TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Neovitami Archive

View 1 post and 62 comments by Neovitami on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

discussionNeovitami/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/21 09:47 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
22

The sentencing gap: https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/21 04:56 PM
1

Perhaps one solution would be to make it easier for people to have kids in their early 20s, perhaps while they still study? Perhaps this idea that you have to have finished your education, landed a great job and bought a nice house before considering having kids, is one of the root causes?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/21 12:19 PM
6

Yeah, from a purely utilitarian perspective, as long as kids are getting born and are well cared for, and people work hard at their jobs and pay their taxes, all is great. But what if like 25% of women decide to become single mothers, you dont worry about all the men who will be lonely and perhaps revolt against this arrangement?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/21 12:14 PM
3

How do we do that? All things being equal, kids from two parent households are already more privileged than kids of single mothers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/21 10:35 AM
5

Feminists will always counter this by saying more women attempt suicide. Am I the only one who thinks this comparison is inappropriate? If you survive a suicide attempt, you get a second chance, when brains is all over the ceiling you don't...
/r/MensRights13/02/21 06:06 AM
-8

Pets and small children are cared for, are they more privileged than adults?
/r/MensRights20/09/19 03:04 PM
3

Statistically Women are happier Ive never seen a study supporting that claim. Could you provide a link?
/r/MensRights26/05/18 05:00 AM
27

My point is that the top 20 to 50% isn't considered above average.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/18 05:40 PM
40

A lot of men don't get that you have to be in the top 20%, in terms of looks, to be considered above average by women
/r/TheRedPill06/05/18 05:35 PM
394

Step one: be good looking enough to actually get tinder matches with girls you wanna fuck
/r/TheRedPill06/05/18 03:23 PM
2

This reminds me of an article I read a few months ago about the link between societies, that to some degree practices polygamy, and war: https://www.economist.com/news/christmas-specials/21732695-plural-marriage-bred-inequality-begets-violence-link-between-polygamy-and-war For example in South Sudan your wealth is measured in cattle and brides cost cows. A rich man with lots of cattle can get lots of wives. This leaves women in short supply, so a poor man from a poor family may resort to cattle …
/r/TheRedPill16/02/18 08:33 PM
19

And today that scene is considered rape by "progressives". This scene from James Bond is also considered rape: https://youtu.be/1pUXH1Bye88
/r/TheRedPill04/01/18 02:25 PM
6

I don't think there is a greater taboo about controlling men. I would argue there is. We all know the social experiment video of the guy being mean/abusive to his girlfriend and strangers intervening on her behave, while when the reverse happens people just laugh: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7M0MW6ON484 If men know they will get negative feedback if they mistreat their partner in a social setting, they are stupid if they dont hide it. While if women know they wont get negative feedback, and …
/r/MensRights24/09/17 08:52 PM
2

Yeah I guess so... Im probably aware of more controlling women than men in relationships too, but im just wondering if this might be due to some sort of selection bias on my part.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 06:41 PM
-27

Well it could be because men hide it better if they are controlling, perhaps because there is a greater taboo about abusive men
/r/MensRights24/09/17 04:55 PM
2

Im sure thats true, but my point is that these women arent the majority, or anywhere close to it, of the worlds 900ish million muslim women. These women you describe, what percentage do you think they make up of the global female muslim population? Somewhere between 1 and 10%? Its just very disingenuous to use something that happens to a tiny minority, and use it to make claims about the rest of the population. Its just like when feminists use the fact that most leaders in the world are male, as…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 04:34 AM
2

You dont think there is also a huge difference between having an appointed public defender and some super expensive just-make-that-thing-go-away lawyer, even in "fair" Europe? Im sure the job of their defender was made way easier by the fact they were women.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 07:15 PM
8

So you're taking something that happened to a few emirate princesses, and extrapolate some meaning out of that and project it unto 100s of millions of "regular" Muslim women?
/r/MensRights24/06/17 04:21 PM
13

Isn't this more about rich privilege? I'm sure emirate princes get away with shit all the time too.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 03:36 PM
191

Yeah and we normally punish parents if they make bad ones.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 05:36 PM
18

According to wiki a quarter are juvenile, doesn't say anything about it being only boys, but we can probably assume its like +80% right? : According to Human Rights Watch, children as young as 9 have been placed on the registry;[5][6] juvenile offenders account for 25 percent of registrants.[7] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_offender_registries_in_the_United_States?wprov=sfla1
/r/MensRights15/12/16 06:33 PM
10

Okay fine, thats your opinion, and you have every right to teach your kids and social group that. But does it make any sense to register teen boys as sex offenders, just because they had sex with a girl 2-3 years younger than themselves?
/r/MensRights15/12/16 06:26 PM
10

Is this the study? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3810986/
/r/TheRedPill18/06/16 06:25 PM
21

Supply and demand. If he can only bargain for a tenth of the pay of his female coworkers, because 100 guys are ready and capable to take hes place at the same wage, then sad day for him. Wage equality is about everyone getting paid what their labor is worth, not everybody getting paid the same. On the other hand he might be able to work in the industry for longer, compared to most women, where I would imagine less than 10% can find work in the business after a year or two.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 07:36 PM
1

Well eugenics is not genocide by definition Im not saying it is. But it is still two closely related terms, and i would argue that the holocaust, along with a whole host of other things, falls within the scope of eugenics. Its kinda like saying that the crusade and jihah are both religious ideas, but that dosnt mean religion is all about war.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 10:25 AM
1

Well the holocaust was a eugenics program...
/r/MensRights30/12/15 09:09 AM
1

Danish? I have never heard of her and im from Denmark.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:45 PM
2

Well usually in a cult there is a person at the top who knows its all a scam, in a religion that person is dead.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 05:07 PM
2

Yeah and thats why there will always be a wagegap, if more women choose or demand to be the primary caretaker
/r/MensRights30/08/15 08:33 AM
-5

Childcare?
/r/MensRights30/08/15 08:18 AM
11

Im fairly certain any feminist would say thats sexists :)
/r/MensRights27/08/15 08:30 PM
2

I would love to see a source on that, so I can use that as an argument with confidence the future.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:49 PM
0

If he's guilty, don't you think that the first victim reporting him could have prevented all the others from falling into the same trap? Or at least some of them? Yes if he ended up being proven guilty or public opinion about him turned around. But you cant be certain of that beforehand, of course you can be 100% certain that nothing will be prevented if you dont report it Victims should feel obligated to report crimes against them, if only to possibly prevent future crimes against others. I thi…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 03:33 PM
0

Yes any rape victim should be encouraged to come forward immediately after the rape has happened, so the rapist can be stopped. Just because I understand why some people dont, dosnt mean that I disagree. I dont know what I would do if I was raped(im male), its certain that I would be completely embarrassed. If I reported it, everybody would know that some guy(assuming its a male on male rape) put hes dick up my ass. I would forever live with that label, that would destroy my self confidence. May…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 02:30 PM
-1

I agree with pretty much everything /u/Men13 said. I get that there isnt enough evidence for a trial, I dont want to have him skipped off to the Gulags or burned at the stakes. But im glad the word is out, now people are free to decide whether they want to continue supporting him and pay to go watch hes shows or buy hes DVDs. And im glad that women now know to be vary around him, so he likely wont get any chance to rape anyone again. Simply put: in a fair legal system if you don't let police do …
/r/MensRights01/08/15 02:11 PM
-2

How do you know? There's no evidence of wrongdoing, just accusations, which shouldn't be enough for anyone who considers themselves a rational person to think of another as guilty. What kind of evidence do you except? He supposedly drugged them, so they probably didnt get bruises, and if they didnt get a blood test right a way the drugs would be out of their system by the time they are ready to contact the police. Do we really wanna "blame" women for not acting rational right after a rape, becau…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 11:31 AM
-5

And where are all the followup of women riding the bandwagon and making similar claims about rape?
/r/MensRights01/08/15 11:16 AM
-5

Michael Jackson went through the same shit, just with children. So two? And with Michael Jackson it was probably opportunistic parents who exploited their kids. Also if you want to talk victim blaming, look no further than feminism. They're adding it to law. And we should be above that.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 11:14 AM
-5

Opportunistic people know this is the attitude people have, so they jump onto the accusations trains to get attention and money. No one will question them too harshly, after all it's obviously true! So why isnt it more common? Why isnt there more celebs who gets into the same trouble as Cosby? And point to me one woman who has made money of this or used the attention to further their career. I dont see any Monica Lewinsky wannabes here. Frankly, let's assume they are all victims for the sake of …
/r/MensRights01/08/15 10:43 AM
14

What is the number now? 40? Sure the occasional celeb gets falsely accused of rape, violence or another crime, with the sole purpose of settling out of court for money. But 40? Many of these women are clearly not in it for the money or fame.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 08:29 AM
3

Women*
/r/MensRights29/07/15 06:41 AM
8

Its just frustrating that the people that come to the same conclusion as me on 90% of the issues, are just so plainly wrong on gender issues. While the people that I disagree with on 90% of the issues are so completely correct.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 10:04 AM
8

Im really torn by the fact that I find myself agreeing with conservative/religious/right-wing people(I dont know if the person in the video is that, but that youtube channel certainly is) on this whole gender issue, when I consider my self to be progressive/secular/left-wing on pretty much all other issues.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 09:48 AM
9

I guess you're right. I was debating this male feminist once here on Reddit, who argued that it was completely unacceptable that women had to fear for their safety whenever they went out partying in the night life of a major city, while men didnt have those concerns at all. I kept bringing up stats(from Denmark, because we're both Danes) that showed that men were, first of all way more likely to be subject to violence and secondly way more likely to be the victim of violence in public places, by…
/r/MensRights06/07/15 10:40 AM
1

Go away please
/r/MensRights06/07/15 07:19 AM
42

Maybe feminists are just bad at math? That would explain a whole lot, like why they keep bringing up rape as if it was an epidemic and the wage gap. For example the "A woman has a 1 in 262,365 chance of being killed by a shark in her lifetime" just seems way off. National Geographic report that you have a "1 in 3,700,000 chance of being killed by a shark during your lifetime" and also that 93% attacks are on males. Which means women have a 14 times smaller chance of being killed by a shark. The …
/r/MensRights06/07/15 07:01 AM
5

I just named the two most well known Islamic extremist terrorist groups, there are plenty more to choose from, like Taliban, Hezbollah, Boko Haram: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_designated_terrorist_organizations And I didnt say fighters, I said strong supporters. By that I mean Muslims who support and encourage Islamic terrorism, this number is of course hard to pin point, but there are have been a number of surveys on the subject: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_attitudes_towards_te…
/r/MensRights30/05/15 11:23 AM
28

Its the same thing when they talk about rape, like its a fundamental problem with masculinity. I believe currently the annual rape rate is 0.4 per 1000 people. Assuming all rapist are men and all rapists only commit one rape per year, you would have to line up 2500 men to just get one rapist, how many men with severe mental issues would you meet before finding the rapist? Way more than 0.04% of all Muslims are strong supporters of ISIS, Al Qaeda, you would be labeled a racist and islamophobe if …
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:12 AM
1

They wanted general niceness and empathy, but that also got them general indecisiveness along for the ride. Which is why most companies goes for the gender they perceive as more aggressive and not being afraid of taking unpopular opinions, when making promotion decisions.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 02:54 PM
0

Its probably only a benefit for women to have this omnipresent "women are wonderful" aura about them in some instances. For example if you get charged with a crime or are in custody battle, its probably better to be female. But what about when more traditionally masculine traits are desired? When HQ is looking for a new mid level management, general niceness and empathy might not be what they are looking for.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 01:20 PM
1

Because society encourages him to be cooperative, because you know, he's a man after all, he can take the abuse, he just have to "man up". And she's probably only abusive anyway because she's under a lot of stress or because society has treated her poorly, deep down she's really a decent person with a lot of heart. She dosnt mean to be abusive, she's just a passionate soul who needs to channel her feelings in a more positive way.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 07:27 AM
20

But if the genders had been reversed no one would be arguing for cooperation. Everybody would be telling a woman to leave a wife beater, because if it has happened once, he will certainly do it again. They would also argue that he would be a terrible role model for her children, and her kids would be better off without his influence. Im not saying this is bad advice, im just saying the same logic should be extended to husband beaters.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 06:06 AM
3

On the other hand none of the game's missions requires you to kill women. If feminists argued there should be more female "obstacles" and villains in games, I could get behind that.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 05:58 AM
1

And I think the free market is wrong...
/r/MensRights18/03/15 06:00 PM
-2

While I agree with infographic, I do think female heavy work areas, like childcare providers and social workers are underpaid and undervalued in western society. I dont know how to fix it, and I wouldnt want to fix it, simply because it effects women the most.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 08:22 PM
2

I suppose if you view women as inherently weak and men as inherently strong, anything that will tip this imagined balance further to the side thats already the most powerful, could be seen as toxic and oppressive.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/15 10:48 AM
7

Feminists has a foolproof way of arguing against any form of female privilege. They call it benevolent sexism instead. That fact that women get shorter sentences for the same crimes as men, is female privilege in our world, but its benevolent sexism in the feminist world, because it reinforces the idea of women as weak and fragile and being the primary caretaker of children. You can use this logic for pretty much anything, ranging from conscription to divorce settlements.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 07:39 AM
2

Karen Straughan
/r/MensRights26/01/15 04:05 PM
18

Or maybe some women are just simply trying to exploit the situation.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 07:04 PM
1

You could probably also use the word progressive to describe your self.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 09:29 PM
1

Well almost everybody in Europe is for universal healthcare, education paid for by taxes aka the welfare state. The most liberal/small government party in the Danish parliament only aim for a 40% flat tax. They only want to reduce bureaucracy and regulations and lower unemployment benefits, not remove any of it. So basically they just want to make the welfare state more efficient and more business friendly, and not cut it in any major way. EDIT* You should really put social in front of every mai…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:00 AM
3

In Europe a liberal is someone who wants less government intervention.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 09:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter