TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NeedsMoreData Archive

View 4 posts and 94 comments by NeedsMoreData on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

This queen stuff needs to stop. Besides, don't they realize, queens are just babymakers in 99% of history?
/r/MensRights13/11/22 09:48 PM
2

We need more boys only schools. It can't be too difficult to start schools is it?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 03:49 AM
2

Report it to twitter. They may not do anything, but if we don't use the tools, its on us.
/r/MGTOW29/04/19 05:17 PM
1

IF? http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/svpjri1112.pdf In 2011-12, an estimated 4.0% of state and federal prison inmates and 3.2% of jail inmates reported experiencing one or more incidents of sexual victimization by another inmate or facility staff in the past 12 months or since admission to the facility, if less than 12 months. And that's self reported!
/r/MensRights20/08/15 11:27 PM
22

That’s hit unskilled men particularly hard, **as they have not been seen as good marriage material.** He said he believes most women still want marriage at some point, but young or less-educated women are holding out for economic improvements or **better marriage-partner prospects**. Always on the lookout for something better so they aren't settling.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 08:33 PM
5

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
/r/MensRights03/04/14 03:52 AM
4

Not sure if its the one he's referencing, but check out. Boys Adrift: The Five Factors Driving the Growing Epidemic of Unmotivated Boys and Underachieving Young Men
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 08:31 PM
4

Sad shame tactics. If a man strives to improve himself, and has bank, is he somehow less of a man for choosing to apply his time and resources elsewhere? Which on that note, better things to do. I say live and let live. I come hear to read, learn and expand my understanding. I don't begrudge others who choose to apply that knowledge in a different way, but meh.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 05:09 AM
3

That was nicely condescending, lol. Are you somehow upset by someone taking the knowledge and using it in a different way?
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 05:04 AM
5

Who said it was noble? It's an informed choice.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 04:55 AM
2

What's wrong with taking the knowledge and deciding that the juice is not worth the squeeze? It's far better than people not understanding and flailing ineffectually.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 04:43 AM
1

Woah there, back up. It "feels" masculine, because they don't like it. Enough said.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 04:39 AM
1

Better parody response - Morgue slab with recently deceased including the y autopsy incision under the sexy bra.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 06:33 PM
2

She's an epic entitled princess. Told all her young life that not only was she special, she was a fucking dragon. Even when she's sold off as a commodity, she becomes a mini queen who then manages to get dragons. If you were told you were special your entire life, then managed to be the only person in centuries to get dragons, wouldn't you be a lil power hungry too? I enjoyed all of them as pop reading, but I rarely get to deep into the trenches of analyzing them. I just hope he finishes them be…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 06:28 PM
3

Constructive stuff is great, and I agree, ideas should stand up to argument if they have merit. But reddit is known for trolls. =(
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 07:25 PM
5

Are you doing it in a way that is constructive? or just looking to start arguments? If you went to most subs (say..feminism) and tried to argue its primary tenants wouldn't you also be downvoted, if not deleted/banned as a concern troll? Strong discourse and being able to defend your beliefs is important, but ultimately, this isn't a sub for conversions, as stated in the sidebar it is for; Discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men. Edit: bad typo…
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 06:43 PM
1

I see that a lot and it baffles me, why on earth would men go to that much trouble to impersonate these women. A number of the moderators have obvious personalities and clear writing styles. I do enjoy peeking in that sub from time to time.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 06:40 PM
2

Creating Companies. Right. Women rarely create companies, they co-opt existing structures. Easier and less risky.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 05:24 PM
1

Which in reality means; Mothers vote counts, fathers vote doesn't. Because how often do you have a father with a child and mother out of the picture? Logically adoption is not a realistic "out" for a man.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 06:38 PM
0

And...when the mother wants it and the father doesn't?
/r/MensRights24/11/13 05:49 PM
0

And if he's not the legal guardian? If she doesn't disclose who the father is? If she doesn't KNOW who the father is? And you completely disregarded the other point. If she wants it and he doesn't. - His vote DOES NOT MATTER.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 05:31 PM
1

That was very enjoyable. It was especially awesome to to see the claims of TRP 22k subs successfully brigading funny with 4 million+ subs.
/r/TheRedPill24/11/13 04:17 AM
0

Try reading this a bit more slowly this time. Mom Says Yes, Father Says No = No Adoption Mom Says No, Father Says Yes = No Adoption Mom Says Yes, Father Says Yes = Adoption Mom Says Yes, Doesn't even Inform Father = Adoption Now tell me who's vote matters again? If the father doesn't want it, and the mother does, pull out the checkbook, your decision DOES NOT MATTER.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 10:59 PM
3

Not unless the mother agrees. 2 votes, only 1 matters.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 07:27 PM
1

Because most men would prefer to have safe and fulfilling relationships with women? It's the society and environment that drove this movement, not innate desires. Always going to be the outliers, the cads, the players (the original term), but the red pill rarely goes down easy, its a painful disappointing process. We want it to be different, but the vast culture changes, the unbalanced legal system, no fault frivorces all seem to have made it so much harder.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/13 07:49 AM
2

Reluctantly accepted, still hate it. On a personal level it makes sense. On a society level - bad sauce when only the people who don't care are reproducing.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 02:56 PM
12

It's not difficult for a woman to be a slut. Most can walk into the street, yell I want to have sex, and have a dozen takers. Hence - women slut, not commendable. Its CONSIDERABLY more difficult for a man. They actually have to try to be a slut. So yes, it is different. news flash, men and women are different. THEY LIED TO YOU.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 01:32 AM
0

I recently read an "alternative history" fiction series that had an interesting look at this. Drakka by SM Stirling if anyone is interested. now the preface - I AM NOT ADVOCATING SLAVERY In that history, the concept of serfs/slaves was live and well and it was common for a young boy to be gifted a concubine. That plus no real restriction on his activities with other slaves meant that the power of the pussy was way way way down. Kids were also gender separated for education until 18, so when they…
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 05:40 PM
5

Was that supposed to be sarcastic? You kind of missed the mark. The current situation is the fucking joke.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 01:57 AM
8

They're talking about safe haven laws, surrendering a child to hospital, firehouse, police station, etc. Not literally just abandoning a child at a random location.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 01:55 AM
27

Charge of Unattractiveness (Code Tan) – The Ugly Tan Charge Discussion: The target is accused of having no romantic potential as far as women are concerned. Examples: Response: This is another example of “circumstantial ad hominem.” The target’s romantic potential ultimately does not reflect on the merit of his arguments.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 11:23 PM
6

Then any links or data will be mocked as "le STEM". When did STEM become a word of mockery? I assume they all created their own computers, internet connectivity, and power plants for posting these ridiculous assertions. And didn't remotely -need- those things created by the people they mock.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 03:02 AM
1

And if being happy doesn't net a mythical 50% split, what then? Will you then legislate your way to 50%? Maybe, just maybe, natural inclinations don't fall that way?
/r/MensRights21/09/13 06:11 AM
2

But you have no problem with the reverse? Custodial fathers almost never get child support, and when women fail to pay, they get incarcerated less than 1/8th as often as Men who fail to pay. She made the decision to have a child, why should she get that decision with no thought to the opinion of the man? Great way to continue trying to shame me and avoiding actual logic or facts. Just "Man up!".
/r/MensRights20/09/13 12:42 AM
2

No shame at all, I believe in equality. Clearly you don't.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 11:23 PM
11

its worse than the threat of JAIL? Seriously? I'll just move on, we're clearly so far apart on this issue not worth discussing.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:19 PM
2

Don't think of it in terms of a single date. Think more "intimidated by a woman's success" or her "education". IE, hard charging professional woman wondering why no one wants her, clearly she's too intimidating.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:08 PM
6

I'll answer your larger edited post here instead of in 2 places. What? Are you saying that single mothers have no responsibility? This is pretty ignorant. I'm saying those that decide they'd rather have someone else pay than take care of themselves don't. I'm specifically indicting the "actions" here, not the people. So in turn making it so that you can make kids and never have to take care of them at all. Yes that's a good ideal. So that one person can't decide to "make kids" AND force someone …
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:58 PM
18

And that's worse than 18 years of forced payments. Forced by the threat of JAIL. Forced to nearly always make that same continued payment regardless of changes in circumstances. Never having an option to restart a career, or start over. Never having the ability to choose a less stressful job to work less to enjoy life. I cannot find the words for how much I disagree. My sympathies for your friend, but that is not a universal reaction. Nor should it really matter. I'm sure many men have a hard ti…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:44 PM
14

So in turn making it so that you can make kids and never have to take care of them at all. Yes that's a good ideal. Men are not "making" women have children. It took 2 people to get there. One of those people has numerous off ramps to back out. One does not.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:35 PM
25

Also forcing the father to pay is not as bad as forcing a women to have an abortion is You legitimately feel that having an abortion is worse than 18 years of child support? Is this because of religious beliefs, or just general opinion? Do you feel this holds true for those who don't have a religious objections to abortions?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:22 PM
16

I have to disagree completely. Pauze. This is one of the most extreme posts i've seen on MRA. sigh. By having unprotected sex you already knew that your partner might get pregnant. If she does and doesn't want an abortion you should pay for the kid. After all its YOUR kid too. If you don't want kids take safer routes. The partner also knew the chances, why does she get all the choices, and none of the responsibility? What safer routes is that? Celibacy? But don't dare tell a woman that, it would…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:11 PM
7

That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to me. But fair enough, I see where you're coming from at least.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:27 PM
5

But you do agree with a woman walking away after creating life?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:23 PM
5

that if the woman wants to keep the child Choice. Again. Powerful thing. This is why this graphic exists. Men don't get those choices. Clearly we're not going to agree. Thanks for keeping civil at least. =)
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:18 PM
2

Why does it have to be taken into consideration? She made the decision to have the pregnancy, no one forced it on her. No one is forcing her to -not- have the pregnancy either. The only force here is AFTER the pregnancy. Wergild - old historical term of paying for pain/life. Most of the arguments are about the child's best interest, what does her body have to do with that?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:06 PM
8

So what, she gets a wergild for the pain and suffering? What happened to child's best interest?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:50 PM
14

What does the mechanics have to do with the fiscal responsibility after the fact? The kid is BORN, the biological stuff is done. Now we're at the $$ negotiation point.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:44 PM
11

You seriously don't see a problem with that? That a woman gets all the choices and a man gets "don't have sex" and you're okay with that?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:43 PM
5

No, because that is women hating and inflammatory.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:42 PM
11

And if you get a 1/1 split on that decision? It's not really a vote if only 1 side matters.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:40 PM
24

An why doesn't that apply equally to the woman?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:36 PM
5

Take this nonsense somewhere else.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:28 PM
18

Not if she chooses to go along with the unprotected sex. He's not setting the stage all by his lonesome. Takes 2 to tango.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:26 PM
44

He "chose" not to use a condom all by himself? The gal didn't have any say in it at all? She didn't consent to said unprotected sex? She was just an object being acted on? and not a enthusiastic participant with agency of her own? Well that'd be rape now wouldn't it, and something else entirely. If she did consent to it, then you have 2 people consenting to an act. Both would have a choice of what to do about it. If SHE chooses to keep it, and HE chooses to not, of course he shouldn't have the r…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:25 PM
9

Only men are accountable, not women? And anyone who disagrees is clearly to be SHAMED! HOW DARE YOU have a contrary thought!!!
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:07 PM
5

Why should the father be more responsible than the mother? Stop your shaming and blaming.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:07 PM
5

Why not the mother? Why is that such a ludicrous assertion?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:06 PM
4

Far better to victimize men than women, righto. (not that I agree with the assertion its victimizing women) choice = consequences authority = responsibility
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:05 PM
9

If she can't afford an abortion how is she going to afford a child? Oh right, from the guys wallet. Given a choice, I imagine many would rather help pay for an abortion than 18 years of child support (assuming both don't want it). And if she refuses his help, then she made the choice to continue and should deal with the consequences.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:01 PM
16

So you would like to give men choice, but its too hard. Why isn't the woman's choice also affected by that poor child theory? Why can't the person who chooses to go through with the pregnancy the one responsible to provide for it? And there are a lot of "fatherless" children who get lots of child support, doesn't mean the father gets the opportunity to have a part, they're just a paycheck for the mother. Equality means equality, warts and all. Society would adjust, people's choices would have co…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:27 PM
16

No, the problem is with choices. Why shouldn't Men get the same choices that Women get to "opt out"? I don't hate women for those choices, I simply want the same opportunities without being shamed or celibate. Why should a woman have the choice to unilaterally decide to keep or not keep a child? and at the SAME TIME the man has the responsibility to pay for it with no say in that choice other than "don't have sex"? Shouldn't decisions be made "together" for things like this, with both having equ…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:00 PM
3

Well i'm sure your data is better than the Bureau of Labor Statistics under the US Department of Labor.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:51 PM
3

How many .99999 is worth adding before you just give up and put 100%? On all the other numbers they only went 1 digit of precision, if within that one digit of precision it was statistically insignificant, then it is correct to state 100%. Yes, there may be a few individuals, that doesn't change the validity of the percentage in the context of the numbers.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:40 PM
3

Hence the "hope for the best" part.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:25 PM
41

Isn't that called victim blaming when its pointed at the women? or slut shaming? Women get "choices", have sex all they want and outs. Men either choose to have no sex at all, or face the consequences? This is EXACTLY THE DAMN POINT of the graphic.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:24 PM
8

Not really. 1) Choose to use birth control, choose not to. (Men, condom and hope for the best - RISUG soon plz.). 2) In the event of choosing not to, or in birth control failing they now have an additional choice that men lack. 3/4) If the mother choose these options, she's free and clear of financial responsibility, even if the father tries to enforce paternity. - Male doesn't get the same choice. Could certainly be better written to be more clear, but hardly a stretch.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 04:32 PM
6

One of those is theoretical, the other is reality. Guess which one matters more?
/r/MensRights17/09/13 03:08 AM
7

Pity that she's a disingenuous con artist? Ya, that's self-inflicted. Save pity for those it can help.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/13 07:47 PM
1

But are they all really death threats? In the examples I gave, would you really consider those actual death threats? If someone posts something like I posted on a comment threat, or in an email, IMO, its not a real death threat, and considering it such is a joke. and does -everything- have to remove competitiveness? Can there not be SOME things that are exclusive? Can there not be SOME things that men get to be better at? (Other than construction and waste management!) Have you looked at some of…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:15 PM
12

Disagreeing with a choice is now mocking? Saying you would make a different choice is mocking? Would you not say it would have been better to have been raised with 2 parents? Would it then not follow that 1 parent is "less than ideal" or "sub-optimal". Are they trying hard, doing well, sure. But its NOT optimal. Now with that premise hopefully established, would you want to encourage or discourage more single parent families? Keeping in mind that you reward activities you want to encourage and y…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 04:07 PM
3

And extra contracts. A number of local US city governments are mandated to spend x% of budget per year at "women and minority owned businesses". Often these businesses took the opportunity to gouge the hell out of it, as the purchasing agents had no choice.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 04:01 PM
2

The best possible candidate should get a job, gender irrelevant. Quotas hurt that. If there are things that are keeping qualified women out of positions over less qualified men, then they should absolutely be addressed with training, laws, enforcement, consequences, etc. What most people here are saying is that quotas are not the answer to the problem, they create more problems. You seem to be saying meh, its better than the alternative, problems be damned. That there MUST be 50/50 regardless. I…
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:55 PM
2

You have no interest in changing your mind. You're here to further an agenda. You need to learn the difference between equality of opportunity and equality of outcome.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:28 PM
2

Any links by chance? would love to read more.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:03 PM
2

::whooosh:: Yes, that was the point.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 01:02 PM
2

Unfortunately it comes from the lack of power (ironically.) "These" men you see represented here (vs those mighty mighty men who run the world) lack the support/means/wherewithal to organize and affect meaningful change. A lot of these Men first get here from the perspective of an incredibly bitter and painful situation where they've been forced to face the reality in a very sudden and very real manner. They're facing loss, outrage and pain with very little support available. So sadly yes, too m…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:24 PM
1

I want something for which someone demands something in return. To provide that return I do something I don't enjoy. CubeGuy wants housing. He works a job he doesn't enjoy to obtain housing. Prostitute wants housing (or drugs). She works a job she doesn't enjoy to obtain it. Is that all of it? Of course not. Part of it? undoubtedly. I'm quite sure real coercion exists. If someone is being held against their will and forced into actions against their will it's wrong and should be changed. But sho…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:17 PM
0

Yes, it was intended as part sarcastic. Our counterparts rarely bother with facts, just scream louder and louder. When called on it we see deflection, insults, shaming. If that is allowed and women get a safe space for an echo chamber, should men not be entitled to the same? You may be confusing me with an earlier poster though, I didn't post any facts (or pretend to), merely observations on the reactions.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:07 PM
5

jesus christ i've read alot of shit on this site but rapists deserve the same symphony as prostitutes? whats wrong with you? Everyone deserves a good symphony. Symphony - A symphony is an extended musical composition in Western classical music, generally scored for orchestra or concert band. You probably meant sympathy. In which case, doesn't everyone have a sob story? a reason? a situation? a bad day? a hard time? Why is THIS CRIME deserving of so much more sympathy than the others? Do the john…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:00 PM
0

I mean, you can take it as personally as you want, if it makes you feel better. Play the victim, I'm silencing you, bablabla. All I asked you was to get your facts straight. Don't voice your opinion as if it is a fact. Rants are allowed, don't act like your opinion is actual fact. That's what you did, that's what I called you on. You can get as huffy and passive aggressive as you want, still doesn't change that. Sounds like I'm arguing with a teenager with that kind of crap. Welcome to our world…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:55 PM
0

Emotional opinions not allowed. Gotcha. Venting not allowed. Gotcha. So much for a male safe space.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:39 PM
0

Well hell, half of the plea deal system of american justice is based on this premise. Wasn't my fault, the ring leader made me do it, i'll tell you all about it for a lil help with my sentencing. Look how well that's working out! I liked how a few at least admitted they liked the money. Coerced, truly I couldn't work at Burger King. I HAD to sob prostitute myself. Hell, legalize it. Trafficking is already against the law, kidnapping no?
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:36 PM
-24

My landlord coerces me into paying him rent, i'm forced to slave away in a cubical day after day to meet his demands. I AM A VICTIM!
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:31 PM
1

Fair enough, not intended to discourage you from posting, but one guy not getting screwed isn't much of a win. =(
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:06 PM
1

Smart and successful aren't mutually inclusive. It's about priorities. Are you attracted to a woman who constantly puts in extra hours at work? who prioritizes her success over your relationship/marriage? over your children? over you? Plenty of smart women (and don't confuse smart with highly educated) who don't prioritize professional success over personal success.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 05:19 PM
2

It has been observed that in many massive multiplayer games player interaction is created through "need". Interaction begets understanding, understanding begets empathy. Have we perhaps created a society where it is far too easy to "solo" with the help of the faceless big government? Didn't we begin as a tribal animal, primarily focused on extended family? Only later creating these nation constructs for the greater purposes. Have we maybe lost something critical to humanity? Probably not that di…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 04:38 PM
2

Not sure I get the point of this post. NAWALT? Or just looking for attention? You didn't use the court to punish your ex. Yay?
/r/MensRights03/09/13 03:20 PM
1

Or as is often mentioned, men are rarely attracted to professional success in women. Is it not possible the male's feelings simply changed? That he didn't feel the "spark" anymore?
/r/MensRights03/09/13 02:44 PM
1

And all that evil is supported by legislation and society too right?
/r/MensRights03/09/13 02:43 PM
18

Maybe add more public shaming in addition. Public apologies, full page newspaper adverts with big shiny pictures, etc.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 02:38 PM
2

SRS is great, they always link to the funny stuff.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 02:50 AM
45

Man: Hello, I'd like to report a mugging. Officer: A mugging, eh? Where did it take place? Man: In my house, 3 times! I invited this guy over, we hung out, watched tv and he asked to borrow a few bucks. Officer: And did you give him a few bucks willingly? Man: Sure, I like sharing money with friends! But then after a few times, he said my sports team was bad. Officer: So you gave him money prior to this time? Man: A few times, I thought he was my friend. Officer: And you give money to other frie…
/r/MensRights17/08/13 05:42 PM
7

But do they expect diversity to make it better? or is it just diversity for diversity's sake? I have never understood this constant push for diversity.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 05:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter