TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NeonCityNights Archive

View 3 posts and 363 comments by NeonCityNights on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

but the woman also benefits from the chores. salaried work is for work where someone else benefits from it
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 01:01 PM
1

this is why it's best to not overly engage with anyone here. waste of time
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 03:56 PM
-1

projection
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 10:57 AM
4

if you can't understand what is meant by women having a monopoly on pregnancy, I can't help you
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 02:45 PM
1

it's you that has rereading to do 🙂
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 05:31 PM
8

women have a monopoly on pregnancy. if you can't understand this statement I can't help you
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 05:21 PM
1

who said they "monopolize" it?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 04:55 PM
13

they are the only ones who can do it
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:30 PM
14

artificial wombs will have a similar effect on women that mechanization in factories had on men mechanization undercut men's greater strength and ability to do physical labor in harsher conditions the artificial womb is expected to undercut women's monopoly on the ability to carry a baby to term if technology that allows 1) egg donation and 2) artificial wombs continues to progress, it could theoretically decouple women from pregnancy, thereby eliminating their monopoly on it
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:16 PM
4

Where is any mention of familiarity in the study? Can't seem to find it. Instead the study seems to imply that women lose sexual motivation because they've solved the problem of acquiring male resources by forming a pair bond. Implying that women in this framework view sex as a bargaining chip to trade for the resources and use for bond formation. Because the state locks a man into providing for the woman, yes her "problem is solved" so to speak. But there is no mention that sexual interest decl…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 11:38 AM
1

Alimony is designed to pay her back for any childcare and homemaking she did and for any career she gave up to support him. It's not just free money). did you make this up? I can't find this anywhere. Alimony reflects a man's contractual obligation to support his wife following divorce, period. it is forward looking. furthermore if we were to use your reasoning around alimony as "compensation for past work", what about all the bills the husband paid that the wife benefitted from during the marri…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 02:46 PM
0

The language is gender neutral but it's written with the understanding that in the overwhelming number of cases men will be the primary earner. Furthermore, women out earning their partners doesn't mean they will not stop working once they are married which is very very common.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 07:59 PM
0

the phrase "benefits of marriage" is misleading, because there are none in the contact itself, only liabilities. the benefits you're referring to are by-products of a couple living together and both the man and the woman derive benefits from living together, despite delusional claims otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 06:53 PM
1

if marriage is bad for women, are there any respected mainstream feminist organizations providing information campaigns to women advising them to not get married?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 06:47 PM
4

All of the woman I know who feel strongly about marriage want kids. I believe you will find similar trends on subs like Waiting to Wed. do you feel this is an adequate method to use in order to understand aggregate behavior across an entire gender? what if another woman said all her friends want to get married because of the financial benefits the contract gives them, and therefore women in general want marriage for this reason?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 06:41 PM
3

so are women
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 05:33 PM
4

The benefits that men get that you're referring to are not the benefits of marriage. They are the benefit of simply living together. Marriage for the man doesn't specify any benefits at all. It just specifies liabilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 05:27 PM
2

what about showing off their husband on facebook
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 05:24 PM
4

how do we know this
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 05:23 PM
1

if abortion isn't available, just don't have sex if you don't want kids, because sex is not a need. pretty simple. trivial even
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 05:07 PM
4

Feminism is advocacy for women. They support sexist opinions and policies when it suits them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 05:02 PM
1

"women happier single" is just deception and pandering to women's feelings. A woman claiming to be "single" is still dating men, having sex with men, getting into "situationships", maintaining online dating profiles on all the apps, etc. Or they're collecting money from an ex-husband and just staying staying "single" on paper to keep the payments coming in. It's all bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 11:22 AM
–

I generally agree with you, even though it's difficult to argue that sex is a need like food and water is. But overall I agree with you and this is why I think the near-term arrival of sex robots represents the only thing that can restore some balance or sanity to he dating marketplace. Sex robots have the potential to have a similar type of impact on women that the industrial revolution had on men, but it's arguable that both genders could actually benefit from this, since the dating market rig…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 03:27 PM
3

I think there will be a significant difference in sexual attraction that men and women will have toward the robots that will hit the market in the near-term. The robots that will become affordable and produced at scale will not be hyper-realistic. They will move slowly and timidly, like a slow-thinking shy person. For logistical, engineering and most importantly liability reasons, they are likely to be relatively small in stature, and relatively light. So basically the robot will be small, shy, …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 03:12 PM
3

I think there could be some surprises in how many decent men, or maybe even top men end up buying these robots. I'm not saying all, or most of them will go for robots, but as the features, sophistication and customizability continues to improve, it could start attracting some of these guys to at least try them out.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 03:05 PM
10

But when men will do it, feminists will try to ban it: Campaign Against Sex Robots Debate: We Must Ban Sex Robots
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 11:56 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Darwinism?wprov=sfla1
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 07:41 PM
0

https://medium.com/read-or-die/how-to-get-the-guy-and-keep-him-bbf6df11927f
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 07:32 PM
1

https://medium.com/read-or-die/how-to-get-the-guy-and-keep-him-bbf6df11927f
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 07:32 PM
–

and you didn't provide a refutation to his comment
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 06:10 PM
–

this isn't a rebuttal in a debate topic that centers on comparing the genders as a whole, it doesn't refute the OPs premise
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 06:00 PM
1

Not OP but this comment is well-read and well-written, keep up the great comments
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 06:39 PM
3

she doesn't deserve you King 👑🤴👑
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 06:18 PM
1

👑👸👑
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 05:12 PM
4

<image> 👑🤴👑
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 04:37 PM
–

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 09:12 PM
2

I don't think Tinder would ever volunteer this info. This must have leaked or been fabricated
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 05:47 PM
–

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 10:11 PM
–

are you going to make a concerted effort to never marry? be honest now lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 08:45 PM
3

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 08:25 PM
–

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 06:16 PM
10

This sub is an utterly terrible representation of both men and women. This is a tiny niche little corner of the internet with a very specific narrow cohort of neurotic people. The regular contributors of this sub just want to argue about why the other gender is bad more than anything else
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 10:38 PM
5

You forgot one critical detail. The checklist only applies to men whose pictures are in the top 2% of attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 01:50 AM
3

I love your posts, never stop
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 03:03 PM
1

wow that's definitely controversial. totally understandable that people would avoid the topic
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 10:36 AM
1

how about mentally? would maturation length have any effect?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 06:22 PM
1

Do you ever wonder if longer maturation periods confer any benefits that shorter maturation periods do not?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 05:41 PM
–

he says he's dominating
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 05:35 PM
–

his wealth and elitism would make him a magnet for women
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 04:34 PM
8

Technology is always improving. If artificial womb technology were to become sufficiently advanced it could eventually become a total, possibly superior, substitute to gestating a human in the womb. It could be both healthier and safer for the baby and mother alike in many instances if it improves to a certain level. If a single man of means could qualify, he could make an agreement with a female donor (or go to a future "ovary bank"?) and then make use of an artificial womb at an authorized fac…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 08:22 PM
12

In summary society outsourced what men used to provide in a relationship (protection, provisioning, working when the only jobs available were rough jobs in factories, mining, and construction) to the government/technology, but hasn't done the same to women (intimacy, child rearing). Once sex robots reach a certain affordability and minimum level of realism, and later when artificial wombs come out there could be a balance restored in the dating market. This difference in outsourcing, coupled wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 04:36 PM
14

Yep, TRP was spawned from PUA strategies that were effective in nightclubs in the 2000s way before it went mainstream. As it gained notoriety, people started "adding more theory" and that's when the crap started to build onto it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 09:59 PM
–

They already have these robots working in factories all over the world so robot companions are basically the same thing
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 05:45 PM
–

This is a valuable point that a lot of people don't know and would rather not know. The net-taxpayer pill is a bitter pill
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 05:42 PM
3

Have you considered the possibility that if people have a sexual outlet with a robot that perhaps the rest of the relationship would be salvaged? If each partner is sexually satisfied, there is less likely to be resentment. All of this has yet to be explored.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 04:59 PM
5

Robots and machines that work in factories don't say no either, but nobody cares about them. Maybe it's because their exterior covering is not human-shaped, even though their circuitry is near-identical to a sex robot.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 04:51 PM
1

Men are going to end up doing unspeakable acts of violence. I think it will go the other way as AI companion bots and other forms of technology emerge that are able to simulate intimacy. It may get to the point where ai companion bots become more attractive than a large swathe of real women. You're a student of history, so why not give an actual historical example of your claim? why is your first example a docu-fiction?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 01:00 PM
3

AI and humanoid robot technology will continue to advance and become more convincing and the price will gradually come down. Future humans will be interacting with robots starting in childhood and robot relationships will be entirely normal to them. The only reason why it seems weird to us is because we're not used to them and have not grown up with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 08:33 PM
2

Bro I am with you on this 100% for high school. It's a damn special time. Your worst worry is your crush not reciprocating or some homework/test coming up. Otherwise you're just chilling and having fun with your friends, you feel like anything is possible, you're not worried about real problems, you have no real responsibilities. Fuck I miss that time so much. Yeah life after high school is cool too but it comes with heavier burdens that that can drag.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 09:46 PM
2

of note is that alimony is awarded regardless of the woman's "performance" as a sahm. If there were no children and she just sat around all day, she still gets the same alimony as a mother who cooked and cleaned.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 02:34 PM
6

AI human relationships will be completely normal in a few years
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 02:06 PM
2

Your robot won't look like Thor and he would show up at your front door disassembled in a cardboard box and require a very lengthy setup process. When finally assembled, his movements will be slow and jerky, similar to a slow person who is extremely socially awkward and shy. His stare will be creepy and vacant. He will just stand in your apartment all day, creeping you out as you walk by him while he just stares at you. He'll have the social status of a washing machine. You might wake up one nig…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 01:46 AM
2

You're not going to want to be Hulk smashed by some creepy robot that just stands in your apartment and waits around for you all day. You're just going to get creeped out by it every time you look at it while you walk by and catch it staring at you with some strange facial expression. Plus it'll have the same amount of social status as a washing machine. It's facial expressions will be creepy and often inappropriate to the situation. Its movements will be slow, jerky and awkward. It will essenti…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 06:48 PM
1

Look if were making technological strides for men to get off, we need the same for women. Where's my Viking sex robot? Do you think women would opt to date real men if we could all get a jacked huge dicked fuck bots? No, women won't be nearly as into sex robots. Mainly because all sex robots will have the same social status as a washing machine. They'll be mass-produced commodities that any woman could have so they won't be rare or unique like a high-status man. Second your "viking" robot won't …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 11:01 PM
0

a sex robot is different from a glory hole in the same way as it is from a fleshlight
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 10:50 PM
0

Only total loser psycho would choose a robot over real huma connection. So it's only good if they go to robots and don't bother normal people. You're jumping the gun on this. Some people simply cannot access intimate relationships through no fault of their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 10:43 PM
1

the pandora's box that is slowly opening with the advent of AI is the new kinds of relationships that humans will form with AIs and AIs in humanoid form. yes, I know, to us, right now, it all seems very strange an "incely" but for humans that will grow up alongside AIs it will probably become quite normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 10:40 PM
1

they are a different thing but that's because male and female sexuality are also quite different women can combine a vibrator with their own imagination and that can largely handle their immediate needs for men however a large part of their sexuality is focused on accessing an entire woman, not just some anonymous genitals and then imagining the rest
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 10:37 PM
2

None of these disprove anything I said because even if they're not better off financially, it still means they're now going to get free money and assets in exchange for doing squat for their husband. The incentive to divorce is still there for women, which is why the initiate it. If men didn't have to pay for their ex-wives, wives would stop divorcing. It's all about the money.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 09:20 PM
3

Your delusions are hilarious 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 07:58 PM
2

Women initiate divorce more because divorce law is designed primarily for women. It's because they'll be financially rewarded because they can take money and assets from the man in exchange for nothing. This also explains why men initiate divorce much less, It's because they know they'll have to pay through the nose. That's why they have the expression "It's cheaper to keep her." It's literally all about money. Any other reason is just mental masturbation to please one's own sensibilities about …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 04:47 PM
1

Women initiate divorce more because divorce law is designed primarily for women. It's because they'll be financially rewarded because they can take money and assets from the man in exchange for nothing. This also explains why men initiate divorce much less, It's because they know they'll have to pay through the nose. That's why they have the expression "It's cheaper to keep her." It's literally all about money. Any other reason is just mental masturbation to please one's own sensibilities about …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 04:46 PM
1

Nope. Women initiate divorce more because divorce law is designed primarily for women. It's because they'll be financially rewarded because they can take money and assets from the man in exchange for nothing. This also explains why men initiate divorce much less, It's because they know they'll have to pay through the nose. That's why they have the expression "It's cheaper to keep her." It's literally all about money. Any other reason is just mental masturbation to please one's own sensibilities …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 04:46 PM
4

Women initiate divorce more because divorce law is designed primarily for women. It's because they'll be financially rewarded because they can take money and assets from the man in exchange for nothing. This also explains why men initiate divorce much less, It's because they know they'll have to pay through the nose. That's why they have the expression "It's cheaper to keep her." It's literally all about money. Any other reason is just mental masturbation to please one's own sensibilities about …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 04:45 PM
1

The vast majority of matches are fake because tons of guys just right-swipe every profile and only look at the ones that swipe back.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 06:57 PM
1

Adults should be able to recognize the fantasy elements however these movies and TV shows end up brainwashing and deceiving children and teens in their formative years because they have little to no sense of the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 05:26 PM
–

If you're worried about not being able to get an abortion, just don't have sex
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 05:05 PM
7

I don't think it tracks. The speed dating events are just a bad deal for the men. The women who show up to these have an arrogant, entitled, mercenary outlook about getting their next man (husband). They're tired, cynical and jaded from all their past relationships and are now treating the process of finding their husband as a factory-style conveyor belt-inspection of men. The women themselves will be average at best but their expectations for their husband will be through the roof. He'll have t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 11:46 PM
3

that's interesting, why would such a small change yield such a big difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 09:36 PM
1

that wouldn't make sense because speed dating has a surplus of women, which is the inverse of online
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 07:14 PM
–

They can't make Chad bots because Chad bots won't be unique or have any social status. What you think will be a Chad bot would actually be a very expensive (and heavy) walking dildo. Since many women could buy one, it won't be special. Because it's a sex robot, it will have less social status than a washing machine. Because it will be a commodity possessed by many women and provide no social status, it can't be a Chad. Chad is Chad because he's rare, special, and provides social status. These bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 09:28 PM
–

You're off the mark, the only thing that can make the impact on the dating market you describe is affordable sex robots. They don't have to be perfect, either in appearance or behavior, they just have to pass a certain threshold of realism and many men could be satisfied with that, at least for a period of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 07:08 PM
2

where? examples?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 05:03 PM
4

That happens daily on this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 06:12 PM
1

You may like this guy https://youtu.be/AMWPendnNeg?si=ku2lRGKkUIludBm4
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 01:47 AM
3

You can tell by so many of the comments that disagree with OP that his post has gone completely over their heads. Furthermore they're confident in their ignorance. OP is in a league of his own, the userbase here is not going to read and learn about these topics, they just want to bicker about man vs bear type debates and then get back on tiktok and insta.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 07:12 PM
0

You should start a substack using all your posts. Based on the comments here, you can see how little of your posts are actually understood, how uninformed the ppd userbase is (especially in regard to anecdotal experience vs population-wide statistics) and how unwilling they are to learn from the source material.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 03:41 PM
1

do you think women will lower their standards after reading this? they won't. the only option men have is to increase their attractiveness however they can. that's the only thing that will make a difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 12:08 PM
-1

It's not. This is just a joke intended to flatter women
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 03:18 PM
0

did the patriarchy build a society that relieved women of the pressure to be feminine?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 01:41 PM
1

you don't know how other people are thinking
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 01:00 PM
1

how do you know other people are being racist when they do it
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 12:08 PM
1

it's a preference when you do it, but racism when others do it?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 08:02 PM
1

Men do women the biggest favor by marrying them
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 08:32 PM
1

Yeah it's a fact that women choose men who are already talented, accomplished, fit, healthy and happy for marriage. You want a study for that?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 07:02 PM
1

These studies have it all backwards. Women choose men who are already talented, accomplished, fit, healthy and happy for marriage. The marriage isn't causing these things, it's the result of them. Marriage is overwhelmingly for the benefit of women, everyone knows it, but it's too taboo to be frank about it
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 06:26 PM
2

You've got it wrong and backwards, marriage doesn't cause any of those things. The men who are paid more and promoted more readily do so via their own innate talent and ability. These men are stepping up their performance at work in response to the responsibilities imposed by marriage, raising family, all the renovations their wives want to do at home and all the vacations their wives want to take. The wife, kids and marriage are the beneficiaries. Furthermore, in many of these cases, these men …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 06:18 PM
1

you've been caught agreeing with red pill and now you're just in denial. I'll let you leave your next denial below, cheers.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 02:03 PM
0

your cynical view about the transactional nature of relationships is red pill and is entirely inconsistent with your user flair
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 01:44 PM
1

what isn't red pill about your view?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 01:22 PM
2

would you say then that this cynical view accords with the blue pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 11:58 AM
2

Can you post a link to the video?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 01:29 AM
2

not everyone here comes to this sub as often as you, so they don't know that the question gets asked a lot, and they're interested in the debate
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 04:03 PM
2

he has taken a red pilled view of marriage, and it's made people angry at him
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 01:45 PM
2

you're seriously asking this question in a debate sub
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 12:43 PM
-1

it's cute that you're imagining that he's "begging" have you not realized that this is a debate sub? the posts are for the purpose of debate? it's in the title of the sub
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 12:41 PM
3

Sorry to hear this. It's maddening that nobody came to help you. Just know there are people out there who would. Get well and try not to overthink it.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 11:47 PM
2

Western feminism is essentially just red-pill for women. Where are the red pill groups financed by the government? the men's studies programs at universities that teach red pill? the non-profits supporting red pill causes? the laws being passed by governments to support red pill causes? feminism has all that, red pill has none of them
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 03:57 PM
4

this would be a very cool movie
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 10:06 PM
-1

the people who did this study are telling us that preteens as young as 10 are more likely to face higher risks than 20 to 24 year olds.... slow clap....
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 09:52 PM
–

The boy bands are typically made up of above-average looking guys and their music contracts give them a massive boost in social status. These two things are both rare among men and highly coveted by the majority of teen girls. The music is also designed to appeal specifically to them. It actually follows a very specific formula that has been reused for decades in the music industry. Girl bands just don't make music that appeals to straight teen boys. Teen boys tend to prefer music made by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 09:47 PM
2

Would you still feel the same way about marriage if there were no legal obligations of either spouse toward one another if the marriage were to end in divorce?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 10:22 PM
–

yep and they last longer too. totally unfair
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 08:38 PM
–

women enjoy sex more than men, and I've always been jealous of it
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 06:16 PM
1

sorry to hear this. I'm not sure what your situation is but I reiterate that a man is capable of truly loving his wife deeply and affectionately while also seeing another woman discretely and privately. obviously it's not ideal, but a man could be happy in a such a marriage long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 01:15 PM
1

I wouldn't take anything he says seriously, his whole schtick is late night comedy, being cheeky, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 01:58 PM
2

the less body hair, the better!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 12:38 PM
3

No. Male danger doesn't come from "statistics," it comes from strength bears are stronger than men
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 05:16 PM
–

what about the average woman? is she overweight and sendentary and 45?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 08:38 PM
3

F. Very hard to recover from that. In the future I recommend you only open up like that with your trusted male friends
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 01:57 PM
–

yup, you can ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:21 PM
–

Exactly none: the population would be chosen entirely at random. That is how you get a truly valid estimate of the population at large. Focusing on specific factors is precisely what you want to avoid because that would introduce bias in the results.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:14 PM
–

Just as is necessary for any statistical measure of a population, proper steps must be taken to ensure that the sample population is 1) large enough and 2) genuinely chosen at random. This is not hard to achieve for any properly credentialed statistical surveyor having the time and budget, and it is very common practice. This ensures that the various factors you mention are controlled for and that the estimate is valid.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:07 PM
–

a random sample of the population that meets specific statistical requirements can be enough to draw a valid estimate. it's how many studies that make estimates of large populations are done.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 06:53 PM
–

It’s legal cheap and easy to access. Just fucking buy one and do it. You are allowed. Nobody is stopping you. Depends on the country. In France, private paternity testing has been banned for a long time to preserve family peace. It's only allowed via permission of a judge. In Israel, a paternity test only has standing if ordered by a family court. In Germany, fully informed consent is required by both parties to have legal standing, etc. In various countries outside the USA, even if private pate…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 06:50 PM
–

you can approximate this via statistical study of a representative sample of the population
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 06:36 PM
2

you're right and so do a lot of the posts in this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 12:31 PM
–

especially in the age of social media
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 09:48 PM
–

women who speak to men as if they're kindergartners the irony is that these women tend to be the most sensitive to this when they're on the receiving end of it. you just have to call them sweetheart, darling, sweaty (sic), and they lose their minds. they're secretly reporting you to the mods and posting on twox about their body image issues
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:32 PM
0

what if "smartness" was referring to an IQ test where he scored significantly higher than you. Set aside anyone's personal opinion about the topic of IQ. I'm assuming you wouldn't mind?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 12:05 PM
0

what if "smartness" was referring to an IQ test where he scored significantly higher than you. Set aside anyone's personal opinion about the topic of IQ. I'm assuming you wouldn't mind?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 12:03 PM
–

Sex elicits some very base, primal instincts in people that are too taboo to discuss in polite society. Many people may not have fully reconciled these instincts with their conscious views. Namely women who consider themselves feminists but also get aroused by being choked, insulted and demeaned during sex. It just is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 01:01 PM
1

You're not listening to original, authentic RP content. That stuff came out in the early 2000s and is very different than what you'll find today trending on the Youtube algorithm. FnF, Pearl, etc are all grifters who tailor their content to whatever will maximize their views on the Youtube algorithm and NOT according to the source RP theory. These are two entirely different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 12:53 PM
-3

When done correctly, it is fine and can still work like it always has. The harassment you read about is caused by men approaching incorrectly and making the woman feel afraid/threatened/uncomfortable.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 12:43 PM
5

If it is indeed a delusion, why worry about it? Are you concerned about those deluded men? How does their delusion affect you?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 01:48 PM
1

it's both. they are rigged, and pictures are all that matter
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 12:33 PM
1

you posted that fortune.com article right under it, (written by 4 women, why is it always women writing these pro-marriage articles?) with a misleading headline that it's just men that benefit. I'm just setting the record straight for those who won't read the article and the study. everyone knows it's WOMEN that primarily benefit from marriage. if that wasn't the case, the government would have ended it long ago
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 12:18 PM
2

your study concludes that marriage benefits both genders. you could use it to make the claim that women benefit from marriage as well
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 12:10 PM
1

the studies are deceptive: they compare married men to *divorced* men who got screwed over in divorce court. The divorced men had to give up their savings, assets and to pay alimony to to their former wives who kept the marital residence while the man had to shack up in a studio apartment to afford it all. It goes without saying that this heavily impacts the man's quality of life. for the studies to be done *properly* they would have to at least compare married men to *never-married* men and the…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 12:05 PM
-2

akshually....
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 01:45 PM
–

they're also saying bears because it's social media where it's trendy to be unserious
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 06:32 PM
-1

it's a just another trend that will be forgotten in a week
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:11 PM
12

if you asked someone if they were red pill, or blue pill. oof not even. I think most healthy well-adjusted people would say something like "what's that?" I would never utter those terms offline unironically either.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 03:01 PM
2

thx!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 06:14 AM
3

the sub's purpose is to debate rp vs bp. most people aren't interested in calling out each other's behavior in the comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 09:27 PM
3

you're making the basic mistake of confusing random people's complaints for RP theory
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 08:34 PM
9

you're making the basic mistake of confusing complaints for RP theory
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 08:15 PM
12

Plenty of RPers find massive success and get what they want. If someone with RP flair is complaining on this sub, it doesn't mean that RP is flawed. In order to implement RP you have to make changes in your life that don't happen overnight and take discipline. The complainers likely haven't taken these steps. OP's comments clearly show she doesn't know RP theory and is just lashing out because she is offended by it, and is thus taking time to post about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 05:31 PM
4

OP why you so mad at RPers?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 05:08 PM
20

You've made a lot of incorrect assumptions about red pillers, namely that they don't get attention, want women to lower their standards, that they all come here to complain, etc. Just massively wrong (tell me you don't know about RP without telling me, etc). As to your post title, RP is not MGTOW and if you don't know why then you should read up about it more.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 04:36 PM
10

Nope. You're confusing escaping loneliness with handling loneliness. Handling loneliness means dealing with it when you cannot escape it. Consider an experiment asking "who tolerates cold showers better, men, or women"? You note that women are better at not standing under shower than men, so you conclude that women tolerate the cold better than men, because they don't expose themselves to it. They're not tolerating it, they're avoiding it, which are two entirely different things. To adequately c…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:21 PM
13

It's clear you've got some steam to blow off about men. Have at it, that's what this forum is becoming. But there's no real studies on who bitches and moans more, and who is more annoying ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 06:36 PM
3

OP, what age group of women were surveyed? Only young women with lots of options? Do you have links to the scientific studies that were used by the author of the article?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 06:30 PM
24

They don't handle being alone well at all. That's why they form social networks; to avoid being alone. Research suggests females, not males, feel stressed when alone. Yes, it applies to humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 06:27 PM
–

Women feel more stressed by loneliness than men, so they form social networks to reduce that stress. There is an important distinction between 1) experiencing stress induced by loneliness and 2) adopting a method to eliminate that stress. Women are better than men at step 2. This would likely interest you https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/10/161011125959.htm#:~:text=%22Recent%20research%20suggests%20that%20young,towards%20social%20isolation%20than%20males.%22 and yes it applies to human…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 06:11 PM
–

Yes you can, have a read. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/mouse-studies
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 01:46 PM
–

yup I metioned that in the first line of my comment in my view women don't accept/handle loneliness as well as men do. they cope by forming social networks to avoid loneliness
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 01:40 PM
–

Here is an interesting study from sciencedaily.com Yes, it was done on mice, but check out the findings: Females react differently than males to social isolation Summary: [...] research suggests females, not males, feel stressed when alone. The findings [...], provide further proof that strategies for coping with stress are sex-specific. They also highlight the importance of a social network for females in particular and pave the way for future research into whether females befriend others as a …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 01:01 PM
–

When you say "alone", do you mean literally alone, or do you mean single while spending huge amounts of time with friends?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 12:34 PM
15

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knockout_game?wprov=sfla1
/r/MensRights12/04/24 04:48 PM
4

One of the greatest inequalities is that women depend on the cooperation of men in order to have their rights, but men don't depend on the cooperation of women for theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 01:33 PM
5

As a man I'd say yes absolutely men would behave the same way. The gender imbalance on dating apps is probably one of the most pernicious forces affecting the market. It's the source of the vast majority of toxicity on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 01:58 PM
2

But I hard time believing that men wouldn’t be uncomfortable with the idea that people are sexually abusing something that looks exactly like them. You can't "abuse" a robot anymore than you can "abuse" a vacuum cleaner or refrigerator. The robots are still just aluminum, silicone and circuit boards. And the robots that are going to be available in the near term will not be sentient. Humanity hasn't invented robot sentience. These bots will have just enough sophistication to do their sex bot tas…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 09:11 PM
5

They won't have lifelike intelligence. Where are you getting this from? Even if humans had the capacity to create sentient robots, there is no rule that states that sex robots have to be sentient. They would simply be given enough sophistication to perform their sex duties and nothing more. Furthermore on the remote chance that humans actually create a sentient robots, it is virtually impossible that the sentience would be human-like. The robot will have been trained using electromechanical impu…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 08:57 PM
2

Men will enjoy the robots much more because the robot just has to look good enough for simulated sex and intimacy. That's all men need and men can be attracted to the robots while looking past their flaws. I can't see women being attracted to them for several reasons. They won't have any social status. They will not protect and provide. They will not look perfectly human and will have a vacant stare and basically just look creepy to most women. They will also creep out most women because they wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 08:47 PM
1

- the AI will never forget her birthday, the names of her relatives, her workplace, their anniversary, or any other data. This eliminates most of the frustrations women have with human males. doesn't matter. the AI has no social status, just like a computer which does the same thing, so it won't be attractive. - the AI will always be 100% there, never inattentive, never checked out, never low energy. At the same time the AI will never bother her when she needs time for herself. anything with no …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 10:50 PM
5

I'm not "excited" about these bots, but I'll chuck out some counter-points Having a real woman be in a relationship with you and having kids ( as there's already a global reproductive decline ) will become even more of a status symbol than it currently is. Perhaps, but if it does, it would be a status boost for men and women alike. The gap between the successful men and those deemed unsuccessful by society due to lack of power, status and resources will widen. You've messed up cause and effect. …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 04:13 PM
6

Women already buy 8-inch dildos and it's a non-issue. So now we are supposed to think it will be an issue when women supposedly want spend thousands of dollars for a 150 lbs robot that will climb on top of them to ram its dildo into her? Interesting theory
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 03:45 PM
–

but do you have an example of what I asked for? I'm aware of that sub btw
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 04:32 PM
–

Men: how dare you post a threat a man sent you on CreepyPMs!!!! That is MISANDRY!!!! just curious, can you link to an example of this?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 04:28 PM
2

thats fair, I can agree
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 03:27 AM
–

incelspeak lives rent-free in OP's head and offends them
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 05:59 PM
4

Men love romantically, women love practically. I suspect that women want romantic gestures from a high value man, or man they are already attracted to (or see great potential in), because it shows a high degree of commitment to her, and removes uncertainty and doubt she may have of his willingness to be with her. Women don't want romantic gestures from men they aren't attracted to already, as I think this would repulse them. Also, too many romantic gestures from a high value man could also lower…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 10:26 AM
1

men will go for the dolls, and that will be one that society tries to prevent, because that will have the greatest effect
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 08:24 PM
4

No one does I think some guys do, and it's understandable. It basically means "you're worthy of me giving you a sucker's deal" i.e. hotter guys got me for free, but you, nice reliable guy, you're gonna pay and take on legal liability to get with me. It's obviously not always meant this way, but it often is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 04:59 AM
0

I'm not sure if you were trying to prove the existence of patriarchy there or give great reasons behind the most vitriol of feminist's hatred of men, but you sure did. I'm merely clearly stating the reality of the power dynamic between men and women; and it is that women have rights because men have decided, collectively, to allow them to have rights, and not because women fought and won some heroic battle. The vitriol from feminists is aimed at men who don't repeat the myth that women did the l…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 12:19 AM
–

I disagree. They sexually pander to men first an foremost or at least they have done for the majority of my existence. flat out wrong. gender quotas for women have been widespread for decades Maybe there's a corrective effort going on now but someone that grew up watching movies, TV, music videos and playing games it was obvious to me that men were predominantly behind the production and it certainly catered to men more. now you're just making broad erratic claims. so lots of men were "behind th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 12:12 AM
–

patriarchy is pretty much a meaningless term at this point. Government, media, corporations, Hollywood, pop culture all pander to women
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 11:33 PM
1

The first point also leaves out the fact that women fought for every one of those. They didn't fight for them, they agitated men to be granted rights without responsibilities that men had. Women have their rights because a certain critical group of men (lawyers and politicians) allowed them to have the rights and privileges and exemptions they continue to acquire today. If a certain group of men (lawyers, politicians or a coup) one day decide to remove or curtail women's rights for whatever reas…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 05:56 PM
–

the modern day trope of women being oppressed is a lie that we let women think is true to please and coddle women it's clear you're grasping at straws by digging up one tiny aspect of an antiquated and defunct legal framework that was abolished all the way back in 1829. If you read the entire wiki you'll see that it wasn't created to "give men power for being men" it had to with social rank, and there were plenty of instances where it would benefit women if they outranked their murderer. again, …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 04:32 PM
6

men hold an overwhelming proportion of power This is simply incorrect at best and deceptive at worst. Only a tiny, miniscule fraction of a fraction of men have had power, and they never used it to benefit all men just because men were men. It's a total misconception of history and the present. The vast majority of men have never had any power. Power has always, always been clealry allocated based on wealth and class. Your comment is textbook, classic Apex Fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 12:21 AM
7

thanks to the internet, people are realizing that women have far more rights and institutionalized privileges backed by laws and the government, which is turning the "women have it so bad" narrative that society has been subjected to for decades on its head so they want to stop "keeping score" but I don't think men will gain anything by complaining, it's their burden to strive and be the best they can be in order to get ahead. Women can get what they want by agitating as a group at the governmen…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 04:30 PM
5

I don't think it's possible to switch back even if you wanted to
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 05:01 AM
1

Well suppose there are 3 people on an island: a couple (man and woman) and a lone man. The lone man and couple don't associate with one another. The couple has a paper abortion. The lone man is now responsible for the child in some capacity. This is how paper abortions work in society, just spread over more people. Do you think it's right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/23 04:24 AM
0

Yes it can hurt the wife, I don't deny this, especially if she finds out. But the point is that men are capable of this without becoming cold and callous to their wives. Men can remain content in a marriage and continue to show love, kindness, tenderness and affection to their wife and kids while also having a mistress he sees discretely. This I think is in stark contrast to wives whom I think absolutely cannot show love and affection to their husbands once they begin cheating. It seems that wiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 03:59 AM
2

Well I don't think it's right for multiple reasons, namely that there are ample studies which show that children raised in two-parent households do much better than those who don't. These programs incentivize single parent household creation. On a more hidden level, it removes incentive for women to be pleasant or desirable mates to men. Think about what men and women did for each other before big government: a woman offered childbearing and homemaking to a man in exchange for his labor and prov…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/23 09:16 PM
1

wow, that seems pretty unfair to men, especially since they are most likely net taxpayers. the women essentially marry the state, and the men fund the state with their taxes then
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/23 05:54 PM
-4

A married man can still love his wife and be willing to commit and provide for his marriage and children even while having sex outside the marriage. My hunch is that women cannot do this. I think they need to feel that their husband can satisfy her sexually, better than any man outside the marriage. And once she changes her mind about this and starts getting sex outside her marriage, she will invariably lose all attraction to her husband. If she stays with him, she would be enduring it strictly …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 05:35 PM
–

AI is in the form of a female body that arguably might make men more likely to target actual women, Again, this is a popular myth. There is no evidence supporting the notion that a simulated activity is likely to cause someone to carry out the act on a real person. This myth arose with the popularization of violent games. The correlation between players violent video games and real violent acts is massively weak to non-existent. People say that female robots will make men more likely to commit c…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 06:37 PM
–

I think these new tech options will appeal much more to men than to women, because they don't look for the same thing in partners. I think a lot of men can have a huge part of their sexual and relationship needs met by the upcoming wave of sex robots and AI. I don't think women will enjoy them nearly as much because they won't offer her any increase in social status, it can't act as a +1 in social gatherings, it can't make her friends jealous because all of her friends can just buy the same one …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 06:27 PM
–

The whole idea seems a little creepy, and I don't think that it's going to sit well with many people to basically create slaves that are also as intelligent as humans. You're making a huge assumption here. There is no law requiring companies to imbue purpose-built robots with sentience (assuming robot sentience ever becomes possible to create). They can just design robots to have enough sophistication to do their jobs, and leave out design aspects that would make the robot self-aware.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 06:21 PM
2

she might just chuckle and say "ya". And then later still be against paternity testing if she was actually asked to take one.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 08:57 AM
1

I blame the patriarchy
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 04:12 AM
–

JustPearlyThings
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 07:12 PM
3

OP do you know if women who choose single mother insemination can then apply for government benefits for single mothers?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/23 02:20 PM
–

hoop earings are a red flag. The bigger the hoop, the bigger the cray
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 10:42 PM
0

No, not even close. Feminism is blue pill. Feminists hate red pillers.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 09:07 PM
2

Feminism is not coherent. Have you heard how many women are allowed to say "well MY version of feminism is bla bla bla". And they're never called out for it. For an ideology to be even close to coherent, its adherents can't be allowed to have their own versions of it. Feminism is not an ideology, it is advocacy. Advocacy for women, plain and simple. Regardless of how unequal the outcome is.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 09:04 PM
6

that's quite an ironic statement, given the title you used for this post
/r/MensRights06/11/23 04:42 PM
1

Second, no one cares what you want to do to a robot. You'd be surprised
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 02:45 PM
2

That's fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 06:03 PM
1

I ask this respectfully, do you think you're projecting? I see the world as full of so many interesting things that could be a man's purpose; a woman would not be. Instead should she would be a pleasant complement to his life, but not a purpose in and of itself. Furthermore, the notion that a man needs a woman to be his purpose is very unhealthy, for multiple reasons. One, for a man to self-actualize and become fulfilled, he would be happiest finding purpose in achieving excellence in some field…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 04:06 PM
1

If there isn't a woman around, men just don't have as much purpose. where are you getting this from??
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 03:12 PM
0

eventually go batshit crazy without a partner. source? I think it's the opposite tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 03:05 PM
2

yes, I think this is the case. Women are ultimately utilitarian when they select a man, as opposed to romantic. They might appreciate romantic gestures, but only because they can help confirm the man's desire or commitment to her. Romantic gestures can reduce any doubt or uncertainty a woman may have about a man's interest. In other words, a woman selects a man based on utilitarianism, and then welcomes romantic gestures from those chosen men to alleviate doubts she may have about him.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 04:28 PM
5

I feel like a big problem of alimony payments is that woman have small or non initiative to remarry. women are even coached by financial planners and divorce lawyers to explicitly never remarry for precisely this reason. they are told they can enter a new relationship with a another man, but to never formalize it or make it official for this very reason. It's totally unjust for the man
/r/MensRights26/10/23 04:18 PM
5

Having such an insane choice of men and spending years going dates I think makes them unable to choose just one guy
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 08:38 PM
–

If he was, it definitely disproves OP's theory that he was motivated by women's beauty.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 07:53 PM
–

There's a major difference. The person with 100 one-night stands will have a much lower ability to pair-bond and be satisfied with limiting themselves to one person in a committed relationship. The novelty of meeting the 101st person will not be as exciting for them. Might not be interesting or exciting at all by that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 03:21 PM
3

They might not have cared about getting laid. People's libido changes as they get older as well. They may simply have not cared.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 05:28 PM
2

the farther back you go in time, the harder it was to be beautiful. the farther back you go, the availability of the following decreases: makeup, shampoos, conditioners deodorant, soaps, toothpastes, dental care, personal hygiene products indoor plumbing bathing facilities clothing that makes you more attractive, since you had to be modest it's really not what you think bro
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 03:57 PM
15

Nikola Tesla chose explicitly to remain single: Tesla himself claimed that to be a great inventor one must not allow himself to be distracted by love. When asked if he believed in marriage he replied that: ​ “for an artist, yes; for a musician, yes; for a writer, yes; but for an inventor, no. The first three must gain inspiration from a woman’s influence and be led by their love to finer achievement, but an inventor has so intense a nature with so much in it of wild, passionate quality, that in …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 02:55 PM
1

sounds like you're just guessing/projecting this is also big simping
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 02:44 PM
5

have to pay my lawyer 48k Honestly, I feel like the biggest idiot for not becoming a lawyer; how many hours of paper pushing did the lawyer have to do for this sum?? I am a university graduate working in stem and it takes me almost half a year of full-time work to earn this before government takes its share of taxes. Seriously, if you're a lawyer, congratulations, you've really won.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 04:30 PM
1

Not at all. Women earn less because they choose jobs that require less training, with cleaner, safer working conditions, less stress to perform, greater job security, shorter commutes, other financial benefits that don't come in the form of direct salary income. Remember, all 'pay gap' studies you see are just the result of taking total average earnings of all men compared to total average earnings of all women, across all sectors and jobs in the economy. Pay gap studies aren't comparing pairs o…
/r/MensRights16/10/23 02:48 PM
1

by 'pressure society places', do you mean media that features attractive women?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 01:24 PM
2

One thing that isn't taught that SHOULD be taught is that if there is a pregnancy, the male has no reproductive rights and his parental obligations become in control of the female and the state
/r/MensRights10/10/23 02:44 PM
8

neither systemic nor institutionalized, try again
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/23 11:34 PM
3

don't look for logic in feminist "reasoning", you'll never find any it's just full of feel-good (yet fallacious) platitudes that society lets slide because of the gynocentric instinct to promote women's interests ask them how is a random man privileged by a male politician or CEO? What laws were enacted to benefit men? What hiring policy was created to benefit men? When you look at laws and hiring policies, they are all created to benefit and privilege all women.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 02:08 PM
9

While I sympathize with your post, it should be clear to everyone that whites didn't "invent slavery". It has been practiced by all races the world over, and in much more brutal ways, well before the USA was created. In the USA history there were even some blacks and natives that owned slaves.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 06:48 PM
13

I would wager that DV against men would not be recognized, for multiple reasons but mainly because feminist ideology assumes women are wonderful and can do no wrong, and two, because a large tool in the aresenal of feminists is gendered crimes i.e. crimes where the male can only be the perpretrator and the female can only be the victim. These crimes are created under the disguise of "protecting women" but what feminists really want is to give all women the ability to accuse a man of a crime in c…
/r/MensRights08/10/23 01:57 PM
23

I don't know why people think these are 'AI girlfriends'. A large language model with an animated body isn't enough to replace real women
/r/MensRights07/10/23 07:20 PM
4

I live alone and just cleaned my kitchen. Nobody paid me ....WHYYYYYY
/r/MensRights07/10/23 07:15 PM
23

Yes, the women and HR dynamic that is so widespread everywhere is toxic AF. You can have tremendous experience and qualifications and achievements in your field and you still have to justify yourself in some screening interview to some 20 something with an over inflated ego because she has an HR degree. The fact that her smart phone is constantly buzzing with likes on social media and dating apps doesn't help either, in fact it probably magnifies the problem
/r/MensRights07/10/23 01:51 PM
0

I get the humor but it misses the point: dildos have existed for a very long time and they cannot replace what a real man can offer in terms earning ability, social status, provisioning and protection, attending social functions as a couple, marriage, work around the house, etc etc (even with extra strong hugging power and a vibrating deluxe rabbit stimulator 9000 🥰🐇🥰🐇🥰)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 03:05 PM
0

AI can't give women what women want from a man. They won't have any special social status to offer. They won't be special because they'll be mass marketed to millions of women and just be a commodity. They cannot be brought to social functions. Men can be satisfied with this aspect of robots in terms of their relationship needs, but women likely won't be.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 02:43 PM
4

Meh. Pay gap is creative math looking at broad numbers that can be explained. It's just the difference between total average earnings of all men vs total average earnings of all women; i.e. it's an earnings gap. But the masses have been intentionally misguided and deceived for decades into thinking that it's the difference between every man and woman working the exact same job under the same conditions. This deception is deeply ingrained in the cultural psyche that it would be monumental task to…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 03:18 PM
1

It's because AI girlfriends will have a much larger benefit for men than AI boyfriends will have for women. This is because men and women want different things from them. Men want the intimacy, companionship, exclusivity and predictableness that an AI girlfriend can provide. I do believe that for many men, this can almost entirely replace, if not completely replace a real girlfriend, at least for a certain period. For some, perhaps it could be indefinite. Women want things that a robot cannot pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 03:33 PM
7

date another player until they realize he's a player
/r/MensRights01/10/23 09:58 PM
36

Women often wonder if they're dating the same guy
/r/MensRights01/10/23 03:24 PM
2

Yes, and furthermore: Young men are often classified as "fighting-aged males" when they immigrate, or during times of conscription; this tends to dehumanize them and hints that they could even be legitimate targets of violence or privation, or that they all want to "fight". While certain men are indeed aggressive and prone to violence, it certainly isn't all of them, and the majority, who are largely just trying to get by, shouldn't be dehumanized this way. Imagine if women were dehumanized in t…
/r/MensRights27/09/23 03:12 PM
1

fyi paternity testing in France has been illegal for decades, because as was said "they wanted to keep the peace"
/r/MensRights19/09/23 02:19 PM
71

yes and they will be coached to do so by their attorneys as well. "did he ever gaslight or mansplain to you?" "um, I think so" "that's domestic violence"
/r/MensRights18/09/23 02:00 PM
1

"Mature" has many many meanings. Does it mean that women start puberty before men? If so, is that really so great, given what puberty entails? Does it mean that women finish puberty before men? If so, what advantage does that confer women when comparing them to men? Does "mature" mean the ability to sit still and listen in a classroom setting? To have "adult conversations"? etc. Try asking her what she means by the word "mature" and have her explain how it gives women an advantage
/r/MensRights31/08/23 02:28 PM
2

OP needs to know that in Canada, the classification of the couple as common law or being in a "de facto union" happens automatically, after the 12 or 24 month period, or whatever length of the time the province has specified.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 04:08 PM
7

Use as much software or technology as you can that will track and record your location at all times, such that you can always prove where you were at a certain time in the past. If you are accused of a crime that occurred at location A at time 1, and you can prove that you were actually at location B at time 1, you can potentially avoid false accusations. Record/audio/video/text of all communications you have with women that you see as potential false accusers, especially of consent.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 03:02 PM
7

There is much to say about this but the TL DR is that most people, in their very deep unconscious, care much more about the well-being and safety and provisioning of women. This runs so deep that many people aren't aware of it. They assume that any preference given to men is zero-sum and would subtract from women's well-being.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 02:57 PM
1

Does anyone know how much it costs? Is it all taxpayer funded or do the women have to afford it?
/r/MensRights25/08/23 05:22 PM
0

It's a stupid BS concept invented by feminists to suit their own selfish agenda. It is nonsensical for a woman to be paid for domestic work because she is the primary beneficiary or one of the primary beneficiaries of that work. Work is paid when the work benefits a separate person who did not do the work. This is why a maid is paid but a stay-at-home wife is not. When a maid cleans a kitchen she will not benefit from that clean kitchen because it is not her own kitchen where she will cook her o…
/r/MensRights23/08/23 07:03 PM
1

Follow the advice in this thread and be extremely guarded with anyone related to your former spouse. Many divorce attorneys are feminist ideologues and they hate men. They have absolutely no regard for justice or fairness of any kind. Instead they are angry spiteful vindictive people who care only about getting your money through the divorce courts. Be aware that many of these lawyers will "coach" your wife to say the "right things" that will give them the best chance of getting as much money fr…
/r/MensRights20/08/23 02:17 PM
2

You can't trust the stats on ANY gendered issue study produced by ANY mainstream institution. They are all feminist. Government, university, media, all of it. Any stats that look bad for women they will just hide or change.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 02:32 AM
10

They're picking easier jobs with similar or better pay like project manager, product owner, program manager etc. They look down on software engineers (I'm a dev btw)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 04:10 AM
2

Some say the myth is that women are the romantic sex, and that it's actually men who truly believe in romance.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 02:05 AM
1

If men weren't sexually attracted to women it would be a very very different situation
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 10:07 PM
–

Online dating and social media has effectively spoiled women with options and choice. A woman's phone is constantly buzzing with notifications of matches, messages from guys and likes on their instagram pictures. When a girl has hundreds, and now often thousands of men vying for her attention 24 7 on her phone, each individual man she interacts with is utterly replaceable and insignificant because a new date can be lined up anytime she wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/23 03:19 AM
2

the man is at work and this is the procrastinated mess left by the woman
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 06:45 PM
0

so are you going to link this article?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 10:44 PM
–

Not at all. Anytime I've seen men talking like misogynists it was on Tv/Netflix, that's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 05:05 PM
2

is this for most subs? What about subs not related to gender or politics?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 04:59 PM
1

Being wanted I don't think this is what guys want. Maybe girls, but not guys. I think guys want access to the companionship and interaction
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/23 03:25 AM
1

Lol OP I know exactly what you're doing and I'm laughing, thank you, trust me I get your post lol 'polite and interesting' 😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 01:16 AM
1

You mean this one? This is not a study. This is an article that just makes a passing reference to "surveys" done years ago but refuses to even show them. Why? Furthermore, surveys are not studies. Studies are rigorous experiments that outline their claims, data, analysis, methodology and conclusion. This article doesn't have any of that and furthermore it actually provides many statements that refute the claim that men want to marry more. Chapter 2: The Demographics of Remarriage Again, this doe…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 04:51 PM
1

You hadn't shown me a study, you showed me an article. These are two very different things. Your new links are no longer about the original claim, which was that men want to get married more than than women. As it stands, it seems there are no studies showing that men want to get married more than women.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 09:47 PM
1

I've never heard that men are more 'geared' to marriage. I would be very interested to see just one of the studies you are mentioning though. Are you sure there are studies?
/r/MensRights08/05/23 07:03 PM
1

Thanks, but do you have an actual study? The article makes a passing reference to a "survey" from ten years ago, but doesn't seem to link to it either. I'm not convinced that men want to marry more, but would be open to changing my mind if you can forward me one of the studies you mentioned. ​ But the majority of dating apps are still predominantly male, so the data seems pretty accurate This is not evidence that men want to marry more.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 06:12 PM
1

this is really interesting, do have a link to one of those studies?
/r/MensRights08/05/23 03:39 PM
2

based
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/23 05:57 PM
3

Or Chad just says he's in a relationship. Regardless of whether this dynamic conforms to academic standards of statistical survey design, this scenario still represents a very real phenomenon that can cause these numbers to materialize in survey results. Even if the survey can be academically dismissed in a classroom, that still does not mean this dynamic is not occurring in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 07:27 PM
1

But it also could have been representative. If n was sufficiently large relative to the overall population and a reasonable effort was made to randomly choose participants. Again we don't know. But my point was just to answer OP's question to show how the numbers could theoretically play out. For for us to confirm a poor design of experiment, we might be better off having a an actual study that was done.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 06:59 PM
1

I don't think you could dismiss the data so quickly- it would still be documenting/capturing a very real phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 06:40 PM
22

They don't have to assume something so formal as a "monogamous relationship" for them to write "relationship" on the survey. I'd wager it might not be so pleasant for a woman in Chad's harem to take this survey, and think about all the times she's had sex with him, and then still write "single" on the survey. It might be more palatable to her to just write "relationship" on the survey in spite of never confirming with Chad that they are in a relationship. She might not feel good about herself wr…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 06:39 PM
7

Just to provide an example, the data can be valid without Chad even taking the survey. Suppose the 5 women he is dating list "relationship" on the survey. Then a non-chad man who still achieves a monogamous relationship with a woman says he's in a relationship. Then 4 single men list single on it. You now have 5 women and 1 man in a relationship, and 4 single men in your data, with everyone answering as truthfully as they can.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 06:09 PM
6

Chad doesn't have to lie or even take the survey (which he probably doesn't) for these numbers to appear in statistics. The only people that have to take the survey are the women in his harem and the single men (sprinkled in with a few non Chad men who still managed to attract a woman into a monogamous relationship).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 06:01 PM
85

Consider the atomic harem: Chad dates 5 women simultaneously and doesn't tell any of them that he's dating other women. 5 women believe they are in some kind of relationship and thus not single. One man, Chad, is not single. The 4 other men who could date 4 of those women are single. This is one way the dystopian math could be playing out. However there are other factors, but this could be a primary dynamic.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 03:00 PM
1

no more intimidated due to your success no more empathy gap no more sexual insecurity no more jealousy no more controling behaviour. I think you're missing an important aspect of AI- it's ultimately indifferent to the woman and doesn't desire anything from her, especially sex. If she withdraws sex or acts moody or passive aggressive, it won't even notice or care. There is no power-dynamic, even if the AI is programmed to pretend to care. And if it's programmed to care, what can the AI do for her…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 02:34 PM
2

no studies on this subject take work quality in consideration. Therefore everyone's assumption that women work more is incorrect then
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 11:53 PM
3

do you think maybe your opinion is biased to the opposite end? would you want to see quality of work done if the study claimed that women worked more? or would you accept it at face value?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 11:17 PM
2

interesting angle. Have prior studies on this subject analyzed work quality?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 10:57 PM
2

there are no feminazis. just a corporate culture that would never allow a study that found the opposite to be published as it would be too offensive to women. the studies just exist to pander to women. you don't need to believe in "feminazis" for this to be true
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 09:27 PM
1

you seem very bitter and angry. who hurt you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 05:12 PM
1

These studies are conducted by feminist ideologues. No government or public institute would ever publish a study showing that women benefit more from marriage, or are happier married than single. They are incapable of being objective on the matter, the culture today is thoroughly devoted to praising women and flattering their egos.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 04:29 PM
1

These studies are conducted by feminist ideologues. No government or public institute would ever publish a study showing that women benefit more from marriage, or are happier married than single. They are incapable of being objective on the matter, the culture today is thoroughly devoted to praising women and flattering their egos.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 04:29 PM
1

Women just self-report that they do more housework. It hasn't been rigorously studied. They don't do more housework
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 04:19 PM
7

Yep, this. OP can only experience her opinion because of the systems you mention.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/23 04:50 PM
4

Men have designed, built, and most importantly, maintain the environment and infrastructure that allows you to have the options in your numbered list. Men came up with and maintain the electrical, sewage, telecommunications network, economic, logistics, water treatment plants, waste collection, building and road construction and police forces, justice system, (+much more) that provide law, safety, comfort and amenities that enable your options. Without these things, society and nature reverts ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/23 04:44 PM
28

lesser sentences for same crimes less likely to be sent to jail for same crime as a man
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 08:56 PM
1

There are more factors, namely that men's ingenuity created advanced, safe and clean societies with modern economies and big governments. Society at large now offers women what only a man could back when humans were living on the frontier.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 02:12 PM
3

Yes I think it will happen. Cycles of adoption repeat. Just like with online dating. When online dating first came out people were like: wow so creepy, so weird, It's only for weirdos. But now it's super mainstream and everyone does it. For robot relationships we're in the first phase mentioned above where everyone is saying: Wow, so creepy so weird,It's only for weirdos, But as the cycle of adoption proceeds and the technology gets better, more and more people will become intertwined with these…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 03:18 AM
3

wasn't there some trending video category a while back about leftwing women complaining that they felt annoyed and guilty for being attracted to rightwing men https://nypost.com/2021/07/10/why-progressive-women-want-to-date-men-who-act-conservative/ https://www.quora.com/Why-am-I-attracted-to-more-conservative-guys-if-Im-a-liberal-girl https://dailycaller.com/2022/08/09/dear-kay-liberal-woman-deeply-attracted-conservative-men-why/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 11:42 PM
1

you have to take self-reported data with a huge grain of salt, it's not really that reliable a woman with tons of people she's not interested in trying to contact her over the internet is experiencing a different kind of loneliness that a man with no social interaction online or IRL at all
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 08:29 PM
5

Are their earlier retirements also funded by the government? If yes then men are paying again
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 05:16 PM
16

It looks like the government will be paying This means men will be paying. Because only men in aggregate are net tax payers and women are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 11:00 AM
1

I'm a 6'3 male. So tall in general, but short on r/tall. I suppose my ideal is a 5'10 to 6'2 female. I've always preferred taller women but they're hard to find in my area. I understand the advantages that can be conferred based on my height, but I have other issues that act against me. Namely, although I have a good BMI, I'm not photogenic. Although I have a useful stem degree, I 'm not career driven (not interested in status). I'm also fairly introverted and don't like texting a lot. All these…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 01:15 PM
1

Basically if its between two consenting and willing adults then it's all good in the hood, have at it, be free.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 04:23 AM
2

this issue strongly influences the dynamics between men and women if (and I think it's more like "when") the technology is perfected, it will profoundly affect family formation and dating and society as a whole
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 12:46 PM
15

thank you for your well-researched and high-effort post
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 12:42 PM
17

It's strange to think about how 'heightism' is basically how the mass of average-heighted people (which is most people) perceive short and tall people (a minority of people at either end of the height distribution). Like there are 3 ways that height is perceived: through the perspective of an average-height person, a short person and a tall person; I think each of these groups of people perceive height in a different manner. Average heighted people (not all, but a significant amount) probably at…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/23 03:34 PM
1

He and Janice Fiamengo are great gateways
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 02:38 AM
2

Im a fellow Heartiste reader. Miss the Le Château lol Good times. GBFM was a great commenter heh
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 02:33 AM
1

I started in 2006 with Neil Strauss' The Game. Went into related blogs like heartiste aka Roissy in DC. Kept consuming it in moderation from there.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 02:32 AM
4

it's a leftover puritanical view of romance and intimate relationships, it needs to go, I agree. It served its use but doesn't apply now.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 03:19 PM
1

Both men and women work and take care of children and the household. "Only women do it" is a myth promulgated by magazines and websites that pander to women's egos. They use faulty studies that rely on women self-reporting their work, which means they're inflated, embellished, unrigorous, and unscientific. Furthermore these studies are conducted by feminists who go into them with their minds already made up that women are wonderful super-hero workers and men are bad. If their studies revealed th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 08:55 PM
2

nobody should pay them because they are the beneficiaries of their own labor. Not other people who don't benefit. The husband does his fair share by working more hours and paying more household expenses.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 01:38 PM
2

wives should compensate their husbands for the extra hours they work too then
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 01:35 PM
1

OP: before and after child birth, should the couple keep a spreadsheet of hours worked by each person, bills paid by each, etc? Should an itemized checklist be kept of every expense the couple has and who paid for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 01:30 PM
33

The new TikTok and OnlyFans economy has created a lot of millionaires by exploiting thirst traps and lonely men. tax-free too
/r/MensRights04/02/23 10:26 PM
132

(Imagine that woman's hysteria if she was getting changed in some locker room and a man walked in telling her he was the district manager) But anyways while this is certainly not the most important issue facing men, it's definitely a very real double standard that is almost universal in the West. Basically, just like men's rights to not be groped by women isn't enforced (you're supposed to enjoy it) men also don't have a right to privacy from the opposite sex in changing rooms. I think they've e…
/r/MensRights30/01/23 06:14 PM
1

In the vast, vast majority of armies, all over the world, if women are drafted, they are drafted into support roles and office jobs. I'm not saying whether this is good or bad, but 99.9% of the time, there is a massive difference between what men are drafted into, and what women are drafted into. When men are drafted, it can be into anything, including the harsh and dangerous conditions of the front lines. When women are drafted, it is implicitly understood by those who work in government and th…
/r/MensRights30/01/23 03:29 PM
7

A lot of popular advice is a A lot of bootstrapping, that men just need to socialize more and work hard on their mental and physical wellbeing to get dates. what is the alternative? what else can a guy do?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/23 06:18 PM
3

the women will only be drafted into safe roles away from the front lines
/r/MensRights28/01/23 05:17 PM
3

That game is a sheer masterpiece; but not in the way that we would expect. Some of the most profound experiences I had while playing that game were the times I was just riding around on horseback in the open countryside, listening to the music and looking out over the vast fields and mountains in the distance. It caused in me so much introspection, wonder, and a deep nostalgia that I can still recall, mainly about life in general, and my own actions in the real world, and whether I have been a g…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/23 06:29 PM
15

I'm pretty sure that men (in aggregate) pay the lion's share of taxes, and women (in aggregate) consume the lion's share of government subsidized services, and a huge part of this is most likely retirement benefits. Taxes are a real and massive transfer of men's excess labor to women, and it's very taboo to talk to about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/23 06:13 PM
3

It seems as if society only allows "feminism" to have infinite definitions, and to mean anything that any individual prefers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/23 06:10 PM
11

Yes, it's basically like this in 100% of universities in Western countries AND in government too. I know it's crazy to say but feminism is literally the establishment. Want proof? Watch what happens to you and your job if you publicly speak out against it at work, at school, or in government.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/23 05:59 PM
3

and some are males
/r/MensRights21/01/23 04:50 PM
2

And you believe that an elected official who must pass laws within a legal framework and separation of powers to be dominance? I think that's pretty weak and unconvincing. It makes more sense to say that we live in a matriarchy because elected officials are chosen based on voting, and women dominate the electorate, ergo it is women in aggregate, who get to choose the elected officials, not men. Women dominate the electorate, which is what we use to determine the supreme law of the land ergo, mat…
/r/MensRights18/01/23 08:07 PM
2

Can you give an example of a position of dominance?
/r/MensRights18/01/23 07:44 PM
3

Just curious about the 'dominance' and 'privilege' you are citing. What are the best examples of this? Elected officials and wealthy businessmen? These are a tiny fraction of the male population. Women are a majority of the electorate. Do they dominate it?
/r/MensRights18/01/23 05:36 PM
1

Just curious, what convinced you to take your positions on these issues?
/r/MensRights17/01/23 05:46 PM
1

who is being censored?
/r/MensRights01/01/23 05:25 PM
6

So let me guess, men who spend more of their lives working, at the expense of their physical and mental health, will now have even more of their income taxed, to give to women, who work less, live more and already consume the lion's share of tax-funded programs Government basically takes from men and gives to women
/r/MensRights31/12/22 04:05 PM
1

It's ridiculous and yes it can basically happen anywhere in public. Have heard of this happenning specifically at parks, swimming pools, shopping malls, etc.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:12 PM
2

I think this might be one of those opinions that is strongly felt but never uttered. Again, I might be wrong, but my spidey senses are tingling on this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 09:40 PM
4

As a guy I'm gonna go out on a limb and say they do- and that your status and prestige of your occupation can trump your salary. My hunch is that women are attracted to men in traditionally prestigious fields like finance, law, medicine, some real estate, investment baking, or positions that are historically/traditionally associated with success and status. As a contrast, a software engineer making more money is considered sort of repulsive (like ewww) because it's not social and doesn't have st…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 06:40 PM
1

I don't use the term 'alpha' and find it kind of cringe tbh. But the main points of the video are valid.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 05:58 PM
1

ok then you're good. But obviously just to be safe it's always good to know the marriage laws in your area, if you haven't checked already. Otherwise, congrats to you for finding someone
/r/MensRights14/12/22 03:13 AM
4

It's generally not a good idea to move in with your girlfriend unless you are 100% sure you want to marry her and start a family. This clip is a must for any young unmarried man: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEA6iP0e-U4
/r/MensRights13/12/22 09:03 PM
2

What about divorce law? Common law and de facto unions? Duluth models of domestic violence accusations? False rape accusations? Paternity fraud? Child support and alimony etc? Do you not see how the woman can be a liability to her man?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 03:43 AM
28

Something something couldn't vote once, something something wage gap, something something most CEOs and politicians are male ergo you're privileged /s
/r/MensRights29/10/22 09:07 PM
1

the fact they still don't understand why the "wage gap" is bunk just shows that at this point it's become a state religion
/r/MensRights10/10/22 05:14 PM
3

I don't know how much men value being "interesting" from women. I think they basically care about her attractivess and, in close second, her pleasantness as a female companion.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 09:19 AM
4

I used to browse this sub years ago and the discussions were much much better. Most of the posts now are just bland misinterpretations of mostly red pill concepts or as you as you say click bait.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 09:14 AM
5

I too am outraged!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 01:00 AM
0

Saying women are 'complicated' is blue-pill simping. They're just fickle and tend toword self-serving morality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 02:22 AM
1

"subtract" may not be the best word, but for every inch after 6'6 that someone grows, their pool of matchable women decreases, which is important, because it's first point at which added height actually starts to reduce a man's choices
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 04:13 PM
1

the concept seems real enough though
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 02:20 PM
2

The best way to read the graph is from right to left. As you move to the left, the % of women that have a compatible height filter with your profile increases, up to a height of 6'6, after which every subsequent inch of height actually subtracts from attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 12:26 PM
6

this is because online dating has shifted- the "height"-focus is passé. it's now all about being very photogenic; having a great smile and having photos that show you smiling attractively (and spontaneously) in social situations social status coupled being photogenic is the new silver bullet for men in online dating
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 12:24 PM
2

I think on OLD your best asset is face and having a photogenic profile shot/smile, coupled with your ability to curate well-shot photos of you in social situations women no longer trust what men put as their height anyway anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 12:07 PM
1

Believe it or not, but disliking women can actually be beneficial to a man. It can change his entire "conversational-stance" and disposition with her that allows the man to retain a certain a self-confidence, assertiveness and outcome-independence that can potentially render him attractive. If a man dislikes women, it can help him align with female hypergamic instinct because women always want men they perceive to be "above" them. If a man communicates contempt for a woman in certain specific wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 11:10 AM
1

Its very much visible my good man
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 11:20 PM
1

I did include it there after wealthy
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 04:14 PM
2

perhaps, but it seems necessary to at least get an initial date
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:31 PM
1

at this point, for men at least, the only positive traits that really count are having a profile/persona that makes you look like a wealthy, attractive, socially-savvy micro-celebrity that throws lots of parties and attends lots of parties and who takes pictures of these parties on Instagram
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 10:52 AM
1

I don't think society has realized just how much Online has skewed and distorted the dating market. It is extreme and the effects are profound.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 03:36 AM
–

why not split bills 50/50 too?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 03:27 AM
-1

While these posts are extremely well done, they wont change women's feelings or behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 02:04 AM
3

but y tho
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:31 AM
5

Agreed, the reason will happen any moment now, I can feel it. It's very exciting.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:26 AM
2

In your early twenties you should avoid relationships and focus on your career, especially as a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 06:43 PM
1

Your friend is a natural when it comes to being social, and this is in itself valuable, even on its own. People are naturally drawn to those with charming, fun, magnetic personalities.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 12:24 PM
1

while you certainly need less men than women for reproduction, you still have to be careful with your number of men. You want to avoid creating populations where cousins are likely to intermarry and produce offspring with complications that arise from that. It can be difficult to recover from that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 12:51 PM
3

the "getting-down-on-one-knee" is a ritual done to please the woman. It's part of giving the woman the wedding experience she wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 12:48 PM
2

I think OP is in his own personal bubble when it comes to listing all of men's wants from women. His list seems completely overblown to me and from what I've heard from tons of men. Men basically just want women for sex and intimacy. That's usually the mechanism that causes them to seek relationships with women, and yield to their demands to maintain them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 12:20 PM
1

To increase their chances of reproducing if they want to. If they were choosy they'd be less likely to
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 05:51 PM
-2

do you have one to share?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 01:48 PM
0

You are a real exception, not the rule at all for our generation. What are you basing your claims on? How do you know the personal cleaning habits of an entire generation of people?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 01:44 PM
9

People have different standards, conceptions and preferences of what is acceptable for housework and cleanliness. Why should the man be forced to yield to the woman's preferences? Based on what exactly? Do all women secretly graduate from Martha Stewart's HomeMaker's Academy for Young Ladies, which gives them some sort of qualification?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 12:46 PM
5

Housework should be 50/50 if the bills are being split 50/50. 9/10 women complaining about housework are silently free-riding off the man paying way more of the bills
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 12:01 PM
1

I'm with you 100% on this, and I've thought the exact same thing for a long time now. The internet has generated what can only be described as a preposterous difference in options for the average woman compared to the average man. I don't think that the effect on women's minds can be overstated, and because this effect is both so new, and so unexpected, it hasn't had the chance to be properly studied or understood. If a woman's phone is constantly going ding! ding! ding! bing! ping! and each pin…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 01:32 AM
1

strong jawline, broad shoulders, height >>>>> better/fancy clothes
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 01:45 PM
1

where are you getting this idea from? any sources you'd like to share?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 01:23 PM
3

don't forget CEO
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/22 04:27 AM
4

they are high on technical-competence hierarchies, however such hierarchies are only respected by other males who work in their industry. These are separate from the social status hierarchies that I believe women look at when it comes to romantic attraction
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 02:39 PM
3

I remember watching Taxi Driver recently. When he went on that date with Cybil Shepard, a woman that would be treated like a celebrity on social media and dating apps if they were around back then....I couldn't stop thinking how impossible the matchup would be today....
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 01:29 AM
1

Once the robots reach a minimum level of realism (i.e. just enough to produce a satisfactory sexual/companionship experience for men) it could drastically disrupt the dating market place, and possibly restore some of the balance to men. I'd wager this is because men and women seek some very different things in a partner, and what women seek is much much harder to satisfy with a robot. Men, in general, have a need for intimate companionship and sexual pleasure in the privacy of their own home, in…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 09:55 PM
7

I can't disagree. However I would be so bold as to say that your job title (having the word "manager" in it) makes you more attractive to women than a traditional STEM worker job title like "engineer, technician, scientist, developer, programmer" etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 04:42 PM
43

(I say this is as a STEM guy) Tech/STEM jobs still seem to suffer from a status problem, despite the massive rise of tech and its influence on the culture, tech and stem workers are still, for lack of a better term, "low on the status hierarchy". In most organizations, STEM workers are not in a social/visible role, and aren't the one's DELEGATING the work, they're the one's DOING the work. Women are more attracted to the men who delegate the work, rather than Do the work. Delegators tend to be h…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 01:56 PM
6

You're right, and they're not even getting the complete average man's experience. They probably still have a huge match queue full of profiles that right-swiped on them, so they have a lot immediate potential matches.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 03:57 PM
83

If men were complaining about how demoralizing dating apps are for them, the only articles that would be written would of the flavor "angry incel men who think women owe them romance are hating on women and feeding on misogyny, they are dangerous and full of hate, how we must mock them!"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 03:52 PM
9

can confirm. I've been on the apps for a long time and when you create a new account you are always shown to many more people so that the algorithm can classify your profile. So there is a period of about 1 to 3 days where you will receive a high level of activity that is biased. It's from about day 4 or 5 onward that you get a better picture of where your profile stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 03:46 PM
3

Since the dawn of time, men have chatted up, wooed and charmed women with their words, actions, dress and demeanour. You can read about it in the Bible and ancient texts of all kinds, all the way through to the present day. you ever see the movie In Quest of Fire? it didn't always go down that way
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 02:15 PM
3

professionally curated images and video footage of someone, along with Hollywood fame, can give them a tremendous boost in attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 03:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter