TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NaturalSelectorX Archive

View 0 posts and 12 comments by NaturalSelectorX on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

And? She was talking about the rate of change.
/r/MensRights29/05/21 01:44 PM
-9

She's talking about the rise, and the rise was greater for women. The rate for the men stayed the same. The rate for women went up 1.5.
/r/MensRights29/05/21 03:32 AM
1

Why so focused on rape, which has nothing to do with the post? It depends on the text of the law in the relevant state. I don't believe rape laws, in general, account for mental state to the extent that murder and physical assault laws do. This isn't about rape, and I made no claims about rape.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 03:50 PM
1

It's not "my philosophy"; it's our legal system which I believe is sensible. I'm also talking about something beyond merely lowering inhibitions. This got sidetracked by rape somehow, and it's not really applicable to the post. Let's say the woman was high and had a frightening hallucination that resulted in stabbing. Should she be punished the same way as someone who stabs with malice? I don't believe so. She needs treatment for her addiction and a lesser sentence than a normally violent person…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:37 AM
1

It depends. Were they going to rape their victim anyway, or did alcohol induce a behavior that wouldn't have otherwise occurred? If a drug temporarily alters your mind in an unexpected way, then you aren't as big a threat to society as someone who does those things under normal circumstances.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 02:36 PM
0

If a child wants a tattoo at 12 you can't get them one legally even with doctor and parental approval, that's a hell of a lot less life altering than hormone blockers. Is there some kind of drawback to waiting to get a tattoo? It's not like you'll be unable to get the exact same outcome years later. That's not the case with hormone blockers. No child should have the ability to change their body drastically based on their wants. Let's use a better comparison. What if a 12-year-old has a hormone d…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:50 PM
2

Show me the medical studies and science confirming that this is a medical condition that should be treated with these types of drugs Are you denying that it's a condition? The research is still in it's infancy, but there are already a lot of interesting correlations involving conditions in the uterus and brain scans. People are born with all kinds of abnormalities regarding sex, so this isn't out of the question. All I know for sure is that people suffer from it, and these treatments relieve the…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:46 PM
0

Letting them make life altering decisions when they're under the age of 10 is incredibly stupid. Is that what happens? These drugs aren't over the counter. I'd imagine there is a doctor, parents, and mental health professionals involved in this decision as well. Should all those people be able to come together and make a life-altering decision? Sure.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 05:50 PM
3

Because a child's brain is not developed sufficiently for them to understand the decision. You are thinking of this in terms of a decision based on outcome, and not treatment of a medical condition. I'm not trans, but I try to understand their perspective. If their body is legitimately causing distress, then why not intervene as early as possible? Would you make them wait to do facial reconstruction or fix any other physical abnormality? I hope not.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 05:47 PM

Don't you think that's perpetuating the stereotype? You are doing what they want, and that behavior only validates the belief men are dangerous.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 06:41 PM

The only thing that matters is the audience. That's the part you are missing. When you come in accusing people of doing nothing and "masturbating" over perceived oppression, you are being an asshole; not changing minds. You don't even know if OP contacted the relevant people with a complaint. Even if they didn't, whipping up outrage on social media often creates pressure to change things. There is a better way to communicate your idea. Here is an example of not being an asshole: We need to make …
/r/MensRights19/06/17 07:35 PM

How convenient that it's impossible to tell the difference between being an asshole and telling an unpopular truth. No, you were being an asshole. You must be one of those people who thinks they just "tell it like it is", but really they are just an asshole. What makes you an asshole is not the content of this "unpopular truth", but the delivery.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 12:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter