NadaBeautiful12 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Had a glow up and the result is shocking You believe in "internal attraction" when the fact presented says otherwise. I would say you're the one going "lalalala"	/r/AllPillDebate	08/03/23 01:14 AM
1	muh looks Because everyone can be a millionaire, right...? There are NO outside factors that can stop someone from earning money, right...?	/r/AllPillDebate	08/03/23 01:14 AM
1	Had a glow up and the result is shocking Mans literally sat down and had people approach him, fuck outta here with "internal attraction" bs	/r/AllPillDebate	07/03/23 06:31 PM
2	muh looks Yeah, you should start using the lottery today! Become the exception!	/r/AllPillDebate	07/03/23 06:28 PM
14	The Black Pill: New Technology and the Male Supremacy of Involuntarily Celibate Men I don't get the obsession with biological essentialism Because you're not affected by its downsides. Classical normie behaviour. Caring only when it affects you. "under what circumstances could you be persuaded of the validity of black pill? The day: - Height stops mattering, both for dating and social situations - Halo effect stops being a thing - Ugly men get their problems treated with actual care, and not dismissed and downplayed. And spoiler alert: That's never happening.	/r/BlackPillScience	15/01/23 12:15 AM
12	The Black Pill: New Technology and the Male Supremacy of Involuntarily Celibate Men So not only you can't, you also think most of the studies (which are mostly peer reviewed and replicated) don't matter. Got it, too bad you're wrong. I would love to live in this crazo reality where looks don't matter and both studies and data from online dating don't translate into IRL behaviour. Again, too bad life does not work that way.	/r/BlackPillScience	14/01/23 09:10 PM
14	The Black Pill: New Technology and the Male Supremacy of Involuntarily Celibate Men Blackpill beliefs are distortions. Sorry. Like, looks do matter, and height is helpful but they aren't deterministic. And they don't take precedence over other factors, not even online. You can try and debunk the entirety of this subreddit postings. I would love to see you try :)	/r/BlackPillScience	14/01/23 01:29 PM
3	The common mistake people make here is generalizing too much about the other gender and ignoring specific information about a person it isn't, but let's grant that Do you have any proof for that? Or you're just saying this based on how you "think" things work? If it was, we could simply know with certainty whether a person will like someone else based on how facially attractive they are, and we'd call it a day. But this is not the case. Only it is? If that was not the case, people with those traits would not have a easier time dating then those who don't have them.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/12/22 01:34 PM
4	The common mistake people make here is generalizing too much about the other gender and ignoring specific information about a person Ill give you one example: https://academic.oup.com/scan/article/14/7/737/5520404?login=false This study shows that people judge facial attributes/attractiviness in .1 seconds. Not only that, theres evidence for the IMPLICIT recognition of attractive faces. Altought i will agree there are SOME traits that are subjective (IE: Style, haircut, lifestyle), theres alot of them that are not. Face and height are really objective.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/12/22 01:29 PM
5	The common mistake people make here is generalizing too much about the other gender and ignoring specific information about a person This argument is does not make sense. Alot of functions of our body, particularly when it comes to dating, are but responses to stimuli. Its not random. We could make a argument for both outliers and people who don't fit in, but "we don't know the studied person fully" is not argument for dismissing the fact she acts like the rest of people.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/12/22 01:21 PM