to get hit, they shouldn't hit first. Nobody should be surprised that someone else defends themselves with similar actions when attacked. The best way to avoid being attacked is to avoid attacking. If you attack first, the response from the one you attacked is not also an attack. It is defense. You hit me. I hit you. Don't hit me, I won't hit you. Basic schoolyard stuff. Boys grow up with that. Girls don't. Girls get taught "Boys can't…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 12:18 PM
19

Woman hits second woman. Hits that woman again. Hits her again. And again. And again. Slaps her. Punches her. Kicks her. Throws a shoe at her. A dish. A cup. Punch. Slap. Hit. Finally, the second woman says "ENOUGH!" and slaps her. There is another scenario for you then. Equal. Do you feel it is wrong for the second woman to slap the first woman in the above scenario..?
/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:53 AM
14

Not at all. I am instead suggesting that an equal person hitting another equal person repeatedly should perhaps expect to eventually be hit back. Anyone hitting anyone else should anticipate reciprocal behaviour. In such instances, reciprocal behaviour is not unwarranted. In fact, it is easily arguably justifiable. In my lifetime experience, I have found that the best way to avoid being hit by someone is to avoid hitting them first.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:44 AM
21

All people have lived and seen examples of this: Woman hits man. Hits man again. Hits him again. And again. And again. Slaps him. Punches him. Kicks him. Throws a shoe at him. A dish. A cup. Punch. Slap. Hit. Finally, the man says "ENOUGH!" and slaps her. Wails! Cries! Tears! Shrieks! Sobs! "How can he do this to poor little me?" she sobs. "I'm just a little woman!" The best way to prevent violence against women is to teach women not to hit. And then not to hit again. And stop hitting. Don't kee…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:18 AM
9

The idea of reproductive freedom is not about compelling anyone to anything. Specifically, the idea is that we should not be compelling ANYONE to become a parent in the event of an accidental pregnancy. Men included. No, women should not be forced to either abort the baby nor give birth to a child they do not want. Likewise, men should not be forced to be parents to a child they do not want. That doesn't mean women must abort if a man doesn't want a baby, but it means the mother gets to choose w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/21 09:23 PM
6

Absolutely. I completely agree. Reproductive Freedom for everyone! Without it, there is no equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/21 09:17 PM
2

while womankind refers to just women, mankind refers to all humans even though women are not included in the term. I can accept that, as it mirrors the general complaint about the term "feminism" as a term that supposedly refers to gender equality.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 04:04 AM
1

Because some MRMs legitimately are on the alt right. Some feminists are legitimately on the alt right as well. We do have rotten eggs in our basket and shouldn't be dismissive of that (I get ridiculed a lot for pointing out this and why we shoot ourselves in the foot when we aren't doing enough to acknowledge it) while acting as the legitimate voices for equality. I agree. However, in my experience, "rotten eggs" are called out far more often within the MRM communities on Reddit than the compara…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 08:41 AM
8

It is funny how feminists often try to conflate the MRM with the alt-right, but it is the MRM who supports the inclusion of women in the selective service registration. The MRM want inclusivity and equality. The feminists, like the Republicans and other alt-right groups, oppose such things. Not surprising, based on history.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 07:23 PM
17

I saw that post, and have seen quite a few similar posts in the past. She seems so fearful and oppressed by men! What a laugh! Willing to "play chicken" with "every single man" she sees on the sidewalk. Completely reveals the false narrative of the poor timid women. I like her complaint of the one guy: "Today, this man locked eyes with me a few feet away from me and continued to WALK DIRECTLY INTO ME and almost knock me over, and then had the audacity to curse at ME under his breath for being in…
/r/MensRights10/12/21 07:11 PM
2

I hear people say men are biologically more aggressive because of larger levels of testosterone (nature). But I feel like it's more to do with the criminal justice system disproportionately favoring women (nurture). Yes. That is the entire point of this thread, isn't it? The core of your OP is a question of nature vs nurture.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 02:03 AM
8

True, I agree that the societal pressures on women to be feminine are not as strongly enforced as the pressures on men to be masculine. That fact changes nothing about the toxicity of the terms used.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 07:23 PM
27

Yes, absolutely. I just looked at mine and it disregards any activity in any of the men's rights groups.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 06:53 PM
14

Do you call it "toxic femininity" when women are being pressured to be feminine all the time? In my experience, most feminists object to the phrase "toxic femininity" and instead prefer "internalized misogyny". You will likely find that most people here also object to the term "toxic masculinity". There are better ways to describe the idea. I would suggest to use "internalized misandry" to describe it. Or better yet, a gender neutral term such as "negatively reinforced gender roles". The phrase …
/r/MensRights09/12/21 06:48 PM
5

Only if women consider themselves inferior to men. If women are to be considered equal, then there is no such thing as "punching down".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/21 02:16 AM
82

The 97% figure was originally about "sexual harassment", not assault. Based on the definition of "sexual harassment", it is quite likely to be true that 97% of women have been sexually harassed. However, again based on the definition of it, there is a high probability that 97% of men have also been sexually harassed in their lives. If you are doing a report for your school, I think you should highlight that fact. It is important to remember that men often have similar lifetime experiences.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 07:47 PM
3

You acknowledge that he wasn't guilty and that it was a "travesty of justice" ... But doesn't make it a false allegation. Seriously..? In what way can you possibly think of the allegation that led to his incarceration for 3 years based on, by your own words, "a travesty of justice" in which this person was imprisoned, while not being guilty, be anything other than a "false allegation"? What sort of allegation was it then, which was proven untrue and led to his incarceration for 3 years, if not a…
/r/MensRights20/10/21 07:13 AM
3

Man cleared = he was innocent? That's not true at all. If someone is cleared, after having been wrongfully convicted, it means that new evidence has been found that proves the person is in fact innocent of the crime. Yes, it is precisely true. Man (or woman) cleared = there isn't enough evidence to determine whether it happened or not. No, when there is not enough evidence to determine whether it happened or not, the case is dismissed due to lack of evidence enough to convict. Being cleared is d…
/r/MensRights20/10/21 06:47 AM
2

How much white people caution about black people is acceptable without being considered racist? How much male caution about women is acceptable without being considered misogynistic? How much Christian caution about Islam is acceptable without being considered Islamophobic? On and on and on. It is sort of all the same, in my opinion. Demonizing an entire demographic based on irrational fears is wrong. It is not justifiable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/21 08:01 PM
8

I've seen this study a few times now, and often the words "harassment" or "assault" are interchanged using the same 97%. The actual study cited "harassment", not "assault", and I can believe the numbers based on the current definition of what is considered "sexual harassment". According to the ACAS website in the UK, sexual harassment is defined as this: https://www.acas.org.uk/sexual-harassment -flirting, gesturing or making sexual remarks about someone's body, clothing or appearance -asking qu…
/r/MensRights11/10/21 06:29 PM
4

A law that only addresses birth control tampering when done by a male can be seen as anti-male, or at least discriminatory against men. The law should be written such that any tampering with or deceit about birth control is illegal, whether it is done by a man or a woman. That would be reasonable, and neither anti-male nor anti-female. It would be egalitarian. Gender neutral. That should be the goal, right..?
/r/MensRights11/10/21 07:46 AM
13

I agree. Tampering with or being deceitful about the birth control methods being used should be illegal. No one should do that. Unfortunately it seems that this law being written only addresses condoms being removed. It should include condoms being removed, of course. It should also include poking holes in condoms, or lying about birth control pills. It should also include lying about having had a vasectomy or tubal ligation. It should be easy to word the law in a way that is egalitarian and inc…
/r/MensRights09/10/21 01:18 AM
16

Paternity, or additional offspring, may force upon the man a distressful life and future. Psychological harm may be imminent. Mental and physical health may be taxed by child care. There is also the distress, for all concerned, associated with the unwanted child, and there is the problem of bringing a child into a family already unable, psychologically and otherwise, to care for it. In other cases, as in this one, the additional difficulties and continuing stigma of single fatherhood may be invo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/21 01:37 AM
20

Men and women both deserve to have an opinion on what rights a woman should have with her body. People who argue against abortion are not concerned with what a woman can or cannot do with her own body, they are concerned with what she can or cannot do to the body of the new human growing inside her. Still a bodily autonomy issue to them, it seems, just a different body is the focus. They are concerned with the rights of the unborn. When the pro-choice movement continually attempts to frame the p…
/r/MensRights06/10/21 07:37 PM
57

It feels like a massive shit-test. I suspect that if enough men start doing as was suggested in that thread, treating all women as though they are paranoid of men and giving the women extra space and distance, in a short while the conversation will turn again and those same men will be accused of infantilizing the women. It will be considered sexist either way. Just be you. Live your life. Nobody should feel a need to account for random strangers potential paranoia. If they are paranoid, they sh…
/r/MensRights24/09/21 12:12 AM
3

It sounds a lot like he is describing the Narcissist's Prayer: "I didn't abuse you, you abused me. And if I did, it wasn't that bad. And if it was, that's not a big deal. And if it is, that's not my fault. And if it was, I didn't mean it. And if I did... You deserved it."
/r/MensRights22/09/21 10:38 PM
10

Unfortunately, that is literally what is being stated by many. Take for instance this quote from Chuck Derry from his AMA in MensLib recently: "Regarding male survivors. This is an important discussion as many male abusers identify themselves as victims of those they abuse. And, in heterosexual relationships, the use of violence by women is often used in self-defense. And even if it is not used in self-defense, the impact of that violence is much different on the man as he is usually larger than…
/r/MensRights21/09/21 10:13 PM
3

Benevolent sexism is sexism that benefits only one sex. ALL sexism is benevolent. It is just that sometimes that benevolence benefits women, and other times it benefits men. It is still sexism. It still needs to be addressed and fixed, with equality as an end goal.
/r/MensRights19/09/21 01:35 AM
7

I agree. "Women's Rights" is much more clear, and nobody could logically argue that women do not deserve equal rights to men. Equality would demand that there must both be fights for "Women's Rights" and "Men's Rights". Hopefully, these can mostly be done simultaneously, maybe concentrating on "Human Rights" or just "Egalitarianism"..? Far better terms than either "Feminism" or "Masculinism" as ways to describe a movement fighting for equal rights for everyone, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 03:58 AM
24

I believe in equality for all. Therefore, I can only view feminism in a negative light, as the movement clearly opposes equality.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 02:46 AM
4

So when people say "All white people are racist" or "All men are sexist", then both white people and men in general can just shrug it off and reassure themselves that it is "Not my fault, it is the fault of society" and "Everyone is like that". It doesn't seem to be a constructive tactic on the part of those using such phrases. If the phrase is misunderstood, then those who are targeted by the phrase will become justifiably defensive. If the phrase is understood in the way you are proposing here…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/21 12:00 AM
5

"What I’m trying to say is that all of us, no matter your background, are racist and sexist to some degree due to being raised in a shitty society." "This is what I wished we understood from the “All ____ people are (insert bigotry)”. It shouldn’t be an attack on the people, it’s an attack on the truth of living and internalizing messages in a shitty society at large." You are racist. You are sexist. When I say that to you, do you feel that is an attack on you personally, or just an attack on th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/21 03:11 AM
48

If the Patriarchy Theory had any basis in reality, then this OP noted result would not be possible. Matriarchy Theory seems far more valid in light of such indisputable evidence.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 03:56 AM
3

Matriarchy..?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/21 03:49 AM
6

Me: More men die than women, every day of every year. You: it’s the other way around but I’m guessing you can’t see that from how far your up in that ass of yours. Tell me any single day in all of human history where what I stated is not true. Just one day. Any. All of human time. I'll wait... Troll is trolling. Can't even do it well.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 06:52 AM
1

I feel confident that if I were to tell any woman I know personally and am close enough to divulge such personal secrets, they would be very supportive.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 06:31 AM
5

Wrong there buddy. it’s the other way around but I’m guessing you can’t see that from how far your up in that ass of yours. This is like a childish "I know you are but what am I?" sort of response. Ignorance personified. I expected no more. Have fun.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 06:10 AM
6

Misandry is systemic. Misogyny is interpersonal. Some men are misogynistic. Society in general is misandristic. More men die than women, every day of every year. Misandry kills. Misogyny hurts your feelings.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 05:08 AM
4

... and also force woman to abort if the man ask it. No. Absolutely not.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 11:23 PM
8

They are recruiting based on sex. People are being denied opportunity based only on their gender. Yes, it is sexist.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 03:22 AM
6

I was a stay-at-home dad for 12 years. Best 12 years of my life. I love spending time with my kids, both of whom are daughters, and we have great relationships. I highly recommend it.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 03:13 AM
7

Calling someone an "incel" is a form of sexual harassment, as it is a derogatory term that refers to someone's sex life (or inferred lack thereof). Just as calling someone a "slut" is also a form of sexual harassment, for similar reasons. If someone self identifies as either a "slut" or "incel" then that is their choice, but labeling someone as such is sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 07:06 PM
7

Why is there not a call to have women step up and step in to stop violent attackers? Just the men..? Hopefully there are many feminists very angry about this Andrew Yang and what he is proposing here. I haven't seen any such posts about that from them yet. This is essentially the definition of "Toxic Masculinity" isn't it..? Socially enforced gender roles which are dangerous or damaging to men and society in general. To put men into the role of protector of women, often at risk of their very liv…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/21 12:31 AM
8

I agree with you on some of these points you've made. If I understand you correctly, I would agree that simply using or discussing only this idea of "The Male Gaze" is evidence in itself of gynocentrism. I don't like such terms and phrases, though. In my opinion, there are better ways of discussing these social phenomenon that do not need to portray one group as the victims and the other group as the sole victimizers. These sorts of ridiculously gendered terms are tiring. If this theory of "The …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/21 12:07 AM
1

I really don't like to see patently false information here in this sub because of its ability to cause inflammatory responses. Wasn't false information. I was describing exactly what happened to me, my experience, and I was truthful. It may be that it isn't law, as others have explained they've had different experiences, and instead may have been my family doctor who told me something that was incorrect. But it is what I was told when I asked. Likewise with the bank account, I wasn't told that i…
/r/MensRights02/04/21 07:28 PM
2

Interesting. I will have to check again then. I had only asked my family doctor, who was a woman, and she told me that I could not get that information. Maybe she knew already that the kids are not mine..? Makes me wonder more now. I will have to try again. If it isn't a law, then I should be able to find out.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 07:24 PM
2

...the reason they gave for the law is "for the preservation of peace in families"... This was the reason I was told as well.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 07:22 PM
582

I found out my wife was a cheater when I found her second OkCupid account by accident. I asked our family doctor if she could tell me the blood types of my children, so I can compare and see if they are likely mine or not. I was told that a man is not allowed to know that and was denied an answer. When my children were born, my father gave me some money so that I could set up an RESP (Registered Educational Savings Plan) account for them. The bank manager, a woman, told me that I could not set t…
/r/MensRights31/03/21 11:34 PM
1

If "toxic masculinity" exists, then so too does "toxic femininity". It is simply "certain cultural norms that are associated with harm to society and to men/women themselves." It applies equally. Alternately, it can be phrased as "internalized misandry" or "internalized misogyny", if you are seeking to avoid denigrating one gender or the other. Referring to the norms of only one gender as "toxic" is toxic in itself, in my opinion. In the general usage, I would consider it "externalized misandry"…
/r/MensRights26/03/21 03:20 AM
8

Yes, good example. Misandry also stops men from being employed in certain areas.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/21 03:13 AM
2

These people initiating such collective punishments against boys and men are exactly what they claim to oppose. They are fighting against an imaginary demon but acting as the demon they imagine. Oh well. I guess one day we can make their daughters and granddaughters stand in an assembly to apologize for this.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 11:27 PM
2

Wow, you're right. That is insane. The BBC is changing "harassment" into "assault", making a statement that is now a complete lie.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 08:26 PM
60

I haven't seen the articles stating that 97% of women have been sexually assaulted, but have recently seen that same number used to describe women who have been sexually harassed. The examples you give are about harassment as well, not assault. By using the definition of sexual harassment, it is easy to show that 97% of men have also been sexually harassed. As you point, being stared at or hearing a joke can count as harassment. This was discussed in another thread recently. I will copy-paste wh…
/r/MensRights23/03/21 10:47 PM
8

So "The Patriarchy" doesn't exist then. Got it. Knew that already. However, I'd disagree and suggest that society was created collaboratively by both men and women. Everyone is responsible.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 07:19 PM
1

But she can physically beat a boy her age. It just takes skill. Some knowledge. As was being suggested. Smaller men can learn to beat bigger men. Smaller girls can also learn to beat bigger boys.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 02:13 AM
2

I’m still trying to hold on to some hope that there’s still some good women out there Most women are good women, I believe. At least, in my personal experience that has been the case. Many are not, but most are good people. The same goes for men. Most men are good men. Many are not, but most are also good people.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 02:05 AM
2

In the past, we'd have seen a fear of specific demographics of men. It is no longer socially acceptable to encourage that through the media. However, the gender of men is not protected in the same way, so the different fears and anxieties previously applied to various individual demographics of men are now applied to the collective gender of men. All men are now held responsible for the crimes of all other men.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 01:49 AM
2

More people should be calling out these generalizations. Not upvoting them. I fully agree with this. Often, when I have seen people justifying statements such as "men are trash", they also tend to mock the calling out of such generalized statements by using hashtags such as #NotAllMen or call it "fragile masculinity". I have engaged in conversations like this, with people on Reddit, where I have called out such phrases as "men are trash". They have suggested that any man who is not trash should …
/r/MensRights19/03/21 01:42 AM
1

What more can I do other than saying that I recognize Sexual Harassment is an issue and it should be prevented? Show them the definition of sexual harassment. Show them that they are just as guilty of sexual harassment. Beyond that, if that doesn't make them aware of what they themselves are also guilty of doing, then they are beyond help and don't truly want to stop sexual harassment. If sexual harassment is bad, which I agree it is, then all sexual harassment should stop. Not just when it is a…
/r/MensRights19/03/21 12:05 AM
2

It is important to note that sexual harassment is not the same as sexual assault, although sometimes there can be overlap. Sexual harassment includes things like asking questions about or making assumptions about someone else's sex life. The responses you have received from the feminists such as "Say you get no Pus*y, without saying you get no pus*y" or "Men who say the '99% of men are rapists' statistic is false do not get pus*y" are actually great examples of sexual harassment. From feminists,…
/r/MensRights18/03/21 11:43 PM
10

It would be misogynistic to assume that women need the help or protection of men. It would also be a form of "toxic masculinity" to try to enforce a role of protector on the gender of men. Do women likewise tell each other that they have a responsibility to protect men by calling out misandry and stopping other abuse when they see it? Ladies first.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/21 12:17 AM
88

The presented stat of "97% of women have been sexually harassed" could very well be accurate, based on the generally used definition of "sexual harassment". According to a UK site called Acas, they define sexual harassment this way: https://www.acas.org.uk/sexual-harassment "Sexual harassment can be a one-off incident or an ongoing pattern of behaviour. It can include: flirting, gesturing or making sexual remarks about someone's body, clothing or appearance asking questions about someone's sex l…
/r/MensRights13/03/21 07:30 PM
5

We can dismiss any violence from anyone against anyone else using similar methods: "Well yes, but it's just humans victimizing other humans."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/21 12:07 AM
5

If you were to say "All women are mentally unstable." would she understand that you of course don't mean ALL women, just the ones who are mentally unstable? Or would she complain "Not all women!" Would she wonder why you say "all women" when you only mean the ones who are mentally unstable? Would she take offense to any of it, or just shrug it off because she knows she isn't mentally unstable so she knows you can't be talking about her when you say "All women are mentally unstable."? If she can …
/r/MensRights27/02/21 12:03 AM
7

That's one of things I've noticed. Whenever they tear down stautes, they only tear down statues of men. In fairness, there aren't as many statues of women. Odds are that a statue torn down would be a man. Also, I think we should acknowledge the fact that the Dianne Feinstein Elementary is included in the list of school names to be changed.
/r/MensRights29/01/21 03:01 AM
1

In what way was Michelle Obama a misandrist?
/r/MensRights29/01/21 02:56 AM
15

Yes, empathy and a willingness to understand others' situations is important. I agree. Does that mean people in general should change how they live their lives? Should a black person just have empathy for and understanding of the fact that some people will fear them just because they are black? Should that black person live their life in a way that preemptively protects those fearful people by, for instance, crossing the street to move away from anyone who is not black in case that person is pos…
/r/MensRights29/01/21 01:37 AM
12

I think the fact that men are not part of the discussion in the article is a Men's Rights issue, for sure. Men being excluded in that way is a problem, and reveals the systemic misandry in that country. So I guess yes, you are correct, this is appropriate for this forum. Another comment in this thread linked a video that shows how boys being kicked in the nuts has become a trend there in India. With this new law, every one of those girls should be charged with sexual assault. Will they? Doubtful…
/r/MensRights27/01/21 09:25 PM
13

True, men are also sexually assaulted. However, the first sentence of the article clearly shows the focus: "A court in India has ruled that groping a child through their clothing does not constitute sexual assault, drawing outrage across the country and frustrating campaigners battling to address widespread sexual abuse against women and children." They aren't interested in addressing or discussing the issue of men being sexually assaulted. This article and issue, while important, may be better …
/r/MensRights27/01/21 09:06 PM
16

Excellent way of framing it. Hopefully this sort of thinking can help deter the detractors.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/21 06:38 PM
17

I’ll have to look up the stats on vehicular accidents but I wonder who is doing all the violent crimes against men........maybe other men? No it couldn’t be. What does it change for you when the victim of a violent crime is attacked by someone of their own gender? Should it matter that it is a man violently attacking another man, or is the more important part here that a violent offender is attacking a victim? Don't all victims of violence deserve protection, regardless of their gender or the ge…
/r/MensRights18/01/21 05:37 PM
5

kill all men is a valid statement You are the problem.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 09:04 PM
27

I agree. If such a thing as "benevolent sexism" exists, then ALL sexism is "benevolent". It is just that sometimes, that "benevolence" benefits men to the detriment of women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/21 02:40 AM
6

If it is determined that handing over my phone after a mugging may result in my mugger getting arrested and charged, then absolutely yes. If I was mugged, I would want the mugger to be arrested and charged. I know that if I go to the police and say that I have been mugged, then it is true, and nothing on my phone would disprove that or incriminate me in any way. Why are you afraid of officers going through your phone to investigate a crime?
/r/MensRights27/12/20 09:27 PM
14

What do you fear the police who are investigating will do with what they find on the phone of either an accuser or a victim? If what is found is not relevant to the crime being investigated, then it would be disregarded as such. Embarrassment is not a valid excuse to restrict or remove evidence from any important investigation, especially when the potential charge is rape. The investigators are not trying to embarrass anyone, just as a doctor who asks their patient to drop their pants as part of…
/r/MensRights27/12/20 09:11 PM
36

No one should fear reporting a crime because they will have their personal life investigated in detail. No one should fear having a crime they report being fully investigated. Details on a phone, including text messages, are very important to an investigation of this nature. Removing that evidence only helps false accusers.
/r/MensRights27/12/20 08:06 PM
3

You would not be in the wrong. If she is asking for you to define your physical dimensions, it is fair for you to ask the same of her.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 07:30 PM
1

If you believe there is a matriarchy you need to stop, then perhaps take some notes from feminists on how they attempt to "stop the patriarchy": Don't vote for women. Don't read books written by women. Don't watch movies with women in the lead. Disregard and ignore women when and where possible. Don't give tips to women. Don't help women. Don't look at women or talk to women. Always remember: A man needs a woman like a fish needs a bicycle.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 12:58 AM
2

Yes, men should have the right to opt out of any accidental pregnancy in the same time frame that abortions are allowed. Accidental pregnancies happen. Solutions need to be available to both participants. Currently, only women can opt out of accidental pregnancies. Reproductive freedom requires that men also have the right to opt out of accidental pregnancies. Nobody should be forced to be a parent to an unwanted child. That is damaging to the unwilling parent, the unwanted child, and society in…
/r/MensRights05/11/20 04:09 PM
1

You haven't even tried yet. Dude, don't undervalue pictures of your feet. You too can be as successful as a woman who sells pictures of her feet. I believe in you. Maybe just shave them first, and paint the toenails..?
/r/MensRights28/10/20 08:58 PM
3

As ridiculous as this would have sounded even just 10 years ago, I think that now, this is the right answer. This is how we should be fighting back. Use their words, use their methods, use their laws. Identify as whatever will get you hired, and sue if they refuse to hire you on that basis.
/r/MensRights22/10/20 12:27 AM
4

Feminists then: "These movies men make are terrible, sexist, made for the male gaze, all that is wrong with the world, examples of toxic masculinity, the patriarchy, blah blah..." Feminists now: "O.M.G.! I have the bestest idea for the most originalest movie ever! So good! Cutting edge! Female empowerment! Yay! Go girls!"
/r/MensRights21/10/20 09:41 PM
4

Thank you. Yes, it seems that the bill itself seems to be written as gender neutral, at least as far as the summary goes: "A bill to make provision for a right for employees to obtain information relating to the pay of a comparator; to reform remedies and time limits relating to equal pay; to provide a right to equal pay where a single source can rectify unequal pay; to amend the statutory statement ​of particulars to include equal pay; to provide for requirements on certain employers to publish…
/r/MensRights21/10/20 03:21 AM
53

Did you find a link to the actual bill? I was unable to find it, and only found information such as presented in this BBC article: (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-54570593) ... which appears to indicate this proposed bill is for women only. Or at least, that is the language the article uses. I hope to be wrong, as it would be very discriminatory against men if this is a bill that benefits women only.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 10:37 PM
31

It would be concerning if only women are allowed to see the wages of men, but men are not allowed to see the wages of women. From what I could read of the linked article (I couldn't read the rest because of ad-block), it appears that this is a benefit being proposed for women only. That appears to be very sexist, and definitely concerns men's rights as it is clearly discriminatory against men. I looked further, for more information, and found this article on the BBC which states the following: "…
/r/MensRights20/10/20 10:13 PM
1

There does not need to be a punishment if paternity testing was mandatory at birth for all births. The problem of paternity fraud would disappear almost instantly. Men would then know right away, and be able to make an informed decision on whether to continue on a relationship with the mother and child, or not.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 09:56 PM
48

I see no problem with publishing the pay rates and hours worked for all employees. This needs to be done in a way that is ethical and equally accessible to everyone regardless of whether they are a man or woman. If, on the other hand, they are proposing that only women have access to this information on men, that would be highly unethical and sexist.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 09:44 PM
5

The term "patriarchy" is a dog whistle for misandrists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/20 08:48 PM
3

They found a poem of Medusa written in about 8 AD which retells the tale of Medusa to be a victim of rape (though the poem appears to suggest that Poseidon seduced Medusa, not raped her). They now appear to be suggesting that the poem by Ovid is the most accurate story of the myth. However, the myth of Medusa had existed for at least a few hundred years prior to that poem. The poem which changes the story was just a fan fiction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medusa
/r/MensRights14/10/20 08:36 PM
12

... but everyone still believes their bullshit. You don't. I don't. Others also don't. More and more will not. These conversations and all the data gathering helps. It convinced me. Now, we can continue to convince others. Don't give up. Facts matter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/20 11:08 PM
11

If she does that, it is "reproductive coercion" which is, according to feminists, a form of rape. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jan/09/reproductive-coercion-abuse-women-control-choices It is interesting, but not surprising, that the article linked above speaks about such reproductive coercion as being initiated only by men against women. In my lived experience, I have only ever witnessed this done by women, against men.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 09:40 PM
12

If they want to try and use the number of women murdered as being evidence of oppressions, we can easily counter that by showing the numbers of men murdered. If women are oppressed because 1 in 100 murders are female, then what does it mean for men when 99 in 100 murders are male..? If anything, it disproves their "women oppressed" narrative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/20 09:32 PM
33

When I first started seeing the term "femicide" I thought it was odd to suddenly gender murder. Now, I am all for it. We need to look at the stats on "femicide" (murder of women) versus "homicide" (murder of men), compare the numbers, and ensure that our tax dollars are being proportionally spent on the bigger problem (the bigger number). Femicide is merely a drop in the bucket compared to homicide, and the tax resources used to address these problems should reflect that. Now that they are insis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/20 07:25 PM
6

Maybe we could start collectively analyzing the commercials, tv shows and movies that we watch? We can share data here. Should be easy to do as a collective: Watch something, compile data by counting the various people portrayed, and post. I would suggest counting each gender portrayed, each ethnic or racial portrayal, and note whether the character is presented in a positive or negative manner. I suspect that a lot of us have been noticing similar things for years. It is time for us to get full…
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:53 PM
1

Walmart will never run out of clothes for you to buy. It doesn't matter who else is buying the same stuff you want to buy, Walmart will always have enough for you too.
/r/MensRights16/09/20 07:14 AM
2

Yes, it is.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 05:50 AM
10

Great example of systemic misandry.
/r/MensRights08/09/20 03:03 AM
25

When they say "Kill All Men", ask them why they hate the Jewish people so much that they want to kill all Jewish men. Or ask them why they are so racist that they are openly calling for the death of all black men. Why are these people so antisemitic and racist?
/r/MensRights25/08/20 06:04 PM
5

Interesting. I just searched "Mens Rights Reddit" and while this sub did show up as the top returned result, the others were not this sub. The 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th results were all for the Ask Feminists sub asking for feminist opinions on this group. Then, a Mens Lib sub link, an Unpopular Opinion link, and lastly another Ask Feminists link. That can't be anything other than by design.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 08:36 PM
4

Yeah I get that most men can go die in a hole, because they do shitty things. But not all of us are like that. You are wrong. Most men are good people. It’s easy to assume that all men treat woman as nothing but sex objects because these men are the most common types of men, but there are some of us out here that deserve more respect than what we’re given. It's ignorant and wrong to assume that all men treat woman as nothing but sex objects because in reality, the vast majority of men are not li…
/r/MensRights11/08/20 06:05 PM
1

This woman is being celebrated as a feminist icon. That IS normal feminist stuff.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 07:15 PM
5

I prefer Taylor Swift circumcised too.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 06:48 PM
10

We are too busy working.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 01:29 AM
2

The BF in that scenario is a piece of shit. Anyone who would manipulate someone else, particularly to make their victim feel anger in order for the manipulator to feel pleasure, is a bad human. I have no sympathy for that guy. We all know that, in general, reversing the gender would make the commentators be more forgiving of the manipulator. That doesn't matter much in this instance, in my opinion. This guy is still a bad person, and deserves any scorn he receives.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 05:18 AM
8

For what it is worth, I have always considered myself very far left wing. The only thing that seems to make me right wing leaning is my belief that men deserve equality with women.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 01:36 AM
1

I agree. This should always be the first step to finding a solution with a partner.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 12:59 AM
17

I always considered myself a feminist as I was a young adult. I did, and still do, believe that men and women are equal. I wanted to learn more about the problems affecting women, from women, so I sought out feminist forums on Reddit. They quickly taught me things. Most importantly, they taught me that in no way am I a feminist. I believe in equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/20 12:49 AM
1

I'm sure some young guys still do. I haven't seen any internet memes depicting such things though. Then again, I don't go looking. I guess we can expect to see many more now, since it seems to be acceptable again. I expect there will be no complaints from anyone.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 07:01 PM
8

Legally change your name. Move to a different state. Find a new career. Begin a new life. Shouldn't have to do any of that. You could always try standing your ground. But you should not resort to either murder or suicide. There are other options.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 02:52 AM
61

some random idiot Urban Dictionary. Same thing.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 02:49 AM
9

This seems like young women "getting back at" men from 50 years ago. Men used to compare vaginas to all sorts of things: hairy clams, tuna fish or roast beef sandwich, etc. A lot of feminism seems to be the sort of "late to the game" jokes. Like they finally got a good response to that joke they heard 30 or so years ago, and decided to make a post about it now.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 02:40 AM
23

Change will not happen until these incidents are actively reported. We can't have equality if we keep trying to justify bad female behaviour.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 12:20 AM
8

Does a UN Men department exist..?
/r/MensRights31/07/20 12:09 AM
3

What you experienced is classic and standard feminism. They don't want discussions or debates. They want echo chambers and strict adherence to dogma. Just as you can't go into a church and ask if god is real, you can't go into a feminist echo chamber and ask if patriarchy theory is real. Or, in this case, gender discriminatory wage gaps. This doesn't prove god is real. This doesn't prove patriarchy theory is real. It just proves that some people are unable to defend their own ideology. They know…
/r/MensRights28/07/20 04:57 AM
8

That is ludicrous. History clearly shows that the pressure was as equally, if not more, from women. Feminists do not march against male disposability.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 04:50 AM
5

While I would like to think that if something like this happened today, I would resist, I think it is clear by the numbers alone that the social pressure on men to conform to this attitude was prevalent and oppressive. We just have to look at how any of the male survivors were treated after. A good example is J Bruce Ismay: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Bruce_Ismay There have always been extreme pressures on men to sacrifice their own lives in favour of women and children. Men have always bee…
/r/MensRights28/07/20 03:13 AM
1

#NotAllFeminists..?
/r/MensRights28/07/20 02:33 AM
4

"A man needs a woman like a fish needs a bicycle."
/r/MensRights28/07/20 12:28 AM
1

Feminism and feminists actively blocks supports for boys, and generally refuse to acknowledge that boys are also victims. Often, some complete fucking idiots who identify as feminists will even try to dismiss issues boys and men face whenever males are victimized by other males. They try to suggest it is their own fault, or something, for simply being the same gender as their assailant. And then they will suggest that isn't feminism's fault that feminists are doing this.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 12:12 AM
2

Collective insanity. If they are so fragile that they crumble when someone looks at them, maybe they should stay home. Don't go out! It is dangerous ... someone might look at you.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 12:03 AM
6

When I was 18, my 29 year old co-worker would grab my ass or cup my balls whenever I'd walk past her. She took me to a hotel for my 19th birthday. I thought we were in love, but she was just cheating on her boyfriend. Another girl who I went on a date with one night stayed and didn't leave for three days. I wanted to go hang out with friends on the third day, but she didn't like that, so I had to tell her that this wasn't going to work out with us. After three days. I heard later that for months…
/r/MensRights27/07/20 04:49 PM
6

I don't understand. I don't see how this is bad. Can you explain? I have personal experience as a stay-at-home dad for about 12 years. My experience was overwhelmingly positive.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 05:55 AM
3

Parental Leave was awesome for me, and I highly recommend every man to take advantage of as much time as is available to them, to bond with their children. I took a full 52 weeks paid to spend the first year with my first child. I live in Canada. My wife, as an American citizen at the time, was not qualified to receive any of that in Canada. Since only I was qualified, I was able to take the full 52 weeks. Long story short, I was a stay-at-home dad for about 12 years total. If you can do it, I h…
/r/MensRights27/07/20 05:38 AM
6

This is good for men. Feminists liking this as well does not detract from that.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 05:32 AM
1

Is a male victim less of a victim if the assailant is also male?
/r/MensRights24/07/20 03:57 AM
11

Teach women not to kill babies.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 09:22 PM
1

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights23/07/20 08:29 PM
3

It is nice that some women seem to be starting to understand, even if only slightly.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 08:08 PM
5

Silly Buzzfeed garbage. In what world is 27 cents equal to a dollar? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/hvqr0g/the_latest_uk_tax_data_are_in_british_women_paid/ Pay up and stop freeloading, ladies.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 05:06 PM
7

On the inside, yes. She is a horrible person to do such a thing. Her physical beauty is otherwise irrelevant.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 05:09 AM
8

It would be similar to feminists who challenge words like fireman, manhole, womxn, etc. All minor problems to be sure, but perhaps worthy of discussion at least.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/20 04:05 AM
5

It feels like they already do rule society. The continuing gas lighting is trying to convince us that we actually do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/20 04:00 AM
5

I agree. I dislike that so many of these terms seem to be purposefully crafted to be adversarial. Aside from the general abuse of the terms and misuse in general internet forums, I think my biggest gripe is that there do not seem to be comparative examples to describe the so-called phenomenon in others, even when by technical definition of the terms there should be equal usage for all races and sexes. For example, while the term "toxic masculinity" is heavily enforced by feminists, the same phen…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/20 03:56 AM
1

...you're entitled to this opinion I believe... Likewise. ...this subreddit disregards other genders entirely and equity for all. I disagree. This is a Men's Rights forum. It is a subreddit for men to discuss issues that affect men. Men have few places to gather and discuss such things. This is one such place. I believe that you will find that when men are discussing their issues, and seeking solutions, they do so with a mind for equality. Most participants in Men's Rights appear to adhere to eg…
/r/MensRights20/07/20 01:29 AM
2

You don't think men are objectified..? How odd. Male disposability is a form of objectification in which men are seen as little more than objects to perform dangerous duties without regard to their own life. That is absolutely a form of objectification, in which men are little more than objects made to perform for others. Men are supposed to be "the rock", "the provider", "the protector", etc. Again, these are forms of objectification that men experience daily, historically. Or are you only spec…
/r/MensRights20/07/20 12:31 AM
11

I can speak to this as a stay-at-home father. This is real, and it affects whoever takes the primary parent role to raise the children. There is a modern push to have both parents working and the kids put into daycare from a very young age. However some parents believe that the best person to raise their children is one of them. One of the parents, not a stranger no matter that they are licensed caregivers or not. To make that happen, one parent usually has to go without developing their career,…
/r/MensRights18/07/20 11:08 PM
1

She is married, but she is no wife.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 09:35 PM
1

It is not acceptable. While they may think we are supposed to accept it, we are not obligated to accept it. Anyone who states that "All men are trash" needs to be reminded that women are equal to men, and therefore, they are stating that "All women are trash" too.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 08:11 PM
2

Hilarious that they claim this is a problem. If it was all coloured people or all women, they would no doubt be cheering.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 09:15 PM
10

If "behind everything a man did was a woman" is true, then women are responsible for everything bad in the world. All wars, all murders, all genocides, all crimes ... It instantly proves the fallacy of the Patriarchy Theory conspiracy. It was a Matriarchy all along.?
/r/MensRights13/07/20 10:08 PM
15

"so can someone just explain to me why guys think it’s ok to make misogynistic comments and deem them as 'jokes' when they’re just offensive" It is likely very similar to the reasons that girls think it's ok to make misandristic comments and deem them as 'jokes' when they're just offensive. Some people are just assholes. I am curious about some other things you said there. "we’ll be talking about rape and they’ll say 'well men get raped too' no shit i’m not saying they don’t ..." I hope it isn't…
/r/MensRights13/07/20 09:58 PM
4

That is a good sign.
/r/MensRights12/07/20 10:22 PM
4

Yes, I agree. The very concept diminishes the contributions that women have made throughout history, and infantilizes them as nothing more than passive bystanders in their own lives.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/20 08:59 PM
7

"Have we become obsolete or even detrimental to women and society?" No. It is all lies and gas-lighting. It is affecting you exactly as intended. You are doubting yourself and questioning your own value. "Gonna cut to the chase: are there areas where women are generally superior to us? Is it true or false?" Probably true, just as there are some areas where men are superior to women. Keep in mind that this is in general. Individual abilities vary greatly. Men are just as valuable as women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/20 08:38 PM
7

I agree. Feminists often seem to be the ones perpetuating the notion of "patriarchy" through their actions and the laws they seek to enact. In my opinion, patriarchy theory itself is a ridiculous conspiracy theory. It is defined as "a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it." Women, by and large, raise the children. Women also, overwhelmingly, teach the children. That is a form of power, and women hold it while men have largely been excl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/20 08:18 PM
1

There is no such thing as "toxic masculinity", there is only internalized misandry.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 11:35 PM
-2

Find a shorter woman? Men judge women's attractiveness too. I don't see this as unequal.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 09:45 PM
18

Women bear the brunt of the pandemic by being beaten by individual men. Men are not a monolith. I am not responsible for any women getting beaten by a man she chose to be with. The woman in question needs to accept responsibility for that, not me, and not any other man. I had no hand in who any woman chooses to have as a partner. I accept no responsibility for any woman anywhere who is getting beaten by her spouse or partner. Men should not be collectively punished for the actions of individuals…
/r/MensRights11/07/20 09:14 PM
89

Yeah, this is so normal now I find it difficult to be surprised at the hypocrisy and double standards. Still angry, but not surprised. This is not equality. This is feminism.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 04:42 PM
2

I agree with all of it except the last sentence. I agree that all of those are not special, in that they are not rare or unusual. I disagree with the implication of the last sentence: That is not what a normal man -should- be like. It is what a normal man IS like already, and always has been. The vast majority of men who have ever lived never raped, never cheated, treated women equally and took care of their family. That is normal.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 04:23 PM
2

Of course they aren't the same thing. One comes from little boys, and the other comes from little girls. Good to see you're paying attention. 🙄
/r/MensRights08/07/20 04:18 PM
2

Really feminists..? You are seeing phallic symbolism in everything now? To paraphrase, "Sometimes a tall building is just a tall building." If a person is imagining everything is penis shaped, then they have an unhealthy obsession. They are the problem. They need help. Society does not need to change. Why do they not see the buildings as bananas? Or tree trunks? Nope, just penises everywhere. They have serious mental problems.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 08:09 PM
10

This must be why female genital mutilation is illegal. Nobody can make a buck off the baby bits they cut from the little girls!
/r/MensRights07/07/20 03:57 PM
6

"This was very offensive and damaging to the women of my grandmother's age when it happened over half a century ago. Hey! Let's do the exact same thing to the boys of today to show them how it felt!"
/r/MensRights07/07/20 03:54 PM
8

"Is there any validity behind the idea that women are wiser or the morally-superior sex?" No. None. "Is there evidence against the 'Women are moraly superior sex who do no wrong' in past and present?" Yes. You need merely point to any single one of the very many women in history who have done anything that is worse than the very best man to provide the evidence against this notion that "women do no wrong" or are "morally superior". Anyone who pushes such ideas is just a misandrist and an androph…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/20 03:47 PM
3

All discrimination based on gender is "positive discrimination" or "benevolent sexism". Feminists only complain if it is positive or benevolent towards men.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 02:25 AM
1

I generally disagree with banning speech, but understand that sometimes it may be overwhelming considered necessary by many people. I would prefer that questionable Reddit subs are allowed to remain open, but the moderators can no longer be allowed to suppress dissent and cannot ban based on differing opinions. The designated "hate speech subs" should be allowed to remain so long as all dissenting opinions can be represented. Allow full debate. Do not give power to mods to ban based on ideology.…
/r/MensRights03/07/20 06:11 AM
2

If you have Netflix, check out Norsemen. Good show. New season coming soon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norsemen_(TV_series))
/r/MensRights03/07/20 06:01 AM
11

They are privileged because of benevolent sexism The exact same can be said for men. Any sexism that benefits men is in fact just benevolent sexism, for men. What is benevolent for one is generally unkind towards the other. To suggest it is only benevolent when it favours women is sexist. All sexism is bad, or none is bad. This "benevolent" descriptor needs to stop being an acceptable way of describing sexism against men..
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/20 02:56 AM
11

I love this kind of bullshit feminists tend to spew. But guess what cunts: If an asshole decides to hit another asshole, then that asshole deserves to get hit back, and should in fact expect to get hit back. Any asshole who hits another asshole should expect to get hit back in retaliation. Which asshole is a male, and which asshole is a female? Does it fucking matter? NO! #Equality.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 07:29 AM
4

The title is inaccurate. This is far worse than a woman getting custody of a child. This is a woman who has previously convinced this man he was the father of a child when in fact he was not. This is a woman who has previously convinced a child that this man was her father when he was not. This woman is vile. She is a horrible example of a human being. She cheated. She lied. She destroyed the life of this man. She destroyed the life of her child. There is nothing she can do to rectify the harm s…
/r/MensRights01/07/20 06:28 AM
3

That is called systemic sexism, or more accurately, misandry.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 06:43 PM
237

My immediate thought on reading this is that she is about to be "cancelled".
/r/MensRights27/06/20 01:32 AM
7

Is it also acceptable to call it "fragile blackness" for anyone getting upset at "All Lives Matter"..? How do these people not see what they are writing..?!
/r/MensRights21/06/20 05:40 PM
3

I agree.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 08:27 PM
84

Not even equality of opportunity for men. If men are not allowed to be hired, their opportunity is zero.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 07:56 PM
4

This aligns with the feminist world view: Highlight the few female victims while ignoring the vast numbers of male victims. Seems like Feminism 101.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 03:25 PM
2

“Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.” - Mark Twain
/r/MensRights13/06/20 11:10 PM
-10

Try not to become angry with stupid people. Twitter is full of garbage like this on both sides.
/r/MensRights12/06/20 10:56 PM
3

I think labels, or badges, can be important especially when we are applying them to others. Assuming that all egalitarians are feminists by default is simply wrong. It is wrong to attempt to conflate "egalitarianism" and "feminism" as if they mean the same thing. They do not. Feminism is not just an ideal. It is a movement, with teachers and leaders of groups. These groups often affect changes to laws, and those laws are not always egalitarian. If we are calling out racists, we are calling out t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/20 07:08 PM
2

I think it is dangerous of us to place badges on others when they would not place it on themselves. An MRA is just as likely as a feminist to agree that men and women should be paid the same wage for the same job. Most average people would agree. That is an egalitarian belief. It is not exclusive to either feminists or MRAs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/20 06:18 PM
3

I would say 99% of women are feminist, just not the stereotype often perceived online. Most studies I have seen indicate that a large percent of women do not self identify as feminists. For instance, according to Ipsos, less than 30% of American women identify as feminists. https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/american-women-and-feminism ​ Many women believe they should be treated as equals to men, have access to proper health care, job opportunities and freedom to live their lives free from harm and unr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/20 04:12 PM
15

What you are describing may sound like what many perceive as the average feminist, but that is far from the average woman. Most women who are not feminists are not like what you are fearing, in my experience.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/20 12:45 AM
57

That is nothing new. They've been singing the same song for generations. "What are little boys made of?What are little boys made of? Snakes and snails And puppy-dogs' tailsThat's what little boys are made of What are little girls made of?What are little girls made of? Sugar and spice And everything niceThat's what little girls are made of" - Attributed to Robert Southey (1774 - 1843)
/r/MensRights11/06/20 06:59 AM
1

I grew up in the 70's playing with Star Wars action figures, Adventure People and GI Joe dolls. We were allowed to play with dolls.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 06:51 AM
0

Allowing this behaviour would normalize that sort of racism. That is enough reason to stop it. The contest seemed like an attempt to make racist behaviour acceptable, and that is unacceptable. I do not know if a three year jail sentence is excessive or not, but I suspect it will be highly discouraging to any others who would think that sort of attempt to normalize racist behaviour is going to be unopposed any longer.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 06:13 AM
0

How do you define feminine in this context?
/r/MensRights11/06/20 05:53 AM
2

If she consents, then she is as responsible as him. This is why the conversation needs to be about accidental pregnancy and reproductive freedom for all. Neither of them intended a pregnancy to result. Neither wanted a child. I believe we should be advocating for reproductive freedom, which is the idea that a person should be able to decide if and when they want to become a parent. And that should be available to everyone. When an accidental pregnancy occurs, if any party can opt out, then eithe…
/r/MensRights11/06/20 02:13 AM
1

I see "moderate feminists" kinda like the "moderate cops" we see all through these ongoing protests. They may not be directly beating people themselves, but they sure as hell aren't stopping those that do. They proudly march side by side.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 09:32 PM
44

This is a good example of why we need Men's Rights. This is an issue of reproductive freedom. Reproductive Freedom is the right to choose if, and when, to become a parent. Everyone should have this choice, even in the event of an accidental pregnancy. Nobody should be forced to become a parent if they are not emotionally or financially prepared to do so. This is the same argument in support of abortion rights for women. Men deserve similar rights in the event of an accidental pregnancy. Nobody s…
/r/MensRights10/06/20 04:42 AM
7

There is nothing gendered in this law, as far as the article depicts it. This should work equally for men and women. If you live together for longer than two years, your assets will be split evenly when you "break up", or discontinue the co-habitation. This would, technically, even potentially apply to same-sex roommates. I can easily imagine such a law being abused.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 05:53 AM
2

Or Playgirl? Again, I don't see a problem, so long as they could either way.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 02:29 AM
12

This is Vogue, a magazine for women. I don't see a problem with them focusing on women in their magazine. This should be ok. The problem, to me, would be if a magazine for men could not also focus on men.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 10:59 PM
6

According to Mirriam-Webster, it already is defined as "unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against a person's will or with a person who is beneath a certain age or incapable of valid consent because of mental illness, mental deficiency, intoxication, unconsciousness, or deception". It is already defined such that, if a man is made to penetrate while incapable of valid consent, then it is rape. I think the bigger problem is not i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/20 11:56 PM
3

That is my opinion as well. Yes, now I can get cheaper tests, apparently. I have decided not to do so until the children are adults. I see myself as their father now regardless, and any proof that my fatherhood is not biological would merely be a curiousity at this point. Previously, when I had looked into it, paternity tests were around $2000, which was beyond my means at the time. I haven't looked into it in quite some time now, if the price has dropped so much. While I can afford it now, it h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/20 06:36 AM
9

I can briefly mention some issues I have faced as a father. In Canada, where I live, families can get a payment from the government for each child they have, to help with the cost of raising the child. As a stay-at-home father, the primary parent, I cannot receive that. The money goes to the mother alone. My wife would need to write a letter to the government, giving them permission to send the money to me. She has opted not to do that. When my child was born, my father gave me a couple thousand…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/20 08:19 PM
-1

Wouldn't make-up or a push-up bra then also constitute a "lie" and therefore makes it rape of a man by the woman..? Almost all men have been raped! *gasp* EDIT: Oh, I see I'm late to the party. Everyone saw the obvious "lie" of women immediately. Haha!
/r/MensRights26/05/20 08:36 PM
2

If someone blames all the world's problems on an ethnic group, we call them a racist. If someone blames all the world's problems on followers of the Islamic religion, we call them an Islamaphobe. If someone blames all the world's problems on men, we call them a feminist.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 09:53 PM
1

Stoicism and strength, either of character or of physical body, do not need to be referred to as "male". Stoicism and physical strength are things to achieve and aspire to for everyone, regardless of gender. Women should learn emotional control just as men should. Physical fitness also is good for everyone. No, I don't think you should insist your male child learns "big boys don't cry" more than your female child. Adults should be in control of their emotions. Emotional outbursts are generally n…
/r/MensRights24/05/20 09:38 PM
6

That is a start.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 08:03 PM
1

Every woman runs on a feminist platform. Men are insane if they ever vote for a woman now.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 07:47 PM
4

It is part of their "The Future Is Female" doctrine, in which they imagine a world where only 10% of the human population is male. The rest, as she is so publicly wishing and calling for, get killed.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 07:44 PM
5

True. One of the "Official Feminists" who writes books to guide their movement, heads up seminars and lectures to teach the next generation, and is commonly defended by other members of their cult. I am so glad we have this woman as an example to point to whenever someone says "A feminist wouldn't say that..!"
/r/MensRights24/05/20 07:33 PM
2

Be the change you want to see. If you want to see more empathy towards men, then be more empathetic towards men. Disregard those who do not agree that men are equal to women, or who otherwise lack empathy for those unlike themselves. We cannot always change the actions or attitudes of others, but we can always change ourselves.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 09:17 PM
4

Stop trying to convince feminists that feminists are wrong. Start trying to convince men that feminists are wrong.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 08:29 PM
44

This is a regular feminist.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 07:41 PM
8

There is no equality in matters of sexism.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 07:39 PM
3

They need a separate car because they are all afraid of all men? They sure don't look afraid as they beat the men. I think it is ok to have separate cars for women, so long as men also get separate cars. Although it seems women are allowed to go in the men cars, but men can't go in with women..? It appears that they have only half-fixed the problem. Women should likewise be kept out of the cars for men.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 07:36 PM
3

Still is.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 07:28 PM
2

It does seem that the only way many of these modern movie writers are able to lift women up is by putting men down. It is unfortunate they are so insulting to both men and women at the same time.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 07:28 PM
1

It isn't radical feminism. It is just standard feminism.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 07:24 PM
15

I disagree, and feel it is useful to make such comparisons. The comparisons, in my opinion, are meant to show that bigotry and prejudicial treatment of others is wrong. It is always wrong. Racism is a form of prejudice, as is sexism. We should treat individuals, and be treated individually, based on our own actions and character, not based on the demographic someone else wants to lump us into. The comparison, to me, is to show that comparable examples of bigotry or prejudicial behaviour, racism …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/20 07:21 PM
2

A Men's Rights Advocate (or Activist) is simply someone who believes that men and women are equal. Anyone who truly believes that men and women are truly equal is a Men's Rights Advocate.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 07:31 PM
6

Misogyny in feminism is like the devil in Christianity. It boils down to faith, belief and dogma. Evidence and proof are not required. Likewise, you will be unable to "prove" to a devout believer that their faith is based on lies.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 07:26 PM
2

I agree. Paternity fraud is a vile crime, and can be stopped almost instantly with mandated universal paternity testing at birth. It should be common practice. Hospitals have many rules and regulations in place already to ensure that only the biological mother can leave the hospital with her own biological child. Father's deserve the same respect and protections. So do their children.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 07:17 PM
1

Feminists can only argue with strawmen. The rest of us, they ban.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 07:16 PM
4

This is feminism.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 11:37 PM
9

^--This is the answer. "The Future is Female" is a misandrist dog whistle.
/r/MensRights08/05/20 07:38 PM
2

Yet another example of systemic discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 07:41 PM
12

Someone who is a Men's Rights Advocate is someone who believes that men and women are equal. If feminists believe in equality, then they are already Men's Rights Advocates by default, and should simply use the proper name to describe themselves. If they don't believe in equality, I guess they can keep calling themselves 'feminists'.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 04:55 PM
45

Good comparison. Cardi B drugged men who wanted sex with her, and she took money from them. Bill Cosby drugged women who wanted his money, and he took sex from them.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 04:50 PM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 04:45 PM
2

They seem to be practicing. They have likely seen all the attention and money that other fakers like Amber Heard received, and imagined a new future for themselves. Believe all women, they say. LOL!
/r/MensRights05/04/20 05:48 PM
7

Women are equal to any man, except in the ability to wait their turn fairly, apparently.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 08:01 PM
3

I use these cartoons as a way to educate my kids. I point out the sexism to my older daughter all the time when she watches these shows. Almost every single show has at least some moment of sexism against men. She now points them out to me too. We of course also discuss the examples of sexism against women that appear in these kids shows, but such conversations are as few and far between as the examples. Sexism against women in kids cartoons is virtually non-existent.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 08:51 PM
3

This is similar to the sort of thing (stealing a semen filled condom to then use for impregnation) that was talked about with NBA players, and they were warned to be careful of disposing of condoms for this exact reason. They apparently called it "stealthing" in a handbook given to new players. https://nypost.com/2016/10/12/sources-back-derrick-rose-nba-teaches-condom-disposal/ Immediately after this information was leaked to the public, feminists started using the term "stealthing" to refer to …
/r/MensRights21/03/20 06:10 PM
3

To me, this shows that men and women are both doing their parts in equal measures to keep society running during a crisis. Sure, most garbage collectors are men but most nurses are women. Lots of the front line positions for this are grocery store clerks, take-out restaurant workers, delivery services, postal workers, nurses, pharmacists, doctors, etc. Many of those jobs are staffed mostly by women.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 12:09 AM
5

The biggest problem, as I see it, is that when feminists claim to care about men or say they want to help men, they do it from the perspective of feminism. They don't ask men what help men need. They TELL men. That is the wrong way. Take what you said: "Gender stereotypes affect everyone, for example they’re one of the main reasons that men have such high suicide rates and such poor recovery from abusive relationshipd." You are "femsplaining" to men "the reasons that men have such high suicide r…
/r/MensRights14/03/20 05:56 PM
1

That sounds like they are financially incentivizing false accusations. I hope it doesn't work in practice that way. On their page, you can make a Freedom Of Information request, and ask to see their data on fraudulent claims that have been made. It would be interesting to see if there is a pattern of fraudulent claims of a certain type being made repeatedly. Using that information would help either cement or alleviate fears about whether this program is increasing false accusations or not. https…
/r/MensRights14/03/20 05:32 PM
3

I have a serious question: what is your goal? Do you want to find solutions to problems that I 100% agree with you on, or do you want to drive away every woman who stumbles across this subreddit? Interesting choices you are giving me there: Find solutions to the problems you agree with, or drive every woman away. My goal here is to discuss with other men the ideas and issues that affect us as men. I am interested in finding solutions to what I see as problems. If you agree with those problems an…
/r/MensRights13/03/20 06:05 PM
3

However, it's notable that perpetrators of these violent crimes are mostly men. And the cops/judges/lawmakers who throw men in jail? They're also men. And the greedy CEOs who rally against worker's rights? You guessed it, they're men! You are grouping us together by nothing more than the genitals we have in common. That is the definition of sexist. Men, like women, are not a monolith. We are individuals. No human is responsible for the sins of any other human, no matter what superficial qualitie…
/r/MensRights13/03/20 06:26 AM
4

Agreed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 07:09 PM
12

Who are the judges who awarded those custody cases? Men and women. In the USA, approximately 33% of judges are women. That percentage is about 27% globally, on average. https://www.americasquarterly.org/women-in-robes ​ Who wrote the laws? Men and women. Legislators write laws, of which approximately 35% are women. Legislators are elected by the electorate, of which approximately 50% are women. The average woman is as responsible for the laws written as is the average man. https://en.wikipedia.o…
/r/MensRights12/03/20 06:14 PM
4

Thank you for doing this. I think this is a good place to be offering your services and making your organization more well known. I see that the CCMF in Toronto was the first centre in Toronto dedicated to helping men, and opened in 2014. Apparently, there was some opposition initially from feminists groups who complained that your group was more about attacking feminism rather than helping men. At least, that was the opinion that Global News wrote about your centre in Toronto. https://globalnew…
/r/MensRights12/03/20 05:14 PM
1

The benefits of universal health care for everyone far outweighs the negative impacts of things like this. These things, like with the midwives, can be negotiated and in fact MUST be negotiated. You don't get to negotiate with private service providers. They just tell you that if you don't like it, try to find it cheaper somewhere else. They can then all raise their prices as much as they want, and you end up with a situation like they have in the United States now. I hear that people down there…
/r/MensRights12/03/20 04:48 PM
1

I don't have a problem with either misogyny or misandry as words, so long as they are used accurately. Unfortunately, so often I see misogyny applied by feminists to situations or scenarios which are not misogynistic, to the point that the word has lost the intended impact and seems to now only mean "Something this feminist didn't like". I think we need to call out misandry when we see it, but be careful not to overuse the word or inaccurately apply it. We should use the words, but not in the fe…
/r/MensRights12/03/20 04:37 PM
220

Nobody is telling men to protect themselves because nobody cares if more men are murdered. This video proves that point. Why do these types always argue that the murder of men doesn't matter when men are murdered by other men? Murder victims are still murder victims. This cunt, and all others with her mindset, can rot.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 10:00 PM
9

Young girls making sexist generalizations about young boys who made sexist generalizations. Feminists in training.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 04:24 PM
4

Let people watch what they want. I don't think we should be telling anyone to stop watching specific genres of movies or types of characters.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 04:48 AM
5

This seems normal for Psychology Today. It appears to have become a bit of a rag.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/20 04:57 AM
5

I fully support everyone on Twitter posting the simple comment "Not today, women." on November 19th. It would be interesting to see the reaction. If Twitter reacted anything like feminist subreddits, it would be a mass-ban on whoever posts that.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 04:53 AM
35

Feminists in particular are guilty of the very toxic masculinity that they're peddling and bashing men over. They are always the first to mock and attack men who open up about their problems and oh look I now have scientific data to back me up. Absolute truth. This is why it is ridiculous to call it "toxic masculinity".
/r/MensRights07/03/20 06:00 PM
18

They want to be token women? Do they not realize that now everyone will assume that any woman on any board in California is only there to meet a quota, and not because she is qualified to be there? Crazy feminists.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 09:32 PM
4

I will never understand how women are stereotyped as the empathetic, caring or nurturing ones. It does not match reality.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 08:33 PM
11

That number seems very low compared to what is known of the statistics on this elsewhere. Mandatory paternity testing at birth should be the norm. That would make this problem disappear immediately. Some men are willing to raise another man's child, but all men should be made aware so they can have a choice. Nobody should be tricked into this. My life, my choice.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 04:13 PM
1

The better concept is to remove gender from the universal experience. You've agreed now that men and women both experience the same problem. You've agreed here that the problems are similar, if not exactly the same. It seems absurd to apply gender to a term for these experiences. We have words to describe this already. Socially enforced gender norms or stereotypes. It applies equally to all. No need to apply gender. That just creates division when we should instead be addressing these problems c…
/r/MensRights05/03/20 03:37 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EA-e8nXlpg
/r/MensRights04/03/20 09:54 PM
2

The "Chad" is an idiotic meme. You don't think more athletic, rich, beautiful women have an easier time attracting partners? And get many benefits associated with fitting into those stereotypes, as reinforced by TV and Instagram, etc? Flip sides of the same coin.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 09:41 PM
2

What would you call the unfair pressures faced by women that arise from expectations on the part of both other women and men to be "successful women" and live up to certain standards? Do you call that "toxic femininity"? If not, then the exact same situation for men should also not be termed "toxic masculinity". We all face these same problem of socially enforced gender norms and stereotypes, but feminists have argued that only the issues men face should be described as "toxic". They are playing…
/r/MensRights04/03/20 09:36 PM
5

You cannot use misandrist terminology to advance men's rights. Using such phrases, and trying to justify them, does the opposite and in fact hinders the rights of men.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 04:34 PM
4

Socially enforced gender stereotypes. Both men and women deal with this. "Toxic Masculinity" is just a dog-whistle for misandrists.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 04:30 PM
35

I disagree. I think they are wrong, and that women are not children. Women should receive similar sentencing as men receive. If they were advocating for men to also not go to jail for similar crimes, then I would have no objections to what they propose. They are not doing that, though.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 04:43 AM
1

Sounds like the man in this case is the asshole. I agree that the father has a right to equal access to the child once it is born, but I do not agree that he should have equal access to the delivery room. It should be the mother's choice who is in the delivery room with her.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 11:48 PM
419

They are equating women with children. Children also do not go to jail.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 11:35 PM
3

Excellent example of a feminist, and the end-goal of feminism. Feminism is like a mental disease.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 11:29 PM
3

This is a matter of Reproductive Freedom, which is what feminists generally cite as the basis of their right to abortion. Some quotes they use to support this notion of Reproductive Freedom: "Reproductive freedom is not just the ability not to have a child through birth control. It's the ability to have one if and when you want." - Pamela Madsen "Reproductive freedom is critical to a whole range of issues. If we can’t take charge of this most personal aspect of our lives, we can’t take care of a…
/r/MensRights25/02/20 04:21 PM
3

This is only sometimes true. This is why the Putative Father Registries were created. https://adoptionart.org/adoption/birth-expectant-parents/putative-father-registries/
/r/MensRights25/02/20 04:10 PM
5

If the sex is consensual, then women are equally responsible for all accidental pregnancies. Everyone who can legally consent to sex also consents to the possible results of that sex. The only way men could be 100% responsible is if women are too immature to be allowed to consent. If that were true, then that would mean women should be restricted in the same way as children. I don't believe this is true. Men are not 100% responsible for accidental pregnancies. I believe women should be held resp…
/r/MensRights14/02/20 08:32 PM
18

Pamela Anderson sounds like a very expensive prostitute, with extra paperwork.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 05:13 PM
0

I could, but since you're telling me you have a differing interpretation of Articles 11-14, you could disclose what that interpretation is so that I can better assist you in seeing. You made the original point, and I questioned how you came to that conclusion, but because I have a differing interpretation then you have no interest in clarifying your point? Instead, you suggest I should disclose my interpretation of it. Odd, but ok. Everything in those articles you mentioned appear to simply stat…
/r/MensRights31/01/20 12:47 AM
22

In most places, it would be illegal to have rules that prohibited women from being allowed when men are permitted. The reverse is generally not true, such as the STEM classes you are mentioning. That is feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/20 08:17 PM
1

Included here is a link to the CEDAW document. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cedaw.aspx I've read through Articles 11-14, and do not see how it can be interpreted in the way you are presenting when you said: "The CEDAW calls for ALL women to live at the expense of ALL men." Can you quote from the Articles the words you believe support your assertion?
/r/MensRights30/01/20 07:34 PM
1

Only children cannot consent. Anyone making the argument that "men are 100% responsible for all unwanted pregnancies" is arguing that women are equivalent to children. Adults can consent. Children cannot. Are women adults or children? Anyone who consents to sex is agreeing to the potential consequences of the act.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 04:53 PM
2

I agree.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 07:33 PM
2

If they are actually powerful women, why aren't they convincing male voters? Doesn't sound like they are very powerful to me. Men will listen to women who are truly powerful, and follow them. History is filled with truly powerful women who inspired and led men.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 08:57 PM
24

The first step to the solution is to stop caring if anyone calls you or are themselves called sexist. If sexism against men doesn't matter, then sexism against women also doesn't matter either.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 08:43 PM
5

This is all very interesting. Thank you very much for gathering all of this. Great reference material.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 04:43 PM
1

If they believe that females are superior, then how do they explain their belief in Patriarchy Theory..? How have inferior men been able to control superior women for all of human history? Another way to look at it is that all embryos start out as a zygote. Based on their reasoning, a zygote is superior to a grown female. Women are less than a clump of cells..? Wow, they are so hard on themselves.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 06:45 PM
5

It is their way of admitting defeat in a debate.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 06:27 PM
1

They are much more open and obvious with their misandry now, in my opinion. Back then it seemed more limited to tv commercials, but now it seems that all media is affected.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 09:31 PM
6

If men, by nature of being men, are collectively responsible for all wars, then men collectively are also the reason we have any times of peace. The fact that we are all not in a perpetual state of war in all places at all times would also be due to men then. If women were capable of stopping wars, then any war that is not stopped would be the collective responsibility of women. All wars would then be women's fault, if they had power to stop wars but chose not to do so. If a woman gets to live t…
/r/MensRights06/01/20 07:48 PM
3

I think if the draft is enacted again, this round should only have women get drafted. Men can still volunteer if they want. For feminism and equality!
/r/MensRights05/01/20 08:56 PM
452

They are trying to conflate anti-feminism with anti-women. Not all feminists are women, and not all women are feminists. Criticism of feminism is not a critique of women. We can continue to condemn feminism without hating women. Hating feminism and hating women are not the same things.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 06:42 AM
3

It would undoubtedly be talked about in Gender Studies classes for the next decade, and used as absolute proof that they are oppressed. But instead it happened to a male republican, so we won't hear much else about it. Just another forgotten and ignored statistic.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 06:34 AM
1

This is a step in the right direction.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 09:58 AM
3

Thank you for being open minded.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 07:41 AM
3

I am most familiar with Canadian history, so will speak from that perspective, however most of western democracies followed a similar trajectory as far as suffrage goes. In Canada, men and women, through labour unions, fought for the right of every tax payer to have a vote in how their tax dollars are spent by the government. They sought true universal suffrage, extending the right to vote from just wealthy landowners to instead include all tax paying citizens. This included men and women. In Ca…
/r/MensRights14/12/19 07:16 AM
1

It isn't just "modern feminists" who have ruined the word feminism. They have been sexist since their inception. The very name of the movement makes it clear that they are not for equality. Egalitarianism is the movement which seeks true equality.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 03:04 AM
1

It sounds instead like you are describing a Matriarchy.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 02:48 AM
19

Exactly. Women and feminists often make the argument that they are not a monolith. Then they treat men as a monolith. A random group of men represents a diversity of opinions. We are told that diversity of opinions is what is valuable, not diversity of genitals or diversity of skin colours. Yet all too often, men are excluded from this so-called diversity. Feminism is a complete sham.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:23 PM
9

Here is the text from the link so you can share it with any other feminists you know who feel the same as you do: The following is a very informed and highly reusable comment by Karen Straughan in response to a feminist who thinks the many blatant sexists among feminists aren't real feminists: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teachi…
/r/MensRights13/12/19 02:42 AM
10

I do agree with you. I was confused by the fact that you put the "retarded 16yo commie" in quotes, clearly signifying it was quoted from someone else, versus the angry incels comment you made which was not in quotes. My mistake if that was not intended.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 10:57 PM
28

I understand where you are coming from, and I agree that we should not appear to be or offer support to people who hate all women. I don't often see that here. I do often see people hating on feminism as a movement, and I do not see a problem with that. However, you are coming in here describing people as "a bunch of angry incels" and a "trump women haters club", while complaining that some random person called Greta Thunberg a "retarded 16yo commie". I am curious if, in your opinion, it is wors…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 10:13 PM
1

This exemplifies feminism. This is precisely why I am not a feminist, and why I think the feminist movement must end. And they say "equality" LOL!!
/r/MensRights12/12/19 09:33 PM
1

Sorry if I assumed you are a person who might also do this, but you keep trying to justify his behaviour as if he did nothing wrong and suggest that this was "perfectly okay" years ago, which seems to imply that you think it should also be perfectly okay today. It is not. If you are not aware of that then this will serve as a good example for you of what not to do. There is no double standard here. Double standards do exist, but this is not one of them.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 09:38 PM
5

I was a stay-at-home dad for over 10 years. I am still the primary parent. Before that, I worked in a corporate office as an Account Executive for 10 years. I highly recommend the stay-at-home parent gig. Best 10 years of my life, easily. Bonus: When my wife and I (inevitably) get divorced, she will have to pay alimony and child support to ME!
/r/MensRights11/12/19 07:04 PM
3

He touched her ass as he ran past. If he was Benny Hill, the crowd would have chased him down and beat him up when they caught him. That was 40 years or more ago and a comedy show. About 100 years ago, in real life, women wore hat pins and would stab the man if he touched them in such a way. Today, people chase him down on Facebook instead, and they publicly shame him. Times haven't really changed so much. There has always been a negative reaction to being touched by a stranger in an intimate wa…
/r/MensRights11/12/19 05:27 PM
4

He was "wrong" in that he did something that is currently not acceptable. I remember Benny Hill. I loved watching it decades ago. It was a very funny show when I was a young guy. His behaviour was considered funny exactly because he was "being overtly pervy", and he would get chastised for it or try to be sneaky about it. Remember how often he would get in trouble for doing that sort of stuff? It often resulted in him getting chased by a large crowd of people, while the familiar Yakety Sax playe…
/r/MensRights11/12/19 12:01 AM
13

The guy was wrong to touch her. I don't see this as a double-standard: It is just a standard. To ensure it is not a double-standard, we need to ensure it is a standard which gets equally enforced. That doesn't mean instances like this should not be investigated and prosecuted. It just means we should also investigate and prosecute when a woman touches a man too. I agree that generally nothing happens to a woman who does this to a man. That does need to change. However, this guy was clearly in th…
/r/MensRights10/12/19 07:27 PM
2

"You guys aren’t misogynistic right?" Some people here might be, but most aren't. Most of us here seem to be against feminism and, by extension, feminists. When we speak out against feminism or feminists, some outsiders viewing that perceive it to be misogyny. It is not. Critique of feminism and feminists is not the same as a critique of women in general: Not all women are feminists, and not all feminists are women. Most of us here understand this difference. "The problem is that female oppressi…
/r/MensRights09/12/19 05:21 PM
3

I am assuming this is a joke based on the "legal to force feed them" bit, but for anyone else who doesn't actually know: It has been over 100 years since women were granted the right to vote. I think it is worth reminding people how long we have been dealing with feminism: All of our lives and all of our parents' lives and all of our grandparents' lives as well.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 04:35 PM
1

Patriarchy Theory is generally only accepted by those indoctrinated into feminism. Most others either reject, dismiss or ridicule the idea as presented by feminists.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 08:12 AM
13

I would agree with most of this, except the very first sentence. Toxic masculinity does not exist. The rest is a great description of why some of the negative gender roles men are forced into continue to persist. In my life experiences, men have no problem expressing emotions with each other. We all learn not to do that in front of women. Women who complain they don't see men being emotional are simply women who do not have any man who trusts them enough.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 10:04 PM
3

Don't use the word "cunt." I see where you are coming from, and I appreciate your point of view on this. I used to agree with this, but now I don't. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cunt Feminists have been seeking to remove disparaging words about women, to make them taboo, all the while inventing new words to disparage men. Every week it seems there is some new man-verb word invented and used to describe behaviour that they try to attribute to men only. Comparing "cunt" to "dick": https://en.wiki…
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:50 PM
5

This is a classic example of why I have a difficult time believing random complaints of sexual harassment. Each case needs to be reviewed for merit. This particular case has no merit at all. There was no sexual harassment here, yet she still became quite hysterical and abusive towards everyone around her. She alone was the problem. The more cases of sexual harassment that I look at, the more that seem similar to this.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:13 PM
8

Thank you for compiling this. Very insightful.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:51 PM
3

They want every man to think KNOW that every woman is only in a prominent position to fill a quota, not because she is qualified..? I don't understand why women are ok with this. It should be humiliating to them. Instead, they seem prideful for it. So odd.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 11:29 PM
19

If only men start wars, then only men stop wars, and only men prevent wars. So then, if a person can complain about past wars without being under direct mortal threat from a current war, that is due entirely to the benevolence of men as well. You're welcome, ladies.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 07:08 AM
1

I disagree. It is easy to find weaknesses in their movement. Their entire ideology is based on lies and other fallacies.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 10:16 PM
4

How can you separate the moderates from the extremists in a hate movement? The moderates act as useful idiots for the extremists, adding an air of legitimacy to those who are otherwise ignorant of the movement. Think of any other hate group, and ask yourself if there are tolerable moderates among them.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 09:43 PM
11

You are complaining about negative gender stereotypes. Thank you for doing that. More men need to do that. Rapists rape. Murderers murder. Thieves steal. Men rape. Men murder. Men steal. Women rape. Women murder. Women steal. All of these are true statements.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 09:30 PM
4

She was right to kill those children. You sound like a feminist. Fuck off back to hell, cunt.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 09:18 PM
3

People may also want to look into her next book after that one, called Voluntary Madness: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norah_Vincent Voluntary Madness is about her experiences as an inpatient in a mental hospital. Suffering from depression after her eighteen months living disguised as a man, she felt she was a danger to herself. On the advice of her psychologist she committed herself to a mental institution. #IfWomenWereMenForADay, they may very well end up in a mental institution because they …
/r/MensRights29/11/19 09:31 PM
1

Feminism in practice. Legalized misandry.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 08:53 PM
12

They were seeking the right to vote FOR WOMEN. They did not seek the right to vote for everyone. They were not seeking equality for everyone. It was not egalitarian. It was white women who wanted white women to be able to vote. They ignored those who were non-white. Men and women who were not white did not get to vote until many years later, and their voting rights came without help from the feminists.
/r/MensRights26/11/19 09:45 PM
14

You are very wrong. Feminism is not about equality. It never has been. We have a word for people who believe in and seek equality: Egalitarian. Egalitarianism is for equality for everyone. Feminism is for special rights and benefits for women.
/r/MensRights26/11/19 09:37 PM
5

Good points. Thanks for doing this!
/r/MensRights26/11/19 01:26 AM
6

I think it is a sort of "the grass is always greener" idea. Women who ask for male roles don't always understand what they are asking for, and having never lived the experiences of men they do not understand that there are as many or more negatives than there are positives. Based on a lot of the discussions I have seen men having about women, I do not think women are the only ones thinking the other gender has it easy. We as men often make the same mistakes about women, thinking their lives are …
/r/MensRights26/11/19 01:01 AM
1

True, but the problem is that calling a misandrist a "misandrist" can cost you a lot of money. If we can't use the word "misandrist", what word should we use to describe misandrists..? Admittedly, the word "feminist" works well enough as a replacement for "misandrist", but they like that word.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 10:09 PM
1

I am mostly joking. "Ironic misogyny". However, a man was just charged with accurately calling out a misandrist. What is your alternative suggestion for dealing with such individuals and the current legal climate which would seek to bankrupt someone who speaks out against misandry? Men get called "dicks" or "cocks" all the time and nobody flinches. I see no problem with calling a "cunt" a "cunt". If you flinch at that, it is a problem.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 05:57 PM
7

We can still call Sarah Hanson-Young a cunt. It is undeniable that she is a cunt. Maybe we should just use the word "cunt" in place of "misandrist", if using the completely accurate term "misandrist" is illegal. There are so many cunts that need to be properly addressed. We will see if they would rather be called "cunts" or "misandrists".
/r/MensRights25/11/19 04:03 PM
35

Great list. From what I have seen, feminists know about those things, but will generally argue that all of them are the fault of men due to "The Patriarchy" or "toxic masculinity". When men are doing poorly, they say it is the fault of men or the systems that men create and perpetuate. Compare that to when women are doing poorly, which they say is also the fault of men or the systems that men create and perpetuate. But women get the government ("The Patriarchy") to intervene to help women (exclu…
/r/MensRights23/11/19 08:58 PM
20

This is a good thing. Thank you, Pampers.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 08:46 PM
16

Be the change you want to see in the world.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 08:44 PM
1

When she says "Any working woman out there, or any woman at home knows exactly what I mean: We have to work harder, and that's a fact." It sounds like she is acknowledging that women have not been working very hard, and they need to work harder. That seems a bit harsh and overly critical of ALL women, in my opinion. I have known SOME women who DO work hard. But sure, many women should work harder. I appreciate that this senator is pointing that out.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 05:12 PM
6

... but legally speaking AND morally speaking ... Which law do you think represents a man's legal right to hit a woman? I agree on the morally speaking part, but have a hard time believing the law either as written or in practice would support this. From what I have read and seen, if a man hits a woman even in self defense, that man will typically be charged and the woman will not. Can you show where and when this doesn't happen?
/r/MensRights22/11/19 04:49 PM
2

You don't need to do anything to reassure these men, or any random man. It is not up to you to alleviate the irrational fears of others. The mental state of others is on them, not on you. We should all seek to avoid purposely causing grief or harm to others, but so long as we are behaving in a manner that does not negatively affect others then how others perceive us is their own issue to resolve. This goes for both men and women, in my opinion. Men should not worry about women around them being …
/r/MensRights22/11/19 12:51 AM
41

This reminds me of Erin Pizzey, who started the first women's domestic violence shelter in the world, in 1971. She has been the victim of death threats and boycotts because of her research into the claim that most domestic violence is reciprocal, and that women are equally as capable of violence as men. Pizzey has said that the threats were from militant feminists. She has also been banned from the refuge which she founded. This newer study supports the research that Erin Pizzey was doing almost…
/r/MensRights21/11/19 04:45 PM
3

Respect is given to individuals, not entire groups.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 03:44 PM
41

No surprise in the least. I have witnessed it far too often. I do not understand how women are stereotyped as nurturers when I have seen so very few women who exhibit any sort of nurturing nature throughout my life.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 04:43 PM
2

Already too late.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 04:42 PM
1

Hahahaa ... just ... wow.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 04:41 PM
4

There are as many good women as there are good men. Every relationship can be difficult at times, but it does not mean they should all be avoided. Unless you enjoy solitude, and there is nothing wrong with that.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 01:43 AM
2

She did not leave the vicinity. She walked a couple feet away. She was still nearly as close as she was when she initiated the random attack. The man had no way of knowing if she would attack again or not. It is justifiable that, from his perspective, she was still a threat that needed to be dealt with and stopped. That is what he did. You seem to think that a random person can walk up to another, punch them in the face a few times for no reason at all, then walk a few feet away and suddenly be …
/r/MensRights19/11/19 12:51 AM
21

Bullshit. I don't care anymore. This shit happens far too often. Start a fight? Finish a fight. Don't want to get the living shit beat out of you..? It is very easy: Don't randomly attack people. Think you get a pass because you have/are a cunt..? Think again. Not anymore. Punch, get punched. Women are equal to men. What you are suggesting is what they call "toxic masculinity", where you are assuming this women should be treated like a child. They want us to stop that. Men can hit women if women…
/r/MensRights18/11/19 08:35 PM
2

They complain about unequal cost on user goods. Is the fix to make things equal..? NO! They work to punish the men. Average everyday feminism. Feminism is a hate movement, and all feminists are trash.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 08:14 PM
10

Women are equal to men.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 07:49 AM
11

The people who generally consider MRAs as a hate group are Feminists. I consider Feminists as a hate group. We can continue to highlight the very many examples of how government-endorsed and media-sponsored feminists create sexist programs that benefit only women, or how they gather to protest against support systems for men, or even when they call for the death of men on Twitter or a national television channel. They can try to find any endorsed or sponsored MRA speaker publicly calling for the…
/r/MensRights15/11/19 04:31 AM
2

"Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Feminist in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article." -- Poe's Law.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 10:59 PM
14

Whenever women say "All men are trash", they should be reminded that "Women are equal to men" and therefore "All women are trash" too. If they argue against that, they show that they are one of the ones we're talking about. I don't actually believe all women are trash. Neither do I believe all men are trash.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 10:44 PM
7

... then that someone is being incredibly accurate.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 10:43 PM
1

Epistotomy is no longer recommended, sure, but that doesn't mean it's not practiced anymore. Not recommended doesn't mean forbidden, so it can still be taken into account. In the USA for 1979, epistotomy was performed in 59% of child births. That went down to 31% in 1997, and again down to 12% in 2012. It is likely an even lower percentage today. We were discussing normal pregnancy, and common procedures for the average child birth. Yes, epistotomy still happens. It does not happen for the avera…
/r/MensRights14/11/19 10:09 PM
1

Even "normal" pregnancies wreck a woman's body to hell and back. Organs are squished to make space for the fetus, the vagina is literally cut open at birth (check out epistotomy), hormones are driven crazy which leads to all sorts of problems like hair loss and skin pigmentation, and other nasty stuff I can't remember off the top of my head. The only thing you mention here that comes close to the original "body torn up in the process" comment would be the epistotomy. According to the helpful Wik…
/r/MensRights14/11/19 04:28 AM
2

Sure, your take on it is within the realm of possibility. Neither of us were there, so we can only guess. Both guys have received briefings from a manager about maintaining their professionalism in the workplace, and are probably worried about being observed by the other. However, I would think that if your scenario was accurate, both individuals would be more inclined to speak with her when observed by the other, not when alone with her. They are more likely to be protected from accusations of …
/r/MensRights13/11/19 10:17 PM
16

She seems like a feminist.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 05:33 PM
15

She is whining on the internet about how these men she works with don't want to socialize with her, and she worries that it will hurt her career. Oh, also it'd be nice to make friends. She then looks to blame everyone else: the men, the wives, the work culture, the MeToo movement ... but not herself. Maybe she is just an unlikable cunt. Nobody owes her anything, but she is acting as though she thinks they do. That is how it seems to me at least. Maybe she is just whining because she is a whiner,…
/r/MensRights13/11/19 05:26 PM
15

She specifically notes: "I don't want this to hurt my career, and it'd be nice to make friends". It appears to me that her career is the concern, and the friends would be a nice additional benefit. Regardless, she is entitled to neither. Nobody owes her career help or friendship.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 05:11 PM
17

Feminists are ignorant cunts.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 04:42 PM
18

These crazy women like this always seem to act as though men are obligated to help them in their careers. Men owe women exactly as much as women owe men: Nothing.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 04:31 PM
13

None of masculinity is toxic.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 04:16 PM
1

Yes, I can see what you mean. I would only argue that "feminine" should replace "female" in your proposed term. It seems that "feminist" is more likely a portmanteau of "feminine supremacist" rather than "female supremacist". Their movement doesn't seem to care as much about the sex of the convert as they do about the gender identity performed. They seem to want more people "acting feminine" and less people "acting masculine", and they attempt to do so by redefining each word such that "feminine…
/r/MensRights12/11/19 08:02 AM
7

Systemic misandry.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 08:24 PM
6

Guess what. They're all women, women in positions of power and influence, who'll use their position to pile more shit on men. There are other commonalities among those people than just their gender. They are all likely self described feminists. The problem is not their gender. The problem is the misguided dogma of feminism that they follow like dazed members of a cult, impervious to rationality.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 06:53 AM
3

No, it isn't better than doing nothing at all. When such ads are put out with a feminist slant, they consider that a "positive note" as well. This ad is nothing more than pandering. They are playing on the weakness of men who wish to hear something, anything, that is not constant criticism of men for simply being male. We should not be encouraging marketing firms to "open a discussion" in which they control the narrative. Their only interest is in selling product, and convincing their buyers tha…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 09:32 PM
20

This is just marketing. Professional liars. It means nothing. It is intended to get an emotional reaction from you, to encourage you to buy their products. That is all. Just manipulation. Don't fall for it.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:42 PM
2

As a man, you will be considered sexist and misogynistic no matter what you do, so you may as well embrace it. It doesn't matter what feminists think.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:29 PM
1

This is not a gender specific issue. This is a mental health and drug addiction issue. These sorts of thing affect everyone. Reactions from feminists on this are irrelevant, in my opinion, and would likely inevitably blame men anyways.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:18 PM
1

If someone hits you, hit them back twice as hard to make them think twice before they try hitting you again. Repeat until they stop. This goes for any of the 842 currently imagined different genders.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 02:43 AM
1

Body torn up in the process..? That sounds scary, but doesn't seem to reflect reality. A bit of hyperbole, perhaps? Pregnancy is a normal, safe experience for the vast majority of women. Let us look at some abortion stats that were released from Florida, and see why abortion is chosen by most women who do abort. You will see that it isn't because of life threatening danger. It is purely elective. In Florida for 2018, there were a total of 70083 abortions. Of those, 194 were because of a life thr…
/r/MensRights07/11/19 05:18 PM
1

I completely agree with this. If one is legal, so should the other be. If one is illegal, so should the other be. That is equality. That is reproductive freedom for all.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 04:48 PM
7

A man should be able to walk away from a pregnant woman and the potential mother shouldn't be able to legally force him to provide any type of support with the upbringing of the child. Do you disagree?
/r/MensRights06/11/19 09:53 PM
15

Denying misandry..? Yeah, that is an example of misandry.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 01:47 AM
1

This has to be a joke. I do not believe this to be real.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 11:28 PM
3

I have a very hard time believing this is authentic.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 11:27 PM
20

That is when a feminist complains about a non-issue.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 05:05 PM
70

Yes. Mansplaining is a noble pursuit, and something all good men should embrace. Do not allow feminists to make a slur of our good actions. Mansplaining is when a man uses facts or reasoning to calmly discuss a femtarded opinion that has been femsplained to him. Femsplaining is using out-of-control emotional outbursts and irrational feelings to argue with a man because the feminist is angry a man had the audacity to speak in her presence. Feminist is just a short-form of saying Female Supremacis…
/r/MensRights31/10/19 04:42 PM
8

Who is that cuntplaining? Why does she have to cuntplain so much? Her cuntplaining is problematic. I have now said it three times, surely that is enough.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 03:16 PM
19

Good lad, standing up to his bully like that. Takes courage and resolve. Good on him.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 03:14 PM
4

"Men's Rights" as a name is clear in purpose. No name change is needed.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 06:05 AM
4

No.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 05:53 AM
2

I assume all of these Twitter screenshots are just bad jokes.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 06:35 AM
4

I am thankful to have never directly experienced anything like that. I just want to put this out there. I was a stay-at-home dad for over 10 years, raising two daughters. I still am the primary parent. I took them everywhere. Parks, playgrounds, swimming pools, restaurants, grocery shopping, libraries, etc. I never experienced anything like that. I often felt excluded as a man, but never directly confronted or questioned. Just so men don't fear becoming a stay-at-home dad, or to take on a primar…
/r/MensRights29/10/19 06:33 AM
1

Fuck off cunt.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 06:24 PM
3

In the scenario you are proposing, parental alienation has already taken place. The children have already been taught to distrust and dislike their father. Now the father kills the mother. You think that brings the children closer to him? Even in cases of "crimes of passion", house arrest would be very rare, especially if the crime was murder. Pussies..? Blahness? Fuck off cunt. Go make your pushes for murder elsewhere, you ignorant piece of shit.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 05:13 PM
2

I still disagree with what you are proposing. "Crimes of passion" are not excused. They receive lighter sentences generally, because they were not premeditated. Such crimes happen due to an inability to control an extreme emotional outburst. In my opinion, such a person is a danger to society, and should be locked up. They should definitely not be given custody of children. They are emotionally unstable to the point that they will commit murder. I would fear they could also murder their children…
/r/MensRights28/10/19 05:07 PM
4

You've identified a problem: Women get preferential treatment. That problem should be fixed by removing the preferential treatment, not by giving men equal but different preferential treatments. That just exacerbates the problem. It fixes nothing. Women will not stop alienating kids from their fathers due to the possibility of "justifiable murder". I believe we would instead see many more men accused of parental alienation getting murdered in their sleep by their wives. You already identified th…
/r/MensRights28/10/19 03:57 PM
2

We should seek to fix injustices, not create more of them. It would help nobody to excuse or encourage the murder of spouses due to real or perceived parental alienation. If the father was hurt by parental alienation before murdering the mother of his children, do you think that would make his children closer to him? Or further alienate them from him..? It would not fix the problems the father was facing. It would make his problems worse. It would make the children's lives worse as well. This is…
/r/MensRights28/10/19 03:51 PM
1

This is a child. Children are not capable of making such a life-changing decision for themselves. Parents who push for this are abusive.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 08:00 PM
1

This seems like a good idea. It would be interesting to read some of the responses by the member states who have already been contacted for sponsorship. Are those available to read?
/r/MensRights27/10/19 07:52 PM
5

This is the sort of Activism we need. Thanks for bringing this to everyone's attention.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 07:43 PM
2

Lots of good sources there. Thank you.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 07:15 PM
3

Projectionists.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 08:02 PM
2

The exact same can be said about women and child murderers: "Child murderers are not lurking in some alleyways patiently waiting for an opportunity to murder a child. Child murderers are in our midst. Child murderers are in our homes, in our churches, in our timelines and in our phone contact lists. Child murderers are our family members, our friends. Child murderers are completely normal women, sane women, matured women. Child murders are women we shake hands with everyday. Child murderers are …
/r/MensRights26/10/19 06:51 PM
3

Betteridges Law applies: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no."
/r/MensRights26/10/19 06:13 PM
54

Paranoid is the wrong word. Paranoia is an irrational fear. That is a bad thing. Men are not acting on an irrational fear. Men are being justifiably cautious. This is a good thing.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 03:38 PM
1

You should record it, then post it to YouTube and/or Twitter first. THEN you should approach the school authorities. They will likely do nothing, but you may be able to force their hand if there is enough public outrage on seeing such a video of a teacher saying that. What do the feminists call it..? "Call out culture" or "cancel culture" or some shit. Yeah, do that to him. Call him out, and get him cancelled.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 05:02 PM
7

Manspreading is the #1 Problem that feminists face. Those poor creatures.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 09:01 PM
16

More proof that "The Patriarchy" as described by feminism is a foolish conspiracy theory with no basis in reality. If "The Patriarchy" existed, none of this sort of shit would happen. Feminists are psychotic.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 04:04 PM
2

Most people here are saying you should walk away. I think they are wrong. YOU SHOULD RUN!! This is a trap for you. There will only be pain and misery for you in the end, if you stay. Run while you can. Would you instead stick around for a while, bond with the child that is not yours, then find out when she decides to leave you that you have no rights and only responsibilities for this child that is not yours? RUN!!!
/r/MensRights22/10/19 03:29 PM
67

At the most basic level, men's rights are the legal rights that are granted to men. However, any issue that pertains to men's relationship to society is also a topic suitable for this subreddit. Men's rights are influenced by the way men are perceived by others. These are just a few of the issues discussed on this sub, affecting men and boys from around the globe: Male Genital Mutilation - Circumcision Education Discrimination Lack of social support Legal Discrimination Selective Service - Enfor…
/r/MensRights22/10/19 03:13 AM
1

That wasn't a feminist. That was a decent person.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 04:05 PM
2

I disagree. Prevention appears to be the problem. Do you know how often the viability of the pregnancy is the reason abortion is chosen versus purely elective reasoning? The numbers are staggering. It is difficult to get true numbers, but Florida has released some interesting stats. In Florida for 2018, there were a total of 70083 abortions. Of those, 194 were because of a life threatening physical condition. An additional 701 were because of serious fetal genetic defects. There were 8 abortions…
/r/MensRights21/10/19 03:54 PM
2

I disagree. I do not believe we should be trying to replace the "believe women" phrase. We should only call it out for the sexism of it, and the irrationality of it. We should not try to give the feminists better marketing, which is sort of what it sounds like you are proposing. If someone says "Believe women", I am now more inclined to just say "That is sexist" and be done with them. Or, more succinctly, just say "No" without any further explanations or qualifiers. We don't need to play along w…
/r/MensRights18/10/19 04:00 PM
1

This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZggCipbiHwE
/r/MensRights17/10/19 02:00 AM
14

Racist, sexist, accusatory, loud and obnoxious..? Average feminist. Trash.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 08:58 PM
11

As soon as someone interacts with that sub, they will see it is feminist and anti-male. Look how quickly you noticed! Have faith. Some may take longer than others. Some may not ever be saved. Such is life.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 05:05 PM
23

True, that is too bad. But any rational man will soon realize their "help" is anything but helpful. Let them have their echo chamber safe space. It is just a place for lectures from feminists, not discussions with men. I suspect that most men will quickly see that after not too long there. The quickest way to cure a man of the affliction that is feminism is to have him speak to real feminists. Sure enough, it worked for me!
/r/MensRights16/10/19 04:49 PM
73

That sub is just feminists roleplaying as submissive subservient men. Don't let it bother you. They are irrelevant.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 04:40 PM
6

All news sources have a disgraceful history of lying to readers, misrepresenting people and blatant illegal practices. In my opinion, all sources are to be taken with a grain of salt. No one source can be trusted. The truth can only hopefully be ascertained by analyzing various sources, and find the commonalities in the story being told. Therein lies a shadow of the truth, I hope. If we ignore the information provided by the sources you feel are disreputable then we will miss out on the stories …
/r/MensRights16/10/19 04:30 PM
7

Feminists and their insane crying about pockets. Such poor oppressed children. Want pants with pockets? Go buy pants with pockets. Prefer to cry about it instead? As you were then. This is feeling like "emotional labour" to listen to their endless whining about endless non-issues.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 04:19 PM
14

Is this the Barbra Streisand Effect in action? I had no idea this movie existed. Now I only want to see it because all the feminists and other freaks are crying about it, so it must be dropping some truth bombs that they don't want anyone to hear. I guess it is time for me to start learning about Jordan Peterson... Thanks feminists for introducing me to him!
/r/MensRights16/10/19 03:56 PM
10

This works for everyone, in all situations: "Trust, but verify."
/r/MensRights16/10/19 04:51 AM
3

Much more needs to be done to expose this issue. There need to be very severe and harsh repercussions for anyone who engages in paternity fraud. How can we help to ensure this gets put into law?
/r/MensRights15/10/19 10:30 PM
3

Mandatory paternity testing is a requirement for equality. How can we get this put into law..?
/r/MensRights15/10/19 10:27 PM
2

No, men should not be able to either force women to become parents or to stop them from becoming parents when an accidental pregnancy takes place. Likewise, women should not be able to force men to become parents when an accidental pregnancy takes place. If women want to become parents, or not be parents, that should be their choice. Men should get the same choice. That is equality.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 08:05 PM
5

I find it very strange that "people of colour" is the new phrase they choose, when it wasn't so long ago that "coloured people" was considered a slur. I'm glad I am not the only one noticing.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 10:01 PM
4

They missed a few that the writer of that sheet is clearly afflicted with themselves. Cis-phobia: targets "cis-gendered" people. Heterophobia: targets heterosexual people. Europhobia: targets "white people". Christianophobia: targets Christian people. Anti-maleism: targets men. See..? We can make up words too.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 03:48 PM
8

Funny how one person's benevolent sexism is another person's regular sexism. This is a great point. I will try to remember it. Any time someone points out sexism against women, it can be reframed as "just benevolent sexism in favour of men". I believe that may cover almost everything that feminists complain about. It is all just benevolent sexism in favour of men. And benevolent sexism hurts men more than women, similarly to how benevolent sexism in favour of women supposedly hurts them more tha…
/r/MensRights10/10/19 03:28 PM
2

Thank you!
/r/MensRights08/10/19 11:44 PM
1

If you love and support your mom, your sisters, your partners, your daughters, etc., then you're a feminist. Sure, this works. Seems so easy. Just like if you love and support your dad, your brothers, your partners, your sons, etc., then you're a Men's Rights Activist. Welcome to the club, fellow MRA! Now, I dare you to go and tell all your feminist friends that you are officially an MRA now. Watch how quickly they kick you out of their club.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 10:32 PM
2

' So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves feminists... they are not "real feminists". That's not just "no true Scotsman". That's delusional self deception. Listen, if…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 10:07 PM
5

' So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves feminists... they are not "real feminists". That's not just "no true Scotsman". That's delusional self deception. Listen, if…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 10:02 PM
16

Just another average feminist, calling for male genocide yet again. Feminism is a hate movement.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 04:13 PM
9

"When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression."
/r/MensRights07/10/19 04:10 PM
4

Some men may be voting at the behest of or to appease women. If men stopped voting against their own self-interests, that should be enough to fix the legal problems.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 07:48 PM
1

It is not logic. It is emotion.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 04:34 PM
9

Clementine Ford is a clown.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 04:29 PM
8

...and only they can change it back. I disagree with this. I think it is up to men to stop listening to or attempting to appease women. Then we can fix it.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 04:28 PM
3

Women "attempt" suicide in ways they know won't kill them, so they can get sympathy and attention. Men kill themselves in ways they know will assure their death because they truly want to die.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 04:15 PM
4

Average modern woman.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 04:12 PM
15

I am at the point of believing that the vast majority of these #MeToo things are exactly like this.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 04:09 PM
1

This looks like two different issues. Do I think it is ok for a significant other to be very close with guy friends as well as ex-lovers? Yes, I do. Do I think it is ok for a significant other to be giving more attention to these other men than to you? No, I do not. That sounds like a form of cheating. The difference, to me, is the level of intimacy. If they are friends with other men, that is ok and there is nothing wrong with that. If they are intimate with other men, then I want nothing to do…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 06:04 PM
59

Make it "femsplaining" and see them freak out over the "sexism". Much fun to be had.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 05:23 PM
4

Femsplaining can be defined in exactly the same way: Any explanation given (by a woman, to a man) that was not requested.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 05:21 PM
2

You are allowed to walk through town. You are doing nothing wrong by walking behind another person, even when that other person is a woman. If that scares someone else, it is that person who has a problem that they need to address on their own. You are not responsible for their feelings or their fear. They alone are responsible. If they are so afraid, they should seek a chaperone when they go out, or they should stay home. I am sorry that you are feeling responsible, but you are not. That is the…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 04:51 PM
2

At that time, I believe the prefix 'were' meant 'man'. Therefore, werewolves are all male. They are also imaginary.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 06:07 PM
5

Feminists are wrong. Don't base your self-worth on their lies.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 06:04 PM
1

Give yourself to the Toxicity. It is the only way you can save your male friends. I see through the lies of the feminists. I do not fear the Toxicity as you do.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 06:01 PM
35

Women also kill men. Here are some interesting stats from Canada: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2013001/article/11805/11805-3-eng.htm If you look at Chart 3.2, you can see that there are far more female victims of spousal homicide than there are male victims. Male victims make up approximately 25% of the female victim numbers. Comparing that to Chart 3.3, which compares not spousal homicide but dating partner homicides. It is interesting that there are far more male victims when d…
/r/MensRights03/10/19 04:58 PM
2

Feminists are insane.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 01:38 AM
2

He should have filed a charge of sexual harassment against her.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 04:32 PM
6

Undeniably, some men do those things. My only problem is with the generalization. When they say "what do men do..." it implies all or most men. It is an easily fixed problem by simply saying "what do some men do...". Just like we can say "Women are baby murderers." That implies all women are baby murderers. Undeniably, some are, but not all. It would be more accurate to say "Some women are baby murderers." Or even "Most babies that are murdered are murdered by women." This new way of using gener…
/r/MensRights02/10/19 04:12 PM
5

If a woman hits you, then she is self-identifying as a man. You can now hit her as hard as you want, because she is a man.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 04:05 PM
14

Based on stats, it is as accurate to say "Women are baby murderers" as it is to say "Men are rapists". Of course ... #NotAllWomen and #NotAllMen.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 04:03 PM
1

Do you have an example of when it was done for merit and suitability for the part..?
/r/MensRights02/10/19 03:51 PM
0

It’s always a shame when characters get race changed but if it’s because of merit and suitability for the part I don’t have an issue. Did you have an example in mind that you were thinking of? When has the race of a character been changed because of merit and suitability for the part?
/r/MensRights02/10/19 05:03 AM
7

There is a difference though. Men are collectively punished for the bad driving habits of some men. Not all men are bad drivers, but all men have higher insurance rates. Men that are good drivers still have to pay the higher fees initially. The bank charges are completely under the control of the individual. The banks are not charging women more. Women are making choices to mismanage their own money, and as a result pay higher fees. The women who do not do this, do not pay the higher fees at all…
/r/MensRights01/10/19 06:33 PM
9

"If someone hits you, hit them back twice as hard." That is what I was taught. I was also taught "Never hit a woman." but I think we should disregard that rule now, for the sake of equality. Women don't want to be protected like little children anymore. If someone can hit, they can be hit back.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 07:00 PM
2

The rest of the world has had many women lead their nations through all of history. Canada, the UK, Germany, etc. So many. In the past, in the present, inevitably again in the future ... The lack of women presidents in the USA is no proof of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 06:29 PM
3

No, that isn't it. "Patriarchy is a misandrist term invented by feminists to place blame for all social ills on men and absolve women of any responsibility for their part. Some radical feminists use this misandry to suggest that men should have reduced rights in comparison to women. Others among them even use this imaginary concept as justification to enact measures to reduce the world wide population of men through selective abortion." LOL, patriarchy...
/r/MensRights29/09/19 06:04 PM
3

You being fearful isn't right, but it doesn't prove the patriarchy. It just proves you are more paranoid. Men are more likely to be assaulted walking home from a bar than a woman. Yet they still do it, in spite of that fact and in spite of the fear they may still be experiencing. Doing something in spite of the danger or regardless of your fear is called bravery. Try being more brave. Your lack of bravery is not proof of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 05:57 PM
1

I agree though, no sarcasm. No woman owes me her smile. Neither do I owe her such things as crossing the street if I am walking behind her at night, taking the next elevator so she can ride alone, or any other such inane shit like that. A smile takes far less effort than crossing the street. A smile is far less disruptive than waiting for the next elevator. But asking someone to smile, I have been told, is oppression. So then, is the rest.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 05:49 PM
1

True, good point. I don't believe all women are cheaters, and didn't mean to imply that. Women who say stuff like that seem to be the ones who are projecting. Those women would be suspect, but not all women. There do seem to be a lot of women like that, though. But not all. My name is NAWALT, and I believe that Not All Women Are Like That. #NotAllWomen.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 05:46 PM
2

They do not accept diversity of thought. To them, it seems that diversity is only skin deep.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 05:31 PM
24

Talk to the head of the school. If they don't support you, talk to the head of the school board. If they don't support you, talk to the news.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 05:28 PM
8

It is projection. They know that the better you treat them, the more likely they are to cheat, so they expect the same back. The amount of women I've heard reject a guy or cheat on him because "he is too nice" or "he never gets mad, its boring" or "he does whatever I want, he has no spine" etc. Projection. They'd do it, so they expect us to do the same.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 05:21 PM
24

That is a lot of things women are asking men to do on their behalf. Can we ask them for a smile once in awhile in return..?
/r/MensRights28/09/19 05:14 PM
8

Yes. Watch it. It is worth your time.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 06:56 AM
4

That mentality certainly explains why all dissenting opinion or contrary facts result in a ban in any of the feminist subs of Reddit. They only want to hear their own thoughts echoed. And they proudly declare this..? Collective insanity.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 06:52 AM
1

Yeah, I think that is all most of us have known him as since first hearing of him. I do like that you recognize your own bias. For someone who seems almost obsessed with this case, you are being willfully ignorant by not looking into the full story. I haven't looked into it at all myself, so I am also being willfully ignorant I suppose, but then it hasn't been a story that interests me. I know nothing more than "Brock Turner is a rapist", and I accept that is likely true. If it is indeed true, t…
/r/MensRights26/09/19 05:14 PM
1

I think I'm just trying to not see his side for some reason. Enlightenment?
/r/MensRights26/09/19 04:44 PM
7

I lived this.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 08:16 PM
1

You won't see mention of the "practical problems" that face men today because as soon as such things are mentioned, those comments are deleted and those who post them are banned or shadow-banned so all their comments are auto-deleted. I recommend reading the deleted comments to see the sorts of things that are "unacceptable thoughts" there. Anything that is critical of feminism even slightly is unacceptable there. MensLib is a trash sub run by feminists who seem to be trying to train men to be "…
/r/MensRights22/09/19 08:05 PM
1

I love hearing this guy speak.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 06:58 PM
3

You mean to tell me they socially constructed the notion of socially constructed genders..? Next you're gonna tell me they made up "toxic masculinity" and invented "patriarchy" too!
/r/MensRights19/09/19 06:46 PM
6

Didn’t read it. LOL.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:38 PM
3

What do you call women who stand for their rights without shitting on men’s rights? That is egalitarian.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:37 PM
10

Real women are Men's Rights Activists.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 08:44 PM
5

Right. The TedxTalk was "How To Be A Man". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tNsNkzEzbw
/r/MensRights14/09/19 03:01 AM
3

Feminism is Matriarchy.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 01:56 AM
0

Feminism creates Patriarchy in the same way that Religion creates Gods. There is no empirical evidence for either theory. Both rely on faith in dogma.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 01:54 AM
1

I had no idea who she was until I saw the parody of her song called "Dad Guy". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilUhwTGOc5s
/r/MensRights14/09/19 01:42 AM
4

Don't fear judgement.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 01:34 AM
5

I suspect a book written by a man titled "For The Love Of Women: A New Vision For Mindful Femininity" would be heavily criticized by feminists, especially if the author had previously held a TedxTalk titled "How To Be A Woman: A Man's Guide". I posted the above paragraph as a comment in the MensLib subreddit when they were discussing this. My comment was very quickly deleted. Trash sub.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 12:55 AM
9

Feminists are baby murderers.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 08:54 PM
1

Social engineering.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 02:43 PM
2

I can't think of any popular female characters that have been remade into male versions. I am assuming I am wrong. Which ones do you know of..?
/r/MensRights10/09/19 12:38 AM
60

Feminists are mentally unstable.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 12:34 AM
0

If a woman makes a claim, it should automatically be challenged. I would never take a woman's word on anything serious without absolute undeniable proof (unless she had already earned my trust). Random women on the internet? Yeah, I doubt them every time. So should everyone else, in my opinion and hope. The "court of public opinion" should be levied against them, not in their favour. Who the fuck is believing these women..?!
/r/MensRights10/09/19 12:29 AM
1

Just those who do that thing. Of those that do that thing, all of them do it. Fun game. Thanks for playing.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 06:47 AM
1

Sure, whichever. I would love to see the stats for homicide broken down by femicide and androcide, and compared for each country. Which group would be more at risk, according to the stats, and which group should therefore receive more government funding for programs to protect them based on that risk..?
/r/MensRights07/09/19 06:45 AM
2

#Not-All-Women..? I didn't say "all". I think that is how this game works.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 06:43 AM
3

Does this mean that homicide only refers to when men are murdered now? Those will be interesting stats to compare everywhere.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 03:09 AM
27

"When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression."
/r/MensRights07/09/19 01:58 AM
3

Call the police. Give them all the information you have. Tell them you want to prosecute. Follow through. You did nothing wrong, except for trusting the woman in question.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 08:25 PM
6

Not even then, usually.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 08:11 PM
9

There is no need to ever compliment a woman for anything. Save your compliments for the men.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 07:53 PM
19

When everything is wrongly labeled as "misogyny", it becomes an irrelevant term.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 05:03 PM
41

This is what the "70% of domestic violence is started by women" looks like in action. They do this to try and make you attack, so you hurt them and then you go to jail. They all cry victim. It is a tactic.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 03:27 PM
4

Fish screeching for bicycles. You don't need a bicycle, silly fish.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 02:56 PM
5

This is not a monster. This is just an average woman. An ordinary looking, part-time employed, soap opera watching, baby making, chilling on the couch woman. We know many of them. Some, even by name. They're everywhere. Hiding in plain sight. Waiting ... #WhoIsNext?
/r/MensRights05/09/19 09:05 PM
6

India has also been afflicted with feminism.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 06:41 AM
1

Same happened to me. I don't want their phone spam.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 04:40 AM
10

Performative emotions and victimhood theatrics. Standard feminism. Such trash.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 04:34 AM
1

Feminism is passive aggressive.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 04:31 AM
10

Feminism is a hate movement.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 11:38 PM
70

That is not fake feminism. That is Traditional Feminism, and it is all Toxic.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 07:04 PM
7

The feminists call it "Reproductive Freedom". Men deserve "Reproductive Freedom" too. It is the right to choose if and when you become a parent, regardless of accidental pregnancy. "It is a moral necessity that we not be forced to bring children into the world for whom we cannot be responsible and adoring and present. We must not inflict life on children who will be resented; we must not inflict unwanted children on society. " - Anne Lamott "Reproductive freedom is critical to a whole range of i…
/r/MensRights04/09/19 07:21 AM
25

If Islamophobia is blaming all Muslims when just one attacks, would this then be "manophobia"? It seems like an irrational fear of all members of a group based on the actions of one. It is clearly a phobia that is afflicting them.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 08:58 PM
2

From the mods of MensLib: "We are a pro-feminism community that uses the framework of feminism to address men's issues." They are using a feminist lens to look at the issues men face, but their lens is distorted.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 11:57 PM
0

I don't think it would take much searching to find examples of men doing the same.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 04:42 AM
2

I sincerely believe that those who lust for power are already corrupt, even before they attain any power. But power, once attained, can corrupt even the best of people.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 09:30 PM
5

Fragile Femininity.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 09:19 PM
18

Power corrupts, not gender.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 09:14 PM
2

Now, we must formulate a response to this appeasement. That is hilarious. Nobody owes anything to this company or their marketing.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 05:52 AM
2

Do you work for them..? Honestly, a better option would be to ensure their demise. That would be a far bigger splash to marketing departments.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 05:47 AM
1

You have a strange way of looking at the world.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 04:57 AM
24

I am almost 50 years old now. This has been going on my whole life. This isn't new, unfortunately. I just saw someone in the AskFeminist forum said "Don't bring men down, lift women up." It is a shame that those who produce the tv shows and movies haven't heard such advice yet. Children's cartoons are even worse. They are filling young kids' heads with this shit too.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 10:08 PM
2

WTF? Of course it is not discrimination or oppression. It is not discrimination or oppression when women are attacked either. It is just violent people being violent. All victims of violence deserve support and protection. People who disregard male victims are part of the problem, not the solution. The solution is to find ways to protect everyone who is a victim of violence. Men are also victims of violence. It doesn't matter who is perpetrating the violence.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 09:56 PM
1

She sounds like a feminist.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 08:26 PM
3

Why would feminists campaign for men’s problems? Why should men support feminism and women's problems?
/r/MensRights23/08/19 08:21 PM
2

The great majority of violent crime perpetrators are also men What does that have to do with anything?
/r/MensRights23/08/19 08:19 PM
1

Maybe try suing the cunt.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 08:57 PM
12

Feminists are violent.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 08:52 PM
1

Seriously though, it won't happen. Even though the phrase may have originated in reference to male decimation, I don't think most women who use it now honestly feel that way. Inevitably, there will be individual crazies. Selective male abortion may happen, just as selective female abortion also happens. But I don't honestly believe we need to fear mass male abortion programs enacted by radical feminists. No need for a war over this.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 06:32 AM
3

"Benevolent sexism". They enjoy that, and do not decry it. It seems to be the only form of masculinity which is acceptable to them now. They are also attempting to increase that effect using "intersectionalism" to create something akin to "benevolent racism".
/r/MensRights19/08/19 02:35 AM
3

It is passive-aggressive, as that is Female Nature. It is male nature to be more direct. Women will kill baby boys to get their female future. They won't try to fight grown men.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 02:30 AM
3

Crazy lady. It is already equal. The only people stopping women from bike riding are women themselves.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 08:12 PM
7

This is basic feminism. A standard feminist speaking her mind. Nothing new, and nothing unexpected.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 07:37 PM
3

Show me the data you are talking about. I haven't seen or found data that shows there are no problems when kids are raised without a mother, as you seem to be implying is the case. I would be very surprised to see data which suggests kids can be raised by a father alone, with no problems associated to the lack of a mother. That seems as ridiculous as the notion that children can be raised by mothers alone, with no problems due to the lack of a father. I have not found anything to support such a …
/r/MensRights06/08/19 08:30 PM
3

The statistics only prove that fathers are important. They do not prove that fathers are more important than mothers. There is not enough valid data from households where the father is the only present parent to make the assumption that you are making. So far, the statistics can only prove that keeping the fathers from the children will damage the children. We do not know how children would be damaged if they are unable to see their mothers on a regular basis, due to lack of data, but it is safe…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 06:44 PM
18

This seems like a push for supremacy, not equality. Neither parent should be put on a pedestal as "the most important". Both parents are equally important in the life of a child, so long as they are good parents.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 01:02 AM
94

Seems like "diversity" is just a code word for "not men".
/r/MensRights03/08/19 01:18 AM
4

To be taken care of and provided for can be a privilege, or it can be a prison. A gilded cage, as it could become, is still just a cage. I think it truly depends on the individuals involved as to who is privileged in such situations. A man can be burdened with responsibilities to provide for the family and home, or a woman can be burdened with similar responsibilities to provide in the home for the family. Often, I suspect each sees themselves as more burdened than the other.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 01:57 AM
2

This is normal feminism.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 06:02 PM
7

Every birth should have a mandatory paternity test. No child should have to guess at who their father is, and no man should have to guess at who their child may be. It is unfair to the child, and the man who may or may not be a father. Laws are already in place to protect women, and ensure that they leave the hospital only with their own biological children. This happened due to the hysteria surrounding a few instances of babies being sent to the wrong mothers. Fathers deserve the same protectio…
/r/MensRights20/07/19 07:11 AM
1

It is discrimination based on gender. I do not believe they can legally do that.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 06:57 AM
1

This is not legal, but they will expect our obedience and compliance regardless. I recommend to just ignore such signs, and park wherever it is convenient and legal to do so.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 08:29 PM
3

This is feminism in action. All while they push negative gendered terms like mansplaining, manspreading, toxic masculinity, patriarchy, etc.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 01:48 AM
2

Average feminist.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 06:23 PM
2

Mirriam-Webster is a troll..? TIL. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/womyn
/r/MensRights27/06/19 05:46 PM
5

Every time I see it defined, the definition is different. You define it as: "Toxic masculinity by definition refers to the restraint that men have due to social norms being pushed onto them, such as boys shouldnt show emotion, etc etc." However, a mod at AskFeminists defines it recently as: "'Toxic masculinity' is a concept. It's not saying 'men are bad' or 'masculinity is bad.' It's a descriptive term for when traditionally masculine qualities bear themselves out to such an extreme point that t…
/r/MensRights27/06/19 05:38 PM
1

Sometimes a joke is just a joke.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 04:28 AM
0

So much of this terminology seems like a reflection or retaliation for perceived misogyny. It sometimes seems as if little girls grew up angry about what they understood of Freudian psychology, which sometimes seemed to suggest everything was mommy's fault, and instead created an APA where all of masculinity is now considered toxic. Much of the new feminist language seems like a passive aggressive comeback for the same things that they themselves have complained men have done to them in the past…
/r/MensRights24/06/19 06:09 AM
1

That is an example of systemic misandry.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 09:06 PM
4

This is an example of both Fragile and Toxic Femininity.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 08:30 PM
9

Ok, I did a little digging, and found a discussion on a BBC site about this: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-48628678 "However, the new rules do not preclude the use of all gender stereotypes. The ASA said the aim was to identify 'specific harms' that should be prevented. So, for example, adverts would still be able to show women doing the shopping or men doing DIY, or use gender stereotypes as a way of challenging their negative effects." It would appear that VOX is being slightly hyperbolic …
/r/MensRights22/06/19 07:25 PM
4

I have no problem with Men's Lib Does this sub have its problems? Yes ​ Seems like you have a bias towards Feminism and against Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 01:29 AM
13

That was well said. Thank you for putting the time into this.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 05:11 PM
18

Norah Vincent Thanks for sharing. I did not know that part of her experiment: "Suffering from depression after her eighteen months living disguised as a man, she felt she was a danger to herself. On the advice of her psychologist she committed herself to a mental institution." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norah_Vincent
/r/MensRights19/06/19 05:09 PM
2

Sorry, no, I don't think it was bad at all, as satire. As satire, I think it was very good. On point.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 01:04 AM
3

That makes as much sense as anything else to come from Gender Studies.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 04:24 PM
9

Yes.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 04:13 PM
18

Yes, they already complained about that. That is why both "womyn" and "womxn" are now in the dictionary. Unfortunately, that is not a joke.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 07:39 PM
2

No.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 03:31 PM
5

It's not that they don't have to, it's that, for the most part, they haven't lived life doing this kind of work. Therein lies the problem.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 09:27 PM
2

The immunity you are looking for is called the Good Samaritan Law. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Samaritan_law There are variations as well. For instance, Canada recently passed such a law specifically to protect those involved in cases of drug overdose: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/news/2017/05/good_samaritan_drugoverdoseactbecomeslawincanada.html I agree. People should not get in trouble when they are trying to help.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 09:25 PM
79

That is toxic femininity. The toxic cultural norm here is that women are not expected to help and they will not be reprimanded or negatively affected in any way for failure to assist. There are no repercussions for the woman who does nothing in an emergency situation. This is very harmful to society at large, and could have been specifically to those particular men and that dog. Thankfully, they seem to be used to toxic femininity and did not wait for or rely on any woman for assistance. They re…
/r/MensRights12/06/19 04:22 PM
4

Gender double standards are just the distraction to keep us busy and away from looking at real, important issues.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 05:03 PM
3

It is like a "femsplainer", but with actual knowledge and facts.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 04:57 PM
1

This is not a problem. This seems like entitlement. Is mentorship something that people are entitled to receive? Are women entitled to receive mentoring from men? Or do men get to choose who they want to mentor? His body, his time, his mentoring choice. This is just choice. Feminists are pro-choice, right..? I don't see what they have to complain about here.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 04:52 PM
5

All good things to fight for, in my opinion. I would add: Mandatory paternity testing for all births.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 04:42 PM
8

MensLib is a feminist forum pretending to be a Men's Rights forum.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 07:36 PM
1

I highly doubt that, and certainly hope not, but I guess we will see.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 06:33 PM
1

No, I don't think that at all. There are many ways to mitigate risk without needing to avoid all women at work or elsewhere.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 06:34 AM
1

I compare them because the chances of any of those things happening to a person is probably similar, I'd guesstimate. But now we are moving on to a new topic: the repercussions faced by someone charged with committing the crime of shooting or raping versus the repercussions faced by a false accuser. I agree that false accusations can be as damaging to a family as a murder or a rape. I agree that all such crimes should be fully investigated, and justice should be served. I agree that false accusa…
/r/MensRights05/06/19 06:22 AM
1

But if someone wants to play the pence rule, no one has the right to ridicule him. I agree with this. I don't interpret the "Mike Pence Rule" as meaning "avoid all women". I always thought of that as meaning "avoid spending time alone with women", based on the "Billy Graham Rule" which added "to whom they are not married". The Urban Dictionary says that "In 2002, Mike Pence told the Hill that he never eats alone with a woman other than his wife and that he won’t attend events featuring alcohol w…
/r/MensRights05/06/19 05:57 AM
0

Not at all. I do not think that mitigating risk is being paranoid. But I do believe that if you think you can only do that by avoiding all women then you are being very paranoid.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 08:28 PM
0

You mean, how does one protect themselves against any chance of a false accusation if not by avoiding all women? I don't know. I think there are some things we have to accept can happen. I believe we can minimize the chances but never completely eliminate it. I do not think avoiding all women is the answer. How does one protect themselves from being randomly shot while walking down the street? I don't think you can. But I wouldn't think staying in the house forever is the answer either. How do w…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 07:56 PM
2

Protecting yourself is always a great idea. However, I do not think you need to avoid all women to protect yourself. Not all women are going to falsely accuse someone. People can die in car accidents. Do you avoid all cars, or put on a seat belt and follow the rules of the road? Not everyone will follow the rules of the road, and no matter how much you protect yourself, you can still get in a car accident. There are some people who might even purposefully crash into you. Do you avoid all cars, o…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 06:55 PM
2

The problem lies not with the women but with the corrupt system. Fix the system or play smart. I agree with this. I guess I disagree with the interpretation of how to best "play smart". I do not feel it is necessary to avoid all women.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 06:38 PM
19

He'll be out in the next election.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 05:46 PM
2

Do you avoid the accusers? You mean that question, regarding avoiding accusers during the witch hunts of Salem..? No, I don't avoid the accusers because I cannot know who the accusers will be. It would be extreme paranoia if I avoided everyone, because anyone could have been an accuser. Likewise, it would be extreme paranoia now to avoid all women simply because some women may be false accusers. Women would also be extremely paranoid to avoid (or advise others to avoid) all men simply because so…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 05:40 PM
1

It is as insane as the women who act as though all men are rapists. We aren't all rapists, and they aren't all false accusers.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 03:29 PM
4

If you saw a woman say this: ​ Avoid men at all cost at work. ​ Would you respond like this too: ​ How can anyone take this unhinged, hyperbolic, child drama queen seriously? ​ This is hyperbolic and sounds unhinged: ​ Avoid women at all cost at work.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 05:43 AM
4

They truly are serious. There was a thread in AskFeminists about this. At first it was explained to me that those who suggest all unwanted pregnancies are the fault of men are only saying that to be purposefully controversial and get a conversation started. But then one of the mods clarified that the original statement came from an article written by a women who very seriously argued that yes, men are in fact responsible for 100% of unwanted pregnancies. Feminists are in fact that crazy.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 04:04 AM
44

Biden appears to be trying to help get Trump re-elected.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 04:31 PM
6

Systemic misandry.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 04:04 PM
7

Always ask them to move their bags. God permits it.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 08:41 PM
4

Welcome to the feminist trolls. This is not a safe space.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 03:34 PM
1

Just because the accusation didn't result in a conviction does not mean the accusation was false.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 10:43 PM
3

This is a good change to see.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 03:49 PM
2

Their rhetoric and inability to have rational mature discussions about abortion is why the laws are being changed as they are today.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 04:57 PM
1

Who says we can't? They are wrong. We can.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 05:28 AM
1

Who says we can't? They are wrong. We can.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 05:28 AM
1

Who says we can't? They are wrong. We can.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 05:27 AM
1

Who says we can't? They are wrong. We can.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 05:27 AM
1

Who says we can't? They are wrong. We can.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 05:27 AM
25

Now, all of a sudden, it seems they need male sponsorship. I just hear fish screaming out for bicycles.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 12:51 AM
5

There is also social pressure for women to do different things, but they refuse to call that toxic femininity. That is my point. Currently, the narrative is being put forward to frame all of this (the social pressures men face as well as the social pressures women face) as the fault or direct consequence of male behaviours alone. That is wrong. This is the objection to the term "toxic masculinity", as it is wrong to frame the discussion in that way.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 03:48 PM
5

I see those as socially enforced gender expectations. Those are not inherently "toxic", and can in fact be beneficial. There is nothing wrong with those behaviours on their own. The problem comes, in my opinion, when a person is forced to perform such a role against their will. That "forcing" happens by way of shaming or ostracizing, which typically comes from women more often than men, in my experience. To call this "toxic masculinity" is wrong. I would suggest that it is more "toxic" that wome…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 03:33 PM
7

I think this is a lot of fun. Using ridiculous words to highlight ridiculous words is a good idea, in my opinion. ​ Here is an example from one of the feminist forums where they defined "toxic masculinity" this way: " Toxic masculinity, or hegemonic masculinity, are the toxic behaviors that derive from cultural norms of masculinity — such as excessive control, aggression, or violence. The idea that emotional expression, compassion, and empathy are 'unmanly.' There’s an element of both misogyny a…
/r/MensRights07/05/19 06:05 PM
7

I don't typically see alt-right materials posted here. I am not alt-right. They link the men's rights movement to the alt-right political fringe by our mutual dislike of feminism. ​ From the Wikipedia: "The alt-right is anti-feminist, advocates for a more patriarchal society, and intersects with the men's rights movement and other sectors of the online manosphere." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right
/r/MensRights07/05/19 05:38 PM
94

She went on to make a movie, in case you haven't seen it yet. http://theredpillmovie.com/
/r/MensRights07/05/19 02:45 PM
3

Good points about abortion. I agree that those laws show clearly that The Patriarchy as defined by modern feminists simply doesn't exist. If the Patriarchy existed, those laws would not. ​ In fact, if the Patriarchy exists, how does Feminism? Does the Patriarchy allow Feminism to exist as sort of "useful idiots"? Or does the existence of Feminism show that the Patriarchy as defined by Feminists never actually existed? If the Patriarchy was so easily able to suppress and oppress all women everywh…
/r/MensRights05/05/19 05:44 PM
2

Goal is to know one's enemy, not become them. ​ Excellent point. I agree.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 04:55 PM
1

I believe that if you post it on Father's Day, you will get some appropriate attention and potentially support towards that cause. I agree that paternity fraud is an important issue that needs attention. However, if you post it on Mother's Day, you would likely be viewed as acting needlessly antagonistic. The message would probably not be heard, and instead I suspect that only the intent of trying to disrupt Mother's Day would be discussed.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 05:42 AM
11

I don't like that idea. Father's Day would be a more appropriate day for such stats and memes.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 10:46 PM
3

Depends on what you mean by "deserve". Nobody is entitled to sex, but everyone should have the opportunity to pursue healthy intimate relationships. No other person should ever feel obligated to fulfill that role for another. I suspect that women who men aren't attracted to get looked down on for wanting to find someone too, if they exclusively pursue people who are not attracted to them. I do not think there is a double standard here.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 08:38 PM
16

They complain that men are keeping them out of STEM by saying comments, then also wonder why many men feel that they are not accepted as full parents when they become fathers. Without double standards, they'd have no standards.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 06:10 PM
5

Feminists keep telling me that "manspreading" is an issue made up by non-feminists to make them look ridiculous.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 09:26 PM
3

I saw that there. I didn't get the impression that the OP believed the proposition of a "patriarchy tax" was a good idea. It seemed more like a thought experiment, not a genuine proposal. Thankfully, there was some sanity there and the idea was mostly dismissed outright.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 09:16 PM
17

They aren't making money because nobody is watching their games, so who are they threatening by not playing? Do they think the people not watching are suddenly going to get upset that they can no longer not-watch-by-choice, but now have to not-watch-by-force? From the article: "This stand by not only the game’s high-profile players but so many of the rank-and-file players would seemingly put the five-team U.S.-based National Women’s Hockey League out of business for the coming season or damage i…
/r/MensRights03/05/19 02:35 AM
4

It is very funny that they complain about being victims of toxic sexism while spewing forth toxic sexism.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 03:37 PM
16

You are a good man. Thank you for following through on that.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 04:20 AM
1

That is a true statement. A good woman in your life will not hinder your success, but actually support it. A bad woman in your life will cause all sorts of problems, and make any success a monumental challenge. A true partnership allows both people to achieve greater success more easily. It is easy to look at the phrase and assume it means that only the success of men is due to women. But it also is saying that the failures of men are due to women, too. The gender flip is true as well. Women wil…
/r/MensRights24/04/19 04:15 AM
1

If they are using you, then they aren't your friends. If they are your friends, then they aren't using you.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 09:41 PM
2

No, you didn't say they did. I am merely pointing out that the feminist assertion is baseless. Debunking "male privilege" to feminists is like trying to debunk "God" to Christians. It is a core belief of theirs, and it is not based in reality so you cannot use reality to dispel that belief. Statistical evidence will do nothing to convince them, from what I have seen. Good luck.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 03:52 PM
3

Feminists have no statistical evidence to prove their assertion that "men are more privileged than women."
/r/MensRights15/04/19 03:19 PM
2

I think only feminists would see feminist subreddits in that light.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 05:28 PM
42

That sounds like child abuse.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 12:21 AM
2

Or neither..?
/r/MensRights04/04/19 06:08 PM
3

Women fight for "reproductive freedom" and use that as their reason for abortion. Men can also fight for "reproductive freedom", using the same arguments as the feminists have used in their fight. I believe that if we phrase it as "reproductive freedom", using their own words, they will have a harder time pushing back. If their reasons are valid for them, then their reasons are also valid for us. ​ For instance: ​ "It is a moral necessity that we not be forced to bring children into the world fo…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 01:28 AM
1

Both sentiments are a bit of paranoia though, aren't they? If a man is afraid all women will likely laugh at him, he is probably paranoid. If a woman is afraid that all men will potentially kill her, then she is also paranoid. The man, in this instance, is actually probably more realistic. He will likely encounter more woman in his life who will feel free to laugh at him than the woman will encounter men who try to kill her. In either case, it sounds like both people suffer paranoid delusions of…
/r/MensRights10/03/19 05:40 AM
43

If "The Patriarchy" existed, would Feminism?
/r/MensRights10/03/19 03:27 AM
11

Feminists in the feminism forums insist on using the terms "Toxic Masculinity" and claim the female version is "Internalized Misogyny", yet they reject the terms "Internalized Misandry" or "Toxic Femininity" as inaccurate and offensive. If men don't like this, the feminists like to describe such complaints as examples of "Fragile Masculinity" while they drink from cups labeled "Male Tears". I am convinced that feminism is a hate movement, and should be treated as such. We don't tolerate Nazis. W…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:38 PM
9

I'm beginning to think that may be for the best too.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 04:37 PM
8

If a man is killed by a man, women seem to think that doesn't count as a death, or doesn't seem to be worthy of notice. I see that same argument made constantly by feminists and other women. "But these women were killed by MEN!! Don't you see the difference?! Those men were killed by other men!" It is insanity and extreme misandry. It doesn't matter that more men die, by a large margin. They divide humanity into men vs women, instead of murderer vs victim. Male victims seem to either not exist t…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 04:35 PM
2

As I have pointed out many, many times: because you cannot separate men from men, because they are men. ​ ... and that is the problem with your thinking. You don't have to separate men from men. You have to separate bad people from good people or protect good people from bad people. One way to do that is to limit the opportunities that bad people take advantage of to attack the good people. You keep making this about men vs women. You are repeating that over and over. You are wrong. ​ The specia…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 08:56 PM
2

I disagree. You haven't addressed the points I have just said either; just taken to something akin to an insult in lieu of a critique. ​ It seems to me you are a sexist who only sees importance in protecting women. If not... ​ The fact still stands that this produces a net increase to safety that cannot be replicated for men due to the statistical fact of who is committing the crimes. ​ Why can't it be replicated for men..? If the goal is simply to produce a net increase to safety, then give men…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 07:50 PM
1

Everything you say comes from the false dichotomy of male vs female. I am sorry you see things that way. ​
/r/MensRights15/02/19 06:58 PM
8

Yes. Men should not be forced to be a parent if they do not want to be one. Women argue the exact same thing as a reason for allowing abortion: reproductive freedom and reproductive rights. We can easily take quotes from feminists in support of abortion and apply them to men for the same reasons. ​ "It is a moral necessity that we not be forced to bring children into the world for whom we cannot be responsible and adoring and present. We must not inflict life on children who will be resented; we…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 06:49 PM
1

I am not disregarding them. I am saying the solution that works for women, is not a viable solution for men. ​ You are clearly disregarding male victims, suggesting they should find their own way to be safe. The solution to protecting victims of violence is not to protect just female victims of violence. That is sexist. That disregards male victims of violence. Protect all victims of violence. Doing otherwise exacerbates the problem and fixes nothing. ​ This parking sign was probably the cheap, …
/r/MensRights15/02/19 06:05 PM
3

Yes, by other men. What I said above answers this as well. And also addresses this. ​ You disregard male victims because they are attacked by other males? That is insane. Why not just disregard all human victims whenever they are attacked by other humans? Do you also disregard black victims when they are attacked by other black people? ​ Men are equal to women. We also deserve protections in society. We would like safe parking garages for everyone, not just women. Men also deserve to be safe fro…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 05:33 PM
8

It's done because parking garages are a common point of attack for women ​ Men are actually more likely to be attacked in a parking garage than women, by a large margin. ​ According to the stats compiled by the National Center For Victims Of Crime for 2015: (https://ovc.ncjrs.gov/ncvrw2017/images/en_artwork/Fact_Sheets/2017NCVRW_Assault_508.pdf) ​ Men are more likely to be victims of assault from strangers. Men are more likely to be victims of assault in parking garages. Women are more likely to…
/r/MensRights14/02/19 07:27 PM
2

I now firmly believe that if I am called a sexist or misogynist or racist, then I am probably doing something right. These words are no longer important or meaningful, and certainly there is no embarrassment to be labeled with such words. These are words used as weapons to silence men, that is all.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 05:11 PM
46

The NBA used to train their rookies to watch out for stolen condoms being used to baby trap them once they had earned a multi-million contract. They called it "stealthing", and it was the first I'd heard the term. Now, the term "stealthing" has been redefined to describe when a man takes a condom off during sex. Crazy world.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 04:46 PM
2

Yes, I am also Canadian. I also tried applying for it, and also was denied by the government because I am the father. I was told the mother has to send in a written request personally to have the change made. Also, when my father gave me $2k to apply towards an educational savings for my child, I tried to have the RESP opened up (Registered Educational Savings Plan in Canada), but the bank manager (a woman) refused to allow me to set up the account and insisted that it could only be done with th…
/r/MensRights06/02/19 06:09 PM
1

Does this mean that any video that is heavily upvoted just shows examples of the Like feature being weaponized..?
/r/MensRights04/02/19 08:48 PM
3

There is idiocy of all ages and genders. Yes, I strongly believe that if a picture of a woman who isn't considered pretty is posted noting that she is a Wikipedia editor, she will also get negative comments about her appearance. Lots of them. Just like any man who isn't considered handsome will get. There seem to be some people of either gender who feel better about themselves by trying to make others feel bad.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 08:08 AM
8

Absolutely. Both men and women do this, and it is equally bad when either do it. This is not a gendered issue, just a human issue.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 04:26 AM
6

"If our president can grab a woman by the pussy then I can grab you by the balls." she says as she does just that. "She just grabbed my dick! Is that sexual assault?" the reporter asks the crowd, then turns to the woman who grabbed his dick and asks "Is that sexual assault?" "Yes." she replies. "So you just sexually assaulted me?" the reporter verifies. "I did assault you." she confirms. "Should you be arrested?" he asks. "Arrest me." she taunts. ​ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgksTdEc7ao
/r/MensRights31/01/19 08:01 AM
15

“And they started punching on him first,” said the witness, who only identified himself as Stewart. “And once they punched on him first, they’re jumping on his back, then he defended hisself [sic] by, you know, counter-punching these women and things like that. So the video caught only the second glimpse of the story.” Self defense is now a crime?
/r/MensRights31/01/19 07:34 AM
0

Why would you care what a feminist thinks of you?
/r/MensRights31/01/19 03:18 AM
6

> ... why does Feminism Ignore Data and Equality? Post that to /r/AskFeminism and see if there is a reasonable response.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 07:19 AM
0

Um ... I am going to assume that Disney princess porn exists without even a need to search out examples for you. This isn't something only women do. You realize that, right..? I hopefully don't have to mention My Little Ponies and Japanime stuff, but yeah, it is not just the women doing this stuff. Baseless complaint.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 04:27 PM
3

As with a lot in politics, whether it's race, sex, or whatever, certain groups tend to be more affected or differently affected by an issue than others, even though anyone could be affected. It seems to me that for most of those (race or sexual identity particularly) people have generally agreed that we should not judge a group by the individuals of the group. We tend not to break down racial demographics when discussing violent crime, for instance, because that is seen as racist. But people sti…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 05:34 AM
3

... women typically call it misogyny instead of toxic masculinity. ​ Yes, that is sometimes true as well. I think it is also true that men sometimes call it misandry (instead of toxic femininity) when they are being ridiculed, shamed, bullied or insulted by feminists for not conforming to the idea of "Acceptable Masculinity" that is being enforced. Perhaps we don't need the terms "toxic masculinity" or "toxic femininity" at all, since we already had misogyny and misandry. ​ Hmm, that's a bit wor…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 04:11 AM
3

Toxic femininity, toxic masculinity, whatever you call it, the issues are still underneath it all. ​ What do you feel the issues are then? As I see it, the issues are that both men and women have societal expectations of stereotypical gender roles that need to be adhered to for everyone. Failure to conform to your role may result in being ostracized, shamed, bullied, whatever. When men experience this, feminists call it "toxic masculinity". When women experience this, feminists apparently call i…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 01:27 AM
2

"Toxic Masculinity" is defined as "the socially-constructed attitudes that describe the masculine gender role as violent, unemotional, sexually aggressive, and so forth" according to Google when I type in "define toxic masculinity". According to the Geek Feminism website (http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Toxic_femininity), "[t]he concept of 'toxic masculinity' exists to highlight the organized, political nature of domestic violence and other forms of violence against women." They also define i…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 12:49 AM
4

That's razist!
/r/MensRights22/01/19 06:49 PM
2

Ouch. How toxic of you.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 03:26 AM
2

"Toxic masculinity" is not meant to be read as all masculinity is toxic Are you trying to be stupid on purpose? Do you teach other feminists as a professor at a university? Do you write articles for major newspapers or magazines? No. You are one crazy person, and as you said previously, we don't have to listen to you. Instead, we need to listen to those who are actually leading the feminist movement, writing the articles, and those who are shaping the minds of the next generation of feminists. Y…
/r/MensRights19/01/19 01:59 AM
3

If you had to create a term to refer specifically to the negative forms of masculinity but not the positive ones what term would you invent? There are no negative forms of masculinity. If some men act like assholes, they are not being masculine. They are being assholes. If someone tells men that they shouldn't express emotions then they are being assholes, they are not controlling or influencing masculinity. They are individuals attempting to control or influence other individuals. When they say…
/r/MensRights19/01/19 01:10 AM
8

Yeah. Sounds like bullshit to me. Here is a noted feminist writer and activist, making a case for ALL MASCULINITY IS TOXIC: https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/zmk3ej/all-masculinity-is-toxic ... and here is a feminist professor (Suzanna Danuta Walters, a professor of sociology and director of the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program at Northeastern University) who, in The Washington Post, uses so-called "toxic masculinity" as justification to ask "[I]s it really so illogical to hate me…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 08:36 PM
3

Women can't even handle the so-called sexism of words and phrases like "mailman" or "garbage man", yet think men should accept phrases like "toxic masculinity". Sure, not all mail carriers are men. Likewise, not all bad or "toxic" behaviours are male or masculine. In fact, by labeling behaviours as masculine or feminine is itself sexist. Bad behaviours are human, and they are not limited to either males or females.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 07:46 PM
2

Yes, I agree with your thoughts here. I like that you point out: " When men use their lizard brains, they'll choose a girl with big tits as a partner and overlook every other factor. This is heavily stigmatized and for good reason. It's called thinking with your dick. " I've heard that often from women, about how men are just thinking with their dicks. You make a good point that women often act in similar ways when making their mate selections. So I guess for every woman out there talking about …
/r/MensRights18/01/19 07:40 PM
2

Everyone interprets differently, I guess.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 07:15 AM
6

The way the video shows "The Best A Man Can Be" is how the vast majority of men already consider average or expected behaviour. The video is not suggesting that the vast majority of men are already being the best man they can be. The video explicitly states "some are, but some is not enough". So, therefore most aren't. Most men, according to that video, are bad men. That seems to be the implication.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 06:38 AM
1

It is shaming language. According to feminists, there are only two types of masculinity: Toxic or Fragile.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 09:36 PM
2

This is feminism, and feminism is bad.
/r/MGTOW16/01/19 07:01 PM
1

Teach women not to murder babies! Maybe someone can make a commercial ...
/r/MGTOW16/01/19 06:39 PM
3

You ignored her message and blocked her. You did the right thing. Nothing more needs be done. Disregard her.
/r/MGTOW16/01/19 06:38 PM
2

I read that as "I've made a horrible mistake and I need a man to help me! HELP!" But I thought fish don't need bikes.
/r/MGTOW16/01/19 06:03 PM
1

They are trying to give us the choice between Toxic Masculinity, or Fragile Masculinity. I reject both terms.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 05:16 PM
2

Thanks for clarifying. I'd not heard of her last name before, and did not know it was already relevant to her branding. Sounds like she may have a legitimate case.
/r/MGTOW16/01/19 03:53 AM
69

She thinks he is not allowed to profit from his own last name..? I must be misunderstanding something here.
/r/MGTOW15/01/19 09:41 PM
6

Save yourself. Do not marry.
/r/MGTOW15/01/19 08:32 PM
7

Another example of Toxic Femininity.
/r/MGTOW15/01/19 05:21 PM
2

Feminists have spent the last century cynically exploiting the good nature and protective instincts of men. Exactly this.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:54 PM
1

Would you not consider gathering DNA to be part of the investigation..?
/r/MensRights13/01/19 11:55 PM
1

Yes, test them all if the initial tests of facility staff does not yield results. Widen the circle. That is how it is done. Sure, the culprit may be in Vermont by now and that is something that can be found out. They find out by investigating. How would you do it? What is your solution? ​
/r/MensRights13/01/19 09:42 PM
1

That sounds like a ridiculous assumption to start the investigation with, but regardless, testing the men to determine where the sperm came from would be the proper first step. Once it is determined who the sperm belongs to, then it can be determined if that man raped the woman in a coma, or if some crazy woman stole that man's sperm in order to impregnate a woman in a coma so she could frame the man. Sperm is created by men. That is simple science. You can't test women to find out where the spe…
/r/MensRights11/01/19 04:45 PM
2

I agree. I see it all as projection from the feminist movement. Every negative thing they make masculine in nature could just as easily be redefined as feminine in nature. There is no Toxic Maculinity. There is only Toxic Femininity. The idea of Mansplaining is the result of Femsplaining. Manspreading, if it is to be said to exist, is far less prevalent than Femspreading. It isn't just Bullshit. It is all Cowshit. ​
/r/MGTOW11/01/19 03:21 AM
15

Thank you for your integrity.
/r/MGTOW11/01/19 02:10 AM
-1

I agree with you on all points you've made here. Paternity testing should be mandatory in ALL pregnancies, including rape cases of coma patients. Who the fuck would argue against that..?!?
/r/MensRights11/01/19 01:31 AM
0

The woman in a coma was raped. The person needs to be found. The quickest and easiest way to find the man responsible is to DNA test every man who works at that facility, whether as an employee or contractor. They need to find him, and find him quickly. He may be continuing such behaviour with others. That is not acceptable, and every man there should be happy to help find such a person. By simply being someone who works there, and being a man, you would automatically and justifiably be consider…
/r/MensRights11/01/19 01:05 AM
2

This is the "Women Are Wonderful - Men Are Awful" effect being maintained and enforced using social programming in mass media. They've been doing this for at least decades now.
/r/MGTOW10/01/19 06:58 PM
12

The title of OP is not accurate. The reason given in the title is not the reason given in the charges. The charge was stalking and harassment. Truth is important. From the linked article: ​ " Editor’s Note: This article and its headline originally stated that a male student at the University of Missouri was found in violation of Title IX because he asked a female student on a date and “was perceived as having power over her.” The article accurately quoted the deposition of the Title IX case, but…
/r/MGTOW30/12/18 02:15 AM
1

"Toxic masculinity" does not exist. There is only toxic femininity. "The Patriarchy" does not exist. There is only The Matriarchy. We don't need femsplaining of their cowshit. Feminism is projection and lies. ​
/r/MensRights29/12/18 09:00 PM
2

I recommend not giving a shit about what people say or think. You could have just said "Yes." when asked if you were there with your child. The person would have walked away, and you and your daughter could have stayed. Some people are ignorant, and you can't stop them, but you can ignore them. I have taken my two daughters out individually and together for their entire lives and have never had an experience where I felt someone was accusing me of something. I would even walk into women's washro…
/r/MGTOW22/12/18 06:37 PM
1

Hmm ... interesting. I used a different source than you are looking at, which states a higher number of non-adults. The difference is likely contained within the group 15-24 year olds. Half of those (or up to at least age 18) are still considered children by most of the world. http://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/syria-population/ According to the info I linked above, there are about 18 million people in Syria, of which approximately 10 million are adults. Therefore, that leaves 8 million …
/r/MensRights14/12/18 06:26 PM
2

Hanzainews is correct. There are more children in Syria than there are women according to this website: http://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/syria-population/ It is not considered problematic because it is expected. The percentage of women who have been killed in the Syrian war, per your linked stats, is approximately equal to the percentage of children who have likewise been killed in that same conflict. I am curious about the makeup of the "other" in the linked casualties data though, as…
/r/MensRights14/12/18 05:33 PM
3

These signs don't matter anymore. You can identify as whatever you want, whenever you want. Use whichever bathroom you feel like using in the moment, and just identify as that particular group of genders if anyone questions it. Use their insanity, and scream blue murder if anyone dares say so much as a word to question you. Be them. Then laugh and walk away.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 04:46 PM
5

Not possible.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 03:44 AM
1

That isn't paranoid. That is realistic. Any man would be a fool to compliment any women, especially in the workplace. What do you have to gain by saying something to her? You will be punished. I highly recommend against saying anything that you would think of as "nice" or "complimentary". You have no idea how that will be received and potentially used against you.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 06:11 PM
2

You say "This has happened with feminism, the loud, obnoxious, and stupid are defining what otherwise should be a movement about total equality with their shitty stupid buzzwords and I don't want to mirror that. " And yet, most of your replies here are filled with phrases such as "angry incel neckbeards" and attempts to shame with words like "immature" or "cringey". You are already mirroring that. You are using the "shitty stupid buzzwords" you supposedly are complaining about. It is you "who en…
/r/MensRights25/11/18 07:51 PM
1

It's cringey when you do it. However, the term 'feminazi' is an accurate description. Watch the video and learn why.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 07:34 PM
2

Feminists use terms like "mansplaining", "manspreading", "toxic masculinity" and decry "The Patriarchy". All of these terms of theirs are sexist and "cringey shit" that comes off as very juvenile and makes them look like a bunch of angry ugfem legbeards (in my opinion). Heh ... I can't believe you are complaining about "feminazis" when you come in here using phrases like "angry incel neckbeards". Fucking troll. But anyways ... Feminazis. They are. They (feminists) have recently accepted for publ…
/r/MensRights25/11/18 06:30 PM
1

Excellent idea.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 04:24 PM
1

Aw shit, I was kinda looking forward to this show too. Damn. Sounds like it will just be another laundry detergent commercial extended to an hour and set in a fantasy setting. Still going to be all the same men-are-dumb-women-are-amazing bullshit. Stupid cunt.
/r/MGTOW09/11/18 03:14 AM
6

It sounds like she is testing to see if you comply, to see how much control she can exert over you. It will end for you badly whether you do it or not. I think you'd be a fool to do it. A person should not make a permanent change in their self just to suit a temporary girlfriend. I would suggest you only do it if it is something you want to do for yourself, although I truly cannot imagine why an adult male would want to do that.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 06:06 PM
1

How dare you suggest such violence against this poor female victim who was so obviously abused by those vicious male babies!
/r/MGTOW28/10/18 05:17 PM
5

Troll.
/r/MGTOW13/10/18 02:31 AM
5

Men don't owe women any support in the feminist movement. Women don't have to debate men about feminism. Men don't have to listen to women talk about feminism. It goes both ways. Who cares?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 11:49 PM
2

Murder, yes, has been common throughout most of human history. As a society, through laws and culture, I hope we are continuing to strive towards reducing murders as much as possible. Not to increase them. Killing babies and children doesn't solve any existing problem.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 03:14 AM
1

Nobody would advocate for the murder of children, other than an insane person. Are you an insane person? You certainly sound like one. EDIT: Ok ... I was wrong. Apparently people have been advocating for this. They call it "post natal abortion", and are seeking to make it "ethically permissible" in any situation where "pre-natal abortion" is already permissible. I still feel that advocating such a thing qualifies you as being insane. ​
/r/MensRights05/09/18 10:15 PM
4

Femtrapment seems like a reasonably legitimate word, as much as any other passive-aggressive needlessly-gendered term can be, I guess. It happened to my older brother. His girlfriend purposefully poked holes in his condoms and also went off the pill without telling him, so that she could get pregnant in the hopes of ensuring that lifelong commitment. My mom even helped the girlfriend, going against her son, by keeping this information from him and convincing him to 'do the right thing'. Their da…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 03:07 AM
7

It may be because so many are raised by single mothers who have alienated or otherwise restricted contact with the fathers, and these little girls grow up with extreme daddy issues. Maybe they are just seeking out the father figures they have lacked for most of their lives. Kind of sad, if that were the case, but it would explain the insistence of some of those women who insist on calling their boyfriends 'daddy' or those who seek out 'sugar daddy' older men. I think it is likely that women also…
/r/MGTOW15/08/18 11:20 PM
11

This actress could have said no. Sure, she may have ended up without a job in that particular industry, but she could have kept her dignity. This is the same as almost anyone else in the world who refuses to do what their boss tells them to do as part of their job. If my job is as a janitor but I refuse to clean toilets, then I will likely have a hard time keeping any job as a janitor, and my boss would likely make sure that information is shared to future employers in the janitorial industry. I…
/r/MGTOW06/08/18 06:47 PM
1

The first time I heard that phrase, it was to describe Anthony Bourdain after he had killed himself because he saw his slut kissing some other guy in a newspaper photo. So, apparently "big dick energy" means you are someone who will kill yourself because you recently found out that you're just a cuck. Seems like a shitty quality to have, not anything to have pride in. Oh well. Now that "Big Dick Energy" is socially acceptable, so too must "Big Tit Energy" and "Loose Cunt Energy" also be acceptab…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 07:01 PM
2

Wow. I wonder if this makes her the highest paid prostitute in history?
/r/MGTOW01/08/18 05:46 PM
1

Satire website. Just a joke.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 12:18 AM
2

This is funny. Women can say men under 33 are useless. We say women over 33 are useless. It all evens out.
/r/MGTOW18/07/18 05:39 PM
25

Let the feminists use the term "Big Dick Energy". We can all talk about "Big Tit Energy", which is that quality someone has when you can see that they are a lot of fun, just seem to have that bouncy personality that pleasant to be around, a good happy beautiful person inside and out. They brighten up any room as soon as they walk in. Everyone instantly sees them and smiles, and wants to get closer to them. "Big Tit Energy" is very attractive. You don't have to have big tits to have "Big Tit Ener…
/r/MGTOW03/07/18 04:34 PM
6

Strong independent women are finally free from the oppression of the patriarchy! Men have listened and learned. Save yourselves, ladies.
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 03:43 PM
1

So just park there then. Every time. It isn't a law. It is a suggestion, from a sign, and they appreciate your co-operation. Don't co-operate. You are not obligated to play their games. It would be an easy win in court if they tried to ticket or tow your vehicle. Even easier to just say that you identify as female when you are parking.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 07:02 PM
5

The article states "lycra-clad packs of middle aged [white] men zooming around the capital are also becoming a problem", and then goes on to point out that "too few females and people from ethnic minority backgrounds are taking to two wheels around the capital". It goes on further: "Despite millions being pumped into the cycling infrastructure in London the majority of those making use of it are middle aged men. At present, black, Asian and minority ethnic groups account for about 15 per cent of…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 06:52 PM
5

I completely agree that paternity testing should be standard, free and mandatory. There are very strict procedures in place to ensure that the mother leaves the hospital with her biological child. Women understand how important it is to know that the baby you are raising is your own. Women fought to have the security in place in hospitals to make it certain that they have their biological child with them. Men deserve that same right. Unfortunately, women also fight to ensure men don't have the s…
/r/MensRights25/05/18 03:29 PM
8

The 80/20 rule works for men too. Over 40% of American women are OBESE. Most others are still fat, if not technically obese. So of those who aren't obese or fat, you are still left with the fuglies and cunts. If there are even 20% of women who are worthwhile for even fucking, let alone any sort of meaningful relationshit, I would be truly amazed.
/r/MGTOW12/05/18 11:27 PM
5

Well said.
/r/MGTOW12/05/18 11:21 PM
2

If it is not a job requirement to carry such packages, it may be simplest just to say something like, "Oh? Too heavy for you? Too heavy for me too, sorry." There is no need to impress women with feats of strength. If it is a job requirement to carry such packages, maybe something like, "Oh? Too heavy for you? I need to speak to our managers about your inability to perform your job and how, as a direct result, you are making it difficult for me to perform mine." Maybe you can get a raise out of i…
/r/MGTOW17/03/18 11:42 PM
1

Were women 'threatened' by male characters in Star Wars, Star Trek and super hero movies, and that is why all these shows are being changed to focus on female characters instead? Maybe that explains it. I don't believe men are threatened by well-written female characters. Princess Leia is a classic example in the same Star Wars series of movies. She was well-loved by men. She was a strong female character. I think what JJ Abrams and Rian Johnson have done to Star Wars would be like if a Barbie m…
/r/MGTOW17/02/18 07:09 PM
5

You are a sack of shit, dude. Fuck off. I hope the hubby finds you and snaps your fucking neck.
/r/MGTOW03/02/18 12:50 AM
17

This is crazy. Men cannot just live and let live anymore. We need to collectively fight back with legal means. Sue the fuck out of that bitch. Holy shit.
/r/MGTOW03/02/18 12:42 AM
3

According to the article, "Nottinghamshire Police put its policy into action after former Chief Constable Sue Fish learnt women were leaving force due to severe menopausal symptoms." I may be wrong, but Sue Fish sounds like a female name. This police chief who implemented this was female. It was the man, Tory MP David Davies who worried it was insulting to women. Women, on the other hand, seem to be actively trying to get such measured passed in other companies. Again, according to the article: …
/r/MGTOW30/01/18 05:52 PM
7

This man is a great example to us all.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 05:16 PM
3

Go to school. Save your money. Eat right. Get enough exercise. Enrich yourself socially, educationally, materially. Be honourable always. I think these are all fairly classic life lessons, and all are very true ways to help anyone live a good and enjoyable life.
/r/MGTOW05/01/18 08:28 AM
5

Sure. I guess it is cathartic, and a good way to vent some steam. I think it is easier to pick apart things she has said which she can control, instead of belittling her appearance which shem has far less control over. I think it is equally shitty when women mock men for their appearance. But I'm not a police. I was only offering my opinion. I generally feel that others should be free to do as they will, so long as they hurt no others. Appearance shaming can hurt others. Not saying you can't thr…
/r/MGTOW04/01/18 08:34 AM
2

My biggest complaint is not against women, but against myself, in that I was very late in life to understand what is 'female nature', or any aspects of 'evolutionary psychology', and instead was fed the idea that 'women are wonderful' from my single-mother-who-didn't-need-any-damn-man. It took me an embarrassingly long time to figure out how wrong I had been led. I should have been taught true equality: that there are just as many bad girls as bad guys.
/r/MGTOW04/01/18 08:25 AM
3

Reading through her tweets, I strongly suspect her son will eventually rise up against her and kill her.
/r/MGTOW30/12/17 06:25 PM
10

Sounds like you chose one of the best options available to you. Good. Hopefully that keeps you safe. You may want to keep all the copies of texts, etc somewhere safe for the rest of your life. Apparently, these things can be revisited 50 years or so later.
/r/MGTOW02/12/17 01:10 AM
2

Be proactive and prepared. Get a lawyer, and keep your lawyer updated regarding every interaction with these women. You will eventually be accused. Be ready.
/r/MGTOW02/12/17 01:07 AM
1

Absolutely this. Every man needs to begin doing this sort of thing. It is petty, yes. But nothing will get better until men begin fighting back in kind.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 01:13 AM
1

Please report this. It needs to be reported that this woman is someone who jokes about sexual assault, will go so far as to act it out such that it is believable enough that you consider calling police. This is the same as women who insist (rightfully, perhaps) on reporting every small infraction against a man in the office just in case he does something similar to someone else. She may do something similar to someone else, but carry the 'joke' further next time. This false accusation needs to b…
/r/MensRights27/11/17 08:13 PM
24

The phrase "It's time to man up" or any variation of it is just the desperate scream of a fish demanding a bicycle. Get your own damn bike, fish!
/r/MGTOW21/11/17 04:45 PM
3

Gone Girl. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2267998/
/r/MGTOW16/10/17 08:20 PM
-2

My view is that MGTOW is a goal, not a religious mantra. It does not matter the path towards that goal. Every man eventually finds his way there, it seems. The article linked describes the idea of AWALT. It can serve as a warning for those not yet in such a mess, or serve as an awakening for those who may already be in the middle of such a mess but not yet aware of why.
/r/MGTOW29/09/17 06:19 AM
7

Not necessarily. Some men learn a little too late.
/r/MGTOW29/09/17 03:34 AM
4

I completely agree.
/r/MGTOW29/09/17 03:07 AM
16

Exactly. Sexism is sexism, and sexism is wrong, from what I've been told. "Putting women's health first" is clearly sexist. I will refuse to shop at that store again.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 02:17 AM
2

Masturbation, or professional sluts. No more amateur sluts, like wives or girlfriends.
/r/MGTOW22/09/17 02:41 AM
4

Legalized prostitution would solve the problem of sexual needs. Artificial wombs solve the problem of propagation. Raise your own children instead of letting feminists raise them. Children you raise will respect you, although robots will likely care for us in old age in 20 years time and beyond. Go MGTOW but still breed and raise your own children properly. Easy. Flip stereotypical gender roles. Be the stay at home dad. Don't withdraw. Constantly improve yourself and help your children do the sa…
/r/MGTOW19/09/17 03:17 AM
1

This sounds like the right way to do it.
/r/MGTOW19/09/17 02:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter