TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NapkinZhangy Archive

View 2 posts and 64 comments by NapkinZhangy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
191

DiscriminationNapkinZhangy/r/MensRights16/11/22 01:00 PM
43

QuestionsNapkinZhangy/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:38 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

You can have privileges that are granted to you by society. However, being pregnant is still objectively a disadvantage when it comes to survival on an individual (not population) basis. Even with infinity money and the best medical care, pregnancy still carries certain baseline risks (including death).
/r/MensRights08/08/26 08:32 PM
3

Being pregnant means you’re in a very vulnerable state. Biologically speaking, pregnancy is important for the survival of the species, but is probably one of the greatest disadvantages in nature.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 08:05 PM
21

The USWNT is better relative to other women teams. The USMNT objectively has better players and generates more revenue. I’m not sure why that’s a controversial take. There’s a reason men and women have separate leagues.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 12:45 AM
53

Agreed. Anyone who supports infant circumcision really need to look at themselves. It’s awful how genital mutilation of male infants is so normalized.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:53 PM
7

Why is your entire posting history trying to troll this subreddit? Are you that insecure?
/r/MensRights04/12/24 08:28 PM
2

OP is probably someone who doesn’t care about men’s rights purposely shit posting in an attempt to reduce our credibility.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 07:09 PM
1

Why don’t you educate yourself? https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3654279/ No really significant STI benefits. Read the fucking literature before posting nonsense. In terms of cancer: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21695385/ A lot more mixed. There are some benefits, but those are largely negated in countries with more resources. Also, the NNT is insane as penile cancer is extremely rare. Why don’t we just prophylactically perform bilateral mastectomies on all female children to reduce t…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 10:12 PM
2

The risks/benefits are only worth it if you have genetic predisposition (e.g. BRCA). It’s also done in CONSENTING ADULTS. Penile cancer caused by HPV typically doesn’t have any genetic predisposition. Again, stop spewing this nonsense.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 10:11 PM
7

Does it? https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3654279/ No really significant STI benefits. Read the fucking literature before posting nonsense. In terms of cancer: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21695385/ A lot more mixed. There are some benefits, but those are largely negated in countries with more resources. Also, the NNT is insane as penile cancer is extremely rare. Why don’t we just prophylactically perform bilateral mastectomies on all female children to reduce the risk of breast cance…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 10:10 AM
1

Neoplasia isn’t the same as cancer. Are you an oncologist?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:01 PM
3

Early vulvar and cervical cancers were renamed as well (from carcinoma in-situ to intraepithelial neoplasia). This happens to cancer of both sexes. As make research is being done, more information is learned and more treatment options are available. This leads to nomenclature and staging changes.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 10:45 AM
1

We just get abused all the time haha. Compared to the stuff we deal with every day, having someone want a preference for a specific sex is the least of our worries. The tantrums that get social media attention are very far and in between. 99.9% of people are reasonable and either proceed with the case or rebook. I don't know about New Zealand law, but (assuming similar to US laws) as the infant can't consent the courts had to step in. If it was on a patient who needed a heart surgery who was abl…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 09:22 PM
–

This I agree with. You should be able to fully give your preference and then the facility can accommodate or not. If so, great. If not, it's up for you to decide if it's a hill worth dying for. Here is what I posed earlier about how I deal with these requests as a male gyn onc: A women has every right to see a female physician just like I (if I'm a patient) have a right to see males. That being said, if I'm on call and an emergency happens and the patient still wants a female gyn, I absolutely w…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 08:46 PM
1

Again, apples and oranges. This is about healthcare. not equal-opportunity housing or food services. Why do you keep trying to change the topic? There are studies looking at ethnicity of physicians and the congruency with their patient populations. Trauma-informed care is also a big part of medicine. Where did you go to med school and do residency?
/r/MensRights12/06/24 08:39 PM
1

My urology colleagues have male patients who request male physicians and nurses. It's common in medicine when it comes to gyn, urology, colorectal, or other sensitive specialties.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 08:26 PM
–

"In modern society, people generally frown on discrimination" Agreed. However this topic is specifically about preferences in how it relates to healthcare. Having preferences is not the same as discrimination. You can have ethnicity preferences in dating. That's not the same as hating someone for their ethnicity. I'm also very deliberate with what I say and my phrasing (part of being in a field that gets sued a lot). I specifically said "I will absolutely find a male driver" not "I will ask Uber…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 08:17 PM
4

There's chaperones in male patients and pediatrics too. It's to protect everyone. I'm all for men's rights, but we should focus on the issues that matter (homelessness, biased family court laws, mental health, etc). Having a preference for a physician sex and using chaperones is part of routine medical practice.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 08:04 PM
11

The real question though: would you rather get operated on by a man or a bear
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:36 PM
–

No one is defending sexism, unless you consider looking at situations with nuance and not labeling everything black and white as sexism. I personally consider sexism discrimination based on sex. Having a preference in the sex of your physician isn't discrimination. You're not saying a male physician is less competent, less capable, less deserving to be a doctor, etc. You're simply stating that you prefer a physician of a certain sex. I personally have a male PCP and a male colorectal surgeon bec…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:35 PM
–

This topic is about the issue of "sexism" or "racism" as it relates to medicine (in quotes because I, and many others, don't consider it sexism or racism the way those words are used in common vernacular). Comparing that to dating sites is apples and oranges.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:30 PM
–

Again, you're coming at this from a layman's perspective. I'm coming at this from a physicians standpoint. As a male gynecologist, I'm the very demographic that "should" be offended by this but understanding the reasoning behind it is important. I agree with you 100% about general racism or sexism. This article and topic is specifically discussing it in the context of healthcare. I linked some studies regarding your comment on ethnicity. And in regards to how it's sexism, why is it not ok for so…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:28 PM
–

I'm all for men's rights but comparing surgery to uber is apples and oranges. But I'll bite. If I had traumatic experiences from females in the past, I will absolutely find a male driver (and won't fault anyone who'd does).
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:22 PM
–

In the medical world, "patient comfort" is of upmost important. The person in the video seem to have gone about it the wrong way, but asking for sex-congruent physicians (especially as a female) is common. I'm a gyn onc. I see only women. I'm also a male. I don't get upset by it. Trauma-informed care is an important aspect of OBGYN and all its subspecialties. It's not unreasonable to ask for physicians of a specific sex either due to your own traumas, culture, preference, etc when it involves vu…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:12 PM
9

I'm a gyn oncologist actually. The shit stories like this you see are definitely the minority. It's a lot better once you're a sub specialist. The anti-male behavior is much more common in general OBGYN (part of the reason why I went to fellowship). However I will say that as a male, IF the L&D staff like you, you will be in a much better spot than your female colleagues. A lot of L&D staff are "pick me girls" are you get treated much better as a male (although I have strong feelings about this …
/r/MensRights12/06/24 06:53 PM
–

Yes and no. Medicine as a lot of nuances where reversing the race or sex may actually not be a good comparison. While it'll absolutely roll eyes for a white patient to request a white doctor, it's not uncommon for black patients to see black doctors. There absolutely are disparities in healthcares and healthcare outcomes in minorities have seen slight improvements when treated by minority physicians.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 06:48 PM
–

A female chaperone is there to protect the physician as much as it is to protect the patient. It's less obvious in the OR when there's a group of people but in clinic, I'll always have a chaperone since it's typically 1 on 1. The last thing you want is for your patient to accuse you of sexual assault if you're alone and it becomes he said/she said.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 06:45 PM
5

I'm a gynecologic oncologist so I only do surgery on women. A women has every right to see a female physician just like I (if I'm a patient) have a right to see males. That being said, if I'm on call and an emergency happens and the patient still wants a female gyn, I absolutely will not call my partners. They can either see me or leave AMA. We accommodate when we can, but will not inconvience people who are off to come in.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 06:44 PM
1

Maybe I’m biased than since I’m a gyn onc so if you ask me, everyone can benefit from the vaccine haha
/r/MensRights07/06/24 07:59 PM
1

I would argue that it’s not the patient. As a physician I’m responsible for asking about health screening. Part of that includes recommended vaccinations. Granted I don’t see male patients, but I still ask about vaccination history.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 07:08 PM
1

Vaccine has some benefits until 45.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 06:52 PM
1

The government approved shit with shoddy evidence all the time. Then when the evidence stopped producing, they moved goal posts to continue the approval train.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 06:50 PM
3

Cervical, not uterine.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 06:48 PM
5

Paps screen for cervical cancer, not uterine btw
/r/MensRights07/06/24 06:47 PM
4

No I wouldn’t. Circumcision is a terrible thing and I wouldn’t recommend it for anyone. During residency we had to circ the newborns and I refused. Now if someone was actively participating in high risk sexual behaviors and refusing PreP, I would 100% call them an idiot as HIV is worse than the drug. You’re comparing apples to oranges. I’m not sure what link you’re trying to make with circumcisions and AIDS lol. You’re comparing a relatively harmless shot to an irreversible cosmetic procedure do…
/r/MensRights07/06/24 05:19 PM
3

As an oncologist: no fucking way the side effects of the HPV vaccine can be as bad as cervical cancer. You’re an idiot if you think so and refuse the vaccination because of it (unless you’re like death anaphylactic to it).
/r/MensRights07/06/24 10:15 AM
4

Did you get your facts straight?
/r/MensRights19/05/23 10:20 AM
7

This is a subreddit not a dissertation defense.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 03:44 PM
23

This comment just screams "all lives matter" at a BLM event.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 03:42 PM
1

I probably made some assumptions too but these quotes were directly from the first article you linked. "the problems that women face when trying to manage a career and family life" "But Hilary Devey’s observations about women prioritising family life over work is a challenge that my profession is having to face up to" "A separate problem is that if the majority of medical graduates are women, then specialisms that are not traditionally family friendly due to the anti-social hours and on call req…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 04:36 PM
3

Very interesting articles. In the post I was responding to, you were referring to "single, childless women" where the first article you linked specifically stated that having a family was part of the reason they wanted to work part time. The second article (and I can 100% relate to it) is talking about burnout in physicians as a whole (most common reason cited is intensity of work hours). It does't specify female physicians. I understand your train of thought. "If more physicians are female, and…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 04:25 PM
0

Can you link me to that statistics? That seems very interesting. It's not that I don't believe you, i'm just a huge fan of reading the primary sources and seeing the data for myself. Wanting a more "balanced" lifestyle isn't restricted to women. I'm a surgeon and I would kill for a more balanced lifestyle. Unfortunately I can't just take time off.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 03:37 PM
6

That's very interesting. Do you have a link to the primary source the article is citing? Often, media outlets misquote or misinterpret the data from the primary source. Here is one I found. https://faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Set-Up-to-Fail.pdf I am in no way saying women can't be successful professionally. The field i'm in is actually predominantly women and they work so damn hard. I think we, as a society, need to do a MUCH better job of addressing the biases against w…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 03:35 PM
4

Yes and no, right? In fields requiring physical strength and manual labor I 100% agree with you; it's just biology. In fields that are more cerebral, there is no reason a woman and a man, when optimized, can not produce the same. The handicap women have is more social, as they're likely to be "suboptimal" due to traditional gender roles such as kids, etc. But hypothetically if a woman chooses not to have any children or anything, I don't see any reason why they can't work as long or hard as men.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 03:13 PM
12

https://faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Set-Up-to-Fail.pdf I am in no way saying women can't be successful professionally. The field i'm in is actually predominantly women and they work so damn hard. I think we, as a society, need to do a MUCH better job of addressing the biases against women who want to be a working professional. There's so much more we can do. However, the bottom line is in our current broken system, women-lead business do fail more and there's evidence be…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 03:07 PM
12

https://faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Set-Up-to-Fail.pdf There’s a lot to discuss. And yes, you can argue that businesses are biased against women to begin with. There’s a lot of factors and we can do a better job of addressing the bias against women who want to start or run a business. That’s a whole other issue. But the bottom line is if you only look at the endpoint, female-led businesses tend to fail more. EDIT: I am in no way saying women can't be successful professio…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 03:00 PM
1

That’s not what they’re saying. They’re arguing the female athletes should get the same percentage of revenue. For example in the NBA, the players get 50% of the revenue where as for the WNBA, the players only get 20%. I wouldn’t say that’s a bad request. Now if they want WNBA players to make NBA money then that’s stupid.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 06:30 AM
1

That’s not what they’re saying. They’re arguing the female athletes should get the same percentage of revenue. For example in the NBA, the players get 50% of the revenue where as for the WNBA, the players only get 20%. I wouldn’t say that’s a bad request. Now if they want WNBA players to make NBA money then that’s stupid.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 06:30 AM
1

That's not discrimination. I support patient autonomy over paternalism. I'm a male gyn. I wouldn't want to see a patient who was uncomfortable with me. If no female physicians are available and they don't want me to see them, they're free to leave AMA. Likewise, if a male is at a urologist, they're very well in their right to request a male. If the preference can't be met, it's asinine to think it's ok to force an exam upon him against his will. I see you support forced exams of individuals agai…
/r/MensRights17/11/22 03:13 PM
1

Patient comfort is a part of healthcare. This isn't the olden days where paternalism is rampant. Genders SHOULD be equal, which is why I support both a woman's rights to choose a female gynecologist AND a male's rights to choose a male urologist.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 03:07 PM
1

Are you in medicine? Do you know about patient autonomy?
/r/MensRights17/11/22 11:26 AM
1

Would you be this dismissive if the OP was a female and she didn’t want random men looking at her or doing exams on her at the gynecologist?
/r/MensRights16/11/22 08:55 PM
2

Vaccines have plenty of medical benefits. Circumcision has next to none.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 11:23 AM
46

I can probably answer this as I am a physician. Males tend to pick specialties that are more exposed to corona and are currently working the front lines (ER, ICU). Furthermore, the specialties most likely to get redeployed since their elective cases are canceled (e.g. general surgery, ortho, etc) are also predominantly male. On the other hand, more females are in specialties like pediatrics and OBGYN, which tends to be more protected from corona. I'm a guy and im an OBGYN. We send all suspected …
/r/MensRights02/05/20 07:24 PM
8

So if I punched Brock Lesnar, is it wrong for him to hit me back because he’s stronger?
/r/MensRights20/11/19 10:17 PM
3

I would be careful. I’m the US, many consents require only 1 parent approval. Make sure she doesn’t take your son off without your knowledge and have him circumcised.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 05:15 PM
2

No. His wife is ethically wrong for wanting to mutilate a child.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 05:14 PM
3

Child autonomy is a weird thing, but generally, the choices the parents make have direct health benefits. Yes, if the child has recurrent infections or phimosis, a circumcision might be medically beneficial. However as this is only cosmetics, I would rather not deform a child before he can make his decision. Personally, I don't offer circumcisions to my patients and explain to them how there are only cosmetic benefits to routine circumcisions, and that if they want their child to be circumcised …
/r/MensRights08/04/19 01:28 PM
4

Replace everything you hear about “foreskin” with “left earlobe” and tell me how barbaric it is. There are very few medical benefits for routine circumcision. It blows my mind how many mothers want it.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 12:33 PM
41

The sanitation sense is propaganda. It’s purely for “cosmetic” purposes.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 03:25 AM
8

I’m in medicine. Being harassed and demeaned is part of every med student’s clinical rotations and present during almost every year of residency. You deal with it, power through, train well, and become a god dam physician after. No one will coddle you.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 08:58 PM
13

You know what else is a violation of trust and privacy? Being accused of rape, having your face plastered everywhere, and having your life ruined.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 01:38 PM
15

I'm not saying it's the best way. It's the way things are done because it's considered a psychosocial emergency. Say you let the child wait. Do you think letting him have ambiguous genitalia for years is good for his mental health? What about the trauma of surgery when they can remember stuff? It's a hard issue. For every person who wished the doctor left him/her alone until he/she was old enough to decide, there's a person who the doctor let decide who wishes that some procedure was done earlie…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 03:34 PM
46

Med student here. The only time I've seen a doctor do anything gender-related on kids is if the kid was born with congenital adrenal hyperplasia or true hermaphroditism. And even then, the goal is to do karytyping, electrolyte testing, imaging, whatever tests you can do STAT to assign the kid a gender associated with the external genitalia that is most likely to be unnoticeable different if correctable. Basically if the kid is a true hermaphrodite, you give the kid a gender based on whether a va…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 11:28 AM
7

Really? I realize if I have sex with a woman using a condom and she secretly impregnates herself, I am responsible because the semen was "gifted" so she had "legal possession" to do whatever she wants with it and we had sex. Im talking straight fapping in a condom.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter