TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NPFFTW Archive

View 3 posts and 77 comments by NPFFTW on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

He has a doorbell camera that showed her opening the door. That's why she was arrested. You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 07:14 PM
5

I'm in the unfortunate position where I develop strong feelings extremely quickly, and having sex just makes it worse. I specifically avoid sex until I'm convinced she's interested in a long-term relationship, because if she leaves after we've done the horizontal tango, it will crush me.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/07/21 04:11 PM
3

we'll permanently your stupid ass. I think you missed the word "ban" in there.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/05/21 05:11 AM
11

Pretty sure nobody fighting for joint custody or male reproductive rights has burned down a city over it. We are nothing like BLM.
/r/MensRights30/08/20 12:11 PM
2

Avocado!
/r/MensRights08/06/19 11:06 PM
-15

I don't.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 05:06 AM
4

The woman is vial Vile. to conflate her character to the validity of vaccinations being dangerous or not is not thinking critically. There was no such offence. Without vaccinations she is more likely to give him a serious illness that he may not be fully immune to. Also, vaccines aren't dangerous. Arguing that they are isn't "thinking critically", it's stupid.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 05:20 AM
1

I know, I'm just parroting the left's extremists.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 11:32 PM
1

We call those "biological essentialists". They're evil bigots who should be hanged.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 10:12 PM
6

Hence you can infer to what degree these people are functioning members of society.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 11:21 PM
10

According to some, biological sex does not exist.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 10:35 PM
33

Some people will tell you that "female" is also socially constructed, so I think we're doing just fine.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 10:00 PM
3

It's a cover-up, man
/r/MensRights29/05/18 06:37 PM
4

There's no gallon bot that I can see either. Murder-suicide?
/r/MensRights29/05/18 04:43 PM
35

It's ironic because a film about men won a female director a "women in film" award, despite the film itself being almost exclusively about men.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 04:23 PM
49

Make more, please!
/r/MensRights20/05/17 01:03 AM
1

You're right, it's not useless. Someone who experiences attraction to only the opposite sex is called "heterosexual". Someone who experiences attraction to both sexes is called "bisexual".
/r/MensRights26/04/17 02:44 AM
1

No. The term is sexual orientation. You can piss on the definition of gender all you want, but sexual orientation is attraction based on sex. Penis or vagina is a sex thing, according to everyone who knows basic biology, and so any sexual orientations outside of heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual and asexual are entirely useless and only serve to make people feel speshul because they're "different".
/r/MensRights26/04/17 01:34 AM
1

No way. He's a Liberal wearing blue. You're right - he isn't "extreme" enough to get media exposure because the things he's saying aren't considered "extreme" by liberals. Right now it looks like none of the Conservative candidates are very good. Guess I'll have to do it myself ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights09/03/17 06:51 PM
-7

Have you considered counselling? That's some "Bush did 9/11" level conspiracy thinking. The word salad is unreal. There is nothing wrong with this letter. Edit: Keep the downvotes coming!
/r/MensRights02/03/17 04:18 PM
3

A bit of a conundrum here. If a man transitions to a woman, do you make her play against guys (where she will likely lose) or against girls (where she will likely dominate)? In another case, if a woman transitions to a man, do you make her play against girls (where he will roflstomp them) or let him fight men (where he will likely lose)? If you apply "biological sex only", then FTM will almost always win. If you apply "whichever gender you identify as", MTF will almost always win. There is no go…
/r/MensRights25/02/17 04:09 PM
1

Go back to TRP. Don't give people a reason to associate us with them, or them with us.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:43 PM
12

I understand this is in the US, but in Canada it's perfectly legal. There is no evidence of coersion and he didn't show the photographs to anyone else, so I fail to see how it's a problem.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 06:06 PM
6

Wow that sub is cancer. "No ableism" in their stickied comments? Teenagers bitching about how profit is evil and nobody should make more than anyone else? Jesus. Siri, define "entitled"...
/r/MensRights25/12/16 03:32 PM
4

"I have PTSD from sexual assault" What now? Are we watering down another deadly mental illness?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 11:03 AM
2

Still valid
/r/MensRights17/11/16 01:02 PM
2

http://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1837/index.do Near the bottom :)
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:47 AM
1

Thankfully this isn't really an issue in Canada. So long as the images are shared in confidence, are consensual, and depict consensual acts, then it's perfectly legal. At least, so long as the person taking the pictures is 14 or older. Maybe it's 16, I can't remember exactly, but I'm happily surprised the Supreme Court made reservations for teenagers who want to do this stuff. Edit: 14- and 15-year-olds can send personal images to anyone less than 5 years older. 16-18 year olds can send to anyon…
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:26 AM
5

Stats for the US are acceptable, just make it clear that they are from the US. If challenged, say you couldn't find reliable sources from Canada. Stats Canada is always a good choice, though.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 05:32 AM
72

Good message, but the numbers are wrong. Get accurate statistics and it will be great.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 04:23 AM
3

That's the problem. It has to go both ways, we're just unsure of how to do it.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 02:28 PM
2

SAME. Being the only sober one at parties is both a blessing and a curse.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 03:07 AM
3

I'm not. Some guys just aren't built for this kind of stuff.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 03:35 PM
13

Did I miss the /s or are you just an idiot?
/r/MensRights18/06/16 03:35 PM
7

I agree that drunk sex is not rape, but the law needs to stay consistent. If drunk sex is rape, if must be rape ALWAYS, not only sometimes.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 11:37 AM
1

Didn't take long for the mod hate to pop up. Ridiculous. Stop whining.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 12:07 PM
0

For the record, South Africa has a rape rate of about 0.88 for every thousand people, so the statistics of 11% and 8% are more accurate than 20%, I think. Of course, 11% and 8% are still too high - they should be 1.1% and 0.8% when compared to the 0.88 figure, but they still fit the bill far better than 20% does.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 12:54 PM
16

It looked great until I got to "misogyny" and "tools of the patriarchy". I stopped reading.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:21 PM
3

I'd assume so.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 08:33 PM
1

Heh, I might just do that actually. Might pick me up a Qur'an too.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 10:17 AM
2

Ohhhh yeah. It's a little scary, actually. Some 1984-level shit. People just eat up whatever gets thrown at them, then they start protesting about how unjust it is. Nobody checks facts, nobody second-guesses.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 10:14 AM
0

Meh, your fault for skipping the /s
/r/MensRights10/04/16 10:12 AM
3

She's my hero. I'd have her third-wave-hating babies if I wasn't a jobless 17-year-old male and she wasn't a 65-year-old female. Well. You get the idea.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 04:35 AM
2

Have an upvote. Will check those names tomorrow.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 04:32 AM
2

If it hurts feminists, I want it. Rebukes, debunks, prominent feminists who have even considered tweeting #killallmen. This is like a smear campaign only we require much less in-depth digging.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 04:20 AM
1

I have an hour fifteen, so I'm just doing a broad sweep.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 04:19 AM
1

I googled the definition of "mainstream" for you... the ideas, attitudes, or activities that are regarded as normal or conventional; the dominant trend in opinion, fashion, or the arts. So no. Not dissident feminists, because their ideology is not the dominant trend.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 04:18 AM
0

Physical and mental maturity are not the same. I am sexually mature, but still developing. Mentally I am very mature.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 01:37 AM
1

Or to have your eyes opened are you maybe slightly more mature I'm 17 and very mature. I think that can be said about most MRMs, too. It's how we win.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 10:49 PM
1

Raising your child is not the same as refusing to get a vaccine that could save their life. I think you need to go to r/languages and ask them to explain the difference between "raising" and "responsible for".
/r/MensRights08/04/16 03:54 AM
1

Except by not vaccinating their children, they endanger other children who can't be vaccinated due to allergies. Also, vaccines are not 100% safe. There are side effects, sometimes fatal. The chances are incredibly slim, though. Believe whatever you want, but don't risk your kid's life over a totally unfounded claim that vaccines are more likely to harm them.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 03:20 AM
1

Uh. No? There is no credible research to suggest that vaccines are inherently dangerous. I invite you to produce evidence that suggests the opposite but you won't find any.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 09:14 PM
1

Considering that scientists are divided on it Except they're not.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 03:11 AM
1

It's not reasonably contestable at all, though. Ignorance isn't a way to win debates.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 11:14 AM
3

But she's wrong.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 05:51 AM
12

It scares me that people like her will teach my children.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 05:41 AM
1

I see. Was it deleted?
/r/MensRights31/03/16 12:41 AM
1

?
/r/MensRights31/03/16 12:06 AM
4

Where I stopped reading.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:23 PM
1

Evidently, not everyone picked that up.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 05:01 AM
1

I think you missed a /s
/r/MensRights19/03/16 11:11 PM
2

Why do we have plus-sized models at all? We shouldn't be promoting poor health. Underweight or overweight - you shouldn't be a model.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 10:34 PM
3

Is this a fucking joke
/r/MensRights18/03/16 07:58 PM
3

According to Stats Canada, about 1 out of every 100 men and women will be the victim of violent crime based on 2008 stats. The study also states that victims of sexual assault are "overwhelmingly female" but that was disproven by a recent StatCan publication. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85f0033m/2010024/part-partie1-eng.htm#h2_2
/r/MensRights07/03/16 04:33 AM
16

We're not TRP...
/r/MensRights06/03/16 04:51 PM
1

Just to be clear, you are 100% correct that going from 10% to 20% implies that a given outcome is twice as likely. I was just referring to it in the context of the problem, which is people going to prison :)
/r/MensRights03/03/16 04:36 AM
1

Nono. 5 in 3, or about 600% of women will be raped by a man in their lifetime.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 04:34 AM
1

As going from 10% to 20% is a "10% increase" I see why you'd say that. It's actually a 100% increase. 200% of 10% is 20%. Here's the kicker... or you could say "twice as likely as last year" Depends entirely on the context. If a man has a 50% chance of going to prison, then a 10% increase would mean he has a 55% chance, which means he's 1/20 more likely to go to prison. A further increase of 20% as you said would make a man's chance of going to prison 64%, for an overall increase of 7/50 and a y…
/r/MensRights03/03/16 04:29 AM
1

Try taking every one of the statistics in that study and prove that they happened because the woman was targeted due to her gender. I'm also not using the youtube video to interpret anything, I'm pointing out the plethora of vague definitions for "violence against women" used to promote statistics that make issues look gendered and far more widespread than they actually are.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 09:17 PM
2

This is unacceptable. Unfortunately, I don't know how to stop it.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 03:49 PM
8

Taken from the Secretary-General's In-Depth Study on All Forms of Violence Against Women (https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N06/419/74/PDF/N0641974.pdf?OpenElement ): "Violence against women 'means any act of gender-based violence that results in, or is likely to result in, physical, sexual or psychological harm or suffering to women, including threats of such acts, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or in private life.'" That is ENTIRELY subjec…
/r/MensRights02/03/16 03:34 PM
2

Exactly. But hey, maybe every first-world justice system is just doing it wrong! There is so much evidence showing that "guilty until proven innocent" is the best way to go. How silly of us! I guess I'm going to prison for hating women and being a cisgendered, able-bodied white male!
/r/MensRights21/02/16 09:17 PM
1

Okay :)
/r/MensRights21/02/16 07:13 PM
2

Maybe I was a bit harsh, but I never got personal. You can't just retract what you say in a debate. Plus, by deleting her comment, my reply was just floating around.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 11:58 PM
2

One of the girls in the group chat.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 11:16 PM
18

Exactly. It's ridiculous how people are so quick to brush off the severity of being branded a "rapist" when they don't understand how real that risk is.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 07:36 PM
15

I've been browsing r/mensrights for a while now, but only today did I decide to post something. Had this debate on facebook today... The person in red has since blocked me because my opinion is different. As for the "public shaming" thing, I discovered about half an hour after the debate began that "red" had taken screenshots and sent them to a group chat with myself and about 30 others with the comment "this shouldn't happen", calling me "a truly horrible person". I guess I hate women, then! ¯\…
/r/MensRights20/02/16 07:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter