TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Necessary-Ad2110 Archive

View 0 posts and 112 comments by Necessary-Ad2110 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
22

People move on. A lifetime is short while also, very quite long. Meanwhile we are compounded by society to marry and to be with someone constantly. Besides, outside the job many people don't really have social lives and being married mitigates that to some degree.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 11:24 AM
2

craaazzzzyyy projection buddy 😂😂
/r/MensRights12/05/26 04:12 AM
-2

Why? I'm genuinely asking to hear your arguments. If anything, I thought no fault divorce would be a step in the right direction. Once a person has decided they are not there in a marriage, then why make it harder for them to leave?
/r/MensRights12/05/26 04:08 AM
2

No, I agree with you. I'm not saying historically marriage has always been about love but present day the emphasis on genuine authentic connection is more or less prioritized compared to before. Don't get me wrong, marriage will always be a tool for wealth, power and to build the foundation for a family but times change. And I'm speaking from a western point of view as I assume most of this sub (for being English speaking) is situated in the west.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 04:06 AM
2

Living rent free in 2026 is a bargain after all :") I had to go into your comment history to figure out where you saw me from, good to know I have a fan!
/r/MensRights12/05/26 03:27 AM
-17

Why downplay women's experiences? Looking for a needle in a haystack will always be hard and exhausting, especially when some of that hay throws you in for a loop. The point of that statement is to highlight how problematic some men's approaches are to dating. Some are entitled, some are porn addicts, some are violent, plenty are okay and totally normal but just aren't the person's type. How is this even related to mens rights? Do you feel entitled to be chosen everytime you look at a woman? Dat…
/r/MensRights12/05/26 02:44 AM
0

I am on your side completely, I agree with some mens right issues like circumcision and the draft but there are knuckleheads in this sub more often then not that just use this platform negatively to push narratives that ultimately achieve nothing or provoke very little discussion. It's just an echo chamber sadly.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 02:39 AM
1

So kind of you to remember me
/r/MensRights12/05/26 02:34 AM
7

Ah shit I meant to say a sign of *maturity* But yeah would be helpful to see the reel
/r/MensRights12/05/26 12:44 AM
-20

Men crying is a sign of immaturity—if you're called a manchild then it's for different reasons. Let's not conflate the two and mischaracterize feminism and fall into a gender war. edit: my bad i meant maturity guys T_T crying *IS* a sign of maturity, earlier honest typo
/r/MensRights12/05/26 12:35 AM
-1

On my end it shows up like he deleted his comments, either way what a snowflake
/r/MensRights12/05/26 12:26 AM
-3

lmfao comment has been deleted by user. tsk. crazy how much we cross into let's take away womens right to divorce and misogyny here.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 08:54 PM
-3

Sarcastic, I'm not arguing about anything but I just found what you were insinuating a bit off
/r/MensRights11/05/26 08:49 PM
-8

I guess we should take away women's right to divorce then...
/r/MensRights11/05/26 08:47 PM
-1

"Hoeinflation"? 😭 On a real note... relationships and marriages have always been risky for both parties. Marriage is about love! Love isnt logical or is supposed to make sense.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 07:54 PM
1

Literally was told to "learn causality w*man" in this thread as if that was a slur and an insult. I dont know what to tell you buddy. And again you're not even addressing my argument or evidence so it makes no sense to entertain this conversation on a serious level. It's just goal post shifting. I already told you what I believe in, your post is hypocritical, a distraction and only hurts MRA in the eyes of women, and other men. I agree with MRA on things like MGM and men who are victims of rape …
/r/MensRights26/04/26 02:53 AM
1

Then kindly hop off then lol
/r/MensRights26/04/26 02:43 AM
1

Why would I want to reply to multiple comments? When people spiral into multiple comments it just messes up the whole focus of the conversation into something unproductive and broad and simply put, I dont want the inconvenience of having to look at multiple different chains at the same time. It's just decency, not even trying to be arrogant.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 06:53 AM
1

Personal insults dont do anything for your argument. I haven't insulted you nor will I. You disagree with feminism, that's your choice but I am not going to go into definitions because that's just going to make this whole conversation into spaghetti and definitions dont really matter here. What I am talking about is that your post is hypocritical and flawed because the same thing can be argued about this sub. 1) your link doesn't say anything special, I am saying functionally both sides will gen…
/r/MensRights25/04/26 06:50 AM
-2

The fuck are you yapping about bro 😭
/r/MensRights25/04/26 05:51 AM
1

Keep it to one comment bro. And again you're just complaining but you're not explaining why you can separate women from feminism when literally its done within this sub so interchangeably. And again, feminists are complaining about patriarchs. Feminists complain about men and patriarchy interchangeably, just as this sub complains about women and feminists interchangeably. It makes no sense to police such language in such a broad basis too. We should focus on actual issues and legislation interna…
/r/MensRights25/04/26 05:50 AM
-5

Feminism rejects biological determinism. You can disagree with feminism, I am not here to talk on that point but you haven't given an argument as to how and why you can separate the two. Instead you just go on some weird vague generalized rant about woman committing immoral acts? What does that even mean? Women can be against feminism, obviously, just as men can be against the patriarchy. This doesn't say anything special.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 05:44 AM
-11

The distinction between 'feminism' and 'women' in this sub is paper-thin. Half the posts here use them interchangeably to vent. Ive seen my fair bit just being on here. And it's weird because feminism is a women's movement, so to say you're not talking about women is a bit strange since you can't really separate the two And if you can separate them then you can say that then feminism aren't really talking about men then instead it's the patriarchs and patriarchy—toxic masculinity, gender norms, …
/r/MensRights25/04/26 05:26 AM
-8

This "men's rights community" can't shut up about trashing women 99% of the time 😭 what is this post even about brooo...
/r/MensRights25/04/26 05:02 AM
1

Not a strawman if you were pushing that as the claim in your title!
/r/MensRights23/04/26 10:46 PM
1

My point is that if they can join the military and go off to another country and kill people they can decide what to do with their own body. And they can! But not with you. Their agency doesn't equate to your borderline pedophilia. It's weird for you as a man who is presumably in their thirties pushing forties (especially sixties holy shit) to feel entitled to date women as young as the legal age of consent... which, again by your logic could be as low as even 11 in some countries. Child soldier…
/r/MensRights23/04/26 10:39 PM
-6

Why are you finding yourself constantly in negative encounters with different women?
/r/MensRights23/04/26 07:38 PM
2

I don't wish to apply generalizations but I've noticed this as a trend a lot. Guys will come in r/MensRights, vent about an injustice and claim its because of their gender when in reality they are just that dumb. It is so weird and it is unfortunate because I do think this sub has some real merit in regards to some issues but then people will look in from the outside (as I have done admittedly) and judge the sub as a whole harshly for posts like these. Which let's not get it twisted, this post g…
/r/MensRights23/04/26 07:33 PM
5

It's distressing that this is apparently a hot take in this community. The deleted comment below tried dismissing it entirely by claiming relationships are more then sex but it's all wishy washy attempts to make pedophilia to look decent. (i read some of it through notifications) but hey at least im not completely alone in calling this out as predators in the making (or shit, child predators in action—you never know)
/r/MensRights23/04/26 07:10 PM
3

I mean by your logic, a 60 year old man can date and a sixteen year old in Connecticut and there'd be nothing wrong with that. What's stopping a sixty year old from going to Brazil and having sex with a fourteen year old? It's legal, right? But noooo, this is totally female supremacy. Fuck feminists, right? Defending this is such a weird hill to want to die on... your step sister is right, it is weird and it is taking advantage of someone if you stick to just what the law says. Laws are in no wa…
/r/MensRights23/04/26 05:53 PM
1

More of an argument of semantics dont you think? I get what you mean but for everyone else this is AI and will continued to be referred to as AI
/r/MensRights23/04/26 10:38 AM
5

Proud of a fellow brother
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 12:16 AM
11

You dont think women wouldn't have the right to complain and vent if they were in a dead bedroom relationship? Men and women both do, grow up dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 12:15 AM
2

Weird way to project buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 12:14 AM
1

...what's wrong with creating safe spaces? It's only an hour long too. Women gyms have always existed. I feel like there are bigger things to talk about.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 11:32 PM
1

I dont know man, this is some weird shit you look at. Let the downvotes come in but weird sucking yourself off over an argument online that no one knows the context of too. I thought this was a serious sub but between this and the meat sculpture guy I don't even know what to say lol
/r/MensRights22/04/26 10:13 PM
1

my ego has been boosted like sky high, im so glad you came my way (OK OK im pushing it but thank you lol) id hope people would break up their sculptures right away after taking a quick pic and cook the meat immediately. and the way op phrased it sounded like he was bringing from his home to work. plus commute and how long does it take to make a sculpture like this? but regardless of the time, even if you can stand in its vicinity just fine the point is that you dont just bring raw meat around. i…
/r/MensRights22/04/26 08:50 PM
0

im being dramatic for trash talking sake, im doing a necessary evil to combat a terrible evil (necessary-ad2110 and adterrible 3979 idk i just thought it was cool) but still, its a bit gross. ill say this, sculptures and all are cool but with raw meat it just sounds like an unnecessary health risk especially if it been around for longer then two hours. and yeah we should call out people who misuse this platform to save their ego by claiming its the oppression of their gender rather then go throu…
/r/MensRights22/04/26 08:24 PM
2

bring playdoh next time lol
/r/MensRights22/04/26 08:18 PM
3

uh yeah... thats why im in disbelief as to why you'd bring a hump of raw beef around. you come on r/mensrights as if you have the right to put other peoples health at risk tsk boohoo. r/stupidanswer
/r/MensRights22/04/26 08:01 PM
8

brought some of my recent sculptures to work liike.... raw beef...?
/r/MensRights22/04/26 06:41 PM
1

I mean, I don't know—I like talking to you because you're making me think here and I sorta have to pause for a bit. I agree with criminalizing third parties from taking profits as well as communication between actors/actresses and the audience. I suppose my middle ground would have to involve a decentralized marketplace, for example if you want to share and view porn then you put up your own website (like a blog) and throughout that entire website only the people identified, registered and licen…
/r/MensRights22/04/26 03:35 PM
5

Well my world view was just turned upside down, thanks. I feel dumb now but I guess that's part of the culture you grow up in and just accepting that this is part of life. I'll say my mind has been changed and for that I want to thank you. I'll look into this more deeply too, I had no idea there was this much nuance into it. Honestly you grow up in a bubble and you look at men's rights and think: what a fringe group of weridos, but I admit there's things I have to take a double look over and ser…
/r/MensRights22/04/26 03:05 PM
3

I didn't know that the foreskin was sold off, I'll give you that—learn something new everyday.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 03:01 PM
-1

I think the government should protect its citizens and when that arguably leads to better life outcomes, helps rebuild families and fixes the distorted view porn has created on sex—on an issue like this, it is a no-brainer. I think I can live in a world where porn is legal as long as we shut down sex work and fight back against pornographic companies who's entire economic model is to exploit, exploit and exploit. I think human dignity in this regard is incompatible with capitalism. Besides I don…
/r/MensRights22/04/26 02:55 PM
9

To be fair, we can't compete with AI on a number of things and it'll only take one more breakthrough before no human on the planet can beat an AI on the same playing field.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 12:44 PM
-1

It seems like there's studies in both camps, admittedly I am not a doctor so you may be right or you may be wrong. As for the 100 baby boys, sure I don't deny that as a tragedy but so many other issues eclipse this easily. And frankly, I just don't see this as a issue worth talking about.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 12:40 PM
0

Why not porn? It is the most normalized addiction in America, it destroys lives and enables an industry to groom, exploit and harm men and women alike. I don't believe in porn, look up GirlsDoPorn
/r/MensRights22/04/26 12:27 PM
0

Where is my 1000000000000000000000000000000000000 downvote button!!
/r/MensRights21/04/26 11:53 PM
-2

Where is my 100000000000 downvote button
/r/MensRights21/04/26 11:24 PM
-6

The draft and sexwork/porn. And you can say mutilating children just as I can say forced injection of dead viruses and pathogens into children. Both vaccines and circumcision have health benefits and save lives... why are we going to die on the hill over foreskin?
/r/MensRights21/04/26 10:42 PM
-8

I feel like there are bigger things to talk about then circumcision... edit: my mind has been changed, I still don't think circumcision relative to other issues is what we should prioritize but I do see now how unethical and ignored this issue overall is and for that i want to apologize for all and any bit of my prior comments. I won't delete anything because I don't see a reason to delete public records but I must say this subreddit and men's rights is definitely coming across over to me as an …
/r/MensRights21/04/26 10:16 PM
-11

seriously like I don't get it? doesn't circumcision save the lives of men by reducing the rates of UTI, STIs, HIV and penile cancer???
/r/MensRights21/04/26 10:15 PM
1

you should post the actual comments and the context with it
/r/MensRights21/04/26 07:52 PM
1

Again, we are talking about someone setting their profile to private and you supporting an exploit to, without their consent, knowledge or approval, bypass and harvest that data. It doesn't need to be common practice, the fact is that it would be practiced. If you don't see anything wrong with that, especially as to how that exploit could be misused (victims of rape, main account or not—is just one example) then I have nothing to say to you. And I have nothing to say to you anyways, you are too …
/r/MensRights17/04/26 09:45 PM
0

Many victims of rape, sexual assault etc choose to make their profile private to ward off the creeps who would groom, exploit and take pleasure in their stories. We were talking about victims of rape just last night... and again, if someone has set their profile to private—then why on God's green earth would you support writing an exploit that would expose people's private information? I get that you were thinking that somehow such a tool would expose "brigadiers" (whatever that means) but you a…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 09:25 PM
1

I mean... if someone sets their data to be private, why would you intentionally go through all the effort to go beyond someone's boundary and violate their sanctity? It's ironic given what we were just talking about, don't you think..?
/r/MensRights17/04/26 08:08 PM
1

I don't think anyone has to believe that, I always remain and do my best to remain polite and respectful, patient too in regards to speaking with others on serious issues—especially when we have differing views. I try to let my comments speak for itself. I don't need to prove anything to anyone and people will more or less stick to their beliefs rather then challenge them willingly. Also I am happy you agree! Only concern I have though is the potential for the tool being weaponized against other…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 07:54 PM
1

To put it to rest, yes—I caution against blanket statements when speaking to everyone and anyone including feminists. And no I do remember a specific example to cite that I can prove exclusively from my Reddit history, to be fair it's awfully specific. If you really want you can plug all that data in an LLM, I was going to eventually one of these days for fun and just ask it questions.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 07:37 PM
2

the double standards is crazy
/r/EverydayMisandry17/04/26 04:39 PM
-1

To make a blanket statement and call all branches of an ideology the same is missing the point and is gravely misguided and dangerous. I didn't defend or make any claim relating to Mary P. Koss and while I promise you, for the sake of my own knowledge, I will look into this men's rights—I must say that this interaction is over.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 01:07 AM
-1

You are mischaracterizing me entirely. I did provide sources and I was willing to engage with the facts and go over the nuances over every citation. You haven't prompted me to source anything else except on how women are oppressed. And I have, throughout my comment history, provided sources countless times.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 01:03 AM
-1

I have read that update in definition earlier in my research (which note is how I am able to reply so quickly this time around). You can attribute it to solely women if you wish but that'd be denying that men have no role in maintaining patriarchal gendernorms that assert men are strong, can't cry and if they get raped it is actually consensual and that he's actually "lucky" (which is flat out evil). And again, ideologies like radical feminism targets those same mechanisms that the patriarchy in…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 01:00 AM
0

If you have a source on that then we can talk about it, I am sure you are right to an extent but my criticism of the post isn't in that women aren't a problem—I just disagree with the framing of the study which made no conclusion on political ideologies (radical feminism, liberal feminism etc) and I offered my own explanation which is apparently a hot take h ere.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 12:32 AM
0

You have failed utterly to thoughtfully address the concerns of more than half the people who replied. You just confidently assert statistically unprovable shit and pretend it's proof. Do better, or buzz off. An opinion to be sure, if you have a grievance with a particular comment I made then you're welcome to make it known rather then vaguely say "you're wrong!!1." which I sure am wrong on a number of things, but that's why I am here. If you want to demonize or cast me out, then fine. But this …
/r/MensRights17/04/26 12:29 AM
-1

Okay addressing what actually matters here—you are right, the made to penetrate subcategory is awful. This is the first time I'm learning about this and it blew my mind away that this was even categorized as separate. I can sort of understand the rationale of wanting to differentiate between forced penetration and being forced to penetrate but I do agree with you that the fact that the CDC does not look at this like a subcategory of rape directly is a grave concern. However when we continue to l…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 12:26 AM
0

When I make these hot take posts I get a lot of replies usually and I try my best to thoughtfully address every concern so it takes time for me to reply to each and every single one. I do my best not to miss any but you can see my reply was posted to u/sakura_drop awhile ago. I won't be on this 24/7 so. And ad hominem attacks don't really do much for the conversation at hand. I am genuinely here to learn through exposure so not sure what was the point of this comment. But it sure does seem like …
/r/MensRights16/04/26 10:15 PM
-1

Straight women fetishize and harrass gay men. You've never been a man dating another man, and it shows. I asked for a source on this but no one has been able to help with validating this claim. I don't dispute it, there are definitely women who harass and fetishize gay men but relative to straight men onto women—I do not believe it is statistically significant, but I am asking to be proven wrong in this regard so I can rectify my world view. Source on women not being as oppressive? The National …
/r/MensRights16/04/26 10:11 PM
1

I don't dispute that, breast size is trivial after all and I don't know anyone who's turned down women for that. But that whole thing about breast size is a bit of a strawman because it's more complicated then that. The male gaze extends itself onto how we interact with women, social media and even how we interact with traditional forms of media and they all play into a kind of caricature that women must follow or else they are degraded and treated lesser for. And I would agree that the same can…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 10:04 PM
1

I read through this and I think I'd need more time to digest this and look over more studies but the evidence is definitely there. Of course there are still studies, undoubtedly, that hold up that men commit more violence towards women and there does seem to be some problems with the first study in particular regarding the definition of violent behavior as evidenced here in the last paragraph but I can't say definitively yet. And of course I think regarding child abuse, there is a discrepancy to…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 09:52 PM
1

You see there I don't agree because the standards for relationships and marriage is a lot more sophisticated then that. Pretty privilege factors into how well someone receives you and when it comes to men and women.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 09:20 PM
1

I would argue that aesthetic standards are reinforced societally by the sum of the sexes. I'd say the greater responsibility comes from men speaking on a more biologically systematic scale spread across generations of time but of course women have their own part to play. So we are not that different in opinion. When men apply cosmetic augmentation—I'm talking beyond things like “using moisturizer” or “using conditioner”, ha—it is perhaps judged as an act of “deception” or “concealment” more quic…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 09:19 PM
1

I agree with that, some ideas shouldn't be—but so long as it isn't rooted in bigotry or a capacity for violence then I suppose I disagree? How else is a movement to grow if they cannot push back the common narrative? It is easy for women to find a sexual partner, after all men are very sexual by default but that doesn't dispute beauty standards being reinforced and rewarded by men though—you are just addressing the lack of standards by men set onto women for casual flings.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 06:51 PM
1

You're talking about women's issues in a subreddit about mens rights, misogyny in a post about misandry, and you want to talk about whataboutism? It is not whataboutism here because I am talking directly towards the original post's content. You literally have women's issues highlighted in the title of this thread. I wouldn't mention women if women weren't mentioned. Gay bars are swarmed with swathes of straight women who harass gay men. That is a first, and I am sure on some level it is true. I …
/r/MensRights16/04/26 06:44 PM
1

I responded to this person, this is my last message directed to u/Smeg-life. LINK: Full context incase anyone else is reading this.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 06:29 PM
1

I defended my post several times, and I continue to do so unequivocally. And I am not... harassing you? You're the one who replied across my comments. You even chased me in a separate sub thread under my own comment to continue the conversation but now that you're confronted with data and reasoning now you are running with your tail tucked between your legs. You won't reply to my arguments or open into a good faith conversation—that is fine. I'll respect it. I won't continue this any longer. I a…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 06:28 PM
-2

If you have to rely on things I didn't say to address my argument then I don't know what to say to you, I'm open to talking about it more on good faith.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 06:03 PM
-2

When I say beauty standards set by men, I mean ultimately I believe beauty standards are reinforced and endorsed by men. Of course women have their part to play, I do not deny that but ultimately the human species is made to reproduce and this is a system that is used to drive up those rates by elevating the perceived value of our genetics and compatibility that is ultimately rewarded with sex and a family.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 05:51 PM
0

I am a man myself. And I didn't say that so it's a strawman.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 05:48 PM
-2

I gave you a list of sources and multiple stats in my reply to you. And again, your rebuttal hinders on demanding proof rather then acknowledging the flawed argument that u/Wylanderuk gave out earlier.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 05:46 PM
-1

Male-on-female violence is higher then female-on-male violence. If you disagree, let's talk about it.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 05:45 PM
1

Your entire rebuttal hinders on the singular use of the word "constantly" as a deflection to ignore the well documented systemic reality that has for so long plagued women for generations. If you want sources, the World Health Organization (WHO) and UN Women report that 1 in 3 women worldwide—nearly 736 million—have been subjected to physical or sexual violence. In the US alone, The National Sexual Violence Resource Center (NSVRC) reports that 81% of women experience some form of sexual harassme…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 05:43 PM
-5

Again, whataboutism. Misandry exists, just as misogyny does. I am not saying there aren't toxic hateful women out there.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 02:15 PM
-5

What about my post "cannot be proved in any way"? I can easily bring up sources when prompted too. My secondary post was a rebuttal that affirmed my earlier claims, I don't understand how you see anything there as backpedaling. And it's ironic too because the original post makes a claim that is verifiably false. It claims the ratio of your digits coorelates to what branch of feminism you believe in which is just not true. Again it was on the bare quality of agreeableness and the study found no d…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 02:14 PM
-9

I have no idea how to respond to that. I work in a predominantly female organization, I wasn't aware I was consistently hitting on them. Trying to supplement a personal anecdote with a claim that has historically always been true as supported by swaths of crime data globally. I am not saying you, the individual, are the problem I simply don't know you—but many men are and those men contribute to why there is so much push back (justifiably) by women on this. This must be a N American female thing…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 01:48 PM
-16

Because women are rewarded for pursuing extreme beauty standards set by men. Bigger breasts, bigger lips, smaller noses... all of this cascades into how men ultimately will treat women. It is pursuing pretty privilege to the extreme. And because taking care of yourself or looking good has always been mischaracterized as something only for women, toxic masculinity will push back against men pursuing similar ends. It is considered feminine for a man to know how to dress, have a skincare routine or…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 01:03 PM
-36

Women are constantly assaulted, harassed and targeted by heterosexual men regardless of their sexuality. There is a whole fetishization of lesbians in porn, pushing the idea that a lesbian can be converted. Gay men can actually be friends with women without it turning into one party wanting sex. And women aren't as aggressive or oppressive towards men as men are to women so gay men largely have no reason to be misogynistic. A large reason why misogyny exists is because an entitlement to sex by h…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 12:14 PM
3

It is a hideously poor indicator. What's harder to stop, socially acceptable bigotry or socially unacceptable bigotry? I could answer this, but I won't because your whole premise collapses when you ask this question. The problem with your whole thesis is it is just a distraction on poor methodology that fails on so many levels. And the way you rationalized is so hypocritical. You said to u/Slowgo45 "I'm complaining about women online fighting their fellow male proletariat instead of the real ene…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 10:37 PM
3

I really don't think ngrams is the definitive proof you're looking for, misogyny and misandry are so distinct from each other in the way they manifest, are normalized and persist in our society. Maybe you can make a case on "kill all men" but the other three aren't even extreme, and misogyny/misandry by nature are extreme. You'd need more data and actually take into account sex crimes, gender rights, gender violence and socioeconomic outcomes. And this data won't just be found on ngrams. And I s…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 05:42 PM
–

That's why I'm against sex work, I can't tell your position but I hope you are too. Things like porn only destroy society from the inside out.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 08:39 PM
–

Just saying, it isn't work and it shouldn't ever be legal in any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 08:36 PM
–

That'd be quite sad
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 08:36 PM
–

I say that because sex work plainly should be illegal not because it is literally not work. Besides sex work isn't legal work either, sex work is a crime and sex work just incentives systems like only fans, human trafficking and the degradation and commodification of women and men alike. I thought if anyone, you would understand that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 08:36 PM
–

Sex work isn't work
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 04:37 PM
4

Just let people go, why are we even talking about policing what other people do? Also it's so weird that the boyfriend (assuming its the one with facial hair) tries to forcefully kiss her, like boyfriend or not but that is assault.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 07:42 PM
3

I'm pretty sure that guy is the boyfriend and the guy with the hat is just someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 07:40 PM
1

Coming from the "the dollar isn't a privilege", "committing a crime is a backup option" and the "debates arent formed by opinions" guy lol The gender pay gap dude, make basic research. also: the fallacy fallacy—because an argument has a fallacy, therefore the conclusion is false is itself a fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 04:12 PM
1

Lol, you get your example logic-nuked and now you can't defend your argument haha brilliant.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 10:41 PM
1

most of those 54% still use the logical definition of rape where is necessary cohercion or physically threat Source? Also I do not subscribe to the idea that rape can only happen under cohercion or phyiscal threat, it is more complex then that and consent should be able to be withdrawn at any given time. It makes no sense to have consent be this one time thing you give per encounter because the encounter can evolve into so many different ways. When a girl consents to giving a blowjob, it'd be ra…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 10:18 PM
1

What evidence do you have of it? in nearly three out of four countries you can be forced to marry by national law Evidence being? No country in the world has reached full legal equality for women and girls | UN Women – Headquarters As you should, you should be free to define wages as a boss. Sure, why don't we bring back slavery while we are at it. This is the most braindead take I've ever heard. Self report or criminal data? This statistic was collected via a survey, you can read more up on it …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 08:16 PM
1

Afghanistan, Yemen, Sudan, DRC, Somalia, CAR, Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, India... then you have nations like Niger, Mali and Chad where a high percentage of girls are married before the age of 18 with many of these girls forced into marriages against their will. Fifty four percent of countries don't even define rape on the basis of consent, in nearly three out of four countries you can be forced to marry by national law and in about half of countries worldwide you could legally be paid less f…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 07:27 PM
1

Afghanistan isn't the only country with abuses concerning women. At least thousands in the US, millions across the world. Women pay taxes too that's just ridiculous. Men have always had a greater privilege in society historically and presently. Sex work has different requirements but it's still there, I am not saying they're equal they're obviously going to have different challenges but to say women have sex work as a backup option is ridiculous. Besides, going into LEO for example has pros that…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:00 PM
4

Women don't have an easier life in general, there's so many other things you need to account for especially in countries notorious for human rights abuses. You wanna go to Afghanistan and tell the women there they have an easier life? Obviously gender dynamics will mean people will have x, y or z and sure it's easier for women to go into an industry that actively oppresses, exploits and degrades them but that honestly doesn't say much and it is not at all a backup option you make it out to be. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 12:30 AM
1

Right... except South Korea is finally recovering from their declinig population after literal decade of government-pushed population control campaigns. South Korea isn't going to die tomorrow so the very idea that a government needs to make x, y or z happen is extreme. Pro-natalist polices haven't failed they just don't show up overnight. 4B isn't encouraging suicide in the country either, tell me the goals of the 4B movement, why it came into existence and what are its demands? Your answers li…
/r/MensRights18/03/26 07:13 PM
0

The sacrifices don't have to be the same, one is forced to put their life at risk of course I acknowledge that but I am pushing back at this post in general since it makes it sound like women just stay home all day during wartimes. And again, women and everyone who stays home would be needed to supply arms, food and other logistics. We can and should incentivize new families but not through forced legislation, it'd be so problematic too. Why do you think people aren't having kids? We answer that…
/r/MensRights18/03/26 05:47 PM
-5

Many women were called to duty in weapons factories during both world wars, its not like its only men defending their countries. Without the contributions of the domestic homeland, there would be absolutely no arms, food or supplies for the frontlines. And it isn't even rational either, no need to increase the burden on the country with single mothers as you'd have an entire generation to feed, nurse, educate and take care of. These babies would also grow up without fathers. You'd also be runnin…
/r/MensRights18/03/26 05:09 PM
2

Why would anyone be in support of the state forcing itself into the private affairs and lives of its citizens? Women shouldn't be forced to bear children, the same way men shouldn't be forced to fight in wars. Instead of making it this weird gender war that women have no blame for, we should take a principled anti-war stance.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 05:05 PM
12

This is ridiculous, DOGE was a highly political and publicized operation launched by a highly controversial billionaire in service for the federal government. DOGE itself has been accused of corruption left and right. The idea that we can't shame these people is idiotic. I agree the majority of attacks should be waged at the figurehead since they carry the most responsibility and power but to somehow claim the political left is evil for this? Brain dead takes honestly. I'm open to having a conve…
/r/MensRights14/03/26 05:35 PM
–

Man this is so weird. Not everyone is ready for a partner, no one is obligated to be available to "to the public" and I think you put too much emphasis on women in this cycle. It's brutal but it sounds like you're paying too much attention on social media and OLD. The process is brutal for both genders, we deal with different dynamics but we always have a choice to be better and defy the seemingly impossible odds stacked against us. AI girlfriends are what porn is to sex but for relationships. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 07:14 AM
1

You're stripping away women's rights and freedoms, it is a very unnatural thing to do. There is no universe where women or any class of people feel it is normal to have their liberties stripped away from them, they may be socialized into thinking it is okay but eventually it will break at the earliest injustice of their happiness. And if you think you'd be happy stripping away a women's right to consent then I think you're the problem if anything.
/r/MensRights23/11/25 05:39 PM
1

Respectfully I think you should be thrown in jail for life. Among a myriad of other things that would only get me banned. No one would live in a world where there friends, sisters or mothers can be raped, forcibly impregnated and stripped of all ability to choose who they love in this world. You could've easily been born as a woman in this parallel universe, do you really think you'd be happy being forced into marriage with someone you don't even like?
/r/MensRights23/11/25 05:29 PM
1

real.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/25 01:18 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter