TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NeighborhoodVeteran Archive

View 0 posts and 321 comments by NeighborhoodVeteran on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

"You're looking so fine right now. Remind me of my sister and shit."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 02:51 PM
2

Bullying was always taboo is Western society.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 09:03 PM
0

And this post is about an NYT article lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 02:29 AM
1

Mate-guarding sounds like some psycho babble bs and less like a healthy or attractive attribute.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 01:39 AM
2

Exactly. You said it. No studies take actual work quality or work done into consideration, invalidating OP's conclusion until there is some actual study done. You say everyone assumes women work more, but we still don't know if that is true or not because the pew poll (not a study) only shows that men reported working more than the women respondents.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 11:59 PM
2

I would probably ask more questions. I never actually gave my opinion, so can't say that I'm biased on whether men or women work harder regarding child rearing. What OP did was look at some data and make an incorrect assumption about the data.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 11:27 PM
1

I don't know, I was just analyzing why OP's premise was flawed and/or biased. I just looked at the sole source they used to come to their conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 10:59 PM
0

What you're actually saying is fathers work longer than Mothers on average. There is nothing about quality of work done.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 10:27 PM
1

Hint: It doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 12:42 PM
1

So you're also trying to fit in your culture to solve the world culture? Bravo.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 12:18 PM
2

I'd rather have more people helping me work than having to beg for a higher salary because you took away half of the workforce ngl.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 12:15 PM
3

It's also Freud. So TTFWIW.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 09:52 PM
0

You mean attractive. Just attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/23 02:43 AM
6

If you criminalize adultery again, the women will just be blamed. Again. And like in other theocratic or semi-theocratic societies that still exist today.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/23 02:40 AM
1

Hate to break it to you, but there are also specific groups of people who are specifically interested in ugly people.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 02:16 AM
1

Imma argue the opposite
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 02:47 AM
0

By magic of course. OP already said they aren't an i cel so you know what that means...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 10:52 PM
0

I don't see how that would validate their fantasies.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 02:16 AM
3

I dunno. Get to know Adam. That's the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/22 02:03 AM
17

You just confirmed looks aren't everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 05:49 AM
1

If that were true there would be no need for a RP "movement".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 01:01 AM
1

If anything, OP proves it's really about fear.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 12:56 AM
1

I don't think it's being seen as more acceptable, no. Movements to decriminalize are more aimed at safetly, and does not mean people are for legalizing right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 05:06 PM
1

True, but that can't always be the scenario, which is why masturbation is common.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 09:51 PM
3

Probably because guys think a person with low esteem is easier to control.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 04:59 PM
12

Bad shoe! Bad!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 01:14 AM
0

What you said is misogyny. Only 1mil OF content creators... less than 1% of the adult women population in just the U.S. alone... women aren't jumping to create an OF account.... that's your misogyny speaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 11:07 AM
0

There are only 1 million content creators on OF... that's less than 1% of the adult women just in the U.S. Doesn't seem like anyone is jumping to create content like you said. Not only that, very few accounts are successful or profitable Lie debunked.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 11:04 AM
2

Tbf OP is also demonstrating exactly what they said about the victim complex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 11:01 AM
2

Except when it's reality. But you go on a suppory human trafficking, I suppose.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 11:00 AM
23

"Who cares about ethics..." Basically RP summed up in a single, succint phrase. You do you I guess, but for othet people reading, you can go overseas, just don't be sleazy about it. The reason women probably won't date these types is because everyone has gotten wise to their game. Don't forget that people in different countries play games, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 01:35 AM
1

Honestly don't even bother. Your spawn will probably just try to milk you for more than you intended. Better to keep your money safe, apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 12:06 PM
1

Honestly you should just look at adopting. That probably has the least chance for someone to "steal your money". Or better yet, just don't bother. Even less people who then have claim to your precious.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 12:03 PM
1

Misgendering. A clear sign of someone who has lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 12:00 PM
1

Nope. You've already dimissed a pre-nup so it's pretty obvious you're not interested in protecting yourself. The veneer... so thin!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 11:50 AM
1

Lol I never said that. Your reverse argument doesn't work here. Sorry. Edit: This is also not about "protecting yourself" as you've already dismissed a pre-nup. Again, the veneer is really thin on this one!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 11:44 AM
1

I'm not talking about rights. I'm talking about your paranoia about "being taken advantage of women" as it pertains to women. Honestly, that excuse is really just a thin veneer barely hiding your misogyny. That's why it was false equivalency. A single woman or a gay couple aren't looking at surrogates because of some delusional belief that someone is going to steal their money. In all honesty, you're probably just RPing and have nothing to worry about.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 11:34 AM
0

Why do you care? According to you, women will think a hoe phase is empowering, men will not. Men will think a fuckboy phase is necessary, women will not. There is no double standard here, just a bitter rant against women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 11:26 AM
1

False equivalency. I'm talking about you, not these fake people you've injected into the situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 06:02 PM
2

True, but I also did forget that in Perfect-Complaint's scenario the men are also braindead. They probably wouldn't know what a CPS even is.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 01:40 PM
1

Lol. That's the point! Just like in a marriage, you never know. You're just trading one contract for another. You should probably just ditch the idea of having kids if your reasoning for looking outside conventional means is fear of being exploited by other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 01:38 PM
1

Usually those also require a legal contact. Unless you're trying to lose the baby to the mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 11:05 AM
1

Depending on state, they may award alimony for common law marriages.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 01:28 AM
3

Pre-nup
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 01:02 AM
3

??? You don't need to get married to get child support.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 12:59 AM
2

75% of divorce is due to lack of commitment. Guess people can't commit even within a legal framework. Maybe they think the contract will help you stay committed? Who am I kidding.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 11:02 PM
14

So why isn't the father calling CPS for malnourished and beaten children???
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 09:16 PM
2

False equivalency.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 09:15 PM
3

A marriage gives someone incentive to leave? Then why stay in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 09:10 PM
0

I don't know. Paying for a good or trustworthy nanny or daycare is going to pretty much cost you more than alimony, unless you're already making decent money.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 09:09 PM
2

I mean the vast majority of complaint/CMV posts on the sub lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 08:23 PM
10

I would agree except that we know who is doing the most complaining here...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 04:33 PM
3

That happens because of terrible communication, especially if you're already married. Didn't want to have kids and someone isn't OK with that? What did you all talk about before tying the knot?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 05:14 PM
1

I don't think they necessarily end badly, they probably just end. Unless one person based the entire relationship around sex. Most people will move on if there is no fire, no need to burn bridges (pun intended).
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 10:47 PM
1

If society has changed, you have to either change or go somewhere where it's to your liking.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 10:39 PM
-1

That's not what makes one an incel but sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 10:38 PM
2

Possibly. I don't devote far enough time to Reddit to have that same opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 05:01 PM
1

I don't think so. Redditors are probably talking about others who post like incels, not just having a different opinion. You can both post an opinion and have that opinion also be "incelic", but you could also just post an opinion devoid of that kind of rhetoric.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 04:48 PM
2

I don't think so. No one on Reddit thinks sexless men are incels, rather Reddit thinks incels acting like incels are incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 09:01 PM
1

I don't think anyone gives this advice unless you mean treat them like people, then yes, treat women like people.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 12:15 PM
2

Yep. New parents, don't feel guilty for taking a little "me time". Everyone needs it. Just don't neglect the kiddos!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 01:16 AM
5

What a sexist/chauvinistic take..
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 01:14 AM
1

I've heard sex is important to men due to testosterone levels. It might have been posted here though so I'm not entirely sure how accurate it could be. There was a lot of anecdotal stories (redditors gf had to get testosterone for some reason and she relayed her sexual changes to them).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 11:23 AM
1

I don't think the things you listed preclude women from dating men, but I do agree that there are differing levels of the traits in everyone, but on the surface they do appear to apply mostly to men. But that's only if you look at it from the outside and don't actually get to to know anyone. If "women are fed up with dating men" it's because they are dating the wrong kinds of people, or maybe they are trying to be too controlling in the relationship. This could also be applied to "men who are fe…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 11:21 AM
1

That or copypasting a tired cliche from the Internet 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 11:48 PM
1

My opinion is that you should probably seek help.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 11:08 PM
1

Honestly I hear men express a gang bang scenario more than women do
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 07:18 PM
1

Maybe a therapist can help work this out for you???
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 06:14 PM
2

OP doesn't want discussion if you look at their posts. They're looking for confirmation of the beliefs they already hold.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 06:12 PM
1

They never said that???
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 06:11 PM
3

I guess that's one way to go about confirming biases.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 06:09 PM
1

People throughout in history have been much poorer with much less time to spend on dating, this isn't it. You talked about dating. What they said makes some sense. Lots of people were wed or paired to the neighboring farmer's son, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 10:49 PM
1

Touch grass. It's the apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 10:46 PM
1

This post is creepy AF.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 07:21 AM
3

Wasn't it Kevin? Stanley is married. Edit: Or had a mistress. I forget the timeline.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 07:29 PM
1

So is this only about sex with her or do you actually want to be with her for the reasons you stated? Maybe you should ask he if she wants to be your girlfriend?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 11:15 AM
1

Maybe. But even before we had society, the strongest hunted, and then the rest looked after the home and gathered. Still not ideal.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 05:22 PM
2

Sounds ideal, but at only 19 I doubt the other partner would be making enough for you all to survive on unless they're working at least 2 jobs. It's like you said, we got to work, men and women. That's probably one reason why your generation is thinking about not having kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 05:00 PM
2

Pretty much! I was just commenting on the list of things you thought you could improve or get caught up on. It really depends on the baby though. Right now I don't have time for anything unless my partner takes rhe baby. Maybe that'll change once they are a bit older.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 04:43 PM
1

Good for you. It also entirely depends on the child/children. I'm lucky if my baby doesn't want to be held for 30 minutes! Still very young, maybe this will change when they're older.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 04:07 PM
3

As someone raising a baby rn and on paternity leave, you do not get much time for hobbies. At least in the beginning.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 04:03 PM
2

People can dress in a way that makes them feel good about themseleves regardless of gender. Maybe that is what is going on here. Also, "conservative" clothing is often seen as a standard forced upon society by men anyways, so wearing the opposite of that standard might be what you are seeing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 06:48 PM
3

Probably hard to gauge when it isn't talked about much.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 05:47 AM
3

Yep. Studies also found access to abortion led to lower crime rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 09:50 AM
0

So nothing, then. I'll just claim kids don't use online dating all that much.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 08:45 AM
-2

You think kids today are mostly online dating? Based on?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 08:42 AM
0

Then don't use an umbrella term like "online dating". It just makes you look like a liar.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 08:36 AM
-2

Hate to break it to you, but online dating existed before Tinder. Social media existed before TikTok. If you meant something else, you should've said it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 08:30 AM
2

OP literally states the bar is low.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 07:37 AM
1

Lol people in their 30s and 40s were also dating online. Influencers are just the cheap man's celebrity. Come on.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 07:36 AM
2

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 11:11 PM
5

My parents also told me a of that, but they didn't say that doing all of these things would make someone interested in me. They kind of just said it was the right thing to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 04:46 PM
3

Bald makes you look younger than balding imo. Like, that balding look just makes you appear 45+
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 10:56 PM
3

Tbh child rearing is hard work. Choosing to be a single mother or father is going to be a choice not many would make. So, I don't think they'd lose much value for most men in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 01:01 AM
1

Looking at Japan...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 02:41 PM
1

I dunno, but people don't go about "gnashing their teeth and rending their blouse" over others. Maybe try a human? Edit: clarified a word for a -cel
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 07:53 PM
–

Looking at Japan, it seems like they also have a rise in "virginism", so it likely has nothing to do with "feminism".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 07:50 PM
2

...life unfairly gave physically attractive people an advantage... What a phrase. Physical attractiveness is one advantage, but if those people keep thinking it's the only advantage, or the only way to meet people... I can see why they are stuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 04:47 PM
–

Rise of virginity amongst men where? Looking at the trends, at least worldwide this isn't the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 04:42 PM
1

...as living together is constantly dating. As someone who has done this, it's really not. On a date, you probably want to show your best side the entire time. Living together is more like being comfortable showing your true side the entire time.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 03:30 PM
1

They were probably looking to get out of the country ngl.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 02:32 PM
1

Pretty sure they said it's painfully obvious when someone doesn't know what they are doing virgin or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 03:52 PM
1

Yup most don't care or know. Having sex one, two, even ten times doesn't make anyone a pro by any means and probably won't change your performace anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 03:51 PM
3

Yes, eventually and if you trust them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 02:51 PM
1

Women who choose to date younger men seem to face a disproportionate amount of judgement. “Us humans are judgemental, and if what our neighbour is doing is misaligned with what we expect, we put a spotlight on it,” says Lordan. “Women who match with younger men go most against the grain when it comes to our narrative of marriage, and so suffer the most judgement.”
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 10:47 PM
0

Up to a point, and then Hulu puts in in as a scene in your mini series lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 08:19 PM
4

Even prospective employers could run into that. Who knows if that will affect their decision. So, just be careful is the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 09:01 AM
0

Oh, baby, baby... no.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 04:40 PM
0

Oh, honey. I know reading is hard. Here it is again: So can a anyone get an abortion in AR? No? That's because the State took that right away. Nowhere did I mention FL. You responded with FL. You know, you can't really lie effectively when there is a paper trail.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 02:58 PM
1

They would probably desire these women you speak of, but possibly they wouldn't be able to reach them. If these older but younger looking women are so wise, they probably will skip the younger less wise males and seek those with similar wisdom and life experiences to their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 06:50 AM
2

AR isn't FL, and in AR you can't get an abortion. So no. You didn't, actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 06:45 AM
2

You didn't answer my question, but that is probably because I mentioned a State that decided to oppress women directly because of SCOTUS overturning Roe v. Wade. Ya know, like my comment had stated. Imagine that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 06:22 AM
1

Proof positive that religious fundamentalism is a dangerous brew mindlessly imbibed by the gullible and the cruel alike.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 02:24 AM
1

??? Have you reported anyone for "murdering" a fetus via abortion? No? That's because it's not murder. At all. You just lost State. Give it up, girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 02:16 AM
1

Especially when the other party l fails to make their argument This is probably why I can't understand what the fuck you're trying to say lol. Game. Set. Match.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 02:11 AM
1

Why would you murder people for getting an abortion?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 01:52 AM
6

It's an incel
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 01:29 AM
2

This just isn't true. You just have a very small circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 01:26 AM
3

So can a anyone get an abortion in AR? No? That's because the State took that right away.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 01:03 AM
1

Why would you go on a murder spree?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 01:00 AM
4

Zamn. I was blind to not see that the conservatives were actually the ones operating to get us easier voting, better healthcare, higher levels of diversity and equality, a living wage, protections from fundamentalists... wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 10:14 PM
1

It's a cluster of cells.. ok
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 10:12 PM
3

SCOTUS didn't make it illegal, they just took away protections to prevent from women being oppressed by the States.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 10:11 PM
1

Yes. Blame the women, but don't provide them all an option to get safe medical treatment. Brilliant.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 10:08 PM
1

Lol no they're not. The Republicans literally took away rights from women in the country, and the Legislative branch also didn't feel like codifying any kinds of protection. Ofc that attempt was blocked by, you guessed it, Republicans.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 10:06 PM
1

Not really. Most people think they are MC but that just isn't true.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 10:02 PM
3

Hard disagree. They will try to pretend that this somehow isn't a big deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 10:01 PM
–

Exactly. But then what happens if the contraception fails.. State-required pregnancy!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 10:00 PM
–

I was on board til I saw they were holding out to be a SAHM.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 09:58 PM
1

See your last sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 11:24 PM
2

Makes sense. Roe v. Wade was upheld by SCOTUS using the same legal theories as some of our other rights not expressed in the Constitution: same sex marriage, same sex rights, interracial marriage, protection from slavery, individual ownership of weapons, etc. Etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 05:51 PM
0

A fetus isn't a baby?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:59 PM
6

I guess the worry is that the federal government is taking away your rights and the idiots are cheering.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:58 PM
1

Probably because the conservatives kept pushing their religious views on everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:57 PM
5

They're just going to use clothes hangers or go to blue states/less regressive countries (if they're rich). Ya know, like happened in the past?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:55 PM
4

The pay gap is about overall pay and inequality btw, not anecdotal evidence or narrow comparisons.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 09:34 AM
1

Also, people jumping from one relationship to the next might not actually be happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 10:56 PM
1

It's not horrible advice, but if you tie your entire worth to a relationship you can't yet get, it's no wonder these people would rather remain miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 10:55 PM
0

Or, you know, when someone thinks they are sneakily checking someone else out but it's so damn obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 10:01 AM
-1

Or, you know, when someone thinks they are sneakily checking someone else out but it's so damn obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 10:01 AM
1

*Holds up mirror
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 09:59 AM
1

In your case it seems like they are offput by your whole vibe.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 09:58 AM
1

Def UCO
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 05:21 AM
1

69
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 05:16 AM
0

They want to harm women
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 05:11 AM
-1

Sounds likely (almost certainly) to be a misogynist
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 05:09 AM
9

Lol women incels exist
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 05:08 AM
1

Nah seems wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 05:01 AM
0

I don't think she ghosted you for that reason lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:56 AM
2

That's what virginity boils down to for a lot of men: Machismo.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:54 AM
1

Why wait til you're 25 then?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:52 AM
0

So brave
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:50 AM
1

Nothing would change except maybe the incels dying off if I'm going to be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 10:36 PM
3

Wait. There's an REBOOT!?!?!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 04:21 PM
30

Also probably relevant: Millenial and Gen X kids are now content creators and directors, and some of the Boomers who had been gate keeping have left the industry.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 02:32 AM
1

Engineering technically falls under STEM. Most if not all the engineers where I work are men, save one woman in the Biomedical Engineering dept.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 02:22 PM
2

Don't be so creepy when you ask women out.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 04:07 PM
6

Most men make fun of other men's dicks. Well, in certain alpha circles I suppose.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 02:08 AM
1

Of course marriage is a relationship. You don’t need to partake, but many of us find it fulfilling.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 12:45 PM
1

Marriage noun the legally or formally recognized union of two people as partners in a personal relationship (historically and in some jurisdictions specifically a union between a man and a woman). "a happy marriage"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 08:58 PM
1

Yes. They are people too.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/22 12:14 AM
4

They don't get circumcized.. that's up to the parents! 😭 Care to try again? If you somehow didn't get circumcized as a baby, no one forces you to get the procedure done late in life. Flagged.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 08:46 PM
2

What? Our culture is still overwhelmingly biased towards males. Not just the US, but everywhere else as well. Bruh. Take a real look outside.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 09:06 PM
1

Except males don't have a body that carries the baby so that slogan is a moot point within the context I stated. "My life, my choice" is a better fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 03:13 PM
1

You're really advocating for permits to procreate? Or are you just playing devil's advocate here.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/22 10:03 PM
1

While true, there is no way to viably transfer a fetus to a male or mechanical uterus at this time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/22 10:01 PM
4

Along with adapting, or maybe instead of adapting, you should try lowering expectations of what you're looking for, that is if you still want a trad lifestyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 07:06 PM
1

r/birthofasupervillain
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 07:03 PM
1

I will meet you halfway. Getting married early is fine, but having kids early is actually much harder. You're right on that part.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 11:08 PM
1

Ohh a study?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 11:02 PM
2

Lol no. No matter the sex, most people complain about uniforms. And example is so laughable it's still covered in jmthe excrement from whence it was pulled.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 12:37 PM
1

How many states already have a database of dna regardless of that statement?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/22 07:19 PM
0

Both parents must consent to the birth of another. Those who opt out must pay child support. Set wages for every job and position, with no bonuses or perks allowed aside from incidentals. Yearly COLA raises are fine, but no other kinds of raises. No sex specific positions. Multiple genders lawfully recognized. No sex or gender specific sports or competetive teams. Universal paid paternity leave of 4 weeks.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 10:04 PM
1

They won't. It will help if you're developed in other areas.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 10:49 PM
2

Dancing isn't looks though, so you just lost your own argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 10:48 PM
1

Lol welcome to every generation ever that has had media or distractions of strength.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 10:45 PM
1

Preaching to the choir.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 12:45 AM
1

No one can consent if impaired. There is no double standard save for the ones you impose on yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 12:30 AM
1

Yes. Logically speaking, a hypotherical homeless man's child should have at least and usually does have the same living conditions as them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 09:57 PM
3

To be fair, anyone can set rules. Whether the two parties (or however many) agree on them is between them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 05:22 PM
0

It's simple enough to not place sex on a pedestal.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 05:21 PM
-4

Seems like one has to come to terms with why they feel inferior not being the first, second or third choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 05:19 PM
11

Probably because everyone and I mean everyone believes that males are just here for sex and don't form emotional attachments. Blame that on the media, culture, whatever, but that idea has been around for ages.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 05:18 PM
1

Women sleep with men for food? I figured it was men believing they can smash cuz they paid for dinner, not the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 12:45 AM
39

Well, if you cherry pick your data ofc you'll get what you want to hear.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 08:17 PM
2

Check out the Saudi princes. Get back to reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 11:48 PM
1

Phil Spector, Menendez brothers, Prince Andrew.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 07:39 PM
1

Oh, are we equating rich as only being born into wealth, now?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 07:32 PM
2

I mean, all you have to do is look at Trump and your entire argument falls apart. Or Epstein. Or Putin. Or Bezos. Or Musk.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 07:24 PM
1

I'm assuming most women who falsely cry rape also don't have the time or money to fight it?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 07:17 PM
2

Ah. I was talking about Ford, not Swetnick.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 07:16 PM
2

They rape people when they can't understand why someone won't sleep with them, or when they are so rich or so well connected they can pay people off ala Epstein.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 07:15 PM
4

Exactly. Also, why they approaching people while they streaming?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/21 11:50 AM
1

If wrongful? Sue all parties involved including the company.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/21 11:49 AM
3

That's not what was alleged. He also likes beers.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/21 11:48 AM
1

Oooooh wow.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/21 11:47 AM
3

Except that wasn't a lie. Rich white dudes did what they did best.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/21 11:35 AM
1

This has nothing to do with what you said in the first post? Unless you said something you didn't mean, because "highest rate" living in single parent households does not equal "single women have the most kids" in this case...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 04:35 PM
2

Just doing a quick Google search tells me that everything you said is objectively wrong, although I csn see why you would feel that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 12:24 PM
2

MeToo was woman initiated and men initiated so not sure this fits with men standing up to other men making a woman feel uncomfortable...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 08:38 PM
1

Not always true. Anecdotally, I'm close friends with a straight woman who I don't wanna bone because she is just too much of an airhead for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 11:55 PM
12

Is this the same OP that posted? Talk about a shift in attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 11:19 AM
3

This doesn't work. Pay no mind to its second edit, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 02:57 AM
2

I think you're trying to say that women who push/pushed for equality are the same women who said they wanted to be a stay at home mom? Just because someone else fights for the rights of others, that doesn't mean that they or others necessarily have the same goals and values. And looking at the percentage, it is still a minority that want to be a stay at home mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/21 02:39 PM
1

You need to talk to women outside of your circle, because some of these situations do work. Also, if you're finding yourself in the friend zone, she probably never found you attractive or desirable anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 03:51 PM
2

It's not only that, Sarah was a shitty mother to John. In reality, the Terminator was a good role model for John because John couldn't hurt him. Foster homes didn't work, and his last family seemwd decent enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/21 03:21 PM
1

True, money and social improvement can lead people to be attracted in a sense to these types
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 01:39 AM
0

Narrator: What they actually said: Who cares? I have high standards and am a kissless fat virgin at 23. Im prepared to still be one at 83 if i don't meet the right woman. Better to be alone then to give up your dignity.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 03:34 PM
1

Let me ask you a question: What are his standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 01:54 PM
3

They don't think they'll never end up with someone, they said that if they don't end up with someone who meets their standards that they are OK with that. Also, that could be their view right now. Give them a decade, maybe their view changes a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 08:05 PM
3

If they're fine with not settling so be it. You might be trying understand the why, but maybe they've already given you the answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 07:41 PM
1

Lol tl;dr Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/21 11:21 AM
1

I agree. Men should take no responsibility since they apparently have no agency
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 03:39 AM
-1

As someone who was 30 and had a 22 year old girlfriend... it happens. It might not be the norm, I don't know or really care.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 11:13 PM
-1

I think incels fit more into the mass murderer, school shooter category rather than the serial killer category.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 01:41 PM
6

Physical assault is generally defined as any unwanted physical contact, but doesn't explicitly say physical harm. Some jurisdictions include threats of physical harm or contact. So, no. Physical assault is not worse than rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 01:32 PM
10

You believe them until and if it turns out they lied. He needs to sue everyone he can for damages. 'Murica. Edit: Mobile typos
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 01:25 PM
0

Oh wow. Which number in the Forbes 500 are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 05:52 AM
1

Lel
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 04:56 AM
1

True, but there is a need to stem STIs and unplammed pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 11:29 AM
2

The short simple answer is that when people are used to being in power, in this case through the privilege of the patriarchy, anything that goes against their sense of entitlement seems like a direct attack.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/20 04:21 AM
-1

What you're suggesting is very close to sexual assault.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 04:51 AM
5

I think you need to start looking and hanging out with different types of women
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 12:13 PM
1

I think you're confusing the human word biology with the actual biology that tells us humans what to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 03:27 AM
5

Lol. Wasn't MGTOW that one extremist reddit that got quarantined/shut down? If anything, femnism had freed up certain small men to show the world the monsters that they truly are. People, avoid anyone who thinks MGTOW is a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/20 01:26 PM
1

Dunno. My fiance is financially stronger than I am.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/19 05:50 PM
9

So... they are weaker, and thus commit less violent crime. Strictly speaking, then, violent crime is the domain of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 05:59 PM
1

This might also be from the study you were talking about: These clinical observations are consistent with what the study’s lead author, Michael Rosenfeld, suggests: that women may be more likely to initiate divorces because the married women reported lower levels of relationship quality than married men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/19 08:04 PM
0

Look it up in your right-wing debate tactics handbook.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 04:23 AM
1

What do you think low cost housing initiatives and subsidies are? Market caps?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 01:57 AM
0

That's why there are laws protecting the many facets of food, water, and shelter.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 01:47 AM
0

Those are called wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 11:07 PM
3

Thank you. Someone here in purple was adamant that sex was a need, like a survival need. They tried to paint it as a mental health issue or whatever... but I agree. It's a want, a desire. No one is entitled to it, at all, and no one needs it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 05:41 PM
2

TYL
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/19 08:29 PM
1

Regardless, sex is not a personal need, something required for survival.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/19 06:49 PM
2

Yep. The power trip of depriving someone of their property. Most muggers have no way of knowing if a target has money or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/19 06:44 PM
2

You're insinuating that married couples legally have to provide sex? Or is that just the religious part?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 02:10 AM
1

Sorry I'm not sure what DB means in this context
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 02:08 AM
2

Yes. Criminals aren't mugging people they can't handle, they attack people that think they can dominate.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 02:05 AM
1

I don't disagree that the need does exist, but to force someone to satisfy your need is an act of force and violence, and cannot simply be disregarded as about fulfilling a need.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 02:02 AM
6

You could jack off to get satisfied sexually. Rape is about power because what you're doing is forcing someone to satisfy your needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/19 02:22 AM
3

I don't think she owes him anything, legally or morally, unless that was something explicitly agreed upon before starting the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/19 02:19 AM
2

Eh. Good luck winning any arguments with that in divorce court.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/19 02:18 AM
2

I mean, people give Melania shit all the time for riding Donald's coattails and for having married her way into success, so I wouldn't say no one talks about the women who got where they are through the achievements of a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 10:27 PM
1

r/selfawarewolves
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 10:28 PM
1

Coincidentally, I could say alphas don’t care about some title or what the world thinks if they actually have power over others. Who chases titles devoid of power? Betas.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 05:27 PM
11

Marriage is a sacrifice and compromise for both parties
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 04:55 AM
7

The media hardly pushes for men to get married. I think you’re confusing the diamond/wedding business for the media.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 04:55 AM
6

I dunno. Lots of alpha male types are actually married, some for love, power, money, etc. Seems like yours was a comment fired off in anger.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 04:53 AM
3

Ok. That makes more sense now. And yeah, I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 02:16 AM
1

Submit means obedient. Usually.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 12:57 AM
1

Exactly. Lots of reports coming out these days that are hilariously contradictory, like coffee leads to longer life... and also cancer.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 03:19 AM
1

Yeah I had to look it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 04:26 AM
0

I suppose an effective way to even out the odds with regards to alimony is to actually address the gender gap. If women made more or similar amounts to men, perhaps there would be no need for alimony payments at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 01:41 AM
1

Huh? I never said punishment wasn’t effective at all. The overarching theme of my argument has been that increasing punishments does not lead to increased deterrence, and that this has been backed up by criminologists. I don’t want anything. I’m just responding to your replies.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 01:38 AM
1

Right. Here is my reply to you about that: Allow me to correct the statement: The notion that more punishment causes less infractions is a fallacy because it is an absolute statement that has been proven false by scientific studies
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 01:29 AM
1

What does this have to do with my original comment? A true statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 01:22 AM
1

Right. Here’s my original reply to you: That’s been proven wrong in criminal justice studies lots of times. A true statement that has been laid out to you multiple times in this comment chain.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 01:16 AM
1

...I believe the number of children being born would dramatically rise once that burden was removed. An interesting theory. A lot of first world countries are experiencing lower birth rates among native born citizens, but is future insecurity a main factor of this phenomenon? I’ve never considered it myself. If you look at the third world, birth rates aren’t much of a problem, but then we might attribute the children being born in those countries as security for the parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 01:06 AM
1

While short and moderate sentences deter crime, criminologists have found that harsh sentences do not deter crime. Meaning, increasing punishments does not lead to a further deterrence in crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 01:00 AM
1

True. But that’s not your original statement. I just took your original statement as incorrect because it’s been proven incorrect. If you had qualified your statement this way (“up to a certain point”), I likely would have chimes in. But maybe you didn’t know that, which is why I simply said that what you originally wrote was a misconception.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 12:49 AM
1

None of my absolute statements were proven wrong by scientific studies
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 12:35 AM
1

Right. My comment was about the top comments and thread in general, not specifically the comment chain. Edit: I think they’re talking about 13 year olds in this thread, not 17 year olds.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 12:06 AM
1

Allow me to correct the statement: The notion that more punishment causes less infractions is a fallacy because it is an absolute statement that has been proven false by scientific studies
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 11:55 PM
1

Right. Which 13 isn’t in the range of and what many of the top comments are talking about (13 year olds).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 11:51 PM
1

That’s one law. I’m thinking they have a separate law for “fact of the commission with violence” along with increased sentencing. So I guess not legally rape but still just as reprehensible. A child cannot consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 11:49 PM
1

He can identify precisely because it’s a social construct.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 11:38 PM
1

I think they’re talking about 13 year olds in this thread, not 17 year olds.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 11:37 PM
1

Good thing we have laws to protect the still-developing children, then.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 11:28 PM
1

Is that a legal definition? Pretty sure you’re still a pedophile if you’re convicted of that crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 11:27 PM
1

Right. The notion that more punishment causes less infractions is a fallacy because it is an absolute statement. While short and moderate sentences deter crime, criminologists have found that harsh sentences do not deter crime. What does this mean? This means that while some might assume that if you increase negative side-effects of an action that people would commit that action less, this is not the case. Increasing side effects has diminishing effects in deterring behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 11:16 PM
1

It’s not a gotcha moment, I was simply pointing out the fallacy of the original statement and commenting that it’s more nuanced than that, as social scientists have discovered.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 11:07 PM
1

Right. Which is a completely different argument than: If you increase the negative side-effects of an action, then it's logical to assume people would commit that action less. Is it logical to assume this? Sure. But it’s been proven incorrect (which was my first reply to you)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 10:37 PM
1

Right. One would assume that more punishment = less infractions, but criminologists have long determined that this simply isn’t true.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 10:28 PM
1

Yeah. My refutation was against the misconception that more punishment = less infractions.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 10:02 PM
1

To phrase it more scientifically, there was no statistically significant change to offending rates as punishments increased.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 09:36 PM
1

More along the lines of ten years to life. Edit: While one might assume that more punishment means less instances of the offending action, studies have shown that isn’t the case. When harsher sentences were applied to various non-violent and violent crimes, rates of offending did not fall.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 09:22 PM
1

Amount. If you increase the negative side-effects of an action, then it's logical to assume people would commit that action less.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 09:04 PM
1

Actually, it has. Multiple studies have concluded that there is a plateau in offenders’ willingness to commit crimes and the amount of punishment received. Basically, at a certain point, criminals won’t care how great the punishment is.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 08:24 PM
1

I’ve heard some arguments here that child support is actually not for the child’s benefit, but for society’s sake. I don’t know how correct that notion is, but I can see the argument. As an entitlement to the child, it’s not a very efficient or effective entitlement when you take into account that no one regulates what the money is used for, disparities in paychecks, and no protections if the one making payments dies or disappears.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 07:58 PM
1

Ironically, food is also not scarce and yet people are starving. Globalism has helped, but also in a way makes new problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 05:41 PM
1

Diamonds aren’t scarce.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 05:30 PM
1

I see the edit, yes. No offense, but of course you would tell us how it’s not a gotcha once you’ve been found out and craft the edit as such.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 04:54 AM
1

Except: “Now you know how women feel” It’s a gotcha. Edit: Look, you can still make a point and have it be a gotcha (which it is). You’re just being disingenuous because you didn’t actually care about the answers to your question outside of how it parallels to how women feel about out-of-the-blue paternity tests.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 04:47 AM
5

That’s been proven wrong in criminal justice studies lots of times.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 04:30 AM
3

The diamond industry will fight you tooth an nail... until they learn to market friendship diamond rings!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 04:29 AM
2

Source where billions of women say this? Source of actions?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 04:27 AM
2

No one ever said we were rational, just correct /abdsurdpost
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 04:25 AM
2

The courts aren’t biased towards the women—they’re biased towards making money. Divorce court/Famy court is a booming business, and honestly they could care less about who gets the child as long as they can drag out the entire process and milk both sides of the aisle.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 04:23 AM
2

You’re right. I was tired and still thinking along the lines of HIV and not pregnancy (which affects only the woman).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 04:17 AM
1

It does make sense, but it would be under circumstances you’d probably find offensive, and admittedly outside the parameters of your question (100% faithful (assuming entire relationship before marriage). Edit: I accept that your question is an analogy, but an analogy can also be used as a gotcha, as you have shown throughout the thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 04:12 AM
1

Sure it is. You should’ve just asked straight up: what is your reaction to a paternity test from your wife?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 03:39 AM
1

Could’ve been illustrated better with an actual role reversal question: how would a man react to a paternity question?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 03:38 AM
1

You should’ve just asked: What would your reaction be if your wife of 5 years asked you for a paternity test.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 03:37 AM
1

One is a question about an STD test, one is a paternity test. The real question should’ve been, how would you react if your wife of 5 years asked you for a paternity test.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 03:36 AM
1

No, he’s right. Your follow up question is related to role reversals about paternity tests, and not about the reaction a man would have about being asked for an HIV test. You weren’t upfront about what you really wanted to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 03:35 AM
1

This is why people are saying you made a gotcha thread. You weren’t actually interested in the reaction about an HIV test, but rather what the male reaction would be if the roles were reversed (concerning a test that questions possible infidelity).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 03:33 AM
1

This is why people are saying you posted a gotcha thread. You weren’t upfront about your actual question.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 03:30 AM
1

I see you don’t respond to replies that go against your preferred answer. This really is a gotcha thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 03:29 AM
1

This is why people are saying your thread is a gotcha post. What you’re really asking is about paternity test questions. You should’ve been upfront from the beginning.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 03:28 AM
1

This is why people are saying this whole thread is a gotcha.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 03:27 AM
1

Yeah. You just described your post: a gotcha is a bad faith effort to trick people. You should’ve prefaced your question with a statement saying you were posting this as a direct result of paternity test posts and wondered what the reaction would be if the roles were reversed. That’s how you prevent your posts from being a gotcha post.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 03:26 AM
1

“Rapey” is easier to say than “sexual assaulty”
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 03:23 AM
2

A man after my own heart
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 03:05 AM
1

A good question. I’m not even sure it would be granted certiorari, but the question could be so important that somehow the case is allowed up to the Sup. Court. All someone would have to do is frame their case as a constitutional issue and bring it up the appellate court chain... not saying it will be looked at. You never know with the Sup. court though. Edit: corrected some misconceptions
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 03:02 AM
2

It’s hard to read how Chief Justice Roberts will lean on this issue (only as of late), but I suspect you are right.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 02:41 AM
1

We’re simultaneously closer to legalizing marijuana and overturning Roe v. Wade... I don’t think it could never not happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 02:37 AM
1

Could make an argument for not paying child support if he used multiple BC and also pushed for abortion, statement of non-parental custody. Who knows if it would work though.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 02:30 AM
2

Beer and Bukake... Brewkake.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 02:24 AM
1

Hey, good idea! This would definitely work towards proving the women were real/serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 01:21 AM
1

Yeah, stretching for the truth. You can’t tell me if those were real people, if you were being catfished or baited. It’s an interesting story that confirms your bias, but nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 12:52 AM
1

I hear what you’re saying, but speculation is based in experience, the same as anecdotes, so one is not inherently better than the other. And that still leaves the huge question—will women actually meet up with self-described pedophiles? Until we can get a super hot guy to meet up with women under this persona...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 12:46 AM
1

The point is you’d have to go. But you can’t, so you can’t verify if they were actually there, who was at the other end, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 12:42 AM
1

I don’t get why you’re lying. The media and research people presented had nothing to do with looks and also self-descriptions of pedophilia. Just the anecdotes. And anecdotes are shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 12:36 AM
1

Probably police referral. One key part of the experiment that you left out is that you have to meet up with people to see if they’re genuine in meeting with a good-looking but self-professed pedo. Everything you did was done behind the safety of a device and avatar.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 12:33 AM
1

You’re really stretching if you think I’m here defending the women. I’m really just doubtful of that dude’s claims Edit: Correction, you are that dude Edit 2: Activists also do this gather intel to forward to police.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 12:29 AM
2

Less of an analysis and more of a theory. It wouldn’t be easy to test, especially if it was the cops. It’d be a pain in the ass, really.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 12:13 AM
2

Well that’s a shame but also not anyone’s fault. You might have to widen your territory, so to speak, if that’s at all possible (visit nearby towns, states, maybe even moving eventually, etc. to find people you connect with).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 11:45 PM
2

Could you see yourself doing/liking activities they are interested in?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 11:23 PM
1

Probably was cops looking to catch you
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 11:20 PM
3

Could be cops/activists who were drawn to the whole child molester motif as well. Bet he never tried to meet up with anyone, thus dooming his “experiment”.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 11:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter