TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NaturalFew8735 Archive

View 0 posts and 39 comments by NaturalFew8735 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I agree. Circumcision just eats at a boy’s confidence. That’s why you see all the weird compensation strategies from the cut ones. There’s a growing number of us that are cut and didn’t have our sons circumcised. Hope it is growing.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 04:38 PM
2

The only developed countries with medical institutions that support newborn circumcision are Israel and the US. The science is lacking.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 02:50 PM
2

The only developed countries with medical institutions that support newborn circumcision are Israel and the US. The science is lacking.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 02:49 PM
2

If it’s such a low priority, why do so many people in the US go out of their way to have their sons cut?
/r/MensRights04/07/24 02:48 PM
4

The only developed countries that have medical institutions supportive of male genital cutting are Israel and the US. You’re the flatearthers of the debate.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 05:19 AM
6

No one should be circumcised as a newborn
/r/MensRights04/07/24 05:18 AM
4

The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis. The only developed countries that have medical institutions supportive of male genital cutting are Israel and the US.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 05:17 AM
5

The only ones with weird penis cutting fetish are the ones doing the cutting.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 05:16 AM
0

r/circmoms2 a sub dedicated for moms and women perpetuating the genital mutilation of boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 03:35 PM

Some states require both parents to sign a consent form, others only require one, either one…and only in the case of boys. Female circumcision is prohibited by law.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 01:43 AM
2

The usage of neonate foreskins started to extract fibroblasts from them because there was a steady supply from freshly circumcised boys. Those extracting the fibroblasts have an incentive to keep pushing parents to circumcise their boys.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 08:52 PM
2

Laws in the US state that any tissue removed from patients, belongs to the hospital. What happens later with the tissue is (apparently) not the patient’s business. What does bug me is that if hospitals do sell it, then they have an incentive to be unbiased towards circumcision. Going on to publish the supposed benefits on their websites, pushing their personnel to sell it, etc.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 07:52 PM
1

Religiously inspired “science”. You have to ask yourself who came up with the penile cancer prevention, cervical cancer prevention, HIV prevention, UTI prevention. In particular, what religion they followed. Also, of the 5 circumcision task forces organized by the AAP, two were very pro-circumcision. These two were headed by Edgar Schoen and Susan Blank, both following the same religion. The CDC was mute on the subject until Ms Wallensky became the director…same religion. I’m not saying it’s a c…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 10:12 PM
2

Watch sex and circumcision and learn how
/r/MensRights02/05/24 10:02 PM
2

You’ve got it the other way around. Male genital cutting was promoted by religious nuts. They perverted science and came up with all those supposed benefits. They only did it in the US. That’s why you will not find the practice being promoted in any other developed country apart from the US and Israel.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 07:28 PM
8

This was 7 years ago, and it didn’t end well
/r/MensRights08/04/24 04:37 PM
5

"I'm a huge fan of socialist medicine but..." How does the left reconcile its love for healthcare while opposing circumcision? Circumcision is not healthcare. If you take a close look at the best socialized medical systems in the world, none recommend circumcision done routinely to infants. Here’s a statement from the Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG) (2010): “there is no convincing evidence that circumcision is useful or necessary in terms of prevention or hygiene.”
/r/MensRights27/03/24 12:54 AM
2

At least they’re not pushing it on babies…yet
/r/MensRights21/03/24 09:47 PM
3

Among developed countries, the US and Israel are the only ones that largely circumcise infants. Weird how they don’t realize how alone they are in their practice.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 01:22 PM
3

Not what this study reports. 53% increased risk from STDs if you’re cut.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 03:39 AM
7

Amy Schumer is Jewish, does she expect all non-Jews to be circumcised or what?
/r/MensRights29/02/24 03:54 PM
2

Yes
/r/MensRights29/02/24 03:44 PM
6

The foreskin is where all the nerves are, so circumcision is a double whammy: we loose most of the pleasure tissue and we loose the glans’ protection.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 03:34 PM
7

If you want to trigger a pro-circ anti-FGM woman, show her this video: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskMiddleEast/comments/12k0l48/opinions_on_iraqi_dr_haifaa_younis_promoting_safe/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=1&utm_term=1 It’s packed with “science” because r/islamisscience
/r/MensRights23/02/24 02:19 AM
4

Some doctors regularly remove the frenulum for a more “clean look”. I’m one of those :/ If a cut guy still has some of his frenulum, he definitely doesn’t have his ridged band or frenular delta, which are even more sensitive.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 02:14 AM
6

Read up; r/circumcisiongrief This guy’s victims didn’t remember either.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 02:11 AM
7

In the UK, it’s legal to circumcise a newborn. Muslims and Jews do it to their boys.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 02:10 AM
14

But this isn’t. They’re being sold here: https://www.atcc.org/products/pcs-201-010 https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/US/en/search/human-foreskin-fibroblast?page=1&perPage=30&sort=relevance&term=human%20foreskin%20fibroblast&type=product_name https://www.fishersci.com/shop/products/hff1-fibroblast-irr-human-fore/502384469
/r/MensRights22/02/24 10:03 PM
6

They’re both bad things that you don’t remember 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:45 PM
47

Just like roofied rape victims don’t remember the rape…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 12:31 AM
-5

Nope.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 12:30 AM
0

Good for you
/r/MensRights11/02/24 12:07 AM
3

I wish I hadn’t had forced penis reduction surgery.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 12:01 AM
3

Why would permanent decreased sensitivity be better for sex? Why does it have to be performed on a newborn? Does decreased sensitivity really make men last less or just enjoy less? Are men in countries where circumcision is not largely performed known for being premature ejaculators?
/r/MensRights03/02/24 06:37 PM
4

I guess callousness towards newborns is a side-effect. The way some people write about them. They sometimes use “it” instead of “he”.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 05:39 PM
5

Long term effects are not inconsequential. We’ll be missing erogenous tissue for life. Some studies report that the foreskin is even more sensitive than the head. Some other studies report an increase in erectile dysfunction due to circumcision. This is not inconsequential.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 05:35 PM
3

So does any other body part
/r/MensRights03/02/24 02:27 PM
2

”the more mal-adaptive and malignant his coping strategies become”
/r/MensRights03/02/24 01:31 PM
16

Did you know the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis?
/r/MensRights31/01/24 09:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter