TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NaturalPeanutButter Archive

View 0 posts and 74 comments by NaturalPeanutButter on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

She's Catholic and insisted at the beginning of the relationship that even though she's had sex with a handful of guys in the past, she decided right before she met me that she wants to suddenly start following her religion and wait until after marriage to have sex. Once a slut, always a slut. Nothing's changed at all. You just need to provide the context to let her hamster get to work and then she'll start fucking you, but don't commit until you've fucked her.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 11:21 PM
2

I'd consider not texting her for a day or two and then saying something like, "Oops, had some other shit going on."
/r/askTRP21/02/15 11:16 PM
6

I would never trust a woman with that kind of power over my physical well being.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 11:14 PM
0

It seems un-alpha to me that you would enter any social situation and say whatever the fuck you want at the risk of being socially ostracized. Then you don't get the concept of being alpha yet. An alpha is his own man who makes his own decisions and pursues his goals. He's not living for my approval, your approval, her approval, or anyone but his. He's just himself and strives to be the best him possible. TRP theory and the experiences of those of us who are alphas, shows that this will usually …
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 10:40 PM
2

I talk that way because I want to and because I don't give a fuck if it offends people. TRP grows just fine without pandering to the masses.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 09:58 PM
3

When we get a world without alcohol, I'd let you know.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 09:57 PM
2

One of the big ideas of TRP is abundance mentality. Would you have gone back to a chick you emasculated yourself in front of, with probably no chance of sleeping with, if you had 100 women hanging off you? If not, you at least didn't do the wrong thing. Losing a chick is much less harmful than over-pursuing or emasculation.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 05:21 AM
2

The important thing is that you're not orbiting her anymore. The fact that you posted this and were involved in the comments shows that she's still not irrelevant to you. That's not shitty of you or anything, it's probably expectable all things considered, but you stood your ground. Don't worry about plating her. Don't worry about exactly how you look. The important thing is you're not being a pussy beta orbiter for her anymore.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 04:20 AM
1

The most recent DOJ report says 1/166. Not sure if that's campus or the general population but since campus is better off than the general population, that's the worst the number could possibly be.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 12:34 AM
1

I didn't say you'll impress women within hours but you'll sound okay with just a few chords, good enough to enjoy yourself and not sound too obnoxious when people hear you practice.
/r/askTRP20/02/15 12:39 PM
1

Yeah, learn three chords and a small bit of rhythm.
/r/askTRP20/02/15 12:38 PM
1

Play the guitar. Women love it, you'll sound at least okay within hours, and you can take it really far.
/r/askTRP20/02/15 05:21 AM
1

He's shit testing you. Handle it like any other, but do keep locking your doors.
/r/askTRP20/02/15 05:10 AM
3

Part of being a beta orbiter is actually orbiting. If you don't constantly give them validation, you don't act as their emotional tampon, you don't pedestal them, you don't buy them shit, you don't white knight for them, and so on, then you're not an orbiter. TRP doesn't preclude you from talking to women who you aren't fucking, it just doesn't emphasize it.
/r/askTRP20/02/15 04:58 AM
1

There is no fixing this society without removing women's suffrage, and there is no removing women's suffrage without revolution. Nahh, you just gotta get rid of the white knights and get men to act in their own self interest. If mensrights ever catches on then there'll be some hope.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/15 04:53 AM
13

TRP isn't about seeing yourself as the prize. It's about actually becoming the prize. It's a long road of self improvement. Towards the beginning, all you get is a dream.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/15 04:47 AM
1

It's a nice feel good truth. If you're a woman, just exist and you get wonderful prizes including all the money you need, respect from everyone, to fuck every guy you want without consequences, alimony, easy access into engineering or business schools, and all other shit. You also don't need to do housework, raise kids, accept blame for your actions, or have anyone think of you as weak. It's a pretty sweet deal really. Meanwhile if you're a man, you don't have to work out. You can feel like you'…
/r/askTRP18/02/15 10:51 PM
1

It's not the blue pill. It's their red pill. Meh. We at least try to go for things that are true.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 05:30 AM
56

feminists hate women’s sexuality even more than Conservative men do. And that's why they hate us. Think about it, feminist theory is almost 100% predicated on women having a nice responsible sexuality. If women want men to be nice to them, women want to take charge, women want that testosterone rush of competition in the workplace and to come home to a beta who worships them, then feminist theory would make so much sense. It would allow women to fight on even grounds with men, take up the scienc…
/r/TheRedPill16/02/15 01:34 AM
2

It's not up to her to make you one unless you let her. An assertive man won't be a beta-orbiter and won't need to ask. However, if you need to know then here are some questions. 1) When you hang out, is it obviously a date? By obviously, I mean that NO ambiguity. Any form of "It's complicated" or "I wouldn't use that word directly to her, or if I did then I wouldn't be 100% confident she already knew" counts as a no. 2) Have you fucked her? If no/no then you're done. If yes/yes then you're good.…
/r/askTRP16/02/15 12:29 AM
1

It's a fuzzy logic, and my axioms are paired with a probability of being correct rather than as an absolute which also trickles down to a level of uncertainty in my conclusions. A few issues. First, you've yet to define the parameters of your fuzzy logic. Which conclusions are excluded? Secondly, your usage of probability is nothing more than an excuse to beg the question. Let's consider two points of views, yours and God's. From your point of view, you've got a solid record of arriving to work …
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 10:38 PM
4

Remember, they'll forget about this in a week. Use the time to speak up in class and assert yourself. They'll remember what you're like but nothing else. This is nothing but a billboard.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 09:45 PM
2

1) It takes an hour minimum to travel to work in optimal conditions. 2) This morning I left 1.5 hours before I had to be at work. 3) This morning I was on time for work. 4) Therefore, had I left an hour later I would have been late for work (follows from 1 and 2). Stop, already went wrong. You're using axiomatic statements again which is fine for abstract cyberspace but doesn't work for the real world. Premise one can be rephrased as the conditional statement: "If I go to work, it takes at least…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 09:19 PM
1

That and I enjoy pedantic discussions about logic. In that case I'd like to make the pedantic point that you didn't show verification above. A proof is something that can just be done on paper like math. Verification is shown empirically. You didn't do anything resembling a verification above. "If I had left an hour later this morning I would have been late for work" which is a pretty damn verifiable logical sentence. How on Earth would you verify it? You can probably verify that tomorrow you wi…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 08:04 PM
3

You take a lot of words to say very very little. Who are you trying to impress? Any women who come across his reddit account. If there's no actual women doing it, he'll imagine some or at least boost his ego by imagining how proud they'd be if they knew but keeping it a secret because he's a genuinely good guy.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 06:41 PM
1

Here, let me answer for him. Why are you here, again? Oh, well you see I've internalized this feminized society's message that anything masculine is bad. I've also read that you gentlemen will respect me just for my genitals so I came here and figured you'd instantly make me your leader and respect my viewpoint and figured I'd cash in for the sake of the womyn. Awkward run on sentence. Oh, and your gynocentrism is showing. Oh no, don't misunderstand me. You see, the theory I've read says that so…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 06:40 PM
2

I was eating some peanut butter when I made this account, but I might.
/r/askTRP15/02/15 02:56 PM
4

The forum doesn't claim to be perfect. It's the imperfect substitute for the male role we never got to view growing up.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 02:55 PM
8

This place actually has a lot to offer other than knowledge. Where else can men get together and discuss things that matter to men? I'm not referring to things like sharing our feelings like has been made permissible to feminism and like what you find on r/oney. I mean actually discussing masculinity and not censoring ourselves.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 05:04 AM
1

What happens if you use a word like Freudian to describe different fields of feminism that are more essentialist, psychoanalytic, and mutually exclusive with Marx?
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 05:00 AM
1

Feminist theory was created by dope smoking hippy anarchists copying Lenin's writings on the family. In the early 1900's, Lenin modified Marx's writings (from the 1880's) on economics and applied them to the family. A lot of feminist writing isn't Marxist and I don't know of any evidence that Marx was a potsmoker or a hippie. I'm the last person to defend feminism but at least get it right. Whether they are pot smoking anarchists or cunning polemicists, they are devious and each and every one of…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 03:58 AM
1

I don't care for them. Some of it seems like common sense, some of it seems probably true but too far from my personality to instill while not necessary enough to make the adjustment for, and some of it seems not really useful.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 03:46 AM
17

Monk mode is really only for absolute fuck ups. If you're a complete omega who's spent the past five years playing WoW and have literally no stories that don't involve fictional swords and you make an idiot of yourself like that then go into monk mode, read, exercise, and do what you've gotta do. If you're just low SMV and want to practice then don't worry about it and do shit. I just swallowed the pill. Rather than being too fat, I'm too skinny. It doesn't work well. I look good in clothes but …
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 03:39 AM
16

"Your purse would look better with a peace sign." Great post but I could never say this with a straight face.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 03:23 AM
1

I'm actually not doing that. I'm using specifically the example you gave. If you gave me the example of your favorite professor or something than sure, aim high. If you're aiming at Arnie though, then just accept that you won't beat the guy. He might be an ideal to structure your life with the assistance of, to emulate in certain practical ideals, and so on but to actually think you'll beat him is ridiculous. And yes, I do think you (or at least most) would stop trying. Aiming for Arnie is not e…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 01:55 AM
1

Look buddy, that's the game. Either adapt or quit and never get laid. TRP isn't about changing it. It's about learning it. Sorry if you're frustrated but just try to learn.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 01:42 AM
1

So how close are you to beating Arnie?
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 01:30 AM
0

You don't get it. You're talking specifically about someone who's basically an archetype. You're conflating passable mentor and Arnie and then when I say something about Arnie, you comment that it doesn't apply to the passable mentor. Makes no sense.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 12:29 AM
0

There's already an opportunity. All of his stats and records are posted. Quick, compare your stats before you lose your gains! We're you close? No? Then shut up and quit talking big.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 11:12 PM
1

It'd be nice to see but ultimately I don't really care.
/r/askTRP14/02/15 10:27 PM
7

Did anyone expect Dr. Phil to be TRP?
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 10:09 PM
4

Sounds good but means nothing. Maybe if you're going to be some mythical man then go ahead but if you're happy to strive just for success, sex, happiness, status, and so on then you need something to emulate or else you're just reinventing the wheel.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 09:58 PM
11

universal truth of AWALT This phrase makes me laugh.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 09:52 PM
1

Yeah, but if you give corporations too much slack they will have no issue driving the rest of the country into poverty while their profits continue to rise. I have a good education and don't plan on having kids. I don't care if the rest of the country goes into poverty and have no stake in the future.
/r/askTRP14/02/15 09:50 PM
1

I think pushing the Democrats to the right too much would seriously give up ownership of the country to corporations. Good. Corporations want workers. It means they'll want a critical mass of people who can work, at least until India and China get their education systems good enough to compete with the elite US citizens. Corporations also have serious financial incentives not to give into feminism, even if they kind of do. They haven't given in as much as other organizations such as schools have…
/r/askTRP14/02/15 09:13 PM
1

Maybe but I do believe that you can push the nation to the left or to the right by voting. I feel almost like there's an abstraction of each party existing independently of policies and candidates and we vote for that.
/r/askTRP14/02/15 09:01 PM
-5

First, check the edit. Two seconds ago I just put important info in there. Second, talk about the perks she might get out of flirting with him back. Encourage her to go after those perks, whatever they may be. If there are no perks, bring up the fact that there are no perks so that you can make fun of him. And then encourage it some more. If there are no perks then say that at the very least, it might be amusing.
/r/askTRP14/02/15 09:00 PM
7

I hate them both. The democrats are better with principles of equality and helping the poor but they're corrupted by feminists and SJWs. The Republicans are better with individual rights and not man-hating but they're corrupted by the religious, corporations, and racists and homophobes. I'm gonna vote Republican in 2016 just in order to try and push the democrats to the right. Or maybe I won't vote.
/r/askTRP14/02/15 08:56 PM
1

Here you go.
/r/askTRP14/02/15 08:54 PM
1

You did well. I prefer one liners though since there's a bit of luck involved in whether or not your LTR would set herself up like that. I would have replied, "Well since they have it, it'd be difficult to see what the world would be like if they didn't." I'm in a different position because philosophy is one of my interests and I probably would have already explained how necessity and counterfactual are such that she'd get the joke. I'd stick to the idea of one liners though for all shit tests. …
/r/askTRP14/02/15 08:49 PM
1

-F.O.R.D (good things to talk about) -Family, Occupation, Recreation and Dreams -R.A.P.E (would not recommend using these as talking points) -Religion, Abortion, Politics and Economics If these weren't famous acronyms then I'd have no idea what the hell he was talking about.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 08:27 PM
1

If I can construct a proof of the counterfactual, then it is verifiable. For instance: In the space of abstract logical entities then sure you can do anything but there's no way to translate it into the real world. For any actual historical instance or current actuality, you can never say "Had X happened instead, then this would follow."
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 08:22 PM
1

I know she had one but I'm not sure what about it is relevant.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 06:48 AM
2

The concept as utilized by contemporary feminist theorists which trickles down to tumblr/Jezebel was first formulated by a theorist named Simone de Beauvoir. Nuggets of the theory do exist from the women who were precursors to feminists and goes back to the colonial era, but the centralizing and robust formulation of it comes from Simone. She wrote about it in her book The Second Sex which is basically responsible for feminism as we know it. She was big on Marxism but not on anarchism and I don'…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 01:23 AM
2

an unfalsifiable theory created by pot-smoking couch anarchists This isn't actually historically accurate. I'm all about bashing it as the worst idea ever but I like to stay accurate when I do.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 01:15 AM
1

I overcame depression too. I also did it without drugs or therapy. Doesn't change the fact that it's a real illness with real cures. Tell me though, what do you think the difference between depression and a 'real illness' is? Physical symptoms, phenomenal symptoms? Depressions tot all that shit.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 10:31 PM
1

What you've just written is the red pill version of a feel good truth that doesn't solve the problem but makes you feel warm and fuzzy. As someone who used to work at a suicide hotline, there's a lot of good science of how to understand and help suicide victims. In terms of understanding them, they're going through a legitimate illness with real cures. In terms of handling thwm, a good and charismatic shrink curing a suicidal is is like a muscular and wealthy alpha trying to nail a chick. They'r…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 07:49 PM
6

I didn't use gendered terms. Feminists aren't all women.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 02:11 PM
23

Take it one step further and realize that you DO already know her. Women generally work the same way and TRP tells you what that way is. Nothing to pretend.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 07:24 AM
45

The problem however, is that what these women refer to as strength and confidence is usually just arrogance and selfishness in disguise. It's actually more than that. Feminists have been telling women for decades that they'd be scientists, world leaders, astronauts, and so on if the patriarchy weren't keeping them down. As result, these feminists don't really try. They do their women's studies major or english or sociology, or whatever else doesn't matter, and then bitch about the patriarchy. Yo…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 06:52 AM
6

Okay, but she made it a reasonable thing for him to do.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 03:59 PM
2

Thank you, I appreciate all the help today.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 09:14 PM
2

That makes a lot of sense, just like women do get something out of sex, men do get something out of commitment. Being all alpha all the time is probably exhausting and difficult when doing it alone. Do you know of any good reads on that balance? It seems easy to fuck it up. Without any knowledge, my hypothesis would be that women would still be doing shit tests and other manipulative shit in a LTR to challenge you, except now you've got a much more difficult tight-rope to walk.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 07:09 PM
3

I don't think a source is needed It is if you want to say it's proven. Saying this is your theory is another story but saying it's proven, that needs a source.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 07:03 PM
3

Can you cite a source on that?
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 05:20 PM
3

What's the relationship between TRP and LTR? My current understanding is that there's a sort of competition between women and men where he tries to grab sex and she tries to grab commitment. She loses if she gives up sex without receiving commitment because then she's only a slut. Getting the valuable thing she has to offer is not easy so she must not be valuable. If he gives up his commitment without getting sex then he's a beta orbiter giving up what's behind his gate for free. But in this thr…
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 04:11 PM
2

Again, I'm very new to TRP. I'll specifically answer what I do but I won't comment on it's relationship between what you should do, the ideal, or anything else. Around here I see a lot if people go for agreeing and amplifying but it doesn't work for me. I'm not TRP endorsed, I'm not jacked, and I'm new to game. I need to fight to be taken seriously. I believe that agreeing and amplifying would for me only serve to validate what she says and even reward her socially, as assistant comedian, for sh…
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 03:53 PM
9

Frankly its not a great market, because as OP noted it's filled with single mothers and aging harpies who didn't have the good sense and upbringing to marry a good man during their peak years. I'm not old enough to experience this market at all but why's it bad? A lot of the 28+ women I see still look pretty attractive. I'd think that their being desperate would just make them sexually available and there'd be shit loads of sex. What happens at that age? Am I the only one who still finds them at…
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 03:34 AM
1

Preface: Still new to TRP but I've done a lot of reading. There's a group here that seems to think if you become alpha enough, if you learn how to be incredibly assertive and decisive that a woman will revert to her innate female submissive nature. This has not been my interpretation of TRP. My interpretation has been that women are already submissive always. The question is not how you turn her submissive but rather how to make her submissive to you personally and not to someone else. Her game …
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 01:05 AM
16

Preface: Still a TRP Padawan. "I'm tired of girls only on here looking for a quick hookup. I'm here to meet someone special. If you are just looking for some hookup, please swipe left.. I'm a strong, independent, gentleman who has self respect and am looking to meet someone special." I think your causation might be wrong here. I don't think it's the strategy, you must either be very good looking or have your BMW in the background. Here's my understanding of TRP, please someone correct me if I've…
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 12:49 AM
9

Definitely been the case with me. The word "shit test" has changed my life. Now, I've only been actively trying TRP for two weeks after reading everything I could find to read, but it's really an eye opener. At first I heard it and didn't think such a thing really even happened but now I just see it everywhere. Every time a woman says something not nice, disagrees with me about something other than ice cream flavors, tries to bring up her area of expertise that I don't know shit about, I just se…
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 12:37 AM
22

Preface: I'm still a RP padawan. However, I'm pretty knowledgeable about the philosophy of language and this is incredibly in line with many well known academic viewpoints. Philosophers have always asked about the relationship between language, meaning, and the conceptualization about our world. Socrates famously showed that many words everyone uses (justice, friendship, knowledge, etc) have completely unknowable definitions. Of course, you can give one but it won't hold to scrutiny. The philoso…
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 12:14 AM
1

I didn't read it literally. You responded to: "pretending not to care is an intensely difficult thing to do for those that care the most." Presumably, you meant that you don't advocate wishing that you actually don't care but rather that you have the strength to pretend. I contention is that it requires no strength. You just need to authentically not care and the way to authentically not care is to see what TRP's been saying all along. Individual women do not matter even if you can care about wo…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/15 04:07 AM
1

Doesn't take broader shoulders in this case. It's just got to be the right kind of indifference. Seeing women as a dime a dozen, and I mean actually seeing them that way without any self deception, allows you not to care about any particular women even if in the abstract you're busting your ass at work and the gym for them.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/15 03:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter