TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NaqeebJamal Archive

View 2 posts and 42 comments by NaqeebJamal on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Is it now socially acceptable to tweet to the world before just turning around and asking these two guys to mind their language? Who hasn't accidentally said impolite things thinking you're conversation is private? The other day I dropped the f bomb near a kid at a sporting event. I'm almost never around children and didn't realize it. It was an oversight on my part. The child's father correctly asked me to mind my language. He was completely right. You get a lot more attention if you tweet.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:59 PM
1

You're making an error here. I am not offering a totally binary argument. A system can be just and deal with everyone equally or be unjust and still deal with everyone equally.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 09:55 PM
–

I get what you're saying- you're arguing that the system is not unjust, only lopsided. However MR and MRA have often pointed out that the system is unjust. It mandates harsh penalties for relatively minor offenses, it has mandatory sentencing amounts that do not fit the crimes at hand, the definition of sex offense is too broad, etc etc etc. The question that people need to answer is what is more important? A just system or a system that deals with every gender equally, regardless of the legitim…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 05:31 PM
–

The calls for her to be placed on a sex offender registry are completely overblown. If we argue in mens' rights that the sex offender laws are too contrary and harsh- then calling for someone to be unfairly penalized within that system is wrong. If we object to a system we can't simultaneously try to apply it to others.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 03:52 PM
1

I actually thought the gay scene was meant to be much more intimate with caressing sincere sexuality.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 07:27 PM
–

The point of that scene is to develop little finger as a character. You thought it was unnecessary? Well its art and art isn't exact. They also added a gay sex scene that wasn't in the book at all.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 07:12 PM
1

NSFW
/r/MensRights20/04/11 06:47 AM
–

Not just any troll. He is an uber troll. Proof
/r/MensRights20/04/11 04:21 AM
1

I thought you left reddit and were never coming back?
/r/MensRights15/10/10 04:12 AM
1

My bad. Thought you were implying the united states was the moral peer of Iran.
/r/MensRights24/09/10 11:53 AM
2

Regardless of the viability of your feelings. This doesn't apply to realitydysfunction's argument in the least.
/r/MensRights18/09/10 03:58 PM
1

I agree with that assessment. Factory2 however attributes these behaviors to actual acts by the OPs SO, and that's when he goes off the reservation.
/r/MensRights29/08/10 12:48 AM
5

I don't know about the debate those two got into but the OP is very vague about the agreements they reached before marriage. Nor has the OP explained the conditions or methods of her planning to have children. The OPs update lays out that previously he had wanted children, something couple really ought to discuss prior to marriage, and now he has rescinded his support. So clearly she has every right to pursue other options. The OP has not laid out how she would go about doing it. They should get…
/r/MensRights28/08/10 11:53 PM
11

Great plan. Punishing performance should work nicely.
/r/MensRights27/08/10 03:49 PM
0

I suspect "feminism" feels the sme way. This is why diplomacy is a heavily coded and formal process designed to allow two opposing sides to retain face as they both give ground. Feminist probably think MR must "earn" their trust first.
/r/MensRights14/08/10 10:46 PM
4

Or Gentlejayhammers.
/r/MensRights14/08/10 09:49 PM
-1

I've wondered if MR is about making it ok for men do pursue things that are "unmanly." Or if it's about protecting what it means to be a man in society. The two aren't mutually exclusive either. An article about male fashion with a title reinforcing gender roles is part of that discussion.
/r/MensRights13/08/10 05:02 AM
1

Unfortunately the saying when mud is thrown some sticks is accurate.
/r/MensRights12/08/10 02:35 AM
2

That's not an inevitable end result, not your best argument. Edit a little more explanation- with an counterinsurgency (ideas are well compared to insurgencies) you will always have a portion of the population in an opposing role. Say we argue that the spectrum of feminism that includes the moderates is our enemy. By definition that would be about 50%. Fighting an insurgency against 1/2 the population is completely unwinnable. Ask the Nationalists how that worked against Mao. Say we expect the o…
/r/MensRights11/08/10 05:20 AM
1

I feel like "Gladiator" isn't high on a list of priorities here. SPOILER: Moon. Spoiler FUCK MY MIND IS BLOWN. Anyhow, what are your parameters for a movie being hostile to men? How can someone differentiate between necessary plot devices?
/r/MensRights11/08/10 05:15 AM
1

Go read the U.S. Army FM 3-24 Counterinsurgency manual. Then let me know if you still want to keep that last sentence. Co-option is better than eradication. So those fairly egalitarian feminists you're referring to are the only ticket to any sort of success.
/r/MensRights11/08/10 02:18 AM
1

If there were a bunch of good men running about it wouldn't really be a movie about overcoming insurmountable obstacles now would it? It would be a pretty shitty movie.
/r/MensRights11/08/10 02:13 AM
1

Yeah i regret the method I chose because it messed up a conversation I'd really like to have.
/r/MensRights09/08/10 12:42 AM
-2

I haven't done any taunting.
/r/MensRights08/08/10 07:04 PM
-1

I'm not trying to suggest JH is a bigot. I read about dworkin getting married (she is the all sex is rape woman) and wonder how is that compatible with her beliefs? In a similar way I do wonder the same- how is extreme MR compatible with relationships?
/r/MensRights08/08/10 07:04 PM
-4

The point was a discussion about how JH's activism is compatible with relationships. He mentions his gf a lot as an example of a good and strong MR relationship. My Gf wouldn't have anything to add to that conversation. But she could probably do a ask me anything on North Korea or something if you're interested.
/r/MensRights08/08/10 06:59 PM
3

If you don't like the suggestion you don't have to participate. The whole concept of reddit is voluntary. You're right I could have asked him in a PM I could have posted too. Sure I'll link you to stuff I think is appropriate- JH discusses compatibility of MR with relationships. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/cyhf0/thank_you_mens_rights/c0w7yp5 JH "Women don't understand shit about shit" http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/cvxmx/ellis_why_be_with_a_woman_who_thinks_of_you_as…
/r/MensRights08/08/10 06:07 AM
-5

Jayhammers is a relatively aggressive MR advocate. I've heard skepticism that his beliefs are compatible with dating. He mentions his gf a lot. I think her perspective on how his ideology is compatible would be interesting and encourage discussion.
/r/MensRights08/08/10 05:30 AM
-2

Is it a finished basement?
/r/MensRights08/08/10 03:16 AM
-4

My gf is incredulous that she exists. Thought you might want to set the record straight.
/r/MensRights08/08/10 02:12 AM
4

Your attitude isn't "enlightened." Look- he's a man. If this was one of my soldiers having sex with a 15 year old his ass would be in jail. At 20 you can go to war, sign contracts, drive a car, buy a home, etc etc etc. At 15 you can't drive, you can't buy cigarettes, you can't join the military, you can't even get yourself declared an emanicipated minor. I also have some serious issues with our society's willingness to brand sex offender on a wide range of violations. However, this one is pretty…
/r/MensRights05/08/10 09:38 PM
10

Statutory rape.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 09:20 PM
11

No. She's 15. Men's Rights shouldn't be about a lack of responsibility.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 09:13 PM
19

20 isn't a boy. He's a man.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 06:33 PM
2

When I read this guy's comments I think he needs professional help. Common sense would dictate this guy get the hell out a long time ago! Its scary and sad, a ruined family, a ruined extended family, hurt children, and a rough future for all involved.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 10:43 PM
1

Hard to answer. It's Poe's Law all the way down.
/r/MensRights18/07/10 09:15 PM
1

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/babylonbeyond/2009/03/marines-in-afgh.html All female units serving in afghanistan in combat and vital insurgency tool. Context and credibility- I am a five year combat veteran of the U.S. Army Infantry.
/r/MensRights12/07/10 03:28 AM
2

AH HAH. I think I accidentally deleted a paragraph when I edited the 2XC post this morning. Sorry I have fixed it. Second question- I think I "admonished" posters in both 2XC and MR in the same fashion. I was confused about your question because I hadn't realized I'd deleted an entire paragraph! I tried very hard in the original posts to be as similar as possible but maintaining 2XC and MR's independence from one another. If I jacked that up- it was unintentional. Thanks for catching this- I thi…
/r/MensRights09/07/10 10:06 PM
8

Next I will attempt to mediate between Palestine and Israel.
/r/MensRights09/07/10 08:29 PM
-1

I'm not sure I quite follow your question. Could you explain it in another way so I can respond better?
/r/MensRights09/07/10 07:20 PM
1

Thanks for your comments.
/r/MensRights09/07/10 02:48 AM
9

That doesn't answer the question.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 10:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter