TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NapkinZhangy Archive

View 2 posts and 41 comments by NapkinZhangy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
191

DiscriminationNapkinZhangy/r/MensRights16/11/22 01:00 PM
43

QuestionsNapkinZhangy/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:38 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
21

The USWNT is better relative to other women teams. The USMNT objectively has better players and generates more revenue. I’m not sure why that’s a controversial take. There’s a reason men and women have separate leagues.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 12:45 AM
53

Agreed. Anyone who supports infant circumcision really need to look at themselves. It’s awful how genital mutilation of male infants is so normalized.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:53 PM
7

Why is your entire posting history trying to troll this subreddit? Are you that insecure?
/r/MensRights04/12/24 08:28 PM
2

OP is probably someone who doesn’t care about men’s rights purposely shit posting in an attempt to reduce our credibility.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 07:09 PM
1

Why don’t you educate yourself? https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3654279/ No really significant STI benefits. Read the fucking literature before posting nonsense. In terms of cancer: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21695385/ A lot more mixed. There are some benefits, but those are largely negated in countries with more resources. Also, the NNT is insane as penile cancer is extremely rare. Why don’t we just prophylactically perform bilateral mastectomies on all female children to reduce t…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 10:12 PM
7

Does it? https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3654279/ No really significant STI benefits. Read the fucking literature before posting nonsense. In terms of cancer: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21695385/ A lot more mixed. There are some benefits, but those are largely negated in countries with more resources. Also, the NNT is insane as penile cancer is extremely rare. Why don’t we just prophylactically perform bilateral mastectomies on all female children to reduce the risk of breast cance…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 10:10 AM
1

Neoplasia isn’t the same as cancer. Are you an oncologist?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:01 PM
3

Early vulvar and cervical cancers were renamed as well (from carcinoma in-situ to intraepithelial neoplasia). This happens to cancer of both sexes. As make research is being done, more information is learned and more treatment options are available. This leads to nomenclature and staging changes.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 10:45 AM
11

The real question though: would you rather get operated on by a man or a bear
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:36 PM
1

I would argue that it’s not the patient. As a physician I’m responsible for asking about health screening. Part of that includes recommended vaccinations. Granted I don’t see male patients, but I still ask about vaccination history.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 07:08 PM
1

Vaccine has some benefits until 45.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 06:52 PM
3

Cervical, not uterine.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 06:48 PM
5

Paps screen for cervical cancer, not uterine btw
/r/MensRights07/06/24 06:47 PM
4

No I wouldn’t. Circumcision is a terrible thing and I wouldn’t recommend it for anyone. During residency we had to circ the newborns and I refused. Now if someone was actively participating in high risk sexual behaviors and refusing PreP, I would 100% call them an idiot as HIV is worse than the drug. You’re comparing apples to oranges. I’m not sure what link you’re trying to make with circumcisions and AIDS lol. You’re comparing a relatively harmless shot to an irreversible cosmetic procedure do…
/r/MensRights07/06/24 05:19 PM
3

As an oncologist: no fucking way the side effects of the HPV vaccine can be as bad as cervical cancer. You’re an idiot if you think so and refuse the vaccination because of it (unless you’re like death anaphylactic to it).
/r/MensRights07/06/24 10:15 AM
4

Did you get your facts straight?
/r/MensRights19/05/23 10:20 AM
7

This is a subreddit not a dissertation defense.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 03:44 PM
23

This comment just screams "all lives matter" at a BLM event.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 03:42 PM
6

That's very interesting. Do you have a link to the primary source the article is citing? Often, media outlets misquote or misinterpret the data from the primary source. Here is one I found. https://faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Set-Up-to-Fail.pdf I am in no way saying women can't be successful professionally. The field i'm in is actually predominantly women and they work so damn hard. I think we, as a society, need to do a MUCH better job of addressing the biases against w…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 03:35 PM
4

Yes and no, right? In fields requiring physical strength and manual labor I 100% agree with you; it's just biology. In fields that are more cerebral, there is no reason a woman and a man, when optimized, can not produce the same. The handicap women have is more social, as they're likely to be "suboptimal" due to traditional gender roles such as kids, etc. But hypothetically if a woman chooses not to have any children or anything, I don't see any reason why they can't work as long or hard as men.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 03:13 PM
12

https://faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Set-Up-to-Fail.pdf I am in no way saying women can't be successful professionally. The field i'm in is actually predominantly women and they work so damn hard. I think we, as a society, need to do a MUCH better job of addressing the biases against women who want to be a working professional. There's so much more we can do. However, the bottom line is in our current broken system, women-lead business do fail more and there's evidence be…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 03:07 PM
12

https://faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Set-Up-to-Fail.pdf There’s a lot to discuss. And yes, you can argue that businesses are biased against women to begin with. There’s a lot of factors and we can do a better job of addressing the bias against women who want to start or run a business. That’s a whole other issue. But the bottom line is if you only look at the endpoint, female-led businesses tend to fail more. EDIT: I am in no way saying women can't be successful professio…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 03:00 PM
1

That’s not what they’re saying. They’re arguing the female athletes should get the same percentage of revenue. For example in the NBA, the players get 50% of the revenue where as for the WNBA, the players only get 20%. I wouldn’t say that’s a bad request. Now if they want WNBA players to make NBA money then that’s stupid.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 06:30 AM
1

That’s not what they’re saying. They’re arguing the female athletes should get the same percentage of revenue. For example in the NBA, the players get 50% of the revenue where as for the WNBA, the players only get 20%. I wouldn’t say that’s a bad request. Now if they want WNBA players to make NBA money then that’s stupid.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 06:30 AM
1

That's not discrimination. I support patient autonomy over paternalism. I'm a male gyn. I wouldn't want to see a patient who was uncomfortable with me. If no female physicians are available and they don't want me to see them, they're free to leave AMA. Likewise, if a male is at a urologist, they're very well in their right to request a male. If the preference can't be met, it's asinine to think it's ok to force an exam upon him against his will. I see you support forced exams of individuals agai…
/r/MensRights17/11/22 03:13 PM
1

Patient comfort is a part of healthcare. This isn't the olden days where paternalism is rampant. Genders SHOULD be equal, which is why I support both a woman's rights to choose a female gynecologist AND a male's rights to choose a male urologist.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 03:07 PM
1

Are you in medicine? Do you know about patient autonomy?
/r/MensRights17/11/22 11:26 AM
1

Would you be this dismissive if the OP was a female and she didn’t want random men looking at her or doing exams on her at the gynecologist?
/r/MensRights16/11/22 08:55 PM
2

Vaccines have plenty of medical benefits. Circumcision has next to none.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 11:23 AM
46

I can probably answer this as I am a physician. Males tend to pick specialties that are more exposed to corona and are currently working the front lines (ER, ICU). Furthermore, the specialties most likely to get redeployed since their elective cases are canceled (e.g. general surgery, ortho, etc) are also predominantly male. On the other hand, more females are in specialties like pediatrics and OBGYN, which tends to be more protected from corona. I'm a guy and im an OBGYN. We send all suspected …
/r/MensRights02/05/20 07:24 PM
8

So if I punched Brock Lesnar, is it wrong for him to hit me back because he’s stronger?
/r/MensRights20/11/19 10:17 PM
3

I would be careful. I’m the US, many consents require only 1 parent approval. Make sure she doesn’t take your son off without your knowledge and have him circumcised.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 05:15 PM
2

No. His wife is ethically wrong for wanting to mutilate a child.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 05:14 PM
3

Child autonomy is a weird thing, but generally, the choices the parents make have direct health benefits. Yes, if the child has recurrent infections or phimosis, a circumcision might be medically beneficial. However as this is only cosmetics, I would rather not deform a child before he can make his decision. Personally, I don't offer circumcisions to my patients and explain to them how there are only cosmetic benefits to routine circumcisions, and that if they want their child to be circumcised …
/r/MensRights08/04/19 01:28 PM
4

Replace everything you hear about “foreskin” with “left earlobe” and tell me how barbaric it is. There are very few medical benefits for routine circumcision. It blows my mind how many mothers want it.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 12:33 PM
41

The sanitation sense is propaganda. It’s purely for “cosmetic” purposes.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 03:25 AM
8

I’m in medicine. Being harassed and demeaned is part of every med student’s clinical rotations and present during almost every year of residency. You deal with it, power through, train well, and become a god dam physician after. No one will coddle you.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 08:58 PM
13

You know what else is a violation of trust and privacy? Being accused of rape, having your face plastered everywhere, and having your life ruined.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 01:38 PM
15

I'm not saying it's the best way. It's the way things are done because it's considered a psychosocial emergency. Say you let the child wait. Do you think letting him have ambiguous genitalia for years is good for his mental health? What about the trauma of surgery when they can remember stuff? It's a hard issue. For every person who wished the doctor left him/her alone until he/she was old enough to decide, there's a person who the doctor let decide who wishes that some procedure was done earlie…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 03:34 PM
46

Med student here. The only time I've seen a doctor do anything gender-related on kids is if the kid was born with congenital adrenal hyperplasia or true hermaphroditism. And even then, the goal is to do karytyping, electrolyte testing, imaging, whatever tests you can do STAT to assign the kid a gender associated with the external genitalia that is most likely to be unnoticeable different if correctable. Basically if the kid is a true hermaphrodite, you give the kid a gender based on whether a va…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 11:28 AM
7

Really? I realize if I have sex with a woman using a condom and she secretly impregnates herself, I am responsible because the semen was "gifted" so she had "legal possession" to do whatever she wants with it and we had sex. Im talking straight fapping in a condom.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter