TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NaynelEven Archive

View 2 posts and 22 comments by NaynelEven on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Ok so you're right but at the same time there's just so much more to it. There are absolutely factors out of your control. Can I control the fact that car culture has made less opportunities for cold approaches on the street? No. Can I control the fact that social engineering is making women think that they dont need a man? No. Can I control the fact that most people get relationships through online dating, and this is therefore leading to less women to meet without going through that toxicity? …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 09:42 PM
1

Yeah and this is including people who grew up in the 70s and 80s. 2/3rds of men under 30 are single, and 27% of men havent had sex since they were under 18.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:52 PM
0

Is he rich? Its not 1968 anymore, women can make their own money and society has told women they need men like a fish needs a bicycle. If a woman goes to a bar and sees some regular guy there. This guy everytime is with different beautiful women that’s kinda all over him and having fun. She will become attracted to that man because obviously there’s something about him. I dont think you realize just how infrequently this happens to men who wouldn't otherwise be at least somewhat attractive. Same…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:37 PM
2

Social proof is everything from whether other women like me to how much money I make, my status in the relevant social hierarchies, to the level of respect I command from the people around me. Im talking about strictly in regards to dating. That list is endless and most men aren't that attractive looking yet many of them still get laid. No, theres 2 single men for every single woman under 30, so this is just wrong. The panopoly of social proof is discernably the most important. Again, especially…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:09 PM
2

It's rather trite to say that men are more likely to do well when already physically attractive as this will independently help generate social proof Definitely not as obvious as it should be. I guarantee you if you survey most people out on the street they will say social proof from being seen with women is the dominant factor, and yet most situations which relationships form out of in the modern day are logically impossible to have social proof be a factor in. This changes how your approach sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 07:03 PM
-1

2 things 1.Confirmation bias and placebo is a hell of a drug and I guarantee you that a lot of these men were getting these signals before but will be more prone to pick up on them once they have a partner in order to confirm the narrativem. 2.Most of "Preselection" can be attributed to a woman thinking other women like this guy just because she does. This ends up being true most of the time not because of the bandwagon effect or anything like that but literally just because theres a lot of obje…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 06:54 PM
1

Bro you hit the nail on the head perfectly, you explained it better in this small comment than I did in my whole point so props to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 06:51 PM
1

Bro you hit the nail on the head perfectly, you explained it better in this small comment than I did in my whole point so props to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 06:51 PM
1

Bro you hit the nail on the head perfectly, you explained it better in this small comment than I did in my whole point so props to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 06:51 PM
0

No, it boils down to: Trying to be "seen around" women at all costs is really stupid and has a negligible impact on your dating success. Yet men are filled with false hope than its somehow: This guy is seen with girls alot, because of this he is now more attractive somehow even if he would be otherwise unattractive. Rather than the much more logical: This guy is objectively quite attractive/a well developed man, I'm not surprised he is often seen with girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 06:47 PM
1

How this is achieved though is completely different than how is perceived. When a man cold approaches and succeeds there is 0 "social proof" other than that he's attractive and the girl subconsciously being assured that it should be obvious this guy is attractive. But an unattractive guy who is "seen with women" is not gonna become instantly more attractive and the example I gave in my post was being friends with a girl platonically for the record.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 06:37 PM
0

Not saying it isnt true, but it will not cause attraction if you don't meet the threshold for attraction, so its not a good strategy for dating and the premise is completely wrong, full stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 06:26 PM
-1

No? Thats not my argument at all. What I'm saying is most people's brains are turned to mush by this shit because this is whats focused on so heavily, it's the same thing with "Girls like guys who are assholes/dark triad" so then people do irrational shit in the hopes that it will "improve their chances". Preselection is not even 5% in the modern dating world. You're much better off just completely ignoring that shit because it only applies to dudes who are already in relationships and its just …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 05:16 PM
-1

Not denying its real, im saying that its such a small portion of what makes someone attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 04:57 PM
3

Thats fair enough, but those aren't the women you want. The point of my thread was that people often misattribute a minority of males getting most of the attention strictly to behaviour, so this is the same problem I have with "Girls like it when u ignore them/are "mysterious"". I should also have mentioned that sometimes I hear this literally in regard to just having female friends and the logic goes that they see you with other women so ur not a "wierdo", even if ur not taken. In both cases I …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 04:54 PM
3

So thats what I'm saying, unless you had a ring on your finger or you're literally next to a girl how would these girls know what you were in a relationship? Im willing to bet you were just in a better place in life and probably had better habits/social skills. Would you say that's the case?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 04:43 PM
1

Ok so tell me what kind of settings these would be then?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 04:31 PM
–

All the couples here are thin men and overweight women, vice versa almost never ever happens outside of gold diggers.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 03:44 PM
–

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/things-you-should-never-say-to-mixed-weight-couples_n_5a983ab6e4b0479c0250543e Find the fat man and thin woman here please.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 03:41 PM
1

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/things-you-should-never-say-to-mixed-weight-couples_n_5a983ab6e4b0479c0250543e
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 03:39 PM
–

Per births but not total population bc of life expectancy
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:13 PM
1

Point is if you think that everyones playing by the same rules then that is a bluepill belief. A more desirable guy will be able to get away with a lot more.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 01:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter