TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NGGYUNGLYDNGRAADY Archive

View 9 posts and 270 comments by NGGYUNGLYDNGRAADY on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Stop watching porn.
/r/MGTOW28/09/19 06:15 PM
3

A test drive is not sex. A test drive is dating. Sex is when you're responsible for filling up the gas tank.
/r/MGTOW25/09/19 03:42 PM
2

Does BMW make a steering wheel like that?
/r/MGTOW25/09/19 06:14 AM
1

Cringe
/r/MGTOW24/09/19 10:35 AM
5

Mentally, a woman, is nothing more than a teenager in an aging body. Men who have achieved their dreams have confronted and conquered enough strife that a woman should be nothing in comparison.
/r/MGTOW24/09/19 01:36 AM
46

Misery loves company. Raising a family is one of the most rewarding experiences. If you're going to do it you have to find a woman who understands her role as a woman and your role as a man. Anything other than a virgin is a gigantic risk. Most of those guys got suckered in to marriage while boys. Marriage is for men who have already achieved their dreams and are capable of controling their women. Men who can't control their women and have yet to reach their dreams get raped in divorce court. Ma…
/r/MGTOW23/09/19 07:29 PM
4

Easy on the hate speech you two.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen22/09/19 11:46 PM
3

Don't let your red pills black-pill you.
/r/MGTOW18/09/19 05:06 AM
1

Them: you get someone to cook and clean for you! Me: most Western women don't do that. I can cook and clean myself. And if I don't want to it's still cheaper to hire a cook and a maid than have a wife. Them: but you can get steady sex! Me: most marriages become sexless within 6 months and sex is never guaranteed. I'm better off keeping a few girls in rotation so I can get sex whenever I want from different women. Them: but don't you want to have companionship and share your experiences with some…
/r/MGTOW07/04/19 01:12 AM
6

Lolol
/r/MGTOW06/04/19 06:07 PM
6

I'm looking for a good time, not a long time.
/r/MGTOW06/04/19 05:22 PM
7

Every. Time. Also never leave the condom in the trash. Bitches are crazy and might try to impregnate themselves. Tie it in a knot wrap it in tp and take it home with you.
/r/MGTOW06/04/19 05:02 PM
38

Then you go your own way and nope right the fuck on out.
/r/MGTOW06/04/19 07:56 AM
99

Never fuck a girl without a condom on regardless of what birth control they claim they're on.
/r/MGTOW06/04/19 07:51 AM
2

/r/redpillmedia
/r/askTRP21/05/16 11:59 AM
1

As I’ve said before: Fuck diamonds, fuck weddings, and fuck legal marriage. I'm investing in Berkshire Hathaway stock instead. You're probably better off investing in the European and Japanese markets. Due to quantitative easing they are currently performing quite well. Also, I'm willing to bet Berkshire Hathaway will plummet after the big man dies. And honestly, how much time does he really have? But who knows. The markets are crazy.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/15 12:01 AM
3

/r/redpillmedia is a place with little activity. Anyone with video submissions should Xpost over there. Then again, having a tag for Audiovisual submissions on the main page would be great for those of us who don't have time to read but can get away with a little media here and there.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 11:49 PM
0

Step 1. Create a new account. Step 2. Comment in a bunch of female dominated subs that will undoubtedly not get down voted. Step 3. Make a post about how you gave consent but regretted it later and were therefore raped. Step 3 alternative. Make a post about how you were robbed by a salesman who was convincing.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 11:21 AM
1

Lol, it's kind if like "you can't spend your money and save it too."
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 01:12 PM
1

Coincidentally a guy at my work said "you always walk around like you're somebody important." First time I've ever had someone comment on the way I walk. So I said "I am somebody important." And kept waking.
/r/askTRP13/09/14 01:43 PM
1

You were originally talking with me to figure out why atheism (rejecting the theist claim) is the rational position. This is why. Believing in god(s) is irrational, absurd, weird, unreasonable, unjustifiable, ridiculous, foolish, and downright silly. And I don't mean this to be offensive. I say this with an attempt to abide by the definition of these words listed above. Therefore, rejecting the claims of this irrational belief, no matter how strongly this belief is rejected is more rational, rea…
/r/askTRP07/09/14 02:02 AM
1

belief in no gods is claiming that there is an odd number of gumballs. What would you call that belief. I thought I cleared up this concept earlier with a quote from Sam Harris.... “In fact, "atheism" is a term that should not even exist. No one ever needs to identify himself as a "non-astrologer" or a "non-alchemist." We do not have words for people who doubt that Elvis is still alive or that aliens have traversed the galaxy only to molest ranchers and their cattle. Atheism is nothing more than…
/r/askTRP07/09/14 01:44 AM
1

The problem is in the understanding of what it means to reject a claim. Read this carefully... Theism, is the claim of something existing in reality. (The claim that a god / many gods exist in reality.) (We agree on this.) Atheism is simply the rejection of this claim. Atheism is not "belief in the opposite". It is simply a "rejection of the theist claim". (You are not grasping this concept.) Just like with the jar of gumballs example... Theism is the claim that there are an even amount of gumba…
/r/askTRP06/09/14 11:27 PM
3

Yeah man, you need to give some examples. If she was intentionally being overly flirtatious / sexual with other men then you did the right thing due to her inability to cease the attention craving. However if it was just witty banter then you kind of overreacted. I'm a dude who naturally likes to flirt a little with strangers. But it's more about me keeping my wit sharp rather than attempting to be sexual. If her flirting wasn't overtly sexual you may just be insecure and need to grow a pair.
/r/askTRP06/09/14 10:19 PM
1

What you fail to understand is that the word "gnostic" pertains to knowledge or "possessing / having knowledge". The word theist pertains to belief, or "possessing / having belief". The prefix "a" simply identifies a negative meaning "not" or "without". Therefore.... Gnostic means "having knowledge" Agnostic mean "without having knowledge" Theist means "having belief" Atheist means "without having belief" Knowledge and belief are two separate items. This is a very simple concept you just can't s…
/r/askTRP06/09/14 09:33 PM
1

Don't claim the higher ground when you are just as guilty as I am. Do you understand now that this is not the case? That I do indeed have the default position and am not committing a logical fallacy?
/r/askTRP05/09/14 06:10 PM
1

I specifically said....... I have suspended belief as to whether or not gods exist AND I've suspended belief as to whether or not gods do not exist. I am holding the neutral position. I did not state I "only disbelieve in their presence" I specifically said that in addition to disbelieving in their presence, I ALSO disbelieve in their absence. I am VOID of belief. I LACK belief. I DISBELIEVE both claims. That is the neutral position and abiding by the rules of logic.
/r/askTRP05/09/14 05:46 PM
1

Do you understand that you're committing a logical fallacy here? Please answer my question.
/r/askTRP05/09/14 05:36 PM
1

I don't believe in those things because I choose to as a personal choice without any evidence, just as I choose to believe in intelligent life outside earth even though it had not been found yet, because I like the world better that way. And there we have it. This is the wishful thinking fallacy. "A specific type of appeal to emotion where a decision is made according to what might be pleasing to imagine, rather than according to evidence or reason." You don't actually care as to whether or not …
/r/askTRP05/09/14 05:05 PM
1

Can you answer my other questions please?
/r/askTRP05/09/14 04:03 PM
2

A few suggestions: "Gay" "..." "Cool" Nah, that sounds whiney. Just say "okay". If she makes plans to reschedule, good. If not, next.
/r/askTRP05/09/14 03:24 PM
1

When someone tells me their name is John. I have no reason to believe they are lying. Why? Because this is an ordinary claim. When someone tells me their name is Anal-Sex-Lover... well, now I have reason to believe they are lying and need some evidence to prove this claim. Why? Because this is an extraordinary claim. When someone tells me they ran a mile today. This is an ordinary claim. I have no reason to disbelieve this claim. When someone tells me they ran a 10 minute mile today. This is an …
/r/askTRP05/09/14 03:10 PM
1

Some anecdotal evidence does not qualify as scientific evidence because its nature prevents it from being investigated using the scientific method. Personal anecdotes of gods existing is not sufficient to prove the god claim because it can not be demonstrated to be true. Instead, you just have to take that person's word for it. Just like personal anecdotes of me being able to walk on water does not prove that I can walk on water. People lie intentionally and unintentionally all the time. Therefo…
/r/askTRP05/09/14 03:00 PM
1

Please answer this question. I'm currently addressing your other question.
/r/askTRP05/09/14 02:46 PM
1

Please answer my previous question before asking me more questions. Do you disbelieve vampires / werewolves / leprechauns don't exist? (aka, do you believe vampires / werewolves / leprechauns exist?)
/r/askTRP05/09/14 02:34 PM
1

Do you believe that I can levitate off of the ground and fly around like superman? Why or why not?
/r/askTRP05/09/14 02:16 PM
1

When someone introduces themselves to you, do you not believe their name or anything personal they tell you without proof as well? How far does your concept of burden of proof go? And what do you accept as burden of proof? I'm assuming all personal non scientific data is excluded, right? Understand the difference between an ordinary claim and an extraordinary claim. If someone says "My name is John." That is an ordinary claim. The name John is a name that is already known to exist and is quite c…
/r/askTRP05/09/14 02:13 PM
3

SMART car.
/r/askTRP05/09/14 01:28 PM
1

Please watch this video. http://youtu.be/sNDZb0KtJDk
/r/askTRP05/09/14 04:24 AM
1

I do not believe in the existence of extraterrestrials elsewhere in the universe. Do you? When there is a concept present... involving a positive claim..... about the existence of something...... a burden of proof exists that must be met in order to validate the claim. The existence of extraterrestrials is a positive claim that has not yet met its burden of proof. Therefore, I do not believe in aliens outside of earth. Do you not believe that aliens don't exist? Or are you going to say you don't…
/r/askTRP05/09/14 03:24 AM
1

I'll let them know, thanks. Lol, you sound like one of my plates. Come on man, you're better than that. Please explain how that definition of religion doesn't include the items you've mentioned. And feel free to provide me with a better definition.
/r/askTRP05/09/14 02:34 AM
1

Enlighten me.
/r/askTRP05/09/14 02:28 AM
1

Correct! I do not believe there is intelligent life outside of Earth. It has not yet met it's burden of proof. Please answer my previous 2 questions. Yes or no, do you agree that theism has the burden of proof and atheism does not? Do you have any logical argument for theism? (That is, not an argument against atheism, but rather an argument for theism.)
/r/askTRP05/09/14 02:18 AM
1

Haha, dude... why do you keep applying double negatives to your statement on theism?
/r/askTRP05/09/14 02:08 AM
1

Yes or no, do you agree that theism has the burden of proof and atheism does not? Burden of proof is pretty much all that is needed. Believing something to be true without evidence is gullibility. Theism is the belief that something is true without evidence. Therefore, to be a theist is to be gullible. There is no assessment of reason using strict principles of validity to come to the conclusion that theism is valid. It is by definition, gullibility. Now if we want to be more narrow and ask are …
/r/askTRP04/09/14 11:56 AM
1

Here is an example where the position of the negative does not change the meaning: I do not have a laptop vs I have no laptop. Thus moving the negative does not automatically change the definition. You are correct! Moving the negative does not automatically change the definition. The thing is, in your example, you're applying the negative to the same word. You're applying it to the word "have". Both sentences describe something you do not have. Or in other words they are describing the amount of…
/r/askTRP04/09/14 04:19 AM
1

You claim disbelief in the absence of gods is making a claim, while disbelief in the presence of gods is not making a claim. That doesn't sound like logic. You want to redefine disbelief of absence of gods into a claim of presence of gods, while refusing to redefine disbelief of presence of gods into a claim of absence of gods. That doesn't like logic either. The difference is, applying a double negative to the definition of a word NEVER changes it's definition. It is still the same definition h…
/r/askTRP04/09/14 03:34 AM
1

Atheism is (normally) defined as belief in the existence of no gods. No my friend. You are wrong. Let's use a dictionary shall we? How about the Oxford English Dictionary. I think we can agree that is a reputable dictionary. Atheism: Disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/atheism Theism: Belief in the existence of a god or gods, specifically of a creator who intervenes in the universe http://www.oxforddictiona…
/r/askTRP04/09/14 02:54 AM
1

Lol, no... they are not the same. I've given you example after example of how they are not the same. I gave you a link to an article explaining the difference. You're just not grasping it and I don't know why. Disbelieving gods exist is the same thing as believing no gods exist. The difference is simple. One is a matter of disbelief. The other is a matter of belief. It's like in a court of law. The jury rules guilty or not guilty. The ruling of "not guilty" does not mean "innocent." The court of…
/r/askTRP04/09/14 02:46 AM
1

What is the difference between your definition of theism and the normal definition of theism?
/r/askTRP04/09/14 02:34 AM
1

There is no misrepresentation of your argument. Theism is (normally) defined as "belief in the existence of gods" Your definition "disbelief in the nonexistence of gods" is the same thing. You're just using a double negative to make it seem like you're saying something different when you're not. The use of a double negative doesn't change the definition of theism. It's still belief in the existence of god no matter how many even number of negatives you use. Unless you can explain the difference …
/r/askTRP04/09/14 02:23 AM
1

And yes, you are using a double negative. Believing that gods exists is the same thing as disbelieving gods don't exist. You're just simply being verbose about it.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 02:10 AM
1

Theism is not claiming something to be false either Correct. Theism is claiming something to be true. Therefore requiring evidence.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 02:05 AM
1

Lol
/r/askTRP04/09/14 01:54 AM
1

To reword your question in order to eliminate confusing double negatives and to make it more coherent... Again, if disbelief (refusal to accept that something is true) in gods is logical (reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity), why is belief (acceptance that a statement is true or that something exists) in gods not logical? Because holding a belief that a god exists has not met its burden of proof. Theism claims that something is true (without evidence). Athe…
/r/askTRP04/09/14 01:43 AM
1

Can you please read that article? And I'm questioning your language skill because you keep using double negatives, which are not clearly representing your point, and incorrectly defining what atheism is. I don't mean it as an attack, I mean it to understand who I'm speaking with.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 01:22 AM
1

I can't address your argument until you understand what atheism means. You keep saying atheism is something that it isn't. You're Your understanding of atheism is fundamentally flawed. Please, read this short article. It's exactly what we're talking about. http://atheism.about.com/od/mythdefiningatheism/a/LackBelief.htm And you didn't answer my question. Is english your first language?
/r/askTRP04/09/14 01:10 AM
1

You are simply confused as to what atheism is. You think atheism is "belief that there is no god" when this is not what atheism is at all. I don't know if there is a word for "belief in no gods" but it is not atheism.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 12:56 AM
3

Dude, we meet at the gym.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 12:48 AM
1

Atheism, belief in no god, This is not the definition of atheism.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 12:46 AM
0

Interesting article. Thank you for sharing.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 12:34 AM
0

I haven't read the article yet but I imagine I know where it's going. Kind of like how most people's favorite sports team just so happens to be the same as their herd.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 12:30 AM
1

Here you are sir. This 3.5 minute video explains it in explicit detail. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ Hope you enjoy it :)
/r/askTRP04/09/14 12:27 AM
2

There is a difference between being incorrect... and being illogical. If this were the 16th century and I said the sun revolves around the Earth, my statement would be perfectly logical. My statement would be incorrect, but it would still be logical because all available evidence points to the sun revolving around the Earth. There is no logical fallacy being committed. Being wrong about something, doesn't mean you are also being illogical. If you said, the Earth revolves around the sun, you woul…
/r/askTRP04/09/14 12:23 AM
1

Saying "I don't believe you" does not have a burden of proof because it's not making a truth claim. "There is a god" - this is a "truth claim" and has a burden of proof. "There is no god" - this is also a "truth claim" and has a burden of proof. "I don't believe in a god" - is not a "truth claim" and therefore does not have a burden of proof. Those making a truth claim have the burden of proof. Theism has not yet met it's burden of proof. Therefore, it is more logical to not believe the truth cl…
/r/askTRP04/09/14 12:13 AM
1

Thank you good sir. Would you like to know the origins of my name by any chance?
/r/askTRP04/09/14 12:08 AM
1

It's not "my logic" it's just logic.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 12:00 AM
1

I don't understand your question. Can you reword it? And is english your first language? Just curious.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 11:58 PM
1

Lol, that's not "my" definition of religion... that's the definition of religion. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=define+religion
/r/askTRP03/09/14 11:58 PM
2

Sharia law.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 11:57 PM
1

True. I just thought I'd see more people questioning their religious beliefs asking along with their other socially held beliefs. Edit: typo
/r/askTRP03/09/14 11:53 PM
1

So you're an agnostic atheist. Correct. You don't believe in god because you have no evidence for the existence of god. Right? Correct. That is not logically different from an agnostic theist, someone who believe in god because they have no evidence that gods do not exist. It is logically different because a logical fallacy is being made. That is the argument from ignorance. But wait... aren't I doing the same thing? No, and this is why. It all comes down to the burden of proof. A) The burden of…
/r/askTRP03/09/14 09:40 PM
1

Neither
/r/askTRP03/09/14 09:17 PM
1

Yes.... I am agnostic. I am also atheist because I don't believe in a god or deity.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 09:16 PM
2

No, you don't understand the fallacy. If someone says "elephants can fly." And someone says "there is no evidence to support that claim." That is not a logical fallacy.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 09:09 PM
1

Understand the difference between knowledge (gnosticism) and belief (theism).
/r/askTRP03/09/14 09:06 PM
1

It is neutral because it's not holding a position. It's not saying "there is no god." That would be taking the opposite position as "there is a god." Saying "I don't believe you" is the neutral position. If someone said to me "I know for a fact there is no god" then I would still be neutral in saying "I don't believe you." Do you get it?
/r/askTRP03/09/14 09:06 PM
1

Let me correct myself because I misspoke. Atheism prevents you from believing things that have not been proven to be true.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 09:04 PM
1

Please define atheism in your own words. You've ignored that request multiple times already.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 09:02 PM
2

I don't think you understand what those fallacies actually are and when they're applicable. You're just throwing out the names of fallacies. Explain to me how these are the fallacies you say they are.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 08:58 PM
1

You still aren't understanding. Atheism does not say theism is false. Atheism doesn't hold a position. It remains neutral. By remaining neutral, you're simply saying "I'm not ready to believe." You are not saying "the belief is true or false" you're saying "I need more evidence before I'm ready to believe." I don't need to have evidence because I'm not making a claim. Atheism is not a claim. If I said "there is no god" then that would be a claim that would require evidence. Saying "I don't belie…
/r/askTRP03/09/14 08:55 PM
1

Evidence for what? How did I claim atheism to be true? Please, in your own words, define atheism.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 08:48 PM
1

Your theism is based on the argument from ignorance fallacy. http://www.logicalfallacies.info/presumption/arguing-from-ignorance/
/r/askTRP03/09/14 08:38 PM
1

In your own words, define atheism.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 08:37 PM
1

No, how did you come to that conclusion?
/r/askTRP03/09/14 08:36 PM
1

Atheism is the logical choice because it prevents you from believing things that are not true. Honestly, which do you think is the better choice... To believe something when there is evidence to support its existence. Or to believe something when there is no evidence to support its existence. Atheism is the logical choice because it's simply saying "I'm not going to believe in something until there is evidence to support its existence."
/r/askTRP03/09/14 08:32 PM
2

There is no evidence to support the concept that gods exist. I also lack a belief in the tooth fairy because there is no evidence to prove that it exists. Do you believe in the tooth fairy? Why or why not? I also don't believe in leprechauns because there is no evidence to support their existence. Do you believe in leprechauns? Why or why not. It is logical to believe things when there is evidence to support it. It is gullibility when one believe something without evidence. Extraordinary claims …
/r/askTRP03/09/14 08:29 PM
3

So do you know if god doesn't exist? Nope. And I never claimed to know whether or not gods exist. Theism is simply rejecting the claim of atheism. Atheism isn't a claim my friend. Atheism, in other words, is simply saying "I don't believe you. Can you prove it?" Theism, however, is a claim. A claim that has not met its burden of proof. Think of it like this. There are hundreds and thousands of religions. They can't all be right. But they can all be wrong.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 08:25 PM
0

please quote me when I said "atheism is a belief." Because I'm pretty sure I never said that.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 08:10 PM
2

.....what? Can you at least quote me? I'm thoroughly confused how you came to this conclusion. And come on man, this isn't a difficult concept. Atheism is not a belief. It's the lack of a belief.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 07:55 PM
1

It's completely reasonable to assume that the concept of religion will come up when the concept of questioning one's beliefs also comes up.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 07:48 PM
1

Nothing is perfect. Edit: Except me of course.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 07:37 PM
1

You're missing the point. The concept is to question everything. Religion is one of the most influencing factors in one's behavior. If we're going to question everything, religion is not excluded in the definition of everything. It's not easy to question our beliefs but it's important to do so.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 07:33 PM
2

Lol, general rule of thumb. If your employer offers to match a certain % towards your 401k... fucking do it. That's free money.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 07:26 PM
3

If you don't put 20% down you're going to get PMI which is essentially a waste of your money. If you want to put more money down the only reason at that point would be to lower your monthly payment. However, with mortgage rates where they are now, you're better off investing that extra 100k in the market. Why lower your debt on a 4% 30 year fixed mortgage by 100k when you can invest that money in the market to get a return of 5+%? Make sense? Generally speaking when you invest in the market... s…
/r/askTRP03/09/14 07:25 PM
0

Because someone mentioned the concept of "question everything." And I found it curious how we don't hear about this tenet of TRP trickling into other aspects of our lives like religious beliefs.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 07:02 PM
4

No my friend. Please look up the definition of words before defining them yourself. You are actively inappropriately defining both atheism and agnosticism. Atheism is not the belief that there is no god. It is not the belief in the negative. Atheism is void of any belief. It is the lack of a belief. Agnosticism is a position of certainty or knowledge. Agnosticism simply says it can not be known whether or not a god exists. It is not the lack of a belief. It is the lack of whether or not somethin…
/r/askTRP03/09/14 07:00 PM
0

That's the thing, I don't identify as an atheist in order to fight a cause. I'm fighting a cause and just happen to be an atheist.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 06:49 PM
3

Religion: the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods. By definition, atheism cannot be a religion.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 06:46 PM
14

Lol, you're really not getting this concept man. No one is saying "god doesn't exist." All people are saying is "before we believe in the concept of a god, we just want a little evidence." Believing things without evidence is the essence of gullibility. Being gullible is not a desirable trait.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 06:45 PM
3

Absolutely, and in no way did I say religious people were not capable of being open-minded. The point I was simply trying to make in response your "question everything" comment is that I find it interesting how we don't see this concept trickling into other areas of our life. And if you're going to bring up the concept of going off topic, I think it's only fair that we look at your original comment in comparison to my original question. I asked what are some flaws with TRP and your response had …
/r/askTRP03/09/14 06:42 PM
2

Your logic consists of "I don't believe you." Not a very strong argument. Lol, that's the thing. It's not meant to be an argument. Saying "I don't believe you" is simply rejecting a claim that hasn't met it's burden of proof. The person who makes a claim has the burden to prove their claim is legitimate.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 06:26 PM
1

It has become a social movement. Mainly because there are too many religious people affecting the lives of people by social, physical, and legislative means without anyone fighting back. Just because they're getting organized doesn't mean they're starting to look like a religion. If anything I'd say they're starting to look like a political party.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 06:21 PM
2

Why is it the logical choice? Because it is the default choice. We generally want to have as few false beliefs as possible. The best way to have a false belief is to believe something without evidence. The default choice is to wait until there is evidence before believing something regardless as to whether or not the claim is natural or supernatural. As it stands, there has yet to be one single shred of demonstrable evidence for anything supernatural including gods. why would you not believe in …
/r/askTRP03/09/14 06:17 PM
6

It's not that atheism and religion have something to do with TRP. It's the concept of "questioning everything" which typically lead people to change their beliefs/views on things.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 05:17 PM
7

Lol, what? My friend, you may have some misconceptions about atheism. Atheism can't be "true". There is no dogma with atheism. Atheism doesn't say "there is no god." It's not a matter of knowledge or fact. It's simply a matter of whether or not you believe in the claim that a god exists. If you don't believe a god exists, you're an atheist because you're rejecting the claim that's being made. You're not saying "I know that there is no god" you're simply saying "I don't believe that there is a go…
/r/askTRP03/09/14 05:08 PM
10

Surely depends on your social environment. If it's likely you'll get killed or disowned for coming out as an atheist then of course it's more logical to pretend you're a theist. However, if you're one who cares more about the truth as opposed to simply believing things that make you feel good then atheism is the obvious choice.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 04:20 PM
2

Can you elaborate / provide some examples?
/r/askTRP03/09/14 04:12 PM
1

Not sure I fully follow you. Are you saying the whole "double standard" of men who get a lot of women are praised yet women who get a lot of men are shamed is something you don't agree with? That is, the shaming of promiscuous women is something you don't agree with?
/r/askTRP03/09/14 04:11 PM
14

Question everything with your inherent male logic. It seems to me that with this mindset, we'd see a lot more atheists within the community. However, there appear to be quite a bit of conservative christians and muslims. It's curious to me why the men here are willing to take the red pill when it comes to what attracts women vs what we're told attracts women but not willing to take the red pill when it comes to superstitious religious beliefs.
/r/askTRP03/09/14 04:07 PM
5

They claim to care about men's issues, but go look at any feminist forum. It clearly says "equal rights for women" not "equal rights for men and women."
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 02:39 PM
1

Go for it man. Worst case scenario she doesn't respond.
/r/askTRP02/09/14 12:36 AM
2

what the reddit hivemind says about prenups. Are there any legitimate common things that could easily be overlooked to make a prenup become invalid?
/r/askTRP02/09/14 12:29 AM
2

General questions... Do you think the benefits of marriage outweigh the consequences? If so, which benefits in particular? Are men unjustly getting fucked over in divorce court or do most situations seem fair? Do you know of any online resources outlining examples of what really goes on in divorce? What is the best advice for men to protect themselves from getting royally fucked over in divorce? Any general knowledge you'd like to share, or have you done so already and can link it to make your l…
/r/askTRP01/09/14 07:38 PM
1

Men hit the wall at around 60. Unless they're in good shape. Then 75. Unless you're rich. Then death.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 02:01 PM
11

You have much sidebar reading to do my friend.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 12:23 AM
1

My gf told me she loved me after being together for about 3 weeks. I didn't reciprocate. Then she said it again 3 weeks after that. I told her I think it's cool how she is comfortable enough to tell me that but I'm not going to reciprocate. Then she told me 5 months later. I kissed her and said you're cute. Then 2 months after that she broke down and said something like "imagine if the roles were reversed, how would you feel if I never said it back to you" which I calmly responded with "whether …
/r/askTRP15/08/14 09:36 PM
1

"Take class on how to dance!?!? But I don't know how to dance!"
/r/askTRP15/08/14 09:26 PM
1

When you feel yourself getting angry say to yourself "am I controlling my emotions or are my emotions controlling me? Do I want to be in control of my life like a man or have my life controlled by my emotions like a bitch?" Then take some time to yourself. If you're in the middle of an argument calmly tell the other person "I can't continue this right now." And that's the end of that. After 20 - 30 minutes you should be a bit more calm. Go lift sins weights in your cool down time, or drink some …
/r/askTRP15/08/14 09:23 PM
0

I would say something like "we're not friends" or "since when did we become friends?" I had a girl that I was trying to bone who kept saying shit like "blah blah blah, because we're friends" or "some friend you are" and I'd respond "you're not my friend. I have enough friends."
/r/askTRP15/08/14 09:18 PM
7

persay per se Ftfy
/r/askTRP14/08/14 04:49 PM
5

respected the establishment's selective look wtf? this is a fucking nightclub we're talking about, you don't have to respect shit... Some places do have dress codes. I wasn't let into a bar once because I was wearing flip flops.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 11:15 PM
2

Then I'd have to sign up for Twitter. Fuck that.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 08:49 PM
1

I would like to start the hashtag "Men Against Women Against Women Against Feminism".
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 07:23 PM
24

Seriously, I've been rejected from places for not wearing the appropriate shoes. I didn't throw a hissy fit, I respected the establishment's selective look which I did not conform to and went on with my life. Women really can't handle rejection.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 06:50 PM
105

Haven't you heard? Equal doesn't ACTUALLY mean equal. It means "selective equality" aka, special treatment.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 06:48 PM
3

There's /r/redpillmedia which is a wasteland. I wish the mods would add a video flair to make observing RP theory in action more understandable to newcomers. Also, not everyone has time to read all day long.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 02:50 PM
0

That's dangerous territory. My ex's 16 year old sister is legitimately super model hot and could easily pass for 21. By far the hottest girl I've ever met. Plus a Polish accent. Have mercy. I'd rather just stay away from the high schools than risk anything. Girls reach their peak too early.
/r/askTRP02/08/14 01:39 AM
3

Do you know if the video of this is online somewhere?
/r/TheRedPill02/08/14 01:02 AM
1

Ehh, not really. The 3 she would fuck are in relationships. On top of that if she wanted to get laid she could easily just go out in public and get her pussy filled by a stranger. Whether she has male friends or not, getting laid isn't very difficult.
/r/RedPillWomen21/07/14 08:51 PM
0

I don't really find it to be all that weird but thanks for your input.
/r/askTRP21/07/14 03:50 AM
1

Hmm, perhaps you're right.
/r/askTRP20/07/14 11:07 PM
5

I'd recommend not saying stuff like this around women. It shows a sense of insecurity and they'll likely pick up on it. Insecurity is not attractive. If you want to shave your beard, shave your beard. If you don't, don't. If you're unsure, trim it a little bit as to not completely get rid of it. But whatever you do, don't act like an insecure, attention / validation seeking little bitch in front of her. You're a man, damnit.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 11:05 PM
1

Can you handle being rejected by her while enjoying yourself in social situations where she is as well? If not, don't make a move. If you're the type of person who is going to be awkward around her from here on out because she rejected you then understand your limitations and look for someone else. If you can brush off the rejection and hold frame afterwards, then make a move. But as more time goes on and the less moves you make, the more likely someone else will snatch her up.
/r/askTRP20/07/14 08:47 PM
1

Thank you for answering my questions.
/r/RedPillWomen20/07/14 08:14 PM
1

Interesting. What is the RPW view on bisexual women and the friends they keep?
/r/RedPillWomen20/07/14 08:00 PM
3

Your slutty friend Meg Agreed. doesn't sound like a RPW Agreed. another bad decision in her long string of bad decisions. Agreed. She is not a RPW nor is she dating a RPM. In retrospect, I guess my comment was a waste of my time to type out and wasting every one's time who reads it.
/r/RedPillWomen20/07/14 07:55 PM
-1

This works with a GF, definitely. I'm not sure as to whether or not it works with a new girl though. Coincidentally it has been working out for me. But I'm not sure if it's doing anything to make them want me more or if prior attraction building keeps them coming back.
/r/askTRP20/07/14 06:02 PM
2

What happened afterwards? Did you give her the iced tea, get a hug and then part ways? We need to know where you're at man. Are you texting her? Did you two make any plans to hang out? Have you two hooked up at all? Was that the first time meeting each other? Are you of legal age to drink alcohol? We need some back story. You can make up for this by never doing it again. Rewards are earned, not donated.
/r/askTRP20/07/14 05:59 PM
6

That's like asking, "what do you do after having sex with a woman? Do you just lay in bed naked, stare at the ceiling and hold hands in awkward silence?"
/r/askTRP20/07/14 05:28 PM
1

This is pretty much what I've always thought. Show them you have self control the first time around, and then make sure you hang out with her again sooner than later in order to show her you mean business.
/r/askTRP20/07/14 05:07 PM
-2

I'm thinking I should install a hidden security camera in my bedroom for such occasions to show that all sex is consensual.
/r/askTRP20/07/14 04:54 PM
5

I wouldn't say a big mistake but you shouldn't have gotten it for her. What has she done to deserve this kind of special treatment from you? Is she incapable of getting her own iced tea? Did you end up doing anything with her or did you just get a hug? Edit: Essentially what you did was reward shitty behavior. A child stomping their feet around because they didn't get the candy they wanted at the store should not be rewarded with the candy they wanted. This woman stomped her feet around, made a …
/r/askTRP20/07/14 04:43 PM
16

Absolutely nothing. Essentially, she just got rejected by me. She's likely just trying to make it seem like she's in control and didn't actually just get rejected. So she says I passed her test in an attempt to make it seem like she's running this operation and never exhibits slutty behavior. If I went balls deep, she wouldn't have said "you failed the test." She would have likely said "OMG I never do stuff like that!" in order to not appear slutty.
/r/askTRP20/07/14 04:32 PM
2

she knows your willpower will falter after getting a taste Woman trickery indeed my friend. I said to her, "2 seconds huh?" and then intensified rubbing my dick on her clit, approached her lips, got 1/2 of my tip in and then said, "Ahh, you're not that lucky. Not tonight." I think I might try the actual 2 seconds next time and turn the tables on her further.
/r/askTRP20/07/14 04:26 PM
1

Done
/r/askTRP16/07/14 11:12 AM
1

Many to most girls will lie about past cheating, but they'll rat out their 'ho friends in a heartbeat. See that's the thing I'm curious about. Women rarely ever admit to cheating. Do we award no points of credibility for honesty? Do we trust the lying cheater who never fesses up over the honest one who does?
/r/askTRP16/07/14 12:13 AM
0

She sounds like a great fucktoy, but she is NOT a GF. Certainly not a loyal GF. But I'll be damned if she doesn't go out of her way to put on a good GF costume.
/r/askTRP16/07/14 12:11 AM
2

Thank you for taking the time to comment. Much obliged.
/r/askTRP15/07/14 08:12 PM
1

Side note - we have very similar usernames.
/r/askTRP15/07/14 07:30 PM
2

If I tell her it's a deal breaker then she's more likely to lie about cheating and never tell me the truth in fear of losing me. If she's under the assumption I'm willing to move past it as long as she's honest with me then she's more likely to tell me.
/r/askTRP15/07/14 07:29 PM
0

Partner count is 7 or less including the girl she recently fucked, very introverted, very conscientious, not flaky, fairly stable, has 0 sexy selfies and dresses fairly conservatively, no slutty friends, comes from a nuclear family, no tattoos or crazy piercings. Her only red flags, from what I can see, is her inability to standup for herself and say no - and obviously the previous cheating. Do you think my best bet is to downgrade her to a plate (mentally and/or overtly) while looking for a rep…
/r/askTRP15/07/14 07:04 PM
1

That thread is what made me post this. I know the relationship is likely dead and I have a new girl already lined up. But like I said, she really does treat me like a king - it's ridiculous. I'm thinking I'll likely downgrade her to a plate or stay in a "relationship" but be very open with her that I'm seeing other people. I'm not sure yet.
/r/askTRP15/07/14 06:48 PM
14

I do this all the time. Or if a girl is trying to hit me I say "I believe in equality. If you hit me, I'm going to hit you back."
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 12:34 PM
2

Women are insecure. Owning possessions are based on personal preference. By complimenting a personal possession she likely purchased herself, her feelings briefly become validated as someone else agrees with her. We don't choose our genes, only our jeans.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 09:40 PM
2

Absolutely. Why? Easy. I'm someone worth dating. I.... Am taller than 6 feet so ladies can feel small when embracing me. Have beautiful blue eyes ladies swoon over. Am in shape (not jacked). Am very attractive (used to model). Am extremely sociable, confident, and funny. Often the life of the party and know how to work a room. Have a great job as a financial advisor. Am independent. Shit, sometimes I get jealous of my girlfriend for having such a great catch in her life. I'd absolutely date me. …
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 08:52 AM
21

Guys, this is a serious problem. We can't live in a society where people receive random compliments from strangers. This makes everyone feel unsafe. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETwtP0ZgUio
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 01:11 AM
1

:-) Funny thing is, now I'm at taco bell. Oink oink.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 10:26 PM
1

We can keep going back and forth for the lolz if you really want. But coincidentally you are actually really accurate with your description of me. I wish you knew me in person because then we could laugh about it together. The only thing... I'm Chad in this scenario. He played three sports I played soccer for 10 years both intramural and travel. Was the captain of my high school swim team. And did crew in college. spent his summers volunteering in Bolivia I volunteered domestically. Was actually…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 07:27 PM
1

Wow... it looks like I really hit a soft spot with you. Feel free to PM me if you can't afford a therapist. Sometimes it's good to just talk about our problems and vent a little bit. It probably doesn't mean much but I love you and think you're a great person. Life is beautiful and you have every reason to live. Here, have an upvote.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 09:00 AM
0

It's very interesting how you want to keep associating the male sex drive with rape when the male sex drive has very little to do with rape. The most common type of rapist is the "power rapist." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Types_of_rape#Power_rapist The motivating factor behind the most common rapist is exerting control, power, and authority. It has nothing to do with being horny and just wanting to fuck. It's a matter of being psychologically damaged and feeling inadequate. The point I was tr…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 01:58 AM
1

Is there any mention of this case in any feminist / heavily female dominated subs?
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 10:01 PM
1

Women get raped in Saudi Arabia, despite their eyes being literally the only part of them uncovered. They then get beheaded for getting raped. That's because of religion. It has nothing to do with the female body. Correct. I never said women get raped because of what they wear. I said they influence the male sex drive. Just like men affect the female sex drive with a big penis bulge. Visual stimulation has a direct effect on one's sex drive. Did you read my comment or simply create your own vers…
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 04:01 AM
2

Short sell that stock, son. If the price is falling rapidly you can make killing on a short. Unfortunately this doesn't apply to women unless you have a vasectomy and she's a gourmet chef who loves to suck cock and clean.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 03:04 AM
1

Men are very simple. They want to have sex with women because women are attractive, wear attractive clothing, and regularly stimulate a man's sex drive from afar. The prime motivating factor in determining whether or not a man would sleep with a woman is simply her level of attraction. All a woman has to do is focus on her outer beauty and she can get laid whenever she wants. A man, however, has to focus on his inner and outer beauty. Women are primarily attracted to status first and then the ou…
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 01:56 AM
1

unsatisfying sex I imagine there are a plethora of gay dudes who would disagree with that. Just because a dude cums doesn't mean it was "good sex."
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 01:25 AM
0

That would depend on why men can get laid so easily. Women can currently get laid any time they want because they are the more attractive sex and men primarily care about a woman's beauty above status or any other female quality.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 11:44 PM
2

A person has 100% right to protect themselves Correct. However, and correct me if I'm wrong, the feminist view is currently "teach men not to rape" rather than "teach women self defense / how to protect themselves."
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 11:26 PM
9

I wonder how /r/feminism and /r/askfeminists would respond to this. I enjoyed it. However, at the end when he said "ohh.... uhm, shit, wellll... those problems were made by other women too so... tough shit. It's not my fault." The more common answer I've heard from feminism is "those are products of the [m]atriarchy." Followed by some other garbage about how women are such oppressed victims in a first world society.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 02:30 AM
8

Blacks often live in lower income high crime areas. Heavy gang & drug presence. Living in a poorer neighborhood in general is likely going to lead people to do illegal things in order to survive / advance their quality of life as legal opportunities are limited. Mix that with repeat offenders, lack of funds for attorney representation, lack of funds to own a decent suit in order to look presentable, high probability of false claims made against blacks (blacks are so often used as scapegoats) and…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 09:24 PM
42

I've brought this up with the wonderful people over at /r/askfeminists. Got labeled a troll. And got banned.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 03:12 PM
1

such as?
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 11:16 PM
2

I was skeptical about /u/yea_tht_dnt_go_there's statistic as well. However I found another study that confirms women receive a lesser sentence. We find that women receive prison sentences that average a little over 2 years less than those awarded to men. Even after controlling for circumstances such as the severity of the offense and past criminal history, women receive more lenient sentences. Approximately 9.5 months of the female advantage cannot be explained b
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 11:15 PM
2

I don't understand what you're trying to say.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 08:58 PM
7

Seriously though, bitches love Mario Kart.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 06:18 PM
5

Excellent - thank you.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 05:56 PM
8

Video games
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 04:13 PM
1

What would be a better definition of alpha?
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 03:59 PM
10

Do you have a link to that statistic by any chance?
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 03:58 PM
3

I don't "look" for things or try to put meaning to things. I'm just enjoying one day at a time. No need to make it any more complicated than that.
/r/askTRP18/04/14 08:26 PM
9

We're looking at you....... Canada.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 07:26 PM
2

Egalitarianism
/r/askTRP16/04/14 05:41 PM
4

This is what I've said in the past and I'd like someone to find a flaw in my logic to help improve my view.... If people actually cared about equality then they'd self-identify as egalitarians rather than feminists. If the feminist movement was about "equality" then it would not only fight to obtain the advances and benefits of being a man but also the punishments and consequences. So until I see the feminist movement advocating it be mandatory for women to register for the military draft at the…
/r/askTRP16/04/14 08:05 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WM1RChZk1EU&feature=kp
/r/askTRP15/04/14 04:18 AM
3

I always thought you had a week, 2 max unless you can stretch it out for some reason. (e.g. coworker you and you don't want to cross that line)
/r/askTRP15/04/14 04:17 AM
1

I just always assumed I was really shallow and preferred the company of beauty over ugliness.
/r/askTRP14/04/14 03:28 PM
3

When it comes to women - "Don't try to make sense out of nonsense."
/r/askTRP10/04/14 05:06 PM
5

Vaginas aren't special; they're just a warm, wet place for me to stick my dick in.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 02:59 PM
2

I'd rather play Catan than fuck a girl.... Most nights at least.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 02:34 PM
1

TL; DW - comedy skit of a guy in the friend zone talking to his female friend who wants casual sex but not with him.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 04:25 PM
5

2) mentally and physically.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 04:01 PM
1

I may have misread your previous post and confused it with your username. Sorry about that. Thanks for not getting defensive and angry about my comment. Best of luck to you man.
/r/askTRP03/04/14 03:09 PM
2

Pretty sure this is satire.
/r/MGTOW02/04/14 09:28 PM
2

"Sounds like Puppet needs to drop you off at my place. Tell him to get you here by 10." If she goes along with it, best case scenario you get laid. Worst case scenario you start working on the next plate within 10 minutes of sending the text. Escalate one while Initiating a new one. The very essence of literally spinning plates.
/r/askTRP02/04/14 06:58 PM
2

Oooooooooooooooooooooo
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 08:55 AM
1

Bitches use so much toilet paper.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 10:20 AM
2

What about that AND p90x?
/r/MGTOW31/03/14 12:15 AM
6

If you feel wrong fucking a married woman then don't do it. If you have no issues then it looks like you have the green light. If I were you - I'd go for it. Bring condoms. Sounds like she's still on the carrousel.
/r/askTRP25/03/14 10:28 PM
1

I see it all as games. Forget whether or not that behavior is from you rescheduling on her; that is meaningless. She's being passive aggressive. That's all you need to know. The question then becomes, will you let her passive aggressive tendencies affect your frame?
/r/askTRP21/03/14 05:45 AM
1

I think I searched for AWOLT. My bad. Thanks man.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 04:27 AM
1

Is there more than one glossary of terms?
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 04:07 AM
1

I did that. It wasn't in the glossary of terms on the side bar.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 04:00 AM
2

Listen to this man. Don't attend class.
/r/askTRP20/03/14 09:17 PM
2

Listen to this man. Don't skip class.
/r/askTRP20/03/14 03:04 PM
0

Thanks. Didn't see it in the glossary of terms.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 02:54 PM
1

Awalt?
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 06:56 AM
4

I usually say something along the lines of "are you going to continue being passive aggressive all day or grow up and tell me what's up your ass? "
/r/askTRP19/03/14 07:38 PM
1

She thinks she's a feminist.
/r/askTRP16/03/14 01:19 AM
26

Grab your pitchforks. We're invading the media to let these success perverts know we will not be treated this way. Let's all gather to protest our rebellion to being treated like objects. On June 9th we gather at our nation's capital for a suit and tie burning. No longer my brothers will we be victims of success and wealth.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 03:50 AM
1

What do you consider yourself now?
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 09:46 PM
1

Who was born into an atheistic, secular Jewish family? You?
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 09:12 PM
1

Very well said.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 06:35 PM
1

Different argument. A better comparison, though not a perfect analogy, would be each city saying their team was the best. However the one with the best record, or the one who wins the Super Bowl would have more reason to believe their claim is true. Again, this analogy has its limits, but it is closer to the actual argument at hand than saying >God is a local being. No, you see, religious beliefs are local. If you were born into a Christian family and a Christian society you're likely going to b…
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 06:34 PM
1

The term blue pill does apply because TBP is about holding on to false beliefs and living in delusion. Atheism is a hard pill to swallow. If you're not ready then you're simply not ready. Did you watch the videos?
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 06:25 PM
2

myth. a traditional story, esp. one concerning the early history of a people or explaining some natural or social phenomenon, and typically involving supernatural beings or events. This is exactly what religion is. The Red Pill, yes, is about sexual strategy but more importantly it's about accepting reality for the way it truly is.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 06:23 PM
0

Bingo. But it's not so much random as it is local / societal. No different than your local Texan being a Dallas Cowboys fan or Pakistani being Muslim or American child believing in Santa Clause. God is the adult version of Santa.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 08:46 AM
2

God alone is the uncaused cause. - What evidence do you have to support this claim. He exists outside of time. - What evidence do you have to support this claim. So what is the first cause of all things? - What evidence do you have to support the claim that there is a "first cause".
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 07:56 AM
0

Lawrence Krauss, a well respected physicist (and rather humorous individual) recently published a book and has quite a bit on YouTube worth watching about this very topic. I strongly recommend doing some research into the origins of the universe rather than holding on to ancient myths that make claims about the universe yet provide no evidence to support their claims (that's blue pill behavior). Here is a really good video clip to watch. Let me know what you think: http://youtu.be/8hspspghojU - …
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 07:42 AM
32

Atheist as I prefer to view the world as it truly is rather than persist in delusion. I'd imagine most people in this sub feel the same way.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 02:00 AM
1

On mobile. No dice. Thanks though
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 03:27 PM
3

Blocked in my country. Any mirrors?
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 12:35 AM
6

When someone points a gun to your head and says "act beta or I'm going to kill you."
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 02:41 AM
-3

A well behaved dog is the product of a good trainer. A well behaved woman is the product of a good man.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 04:27 PM
1

Once you get her to hang out with you and you want to make a move just say "come here" after you feel some sexual tension. This has never failed me.
/r/askTRP11/02/14 01:54 AM
0

How do you figure?
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 04:42 PM
1

This is great.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/14 05:49 PM
1

Purchase a visa gift card from your local bank in cash.
/r/askTRP29/01/14 02:45 AM
0

Haha you're probably right. Thanks for taking the time to reply.
/r/askTRP28/01/14 11:47 AM
0

I understand where you're coming from, but I'm not sure this actually addresses OP's concern.
/r/askTRP28/01/14 03:59 AM
0

Carl Sagan said something similar: For me, it is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. RIP
/r/askTRP28/01/14 03:09 AM
0

Excellent point about 2.
/r/askTRP28/01/14 03:02 AM
0

I literally just submitted this question to this sub about a hour ago. Do you have any reliable data to support this?
/r/askTRP28/01/14 03:00 AM
0

Is this a quote with a specific origin? It's perfect for Red Pill and atheism / science enthusiasts.
/r/askTRP28/01/14 02:56 AM
0

Something similar happens to me. However in my case I usually can't stand them after I learn we have a very different sense of humor.
/r/askTRP28/01/14 02:36 AM
0

What makes you say that?
/r/askTRP28/01/14 02:33 AM
0

I let my girlfriend hang out with her ex. I don't see any reason to prohibit her from doing so.
/r/askTRP28/01/14 02:31 AM
0

Even if you have nothing better to do, make time just to hangout with yourself. When she invites herself over just say "nah not tonight."
/r/askTRP28/01/14 02:30 AM
0

Shitty thing to do to her ex husband. But it's his own fault for doing it.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/14 03:56 PM
0

Personally, I enjoy dating feminist and applying red pill on them. It's kind of entertaining to see her argue with nothing to back up her point or counteract mine.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/14 04:39 PM
1

I don't believe they do. I've known them all for 10-15 years. Had sex with one ~5 years ago but it was more because we both hadn't got laid in a while - not because we "wanted" each other. It was one of those nights where we were drinking and then one of us said - "want to have meaningless drunk sex?"
/r/askTRP04/01/14 05:38 PM
5

I have female friends I don't want to fuck. So, yes.
/r/askTRP04/01/14 12:55 AM
1

She texted him back, told him she's in a relationship and not going to do anything with the guy. What's the part that bothers you?
/r/askTRP01/01/14 05:31 PM
2

The way I see it, she's just one of the plates you're spinning. You can still keep her around for sex. Just don't act all lovey dovey with her. She's not your girlfriend and isn't going to be. But she's hot and a good fuck. There's no need to bring anything up to her or shove it in her face; that's childish. Use a condom and keep fucking her if you want. If not, move on to the next one.
/r/askTRP30/12/13 03:30 AM
-1

Would a prenup prevent me from inheriting her father's wealth or would I still get something after 15 / 20 years of marriage regardless of a prenup?
/r/askTRP29/12/13 02:09 AM
9

Additionally, she isn't "giving" you sex. She gets something out of sex too. She's manipulating you by saying she gives you sex.
/r/askTRP27/12/13 02:12 PM
10

She's straight up telling you to buy her stuff? Dude, she's using you. Just tell her gifts are for birthdays and Christmas.
/r/askTRP27/12/13 02:10 PM
13

/r/asktrp is specifically for questions. People need to stop getting their panties up in a bunch when a beta in transition is evaluating himself and his actions. G4RRETT - keep asking questions. You'll get there soon. In this situation, you can open the door and tell her to get in or say something like, "give me a kiss and I'll consider letting you in my car." After the kiss say, "nope - try again." And then be like, "okay, we're going to have to work on that later." Then open the car door. You …
/r/askTRP25/12/13 01:51 PM
2

Yeah, if she's unwilling to open up the door then I'm unwilling to unlock it.
/r/askTRP25/12/13 01:41 PM
-3

You could always switch teams and go after guys. Even if you don't want to do anything sexual with a guy, do it for the challenge to see if you could pick up a guy. See how the game is different between men and women.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/13 04:21 PM
-1

Do what you want.
/r/askTRP16/12/13 10:24 PM
0

What'd I miss?
/r/TheRedPill14/12/13 09:51 PM
0

Logic and honesty will lead you to a paradigm that is worth living. Well said.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/13 01:25 AM
–

God I hope you're joking. It made me laugh though.
/r/askTRP
–

Relevant user name?
/r/askTRP
–

I'm a financial advisor and used to be a mortgage banker. Feel free to ask me anything. Here are some basic tips... Mortgages: If you're going to buy a house it's ideal to put 20% down for the down payment. If you can't do that, don't bother buying a house. On top of that, you should have 12 months worth of total monthly obligations saved up in addition to your down payment. There are a shit ton of other tips but when making such a large commitment, you want to make sure you're prepared when shi…
/r/askTRP
–

They are the people that have bucked the system altogether and smash just as much tail as an alpha. Gammas are rare and annoy the shit out of alphas.. I thought that was sigma?
/r/askTRP
–

Haha, excellent point. My main concern was a potential rape accusation as she was white girl wasted. But after doing it I was reminded of how I used to do this to girls from time to time even when sober. Thanks for your input. I'll likely not do this again unless I'm in a similar situation where I think the girl is too drunk and I'm at risk. No sex > rape accusation.
/r/askTRP
–

I never bothered to do any research into understanding gamma / sigma etc within this sub until you mentioned that. I see where you're coming from. Do you think this is an effective method of enhancing / maintaining desire?
/r/askTRP
–

Are you saying I sound like a gamma or the act of denying a woman on the first go around sounds like a gamma move?
/r/askTRP
–

Haha, did it ever only last for 2 seconds or did it turn into a full fledged fuckfest every time? I'm thinking the 2 second line is a matter of trying to get control back. If I agreed, now she's in control and doesn't feel rejected. (Women hate being rejected.) But if I don't put it in, I'm still leading this operation.
/r/askTRP
–

Do you see how these are quite possibly the most important criteria to answer your question? Absolutely. As much I'd like for her to change her ways, I'm not expecting her to. I was kind of hoping TRP had some knowledge on how to limit this kind of behavior or instill fear of losing me (dread) to prevent this completely. I didn't realize The RP view was a firm "once a cheater always a cheater." Damn. Perhaps I'll make a separate post about this but women rarely ever admit to cheating. Do we awar…
/r/askTRP
–

I do have slight feelings for her but it's easily manageable. I know she's replaceable. I'm thinking my best bet is to mentally downgrade her to a plate, run more dread game, and actively seek a replacement for the next month until she's actually put to the test with this guy. I have no intentions of marrying her nor having children with her and have made this very clear with her. If I start hunting for a replacement more actively I can essentially turn this into a non-issue.
/r/askTRP
–

don't put excuses in her mouth. You're hamstering. It's not a valid excuse on her part to cheat and reason as to why I'm going to break up with her. If you could see her in action... she almost never says no as she feels so guilty when she does. Every time my mom offers her more to eat or drink, she doesn't turn it down because she feels rude or guilty for saying no. If I ever want sex, she won't say no. If I tell her to do something for me, literally no matter what it is, she won't say no. Cook…
/r/askTRP
–

Personally, I just don't like being friends with ugly people - especially women. It's been my experience that attractive people attract more attractive people. Befriend a hot girl, plow her hot friends. Has worked for me more than once.
/r/askTRP
–

What? No... /u/Karmasutur3 and /u/heroicnapkin are just plain wrong. Just because she is attractive doesn't mean you're an orbiter. I have many female friends whom I'd gladly fuck. However, as long as I maintain frame I'm not an orbiter. I don't treat my attractive female friends any different than my male friends. One of my best friends is a girl. I've known her for ~ 13 years or something. Sometimes she'll treat me to things and sometimes I'll do the same back to her. The exact same thing happ…
/r/askTRP
–

Hey man. I'm not trying to tell you what to do or anything but just wanted you to know that your "-RED" signature comes off as cringe worthy. I've seen you post a couple of other times and saw you announce that you're redder than red pill and have been before this sub existed or something along those lines and it made me cringe pretty hard. No disrespect. Just giving you a third person point of view.
/r/askTRP
–

It's a necessity in today's society to satisfy the conservative employers who think that piece of paper means anything.
/r/askTRP
–

If I knew why you were suggesting it I wouldn't have asked. What about that book did you find valuable? It's common courtesy to give a little feedback when making a suggestion.
/r/askTRP
–

Why do you suggest that?
/r/askTRP
–

There's just this special tingling I feel in my balls. She HAS to be special.
/r/askTRP
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter