TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ndvorsky Archive

View 2 posts and 254 comments by Ndvorsky on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

Ndvorsky/r/MensRights16/08/13 10:04 PM
6

Ndvorsky/r/MensRights15/05/13 06:25 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yeah, it’s insane that people even think it’s a valid option here. “I’m conservative because real equality is making everyone’s life worse!” Even if the left was genuinely anti-male and granting all the worst complaints here as true, men should still support them because of all the other good being done. A little empathy goes a long way.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 07:24 PM
2

It’s going to be hard to maintain equality in rights when you think you’re better than someone, even if you want equality.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 11:02 PM
2

I would not call this post positive towards women. It implies and then outright states that men are just better than women. That’s not what equality looks like.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 07:07 AM
-4

On gendered issues the right appeals more towards men but not because of valuing men, but by devaluing women. Ok the other hand, the left is not the most friendly to men right now but it is friendly to people of which roughly half are men. The right will do far more harm to men by harming everyone than it helps men.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 12:04 PM
2

This is a men’s rights sub, not women bashing.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 02:03 PM
2

The libertarian position is utterly childish and has no sway over normal people. Whether it’s a view you really hold or you are just being contrarian doesn’t really matter. Come back when you have a serious point to make.
/r/MensRights19/09/25 10:57 PM
1

I mean, not everyone on the right is a Nazi…
/r/MensRights19/09/25 06:19 PM
2

Helping the homeless? Feeding the poor? Healing the sick? Protecting our environment? Improving life for everyone? These do not sound like violent ideologies.
/r/MensRights19/09/25 06:16 PM
3

We are not adopting his beliefs. We are not abandoning empathy because a bad person got hurt. We are not supporting unrestricted guns because the “right” person got shot this time. It’s a bad situation when people start feeling like violence is the only option left to them but do not confuse violence in self defense with hateful, unjustified violence.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 06:54 AM
8

Minecraft is being sued for the same reason. If a company publishes platform rules, they have to apply them fairly. IANAL
/r/MensRights21/08/25 06:47 AM
16

Is that a good thing?
/r/MensRights12/08/25 11:31 PM
9

Yes. A gay man is a man.
/r/MensRights16/06/25 05:00 PM
1

I was talking about the comedian.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 11:23 PM
1

Yeah, he’s probably made that joke too.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 05:29 PM
1

It’s a tv show. It didn’t actually happen! Literally everything the poster said to make it sound bad isn’t what happened. He was not alone, there were witnesses for his protection. He was not asked any sexual questions. He was accused of murder (with irrefutable evidence), not just some social woe. Again, he subject was murder, not social Justice and the lifting incident was not a punishment. Every single point they made is horribly exaggerated and changed to make it sound worse and what neither…
/r/MensRights27/04/25 08:09 AM
1

It was obviously an element but that stuff just messed up his mind. It made him angry, it didn’t seem to make him think what he did was ok.
/r/MensRights26/04/25 12:15 AM
-7

Because bullying =/= premeditated murder. Have some perspective dude.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 06:41 AM
-1

And everyone thinks they are drowning in it.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 06:40 AM
8

It didn’t happen on screen (or at all.). OP is making rage-bait.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 12:09 AM
-4

You’re right about the bullying but the psychologist wasn’t “using him”. She was hired by his parents to determine mental fitness.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 12:07 AM
9

He was arrested for murder and strip searched. It happened off camera and all characters were acting very uncomfortable in the situation. It is in no way portrayed as a good thing that this happened to him.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 11:59 PM
-20

That’s not at all similar. He was arrested for murder, they were doing a strip search. It was included for shock value and every character was very uncomfortable following this procedure. It has nothing to do with punishment or intended humiliation.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 11:58 PM
12

I don’t think that was forgotten. It was pretty critical to the story. It would have ended on episode 1 if it weren’t for the cop trying to find out why he did it.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 11:55 PM
-3

That’s not even what happened in the show. He killed her because she bullied him, not because Andrew Tate told him to. No one is understanding the show.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 11:52 PM
1

You would pay 4-5 people just to live your own life for you? You must have a busy life. Having a stay at home partner is just doing all the normal life chores but during “work” time instead of it taking up your free time.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 11:08 PM
1

You don’t? Just buy a blue razor if you don’t want to pay for the pink one.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 11:01 PM
3

See my previous comment.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 10:55 PM
32

Everyone has rights. Not everyone has the same rights.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 12:26 AM
0

So you don’t know what it means. D for diversity. I for inclusion. These things help everyone. Yes even the people who are “not diverse” or are already included. Diversity means new ideas. Between two candidates who have negligible difference in qualifications, a person with different experience and ideas will help the group produce a better result than people who have the same ideas. New ideas are a good thing for everyone. Wouldn’t you like to see some diversity in the k-12 school system so yo…
/r/MensRights25/02/25 01:08 AM
16

What does that even mean?
/r/MensRights24/02/25 03:11 PM
-7

they are also the largest targeted group so that makes sense.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 07:53 AM
-11

Better products and services.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 07:48 AM
-1

Dude, priorities!
/r/MensRights20/02/25 09:46 PM
17

I was crashing on a friend’s couch and she had forgotten to tell all her roommates. The next morning one comes out and nearly has a heart attack and goes to yell at my friend about this “strange man” in her house. I’d never been referred to independently as a man before. I thought “strange men” were older guys, no one could be afraid of me. I learned differently that day.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 06:53 PM
2

Probably one of those things you think of after but I’d have said to the anesthesiologist “maybe you should speak in a language I understand.”
/r/MensRights21/12/24 03:00 PM
0

Caring about half the population is literally a hundred-fifty million times better than caring only about one person. There is no contest. Besides, you may find that men and women share some similarities like needing a place to live, or childhood education, or sometimes needing emergency services or paying taxes. Trying to make the choice between the two somehow into a gender debate is more brainless than trump’s normal supporters.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 10:06 PM
9

No, that would mean she only cares about women. Shouldn’t be hard to understand, you even wrote the words yourself.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 07:09 AM
28

That’s not all you’re saying. You said a whole lot more than “the system is broken.” That’s just what you’re saying now with pushback.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 06:43 AM
1

I’m not stopping useful conversation, only discouraging an endorsement.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 06:32 AM
2

So true. Title IX is not the primary issue in this election. Let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 10:16 PM
0

How about we discuss his successes after we are no longer in danger of him being elected again.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 10:12 PM
1

No, I can’t say I’ve seen that. Sounds awful.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 01:05 AM
-2

Bruh you literally called some other person an incel. Now there is a double standard!
/r/MensRights17/05/24 08:15 PM
-1

Those statistics don’t contradict. Women in general can use more healthcare even if of those seeking treatment more women seek alternatives than men.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 12:07 AM
2

28, military drones. What is this “women” you speak of? I’ve never seen such a thing.
/r/MensRights02/12/23 11:16 PM
1

You’re assuming which is legit and which is false when I’m saying the same words would be used for both. That’s why it’s equivalent.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 10:58 PM
-1

Your exact words could all be used to defend false rape accusations. In fact I’m sure I’ve heard them used before somewhere. I’d be careful if I were you. “That’s just the evidence we have but you’re ignoring the ‘he said she said’”, “they wouldn’t report it if it wasn’t true”, “just one false report doesn’t ruin lives!” I am all for what this sub stands for, especially the dislike of hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 05:19 PM
26

*cues
/r/MensRights19/12/21 11:12 PM
1

I don’t see the problem. He seem to be conflating sexual harassment and sexual assault. If 98% of women have been cat called then yes 98% of them have been harassed. As far as I can tell you seem to be the one misconstruing that as assault rather than harassment.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 10:09 AM
1

Dude was makes no a good point until we get to “sir, this is a Wendy’s”. There is a time and a place.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 04:15 PM
18

I’m not a huge fan of menslib because it has a pretty obvious feminist slant. It has the right type of content but it just seems like the answers/solutions are all wrong.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 02:25 PM
4

You’ve got to fight...for your right...to parrrrrrrrrrtaay with your child on their birthday.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 10:49 PM
1

This is an issue I have learned not to get involved in. I actually agree but it’s just not worth it to ever say it.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 11:06 PM
1

Circumcision is mentioned only once. No, its both number 35 and 89. Men work more hours because they are usually the primary earners. They have a responsibility to keep their family well off. My point was if you see no issue with the wage gap then you should have no issue with men working more hours. If you are fighting the 75 cent thing so that women make overal equal to men then feel free to keep the "more hours" problem in there.
/r/MensRights06/10/20 01:47 PM
3

Few problems I saw: I think circumcision was on there twice. “Men pay more taxes” is not a good one because that is expected. If you make more then you pay more. That’s just how taxes work. Similarly “men work more hours” is also a bad point. It is a choice. You cannot say the pay gap isn’t real because of personal choices while also complaining about one of the causes of the pay gap (number of hours). The one about non-reciprocal step-parenting is odd to me. Where did this belief come from. Lot…
/r/MensRights06/10/20 09:44 AM
43

No no, he's one of the good ones.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 01:26 PM
1

This one is going to need some explaining there chief.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 11:24 PM
16

With sensitive matters like this you should have a lawyer even before charges. Someone may have an axe to grind or maybe some personal or political motivations. I won’t say it’s common but is it worth the chance? The police sound reasonable but the situation has escalated and today is the second best time to get a lawyer. There was a great video made in a classroom at MIT or something that was 30 minutes of why an innocent person shouldn’t talk to the police. A lawyer would help protect you from…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 11:11 PM
0

There are several things wrong with that. 1) I did provide alternatives but you don’t really care anyway 2) sometimes action is worse than inaction. In this particular case “let the fighters do the fighting” makes everything worse. Unless all you want is a fight and something to get mad or offended about (perpetual victim mentality) then this seems like the perfect battle for you.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 09:07 PM
0

I never did. It should definitely be protested, just not in a way that will make things worse instead of better.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 07:05 PM
0

Threats? Stop equal treatment? WTF I’m not the enemy of men’s rights. YOU are. I don’t go around saying/believing stupid stuff that convinces undecided people that men’s rights is an evil movement made of hateful or reactionary people. That’s what you do. You can’t even tell that we are supposed to be on the same side.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 04:50 PM
1

That’s a really short sighted view. Ideas like yours kill movements. There is a big difference between saying “I’m protesting bias against men by...” and “I’m going to torture women because I want to and am a man and stuff”. One of these makes friends of reasonable people one of these makes enemies of reasonable people even though they are both supposed to be statements about how ok society is with watching men die. Just because your cause is righteous does not automatically make everything you …
/r/MensRights05/12/18 01:44 PM
1

They are likely now your enemy.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 07:33 AM
1

And the people who see this and don’t get it?
/r/MensRights04/12/18 08:48 PM
1

The message as written does not convey the proper intended meaning. If you want to be abrasive about making a point, fine. Just at least word it so that people can understand the point. When I first saw it I thought it was some lunatic making us look bad because that’s what it is. Now that I understand the context it makes more sense but the actual post does not even hint at the justifying context.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 11:16 PM
4

This isn’t about free speech, it’s about being smart about what you say and realizing words have consequences.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 11:11 PM
0

And people are starving in Africa so why are you complaining about first world problems? Bringing up other different or worse problems does not change anything and is totally irrelevant. This isn’t a men’s rights issue.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 12:56 AM
7

This isn’t a men’s rights issue. Cheerleaders really are treated horribly.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 06:26 PM
1

Be careful what you praise. The link does not specify but it is very important to distinguish between “women can...” (awareness) and “women usually...” (not a good statement).
/r/MensRights30/11/18 06:22 PM
4

Can I have one of those jobs with a 40% raise every year?
/r/MensRights30/11/18 06:10 PM
1

The statement was meant to discredit Wikipedia entries on social issues/structures.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 09:02 PM
2

This reminds me of the video of the husky crying/yowling and a baby copying it.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 09:00 PM
1

If black people are racist toward white people, the worst thing that happens is hurt feelings. Your assumption that black people never have any power is extremely racist. I find it offensive that you would think so low of them as a general group completely ignoring their individuality.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:11 AM
-3

As a thought experiment what if every soldier killed one civilian? It would be numerically impossible for the soldiers to be the primary victims. It of course depends on your values and criteria but the conclusions is not impossible.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 02:49 PM
1

You don’t understand.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:44 AM
1

They said what they meant. You just misunderstood.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 08:08 AM
0

You're substituting one form of bullshit for another form of bullshit. There is no such thing as "a male brain in a female body" that is physiologically impossible. That female would die in the womb as a non-viable product. That’s...not what they mean.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 03:13 AM
2

Could you be any more of an asshole? And no, that’s not a challenge.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 03:01 AM
1

All he said was “haha! You strawmanned.” Without actually explaining anything or what about the response was misrepresenting what he said. Oh, and thinly veiled insults, he said those too.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 02:56 AM
5

Clearly this will help to make women more desirable workers and will close the wage gap. /s
/r/MensRights30/06/18 11:01 PM
0

Relevant username.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 08:28 AM
1

I remember in grade school uniforms were stupid expensive and they weren’t even special. My parents would spend well over $150 each trip and that was years ago.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 02:20 AM
1

If you’re going to bring up plastic surgery, there are procedures that can be done to make you taller.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:38 PM
7

Something along the lines of false advertising or fraud right?
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:27 AM
14

I suspect they meant cultured.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 02:57 AM
1

If women were less valuable, they wouldn’t be hired at all.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 12:47 AM
2

Wow. Source?
/r/MensRights10/04/18 12:20 PM
14

Catholic.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 12:58 AM
21

There is no proof!
/r/MensRights15/03/18 12:11 AM
8

You can compare two things with out saying they are exactly the same. That's literally the point of comparing things. If they were exactly the same you would only have on thing instead of two and there would be nothing to compare.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 12:10 AM
-2

Sorry mate, that was just the most level headed, well-rounded, inclusive and real comment you wrote but people are still going to come around looking for a fight. Keep doing what you’re doing.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 05:59 AM
3

While true, they made no attempt to disagree with this statement.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 05:54 AM
2

Wow, did she think she was working out or was it purposely fake for her social media?
/r/MensRights19/02/18 12:32 AM
1

What do you mean straddling the belt?
/r/MensRights18/02/18 09:51 PM
1

Well, affirmative action bans any discrimination in any public institution but private schools have much more leeway.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 04:49 AM
1

Eh, Everyone does it. Is it really that much worse to use children for the same thing will use any other moron we find on the street? It’s not like actually does them any harm.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 10:24 PM
2

Sorry for only knowing the text of the constitution but not every relevant judicial verdict for the past 200 years. but thanks for the info. Another thing that I believe is that you're an ass. Where do you think I could find evidence to contradict this belief because I can't think of anything.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 05:51 AM
1

I believe it is specifically for civil cases. Criminal cases are not about dollar amounts.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 03:41 PM
5

I’m not particularly knowledgeable on the subject but I do believe I heard that the memo was part of Google‘s attempts to discuss diversely in the workplace. If that’s true then Google literally asked him to write this memo.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 06:27 AM
1

I’m pretty sure it’s a constitutional right for cases over $20 (adjust for inflation)
/r/MensRights10/01/18 06:21 AM
6

It's the fantasy that we live in a rape culture.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 11:28 PM
2

That was a really nice ending. Good job.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:45 AM
1

But boys and girls are the same! Equality, etc, etc...
/r/MensRights06/11/17 02:44 PM
3

By definition to be the victim you must be the person being harassed. I would instead write it as "the target of [harassing actions] is not always the only victim."
/r/MensRights21/10/17 01:13 AM
3

Remember when prejudice used to be a bad thing? Ah, those were the days.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 03:10 PM
7

I absolutely do not agree with his view but I think I can see where he is coming from. He made it clear (to me) that he doesn't really believe in free will. So, when he puts people in these little boxes based on their race, class, and sex, he doesn't even think twice about how they could be individuals. They are simply a product of their statistics so nothing is lost by grouping them. To him, it promotes individuality by being able to discern more different groups. The more [specific] groups the…
/r/MensRights10/10/17 06:08 AM
2

Humans are irrational creatures. You will find someone who likes or dislikes anything for any reason.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 04:28 AM
1

That IS his approach.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 06:38 PM
7

For the first part, I thought they were referencing the part where the women were paid a lot more. Requiring a higher pay absolutely means they did not want to work there as much as the men did.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 08:45 PM
3

I love it! They are all mindless robots.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 05:26 AM
3

Not being convicted is not the same as innocent. As most accusations have no evidence for or against, they should not be counted as false or real because we just don't know. There are however many provably false accusations which I wish more people would take note of.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 06:54 PM
3

If you're going to report a crime, showing the officers you have an alternate agenda isn't going to do you any good.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 03:10 PM
3

It's. likely certain kinds of pain. Testers are particularly fond of "hand in ice water " tests.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 07:07 AM
3

Hurricanes are named after men and women. I think it alternates every year.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 05:56 PM
1

As you might know calling the cops can end up pretty badly for you. 50-50 as some say. I recommend going straight down to the police station where they don't have mandatory arrest requirements and you can take your time and explain what happened there to someone who doesn't feel any pressure about being in the field. I can't exactly explain why but I am very sure that they will be more willing to listen, if you do it in their house so to speak.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 08:24 PM
1

Roughly the length of human history. Before that it's mostly bones. Just a popular figure not necessarily accurate.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 06:50 PM
10

/r/talesfromtechsupport ?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:08 PM
1

This only solves part of the issue, however. With conscription, you've got involuntary service and risk as separate issues. If women were required to fill more non-combat roles, fewer men would get drafted >but< the drafted men would face higher risk. Because the men would disproportionally be sent to roles requiring strength and endurance (infantry, for example). It's a delicate dance to know when to use percents and proportions or absolute numbers. They would still need the same number of infa…
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:39 AM
3

Queens sending men to war sounds to me like a woman leveraging ideas of masculinity to force men to die. Sounds like something many feminists would abhor. So are you retracting your statement that women would make better decisions? You're basically saying that all examples of women in power don't count because they're acting like men? There are two conclusions to be made: either the men in charge made the right decisions as women would have made the same decisions or power just attract certain t…
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:34 AM
3

you don't know shit about my worldview Well, you kind of just plastered it all over the Internet so…
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:28 AM
2

In this case sides don't matter because your statement was incorrect.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:16 AM
2

So long as you continue to stand up for yourself, you will likely be fine.don't let his experience make you think that will get worse. Even if it does, someone has to get in there and make a change, lead by example. Not that it's your duty but it's something to consider.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:01 AM
3

Despite being on the western hemisphere, Mexico is not really a western country.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 05:38 AM
2

She liked him before Aladdin even met genie. Your memory of that movie is terrible.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 10:34 PM
3

You've got to be kidding me! After the magical ride they are hanging in China and she says "too bad Abu can't be here" and he says "nah he'd be afraid" (or something like that) giving away his identity.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 10:33 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_distribution Thanks for the link to something not related to what you were talking about. Nowhere did that mention a random probability distribution nor did it explain what you were trying to say. How do you arrive at that conclusion? How is it falsifiable? Nothing does suggest it. So a survey finds these men to be less attractive and you don't think that may suggest these men could be less attractive? How could you not consider it a possibility? you're …
/r/MensRights23/05/17 05:54 AM
1

Assuming a model of random distribution which you could build many times over given the huge and diverse populations of dating site users, there is nothing to suggest that men are any uglier than the average. What does "assuming a model of random distribution" mean? The graphic/data we are discussing suggests that exact possibility. Why would you say nothing suggests it? If there are enough people to supply the most frequently sought after types of pulchritude, why is that not reflected in the f…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 04:20 PM
1

That's true but personally I think that when someone calls you ugly that it is different when you actually are ugly than if you weren't. It's still mean and could be bullying but I just think it's not quite the same. In any case the question should be looked into.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 06:34 AM
1

I'm not sure what you mean. Sample size shows that either the data is meaningless or it's accurate. It won't allude at all to the cause. They are intentionally measuring subjective preferences so I don't see what's accounting for what. Do you mean that we should expect that men and women on dating sites be of equal attractiveness? I don't necessarily see why that must be true. Obviously they are pursuing the same thing but if the goals and motivations are different (they could be) then I would e…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 06:30 AM
3

You're absolutely right. I was just trying to avoid the appearance of saying the data was useless or starting an argument
/r/MensRights21/05/17 11:29 PM
36

It's quite possible that men on dating sites actually are uglier but that doesn't mean the data is useless. It still has meaning it's worth finding out what that is.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 08:57 PM
1

But how many reports don't go to trial?
/r/MensRights12/05/17 04:18 PM
6

How is reporting a crime to the police "obstructing them from reporting crimes"? There is literally no benefit to using a less structured court.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 07:38 AM
17

That figure on jail is identical in misleading...ness as the figure on the wage gap. Same time same crime? Who knows. Do they count crime history. Negotiating sentences? Maybe men choose higher punishment crimes. If you're going to make a point, do it right.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:58 AM
3

How dare you NOT use stereotypes.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 05:26 AM
3

Since you brought up jail, the difference between men and women is actually much larger than blacks and whites. So technically she's right. in that aspect.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 04:18 PM
7

Because we don't censor.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 04:17 PM
0

Lol wut?
/r/MensRights01/05/17 01:07 AM
-2

What's wrong with you? Your name has "MRA" in it but you talk like you belong on TRP.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 10:12 PM
1

Underrated comment. This article is so fake. We need real stories.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 05:15 PM
1

Lots of people seem to have data covered but here is public speaking advice (assuming you have to give some kind of presentation where you may be asked questions). Memorize a deflecting answer to unrelated questions. Some one could say "well what about cat-calling?" You want to find a way of saying that is not relevant to your subject without dismissing it as unimportant.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 05:18 AM
3

Personally I'd have written "I don't need a source" as that's what I have come across a few times.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 01:03 AM
1

Ah, ok.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 04:36 PM
12

Didn't she make a bunch of feminist movies and stuff beforehand? She must be one serious, long term, dedicated, sleeper agent to be able to pull that off.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 03:51 AM
1

Actually yes. It would be something like "accidental death with intent to harm" or probably drawn up as 3rd degree murder or something.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:14 AM
5

You're an asshole.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:03 AM
9

Shit, this is my school. I'm glad i didn't have her as my English teacher. Usually the school is better than this though. It even had things on domestic violence on males in an orientation thing.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:00 AM
14

It was obviously intended to get a response but I wouldn't consider her a troll. She just wore a shirt with one word on it. It's not making a claim or even stating an opinion.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 05:07 PM
3

At least the mods are not ban-happy.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 04:29 PM
1

That's why I brought it up, because the ratio to men and women does not matter. The nature of a couple demands that an equal number of men and women are in relationships. Gays are not a significant portion of the population and there is no reason to suspect that either men or women are more likely to be gay. So they follow the same trend as the rest of the population.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 05:04 PM
11

Pure numbers seems to become even more relevant when you consider there are an equal number of men and women in relationships.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 07:10 AM
15

Oral
/r/MensRights23/03/17 08:18 PM
11

Supposedly it's not chemically active so there should be absolutely no interactions. The only problem I can see is if it causes irritation which results in the body damaging itself.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:18 AM
11

I was almost with you until you started throwing out insults. This study speaks for itself, 25% of men are arrested/put in jail just for asking for help and protection. Those are not good odds.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:08 AM
56

"You're making a strawman now. You're saying that any group should just go up and automatically get funding. That they have a right to get money because they exist." Who is making the strawman here? That was painful to listen to.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 05:55 AM
1

Ok, how? You asked for a logical thought process. What was there to misunderstand?
/r/MensRights13/03/17 01:55 AM
1

I agree, but just because you don't want something does not mean that somehow parents making medical decisions for their kids is suddenly not normal.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 01:53 AM
0

Join the club dude.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:04 PM
1

The inevitable quote.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 09:26 AM
-1

They replied to a comment saying it's a bad choice. Entirely relevant! Honestly, this sub looses all semblance of reasonable discourse when circumcision comes up.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 09:10 AM
-2

He already did ಠ_ಠ we make choices for people who can't make choices. Adult women are not people incapable of making choices. Thus different.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 09:08 AM
0

Vaccines, am I right? We can't just be forcing these things on the bodies of children until they're 18! /s Not saying circumcision is good. But it IS different.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 09:06 AM
3

A male is supposed to actually be called wereman like werewolf.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 03:43 AM
2

Agreed
/r/MensRights02/03/17 06:03 PM
10

There were many things done wrong by that university but let's be accurate. He was expelled because she accused him of rape.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 03:04 AM
6

Yeah, this post is a little much.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 06:02 PM
3

That definitely seems to be how boys would play with a Barbie.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 02:08 AM
6

They don't think it is like it be, but it do.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 04:08 PM
3

There is nothing simple about anesthesia on an newborn.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:18 PM
8

I'm not sure what you mean. I got the impression the whoever wrote that had the opposite intention.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 07:25 AM
11

This article is disgusting as it adds nothing of value to this group. It spends the whole time insulting women by slyly calling them petty. Who does this help?
/r/MensRights18/01/17 06:18 AM
137

Both are victims of society /s
/r/MensRights17/01/17 06:19 AM
3

He's got a beer, that should count for something
/r/MensRights15/01/17 05:03 AM
-4

Seems like a fun movie, I may watch it tomorrow.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 08:20 AM
1

Does that stat take into account any variables, or is it just a complete average of wages like in the 77% one?
/r/MensRights07/12/16 06:28 AM
11

It isnt
/r/MensRights01/11/16 01:36 AM
3

So, if they don't have sex is it legal for a woman to have her brothers child? Now THATS a loophole.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 06:02 PM
0

Wasn't a law just passed requiring women to sign up for the draft in a few years?
/r/MensRights24/10/16 02:23 AM
1

By 1/3 or to 1/3. I would probably roll the dice if it was by 1/3 and I had a good reason.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 07:48 AM
1

4: Yeah, umm... are boys allowed to wear shorts that go up nearly to their ass cheeks? Are they allowed to wear skirts with visible underwear? This one's actually not so bad. I don't mind.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 09:52 PM
1

I only heard of it today from you but if I had to make a distinction I would say 3rd wave garnered support for misguided application of real/reasonable social problems. While 4th wave meaning roughly 'today' onward, stems from true anti-male thoughts/intentions. Of course if this 4th wave was made by feminists then that couldn't be the official definition. It's just my thoughts.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:01 AM
2

I don't know. A Google search should turn something up though.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 11:18 PM
4

She made a sex tape recreating the "incident".
/r/MensRights18/08/16 09:42 PM
4

Go big or go [120 miles back] home.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 09:03 PM
1

Im thinking that a person with no feet should have bad balance (it's all in the ankles) so would easily be toppled in the ensuing struggle.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 09:02 PM
2

Well... She's not wrong. shrug
/r/MensRights28/07/16 06:26 PM
1

No phone backups? No phone records? You don't text your rapist 30 times a day, that's more of a boyfriend thing. I can't believe they let her take his phone.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 09:11 PM
2

Too far
/r/MensRights13/06/16 12:23 AM
2

It's not specifically anonymity but closed courts that are really dangerous. If the court is closed we don't know if the rules of our system are being used. I think anonymity would be good. Just prevent news sources from giving otherwise pointless information used to identify participants in the case.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 12:21 AM
2

Jesus.... That's awful!
/r/MensRights12/06/16 05:26 AM
1

I did not like that very much. The opening bit before getting on topic was just rude and unhelpful. But the alleged interview and the argument on definitions was pretty good.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 04:59 AM
3

I would not trade my experience at an all guy HS for anything in the world. It was just the friendliest, bro-ist, most intelligent, and most respectable group of young men ever.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 04:52 AM
1

My high school would have had something like that. I took a class called marriage and family and the school had yearly week-long programs to talk about issues in society. But I don't think public should would have programs like this.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 04:29 PM
1

It shows a tendency that we both agree on. That can be useful in explaining many social curiosities and slights we observe in our society. Plus I don't know the actual split. If it's more like 75% or 90% then we CAN start to say that certain tasks are masculine or feminine and as long as we have a culture of not being mean to each other, then that's fine.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 06:03 AM
1

I'm sorry, I don't know why but I can not decipher what you are trying to say here. It's not making sense to me.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 05:59 AM
1

No one says its 99% and no one cares if it is. 60/40 is good enough to prove a point.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 03:01 AM
1

Neither do 9 month olds . . .
/r/MensRights05/06/16 02:59 AM
2

Except the female role being more open than the male role, in humans, is very recent. Can't use a "it's always been this way" reason. I think that's the purpose of doing this study on monkeys. If that's what is happening with apes then we can say "it's always been this way" to such a degree that it's been happening before we were even a species.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 12:05 AM
2

The purpose of this study is to test kids when they are too young to be subject to peer pressure or socialized for very long. A 9 month old can only say a few words. I doubt they really know what their peers/parents expect them to do.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 11:58 PM
2

Mgtow?
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:35 AM
1

TIL. Can you elaborate?
/r/MensRights12/05/16 05:49 AM
1

How bogus? They are working at most 200 ft away from a nuclear reactor that is probably not perfectly shielded.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 09:44 PM
1

Did you know that women can't Serve on military subs? They are worried about the radiation being bad which seems like a reasonable concern. Just a fun fact (subs are cool!)
/r/MensRights11/05/16 06:28 PM
2

Dang, marriage hasn't changed in 3000 years
/r/MensRights11/05/16 03:09 AM
14

He could have a really good argument there if they consider that many legal definitions of rape define a rapist as a man.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 08:56 PM
2

I hear that it's mostly complaints by female passengers of harassment.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 08:36 PM
5

I feel like some of these people have such a reverence for women that that is all they can be. She is a woman first and her mom second.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 09:13 PM
1

hey even concocted some kind of super-powered hangover cure so they could function in the hospital after a heavy night’s boozing. Was it water? I bet it was water.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 06:44 AM
1

Good point. and most male assaulters are repeat offenders making that even more relevant.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 06:04 PM
1

List of reasons? It seems like it is an exact quote from every single case "I said it was rape so my boyfriend wouldn't find out". Almost every time this is their explanation. It's strange how they are all so similar.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 04:38 PM
1

Is like to agree but there are no relevant differences in the scenarios. In both cases the male consented to sex but not fatherhood and the woman wanted to keep the child. The fact that it was rape does not really change the rights of responsibilities of the male. Not that it really matters, he should be in jail anyway if this is even a question.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 04:03 AM
1

I have always wondered what the statistics are for motherless homes to compare to fatherless homes.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 04:05 AM
0

What ignorance? it's still not thousands of years old
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:43 AM
7

You forgot Sara Connor
/r/MensRights06/03/16 04:34 PM
-12

Chivalry is only a few hundred years old and has nothing to do with women. But otherwise, yeah.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 04:23 PM
1

Well it is necessary to some degree, though post birth leave is more important (for fathers too of course).
/r/MensRights02/02/16 12:42 AM
1

Thank you for noticing this. We have to be strict on ourselves lest we be called hypocritical.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 05:52 AM
0

You can't know that there isn't evidence until you look. The bruises(if there were any) may have healed but if police investigated maybe they would find some creepy neighbor who installed a camera in the bedroom proveing that no crime was committed or providing undeniable evidence that the crime occurred. Fact is that just like any other crime, the police should at least take a look.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 06:19 PM
1

There is obviously no good reason why victims tend to wait pointlessly long times before reporting a rape. But fact is that they do and all crime should be taken seriously and investigated objectively. Your view helps no one.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 03:04 AM
31

If you expect a repeat appearance from the aunt, you could get it in writing from the parents that she is not allowed in when you are there. You could then lock her out and call authorities if she gets belligerent.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 06:01 PM
1

Well the other dude was ACCUSING her of lying / libel. So why don't we just not jump to conclusions either way.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 10:57 PM
1

Keep it civil. When has calling someone a piece of garbage ever helped anything?
/r/MensRights25/11/15 07:40 AM
53

In that case it does not really surprise me. 90 years is a very long time for 20 people to not even attempt one butt grab. Not that I condone the actions
/r/MensRights15/09/15 10:58 PM
9

Indeed they say that they are male behavioral change stuffs
/r/MensRights01/08/15 03:31 AM
1

Technically i think it's libel
/r/MensRights17/07/15 09:20 PM
36

Do they not realize who the other 70% are?!
/r/MensRights27/06/15 08:27 PM
-32

But the women did not leave, they stayed for their date an one went home with the fat guy. Watch/read the posts before making combative statements.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:21 PM
14

I wonder what would happen if you called 911? Emergency dispatch, what is your emergency? "HELP! There is a man and a woman(?) in my house and they each have guns. They're tearing the place apart. I think they are going to hurt me" what else can you do when police overstep their bounds? Does this work?
/r/MensRights06/05/15 06:45 PM
1

They asked her to give it to them, "give [it] here"
/r/MensRights31/01/15 08:22 PM
1

While I agree with your feelings, what you want to do is literally the problem with voting in this country.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 05:19 PM
3

He is not wrong but he is a bit of an asshole. This will not change minds and I don't think it is a good representation of what we stand for on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 06:33 AM
1

No need to name call. I'm just wondering if you think the foreskin is more or less sensitive considering your conflicting statements that I originally brought up.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 07:27 PM
1

this injury wouldn't have occurred at all if he wasn't circumcised Thanks doctor, I didn't know we had so many resident MD's
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:52 AM
1

i cant begin to imagine how much it must hurt of the actual head. Or you must lose all sensitivity So which is it? More, or less?
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:17 AM
1

You are unclear because of bad grammar, punctuation, and spelling along with some generally unclear phrases.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 04:20 PM
-7

No offense but I call bs. No way the shaft is more sensitive than the head. (Personally speaking and intuitively) On an unrelated note, what is the purpose of the foreskin if not for protection while not aroused, therefore why should it be more sensitive?
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:18 AM
2

He did not expect rape but the ways she spun the story and changed things for whatever benefit could have easily been twisted into rape rather than just portraying him as a jerk.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 09:46 PM
3

Well, you made an amazing report, did all your research and presented it well and you deserved an A, but instead of the teacher facing the truth your teacher gave you a C- Then your friend made an amazing report, did all his research and presented it well and also deserved an A, but instead of the teacher facing the truth she gave him a D- When you start stacking things up like this, the Common denominator is your teachers. . . Well kid you might want to reconsider how easily you excuse them fro…
/r/MensRights30/01/14 08:27 PM
1

For someone who claims to be a fan of Katniss and the story this author has no idea what is going on in the books or movies. The point they made was fine but has nothing to do with the hunger games.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 08:08 PM
3

If it is kidnapping, that seems like an easy way to get in. Call the police say you have custody and that she has "taken" your kids. They may be mad but once the police open her door they can't stop you from bringing them home. Can they?
/r/MensRights21/01/14 06:57 AM
3

I think we all know what the REAL issue here is: irregardless is not a real word.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 02:59 AM
8

Ms. Heterocage, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul. - billy maddison movie
/r/MensRights18/12/13 03:59 AM
3

YOU have obviously never been to an all male highschool
/r/MensRights04/11/13 05:30 AM
1

I just wrap the solder around the index finger of whatever hand holds the iron so I don't need 3 hands, you should try it once it works rather well
/r/MensRights29/10/13 06:29 AM
1

While I agree with your message I have always thought that the combat death statistics have always been sensational and misleading. It is a half-view approach that I see so many feminists use. In my opinion a proper statistic to use would be the number of servicemen vs the number of service women. Or male death over # of service men vs female deaths over service women. I think the statistic as it stands infers an unfairness in how men/women soldiers die that is not shown in the statistic. If you…
/r/MensRights27/09/13 07:19 AM
2

I don't know, I think it is pretty accurate to say that OP got raped in the courtroom.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 07:30 PM
-3

LESBIANS!!
/r/MensRights05/07/13 08:19 PM
1

Have you tried going into the actual police office,I would imagine it to be much harder to say no to you when you are face to face.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 12:27 AM
1

It is clear that almost all of this is complete BS but i must say a select few pieces of legal advice in this document can be mind-blowingly useful. Thanks anyways
/r/MensRights24/06/13 05:52 AM
2

I would like to point out that the degree gap is really more of an enrollment gap. No point here, just an info.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 12:22 AM
-6

You asked a question and I answered. But what I am arguing is that MGM and FGM are like comparing apples to oranges they aren't even close. There is no evidence of psychological damage from MGM and no conclusive studies showing whether or not it affects performance or pleasure either way. It's like taking out your appendix (minus the possibility of it killing you) it does not really change your life much, so I don't get why people care.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 06:43 AM
5

"All animals are equal but some are more equal than others" Animal Farm
/r/MensRights30/04/13 01:53 AM
-14

Because doing it to girls causes permanent serious "damage" to the functionality of their genitals. And it is usually done to them later in life thus they remember it. And doing it to men is not for hateful reasons as it is with girls (subservants). That is some of the reasons why.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 01:06 AM
-1

Why does everyone get all bent out of shape about the foreskin, it's gross and attractive dirty (maybe). And whether or not the removal is painless, the babies don't care or remember. It is nothing like female genital mutilation that people are always comparing it to. I don't see how it's a big deal. And yes I am male.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 03:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter