TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NRG1975 Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by NRG1975 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Why not a bed?
/r/seduction10/12/25 02:04 PM
8

Young Whippersnapper, lol. If you are upfront, you can not be faulted. Dating is EXACTLY that, dating around. I am married now, but literally if you are honest on what you want, you will find what you want.
/r/seduction18/11/25 07:32 AM
11

I'm 50, met hundreds, maybe 3. Otherwise it is just infatuation.
/r/seduction13/06/25 05:36 PM
1

In my younger days, I was pretty good at it. Been settled for 10 years now though.
/r/seduction21/02/25 11:19 AM
3

I have had more luck telling them the truth, that they are one of many plates. In the end, if they don't like it, they can get off the ride, and I come off as the honest one, instead of her finding out, and bad word being spread, I was honest. In the end, it odes make them try harder.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/18 05:26 AM
1

How Trump is actually behaving, via PhD http://www.skepticink.com/gps/2016/03/04/1553/
/r/TheRedPill05/03/16 05:28 PM
1

"Head-to-head polls of hypothetical general election matchups have almost no predictive power at this stage" Click my 538 link
/r/TheRedPill02/03/16 04:49 AM
0

You realize how the question is phrased. 'If Trump is the Republican nominee, would you vote for him over anyone the Democrats offered' That is called Trump vs. Generic Democrat. So, yes, I realize it is actual poll.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 09:26 PM
-1

Lol, man you just don't understand life, being trustworthy, or points that are made. That's fine man. You do you. Trump didn't have people that like him because they like him, they like him because they can get something from him, or so they perceive. He has sycophants and brown nosers. All good. Trump is appealing to low information voters, if you want to use them as followers go right ahead. However, save this post. Then let me know how well Trump's bravado translates into a election loss.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 08:10 PM
1

You are obviously missing my point
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 07:51 PM
1

Gifted, he was gifted 40 million, if you prefer that term
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 07:33 PM
-5

Because they expect the Republicans to fall in line. Part of Party Politics. 40 percent is terrible
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 07:29 PM
1

It was actually 40 million in 1974. ;) Fucking Simpleton ;) He did keep the value with the stock market, though. So, something to be said abut that.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 07:09 PM
0

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/donald-trump-is-really-unpopular-with-general-election-voters/ So, with that out there. The point remains, it is a small contingent of Republican voters, because it is a Republican primaries, and the LIVs, which I acknowledged in my post and you cut out. No wonder why you did that.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 07:01 PM
0

If you would like to read my whole post, then maybe you could discuss it on a level that I could understand ... then again, maybe not. This was not directing to a solely political point, but how to defend yourself in life, which is what I thought Red Pill was all about? No? So, my point was not about politicians in some TV debate, but about getting what you want from life, which I thought I made clear further down in my post. Trump's strategy is a long term loser, in life, and in politics. Which…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 06:53 PM
0

He started of with 40 million dollars in value from inheritance. That does not change what I said. The point remains, he is not a "self made man". He accrued his wealth through inheritance. I never stated he was a terrible businessman. Maybe if your reading comprehension was stronger, my words would not be so silly to you. It appears as if you are active in rebutting me, so at least you are going to learn something.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 06:42 PM
-1

Why did you truncate my whole sentence? Also, the only support that is being talked about is "Republican Voters" because it is in a "Republican Primary". Add to it, Primary voters, by and large to themselves are a small contingent. Then realize that he is only getting a third of the support roughly in this small contingent, and it is easy to see where my statement was highlighting. In the future, please include the whole quote, thanks.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 06:32 PM
-2

Dude, he inherited 40 million in 1974, which had he invested at that time, normal compounding of the market would put him at 3-4 billion worth today. You are the one that looks uninformed, brash, and just being a douche. Sit down, shut up, and go learn something.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 06:22 PM
7

It isn't a narrative, it is real life. He is soft. Brash, but so is a barking Yorkshire Terrier. Trump is the one selling a narrative, which you seem to have bought.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 06:12 PM
3

He's a conspiracy theorist, Alex Jones. He is nothing more than more of Trump. Say shit for short term gain whether it is true or not. The sad part is AJ makes predictions that will be provable in the near future, and his predictions almost never match with history. Whoever links AJ should seriously not be taken seriously. Add a hefty helping of granular salt with anything they say.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 06:01 PM
-4

1) Trump is not the only one who has hired people. That is patently false, as all these people have people that work for them, they do indeed have jobs. Rubio was correct in stating that Trump was the only one fined for hiring illegals. Trump all he did was make a patently false statement. So with that said, number 1 should not be re-framing, but LIE and DERIDE. 2) I will agree that he has effective branding, but that is really about all he has got. 3) Agreed, but helps if they are truthful, whi…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 05:42 PM
-1

No, you can't simply discount by saying what I quoted from you. You will lose 100% of the time, you are not arguing from a strong position. To think otherwise, is foolish. You can be obtuse to this fact all day long if you want, it won't work on someone like myself, a male, or someone educated in a subject, that you are not. If you have sound reasoning, which you don't with an argument like you are presenting, then sure you might have an argument with merit. Otherwise, you are practicing project…
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 04:31 AM
-1

does that person have a Ph.D? What are their credentials? It was this I was responding to. It would not work on a Psy.D Psychologist, that specializes in marriage, and family therapy. While I agree on the sentiment, that retort in a verbatim form, will fail, and fail %100 of the time..
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 08:16 PM
-5

Doesn't work when your wife is a Ph.D, lol. ;)
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 05:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter