TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NWVoS Archive

View 0 posts and 56 comments by NWVoS on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

False accusations are less with rape than robbery. The source I read yesterday listed 5% roughly for both. So I'm not really inclined to belive most are lying about either situation.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 06:38 PM
-6

no college kangaroo courts A school has every right to kick someone out. I'm not saying schools act without fault, just that, sometimes the situation calls for action to be taken even if legal recourse is unavailable. There are both civil and criminal courts and you can be found not-guilty in criminal court, OJ comes to mind, and be found liable in civil court. All situations are unique.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 12:13 AM
1

edit: here's an example of 5 kids getting "beat the fuck out of" and each of them rightfully deserve it They are all the same age. We're talking a senior in high school vs preteen kids.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/18 10:01 PM
1

You can buy a gun a lot easier than you can buy or build a bomb.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/18 08:47 PM
1

What if a considerable percentage of the population opposes a tyrannical government? And that is what you need. A government is only as strong as the support it has. If the government has lost the support of its population, it will fall. You don't even need a majority. It would be more shades of grey than black or white. So while, only 10% might actively oppose the government another 30% kind of agree with them. And that might not be a lot, but everything starts to fall apart without support.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/18 08:40 PM
3

Yep. An anonymous chat app that asked it users across many companies what they thought about the memo. It's crazy to suggest it has any kind of legitimacy.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 04:35 PM
1

The decision to abortion or not is entirely separate from a couple making the choice to have kids and to raise them. To suggest otherwise is completely absurd.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 04:12 PM
1

Obviously. The problem is that child care needs fall on women disporationaly.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 02:35 AM
1

"You cannot reason people out of a position that they did not reason themselves into." The above is just a bullshit talking point. You cannot reason someone out of a position if they reasoned themselves into it. I don't care who you are, if you logical reasons for a position, you are going to hold onto that position. You can be perfectly logical and reasoned and still wrong.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 05:35 PM
2

That's my biggest complaint about this whole thing. People are seeing sources and claiming the opinions of the memo are backed by them. The fact he used old sources drew such large conclusions from them suggest to me he was looking for conformation and is too bias to evaluate any sources.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 04:45 PM
2

And your comment hits on the nose for a lot of other issues brought about workplace problems relating to women. There are not many men who take up the role of getting kids ready for the school year.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 04:22 PM
1

And Chelsea Clinton was mocked for her appearance. And the Bush Twins were targeted for their typical college behavior; like underage drinking. The fact is people are just shitty to each other at times.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 12:50 AM
1

You are given a source, and then call bullshit when it doesn't line up with your anecdotal evidence? You could at least provide a source that supports your argument instead of just saying, this isn't right.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 07:14 AM
-1

The Muslim Brotherhood is arguably not a terrorist organization.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 06:34 AM
-6

Similarly, if you and your ilk care so much about the kiddies' welfare, stay married and stop with the capricious divorces every time things don't swing your way. Learn to bear the responsibility for the choices you make. Yes, stay married in broken marriages and bad relationships. That is the wise thing to do. Jesus. You have a lot of anger.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 07:29 AM
-15

but no fault? So just because the marriage falls apart through no fault of either person, women who sacrifice their career for children should be thrown out on the street? part of her committing is that she's sharing in benefits from his income. And part of his committing is getting to have a family and home taken care of. What do you not understand about that? It takes two people to make a career, kids, and a life. Seriously, if you people care about your money so much, stay single and never ha…
/r/MensRights08/02/17 02:12 AM
1

Read the two comments above mine for context. Also, it's a general example of letting somethings slide and others not.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 11:14 PM
1

In reality I would be surprised if leg spreading was anymore or less common in men or women, it's just a naturally comfortable way to sit. It's less common in women. Here I'll give you a hint why. Skirts and dresses. I think you can figure out why they don't spread their legs when sitting in a skirt or dress. Now, if you have to sit with your legs right next to each other a lot and not doing so creates a very uncomfortable situation, it creates a habit of keeping your legs together when sitting.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 03:40 AM
3

What was the joke? Was the joke at the expense of the "sub 30's woman in a hijab?" Was it about Muslims? Did you say a muslim joke in front of a muslim? Or was it a joke about women?
/r/MensRights16/01/17 03:27 AM
-3

They will add nothing for fear of lawsuits. That is if they speak in the negative. They face no repercussions for speaking in the positive about you. Answering only in yes or no to questions speaks volumes about your work performance.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 03:17 AM
-2

Most people let little things slide. One inappropriate remark from an otherwise good boss is overlooked. Inappropriate remarks everyday would be a bit different. Same thing applies to coworkers. Also, if the inappropriate remarks are coming from a boss, that can have a negative effect on a person's career. Those sexual comments from a boss can indicate a devaluing of women overall independent of work performance. Sexual comments can also indicate a requirement of sexual favors for promotions tha…
/r/MensRights16/01/17 03:07 AM
1

"it's wrong" for women to be making more than men, and how they wouldn't stay in a relationship where that was happening. I know a married couple that got a divorce and this was one of the contributing factors.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 01:41 AM
1

People being crushed by stampedes of people or riots don't happen if people feel secure in their persons while in public. What? Source? Ok, let me put you lying down on the floor between the door and 30 people. Now I'm going to set the fucking place on fire. Let's see how long that feeling of safety last for those 30 people and your safety on the floor last.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 01:24 AM
5

but you don't have a right to feeling safe(eg. walking through the city at night, You might not have the right, and yet life would suck if you are constantly on guard and feeling unsafe. What type of society would that be? I know I would be looking to escape it. And here's the thing, it's easy to see how women feel unsafe walking through the city at night. Let's take a girl walking from work to a bar to meet friends. If a drunk guy suddenly came up to her and started to flirt with her, and refus…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 01:04 AM
9

People ignore red flags all the time on many issues. And in the case of domestic abuse, well, there are many reasons a victim will stay. Compelling Reasons Women Stay
/r/MensRights19/12/16 12:48 AM
12

He does. One example is of a kid with a b/a in a class and like a c/d in another. Instead of focusing on the bad grade you focus on the good grade and incorporate it into motivation for the bad grade. Basically, "You did very well to get an A, and with the same diligence you put into that class I know you can get that C to a B."
/r/seduction16/02/16 06:24 PM
1

The logic is that some people growing up with bad parents don't learn certain things. Like a kid who grows up in an abusive house might think it is a normal thing. The poster is to educates people not stop people who already rape.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 11:30 PM
3

That's the point he is making. Only asking girls willing to give out their number how they feel about being approached creates a bias. That biases will show girls as more willing to be approached because the answers are from girls wanting to be approached. Now, the truth of the matter is if you don't ask you wouldn't know if they want approached or not. You have to ballance separating the two groups. somehow or just not give a fuck and go with a shotgun method.
/r/seduction19/10/15 08:02 PM
2

(have your husband take a sabbatical to watch the kids!) You would think this would be a men's right issues, but it's not. Paternity leave in the US should be a thing. Anyway, Lean In became a term for women actively seeking leadership roles and workplace concessions to accommodate their home lives. Again, men would benefit from flex-shifts, working-from-home arrangements, among the other options. While it would disportionately benefit women more it would help every parent in reality. Even in a …
/r/TheRedPill03/09/15 04:10 AM
1

Would have been difficult doesn't mean would not have. It means the prosecutor didn't know if we would get a conviction or another mistrial again with a second trial. The plea deal is the consolation prize; he doesn't want it but he will take it. If she pleads guilty to a felony. The courts have to legally assume she committed the felony. That is true. You assume that because they're two different courts the family court didn't know about the conviction. Do you really think he didn't bring it up…
/r/MensRights05/08/15 04:55 AM
2

There are two court systems at work in this instances. Criminal court and family/civil court. Here is a quick rundown of the differnce if you are the victim of abuse. Here is one that shows the impact on family court of criminal court. Also interesting is the following quote from the news article. Bochicchio said in court that winning a conviction at a second trial would have been difficult because witnesses gave inconsistent statements and this Police said Eric Stevens had told them that whoeve…
/r/MensRights05/08/15 04:03 AM
-11

What exactly did I debate? I simply explained why I posted my comment. I explicitly said I wasn't going to debate the problems with /u/zer0t3ch argument. I'm still not going to debate his argument.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 03:49 AM
-13

I posted it because /u/member12 is rather sanctimonious in his post. I also don't care enough to debate the problems with your argument of evolution programed men and it's just the social barrier that makes it wrong.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 03:27 AM
-5

Strict liability works to give appropriate punishment with most cases, did it work here? Nope, obviously not you inept fuck. Yes it did work here, because this dumb kid realized she lied, but said fuck it and fucked her. She's 14 they are obvious as day. You and your 'strict liability' defense, can legitimately fuck off. The law is the reason he's in this garbage predicament, you don't need to go on with your continued redundancy trying to make your defense stand. It has no merit. Strict liabili…
/r/MensRights05/08/15 03:08 AM
-12

You posted this talking about feeling great for following girls under 18 on instagram. I don't think you fall into the grey area. I screenshotted it, so no taking it back for you.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 02:55 AM
-4

This is what happens when you have people who look at the law in a literal manner That is exactly what judges and lawyers are suppose to do. It is also how jurors should convict. This case is a prime example of that application. The law says don't have sex with 14yo and nothing else matters. It doesn't matter to the law if she lied. Only the written letter matter to the law. What matters is he had sex with her. Hell, he could be in jail for 1-6 years since it is a level 5 felony. He was in for 9…
/r/MensRights05/08/15 02:31 AM
1

Such a tiny percentage that is blown way out of proportion here. Also, this is about a school's judicial board not a court of law. Every system has it's flaws where the innocent are punished and the guilty are free.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 07:18 AM
1

Yep it also fucks women. Over the last say 10 years or so many states have changed the law to include non penetrative acts. Many have even removed the word rape and replaced it with sexual assault. Does anyone else remember that case of the dude jacking off onto a girl and getting no charge because the law was behind the times?
/r/MensRights24/07/15 02:32 AM
1

Let the people who sexualy assault others go uneducated. Education doesn't fix what causes a person to violate another sexualy.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 02:28 AM
1

That's cool, thanks for explaining.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:45 AM
1

look i am just going to put it out here straight. child support is illegal and having a child does not entitle a women to earnings under the constitution. and so in short for half of your DNA you are in debt to a contract that you never signed. and i need to know the crime any male committed by having a child. if children are a burden on women then women need not have the right to care for children it is that simple. Wow! The gulf between us is huge! But I'll bite. The male did sign a contract, …
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:53 PM
1

Not really, contempt of court means that you do not follow the courts orders. If the court orders you to pay $X a month and you don't pay it, it is well within the rights of the court to jail you. It's not a men's issue it is a what is in the best interest of the child/children. More women becoming breadwinner and more men becoming stay at home dads would even the trend of men traditionally being the payers of child support. So support initiatives that allow women to return to work after childbi…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 09:23 PM
1

What is a Ttl statute? Also how could she be given a juvenile sentence if she is filed as an adult?
/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:50 PM
1

It is also possible she freaked the fuck out. I know I will and try to get away with it if it ever happens, which it wouldn't, but still. I would still freak the fuck out and be like jesus fuck, and when the cops knock on my door, which they will, I would break down in like 2 seconds. I doubt the girl kept her suicide story longer than that. Like do we really think this girl is a master liar and manipulator that withstood days and days of interrogation and shit.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:35 AM
1

You cannot be jailed for private debt, eg money owed to a bank, owing money as a result of criminal court or divorce is different. Being jailed for private debt use to a be a thing.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:24 AM
1

At 17 she will likely be filled as an adult. In fact, many states only apply juvenile laws to those 15 and younger. In fact criminally you maybe held as an adult even at the age of 17 automatically depending on how the law is written. While 18 is traditionally thought of as an adult age it varies, and in criminal law an adult age tends to be less than 18.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:16 AM
1

Do you not know what mandatory means?
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:13 AM
1

I didn't say that. Just that she has a possible claim if he worked on making his business a reality during the marriage instead of getting a job. He didn't start his business in a vacuum. If she was raising the children, yes both the step-daughter and son, while he worked on his business it makes sense that she sees some of the delayed benefits of that work. Instead of the immediate benefits of a job a la income which she would be entitled to his benefits were delayed due to the given nature of …
/r/MensRights09/12/14 05:41 PM
1

There is nothing in the article to suggest what type of relationship they had with each other during their 11 years together. I find it odd that you think that his business went from idea to reality in 3 years thanks to him divorcing. Also, he was arguably at rock bottom the entire time from 81 til 95 since they met when both of them were homeless and living off of benefits. Your assertion that I have none or little empathy for men is interesting. Also, I'm not sure where you are getting indentu…
/r/MensRights09/12/14 03:44 PM
3

The daughter was not his kid; the son is biologically his. The women then had two more children with another man.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 06:42 AM
-1

I really don't see why so many people are complaining about 2 million. He founded his company only 3 years after the divorce. If he was putting all of his money into his business and none into his son, then he clearly should owe back child support. Another issue, if he was working on the business while she took care of the children(his son and step-daughter) they were raising, she could be entitled to a portion of his increased wealth. I seriously doubt his business sprung up in 6 months. Hell, …
/r/MensRights09/12/14 06:39 AM
1

That isn't no reason though, so the point still stands. The floor guy may not like op if that is the case, op should just move on and avoid the trouble. Like someone said earlier, the manger hired the floor guy and simply providing good customer service to op by being friendly. The manger knows the floor guy a hell of lot more.
/r/seduction20/01/13 03:04 AM
1

Ha! No competent lawyer will take that case, and your suit will be thrown out of court by almost all judges. Private bushiness have a lot of leeway with deciding whom and whom cannot be on their premises.
/r/seduction20/01/13 03:00 AM
2

Absolutely this. Many girls will flirt back because they know walking away or saying no doesn't work with some guys. And, the creepier the guy the more nervous it will make the girl.
/r/seduction20/01/13 02:55 AM
1

Thank you! I have been saying that forever.
/r/seduction20/09/12 03:32 PM
3

You are a complete douchbag. You force a girl to chose between you or her brother? WTF?! It is a first date! Common sense dude tells you what to do. If it is like say a 2 year anniversary yeah you have a point, but a first date no. Just because you committed your Sunday night; grow up. This isn't a victory for anyone. You proved what everyone suspects about seduction; that everyone who follows any of the advice just becomes an asshole. Why the fuck couldn't her brother come? Why can't you go out…
/r/seduction10/09/12 11:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter