TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Necessary-Ask-3619 Archive

View 1 post and 376 comments by Necessary-Ask-3619 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

DiscussionNecessary-Ask-3619/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 01:51 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
20

The problem is the dishonesty. Also, the gaslighting that the one she made rules for is the lucky one who should be grateful she chose him finally. When a woman sleeps with a man from the bottom 80% it's only beneficial and is rewarding for the male You all really treat sex as a favor you are doing on those men. No self-respecting man feels rewarded by that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 03:03 PM
2

That's bs. Friendship + Sex = Friends with benefits. Friendship + Sex + Exclusivity + A desire to built a life together + Romantic feelings = Relationship. If so, assuming you're straight and have close male friends, do you believe that you and your friends are in a pseudo-relationship of sorts? I mean, if they believe "relationships = friendships + sex", that's the logical conclusion. Hell, they and their friends are in a relationship similar to the one a married couple with dead bedroom have.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 02:24 PM
4

Agreed. Values over interests. As long as the non-common interests don't create issues because of incompatibility, it isn't a big deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 01:59 PM
3

While true, the discussion is about what makes the relationship last longer. Common Values are more important than common interests. Looks > Common Values > Common interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 01:57 PM
1

No. I joined. I learned all I need to, most of which I had already observed but didn't know how widespread it was or why it happened, and then left. The only redpill related sub I am now in is here.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 04:04 AM
8

That's why they are obsessed with how much money they can make Red pill has never advocated for making money. On the contrary, it advises that if making money makes it easier for a man to get into relationship, she isn't really in love with him. This tells me all I need to know about how much you know about redpill. desperately shaming and attacking men who actually have loving and trusting relationships with their wife / girlfriends. Only if those men are giving some bs advice because they happ…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 04:01 AM
–

Confident + Attractive = Bold and Brave. Confident + Unattractive = Creepy and arrogant.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 05:07 AM
1

My two friends have been like this. 1st guy, before his marriage, we would go to movies or to just eat pretty much every weekend. Now he genuinely has to ask his wife whenever he makes plans with me. I know it's not an excuse because he loves to watch movies as much as me & we have been best friends for a decade. The 2nd friend's wife checks his bank records all the time because she doesn't want him to drink. So he has me pay for all of that. Sends me the Payment QR link whenever he goes to drin…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 02:37 AM
–

The difference between their words and actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 01:25 AM
–

LMAO. You seriously believe that or just trying to convince yourself. For a guy she is really attracted to, he could be an absolute deadbeat and she will blow him every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 01:23 AM
–

No. It doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 01:21 AM
–

Given his fame, he could say "I'm a nice guy" while pointing at his penis, he wouldn't have problem getting laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 01:20 AM
4

People like you are the reason feminist organizations get away with their bs. evil feminists the word "evil" is redundant here. worry that stories like this reinforce the idea that there are monthly feminist meetings where feminists get together to deny men's rights. There are no monthly meetings because they don't need one when all feminists have the same goal: To deny men's rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/24 06:47 AM
10

Not because they care for women but because they believe it hurts women: In this case, however, we share the common goal of ending an antiquated federal law that harms both men and women. Like many laws that appear to benefit women, men-only registration actually impedes women’s full participation in civic life. Limiting registration to men sends a message that women are unqualified to serve in the military, regardless of individual capabilities and preferences. It reflects an outmoded view that…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 10:57 PM
22

One can only hope. Pendulum needs to swing back. South Korea has active forced conscription. Yet, south korean women claim they are the one oppressed and discriminated against. Western men will also be forced just like Ukranian men were if there is a war but since the possibility is low, men take feminism too lightly in west & think they have male privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 12:36 PM
5

If men don't allow their sperms to fertilize your eggs, it's game over, what is not clicking here?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 12:32 PM
4

Okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 06:49 AM
8

You make a good point there.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 05:23 AM
6

Never disagreed. Most physical abusers are indeed men. Easy when you are the stronger sex. Difficult when weaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 04:57 AM
1

No. We can conclusively say that 30% represents lesbians with ONLY female aggressors. We don't know how many lesbians have faced DV from female partners with male accomplices. Get that data and then we will talk how much it compares to Heterosexual women facing DV from Male partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 04:55 AM
2

I already did refute you. You claimed only 30% of lesbians are victims of DV by their female partners. I proved that relies on false assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 04:42 AM
4

Not a goon but an accomplice. Is that not a possibility?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 04:41 AM
9

We don’t know though. It could also be only male perpetrators. And you are calculating like you do know. Yes, it could be only male perpetrators. But we don't know if it is. The point is there is not conclusive data to claim that lesbians commit DV at the highest rate. But there is conclusive data to claim lesbians committee a MINIMUM of 30% DV. Interestingly enough I found this other link using the same data and it says for bisexual women 89.5% reported exclusively male perpetrators. Irrelevant…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 04:41 AM
4

Which doesn't mean male partner. It could be female partner with a male accomplice. Thing again carefully.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 03:35 AM
6

You are missing the point. You are claiming 30% of lesbians were abused by their partners. What if in the remaining 1/3rd, some were by female partners with male accomplices? You are excluding them in your calculation. You should say "AT LEAST 30%" of lesbian are victims of DV by their female partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 03:34 AM
14

It says that 67% of lesbians reporting IPV also report a female perpetrator. 67% of 43 is 30 so you can see that 30% of lesbians report being abused by women. Wrong calculation because the link also says: The other third reported at least one perpetrator being male, however the study made no distinction between victims who experienced violence from male perpetrators only and those who reported both male and female perpetrators. For all we know, majority of those 33% could be from female partners…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 03:31 AM
-2

Oh yes. Simp men are equally responsible.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 02:20 PM
0

Because adultery is immoral. You don't owe sexual fidelity but you owe it to the society that you don't do anything you don't want done to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 04:49 PM
–

Being truly loved for who you are >>>> Sex, anyday.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 04:40 PM
3

Tree. I know for sure it will be never used against me, shared with other trees while laughing about it, and it won't give the tree any ick.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 04:38 PM
–

Because most men didn't choose to call it oppression when women reject them for male pattern baldness or being short. Some tried but gynocentric society, so their voices didn't get as much attention as women got.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 04:35 PM
1

That still doesnt change that if given an option between a clean Lambo and clean Maserati, he will chose the clean Lambo. That's why the Lambo will always remain his first choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 12:41 PM
5

Those women are not really different. Just more practical and smart. It's not that they aren't attracted to the alpha. It's more likely that they realized the probability of locking down an alpha is low, the best they can get is pump & dump. So they are making a smarter decision and instead choosing the safe secure beta guy. Instead of "fuck around & find out", they directly find out. Think of it like you want to buy a Lambo and have close enough money to buy one but you realize the mantainence …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 12:29 PM
–

Because feminists wanted to. People have preference. Men generally prefer women who have hair only on their heads and maybe their pussies. Women, in their eternal quest to victimize themselves, declared that was another form of oppression by the patriarchy. That's how it became controversial and political.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 08:15 AM
–

the average man is no longer fulfilling these traditional roles. And the average woman is? Women are free to walk away from those relationships and find the top chads they want to and be part of their harem if they want. Nobody stopped them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 08:11 AM
–

most people can get someone to develop mutual feelings and attraction to them if you’re fun, enjoyable and can show some level of competency. Do you know what happens when men develop feelings for men? Here's a verbatim quote of what a woman said on twitter with 88K likes: We’re upset because in 90% of cases, it means that they did not have a genuine interest or care for us as people but rather saw us as a person they could use to fulfill the “girlfriend” role they yearn for. The man develops fe…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 04:00 AM
–

It’s like that kid in school who constantly says “school ain’t shit, bill gates dropped out of school!” Or how Einstein failed at math (which is a lie as well).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 03:54 AM
0

Not consciously but it happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 03:52 AM
–

If he is behaviorally unattractive despite being aesthetically attractive, he will turn her off. She won’t feel aroused. LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 01:01 AM
0

In short, it's about looks and not social skills or personality. Those guys have figured it out but they don't state it out loud because there will always be people to deny & dismiss their opinion and maybe even gaslight them into thinking they lack social skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 02:36 PM
-1

None of what you listed is hard in practice and that’s why MANY people get friendzoned or end up with being BEST FRIENDS with women. Good point. For supposed losers with no social skills, they have no problem being friends with girls. Either women aren't caring about social skills & personality of their friends or it is just a lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 02:22 PM
9

OP probably thinks chads are lonely losers who aren't getting any while above average guys with personality are getting the attractive women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 02:20 PM
4

Schrodinger's advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 02:18 PM
1

If the question is how to get women, the one who can do so maximum is the model example.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 02:18 PM
1

don't waste your time learning "game". Instead, learn empathy and active listening. These two skills have much more broad application than "game", which you don't really need at all. Not even remotely true. If you have game, you could be the least empathic person and she will only take it as a challenge.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 02:17 PM
16

Really, knowing how good looking guys get treated by women and how easy women give them access to their body, makes me roll my eyes when people yap on about personality. I honestly think nothing redpills men more than either being the handsome dude or being around someone more handsome.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 02:15 PM
19

Dating is like Interview with elimination rounds. 1st round is looks. You don't meet that, you don't get to the 2nd round to show your personality. Your only hope then is you meet someone with whom you either that your intentions or have no dating intentions, they get to know you slowly and then develop an attraction for you. Which rarely happens. Let's not forget the feedback loop. If you are good looking, you are well received which makes you confident which helps with social skills & personal…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 02:15 PM
11

Plenty of people actually desire to have committed relationships, marriages and families, and find strings of casual sex and one night stands to be repulsive. Yet, 99% of those men who sleep around will have no problem getting a committed relationship if they want. I can't help but feel like there is a subset of men who desire a certain type of sexual life, which involves lots of access to casual sex, and get really frustrated when they realize they don't have that life. No. What they desire is …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 02:15 PM
9

He can have a terrible personality and he will still score, at least for short term relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 02:08 PM
3

omen who pick the bear were either kidding or just pandering to what feminists want them to say. OP, you are helping feminists with this post. They will only claim "We are making a point. We dont actually choose the bear". Sure, they maybe less than 50% on a survey but it is still way too high. What's disappointing is there are some men who are also choosing a bear over a random man. Keep this in mind: women who pick the bear probably were just taught to think by feminists that men are more like…
/r/MensRights23/05/24 06:32 AM
1

If she doesn't like you, there maybe reasons other than looks, money, or status. But if she likes you, looks or status are necessary. They also help compensate for many other flaws that women generally claim are a red-flag. Money won't help except to get some gold diggers.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 06:10 AM
4

Not surprising. My own mother has given me all the bluepill advice even though she is extreme conservative. I have seen mothers straight up tell their kids that there is nothing wrong with dual mating strategy and if the girl chose them in the end, they should be proud of that. Sisterhood >> Blood. That's why I say AWALT or atleast almost all are like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 01:54 AM
1

Again the thought experiment is stressing the point that a woman alone in a secluded isolated place with a bear or with a man who is fully aware he could get away with whatever poses a potential threat to her. The only time men get away with crimes is if there is no evidence or if they belong to some other group that shields them (rich, celeb, powerful etc). All else being equal, an average man gets away less than an average women. A man convicted of murder/rape/pedophilia etc is less likely to …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 01:46 AM
2

A) Most people, men & women, would pick women. Not because they are inherently better. But because they are less of a threat. B) Women wouldn't like it if some men started to answer they would choose a Woman because of some bad experience they had, while literally doing the same. C) The issue was that women who chose bear are not only comparing us with an animal but straight up admitting they think worse of men than they do for dangerous wild animal.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 09:17 AM
2

I make it a point to not spend any one-on-one time with my female colleagues. No matter what. If I have to, I make sure the doors are left open and there are Cameras. Strictly professional relations. Feel zero guilt. It is a necessary precaution. A simple accusation can cause severe damage to my reputation as people are more likely to assume guilt until proven otherwise when men are accused of any misbehavior. I won't chose a bear but then neither do woman. They just say they would bear to show …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 04:41 PM
2

No, it is not. But those stats, even though inaccurate, are an efficient way to shut down any conversation about male issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 12:41 PM
–

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 05:25 AM
–

Transfer of funds back & forth is not the same as child support. In child support, there is only transfer of funds in one direction. Nobody has problem with splitting bills. The daycare sends a single bill? Let's divide it. Child support doesn't do that. Child support would send it all to one person who is responsible for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 04:48 AM
1

NO.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 04:46 AM
–

Numbers not readily available =! Not done research.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 04:46 AM
–

10% more that it should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 04:44 AM
–

I don't have the stats readily available. Whatever the number is, it should be ZERO.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 05:43 PM
–

They shouldn't pretend like they suffer more when men suffer more. When men die in Ukraine wars, they shouldn't talk about how it is affecting women worse because their mental health is affected. When percentage of women among journalists killed goes up from 6% to 11%, they shouldn't whine about sexism. When 1 in 4 homeless people are women, they should make a bigger deal that 75% of the men are homeless. Not that 25% women are homeless.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 05:42 PM
–

Most women are responsible for their own bills after a divorce. It should be ALL Women. Alimony is a pretty rare thing these days Not even remotely true. child support isn’t to cover the bills, but to provide for a child that both parents are responsible for. If both parents are responsible, they both get custody and both spend their share during their time with the kid. Why does one have to pay the other?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 05:36 PM
–

They wouldn't have to if they don't demand Alimony.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 05:34 PM
–

10% more than there should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 05:34 PM
–

No, they get alimony because they are leeches who dont want to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 05:34 PM
–

Let's start with the most basic one. Let's hold them responsible for their own bills after their divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 04:59 PM
1

More like, they are dedicated too much so come to some arrangement without dragging kids into custody fights. On the other hand, women are the ones not dedicated to their children & using them as pawns in their fight against their husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 03:19 PM
1

Most couples decide themselves because men know they will be fucked in court so agree to whatever they can get out of the courts.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 03:12 PM
1

So men have to pursue custody and even then only 70% of them get it? And you think that's a positive thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 03:02 PM
–

They are usually very dishonest about AFBB. They will manipulate the beta guy that he should feel better because she chose him in the end. He is made to believe he is in love. Living in delusions of love is always a worse outcome than being alone. Also, he will never be respected by her. He will be surrounded by kids and grand kids who will all show no respect for him, something they learned from their mother & grandmother. The asshole will likely become a deadbeat dad, if he procreates at all, …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 01:29 PM
–

Women and Men both care about that. Nobody wants to be with someone they aren't attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 01:26 PM
1

That's not fear. That's just pattern recognition. The girlbosses make for a bad wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 06:06 AM
1

It's the women who want to eat their cake and eat it too. They don't want to be trad wives yet they want men to be traditional husbands.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 06:05 AM
0

Men say women only care about money, only want men to pay for dates etc for women who only men to uphold the traditional masculine roles while themselves not upholding traditional feminine roles. The women who want to work but will not want to be with a man who earns less than her are also gold diggers. If you want to be a tradwife who wants a working financially well husband to take care of the bills while you take care of the homemaking, nobody is going to call you a gold digger.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 06:04 AM
-1

BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 05:55 AM
0

Men wouldn't complain about child support if they were given child custody where they could pay their share of expenses. You all don't want to give them custody but want them to pay for child support.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 04:01 AM
-2

Maybe if men were given equal custody, there would be no need for child support and they will recognize their kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 03:59 AM
2

More like proof that men will always be the one who have to work or approach while women have to just exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 03:55 AM
6

Yes, I have discussed many ideas from Manosphere before I even heard of any parts of Manosphere.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 03:53 AM
1

No, it's because pearl is a grifter and ugly. A woman with the values that Pearl espouses to have, wouldn't be an influencer in the first place. Women are the ones with "I can fix him" virus. Not men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 03:49 AM
1

I put as much logic into my argument as you all put when you chose bear. if you have any reason to fear women physically So it's physical strength that scares you but chose the bear? I guess in your mind bears are weaker than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 03:44 AM
46

Attractive: Enthusiastic: Unattractive: Desperate.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 03:04 AM
6

The point was misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 05:05 PM
–

An excellent example of Kafka trap.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 06:49 AM
–

It was to say, "Hey, shit is bad out here, fix your shit men!". That would be as acceptable as us men saying "Hey, shit is bad out here, fix your shit women" would be to you all, regarding so many female-on-male issues. "Was what they were saying about women and logic right all along?". Yes. Statistically, I am more likely to be a victim of violent crime than a woman is. Women are more likely for some crimes like rape or SA but overall it's men. Apparently it doesn't matter because the perp is l…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 06:39 AM
2

If you define it broadly enough, you can show any crime is happening to as many people as you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 06:30 AM
3

The power that women hold over men. That is something to be admired. The way they can influence, manipulate and control narratives is impressive. Their loyalty to the sisterhood. Family, friends etc all come secondary to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 06:23 AM
1

You think people on this sub will be as honest in real life? The people you know in real life probably are just good at hiding this stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 06:18 AM
1

The massive taboo exists because nobody wants to be the cheated one. But it is indeed common to be the cheater. The very existence of a popular app like Ashley Madison is proof of how common cheating is. An easy proof of this is that in other cultures where cheating is more common there is actually less of a taboo around it. The link proves the opposite: Most people affected by the hack were based in the United States or United Kingdom, countries where 84 and 76 percent of people respectively co…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 05:53 PM
2

They say 30-35 because it takes time to date, commit and eventually have a baby. Even if we go for 4-5 years between meeting someone, dating, marrying and having children, starting at 35 isn't gonna work. Or else you will have to rush into things.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 07:38 AM
1

Nobody has said you become ugly and useless by age 30. Hitting the wall means you aged and are not someone I would want to START a life with. But if I started a life with you when you were younger, you will still remain beautiful and valuable to me as a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 07:36 AM
–

*Women have a hard time trying view men as human. FIFY
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 07:25 AM
1

So if men say we choose bears because bears cannot do Paternity fraud, gold digging, and SA to us.. is that fine? SA can be done by both men and women. Gold digging is mostly women and Paternity fraud is only women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 06:27 AM
4

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 08:57 AM
–

Kinda like the rich get richer and poor get poorer.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 08:54 AM
–

Nobody has ever claimed "goodlooking every approach works". If you want to be taken seriously, maybe stop making up stuff that was never said.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 08:53 AM
–

Social skills help if you are good looking. If you are ugly, it will be just "trying too hard", "over confident" etc. An average looking guy isn't mogging a 6'5 7/10 looking dude with his social skills unless they have something else to compensate (status or height). If a guy with avg status, height, & looks mogged you, did you consider that those maybe the anomalies?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 08:50 AM
3

As expected, a feminist will twist words to justify their false ideology. I never said they have comfortable lives with no heavy labor. I said their lives were comparatively risk free. And that rights came with those risky responsibilities which women didn't have. Now you got equal rights but not equal responsibilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 05:39 AM
5

I'm curious to see where women ask for 50% quotes in all blue collar jobs though. My bad. I should have written, women only ask 50% representation in ONLY white collar jobs while ignoring the blue collar jobs which are completely male dominated. Irrelevant that human rights was fairly recent. You didn't start fighting for them along with men. You waited until it's convenient. Working in coal mines & factories? Dying in wars? "You go and risk your health & life. I will be at home taking care of k…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 05:16 AM
5

Feminism has no end goal of turning all women into one copy or make all women "bossbabes". The day I see women stop asking for 50% reservation in all blue only white collar jobs or stop mocking stay at home wives, I will believe this. Feminism at its core is about women's rights and the ability to choose for themselves. Feminism at it's core is a false ideology to get rights you didn't earn (by taking on responsibilities). You all started your fight for equality only when it became convenient wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 04:57 AM
2

Read what I said again: If you need to pay to get laid Chads don't need to pay to get laid. This post is for those lonely guys who cannot get laid on their own and need to pay.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 04:48 AM
0

They are saying it as a manipulation and to set the narrative. They want to make it appear that those men are starved for sex and not for intimacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 07:26 AM
3

Not only will she not date you, she will be disgusted. If you need to pay to get laid, you are at lowest rung for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 07:24 AM
2

Wrong. For couples, they are looksmatched couples because the 6ft chad wouldn't match with her. She has no option but to settle with someone on her level as a couple. As for hooking up, she still desires to hook up with the 6ft chad not the 5'5 average dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 05:11 AM
1

Do you think that's how attraction works? A 5 is still a 5 to a 4 or 3. He suddenly won't become hot and attractive to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 04:14 AM
3

I have seen it in real life and many online spaces.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 05:04 PM
1

You mean the link where they pretty much denied FwB exists. Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 05:01 PM
1

I thought so because your comment wasn't really making sense as a reply to me since we agree on it. No worries. My bad for calling your a knobhead.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 03:23 PM
4

Either living in a bubble or lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 02:58 PM
1

If you making a post asking Americans if they support Nazism and most of the responses support nazism, then yeah... it is an indicator that there is some truth to it. The world is a big place full of people with all types of opinions. And he posted a small sample where most women admit to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 02:55 PM
5

Reddit, Facebook, twitter, real life. It's the same everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 02:52 PM
-3

Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 02:52 PM
3

WTF. Are you high? Good grief who hasn’t had a girlfriend that cheated on him with a hot guy? I would consider you much more a loser if that unfortunate didn’t happen to you. Dude, just because you got cheated on with some hot guys doesn't mean you start calling people who didn't get cheated on as a loser. I lived with a fat girl just over a summer that could pull hot guys, her husband was below average looking though. That is what I have been saying you knobhead.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 02:52 PM
1

I expect you to not lie and get back to reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 11:01 AM
1

I'm not sure how you would know that. Common pattern observation. If you disagree, feel free to make a post on r/feminism about how you had a tragic experience with a black male and are not scared enough of them that you will choose a bear over a black man. Let me know how it goes. Men are stronger than women, they can take away rights and other things from women by force which they had done in the past. No, they didn't. They just didn't give you rights because you didn't have as many responsibi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 11:00 AM
0

That is a valid arguement if we are talking about spaces like /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen which curate that kind of stuff. If you find stuff like this in normal spaces like Askwomen, then it is not abnormal.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 10:54 AM
0

You: This reads like some kind of cuck fetish, OP. Are you okay? You constructed a narrative inside your head and act like that's an absolute truth, but it's not for most people. OP: Provides evidence for his narrative. You: But obviously, people are different. Maybe don't say people are making up stuff just because you are the minority to which this doesn't apply.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 09:43 AM
2

i find it very weird to form judgments about people based on their ability to have casual sex Women do it all the fucking time. And they are so delusional about how men feel about that they think calling someone a husband material as a compliment.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 09:41 AM
3

How do you expect them to strawman your arguments without being disingenuous?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 09:40 AM
6

A random reddit screenshot is much more reliable than your ugly friends having casual relationships. And it's not just 1 screenshot. It has been observed many times in many online spaces as well as real life. For casual sex, looks & game are all that matters. For relationships, they are usually at the bottom on the list of priorities.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 09:39 AM
13

The casual sex standard is usually lower, in looks, than the relationship standards. Not even blue pilled guys will believe that bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 09:37 AM
1

I am not asking if you are okay. I am asking if people who choose the bear will be okay. They won't be. They will whine about misogyny, racism, islamophobia etc if the same generalization is done to any other demographics because of some tragic experience. If women ever try to give animals more rights than men or anything I feel is actually unreasonable, I will do all I can to stop it. Your help wouldn't be needed. The day they try is the day they lose whatever rights they have. Women only have …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 05:58 AM
7

Yes. The people who don't believe her or are skeptical are still a minority. That's why a simple accusation can ruin a man's reputation without an ounce of proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 04:30 AM
5

Seems classic AFBB.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 04:27 AM
0

Women are literally saying men are worse than bears that will tear you apart and eat you alive. They are saying it out loud publicly with full support from pretty much all women. Men's spaces can be extreme but the general mood is about women being hypergamous, looks over personality etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 05:55 AM
2

No, not one bad experience. It's the bad experience combined with the overall reaction of the women to it that makes us generalize it. Taking the bear case itself for example. If a few women said they choose bear and most other women called them out for being dumb, I wouldn't generalize that most women are like her. But when pretty much every women tries to justify her in choosing the bear.. then it is fair to generalize. Take a look at all the posts about bear here and anywhere else. Most women…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 05:53 AM
1

No true Scotsman.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 05:44 AM
3

they aren’t 300lbs, have a job and do basic hygiene daily I will give them a chance. Classic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 05:42 AM
-1

Not really. It has led to some hiding their behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 05:39 AM
2

I see where people are coming from Delusion. Unfortunately I've spoken to women that had such tragic experiences with men that she might think men are women's natural predators, while bears are not despite being stronger. if they have had some tragic experience, it's understandable. My only question is if they would be okay with similar generalizations by men or any other group based on some tragic experience. A man got divorce raped and he starts to think the same of all women? A man was a vict…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 05:12 PM
–

Agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:26 PM
–

The only one whose mind is poisoned by cult propaganda are the ones who are blue pilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:22 PM
–

That's how they manipulate the narrative. They cannot admit that they find most men unattractive, so they claim they are undesirable and need to improve.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:20 PM
0

It's fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:12 PM
1

Not if he does it voluntarily.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:24 PM
-1

Irrelevant. The question is about the value SAH provides and are they unpaid or not. Answer: They are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 11:59 AM
5

How much are you able to filter out in an hour or so of meeting or a few texts on Tinder? Not enough if you think choosing a bear is better than choosing a random man. What bear can do: Kill you and eat you. How many men do you think are capable of such crimes? Per one estimate, there are around 475K homicides per year. Many of them were committed by a single person. Some were by women. Let's ignore all that for now. Let's say an equal number of rapists. Since this is per year, let's scale it to…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 11:57 AM
1

You act like he wouldn’t have had bills if he didn’t have a wife. Nobody said or acted like that. His bills will be half. Who made sure he had everything taken care of for him so he didn’t have to do anything but his job? Who made sure all your bills were taken care of for you so you didn't have to do anything but homemaking? The difference now is that my boyfriend contributes to the upkeep of our house vs when I was with my ex and it was all on me. There is another difference. Your current boyf…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 11:10 AM
11

When they are swiping on tinder or meeting strangers in bar, isn't that a completely random man? If women truly are on constant guard about men, there would be no one night stands with strangers you just met in a bar. Nobody believes that every single man is a murderer. Any woman who chose the bear believes it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 10:59 AM
2

And the article you shared concluded that her services are worth 19K only if she is a SAHM. "However, in the eyes of an economist, it’s that extra value provided by stay-at-home moms — the 3.17 more hours they spend a day on childcare and household work than working moms — that determines their market value. When you isolate that additional time, economists would value a stay-at-home mom’s work at $19,655.25 a year." Woman, the article you linked debunked your own number. Next time, read the art…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 10:50 AM
1

"From an accounting standpoint, the total stay-at-home moms would earn annually based on the wages of workers in jobs similar to the daily tasks they perform would be $39,368.90." LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 10:45 AM
2

LMAO. This is so hilarious that you linked the article debunking the point you are trying to make. Did you even read the article you shared? That article is DEBUNKING the insure.com's figure of $126K. Literally the next paragraph: However, if you were to approach calculating how much a stay-at-home mom is worth like an economist, the amount you’d get would be nowhere close to those two figures. Of course, you can’t truly put a number on the invaluable love and nurturing a mom provides. But accor…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 10:45 AM
0

Not even close unless the guy is earning like $10 an hour. Remember, all her services are for two people one of which is herself (assuming no kids). So technically, she is only eligible to be paid for 50% of the work she does. Does she provide professional level services? If no, we can say her prices are substantially less what those services usually gets in the market. If you account for all such factors, it will not be higher than what he spent on her.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 10:30 AM
0

So who paid all your bills while you were a SAHM?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 10:26 AM
5

Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 10:09 AM
1

Well, I think it's quite obvious but let me help you: The smaller the sample, the less reliable the results are.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 10:01 AM
4

He is questioning the methodology. A regular thing in academic debates. You would have known if it wasn't your first time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:31 AM
14

Male danger doesn't come from "statistics," it comes from strength. Is that why women are choosing Bears over men? Bears are weaker? I do agree that it's about strength. Wouldn't that also mean women aren't less violent but that they know they stand little chance against a Man. Kinda like many of the weak men who have violent fantasies but know they are weak and chose to be non-confrontational. Would you classify them as Violent men or Non-violent men?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:30 AM
4

Why would a woman want to be in the woods with a man that won't even listen when she voices, not even an view but, a study. There is a difference between listening & agreeing. He listened (or read in this case) and disagreed. Unsurprisingly, you take it as not listening.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:20 AM
4

You can’t be that dumb. The bears vs Men thing makes me believe otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:18 AM
2

No. They are the ones who tell that to keep the bottom men in line. They are chasing and actively trying to date men alright, just with the chads.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 07:24 AM
–

True. Just be honest about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:41 AM
–

Every one should always choose based on love & attraction. The delusionality isn't about being able to chose a partner based on attraction and love. They are delusional about who their looksmatch is. The 4'8 ugly nerd girl doesn't think 5'4 ugly nerd guy is her looksmatch. She thinks 6' handsome jock is her looksmatch. today there are zero women who are "pressed" to date a man they dont fully like, and that is a good thing. Almost every man gets married at some point. The 5'4 ugly nerd you talke…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:33 AM
24

Insecure: Any thing a man does that inconveniences woman. This is the definition they have been using.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 07:44 AM
–

How predictable. I expected these "problems" A) In USA, with 3.7M births a year and $300 to $500 per test, it doesn't even reach $2 Billion. US has a budget in trillions. The country has the infrastructure, personnel and training isn't a big deal. Most countries have. $2 Billion in expenditure for a crime that affects $100K each year is perfectly reasonable. They sent $72 Billion to Ukraine. B) There would be no need to keep a database. It would be a cross-reference between the father & child af…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 09:48 AM
–

Can you possibly imagine that the most of the 2% of the men who are raising someone else's child also thought the same? They literally have the same line of thought. My loyal & loving wife isn't capable of this. Can you possibly imagine why men would want to not be manipulated into raising someone else's child for 18+ years? Yes, we understand the implication of this accusation. That's why making it mandatory & normalized removes that accusation as it becomes a standard procedure. If it was trul…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 09:42 AM
–

There are no problems that Mandatory testing will cause that don't already exist. Feel free to share some.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 09:33 AM
2

I got the first definition from the textbooks and left leaning spaces. Those feminists identify themselves usually. I am currently white collar but have done blue collar jobs as well. Not in the west. Mid 90s. Edit: u/pyropirate1 I am temp banned but here's my response: 1) Mandatory Paternity Test. Hurts No One. Literally not an issue. Barely a fraction of the budget. Solves paternity fraud for 100K+ men in US and 4M+ men worldwide every year. Feminists don't support it. 2) Yes, there are. Most …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 09:31 AM
–

That's why we make it mandatory. There is no distrust then. At least not from your partner. You don't want to be hurt. You also don't want laws that eliminate the distrust that causes hurt. At this point, It's like you want paternity fraud to continue.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 09:29 AM
–

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 09:27 AM
–

No. I didn't say that laws should regulate how women are allowed to feel. But whatever helps you cope with your misandry. The conversations are necessary because there are no laws to prevent paternity fraud. Establish them and the conversation won't be necessary. Your fault is objection to a law that doesn't hurt you in any way but solves a real problem for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 08:32 AM
0

First definition: Women should be treated equal to men in all aspects of life. Current definition: Want all the rights that men have without responsibilities. No accountability. Want equality only when convenient. Built on a false foundation that men oppressed women. What influenced the change: Observing feminists. Every single issue that men face, they will actively work to prevent a reasonable solution to it. They want the right to vote who governs the nation but they don't want the responsibi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 08:29 AM
–

Irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 08:21 AM
–

That you cannot stop getting offended over this is definitely your fault though.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 08:20 AM
–

Bye.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 08:19 AM
–

So who is taking the responsibility of the child? Just the mother? I know. It is established without proper checks.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 08:14 AM
–

So you think a man's feelings are more important, cool, I got that. Personally, I think the child knowing who is thier father is what's important but sure. I said his feelings are more important than hers. But sure, you want to twist it to make it sound like I don't care about the child, understandable. If men aren't asking for tests that's on them, where's their accountability. Yes, it is on them. That is why the proposal. They don't have to worry about breaking up the relationship by asking fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 08:12 AM
–

And he has a right to verify if he is being handed over the responsibility of the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 08:07 AM
–

Fair enough. I disagree on both counts but at least you are consistent. Rare to see that in feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 08:05 AM
–

The paternity test is also done on himself and his supposed child. Not on someone else. He has the rights to verify his paternity right? Or do you deny that as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:54 AM
–

Her feelings aren't as important as the security of not raising someone else's child. We have to go on that tangent because that's the only way to show the mirror. As stated in my first reply, the feelings don't mean you get to refuse the test. They don't need to refuse the test since men won't ask for the test to avoid offending the feelings. That's how even men who don't have any suspicion end up raising someone else's child 2% of the times. With 150M birth every year worldwide, that's 3 Milli…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:53 AM
–

No rights and No responsibilities. Fine by me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:50 AM
–

First of all, I don't know a si gle woman who does this, since most trust their partners. Sure. Second of all, if course she's doing it in secret if she doesn't trust him. So you agree women shouldn't do it and if they do, men divorcing or breaking up is reasonable?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:45 AM
–

Yes. She can and she should be able to.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:43 AM
1

That's why I mentioned Matriarchal societies. They are surrounded by women in their parliaments and they stood no chance against male dominated society. So they didn't engage in wars. If all countries were female dominated, they will be as violent or maybe even more. You can stop waiting now.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:34 AM
–

Of course, they will not make it. We are talking about what should happen. Not what can happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:33 AM
–

LMAO. They are saving it in secret because it is supposed to protect them from HIM. Not to avoid offence. That's why when a man finds out, they say asking for divorce or breakup on finding it is unreasonable and it's not personal. That he shouldn't be offended.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:31 AM
1

If they say that they don't need females, then yeah. Men also start wars compared to a woman centered society. A women centered society is probably a bunch of women knitting And that's how I know you are out of your mind. Look up stats. Queens started as many wars as men. The only reason some matriarchal society remained relatively peaceful is because they were mostly surrounded by male centered society. They stood no chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:30 AM
0

I am not saying I don't need women. So I am not abstaining from women. Any services provided by men or dominated by men. Be it firemen, police, bluepill workers, garbage men, construction workers. The society and most it's services are mostly built, run, and maintained by men. Basically, just group all the 4B feminists together and start their own society away from men. Their own sweet little utopia.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:15 AM
–

That's why it should be mandatory. You want your name on the birth certificate and want to exercise legal rights that comes with being a biological parent, prove you are one.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:08 AM
–

There's probably few people who would be opposed to medical institutions administering the tests as a matter of course You would be wrong. Almost every women and so many men oppose it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:07 AM
–

Because if it's an opt-in the women will say "How dare you question me". It's an opt-out with consequences, she doesn't have much choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:06 AM
–

Nobody is dropping the kid like nothing but they are still dropping. Irrespective of how much I love the kid, he will always be a reminder of the betrayal. If I stay, I will only start to resent the kid. Better go no contact. Also, reasoning like this is why women engage in paternity fraud. You all enable this.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:05 AM
–

Do you understand what High confidence means? That they don't have any suspicions and don't feel the need to get one. That's why this is a thing. Mandatory means they have to get one.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:03 AM
–

Yes, we can go and get one anytime. How is that going? Millions worldwide every year raise someone else's kids. So are STD tests. As offensive as STD tests, secret money, prenups etc. But they are all are normalized because either it generally is offensive against men or neutral.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:01 AM
–

The end goal is ensuring all fathers are raising their own child without having to risk losing their relationship because women got offended. Also, helps with the men who will never doubt their wife from not raising someone else's child.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:00 AM
0

Not enough. Don't use any and all services provided by men. Then talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 06:58 AM
–

It has as much to do with women as the secret rainy day money women save has to do with men. If women don't want men to be offended when they save money secretly, then they are hypocrites to get offended when men want to ensure paternity.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 06:57 AM
–

High confidence simply refers to people who don't have any suspicions about paternity. It's 2% even among such men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 06:55 AM
–

Why should there be consequences for a man wanting to ensure he is not taken advantage of? Should there be consequences for Prenups, rain money? Only blind faith is acceptable?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 06:52 AM
–

Yes. Anyone who doesn't agree either supports paternity fraud or will do paternity fraud themselves. "You can go and get one anytime" doesn't stop people from unknowingly raising kids since many people don't even doubt it until something raises suspicion. "You don't have to tell her. Get it secretly" also is risky since she can never find out. Or else, her feeling offended takes priority over a man ensuring he doesn't spend the rest of his life raising someone else's kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 06:51 AM
1

Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:49 AM
1

Not when it's the way humans have evolved to conceive. Yes, they don't know. That's why they shouldn't be allowed elective abortion after 1st trimester until they know.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:48 AM
1

Those exceptions are stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:46 AM
1

I disagree it's fear but if it is, good. If the choice for men is between being hated and being feared, I am fine with men being feared. Be afraid. Have to say, I have a lot of increased respect for masculinity now. Such a dangerous force even bears seem tame compared to us. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 08:02 PM
2

Not until they actually move away from men. As of now, they leech off of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 07:52 PM
0

Another thing this revealed: Some women genuinely think they can use mental gymnastics to convince us they don't mean it that way after calling us worse than wild animals. The core concept is simple. They hate men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 07:47 PM
-3

We could but we choose not to. I wish we did.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 07:45 PM
-1

4B feminists threaten to completely stay away from men but they never truly do. I wish they fully did. They still rely on men for everything else. Just not for dating & marriage etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 07:27 PM
1

Why would TRP be talking about Mothers? Sure, Mothers are women but TRP is mostly about dating and Mother's aren't relevant to that part. TRP spaces will talk about what is relevant to dating and the general gender dynamics. Not parent-child dynamics.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 07:07 PM
2

LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 06:53 PM
5

How is that relevant? The point is draft exists only for men. Ukraine is at war, so they are dying. The moment your country and mine is at war, it will be men dying while you will be free to choose.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 06:52 PM
5

I am not sure if it's ignorance or just utter hate for men that makes you lies. If the draft ever did become a real possibility then women would likely be drafted as well. It happened in Ukraine. Why were women not drafted then? Why did different countries pledge to send Ukranian men back but not Ukrainian Women? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/25/poland-and-lithuania-pledge-to-help-kyiv-repatriate-ukrainians-subject-to-military-draft
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 06:51 PM
6

Especially since it would likely be changed if being drafted ever became a real possibility. Is that what happened in Ukraine? Men weren't forced to stay back and fight? On the contrary what happened was they changed rules to increase conscription: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-parliament-passes-bill-overhauling-mobilisation-rules-2024-04-11/
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 06:43 PM
3

That is my reaction also hearing about all the atrocities women face. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 06:41 PM
0

No, it isn't. A parent being required to use their body to sustain the life nurturing in their body is perfectly reasonable. There is no physical harm in most pregnancies. If there is, abortion is allowed.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 06:05 PM
8

One of the many. Keep saying lol. These lols showed me how much women hate men and are the reason why I am apathetic to women's concerns now.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 06:03 PM
-2

No, it isn't. Elective abortion will never be a right.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 05:27 PM
4

Difference being Men are grateful for the nurturing by those women and men who did. Women aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 05:17 PM
-1

Wrong. Your bodily autonomy extends only until your own body. Not to the body inside you. Which organs will you lose during pregnancy? If it's merely making use of your organs, then it's perfectly fine given you are the reason it is in a position that needs use of your organs in the first place (except if it was rape) Who argued to withhold medical care to pregnant women? Elective abortions isn't medical care. Yes, it does. Allow a fetus to leech off the mother's organs for 9 months and rip her …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 05:16 PM
5

No, for them you are worse than a dangerous wild animal.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 05:11 PM
4

Is that group in the room with us?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 05:10 PM
2

The only problem it revealed is lack of critical thinking, basic math skills, inability to understand how stats work, paranoia of women and overall delusions. The men are upset because this assumes they are the problem. Not that there is a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 05:09 PM
2

Situations like these or "Teach men not to rape" never made sense for this reason. People who rape cannot be reasoned with. They will always be deviants. All this does is blame men who aren't for the actions of those who are. This also assumes the default is that men are savages who needs to be taught to not hurt women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 05:07 PM
4

women have moved on Not towards bears. 😁
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 05:03 PM
4

It certainly enlightened me to how bad women & male simps are at basic math. I will take them seriously when they walk the talk. Go and live with bears instead of a society built largely by men who made it so the bears are kept out of the society. We know we are shitty. Speak for yourself buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 05:00 PM
8

Draft is a bad example? Fortunately, my country is not at risk of war. But if it was, like Ukraine was, why does my life matter less than that of women? Is it not a violation of my basic human right?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 04:41 PM
4

A part of me is like this. Thankfully, it's being crushed from the other part which is red pilled as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 04:29 PM
4

This is just the excuse to defend double standards that overwhelmingly benefit women. I would say the right to not be forced to die in a war is a basic human right. Men don't have that. Women do. Is there any basic human right that men have but women don't?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 04:27 PM
9

There can be no double standard on this since Men cannot get pregnant. The legislation against abortion are all about whether the fetus deserves rights or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 04:18 PM
5

Feel free to present your data that shows women who spend as much time as men at work outside home and end up doing more homemaking than Men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 07:03 PM
5

Wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 04:45 PM
2

No. I think it's bullshit that average mothers of all working backgrounds spend as much time at work as their spouses and still end up doing more childrearing. The time average mothers of all working backgrounds spend at work is less than what men spend. So obviously women will have more time to engage in homemaking, which includes childrearing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 02:26 PM
3

On the contrary, 18-24 have only one primary high standard: Attraction. Be attractive to her and you are set. The 30+ will have a long list of standards (where attraction is very low priority), each of which higher than the previous. The same standards that the guy she fucked when she was 22 didn't have to meet. Men don't complain about age as long as it's lower or near to theirs. Also, Saying I have these standards which make it difficult for me to date, I am not sure counts as hypocrisy. Hypoc…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 02:24 PM
-3

1) If your date doesn't give you a better or at least the same sexual experience as she did with her previous bf, you will be the "previous bf" to someone else pretty soon. 2) Solo trips are definitely questionable. 3) If she goes to clubs or bars to dance but not with you, then yeah. 4) Make up is a lie. 5) Yes. 6) Have you met overweight women? 7) Depends. One bad relationship is understandable. A Pattern isnt 8) There is some truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 02:18 PM
1

Why do you all have this default assumption that men don't brush their teeth, are smelly, unhygienic etc? Is that your way to justify why you aren't attracted to the bottom 80%?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 02:09 PM
1

I also know how when women call it’s dismissed. Not even remotely close to how much it's dismissed for men. Are you seriously trying to tell me that DV for men is taken as seriously as it is for women? It’s not a default. Women request it and present evidence. What evidence do they present? That they spent more time with the kids while the father was working to pay for the kids expenses? When a stranger is hurt women are more likely to help them and tend to them while proper authorities are call…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 02:07 PM
0

I was someone who never gave much thought to being masculine or feminine. Just an example, I am an introverted person. So I would stay home most of the time just focused on books or movies or internet. My friends would say or even advise me that you should be masculine and I would say "I don't care if you think I am feminine". It didn't matter. Now, it doesn't matter with strangers but with people I know, I have changed and would want to be perceived masculine. Specially with women. I saw some w…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 01:43 PM
–

You know this isn't talking about Widows.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 09:25 AM
–

Single Moms are a big No. You will be the butt of jokes for most men (& women but they won't say it to your face). You will always come second to their real father while doing all the work of the step father. Even for the mom, the bio father will probably be as much if not more important than you are. She can & will throw "the kids aren't yours" any moment you try to discipline her kids because you are not their biological father.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 08:05 AM
2

There are none.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 07:29 AM
1

The latter. Hell, I say 50% of all blue collar jobs and frontlines on the military should be women. You want to decide who governs the Nation, great. Start by defending and contributing to the nation.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 07:19 AM
2

I did answer but I guess I wasn't explicit enough. I will disqualify a woman who thinks women should be able to vote without being drafted to frontlines during attack. If she wants rights (able to vote) but no responsibilities (serve the nation), she is a feminist and I wouldn't want such a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 06:50 AM
1

Actual Feminism. It is based on a fundamental misrepresentation of the gender dynamics in patriarchy. A lie that men oppressed women, that there is anything called Male privilege. Being patronized and told to be a homemaker while forcing men to work in often very dangerous jobs isn't oppression. It never was. As for rights, men & women should have rights proportional to their contribution/responsibility to build, maintain, & defend the nation. If you are not going to the frontlines to defend the…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 06:39 AM
23

You know how when men call cops about DV and cops instead believe he must be the perpetrator? Women getting more custody by default unless men contest it? When you see a stranger in trouble, they are more likely to get help if they are women. The idea that women are better parents because they are more involved when it's usually because them not being the primary breadwinner allows them to more time to spend with kids. That's al because of WAW effect. What are some examples of why women are deem…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 05:28 AM
4

A) Cheating. B) Casual sex. C) Feminist. D) Settling for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 03:37 AM
0

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 12:38 PM
1

Inability to read social cues isn't the same as observing what is told isn't matching what is real.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 12:37 PM
1

Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 12:30 PM
1

I did. But that went against the propaganda that men are the shallow creatures while women don't go by looks. The propaganda had more impact as it is far more widespread & takes time to be undone. That's why.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 11:17 AM
0

It also doesn't mean attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 07:52 AM
-1

That is true. Money makes a lot of difference. My comment is more for men who think looks don't matter or matter little. That they can make her forget the 9+ red flag by putting in more efforts or becoming a super-ultra-pro-green flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 07:44 AM
-3

I don't know if they are but if they are, I can see why. Autists are more observant in nature and observing dating game and female nature is enough to red pill so many men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 06:21 AM
0

No. Men aren't the one pretending "It's not about looks, it's about your personality".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 06:03 AM
4

Men need either of these two things: A) If not a 9+, be friends with a 9+ man. If 9+, be friends with not 9+ men. B) Be really close friend with a few girls to whom you have made it clear that you are not at all interested in them & gain enough confidence that they open up about their interactions with the 9+ and the not 9+. That is enough to red pill most men. The difference you will observe in how much looks matter, the shit you can get away with if you are handsome, the effort needed to compe…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 05:40 AM
1

When men observed Pareto principle explains the behavior of women when given enough choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 04:34 AM
-1

Yeah. As it happens, we don't have a bookmarked list of every handsome man in the world who received that treatment. But we all know one or two handsome men who have.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 04:33 AM
2

How is that relevant that they messaged BACK men they didn't fid above average or higher anyways? They are still chasing the top 20 but since there aren't enough top 20, they also entertain the bottom 80 for many reasons (Cannot get the top 20, free meal, validation, backup etc)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 04:31 AM
-2

There is so much wrong and bs there, I am not even going to bother. Keep being delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 04:24 AM
8

Approach friends: You were only a friend to get in my Pants. Approach others: So gross and insulting. Men cannot win.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 04:22 AM
4

It will always be a meme. Soft guys will never be respected by women and consequently by men. But it does help show the mirror.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 05:22 PM
16

internet has told us to no end that it is akin to sexual harassment. Correction. Women has told that. What they didn't tell was there is an asterisk there. Applies to ugly or average guys only. Attractive 9 or 10 guys will rarely have any issue cold approaching irrespective of place & time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 05:20 PM
8

A) You are not watching RP Content but grifters. B) You have my full support in not marrying men. Some poor sod will be spared. C) You have men in your daily life. You have watched them all your life & based on that your perfect life was being housewife with 2 kids & husband. Now you find RP content, who by your own admission, think similarly. Yet that has now changed your views? Am I misunderstanding or does that not compute?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 05:00 PM
–

If it's not biological effect, then it is psychological right? Mental illness seems too harsh but I cannot think any other reason why I would want to be in someone else's control. I am a man, so maybe that's why I will never understand but being turned on by someone else being in control of me (however much I trust them), screams issues to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 05:47 AM
–

the feeling of someone else being in control is hot for some people. Some people think it’s hot to BE in control like that "Being in control is hot" is something I can understand but the very idea of being in someone else's control is so degrading I will never understand people who are into that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 05:42 AM
–

I will never understand why anyone will be turned on by things like choking, spitting etc. I can at least see, not agree with, why you would be turned on being the one doing the choking but why would anyone on the receiving end be turned on by it? The rape fantasy thing is the worst. The taboo-ness of being a submissive makes it hot. They don't enjoy the choking itself but doing something that is taboo. Or their mental health is fucked up. Or they have a degradation fetish.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 05:39 AM
–

Their other option is acknowledging that they have the upper hand in dating. That's why.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:43 PM
2

True for now but it's changing even in conservative countries now. I am from India where arrange marriages are common. The only reason ugly men aren't struggling is because they aren't even trying. They know they stand no chance. They know if they focus well on their career, they will get some woman sooner or later. Women also know they don't have to worry about finding a husband. So they also have relationships and bfs but with no intention of actually marrying and hide it during marriage. Almo…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:40 PM
-1

There is no addressing. Before Internet, people didn't have as many choices. They paired up with whoever they could from the people they know. Plus there was lot of slutshaming and monogamy. Now they have far too many choices in the palm of their hand, no slutshaming and monogamy exists only in a technicality. True Monogamy only exists in marriage and that's why almost all men end up getting married even if they never were given a second look for dating. You cannot go against your biological imp…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 02:32 PM
-1

So median is a hoe.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 06:59 AM
1

Those are hyperboles. What men think, and what women deny, is that as she ages, the chances of some decent man wanting to be with her goes down far rapidly than it does for men. People don't usually end up getting pregnant immediately after dating. It takes times. Dating, relationship, fiancé, marriage, then kids is how usually they plan. If you are a man who is looking for a life partner to have a family with, why would you go for someone who is 32? If you don't rush, then by the time you are l…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 05:48 AM
1

See, I don't know enough. I looked up on Wiki and I am mainly going by that. endangers the health of the woman What health is considered here? Just physical health or mental health?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 01:06 AM
1

I don't know french but I used translate option. Voluntary termination of a pregnancy may, at any time, be practised a qualified person bound by professional secrecy, and, who can be a social worker or psychologist.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 12:42 AM
1

Romantic loneliness. Men don't suffer from general loneliness. Men also have friends. Sure, some don't but most have friends. Our friendship doesn't work like female friendships. The comments like “I wish someone other than my parents cared about me” or “no one cares about me.” aren't indicative of lack of friendships. They are indicative of the general attitude towards men. I have friends (both male & female). I know they care for me but I also know that they, for no fault of theirs, hold me to…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 11:04 PM
1

Wiki: Abortions at later stages of pregnancy up until birth are allowed if two physicians certify that the abortion will be done to prevent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman; a risk to the life of the pregnant woman; or that the child will suffer from a particularly severe illness recognized as incurable France24: A time limit of 24 weeks was added in 1990 but with exceptions, for example, if a woman faces the risk of death or “permanent damage” to her physical or men…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 10:49 PM
2

A double testing in cases of negatives eliminates that. Just excuses.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 08:36 PM
0

In that case, better than what's in western world in general but still shit. What's the point of monogamy if you just end up marrying someone who fucked the town.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 08:05 PM
2

Isn't your culture also the one which prohibits Paternity test unless court ordered? slightly better in some aspects but that one thing makes it all not worth it. Also: Abortion has been added to our constitution as human right, it cannot change You guys allow abortion up until birth because it harm her mental health and you think that's a good thing? Physical harm I understand but mental heath issues are enough to allow elective abortions in 3rd trimester? To exhibit wealth and pay for women's …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 08:02 PM
–

Blue Pill Man. No wonder you believe it. I would have, during my blue pill days.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 07:49 PM
2

Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 07:33 PM
1

This is not even a thing that all men care about. Men not caring about an issue affecting them doesn't mean we should ignore it. It’s really, genuinely, a pretty niche concern and position to prioritize. 100K+ men in US alone is a niche concern for you? I am guessing if I said the same about nearly similar number of reported rapes in US, you would have a problem. Hell, unreported rape numbers are similar as well if we go by median paternity fraud estimates. Guess, I will be happy that at least a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 07:30 PM
2

Start seeing people as individuals and you will be able to evaluate them better. Ladies first.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 07:16 PM
–

Halo effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 05:35 PM
–

We will. When they stop lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 05:25 PM
–

Yeah, they have superiority.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 05:24 PM
–

All of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 05:23 PM
–

Dudes here claim that women not having sex with every man equally is misandry. /r/thatHappened
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 05:23 PM
–

Must be one of those sexists who think only women can be feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 05:22 PM
–

😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 05:21 PM
–

LMAO. Edit: With this kind of language, the bias is set already. We examined the accuracy and underpinnings of the damaging stereotype that feminists harbor negative attitudes toward men. Feminism has achieved many impressive advances for women and girls as well as men and boys his trope has been used to delegitimize and discredit the movement, has deterred women from joining it, and motivated men to oppose it, sometimes with violence Also, a self-reported study. Of course, they aren't going to …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 05:15 PM
2

Reasonable people will agree that 1% of their budget to save 100K or more men per year from paternity fraud is acceptable. are a better use of finite resources vs. other beneficial programs. Let me guess what you all think those beneficial programs might be. Gender Studies? Programs to dismantle patriarchy? To send to Ukraine so the oppressive men there can be forced to fight a war while the women they were oppressing fled? BS. And what are their reasons "Men's issue aren't societal concerns", "…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:59 PM
1

Disagree. I cannot think of a single group facing an issue I sympathize with and would not support laws that would resolve the issue for them while harming no one innocent. Mandatory Paternity Test harms no innocent people. There are no reasonable downsides to it. Not a single one. Cost & logistics are miniscule compared to the 100s of thousands of men who are saved PER YEAR. The only reason one wouldn't support is because they don't sympathize with the issue or themselves are perpetrators of pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:41 PM
1

Do men have agency or not? As much as women but propaganda prevents them from exercising their agency. There's no "propaganda" about this. There's no "anti-paternity test" lobbying. Paternity tests are legal and cheap, and men are perfectly able to avail themselves of them. Paris has paternity tests banned unless court ordered. An entire country prevents men from getting a test without jumping through legal hoops. But Sure. If I told someone she was my friend, then I went and gossiped about her …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:38 PM
-1

I know. Doesn't matter. If you support women leaving their spouses for asking for paternity test or don't support mandatory paternity tests, you sympathize with paternity fraud perpetrators. Not victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 01:52 PM
2

Yes, she won't know. But why should there be a need to hide it in the first place? Are women not strong enough to not let their hurt feelings over a man wanting to ensure paternity destroy the relationship? Shaming tactics like calling men who want it as insecure, neuroticism of a minority of men etc. Check any aita or relationship advice sub post or even in real life, where men want a paternity test for their own assurance. He will be mocked, shamed and called out. If the result comes out negat…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 01:49 PM
3

Is it possible? Yes. Has it been observed in women? No.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 01:46 PM
3

Women shouldn't be talking about being entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 08:35 AM
3

A) I stopped sympathizing on any issues with Women. B) If I did sympathize, I will fully support a mandated criminal BG check like that provided it is gender neutral. It has to be gender neutral since both genders are capable of those crimes, unlike Paternity fraud. It maybe nearly all male but it's still not "Only men are capable of that".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 08:34 AM
2

Which you already can do by getting a paternity test. Not when there exists shaming tactics and propaganda to convince men that they shouldn't. I think you'll clearly see a pattern that I was directly relating government meddling to the idea of "preventing your partner from being offended." But govt should meddle in the idea of frauds. Why don't you want that? minority of men's paternity insecurities Those are not the words of someone who sympathizes with men being victims of paternity fraud. es…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 08:30 AM
1

A) How successful has that been in preventing Paternity Fraud? B) Is that your solution to all types of frauds? No Laws to prevent or punish the fraudsters. People should do their own due diligence but cannot get govt involved. I am guessing this solution applies only to paternity frauds and not all types of frauds.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 08:23 AM
2

If their actions don't align with their comments, then Yes, I am going to ignore those comments. So far, I have only heard women claim they empathize with men. Provide any solution to men's issues that they empathize with and watch them refuse the solutions. Yes, my mother can empathize with me because I am her Son. Not because I am a man. She is from a very conservative background and far far removed from feminazis. So even though I was red pilled from years ago, I used to think she & other eld…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 08:21 AM
1

Given that both your comments are noticeably similar (about how you don't like laws that would protect men from being victims of paternity fraud), then my response comment will also be noticeably similar. I said I sympathize with the stance, and I do. You not supporting laws that would protect them from paternity fraud shows that's a lie. the idea that two people can see an issue but disagree how to address it. So what's your solution on how to address it?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 07:21 AM
0

Just because I sympathize with their viewpoint doesn't mean I have to agree with what they want. What we want is to ensure paternity. Obviously you don't agree with that. This is some "you're either with us or against us" bullshit. Yes. When it comes to Paternity test, it's either support men in ensuring paternity or you are against us. There's nothing wrong with the current system where if a man wants to get a paternity test, he can do so on his own dime. If true, there wouldn't 100s of thousan…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 07:20 AM
5

Spam you? Saw 2 of your comments in the same thread and replied. I don't fucking care. I know you don't. That's why I said you don't sympathize with men's issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 07:15 AM
7

Lazy comes in all genders. Not to the same proportion. I have done those hard jobs only once but when I talk about men doing hard jobs, it is usually in response to claims of male privilege. I know women who pay significant alimony They are the exceptions. Not the norm. There should be no alimony. No Fault Divorce is fine as long as equal child custody and no alimony is there. Complaint that women hold ALL the power in dating They do.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 07:01 AM
0

I am also Aro/Ace and red pilled. I don't give a fuck about dating for myself. But even if view women outside of the realm of dating, they don't empathize with men. Child Custody Laws? Alimony? Gender Pay Gap Myth? Drafting.. the list goes on and on. Women expect men (even strangers) to risk their life to protect them while also saying they would rather be with a bear than with a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 06:58 AM
4

Do you empathize with the difficulty of their selection task though? No. Kinda like how I feel bad for people who lose all their life savings on a memecoin, even if the decision-making is questionable. No. Because those don't lie about it. They will tell you why they choose the memecoin - to make quick money. They will not preach about how they chose it because it has some features. Will the women do the same? Admit that they chose the guy for his looks? No. Will she preach about how it wasn't h…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 06:56 AM
1

You: I even sympathize with the fact that men can't truly know if a kid is theirs without a paternity test. Also You: Doesn't want to dedicate any resources to prevent that. Calls it men's problem and not the fault of the women who do it. Says they are chickenshit if they don't want to be left for wanting to ensure paternity. Another example of woman claiming to be sympathizing with men's issues but the moment it even so much as offends women, showing their true nature. The only people you sympa…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 06:52 AM
0

If you truly sympathize with men about paternity, you would support mandating it or at the very least not support women being offended or leaving guys over it. Saying it's justified to leave a man over a paternity test is straight up a shaming tactic to stop men from getting paternity test. You don't sympathize with men who are victims of paternity fraud. You sympathize with the woman doing the paternity fraud. Mandatory Paternity test is the only way to ensure it doesn't happen. Even if somehow…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 06:48 AM
-1

Not anymore. I did. Infact, I ovedid. Was a hardcore bluepiller who used to think women are oppressed by men. Never empathized with my own gender. Now, I am completely flipped. Individual cases, I may empathize but the gender related issues women face? Absolutely not. Women have shown that they will never empathize with any issues men face. Not only will they not empathize, they will actively enable & encourage other women to continue their abuse of laws, shaming & coercion tactics and would gla…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 06:41 AM
–

This is so stupid but faking beauty has nothing to do with faking being nice. Plus being nice doesn't work. Being beautiful works.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 06:33 AM
–

A) They do. We all know in which character trait our partner is good and which character trait bad. B) Discussion is about potential partners. Not Partners. People will be evaluated on many character traits before agreeing to dates and progress in the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 03:14 AM
–

Normal people don't consciously categorize partners by their character stats dude Sub-consciously, we all do.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 03:02 AM
4

Because men have become immune to your shaming tactics and no longer hold back when calling your bs out. Women, unsurprisingly, perceive it as misogyny. Men saying they don't want date sluts & OF Whores is misogyny now.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 09:44 AM
–

She kept the beta buxx waiting long enough. Now that she knows she can't lock down someone else, she goes back to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 09:16 AM
–

I wish. Preferences isn't racism. On the contrary they are the ones who most commonly go the extra mile to be anti-racist to the point of hating their own race.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 09:12 AM
0

Women rage quit out of frustration and disgust Then they shouldn't make blanket statements like "I can't find a decent partner" if they quit. they aren't efficient sorting machines Oh, I know that. So many single mothers, dark triad men who are highly successful at dating, the fan girls of violent criminals writing them in prison, the dominance of women in Hybristophilia, "Where are all the good men" complaints etc have proved that long ago. Do you never vent? Do you never get frustrated? Do you…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 07:01 AM
0

It's not an analogy, if it breaks at the start.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 06:49 AM
2

We are talking about choices with high variance in quality. There will be obvious red flags. You don't need any serious evaluation to know the bottom tiers ones. We aren't talking about resumes where everyone will be at their best behavior. The work is too little given what you are choosing. A Partner, not Jam flavor. You don't know, they could all mean "Hey", they could all mean "nice tits, give me a taste, my dick is hard boing" or some combination. Still, choices are reduced when you eliminat…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 10:05 PM
–

Not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 08:31 PM
–

Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 08:20 PM
–

You are reversing the cause & effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 08:20 PM
–

You can help them by not lying. If girth is important, then don't lie that it's not partly true.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 07:29 PM
–

If I tell you height isn’t that important to me so you being 5’10 isn’t why I won’t fuck you That is not what happens though. What you all say "Height isn't important to woman so you being 5'10 isn't why no women fucks you" This post is the same if we swap height with penis. The OP is making a generalized and false statements on behalf of her entire gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 07:26 PM
–

They are brainwashed by society actually. You are not trolling right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 07:23 PM
–

They still use it as an insult because they perceive being a slut as a bad thing. Same for Small Dick Energy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 07:22 PM
–

But why are using dick size being small to talk about insecurity? Insecurity is bad & Small dick is not bad right? So why? Oh I know why. Because you all are fucking liars. You know what you mean. You just don't like when called out for it, so you come up with these stupid mental gymnastics.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 07:18 PM
–

You tell me. It's your gender who uses the small penis size as an insult? Yes, it is over for such men because we know how women will treat them. Women have been quite vocal about it. It being unscientific is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 07:11 PM
2

higher N count Wait a minute. Men a advocating men to not have high N count is bad. But if it's a risky thing, why not advocating against it?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 07:05 PM
1

I hope you realise that choosing a man is a very important life altering decision, much more than shampoo or ice cream. Yet you compare it to choosing jam jars. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 06:55 PM
3

Okay. Whatever helps you bro. I am out. I have shown what needs to be. You can choose to remain ignorant & live in denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 06:53 PM
3

Reread the comment. I edited it to add links & quotes both from the article and wiki. Both which prove "Choice overload doesn't necessarily mean too many choices". Wiki article literally has: The phenomenon of overchoice occurs when many equivalent choices are available. Having too many approximately equally good options Choice overload is not a problem in all cases there must not be a clearly dominant option in the choice set all options must be perceived of equivalent quality One option cannot…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 06:20 PM
2

You can laugh all you want at "Having too many choices =/= Choice overload.", the same article that user posted proves me right. Here's a quote from literally the same article: Choice overload occurs when an individual is overwhelmed by what appears to be SIMILAR OPTIONS. Here's what wiki says about Choice Overload: Choice overload is not a problem in all cases, there are some preconditions that must be met before the effect can take place. all options must be perceived of equivalent quality. On…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 06:00 PM
5

No. Having too many choices =/= Choice overload. Choice overload happens when you have too many choices and all of them are as overall nearly as good as others. You need to evaluate each of them on many merits to find what you prefer. Like it was in the experiment. All from a single brand and same price range. Only taste varied. When the choices include few high quality & most low quality choices (and you know which choice is which), there is no choice overload. That is the case with those 500+ …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 05:11 PM
2

That eliminates choice overload. A few more interactions and the choices eliminate themselves even more. Doesn't seem like that big of a deal when talking about choosing your life partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:48 PM
1

Sometimes the label outright lies though with people, you actually have to buy them, take them home, open and taste them then wait to see if you have food poisoning. Then how do women know all those messages are from bad guys if the guys are faking? Is that the famed female intuition I keep hearing about. It's either "I mostly get attention from assholes, creeps etc." or "They could be decent but since they can lie, I don't know". Which is it? If former, then there is no choice overload. Just el…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:27 PM
4

The Jars experiment is a false equivalence. I looked up the study. All of them were Wilkin & Sons jams and more traditional flavors were removed, leaving a choice set of 24 more exotic flavors from ONE BRAND and same price range. If out of those 24 jars, 20 were from "all icky and gross and below my standards", it would simply bring the choice down to 4 and it would be easier. Instead, you have many products of same quality but differing in flavor. From your own article: Choice overload occurs w…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:17 PM
2

More lies. She clearly says that she would have dated only if she knew his personality. That is enough to know she wouldn't have dated him based on his looks i.e his looks are unattractive to her. He literally asked her she would drop him if he wanted casual sex but she would maybe say Yes to basketball players. She didn't deny it to him or even in the post. That's an admission.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 06:29 AM
2

That is not what happened in the post. Just shows how dishonest you are being. You realize there is a difference between "most likely that at least one had a better look than you." vs "I date different guys that I used to in College. I would have swiped left on you on Tinder and only reason I would give you a chance is if I knew your personality" The former doesn't imply he is unattractive to her. The latter does. She straight up admits that she would be okay with casual sex with basketball play…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:45 AM
4

Zero link to the source because direct linking to other posts isn't allowed. But you can freely google the post title and probably come with the actual post. I did. We only have his words. I want to see actual people , not the report of it from the scope of a redpiller Guessing all the people who commented on those two posts aren't people.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 11:39 AM
3

I didn't delete. I edited it to add a link but auto-mod removed because the link wasn't a np link. So here's the comment: No body is going to support it when you outright say you are not attracted to your spouse. The blue pill narrative works by denying such hard truths. When the lady outrights admits those truths, you cannot deny and the narrative falls apart. Nobody will say he is the lucky guy if she confesses that she is not attracted. Because she outright admitting it. No Scope of denial. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 10:58 AM
9

Entertainment is fiction. But fiction usually have a message or at least an Idea. That can be a blue pilled one or a red pilled one. Blue pilled one is when the movie implies that the guy who got the girl after her hoe phase won in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 10:17 AM
5

When women have their party phase in their 20s, feel a desire to settle down (family, kids etc) as they reach early 30s so she goes for the type of guy she never would have given a second look during her party phase. The blue pill would say he is the lucky one because she chose him over all the other guys. He should be grateful as if she is the prize. The idea that genuine desire can be negotiated is another blue pill narrative. A man says his wife doesn't want to have sex with him, the response…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 09:57 AM
–

I fully support them in this endeavor and encourage them to find the nearest jungle and meet a bear to show us abusive men how much friendly bears are compared to us.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 05:37 AM
1

No. There is no conflict here. Men want to be providers and protectors for a wife who is doing chores at home. No one wants to pay her for everything or even share half the bills if she is a SAH. They just don't want to be taken advantage of for free meals, biased alimony laws and be a lazy bum who spends her husband's money without contributing anything. Red pill is fine with both: A) Being the provider & protector for their SAH Wife who does chores at home. B) Bills and chores are fairly distr…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 05:32 AM
5

"You don't have to do this" is such a stupid argument. Might as well say "You don't have to date. No need for the pills. Let's shut the sub down".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 05:36 PM
3

Him: You still haven't described to me WHY a man should be the one who has to be paying for a date You: Bruh, if anyone need an explanation of WHAT a man is, then there really isn’t any point. Not sure if trolling or just confused between WHY and WHAT. if she’s attractive, there are plenty of dudes willing take her out. For pump & dump. So a man can wait for the world to change or do something. Men did. They stopped doing the monkey dance for them. That's when women started complaining about how…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 05:08 PM
2

You don’t just say “we’ll all these things mean chivalry” cause they don’t. Who lied and says they did? The one who complained about chivalry is dead i.e. woman would disagree. A bunch of lonely dudes on a website bitter cause they can’t get Tinder matches? Who the fuck cares what “meanings” the excuse squads want to make up? These shaming tactics has gotten stale. I already posted an article that’s 9 years old that’s debunked all that. It didn't. BTW dating nowadays ALSO involves women who plan…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 05:04 PM
1

😂
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:54 PM
-2

TDS. Not even bothering with you bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:43 PM
5

Except no one has ever said paying for a date is part of chivalry. That’s just some ppd made up bullshit. You prove yourself wrong the very next sentence when you say MEN must do all of this and if they can't they aren't man enough to date. 👌 Same gos for planning dates, protecting and providing. these are just thing adult MEN do This idea of putting the onus of paying, planning dates, protecting and providing on MEN and MEN alone is what Chivalry has come to mean in regards to dating. If a dude…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:42 PM
13

All valid points. It's in her interests to optimize her dating strategy to find the best she can. The issue I have with is except in rare cases like your comment, they actively deny this. The one who wants the most attractive man will say looks don't matter and the one who wants the richest will say money doesn't matter. Women have options, some bad, some good. They have more good options than the total options men have but then say dating sucks for women. But you’re never going to have a situat…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:31 PM
6

Words and their meanings change. This article talks about the origins of the term and concludes "Chivalry boils down to three things: mercy, charity, and humility." None of those things have anything to do with what Chivalry has come to mean. Men paying for the date, holding the doors, pulling out the chair, planning date nights, open the car door, protect & provide women etc. Those are the chivalrous ideals that are referred to when one says "Chivalry is dead".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:22 PM
–

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 07:24 AM
–

You all want equality right? So start by acting equal. Don't expect he will pay unless stated explicitly.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 03:30 PM
3

We aren't in early 2000s anymore. Internet shows the hidden nature of the real life. In real life, you will say and do things in a way that won't cause serious backlash. On internet, you say the truth because of anonymity (or at least a perception of it). If you ask me in real life about red pill, I will say you are talking about Matrix. Doesn't mean I don't know what TRP is.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 07:01 AM
2

The contrast between what they are told by the mainstream society and what they are observing. If you tell me personality matters more than looks and then I see good looking bad people get laid all the time while average/ugly not bad guys struggle, then I seek answers on what explains this difference. If I see women talk about how much they hate misogynists and then also see their thirst comments on a good looking model with someone "misogynistic" caption, I want to understand this difference in…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 06:59 AM
-2

Mainly due to proximity.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 05:31 AM
0

Yes. Men want challenge and overcome those odds in terms of looking after his loved ones. We want to face external challenges to protect our relationships. Financial hardships, protect & provide for our loved ones etc are examples of pleasure & purpose that men want. If the relationship itself is a challenge, it fucking sucks. I want to face the challenges of life with her by my side. I don't want her to be the challenge. if I was married, I will find purpose in doing all I can for her. She pref…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 05:30 AM
–

ikr. They think posts like this would paint the men as the bad ones. When in reality, any man would want to avoid this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 08:41 AM
–

By your own description of how all your relationships were, you were the one to not put any effort until it was too late.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 08:39 AM
–

The efforts you are talking about is the chase, which women never do. The man was the one putting efforts during courtship, it reduces with time. You all think he is taking you for granted. By that logic, you have been taking the man granted all along. She doesn't understand what happened to the guy she met in the beginning, she put more and more effort into the relationship, starts reading about love languages, tries to surprise him with sexy lingerie, buys him thoughtful gifts, asks if there a…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 08:36 AM
2

It is usually aimed at people who claim to be about equality of certain trait (race, sex, religion etc). So if they truly believe in that equality and they believe the situation isn't bigoted, then they should be comfortable with the situation if the people are interchanged. If they f eel discomfort and develop some cognitive dissonance, it either makes them realize they are going against equality at which point they will admit that it is indeed bigoted or shows that they don't really believe in…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 05:37 AM
–

the empathetic gender. One woman untied my shoes on a date because she didn’t believe I could tie them myself. This is just next level cruel.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 01:10 PM
13

63% of 18-29 men are single. However, only 25% of 30-49 men are single, much closer to women's 21% single rate of the same age bracket. It's called nearing the wall and settling with the best you can get. There are as many men as women, so their options are to settle down or get cats. They clearly aren't choosing to get cats despite all the talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 07:08 PM
0

Because you are a girl. Create a fake tinder profile as an average guy and let us know.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 06:48 PM
6

Which is funny considered Lesbians have the highest DV Rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 06:47 PM
–

There are hundreds of threads on PPD telling low value women that men will sleep with them but wont commit because the standards r different (and unrelated). Unfortunate but true. Something men won't deny. What's confusing about the qualities for a good sex partner being different from the qualities for a good LTR/marriage partner? Nothing. Is that not the exact same thing? No. Because like you said, men will literally make threads and are open about this. They will still admit that looks matter…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 04:28 PM
–

Well, I don't really see women making virtue statements about who gets sex and who does not. Upside down world. to grow a clue and come into his stride As expected, blame the guy for her lack of communication.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 04:21 PM
–

Because men aren't going around lying to women they are settling for. When women shame incels, it is indeed about what gets a guy laid easily. Guess what they say? "It's your personality"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 04:13 PM
–

Yeah, it's telling he was too naive and she was too good at lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 04:12 PM
–

This wasn't on a blue pill sub but on offmychest or something. Any space that isn't redpill is blue pill. This was on bestofredditor updates. The thing is she pointed out one thing which can be worked on No. She didn't point it out. She mocked about it behind his back. he should have communicated He did. By asking her. She denied. Clearly it wasn't bothering her but it was bothering him. If true, she wouldn't have brought it up to their friends & then lied when confronted. Instead of using an in…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 04:03 PM
–

I don't think it says anything is a lie? The women are not in relationships with those men, so obviously those factors are not unimportant for relationships. The comments women make are about getting laid in general. Their argument always has been that only good guys get laid and bad guys don't. Being good is a factor for getting laid is the lie. It is an unimportant factor. As for the rest of your comment, it's just more validation for AFBB. And it's not being unselfish. It's being not interest…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 04:01 PM
–

The statement about how attractiveness changes with maturity/age. The comment alluded to in the post isn't talking about relationship priorities but simply about who happens to be the best at sex and it is not dateable guys. AFBB is about settling. What you find desirable remains same while relationship priorities change. During the party phase, only relationship priority is that she must find the guy desirable. If who she finally ties the knot with isn't the type of guy she earlier dated/fucked…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 03:45 PM
–

Because the traits women claim make guys bad partners (boring, narcissistic, disconcerting etc) are also the things that make them apparently best for sex. It wouldn't be controversial if women straight up admit it (like that comment did) instead of lies. Don't say "personality matters more than looks" or "narcissisicm is a red flag" or "men who are heard to deal with don't deserve a girl" and then also say the best sex is with the "very pretty boy too boring for words, complete narcissist who m…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 03:27 PM
–

He definitely overreacted. He shouldn't have moved to a new city and that is not normal. But definitely should have broken up with her. And cut off the friend for not telling him when she realized he is being settled for. He had the opportunity to talk to his partner, to discuss that he was hurt by what she said He was hurt more by the mocking him behind his back (hence the overreaction of moving away) and lying to him for 6 years. to reach an understanding about how things could improve. By div…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 03:20 PM
–

It's pretty much a nothing burger, truly. The comment saying that the best sex is with the guys who are a glaring example of, what women claim to be, red flags isn't a nothing burger. It shows all their talk about Personality, Kindness, being good etc are just lies. should be working towards "best sex" as a future goal and a bar that keeps rising. You cannot work towards "best sex" as a future goal with a partner who is with you because they don't care about sex much & only about you being a com…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 03:15 PM
–

They legitimately think the husband should be happy reading this. He may even pretend to be but most men with an ounce of self-respect wouldn't be okay with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 02:52 PM
–

He wasn't prying about sex at all though. He was prying about something negative she said to them. Stupid and childish behavior honestly but he wasn't expecting that the negative thing she talked about would be his performance. He obviously didn't know.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 02:42 PM
–

The statement isn't used in regards to relationship priorities but more in regards to what is attractive. The implication is that the guy who they didn't find attractive earlier is now attractive to her because of maturity, which is 100% bs. Don't take this the wrong way, but maybe BPD is the reason. If not for BPD, those guys may be happy to wife up your sister. I don't know enough about BPD so won't comment further. Men do go from dating party girls to later marrying stable wives but in both c…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 02:40 PM
–

Sometimes but not much I showed a study that said criminals have a higher reproductive success than non-criminals. So not only does it work, it works too many times. At least the asshole gets respect for being upfront and honest about who he is. Cannot even remember how many times I have heard that excuse. I mean isn’t a “niceguy” just an asshole without a spine? No. "niceguy" is anyone who, after being told 100s of times by women that being good/nice matters more than looks, dares to think he d…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 02:34 PM
–

Ah. the famed "Being nice is the bare minimum". I remember my bluepilled days when I used to visit r/niceguys. A very common phrase there. Genuinely believed that as well. If it were true, we wouldn't see assholes getting laid. But as you admitted, they do. Literal criminals get laid. Hell, their chances of reproductive success increases with criminal offencesSource . Being nice isn't the bare minimum. He’s an asshold to everyone including his family but now that there’s a pretty girl on front o…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 02:12 PM
–

That's always the excuse. Fact is nice guy persona, fake or not, isn't something gets most women going.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 01:06 PM
1

Love this cope. Women can see through the fake nice guy persona so it doesn't work. But when they are told that they should have picked better after some bad shit happens, "Men pretend to be nice at the beginning. We didn't know they are assholes."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 11:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter