TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NephilimXXXX Archive

View 0 posts and 471 comments by NephilimXXXX on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Or it means the "patriarchy" is just a scapegoat for whatever people think is wrong in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 08:20 PM
52

Yup. One of my female friends who gets tons of matches, likes, and dates on dating apps - despite being overweight - looked at a male friend's dating profile. She was shocked. She said that despite him having plenty of good pictures (he's not ugly, has professional photos) and good bio, she couldn't believe how depressing it was to see how few matches or likes he'd get, and how women would barely put any effort into any conversion. If you had told her this beforehand, she would've said you were …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 07:57 PM
3

Your friends are losers, therefore most men are losers. Okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 07:52 PM
1

The issue is that those average men are often socially skilled than the 80% of men who... I can't figure out what you're trying to say here. Seems like you missed a word. Did you mean: The issue is that those average men are often [ MORE / LESS ] socially skilled than the 80% of men who...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 07:33 PM
1

Lol. PsychologyToday is very often just a platform for people to write opinion pieces. I've checked their sources before and discovered that their sources often don't even support their arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:48 AM
0

And the reason that lesbians have twice the divorce rate of heterosexual couples? I bet that's some lazy man's fault, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:43 AM
-2

Studies have also shown that men do more hours of paid work. People always neglect to mention that, but it seems very relevant. Why should a man have to do 50% of the housework and childcare on top of spending an extra 10 hours of work at the office above and beyond what his wife is doing at work?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:37 AM
1

married males live longer than single males. Considering that men aren't randomly selected to be in a marriage, there's a lot of confounding factors. It seems to me that women choose men who are healthier and wealthier to marry, and both of those factors lead to a longer life. It's worth pointing out that men who are monks live longer than other men. This makes me doubtful about this idea that men are benefiting in longevity by being married.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:29 AM
8

Since all the top responses are putting all the responsibility on men, I want to mention that lesbians have very high divorce rates. Double the divorce rates of heterosexual couples. And gay men have lower divorce rates than heterosexual couples. This suggests to me that it isn't about childcare or men being trash.i believe the answer is that women are more difficult to please. I also think men are required to do a significant amount of work in the early stages of a relationship, and women want …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:22 AM
2

Do most humans actually give af about other peoples plights if it doesn’t affect them? I literally read on PPD that men need to care about women and women's problems, and men who only care about things when they benefit from it are selfish and awful.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:51 AM
4

I don't like that analogy at all because I think there are a lot more decent guys out there than women claim. My belief is that women look at men with a negative bias, and women are demanding about all the traits that want in a man. As a result, they perceive that they only have bad options, when in reality, they have a lot better options than they realize. Women are not looking for water in a swamp.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:07 AM
3

Because it's an easy rebuttal. It doesn't matter if it's true or not. The important thing is creating the illusion of winning the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 12:55 AM
3

Of course. It's obvious that a lot of people on PPD aren't interested in the reality of the situation. They're interested in selectively hiding details, exaggerating their victimhood, and trying to sound as persuasive as possible while doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 12:57 AM
47

Whenever I read stuff like this, I think about the fact that, during the Great Depression, the unemployment rate reached 25%. This means that 75% of the people that wanted a job had one. "I don't understand why people think the Great Depression was difficult. 3/4ths of workers had jobs!"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 07:47 PM
1

The post only exists because Lilith wants to "dunk" on men using something that's totally obvious but turned into an accusation. Here's how it's done: "Women need to understand that their pussy isn't worth a relationship!" "Women need to learn that their vaginas aren't spaceships!" "Women need to realize that people aren't lizards!" You get the self-satisfaction of talking down to the opposite gender, and you get to "win" an argument against the gender that you hate. That's a win-win!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 10:02 PM
1

Which is it, fellas? I thought you were going to say "which is it, women?" because this post only makes sense if women are at least as demanding about body weight as men. Maybe Lilith accidentally showed that women care about looks as much as men, and the virtue signaling about "women care less about looks" is now a settled question.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 09:53 PM
2

That depends A LOT on who women interact with. Women's friends are typically telling them they look great. I've seen women's Facebook posts. Women praise their friends to the ends of the earth.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 09:47 PM
1

The post exists because Lilith wants to have an excuse at attack men and "win" an argument in her own head.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 09:44 PM
4

And tbh much of it is "buhu I can't date a victoria's secret model while chad can life is unfair". Whenever I read that counterargument against men, I have to wonder how much of that is just a convenient fiction to justify disliking them and "proving" them wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 08:17 PM
2

I'm be sure to stay on your good side, just to be safe. You're looking quite nice today, by the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 08:05 PM
2

it's not like I can make a million dollars and have girls come to me. You make getting a million dollars sound easy. Further: men with money don't want women who are only there for the money. As a guy who's been accumulating a fair amount of money, I think a lot more about being used for money than I did when I was poorer.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 11:10 PM
3

Wow. She says she's a 7? Some pictures for those interested: https://www.chicagomag.com/chicago-magazine/august-2018/kim-brooks-is-an-unhelicopter-mom/ https://images.app.goo.gl/jk8JoXir2LcMod5n9 https://images.app.goo.gl/6Yug5RJG5JiAujh77 https://images.app.goo.gl/n5Yxg4LLZXxuh7ePA https://mediaproxy.salon.com/width/1200/height/675/https://media.salon.com/2014/06/kim_brooks.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 06:10 PM
1

But men choose this life. No, we didn't. It was forced on us. When i was younger and feared rejection a lot more, I'd avoid asking women out unless I was almost certain they'd say yes. That led to an absolutely terrible dating life. And sometimes when I thought a woman liked me, she'd turn me down. For example, there was one coffeeshop I used to go to. The female barrista would give me free drinks like half the time I went there. We'd often chat as I sat at the coffeeshop. I was pretty sure she …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 01:44 AM
1

my lifelong preference for blondes? I think a preference for blondes is related to the fact that people tend to have blonde hair more frequently when they're young, and it tends to darken with age. This means that blonde hair is correlated with youth, and I think men make that subconscious association. Youth has always been an attractive trait in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 08:46 PM
1

Nah. There's still a pretty narrow range of what's typically seen as attractive. If you took every woman who was considered attractive in the last 100 years, you'd see they still mostly fall into a fairly narrow range. Things like big boobs versus small boobs is like saying that women prefer all kinds of men because they liked guys with mustaches and now they don't. Nevermind that all the guys were tall and low body fat. There are certain fads involved, but it's not as simple as "every preferenc…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 08:39 PM
1

Most white people have not co-opted it, and not in "full force". It's more common than it used to be, but it's still not that common.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 08:35 PM
1

I don't know the answer to that, but part of it feels like "imprinting". There's a thing with baby animals that they become very attached to any large moving thing in their sight shortly after birth. It usually works to make the baby animal follow their mom. But it can cause them to become bonded to humans. And it's just a weird quirk that mostly works in nature, but can lead to totally unexpected outcomes. Sometimes I feel like some men's preferences can be a little bit like that. https://en.m.…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 08:32 PM
1

or because she doesn’t wanna fuck [or date] him Personally, I think men take a ton of rejection. You don't even have to be a loser to get a ton of rejection as a man. I think that level of rejection has fucked with some guys' heads. Honestly, I'm not even surprised. If I bullied a kid or a dog, I wouldn't be surprised if it acted like shit. (Not that rejection is equal to bullying, but it is a negative outcome when someone was hopeful. It also feels personal.) I also think men get rejected more …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 08:07 PM
1

I mean the exact same dynamic plays out with women towards men, but it's less about sex and more about romance. Most romance novels involve a guy who only wants the female lead, and sees her as "above" other women. It's a huge ego boost to be seen as special. It also signals that he will be faithful and not cheat - because why would he when she's the most special woman in the whole world?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:56 PM
1

Why do people play Dark Souls? Its hard and you die all the time. Its also fun though. Most people do not play Dark Souls and would not enjoy playing the game. I have no interest in playing a game that's punishingly difficult. If you do, fine, but it's unfair to the majority of people to force them into a difficult game that they don't want to play in order to get a relationship. I can't blame people for hating the process, and I definitely believe the whole process has only been getting more di…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:05 AM
14

Sounds like a post on r/tinder I saw recently. Some guy had something like a thousand likes. He showed his message queue and a lot of women were starting the conversation - which is rare. He was a 6'3" white guy, muscular and on steroids (he said so), and had tattoos. He had an okay face. His bio was simply his snapchat and his height. I was a little surprised by how many matches and likes he had, considering everything, but it seems like a lot of women go for the 6'3", steroided tattoo guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 06:52 AM
3

Or he's dating women that are objectively not very attractive, but he perceives them to be attractive. An average looking guy can do decently well with unattractive women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 02:37 AM
3

In my experience, men who say they don't struggle with dating usually have very positive opinions about women's beauty. I had one buddy who'd frequently date women 50 pounds heavier than him, but seemed to think every one of them was super attractive. It was like he was walking around with beer goggles 24 hours a day. Perhaps that's what's going on with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 02:35 AM
3

No the problem with incel subs is they can be violent out in the real world. Violence is not the only form of harm in the world. Let's take a completely different example as an illustration: girls bullying other girls in school - not through violence, but by a campaign of lies and rumors to destroy a girl's friendships and reputation. Is this harmful? Of course it is. It's it violence? No. There are ways to be shitty that don't involve violence, so let's not pretend like violence is the one and …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 08:04 AM
3

Women are privileged in dating. And men act against their own interests all the time, as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 08:00 AM
9

I thought someone was joking when they said FDS was gone. I'm just bummed that r/FemaleDatingStratPros is gone. It was the FDS parody subreddit. https://web.archive.org/web/20220104235630/https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStratPros/ https://web.archive.org/web/20210916102131/https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStratPros/
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 07:47 AM
8

So I would argue the fds women are not all low social status economically or educationally. How would you classify a woman who makes a bunch of money but is only open to men who are equal or higher in value than her from a social /money status? She’s making her dating pool smaller by having the higher than me status. That's one reason why women could have trouble dating. But there are plenty of other reasons that lead to bad dating lives. It's a stretch to say that FDS members are having dating …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 01:46 AM
8

No campaigns telling those people urgently to lose weight. Nope. Just stay home and sit on your fat ass. While I agree that getting people to lose weight would be useful in avoiding serious covid outcomes, people are historically really terrible at losing weight. When following diets, so many people fail to lose very much weight or their weight yo-yos. I don't know why that's the case, but given the failure rates of diets, it's probably not a huge game changer when it comes to covid.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 01:33 AM
2

Yes, in the US it is. Maybe UK too, to a slightly lesser extent. So obesity is causing dating problems? But I think generally it evens out where fitter people pair off and fatter people pair off. But your last sentence, you think it doesn't cause dating problems?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 01:26 AM
2

This sub was good when I joined a year ago. A moderate approach to modern day dating and everyone expressed themselves well. Back then, there were women on PPD who would frequently make nasty posts about men. Some of these women were popular members of FDS. I'm glad I don't read their brain-rot anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 01:20 AM
1

I've seen statistics that show that obesity is still common among young people: Adults aged 18-24 years had the lowest self-reported obesity (19.5%) compared to adults aged 45-54 years who had the highest prevalence (38.1%).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 01:14 AM
4

And we especially do not live in a partriarchy when it comes to dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 12:48 AM
3

What if I have no desire to marry or have children? Does that drop everyone's SMV to zero for me? Not even sure what you're trying to say. Do you know what SMV stands for? It's "sexual market value". It is distinct from RMV, or "relationship market value". If you had no desire to marry or have children how would that affect everyone else's sexual market value? First, if you're talking about marrying, then the topic is RMV, not SMV. And it's a "market value", meaning that no one person (including…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/22 11:18 PM
3

I think a lot of guys like small boobs. I think there's great, and they'll age better than larger boobs. There are even porn categories for small boobs, and there was a study of people's sexual fantasies that showed that fantasies involving women with small boobs were almost as common as large boobs. https://www.businessinsider.com/which-sexual-fantasies-are-normal-2014-10
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 05:51 PM
1

I mean they encourage 18 year olds to take out undischargeable loans for tens of thousands of dollars. It's bananas. I don't think there's anything wrong with getting college loans, provided that people don't get a dumb major and don't go to an overpriced school. But, hey, I got a STEM degree and my investment in college was rewarded many times over.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 03:26 AM
2

More than half look either heavier or visibly older than their photos. I remember one date I went on where the woman was probably 50 pounds heavier than her photos. I'm convinced that another woman I met up with was actually a trans-woman. I think she used photos of people who looked similar to her. I was very confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 03:19 AM
3

You're in New York, where there's something like 5 single women for every 4 single guys. In that kind of environment, it's easier for guys to date-up, and hard for women to date up or date their equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 03:11 AM
1

This sounds very "I'm very smart".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 01:59 AM
5

That may be, but men tend to be older than the women they marry, so men have more time before marriage to accumulate stuff. Plus, I've seen information that men tend to be better at saving money than women. And since women care more about men at marrying someone with higher income or wealth than them, all of these result in men being more likely to have money before the marriage than his wife. So it disproportionately affects men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/22 05:58 PM
1

child support thread where all the guys were like What child support thread? And all the guys? That seems hard to believe that all the guys thought that, since I'm a guy and I've been out spoken about men paying for their own kids and I've also disagreed with the idea of "paper abortions".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/22 04:35 PM
5

Meaning a wealthy man can protect his prior assets with a prenup Wait, what?! Women can walk off with half the stuff a man earned before the marriage, unless there's a prenup? Holy crap! I had no idea that divorce was so biased against men. Fuck. I thought that women would just get half the money that was earned during the marriage, but not have access to money earned before the marriage. But it requires a prenup in order for that to happen? Fuck that. I'm single and I've earned and saved quite …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/22 04:20 PM
7

I see it as a test of intelligence. Lol. That seems like jumping to a conclusion. Isaac Newton had zero children. People who never graduated from high school have the most children. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2013/05/SDT-2013-05-fertility-education-07.png
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 08:06 PM
1

Seems a certain demographic can’t reconcile the truth…and all I’ll say is niggas in the hood don’t whine about how they were “lied to” about bitches and female nature Tupac definitely had some things to say about how he was lied to. He was raised by his single mother to be nice and respect women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 08:48 PM
5

That feels like an overly convenient psychoanalysis of what's going on.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 06:14 AM
9

Yeah. Get a job at Walmart, and then get public assistance because they're paid so little: Wal-Mart employees are the largest group of Medicaid recipients. They are also the single biggest group of food stamp recipients. Wal-mart's "associates" are paid so little, according to Grayson, that they receive $1,000 on average in public assistance.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 09:14 PM
1

The reason for learning how to hold a convo should be “it’s good for my future prospects in life, like employment and friendship”. They’re reasons and rewards you’re guaranteed to get I suspect those rewards are not guaranteed.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 09:04 PM
2

I don't know about that. Justin Bieber was largely mocked by boys. There's plenty of e-boys with good looks that girls swoon over. Prince never seemed particularly popular among men. Lots of young boy bands - both American boy bands and Asian boy bands - were largely mocked and ridiculed by guys. Plenty of musicians write sappy love songs and get attending from women, even though men don't respect that. Plenty of actors which were skinny or young were mocked by guys, but girls still liked them. …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 05:30 AM
2

I’m never surprised that people who express toxic opinions about women and dating have a hard time with women and dating. Theoretically the cause and effect could be the reverse: "I’m never surprised that people who [have a hard time with women and dating] will end up gaining [toxic opinions about women and dating]."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 11:40 PM
2

No it doesn't. Sometimes people get fed up and jaded. By the same token, if someone got erroneously sent to prison, and they got beaten down for being kind, they'd learn to stop doing that behavior too. It doesn't prove that "they were never kind to begin with".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 11:33 PM
4

There are plenty of genuinely nice guys who don't do well with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 11:27 PM
2

Women don't pick through men, they let men sort each other out and pick from the top. There are plenty of musicians and actors who are/were mocked by guys who are still popular among women. So, that's not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 11:25 PM
7

So basically you spend a half hour pouring over the page It's the second sentence of the first comment on that thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 10:23 PM
1

He said "You're mine, you silly wench!" and, by the laws of the kingdom, she was obligated to marry him.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 06:42 PM
1

I actually heard men say that on Reddit. If that's the standard, then you're going to have a bad time. I can find women on reddit saying dumb stuff about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 06:34 PM
2

Why are you writing "no hookups" in your Tinder bio if you think it's a hookup app? Do you also post things on ebay and say "this isn't for sale"?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 06:32 PM
4

"Ugh. Who's this ugly guy on my tiktok trying to get my attention? Get lost, loser." /s
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 04:47 PM
4

Do you think men never get ghosted when they're following good advice?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 04:43 PM
9

I don't even think that's the issue. Places which have no moderation policy can become cesspools and hate and bullying. That's the problem with libertarian thinking. Libertarians think that everyone will just behave themselves when there's no rules, but that's not what happens at all. Some examples of stuff that happens: people posting porn, CP, goatse, brigading, bullying to drive people away, doxxing, misinformation, etc. I can think of examples of these things happening. For example, the app …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 11:15 PM
28

now “white people and men as a group are not a protected class” For a second there, I thought you were confusing reddit with Facebook, because Facebook has the same policy. Nope. Both platforms are like that. Before Facebook’s changes, comments such as “white people are stupid” would receive the same numerical rating as antisemitic or racist slurs, despite the distinction between how much each groups have historically suffered from abuse. They used to treat slurs against all groups the same, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 08:32 PM
5

I was listening to a podcast a while back. It was hosted by two women. They started talking about Squid Game, and one of the women started swooning about one character. She was in love with the fat, sleazy gangster character. Not only was he physically repulsive, but he was a total sleaze. I was shocked how anybody could like that guy, much less be attracted to him. Sometimes being a sleazebag isn't a problem, it's an advantage. Some women have fucking shitty taste in men. Describing this as "wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 08:48 PM
2

We aren't. Only dweebs in the internet say that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 08:20 PM
1

I know it's anecdotal, but a good 70-80% of the women in my friend group are effectively moving from one high value male to another, failing to lock them down, and getting more depressed by the day... Really? Because I know zero women who jump from one HVM to another. When it comes to women trying to find some mythical HVM, what I see is a bunch of fairly attractive UMC women with absurdly high standards complaining about not being able to find a HVM - in other words, they can't find any man "wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 07:08 AM
1

CGI centaur shemales gangbang pikachu I can go along with the CGI centaur shemales gangbang part, but adding pikachu goes too far. You sound like a degenerate. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 05:00 AM
1

Feminists have also been working to abolish gender roles. They do this while pretending that the historical male gender role was nothing but privilege, which is very much untrue.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 08:55 PM
1

because men are overweight, inactive, Scientists have controlled for factors like being overweight, and that's not the cause. I see that red herring explanation all the time, and it's not the cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 08:53 PM
1

Europe (and especially the UK) is catching up to the US in obesity rates. From 2017: Around 27 per cent of the [UK] population are now clinically obese and another 36 per cent are overweight, making the combined figure among the highest in the world. The combined rate is 63%. The 2017 rates in the US are 31% and 42%, for a combined rate of 73%. This is mostly concentrated in the South and Midwest. There are some states in the US that are more fit than some countries in Europe. And the obesity ra…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 08:14 PM
4

I'm unclear on whether you are a man or woman, so I'm having a hard time figuring out what you're saying. You're saying that, since the odds are stacked in women's favor, they should have less reason to act badly? I think the issue is that people are lazy, and since the odds are in women's favor, they basically "out source" all the work of being interesting, entertaining, carrying the conversation, making the plans, and paying for everything to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 04:30 AM
11

We can still tell. Sometimes, yes. But sometimes, you can't. It's like plastic surgery: you only notice when it's bad. I would post pictures to prove you wrong, but I don't think trans people would like me doing that, so I won't. Edit: I suppose I could find pictures of trans people on the internet as examples. Edit #2: Here's some pictures: Picture #1 Trans man Source Picture #2 Trans man (left) Picture #3 Trans man Picture #4 Trans woman Picture #5 Both Trans women Source Picture #6 Trans woma…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 04:10 AM
8

I assume the person above you was being sarcastic, but it's hard to say for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 02:19 AM
12

model I assume you mean male model?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 02:17 AM
12

the app must just be broken or something and then give up... admitting that women are garbage On some apps (tinder), there's way more men than women, so it's sort of expected based simply on gender ratios. On other apps that are supposedly more gender equal: a lot of women are bad at actually making decisions about who to match, and actually having some preliminary conversation. As a man, carrying a conversation is way too common.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 02:16 AM
11

I've seen trans people not mention their trans status on dating apps. Based on seeing experiments where women posed as men on dating apps and were surprised how few matches they'd get out how often they'd get ghosted, I'd bet trans-men who were hiding their trans status would also say that dating as a man is hard. As far as trans people not mentioning their trans status that I've seen on dating apps: how did I know they were trans? Well, in one case, I matched with this woman a while back, sent …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 02:12 AM
43

how all women experience dangers There's been plenty of bisexual and lesbian women who talk about the difficulty of dating women, too. This tells me that it isn't just about men being potentially dangerous.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 02:05 AM
0

In theory, OP could argue that the bisexual situation is different because men are horny and that's why a heterosexual man and woman can't be friends. But a bisexual woman could be friends with a woman because women don't have that extra horny factor involved. I don't agree with this argument, but I could see how someone could rationalize that position.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 01:48 AM
3

I don't see the contradiction. Imagine this scenario: there's a sinking ship. The crew (all male) says "women and children first in the lifeboats". Men are literally in control. Women are given preferential treatment. There's no contradiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 01:37 AM
5

I think if a man really loves you, he wants to pay That feels very gross. It also sets up an obligation on men: if you don't pay then you don't love me, and if you don't love me, there are consequences for that (breakup). It also feels very self serving for women to say that. A gender flipped version, which also feels gross, is: "if a woman really loves you, she will give you a blowjob whenever you want it".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 01:26 AM
2

Just why women are not inclined to use OLD though? I have a female friend who recently joined Bumble. She said she had hundreds of likes in a day or two. She got overwhelmed and quit. She literally didn't even match with anyone. She was just overwhelmed with options and she didn't know what to do. I'm not saying that there aren't other factors, like whether you can judge someone's vibe by looking at their pictures, but I think some women just don't want to make decisions about who to match or ta…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 11:21 PM
3

80% male users on top of men being way more thirsty and swiping on damn near every profile they come across. That is a self-reinforcing cycle. When a guy isn't getting matches, he decides to lower his standards and swipe right on more women. This causes women to get more picky and swipe right on fewer guys (she still gets the same number of matches). This, in turn, causes men's matches to go down further, causing him to swipe right more. The fact that the genders are so imbalanced is a major fac…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 11:17 PM
1

There's an awful lot wrong with his claim, even if we ignore the whole gender debate, there's a lot that can be said about distortions in the market and incomplete information and a ton of other influences which, even from a purely economic standpoint, makes the post wrong. For example, one of the reasons that used car salesmen are hatred is because they have more information about the car than the buyer does. He's also not going to give up information. Maybe the car was in an accident and is un…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 09:51 PM
1

ThE InViSiBlE HaNd Of ThE MaRkEt Is AlL KnOwInG AnD AlWaYs RiGhT. AnYwAy, BuY My OvErInFlAtEd Shit CoiN CrYpToCuRrEnCy aNd NfT. ThEy ToTaLlY aRe NoT PuMp AnD DuMps.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 04:37 PM
1

Society has never been “fair”, and yet society seems to exist and be fairly stable anyways. A society that is perceived as unfair will always have discontents. The greater the unfairness, the greater the discontent. Isn't the meaning behind the slogan "No justice, no peace"? Three big examples of unfairness in the modern world - which are being fought against because they are seen as unfair - are racism, sexism, and income inequality. Nobody is going to just say "okay, society has always been un…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 12:36 AM
1

I think the looksmatch thing does make sense, although it's only one aspect of people being attracted to each other. There's still plenty of other aspects to take into account. I've been around a few German women before who sort of seemed like robots. There was very little emotion and everything was very factual. I couldn't really be attracted to that, even if she was physically attractive. I can also understand if a guy could do better with women than you'd expect because he's funny and a lot o…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 12:26 AM
2

I've never seen these shows, but I'm guessing HIMYM is the TV show "How I met your mother" and I had to google the other name to figure out that TBBT means the TV show "The Big Bang Theory".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/22 10:49 PM
3

Just because they are pickier Bout who is worth sexing up doesn't mean they like sex less. You aren't listening to what's being said. Lesbians in relationships literally have less sex than heterosexual or gay male relationships. Lookup "lesbian bed death". It's an empirical finding that shows that lesbians in relationships longer than two years have surprisingly little sex. The fact that they are in relationships shows that they literally picked them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/22 09:04 PM
2

You’re scared of us? Most men are stronger than most women That's a non-sequiteur. There are more forms of power than strength. For example, let's say you're working at a job. Your boss is half your size. Should your boss be afraid of you because you're twice their size, or should you be afraid of your boss because they can fire you and take away your income? Obviously there's reasons for both people to be worried about being harmed by the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/22 05:28 PM
1

If a guy has a female “friend” 99 percent of the time it’s because he has some level of romantic interest in her and is hoping to be taken out of the “friend zone”. Lol. That's not even remotely true for the large majority of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/22 07:48 AM
3

but a match to date rate of something like 90%. Seems surprising. Everyone I've talked to says that fewer than half the women even respond after a match when a guy sends the first message. Tinder was the worst. Only something like 30% of women would respond after I sent the first message, and I would always send a personalized message, not some canned line.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 09:11 PM
2

There's 50 Shades of Gray (shy girl gets the undying love of the billionaire man) and Twilight (shy girl gets the undying love of vampire man and werewolf man).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 07:35 PM
0

So you agree with SGD316?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 07:24 PM
2

It should be noted that she's not the only woman saying this. Another woman wrote a whole book about it: https://youtu.be/z0wxSmrs5fs?t=83 I had also heard from a female dating coach that she switched to coaching men because it was much easier. She said that women weren't used to receiving criticism, so she had to constantly give compliments to women and worry about how any constructive criticism would be received.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 06:53 PM
1

I think if your a matchmaker with only guys on the books your a shit match maker. It's typical that they have one gender who pays and one gender who does not. I had a female friend who was asked by a matchmaker to be in their dating pool. My friend didn't have to pay. The guys did have to pay.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 05:55 PM
1

This is true, women don't perceive men as attractive, whereas men see many more women as attractive. All in the eye of the beholder.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 05:52 PM
2

I think s lot of these guys are rich but don't have a lot of time. If a guy is worth 8 or 9 figures, it's nothing for him to drop $100k on a matchmaker because that amount of money means nothing to him. Sure, you're not going to drop $100k on a matchmaker because that amount of money means something to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 05:44 PM
2

Of course, if there is a growing lack of attraction to men, it is also possible that men have somehow become less attractive, and need to takes steps to fix that. If there is a growing lack of attraction to men, there could be plenty of reasons for that. The "paradox of choice" shows us that people with lots of options are less satisfied with all their options, and obviously the movement from small tribes to towns to major cities has given everyone a lot more options. Studies have also shown tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 07:16 AM
4

Despite the presence of OF and every other app in which women masturbate themselves into a frenzy; they choose not to believe women possess a sex drive. Are you arguing that women are on OnlyFans because they love sex, rather than chasing money? If that's your argument, then I guess everyone absolutely loves their job and aren't just doing it for money. I didn't realize how much my local garbageman and janitor absolutely loves picking up garbage and mopping floors.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 06:45 AM
1

One of the places that I see less to no fat people regardless of class are places like the Midwest, or Idaho. Here's a map of obesity rates. There's plenty of fat people in the midwest. It's actually higher there than in other places. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/prevalence-maps.html#overall
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 06:05 AM
5

Maybe you're a little confused, sweatie. What a nice condescending comment to start your rant. So much of this is nonsense. There's plenty of good guys who want to get married. Acting like all the men are fuckboys who refuse to settle down is a gross misreading of the dating market. Sounds like you're married, so I don't know how you would know what the current dating market is like anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 05:54 AM
15

huge ass and tits something that is known as “black” traits I'm starting to doubt that this guy has ever seen a Russian woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 02:16 AM
2

Lesbians are already rare to begin with (2% of women if you're being generous) Bisexual women are also an option. From what I've read, bisexuality rates among women have increased significantly in the past 10-20 years. As of 2018, almost 6% of women responding to the survey identified as bisexual compared with 1.5% in 2008. https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2019/04/16/the-bisexual-boom/
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 10:50 PM
2

He reckons Islam, despite considering it to be a 'barbaric system', will replace European secularism because European men will eventually realise they'd benefit more from living in a 'regulated market' with a fair distribution of sexual resources than living in an 'unregulated' market where only a few succeed. That seems like a ridiculous prediction. If it was via conversion, there's no reason for anyone to prefer islam to conservative Christianity, especially since Europe has a christian histor…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 04:12 AM
1

Don't forget that New York is one of the most skewed dating markets - too many women and not enough men. This made things extra easy for him. I don't he'd be doing as well if he were anywhere else, or god forbid, in a dating market with a surplus of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 12:30 AM
1

Nobody is arguing that someone has to be attracted to every person who's "in their league" or "statistically equal". But if sometime thinks that 0% of the people in their league are worth dating, there's a problem inside their own head. Someone in that position needs to do one of the following: improve themselves so they're in a different league (although their standards will likely increase, which repeats the problem), accept being single and not complain about the other gender being "worthless…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 11:43 PM
1

Besides subjective aspects of physical attraction, WHO decided this? You're already setting up a strawman when you say this. You're implying that there's one person who makes these decisions. While people have subjectivity when it comes to deciding another person's physical attractiveness, you'd have to be crazy to think there isn't some consensus about who in the world is attractive, average, and unattractive. Who decides who is a 6, or a 7, or other arbitary "ratings" or judgement of how good …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 06:48 AM
1

He's definitely less than a 7.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 06:24 AM
1

Can you provide examples? Because I don't see a lot of that going on in PUA. Sure, there's a few guys who love to talk shit. But they're more the exception. There's one guy in particular who's a PUA coaching who seem narcissistic and holds decade-long grudges. He's a major exception, though. I don't watch his stuff. Usually PUA coaches don't even mention the existence of other coaches. There's also a lot of debate about what attracts women. The blackpill are all "it's all about looks, nothing el…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 05:56 AM
1

There's nothing visible. The post was removed and there's no comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 05:36 AM
2

It's hard to know exactly what that last line means. If they measure "sexual success" as number of partners, then maybe disagreeableness is connected to people who can't maintain relationships, and so they bounce around from one relationship to another and get a high sexual partner count. Whereas people who can maintain a relationship end up with fewer sexual partners because they're in a stable long term relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/22 10:12 PM
2

It was episode 110 "Boomers, Coomers, and Consumers" at about 38 minutes. One of them said that watching Fight Club was a sexual awakening. Here's an actual quote from the podcast: "If I were to say my kink is seeing two guys fight and then I fuck the winner, people would probably look at me like a psychopath. But that's how a lot of females experience sexuality. I love NBA fights... yes yes yes tall men please. I love hockey fights okay? ... The best part of every hockey game is [when two guys …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:05 AM
3

A while back, I listened to part of an episode of the FDS podcast. In the podcast, they talked about how turned on they get by men fighting, and how the movie "Fight Club" was very hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 02:06 AM
3

That's an amazingly terrible summary of what he just said.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 08:35 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/sftvig/how_many_people_here_have_had_their_heart_broken/huw9ipm
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 08:18 PM
1

Yes. I'm good looking (have worked in the past as a male model), have a college degree (actually double majored with a high GPA), earn $150k/year, go to the gym 3x a week so I'm in good athletic shape and low fat, a good person, etc. Heck, I even sponsor a kid overseas.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 08:15 PM
2

Then why in the ever living fuck was we all taught to be the exact thing women Fucking despise? It's because teaching people to be nice works in every single role in society except for dating women. Be a nice employee. Be a nice neighbor. Be a nice father. Be a nice brother. Be a nice friend. Be nice, don't be a criminal, works for society. Nice employees are easier for bosses and coworkers to deal with. Be a nice coworker who doesn't make women feel uncomfortable. Being nice literally works in …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 08:09 PM
2

I don't think that's true. But women do want a man with options. I think women want a man with options, but chooses not to exercise those options because he's so in love with her. That's validating. But yeah, I remember seeing a woman's tweet recently where some woman said that her man doesn't have any sidehoes, and then asked why she was applying for a position that nobody else wanted. Some guy replied "What do women want?" If he has a sidepiece then preselection makes him more attractive, but …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 07:58 PM
3

I had a girlfriend a number of years ago who I really liked. Was with her for a little under a year. The last half of it involved me finding out more and more about her lying and cheating on me. Eventually figured out she cheated on me with four other guys, including a friend of mine, and she was telling these other guys that she loved them. I don't think there was ever a period in our relationship where she wasn't cheating with at least one guy. I broke up with her, but my anger at her was a 10…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 12:27 AM
21

This is the same Bob Marley who had relationships with 7 different women during the course of his 15 year marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 08:43 AM
0

On the dating market, women with kids are less valuable than women without kids. He has harmed the women, and harmed the dating market. There's a rule in camping that says "leave the campsite better than you found it". Men who knock women up are like campers who leave their campsite in worse condition than they found it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 09:09 PM
2

I think he just spelled the subreddit wrong: r/datingoverforty
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 08:39 AM
2

The fact that you're talking about your first and second baby mamas proves that you're an idiot and a waste of a human being.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 09:59 AM
2

Women have a strong in-group bias. I don't know why you're saying they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 08:41 PM
3

Her comment is an insult pretending to be an insight.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 08:39 PM
1

Funny enough, I happened to be looking at reddit while not logged in the other day. I stumbled on a post in /asexuality and quite a few women were talking about being asexual and how their mothers were telling them things like (paraphrasing) "women don't have sexual desire, what you're describing (asexuality) is just the natural state for women, but men are horny". Thought it was interesting that there are apparently enough women with no libidos that some women actually think it's normal and com…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 05:56 AM
0

I'm mean - this exists: Reasons patients want a vaginoplasty After childbirth, women may complain of vaginal laxity, resulting from stretching of tissues and separating of muscles, sometimes to the point that a tampon falls out, and this lack of tone can contribute to sexual dysfunction. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/cosmetic-procedures/aesthetic-genital-plastic-surgery/vaginoplasty
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 03:53 AM
2

His hair extensions definitely improved his looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 08:18 PM
1

There is a dating app called "the inner circle" which is supposed to be all hot, rich people. You have to apply to get in, and it's supposedly exclusive. Admittedly, they don't match you up with your perfect match. It's just a curated pool of hot/rich/whatever people. https://healthyframework.com/dating/review/inner-circle/ Anyway, there are some premium matchmaker services. As far as I know, it's for rich men trying to find someone. Not sure how much women pay to be a part of it. But a number o…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 04:58 AM
3

I've seen some interviews with tinder software developers. I think they hide their identity because they're not supposed to talk about the algorithm. Also, I think people were doing experiments. After Tinder came out, people started to automate the right-swipe action, which the company didn't like. So they started implementing ways to stop people from doing that by penalizing them in various ways. I think one of the things Tinder did was watch how quickly the right-swipes were happening. One of …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 07:56 AM
0

I would rarely get matches, so I decided to pay to see who was liking me and start picking from that pool. I was getting less than 1 like per day, and almost all the women liking me were unattractive - often overweight and obese, while I'm a gym guy who's in good shape. That's why I was getting so few matches - because I generally didn't like the women who liked me. On rare occasions, I'd see someone worth matching with. She'd respond maybe 30% of the time. In cases where she's respond, she'd us…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 07:49 AM
5

The reason most men get so few matches is not because thousands of women are swiping left on them; it’s because their profile is being shown to very few women. It's not because men are mass right-swiping. I never mass right-swiped, and neither did my friends. Still got shit results on Tinder. I ended up quitting Tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 03:54 AM
6

You’re limited to 100 right swipes per day in Tinder, to make sure you’re actually looking at profiles and not just spamming everyone to rack up random matches. Tinder obviously cares about making matches, but it cares more about the app feeling useful and the matches feeling real — as in, resulting in conversation and, eventually, dates. It tracks when users exchange phone numbers and can pretty much tell which accounts are being used to make real-life connections and which are used to boost th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 03:52 AM
6

As usual on PPD, there's a lot of missing information that could allow people to reach valid conclusions. We don't know what your friend looks like, what his matches/dates look like, whether he's in a city with excess men or excess women, whether he's in college (most colleges have too many women), etc etc. There's lots of factors that we don't know that could explain a lot of things, so nobody can make an informed decision on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 03:49 AM
1

You also have to admit that some of it is just imaginary traits made up in the mind of a woman. I've met women who thought their boyfriend was confident and had no filter. She was framing them as positive things. I've interacted with the guy before. He was arrogant, a constant one-upper (he seemed very insecure anytime another guy got attention), talk down about his friends, narcissistic, and lacked some basic social interaction skills. But she described it as "confident" and "doesn't have a fil…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 02:28 AM
3

Could be a lot of men going on dates with less attractive women. Or women going on dates and saying no to second dates. Personally, I'm amazed at how many overweight women, women with kids, or both that are on dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 11:14 PM
6

Yeah, but they could charge a LOT of money for it. Plus there's new people every year because everyone is growing up. ( In reality, nobody really knows how to match people. There's been tons of research on it. )
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 11:11 PM
2

When there's 10 men for every woman on the app, then women get an average of 10x the number of dates that men get.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 10:38 PM
1

I've never understood the guys who complain about online adult models, since most of them seem to be actively following these lady's content at the same time as they complain about it. Citation needed. Because this claim seems to be pulled out of thin air because it makes your argument sound more convincing. I think OF creators and OF members are both awful, and want nothing to do with either of them. If I ever met a guy who told me he paid for OF, I would laugh at him and mock him for wasting h…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 10:20 PM
1

I laugh when my female friends post pictures which are designed to show off their asses. It's stupid and pandery bullshit. I couldn't care less if they stopped posting those kinds of pics. Honestly, I'd respect those friends more of they did. And I never follow any woman on instagram that I don't know personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 10:15 PM
0

You mean you're not doing to debate him on this debate sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 09:46 PM
1

I can think of lots of reasons people can complain about what other people spend their money on. I avoid Chinese products because China's government sucks and people who buy their products are empowering a totalitarian government. I also wouldn't want people buying drugs that empower Mexican or South American drug cartels and their murderous actions. People paying for products affect the world in ways that are bad for other people not involved in the transaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 09:44 PM
1

Lol. Yeah, okay. All labor and experiences are exactly the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 09:32 PM
–

none of them invalidate women's issues Expert level strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 06:10 PM
4

There's a guy on youtube I sometimes watch. He teaches how to be successful on dating apps. His whole approach is to hookup with girls and much as possible, and as far as I can tell, he's far more successful than me, even though I'm better looking. His whole approach revolves around filtering out all the women who aren't DTF. This involves being flirty and sexual which filters out all the women he doesn't want. He also doesn't usually bother with meeting women for drinks and prefers to have them…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 10:37 PM
2

Men are a lot more honest with other men than women, wouldn't you agree? I don't even think that's true. Men are often times not talking to each other, and this idea of "locker room talk" is mostly a myth. I'm almost never been involved in it and almost never see it. I say "almost" because once every decade or so, I'll overhear two guys talking about shit. Heck, it wasn't that long ago that a survey showed that Americans have fewer friends than ever and a surprisingly high percentage of men had …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 09:48 PM
2

In support of your argument: https://images.app.goo.gl/XWLFj7qNE9H3f5WX6
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 02:36 AM
2

Reddit’s tradcels are wrong — birth control isn’t just for Chad banging 20 something sluts. I'd be surprised if that (emphasis on "just") was the argument that TradCels are using.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/21 09:55 PM
2

Both can be true at the same time. They want you to go away and they're bitchy because they're bitches. I've seen female friends of mine be bitchy towards guys approaching them. Those female friends are also bitchy in regular life.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/21 03:43 PM
1

Young teenage women will go for those young effeminate boys because those girls are in the transition between having all female friends and having crushes on boys. Effeminate boys are the "training wheels" for young women who are only beginning to like boys. Effeminate enough to be familiar and safe, like her female friends. But is actually a boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 09:10 PM
1

Wow. Rich and famous musicians had lots of interest from women? I kinda laughed that you left N'Sync out of your list. I guess you were worried about including Lance Bass in the list?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 09:06 PM
0

No it's not. I've never had a girlfriend buy me skincare products. Wearing sunscreen is not seen as gay or effeminate. The fact that men get sunburnt is a strong incentive on its own to wear it. And women often try to turn men into people that they aren't attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 09:03 PM
1

Because that's typically how society sees it and because gay men often act effeminate. Much of stereotypical gay male behavior is copied directly from women. I'm surprised that anyone would question why people perceive a connection between the two.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 08:59 PM
1

because “cultural appropiation” is retarded af. Yes, it is. I don't understand how you're getting downvoted. People are hugely hypocritical when it comes to "Cultural Appropriation", they use poor counterarguments, and often just being selfish (or selfish "on behalf of other people"). I like to point out that minorities use white culture all the time. It's not like black people invented the guitar. Sorry Jimi Hendrix. You're guilty of cultural appropriation! There are plenty of pictures of black…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 08:51 PM
1

https://images.app.goo.gl/paxqKzVpGntvbug66 https://images.app.goo.gl/794PxjfLLhFqG8HEA The fact that the (median) guy has the same amount of sex doesn't really tell you much about his level of attractiveness because the task guy might be more desirable and sleeping with more attractive women, while the short guy is having as much sex, but sleeping with less attractive women. I'm sure if a guy lowers his standards enough, he can get more sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 06:07 PM
1

Lol. Plenty of black guys are over 6 feet. Have you ever seen sports? Also, the guy who made the Juneteenth Google logo? He's a black artist. He also made this comic: https://images.app.goo.gl/YgtDiD2dvcW8jBUC9
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 06:02 PM
1

Yeah, k-pop stars are only admired by young teen girls. This is also the time in a male's life when they are their most boyish and effeminate, so relative to other males the same age, they're relatively more masculine than you're admitting.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 05:55 PM
1

Good pictures will never make a man as popular as a woman with good pictures. Please stop pretending like this is the issue. It's a form of gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/21 05:30 AM
1

The Top half, the top 25 % of men in terms of looks and personality* will (and largely do now, esp. if they live in an urban area) live in a land of milk and honey, in a reality of abudant sex, romance and social status. I don't even think that's true. Women want men that they can lock down and make into good, loyal providers. Many women will become combative if they don't get that, especially if they are attractive because attractive women have more options than anybody, including attractive me…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/21 05:16 AM
1

Wikipedia agrees with you: The term "goose" may refer to either a male or female bird, but when paired with "gander", refers specifically to a female one (the latter referring to a male).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 04:17 AM
2

I suppose it depends a lot on the risks. I know a number of women that are pushing 40 and freaked out that they haven't locked down a man. I've seen some women contemplate getting a sperm donor because they want kids but haven't managed to lock-down a man. Being a single mother is not the ideal option. There's also a possibility that they become jaded and it affects their subsequent dating options and relationship happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 10:08 PM
2

I can't help but wonder if that's related to the idea of game being demonized and also the push for equality - so men don't think they should have to work any harder than women. And women have very terrible game. Admittedly, most women expect men to do most of the work, so they are resentful about the idea of making an effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/21 08:59 PM
1

You mean the guy that had sex with men and girls as young as 9 years old in his "count"?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/21 08:23 PM
2

I think this is wrong. There are plenty of guys who enjoy women's company who don't do well with women. It's oversimplistic to act like there's two camps of men: men who like women and have sexual success and men who don't like women and don't have sexual successes. I also don't believe that most men hate women or are just LARPing. It also unfairly suggests a "just world fallacy" where guys are getting the success and failure that they "deserve". I can't help but remember watching the video of a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/21 07:03 PM
1

That list is pretty incomplete.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/21 06:45 PM
1

Wayyyyy too much discourse about gender is controlled by the feminist camp of thinking. And the feminist camp of thinking is to reinforce the idea of women as victims. I'm not at all surprised that a gender studies professor would say dumb things like this. It also makes me wonder if he's trying to sleep with women in his class (like Hugo Schwyzer) by playing the "I'm not like other guys" card. (In case you don't know, Hugo Schwyzer was a gender studies professor and feminist who was cheating on…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/21 04:22 AM
2

It's the fact that motherhood is so unsupported in our society that it's basically a form of suicide. It's worth pointing out that there's no better time in history to be a mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 11:19 PM
5

There is nothing wrong with appealing to altruistic or "social good" reasons for getting something that's also in your own interest. For example, if a feminist came and appealed to "social goods" that result in women working (e.g. it improves the national economy) or black people appealing to nationalistic reasons while fighting for equality. In either case, it's perfectly acceptable to use things like nationalism or selfish reasons (e.g. "if you're wife works, then you'll have more money") even…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 11:12 PM
7

You’re rich? That explains your position lol Nah, bro. Those women want him for him, not his money.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 09:45 AM
24

It isn't something I notice in Russia tbh, but I guess it might be different in the US. There seems to be a trend going on in Asian countries. I've heard of it happening in Japan, South Korea, and (more recently) China, too. Admittedly, in China there's the potential for it to get a lot worse because of the disproportionate number of men compared to women (because of selective abortion) which will just increase the competition among men, and cause a lot of guys to just give up.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/21 06:06 AM
1

No they don't. Let's be honest: the primary goal of businesses is to charge as much as you possibly can, and with healthcare, you always have the fear of dying. So the healthcare industry has been turned into a massive money making enterprise. They'll continue to squeeze every drop of cash out of the American population. As a side note, I have a friend who's dad was a high up guy at a major insurance company. He bought a 17000 square foot mansion on a mountainside in Colorado. It was his second …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 08:48 PM
1

on the same track as Japan or South Korea I saw a YouTube video about China recently, and they were saying the same thing was happening with guys there.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 08:41 PM
2

I think you may be confusing the casual sex marketplace with the relationship marketplace. The name "golden penis syndrome" heavily implies that it's the casual sex market that we're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 08:32 PM
2

only the relatively small % of men that know they meet those 3 standards I listed. Yeah, it takes a lot more than those three standards to have any chance at having "golden penis syndrome". And guys can have golden penis syndrome even if they don't meet those three standards. It's not like Jeremy Meeks had a college education or decent job prospects. I most definitely know guys who meet those three standards, but have trouble with women because they're short or some other minor issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 08:29 PM
1

Men are in full control of their urges/horniness. That doesn't matter. Why? Because men exist in a dating marketplace, in competition with other men. If I, as a man, perfectly control my libido, I still have to compete against men who are bending over backwards for women because of their libido. That fact strongly affects what I, as an individual man, has to do for women in order to compete in the dating/sexual marketplace.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 11:10 PM
1

You act like you speak for all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 11:06 PM
5

I tend towards more "masculine" roles of providing food and gifts, always focused on protection of my partner, nearly always the initiator of sex, have a "need to be needed", being the planner, the one who makes sure everything will go off without a hitch, and am more emotionally stoic. On the other hand, my lover tends to take on more "feminine" roles. He enjoys being taken care of, likes it when I have everything set up without him needing to do much, really likes being sexually pursued, "want…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 10:47 PM
2

There are more single men than single women in the 20-40 age range.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 09:03 PM
3

In other words, you guys are finally admitting women want beta males. They just need some alpha traits sprinkled in there. Oh so close. Here you go: In other words, you guys are finally admitting women want alpha males. They just need some beta traits sprinkled in there, but only for her. I mean you're trying really hard to get everyone to agree with you, but that's not how things are. There's a reason male leads in romance novels have "alpha" careers or positions - billionaires, pirates (specif…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 09:27 PM
85

without being TOO aggressive ... He said to me without missing a beat "Probably go work on my 4 wheeler when we're done fucking later tonight." I'm curious what "too aggressive" means considering that this seems rather aggressive. And I think most women would consider that overly aggressive. Do you mean "gropes me at the bar" is your level of too aggressive?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 09:05 PM
9

Okay, so if people said "women and bisexual men are picky/hypergamous" or "people who date men are picky/hypergamous" you'd be happy?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 09:01 PM
3

Women are judged for having past sexual partners, no matter how few, even the women who only had one sexual partner their entire life, and they are either prudes or whores That's a false and people only believe it because justifies a victimhood narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 08:41 PM
5

Exactly how much money does a man need to contribute to his estranged family in order to be considered a "breadwinner"? If a woman earns $40k, but the man contributes $20k of his $50k income, then he's "not the breadwinner", correct? So is he supposed to pay more than $40k of his $50k income so that he beats the income of his divorced wife in order to be considered a "breadwinner"? That seems like a bad standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 07:33 AM
9

Considering that women cheat as often as men, maybe nobody should ever get married and we can all watch the world burn.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 07:46 AM
4

Women are fucking angry and don't just want social justice, they want some retribution. It's more than just that. Every ideological movement benefits by playing up it's own victimization and downplaying the difficulties of the "other". This stirs up people's anger and the righteousness of their own side. For feminists, it involves exaggerating their own problems and downplaying and ignoring men's problems, so that they can maximize the perceived relative problems of women. As another example, I'…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 08:29 PM
7

The reason that gay men are (sometimes) in good shape is that working out has a better ROI for gay men than for straight men. Gay men love a great body and gay men like looking in the mirror and seeing a great body. Getting in great shape might improve a gay man's dating life by, say, 3 fold. Because women judge men in a zillion different attributes (including idiosyncratic preferences), there's no one thing that can improve a straight man's dating life by the same amount. Getting in better shap…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 09:06 AM
2

I was wrong, the average child support is 430 USD in the US Based on the math in that article, the average man paying child support earns $30,000 / year, which is much lower than the average wages of American men. "The average annual wage in 2019 in the US was $51,916.27" This also means that women weren't getting much money while married, either, so child support might not be that different from her married financial situation. It also seems like an indication of the high rates of divorce among…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 06:01 PM
12

A study of women's dating revealed that women felt that they were "settling" if they were with a man who only had 80% of the dating criteria that they wanted. https://youtu.be/z0wxSmrs5fs?t=83
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 05:47 PM
13

Most women find most men attractive. . 80% of men still get laid. Those are wildly different claims. The second statement is NOT evidence that the first one is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 05:36 PM
3

As a little girl, I did benefit from a lot of the "girls rule" messages that were out there, but I didn't really think about how the boys took that message. I had a girlfriend a few years ago who, even though she didn't come off as a huge feminist, didn't seem to immediately get the problem with shirts like "the future is female" (which she bought for her neice) or another shirt I saw being sold in the mall that said "girls are better at science". Like, how did she not understand that it was put…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 09:12 PM
1

I haven't been to Scandinavian countries, but I have been to Iceland (which is Scandinavian, too, I suppose). They were super feminist. An interesting thing about the vikings who settled the island is that most of the male DNA (i.e. y-chromosomes) was from the Scandinavian countries, but the female DNA (the mitochondria) was from elsewhere - much from Ireland. Obviously, the vikings took (captured?) brides from elsewhere and then settled in Iceland. I couldn't help but think that Icelander men w…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 09:03 PM
1

https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/typical-mind-fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 08:41 PM
2

I don't understand your point about comparing them - because both of them are pretty crappy subreddits and is possible to think they're both stupid. I stopped going to the RedPill sub because it was too much hatred of women and lots of assumptions about women's behavior. I remember that they would take some post from some relationship sub, and then create a while fictional narrative about how the woman in the story was cheating (because no woman considers leaving a relationship unless she alread…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/21 08:59 AM
6

I think your numbers are off. After a 2014 interview with Tinder CEO Sean Rad, the New York Times reported that men swiped right, or "liked", 46 percent of the time while women did so to 14 percent of profiles.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 08:51 AM
2

From screenshots and the like that I've seen, there's definitely a particular type of guy who uses them. Very dudebro. You're basing your opinion of guys on dating apps on the screenshots that other people have decided are worth showing to people? That seems like a highly curated selection of male dating profiles. I have a folder on my phone where I store weird female dating profiles. Anyone who thinks my "weird tinder profiles" screenshots are an accurate reflection of women on dating apps in g…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 08:40 AM
11

But then men get pissy if you don't fuck them on the 1st date because you don't find them "attractive" enough. What's a girl to do? What kind of third-world country are you dating in?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 04:44 PM
5

I wouldn't blame a woman for having gotten accidentally pregnant due to condom failure. Uh, Ok. It's possible to not blame someone for a condom failure and also suggest that women use other birth control. Many women have horrible side effects from hormonal birth control as well as the copper IUD. Okay, but that's still not all or most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 04:42 PM
7

Lol. No.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 04:39 PM
40

Don't forget the other problem for men: women who put almost no effort into dating or talking. I get some number of matches, but the rate that women don't respond, or respond but expect the man to carry the conversation and entertain them, or ghost out of the conversation randomly is (as far as I can tell) much higher than the number of men who do that to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 04:32 PM
4

I mean, if you're using condoms as the one and only form of birth control with Tinder hookups, and you're worried about this, you might want to consider other birth control options that you control. I've had girlfriends who took various birth control pills or had an IUD.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 04:28 PM
1

Like how exactly do you plan on talking to strange girls once you get there? "Hi! I just traveled for an hour to get here with the intention to hookup? Whassup girl!" Jesus dude! This is facepalm territory. Kinda weird that you make up a fake scenario where he says exactly the things he shouldn't say in order to make him sound socially inept.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 07:46 AM
4

Elon Musk did quite a bit to fix his hair. https://pagesix.com/2018/07/25/its-highly-likely-elon-musk-spent-over-20k-on-hair-transplant-surgery-doctor-says/ Although it might depend on the nature of the hair loss. I don't know.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 07:42 AM
6

If the women are dumpster fires by then, it seems like it would be easier to get dates, but harder to get dates with good women. That doesn't seem like a win for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 07:38 AM
3

Even for good looking, financially successful guys, the dating market is still pretty fucked because women do have a lot of deal-breakers for men. I'm shocked by how often I get turned down by women even though I'm all of those things. Some of it is women's idiosyncratic tastes, and some of it is reaching for objectively better guys. As fucked as it sounds, a woman who was a "5/10" pretty much knew she would have to be willing to be down for "netflix and chilling" to sustain the attention of goo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 07:23 AM
5

I don't know about that. Part of your argument relies on this idea that fat women are treated as subhuman. Obviously, it's in the interest of your argument to exaggerate how terrible fat women are treated. The other thing is that "fat acceptance" is being pushed into other areas besides just "treat overweight women as human". The fact that there was a "plus sized" model in the Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition seems an awful lot like they're trying to market overweight women as sexy to men. ht…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 07:10 AM
1

If I posted a comment to this thread indicating that I prefer men who are 6’2 or taller, who aren’t bald or balding, and who are fit/ripped/jacked…. It's not very common for men to be that tall, so a lot of guys are getting excluded based on that. It's also not something that men can change and it's a fairly common female preference (meaning most men have worse dating lives because of it). Of course, my judgement of that preference also depends a lot of what you look like. If you're a Victoria's…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 06:59 AM
1

Settling is misery for all involved Awful lot of assumptions built into that sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 07:49 PM
1

Click on any age group. At age 25-29, there are 12.107 million males and 11.673 million females. 12.107m / 11.673m = 103.7 males for every 100 females. That's a 3.7% surplus.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 12:44 AM
1

an underclass of frustrated young men who saw no future and having a large group of young men who feel they have no future Reminds me of fundamentalist mormons. In areas where fundamentalist mormons live, the leaders of the Mormon cults marry lots of young women. The boys have no romantic prospects and are forced out of the communities because they're competition. They're termed "lost boys" because they are no longer allowed to exist in the strict religious communities where they grew up, and en…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 10:55 PM
0

You just linked me to a chart that shows a 0.1 percent difference between the male and female population in every age group from 20 to 35. 0.1% You're looking at the chart wrong. The chart shows that, in the 25-29 age range, 3.6% of the entire US population is 25-29 years old and male, while 3.5% of the entire US population is 25-29 years old and female. That's not a 0.1% gap. Looking at the absolute numbers there's 4% more males than females in the 25-29 age range. That's not a massive differen…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 07:11 PM
5

Yeah, I was in Spain recently, and I was surprised how often I was thinking "Wow, she's really attractive". The Spainish guys were just "meh", so the competition wasn't strong. I remember seeing one woman and thinking that she looked like Megan Fox, but she was with some loser who looked like a skinny criminal with a drug habit. I came back to the US and now I feel bad about how overweight so many women are - even in their 20s. Makes me feel crappy about the dating prospects here. I think the nu…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 07:55 PM
8

Online dating is skewed towards too many men and not enough women. I don't understand how that couldn't affect people's expectations. There's also a lot of things in modern society which could potentially affect people's dating preferences and expectations. Some examples are: Studies have shown that when people are presented with more options, they become more more conflicted about making a decision, and are more likely to pick nothing at all. And if they do pick something, they are less satisfi…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 06:06 PM
2

because of marriage, due to which women mated with otherwise unattractive men, hence no selection pressure. If that's true, then women were in the same situation: men married them despite the fact that they were unattractive. So, your argument should result in women being ugly, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/21 01:47 AM
4

You clearly don't know what apps are like for gay men if you believe that. It's absolutely not like Tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/21 01:43 AM
6

There was a study where they tested both men and women. It didn't have much of any effect on men. As I recall, they showed people photographs of people and asked if they'd like to date them. Sometimes they'd claim the person in the photo was single and sometimes would say they're in a relationship. Women were more likely to be interested in a man of he was in a relationship than single. For men, it made no difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 08:06 PM
4

tells our lizard brain “ok this dude is probably not a serial killer” Have some doubts about that. First, I'd question whether or not being around women is at all correlated with being a serial killer, as plenty of serial killers could get women. Second, I'd bet it has more to do with "if she sees something in him, then maybe I should, too." Maybe a better test would be how women react when a guy is with an ugly woman versus an attractive one. Preselection forces would be stronger when a guy is …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 08:01 PM
21

It's true that they use that argument. Studies have shown that preselection isn't much of a factor for men, though. So they're clearly wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 07:54 PM
1

Yeah, ok. I'm sure they weren't just engaging in pillow talk, and somehow your dick is representative of every dick of every guy of your ethnicity.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 07:49 PM
1

The truth is, men are just men no matter what skin color or what language they speak, they behave similarly. Lol. Not true at all. There's differences between white men and black men in terms of std rates, unemployment rates, income, education, domestic violence, domestic homicide, fathers being around for their kids, crime rates, incarcerarion rates, etc. Some of the women I've grown up with have had kids with black men and there's an obvious divide in the life outcomes of women who got involve…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 07:08 PM
1

Yeah? Then why aren't women going for Indian, Asian, and Jewish guys over white guys? Statistically, all three of those groups make more money on average than white guys. Statistics: notice that the top earning religious groups are "Jewish" and "Hindu"? https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/10/11/how-income-varies-among-u-s-religious-groups/ Other statistics show that asian men earn more than white men, on average. (Feminists conveniently leave that fact out when they talk about the wage ga…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 06:34 PM
1

That's stupid because even in countries where everyone is basically the same color, there's always microdifferences that people pick up on and use to categorize people. I've even heard of Jamaicans making fun of their own siblings because they're a fraction of a shade darker. People will always categorize people - whether by race, country of origin, region, accent, education, religion, etc. It will never end because people use rules of thumb to make quick judgements. A white person from the Hamp…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 06:27 PM
2

That's mostly true. However, a small minority of white women (maybe 5%) absolutely fetishize black men and they are more interested black guys more than white guys. It generally doesn't end well for them in the long run. Those white women also screw over black women because they give black guys more options than they should have, and that reduces black women's power in the dating/sexual marketplace. Kind of ridiculous to see liberal women screwing over black women. The media also plays a role in…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 06:15 PM
1

The CDC gathers these statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 06:08 PM
1

The CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2019/overview.htm
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 06:06 PM
1

Yeah, the Centers for Disease Control have no idea about the prevalence of sexually transmitted Disease. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 08:44 AM
5

Feminists have been pushing this idea that you need to pay for porn. Example: "Most people get porn for free—but feminist filmmakers are hoping to change that..." (see full article) https://www.bitchmedia.org/post/why-you-should-pay-for-porn-feminist-porn-report
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 08:04 PM
1

Shut up, scrote! It's your fault. Stop being in denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 08:03 PM
1

Definitely screenshoting your comments and showing them to everyone once purge is over. Rather than debating you're going to try to bully people with social disapproval?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:06 PM
1

Women are happy living their best lives. If they weren't they would settle down. That logic didn't even make sense. That's like saying, "People are happy with their politicians. If they weren't, they'd just elect someone new." The obvious problem with that idea is that people generally don't like their politicians, they're just choosing the lesser of two evils. When people choose between two options, it doesn't prove that they're happy with either option. This is especially true when people are …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 05:46 AM
2

So feminism is more connected with red-pill rather than blue-pill. Lol. So you used one datapoint to conclude that the redpill and Feminism are similar. Are you going to tell me that analog clocks are like humans because they both have two hands?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/21 06:49 PM
5

Then you've learned the wrong lesson.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/21 09:18 PM
2

Not always. You're subscribing too much to the "everything women do is for the right reasons" belief. A ton of videos of "Karens" on the internet show how unreasonable some women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 06:14 PM
1

Women are the gatekeepers of sex AND commitment... Women pretty much control all of dating Great. I'm glad to hear women finally admit what guys have been saying on PPD - that women are privileged in the dating market compared to men. There were so many women denying it, and saying that women only have an advantage when it comes to casual sex - as in the recent PPD thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/pq1knf/women_tend_to_downplay_their_dating_advantage/ I think a lot of wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 05:53 PM
1

I don't think it's as simple as you say it is. First, there's still plenty of guys who will pretend to really like women to get them in bed. I've seen women complain about "future faking". There's even a commenter on your thread saying that she uses a "3 month no sex" rule to weed out guys only looking for sex. Obviously she wouldn't need to use that rule if guys were just looking for casual sex with women who only wanted casual sex. And second, when casual sex is more easily available, many men…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 05:38 PM
2

Also these days all you really need is a 3 month rule or something of the sort. So basically, you're saying that the other commenter (qthrowaway111) is wrong. Men are still pretending to want a LTR but they only want something short term, which is why you use the 3 month rule, which is the same type of thing past generations of women used.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 05:29 PM
3

Poly is a great option for people who want to be treated like a "you're good enough for now, but not good enough" dating partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 02:02 PM
1

as feminine and therefore something inferior that must be avoided. It isn't. That's the lie that feminists tell themselves so that they can reinforce the idea that they are being victimized. Seeing yourself as victims is very useful for every ideology. Even FOX News will tell their viewers that they're all being victimized. They do it, just like feminists do, because they know that people who see themselves as victims are useful tools for the movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 02:34 AM
2

The vast majority of women around the world do not have access to birth control or abortions. It's a form of appropriation when western women use the struggles of third world women as ammunition to claim that they are oppressed. Childbirth is still a leading cause of death for young women. In the developed world? No, it's not. First of all, death is not common for young women. And for the (rare) women aged 20-24 who die, only 1 in 150 deaths is related to pregnancy or childbirth. Car accidents a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 01:06 AM
9

Yes, it's not impossible to get approached by a woman. It's just unlikely and you'll have far fewer options as a guy unless you approach. Just like it's not impossible to win the lottery. Pointing out that you know someone who won the lottery doesn't prove anything about how easy or likely it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/21 06:54 PM
3

The post and the article are wrong. The original paper shows that, when women rotate rather than men, their selectivity decreases and men's selectivity increases, but it's not a full role reversal, as they claim in the article. I'd link to the original paper, but for some reason, I'm having trouble copying the link. So Google the original paper by searching for: "ROMANTIC SELECTIVITY Arbitrary Social Norms Influence Sex Differences in Romantic Selectivity". Scroll to the last page and they have …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/21 11:06 PM
6

PPD always seems to flip flop between: "The dating market is screwed up by men because too many men are willing to date down" and "if you can't find someone attractive enough to date, it's because you're ugly, and you need to lower your standards". So, basically every guy needs to lower his standards below the standards of every other guy? Sounds like a race to the bottom.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/21 10:44 PM
3

Sidestepping the fact that this reeks of "I'm a victim of misogyny", the fact of the matter is that even if this was true, there's a big difference between a guy not respecting a woman who has sex with him on the first date, and a guy who loves that his girlfriend is very turned on by him. if a woman “gives it up too easily”, they don’t respect her because she’s a whore. They want women to desire them… but demean the women who show them desire. You're also conflating having sex with showing desi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/21 05:15 PM
4

I don't believe that at all. That's just an excuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/21 05:05 PM
8

Women have the larger gamete. In any species the one with the larger gamete is more selective. Nah. It’s not about wasting an egg, it’s about the cost of fertilizing one and birthing it. Yes. And the work of raising a child. It's not about size of the gamete. Eggs and sperm are both super cheap. It's about the calories and effort to bring a baby into self-sufficiency. Typically, that's the female because pregnancy and nursing/raising young children requires food, effort, and is dangerous for the…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/21 09:21 PM
3

file:///C:/Users/595-424-424%20Windows/Downloads/Main%20document%20V3%20-%20corrected%20.pdf Just mentioning that this is a location on your own computer. You can access the file, but nobody on the internet can read it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 09:20 PM
1

Then move here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Womyn%27s_land
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 08:55 PM
3

There are lesbian collective communities. They're dying out, but they still exist at the moment. So, you've got a place to go if you want to go there: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Womyn%27s_land (Also, they don't typically require that you be a lesbian to live there.)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 08:55 PM
3

Geez, bro. Stop destroying her victimhood narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 08:45 PM
5

I can already guess that women commenting on this video are going to downvote it and try to invalidate it in a variety of different ways because it's impolite to suggest that women elsewhere are better in some way. This is part of tearing-down the competition. Also, I looked up obesity rates for the US and Brazil. 36% of US adults are obese. 22% of Brazilian adults are obese.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 04:34 AM
1

young marriages Define "young marriages". Yeah, if you're taking about people who get married before 22. Most people would consider getting married in your 20s to be "young".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/21 05:28 PM
0

It’s a one way ticket to become a single parent since statistically most relationships don’t workout. "The majority of America's 73.5M children under 18 live in households with two parents (70%). The second most common are children living with mother only (21%)."
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/21 05:26 PM
3

This shows a decline in T not based on exposure to the environment by time, but generation by generation. Nah. You can get declines from one generation to the next via the environment. That doesn't prove anything about it being genetic. For example: I'm sure that CO2 in the atmosphere doesn't affect testosterone levels, but if testosterone declined as CO2 increased, you'd see the same generation to generation decline. That would be an example of a non genetic decline that was purely environmenta…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/21 05:51 AM
2

Domestication is an evolutionary process that can be as quick as 80 years, and it drops testosterone levels in a specie. Yeah, which species? Species that have two or three generations in a decade? Not a relevant comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/21 05:39 AM
5

First, there's no evidence that what happened to baboons was genetic, as opposed to cultural. Second, you said there was a large die-off of aggressive baboons and that shifted the gene pool dramatically. Nothing like that had happened to humanity, so it's not a comparible situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/21 05:37 AM
1

Humans didn't die as young as you think. When you see things like "the average Lifespan was x before modern history", that's because child mortality before 5 years old was really high, which brought down the average. For example, in ancient Rome, if you survived to be a teenager, then you could expect to live to your early 50s. Socrates, who lived in the 4th century BC lived to 70 years old.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/21 03:14 AM
1

Yeah, it's more complicated than that. Saying it's just because of bullying seems like a stretch. And it also implies the only problem porn stars have (beyond the average person) is because of how society treats them. (The "If only society would treat them normally, then everything would be fine!" victim narrative.) I'm sure it's for a variety of reasons, including emotional issues directly because of their experiences in porn, and also emotional/childhood problems that influenced them to go int…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/21 01:09 AM
8

I bet nobody has ever been hurt because a friend didn't want to hang out with them anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/21 01:00 AM
2

I can't believe I had to scroll this far down to find this comment. The fact that lesbians have a major problem with deadbedrooms suggests that this isn't simple as "men are lazy and terrible".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 03:40 AM
1

You could have interpreted his statements in a variety of ways. You chose to pick a racial angle. You could have just as easily picked the "Idiocracy" angle. https://youtu.be/sP2tUW0HDHA
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 12:29 AM
8

Seems to me women not wanting to reproduce with losers is a good thing. That's funny that you think women are just having kids with high quality men. Lots and lots of losers are having kids. In fact, people with less than a high school education are having the most kids, and people with only a high school education are having the second most number of children. You're being naive by thinking women are filtering out the losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 12:22 AM
1

The tallest men are the best fighters Oh? Is that why professional boxing has weight classes, instead of height classes?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/21 01:14 AM
1

I think it generally doesn't matter if people have preferences as long as people have different preferences. When groups of people have the same preferences, it can cause problems for lots of people on both sides. If most women want men over 6 feet, it causes problems for men under 6 feet and causes problems for women who can't get their 6 foot man. Another example might include racial preferences, too. If most men don't want to date black women, it causes problems for black women and increases …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/21 12:20 AM
5

Not only that, but they'll say that men dancing around with a thong on is comedy. They're clowns. It's a very "OMG. This is so ridiculous I can't stop laughing" kind of attitude that a lot of women have towards male strippers and male semi-nudity. Heck, I had one female friend who hired a stripper for her bachelorette party, but she thought that "male strippers are gross" so she hired a female stripper.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 07:23 PM
2

much more meaningful to receive compliments from other women, in my experience. I question that position. Women will compliment each other for disingenuous reasons. Sometimes it's just about creating and solidifying friendships or get an edge in their business, and in either case, the compliment isn't real. And, of course, women go out of their way to praise each other as beautiful in all kinds of situations. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/sep/30/i-know-love-is-real-why-is-stunnin…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 07:06 PM
1

Absolutely not true. It's also likely that you're sons are lying about the amount of attention they get, how often girls are ghosting them, and how much of a waste of time the whole thing is. Young guys think that getting a match or having a conversation is "doing well on a dating app" because they don't know any better. I don't even count that shit. I remember one of my female friends telling me that she was looking at a mutual guy friend's dating apps, and she said she was genuinely depressed …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 08:53 AM
1

I think you're full of shit. I'm a guy on dating apps and the whole thing is mostly bullshit. And I'm definitely above average. (Yes, I've posted my picture to rateme on reddit and other people agreed I was above average, just in case you're going to accuse me of being clueless about my own attractiveness.)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 08:38 AM
1

Yup. I did the same. Used pictures of a woman than was about the same level of attractiveness as me, just to see. She got WAYYYYY more matches and attention and messages than I do with my profile. Not a single dick pic, and not a single guy who seemed like he was trying to hookup or have sex. Every guy wrote at least a few sentences and not a single "hey" or low effort message.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 08:21 AM
3

Are you talking about Norah Vincent or someone else?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 08:15 AM
4

One of few upsides to the new paradigm is that it will surely mean the death of the unrealistic romcom wherein pestering someone into dating you was the norm. There's still plenty of ways to do it badly, though. All they need to do is make the "nice guy" not pester her, but still somehow end up with the girl at the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 09:13 PM
2

Interesting fact I heard the other day: the movie "Pretty in Pink" was originally written and shot with Ducky (the shy "nice guy") getting together with Molly Ringwald at the end of the movie. In test screenings, people said they hated the end of the movie and found it unrealistic. So, they brought all the actors back and re-shot it, and Ducky didn't end up with the girl at the end. Kind of interesting because "the good guy ends up with the girl" is the plot for a lot of young adult movies. The …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 04:57 PM
–

Also, average looking guys were disproportionately getting more messages from females than average looking women got messages from men. No they weren't. You're reading the graph wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 06:25 PM
4

While I'm unsure about the exact categories, I have to agree that women who two different attraction systems. One is subconscious and one is conscious. I think the subconscious one is influenced more by evolutionary psych and the conscious one is more influenced by society, what a woman should want, and what might make her happy on a personal/friend level. That's why there's such a disconnect between what women say they want and the things they do. The topic reminds me of this: https://www.salon…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 09:40 PM
5

I'm not even sure that's true. Small boobs is a fairly common category on porn websites.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 09:28 PM
2

FDS has done nothing of the sort and is a much newer sub. Did you skip past the claim that they're promoted? Normally, I'd be skeptical that FDS is promoted. Although there have been mainstream articles promoting it. Also, I sometimes look at reddit while I'm at work. I don't log in. (I don't need my boss knowing what subs I look at, and don't want to vote or comment.) But what surprises me is that FDS posts appear on the frontpage for users not logged in. Seems like a weird promotion of FDS. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 01:35 AM
3

I have two female friends who are no longer friends with each other because one of them started making slight comments in private about the other's boyfriend being overweight.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 08:28 PM
13

"In whatever way that men and women are different, the opposite sex is wrong" is an overly common belief here at PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 08:24 PM
8

Big tits and big round butts! Huh? I think the whole big butt thing on instagram is ugly. And I think Kim Kardashian looks terrible. Lots of us like thin women. Athletic can be good. Small boobs are good. There's even a "small boobs" category on porn sites, which indicates that this isn't uncommon.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 08:18 PM
3

women were more likely to cheat because they felt unloved and problems in the relationship. I can tell you that some women will manufacture reasons to justify cheating - including creating fictional relationship problems. Perhaps it's about coming up with excuses that allow her to maintain a self-image as "a good person".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 07:39 PM
1

That's definitely not what I've seen. I can think of plenty of women who have been single mothers for a long time. It also raises the question: if divorced women can find a new husband within 2 years, then why are so many women single at all? Sounds like divorced women with kids are doing FAR better at getting married than single never married women... if you were actually correct in what you're claiming.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 07:17 PM
3

The reason I say that's a stupid take is that you're claiming that every guy who is nice is actually lying. I'm not arguing that they're aren't guys who pretend to be nice but are actually putting on a facade. I'm saying that not every guy who appears to be nice is putting on a facade. Look at it this way: let's say I create a subreddit devoted to people who have "Harvard" bumper stickers on their cars or wear "Harvard" t-shirts, and then it's revealed that they never actually went to Harvard. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 02:33 AM
3

No. The average height in Europe is 5'10", and it varies by country. Some countries like Scandinavian countries and the Netherlands are a little taller. Some southern and Balkan countries are shorter. In the US, the average height is 5'9.5", but it varies by race. White men age 20-39 average 5'10". Black men age 20-39 average 5'9.5". And Hispanic men age 20-39 average 5'7.5". Source: https://www.disabled-world.com/calculators-charts/height-chart.php
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 10:19 PM
1

I think it's important to remember that each person has both evolution-based desires and personal desires. Sometimes these two things are even in conflict. From an evolutionary perspective, every person should have lots and lots of babies. From a personal perspective, that's a lot of work and can make your life a lot worse (poverty, constant work, constant noise, etc). Whether you're a mom or a dad to lots of kids, or if you're a rich fuckboi with tons of child support payments, it has a negativ…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 06:04 PM
0

Nice guys are the ultimate manipulators because they are only acting nice for the CHANCE of getting the goods. They aren’t genuinely nice guys, they are putting on a front, an disguise, illusion, etc. That seems like a stupid take.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 05:20 PM
1

Then be a cheese rather than a human.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 05:17 PM
2

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/BlindPastelHaddock-max-1mb.gif
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 05:09 PM
1

Only people who believe that there's one person in the whole world for them are capable of falling in love, huh? That's a rather absurd and toxic belief.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 04:42 PM
2

Yeah, I don't know that I buy that. I think there are some harmful effects of porn, but without masterbation, I think a lot of guys get irrationally horny. This can lead to them simping - because if women are your one and only sexual outlet, then women have a lot more power. I also saw a post on reddit a few months ago where a guy was talking about his experience with NoFap. He said he'd get really horny and when women rejected him, he'd get irrationally angry. He really started hating women bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 09:30 PM
1

It's called a "dating pool" for a reason. If the worse a dating pool is, then the worse it's going to be to try and find someone decent.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 09:22 PM
2

Here's a source showing the correlations between virginity and IQ. Basically, high IQ people are more likely to be virgins. Same for very low IQ people, but high IQ had even higher virginity rates than low IQ people. http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/04/intercourse-and-intelligence.php
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 09:09 PM
2

Criminal men are more likely to have paid for sex and committed sexual assault/rape which plays a role in why they may have higher number of sexual partners. I have doubts about that being the main factor. Although, along the same lines, I have to wonder if criminal men are less capable of maintaining a relationship, and therefore, spend more time single - i.e. chasing women, in short term relationships, and hooking up. For example, if Responsible Joe dates around and gets married at 24 and is s…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 08:53 PM
1

Seems weird to castrate yourself AND become gay. Doing both seems counterproductive.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 08:20 PM
1

There are roughly equal numbers of men and women at age 25. By the age of 35 it is 45% men/55% women. And by the age of 45 it is 40% men 60% women. I highly doubt those numbers. Are you saying that 1/3rd of men have died by the time that they reach 45 years old? Because that's what your math would require. Also, you're skipping over the relevant number: the number of single men and women in those age groups. There are more single men than single women in their 20s. It doesn't really reverse unti…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 05:02 PM
9

Don't worry about it. She gets off on saying shitty things to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 04:46 PM
6

You're making it sound like the main issue here is how much an individual male wants her. In reality, it's more complicated than that. If she has more options than you (and women almost always have more options than a guy does) then the dating marketplace has given her more power. A guy can be as completely disinterested in pussy, but it still isn't going to give him power when she's got a half dozen or a dozen guys who all want her.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 04:45 PM
3

If anything, the rise of OF and sugar baby/daddy culture (which has always existed, but w/e) actually means women we are aiming to date are less interested in that cash money. I disagree. You're assuming that some specific percentage of women in every society and time-period are gold diggers, but neglecting the fact that culture can change and make more women interested in gold digging - especially if they feel like they're missing out on big paydays. To use an analogy, imagine 100 people workin…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 08:58 PM
6

It's saying that people manufacture reasons to justify their own self- interested actions while believing the best about themselves. On a related note, there's a whole lot of information on this topic in books like "The Truth About Dishonesty" which talks about ways that human being will cheat in ways that are in their own self interest while also believing that their actions are justified and they are a "good person". What they found (through lots of experiments) is that people will cheat the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 03:00 AM
7

I doubt the study you linked to says anything about men actually lying more than women, and reveals more about the experimental setup and whether they're asking the right questions. Fake lie-detector reveals women's sex lies Women who thought their responses might be read said they had had an average of 2.6 sexual partners, compared with 3.4 partners for those who thought their answers were anonymous. But those who thought they would be caught out by the polygraph reported an average of 4.4 part…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 02:50 AM
7

The original post is just another dumb "men are terrible" post. This crap is just displaying that posters have an axe to grind. And, yes, I agree that some experimental setup in a lab probably doesn't capture the cases where women lie in the real world. On the topic of women lying about partner counts, there's a study on that, and you're right. Men are quite honest about their partner count (despite people who claim that men triple their partner count). Women aren't so honest about it: Women who…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 02:45 AM
1

It seems to me that the only reason someone would like this idea is if they didn't trust their partner or were deeply insecure. Either way, it's a signal of a bad relationship or deeper mental health problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 07:32 PM
2

Things were looking really good for us before she did this. Um no they weren't, you just weren't paying attention Seems like quite an assumption. One of the major assumptions you're making here is that people only cheat when they're unhappy in their relationship. I had an ex I really liked years ago who cheated on me -- and not a little bit of cheating, but multiple other guys. She'd lie to my face and tell me that she still wanted to be in a monogamous relationship with me when I asked about it…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 07:27 PM
2

Saints and Sinners have the same motivation, they do what brings them the least amount of pain and most amount of pleasure. A guy cheats on his wife because not cheating felt worse. A man works for a charity because he would feel bad not doing so. So if a guy picks a wife who is ugly, he did it because not picking her would be a worse choice in his mind. I think that theory of human motivation is too simplistic. It might seem right, but it isn't. Let's take the case of a man who takes an ugly wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 08:33 PM
1

Subs like r/changemyview are terrible for debate imo, seems like the poster literally always changes their view and rarely from a good argument. Yeah, I've seen some stuff on there that made me think that the OP was lying about actually believing what they originally said, and then were convinced by some dumb argument that someone made. It almost looked like they were designed to "be convinced" in order to promote the opposite view than they originally claimed.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 04:27 PM
4

My guess is that the only reason women say the problem is porn is so that they can blame men and not women. If the problem is the media more broadly, then it's not just men being affected.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 02:28 AM
1

Seems like an appropriate place to post this: "How TV ruined your [love] life." https://youtu.be/nKSqXGZJKbk
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 02:25 AM
2

That'd only be true if nobody else in the world paid attention to the media, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 02:24 AM
2

Also a lot more than 1% of men are violent in hetro relationships becuase male violence towards women and children is codified into our cultural script. I don't believe that. Growing up, I heard "never hit a woman ... under any circumstances". This is why many guys will just run away rather than fight back against a woman who's attacking him. Also, is very clear that male violence against women is extremely disturbing to people. Female violence against men isn't seen as disturbing. In some cases…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 09:09 AM
12

Most of recorded history has no relevance to this argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/21 04:21 AM
2

I'm sure some people would categorize casinos and lottos as scams. We've all heard the phrase that "the lottery is a tax on people who are bad at math". Admittedly, there's no way that any dating site/app can deliver guaranteed results.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/21 12:00 AM
2

If you’re a man and you NUT IN SOMEONE, you are accepting the risk and very real possibility of pregnancy. If you disagree, please stop having sex and take a sex Ed course IMMEDIATELY Sounds an awful lot like the argument that pro-lifers use on women: "If you didn't want to get pregnant, then you shouldn't have had sex or at least use birth control".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 08:23 PM
-5

there’s a possibility that you’ll die while giving birth. The risk of death in childbirth is very low in most countries, and it's much lower than it was at any other time in history. "The most recent U.S. maternal mortality ratio, or rate, of 17.4 per 100,000 pregnancies" and death rates are lower in other first world countries. In the worst countries, that death rate is above 1000 deaths per 100,000 pregnancies - which is closer to what our ancestors in previous centuries has to deal with.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 06:34 PM
1

I have never witnessed this and unless you can provide evidence I'll assume you're making it up to win an internet argument. I've had it happen to me plenty of times. One of the most common ones is to have women start saying I must be gay. It's a coping mechanism to explain away being rejected without harming their self image. And how many women are assaulted/murdered by them rejecting someone? How many men? Surely if women took rejection so much worse than men, then the number of men who are as…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 02:30 AM
19

Your comment reminds me of that video of a girl who was challenged to run a guy's Tinder profile. She thought it'd be like shooting fish in a barrel. She setup a bio, and talked about things like how she was looking for a LTR. She was shocked at the low number of matches she got, and number of times she got ghosted by women. She said she never got treated like this when she was on her own profile. Just goes to show how much more difficult it is for a guy on dating apps, although everyone likes t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 12:39 AM
37

A while back I was talking to this super attractive girl at a coffeeshop. She was waiting for her Tinder date to show up. She said that it gets overwhelming because there was like 50 guys trying to talk to her. And I was thinking "if you matched with a bunch of guys, why are you still right swiping on new guys? Seems like there was a point when she had 10 or 25 matches trying to talk to her and she still kept swiping on new guys."
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 12:36 AM
5

While I don't want to agree with your cynical take on the world, I will agree that there are quite a few cheaters on OLD. (I've heard some stories from female friends.) I will also add that these cheating men are competition for single men, and it makes dating worse for single men than it would be otherwise. This also contributes to men feeling screwed in the dating world.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 12:27 AM
2

Nah. I have female friends. I'm not attracted to over 80% of the women I meet. So, it's real easy not to try to sleep with or date them. If you're wondering why I hang around with them: same reason I hang around with guy friends. I'm not trying to sleep with them, either.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 09:42 PM
1

Women do the exact same thing. I don't know why you're pretending that it's just men who do this. The fact of the matter is that everyone over-simplifies the complexities of everyone's thoughts and opinions on everything -- men, women, republicans, democrats, libertarians, Christians, Muslims, atheists, etc. Everyone oversimplifies and generalizes the views of everyone else. And why wouldn't they? Our brains are only so big, but we have to somehow model the brains of every other person inside th…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 09:15 PM
5

The "pet rock" was a thing. So, no. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pet_Rock
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 01:03 AM
17

There is still this patriarchal idea that if a woman cheats it's because of something the man did. I don't know where you get that from. If the evil patriarchy was making up rules on who to blame, I'm pretty sure the patriarchy would do the opposite and blame the woman whenever a man cheated, and also blame the woman whenever a woman cheated. I mean, that's kind of the best way to get what you want and avoid blame. I've also seen women blame men for when they cheat. I'm pretty sure they're not s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 08:10 AM
7

The author did write a positive piece about the women's march, so I can't imagine that she's an anti feminist. https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/politics/news/a9303/mothers-daughters-womens-march-washington/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 07:59 AM
12

Men obviously have an issue with this because no one wants to be in a committed LTR with someone who only values it on a transactional basis. That’s a lie. Otherwise. Rich men would never marry supermodels half their age. Have you never heard of Sugar Dating? Men: "We don't like getting kicked in the balls." Lillth: "That's a lie. Otherwise. There wouldn't be guys who go to a dominatix to get kicked in the balls." Translation: "I found an example of that being false, therefore it's universally f…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/21 07:15 PM
2

Yet another example of the FDS strawmanning and not being willing to ask a question without trying to force the conclusion that she wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/21 04:56 PM
5

more convenient than your friend's wives Nice strawman. Prostitutes and your friend's wives are the only two options for cheating, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/21 04:57 PM
7

That's funny because there's a whole group of women against porn, but are totally happy with OnlyFans. The main difference seems to be the amount of money a woman gets. This suggests that it's not about being degrading. It's about getting enough sweet, sweet cash and the schadenfreude of watching men lose their money.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/21 04:54 PM
25

Porn ... ? Ew, gross, he can’t get women on his own. Lol. I guarantee that every man that has had sex has also looked at porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/21 04:50 PM
6

When you first join dating apps, they'll show you more attractive women. They want you to be hopeful about meeting some of those women. If they showed you ugly women, guys would just delete the app within the first 10 minutes. It's a business strategy. They also promote new profiles, so that new users get more likes - also part of a business strategy to make people stay on the app. (Honestly, writing this makes me wonder what other tactics they're using to make more money and increase user reten…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/21 07:14 AM
2

I think there are some special cases - like Mormons, which teach that having more kids results in more treasure in heaven. But, generally speaking, I think that's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 08:53 PM
3

Facebook did the same thing: they changed their algorithm so that hated aimed at men or white people was permissible but not hatred at anyone else. https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-worst-hate-speech-anti-black-race-blind-algorithm-zuckerberg-2020-12
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 08:08 AM
4

Yes. The fact that people congregate online with other people who think like themselves and have the same demographics as themselves seriously nutures extremist views. I've seen plenty of places which are almost entirely male dominated or female dominated that allow for extreme views to go unchecked. Same goes for white people, black people, Republicans, etc. There's no moderating influence when people can say that nastiest shit about another group of people and everyone with either agree or not…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 08:01 AM
19

... and the misandry aimed at men only makes men angry, which in turn leads to men hating women and society. You can't throw rocks at someone and expect that they won't pickup those same rocks and throw them back at you. That's where society is at, except that it hasn't realized that hatred towards men is going to just inspire men to be hateful back.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 07:53 AM
1

When you control your sex, no one has control over you. Do you think that sex is the only thing that can be used to control someone?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 07:48 AM
1

Why not be upfront about what you’re looking for? Not like girls don’t wanna have hookups too. Because: 1) Women hate men who say they're only there to hookup. Also, if any of your female friends see you on a dating app just trying to have sex, they'll think you're a sleezebag. (I've definitely stumbled on female friend's dating profiles, so I know they've stumbled on mine. In fact, some female friends have told me they saw my profile online. End result: don't put anything on your dating profile…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 09:41 PM
1

You should work on your anger issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 09:31 PM
1

It's also partially false.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 09:28 PM
3

I'm routinely amazed how little women understand men. Yeah. OP's post could simply be summarized as "I don't understand men + I'm angry at men = I'm going to make up incorrect explanations for men's behavior to justify my hatred of them".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/21 12:19 AM
1

Scared by a virus that can't even out-kill the common cold. Yeah, okay. Half a million Americans died of covid. In a typical year, flu kills less than 1/10th that number. Colds kill far fewer than that. It's amazing to me how many covid-deniers just make up statistics out of thin air.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/21 11:28 PM
4

Not a guaranteed orgasm, but fairly common. "The study found that heterosexual men and gay men both experience orgasm about 85 percent of the time."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 06:07 PM
1

"The study found that heterosexual men and gay men both experience orgasm about 85 percent of the time."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 06:06 PM
1

No they don't. Most women don't do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 06:09 AM
1

One of my female friends won't join Bumble because she hates the idea of having to send the first message. She just gets super nervous about it. That counts as evidence that women (or at the very least, some women) don't like to pursue.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 06:08 AM
1

The fact is that if a woman likes a man, she makes it very obvious; there's no mistaking it. There is no such thing as a woman who sucks at giving signals of attraction. Nonsense. Some women are better at it than others. And some women give completely the wrong signals in the opposite direction. One of my friends (who's around age 30) said that she gets really nervous around men that she likes and will actively avoid them. She admitted that it works out badly for her love life. She is an example…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 06:02 AM
1

That's because, for some women, it is demonstrably false.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 05:56 AM
0

I don't believe this at all. Generally speaking, women will generally only chase if you're significantly better than her (which is slightly different than whether you are objectively desirable). Also, women want attention and validation. They also avoid the risk of being rejected (rejection is anti validation). So a woman will often not chase because chasing is anti-validating ("she shouldn't have to chase, she should be chased after"), and chasing is likely to lead to rejection (which is also a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 05:43 AM
1

I don't know where you're getting that from. Romance stories often follow the narrative of a hot bad boy discovering how amazing the female lead character is, and pursuing her. Example: 50 Shades is about the hot, hyper-successful bad boy billionaire who becomes obsessed with the female lead (who's mostly not that interesting). Twilight is the same: the hot, hyper-powerful vampire bad boy becomes obsessed with Bella. And then the hot, powerful werewolf bad boy becomes obsessed with Bella, too. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 05:29 AM
3

The costs depend a lot on how much the parents can afford to spend. Poor people spend a lot less than the $233k figure that you mention. This is evident in the fact that many poor families have multiple children, and if you add that up, it means they'd have to spend $15k per year per child. But when poor families have, say, four kids, that means they're supposedly spending $60k per year on their kids - on top of all the regular expenses that a couple would have (let's say $40k). But looking at t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/21 12:18 AM
10

There's a few YouTubers I've stumbled on in the past year that are like this. Both guys work out constantly, and I'd bet money they're both on steroids. Some of their videos talk about women hitting them up on instagram or their messages on dating apps. One of them also told his male followers that he would (with their permission) hit up their girlfriends on instagram to see if they would cheat. It's often hard to tell how attractive some of these women are because sometimes their photos are blu…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 11:27 PM
7

I don't believe this framing of the issue. Even if there are more pathways to success, it doesn't prove that it's easier for men in aggregate. Here's an analogy: let's say men can get an athletic scholarship via football, hockey, or basketball. Let's say women can get an athletic scholarship only via softball. Does this prove that men have an easier time? No. The fact that there are more avenues doesn't prove its easier. If men have to be in the top 1% of players in any sport, it means that only…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/21 10:48 PM
2

So if a man doesn't use violence, harassment, or coercion, but he just uses women for sex, it's okay and not objectifying?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 11:50 PM
2

Sure you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 08:56 PM
1

A woman in her early to mid-20s has a 25 to 30% chance of getting pregnant every month. Fertility generally starts to reduce when a woman is in her early 30s, and more so after the age of 35. By age 40, the chance of getting pregnant in any monthly cycle is around 5%. It’s a common misconception that IVF treatment can overcome age-related infertility. A woman’s age also affects the chance of success with IVF. In Australia, the chance of a live birth from one complete IVF cycle (which includes al…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 08:54 PM
1

Why is this under the AutoMod?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 08:34 PM
8

Haven't seen the movie, but I saw the trailer and thought, "Oh great, a movie to tell everyone that men are a bunch of evil rapists - even the one's who seem nice". It reminded me of that viral video on YouTube a few years back where a girl pretended to be drunk and all these guys on the street were trying to get her to go home with them. These guys looked like scum, and everyone took it as an expose of how terrible and rapey men were - which was exactly what the director was trying to show. But…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 08:15 PM
-1

No man has ever taken a girl not kissing him to mean she isn’t interested. That's so ridiculously untrue that it raises questions about your entire comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 07:57 PM
5

It goes from 0 to LTR in like 2 dates. I've heard the stereotype of women trying to immediately turn every relationship into a LTR, but that sounds more like desperation than anything else -- as in "I have to lock this down immediately because there's slim pickings out there".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 07:51 PM
1

Only because women die later. So, yeah, if you're looking for a 75 year-old woman, you've got the gender ratio in your favor. In the West, there are 105 boys born for every 100 girls. In every age group, the number of boys/men outnumber the number of girls/women until somewhere around age 50.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 07:48 PM
1

I suppose you could argue that lots of stuff is an STI, then. The common cold? An STI. The flu? An STI. Coronavirus? An STI. Basically all contagious illnesses are STIs according to that view.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 01:52 AM
3

Nah. There's certainly a higher risk when you're the receiving partner rather than the insertion partner. It's the same reason gay bottoms have a higher risk of infection than gay tops. There were some statistics I saw years about talking about the rate of transmission of HIV. They broke it down into types of sex: oral (giving/ receiving), vaginal (giving/receiving), anal (giving/ receiving). The odds of a woman contacting HIV from in infected male partner was about double the rate of a man cont…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/21 08:46 PM
1

Any worse than animals? 40% of chimpanzees are infected with SIV - which is the ape version of HIV. They've evolved immunity to it, so they don't die from it, but it's still there. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4584299/ Edit: I might be wrong about that. It looks like some places have reported higher death rates for chimpanzees with SIV. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090722142828.htm
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/21 08:36 PM
2

The article mentions the CDC as a source, but doesn't provide a link. I'm doubtful about the 1 in 5 number. All the statistics I've seen, even ones from the CDC look a lot lower. If also be curious what STDs in particular they think are widespread. This link, from the CDC, shows the incidence of chlamydia (0.36% for men, 0.68% for women) and gonorrhea (0.2% for men, 0.14% for women). They're still below 1% even added together. https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats17/minorities.htm Not sure about things …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/21 08:16 PM
1

Well, mens failures arent their fault. Most of them cant help it that women dont find them attractive (they are either too short or ugly). I mean, that's the blackpill viewpoint, but I don't know that it's the viewpoint held by most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 11:04 PM
0

This comment reminds me of a story about a lottery winner a while back. He stayed in his home town. One of the problems that came up was the fact that women were suddenly more interested in him, including women who were already married. Lottery winners don't get rich based on their intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 09:25 PM
2

Except that it undermines your point by illustrating the fact that women's pickiness is at the mercy of poor selection mechanisms for men. Effectively: women pick the wrong things.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 09:01 PM
1

I assumed he meant sequentially, not simultaneously - i.e. on his sixth wife after five divorces.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 08:49 PM
19

To be fair, he was young and not famous yet and he was doing very blue pill "too nice" stuff. Still, it's sad that nice = you're a boy, mean = you're a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 06:36 PM
4

Not sure whether to upvote you or not. Telling guys to be proactive is good. Asking guys to become internationally famous to get women (and then blaming them for their own problems if they don't pull it off) seems like a stretch.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 05:53 PM
29

Reminds me of seeing a video with Tupac where he talked about how badly he did with women, and how women told him he was "too nice". Edit: Here's the interview: Tupac: And it gives me a lot of friends. I mean, I get a lot of friends but, also I get a lot of friends cause I have respect for women, ultra respect for women. Tupac: But then like I, I was, liking this girl at Tam and I’m extra nice, you know, extra gentlemen. I’m extra just oh, you’re beautiful and you deserve the best. Tupac: And sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 05:47 PM
3

I think it's mostly a huge exaggeration (every corner, really?) which is designed to make women feel victimized ("if men were in our situation, then this problem would be instantly fixed. This proves that we're deprived of power and forced to live under their patriarchy!"). And the comments here are just reinforcing that dumb idea ("it's about controlling women's bodies!") Really? How about the fact that not having abortions is also super inconvenient for men? Men knock someone up and then have …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 07:16 PM
1

Both things can happen at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 05:06 AM
1

For example, the most fertile men were seven centimetres above the average height. Statistically, they had 0.24 more children on average than the least fertile men, who were about 14 cm below the average height. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/08/scientists-try-to-answer-why-dutch-people-are-so-tall
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 05:01 AM
1

So who is labeling these men as shallow misogynists? . There’s still the question as to why some older men choose to date women much younger than them. It sure as hell isn’t shared life experiences and it’s much more complex than just sex. It’s about control.... What’s perhaps most interesting about Leo’s situation, in particular, is that he’s considered “woke” when it comes to the danger that our planet is in and yet he can’t seem to check his own misogyny and ageism. http://www.femestella.com/…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 04:40 AM
1

Some women really don't like porn, and hate the idea of men (their significant others, in particular) watching porn. One way they justify this animosity towards porn is to say that women are coerced into it. This gives them a moral justification that's a lot better than "I just don't like it when my boyfriend looks at porn".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 08:17 AM
4

I mean ... I can think of ways that both statements can be true at the same time. RAINN did some research and discovered that almost all sexual assaults on college campuses are done by 3% of the male population. That makes it both potentially dangerous to be around men in general because you don't know which guys are in the 3%, and also insulting to 97% of men when you say they're all rapists.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 07:29 AM
1

I think the point is that things like gender can be a factor in whether someone is privileged. For comparison, you could say that a rich black kid has it easier than a poor white kid. Did this mean that being black is not a factor in how people are treated? No. In this case, it just means that wealth is more powerful than race. But it didn't mean race isn't also a factor at play.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 12:14 AM
0

I didn't answer this particular question because I'm a man, but there have some times when i have accidentally answered posts "for women" because I missed to tag when I glanced at the title. It isn't because we are just ignoring it and not listening.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 06:35 AM
3

This reads like the way the favorite son of a CEO talks about how he "totally" earned his vice-president position in the company, and his he had to work really hard to get it. It's not that the son of the CEO or an OnlyFans girl did zero work. They obviously did some work, but it's also easy street. It's funny how people on east street try to pretend like they weren't playing with the cards stacked in their favor. The Onion: https://youtu.be/_67JbvXLrmw
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/20 07:03 PM
8

I think its mostly men who are commitment phobic. I don't actually believe that. I think a part of the problem is women's standards have increased. I'd always seen myself getting married and having kids, but the women I'm interested in doing that with are all trying to get the perfect man, and the women who want to have a family with me aren't that attractive. That might be misinterpreted as "men being commitment phobic" but it's actually about women having higher standards than they deserve (or…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 07:22 PM
3

Now women and men are living life as they want to, not as their parents or grandparents want them to. Lol. I highly doubt that. I know plenty of women that want to get married and have kids (and have a job, too) but the whole sexual/relationship marketplace is kinda fucked -- because of both men's and women's behavior. I can count up plenty of people who either knocked-up/got-knocked-up or are on the other end of the spectrum: women talking about freezing their eggs for when the "right guy comes…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:10 PM
9

There was a study I saw a while ago showing that the number of sexual partners a man had was correlated with his physical attractiveness. Whereas, women's physical attractiveness wasn't. It basically seemed to confirm that women's ability to get sex didn't depend on her attractiveness and the limiting factor was how much sex she wanted to have / how much she wanted to sleep around. But for men, his physical attractiveness was the limiting factor. I'll attach it to this comment if I can find it. …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 07:58 AM
9

To add to your point: There was a survey I was looking at earlier this year showing that, 50 years ago, women who were "lesbian or bisexual" were mostly all lesbians. But in recent surveys, women in the "lesbian or bisexual" category were mostly bisexual. There's been a large increase in women being "out" as bisexual and not so much of a change in the numbers of lesbians. If you scroll down in this article to the "The LGBT Population" chart, you can see that, of LGBT people, 19% are lesbians and…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 06:16 AM
6

Ha ha. Are there any guys who don't look at pornography? At the very least, I'd be curious about the sample size for the guys in the "I don't look at porn" category, and would be curious if they are deeply religious "no sex before marriage, and porn is evil" types. That alone is likely to skew the numbers. And maybe there's a contingent of "no sexual desire at all, so no pornography and no sex" types.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 05:43 AM
21

That's because most of this is bullshit. As a man, most of my interactions with women do not involve any expectation or desire for sex. Hell, I've helped old women across the street, but PPD will be all "every single bit of kindness from a man is because he expects sex". Yeah, because I'm trying to bang 80 year old women who has a hard time walking across the street. Obviously, it's bullshit. But, there are issues of ulterior notices in some cases - for example if that playdate guy only has a 10…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/20 05:21 PM
1

be yourself only works if who you are doesn't suck I think that's an exaggeration. Phrasing it that way makes it sound like "being yourself doesn't work? It must be because you suck". Lots of men don't suck and it still doesn't work for them. "Be yourself" only works if you're already kinda awesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 08:33 PM
1

Kinda weird that the phrase is "just be yourself" when you say there's a lot more to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 08:30 PM
3

I agree with your first paragraph. Not so much with your second one. Do men and women both have this problem? Yes. Do men and women have it equally? No, men have it worse. I've seen the dating lives of male and female friends. Women have it easier. This might not hold true in the few geographical locations where there are more women than men. But MOST places have more single men than single women in the 20-something and 30-something age ranges.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 07:16 PM
1

Women say just be yourself because dork guys always end up putting on ridiculous acts around women, bragging about stupid things, puffing out their chests, acting totally fake, getting all insecure, and putting girls way up high on a pedestal. Nah. It's like plastic surgery. People think all plastic surgery is terrible because they only notice the cases where is obvious and bad. The reality is that there's two types of plastic surgery: it's good and you don't notice it and it's bad and you do no…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 07:05 PM
1

And you only need to win the lottery once...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 06:09 PM
1

You mean if you're Chris Hemsworth, it's perfectly fine? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 06:09 PM
1

It's entirely common for men to put on a persona around their guy friends; they feel they need to put on a show of machismo; they can't show emotion or vulnerability or empathy without risking being mocked or excluded from the group. I don't know about that. Sounds like a stereotype. It is extremely common for men to only feel like they can open up around their wife or girlfriend. And it's extremely common for men to feel like they can't open up to their wife or girlfriend because women's attrac…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 05:35 PM
1

Except that it's worth pointing out that women get benefits from their investment. If I could spend $50 and increase my perceived SMV/RMV by 2 points, it's worth the investment. Women benefit from the money they spend. To spend that money, get a benefit (increased attractiveness), and then also complain that you deserve more benefits seems a bit greedy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 03:49 AM
5

Some of the dating apps have already added this option. I've never used it. Although one of my friends did. It's basically a step in between texting and actually meeting.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 03:29 AM
1

That doesn't prove anything. Very liberal women will also stand up for a man's right to be gay. But that doesn't mean she desires gay men. It's basically: "I care enough about you that I want you to be what makes you happy. Coincidentally, doing what makes you happy (being/acting gay or effeminate) is a turn-off for me, but that's fine because I'm not trying to turn you into someone that I'm attracted to. Someone somewhere will love you. (crosses fingers)"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/20 05:29 PM
1

Men stepping out of gender norms are much more punished than women are. I've heard this is rooted in toxic masculinity and how being feminine is the worst thing a guy can be. No. That's a feminists' attempt to understand it while applying the feminist narrative about how women are always victimized. Women have more freedom than men, but they can't accept that, so they have to try to believe that women are somehow being victimized.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/20 05:18 PM
2

I bet if I went to a 3rd world country with a stack of money and a green card, I could get enthusiastic sex from hot young women who would fulfil all my desires. Nah. You'd get more attention than you'd get in the US, but it's not on the magnitude of the attention that gay men get from gay men. But if I spent that same money on getting plastic surgery to look like a handsome male model with a "perfect" face at home, I'd only attract a herd of horny aggressive gay males. Absolutely untrue. Have y…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/20 07:15 AM
1

No. There's a stereotype about picky gay men. But they're not really that picky in general, especially not for hookups. That's why HIV went through the gay community like wildfire. I remember one of my gay friends telling me a few years ago that he's had around 120 sexual partners (at age 30). Lookup Gaetan Dugas if you want to see some crazy sexual partner numbers - he had around 2500 sexual partners in 15 years. I've heard enough stories about gay orgies in bath-houses and anonymous sex in pub…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/20 06:19 AM
1

OP is saying basically that hetero men have it better than gay dudes I don't know how you came to that conclusion from the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/20 06:11 AM
1

Yeah. I get about as much attention from gay men as straight women. Which is kind of amazing considering that there's probably 20x as many straight women in the world as there are gay men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/20 06:10 AM
1

Ha ha. It depends on which gay bars you're going to. There's a bear bar up the street from where I live, and I've been there with some of my gay friends. The guys there? Mostly middle aged, fat, hairy. Those guys definitely are not lookers. Most of them are a "4" or less in looks. I'd categorize some of them as a "1" or "2".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/20 06:08 AM
2

That's not what it's showed. Are we just making up summaries for these studies? First, the graph is difficult to figure out, because you have to compare the number of people in each category against the number of messages. Second, other studies are much more clear about what's happening. Men are slightly more willing to message women of the same or lower tier as them than women are to message men of the same or lower tier as them. Look at table 4 in this article. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/20 03:25 AM
2

On dating apps I've had girls message first saying "nice arms" and "hey handsome". Are you mass right-swiping or something? Because I'm a good looking guy. I'm in dating apps. I'm also in very good shape and go to the gym regularly. I can count on one hand the number of times that women I've matched with have messaged me first or say anything like that. And in most of those cases, they were women that I accidentally right-swiped on - read: I was quite a bit better looking than them. I don't see …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/20 06:24 AM
1

equality for the sexes - feminism. The problem is that feminists have told men that Feminism will solve their problems, too. Then they completely ignore men's problems or only consider them to the extent that they affect women. It feels like a huge bait and switch. Like: Feminists: "Join Feminism and men's issues will get fixed, too!" Men: "Okay." Later... Men: "It seems like men's problems aren't being addressed." Feminists: "Women have a lot bigger problems than you do. So sit down and shut up…
/r/MensRights31/08/20 08:46 PM
2

~$11k per month over course of 30 years I'm kinda doubtful about that math. That would be over $130k/year. I don't know anyone spending that kind of money just on a wife and kid. Seems like you'd need a $200k job just to survive.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 08:32 AM
3

It made me laugh that this is a real quote, since it sounds so fake: "What lovely women there are in the world!" - Adolf Hitler
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 08:27 AM
1

That's mostly seem by women in their 20s and he's in his 20s - while the guy still has a shot at fame and his full potential hadn't been reached, so she can imagine he had tons of potential. Women in their 30s are going to look down on a broke musician in his 30s because if he hasn't done well for himself by that point, she knows he probably never will. At that point, it just feels a little sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 07:22 AM
1

Too many people on this thread are immediately turning "looks and personality" into just "looks" and then complaining about men being shallow because of it. The way they twisted it feels like they're looking for an angle to critisize men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 07:16 AM
1

men don't do their share. So women are left with even more work and more emotional labour under the guise of "empowerement". That's a dumb comparison though. Women do more housework, but men spend more time in the office. According to studies (see link), among all adults age 18 to 64, men spend an average of 10 hours more per week at work than women do. Women spend an average of 10 hours more per week doing housework and child care. It equals out. Or do you want men to work 10 more hours per wee…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 05:11 AM
1

Who said men want to be valued for their bodies?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 04:32 AM
5

Her: "I offered to pay so that I seem generous. I didn't want to be generous."
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/20 11:39 PM
1

I would add to this: in small towns, people get reputations. Screw over a few people and everybody in town knows not to trust you. In big cities, it's super easy for people to avoid getting a reputation that follows them because the social network is too large. Bad people can screw over people constantly, and if they move a to a new part of town, suddenly nobody knows them or the past things they've done. They've managed to escape their bad reputation and can pull all the same tricks again.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/20 09:27 PM
3

It's some of both. But I've seen some young women act unnecessarily mean. In that case, it's not about not being taken advantage of, it's a result of the fact that they can be as nasty as they want and face no consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/20 09:22 PM
2

This also wouldn't be a problem if men weren't expected to be the initiators of romantic relationships - i.e. men are often supposed to read subtle and non-obvious clues (like being nice) to guess if a woman is interested because she's not going to come out and say it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/20 08:33 PM
1

Your title conflicts with your actual argument. Your title is "it's more logical for a man to take a woman's last name upon marriage", but then your arguments are about the kids taking the last name of their mother rather than father.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/20 08:28 PM
1

Haven't you seen "things my wife cried about"? Also, all of your examples involve anger for men. Anger is one of the only emotions men can show without being seen as weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/20 07:21 PM
1

Anger is one of the only emotions men can express without being seen as weak, particularly when talking about strong emotions. As a result, most of men's emotions get suppressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/20 07:15 PM
7

Yup. Years ago I had a girlfriend who was rampantly cheating on me and lying to me. She was also lying to her friends about not having dated anyone - even though we had been in a relationship for over 8 months at that point and had supposedly been in an "exclusive" relationship for the previous 4 months.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 08:44 PM
3

Polyamory doesn't work for families. First, is women who suffer most from a sexually free sexual marketplace where there is no monogamy. This is because children take 20+ years of time, effort, and money. A man who jumps ship on a woman to be with someone else doesn't suffer that much, but the original woman (with children) suddenly loses that man's time and resources being applied to their children. I suppose that's why the only polyamorous women that are know are 100% against ever having child…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/20 08:59 PM
3

Its funny how gender roles are conveniently still set towards men being the sole benefactors. And just to be clear for people reading this, since people often confuse the definitions of these two words: A benefactor is someone who gives value. A beneficiary is someone who recieves something of value.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 06:04 PM
2

I was thinking something similar. I'm a little surprised that nobody brought up the history of kings in this discussions, since kings were in the best position historically to get what they wanted. As far as I can tell, this is mostly what kings did. They had a wife, and then had some mistresses at various times. I'd be curious what the percentages were, as far as percentage of kings who had various arrangements (married and faithful, married and a few mistresses, concubines, etc).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/20 01:56 AM
1

Yup. There have been a few times when I've read comments by women on reddit where they said they liked the idea/fantasy two men fighting over them. It's pretty clear that it's an ego-based fantasy. It basically says "if two men are willing to fight over me, it means that I'm worth fighting over". It's basically validation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 05:04 PM
1

polyandry existed in several cultures Ha. Which cultures were those? Polyandry tends to be confined to men who are related to each other - like brothers sharing a wife, or one family marrying another family (all brothers share all the sisters of the other family).
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 04:59 PM
7

Actually, you're not expected to do anything. If your match isn't engaging, you're free to unmatch her. While you're technically correct, there's an additional factor involved: there's fewer women in dating apps and women are more desired than men are. This skews the balance of power towards women. A woman can unmatch you for being boring and have plenty of other guys who want to talk to her. A guy who unmatches women who do this ends up with no decent options for at least a few weeks. So, a lot…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 07:33 PM
2

There's a ton of videos on YouTube involving men being portrayed as weak or stupid in commercials. If you did a search, you could probably find them. And it's not just for products where women are the consumers. I've even seen Truck commercials where men look like idiots.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 08:48 PM
8

At least you get to have an orgasm. No, we don't always orgasm. I've certainly had ONSs where I didn't orgasm. It's even more common to not orgasm when wearing a condom. Condoms reduce pleasure and make it less likely that a man will orgasm. Also, if you google "percentage of men who had an orgasm in their last sexual encounter", it appears that it's about 85%. So, for the average guy, sex doesn't result in an orgasm 15% of the time. I'd also say that there's a difference between a good orgasm a…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 01:57 AM
2

That's a lie that FDS redditors tell themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 04:06 PM
11

That's dumb. If anyone could pay $3k and get a perfect spouse out of it, everyone would be lining up. That's absurdly cheap. Further, it's stupid to pay $3k and then price yourself out of the market so you end up with nothing at all. That's $3k and zero return on your money. Also, in many cases, people who use these services are wealthy and busy. It's tailored towards wealthy people with plenty of money to spare and not much time. $3k isn't much for that clientele. I've heard of absurdly expensi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 04:28 AM
4

somehow less shallow and more moral than women desiring productive men. You mean wealthy men. The average productive man who earns a median wage isn't desired.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 04:16 AM
6

And you're pretending that's true so that you'll have a counterpoint against men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 04:14 AM
1

When the economy recovers? Dropping marriage rates isn't something that happened just in the past three months.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 12:23 AM
2

There's a man married to Hatsune Miku, a man married to his car... anything that will let them fuck them Odd that you mention them since neither of those things have a pussy or will fuck them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 12:18 AM
3

What I always find funny about the whole "better for the species" argument is that, in order for women to select only the best men, it means that women need to share men. If you really want to "better the species", then you should also be arguing that men shouldn't be monogamous. We need to spread those top-tier genes around after all. So, it ends up being a double-edged sword for women. Yes, you can justify your preferences for top tier men using the "it's better for the species" argument, but …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/20 08:33 AM
3

Nice guy There are multiple different kinds of "nice guys".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 11:02 PM
1

Is clear to me that this isn't at all true. You don't understated the lengths men have to go to in order to attract women. Even men who aren't running around just trying to bang women all the time still have plenty of dating problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 08:46 PM
1

That’s your true market value :) No it's not. Whenever there's a surplus of men (as there is online), then women can get attention and dates from men who are more attractive than she is - e.g. women who are 5s can get attention and dates from men who are 8s. That's not his and her "market value". In the real world, women who are 5s aren't able to get 8s. The whole thing is skewed by the fact that there's a scarcity of women online. He'd be better off ditching online and go for real-life dating. …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 10:15 PM
1

Well I'm glad this discussion didn't devolve into a bunch of poop flinging retards saying that the world would be shit if the opposite gender was the only one in existence. Also nice to see the FDS lackeys show up to upvote the "men suck" comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 03:46 AM
0

Ha ha. And if you were a republican, you'd tell me that Trump is to be given credit for everything every American company accomplishes too. Lol. Also, Elisabeth wasn't in an egalitarian society. It was fully expected of her to get married. She just didn't do it. It just shows that monarchy trumps everything else. Interesting that you didn't attempt to address the fact that communism is more egalitarian that the West, but failed on so many levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 03:29 AM
1

The industrial revolution that sprang out of Great Britain which had both male and female rulers spurring on their technological supremacy? I'm not sure if that was a factor. I think it's accepted at this point that control of the seas was a big part of Britain's success. It allows you to move goods cheaply, establish colonies, and move around armies easily. It's the reason Britain did so well. The sea around Britain also gave it protection from it's neighbors. (Compared to the constant wars on …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/20 11:44 PM
2

The reason this happens is because women lower the bar and you still manage to act even worse then we could possibly imagine. Seems like a rather sweeping generalization against men based on a story about one man.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 08:25 PM
1

Your comment reminds me of this: https://www.theonion.com/european-men-are-so-much-more-romantic-than-american-me-1819594261
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 03:04 AM
2

Sounds like an awful lot of theory that isn't informed by the real world. Is that why 12% of white men are married interracially, but only 10% of white women are?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 02:57 AM
1

No we don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/20 08:34 PM
1

Yes. Advertising data is unreliable. There are some places where you can check what market categories they've placed you into. I remember looking mine up one time. I was categorized as both "male, age x-y" and also "female, age x-y". Even the age ranges were even different. (I don't recall exactly what the ages were, but they're typically 10 year spans. ) Heck, I've even gotten ads in Spanish. (I don't speak Spanish at all.)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/20 08:17 PM
16

Those examples involving physical strength really miss the mark. It's about what people are allowed to do without being seen as the asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 04:53 PM
1

Yes, double standards are rampant and largely unacknowledged. Also, it's not just a bunch of white knights defending women (as some people on this thread are claiming). Women posting on those threads have larger biases towards other women than anyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 04:51 PM
44

Is obvious from the AITA posts (based on upvotes) that the majority of people side with the woman rather than the man. Citing examples of individual men who are biased towards themselves (as individuals) and who aren't widely upvoted isn't proof that it goes both ways equally.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 04:40 PM
2

You're telling men that women are like men, but men are also told that women's attraction to men isn't like men's attraction to women. You can't have it both ways. When you tell people that women's attraction to men is different than men's attraction to women, then it automatically means that men can't simply rely on their own experience of what they like in the opposite sex to guess at what women like in the opposite sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/20 01:57 AM
3

Women don’t need looks good enough to turn them on, they want guys that dont just rub the labia for two seconds and stick it in. It's dumb when women pretend like finding a guy who has some fairly insignificant trait like "he doesn't just rub it for two seconds and stick it in" is a great find. It's a lie and it's insulting to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/20 12:43 AM
3

they're saying women have standards and men don't And I agree... which since the dawn of our species have baffled stupid men This assumes that women's standards are good. I'm not saying women always have terrible standards, but I've seen some absolutely awful choices in men made by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/20 12:40 AM
3

He's obviously a troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/20 11:37 PM
1

I'd be curious to do a real survey of these movies, categorize them, and figure out who wrote the screenplay - rather than relying on some off-the-cuff claim by some random person on the internet. I suspect that women were more involved in a lot of the more recent movies than we realize. (Just like there are a lot more female porn directors than we realize; we just blithely assume they're all men). Off the top of my head, the "Bridesmaids" movie ends up with the main female character getting tog…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/20 03:21 AM
1

You said "Statistics show one is exceptionally more common than the other... Don’t let “Snapped” trick you into thinking women and men are the same when it comes to the penchant for violence and executing on it." The exceptionally part and the rest of what you wrote suggests that it's many times more common.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 12:56 AM
2

Screw that. Nobody's going to back that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 12:54 AM
0

I highly doubt that men are more jealous than women, and that women are more okay with their spouse having multiple partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 12:53 AM
1

Wives murdering husbands is roughly 70% as common as husbands murdering wives. It's actually not that different, but popular imagination would have you believe that men are 10x as likely to murder their spouse. FBI data from the mid-1970s to mid-1980s found that for every 100 husbands who killed their wives in the United States, about 75 women killed their husbands indicating a 3:4 ratio
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 09:48 PM
1

What polygyny? I don't see any evidence of polygyny going on other than cheating (and women are plenty angry about that, which is understandable). Do you think women should be complaining about Saudi Shieks and Fundamentalist Mormons? There is no polygyny going on.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 07:43 PM
1

Let me count the ways this is a poor argument: First, it's stupid because when there's an exodus of men from the dating/sexual marketplace, it reduces women's power and ability to get a relationship. There's enough women with baby rabies that lots of women will be disappointed. It could literally result in lots of women having to choose between being in a harem, being a single mother, or not having kids at all. We've already seen this situation happen in the past, after a major war. Look at post…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/20 05:45 PM
2

Good job shooting your argument in the foot and conceding the argument when you hadn't lost it. I swear the biggest problem with men is the inability to argue well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/20 05:29 PM
3

That's mostly bullshit. Sex toys for women are far more socially acceptable than sex toys for men. Pretending otherwise it's just playing stupid games.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/20 05:27 PM
6

I think she knows it's a meme. She's just saying that "Men only want one thing" has been a popular phrase for decades -- long before the internet was around.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/20 04:19 AM
1

I believe that there are more men than women on the app based on experience. Let's not pretend like 9:1 is anything other than a totality unsubstantiated number. It's not a fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 08:59 PM
2

I thought the argument was that men were mad that women in their own league won't date them. Sounds like you're moving the goalposts by suddenly changing the subject to sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 08:27 PM
2

I don't blame men. I blame the entire system. The system that requires that men do all the initial work of initiating everything also forces men to complete against each other. You can opt out of the system, but you're only hurting yourself. We should also distinguish between "men as individuals" and "men collectively". In many cases, the system is setup in a way that what's in a man's interest (as an individual) is bad for the men's interests collectively. Look at it this way: if I setup a "Sur…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 08:16 PM
1

There are 9 times more men than women on tinder alone . Nine. N.i.n.e. Nah. I've looked at lots of sources for gender ratios in dating apps. I came to the conclusion that none of these numbers are accurate. I don't believe the 9:1 statistic because I've seen too many completely contradictory "statistics". Seriously. I'll post sometime about all the bullshit dating-app gender ratios I've seen in print. Edit: Example: According to SimpleTexting, Tinder is comfortably the most popular app among bot…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 07:31 PM
2

How else are we going to vilify it, though?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 07:28 PM
3

The discussion is about the risk of sex. Women have the risk of having children, but have the option of abortion. Men have the risk of having children but not being able to have an abortion. I don't know why you're being so dismissive of the fact that men have that particular risk that women do not have. BTW, I'm not a prolifer. I'm mocking your argument as being reminicent of what what a prolifer tells women. You're horrified that a prolifer would say that to a woman, but have no problem using …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 06:53 PM
0

Prolifer enters the chat: "Women do have control over what hole men stick their penis into. They shouldn't have the option of an abortion. Like men, women made their choice when they had sex and whether to use birth control."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 06:17 PM
2

Yeah, you're deflecting. If a woman gets pregnant, she has the option of an abortion. A man has no choice in the matter. His choice ends when the sexual act happens. Effectively what you're saying about men and their choices sounds an awful lot like was pro-lifers say to women: "sorry, you can't have an abortion. You made the choice when you had sex. You should've used birth control, and your options end there. Women need to take responsibility for their choices. Women have control over 2 things…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 06:13 PM
4

A man’s risk of ... murdered by a partner is slim It's higher than you realize. Last time I looked it up, men are about 60-70% as likely to be murdered by a partner as a woman is. That's not that big of a gap. [A]mong black marital partners, wives killed their husbands at about the same rate as husbands killed their wives--47 percent of the black spouse victims were husbands and 53 percent were wives. Among white victims murdered by their spouses, 38 percent of the victims were husbands and 62 p…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 06:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter