TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NateExMachina Archive

View 0 posts and 268 comments by NateExMachina on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You mean like how you ignored the rest of my post? One wears a giant ripped robot suit and is ridiculously handsome to compensate. Also this. One turns into a giant, ripped monster to compensate. The other is the only legit short person and he's supposed to be playing a kid. Apparently [people] (https://www.reddit.com/r/Spiderman/comments/6j1tik/is_anyone_else_bothered_by_tom_hollands_height/) are bothered by it. And holy shit. What happened to the dwarf? lmao You didn't even try. QED black pill…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 02:07 AM
6

They're all six foot tall, perfectly symmetrical faced, literal super heroes and 11/10 to everyone. Even straight dudes get hot for them. Yet even with all those top choices, most women want Thor. Like how much do you have to bend reality to think they're a great example.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 11:36 AM
4

Also this: She cannot be named in order to protect the identity of her little girl Yeah, protect the little girl...
/r/PussyPass13/10/18 01:20 AM
2

That's what the entire article is about...
/r/MensRights05/06/18 08:29 AM
3

Check out the list of mods and FAQ. It's a feminist sub.
/r/MGTOW12/10/16 02:18 PM
3

People who do this have already made the decision. They just don't want to be responsible for it. They ask around until someone tells them what they want to hear. Then they can feel like it wasn't their decision and they were just following advice.
/r/MGTOW29/09/16 01:22 PM
-1

The sidebar rules in /r/feminism used to state that you must "assume the validity of feminism's existence". I was sent this message when I was banned. I did believe feminism was valid at the time too. I am one of the moderators of /r/Feminism. Please keep in mind our main posting rule for the future: Discussions in this subreddit will assume the validity of feminism's existence and the necessity of its continued existence. The whys and wherefores are open for debate, but debate about the fundame…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 11:36 PM
1

I read fine, thanks. Your logic is bad. You made three assumptions: That these purposes contradict each other. That the criticism of men is correct. That the criticism of women is incorrect. I have to assume you are gynocentric because you made these choices without providing an argument. The language in your posts is also passive aggressive. "I'm not actually going to give an argument but I'm right, you should know why, and now I'm going to insult you." Furthermore, you characterized the men ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/15 12:21 PM
1

You don't have a point. Are you really going to pull this Kafkaesque nonsense? "Arguing against feminism proves feminism!"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 06:45 PM
3

Everything is always the man's fault and responsibility. That's what I get from your summary. They criticize both men and women. You like the criticism of men and want to throw away the criticism of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 09:20 AM
2

"I regret the language and strategies I used" This sounds like: I'm not actually sorry but I regret that my plan backfired.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 09:19 AM
1

And if she got raped, you wouldn't care either? Did you read the entire comment or only the part you could argue with?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 12:16 PM
11

Oh god, this comment again. First of all, he's running as a Democrat. Second, he's always been part of the Democratic caucus. Third, and most importantly, his rhetoric has always blamed Republicans for the failures of Democrats. Moreover, I'm an independent.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 05:05 AM
11

I liked him too. This campaign really brought out the liar in him. He always played partisan politics though. Just this week he blamed Republicans for talking about gender... https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&t=6m45s&v=58DQ0C7Krnk
/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:44 AM
1

With all seriousness, I suggest therapy. There is definitely something wrong with your self-image and no one is attracted to obsessive insecurities. All other advice is pointless for you. This is in your head. For example, wtf @ 5'9 being short. You're literally average.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 08:20 PM
5

Actually, I am for ending government involvement in marriage. Special marriage "rights" discriminate against everyone who is not married.
/r/MGTOW27/06/15 08:59 AM
2

I agree with the others. The title is weird and has nothing to do with the video. In fact, it has the exact opposite message of the video, which was to focus on positivity...
/r/MensRights13/06/15 07:03 PM
2

The title also has nothing to do with the video.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 07:00 PM
2

It's important to note that they also redefine "power" in a way that pretends women don't have any.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 10:50 AM
1

Only a child would think it's safe for men at night. What makes you think you can reason with these people and why are you dating one of them? I would first test to see if they have any empathy at all.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 10:35 AM
1

Wow, they have their own PAC now after all the orchestrated abortion and birth control fighting. Divide and conquer.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 10:21 AM
2

people are saying So "people" was one person? Its implied heavily in this comment. It says nothing about a "race pass". You have quite an imagination.
/r/PussyPass28/03/15 11:37 PM
3

my problem is people are saying shes getting away with the crime because shes black Source?
/r/PussyPass27/03/15 10:04 PM
-2

Omega --> Alpha transition is common? Lol sure. Did I say that? No. Improvement is common. The description doesn't even sound like an alpha. LOLOLOL!!!!1111!condescendinglaugh
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 08:53 PM
-1

I think this is common. Ever wonder why all the hot people are taken? Obviously, more people are attracted to them -- but also, some take care of themselves better once they're in a relationship. I've dated a lot of women that were legbeards. After a few months, they start buying new clothes and makeup. It's not about sex. It's about feeling happy and accepted. A lot of people don't take care of themselves because they're depressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 08:13 PM
1

No it's in my opinion that the "cute guys are all jerks!" doesn't jive with reality. I agree. But some of them are jerks and "it's easier to blame women" doesn't jive with reality either. These "nice" guys are told they're nice. They're told the other guys are assholes. They're not told how to be attractive. How can you blame them for hating other guys? Do you understand this? I haven't seen any acknowledgement that you've read this. Men don't act the same way women do. We don't stare at other g…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/15 09:24 PM
1

TRP Men, do you think that certain "nice guys" underestimated the importance of "appearance" and "presence" and used "being nice" as the "bad guy" because it's easier to blame women than it is to "lift" or "groom" or care about style and how you look? I understood your overall point. You put the entirety of the blame onto the men. You think they should "man up" and that's all you want to talk about. It's not a mystery why the shoulders to cry on don't approve of other men, when the women in thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/15 12:38 AM
1

I'm not a RP or BP but I'll give my personal experience. When I was young, I never really thought about whether I was nice or not. This wasn't a word I associated myself with. It was women that told me I was nice. They would randomly say powerful compliments to me, like how I would make the perfect husband or how thankful they are to know me. In addition to this, they would complain about how horrible the men in their lives were. So it's not the boys coming up with these ideas. Boys X, Y, Z were…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/15 09:25 AM
11

redditor for 9 days Fake story. Creative though.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 01:30 AM
1

They think rape jokes cause women to be raped. They're cool with violence against men though. That's why they made a #KillAllMen hashtag.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 06:52 PM
2

redditor for 8 days
/r/MensRights15/12/14 06:38 PM
1

This is so stupid. He makes her promise not to steal again. "Okay officer, next time I'll let my children starve to death." If she can afford eggs, then arrest her. If she can't, then what the fuck.
/r/PussyPass11/12/14 08:51 PM
2

I think they enjoy hurting people. It's the same mentality bullies use. They'll shove someone and yell "HIT ME!" when they want to start a fight. It's what white knights do too. Some don't even care about women. They just want an excuse to fight other men. Their eyes light up with excitement, like serial killers.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 05:44 AM
1

Maybe you shouldn't knock anyone out if you're not in danger. If your most pressing "rights" issue is the "right" to knock out someone who slaps you, then I hope the movement doesn't go there.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 08:52 AM
1

My concern is if the police report lied and whether someone should be shot until they die for it. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/11/04/1341612/-Proof-the-police-have-told-two-huge-lies-in-the-shooting-death-of-Darrien-Hunt
/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:08 PM
3

Video of the cosplayer shooting just came out too. http://boingboing.net/2014/11/26/new-video-emerges-of-black-cos.html
/r/MensRights04/12/14 07:12 PM
1

What is an "inequality"? Something that only happens to one gender and/or when the law is biased? For example, if only women were the victims of catcalls, then that would be "inequality" instead of just "gendered"? I'm not sure if I would make a distinction between inequality and gendered. If something happens 100% of the time to one gender, even though the other could do it, then is it still "gendered"? Does it even matter? What is the purpose of the distinction? To be honest, I don't think men…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 08:23 AM
2

In that case, I'll try to pick apart your argument. You say that catcalling is not a feminist issue. What is a feminist issue then? Then you say there's no inequality if both men and women can do it. Do you mean equality under the law? I think the problem you're having is the word equality is also amorphous, like "feminism". It can mean anything or nothing at all. It can even be a feeling. I would avoid words like egalitarianism, feminism, and equality entirely. Orwell wrote an essay on why word…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 02:32 AM
1

Wow, this shits all over title IX. Now they have twice as many women's groups and no men's groups.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 12:37 PM
1

Their husbands are in jail and their sons are dead; but they're the oppressed ones.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 12:27 PM
2

Some feminists are the greatest threat to rights.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 12:08 PM
0

http://youtu.be/pCj5ONvDCz8
/r/MensRights24/11/14 12:02 PM
2

Before you embark on changing your girlfriend's mind, start asking yourself some serious questions. Is she an honest person? Is she vengeful? Does she admit when she's wrong? Does she take responsibility for her actions? Does she ever act like a victim? Does she ever tell you to man up? Does she have empathy? I would also recommend Stefan Molyneux's book Real-Time Relationships. Good luck, friend.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 11:52 AM
4

Some feminists are the greatest threat to rights.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 04:23 PM
3

You could wear a bowling shirt. http://www.alohaland.com/whats-new/new-gunner-girls
/r/MensRights14/11/14 04:13 PM
4

You'd think landing on a comet would be enough to get attention.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 03:25 PM
1

Frankly, no one cares what you think about anything at all; let alone anything you mentioned just now. The truth hurts.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 02:21 PM
1

Great that he recorded. Laughing and yelling "OH SHIT!" was fucked up though.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 02:19 PM
1

Maybe they could teach their sister how to act like a grownup in public. That woman was clearly failed by everyone who had a hand in raising her. EDIT: Down-votes now? I guess the truth hurts. That woman had no idea how an adult should behave. Her mother, father, grandparents, etc... should all be ashamed of themselves. Personally, I don't think your comment contributed anything to the conversation. It's circle-jerk material and frankly not even really related to the comment you replied to. The …
/r/MensRights14/11/14 03:13 AM
1

Were they black? He wasn't. At least one of the animals was white too, not to mention the black guy helping break up the fight was the most mature person there.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 02:41 AM
1

Except the white animal at 1:35 who cheers in front of the camera.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 02:29 AM
1

Okay Joe, what about when a grown man rapes a boy?
/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:33 PM
1

Wikipedia? The site that can be edited by anyone? Yup. They love Wikipedia because it's becoming a "safe space". Safe from criticism.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:21 PM
1

Nice try, sock account.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:12 PM
1

But now universities are pushing it.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:01 PM
7

Define political, economic, and social equality. Define women's rights and interests. It's not an answer. Feminism is a completely meaningless word. It will never point to anything tangible and that is the intent. It is a word used to hide behind when criticism comes. It only functions as a connotation and an identity. Meaning is bigger than a dictionary. Also, whether or not this is an average feminist outside of the internet, it's not right to act like this person isn't a feminist.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 04:07 PM
1

As I said, privilege probably exists but your example of privilege is so blatantly stupid, that it surely doesn't. You tried to piggy-back your screwy thoughts onto a truistic buzzword and hoped nobody would notice. In fact, I think you intentionally left explanations vague because you're a coward and even you know that you're an idiot.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 04:32 AM
1

Poor baby. Is your ego bruised? If you think I'm wrong, then show it. Oh wait, you can't, because you're terrified of criticism. Okay then, hide behind your emotional non-arguments. I'll call mommy to get your bottle.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 05:12 PM
1

The point is that you're too dishonest to make a real argument; and this is why you continue to use emotional buzzwords, instead of communicating. I don't know WHICH privilege you are talking about and you apparently don't WANT me to know either. I cannot say if something EXISTS if you don't DEFINE it. You have a SPECIFIC definition of privilege that you will not TELL us. You are instead using the word with two definitions at once. One is your bullshit definition, that is probably wrong and you …
/r/MensRights10/09/14 02:15 AM
1

White privilege obviously exists because white is the majority and there are privileges inherent in being part of the majority. White privilege obviously does not exist because it doesn't have a definition. It is a collection of unproven assumptions, many of which are probably false. The goal of this word is to assert something in a way that cannot be challenged by honest people. Some privilege theories talk about "norms". People complain that we imagine men when we think about doctors, while ig…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 01:38 AM
1

I assume by left it is meant left-leaning media. Both the left media and politicians function as one. They have the same donors and agendas. This is an expression of White Privilege, ie no one cares about the violent crime within the minority groups. You've said this twice now without elaborating. 1) White on white crime. 2) White on minority crime. 3) Minority on white crime. 4) Minority on minority crime. You're saying we only care about 2 & 3 and somehow that's a "privilege"? Do we care about…
/r/MensRights08/09/14 05:25 AM
1

I don't know why that matters to my point. You don't have a point. You're not even on topic. This person claimed the left wanted Zimmerman to be white. That is undeniably true. I've seen unaltered pictures of Zimmerman Good job, Sherlock. We all have. He looks hispanic. He has a Spanish accent. Unsurprisingly, he's from South America. Now let's look at everything you didn't respond to in the comments. What about the race-baiting audio tapes? What about how the media portrayed Trayvon as a little…
/r/MensRights08/09/14 12:10 AM
0

Zimmerman wasn't made white by the 'left'. He was made white by the media By the left media...
/r/MensRights07/09/14 08:11 PM
1

This guy is like the stereotypical strawMRA. Women aren't loyal. Women just want attention. Women bring nothing to the discussion. The whole video is crap and even the beginning description of how MRAs act was nothing I've observed.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 08:37 PM
3

They brightened Zimmerman's photo to make him look more white and edited the 911 call to make him sound racist. The race baiting is undeniable. I agree with him that the left is predictable. The place where I diverge is I think both the left and right are in on the game.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 08:02 PM
2

remember when I said, Done? Passive aggression. I'm commenting to remind you that I'm not going to comment! I'm really leaving now! You're going to cry when I'm gone!
/r/MensRights19/08/14 01:56 AM
1

When I was in my all girls high school, our computer classes involved learning how to touch type. Computer science didn't exist as far as our school was concerned. So from my experience, computer science wasn't an option for females. My co-ed school didn't have computer science classes either. Despite this, dozens of boys, and only boys, taught themselves how to program in BASIC, from reading the source code of TI-82 programs on calculators. Nothing stopped the girls from participating in this, …
/r/MensRights14/08/14 08:18 AM
1

Do you also hate all Americans, since they are also American? America is not an ideology. It is a piece of land. It is not comparable. Do you hate Christianity because of the Westboro Baptist Church? Yes. There is good reason to hate all christians for using the word "christian". There are 30,000 different denominations, yet they all want to call themselves the same word. This is so they can feel like their group is bigger than it really is and also so they can deflect criticism. Whenever someth…
/r/MensRights14/08/14 07:40 AM
2

You can have an agenda that doesn't personally benefit you.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 07:39 PM
13

http://youtu.be/gCSWbTv3hng?t=2m48s Who cares what you think? It's not your dick. Let the babies decide when they're older. It's like saying you should chop a baby girl's cunt up because it looks funny.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:56 PM
1

I'm not an MRA. I'm not sure if I even identify as an egalitarian, because an "equal" world may not be in everyone's best interest. I'm also not a humanist because morality extends beyond humans. I also feel that such labels are meaningless. What does it mean to care about "equality" or "humans"? It says almost nothing about a person's beliefs. It's just ego masturbation, a way of sounding like an intelligent and good person. I've become anti-feminist because feminism is the greatest threat to t…
/r/MensRights22/07/14 09:11 PM
2

I saw a statistic that said MRA's don't think trans people should have equal rights, but statistics are easily manipulated and I'd like to see real opinions! ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights20/07/14 10:31 PM
1

Patriarchy will NEVER have a definition. It only functions because it does NOT have a definition. You are NOT the first person who came up with the idea of defining something that people don't want defined. Your idea has repeatedly been tried and failed with other words. You are the one who can't understand, so don't be a condescending ass. Meaningless words. In certain kinds of writing, particularly in art criticism and literary criticism, it is normal to come across long passages which are alm…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 10:18 PM
2

This same thing happened in Korea. A group of women, led by a woman, many of whom identified as feminists, created female-only parking spaces, because they were concerned about "women's safety". They wanted them in front of buildings and in well-lit places. The western media got a hold of the story. They blamed men for implying that women can't drive. In each district, 100 women, from housewives to feminism specialists, are chosen as Women Friendly Seoul forum members, a local network to devise …
/r/MensRights20/07/14 08:07 PM
1

Jealous, bitch? http://youtu.be/75aGG27dGUA http://youtu.be/0oRkv8EGH4o
/r/MensRights20/07/14 06:57 PM
7

lol. My IQ is 154. What's yours, assmunch? http://youtu.be/HQey-2LP1E4
/r/MensRights20/07/14 06:34 PM
0

No. You're asking them to define a word, not their beliefs. This assumes that the word has a definition. It does not and that is intentional. Patriarchy is an emotion. It is a conclusion without evidence. Its "definition" is constructed on the fly and can change at any moment. The behavior you are engaging with unwittingly gives legitimacy to the word, the same way that "debates" with creationists vs evolutionists give perceived legitimacy to creationists. Again, patriarchy does not have a defin…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 05:41 PM
1

If nearly all feminists agree that we have to "smash the patriarchy", yet none of them are using the same definition, then they are functioning as a cult. They assume that "patriarchy" exists, only coming up with definitions afterward. They also act as if all feminists have the same goal, until they are forced to define their beliefs. This is a form of passive aggression. Patriachy is a word that is not meant to be defined. It is meant to be ambiguous because that makes it impossible to argue ag…
/r/MensRights19/07/14 11:24 PM
1

I didn't ask whether or not I should go there. I don't need your advice. I wrote comments, showing that it was a feminist sub. I made my point and you AGREE that it's a feminist echo chamber that bans CONTENT -- yet you're still trying to prove something. What the fuck is your point? That's rhetorical. You never had one. Now you're even babbling incoherently and reciting ignorant platitudes like "rules are rules" and "don't like it, don't do it". That's not the point. The point is it's a feminis…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 09:01 PM
1

I gave examples that have nothing to do with "the way you say it". As you can see from my links, you are not allowed to question the OP in any way. The people who post there act accordingly too. Even after someone suggested that the OP was wrong, three people continued believing that it wasn't a bot and was sexism. The fucked up part is how easy it was to prove that it was a bot with a google search. "Feminazi" and "crazy" are also concepts, not just words. You might be allowed to criticize femi…
/r/MensRights16/07/14 05:22 PM
1

Thanks for writing passive aggressive comments after you've been proven wrong. Your post is childish and pointless. Feminazi is a harmless word. Banned for saying Omegle posts don't belong on creepyPMs. Banned everyone who posted in a thread. Banned for writing: "OP: 'There's no need to carry on messaging me...' continues messaging him back Or just click on any post and watch the mods police speech everywhere. Posts get deleted for not using "/s". 1 2 3 Their rule "reasoning" is totalitarian. Th…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 10:58 AM
5

Their sidebar says: We are feminist and women-friendly. You don't have to identify as such, but you must be respectful of the environment. Low-substance humor and stale hivemind circlejerks are not welcome. We have zero tolerance for racism, sexism, transphobia, ableism, and homophobia. Here's a post from another user: "You bet your ass it's a feminist sub. 8 of the 21 mods are in SRS according to my autotagger. Don't bother going there." Also, check out their rule "reasoning". It's definitely a…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:52 PM
0

Are you implying that I don't know why I was banned? That would be condescending and twatish. Regardless, you missed the point. They ban people on the first strike and in record time. I've both sent and received far worse messages in dozens of subs without consequence. The fact that you're allowed to call people names here illustrates my point. It continually blows my mind how people don't use search engines. You doubt that they censor people? Well, we can easily find out whether it was the tone…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:47 PM
10

It's not as bad as other places. You just have to be careful when saying the word "feminists" or talking about another poster. They're liberal with their definitions of what a "generalization" or an "insult" is. You will get a strike for it but they will remove it after a month. Also, instead of just deleting your comment, they will post a copy of it to another forum.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 03:55 PM
6

You may wish to study passive aggression if you're interested in why people bullshit and how to deal with it. I think it's common with feminists because they want to make everything about their feelings, not yours.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 03:25 PM
1

If you want to know who rules over you, find out who you're not allowed to criticize. I have the same view as you. I dislike both labels. Actually, I didn't even give a shit about gender. The only reason I'm here is because women's issues were used as a political divide in the last US election. People felt that birth control was more important than talking about over a decade of war. The MRM is a response movement. It's essentially anti-feminism, because it's the biggest threat to men. Most of i…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 03:14 PM
6

They might be about drunk rape allegations but they look horrible out of context.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 02:25 PM
3

I just made my first post there. I was banned in literally less than two minutes. Some dipshit got a "creepy PM" from a bot. She thought it was real. My post: What is wrong with you? It's a bot. They do it to install viruses. Just google the text and see how many results pop up. Stop playing a victim and get a clue. http://community.skype.com/t5/Security-Privacy-Trust-and/Bots-on-SKYPE/td-p/3225546 http://np.reddit.com/r/creepyPMs/comments/2ajb62/random_skype_adds_i_wonder_how_often_this_works/c…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 01:24 PM
1

redditor for 2 days
/r/MensRights11/07/14 12:09 PM
2

I am the party. http://youtu.be/BTZPLSZw4FM
/r/MensRights10/07/14 04:38 PM
2

I am at a loss for words. Just when I thought this sub couldn't sink any lower.... Post got rated down here. What are you complaining about?
/r/MensRights10/07/14 03:35 PM
3

I don't know why you bothered role-reversing something so unintelligible.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 01:28 PM
3

http://www.reddit.com/user/JoinorDIEsirr redditor for 1 hour
/r/MensRights07/07/14 01:08 AM
0

Posted MGTOW links in TwoX on a new account. Never researched what MGTOW was. Username is "sickofthisshizzle". Claims to be a gender expert. I'm not surprised that your post was removed. I even find it suspicious that you think it was a great injustice.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 04:56 PM
3

I thought the same thing when I saw this. I've gotten worse marks from walking past a bush, getting scratched by a pet, or a skin rash. The article is written by "Anonymous" and has SJW shit like trigger warnings in it. I'm almost certain this is fake. This could be an insane feminist. It could also be a troll. It might even be a false flag by the #EndFathersDay people. But none of that matters. What matters is how gullible feminists are. Let them continue to make fools of themselves. Also, chec…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 08:55 AM
1

We're talking about an activist movement though, their words are their influence. The point is not what's said but what isn't said. A group who says one thing and does another will not talk about what they did. Another comment I wrote talks about Sarkeesian's video. The entire video is "true", without a single factual inaccuracy. Looking closer reveals that she lies by omission. In this way, what activists don't say is actually their largest influence. we're talking about problems that exist in …
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:24 AM
1

If you wanna reframe you should do a 100% switch, the point of those rituals is reinforcing that the man is the provider and the women is fragile and delicate, needs to be protected. Benevolent sexism is used to deny privilege. Privilege is not "better called" sexism. It's both. I have literally never seen a feminist talk about benevolent sexism without denying privilege. The fact that the first time only happened now, after a reframe, is worrying. Likewise, the redefinition of privilege to mean…
/r/MensRights24/06/14 12:29 AM
2

Has it excluded them though? The reason feminism had to broaden itself was because it shit on minorities and the trans community. It didn't go well when feminists tried to tell black men that they were privileged. Likewise, TERFs destroyed feminism's image in the LGBT community. I'm here because I was frustrated with how feminism had taken over the narrative during the US elections. I thought it was fucked up that everyone was discussing birth control instead of wars and mass incarceration. Like…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:27 AM
1

The MRM seems to be threatened by groups which face real discrimination and oppression on a daily basis, and advocating for them makes you a "SJW". You made about eight unsubstantiated claims in one paragraph, that reads like a tumblr post. You even used the word "threatened", which is often used to deny a person's experience and construct a new narrative of fear and hate. I don't think it's a coincidence that you shitpost like a SJW and also think people are wrongly accused of being SJWs.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 08:37 AM
1

The only effect it had was making her rich and famous.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 08:30 PM
1

Have you actually seen the quality of comments on YouTube Reddit?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 08:27 PM
2

And the botox comment? You're going to pretend it didn't happen?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 08:17 PM
1

I'm not convinced this situation would be any different if this were a lesbian couple
/r/MensRights19/06/14 07:22 PM
1

It's probably because you're treating them like shit.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 07:00 PM
1

A movement's opinions is, you know, relevant to the image they portray. It's relevant at a superficial level, the same way politicians say one thing and do another. Words are not to be taken literally, but in concert with actions. Actions reveal the true intent, while words show the lie used to justify actions. As far as "men need to", "men need to stop harassing women sexually", "men need to stop objectifying women", what's the issue? Feminists need to stop oppressing men in the legal system, d…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:40 PM
1

don't feminists object to things like having doors opened for them all the time? Benevolent sexism is an ideology of hate. Its function is to erase female privilege and the male experience. Imagine a gender reframe. Do you know what's sexist? Women who do nice things for men. Don't be fooled by seemingly innocent mating rituals. The true purpose is to display dominance as the leisure class. It's a message to men that they had better work their asses off to support women. Go die in the coal mines…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:16 PM
1

The dialogue in this sub-reddit is quite disturbing at times. I think people need to view the silver lining in all this. There is no reason to absolutely advocate, diminish, question, or degrade women being objectified, used, or anything worse. Now, Claiming that men are objectified just the same is even worse. That is completely false. Blah, blah, blah, no examples. but mainly it comes from other Men Who gives a shit? All men aren't criminals. women are more prone to family life than career amb…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:08 PM
1

feminists groups are funding self-defense courses for women all the time They're spending far more money funding the Duluth model. Feminism also took a 180 on self-defense after slutwalk and blaming all men gained momentum with rape culture. "Men can stop rape." Never heard that phrase? They're even making organizations for it now. Were you asleep during the endless discussions about crime prevention? What, do you think R.A.D. courses were created by the MRM? Fuck no Ms. U.S.A. was called a vict…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 12:13 PM
1

I remember at 17 I could make decisions on whether I wanted to sleep with somebody or not. Now, I know the kid wasn't an adult in the eyes of the law He was an adult in the eyes of the law though. He was old enough to have sex, just not with an "authority figure". The only reason she's in trouble is because she is a coach at the same school. According to this law, having sex with someone of legal age can still put you on the sex offender list. It makes no sense that it's a sex crime.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 05:06 AM
1

There's a tacit compliance. He argues not to punish innocent people, then discusses how to properly punish innocent people.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:30 AM
1

Now you can!
/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:11 AM
1

She abused a position of power A position of power? She was a cheer coach. He wasn't even her student. if we are going to punish these actions, the punishment needs to be applied equally Two wrongs don't make a right. Civil rights violations are not justified when they are "applied equally". Do the right thing, not the equal thing. Accepting laws for no reason is authoritarian bullshit.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:27 AM
2

Also, does anyone else notice that when things like this happen, the picture shown of the woman being charged is usually one of her smiling, whereas in the case of a man being charged, they typically use a prison photo where he most definitely is NOT smiling? I think you picked a bad example. There's a giant prison photo both in the video and on the page. Most of the articles there use the prison photo only. But when I googled her name, the first thing that came up was tabloids posting sexy pict…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:11 AM
1

Nothing about this story is "as it should be". You think about it. She was an assistant cheerleading coach, which is an extracurricular bullshit activity, detached from the main school system. Regardless, he wasn't even her student. She had no power over him at all. It also does not make sense that a 16-year-old is considered mature enough to have sex, but not mature enough to do it with an authority figure until 18. The argument you made is about authority, not about age, which makes it totally…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 11:57 PM
6

It was not rape. The age of consent in Indiana is 16. But apparently it's illegal there to have sex with someone under the age of 18 if you have some kind of authority over them. What's most disturbing though, is when I searched for her name, the first website that came up was "20 Best Photos Of BJ-Giving Cheerleader Coach Megan Crafton Twitpics!" The third link was similar.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 05:10 AM
1

You may want to check out FeministWhore on YouTube and Twitter.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 06:43 AM
3

You didn't read the image before commenting and you should feel bad.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 06:23 AM
1

I think specifically in the case of donglegate, however, Anonymous's DDOS was the shot heard around the world. I think you're overstating the significance. Even posts on /r/Feminism didn't defend Adria Richards. This was not a partisan effort. She was clearly in the wrong. "Shot heard around the world" is ridiculous, especially since Playhaven ran away from this unscathed. Imagine if Adria Richards had straight up lied and said these guys said truly sexist things. They would still have been fire…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 05:03 AM
0

First you say being "bitchy" is the worse they can do. Now you're advising victims to run away?
/r/MensRights07/06/14 12:28 AM
1

This is why MRAs always talk about false accusations.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 08:37 PM
1

What changed the game was the DDOS against Adria's employer. A reverse partisan hit that was swift and decisive. I don't agree with this. I didn't even know about the DDOS attack. What changed the game was the massive number of big atheist players who don't tolerate bullshit, people like Dawkins, Thunderf00t, TheAmazingAtheist, etc. The ones who sided with feminists were even publicly humiliated by their own doing. For example, Matt Dillahunty was banned from the Athiesm+ forums for not being ra…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 05:46 AM
2

You guys do not like to be generalized as violent and hyper-sexualized and yet I see in many of these posts women are generalized as manipulative and emotionally unstable. Link to them. It's important to know the context, how it was received by the community, etc. Otherwise this is really ambiguous, which can be passive aggressive; for example, I could vaguely accuse you of something, without evidence, then demand that you defend yourself. It's better to talk about specific instances than to gen…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:41 PM
2

Please do. Bring a video camera.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 06:30 PM
2

User deleted his entire comment history prior to today. Submits in /r/malefashionadvice: "What if i died my hair pastel blue and wore preppy pastel clothes. Its like a paradox because preppy is very natural so dying my hair goes against the preppy trend but my hair and clothes will be preppy. My goal is to just mess with peoples minds." All negative karma in that submission. Makes no effort to read sidebar material. Asks people to explain everything instead, then complains that they wrote too mu…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 10:02 PM
1

The point I'm making is that his misogyny is due to narcissism, so it's superfluous. His motivation for killing people is clear: they have something that he doesn't have. It just happened to be women. I think he measures happiness by how much other people admire him or are jealous of him. That's why he always talks about his own jealousy and envy so much. He directly equates their happiness with his envy. The early years of his manifesto are entirely about how to be "cool". He even first mention…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:19 PM
1

I lost a few friends that I had known for years. One defriended me after she posted a story about how men are privileged to be able to be out at night. Mind you, this girl used to walk home across a college campus at midnight. I told her that it's not safe for men either in bad areas. Defriend. Another girl I had known for about 13 years. She changed from a normal girl into a victim-obsessed feminazi the moment she started college. She defriended me after I commented on an article about how men …
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:41 AM
2

/r/Feminism and /r/AskFeminists are ban crazy /r/Egalitarian, /r/Equality, and /r/GenderEgalitarian are alright
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:35 PM
3

He hated sexually active men BECAUSE of women. Women fucked them, gave them attention, etc. He hated men who were more successful than him long before he hated women. We don't know if he was mentally ill. I'm beginning to wonder if you're mentally ill. He wrote a 140 page story about how he was jealous of every man, even for things as absurd as being better than him at skateboarding or having a nicer house. He spent thousands of dollars on lottery tickets because he wanted to get rich, so people…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:32 PM
0

He hates men because those men get to fuck women and he doesn't. Your analysis is superficial. It's crystal clear from his writing that he's a narcissist. He's insanely jealous at anyone who has anything he doesn't, not just success with women. He wrote at length about how he wanted men to think his family was rich or how he wanted to be validated in the eyes of other men by being good at skateboarding. He also used the words "jealousy" and "envy" to describe his feelings toward literally every …
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:03 PM
0

Again, downvotes? Bring it. My pet peeve is people who intentionally annoy others, then act like victims.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:10 AM
1

http://youtu.be/HcHBLx4dPog
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:40 AM
1

He was completely obsessed with being "cool". He writes dozens of pages about it, before he even starts talking about women. Why don't you try reading?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 02:48 AM
3

A short, fat kid who was less pathetic than he was. https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1173655/elliot-rodger-manifesto.pdf My new housemate arrived in the middle of September. His name was Spencer Horowitz; a short, chubby UCSB student who was about a year older than me. He seemed like a friendly, mature sort of person; definitely a pleasant contrast from the housemates I had to suffer through in the previous month. I didn’t expect to have any problems with him. However, I w…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 12:47 AM
2

So you can make this about you or "men" if you want to, but the fucking PROBLEM is the fact the kid felt entitled to women and sex and that perpetuated his unhealthy world view to do what he did. Wrong. More than anything, he was mad that other men had something that he didn't. From his manifesto: The males deserve to be punished for living a better and more pleasurable life than me, and the females deserve to be punished for giving that pleasurable life to those males instead of me. ... This re…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 12:04 AM
8

Here's one from a feminist, Elizabeth Plank, on MSNBC: http://youtu.be/oOrKCLnsy2U?t=19m17s
/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:52 PM
3

He also said that he would enjoy killing them. Two new housemates moved into my apartment for the Autumn semester. They were two foreign Asian students who attended UCSB. These were the biggest nerds I had ever seen, and they were both very ugly with annoying voices. My last two housemates, Chris and Jon, were nerds as well, but at least they were friendly and pleasant. These two new ones were utterly repulsive, and one of them had a very rebellious demeanor about him. He went out of his way to …
/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:45 PM
9

He also said that he would enjoy killing them. Two new housemates moved into my apartment for the Autumn semester. They were two foreign Asian students who attended UCSB. These were the biggest nerds I had ever seen, and they were both very ugly with annoying voices. My last two housemates, Chris and Jon, were nerds as well, but at least they were friendly and pleasant. These two new ones were utterly repulsive, and one of them had a very rebellious demeanor about him. He went out of his way to …
/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:43 PM
10

I was talking about social media, which is mostly liberal. CNN only cares about gun control and pro-war / anti-civil liberties propaganda. That's why they hire people like Wolf Blitzer from AIPAC. I just looked up a CNN clip on YouTube. Literally in the first sentence was the words "gun control". In fact, that's all I see in every clip from them, which is exactly what my first comment talked about. Switch to MSNBC, where you have "gun control" and "poor women". Here's the first clip I found: "I …
/r/MensRights26/05/14 09:01 PM
22

His plan didn't work and he improvised by shooting people nearby. He stabbed his roommates to death. He even wanted to kill his father, brother, and step-mother. What's most disgusting about this story is the rationalization. You don't know what happened but you've already explained away the deaths of the men.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 07:12 PM
6

I think you missed the point. This guy hates women, yet he killed more men than women. Kind of odd, yeah? Everyone is talking about why the women died. No one is asking why the men died. Instead, they're rushing to Twitter to trend #YesAllWomen. Fucking nutjobs. That's how they don't care about the male victims.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:46 PM
3

He was even more pissed off at men who were successful. He thought that life "wasn't fair" because he should be popular and not them. That's what first brought him to care about women. To him, they were a symbol of popularity. He cared about that more than anything.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 05:56 PM
7

whole group of random men got shot up cause he had narcissistic visions and believed he should be successful, not them And this started long before he ever cared about women. In fact, at first he only cared about women because having a relationship is a sign of being popular. Did you even research this?
/r/MensRights26/05/14 05:49 PM
6

Wow, really? He didn't kill them because they got in his way. He killed them because he was jealous of successful men. He hated other boys before he even cared about girls. It's all over his manifesto. He even wanted to kill his father, brother, and stepmother. Try researching next time.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 05:41 PM
1

Feminism overlaps with mensrights. Does that mean everyone is both? Correlation is not causation. Also, it's amusing that League of Legends is on that list.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 05:18 PM
1

Apparently PUA = MRM now too. Check out these nutjobs. http://www.reddit.com/r/feminisms/comments/26e2cc/man_murders_6_women_elliot_rodger_gunman_in/
/r/MensRights26/05/14 04:24 PM
-1

With a knife too. The front page blows up about gun control. People only see what they want to see.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 04:20 PM
2

Republicans dominate their audience with fear, while Democrats play victim politics, just like feminism. Even the dynamics between the parties is victim politics. Watch as Democrats pretend to be helpless whenever Republicans do anything. The reality is that both parties are corrupt and working together to reinforce this illusion. This is how good cop / bad cop works. The "good cop" Democrats pretend to be victims themselves, who want to save you from the evil Republicans. The Republicans, in tu…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 12:36 PM
1

He said, very clearly, that whether you are a man or a woman is determined by your genitals. That denies trans people exist. And I said, very clearly, that this isn't about denying the existence of trans people. It's about denying the existence of biological norms. I also have to comment that your use of language is disturbing. Denying that trans people exist? Really? Only in an absurd victim universe. Everyone knows that trans people exist. So what are you really trying to say? Because this sou…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 11:21 PM
1

I care. I don't see how his statement denies that trans people exist. I also don't think it's acceptable to treat people like crap for not knowing the latest self-righteous, politically correct language. It's also strange to me that people obsess over how there are so many things outside the binary, yet they maintain the binary by cramming trans people into it. There's also something to be said for answering objective questions with unrelated, subjective answers. If someone asks "what are you bi…
/r/MensRights11/04/14 11:08 AM
2

Denying that trans people exist? Nonsense. I defended a game about female masturbation. This game only included vaginas which I thought was reasonable given the point of the game was to teach women how to masturbate. It was pointed out to me that not all women have vaginas and I will admit right here in front of everyone that this came as a big shock to me. Some people called the game exclusionary because it did not take into account the existence of transexuals. I said I think a game about fema…
/r/MensRights10/04/14 12:10 PM
2

He did "get away". Did you even watch the link?
/r/PussyPass08/04/14 06:55 AM
1

Did you not see all the security guards shoving him out of their stores and off their property. She literally walked up to a police officer and was doing this. Did you not see him crawling across tables, blocking doorways, and persisting after people pushed him away? Also, here's a plot twist: he was shoved out of the store for suspected shoplifting.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 04:30 AM
7

Sexual harassment is in the workplace and this is hardly sexual assault. She got a "pass" because everything she did was legal. You should feel bad for posting this. Also, this.
/r/PussyPass02/04/14 04:14 AM
1

redditor for 13 days only posts in /r/MensRights posts article named "Another solipsistic & ignorant woman ..." posts in this shit thread /u/marzoopial created two days later, also only posts in /r/MensRights /u/eberan-signs, /u/birnbom, /u/jo-in-o, /u/zombiehandy accounts now gone Cooler story, old chap.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 04:36 AM
20

RAINN just slammed rape culture in a letter to the White House. http://rainn.org/images/03-2014/WH-Task-Force-RAINN-Recommendations.pdf Rape is caused not by cultural factors but by the conscious decisions, of a small percentage of the community, to commit a violent crime.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 07:41 PM
9

There are so many sock accounts in this thread. /u/eberan-signs /u/birnbom /u/jo-in-o /u/cheap_fuck /u/zombiehandy /u/marzoopial /u/Lobstermansunion
/r/MensRights23/03/14 06:36 PM
1

Perhaps you're speculating that I'm speculating.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:24 PM
0

contradicting just about every historian worth his salt Contradicting who and how? omitting a number of important facts What facts?
/r/MensRights20/03/14 01:14 AM
1

And yet, the United States is engaging in endless war and spying without limitation... Perhaps these politicians are voting for war and spying, endlessly and without limitations...
/r/MensRights20/03/14 01:03 AM
-1

You've apparently blahblahblah I'm ignorant and condescending And you apparently never researched a single counter-argument from the people you're criticizing. http://youtu.be/dmzZ8lCLhlk Was that so hard? Are you another failed product of American public education?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 11:14 PM
0

All of which have been shown to create inequality. Define "equality". Okay, show it.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 04:27 PM
1

contributes to a situation where some services have to turn women away for lack of funding, while being forced to pay for unnecessary services for male victims even though not a single man has ever approached asking for support What service are they providing for men that's not being used and is wasting money? This is such a bold thing to say without an example.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 12:20 AM
1

What is the purpose of justice? Is it to get enjoyment from punishing criminals? Is it healthy to enjoy seeing people suffer? If that's not the point, then is an eye for an eye even necessary to achieve whatever justice is trying to achieve?
/r/MensRights26/02/14 05:36 PM
2

All the benefits of marriage discriminate against anyone who wants more choices. For example, what about single couples who want some benefits but feel pressured because it's a love ceremony? What if you want to give a friend a green card but have your tax status with someone else? What about polygamy? The number of people who don't have "options" are endless. Every time you add an "option", you are discriminating against everyone who does not have that option. Marriage is a social ceremony. It …
/r/PussyPass03/02/14 10:13 PM
-2

Yes. Marriage discriminates against everyone who is not married. I would rather see straight marriage removed from government. It's really scary how marriage has been redefined as a "right", when it's really a form of discrimination.
/r/PussyPass03/02/14 05:00 AM
2

Liberal essentially means "Democrat" in the US. One of the reasons it's so confusing is because Democrats don't have an ideology of their own. Their beliefs are instead shaped by lobbyists, politicians, and the media. Despite their message of social freedom, they seemingly don't care about throwing everyone in jail, spying on everyone, and bombing the shit out of third-world countries. They also overwhelmingly support government intervention in every area of life. With that said, some self-ident…
/r/MensRights21/01/14 01:00 AM
6

This isn't about favoring one gender over the other. In fact, I do not affiliate myself as a feminist or an MRA for that reason. My point is there are very real obstacles that suicidal men uniquely face compared to women. Many of these suicides are even a direct result of gender and sexism. It's not less tragic for a woman to die. No one implied that. The implication is the opposite: that society thinks it's less tragic when a man dies. Male disposability is a top MRA issue. The OP is asking MRA…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 02:28 AM
21

Whenever I see a depressed girl, I also see a dozen guys trying to cheer her up. Not that we should ignore suicidal women; but I personally feel that I've spent too much time helping women who I later realized didn't need the help, while also ignoring men who truly needed help. The point is that helping women already goes without saying, whereas helping men unfortunately needs special emphasis. One of my friends killed himself a few years ago and most of his problems had to do with gender. Peopl…
/r/MensRights29/11/13 10:54 PM
10

Thanks Obama.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 11:06 AM
0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9REQpM6ddbk
/r/MensRights08/11/13 03:59 AM
1

Jesus saves... ...you money on alimony.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 05:40 AM
2

Is this a joke, or are you stupid? Men can actually get breast cancer, you fucking idiot. Women don't even have prostates. While I'm sure you know that latter bit, the joke doesn't work unless you fail to realize the former. Because otherwise there's no absurdity to highlight. The joke worked. You just don't understand it. I'm not sure why you're on a crusade to treat this person like shit and prove that their joke wasn't funny; but you should consider acting less crazy and abusive.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 04:58 AM
1

It took you three replies to answer the question and you still got it wrong. Nothing in the caption or image indicated that this was a feminist page. Why are you so dysfunctional?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 07:54 PM
1

It's about NEITHER. It's about an "abusive page", not a "feminist page", and especially not about MRAs vs feminists. If not, what's it really about, other than you forgetting this evening's meds? Grow up and stop being a bigot.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 02:14 AM
0

This topic has nothing to do with men's rights pages or feminist pages.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 11:25 PM
7

There is no fairness in a system with censorship. I'm also not sure why everyone keeps calling this a "feminist page". Did it actually have feminist rhetoric or do you just assume everything that's abusive to men is "feminist"?
/r/MensRights10/10/13 09:07 PM
3

feminist pages Are you calling this a "feminist page"?
/r/MensRights10/10/13 09:03 PM
3

You must be blind to it. Check your privilege. /s
/r/MensRights25/09/13 11:29 PM
2

Solutions are obvious when you answer the wrong problems.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 01:54 PM
7

I'm glad for that. Mine never have, not even once. My wall is a horror story of privileged, upper-middle class, white college women. Here's today's latest copypasta from a female college grad: Now...what if MEN got PREGNANT! ~ Maternity leave would last for two years....with full pay. ~There would be a cure for stretch marks. ~Natural childbirth would become obsolete. ~Morning sickness would rank as the nation's #1 health problem. ~All methods of birth control would be 100% effective. ~Children …
/r/MensRights25/09/13 05:01 AM
-3

I don't see why they'd miss an opportunity to further rape hysteria. They don't seem to care about any other form of violence. I'll be happy when your feminist friends start posting about Syria or the prison-industrial complex. I won't hold my breath.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 04:46 AM
0

It was obviously satire -- failed satire, as chocoboat explained. You're not reading. You're attributing views to people, based on knee-jerk emotions.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:36 AM
1

My reply was concise. What's the problem?
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:22 AM
-9

I think we should do away with all of the white male privileged authors starting with Sophocles, and Aristotle, and moving our way forward. Their shallow words are soaked so deeply into the roots of our society that it's a wonder our privileged white forefathers were able to draft a constitution at all! I mean Paine had no common sense! Smith knew nothing of the wealth OR nations! Dale Carnegie was only able to make friends because he was white, and he influenced people with his erect fascism! T…
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:00 PM
0

There's no context. You don't know who the person is or why they're writing what they write. It could be a troll or an MRA for all you know. The comment is even ambiguous. It's just as bad as Sarkeesian pointing at damsels, while ignoring the entire plots of games. It's fine if you repost things from the media but if you post every comment you find on a social networking site then you look crazy and pathetic. That's the message "society" is going to get from you.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 11:00 AM
-2

Someone on the internet made a sexist comment? How totally newsworthy. Stop posting this shit. Seriously, it's fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 01:07 PM
2

The whole concept of "deserve" is really inappropriate with morality anyway. Nobody deserves to suffer. People act like it's okay to commit immoral acts as long as the target is said to deserve it. For example, if someone leaves money on the ground, some will say, "That was stupid! It's mine now!" Likewise, it seems popular for women to vandalize cars after a bad breakup or talk quite seriously about chopping a man's dick off if he cheats. Now imagine an opportunist who sees a drunk girl at a pa…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 09:48 AM
0

It was sort of funny; but now you're trying too hard to save face and it's really weird.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:59 PM
2

/r/equality is pretty good
/r/MensRights13/08/13 02:52 PM
1

HAHAHAHAHA. You have issues.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 04:27 AM
1

Thanks for the video. It was convincing.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 02:44 AM
1

Lol a quick browse through your history shows that you're clearly just looking for fights. Agreed, it is a stupid conversation. Im embarrassed at having replied to your pathetic attempt to instigate an argument in the first place. Keep on fighting the good fight kiddo. Maybe someday you'll get there. (Somewhere that matters, I mean.) I'm opinionated and genuinely interested in what people have to say. Perhaps you should try to understand others instead of looking for reasons to dismiss comments …
/r/MensRights07/08/13 07:47 AM
1

And by the way, for the most part, there is a social paradigm for a reason. Traits that are valued in society are valued for certain reasons. To tell yourself otherwise is simply ignorant and arrogant. You're right, there is a reason. Since you didn't tell me the reason, I'll just assume you're thinking of the typical ignorant and arrogant reason; and I also won't tell you what it is. What an incredibly stupid conversation.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 02:59 AM
2

Working hard is not a gift or talent. Even when nerds works hard, it's only because they love what they're doing. The work is the goal itself, not the means to an end. The obsession with socially unproductive gifts and talents is often the reason they are socially inept. The people you described are not gifted or talented. The majority of them care deeply about their status in society and work hard to achieve ideals that society has told them are important.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 12:06 AM
3

It says where the 50/50 comes from in both the article and image. This is the same study that's used to promote rape hysteria, so if it's ridiculous then I'm glad more conclusions are being drawn from the data to reveal the absurdity. Nobody questions when a study says 1 in 5 women are raped but when the study also says that 1 in 5 men are raped, suddenly the shit hits the fan. I too, think it's ridiculous. This data should have been used to debunk the CDC study, not to promote further fairy tal…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 11:06 PM
3

What is bad about the data? It's not clear from your comment.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 11:30 PM
2

Fair point You should have stopped here. though the videos do show that there are a lot of games with those tropes in them, good games, too. You don't have to make up bullshit to pretend you were right about something. Check your ego. Perhaps, but more obvious are your problems with reading comprehension. Nice vague attack. You're the one who failed. You even admitted it; yet in your mind, I'm the one who can't read? Nice logic. You're an embarrassment. Just stop.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 03:20 AM
3

Nice strawman. He didn't say "don't play games". He said don't play the games you don't like. There will be other games. Boycott.. buycott.. you could even -- gasp -- make your own. You also might have serious issues if you think losing your children is in any way comparable to playing a bad video game.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 02:14 AM
1

Ironically, they throw each other like objects in the NES Rescue Rangers game too. Is there a word for discrimination against chipmunks? What's wrong with being a dog anyway?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 01:01 AM
1

It describes some feminism and also misandry. Do you still complain when people say good things about feminism as a blanket statement? The problem here is you insist on hiding under an umbrella label. How do you decide who the "bigots" are if you have incompatible ideologies within your own group? For example, feminists as a "group" are both for and against prostitution. Which faction are the bigots? Why are you using the same label? What I constantly hear from feminists is how the word "feminis…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 12:30 AM
0

The [May be fake] tag is really awkward. It implies that the rest of these submissions aren't fake.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 12:15 AM
0

Nice strawman Sherlock. The victim-blaming dehumanization is what's the same. You're welcome to stop being abusive at any time, both in this thread and in real life.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 12:08 AM
1

To "enjoy ending conflict" is also part of violence culture. Imagine every action movie where a hero violently defeats a villain. Some people desire to be a hero so badly that they create conflicts so they can feel powerful when they end them. We also see this a lot with violent white knights. Some don't merely desire to protect women; they actually get excited to hurt people. You should consider two questions: "Why are you trying to hurt me?" and "Why are you comparing me to you?" Both are unne…
/r/MensRights10/07/13 05:24 AM
2

Backhanding someone who annoys you isn't self defense. Your comment is completely out of context. I know a guy who does MMA because he enjoys hurting people. His eyes lit up like a child at Christmas while he told us a story of how he bashed someone's face in so hard that he needed plastic surgery. He laughed while describing how the blood poured down. Later that day, I watched him chase a moth around with a lighter, trying to set it on fire while alive; and he seemed eager to show us he was car…
/r/MensRights10/07/13 12:06 AM
4

I dislike your comment. I'm going to make a clear statement by punching you. I'm really mature.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:50 AM
1

It doesn't matter what she wants. Doing the right thing isn't about winning, hurting someone, denying them pleasure, etc. It doesn't matter if kids are there either. If someone acts a different way around children then they're self-loathing people that want their children to be better than they are. If someone beats random people then they probably beat their children too, or at least scare them with threats of violence.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:47 AM
-1

The comment you're responding to wasn't personal at all... in fact, you're the one who took things personally by citing yourself in your example. Also, hitting people is probably the best way to teach your kids how to be rapists.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:30 AM
25

I think "creep" is generally used in a sexist way too.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 06:16 AM
1

Two weeks ago this was posted here. A mother wanted to be included in a father's day event. The reaction was completely the opposite. Why is there a different reaction now?
/r/MensRights17/06/13 02:51 AM
1

I'm sorry that some of your experiences with the opposite gender were so unpleasant. Surely there are "fucking crazy" women and most people participate in questionably insane gender norms; but if you find yourself surrounded by horrible people then it's time to start analyzing your own behavior. Imagine a woman with undesirable character traits. Maybe she's cruel, vengeful, irrational, or greedy; she's dysfunctional somehow. What will happen when she approaches a man who cares about ethics and k…
/r/MensRights04/06/13 09:16 PM
-2

I can see the value in talking to the parents individually. The problem is the men feel like they can't communicate and both parents need to be a part of that solution. Building a gender wall and saying "okay, you can have emotions now that the women are gone" is not the solution. It's just like when feminists say they need "women only spaces". They're trying to remove men from the conversation. It does not promote dialogue between the genders. Instead, it creates cult-like behavior where one gr…
/r/MensRights01/06/13 09:38 PM
0

No. Nowhere in the article does it say the woman is a feminist. How do you feel when something bad happens and feminists assume the guilty party is an MRA? Furthermore, the father/son event is what looks like feminism. It's trying to promote "safe spaces" for men, which many people here disagree with.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:43 PM
3

Meanwhile, you assume everyone who gives threats to Big Red is an MRA. You're mindlessly spamming a link you don't even understand. You're no better than Big Red trying to shout people down with her feminist bible.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 03:50 PM
1

http://youtu.be/0hULBTOha6M
/r/MensRights25/05/13 06:19 PM
2

TEDxFiDiWomen is a radfem hub. All their speeches are insane. Here are some examples: Randomly scaring people with stories of abusive husbands and child molestation. The solution to sex trafficking? END PORN! I want you to look at my sexy body!!! Top rated comment on the third video, a video entirely about body parts: "Wow, you just have to criticise her by alluding to her body parts, do you?"
/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:57 PM
2

Censorship is at the core of many feminist beliefs. It's why so many feminists support "safe-spaces" and "women only spaces". The ones who think like this think it's their duty to cleanse the world of impure thoughts in a totalitarian way, starting from their bubble and extending to the rest of the world. Many are also overwhelmingly collectivist. That's why when you ask them why they don't call themselves "gender egalitarians", they say some nonsense about getting warm and fuzzy over the label …
/r/MensRights06/05/13 12:15 PM
1

Way to ignore the rest of my comment. Even people here are getting fed up with you treating people like shit. You're a hate movement.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 06:56 AM
2

You're being seriously disrespectful to both feminists and people in this thread. You're not entitled to anything and you're not a victim of censorship. You were kicked off your soapbox because you lack empathy for the people you're trying to persuade.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 10:15 PM
1

Apparently they stopped making these stickers over three years ago. They couldn’t remove the stickers from the market, because the company that printed them went out of business in 2010.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 09:16 PM
1

It depends on how you pursue "equality". Any mistakes you make create inequality.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 08:23 PM
3

You're not supposed to be able to read it. That's the joke. The femo-o-sphere makes up PC words because they love censorship and love being offended. It's authoritarianism mixed with perpetual victim culture.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 01:48 AM
4

Otherkin is like another version of transgendered. It takes that feeling of "being trapped inside the wrong body" a step beyond gender. Somewhat related: I saw a video of a preteen boy who tried to cut his penis off with nail clippers because he was upset that he wasn't a woman. His butch-haired mother decided the best course of action wasn't counseling, but to get him hormone injections. I do wonder about gender identity disorder. It's cool if you want to dress up as something you're not. It's …
/r/MensRights27/04/13 01:40 AM
1

It's relevant because I've read responses to the PAX incident where people complained about the lack of female rolemodels to dress as. My point is that the cosplayer didn't merely dress as a video game character; she chose to dress, literally, as a prostitute. She openly displays her sexuality, yet shames any man who makes comments about her breasts, talks about his arousal, or rates her looks. It's a double standard. It's not about slut-shaming. It's about the ability to express arousal not bei…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:52 PM
1

Yup. The original source is dramatically titled: What would you do if you weren't afraid? Apparently she's both a helpless victim and courageously empowered. Here's another gem: "I am not comfortable with you remarking on my breasts. I am not comfortable with you implying that you’d like to have sex with me. And I don’t appreciate you rating my looks against my girlfriends in candid photos." Imagine her saying it in this outfit. "Don't talk about my breasts!! My eyes are up here!!" It's funny ho…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 08:53 AM
2

Okay. How do you define dressing sexually? I don't have to define it. I'm against censorship. The point was: the same logic used to censor people is the same used to censor clothing. We aren't talking about awkwardness or male-shaming. Yes. We are. We're talking about women who are allowed to express themselves sexually and men who are shamed for expressing sexual desires toward those women. We're talking about explicit sexual harassment. No. We're not. Nothing in the thread you responded to was…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:44 PM
2

You can't say "nice tits, honey" and then get mad that she reacts negatively to your bad social skills. You also can't dress sexually and then get mad when someone reacts negatively to your bad social skills. The argument you're making to restrict someone's freedom of speech is the same as to restrict the way someone dresses. It is a way to express oneself, after all. If people shouldn't be allowed to make "rude" comments then people shouldn't be allowed to dress "rude" either. Is that what you …
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:38 PM
4

The question was: "How does it feel to be at a convention where none of the men could please you?" If someone asked that at a porn convention, would it be alright? Many of the characters in video games are highly sexualized. I think it's unusual to dress as one of said characters, only to get angry when people make sexual comments. The outrage does shame men, in a sense, because they're unable to express their sexual attraction to women who openly display their sexuality. Where he crossed the li…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:26 PM
1

Contrary to popular belief, straight men don't feel the need to fuck every woman they meet, although we have been conditioned to only care about attractive women. The worst they can do is the same as for straight men: social shame and have white knights bully you.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 06:43 PM
3

I agree, but are you a monster if you're indifferent? Think Bell Hooks "Killing Rage", where she feels angry enough to kill a man because a woman was rude to her and he didn't want to get involved.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 05:19 AM
9

Even /b/ would agree with this but it's ironic coming from reddit.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 02:17 AM
1

I'm actually incredibly surprised that a 4 or 5 year old would even know to do that (like, what do the parents of that girl let her watch...) Or maybe someone showed one of the kids how...
/r/MensRights05/02/13 03:45 AM
1

Cool story, dog.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 03:23 AM
0

She would also be upset that women feel empowered when they mimic unfavorable "male" traits, like violence.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 02:41 AM
2

Rihanna also cashed in on the drama before going back to him. Does anyone remember Love The Way You Lie?
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:55 AM
1

Men are potential shooters now too.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:21 PM
1

I assume your professor was thinking about privilege, not sexism. I believe privilege is defined by its ability to propagate itself. You are not privileged unless you can maintain that privilege. Here's the problem: I believe women are privileged because they are just as responsible for maintaining the so-called "patriarchy". They have every incentive to find ways for men to take care of them. So long as they can control the actions of men, having men in power is desirable for them, if they do n…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:29 PM
2

I love GWW but her videos suffer from presentation. Sometimes the overall points aren't clear and she speaks with monotone, so a lot of people can't tolerate the length. Warren Farrell's wage gap video is an hour long but it feels very accessible to new people. Christina Hoff Sommers is very professional as well. ManWomanMyth has a hundred videos of all lengths on gender, with a perspective from the UK. I like Russ Lindquist a lot too but most will be turned off by his tone.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:34 PM
1

Mohawk guy from NASA is a good example of objectification.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 03:07 AM
0

Oh, I guess I interpreted the thread title in a way you didn't intend. I thought you were suggesting that we should spread propaganda like in that diagram. That would be disastrous. I agree with you then. EDIT: My previous comment was upvoted before I wrote this comment. Clearly I was not the only one who was confused by the title. It's disturbing how people hammered the downvote after I clarified my confusion. Going back to my message about politicians: this is why honest people get voted out. …
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:00 AM
0

Two wrongs don't make a right. I would rather have people educated on propaganda so they stop supporting nonsense causes altogether and stop reelecting corrupt politicians.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 11:07 PM
-1

Just like those repulsive black and gay people, right? All the decent people "backed the fuck off" because of them? I note that you do not say that you find them repulsive; but rather, you state that they are repulsive. That is the mentality of a bigot: you have redefined these people as insults. Furthermore, there's a big difference between "annoyed" and "repulsed". If you are repulsed by sluts then you have serious issues and most likely a purity complex.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 12:16 AM
1

wtf? TL;DR I only read the TL;DRs...
/r/MensRights28/01/13 10:18 PM
0

Decent people don't slut shame. Just saying. Maybe you should move somewhere with burqas if you can't handle it.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 10:15 PM
6

You don't see how a woman playing a victim to receive support affects men?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 07:27 PM
1

That reminds me of Sam Harris on fundamentalism; although, I don't think you can quantify feminists this way because their factions have diametrically opposed beliefs. That isn't even the problem though, because MRAs are opposed to everything feminists do agree on, such as patriarchy theory, denying female privilege, and endorsing safe spaces. Also, radical feminism is a specific movement.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:20 PM
1

Somewhat unrelated, but I've gotten death threats for anti-war comments. I think the irony is lost on violent people. "If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail."
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:09 PM
1

Yes, "nice guys" refers only to the men described. It's not a naming convention. The men gave themselves this name. It's in quotes because it mocks the validity of the label. I've heard men refer to themselves while saying "nice guys finish last", and in almost the same breath, call a girl a stupid bitch.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:00 PM
10

5 hour old sock account. Maximum trolling.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 07:54 PM
1

It sounds like a scraper site. The purpose of those obnoxious websites that are stuffed with key words and links is to raise the google page rank of sites they link to. They try to fool crawlers by making pages that look unique and legit by piecing together fake information. Does the site link to other random sites? It could be trying to promote an unrelated site, or even promoting sites to promote other sites in order to appear at the top of google searches. Just throwing that out there before …
/r/MensRights27/01/13 12:15 PM
1

Their initial actions are nice but if they don't get what they want, they'll treat the woman like shit. This is why these "nice" guys aren't nice. You don't understand this flow chart because it's not describing "polite people". It's describing two-faced men who have been programmed by society to be this way. As I've said in other posts, men have been dysfunctionally programmed from romantic comedies to believe that if they just try harder, they can win over any girl. When it doesn't work, they …
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:41 AM
1

Part of the confusion is that "nice" guys usually see love as something you make, whereas a lot of girls see it as a feeling that can't be controlled. When these guys get rejected, they feel as if the girls weren't trying and get mad at them. The girls are confused by this and think the guys are acting like entitled assholes. The guys have been told their entire lives that if they're nice enough, they can win over any girl. Now they're realizing the harsh reality that nobody is obligated to care…
/r/MensRights26/01/13 02:55 AM
1

Fair enough; but you ignored the part where you overlooked everything she wrote so you could swear at her and dismiss her opinion.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 02:35 AM
4

A woman posted this on facebook. I wrote back, saying that men also fear walking through parking garages at night. I also said that you're more likely to get mugged than raped, that rape is unlikely to happen in public by a stranger, and that the discomfort of unwanted advances is more about the ability to escape than gender. Of course, I was promptly defriended, despite being friends for 13 years. She's a white, upper-middle class liberal in a nice neighborhood and doesn't identify as a feminis…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:31 PM
1

The message was more nefarious than that. Not only is feminism on a high pedestal; but if you are openly misogynistic, then you must be an MRA.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:54 PM
8

I agreed with most of it, until it tried to draw a parallel between people who call themselves nice and murderers... She went Schordinger's Rapist with it. I'm sure you're not an axe murderer... but you never know! It doesn't describe the other side of it though, which is why these guys have so much pent-up emotion. It just demonizes them without even trying to understand. How can you change the world if you don't give a shit about the people you're trying to change?
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:31 PM
1

I don't think anyone believes women are entitled to friendships from men who just want to date and/or fuck them. Men who just want to fuck don't get put in the friend zone. I believe this is about men who aren't assertive enough and let a lot of time pass. She thought they were friends. He thought they were more. Now he needs distance because it's like a break up to him, even though they were never together. According to this diagram, these men suck and should go fuck a jug if their female frien…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:16 PM
0

You shouldn't ask for sources to validate an agenda. Be open to the possibility that you could be wrong; otherwise, you're no better than the propaganda machines.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 12:12 PM
1

y u no google?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 11:07 AM
5

I agree with you 100%. In fact, what bothers me most about this image is the "friendzone" thing; the people behind this seemingly feel that women are entitled to friendships. I believe that was the point that "changes" was making. I think you're misunderstanding her position. I did not get the impression that she said men were entitled to anything. She said that reciprocity is required for a relationship. No one is entitled to give you anything -- but if they don't, you move on -- and when you m…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 09:26 AM
1

This was also posted on /r/feminism. As you can imagine, the reception was completely the opposite...
/r/MensRights09/11/12 03:19 AM
2

I'm all pro-abortion and pro-meat eating. I'm skeptical. I think you're trying to shame us to sell more watermelon.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 05:01 PM
1

It's bad enough that misandry isn't even in spell checkers.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 12:11 PM
3

I posted this in another thread but it's nearly the same topic. Even changing the word to egalitarian doesn't help because it says nothing about what you believe and encourages identity politics: Why are you trying to change the connotation of "feminism"? At its core, it's the study of issues that pertain to women only, or else terms like "gender studies" or "egalitarianism" would have been used instead. Surely you will not bring about equality with a dividing, collectivist mindset. The word rep…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:07 PM
7

Why are you trying to change the connotation of "feminism"? At its core, it's the study of issues that pertain to women only, or else terms like "gender studies" or "egalitarianism" would have been used instead. Surely you will not bring about equality with a dividing, collectivist mindset. The word represents a community of diametrically opposed beliefs. Are you authoritarian or libertarian? Are you sex positive or negative? Are social constructs acceptable to some degree? Is there a biological…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:05 PM
2

I don't doubt you. I was just pointing out that the link you posted looks like a troll account.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 07:59 PM
1

Username: Mangina Other questions from the same user. thislookslegit.com
/r/MensRights02/10/12 12:51 PM
-2

It's my understanding that patriarchal theory is just the study of why males dominate leadership roles. Feminists have vastly different explanations of what is causing the patriarchy and what the negative effects are, so you really have to push for a definition if anyone uses the word. If "patriarchy" is used without a definition then it's just a misandrous slur. Likewise, you should seek to avoid blanket statements that are negative of feminism and the patriarchy. I generally view feminism as s…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 12:13 PM
2

People seem obsessed with punishment and assumed guilt. The Casey Anthony and George Zimmerman trials are two incidents that come to mind. Many have no respect for due process and want them both to be killed, regardless of what the courts decide. When I posted comments about this mob justice effect on YouTube, it was met with the same kind of vitriol. I was called a baby killer and a racist for merely suggesting that we shouldn't assume people are guilty based on a TV narrative. So there's somet…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter