TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NINETY_3 Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by NINETY_3 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

How do you figure? Both parties are a part of the kleptocracy.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/13 08:42 PM
1

It really isn't a surprise that men are generally more interested in politics than women. It's for the same reason they are more involved in "public life" in general. For the majority of human history (and if chimps are any indication, many of our pre-human ancestors as well), precarious encounters with "outsiders" would have invariably been dealt with by the males of a given tribe. When the shift toward settled life came about, living with the aforementioned outsiders became a practical necessi…
/r/TheRedPill04/07/13 07:14 AM
5

I'd say having mixed genders in the ranks does infinitely more harm. If anything the porn probably helps.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:07 AM
14

Kind of figured this would get linked up here. XD I tossed in my own two cents on the video as well. It's interesting that so many are convinced that this common comedy trope represents some natural dynamic between men and women, rather than the complete lack of respect for men that women have now been educated in for the last several decades. This isn't nature. It certainly ain't "law of the jungle."
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 07:27 PM
1

Socialism is about state control of the means of production. Really?
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 01:15 AM
3

I still try to be chivalrous, not just to ladies, but to everyone (so it's not so much chivalrous but just being nice to people). This is what few understand when they dismiss chivalry - that it doesn't only extend to the weaker sex, but to everyone. Nor is chivalry beta ass-kissing. Far too many lesser men imagine they are "chivalrous" when they act like a valet/man-servant for whatever woman they are obsessing over at the moment, while paying little regard for other human beings. Such behavior…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 09:21 PM
-3

I'd say the wikipedia entry on the subject is a pretty good introduction. Interesting historical note - "libertarianism" was a term first coined in 19th century France by anarcho-communists, and was originally a synonym for "anarchism". I believe it came about because of state suppression of anarchism, which included bans on printing materials mentioning "anarchy" by name. edit: Downvotes? Really faggits?
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 07:59 AM
0

That sounds like communism, socialism is when the government confiscates everything so they can run it. Actually, communism refers to the situation whereby one's ability to draw upon the commonwealth is not metered on the basis of one's labor output. In some schemes (like anarchist-communism), this is done on an ethics-based, voluntary system. In others (like Marxism), communism is a result of prosperity, and is seen as the end product of socialist development. There are a lot of things which fa…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 06:55 AM
-1

Actual, definitional "socialism" is about worker control of the means of production, or steps toward such. It is all about fair treatment, and not expecting men to humiliate themselves with servility just so they can support themselves.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 06:37 AM
25

Being expendable is fun!
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:40 AM
5

I can read it, and I ain't shit.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:39 AM
7

A woman once said to me that 'The best-looking guy in any club is always gay'. I asked them how she knew that. Their reply: 'Of course he was gay: he showed no interest in me!" Been there. I guess it is a kind of flattery... And no, I'm not claiming I am gorgeous. Only that any man who is utterly out of the reach of a sufficiently interested woman runs the risk of having such speculation given voice.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 05:02 AM
4

I was completely with you up until your last sentence. "Slave labor" and the love of power is not only the realm of capitalists. Never said it was. And I'm assuming I can thank-you for the downvote? Capitalism, with all of its flaws, still affords us the best goods and services for the value, the best quality goods and services, and the most choice. Okay. Granting this (for argument's sake), how does that falsify the identification I made of the primary culprits in our present situation? I'd als…
/r/MensRights30/06/13 10:43 PM
18

Hell the major reason why the government and the corporations backed feminism so much in the first place is because they wanted a new underclass of workers they could pay less and who would be more docile. We have a bingo! This is the giant pink elephant sitting in our midst that most choose to ignore. It amazes me how almost all literate persons understand "supply and demand", yet they cannot see how nearly doubling the labor pool over a generation or two (depending how one defines "generation"…
/r/MensRights30/06/13 08:47 PM
76

Why would women need men when the big-daddy state will extract the fruit of men's labor and just hand it over to them? The state has become a meddling busy-body in men's lives. They're pimps, and have in effect laid claim to every woman in sight. When a state perverts social relations so thoroughly, it causes unthoughtful people to assume their rackets are nothing of the sort, and are even wholly natural and inevitable. Little wonder there is so much neurosis in "advanced" nations.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 08:37 PM
9

If one puts their "They Live" sunglasses on first, that thread is (almost) pure gold. :)
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 06:24 AM
-2

Being in a relationship isn't the only way or even the best way to get "sexual pre-selection". Never said it was. :)
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 05:13 AM
-1

Google "sexual preselection." It's not an obscure topic, and it is quite gendered. Women find men showing concrete evidence of being "relationship material" more intriguing. And nothing spells that out more than already having a woman (or women.)
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 01:32 AM
3

Agreed. It is supremely misguided to believe there is something to be accomplished by getting into exchanges with these women. There is nothing to be gained by any of us as individuals by any such descent into polemics. Aside from it being "no win" of itself, it's not like the kind of social changes I'm sure many here are hoping for are going to come by arguing with women. I think believing such a thing would be fruitful is of itself a kind of delusion, and in some respects is opposed to what "t…
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 01:28 AM
7

You beat me to the punch. I was about to post something to this effect. :) It is my experience that women are (in their passive-aggressive way) quite contemptuous of one another, and see other women as enduring social threats. For instance, half of their "sexual display" behaviors are not even aimed at getting male attention, but rather at thumbing their nose at the other women in their circle and asserting a type of social dominance. And don't get me started on the trash-talking they engage in.…
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 01:20 AM
20

This sounds like an awful lot of trouble to be going through for an older divorced woman with two kids. And who you haven't really been seeing that long. She's got you bouncing around all over the place.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/13 05:53 PM
3

No - but more importantly, they don't know mine.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 01:32 AM
10

Do you sign my check?
/r/MensRights25/06/13 11:54 PM
14

Harald Eia was subject to widespread critic because the quotes and filming was claimed a result of heavy copy paste and cherry-picking of quotes. I'm not buying it. Even if one wants to argue much was left out from the "social studies" perspective, their actual responses to hard-science research is damning enough. For a "scientist" to say falsifiable research is pointless is astounding. This really has all the appearances of religion, on the part of the Norwegian sociologists featured.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 11:50 PM
7

It's especially damning considering the quality of the British researchers in question, and the prestige of the institutions they operate in. The blithe dismissals were inexcusable, and I don't see how any amount of "sly editing" could have put such nonsense into the mouths of the Norwegian ideologues/"researchers."
/r/MensRights25/06/13 11:36 PM
4

Woman = Sex Object Man = Success Object
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 01:05 AM
0

Yep, I do all of that. Doesn't make me a white knight. No woman takes advantage of me, and as a person possessed of values and character, I take advantage of no one. Exactly. /u/noblepaladin puts it very well in another post in the thread. There's a world of difference between being disciplined and just with everyone (each according to their state in life, and how one is related to them), and just plain ole' sucking up under the guise of being "a gentleman."
/r/TheRedPill23/06/13 10:14 AM
1

It's that they get all ego inflated. Pull out her chair for her? Hold the door? Get ready for the Female Ego Quantum Singularity. Not necessarily. If done slavishly and when completely impractical, it just starts feeling forced and silly (and women will usually pick up on that.) Likewise if one doesn't otherwise have their shit together, then any kind gesture will be for naught.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/13 10:10 AM
2

That's just weak shit. There's nothing "old timey" and gentlemanly about that.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/13 10:06 AM
1

Women generally like feeling protected, and taken care of. Even if the gestures involved are largely symbolic. It'd never occurred to me that removing one's self from stupid political fashions meant never giving women the things they desire.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/13 10:05 AM
2

I think a lot of people who first turn to the red pill think it is about acting in a very disrespectful and hateful manner. I've noticed this. :( You make some excellent points. I feel as if you've spoken my own mind on this particular subject. I'd also opine that this is what distinguishes genuine men of principle from reactionaries. The latter are addicted to form and slavish imitation, but neglect to notice that the "ways" of their forebears were in fact largely a matter of considered practic…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/13 10:01 AM
24

Is preventing violent assault or murder part of your daily routine, rather than merely something you do when you venture into war zones? Because, for women, it is. Yes, yes it is. Considering that men are the overwhelming victims of violent crime (in particular, homicide), I can say quite unequivocally that men spend a lot of time concerned about their safety in open environments, and with good reason. I've yet to experience this world of sunshine and lollypops that feminists seem to believe I (…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/13 10:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter