TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Narsauce_Alpha Archive

View 0 posts and 33 comments by Narsauce_Alpha on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Then I would ask, do the solution to men’s problems that men have to find need to align with and be supported by feminist theory and ideology (ie. do men have to work within feminist frameworks to achieve equality in areas where they are disadvantaged) or can men develop their own theories in parallel to feminist theories?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 07:11 PM
3

Y’know, there’s this one phrase that always shuts this kinda shit down because people like OP fucking bluescreen from hearing it. Say it with me now! DESPITE BEING ON 13
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 10:54 PM
2

I mean, I’ve seen it where women get bother by women giving their man attention. I’ve seen both sides of the coin, and in all the cases, the woman has been the one who is told she is right, regardless of the scenario. In situations where a man would be called “insecure” the woman is told she’s not, for any number of reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 06:48 PM
2

I think part of the problem a lot of men have with the “Just vote to abolish the Draft” stance is they know it’s rather hollow. Like sure, everyone votes to abolish the draft and it happens, then what? If, god forbid, there is a point where people are needed to fight in a conflict and there’s not enough willing, boom, draft’s back, men get in line. The vote did fuck all and we’re back at square one again.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 09:41 PM
1

Look, if I ever do, I’ll buy a lottery ticket and send you half the winnings, deal?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 02:12 AM
2

Giving myself a lead lobotomy works. God, I’d love to rid myself of the desire I have for a woman to love me. Because I’m probably more likely to win the lottery than I am to find one that does.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 01:55 AM
–

My brother in Christ I cannot simply Magic myself a woman who fawns over me at the drop of a hat for no discernible reason other than “yes”. Because yes, that’s what Romance novels, at least insofar as an inversion of genders for the standard romance novels that caters to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 07:21 PM
3

Mmm, Buddhism/Monastic life, my favourite.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 08:23 PM
0

Would the “If you were on fire, I wouldn’t piss on you to douse it” metaphor be better? Or is that still to problematic? Sally Miller Gearhart, Valerie Solanas, Mary Daly, Clementine Ford. There are others, but those are the big ones. And the first three called for it in published theory and academic works. What? No seriously, what’re you trying to say here?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 03:11 PM
4

> Then don’t use a phrase that implies violence or being a very big problem for society. It’s a metaphor, a saying, it’s not a literal call to violent action, you dense motherfucker. Feminists have said the same or similar thing for a damn while. The point of the metaphor is that a person who is cast out from a place, who is unwanted and unloved by that place, will see no reason for its continuity. Would it be better to say “Men wouldn’t piss on society if it was burning down?” Would that be les…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 02:49 PM
–

Yeah, I could sorta figure. Imma lurker, but Jesus Christ I have no idea what she’s getting at.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 02:35 PM
–

I’m gonna be completely honest, I cannot parse what you’re trying to say, because this feels like it’s not really a “debate” so much as it is “Lilith decides to scream at the void”. Nonetheless, I will engage, because I am a fool who has little left in the way of dignity. The people that have said things like “a child rejected by a village will burn it down to feel warmth” aren’t wrong, but that statement shouldn’t necessarily be taken as literal. What it effectively means is that those rejected…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 02:20 PM
1

That is not the case, no. If men were to disappear, it would take about three days for the world to collapse. Most highly critical bedrock professions (logistics and supply lines, energy, etc) are manned almost entirely by, well, men. If those men disappear, bang, there goes your lights, bang, there goes the power plants, bang, there goes the food because there’s no refrigeration.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 04:44 PM
1

Regarding your point of men not always making the best leaders, this likely came about as a result of how tribal dynamics regarding intra-group conflicts evolved into the modern hierarchies that we see today. Tribal leaders were often also the ones leading their tribe into conflict against other tribes. If someone ordered you to march and fight against a vastly superior force, then it’s reasonable to expect that the fucker would also be on the hook as well. Basically, I imagine most men in histo…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 04:41 PM
1

I mean, I’m not because I view myself as ugly as sin and cannot conceive of any women actually viewing me as attractive. Because of that, I decided that the effort I’d spend in trying to make a woman like me is better spent elsewhere doing things I actually enjoy. That’s not to say I treat women poorly or anything, I just go into any interaction with a woman presuming that she is either asexual, aromantic, lesbian, or in a relationship, or some combination of the previous. I make these assumptio…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 04:26 PM
2

To put it bluntly, it wouldn’t happen. Women do not have the monopoly of force, meaning that any potentially violent uprising would require the support of men. Presuming the goals of the violent uprising were to seat women in all positions of power and disenfranchise men in the manner that women believe they are currently (rightfully or not), the support of enough men is basically a pipe dream. Even in revolutions instigated by women, like the ones in India during British rule of the Indian sub …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 04:22 PM
–

Oh, I have no doubt that it’s massively over exaggerated, and I have no doubt in my mind that a woman who out earns her male partner would not immediately dump him for a better earner. I’m not that much of a doom and gloom moron. The problem I believe is in the “liking you” aspect. A pre-existing relationship likely has enough familiarity and mutual interest between the partners that a difference in earnings wouldn’t cause it to degrade immediately or ever, but that assumes you’re already there.…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 04:06 PM
–

To be fair, not a lot of anyone’s making a good case for it nowadays. I think part of the problem also is that, despite gaining that independence, women retain certain expectations of men that existed because of the restrictions. Things like “the man must make more money than me” and other expectations should’ve completely died out, but haven’t. Yes, some women are fine with getting hitched with a more down on his luck guy, but that’s an exception that proves the rule. Is it a bad thing women ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 12:58 PM
0

No shit, tell me something I don’t know.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 03:56 PM
1

I know I’m not, because frankly, why the fuck would I want any of that stuff. Just seems weird, to be honest. Outside of artificial wombs assisting couples in conceiving when they can’t, that is. Also, do you currently have grandkids? If not, how certain are you that your kids might have kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 03:53 PM
1

Even women can’t make “perfect foetus’” with no complications. That’s not an argument. Secondly, you are a machine. You are a meat machine, but you are a machine. Anything that human can do, technology will eventually be able to replicate, even all the shit you mentioned. Hell, machines will probably be able to do it better than you, because machines can be kept in a stable site where no negative external factors can affect the foetus. And for your other point, if the mother isn’t growing the fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 03:44 PM
1

The “it’s not going to be viable for centuries” argument doesn’t really hold water. It took humanity less time to get from it’s first flight to putting people on the moon then it did getting from the first steam engine to that first flight. We already have some form of artificial wombs that, while not really able to incubate a foetus from day 1, it can after a certain point. And regarding the second point, thank you for being honest. You want the right and authority to kill a potential human bei…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 03:32 PM
1

The “it’s not going to be viable for centuries” argument doesn’t really hold water. It took humanity less time to get from it’s first flight to putting people on the moon then it did getting from the first steam engine to that first flight. We already have some form of artificial wombs that, while not really able to incubate a foetus from day 1, it can after a certain point. And regarding the second point, thank you for being honest. You want the right and authority to kill a potential human bei…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 03:31 PM
3

Average Gomba Fallacy moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 03:19 PM
1

So if artificial wombs/incubation machines were to become advanced enough that a foetus were to be able to survive outside of a mother and reach full maturity, would it then be reasonable to say that, at that point, abortion as we know it (termination of the foetus and the pregnancy) should be criminalized?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 03:18 PM
2

Lemme take this one on the nose. There is no reason a feminist cannot be both a feminist and a misandrist. Feminism, by its function, is about equality between the sexes, insofar as it relates to areas wherein men are advantaged as compared to women. Feminism makes no claim to directly assist men in areas wherein men are disadvantaged and women are not, and it tends to ignore those areas in its theories. Where it doesn’t, it typically attributes the disadvantage that men’s suffer is of their own…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 03:15 PM
0

So is a nurse/doctor going to a palliative care floor of a hospital and just unplugging a bunch of people considered an “okay” action?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 02:55 PM
1

Let’s be honest, there are some people who would do exactly that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 02:51 PM
0

So in other words, what you are wanting is the sole authority over whether or not a potential human life can be and deserves to be considered “alive” or “a human being”.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 02:50 PM
2

You referred to a fetus as a parasite. You are now referring to is as “what would eventually be a life”. These are contradictory positions. If a fetus is a parasite, then it should never be counted as it relates to the murder of the woman that was its host. If the fetus is “what would eventually be a life” and thus something that should be protected and its destruction punished, then the destruction of a fetus should be punished regardless of who ordered it. Presume then that a woman was walking…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:59 PM
0

Why then is it that when a pregnant woman is murdered, the murderer gets charged with double homicide? Like no, seriously, why? Like if it’s just a parasite, then killing some poor sap with a tapeworm in their gut should also count, no? It’s a parasite too.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 12:21 PM
3

Sure, it could be in any form. But I think we all know what form it would come back as, and that form would not be one where women would take equal part in the conscription, even if they’re only for non-front-line roles. Hell, look at Ukraine. Before Donbas, they had done away with conscription. It came back in 2014, and it’s gotten worse since the war with Russia started. Only men were conscripted. And I hesitate to say that stopping the “whining” is a good thing. All that means is the men of a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 04:38 PM
4

While I tend to not post on most places as I prefer to lurk, I’ve seen this argument a lot and it feels reductive to me. The unfortunate truth is that getting rid of the draft in the States won’t actually mean anything in the event that such an institution is needed. Saying “Just get rid of it” ignores the fact that getting rid of it wouldn’t matter, because the second it’s needed again, poof, it’s back. Essentially, if worst comes to worst and, say, China declares total war, the States would li…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 04:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter