TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NameIs-Already-Taken Archive

View 5 posts and 881 comments by NameIs-Already-Taken on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

The media loves to put men down. It's been doing so for decades and it's deeply destructive.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 11:56 AM
8

Food, sex, respect and peace: The simple way to make men happy.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:53 AM
1

And if you point it out, they go straight to shaming you.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 07:57 AM
7

They hate men having a space they can't get in to.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 07:03 PM
22

We can work with either. We hate the hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 04:54 PM
194

I don't mind mixed gyms. I don't mind single-sex gyms. I object to women having women-only gyms and demanding entry to men's gyms, especially if they then claim they don't feel safe.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 04:18 PM
10

I wish you every success. Personally, I've found it fruitless. The women don't want to hear any view but their own.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 10:16 AM
36

I'd suggest countering their claims with facts like from https://boysvswomen.com/ but my experience of debating feminists is that they don't deal with facts, they migrate straight to shaming men who disagree with them. So, don't bother. In time reality will catch up with them. They will be publishing "Where are the good men" videos when they hit their 30s, are childless and single. It's very sad but I just don't know how to reach them.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 10:09 AM
0

I suspect she has trauma, and most potential dates are not equipped to deal with that.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 11:00 AM
-8

Why do you think I hate America? Trump is pretty abominable, along with the MAGA folk like Mike Johnson and MTG, but most people already know that.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 06:14 PM
-5

Ukraine needs to locate and prioritise hitting this unit.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 03:08 PM
10

The root is a sense that men have it better. The consequence is the feeling that any advantage women can get is fair. The result is women who are still unhappy and men who either go their own way or kill themselves.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 06:41 PM
1

Takes care of _her_ kids, regardless of who the Father is...
/r/MensRights17/04/24 08:41 AM
4

YES. Removing women from a situation makes it much simpler. We can speak from a male perspective without worrying that we'll upset the women, and it's easier to be authentic. It is almost impossible to find such spaces now because women insist on breaking the doors down to get in, but equally, they get pissy when men try to join women-only spaces.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 07:55 AM
11

"Where have all the good men gone?". We assessed you weren't worth the risk.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 11:25 PM
13

As a guy, I want to be able to go to guy-only places and to do guy-only stuff. Why do women insist on gate crashing every such space? To be honest, I'd love to start an organisation just for men, and limit the number of members to just below the point at which women are allowed to burst in.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 11:24 PM
6

Women feminists go to shaming as soon as you start to disagree with them, rather than debating the facts.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 08:56 PM
9

What qualifies something as "deepfake"? Supposing it's a very sexual, very intimate picture of a celebrity, but without their head being visible. Is that a problem? What if the celebrity could be identified if you happened to know they had a particular tattoos or other mark, meaning most people would not know who it was supposed to be? I suspect it will be hard to legislate well for this.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 06:28 PM
21

Yeah, just focus on getting their money. Once you have that, the man is disposable. :-(
/r/MensRights16/04/24 12:01 PM
1

"A matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses." 2 Corinthians 13:1 I don't think US courts follow ecclesiastical rules, besides which, they don't have space for forensic evidence. But I am in favour of false accusers getting the punishment they tried to inflict on their victim.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 09:59 PM
55

"slightly larger"- when women often drive smaller cars, that really implies they can't park properly. "closer to the establishment"- I thought women were equal to men in every way? There might be an argument for this on safety grounds, but equally, if someone wanted to know which were the women's cars, they'd know which ones.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 12:38 PM
2

I am saddened that women are doing this.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 09:25 PM
25

Feminism is very easy to understand. They consider the differences between men and women to be a buffet from which they can choose the items they like. Standing when others are sitting is not one they want, so then they complain about men not being chivalrous.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/24 07:52 PM
7

Don't have sex with them and it's harder for them to claim rape. Even "buyers remorse" isn't a factor if you never actually did the deed.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 06:32 PM
2

Do you have a source for your numbers please? This is an interesting source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616076/ It's not quite the same but "Roughly 49% of men and 40% of women are over age 30 at first marriage entry nowadays", from the same source. I think women mostly can't marry the very top guys because these guys have choices, but they marry the best guys under that.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 01:18 PM
3

Education _may_ help your salary but _will_ cost a lot. I think the core problem is that many women's expectations have become unreasonable, with 5's wanting 9's or 10's, and not understanding that a guy sleeping with her is absolutely not the same as him having any interest in committing to her. This seems fairly consistent in a lot of reporting on the world of dating.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 01:06 PM
2

That's true, but as soon as most guys work out, the average will move, so women will get pickier. Do you have any advice on how most guys can get an above average salary and also grow a few inches taller?
/r/MensRights14/04/24 12:54 PM
3

Yes... but "work on" is not the same as achieve. So everyone can work on their education and earnings, but, by definition, it's hard for everyone to make more than the average wage or to have a better than average physique.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 11:21 AM
19

Rape is almost always very hard to prove due to a lack of evidence.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 11:19 AM
14

And if we swap the genders in this article? All the feminists would be screaming about abuse.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 09:12 AM
2

One of the powerful drivers in a man's life is his desire for sex. That's what motivates us to leave our consoles and basements, to get an education and work on achieving a career. When women exclude most men as unsuitable, not only do they condemn themselves to the single life, they remove the motivation that men need to achieve. Why work hard when no-one will sleep with you because you "only" make $50,000, are "only" 5'8" tall, or don't have a gym body? So men plunge into despair, and climbing…
/r/MensRights14/04/24 09:01 AM
1

Where's the "resentment and anger toward women" you are referring to please? Men mostly turn their focus elsewhere, such as on bettering themselves, or they get angry with themselves and either abuse drink or drugs, or they commit suicide. I rarely see this " resentment and anger toward women" you mention.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 11:28 PM
16

Because most of them have real trouble getting a man, so any woman who is attractive is their enemy. Imagine that, all men _and_ attractive women are your enemy. Not many friends left for you then!
/r/MensRights13/04/24 10:33 PM
1

Sure, it's a matter of free will, driven by intense hormonal pressure... so not quite as free will as might be good for them!
/r/MensRights13/04/24 08:38 PM
1

Someone said of prostitutes that the fee you pay is actually to get them to leave afterwards. That makes a lot of sense to me. Someone also said "If it flies, floats or fucks, it's cheaper to rent than to buy.", which also makes a lot of sense.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 03:18 PM
2

And some of the $10 she spent that day is "transferable", in that some of it was probably used in the morning when she had other reasons for wearing it, and the $100 he spent is also transferable, in that it will keep her fed for some hours after the date. Both transfers favour her outside the time of the date, whereas his credit card bill is his to pay, whatever the result of the date.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 10:49 AM
9

The average American woman spends $1754 on makeup. That's $5/day. (lendingtree.com/credit-cards/study/beauty-spending/). She goes on a date. Supposing she uses twice as much makeup for the date, so that's $10, the price of a burger meal at McDonalds. The guy didn't ask her to spend that, but she will expect him to pay $100 for dinner. Do you think $10 is equivalent to $100?
/r/MensRights12/04/24 09:25 PM
10

Guys will pay a high price to get sex... but you know that already.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 09:22 PM
80

And guys buy girls food and drinks.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 11:19 AM
3

Don't go if they charge men more. Some places make this illegal, some don't. And tell your local "equality seeking feminist" about it so you can see that her version of equality goes no further than getting advantages for women.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 08:53 AM
1

We need to deal with issues individually. One of the problems with feminists is they take individual issues where particular guys have done wrong and they generalise that into "kill all men". Yes, we could have a gender war. If men so chose, 99% of women would be dead within a day... and we would be even worse than the worst feminists. So, we have to deal with individual acts on their own merits. I am sorry that woman took offence at you. That does seem much more of a woman thing... but generali…
/r/MensRights12/04/24 08:42 AM
6

I think you'll find women prefer to leave when he is making more money than her, rather than risk paying him alimony.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 11:41 PM
7

"Not able to use contraception, despite the many choices available."
/r/MensRights10/04/24 08:58 PM
8

There are two issues here. One is supporting feminism, and one is supporting battered women. You can support one without supporting the other.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 10:23 AM
1

I can sue you for wearing a jumper I don't like... I won't win, but I can definitely take you to court. So women can be sued for speaking the truth, but, if they can back up their assertions, they will win. if women make stuff up, they will probably lose... but bringing defamation suits in the UK is usually not worth it unless the defamer has lots of money and you have lots of money you are willing to risk.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 07:50 PM
1

And I am sure she is passionate when he's sober... /s He might even post in /r/DeadBedrooms at some point. He should either get used to a sexless marriage or move on.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 02:18 PM
6

Speaking only for myself, I object to the stupidities in feminism. I don't have a problem with women or the sane bits of feminism. For example, women (and men) should be able to work without fear of sexual harassment and should be paid the same for equal work. I seriously object to the "buffet" approach feminists have to the existing difference between the sexes, so they want equal pay (no problem) but expect men to pay for everything (like how is that fair?).
/r/MensRights07/04/24 10:45 PM
0

I don't think the Ukrainians are fascists. Dissent is still possible, so I refute your premise. However, I'd rather support a democracy against their evil neighbour. Have you not seen what Russian soldiers did in Bucha?
/r/MensRights07/04/24 04:42 PM
5

They're the same? Really? When did Ukraine launch a full scale invasion of Russia and flatten their cities? Perhaps you need to open your eyes?
/r/MensRights07/04/24 03:17 PM
-1

The tests done by various armies show that women simply don't have the strength for many tasks. They fail at the per-bodyweight tests like pullups, and fail even worse at things like carrying weights over distances and up hills. They are physically less robust to physical damage than men because their skeletons are not as heavy. They don't cope with combat stress as well as men, again, there have been studies on this. Put simply, a nation that sends its men to fight will do better than one that …
/r/MensRights07/04/24 02:31 PM
-10

Yes, women could serve in many of these roles too... but what difference is there if they are serving the war effort in civilian clothes or army fatigues?
/r/MensRights07/04/24 02:28 PM
-24

Women don't make good soldiers in many ways. They lack the muscle to be very effective, get injured more easily and are more traumatised by the stress of combat. No nation can send everyone to the front, people are needed for many other tasks, including making weapons and caring for children and the elderly.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 01:52 PM
23

So... she'll be sentenced to a good telling off from the judge? She should get the same punishment as if the genders were swapped.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 12:22 PM
-67

We support Ukraine because Ukraine is a far better country than Russia. It's not that bad stuff doesn't happen, but it happens a lot less than in Russia. By the way, how is the weather in Moscow?
/r/MensRights07/04/24 11:37 AM
1

She is feeding those fantasies. They are likely to hurt her husband and she is likely to end up single.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 11:30 AM
1

I'm glad you wrote such a comprehensive reply, but you are replying to a question I didn't ask. OP stated that 'Majority of "Incels" began as "Allies..."' and I was questioning that claim. I am comfortable with the points you raised.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 06:26 AM
1

Thank you. I am mixing with lots of feminists and... <sigh>
/r/MensRights05/04/24 03:18 PM
-5

Do you have a source for that assertion please?
/r/MensRights05/04/24 02:18 PM
5

I demand equality with women. We should have quotas for women that they should be at least 50% of suicides... oh no... Can't have quotas for anything where that doesn't benefit women. Forget I wrote this. /s
/r/MensRights03/04/24 07:15 PM
3

Add in the demographic issue and we are in trouble.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 05:34 PM
3

And that's assuming women were oppressed. Life was difficult for most people. Men would do things like mine coal, knowing it was sentencing them to an early death, so they could provide for their families. Weren't the men the ones who were oppressed? It's like the women complaining that they are refugees when their men are on the front lines getting bombed and shot at. I am really sorry you can't get your hair done, but your man hasn't eaten since yesterday and only got 4 hours sleep in his tren…
/r/MensRights03/04/24 09:00 AM
2

For me, the push in Christianity is that the husband is told to provide sex to his wife, and the wife is told to provide sex to her husband.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 10:13 PM
11

"Ah but that's only reasonable considering how women have been oppressed all these years"... I don't think that teaching has made the world a better place in any way.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 09:41 PM
4

Reality will hit, eventually. Usually when they reach their 30s and realise they have no man and no kids. That all-6's man they really wanted is still not theirs and they have no idea why. Must be because all men are evil I suppose.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 05:15 AM
2

Look at how this is pitched: 3 A husband should fulfil his marital responsibility to his wife, and likewise a wife to her husband. 4 A wife does not have the right over her own body, but her husband does. In the same way, a husband does not have the right over his own body, but his wife does. 5 Do not deprive one another sexually—except when you agree for a time, to devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again; (1 Cor 7) and this: “When a man calls his wife for his need, then she must g…
/r/MensRights02/04/24 05:04 AM
7

The dark triad of personality traits are attractive to women: https://www.simplypsychology.org/dark-triad-personality.html
/r/MensRights01/04/24 09:38 PM
2

Traditional _Christian_ marriage. Islam, for example, does not recognise women as having the right to refuse.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 03:40 PM
8

By that point, the marriage had already been arranged. The bride price was already paid. The groom would turn up on his chariot when he'd built a room for her. Her stepping on to the chariot was the point she was considered married.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 03:39 PM
32

Marriage was fine until the laws changed and screwed men over. Divorcing, particularly with children, means people end up poorer... and the laws cause that burden to fall very heavily on men. I don't think people should marry legally because of this.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 03:37 PM
4

Agreed.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 12:08 PM
9

With all due respect, I did not attempt to fully describe marriage or provide a "value proposition". My point was that most people who get married expect sex to be part of the deal. I've not done a survey, but I expect most people, men in particular, would not get married if they did not expect to have sex with the person they were marrying.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 11:22 AM
8

I agree, no means no, without question... but spouses also have the right to walk away from sexless marriages.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 11:18 AM
10

I am shocked. A feminist has concluded that men are bad. lol
/r/MensRights01/04/24 09:03 AM
29

And yet I'd argue that getting married includes an expectation of sex. How many guys would get married if sex were not part of the deal?
/r/MensRights01/04/24 08:59 AM
2

Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 08:54 AM
4

The idea that women could do bad things to men is uncomfortable. Feminists like to say that only men are evil, and evidence to the contrary is really difficult to hear.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 08:46 AM
3

"Are we dating the same woman"? I don't want to go there. It would be interesting if everyone came with a dating logbook, a bit like AirBnB, so you could read the comments and decide if they were crazy.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 07:57 AM
3

You were unlucky. Unfortunately the number of such women seems to be increasing and they seem oblivious to the effect they are having on guys. The number of sane women keeps reducing.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 07:55 AM
2

He should also be awarded +100% damages because she might well have gotten away with it.
/r/MensRights28/03/24 07:37 PM
1

You might benefit from seeing a therapist to talk about this.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 08:00 AM
6

I also want to add one about stealthing being wrong but self-insemination not being, and one about not paying child support being punished, and paternity fraud not being punished.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 02:25 PM
10

When the father is suspicious, the rate of paternity fraud is up to 30%. I am not sure what the general rate is across the whole population.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 01:22 PM
5

Look beyond the details. What's the underlying dynamic? The symptoms will come and go, but how she actually regards you is less volatile than that, and that is the important thing.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 01:02 PM
151

Blame men!
/r/MensRights23/03/24 07:09 AM
1

Yes, that's an abuse of that clause. It may well be problematic legally.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 09:01 PM
1

It's long been present in UK employment contracts because sometimes employers do need staff to do other things. For example, a programmer in a small company might need to go to an exhibition as a visitor or representative. What's not okay is using someone for something unrelated for significant amounts of time.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 10:13 AM
5

Membership of the top 10% is not about one thing. It does include skills like how to talk to women. And we are still left with most women only wanting a few men, that they consider 80% of men as below average.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 10:24 PM
3

One was quite lazy and not very bright, but the manager was not very effective so he didn't really engage with the issue. One I know as a student, so have no contact with her manager(s), but really her interest doesn't go very deep. She can quote the manual, but that's not the same as really understanding stuff. Her competence seems brittle, that any encounter with a difficulty exposes a lack of understanding. The last one works for another company. She can't understand and answer basic question…
/r/MensRights20/03/24 01:39 PM
21

"Where are all the good men?" You rejected them honey.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 01:22 PM
15

I am in tech and find that the women I have worked with have generally not had a real interest in it. They do okay with the mundane tasks, but don't have the deeper knowledge and understanding necessary for the more challenging work, but of course expect the same pay as those that do.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 01:20 PM
5

I mostly support you on this, but what do you consider a paedophile? Someone who has sex with a 14 year old? Does the sex of the 14 year old matter? What if they are married to each other? What if the other person is 14 or 15?
/r/MensRights20/03/24 10:38 AM
114

Women... no wait, they are only interested in the top 10% and most guys don't fancy paternity fraud and divorce rape. How about success at work? Great, except women are favoured over men in many situations.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 09:58 AM
7

I think you will find the Russians are pretty vicious with their equivalent.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 08:07 PM
3

I am sorry for your loss. That's terrible for everyone involved. The Old Testament rule was that a false accuser got the same punishment the falsely accused would have got, if convicted. That seems pretty neat to me.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 10:49 AM
2

If you are serious about understanding the effects, there are plenty of online sources that discuss the consequences. This will be serious. It might feel great, but it won't be.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 11:57 PM
5

My understanding is that a demographic crisis is going to be pretty tough in many ways. For example, as the population goes down, we will have more houses than we need. Home building will collapse, along with the industries that support it. More people will be engaged in caring for the old, meaning fewer workers in the wealth=-generating industries, meaning higher taxes. We might even find a whole generation chooses to leave to an economy where they are not so heavily taxed.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 06:12 PM
8

Chad and Tyrone are doing fine. The single mothers they create are struggling.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 06:10 PM
8

If a woman is not as strong as a man, why should she get the same pay when the job is physical? Surely equity demands she should be paid less because she needs less food?
/r/MensRights18/03/24 06:09 PM
5

As a woman she'd still have lighter punishment than a man would have got.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 09:24 AM
51

And women find it really easy to get as much sex as they want, but can't find a husband. We are not producing enough children and it will destroy our society.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 07:27 AM
253

Feminism is based on the idea that men's roles and privileges are a buffet to be picked from at will. They want to vote, but not be conscripted. They want equal pay, but won't lift the heavy boxes. Equal rights but not equal retirement ages. To receive alimony and child support, but not pay it. That's how it goes through all the issues, picking the things that benefit them and rejecting the things that don't.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 07:25 AM
1

We are taught to just suck it up, and our experience of society is that it doesn't care about men, that if we are to have rights, possessions and honour it's because we fought hard to get them.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 12:16 PM
6

You should note that men who experience DV are far less likely to report it.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 10:38 PM
2

It's relatively okay to open up to other men. Pick with care, ideally to find someone who is willing to actually listen and not just tell you they experienced the same thing and derail you pouring out your heart.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 07:30 PM
1

Good luck with equal rights in Islamic countries where Muhammad set a very particular example of how to treat women.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 07:25 PM
2

There's quite a lot to unpack here, and complications like her interest in her co-worker being partially driven by how (perfectly understandably) you treated her after her allegation against you. You might want to get some talking therapy (Gestalt is good!) to help you work your way through this stuff.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 02:04 PM
1

Instead of attacking me, why not provide evidence to support your point? This is what happens whenever I disagree with a woman feminist- they attack me and don't debate the point.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 12:42 PM
1

Instead of attacking me, why not provide evidence to support your point? This is what happens whenever I disagree with a woman feminist- they attack me and don't debate the point.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 09:59 AM
1

Most of the top 14 didn't make their money from Social Media. Musk lost money due to his purchase of Twitter/X so I don't see why you mention him as his main growth came from PayPal, then SpaceX and Tesla. I invite you to pick a consecutive block of 15 people from the list where the majority are women who made their own money rather than inherited it or got it through divorce.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 08:16 AM
6

"Never argue with the stupid. They'll pull you down to their level and beat you with experience". Don't bother arguing with them. They won't listen. They need to wait until they are 35 and single, with or without children, to realise feminism didn't help them. Arguments can be classed as being based on objective or subjective reality. Men are better at the objective reality, women at the subjective reality. So, men argue objective reality using facts and logic, and women will argue subjective re…
/r/MensRights11/03/24 10:56 PM
0

Can't you just bring some facts and prove me wrong? Which of these top 14 inherited their wealth? They all seem to have largely earned it. Even Musk, whose Dad had an Opal mine, made almost all of his wealth himself. I am open to being proven wrong.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 11:57 PM
0

Of the top 14, Bernard Arnault, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison, Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Steve Ballmer, Mukesh Ambani, Larry Page, Sergey Brin, Michael Bloomberg, Amancio Ortega, and Carlos Slim all made themselves rich. Some had some money behind them to start with, but fundamentally got rich using their own skill and effort. As women are ~50% of the population, the odds of the top 14 all being men is 1 in 16,000, were this random. The richest woman, at #15, is Françoi…
/r/MensRights10/03/24 09:44 PM
1

Here's a list. Please prove me wrong: https://www.forbes.com/real-time-billionaires/#114bf3293d78
/r/MensRights10/03/24 08:27 PM
2

However, almost all the ultra rich people in the world are either men who earned their money, or women who got men's money from divorce or inheritance.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 08:01 PM
1

I don't know that it is possible to argue successfully with committed feminists. They normally just reply by trying to shame any guy who tries.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 07:59 PM
1

I think most jurisdictions allow conviction for murder even when no body was found, but it's harder to prove murder if the person disappears and there isn't even blood spatter to indicate death.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:28 AM
12

Which has to be a major plus for society. As a bonus, most thieves don't tell people where they are going robbing either, so you might find no-one attempts to find them.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 05:30 PM
74

That is extremely broken. I am thinking that the correct response now is to kill intruders and dispose of the bodies.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 12:14 PM
2

If your money is in a trust, it's not yours. You don't control it. Courts respect trusts in a way they don't support pre-nups. I suggest you start reading about Trusts. They are easy to create, but you want to make sure you construct yours correctly.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 10:25 AM
11

All the male-dominated jobs they don't want to do? Bricklaying, scaffolding, sewage, power line workers? I think she might be disappointed. These are already good paying jobs and they will become more so as women really will object to doing them.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 10:30 PM
9

Put your money and house in a trust for the benefit of you and any DNA-match children. Then it's not yours for her to steal.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 09:47 PM
3

And here is the only place you can say that without getting fired for gross sexism. :-(
/r/MensRights08/03/24 08:32 PM
16

Go low contact with women for the next 10 years. Work on yourself. Get educated. Get skills. Get fit. Get a good job. Women will start taking an interest in you.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 11:05 AM
16

There are few women in tech, and those that are are often of mediocre talent. They don't run home labs. They don't contribute to open source projects. They don't have a side project in anything tech.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 08:06 AM
8

Women demand access to all men-only spaces. Then they come into those spaces and a few claim to feel unsafe. So then they demand women-only spaces.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 08:04 AM
81

So if a man can't get sex, he needs to be banned from certain groups on Reddit? Got it. :-(
/r/MensRights07/03/24 08:16 AM
4

What did they expect to happen? Blatant prejudice against men, and men are getting creative.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 06:12 PM
1

How to increase the birth rate: Women who are not pregnant or mothers are eligible for conscription...
/r/MensRights06/03/24 01:35 PM
1

useless comment
/r/MensRights06/03/24 12:11 PM
2

Women find tall men attractive.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 10:21 AM
2

That doesn't help them earn more or grow taller.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 08:23 PM
3

Women shame men to control them.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 09:56 PM
-4

I think you just summarised this sub.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 09:45 PM
5

Take a look at https://betel.org/betel-australia/ Betel (I am very involved in the UK) is a Christian Church where almost everyone used to be an alcoholic or drug addict. I was literally there this evening. I see many men and women turning their lives around, breaking the drink and drug addiction and addressing whatever else is going on in their lives. Give them a call and find out what they are like for yourself, though there are a number of Betel videos on YouTube if you want to do a bit of re…
/r/MensRights02/03/24 12:26 AM
5

I think he means that you've identified as a young woman and various anti-social guys here might decide to send you inappropriate and unsolicited "personal pictures". I expect the mods would kick such guys out of the group if they could, but those guys tend not to send such pictures to the mods!
/r/MensRights01/03/24 03:08 PM
2

The only available solutions for many of these issues is for men to start businesses and only employ men. It is harder for women to complain if they don't work for you.
/r/MensRights01/03/24 02:49 AM
9

When a couple marry, who wins? The woman. She gets a party that's all about her, and then she gets a stake in his assets. What does he get by marrying her when they were already living together (probably)? Nothing except liabilities.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 10:02 AM
11

Why is it always the fat chicks making these allegations? That punishment, like most punishments of women, was insufficient.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 11:53 PM
10

The punishment should be what the guys would have gotten if they had been convicted.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 07:05 PM
5

How about getting more men into the education system, both as teachers and students, or does gender equality no longer matter now women are in the majority in both?
/r/MensRights27/02/24 11:04 AM
0

Oh no... the patriarchy is hard wired in men's brains!!! Cue the feminists blaming men again... but lots of guys no longer want to engage with them and their garbage. So they expect a man to uber them to a date, pay for dinner and uber them home again, maybe even pay for their time... nope. No thank you. Enjoy your cats ladies!
/r/MensRights26/02/24 03:53 PM
9

There are only so many top guys. Getting more women to chase these guys just increases the competition and this reduces what those women can negotiate for. The result is that many more women are going to end up single and childless in their 30s and wondering what went wrong.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 09:01 PM
21

Yes, "Equity" vs "Equality"... I really don't like equity as it disincentivises effort.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 06:19 PM
132

How is it unfair on women? It reflects that they are less capable physically. Haven't you seen those videos of multiple women police officers being thrown around by one man until male Police officers actually arrest the guy?
/r/MensRights25/02/24 01:32 PM
7

I have no problem with people recording in gyms. I do have a problem with people recording others without their consent to make online content that mocks those others. Unfortunately it is not possible to tell how video will be used later, so it should be banned, despite my dislike of creating more rules for people to obey.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 08:05 AM
3

I suspect your comment was /s... but if you were serious then gyms often contain mirrors for that very purpose, and most people could find a wall at home to be recorded against.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 08:02 AM
8

If you look at the videos where women are making these videos, there is apparently usually no issue with her having a camera and filming. My guess is that these girls mostly don't film where it's banned.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 11:19 PM
38

Some will, but there's enough of these girls trashing guys for looking at them in tight clothing doing eye-catching poses that some clearly don't.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 06:10 PM
212

Ban filming in gyms. These girls need to be stopped.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 01:56 PM
5

I see that you have strong feelings on this. Yes, parental poverty can be an issue and that should be actively addressed, but not having enough young people is catastrophic for any society. There are effects like a real shortage of people working who can either care for the elderly or pay for that care. It is so easy to not comprehend the crisis because it happens so slowly, but it will have extremely severe consequences and is really really hard to fix. I know you don't believe me, so I suggest…
/r/MensRights24/02/24 12:41 AM
7

Your comments suggest you didn't understand the point I was making. I was suggesting that the government carried the cost of women being pregnant, with the intention of increasing their employment opportunities.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 09:45 PM
7

I would have hoped that it was obvious that the company could reduce its direct costs by not employing fertile women and that the incentive to not do so would be reduced if their decision was not going to be so obviously expensive for them. As for subsidising pregnancy, we need something to ensure that women produce a lot more kids than they are. Our society is starting to experience a demographic collapse and we need to fix it immediately and not in 40 years time. As for women being insufferabl…
/r/MensRights23/02/24 09:41 PM
13

Take two identical candidates. One might get pregnant. Which one would you hire if you have to pay her when she is off and when you can't even hire a permanent replacement because she might come back? This is driven by biology, not prejudice. The correct thing is for the government to pay, not the company, and the company should get compensation for the disruption too.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 05:10 PM
35

The problem is that the risk is entirely borne by the employer, not just her salary, but the loss of a person in a role that the company presumably needed someone for. My own take on this is that if the government wants companies to hire fertile women, the government should carry the risks of doing so.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 03:59 PM
3

Creepy now means "I don't find him attractive", not the old definition of him having breached social etiquette.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 03:55 PM
9

And they are not sure about their fathers, brothers or boyfriends.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 11:39 AM
20

"The closer I’ve come to relationships, the more I’ve witnessed many of my male friends become more hostile towards me." I wonder why? Is it because you think they are all scum?
/r/MensRights23/02/24 11:36 AM
2

Where is this "men are angry" thing coming from? Most of us are just resigned to how things are with modern women. We do our own thing without women and enjoy the benefits this brings, like the huge savings, no risk of allegations, no STIs, no pregnancies, no drama, no being raped by the divorce courts. Sure, we miss sex, but most of us don't want sex at any price.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 11:01 AM
2

The crazy thing is that the problem men are probably still problem men, but most other men have just backed off. It doesn't help that some women have weaponised #MeToo as a way to get rid of men they don't like, including a few getting rid of their boss so they can get his job.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 11:52 AM
17

So what if Mum is in hospital and Dad has brought the kids to Sunday School? Or doesn't that happen in your church?
/r/MensRights21/02/24 01:40 AM
21

Feminism regards mens traditional roles as a buffet to be picked from. So, they only want the good bits and not the draft.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 12:59 AM
16

In the UK, half of all 18 year olds go to University: a. The standard to pass a degree passed by 50% is far lower than when only 10% could get a degree, and b. An excess of graduates in useless subjects where almost no-one uses their degree.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 12:17 AM
94

I think there are at least 4 factors at play: The women who seek to shame men for approaching them, including #MeToo, Men being invisible if they are not in the top 10% The abundance of alternatives to real women, whether AI, OF, prostitutes or porn, and Divorce laws that destroy a man financially. So, for many men, the women are not worth the effort.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 12:15 AM
5

I think almost everyone settles for less than what they'd like. That's just how dating works. However, just getting with a guy to produce children and then taking all his assets in divorce... truly is despicable.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 11:32 AM
3

They need to keep up competition for her attention. If a percentage of men stop pursuing her, her market value drops.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 01:04 AM
42

It seems normal for women to use men's secrets against them.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 12:42 AM
10

Most of the they/them won't pass their beliefs on to their own children because they won't actually have children, so it has some up sides.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 03:54 PM
4

For those in the UK, take a look at https://andysmanclub.co.uk/
/r/MensRights17/02/24 03:52 PM
1

Work on you. In 10-20 years you should be earning a good wage and they will be working national minimum wage.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 09:45 AM
2

Agree. All it does is tell men to dump women after 18 months so there is no accidentally falling into being legally married. "If she stays another night, she is entitled to the house and a slice of your future earnings for life"... err... nope.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 03:26 PM
0

Medics don't have to answer every question, especially if they are not sure their answer would be factually robust. Do you really think medics should be compelled to give answers to every question, even outside their speciality? Should a cardiologist be required to give answers on (say) cancer or give nutritional advice? Of course not. I don't know where you work, but I doubt you can answer every question relevant to your industry without at least checking other sources... so let's not expect th…
/r/MensRights14/02/24 02:37 PM
1

Prenups are sometimes overturned as women argue during their divorce they were coerced into signing them. Even not getting married isn't enough- some places consider you married after living together for two years, and one judge decided that a woman was entitled to alimony even though she'd not lived with a guy for two years.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 02:30 PM
1

Alimony is very broken. It is contributing to men not wanting to marry.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 09:01 AM
1

Yes, men, through taxes, are paying for women to be mothers, but most of them are not enjoying the traditional benefits of funding wives. Sucks!
/r/MensRights14/02/24 08:59 AM
2

You forgot to mention "Also a unicorn"! I suspect few women share your perspective.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 08:58 AM
3

Yes, men traditionally supported their wives with housing, food, protection and some parenting in exchange for someone keeping house, sex, child bearing, child rearing etc.. The consequence of alimony can be that the woman gets much of what she had before without having to do any of her previous duties. This seems grossly unfair to me.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 08:58 AM
1

One reason is that women have mostly learnt to not fight men physically. Even women-on-women fights tend to use that sort of approach.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 11:16 PM
2

One thing that angers me about alimony is that the woman gets all this financial support to continue living as she used to, but he no longer gets any of the benefits of a stay-at-home wife, such as cooking, cleaning and sex, ie he suffers more loss than his ex-wife.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 08:29 PM
1

So here's a scenario. Two parents working the same job for the same pay. She, for whatever reason, gets custody. Should he pay her child support?
/r/MensRights13/02/24 12:42 PM
5

Women's biology is different. The nurse might not have been confident of the explanation.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 10:45 AM
1

Child support is the moral duty of whoever has the kids less and earns more, as a general rule. I suspect her real issue is "Men should pay women" and that she is hiding this behind men earning more.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 09:55 AM
2

Maybe... but men paying for things makes it easier, especially if that man has to do the long hours to pay for everything.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 01:46 PM
2

There are serious limits on our ability to get others to change their beliefs, especially when they aren't looking to do so.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 01:43 PM
1

Stupid beliefs eventually collapse on their own.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 10:59 AM
1

It's because women are oppressed by the patriarchy. Or something like that. Which is why they expect gifts from men, but don't give gifts to men. Just pure oppression. Somehow. /s
/r/MensRights12/02/24 12:39 AM
33

Straight women usually enjoy the company of men. They can also get benefits like free food and some sucker to pay for them to have children, whether he wants it or not.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 11:55 PM
6

Men can typically overpower their partners quite easily... but we are heavily conditioned to not do so. Women, on the other hand, can use their tongue to destroy men, and they don't seem conditioned to not do so, plus, if they attack, they do so when they are not facing a man on equal terms, whether it's when he's asleep or by attacking his property.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 08:53 AM
1

Yes, the leading feminists want to be in charge, the assumption is that the world will be a better place if only women were in charge. This assumption "doesn't seem evidence based"...
/r/MensRights11/02/24 08:42 AM
5

To an extent, we all do.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:54 PM
4

Not quite. The top 10% of men are happy with all the attention they get from women. They can run several women at once and that seems to work... except the women never get to capture these guys. Most of the rest of the guys are of little interest to many women. It sucks for everyone I think.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 03:23 PM
49

They want sameness where that benefits them, but not where they'd lose a privilege or pick up an obligation. So women want the right to vote, but not to be conscripted, they want equal pay but don't want to pay on dates, they want all the freedom of men but they also want men to protect them when there are problems. It's a very long list of inequalities.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 03:22 PM
26

I welcome them having the freedom to have women-only events. Why are men not allowed to have men-only events? Why do women insist on being part of everything men do (well, all our social events and all the high paid jobs, but not sewer technicians or brick layers).
/r/MensRights10/02/24 03:20 PM
10

That's the problem. They can't get anyone to!
/r/MensRights10/02/24 03:04 PM
1

Alimony and child support are calculated differently. If someone has the children, I would normally expect the other parent to contribute financially... but if the person with the kids earns more, there comes a point when there should not be any payment... but I don't know the rules.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 09:07 PM
45

Equity is only brought up when it would give women an advantage, no matter how unfair... but you already knew that.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 05:28 PM
5

The causative phenomena is called Divorce. Men should not get married these days, it just means they have a high chance of losing all their assets when she gets bored and decides to leave.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 05:20 PM
6

I am sorry you went through that.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 01:05 PM
11

She'd projected her fantasy or fear on to you- not okay, but kids do stupid things Where it really went wrong was all the adults going with her lies. If you are young enough, you could probably sue the school/education authority.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 12:36 PM
5

Women have forgotten that men need respect. Perhaps you could leave and sue for alimony.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 01:13 AM
1

You think Chicago does these things?
/r/MensRights07/02/24 02:37 PM
1

The courts in China favour Chinese citizens. Getting a judgement against you can mean you can't leave the country. The Social Credit system is oppressive. Citizens and visitors are not free to speak their mind about many things. And their economy is heading south right now with the collapse of the retail sector. The centrally planned economy means they now have a million graduates a year, many of whom can't find relevant jobs, and a shortage of people willing to work in the factories that made C…
/r/MensRights07/02/24 11:27 AM
2

I suppose Countries that are: Happy to take foreigners hostage for bargaining, Happy to kidnap foreigners into their militaries, and Lack the rule of law (eg Saudi Arabia).
/r/MensRights07/02/24 04:44 AM
1

Almost everywhere is better than Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Belarus or their buddies.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 02:16 AM
7

Eventually, women move out of their 20's and are no longer invited to so many parties or pursued by so many guys. It seems to be a shock to most of them, but their beauty is temporary and they squandered it. Men are biologically programmed seek fertility and guaranteed paternity: Women in their 30s are a lot less fertile, and women with high body counts could easily get pregnant with another man's child. So, these "older" women are a much worse bet.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 12:05 AM
2

Apparently Russia has also been grabbing foreigners who've come to work in Russia. They have no family to complain if/when Russia abuses them or gets them murdered, so they are a great choice.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 12:02 AM
14

Go to Russia? Want to get conscripted and sent to support the invasion of Ukraine? Yes, that would be exciting for a few weeks... then you will end up dead. Go to Iran? Get imprisoned to be used as a pawn in politics? Are you insane? Brazil could be more fun.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 09:59 PM
13

Demographic collapse is part of this. Women are reaching their 30's and suddenly realising that they haven't captured a man and will probably never have children. Our society threw away a pattern we knew and tried something different that is now destroying it... but almost no-one wants to address the problem.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 08:38 PM
8

Yes. I think that's a toxic decision.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 07:59 PM
6

I support mandatory DNA tests at birth and storing it for life. Other people can submit a sample for comparison if they want.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 07:58 PM
5

"And it wasn't our fault!"
/r/MensRights04/02/24 11:24 PM
29

And "Small dick energy" just to drive the point home.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 02:27 PM
24

And if she had swallowed the wheelchair tennis thing, suggest that teenagers should also get the same support as the adults.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 11:40 AM
10

This is why women's sports are just not that interesting- https://boysvswomen.com/ Women are weak and slow compared to men. Want to watch something fast paced and full of skill? It won't be women you want to watch.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 08:32 AM
1

Children of a mother should share 50% DNA. If it's 25% then, for example, their actual mothers are sisters and not the same woman.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 10:57 AM
2

I doubt any politician would openly distribute a fake... but putting it anonymously on x would be just fine by many of them, and then the trolls can distribute it for free.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 03:10 AM
4

It's already been done. This is a hilarious example with Obama, Biden and Trump: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEkuLy6WozU
/r/MensRights29/01/24 04:30 PM
1

Yes. Women have become worse. Attitude and body count, divorce rates, plus unfair divorce laws, make marrying them a poor choice for most men... so marriage rates have crashed. These alternatives will only get better, meaning it will be harder for women to find a man.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 03:01 PM
5

I am a man, training to be a Gestalt Psychotherapist. I cannot comment on overall effectiveness, but your reasoning seems wrong.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 12:47 AM
11

This is worth a look: https://careersmart.org.uk/occupations/equality/which-jobs-do-men-and-women-do-occupational-breakdown-gender You should also note that being in shops requires time, money, and in interest in those goods. Women, due to having kids and working fewer hours in general, have more time to shop, and women, courtesy of running up debts and extracting money from men (either in relationship or through a divorce settlement), have more money for the things sold in shops. Men, if we spe…
/r/MensRights28/01/24 08:31 PM
10

Look up "Buyer's Remorse". Assuming everything is as you describe, this girl is very dangerous. She's already trashed your reputation, just be glad she's not gone to the Police or School because they take unfounded allegations very seriously and it's then hard for a liar to retract her claims.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 04:19 PM
1

Shaming men seems the default tactic for many women unfortunately.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 03:08 PM
1

That's both funny and clever. I'm interested in how you get on. Have you tried metric?
/r/MensRights27/01/24 10:22 AM
17

It took "Ken" more effort to play his role in the stupidity of the movie than the delusional feminists playing the lead roles to do theirs.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 11:39 AM
7

Be careful of projecting your feelings on to all women claiming to support men. Some, I believe, genuinely do, though I am not able to give you a percentage.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 09:44 PM
3

Someone said- "Don't argue with a fool. They'll bring you down to their level and beat you with experience". So I take care how I debate them.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 12:56 PM
3

It is not justified. In fact, it is plain wrong. If I make a claim that is wrong, all they have to do is prove my claim is wrong, they don't need to speculatively trash my personality or physique (and they know almost nothing of either). Women tend to treat men's roles as a buffet. They will demand equal pay, but the men must unload the heavy boxes and do the dirty jobs. They (correctly) demand to not be sexually harassed at work, but are happy to do the harassing as they know that men are afrai…
/r/MensRights21/01/24 12:47 PM
49

My experience is that they tend to focus on shaming me, rather than arguing something intelligent. Stuff like "Incel" and "Small dick energy" rather than "Here's a site with statistics that prove you are wrong".
/r/MensRights20/01/24 07:56 PM
37

We don't want to punish women, we just don't want them to ruin our lives with false or exaggerated allegations, or to take our lifetime assets in divorce. Porn, AI virtual girlfriends, and various physical sex toys provide alternatives that are sufficient for many men to avoid the pain of dating modern women.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 09:08 PM
37

I am with you 100%, Moving out was such a relief. So much less stress. Us guys are simple- we want food, sex, respect and peace for most of us to be happy most of the time... and modern feminism tries to stop all of these, with the result that guys are as happy being single as in a relationship.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 02:33 PM
31

Food, Sex, Respect and Peace... make most men happy most of the time.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 09:49 PM
6

If you vaccinate all the women, you almost completely stop the spread of HPV amongst straight people... provided people don't get very high body counts.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 01:19 PM
57

Interviewer: "Having put all your minimum requirements into the calculator, you want a top 0.014% man" Woman: "Cool. I'll just have to look harder" At which point the interviewer asks himself how this 5 with 4 kids by 82 different men is going to capture a top 0.014% man... but doesn't say so because there is no point.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 05:51 PM
51

I now identify as 5'14" in sympathy with my under 6' brothers.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 05:48 PM
1

Women's vigilence does prevent some problems, which skews the "outcome" statistics.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 06:14 PM
18

When I debate female feminists, shaming me seems to be the go-to reaction. Debating the facts with logic and sources isn't part of that perspective.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 04:34 PM
6

Do you think that irrefutable evidence would do you any good? People who run on emotions will diminish you if you bring them facts they don't like, and that can be unhelpful to you.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 04:31 PM
4

Feminism views men's rights & roles as a buffet where the good bits can be taken, and the undesirable bits left, according to the woman's tastes and mood. So, women don't care that more men than women died of Covid, or that men are in a minority at college, or that most deaths at work are men... but they do want quotas for participation at the board, equal pay even if they don't do equal work etc..
/r/MensRights13/01/24 12:59 AM
7

How to get another complaint. :-(
/r/MensRights12/01/24 10:57 AM
21

I don't want to be horrible to women, but women change the dynamic of spaces they enter, and sometimes guys just want to be guys with other guys. Is that too much to ask? I don't mind them being in some "male" spaces, just not all of them.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 10:54 AM
20

There are many reasons, including women: - want to be approached by men, - overall are less feminine and wanting to do male things, - are 'fighting the patriarchy' by inserting themselves in men's spaces. There are probably others. I mostly "fight back" by avoiding women.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 09:54 AM
6

I suggest you don't try this: Her: "I have a husband" You: "That's a relief" Might cause a reaction... lol Or, to really be considered unavailable... Her: "I have a husband" You: "Me too!" You might find the women treating you nicely after that because they don't consider you a threat.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 10:31 PM
3

This is a real phenomenon... but it's also pretty rare. Women roasting men because they don't measure up to their inflated expectations, however, is relatively common.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 12:24 PM
8

If women won't touch a guy because he's "only" average height, or earns "only" an average salary, or "only" has an average body then his options don't include women. The best solution is for people to have realistic standards and to form good relationships... but it takes two to tango.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 12:39 PM
51

Men really had few options except prostitutes since forever, but now we have choices. We have computer-based AI, and increasingly realistic sex robots, with a merger between them happening now. So you blow $10,000 on a sex doll that lasts 5 years. $2,000 per year. No drama, no attitude, no refusal, no false allegations, no dinners out, no STIs, no adultery, no obesity, no health issues, no divorce, no alimony, no difficulties with seeing your own kids. These things are really only being created …
/r/MensRights09/01/24 10:32 PM
77

It is a good laugh for them, because they don't have any consequences. What a man would get hit, fired, or arrested for, women can often get away with. I am saddened that the above seems to be the case. It is so unfair that men are punished so harshly for things that women can get away with without consequences.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 09:31 AM
60

If you’re drunk and commit a crime, you _should_ still go to jail. They should absolutely be held accountable. Women get away with things guys can't.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 09:30 AM
2

Is "people choosing what’s correct for them and being individuals" affected by any innate gender differences? For example, how many women are strong enough to be orthopaedic surgeons, and how many men want to work as nursery nurses? Do you think women's pressure on men to earn more than them affects the roles men take, or the effort they put into succeeding?
/r/MensRights07/01/24 09:17 PM
3

Yeah, you want to consider going after her and the bar for damages.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 02:44 AM
2

All of those are possible... but they all seem atypical to me. Do you recognise that men and women tend to choose different roles in marriage and at work?
/r/MensRights04/01/24 09:15 AM
-2

Which woman? What evidence is there of what she said? There's not much to work with, but what is guaranteed is that your lawyer will charge you a lot!
/r/MensRights03/01/24 10:48 PM
3

You cry more than me. I stopped when my Dad spanked me 45 years ago.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 08:40 PM
2

What role do you see for gender dimorphism in relationships?
/r/MensRights03/01/24 09:07 AM
2

"Irony all round"... an appropriate name.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 08:14 AM
17

What would a case look like? Submit something against "Jane Doe" and demand a deposition from the manager? That could only progress if the manager knew the complainant's name, and that is far from certain.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 08:13 AM
70

That's terrible. Is she going everywhere else you go and ruining your reputation? Surely that's slander- there might not even be a Police investigation going on. Unfortunately, women fight with words, and there are often no criminal legal consequences for trashing people's reputation, even driving them to suicide.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 08:11 AM
129

"Hole Parent" and "Pole Parent". Every child has one of each!
/r/MensRights02/01/24 11:43 PM
5

Thank you. I upvoted you- I appreciate you seeing my point because this sort of debate can become very polarised when I'd rather focus on the facts. My compliments to you for tackling the spiders. :-)
/r/MensRights02/01/24 06:59 PM
10

Women largely don't do the truly dirty jobs, the dangerous jobs, the physical jobs, the outdoor jobs. Yes, there's the odd one that does... but they are the exception not the norm. And they will complain that sitting on a chair doing customer checkout is as hard are working in a warehouse loading and unloading trucks.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 11:16 AM
21

"Men cheat because men are bad. Women only cheat because men are bad". Once you understand these two facts, you understand male female dynamics.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 11:08 AM
3

I find it hilarious that OnlyFans is about to be flooded with AI "women" who are better in every way than real women. Want someone who is 24 and stays 24? Easy. Want her to have a particular skin tone? No problem. Feminist? You can turn that off! Body measurements? Anything you like. Hair colour? Hair style? Attitude? Nails? Piercings? Tattoos? All selectable like an in-game avatar. Meanwhile in the real world... your domestic robot is doing many of the chores and will never ask for alimony.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 11:03 AM
8

"We don't need men"... Who made the road you are standing on? Who got the oil your shoes are made from? Who created the plastics you are wearing? Who designed the machines that made your clothes? Who constructed the building behind you? Who supplies the electricity, water, gas, internet that you use every day? Who built the car you drive? Who fixes your car? Who designed the camera you are talking into? Who kills the spiders at home? Who goes downstairs when it sounds like you have a burglar? It…
/r/MensRights02/01/24 10:58 AM
7

That's feminism for you. What she really needs to experience is men not doing things for her, utilities like electricity, water, sewage, gas and internet are all provided by 90%+ men, plus all the repairs and other work on her house and all the trucks bringing food for her to eat. How many women work in abattoirs?
/r/MensRights25/12/23 06:39 PM
1

Can you meet the sisters and friends of your friends?
/r/MensRights22/12/23 03:25 PM
2

Today's women all think they can get a top 10% man. Their real-world grasp of maths doesn't allow them to understand how impossible it is for all women to get a top 10% man, compounded by the belief that they personally are in the top 10% even if they are distinctly average or below.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 03:23 PM
2

That moment when I want to reply but then think I might get banned. <sigh>
/r/MensRights18/12/23 10:01 PM
4

Don't forget the computer it was written on, or the paper it was printed on. All demonstrate misogynistic traits. Men are wicked I tell you! /s
/r/MensRights18/12/23 10:00 PM
7

Whatever is necessary to show that women are not to blame for anything, even the things they actually did.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 09:59 PM
63

"That shows the researchers were misogynists"- feminists.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 01:22 PM
13

Don't get married. You are at serious risk of getting dumped once she has kids and access to your house and income. You might end up living in your car. And if she already has kids... no!
/r/MensRights16/12/23 10:10 PM
0

"I've been banned by several subreddits i was never subscribed to for this post". Welcome to the world of men, where we can have action taken against us for no reason at all, and the relevant authorities (in this case Reddit) are perfectly happy with it. I see two problems with feminism: It is focused on "equality", but only the bits of equality that would be helpful to women, never the things that women don't want, such as conscription or doing the dirty bits of drilling for oil, and It has the…
/r/MensRights16/12/23 03:50 PM
17

As you escape the school system, you will find ways to avoid such girls. When they get to 33 they will be wondering why no man ever married them.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 09:21 PM
73

Women tend to shame men when they can't argue a point. If you tend to crumble when she does this, it will become her go-to way to win any debate. You might want to explore if there is any basis to this in therapy.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 09:17 PM
6

Women often don't argue like men. It's more emotional for them. They frequently go straight to labelling and shaming instead of presenting the facts that support them, with sources.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 02:12 PM
1

I suggest that, when a couple get divorced, that the children should all have paternity tests.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 09:44 AM
7

I agree with a man being required to pay child support for his biological children. I even support contributing to an ex-wife's income for a while because it costs money to be available to care for kids. I object to large asset transfers and long-term alimony, often leaving men destitute.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 11:55 PM
61

Or "until I am entitled to the house, half your assets, and a free salary for life". No thanks.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 08:43 PM
0

Who are you speaking on behalf of? My experience of debating women is that they label and shame me pretty much immediately that I disagree with them.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 09:11 AM
99

And trying to explain it could well get you labelled and shamed.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 02:08 PM
6

Swap the genders and... life in prison. Sucks.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/23 07:52 PM
60

That's easy. Misogyny harms women. Women are valuable. Thus misogyny is wrong. Misandry harms men. Men don't matter. Thus misandry is okay. I told you it was easy!
/r/MensRights09/12/23 07:46 PM
5

Not quite. Women's successes are seen as women being amazing. Women's failures are seen as being due to the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 01:17 PM
1

Most people these days run off their emotions and not facts and logic. Women especially tend to resorting to shaming men rather then trying to understand and debate the actual issues.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 01:15 PM
2

If you can, see a therapist. If you can't, message me.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 10:08 PM
8

Don't forget paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 08:06 PM
8

Shaming men seems to be standard procedure for many women.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 08:03 PM
16

"Yes, I signed the form but under duress" "Yes, I signed the form but changed my mind" "Yes, I signed, but then he did <thing> that I had not consented to" "Yes, I signed, but he then raped me in the morning" How much use are these forms?
/r/MensRights01/12/23 06:18 PM
8

Women's children are responsible for all murder.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 10:59 PM
4

A man being unhappy because he is mistreated is clearly a sign he's a terrible person. /s
/r/MensRights20/11/23 06:21 PM
0

You can certainly find trained women in their prime who can beat untrained men past their best. That's pretty easy and not a point of contention. I was considering like-for-like, whether it's the national men's team vs the national women's team, the local for-fun men's team vs the local for-fun women's team, even men and women joggers.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 02:25 PM
0

Women will never compete with men on speed, power, reaction times or 3d modelling. Sorry ladies!
/r/MensRights19/11/23 10:11 AM
1

The core problem is that women are not as good as men at most sports, making them less worth watching for most spectators.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 12:00 AM
1

Yes, there are some good women in sports... but they are generally beaten every time by men except for a few things like ultra-marathons. Being good at sport is similar to being good at war... and enough men have died that the survivors were better at war than women were. For example: https://boysvswomen.com/ Adult women's national teams often practice for tournaments by playing teams of 15 year old boys... who beat them. Women would get more viewers if they were better at those sports. There's …
/r/MensRights18/11/23 11:59 PM
2

And the patriarchy. And they have a nice list of insults.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 11:54 PM
1

If a football team starts a woman's team, they can't just close the women's team down despite it running at a loss. It would just cause so much political trouble. So the smart thing is... don't start women's teams. Let the women do that- they don't need men for anything after all.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 11:47 PM
2

You might find the difference between equity and equality interesting. Equity is about levelling everyone. So women sports players should get the same as the men. But equity is only applied when it advantages women... and that's one reason it is unfair.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 08:43 PM
1

Yes, and we all know how that will go once they get to around 13!
/r/MensRights17/11/23 08:29 PM
2

No, that's not right either. Women should be allowed to play sports if they want to, and commercially succeed if they can. My objection is the presumption that they should be subsidised by men's sports. (I do also have a problem with women demanding access to male-only spaces, then complaining they need a women-only version in that same space. It feels like an attempt to seize territory)
/r/MensRights17/11/23 08:28 PM
2

I have nothing I can use to disagree with you. I am forced to say you are right, though I wish reality were different.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 08:02 PM
2

Serena Williams, at her best, was probably 500th best in the world, give or take a bit. She was paid similarly to the men, I believe.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 07:03 PM
1

I think any men's team that starts a women's team is deeply stupid. It will only cost them money and heartache. Don't go there!
/r/MensRights17/11/23 06:56 PM
1

A lot of effort is put into making equity sound fair, but is just seems that the unfairness is distributed differently, and that a third party gets to decide who gets what advantages or disadvantages.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 06:48 PM
1

Do you think that men's best-of-5 and women's best-of-3 typically take the same amount of time? I could look for statistics if you want to argue that point. The fact is that men's tennis takes longer, is played faster and is more skilled, which is why more people watch it and why it earns more money.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 06:46 PM
1

You clearly missed the point- I think she's about to call you an incel! lol That's the problem with debating feminists- they can't manage debating without trying to shame.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 06:37 PM
4

I bet they do want equal pay, but they are just ignored.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 06:34 PM
7

Pick a popular sport and we'll look at the numbers.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 08:53 AM
9

The thing is... men know their value comes from things like their status and income, which are attained by hard work. So guys have more pressure to achieve than women do, so they do the long hours, tough projects, all of that, to win. Men also take the risks of starting significant businesses that can make huge amounts of money, whereas women start women-focused businesses that are always going to be limited, such as hairdressing or fashion.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 08:51 AM
4

That's quite funny... or it would be if it didn't have such an adverse impact on guys.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 08:48 AM
1

The problem is that society doesn't care about men.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 12:58 AM
4

Women can be as dedicated and hardworking as men... but biology means they will never seriously be equal to men. This, for example: boysvswomen.com Men know this, some women seem not to. All those movies of a 60kg babe beating up 10 men of 120kg with a single blow seem to have gone to women's heads. They don't understand that when they "overpower" their boyfriends in a "fight", he was just enjoying the contact and not fighting with all his power. At her best, Serena Williams was perhaps the 500t…
/r/MensRights17/11/23 12:46 AM
15

No, it's about including everyone... unless they are some combination of white, male, older and/or Christian.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 12:38 AM
9

Wesley Allsbrook is a woman. You shouldn't be surprised she thinks men are crap. Women have worked hard to ensure men are no more successful than women are. They then complain that men are no more successful than women. Most men are invisible to most women, so women shouldn't be surprised when most men lose interest in women who view equality as a buffet, to take only the bits that they enjoy. Men are pretty simple creatures. We want food, physical intimacy, respect and peace. We'll move heaven …
/r/MensRights14/11/23 01:06 AM
20

A friend described youth groups to me: The girls stand around in groups discussing the boys. The boys stand around in groups discussing motorbikes. I don't think that changes much as they get older.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 03:47 PM
4

Don't. Source: Am circumcised.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 07:39 PM
1

No. Firstly, wearing a bodycam is great, but it won't cover you for the time it's off. Secondly, if a woman knows you have a bodycam, she can accuse you from a time before you got it. Thirdly, she could claim that you had a friend wear it so you could do whatever you were accused of. Your best bet is to not be someone she thinks of.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 07:49 PM
5

The injustice. Paternity fraud has no legal punishment, yet it is theft of 20 years of a man's wages and love and denies him the chance to his own children, Equality is treated as a buffet- women demand equal pay (fair) but object to contributing to date night. They demand the vote but don't want to be conscripted. It's a long list.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 10:20 PM
3

As soon as ad-hominem arguments start, you are wasting your time.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 05:21 PM
1

I support the idea of some cities being designated women-only. I would love to see how that works out.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 05:58 PM
1

I suggest you look at joining something like Betel.Uk. You can get free of drink and live a much longer life.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 05:22 PM
0

I agree. Let's find real evidence for our beliefs. I invite you to look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternity_fraud "These numbers suggest that the widely quoted and unsubstantiated figure of 10% of non-paternal events is an overestimate. "
/r/MensRights05/11/23 05:07 PM
2

This is a good intro: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternity_fraud I am sure a bit more digging would find more studies.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 05:06 PM
3

The average rate of paternity fraud is lower. These tests were mostly done because there was doubt, and are thus higher risk.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 06:32 PM
2

Right now, it's not a thing, but when judges are trying to get "the right result", they can be creative with interpreting the law. So they could rule that a guy put his assets in a trust to avoid his wife claiming a divorce settlement and that they were going to undo the trust "to be just". The Canadian judge managed to use a law covering a couple living together to rule in favour of a woman who was not living with the guy in question... and guys took note and are more careful.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 10:31 AM
6

Yes they do. I've seen films when a petite girl has successfully beaten up 20 tall and chunky men... unfortunately, a number of women think this is realistic and are shocked when play fighting with their men that their men can instantly overpower them should they so choose.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 09:57 PM
2

Viewing privileges as a buffet is a cornerstone of feminism. They want to pick and choose what they get, so they want to vote, but don't want to be conscripted. They want equal pay, but for the man to pay for dinner. They want to invade men's spaces... but then insist on women-only spaces. Some women delight in setting up situations when men will look at them so they can shame the men on video. Many men realise they can't win and have given up on dating.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 09:54 PM
2

They really want "Equity" not "Equality". I am increasingly disliking equity.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 05:39 PM
17

And that's precisely why I am angered by feminism. It's not okay to regard equality with men as a buffet where women get to choose which bits they want and which bits they don't. For example, feminists don't care that nearly all child custody goes to women, even though some women are terrible mothers. They don't care very much about what's in the kid's interests.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 05:38 PM
5

That's the theory. The practice doesn't always work out, with judges doing things like saying one party signed "under duress" and then throwing the prenup out. If you want to be smart, put your assets in a trust before you marry. This seems watertight, so far at least, though a judge might argue that putting your assets in a trust is "avoiding your creditors" (referring to your wife!).
/r/MensRights16/10/23 05:26 PM
16

The problem is not marriage as such, but the divorce laws which mean a woman gets the house and alimony, being paid to break her vows.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 03:38 PM
8

Why are men still getting married? You nearly guarantee that you will lose your house and have to pay alimony.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 11:18 PM
2

Please explain SIGN language to me.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 09:05 AM
2

Women are rightly very upset by this sort of thing, so even a very small number of men can cause a lot of distress to them.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 09:04 AM
3

When everyone is pushed together, that's one thing, but some men use that as an excuse to do things like rub themselves against women or use their hands. I would expect most women, most of the time, to be very aware of the difference.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 08:56 AM
34

Some men grope women when everyone is squeezed together. No one can see anything because everyone is too close. So, I have some sympathy for this one.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 04:17 PM
3

Yeah, they can't deal with having their hypocrisy pointed out. Every time I engage with feminists they resort to shaming me. They almost never try any kind of response based on reason or evidence.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 03:11 PM
3

They are emotionally driven, not logic driven, so they can happily argue women should be able to join men's groups, but that men should not be able to join women's groups and not see any contradiction.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 02:58 PM
1

Women hate to be excluded from men's spaces. They've invaded everywhere men used to hang out with men. Now they are in these spaces, they are getting pissy that there are men in them and are demanding women-only spaces. I wonder sometimes if they actually just want us all dead and out of the way... provided we can simultaneously make the infrastructure work and pay alimony and child support.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 02:40 PM
1

I suspect men have a drive to provide in the same way women have a drive to produce children.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 07:31 AM
6

Please advocate for us with the women you know.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 10:15 AM
2

As a Christian, I fully support marriage... but then I look at marriage in the West, and realise it is quite different from Biblical marriage because women are incentivised to break the covenant. When we look at modern women, most of them have slept with enough guys to no longer bond very effectively, and they will keep comparing their husband to the best bits of each of the guys they've dated, which I am sure feels really undermining. So, if I was in my 20s now, I'd probably just stay single. M…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 11:14 PM
16

In the Anglican Church, they have a thing called "The Peace" when people are supposed to stand up and greet each other. I have no problem with that... but I have a major problem with the people who think that they _must_ hug you, whatever you feel about it. Haven't they heard about consent? I love hugging, but in the context of knowing someone and wanting to hug them.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 12:42 PM
30

This is against the best interests of honest men.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 02:28 PM
2

Thank you.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 12:11 PM
11

But most women seem to feel entitled to select the 'male privileges' without taking the hardships. Men should pay for dinner, but also women should not be drafted.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 07:40 AM
0

Hopefully, if I had a NEET daughter, she would not be looking after _our_ children! Just to be at home cooking and cleaning, in an age of cookers, washing machines and dishwashers would seem an inefficient use of time. Kids, however, can use all the time we have available, but, as above, I'd want someone to be looking after their partner's kids not their parent's kids.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 09:10 AM
3

I am happy for women to have women-only spaces. You don't need many bad men to make lots of women afraid. What I object to is the deliberate invasion of every men-only space by women. All the places men used to go to get away from women now have women in them. I suggest that we either ban all single-sex spaces except bathrooms and showers, or we allow single-sex spaces. I am okay with either.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 09:06 AM
24

That can be viable if they are contributing in other ways, like keeping house, cooking delicious food from cheap ingredients, and looking after the kids. It's not viable if they don't want to contribute, only spend.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 08:41 PM
2

Involuntarily Paying Their Own Way? IPTOWs?
/r/MensRights16/09/23 08:39 PM
2

Beware of marriage. These days it offers little to men.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 08:41 AM
-4

Because Russia has shown it likes to kill the men and rape the women. I don't want that to happen to me or any of my loved ones. That's why, if Russia were invading my country, I would do everything I could to ensure their defeat, including putting my life at risk.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 09:23 PM
-2

It might make a difference to your close relatives. Don't you remember what happened in Bucha and many other towns, and the number of torture centres that have been found wherever Russia occupied a place?
/r/MensRights13/09/23 09:21 PM
16

Women want equality, provided it's a buffet from which they can pick the nice bits. So they want equal pay, men to pay for dates, men to lift the heavy stuff, but they don't want to do building work, be conscripted or deal with the spiders.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 08:06 PM
-7

Ukraine needs to defeat Russia or there will be no Ukraine.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 08:04 PM
1

No, not just women, but far more common amongst women.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 07:03 AM
3

Shaming is women's go to argument tactic.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 03:37 PM
4

"bipolar/bpd radical feminist"? RUN
/r/MensRights11/09/23 10:56 AM
1

The "I need to make sure you aren’t a serial killer.” is mostly humorous. What is real is the desire to check you out further before meeting you, checking for extreme political views or strange hobbies for example. It is also girls being collaborative in a way guys aren't.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 10:53 AM
6

Sleep with, or marry?
/r/MensRights03/09/23 06:06 PM
3

Try /r/deadbedrooms. Marriage often results in women not trying anymore, including getting obese.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 05:29 AM
1

And you can always fire the nanny with very limited consequences.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 05:26 AM
5

Marriage gives a man nothing. it incentivises his wife to divorce him so she gets the house, kids, child support and alimony. A man, these days, would be stupid to marry a woman.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 05:24 AM
2

Thank you. It felt nice to read that.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 06:00 AM
1

After a few years of marriage, divorce for a man will mean the loss of his house, kids and payment of child support and alimony. Working hard before the divorce results in a man being sentenced to working that hard for decades to provide for his ex wife and kids. The longer the hours he puts in before she leaves him, the lower the chances of him ending up with his kids after the divorce because "he wasn't there for them". It's truly broken.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:29 PM
2

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/23199-male-yeast-infection
/r/MensRights25/08/23 04:00 PM
3

A wedding is a bad omen for divorce. 100% of divorces happen to married people... She shouldn't get married if she doesn't want to risk divorce!
/r/MensRights24/08/23 04:05 PM
8

I'd like to change the culture of women sleeping around before marriage, which destroys their ability to pair bond, and I'd like to change the divorce laws that incentivize women to dump their husbands because they get the house, kids, child support and alimony... and can look for another man to bring more money into the house.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 03:18 PM
4

Well, I could have used a lot more words to be more precise, but I thought most people would have been smart enough to understand my meaning. I guess I was wrong.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 03:16 PM
1

Marriage should be a joy... but various things have made it stupid for men to do.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 03:14 PM
4

I wrote: As soon as they get bored and leave, women try to take as much from their soon-to-be-ex husband as possible. I never said most divorces were bitter battles, but I don't believe many women intentionally go for anything less than a court will award them, and that almost always means men struggle financially.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 11:22 AM
9

That's great, but it's: a. Canada, which is more amicable generally, and b. It's their belief on what they can achieve in the future, not what they achieved in the past. Lawyers earn more when they stir up conflict... I mean, when they defend their client's rights. Do you have a better source?
/r/MensRights24/08/23 10:29 AM
22

Men fight physically, but women fight emotionally and psychologically. So, women put pressure on their guys. Some of them withhold intimacy. Some play other games. It doesn't change the fact that marriage in the West is almost always worse for men than cohabiting.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 10:26 AM
8

Source please?
/r/MensRights24/08/23 10:24 AM
39

How many women aren't aiming for marriage if they can find a guy they like? As soon as they get bored and leave, women try to take as much from their soon-to-be-ex husband as possible. That's a pretty universal experience here in the west. I really don't think men in the West should get a legal marriage any more.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 09:40 AM
86

Why would women want to give up a wedding focused on them, and the rights to the house, kids, child support and alimony? They exist, of course, but marriage for women has far more advantages than disadvantages.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 08:26 AM
3

This variety of feminist doesn't need any excuse to hate us more. We should just leave them as alone as we can manage.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 09:36 PM
1

Most feminists need to get to around 30 when they realise that they don't have a man, don't have a realistic chance of getting married, and are unlikely to ever have kids. But most of them still want a guy who is over 6' tall, earn over $200K, have a 6 pack etc. because they are certain "their value has gone up" when men think their value has gone down.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 09:35 PM
2

The standard response of women feminists when you offend them in any way is that they will try to shame you.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 09:31 PM
3

The risk of false allegations even applies to being with little kids. I was put into such a situation against my will, and chose to take the risk of allegations because I also knew that the circumstances meant I could be very good for the little girl in question. She's had a blast (as I expected) but I need to wait 20 years to know that the risk of any misunderstanding, mis-remembering or indeed plain malicious allegation is over. It sucks.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 10:31 PM
-10

Women do tend to need more bathroom time, so it's not as unfair as it first appears.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 01:24 AM
7

Women love to shame men. Avoid such women
/r/MensRights12/08/23 04:01 PM
5

I am currently providing 'Dad services' to a 9 year old girl, making sure she gets out regularly, goes to feed ducks, has a bit of rough and tumble. I love it, but am pretty careful to ensure a woman is around when I do these things, just in case.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 10:36 PM
6

You were probably blocked because you didn't agree with her, not directly because you were a man.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 07:32 PM
20

If you work hard to provide generously for her, the courts will give her the kids ("You were never around") and sentence you to working that hard for the rest of your life so you can provide for her and her new partner. The divorce laws and courts make marriage a fools game these days.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 03:00 PM
10

Forgetting Sarah Marshall I just bought this on ebay. Thanks!
/r/MensRights05/08/23 07:58 AM
1

Another factor is that men take suicide attempts more seriously, thinking of ways that have a good chance of success, whereas women are far less effective at planning a successful suicide.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 11:53 PM
1

You can't change women's preferences, just like they can't change yours. So you either accept your job and pay, or move to another job that pays better.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 01:24 PM
0

I'd not met the 3F rule, but I find it interesting that in an age that allegedly embraces equality, most women quickly assume that any guy in their life is going to be providing for them, as per the first 2/3 of the 3F conditions.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 01:01 PM
2

Not for some time, I think. Men's issues are just ignored providing we keep bringing the money home.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:05 PM
2

We want justice, rather than reparations for past wrongs. Just treat us fairly today. I would like to say something about divorce settlements: A good man is expected to work hard to support his wife and kids, and that often means lots of hours. If/when she chooses to divorce him, that's used against him. Not only does he not have a chance of getting custody of his kids, but he is expected to continue to work long hours to keep her in her old standard of living. Had the guy not worked hard and ju…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 02:56 PM
2

I moved out 2 years go. I don't get anything like as much shit as I used to, even though I see her regularly.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 02:53 PM
4

Don't rush into any relationship with a woman. Work on you and think how you want to play this. One of the few advantages of having a dick is that you become more valuable into your 30s, whereas the value of the dickless peaks in their mid 20's.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 02:28 PM
1

Your username supports this allegation!
/r/MensRights25/07/23 08:45 PM
9

Some simple maths to illustrate their problem. 60% of fresh graduates in the US are women. Let's boldly assume that means 40% are men. Women don't want men less educated than themselves, so only 2/3 of recent women graduating could marry, assuming that every man was available and none of them chose to marry a girl without a degree.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 12:47 AM
10

It's frequently the women who don't want to progress. They think that they can marry the calibre of man they slept with... so they sleep with a footballer and think a footballer will marry them. They don't realise that 5 other chicks like her slept with him that week!
/r/MensRights20/07/23 12:45 AM
2

Women feminists always revert to shaming when they run out of arguments.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 09:41 AM
2

Nothing pays better than marrying and divorcing a rich man.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 07:53 AM
3

So the premise is that women are wonderful and that if the world were run by women, all the problems would go away. Sounds like the sort of 'thinking' I would expect from feminists.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 07:54 PM
8

I don't know there is a way to win here. It's their projections on to you that are the problem. Is there a process to deal with these letters, like handing them in to the head teacher, that would help with the appearance of being safe?
/r/MensRights11/07/23 09:26 AM
1

I (M) have had 200 hours of therapy so far, and have just completed my first year of a 4 year psychotherapy course. It is a female dominated profession. Done properly, it should make him more robust and better able to identify what the real issues are. For example, creating a set of boundaries can help stop her trespasses. If she won't respect his boundaries then yes, he might do well to leave the relationship, but if he doesn't leave, then she will, because she will hate his reaction to repeate…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 03:25 PM
3

All rights come at someone else's expense. Why should women, after a short period of marriage, be entitled to a life of financial support?
/r/MensRights02/07/23 05:20 PM
2

Unless the offender is a woman.
/r/MensRights28/06/23 10:08 AM
1

What do you think should be done when there is not a functional Police Force? Do you think people should just let criminals get on with it, or is it okay to intervene directly to protect themselves, their people, and their property?
/r/MensRights27/06/23 09:24 AM
32

I wish we could flog people who do stuff like this.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 08:55 AM
20

And her accuser has no money to pay them what she owes.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 08:53 AM
1

Because it gives them benefits and negligible costs.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 09:56 PM
17

Do you live in my area? Stealing from pensioners isn't considered a serious crime, but whatever you do, don't hurt the criminal trying to steal from you.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 02:54 PM
6

I also hate vigilante justice, having watched my neighbours endure it, wrongfully. However, I also live in an area without effective Policing. What should I do when someone decides to commit a crime against me? My take on it is that I favour composting burglars and the like. That way, they will never reoffend and I won't have to deal with a Police Force that is desperate to stop me removing their primary reason to exist.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 02:53 PM
2

Getting married seems a fools game these days. I want to be committed to marriage, but the financial implications are terrible.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 11:33 PM
3

I was not arguing that there is no cost for women, but that many of the costs are multi use. So she spends $300 on makeup that lasts 6 months, or $100 on a hair cut that lasts a month. This is not the same rate of spend as a $100 meal that lasts one evening.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 06:21 AM
11

How much does it cost to get dolled up? Make up, hairdresser, clothes are all multi use, but dinners aren't.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 07:08 AM
83

More generically, women resort to shaming when they are losing an argument
/r/MensRights10/06/23 06:54 AM
0

Now you are married with a kid, your Wife can get possession of your home, get alimony, and her Mum can live off the "child maintenance" payments the court will impose on you. All Mum needs to do is poison her daughter against you, and Mum has everything she needs for her old age. Ideally, you need Mum to leave the house, because otherwise divorce is likely and you will really suffer due to the way divorce courts work.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 03:09 PM
5

There are many reasons why women are paid less than them. Very little of that is because of bias. If women are underpaid, where are the women running businesses with women as most of their employees? Surely getting labour cheaply would mean these businesses would grow faster and be more profitable? They could take over industries like construction, sewage treatment, road repairs where men are in the majority. Why isn't this happening?
/r/MensRights07/06/23 12:09 PM
3

Country? State?
/r/MensRights07/06/23 10:55 AM
1

Feminism seems to include quite a dose of narcissism. "You're a 10" they say to each other, not matter how ugly, old, fat or unpleasant a woman is. This is produces unrealistic expectations, leaving many of them single when the Henry Cavill clone doesn't decide to marry them.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 10:54 AM
16

What benefit do you get from marrying her? It seems that most of the benefit from marriage goes to women- men just tend to lose their assets and income.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 10:28 AM
5

Women are trying to be like men. Welcome to men's problems. A very sad situation all round.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 08:08 AM
4

It is politically unpopular to hold women to account, but popular to hold men to account. I would not be surprised to see myself banned for this very comment as 'hate speech'.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 08:35 AM
0

Yes yes yes and yes! We need these suits for every such group worldwide.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 08:33 AM
8

Many women want multiple men to pursue them because it feels good. It's validation and a great antidote to fearing she won't find anyone.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 07:39 AM
3

Are men who work hard to pay child support slaves?
/r/MensRights04/06/23 10:43 PM
2

People in a relationship should find a way that works for them. It seems to be that women end up unhappy with husbands who earn less than them, or who are less qualified than they are. It also seems that men don't like the masculine traits that are associated with women who are climbing the corporate ladder. Finally, a woman's biology means that her fertility is time-limited, so yes, she can become a corporate VP, but she probably won't find a man she wants, who wants her, and in time to produce…
/r/MensRights04/06/23 10:06 PM
1

I completely agree. That's not the same as a "not proven" verdict, it's in the case of made-up accusation, such as for controlling a guy, by saying "If you leave me, I will say you raped me".
/r/MensRights04/06/23 09:19 PM
9

My experience is that women feminists love to shame men into doing what they want, they are unable to carry a logical argument, and they love to have their opponents silenced.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 09:53 AM
35

Russia has fought enough wars, badly, plus the effects of things like drinking, that men are in short supply.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 01:50 AM
4

False accusations are serious and should be addressed with similar severity.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 10:03 PM
2

Shaming men is the go-to tactic of women feminists. They won't debate the points, they just shame.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 12:34 PM
2

I got banned from making comments on Facebook because I'd suggested that there should be women-only cities so we can find out how long it would take for the "don't need no men" women to find they did need men.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 12:30 PM
80

The Old Testament standard is that false accusers should get what they tried to get for the other. I like that standard.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 07:19 AM
7

I suspect she will end up messed up too.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 07:16 AM
32

What if he doesn't have $100k? Lawyers are expensive
/r/MensRights31/05/23 07:25 AM
36

The cost to him of this whole thing, even if he gets off, is huge.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 05:52 AM
1

But Islam seems to control women institutionally not just outlying sects.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 09:54 PM
20

I never understood why feminists don't hate Islam. It seems to get a free pass, despite the fact that Muhammad married Aisha when she was 6 and had sex with her when she was 9 or 10. They seem to ignore the bits in the Quran that should really offend them, like these: https://unite-production.s3.amazonaws.com/tenants/mtcalvaryhuron/attachments/105871/Top\_ten\_rules\_in\_the\_Quran\_that\_oppress\_women.pdf
/r/MensRights30/05/23 06:32 PM
10

Because the attitude of "Kill all men" applies equally to both movements and any women who support them.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 06:06 PM
37

Did they also test for 'men hating disorder"?
/r/MensRights30/05/23 01:43 PM
8

We need a class action lawsuit against Facebook for this.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 10:31 AM
9

I like all of what you wrote, except I doubt they'd learn anything. Our culture diminishes men and individual complaints won't change that.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 07:06 PM
1

To be sure, your recorder would need to always be on, or accusations could be fitted in any of the gaps. It doesn't need high resolution or high frame rate, but good audio, so 10tb per year might do it.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 07:25 AM
2

Christianity includes various verses that upset feminists, like "Wives Submit to your Husbands". They ignore the other verses, like "Husbands love your Wives as Christ loved the church".
/r/MensRights25/05/23 07:10 PM
5

I am astounded that feminists aren't going nuts over what Islam teaches. Instead, when they get criticise religion, they attack churches. Oh well, let their daughters explore what Islam has to offer them...
/r/MensRights24/05/23 06:38 PM
5

Part of the misandry is diminishing the size and impact of misandry.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 09:50 AM
1

Creepy has come to mean noticing interest from a guy they don't find attractive.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 09:01 PM
5

So many women make contact really hard and the courts don't do anything. Another way to disempower men.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 07:53 AM
3

There are three standards, I believe. The earliest is "Gillick Competence", when a child is considered old enough by a court to make choices, which came from a child not wanting further treatment for cancer I believe, and the more general ones of turning 16 and 18 when rights come to children without reference to the courts. Gillick Competence is not a set age, it's when the child is considered capable of understanding multiple options at once and choosing meaningfully. It is the one you will wa…
/r/MensRights22/05/23 07:48 AM
9

What are the "right reasons" for persecuting men please?
/r/MensRights20/05/23 09:05 PM
16

A class action lawsuit against Facebook might get their attention. A lawyer finding the men in question could get quite a payment.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 11:03 AM
71

Not as well known as it should be.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 09:27 AM
7

Women celebrate victory in Asda equal pay bid https://mol.im/a/9407509 via https://dailym.ai/android
/r/MensRights18/05/23 09:25 AM
21

That's not inherently a problem. Nursing, for example, is majority women and most of the managers are likely to be women. Boasting about it might be a sign of problems though.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 05:23 PM
4

What is misogynistic abuse? Anything any feminist anywhere objects to. I wonder when men's names will be outlawed...
/r/MensRights16/05/23 01:07 PM
4

And a six pack, over 6' tall, and over 6". Plus single, a nice personality and... And they don't seem to realise every other woman wants the same few men.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 09:05 AM
4

It's when they hit 30+ and realise they are single and childless that they reconsider... but they then have a short window to capture a man and produce kids.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 06:40 PM
6

Shaming seems to be the specific technique used.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 07:02 AM
4

Women feminists tend to try to shame men into silence rather than raise specific factual points. Their problem is that we can prove most or all of our points using statistics and simple logic. For example, women want to marry men who are at least as educated as they are, and 60% of US graduates are women. That suggests 1/3 of women graduates, regardless of any other restrictions, will not find a husband. Good luck with finding a feminist who will accept those two claims and the simple maths invo…
/r/MensRights15/05/23 06:58 AM
2

Ultimately, if women as a whole are aggressive and unfriendly, men will stay away. It really is that simple.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 12:37 PM
18

And women wonder why men are disinterested. Women can take our reputation, assets, earnings and children.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 06:51 AM
38

And that girl, having discovered the power of gossip, is going to get a job somewhere and repeat the performance. The sad fact is that "creepy", which used to mean that a guy was behaving inappropriately, now means "I don't fancy him"... and so men's reputations are ruined.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 12:30 AM
4

Feminists tend to immediately move to shaming men who don't agree with them. They don't argue the point with logic or statistics, but say things like "That's just what I'd expect from an incel".
/r/MensRights13/05/23 06:37 PM
1

Feminists/women love to shame men for their opinions, but often don't make any effort to bring any facts to support their case. I find it interesting to consider that, as women get more control in society, that this will become the norm. "Yes, there's CCTV showing that you didn't touch her, but she _felt_ touched, and that's what matters"....
/r/MensRights13/05/23 06:18 PM
6

Third Wave Feminism certainly is.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 02:33 PM
1

Fat and/or old women can end up being involuntarily celibate, but involuntary celibacy is much more a problem for men and so "incel" has ended up gendered. "Nice guys" is particularly gendered, which is why it isn't used for women.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 12:30 PM
1

Yes, but women tend to use one at a time unless their periods are extra heavy, so I would expect them to carry a range. Multiple women for multiple years would use a lot of them, so taking variety makes sense. I expect alternative uses would be explored too.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 08:29 AM
9

If we had "Are we dating the same Woman", that would be taken down immediately, and no-one would be conscious of the double standard. :-(
/r/MensRights10/05/23 08:32 PM
2

I would expect that composting and reusing the material would make a lot of sense. 100% compostable pads either exist or can be easily made.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 01:00 PM
3

It is lovely to talk to someone who has the humility to say that. Thank you. So many debates, especially on Facebook, never resolve properly.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 11:29 AM
4

The average is 22 per period (I checked for this!). That's 286 per year. They are around 10g each (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790822000404), making 2.86kg, per person, per year. We can explore this further, but my sense is that this is trivial in comparison to the other weight savings women produce by reduced consumption.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 10:02 AM
1

If a woman you know needs that many then she probably should see a gynacologist.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 07:01 AM
13

If they aren't given hormonal treatment, yes, they will need those too.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 09:11 PM
14

They are not the only criteria. Water, food and oxygen on such a mission is going to be heavy. If they send women instead of men, they can send more of the other stuff needed for survival.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 08:06 PM
0

Some examples would be nursing of babies, the ill and the elderly, also counselling. They are more in touch with people things, whereas men are more in touch with things. Women will notice when something is wrong with the kids or friends, but men will notice that the wheel bearing is starting to fail.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:34 PM
2

No, there are many professions women are better at, especially those using soft skills which women excel at. I just don't think the evidence supports women equaling men physically.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 08:25 AM
5

Get a guaranteed bang and not a dead bedroom.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 06:59 AM
1

So that's one field. How many others can you name please?
/r/MensRights08/05/23 06:56 AM
7

Median men are still stronger and faster than median women.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 06:55 AM
1

Another reason to not date women.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:05 PM
0

It can be difficult to cover every situation in which you might be accused, especially as accusations could go back a very long time... but "she only just felt safe enough to mention it".
/r/MensRights06/05/23 07:47 PM
2

When your manager is replaced with a woman, you'll find women start joining your team anyway... Have fun with that!
/r/MensRights06/05/23 01:51 PM
21

The lesson is... don't work with women.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 11:29 AM
3

I think you mean "unsolicited". By definition you would not love pictures you didn't want.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 07:23 AM
8

And with 3 kids by 100 different men... "What do I bring to the table? I _am_ the table"...
/r/MensRights05/05/23 07:16 AM
5

Tax only works if men bother to earn enough. More and more men are not getting degrees and doing other jobs.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/23 09:22 PM
2

Parliament can pass laws to ban MGTOW if they want, overriding previous sex discrimination laws. For example, the Labour Party passed a law to allow them to have all-women shortlists for certain wards, divisions and constituencies.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/23 09:20 PM
3

You can't fight every issue at once. Don't try. Pick one issue, or part of one, and get familiar with the facts and statistics for it. Then discuss just that point... However, most women, when challenged on this sort of stuff by someone who has facts and sources, will just try to shame the man they are talking to, and will also change topic so you can never follow a logical chain to conclusion. At its root however, is her issue with men. Perhaps it's something she learnt, perhaps she was herself…
/r/MensRights26/04/23 02:44 PM
18

Being MGTOW has to be on the list of things to criminalise too. How will they get men's money if men won't engage with the system?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/23 10:55 AM
19

And, unfortunately, a lot of politics these days.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 01:20 PM
2

Agreed. I don't debate feminism, I debate the individual issues because there are statistics for those.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 01:38 PM
1

Yes, that's the line I would take.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 01:36 PM
1

I suggest you look at 'Self Made Man' by Norah Vincent. She lived as a man for a year and shared her experiences. Clips are available on YouTube. You might also enjoy 'The Red Pill' movie.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 01:34 PM
1

Or see a psychotherapist. I suggest Gestalt or Integrative.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 01:28 PM
1

May I suggest you find an activity to do where there are men present, such as hiking? Drift in to and out of contact with various men as you walk. The presence of others should make this feel safer for you, yet allow you experience of multiple guys. You could try talking to a guy and say that you want to experience being little spoon. A number of guys would be willing to be big spoon for you, without it going further.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 01:23 PM
1

My argument is that Facebook can display your photo, but they don't have the right to use it on their page.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 01:15 PM
5

That does not give third parties the right to process your photos.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 09:38 AM
3

My conclusion is that there is no point debating bundles of idea such as feminism. The only way to debate them is to tackle individual elements, such as the gender mismatch at colleges.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 12:22 PM
3

The first step is awareness, which you have done. Thank you. I think there are two other things you can do- a. Challenge misandry when you meet it, and b. Support men who are experiencing misandry.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 10:58 AM
11

Yes, it is destructive. The adverse consequence will become far worse over time.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 01:22 PM
43

My experience of dating feminists is that they tend not to debate the points, but they are very quick to shame men. That means it's not possible to question any aspect of their beliefs.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 01:03 PM
21

I genuinely laughed out loud at that. Most of the guys here are just avoidant of the garbage that comes from feminists and don't hate women at all. There's the exception of course, but generally the feel is a passive "let them get on with it, but without us".
/r/MensRights22/04/23 01:01 PM
24

More broadly, feminists tend to shame men rather than argue facts with us. I pointed this out on a Reddit thread... and got shamed for it! Oh the lack of self awareness!
/r/MensRights22/04/23 06:32 AM
-19

I won't condemn her. Caring for someone with cancer is really tough. In fact, most people who leave their partners because of sickness are men.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 08:59 PM
9

Whether it's coded into statute or not... yes. Similarly if a woman hits a man, it hardly registers in the legal system.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 05:42 PM
10

I increasingly believe that many women wait at the finish line so they can pick the men who have succeeded, whilst contributing nothing to that success.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/23 09:55 AM
1

At that point, she realised she'd messed up!
/r/MensRights14/04/23 11:49 PM
9

Some Dads shouldn't see their kids... but that's rare. Most of the time it is vindictive ex-wives playing games and refusing access, and the courts typically do nothing at all about it.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 09:14 PM
1

It feels better to tell a woman she's a 10 than to say she's a 5, and no-one wants to upset others by telling the truth.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 05:01 PM
134

The divorce laws tell me that men shouldn't get married.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 10:42 AM
3

Do you think that is typical?
/r/MensRights14/04/23 01:47 AM
108

And many of these houses are part of their divorce settlements, which is also why the guys then don't have a house. Honestly, most guys getting married these days are making a bad mistake. It's signing up to her getting the house and alimony when she finds someone better.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 09:38 AM
1

No, but it's not appropriate right now as I am still married.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 05:52 PM
17

The BBC strongly push everything women, ignoring things where men are disadvantaged.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 05:33 PM
30

She should have got whatever he would have got had her allegations proven true.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 05:33 PM
10

"Men don't approach women any more"... Any ideas as to why? Women are vulnerable to a man's violence. Men are vulnerable to a woman's words. If I were in my 20's again, would I want to date modern women? Would I want to marry one and give her the right to my assets and income? I would be very very reluctant.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 05:32 PM
3

I look forward to an EU directive that pushes for women to be involved in less glamorous jobs, like bricklaying, sewage treatment, truck driving and slaughterhouses. Except it will never come. Women want laws that mean women get the top jobs.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 08:52 PM
1

If a client comes with something particular, which may be a requirement for their counsellor to be a particular sex, race, religion, or for their client to have particular specialisms, such as addiction, child abuse, domestic violence, to have a particular modality (style of working), or the ability to work remotely or in person, regularly or at erratic intervals... then that's fine. However, my sense from the 10 therapists I've had (3 longer term, 7 trainees) is that their skill and personal fi…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 09:17 PM
1

Part of the training is for trainees to act, for short periods like 20-25 minutes, as clients and counsellors, whilst being observed by other students who subsequently comment on the 'therapist's' performance. My sense is that gender is less important than the skill and character of the therapist. I am very cognitive, for example, some are very freely and sensitive, and everything in-between. Take a look at Gestalt therapy.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 06:46 AM
2

I am training to be a psychotherapist. 8 of 24 are men.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 06:48 AM
3

The numbers seem close to those of other sources. What source are you using?
/r/MensRights05/04/23 10:24 PM
23

Somewhat over 70% are women. Source: https://www.crossrivertherapy.com/therapist-statistics Though 90% is over 70%, I suspect they mean 70-75%.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:08 PM
1

If 1 in 5 women have been raped, and the women being asked have 30 years of life experience, and meet 5 men a day... that's 10,000 days, 50,000 encounters with men, and 249,999 non-rape encounters for every rape. Maybe, possibly, her reaction is excessive.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:07 PM
6

Ad-hominem attacks are very common when people can't argue the facts. Have you considered asking questions as a way of debating? I don't mean questions that include claims of facts, but things like "If the percentage of journalists killed who were women was reduced, what would that do to the percentage of journalists killed who were men"? Or how about "If feminists demand equality, why are none of you campaigning for 50% of journalists being killed to be women"?
/r/MensRights04/04/23 11:42 AM
15

I oppose the injustice promoted by feminists, which they describe as "equality". They want quotas for board members, but not for brick laying, underground mining or sewage treatment. They want equal pay for soldiers even if women lack the strength and endurance of men. They want to be taken on dates and paid for even if the guy earns the same as they do.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 08:22 AM
-4

I offer to be a mod.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 08:17 AM
16

You might well be right on that. Normal police practice is to throw the man out of any shared housing, which sucks.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 08:14 PM
40

You might want to read some of the literature on domestic abuse. The psychological dynamics make it really hard for the victim to leave. In this case, he might well have been made homeless, and there are effectively no homeless shelters for abused men.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 07:32 PM
13

Women should get the same punishments that men get. Judges who can't manage that should be reprimanded.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 10:59 AM
4

If the accusation was malicious, not mistaken, his accuser should spend 16 years in jail too, and pay him compensation.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 07:23 AM
5

Agreed. Men have the right to refuse sex, just like women have the right, and no-one should be shamed for it.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 06:07 AM
2

Under English law, that's not adultery! https://www.slatergordon.co.uk/newsroom/what-is-adultery
/r/MensRights28/03/23 09:50 PM
1

To be fair, 97% of mass shootings are done by men. Source: https://www.statista.com/statistics/476445/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-shooter-s-gender/ This is not worth disputing- there are far more egregious abuses and assumptions out there.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 11:38 AM
2

I think AI-generated people will flood OnlyFans. Any height, weight, age, sex, colour, hair colour, hair style, with natural proportions or any variation the customer wants. Want it to look or talk like a celebrity? A lot of women will need to say goodbye to easy money!
/r/MensRights27/03/23 08:46 PM
1

Thanks for that! But if you'd suggested they go to work so you could stay home... they might have been "slightly" less keen, I think.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 03:03 PM
2

I suspect many women would fail to respect such a man, and respect is essential if a woman is to stay with a guy.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 02:03 PM
5

That's what equality looks like... /s As women seem reluctant to marry guys less qualified than them, here are more girls who won't find anyone long term.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 08:08 AM
1

Happy Cake Day! May all your years on Reddit be good ones.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 01:51 PM
2

I watched "The Red Pill" movie, done by a feminist who stopped being a feminist. Really worth a watch. I think feminists are focused on their own interests and not that interested in the issues men have.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 12:31 PM
2

Let me know if you ever want a rational discussion of Christianity.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 01:57 PM
1

It is possible to project things onto other people: - I like Burger King, so you must too. - I don't like Sushi, you won't like it either. It can also be difficult to hear that we've messed up on something we've tried to do for another, and it can also be plain self-centredness. So maybe you should talk about this topic featuring something that has not been an issue yet, so it's not loaded? Colours? Clothes? Types of coffee? Whatever! But if she really is a narcissist... it's virtually impossibl…
/r/MensRights20/03/23 09:57 PM
1

That's not easy to fix. Thinking your partner is wrong is a normal element in relationships. Does she feel secure in the rest of your relationship? Have things changed that make her feel insecure, scared even? Are you able to package your challenges up in a way that simultaneously provides assurance of your love?
/r/MensRights20/03/23 07:58 PM
5

You are right. It's mostly women posting now. <sigh>
/r/MensRights20/03/23 07:38 PM
5

How narcissistic is she? Have you looked at the Narcissists Prayer? "That didn't happen. And if it did, it wasn't that bad. And if it was, that's not a big deal. And if it is, that's not my fault. And if it was, I didn't mean it. And if I did, you deserved it." If that's her, getting any change will be difficult.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 07:33 PM
4

/r/DeadBedrooms :-(
/r/MensRights20/03/23 02:22 PM
4

The Bible had a nice rule. If you make a false allegation and it's proven, you'd get the punishment you were trying to get for the other person. Falsely accuse someone of murder- you'd be killed!
/r/MensRights16/03/23 10:31 PM
1

I really don't want women in the military for most jobs. If power, strength and endurance matter, then why allow in women who can't meet the same standard? Women might be great in space or in submarines because strength is not needed and they consume less air, water and food... provided they all get on! They might also do well in a few jobs like air traffic control or intelligence, but if strength were to matter, they'd risk their own lives and those of their colleagues.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 10:30 PM
5

It takes 1 burglar to make everyone put locks on their doors. It takes 1 false accusation to make lots of guys avoid women. The cost is just too high. I would love women to police themselves on this... but it won't happen.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 10:25 PM
1

I think men have a condition called "learned helplessness". We don't expect anyone to care or change things. What we can do, however, is succeed on our own. We can get fit, succeed at work, and have the friendships we want, all without much interaction with women.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 10:31 PM
3

Distance and document. Nothing will probably happen, but install a track-and-log app on your phone so that your accurate position is recorded every minute or five. If you can prove you were 5 miles away when she said you were with her, that's helpful. Selfies in recognisable backgrounds are pretty useful too.
/r/MensRights14/03/23 09:45 AM
2

And saying it's okay because women are in the majority!
/r/MensRights11/03/23 12:33 PM
2

(disparately)
/r/MensRights11/03/23 12:28 PM
4

The issues seem to reduce down to.. Men are in power. This is often because they founded successful companies (not nail salons), took STEM degrees and not Women's studies, and work long hours. Men are violent. True... but men are mostly violent to other men, usually outside bars. Women, on the other hand, destroy men with their tongues, from underming through to false allegations.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 04:08 PM
4

Do any feminists ever swap the genders and ask how things would look? So "Belgian school makes girls stand up during class time while boys sit down on international men's day", for example?
/r/MensRights09/03/23 10:09 PM
3

_had_ being the operative word. Guys don't like women who are aggressive. We treasure a peaceful supportive home.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 02:28 PM
11

Women wouldn't take their kids there, even though the kids would do some really fun things!
/r/MensRights05/03/23 02:28 PM
38

Another woman accusing a man.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 04:21 PM
1

Rape is very very difficult to prove... the real issue is the damage to his reputation.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 03:58 PM
2

Slander is not usually illegal, it's a civil offence that you could sue for if you could find and prove who did it, and if she was rich enough to be worth $200K (or whatever) in legal fees to sue.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 03:57 PM
2

Very likely, no-one has made an accusation to the authorities- if they had, they'd have been in contact with you. This is just some girl being shitty. You won't be arrested for something written on a toilet stall, but you might want to be more careful around girls like this.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 03:55 PM
1

No, that's not true. Men have been honoured, but 3rd wave feminism has fought against it.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 08:48 AM
2

And many men are removing themselves from dating, work and indeed from life, as a consequence.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 08:47 AM
2

Maybe women should just cull males at birth? They only need to preserve 1% of us to ensure the survival of the species. Then women can get what they truly want... to do everything that men do. They can become bricklayers, high wire electricians, truckers, soldier, miners, slaughterhouse worker, portable toilet cleaners, sewage worker, plumbers etc.. I am saddened by this whole debate. Women do not honour men any more.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 11:50 PM
1

Third wave feminism doesn't benefit anyone. It's really about encouraging women to act like men, but these women lose the very thing, femininity, that makes then attractive to men. So she's become a partner in a law firm by 35. Fabulous. But she won't date anyone earning less than $200K and guys aren't interested in her disagreeable and bossy nature. Such women think they are winning, and in a sense they are, but they will find it hard to find a husband and produce children. I don't think there …
/r/MensRights01/03/23 11:27 PM
4

Because that's how it is. Compare... The availability of women's shelters vs men's shelters, The judgements of family courts against men for alimony, Men can go to prison for not paying child support, but women can withhold access to children and brainwash them against their Father with pretty much no adverse consequences, Men almost always get longer sentences for crimes than women, It's okay to say "kill all men", but not "kill all women", and False allegations by women against men are rarely …
/r/MensRights01/03/23 08:18 AM
4

I completely agree on that. If women are underpaid, that's an easy win for women bosses wanting cheap labour. However, you and I know that women don't want/can't do the physically demanding jobs that men do. Women avoid working at heights and dirt. However, somehow, every problem women have is actually men's fault because of the patriarchy. Please, demonstrate that you don't need us by doing the same jobs as us. Oh wait... Bear Grylls already did a test: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=073u84xcz…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 10:27 PM
18

YouTube- look for "All Female Company Fails Due To Catfighting, Backstabbing, Drama, Etc" if my direct link to the video gets removed.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 10:22 PM
9

Strong Successful Male: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueq9\_-gt6e4
/r/MensRights26/02/23 10:21 PM
1

Women are as good as men in every area, or so they claim. Women should just start businesses and hire women. It won't take them long to be as successful as men. Can't they raise capital? Start an investment capital business! The Internet allows anonymity. Women, ethic and religious minorities can use that to succeed without prejudice being relevant.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 06:03 PM
10

The solution is simple. Don't hire women.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 11:06 AM
4

Yes there are. The problem is that even the good ones are unlikely to turn down a free house and money for life, when urged to do so by their lawyer. How can a man even be sure he won't be accused of rape or assault? The question a man has to ask now is: Is it worth it?
/r/MensRights12/02/23 09:38 PM
6

I also suggest: https://www.youtube.com/@CourtneyRyan and https://www.youtube.com/@JustPearlyThings for more information. There doesn't seem to be much point chasing modern women. Want to be blamed for everything? Falsely accused of rape? Lose all your stuff in a divorce settlement? I don't.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 08:05 PM
1

Let me guess... she's happily married to a man? /s
/r/MensRights11/02/23 01:48 AM
4

Feminists don't seem to object to using the things men made, like roads, cars, water pipes, sewage treatment, electrical power, buildings etc., the problem comes when they want the fruit of other people's hard work without working for it themselves.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 12:01 AM
1

I object to the means used by some of them, but that doesn't mean it was wrong for them to want these basic rights.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 10:40 PM
1

No no, it's prejudice against women. The patriarchy!!!! /s And so the feminists get upset with men who make twice the money because they work much harder... but it's men's fault, apparently. :-(
/r/MensRights10/02/23 10:39 PM
6

S.C.U.M. manefesto I had not seen that before. It's shocking. Imagine if there had been a male equivalent- there would have been outrage. But targeting men is apparently fine.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 10:36 PM
-2

I agree that feminism has always included some women who hated men, and that early feminists did some things I object to. That's not the same as saying their early objectives were inherently bad.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 10:31 PM
27

And the demand to be a certain proportion of a companys' board of Directors without spending the decades of long hours that everyone else spent to get there... No. Not good. If women were that good, where are the women equivalents of Elon Musk and Bill Gates? The internet doesn't care what gender you are or claim to be- so where are the successful women? They exist, but far down the league tables.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 03:59 PM
3

First wave feminism was okay. It focused on things like women being allowed to work when they got married, and the right to have a bank account. Third wave feminists are the "we hate men" brigade. They are the ones who treat men badly.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 03:56 PM
1

Video is best, but might need some investment to do so secretly. Check local laws first!
/r/MensRights10/02/23 02:11 PM
2

Document document document. And get the buy-in and confirmation of your colleagues. HR (all female?) might cover it up and alert her, so you need to have enough evidence if you are fired immediately. Video is perfect, if it's allowed in your jurisdiction.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 02:10 PM
1

Collect lots of evidence first. Ensure you have support from the other guys you work with so that, if you are fired, they will support you in court when you sue.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 02:09 PM
36

"did not realize that even just posting on this subreddit would get you banned in other subreddits. That is honestly ridiculous" Yeah. We find it ridiculous too. You came on here to challenge bad debate and get banned (EDIT: From other subs) just as surely as if you were saying something horrible. Welcome to our world! What do you propose we do about it? Right now, lots of the guys here are practising "learned helplessness" and just zoning out from contact with women. It's not just dating, but t…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 02:03 PM
23

What men-only spaces exist now? It seems to me that women have fought to be included in all these spaces. They then "feel threatened" and demand women-only spaces. That looks like hypocrisy to me.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 08:36 AM
1

I agree that it sucks, but men are optimised for combat, and women are optimised for caring for kids. If women go to the front, more of them will be killed and the risk of losing the war goes up.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 10:11 PM
2

In the UK, and club with 50 or more members is unable to discriminate on gender. So a men only gym could not keep women out.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 11:08 AM
23

I think it's validation: I am so hot, men can't help but stare at me so I had to get them banned from the gym. Oh it's so awful being this pretty.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 08:45 PM
144

Feminists demand access to all men-only spaces. Then they complain about the men and demand women-only spaces.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 08:41 PM
0

You are making a claim about all men that I think is not supported by the facts. So, do you have a source to justify your claim please?
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/23 10:37 PM
13

Straight men aren't attracted to men or masculine women. Lots of these girls reach 30 and then realise that they didn't secure a man when at their most attractive. Sure, they slept with some high value men and/or bad boys, but they aren't married and the guys they chased aren't interested any more. This is not something most men can contribute to fixing.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/23 11:37 AM
4

Personal insults and blocking are becoming more normal across society as a whole, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 07:21 AM
1

Moderators should be trustees for their communities, but a number use that position for a power trip and delight in shutting discussions down. It's a serious issue for having healthy subs where issues are discussed properly.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 07:23 PM
7

Countries cannot mobilise a high percentage of their population into the military. Initially, there is a limit to the rate at which newcomers can be trained and equipped, but as the war goes on, it is essential to supply food, clothing, medical care, weapons and munitions. So, I think it is better to send the men to fight, something they are far better equipped for than women, and for the women to contribute to the war effort in other ways. I too am unhappy with the way women demand equality onl…
/r/MensRights31/01/23 12:21 AM
7

Okay, that's admissible. But isn't it sad that we are at this level of reason for men to marry women? As "BetterBachelor" says on YouTube, when women divorce men they usually get "cash and prizes", as in alimony and the house, so why would men invite that on themselves?
/r/MensRights31/01/23 12:13 AM
7

I _now_ know of 4 reasons for a man to marry a woman who is willing to live with him: a. Religion, either his, hers or her family's, b. To get a visa for one of them, c. If they are part of something like the military which sets rules on these things, d. In some jurisdictions, wives cannot be compelled to testify against their husbands. But generally, the divorce laws and the practice of the courts mean marriage is financially dangerous for me.
/r/MensRights30/01/23 08:37 PM
55

LA? Limited Awareness?
/r/MensRights30/01/23 07:20 PM
1

You might find Courtney Ryan interesting to listen to, like this one on Youtube: Why So Many Women Are Single (Men Don’t Want Relationships?) I won't link directly to it because of the automoderator.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 06:09 PM
1

If men don't offer what women want, the women won't accept them. If women don't offer what men want, the men won't accept them. What I see of the dating world is that it's a mess with a lot of unhappy people trying to find partners, but failing for a variety of reasons. I am not interested in dating at this time.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 10:56 PM
1

It varies in the extent, and method, so any answer will, by necessity be a generalisation. Let's start with highly successful women. They've worked hard and fought their way up the corporate ladder and are making a good salary. This requires them to be disagreeable like men are... and men don't want to come home to disagreement. It's not even as though a high salary makes a woman attractive to a man (unless he's in the few percent who are leaches!), so she attains something that men don't value …
/r/MensRights28/01/23 04:59 PM
1

A top-of-the-head answer is... I'd like women to be feminine. I don't want a woman who is trying hard to be a man. There's lots of men who do a better job of being men, so I don't see why women are trying to compete with men. I'd like to be appreciated for what I can do, especially where it involves my strength or skills. Most men also want to be respected. Being respected reduces the risk of paternity fraud, I think.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 04:18 PM
5

Thank you. And that's exactly why women shouldn't be in the military in combat roles.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 12:00 AM
6

("Cue")
/r/MensRights26/01/23 06:07 PM
10

The "Feminists need to experience some of what Men do" bit of me is enthusiastic about this... and the "women can't match men physically and will get themselves and their comrades killed" bit of me thinks it's appalling. Some women can get close to the performance of men... but they really have to try, and that drives up their risk of injury and again, of getting their comrades killed.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 03:48 PM
1

The alternative is that we become the controlling ogres the feminists accuse us of being, and that seems counter-productive to me. If women want to buy into 3rd wave feminism, we should just look after our own interests and not participate. I was going to say "we should let them", but even that feels controlling. If the laws on divorce are too strict for us to want to marry, then don't marry. If the laws on child support are too harsh, get a vasectomy. There is only so much they can do to force …
/r/MensRights24/01/23 11:20 PM
4

You want some recordings of this, and some legal advice.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 10:10 PM
1

Women can only have these views because men have built the world they rely on. When they take this approach, ask who build the floor they are standing on: Women or men? Then the walls? Ask about the heating system. Who drilled the wells to extract the oil? Who designed the machines that made their clothes? The list is endless.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 08:38 PM
8

They don't want competition for the men they'd like to date.
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 10:24 PM
3

Sounds like a plan. I suggest they have conscription for a few centuries too.
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 04:17 PM
1

And because she sees the issue, she is on our side.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 04:26 PM
4

I think we should speak kindly to those who see the problem. Better behaviour comes from awareness. Now she is aware, she will behave better, and teach others. I always said to my kids that the most important part of sorry was living differently, and I think this is good advice for adults too.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 04:08 PM
-8

That's not how therapy works. If you had that experience, you had a bad therapist.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 11:09 PM
-12

That's not how therapy works. Source: 200 hours of therapy and now training to be a therapist. The trick is to help your client see what's really going on, which includes helping them to see their part in a problem. That is why it takes years of training to become a therapist.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 11:08 PM
11

Not nothing. She could panic, just to show she's contributing. /s
/r/MensRights20/01/23 02:02 PM
15

And women-only everything else. Police? Plumbers? Sewage Engineers? Go for it!
/r/MensRights20/01/23 02:01 PM
47

That's the truth right there. "We demand equal pay"... whilst not being able and/or willing to do equal work.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 02:00 PM
11

Any requirements for a job are inherently prejudicial against the people who don't meet them. Everyone whose opinion is worth anything opposes prejudice. Therefore, all jobs should be open to anyone, regardless of their physical abilities, health, or qualifications. Isn't that obvious- or are you just a bigot? ​ /s
/r/MensRights20/01/23 01:59 PM
1

Do they have enough money to make it worth it? In the UK, it isn't worth suing anyone for libel or slander unless they are rich and said or wrote something very public... but if they are rich, they are very hard to sue successfully.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 07:08 PM
-1

She's happy. He's happy. I guess the feminists were ignored and are really upset with her.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 02:21 PM
6

No no... it's much better to work a job you hate so you can pay other people to raise your children... /s
/r/MensRights19/01/23 02:01 PM
3

Maybe do a course the women like to do, like "Gender Studies" and not something like Engineering or Computer Science?
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/23 03:33 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/@JedediahBilaLIVE but she also talks about "the matrix", unfortunately.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 11:29 PM
1

And how does he feel about that interview?
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/23 12:38 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/@StrongSuccessfulMale
/r/MensRights17/01/23 01:31 AM
3

I had a look at "12 rules for life" by Jordan Peterson. It seems to have some relevant things in it, including a chapter on not stopping kids skateboarding, where he talks about boys and their need to develop skill in dangerous things.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 11:54 PM
11

Yes, it would be a ridiculous conclusion. Where does it go though? What should a guy do if a woman can just pepper spray him because he's jogging past her?
/r/MensRights16/01/23 10:15 AM
6

I am sorry you have to experience that. :-(
/r/MensRights15/01/23 10:24 PM
5

I choose to avoid women pedestrians at night. I cross the road if I can, for a start. Mostly it's because I don't want them to feel afraid. Her action, though, was completely unjustified.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 09:30 PM
12

Imagine if he'd knocked her down because he'd been pepper sprayed in the past!
/r/MensRights15/01/23 08:04 PM
65

100% of paternity fraud is committed by women!
/r/MensRights15/01/23 08:04 PM
221

Imagine if he'd knocked her down because he'd been pepper sprayed in the past!
/r/MensRights15/01/23 07:59 PM
3

I completely agree. They bring different things, and that's okay. The point I was attempting to make was the absurdity of the clip questioning whether men had any value, when almost all the stuff round her was designed and made by men.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 10:14 PM
6

Are men important in society? A good question. Let's start with the wall behind you. Were those bricks laid by a man or a woman? How about the pavement you are standing on. Was it laid by a man or a woman? The microphone you are holding, was it designed by a man or a woman? The camera you are using, was it designed by a man or a woman? The wool jumper you are wearing, was the farmer a man or a woman? So, apart from the city you are in, the gear you are using, and the clothes you are wearing, men…
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:24 PM
6

Thank you so much for this award. I really appreciate it.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 10:27 PM
1

So, fun question... what do you disagree with?
/r/MensRights10/01/23 10:25 PM
124

Well, the dead don't complain much compared to women, so obviously the women are affected worse. /s EDIT: Thanks for the most unexpected award. :-D
/r/MensRights10/01/23 05:15 PM
1

Watch some of these videos and like them, and you will receive 'red pill' and mgtow content. I am glad you liked them.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 04:12 PM
2

You are welcome. Also betterbachelor on YT
/r/MensRights10/01/23 12:35 PM
1

bc? Birth Control? or Because?
/r/AntiFeminists10/01/23 11:42 AM
1

"JustPearlyThings" on YouTube is worth a look. She shoots down lots of feminist arguments really well.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 11:37 AM
3

I love this! Humility is a rare thing on social media. I compliment you for owning up to this. I am smiling. :-D
/r/MensRights10/01/23 11:33 AM
1

I didn't mention non-working women. Men tend to work longer hours and in jobs that pay more, like engineering and construction, women tend to spend beyond their means, and the men in relationships tend to be older, so it's more likely the man would own a house that the woman would. Thus, most times, marriage and divorce represents a nett transfer of wealth from men to women. How often do men get the house or an award of alimony? Almost never.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 11:32 AM
2

There is a limit to how much the state can take from a man. JustPearlyThings on YouTube said that 80% of babies in a New York Borough were fathered by just 18% of the men... those kids are going to grow up without a Dad, with all the consequences this brings.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/23 10:28 PM
3

How do women get cervical cancer? Almost always from HPV. The more guys she sleeps with, the greater risk she is at.
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/23 10:26 PM
2

It is better to address the issue than to shame people. If you disagree with him, please explain why. Whether he accepts your point or not, you have the chance to affect the other people reading the thread.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 10:12 PM
8

Yes, I worded that poorly. Thank you. Men are really not that interested in a woman's professional success. Our sense is that our income is what matters, not hers. On the other side, women who earn more than their men tend to leave for someone who earns even more.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 09:58 PM
7

Marriage rates keep falling. Women are increasingly desperate to marry but it seems guys are increasingly aware of the cost to them of doing so. If she'll live with you, why would you want to actually marry her and allow her to take your house and a chunk of your income? What does that bring men with the divorce laws being as they are?
/r/MensRights09/01/23 09:55 PM
2

My sense is that when Paul wrote about being single and not marrying, he did not mean taking part in hookups.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 09:53 PM
8

I can think of only 3 reasons for a man to marry a woman who will live with him: Religious reasons, whether his, hers, or her families, to get a visa, and if someone is required to because they are in something like the army.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 03:43 PM
17

And they wait at "the finish line" for the most successful men, thinking they can just marry into their success without working on their own success.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 02:57 PM
5

Women want someone who will pay for everything for them. They will offer sex in return, whether that's by marrying a rich man, being a sugar babe, or being a prostitute. Men are vulnerable when the woman finds a better deal comes along, or even when they get bored with the current guy: When they divorce Husband #1, they get the house, the kids, child support and alimony. What's not to like? And why would men want such a deal?
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/23 11:04 PM
17

"If it flies, floats of f***s, it's cheaper to rent than to buy" I'd love to be proved wrong on that!
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/23 09:38 PM
3

Any man interested in her should see that video.
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/23 09:36 PM
2

Like other mostly closed communities, it is easy for feminist groups to be echo chambers, where not only do people tend to reinforce each others beliefs, but moderators exclude people and delete posts that actually or potentially disagree with the consensus of that group. For example FDS I think it is very dangerous, but it applies to many, if not most, opinionated groups,
/r/MensRights08/01/23 06:05 PM
5

They are mostly gone now, but golf clubs and working mens pubs used to be men only. Now, in the UK, and group of 50 or more can be forced to admit women.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 06:54 PM
33

And women insisted on joining all the men-only spaces... and are now insisting that they aren't safe and need women-only spaces there to keep them safe! However, men don't try to join women-only spaces.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 09:10 PM
4

He'd try to stop the slide as fast he could, then he'd have to pull himself back up to where he started.
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 07:54 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8P\_xTBpAcY
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 07:53 PM
4

We know women judge us on our ability to provide. So we will take the dirty, dangerous, and difficult jobs. Women just need to be pretty and have a nice attitude... and they've got until 30 to capture the man they want.
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 07:52 PM
0

What you might find is a line of qualified female plumbers, carpenters and electricians who are denied work because they have a bad attitude and won't pull their weight.
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 07:50 PM
14

Feminism is all about winning more rights for women. It has nothing to do with equality as such.
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 05:39 PM
3

First wave feminism is great, it's 3rd wave I have a problem with.
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 02:43 PM
2

It makes it simpler!
/r/MensRights01/01/23 05:26 PM
-5

Buy some soap. Try it. Use it or get something else.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 04:29 PM
3

You might be right. The important thing for OP is that he can see this list and has the chance to run.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 04:11 PM
6

Not as often as we'd like to be, but it does mean we don't, in turn get fucked by the divorce courts and have our assets taken.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 12:33 PM
56

Not at all. She is just filtering out almost all the guys who might possibly be interested in her. One of my red flags is... chicks having a list of red flags, particularly a long list. She just disqualified herself from being of interest.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 12:32 PM
22

Marry a guy, produce children. Divorce the guy. Get the house and free money. Live with another guy. Enjoy his income too. What is the down side for the woman?
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/23 12:23 PM
1

The orientation toward things vs people is a spectrum. Yes, of course. Generalisations are helpful for discussing humans, but they don't necessarily apply equally to everyone.
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 07:21 PM
5

There's been lots of research on this. Women, compared to men, are interested in people, and men, compared to women are interested in things. One paper of many for you: "Results showed that men prefer working with things and women prefer working with people, producing a large effect size (d = 0.93) on the Things-People dimension. " https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19883140/
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 01:44 PM
6

There are some barriers for women. The first and most obvious comes from the physical differences, that men are taller, heavier, stronger and faster. There is a reason women don't beat their male equivalents at sports. The second is that women are biologically orientated towards people rather than things, so they tend to be less experienced with things than men are. For example, not many mechanics are women, even though many of the jobs don't require great strength. The third is that there is ac…
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 09:13 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/@JustPearlyThings I love her stuff.
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 09:04 AM
2

It means I am not in a place to comment further on whether this way of examining people is helpful or not, compared to the alternatives.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:17 PM
5

OP probably doesn't want to get roasted.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 10:07 PM
7

Men almost certainly drive more miles than women. Provided the cars are moved off the main carriageway before the men leave, women would be mostly okay for a while. I guess most fuel tanker drivers are men, electricity is needed to get the fuel out of the underground tanks, and computer systems are needed to process payments... so it won't be long before fuel becomes unavailable.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 10:07 PM
14

If we lost 83% of Police Officers and all the men... crime would go down roughly proportionately! https://open.lib.umn.edu/socialproblems/chapter/8-3-who-commits-crime/
/r/MensRights30/12/22 10:05 PM
0

Do you have a source for that please?
/r/MensRights30/12/22 09:36 PM
2

I am not in a place to add any further value.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 09:33 PM
-5

This one? https://www.factcheck.org/2018/03/female-led-company-didnt-build-collapsed-bridge/
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:48 PM
4

What will they do about Montana and men's pass rate being lower there? Oh yeah... absolutely nothing at all. But where women do less well? That requires action!
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:26 PM
5

Engineering apprenticeships are really important and produce valuable professionals who can make and build amazing products to high standards on dodgy equipment. Engineering degrees produce a different kind of engineer, one who can design what needs to be made. It needs both formal training (a Bachelors or Masters degree) and a period of supervision: No-one wants a fresh Civil Engineering graduate to design a bridge without input from more experienced engineers! Well, maybe except for litigation…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 02:49 PM
2

Perhaps an extended test, under pressure, is what's needed as a way of checking someone fit for practising in the real world? Maybe the objective is to force the candidate to demonstrate to exercise many skills simultaneously, such as design, drawing, stress analysis, all in one go, because many engineering problems require solutions that satisfy conflicting requirements. For example, aircraft must be light, tough, safe, fuel-efficient and as cheap as possible. Doing any one of those is easy!
/r/MensRights30/12/22 02:45 PM
6

They will re-evaluate after some innocent people have died. There's nothing else we can really do.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 02:40 PM
38

Engineering is hard. Mistakes can kill people. Thorough exams make sense. Source: Engineering graduate.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:07 PM
11

I prepared a list:
/r/MensRights29/12/22 07:33 PM
2

Also try /r/AskATherapist
/r/MensRights29/12/22 08:32 AM
3

I agree, but there is no way our society, feminists in particular, would allow that.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 05:46 AM
4

At what point will we collectively refuse to pay child support so we can all go to jail together?
/r/MensRights26/12/22 06:51 AM
8

Of course they will try that, and of course the courts will agree.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 09:30 AM
3

"Only 46% of women try to use dating to be a better version of themselves, preferring to concentrate on getting a free dinner, whereas 63% of men see and use the opportunity for personal growth" There, fixed it for you.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 10:25 AM
3

And what percentage of women use dates to get free food?
/r/MensRights23/12/22 09:38 AM
1

What element of the patriarchy do you think are still around please? How do they affect our society?
/r/MensRights22/12/22 04:36 PM
13

And they will all get a good telling off.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 10:53 AM
1

"Destroy the Patriarchy"- how women want to destroy the system that keeps them warm, hydrated, fed, clothed etc.. Honestly if you put all the men on one island and all the women on the other, the men would find ways to survive, and the women wouldn't.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 02:46 AM
2

What is she doing for the $50/month? Very explicit? Private Messages? I would think OF subscribers have looked at the alternatives and choose her because she offers better value.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 09:33 AM
1

I didn't mean artistically amazing, I meant things like being more sexually explicit.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 09:25 AM
4

Getting recordings of these things is always helpful. No-one can then dispute what was said or done, and by whom.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 09:23 AM
10

We can still make choices to reduce exposure, especially to the toxic women.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 09:21 AM
12

The trick is to not be involved, that they can get as angry as they like but without it becoming our problem.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 05:16 AM
4

I oppose some definitions of "equality". Before you shoot me at dawn, let me explain. If you give boys and girls the same sort of education and allow them to choose what careers they want, the boys will want to work with stuff, and the girls will want to work with people. Yes, it's a generalisation, but it's essentially true. Some definitions of equality would involve forcing women to do jobs like brick layer, lather operator, sewage operative, and forcing men to working in nurseries, hospitals …
/r/MensRights20/12/22 03:43 AM
9

My understanding is that most OnlyFans content producers don't make much money. They need to be hot, and they need to 'push the boundaries' if they are to make worthwhile sums... and then afterwards they find it very hard to get married
/r/MensRights20/12/22 03:25 AM
8

Feminists don't ask for equality. They demand selective equality. When do they ask to pay for dinner, open doors for men, carry heavy things, work the same hours, go downstairs to confront potential burglars, be included in conscription? The fact is that they don't want equality and they never have.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 03:18 AM
6

And, as she has autism, go over and explain how devastating false accusations are to men, including losing their freedom, family, friends, university course, job, career... almost everything they value. Source: Am on the spectrum. Not everything is obvious to me.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 10:25 PM
1

It would be lovely if they made paternity fraud a crime. If wolf whistling and staring can get you 2 years in jail, I propose that taking £200,000 of a man's money over 20 years and depriving him of the opportunity to have natural children should be punished by, say, life imprisonment.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 12:10 PM
4

She should be required to pay it all back, with interest, plus she should receive criminal penalties for the fraud and civil penalties for the deception, things like depriving the guy of being able to raise his own natural children and see them grow up. To be honest, this sort of thing makes me furious.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 08:17 PM
0

Women can fear violence from men. Some of it is a reasonable caution, some of it is their personal baggage, and some has been taught in anti-men groups. The ratio will vary from woman to woman. I can believe some women fear finishing a conversation with men because there are a small number of guys who act shitty when a woman doesn't want to continue talking.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 10:14 AM
7

I don't want to hear from either of them. Bye!
/r/MensRights05/12/22 07:49 PM
0

As far as I can tell, ISIS tried really hard to live life as taught and demonstrated by Muhammad, as far as I've got from reading about him.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 07:04 PM
2

That is very very sad. Not only did it cost him his will to live, but she, her kids and many others will be impacted by this.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 04:27 PM
5

I support the Starbucks crew in looking after her. I think it was helpful. They gave her a choice to avoid a potentially difficult situation. They will have seen many situations and felt uncomfortable enough with this one to act, so they have my full support.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 01:02 PM
8

My guess is the attacks start when the women hit "the wall" at 29-30 and suddenly don't get the attention and free meals they used to get, so obviously men must be at fault, again.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 01:45 PM
5

You could record them, then write a gender-swapped version, and let them hear what they sound like.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 08:46 AM
4

In the family courts. Men do litigation.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 08:37 AM
1

An uninvolved person saving a child from poverty suggests that other people are ducking their responsibilities. If your roof leaks, is it my responsibility to fix it?
/r/MensRights01/12/22 10:16 PM
13

However, many of them only really wake up to that when they reach 30 and the guys are no longer that interested in them.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:25 PM
1

If you'd read my post, you'd have seen that my "least bad option" was for the biological father to pay. I am not impressed with any of the choices. Why should I pay taxes to raise a child someone else fathered? Why is it my problem? But equally, I don't want innocent kids to suffer. It sucks all round.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:00 PM
0

I don't have nice answers. I wanted contribute to the discussion on a difficult problem.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:55 PM
1

It would be interesting to introduce a legal duty on anyone receiving child support that their child could sue them for misusing it! Why only support kids with absent parents. Surely we should support the good parents too...
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:53 PM
-1

The moral challenge to that, of course, is that almost none of the men paying for that child had a part in its conception.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 01:50 AM
12

Strong and independent feminist women stealing from men... AGAIN. "We demand equality- give us the money you earned"!
/r/MensRights30/11/22 09:55 PM
-7

Probably fewer, but the drive to produce children is very strong. The whole thing is broken. I am not saying I like any of the three options, they all suck, but what else are we going to do? Compulsory adoption at birth if the Mother can't prove she has the means to raise the child? I am open to any better ideas because I like none of the options on offer right now!
/r/MensRights30/11/22 05:38 PM
-26

The problem is very few mothers can raise children without support. So either... a. The child is raised in poverty, b. The biological father pays the cost, or c. The state (mostly men, in the end) pays the cost. Should the child be raised in poverty? No. Should the biological father pay, if he doesn't want the child? Probably not. Should the state (i.e. other male taxpayers) pay? No, that's not fair. So the least bad option is the biological father should pay, but it truly sucks as he has so lit…
/r/MensRights30/11/22 04:09 PM
1

I can't criticise you on this list.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 12:17 PM
1

And Reverand LoveJoy is an idiot too.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 08:03 PM
3

Lying about taking the pill, poking holes in condoms before sex, and self-impregnating with a used condom, do not qualify as rape. They probably should, as the man did not consent to this, just like "stealthing" (removing a condom secretly during sex) is rape. However, it would be near impossible to prove a woman did any of these things if she fell pregnant.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 01:15 PM
4

If the Police were called, they'd arrest the guy and not the girl. That's how it goes.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/22 09:00 PM
1

There's lots of men's hobbies videos on YouTube, but not usually described as hobbies. For example https://www.youtube.com/@ThisOldTony and https://www.youtube.com/@wranglerstar Men are doers, so we'll build something (YouTube search for "DIY CNC") and share that with others, rather than "perform". Part of that is the innate pressure to succeed because of the biological urge to be attractive to women.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 08:28 PM
1

Yeah, for normal men, getting any interest on OLD is really difficult. All the attention goes to the very hottest guys, who the girls might be able to borrow and bed, but the girls can't capture them because they have so many options.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 09:58 AM
1

Yes, there's been a cultural shift where guys are saying it's not worth it.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 09:42 PM
2

Thank you. I added that to my list.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 09:41 PM
4

I can see the pressure in that, but it would feel to me like just getting in a deeper mess. Thanks for the suggestion though.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 09:27 PM
16

I see 3 reasons for a man in the west to marry: Religious or social pressures, either in him, in her, or her family, To get her a visa, because he'd rather marry someone from overseas, and Being required as a member of the military. [EDIT]
/r/MensRights24/11/22 06:07 PM
5

And yet, so many men are willing to share theirs!
/r/MensRights24/11/22 02:00 PM
6

There's a few things that should be banned, such as threats of violence, illegal activities such as child porn, encouraging law breaking (generally, not necessarily all of them). So we pretty much agree.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:12 PM
7

I love real freedom of speech. Come here, say your stuff. If we don't like it, we can say. If you rely on dodgy facts, we can say. If your logic is faulty, we can say. I don't feel the need for you to apologise, but equally, you can't complain if people disagree. :-)
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:09 PM
1

Timesharing is indeed a solution to the supply and demand issue. The girls keep trying to land the 15%, and he gets to sleep with as many as he has energy for! The result though, is lots of women reaching 30 or 31 and realising they've slept with lots of 15% guys, but none of them wanted to keep her, and they are now interested in women younger than her... so then she settles for a guy with an income.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 09:28 AM
1

(penchant)
/r/MensRights22/11/22 06:34 PM
4

Thank you. That's funny.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 06:12 PM
3

Difficult when they ban you at the slightest disagreement.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 05:35 PM
11

"Creepy" means "A guy I don't find attractive is interested in me". That's all it means. It's a terrible slur.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 05:32 PM
10

Exactly that.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 05:31 PM
7

It's okay to be prejudiced, you just need to be prejudiced against the right people, namely white men, especially older white men.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 05:30 PM
1

Thank you. That is very sweet. We don't often hear this. Please tell the sisterhood.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 01:28 PM
35

When they all want a guy over 6' (15% of American men), you know 85% of them won't find a guy, never mind adding in the other conditions like a 6 pack and 6-figure earnings.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 05:00 PM
23

The cost of a malicious allegation is huge. The payoff of getting a relationship with one of these women isn't worth it. Nopety nopety nope. Bye!
/r/MensRights21/11/22 04:59 PM
11

There's more risk and less payoff. I wouldn't want to even be friends with a 3rd wave Feminist, never mind be in a relationship with one!
/r/MensRights21/11/22 04:55 PM
8

Older guy with Asperger's... yup. I know all about that. I mostly just don't engage with girls now. I completely avoid whole classes of issues with them as a result. One feature is that when things go wrong for girls, the outcome can be very bad, so they are naturally more "cagey", but they pour out that anxiety on guys with AS because we tick many of the threat boxes.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 09:50 AM
2

You missed the ending where he killed himself because it was all too much.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 12:52 PM
20

"If it flies, floats or fucks, it's cheaper to rent than to buy".
/r/MensRights19/11/22 10:43 PM
44

Divorcing a man means they get a house and alimony. She can then live in that house with another man, with her earnings, her ex's contributions, and her new partners earnings. What are the down sides for her?
/r/MensRights19/11/22 10:42 PM
3

What's wrong with being mediocre, white, or a man?
/r/MensRights19/11/22 02:41 PM
1

This is also blackmail.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 10:02 AM
2

Unfortunately, I don't think anyone cares, which is the original problem
/r/MensRights17/11/22 11:30 PM
9

And some of these women wonder why guys don't want to play any more. When they get to 31 and are looking for a man to settle down with... and the guys aren't engaging.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 10:55 PM
1

This is easy to understand, once you know the rules: - Male-only spaces should be open to women too. - Mixed spaces are dangerous places for women, so men should be excluded.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 08:39 PM
24

Marriage offers far more to women than to men, when compared to just living together, especially with the laws that favour women's interests. As BetterBachelor puts it on YouTube, when women divorce, they get "cash and prizes". What do men get? They lose their house and acquire extra expenses. I love Feminism 1.0. Women should be able to get education, have bank accounts, work in any field they can compete with men in for the same pay. Feminism 3.0, however, seems more about hating men for women…
/r/MensRights15/11/22 01:08 PM
10

They can't believe how, since they are all thoroughly wonderful, they don't have everything they want. It must be a man's fault!
/r/MensRights15/11/22 12:05 PM
6

It's not so bad if men can decouple and let them get on with it, without them messing up our lives. Unfortunately, that seems impossible- we need to engage with things they have involvement in, such as education and employment.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 12:03 PM
2

Please check this out. 40 days is about the limit, with people digesting their own organs, so there is a point of no return. 40 days is not safe!!
/r/MensRights14/11/22 08:38 PM
1

I propose that "She earns as much as I do" is a great reason for a man to not want to pay for all of a first date. There is no need to think he is insecure. You could equally accuse the women of being insecure because _she_ doesn't want to pay.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 10:05 PM
2

I'd divide strength tests into two: Per-bodyweight, and absolute. The per-bodyweight tests are things like running and pull-ups, where heavier people need to be stronger, but being light isn't necessarily a problem. The absolute tests are things like bench pressing a weight, or carrying a lifelike dummy for a distance in a time. Being bigger makes these sorts of tests easier. Women, obviously, tend to have much more of a problem with the absolute tests than the per-bodyweight tests. If a job req…
/r/MensRights04/11/22 10:03 PM
1

Entrapping a man using a child is a very sensible idea for a woman who wants kids but who can't find a guy who will commit. She gets to choose a higher value man, which means her child is likely to have better genes, and she can extract better child support from him because he earns more. This is why paternity fraud is also a thing- a woman can get better genes for her kid, whilst using a lower-value man to play Father and pay.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 09:57 PM
1

What is your reasoning for thinking that "it is only appropriate" for men to pay for first dates please?
/r/MensRights04/11/22 09:53 PM
1

Why should men pay for dates?
/r/MensRights04/11/22 07:06 AM
1

Thanks. What I'd really like is some quality evidence that I am wrong, but instead I get personal attacks.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 08:02 PM
1

Why? Please give an explanation.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 08:01 PM
3

Tragically for men. Women seem quite happy with it.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 08:00 PM
2

Yes, "who invites should pay" seems a good policy... but how often do women invite men to a first date? When asked in surveys, quite a few women say they don't expect men to pay... but it's different to when there's a bill on the table that needs paying!
/r/MensRights03/11/22 08:00 PM
2

Yes, women seem to focus on taking what men bring, instead of creating for themselves.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 07:58 PM
2

Yes, that's how it plays out. Equality when it works in our interests. It's "I earn less than you, so should pay less of the rent" and then after her promotion "I earn more than you do, but we should still split the rent equally".
/r/MensRights03/11/22 07:56 PM
2

I compliment and thank you for trying to engage in this discussion in a friendly and helpful way. Most people who object to what I wrote like to be abusive and fail to provide either reasoned argument or facts to back up their views.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 07:54 PM
1

Adult men are stronger and have more endurance. There are not many jobs that leave men physically tired that can be done just as well by women. I cannot say no woman could do any particular physical job, just that most of them can't do so and compete with men. Women, on the other hand, are generally far better at people. Most counsellors are women for an obvious reason- they are more able to capture the complexities of people and their relationships than men are.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 07:52 PM
2

There is a very strong argument that the collapse in violence in New York was not about the change in mayor, but because of Roe vs Wade 18 years earlier, and women terminating pregnancies they were not ready to raise properly. (Source "Freakonomics" or one of the later works of the same authors).
/r/MensRights03/11/22 07:47 PM
1

When men earned the money and women made home life happen (before washing machines, dishwashers and modern cookers), it was necessary for men to pay because women just couldn't, and it was a way of filtering out the men who had difficulty providing. What is its function now that women can earn the same? John MacEnroe spoke very highly of Serena Williams, but then said she would probably be ranked around 700th if she played in the mens league. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDPK8ds1D-o When adul…
/r/MensRights03/11/22 07:44 PM
1

"Elite Singles polled 300,000 singles and found that 63% of men surveyed believed that men should be the ones to pay on the first date — 46% of the women surveyed came to the same conclusion." https://www.cnbc.com/select/who-pays-on-the-first-date/ In a survey on love and finances conducted by Money and SurveyMonkey, a whopping 78% of respondents said they think men should pay for the first date. And, perhaps surprisingly, men (85%) were even more likely than women (72%) to think that men should…
/r/MensRights03/11/22 07:25 PM
1

_1 Women are indeed in their own league... because they can't compete in the men's league in every sport I know of. I can't knit. If I declare myself a professional knitter, should that entitle me to the same salary as a woman who's far better at it than I am? _2 I don't think the frequency of occurrence is that relevant to deciding the consequences. Should Ponzi schemes be punished less than cheque fraud because it's less common? Surely it's the severity of the event and its consequences that s…
/r/MensRights03/11/22 07:02 PM
2

You are entitled to as much sex on your own as you'd like. Compelling others to participate is not going to be widely supported!
/r/MensRights03/11/22 06:42 PM
2

I think feminists want equality with men where that's an advantage, but not where there is a disadvantage. Meal to pay for? Mans job. Reproductive rights? All ours. Hard physical work? Men can do that. Competitive sport? We want our own league because the men would trash us... but we want to be paid the same as them. And so it goes. There's lots about feminism that I thoroughly support- equal pay for equal work, freedom from harassment, the right to work in any field (if they are good enough). W…
/r/MensRights03/11/22 06:40 PM
2

I am saddened at the inequality that maquerades as equality. Why are you here if you don't like the content?
/r/MensRights03/11/22 06:34 PM
2

I agree. Some of these issues are difficult: They remain unsolved because there is no solution which is both practical and popular. It would be great if a pregnancy could be easily transferred to another person (eg the man, or a substitute). Some have suggested that men should be able to renounce a pregnancy, so they get no rights on the child, but also no responsibility for it... but would the results of that be good? It would be fairer, I think, but personally I don't like it.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 08:42 PM
8

That, regrettably, is what I get all the time: Insults, but no presentation of any credible evidence to refute my claims.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 07:03 PM
46

What I'd really like is someone showing me that my points are invalid, not just throwing insults around.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 04:04 PM
9

I invite you to challenge me with facts. Here is a site comparing the 2016 High School Boys NBNO Finalists vs 2016 Olympic Women's Finalists: https://boysvswomen.com/#/ Please bring your facts. I would _love_ to be proven wrong, but whenever I write something like my original post, all I get is abuse. No-one brings a well sourced set of contradictions (not just single outliers, the "My Grandpa is 90 and smokes like a chimney, so cigarettes aren't dangerous" argument). More statistics if you want…
/r/MensRights02/11/22 03:55 PM
13

Some good points. I don't think we can justify mistreating men now because women were mistreated in the past. That seems very dangerous- many of these men were not involved in mistreating women. My points are about how men often get a raw deal today, and I don't think any of these are justified. Paternity fraud, for example, was once a secret that women could (mostly) keep, but now it's easy to test for. I think it's at least as serious as rape, but the worst a woman might face is a civil case i…
/r/MensRights02/11/22 03:49 PM
2

I am now afraid of a sexual relationship because of after-the-fact changes in opinion. No, I'd rather go without than risk the legal, social and relational consequences of a false accusation.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 10:18 AM
6

What did she expect would happen?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/22 04:32 PM
109

Be nice to IT and HR. Both can make your life miserable.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/10/22 10:53 PM
23

She can want whatever she wants, but if she wants a top 0.2% man then she should be at least a top 1% woman... and almost certainly isn't.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/22 10:42 AM
1

Ah... I think I understand. I was communicating my support for equal pay for equal work, not saying 'I want it to start happening because it wasn't'. Generally, women do get equal pay where they do equal work. I was in particular trying to distinguish this from equal pay for the same job and non-equal work. The classic would be some warehouse work, where women demand equal pay, but also either want the men to do all the heavy lifting, or require two women to do what one man could do alone.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/22 08:40 PM
1

True. Not always the case, but the combination of men tending to earn more, women tending to have more debt, women being more likely to stay at home, and women tending to have the kids means that the money tends to flow from the man to the woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/22 08:19 PM
3

I read that pre-nups were often struck down by the courts, but I have no expose beyond that. Can you add anything?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/22 12:33 AM
1

Nicely put.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/22 11:31 PM
4

I am sorry you experienced this. The problem is not divorce, but the rules that screw men during divorce. I don't see why a guy would risk it these days. Essentially, men should go on marriage strike until the laws are fairer.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/22 11:31 PM
2

i agree with you, though women's sports are an unusual case. Should you pay the best women athletes the same as the men, or as the U15 boys who tend to beat them? I don't watch sport so I don't care, but "Equal pay for equal work" suggests they should be paid like the U15 boys.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/22 11:28 PM
0

There are many such factors, including men choosing to work with things whereas women choose to work with people. There's lots of research out there for those interested in finding it.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/22 11:22 PM
1

You just need to replace your woman every 18 months! And yes, it's a mess.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/22 11:22 PM
-3

I didn't say they didn't. Stop making things up.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/22 11:17 PM
2

I still scored -20 karma though! Some people are very free with downvotes, but I don't know why they hate my comment.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/22 09:34 PM
7

Yes, prejudice against WASPs (White, Anglo Saxon Protestants) seems perfectly acceptable somehow.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/22 09:32 PM
2

We agree more than you seem to think. I don't support "Equal pay for the same job" but "Equal pay for the same work". If one person does more and/or to a higher standard, they should be better paid.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/22 07:08 PM
1

Exactly. But if men and women are doing equal work, I think almost everyone agrees they should be paid equally.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/22 06:01 PM
19

Exactly. Why do it? What does it bring for a guy? Liabilities! It's not even a fair price- you can pay child support on time and still get no access to your kids! Why do it? I am open to persuasion, I just need reasons as to what's in it for guys when the downsides are so obvious. The upsides for women are obvious!
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/22 03:05 PM
-8

Not in general. Gender itself is normally only a small element of pay differentials. Other factors lie behind the majority of the difference.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/22 03:03 PM
8

For example, in a warehouse where women might either try to get the men to move all the heavy items, or where two women will be needed to do what one man could do.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/22 03:00 PM
-43

There's bits of feminism that I thoroughly support. I want women to get equal pay for doing equal work (not just doing the same hours), to be free from harassment, that sort of thing... but then there's the rest of it, which I oppose.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/22 02:08 PM
15

That's hilarious. It's lovely to see it go the other way for a change.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/22 02:06 PM
100

The only reason I can see a man wanting to get married these days (in the West) is religious. Apart from that, it brings only costs and risks. Sure, you might get a small tax allowance from being married... but then you lose everything in the divorce. Nope, nope and nope. EDIT: And immigration as they bring in a woman who doesn't share Western Third-Wave Feminist values.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/22 02:05 PM
1

So you agree that people need to start with the default rules, and personalise from there?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/22 01:39 PM
1

When two people first meet, neither knows the other. What rules should they initially follow, until they know each other's preferences? Some personal preferences become apparent very quickly, some take weeks, months, or even years to learn. As far as I know, most people follow the default rules for contact with new people, and try to learn that person's requirements over time. How do you think it is/should be done please?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/22 01:02 PM
2

They have many issues that seem to be supported by the evidence. For example, many women put a requirement on their profile for any guy to be over 6' tall, when only 20% of US men meet this requirement. What about the other 80% of guys? Of course women can specify whatever they want in their profile, but if more than 20% of women have this requirement then it will mean a bunch of men and women won't find anyone. It's the same with the other requirements women make such as earning over 6 figures …
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/22 02:50 PM
2

Thank you, but I did actually mean the Red Pill movement. I am not dating, but the world of dating seems very messed up to me, especially online dating (OLD).
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/22 02:29 PM
4

Do you think the "Red Pill" guys have any valid points at all?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/22 02:28 PM
2

As a guy, the problem is there is no consistent model from women as to what they want. If I took someone for dinner, for example, I would not know "the rules" for whether they wanted or expected me to pay for dinner or go halves. It seems that "hypergamy" is a thing, and that in turn means lots of people won't find a partner. I am not dating, but I am fascinated by the world of dating: It seems a real mess. It's not even in the interests of dating apps for people to find life-long matches becaus…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/22 02:27 PM
12

Take a look at "Red Pill" on YouTube, also BetterBachelor and JustPearlyThings. Women demand equal pay, that their boyfriend should earn 50% more than they do, and that men pay for dinner. This formula does not add up.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/22 12:58 PM
1

Well, the Taliban just arrested a Pakistani journalist, so even being from a friendly country is no guarantee!
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/22 04:34 PM
1

Make it hard for them... by not going at all. These are not law-loving regimes- if it's convenient to convict you of something, you will be convicted.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/22 04:32 PM
41

This is political. Russia wants a hostage to swap. Honestly, anyone travelling to Afghanistan, China, Iran, North Korea or Russia and holding a Western passport is just asking for trouble. Don't go to any of these places under any circumstances or you risk being arrested or kidnapped.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/22 11:19 AM
79

Obviously men are evil. /s
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/22 10:54 PM
11

This seems fatal to Amber Heard's defence.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/22 04:59 PM
1

I think a lot of Tik Tok users need the same lesson, but learned in a more gentle way!
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/22 08:36 PM
2

Did she learn anything from this?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/22 07:10 AM
6

Isn't that the truth though? Women demand equality only in the areas they benefit from. They don't seek equality, but advantage.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/22 01:40 AM
1

TallGrayAndSexy wrote "It's not your job to modulate the force of your response when said response is a single punch.". Taken literally, he'd hit the weedy 10 year old as hard as he would someone who looked like Anthony Joshua. I don't really think he means that.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/21 04:58 PM
-1

It is your job to use appropriate force if this is possible. If you are hit, you can hit back, but, if it is possible, you must be appropriate. Supposing you are hit full force by a weedy 10 year old- are you going to say you can defend a full force adult hit on them? Of course not.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/21 07:51 AM
2

troon equality Sorry, what is this please? I have never heard of it.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/21 08:56 PM
14

WE DEMAND EQUALITY!! Except for... conscription, paying for dates, child custody, fixing the car, unblocking the drains, competing against men in any sport, judicial punishments... and many others. Edit to add: Equal fitness standards in the military, police and fire service, retirement age...
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/21 08:33 AM
7

It looked like she was a suitable match until she showed what she was really like. That saved him a lot of wasted time.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/21 07:59 AM
2

"Ho" implies she can find a man. The transcript suggests that is unlikely!
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/21 07:57 AM
9

Wow. At least you were the Father. Paternity fraud is evil but surprisingly common.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/21 07:54 AM
4

This has many attributions- https://www.barrypopik.com/index.php/new\_york\_city/entry/what\_kind\_of\_woman\_do\_you\_take\_me\_for\_madam\_weve\_already\_established\_that\_c
/r/MGTOW217/07/21 05:46 AM
1

I like the Old Testament rule that if you were caught falsely accusing someone, that you got the punishment you were trying to get them. My maths says 15 men x 10 years = 150 years. Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/21 10:32 AM
51

Porn messes up mens expectations of relationships. Romance messes up women's expectations of relationships.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/21 04:31 PM
6

I think you captured the problem just there!
/r/MGTOW203/07/21 02:40 PM
3

Feminism stops when the bill arrives, there's the threat of violence, something heavy needs moving, the drains are blocked...
/r/MGTOW203/07/21 02:39 PM
4

We agree on the first issue. There appears to be lots of evidence that sportswomen get injured more often than men. I speculate that women soldiers are even more vulnerable to injury because they are being more extreme than the men so they can pass the tests. "The gender gap in sports injuries - Harvard Health" https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/the-gender-gap-in-sports-injuries-201512038708
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/21 11:46 AM
6

I get your point, but it seems that there are two issues here. The first is whether women can achieve the same standard, but the second is their vulnerability to injury. So even if a woman makes it past the first issue, susceptibility to injury can imperil everyone.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/21 08:05 AM
1

I speculate that men's superior 3D awareness makes them better fighter pilots, but women's greater consistency and risk aversion makes them better transport pilots. Does anyone have any facts on this?
/r/MGTOW208/06/21 11:16 AM
2

They are famous because they performed in Russia and upset the authorities.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/21 10:30 AM
1

Sorry- my post was unclear. I have edited it to make it better, I hope. The couple were both accused of raping two kids. (anyone supporting a crime is also legally guilty of it, hence her inclusion). The rage of the wrongly accused woman, even after her acquittal, seriously messed her up, in my opinion.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/21 09:06 AM
1

My neighbours (edit: Man & Woman) were falsely accused of rape, and, 9 months later, were in court when the case against them was thrown out because it was full of holes. The (edit: accused) woman was full of rage at her mistreatment. It drove her to be an alcoholic, and, I think, helped her develop dementia. She had no pleasure in life. So, whilst I too hate false allegations, we need to protect ourselves from marinating in hate.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/21 01:25 AM
1

I don't challenge you there, but to spend a long time trying to ruin someone's life would mess with most people's soul. We are conditioned to behave pretty well, otherwise society could not function, and working to destroy someone would mess most people up inside. I've seen people obsess with revenge and 'justice', and it does them no good at all.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/21 11:45 PM
1

We get to choose how we behave, and that is what we are morally accountable for. What did we do with the options available to us? Sometimes we only have a limited set of options- we are not responsible for choices we could not make.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/21 11:41 PM
1

Agreed. Spending your life focusing on impoverishing another is not good for us. Life is difficult enough without working to destroy someone.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/21 11:39 PM
0

She is guilty of two huge crimes, no dispute, but pursuing her and trying to break her using a debt judgement can be quite corrosive to one's soul. Legally possible, but destructive to the self.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/21 11:35 PM
0

I presume you can understand the literal meaning. What I am saying is that, whilst it would be possible to legally hound her for a long time, I don't think it would be good for anyone.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/21 11:33 PM
14

I like the Old Testament rule- if you tried to get someone convicted of something they hadn't done, you received the punishment you were trying to get for them.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/21 07:28 PM
48

What you can do is get a judgement and, whenever she gets out and starts work, you can pursue her for the money. It is possible to make her life miserable that way- she could be prevented from ever owning things of value. The morality of doing so is an entirely different question.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/21 07:27 PM
20

It might be self-published because no publisher was willing to risk being associated with it. Does it have an ISBN? Who is the publisher?
/r/MGTOW205/06/21 11:04 PM
9

If you are not rich, you cannot afford to sue. If they are not rich, it is not worth suing.
/r/MGTOW205/06/21 01:44 PM
2

They are until the meet Lenny... /r/itslenny
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/21 05:42 PM
2

The expensive thing is kids, both directly, and in the loss of a wage to bring them up. I am glad I had kids anyway.
/r/MGTOW203/06/21 05:34 PM
2

I think that your questions need to be their own separate post, titled "How to tell your girl is actually the virgin she claims to be"
/r/MGTOW18/05/21 02:25 PM
1

Etiquette says that the inviter should pay. It is not directly about gender. Yes, I understand that some women date men so they can get free, expensive dinners and are not serious about relationship.
/r/MGTOW17/05/21 06:53 PM
4

/r/FemaleDatingStrategy is no such thing, it's "let's abuse men". Men are flawed, but so are women, and picking the worst examples as being typical is very broken.
/r/MGTOW16/05/21 10:00 PM
349

Women don't need to spread their legs to feel comfortable when sitting. Guys often do- they are "differently equipped".
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/21 10:34 PM
1

There is nothing in the Bible to suggest Mary remained a virgin after the birth of Jesus. The only source for that belief is Catholic doctrine.
/r/MGTOW215/05/21 12:14 PM
0

Was she dropping a hint about her availability?
/r/MGTOW215/05/21 12:08 PM
7

She had a great opportunity to learn a great life lesson. Whether she learnt or not is less sure.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/21 12:06 AM
8

What is needed is for him to counter Sue her for the $65K, plus damages, plus legal fees.
/r/MGTOW205/05/21 07:41 AM
1

She saw him as a meal ticket she could exploit... and lost.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/21 12:25 PM
1

I suggest you spend some time on /r/femaledatingstrategy. This will show you the mindset of many girls these days.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 02:57 PM
1

That's not what FDS started out as. It's become increasingly man-hating in the time I've been reading it. Not "How to date men" but "Most men are low value and not worth dating".
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/21 12:35 PM
2

That's misogynistic! /s Oh what a can of worms that could be. Can you imagine the reaction if that were normal, that women were supposed to open doors for guys?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/21 04:35 PM
3

I learnt from recent high profile narcissists that it is always possible to find and believe one or more reasons it was someone else's fault. If you look at /r/femaledatingstrategy you will see a similar thing. Apparently 90% of men are not worth dating... that sort of thing. I think we all need to be asking 'what is my part in this problem... but it is easier to blame others.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/21 09:52 AM
3

Women, not unreasonably, have insisted that "No" means "No". So, when they say "No", any guy who doesn't want trouble should just walk away.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/21 05:56 PM
2

$26,000,000 per year in jail? Obviously white collar Crime does pay! How about a sentence 1000x longer?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/21 07:09 PM
6

The problem is the existence of the WNBA- as it's name implies it's a sexist organisation. The NBA should allow women to play alongside the men if they don't already and women who are good enough can earn the same as the men. If they aren't good enough and still want the same salary, then I have a problem with that.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/21 08:23 PM
9

How is this "pussy pass denied"? She got a lighter sentence than a guy would have- looks like "pussy pass granted".
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/21 10:14 AM
1

She fell onto hard compacted earth. Not as hard as concrete, but good enough to leave you hurt.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/21 03:45 PM
6

She tried to intervene because of her position at the Port Authority, not because she was a woman. Not a PussyPassDenied incident.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/21 08:38 PM
2

Isn't it sexist to " advocate of illustrating areas where women outperform men"?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 01:11 PM
3

Agreed. Removing the advantages of greater mass is not sufficient to explain the performance discrepancy between men and women, no matter how politically incorrect this is!
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 01:02 PM
3

Men have an inherent advantage in some challenges because of their greater mass (eg weight lifting, personal combat), but in others (eg running, pole vaulting) this advantage disappears. However, even in these situations, men generally perform better than women.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 12:35 PM
12

There is alot of commitment to the idea that men and women are the same, when every attempt to measure them puts men clearly ahead physically. I think more of these contests would help women to understand the gulf between men and women's physical abilities. There are areas where women outperform men, but soldiering and fighting are not those areas!
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 01:29 AM
1

They usually try really hard to hold it together. Try talking to some.
/r/MGTOW205/03/21 09:20 AM
3

"Links" below. And above too. :-D
/r/MGTOW225/02/21 08:31 PM
2

Yes, she's looking for attention and validation. I know nothing of this girl in particular, but the next step might be to ask for money for nudes or to join her OnlyFans page.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/21 10:42 AM
1

Some professionals are in a league of their own.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/21 10:38 AM
1

The best sign here is... EXIT
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/21 11:24 PM
1

And she's single to this day...
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/21 11:32 PM
4

Good design means that everything in the poop can be lifted out. Source: I maintain a sewage system. But yes, you don't find women doing these jobs.
/r/MGTOW228/01/21 06:04 PM
1

Addiction to drugs, alcohol or gambling are hugely destructive. I would support anyone withdrawing from a relationship with an addict. I am very involved with addicts.
/r/MGTOW211/01/21 06:12 PM
8

She is immature in this area, and needs to get better at communicating. He needs to get better at communicating that he doesn't understand what he got wrong in a way she can receive. Everyone is imperfect in some way, and real relationships are about overcoming these imperfections in ways that work for both people. There are some noticeable areas where there should be no further discussion, such as addiction, cheating and violence, but much of the rest can be worked through. Source: married over…
/r/MGTOW211/01/21 01:16 PM
-8

Maybe you should fish in a better quality pond.
/r/MGTOW208/01/21 06:46 PM
2

Brutal!
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/20 11:14 PM
1

She's a nightmare! He got a great result- she left!
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/20 10:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter