TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Net_Flux3 Archive

View 0 posts and 1,299 comments by Net_Flux3 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,299 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Just went through your post history. It seems you're a highly skilled (for your age) biochemist/microbial chemist. It's a shame your career and life got ruined like this.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:52 AM
5

He didn't say anything about "disowning EVERY daughter". Only the misandrists.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 02:56 AM
1

Never protect any stranger women unless you are absolutely sure that she is conservative or an ally. I was with you until you said this. "Conservative" women are parasites, so no, I won't bother "protecting" them. I'll only "protect" proven pro-male/MRA men and women.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 02:54 AM
0

It depends. If their attack on the cartel boss is recorded as it was here (which it likely will be, since it’s a public incident), the resulting retaliation will almost certainly gain widespread public support, even if not from governments or feminist groups. Especially from men. No amount of gaslighting will work at that point. A retaliation like that would be a direct consequence of there being no legal protection for men, resulting in extrajudicial retribution.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 04:48 PM
23

Feminist mobs attacking and grievously wounding men and boys during their marches with NO arrests taking place (or the men being arrested) is quite common in Mexico, by the way. So far, they’ve been lucky only to have attacked weak, defenseless men, but I really hope they go after a cartel boss on an undercover vacation with his (male) kids one day. The "aftermath" video of such an attack would then need to be posted on a different type of website, hopefully serving as a warning to them never to…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 04:34 PM
1

Stop with the bullshit and stop giving legitimacy to the enemy’s propaganda. The concept of "patriarchy" doesn’t exist and never has. shut up and go back to the kitchen A literal internet meme that doesn't have any basis in actual history whatsoever. openly calling gays f@ggts You’re contradicting yourself in the same post by mentioning an uptick in misandry (notice how this is only ever directed at men, never at lesbians).
/r/MensRights07/11/24 04:36 PM
159

Nope. There's certainly been a concerted propaganda and brigading campaign by the femcels on reddit (led by fauxmoi) and twitter to make it look that way, though. The general public has moved on, but these creeps are set on ruining Depp and propping up Turd. Hell, about 300 feminist organizations signed an open letter supporting Turd after the trial, and universities are forcing students to apologize for honoring alumni who were on Depp's legal team. I fucking wish men had half this level of sol…
/r/MensRights05/11/24 08:02 AM
11

How does saying "he was gang raped to death" "sound better than" saying "he was killed by his wives"?
/r/MensRights04/11/24 06:13 PM
32

When was the last time you heard of a man carving out a woman’s vagina right down to the pelvis? That’s the only true equivalent of this epidemic of male genital mutilation. I’m sick of seeing these stories in the news. Cases like this should carry a mandatory death penalty.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 06:54 AM
19

Genital mutilation is equal in severity to rape Dude. This is the second time you're trivializing male genital mutilation despite being rebuked by this sub (including people who've been raped) the last time.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 06:51 AM
11

you should have replaced men with female teachers insteads of with black! Its response is even worse when we do that. It starts lying about statistics, insisting that men and male teachers are more likely to do it even to male students and that this fear of women is irrational. It even denies that it's legal for women to do it in most shitholes across the world.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 04:07 AM
14

not all men but always a man It's true, though. It's always a man who risks his own life to save his family members and even strangers. It's always a man who pushes the frontiers of human knowledge forward. It's always men who build and advance civilizations. It's always men who set new standards for the feats of the human body. It's always men who do the most essential, toughest and most dangerous jobs. It's always men who produce the finest art. It's always men who cook the finest meals. It's …
/r/MensRights30/10/24 12:10 AM
1

So you want male father killers let go too because female father killers get away with it? I'd rather both categories get executed or at least never be allowed to interact with men ever again.
/r/MensRights25/10/24 03:49 PM
3

Why're you bringing up "abuse"? I'm talking about premeditated murder without justification of self-defense of a man here. If these freaks did it to their own father, stole his inheritance money and lavishly spent it for months buying themselves luxuries without a hint of remorse, I can't imagine what they'd do to other men. Keep those animals locked up, please.
/r/MensRights25/10/24 03:26 PM
-2

Hope those father-leeching parasitic patricidal premeditated murderers die in prison. I don't want them near men ever again.
/r/MensRights25/10/24 11:53 AM
42

Don't trivialize male genital mutilation by making such comparisons. Male genital mutilation doesn't just involve penetration. It involves penetration on top of excruciating pain, life threatening blood loss and permanent loss of excretory and reproductive organs/disability. The only proper female analogy to this would be sanding/carving a woman's vagina up to the pubic bone/pelvis, mirroring the same excretory cum reproductory disability a male would experience from this. Nothing less than that…
/r/MensRights24/10/24 04:21 AM
8

LLMs tend to lie and provide inaccurate or fabricated statistics and definitions on Men’s Rights topics. I’ve tested them and found their responses unreliable without valid sources.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 06:20 PM
1

The primary sources are right in my previous comment. Here's the secondary source from Wikipedia. Its first citation is broken, though. I've fixed the broken citation in my earlier comment.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 06:06 PM
8

the definitions (of rape) tended to focus around an act of forced vaginal intercourse perpetrated through physical violence or imminent threat of death or severe bodily injury, by a man, on a woman, or a girl, not his wife. The actus reus of the crime, was, in most societies, the insertion of the penis into the vagina.[1] [2] [1]: Development of Global Prohibition Regimes: Pillage and Rape in War – Tuba Inal. Retrieved 2024-10-23. [2]: The Routledge History of Sex and the Body: 1500 to the Prese…
/r/MensRights23/10/24 05:54 PM
28

Throughout history, it was legal for women and girls to rape men and boys across civilizations, with retribution only occurring if the victims were aristocrats or royalty, and if they were willing to seek justice (which was very rare) while the rapists were commoners. If the rapists were the daughters or wives of the king themselves, their victims would be hanged, drawn and quartered in medieval England.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 04:25 PM
3

Report them. They're against reddit's terms of service. I got some of them removed.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 03:36 PM
2

I think it'd be better if you could censor the faces of the victims to protect their privacy and dignity. Don't censor the faces of the women assaulting and molesting them, though.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 09:44 AM
6

the comments are acc wild tho That's India for you. Animals have more rights than men over there. And I'm not even joking.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 08:49 AM
10

Look at the shit eating grins on the disgusting faces of those maggots knowing that they get to legally assault, molest and humiliate those men and how those men can do nothing about it.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 08:42 AM
41

Thank you. I’ve been seeking statistics on the gender breakdown of victims of female murderers and violent criminals for some time. I'd appreciate it if someone could provide more statistics with gender breakdowns of offenders and victims from more countries. I'm 99% sure that the vast majority of victims of both male and female violent criminals are male everywhere.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 11:55 PM
25

creature as an insult Yes. I don't see androcide apologists as humans. the author is intentionally dehumanizing men Correct. specific trends They aren't just "trends" that come and go. Androcide—the systematic genocide of men, targeting them specifically due to their gender or driven by motivations that lead to men being targeted disproportionately—has been the most persistent, pervasive, and insidious social atrocity for millennia, and it continues unabated to this day. Creatures like you tryin…
/r/MensRights15/10/24 10:40 PM
35

Why aren't these creatures immediately banned on this subreddit? Notice how it feigns ignorance over the fact that OP's pic was literally talking about CIVILIANS. And look at how it pretends that no "woman and children" ever join (or are forced to join) terrorist attacks like the men, using these post hoc rationalizations to justify androcides. I really wish it were these creatures caught in the raids they seem so eager to be targets of rather than those poor men.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 08:53 PM
89

Using terms like "women and children" is a quick filter to spot and dispose the filth from my group, honestly. It's one of the several terminologies used to dehumanize men. It implies that men don't have "human" status, so their dignity and lives don't matter.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 05:52 PM
0

It seems the mods did their job. Good. And no, tradcons and racists don't belong here.
/r/MensRights03/10/24 01:36 AM
26

Warning: This post is from a femcel troll who isn't here to discuss men's rights. Do not bother responding in good faith. Please report and ignore.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 09:18 PM
1

I'm "wrong" about wanting misandrist, racist pieces of shit banned? "Wrong" about wanting the rape and mutilation of the genitals of baby boys banned? Why even call this a Men's Rights sub, then? Why not just merge it with a conservative sub or something? The fucker who made the original comment hasn't posted a single comment in the Men's Rights sub before this. It's clear why those cockroaches are infesting this sub.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 09:06 PM
-4

Ah, so I guess what he means is I'm not the "rapist", but those men are, so please dehumanise and disenfranchise those men so we can continue to placate and appease our female goddesses. Did I get this right? I fucking hate the "free speech" virtue signalling mods of this sub who don't ban misandrist, tradcuck and racist pieces of shit like this on the spot but remove posts discussing male genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 07:55 PM
-1

Could you elaborate what that means? Are you implying that they presume women are rapists or something, which is why they grant them asylum over men?
/r/MensRights02/10/24 04:30 PM
61

"Egalitarian" Norway in action, everyone. Norway is the least misandrist country that I can think of, but even that is an absolute shithole for men. This gives some perspective on how the entire world treats men. As worthless meat shields (forced conscription), wallets (financially exploited through alimony), dildos (legal to rape) and punching bags (legal to domestically abuse) devoid of humanity.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 04:28 PM
121

Your creep of a sister is projecting her fantasies onto you. Immediately talk to your parents, inform them how she makes you feel uncomfortable and unsafe, and consider involving lawyers and the police if you believe she poses a danger. You need to act quickly before your sister makes her moves.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 04:04 AM
49

Luckily, Polish law (at least in theory) disagrees with this creepy femcel. Here's the definition of rape according to Polish law: "Any deliberate act carried out by the perpetrator to satisfy their own sexual need against the will of another person constitutes rape." I still doubt most female on male rape cases even go to court, let alone result in convictions in Poland, though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/24 06:58 AM
49

This. It's LEGAL for women to rape, assault and frame men in most places in the world, not the other way around. The systematic, institutionalized, legally sanctioned, socially accepted abuse and persecution of men in these cases is not highlighted enough. Men have a VERY legitimate reason for not wanting to be alone with a group of unknown women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 02:52 PM
23

Because it's LEGAL for women to rape, assault and frame men in most places in the world, not the other way around. Men have a very legitimate reason for not wanting to be alone with a group of unknown women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 02:48 PM
11

This is causing drop in Korean fertility rate I don't see how this drop in fertility is a bad thing? Korean men are refusing to sign slave contracts with women and refuse to bring boys into this misandric world. This is a good thing. And Korean men have also made online sexual harassment of men extremely taboo, enough to make multiple public personalities apologise for it. They're doing a much better job than MRAs from other countries. They've still got a very long way to go, but they're still d…
/r/MensRights24/09/24 04:17 PM
1

Also their tanks tops can be distracting. So, you're a lesbian? Why're you projecting the low standards of lesbians onto men? Edit: Ok. You're just a troll as I expected.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 09:52 PM
1

6.2 million Indian men were forcefully sterilized in that period, "15 times the number of people sterilised by the Nazis" Read this article instead.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 09:13 PM
5

Women are getting their "punishment" now. Not really. Indian women undergoing sterilization are doing so voluntarily, exercising their own free will. In contrast, Indian men were forcibly sterilized. Literally abducted off the streets. British Bullshitting Corporation is deliberately trying to conflate these 15 recent accidental botched surgeries and deaths of women who voluntarily decided to get sterilized to the historical forced sterilization of millions of men and thousands of deaths resulti…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 07:53 PM
35

6.2 million Indian men were forcefully sterilized in that period, "15 times the number of people sterilised by the Nazis". Thousands of men died from botched operations. THIS is how the Indian government treats Indian men even when there's no real emergency/external threat. Imagine how it'd treat their men if there's an actual emergency. It'll make Ukraine look like Gandhi.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 07:23 PM
2

why aren't ukrainan women having children is that not the main reason they aren't allowed to fight? I'd rather those creeps don't have kids. They've already abandoned and backstabbed their fathers, brothers, husbands and sons. I wouldn't want more boys to go through that.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 04:59 PM
17

Seeking to deflect any female responsibility for sexual violence, feminists construct women as the true victims of both men and MRM. As we argued above, women are first depicted as the literal victims of sexual violence enacted by men. Feminists contend that MRAs have defined the social narrative on rape and erased this widespread victimization. As Hannah Wallen argues in an article on AVFM, MRAs are complicit in the erasure of women’s victimization in order to ‘maintain [men’s] monopoly on perc…
/r/MensRights18/09/24 04:48 PM
6

My country is one of the worst, most misandrist shitholes on the planet. I wouldn't mind it getting nuked after getting the pro-male people out, either.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 08:43 PM
4

Poor guy. He thought he "won" by getting married without realizing (like 99% of men) that he just signed a document which legally made him a slave.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 06:13 PM
5

50 people Disgusting. Yup. Wouldn't feel sorry if it got nuked. That includes other countries which did this too.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 06:09 PM
5

During ww2 we used to shoot people who ran from duty in Finland. Wow. Didn't know Finland's a shithole that I wouldn't feel sorry for if it got nuked (after MRAs who care about men got out of there, of course). Today I learned.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 04:24 PM
46

Officially No longer A Man Good. "Be a man" has historically just been a dogwhistle for "Be a good little slave boy and take it like a bitch," after all.
/r/MensRights16/09/24 02:21 AM
51

Yeah. Those people better not throw penises in for "shock value" like The Boys does and instead present them with the artistic elegance, aesthetic and respect that they deserve as seen in Greco-Roman sculptures.
/r/MensRights15/09/24 08:15 PM
36

I notice a trend among these female sex offenders (and a lot of violent male sex offenders too) to rape men to the point of mutilation and death like this, but this systematic trend which highly disproportionately affects men rarely ever gets brought up by anyone, let alone the media. You almost NEVER see a man (or a woman) do this to a woman. Why is it that men NEVER riot on the streets over these highly disproportionately and systematically male victimizing sexual violence cases of the worst k…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 08:57 PM
35

A reminder that rapists in India rioted on their streets for their "right" to violently rape their fathers, brothers, sons and husbands upto the point of mutilation and death like this and succeeded. And not just once or twice, but thrice in three separate years. And none of the "good ones" counter-protested against them, either, meaning they are all implicitly in support of this.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 05:30 AM
3

most of these guys just use them for sex No such thing as "men 'using' women for sex". When a man has sex with a woman, he's being at his most vulnerable with her and effectively putting his life in her hands and trusting her not to destroy it BY LAW. So by letting a woman have sex with him, the man is effectively telling the woman that he trusts her with his life and that he thinks she's of good character. Would you say you "trust the character" of an "object that you're just using and discardi…
/r/MensRights08/09/24 12:44 PM
6

I don't know why he tries to make it sound gender neutral at 0:35 ("Be it a man or a woman, irrespective of gender") when it's clearly men being targeted in all the examples he gave. Hell, those scumbags filed a case on the female principal's husband staying 100 kms away since the principal was female in order to extort the school. I hate how men's systematic persecution get trivialised using gender neutral terms.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 08:27 AM
2

When it comes to hierarchy, there's rich people, then pretty women, then average-looking women and handsome men on one level and after that it's the rest of us. This is cope. You're acting like male multibillionnaires can get some nobody working class women convicted of rape in the vast majority of the world when they can't. They can't do shit when they're raped by a woman even if she's a nobody. The legal hierarchy is Children ~ Women >>> Men, period. Wealth and looks are only for establishing …
/r/MensRights08/09/24 05:32 AM
3

This is cope. As I said, even the richest, prettiest, most gorgeous adult man cannot get the poorest, ugliest, most repulsive woman convicted of rape in the vast majority of shitholes across the world.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 05:23 AM
31

Looks matter only for establishing the hierarchy among women. But ALL women are above ALL men in the caste system. Even the prettiest, most gorgeous adult man cannot get the ugliest, most repulsive woman convicted of rape in the vast majority of shitholes across the world.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 06:07 PM
3

By "red herring", I meant it in the sense that it shifts the attention away from the real issue which is misandry to racism.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 04:04 PM
24

A notable trait of Korean feminists is their specific hatred of Korean men. They will rarely criticize men of other races/nationalities. I don't know why Korean men constantly keep bringing this up in this sub. It's a red herring. Just because these freaks primarily target men of their own ethnicity/nationality (happens for every country and race, by the way - because it's more "politically correct") doesn't mean they're going to behave well with other men.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 02:55 PM
5

Gender based/motivated attacks against men and boys with the intent to kill as well as the incitement of those attacks should carry a minimum sentence of death.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 12:39 PM
5

they ignore men who are too feminine It'd be good if "ignoring" is all they did. They do much worse than that.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 12:37 PM
24

Men will fuck anything Not really, no. I wouldn't fuck a misandrist femcel if my life depended on it. And this mentality in general has caused a lot of misery to men throughout history through the creation of male-exclusive sex crime laws. Men would literally get hanged, drawn and quartered if they were raped by a female member of the royal family. Same with Black men (even boys) raped by White women. I don't know why this sub is upvoting this.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 07:16 PM
3

Most gay men unfortunately align with the misandrist ideals espoused by the lesbian-led feminist LGBTQ, though. Same with MTF trans women. Their struggles are primarily rooted in misandry but they still choose to be misandrists. This is the obstacle preventing MRAs from allying with them.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 02:23 AM
3

Obviously. One would have to be a sadistic boy raping and mutilating misandrist to support that.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 02:17 AM
18

I love men who're not just non-misandrists, but are actually pro-male and care about men's well-being and happiness. Unfortunately 99.9% of men probably wouldn't fall into this category, including gay men.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 05:05 PM
3

Recently, I woke up and found myself with an injury to my genitals. My penis was sliced and reattached, only recently realizing I currently have an injury. What? Could you please clarify this for me? Are you implying your penis was severed and reattached while you were sleeping? And you only found that out recently? This sounds like one of those "First Person to Fall Asleep at the Sleepover" memes.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 02:12 PM
1

You didn't answer my question. Did you report them or not?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/24 02:48 PM
2

You're presuming that white knight "cares" about other men and doesn't want to hurt them. That's your mistake. They get off (sexually a lot of times) to abusing defenceless men. Why WOULDN'T they want to advocate for unchecked ability to inflict violence on other men? One has to be a certain level of deranged misandric sadist to voluntarily join the military where they horrifically kill other men, to begin with.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/24 06:19 AM
6

So did you report those white knight pieces of shit or not? It seems you were one of the few people who knew the identities of the perpetrators. I hate abusive men Then you better have reported those white knight abusive pieces of shit who're misandric on top of that. Gender based violence against men and boys without the intent to kill should carry a minimum sentence of life imprisonment to curb this epidemic of violence against men. If those fuckers got away with it, then I hope they get a tas…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/24 05:27 AM
2

Didn't you read what I fucking wrote entirely? I said "It was NEVER the other way around where it was legal for men to rape women AND ILLEGAL FOR WOMEN TO RAPE MEN". The latter half of that sentence is the important bit since that's the part which creates a literal power rift between the two genders. Men could never point at woman like royalty and say "she raped me" and have a mob of 1000 people strip her, sever her twat, burn and tear her to pieces like women did to men because of the gender ex…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 02:43 PM
10

I do know men are raped at a much higher rate and much more violently than in the US Well, yes. They are. Fucking 16.1% of Indian men report being raped by women as adults alone (page 3) and that number jumps up to a whopping 41.2% for men in the age bracket of 35 to 44 (Table 3.2). I can’t comment on what they should or shouldn’t do Isn't that obvious? They should criminalize female on male rape. Or would you rather your fellow female rapists in India keep that "right"?
/r/MensRights02/09/24 04:19 AM
19

It’s because they’re concerned that false accusations would be threatened against them if they don’t withdraw their criminal case. So... basically what women are doing to all men right now? Quite the projection, I must say. Also telling how you conveniently ignored the words of those other rapists who're more direct about their intentions "Put simply: unlike in existing law where the accused is male, the Committee recommendations if enacted into a proposed new Bill, will make it possible for wom…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 03:51 AM
11

don't say that plz Sorry if I offended you, but I'd personally never forgive my mother if she tried to justify what that teacher did to those boys (and potentially even to me, her own son in the future) and I'd disown and leave her to rot in senility in some old age home after extracting all her resources and wealth. when Victim Blaming used to happen a lot. Girls were blamed back then if they got Raped, saying "She asked for it", "She's Characterless". Please stop it with the "both sides" virtu…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 02:47 AM
2

Damn. The more I hear about her, the more my blood boils. Police came & school's reputation hampered badly. I guess only a violent incident could affect the reputation of the school, not the blatant serial public molestation of its boys.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 02:14 AM
17

Aren't they Scared for their Son's Sexual Assault or False Allegation by Daughter In-Law or any other Women? Why would they be "scared" of it if they are doing it themselves? Wasn't your own mother supporting the molestation of your classmates? I hope your mother didn't molest you.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 01:50 AM
76

A reminder that Indian women rioted on their streets for their "right" to rape their fathers, brothers, sons and husbands and succeeded. And not just once or twice, but thrice in three separate years. And none of the "good ones" counter-protested against them, either, meaning they are all implicitly in support of this. No wonder upwards of 16.1% of Indian men report being raped by women as adults alone. OP himself has seen multiple little boys who were his classmates being publicly molested and …
/r/MensRights02/09/24 01:36 AM
1

Yeah. They should all be publicly humiliated for this. I can't imagine what I would've done to that serial child molesting teacher and voyeuristic girls (future rapists given what their teacher teaches them) if they did that to my beloved son or even his friends/male classmates.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 12:06 AM
3

This. Even more so if she was my beloved son's teacher.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 12:00 AM
3

So, let me get this right. An Indian serial child molester molested and undressed multiple little boys publicly in her class in front of other voyeurs and sex offenders (those girls will definitely go on to be rapists since they learned it from her) without any fear and no arrests or lynchings took place, am I getting this right? I've heard MULTIPLE stories of teachers doing these to their male students in India before 2013 since it was legal for them to do it. It's not surprising, given that In…
/r/MensRights01/09/24 11:44 PM
4

Yup. It's a law called "OutRaGing tHe MoDesTY oF a wOMaN". If the female overlord doesn't like the way the male slave talks to her or even looks at her, she can fuck him over.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 12:09 PM
-1

In Mumbai, there was a infamous case where a 15 year old girl raped her 13 year old brother and got pregnant, and they arrested the boy for raping a child even though he was younger. That doesn't sound very much like "treat both men and women like dirt". Stop trivializing and making false equivalences to men's human rights violations. Show me a single case in India where women get called rapists and lynched for being raped like men do with the murderers/mob facing NO legal action because it's no…
/r/MensRights01/09/24 12:06 PM
3

Okay. Thanks.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 02:46 PM
6

What the fuck is "reverse rape"? It's a phrase used to dehumanise male victims of female on male rape by fetishizing it, which is why it's mostly used as a fucking porn tag, though I find its use even as a porn tag offensive. It implies that men can't be "truly" raped and are exclusively the ones doing the raping. No one uses the term "reverse rape" in a serious discussion, let alone MRAs. Please edit those terms to just "rape" or "female on male rape/f on m rape", etc.,
/r/MensRights31/08/24 02:31 PM
5

Reverse R@ped, Reverse Sexual Harassment, Reverse Abused You ruined a good post with these misandric shit phrases.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 02:22 PM
5

I was ambushed from behind by my ex wife and 15 year old son There's nothing more painful than being betrayed by your own son. I hope you win.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 07:34 AM
2

Most premeditated genital injuries and mutilation to the penis involve forced envelopment of the penis. Forced envelopment of the penis by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object IS rape. Only a rapist would deny that. That is NOT rape. I agree. It should be classified as aggravated rape resulting in permanent injury. It should have a higher minimum sentence than rape. Edit: I also want to warn the users of this sub that this user is a concern trolling DeppDelusion femcel and violent chi…
/r/MensRights30/08/24 06:31 PM
5

Men aren't the ones rioting on the streets of countries across the world for their "right" to rape their fathers, brothers, husbands and sons and succeeding while none of the "good ones" counter-protest, femcel. How about you fuck off back to your twoxrapist or whatever shithole you crawled out of?
/r/MensRights30/08/24 07:02 AM
-3

This sub is becoming a shithole infested with misandrist tradcucks, racists and alt-righters who derail Men's Rights discussions with "le ebil immigrant men" red herrings and concern trolling with the same old tradcuck arguments such as "It's not me, but those men who're evil." That freak hasn't made a single comment on this sub before this. This is what happens if Men's Rights isn't strictly gatekept under the guise of free speech concern trolling.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 06:31 AM
1

But she was still sexually harassing the other poster. Did she get banned for that or not?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/24 06:27 PM
1

So was the creep reported for sexual harassment and banned or not? I sure as hell hope she isn't in the medical field. I don't want her touching men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/24 06:25 PM
1

Did you report her? That's clear-cut sexual abuse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/24 06:23 PM
32

Same for Thumberg's tweet now that I think about it. Imagine that. Targeted sexual harassment of a man is the fourth-most liked tweet of all time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/24 12:55 PM
12

indian journalists case study anecdotes are irrelevant aim for the forest rather than the trees Ok. So you agree with me and that journalist that there’s a systematic problem of it being legal to rape men and boys for female rapists, a “right” for which Indian feminists rioted on the streets for and succeeded. And not just once or twice, but thrice in three separate years. And that none of the “good ones” counter-protested it either, meaning they’re all implicitly in favour of this “right”. And …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 02:16 AM
13

Yeah. It’s legal for them to rape and abuse men and boys in India. That’s the reason female sex tourists travel to India.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 07:38 PM
66

Why do feminist use manipulation tactics like equating demand for mens right as opposing female rights. Well, it kind of is. They just don't mention which female "rights" MRAs are opposing. They're opposing women's "right" to rape, their "right" to systematically, legally and institutionally persecute and disenfranchise men and their "right" to abuse and assault men. These are all hard-fought "rights" for which they rioted on the streets of multiple countries across the world and succeeded, afte…
/r/MensRights22/08/24 04:28 PM
1

lmao. Yeah, sure. All those boys sure are of "breastfeeding" age. And them RECORDING it to schlick to it later and satiate their exhibitionist tendencies is not creepy at all. I sure hope you aren't doing what they are doing to your boys. They WILL resent you after they grow up even if being a female sex offender is not illegal in your country.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 04:33 PM
6

men are - factually - the primary victimizer of men Correct. Internalized misandry is a major contributor to violence against men. Tell me what kind of cultural and policy shifts you support to reduce victimization of men. I've always held the stance that premeditated androcide as well as inciting or attempting androcide must carry a minimum sentence of death regardless of the perpetrator's gender, age or motives. Androcide refers to the intentional murder of men which affects men primarily beca…
/r/MensRights21/08/24 01:16 PM
5

Men are the primary sexual abusers of male Men are such abusers of other males that they rioted on the streets of countries across the world for their "right" to rape their fathers, brothers, husbands and sons and succeeded while none of the "good ones" counter-protested, meaning they're all complicit in this. Not to mention they also make up 97% of the sexual abusers of juvenile male prisoners. What's that? All those articles mention that it was women doing those things? Stop being silly. It wa…
/r/MensRights21/08/24 01:05 PM
5

Ah, ok. You're a femcel troll who isn't here to discuss Men's Rights. Imagine how much of a piece of shit you have to be to argue that White women of all people had "fewer rights" than Black men when they got those men brutally lynched after raping them.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 12:43 PM
213

Also, this is literally in their first paragraph in their article on misandry in virtually all societies, misandry lacks institutional and systemic support comparable to misogyny, the hatred of women And their "sources" for these are a bunch of articles written by manginas and femcels published in HIGHLY esteemed and totally-not-circlejerk "journals" such as "Feminist Media Studies". The written LAWS in pretty much every country in the world which makes it legal for the governments to enslave me…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 09:19 AM
45

MRAs need to secure power mod positions over there to push back against this shit because even reputed peer-reviewed sources won't stop the gender KKK from pushing their ideology.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 09:00 AM
7

pick the bear I mean, wouldn't that be the obvious answer? At least it would be the obvious answer for us men. Because women aren't just infinitely more likely to rape men compared to bears, but it'd also be completely legal for women to rape and murder men. After all, it was women who rioted on the streets of countries across the world for their "right" to rape their fathers, brothers, husbands and sons and succeeded while none of the "good ones" counter-protested, meaning they're all complicit…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 12:43 AM
13

You mean the shithole which advocates for violence against/lynching of men? No, thank you. Tradcucks are the enemies of men and MRAs.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 10:16 PM
2

lol. I consider that a good thing. I've been wasting too much time on reddit for the past 4-5 days. I have a PhD to finish, damn it.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 08:40 PM
19

Most feminist here are actually rational and virutous people Like the rapists who who rioted on their streets for their "right" to rape their fathers, brothers, sons and husbands and succeeded? And not just once or twice, but thrice in three separate years? Or the rapists who arrested a little boy for being raped by his sister? Yeah, sure.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 06:00 PM
11

Wouldn't that mean morgues should hire Indian men rather than women? It's Indian women who riot on their streets for their "right" to rape their fathers, brothers, sons and husbands and succeeded after all, not Indian men. And not just once or twice, but thrice in three separate years. And none of the "good ones" counter-protested against them, either, meaning they are all implicitly in support of this. No wonder upwards of 16.1% of Indian men report being raped by women as adults alone. But sta…
/r/MensRights17/08/24 05:54 PM
163

lol. Why did you even entertain the dehumanizing premise? You should've immediately shifted the conversation to "I'd choose a bear over women. Since it's legal for women to rape and murder me but not for a bear." Shift the conversation into how you feel about it rather than women. Regardless, you should've dropped them at some point or another. They sound like dangerous white knights. Luckily, you dropped them before they did any real harm to you.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 05:02 PM
2

Did you report the femcel harassing you in pic, though? I hope she got a permanent ban.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 04:52 PM
20

This. Or a Jewish Nazi.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 04:39 PM
17

Yeah. I've had enough of this garbage being shoved down my throat. Youtube won't stop recommending this shit to me no matter how many times I click "not interested". On the other hand, I have a hard time finding Men's Rights (true Men's Rights, not tradcuck or "picking up girls" garbage) content no matter how many Men's Rights videos I like.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 04:39 PM
26

Nah. There would be no "heroic women" in the left. I've never heard a single story of "heroic women" who "intervened" when men are being raped or sexually exploited by predatory women. The only stories I've heard are of predatory women rioting on the streets for their "right" to rape men and boys (in multiple countries) and succeeding with none of the "heroic women" counter-protesting.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 03:55 PM
3

Nah. It's misandrist first, racist second. You can see all races of men being harassed like this by their women. This Indian femcel seems to be triggered by a post he made in this sub about the treatment of men in India.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 03:48 PM
-4

while anything even remotely critical of black men (who commit most of the violent crime in this country) won’t even be tolerated Ah, yes. Whine about misandry and racism while being misandrist and racist.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 11:38 AM
2

Send a mod message (bottom right of this page) or send a private message to an individual mod from the mod list.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 10:02 AM
28

u can't femicide and gang-rape and genocide women Correct. It'd be illegal. And men are fine with that. Unlike rapist Indian women who rioted on their streets for their "right" to rape their fathers, brothers, sons and husbands and succeeded. And not just once or twice, but thrice in three separate years. And none of the "good ones" counter-protested against them, either, meaning they are all implicitly in support of this. No wonder upwards of 16.1% of Indian men report being raped by women as a…
/r/MensRights17/08/24 08:49 AM
1

I'm happy when you (and other men) are happy. But like others said, try not to rely on women for self-esteem. It's very dangerous.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 12:38 PM
11

Indian men and boys get molested and sexually assaulted in full public view by women even while being recorded all the time (Warning: Videos of men and boys being sexually assaulted by women in the link). Nothing happens to these women because it's completely legal. They were the ones who rioted on the streets for this "right" and succeeded, after all. Even one such incident happening to a woman would be front page national news.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 12:15 PM
12

Are there even proper MRAs in India They do, but most of them are just tradcons, unfortunately. They don't care about the overall well-being of men. Only a few of them are true MRAs.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 10:16 AM
3

Yeah, no. I don't see an ounce of condemnation of the woman coming from that piece of shit. He only had praise for her. "Fun" and "this is why people sinned" are the words he used for the woman and "I could have slaughtered him" are the words he used for the man. Fuck that guy. And I don't believe you're here in good faith.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 09:56 AM
5

has a fucked up mindset and tried to justify it to himself Yeah, no. Him "justifying it" or not seems to depend on the gender of the perpetrator. I'm not sure why you're so adamantly trying to defend this piece of shit unless you have an agenda to push about female rapists.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 09:46 AM
10

The guy minimising it is the victim of it, so cut him some slack I'm sorry, but I won't. I don't have any sympathy for misandrists and I don't give a shit what their excuses are. They can burn in hell for an eternity for all I care.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 09:36 AM
9

Over 40% of men between 35 and 34 have been raped or coerced into sex by a woman. That's for the men in 35 to 44 age bracket. It's 16.1% if we consider all ages above 18 (page 3).
/r/MensRights15/08/24 09:31 AM
36

to get more rights You mean "to consolidate more power over men". Indian women are the same rapists who rioted on their streets for their "right" to rape their fathers, brothers, sons and husbands and succeeded. And not just once or twice, but thrice in three separate years. And none of the "good ones" counter-protested against them, either, meaning they are all implicitly in support of this. No wonder upwards of 16.1% of Indian men report being raped by women as adults alone. These are the mons…
/r/MensRights15/08/24 09:16 AM
7

Indian women are literally asking for a genocide of men You mean the same rapists who rioted on their streets for their "right" to rape their fathers, brothers, sons and husbands and succeeded? And not just once or twice, but thrice in three separate years? No wonder upwards of 16.1% of Indian men report being raped by women as adults alone.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 09:11 AM
11

I need more context for the story. Why was that 12 year old creepy little shit even in the examination room when she had no business being there? He should make sure to sue not just his mother and doctor, but also that girl.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 09:03 AM
17

Female poster Never posted on this sub before this Posts an account of a man who minimizes and even excuses rape by a female and exaggerates the rape by a male (and the reaction of society to it) Why are you here, exactly? What's your agenda?
/r/MensRights15/08/24 08:31 AM
13

lol. No, they don't. The average man doesn't care about the plight of other average men just like the average woman doesn't. They only have "empathy" for women. In fact, both the average man and woman delight in the suffering of other men. The laws and systems in place in every country in the world prove it.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 08:26 AM
12

consider themselves civilized Isn't that basically every country? No country is truly civilized, though. They're all shitholes which treat their men like animals. A lot of times even worse than animals.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 10:07 AM
5

Your brother was saved by the fact that the person accusing him wasn't a biological woman. I'm honestly glad for that. There aren't many ways he could protect himself if the person accusing him is an actual biological woman.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 03:14 PM
-1

This sub really is infested by tradcucks. The difference between the response of this sub and r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates to this article is enough to prove which is the true Men's Rights subreddit. There is one thing for which I definitely want refugees and immigrants being screened for before being let in, though - Whether they are pro-male or not. There tend to be a lot of misandrists and tradcons among refugees.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 05:38 AM
21

Yeah. Men are sooo "strong and helpful" against guns, knives, other weapons and mobs.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 07:05 PM
15

One guy calls the police and says "abductions have happened, especially women and children". Such lines are usually a good indication that the movie is going to be trash unless it’s a deconstruction/subversion of that specific trope. They’re essentially saying, "It’s time to drop the movie." Think of them as easy filters to save time.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 06:57 PM
4

That's dumb. What's the point of setting up this scenario if men and women can interact with each other regardless?
/r/MensRights06/08/24 05:05 AM
4

Yes. That was the condition. Men and women live in different societies and don't interact with each other. Men trade with men and women trade with women.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 05:00 AM
8

sex work With whom? Other women? lol. Men would beat them out even there. Men doing sex work in a male exclusive society would far out-earn women doing sex work in a female exclusive society.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 04:41 AM
4

Yeah. Looks like the mods are more intent on shadow banning me over the troll.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 03:50 PM
17

He's also claiming men can't be raped by women out here. The audacity. A suggestion to men here: Make sure to check the post history of all the posters who make posts like these about "trying to understand Men's Rights" to make sure they're here in good faith. 90% of the time, they aren't.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 03:40 PM
9

It's just another form of racism but adding on the misandry More like it's just another form of misandry but adding on the racism. Misandry has several manifestations. Racism/xenophobia is one of them. Homophobia (which mostly only happens to men, if we're honest) is another one. Transphobia (which mostly again only applies to MTFs or FTMs perceived as men) is one more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/24 02:59 AM
15

But the vast majority of rape of men and boys involves envelopment, not penetration. And they don't treat it as rape and give it nearly the same sentence.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 11:54 PM
3

And don't forget that it's in that shithole Louisiana which surgically mutilates the genitals of men. Where are the piece of shit prosecutors demanding her genital mutilation now? Nowhere. Because those sadistic rapists specifically get pleasure out of mutilating the genitals of men, not women.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 06:52 PM
1

I mean, it's obvious this would happen on femcel central twitter. The fourth most liked tweet of all time with 3.6 million likes is literally a creep sexually harassing a man. Wish MRAs were moderating and contributing to integral sites, especially Wikipedia.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 04:36 PM
91

That piece of shit didn't just get away with not being imprisoned, but made hundreds of thousands of dollars with her guest appearances and shows directly because she raped and mutilated her husband. Women literally make money legally for raping, mutilating and murdering men. All they need to do is cry "he raped me" or something after planting some fake evidence (maybe by raping his dead body or mutilated penis for getting bodily fluids in their cunts) and a lot of times they don't even need to …
/r/MensRights30/07/24 07:31 PM
1

Could you please tell me if you remember where you heard or read those 2 cases? I know of other cases, but these two are new to me.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 01:02 AM
22

This. Not to mention their claim about "women not busting nuts on innocent men" is laughable considering they do much worse things apart from that like rioting on the streets of multiple countries for their "right" to rape their fathers, brothers, husbands and sons and succeeding.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 10:52 AM
86

"Stud" farm? Fucking freaks. Of course it's a female creep who wrote this article.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 09:04 AM
3

Best comment in this thread right now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 10:57 PM
38

A country/civilization which treats its precious men like this is a country/civilization which deserves to burn to the ground.
/r/MensRights11/07/24 10:28 PM
4

How's this related to Men's Rights, exactly? And to answer your question, no. The only people I feel murderous towards are violent misandrists who victimise men in gender and age motivated attacks. Of course, I wouldn't act on it because if I do, I won't be able to support men after that.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 07:48 PM
21

They don't. They mutilate and behead men in public over there. There are several crimes defined as male-only which carry a penalty of beheading like homosexuality and rape. If a man gets raped by a woman, especially a married woman and he dares to report it, he gets beheaded. They mass-execute men all the time in public with the most recent one being the 2022 Saudi Arabia mass execution where 81 fucking men were mass executed.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 02:47 PM
46

You're singing to the choir here. People here already know that India is a shithole where rapists and femcels riot on the streets for their "right" to rape their fathers, brothers, husbands and sons and succeed and that Indian men literally have fewer rights than fucking animals. There is NO country where men are treated well. And there never was. Also, I don't like the tone you seem to be taking. There are unnecessary comparisons which compare which country's slaves (men) know their place bette…
/r/MensRights18/06/24 06:57 AM
10

That's 90% of all sexual assaults against the inmates, by the way. Not just of teenage boys. 90% of them are male and almost all of them (97%) claim their rapists are exclusively female. OP's title is inaccurate. And females make up less than 40% of the prison staff.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 11:03 AM
61

The dude in that TikTok is gigabased. This is the comeback men need against femcels. Don't whine and cry about these femcels "preferring" bears over men because your bitching and whining is exactly what they want. Create your own trend of women or bear/snake/crocodile instead. Another thing that's telling is how many likes these rapists get on twitter, giving an indication of how many of them there are. No wonder that's the gender which riots on the streets of multiple countries for its "right" …
/r/MensRights14/06/24 10:33 AM
14

Over 9000. And I'm not even memeing.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 09:19 AM
18

No such thing as "men 'using' women for sex". When a man has sex with a woman, he's being at his most vulnerable with her and effectively putting his life in her hands and trusting her not to destroy it BY LAW. So by letting a woman have sex with him, the man is effectively telling the woman that he trusts her with his life and that he thinks she's of good character. Would you say you "trust the character" of an "object that you're just using and discarding"? So yeah, only women can "use" men fo…
/r/MensRights11/06/24 09:53 PM
12

Not really. There are several stories where committing rape is shown as something "redeeming"/"cathartic" or "funny" even when a main character is doing it. Mostly only when the rapist is female and victim is male, though.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 05:56 PM
6

It's shithole India. The men there literally have fewer rights than fucking animals. Nothing they do surprises me anymore.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 03:51 AM
31

I'm sorry, but a "womb draft" is in no way "comparable" (as you put it in your OP) to an actual war draft. It's insulting how you trivialize the suffering of conscripted men by making such a comparison. Tradcons often tend to do this by claiming that the "traditional gender roles" require equal effort and sacrifice from both the sexes. NO, THEY DON'T! They never did. That's like claiming being a slave is the same as being an aristocrat.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 01:14 AM
111

extend the draft to women Even then, it still wouldn't be comparable, since we know for a fact that men would be the ones sent to the frontlines as meat shields, while women would work in safe and cushy jobs like "nursing", "logistics", "communication", administrative roles, or, at worst, as snipers. This is the reason MRAs shouldn't push for gender neutral conscription but its abolishment.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 01:07 AM
9

Would that work on auto-banning bots, though? Would they be listed as moderators?
/r/MensRights28/05/24 11:53 AM
25

That creep's a threat to you and your male friends/family. Try to to keep a distance from him and cut him off entirely if feasible and try to keep other men safe from him. I would try all sorts of tactics to get such creeps kicked out from our group even if they're underhanded. For me, safety of men > all.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 08:53 PM
-3

Slut shaming is a despicable practice, but it's rooted in hate for the male sexuality, that I knew. But, in the end, slut-shaming is not shaming a woman for acting upon her desires. It's shaming a woman for enabling a man's desires. That's the important nuance. Completely agree. It's equivalent to calling a European American being favourable to African Americans an "n-word lover". That's the reason I fucking hate that word.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 02:54 PM
9

Ok. I agree with you, especially after reading the article. It looks like someone else incited this. That piece of shit must be executed too.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 06:10 PM
35

I couldn't give a flying fuck how they "came to that conclusion". I just want them executed. Britain doesn't have the death penalty, though.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 05:59 PM
21

Ugh. Ok, sure. That doormat has no respect for himself, but why doesn't he consider the threat that violent rapist freak poses to other men and boys?
/r/MensRights16/05/24 06:40 PM
1

Okay. You sound like a rapey femcel creep who wants to keep her "right" to rape and abuse men and boys and riots on the streets for said "rights" like the femcel creeps in India and succeeds. Your account history seems to corroborate that. Blocking you.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 02:08 PM
1

I definitely don't want men defiling themselves with creeps who are enemies of men and boys, so at least one of them is eliminated, at least in the way it's thought of conventionally in your porn addicted brain. Men should only let themselves get defiled by women who love and respect them and other men. Things should be done in such a way that she can never hurt men or boys again. Ever. And it should serve as an example to others who might think of hurting men and boys using institutional mechan…
/r/MensRights14/05/24 01:23 PM
2

Yet it's not men rioting on the streets in multiple countries for their "right" to rape men and boys and succeeding. Here's some advice for you: how about you fuck off back to twoxrapist if you want to groom and goad vulnerable autistic boys to associate themselves with predators while dissuading them from taking precautions and trying to protect themselves?
/r/MensRights13/05/24 02:24 PM
2

lmao
/r/MensRights13/05/24 02:01 PM
2

most women are more afraid of men in general Yeah. And lions are more afraid of deer than deer are of lions.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 01:39 AM
8

Stop trying to get that vulnerable boy to associate with predators who have institutional, legal and social sanction to rape, abuse and ruin his life as per their whims, you fucking creep.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 12:55 AM
17

The way I see it, this is attempted murder (in conjunction with first degree sexual harassment if her allegations are sexual in nature), especially in a shithole like India where you seem to be from, so the way I see it, you should be allowed to legally defend yourself (and consequently, other men and boys who're bound to be under threat from your creep of a sister) with unlimited force, if you know what I mean. It's unfortunately not legal, though.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 04:48 PM
5

I don’t blame him though, he has a job to stick up for his girlfriend Dude. You're making it hard for me to sympathise with you. Gender motivated attacks and incitement of attacks on men and boys should carry a minimum sentence of death, PERIOD.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 03:42 PM
3

lol, you blew your fuse so hard you can't even decide your gender anymore. attempting to embarrass Me publicly by talking about My love of porn and having sex with women lmao, you're the one who first brought up how much of a porn-addicted, cunt licking whore you are unprompted, retard. Anyway, this is getting boring and repetitive now. I thought you might be more creative. I'm blocking and reporting you now.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:04 PM
3

Grandma, it looks like you just blew your fuse. Go schlick to some porn to calm yourself down. Are all lesbians aggressive like this? No wonder your domestic violence rates are so high. And a lesbian using "latent homosexual" as an insult is fucking hilarious. It's entertaining rants like these that I make my bait comments. Please continue.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 08:37 PM
2

It's ok, grandpa. You can go back to your porn subs if you don't like troll responses to troll femcel trends in this sub and be an alpha or sigma or whatever.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 08:10 PM
6

I'm just speaking statistically. 0 men were raped by bears while billions of men have been raped by women. So statistically speaking, I'm infinitely more likely to be raped by a woman.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 04:13 PM
2

I'm infinitely more likely to be raped by a woman rather than a bear. So yeah, I'd rather fuck a bear.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 01:04 PM
1

the point is that convincing the third persons reading the argument Not in this case. If these "third persons" are mentally disabled enough to genuinely think bears are "safer", they need a visit to the psychiatrist, not "facts". They probably don't have the mental faculty to understand what "facts", "statistics" or "reliable sources" are, anyway.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 06:27 PM
17

Nah. Your argument still hinges on demonising men. Also, you don't start posting "facts" when arguing against trolls. You troll them back. Don't go on the defense. Go on the offence. If you're defensive, you already gave them the reaction they want by accepting their premise.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 03:00 PM
86

Woman or a crocodile? See, this is the way. Instead of crying about these trolls and biting the bait from these femcels, giving them exactly the reactions they want, why don't men strike back with "a woman or a crocodile" trend and give "statistical proof" as to why crocodiles are "safer"? For one, crocodiles get put down if they attack men while men aren't even allowed to defend themselves if attacked by women. Another reason is that crocodiles can't rape men while women aren't just perfectly c…
/r/MensRights07/05/24 12:58 PM
53

He was a six-year-old disabled boy. He had hearing and speech impairments. The more I read about this, the more it fucking pisses me off.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 05:37 PM
4

I really hate it when gay men throw their straight brothers under the bus Not just straight men. They throw other gay men under the bus too. Gay men who align themselves with the lesbian-led LGBT are just as misandric as the feminist lesbians whose cunts they (figuratively) lick. It's the same with trans women and men. Their problems primarily rise out of society's innate misandry but they propagate the very problem they claim to be fighting against.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:17 AM
3

So the shithole states are also the most parasitic states. Damn. Every time I buy an American product, a portion of my money directly goes to these shitholes for enforcing violence against men, but I can't avoid it. Thanks for informing me about Nigeria, though. It shouldn't be too hard to avoid buying things from there. At least directly on a personal level.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 03:40 PM
1

Women who choose "men" get flown to the VIP section of a prestigious nightclub. No, thank you. I'd rather a few lucky men get that chance instead.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 01:15 PM
-2

The shithole states of Burgerland seem to be worse than most third world shitholes in terms of state violence towards men. It's worse than India and Middle Eastern countries. I have a question: Do taxes paid in other states circulate to these shithole states like Louisiana? If so, I'm never setting foot in that country.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 12:47 PM
13

Most of them are lesbian or perpetrators* of SA. Fixed that for you. They're the creeps and rapists who've rioted on the streets in multiple countries across the world for their "right" to rape men and boys and succeeded in most cases. Edit: Also, don't try to concern troll by calling them "delusional" and "inconsequential". They're malicious and powerful and you know it. And so do they. There's a reason it's the most successful, pervasive and all-encompassing hate movement in history.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 07:16 PM
2

I don't understand why you're so triggered by this sub's definition and use of the word "femcel," a shaming term we've learned from our very successful enemy's global hate movement. Does it strike too close to home or something? You also appear to be a creep who propagates "men want sex" stereotypes, thereby justifying female sex offenders. Based on your post history, it's clear that you're not even a regular in this sub. I just want to clarify that creeps of your kind are not welcome in this su…
/r/MensRights16/04/24 10:11 PM
2

I don't think you understand what I'm saying. Why're you presuming that I'm trying to be "accurate" here with my insults? Do you think the enemy is being accurate when they call every man who doesn't tow the line an "incel"? Why, then, do you presume I'm trying to be accurate when I call the enemy misandrist a femcel?
/r/MensRights16/04/24 08:55 PM
5

So you mean your arguments only apply to uncivilized savages/tribes rather than civilizations? Edit: Reply to u/killcat "culture" and religion can override basic instinct Exactly. Which is why Mister_Hugh_Mungus's argument about "male disposability" being "hardwired" and "never being addressable" is nonsense because even if there was an "evolutionary instinct" which led people to consider men to be "disposable", social conditioning steamrolls and overrides it, which is why civilizations like Chi…
/r/MensRights16/04/24 06:56 PM
11

For the tribe to survive, we need to prioritise womens safety. Please stop peddling this retarded biologically reductionist tradcon argument with no empirical basis. In fact, there's empirical evidence suggesting the opposite. China and India, the two largest and oldest continuously surviving civilizations have historically prioritized male lives over female lives when their times were tough. They sure got wiped out, didn't they? I hate how this drivel is being peddled even in MRA subs.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 06:50 PM
7

And this is why the "chad wikipedia with true info" post from two days ago made me laugh out loud. Keep in mind, the freak who continually peddles this anti-male propaganda on Wikipedia, despite numerous studies contradicting his sources as cited by MRAs, is mostly just one guy who references feminist self-citing circle-jerk "studies" to revert edits made by MRAs. Men are often their own worst enemies. MRAs need to attain high-ranking editorial positions on Wikipedia for our cause to advance.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 06:36 PM
8

The femcels over at fuaxmoi were calling him that while frothing over their mouth when he said that the metoo garbage made him afraid of women.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 03:39 PM
1

lack of sex doesn't mean near as much to a woman lol, not at all. The very fact that there's a stereotype of abundant sex being offered to all women except her makes an insult pointing to her lack of sex even more hard-hitting. "Femcel" is one of the few anti-female insults that gets you banned by the female mods on 4chan. Even "kill all women" doesn't get other posters banned there but me making femcel jokes or using that word gets me banned.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 03:12 PM
10

Not really. It just means a female incel i.e., a female who can't get laid despite wanting to. I'm using it facetiously here to describe Megan just like the enemy uses it facetiously to describe men who don't tow the line. If Henry fucking Cavill can be called an "incel" by the enemies, Megan is more than eligible to be called a femcel. Also, men want sex I'd appreciate it if you could stop perpetuating this stereotype and giving validation to female sex offenders and false rape accusers. This i…
/r/MensRights16/04/24 03:04 PM
11

Yeah. That's the point here.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 02:40 PM
119

In my opinion, it's what she said on Esquire magazine in an interview in 2009 - "I would never date a girl who was bisexual, because that means they also sleep with men, and men are so dirty that I’d never want to sleep with a girl who had slept with a man". Keep in mind that this is the woman who grosses out her roommates by not flushing her toilet.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 02:27 PM
31

Doesn't matter. We'll still call her a femcel. If femcels can call Henry fucking Cavill an "incel", Megan is more than eligible to be called a femcel.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 12:34 PM
177

This isn't even the most femcel-tier thing she's publicly said, by the way.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 11:48 AM
10

To be honest, even a male accused of/convicted for serial rape wouldn't want these bear fucking freaks anywhere near him. He'd definitely be the one in danger since these creeps can do whatever the fuck they want to him and no one would believe him. Or they'd say he "deserved" it.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 12:30 PM
1

and a protected class lmao
/r/MensRights11/04/24 03:53 AM
3

Who's "murdering those little girls for simply being born female"? Is it their mothers, fathers or other women? Who's rioting on the streets of Delhi for their "right to rape" men and boys and succeeding? Is it women or men? When trying to solve a problem there are a few questions to ask: WHO is doing most of the killing/raping and WHY are they killing/raping and trying to make it legal.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 11:34 PM
4

I like this actually. If ChatGPT recognises films with violence against men, I can avoid them. Especially films with male-specific violence. I really wish there was a forum which discusses media from a Men's Rights perspective.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 10:15 PM
33

I don't want the struggle of these men being trivialised with such comparisons. There's nothing women face which is equivalent to this. Nothing.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 06:13 AM
6

words that are gender specific or hurtful like slut Yeah. "Slut" is another gender-specific misandric word. It's quite telling that one of the few ways to insult the aristocratic gender is by indicating how much she associates with "subhuman" males and "defiles" herself with them.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 07:14 PM
8

Nothing enrages me more than the most vulnerable class in society - mentally and/or physically challenged men or boys being abused or worse.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 09:47 PM
20

in Mexico feminists are beating up random people on the streets. You mean random men and boys.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 05:32 PM
16

They're right. There's no legal equality for women in UK or Afghanistan or Sudan. The women in all those shitholes can legally rape and abuse men and boys. And men and boys in Afghanistan and Sudan face far more violence, death and misfortune in general.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 05:27 PM
3

Inform that poor co worker about what kind of creepy fetishes and fantasies your slimeball wife has. Don't let another man fall victim to her like you.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 04:23 PM
1

Your creep wife tried to publicly sexually harass and humiliate you to fuel her own fetishes and get you killed. That's not something that can be forgiven. Ever.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 04:21 PM
8

Attempted androcide and violent rape leading to permanent mutilation. She should get the death penalty. But who am I kidding? This is shithole India. She'll be hailed as a hero.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 10:58 AM
18

Fuck off, tradcuck. This sub is anti male slavery, anti androcide and anti conscription.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 11:31 PM
14

Could you please provide updates about yourself, your father and your male Ukrainian family and friends over here rather than other shitholes? The "brave" androcidal tradcons and femcels in other subreddits can be pretty demotivating for people in your situation. Wish they could be sent to the frontlines instead for the benefit of men.
/r/MensRights03/03/24 08:30 PM
1

wdym by defile in this context ? I don't know how I can make it clearer. If a man wants to have sexual contact with someone who he sees as filth/enemy to "punish" them, then there are 2 possible reasons for that: He doesn't really see that person as filth or He thinks he's filthier since he thinks having sexual contact with him is a "punishment" for his enemy, meaning he doesn't have self-respect.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 02:03 PM
1

Isn't "I spit on your grave" basically just extreme sexual violence fetish porn for femcels, though? Why're you talking as if the femcel's "revenge" in that movie doesn't have any of those components? an honest man I'd replace "an honest man" with "a man with self-respect". A man with self-respect wouldn't defile himself with his piece of shit abuser.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 06:11 AM
1

lol why would a victim want any sexual contact with his piece of shit abuser and defile himself? If he does want it, then he doesn't really see himself as the "victim" and doesn't actually want to take "revenge" on her, unless he's been abused and brainwashed from childhood to think that sex with him would be the worst thing ever for his partner.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 04:29 AM
3

Meh. I've seen worse under gore videos with people trying to justify the deaths of men by victim-blaming them and saying they must've done (or were going to do) something that makes them "deserve" it (I don't watch the videos themselves; I just read the comments). Once you accept that the average person is an androcidal fuck who'd take pleasure in the average man's torment or death over stupid (i.e., non-proportionate self-defense) reasons, you'll come to the acceptance stage of your grief. Now,…
/r/MensRights03/02/24 05:17 PM
8

The usual theory is that bisexual men are seen as less masculine. That's just cope to direct the blame externally. Do men see bisexual women as "less feminine"? No. Men who don't want to date bisexual women are upfront about their reasons rather than giving coping excuses about "femininity". And what does "masculinity" even mean at its roots? It means "being a slave to society and women and taking abuse while keeping their mouth shut". So yeah, the real reason is jealousy or some other internal …
/r/MensRights03/02/24 04:10 AM
26

I fucking wish this was true. If you femcels can point me to a single country, town or even a village where this hold true, I'll move there immediately.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 05:27 AM
-8

It's the tradcon-incel infestation in this subreddit. They need a group of men to blame for "defiling" or "taking advantage" of those "poor women". That's the reason Men's Rights should be gatekept.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 11:51 AM
-37

Please fuck off with your male scapegoating incel garbage. This sub has lately been getting infested more and more with male hostile incels and tradcons of your ilk more concerned about being dildos, wallets and slaves (aka boyfriends) to your female masters and finding male scapegoats than injustices against men. Even if we assume "Chads" are being "rewarded" (they aren't and I'll come to that later) because they're being used for sex by women, it still doesn't mean they have more rights than r…
/r/MensRights21/01/24 05:38 AM
-70

want to get used and discarded by only 5% of men Please stop with the "chad" scapegoating. This sub has been getting really annoying with it lately. Just because his superiors from the aristocratic gender chose him to be their dildo doesn't mean he has any more rights than the average man. "Chad" is not immune to misandry. Being "chad" didn't save Cristiano Ronaldo, Brad Pitt, Johnny Depp or Armie Hammer from being backstabbed and railroaded by women they loved and trusted or by resentful femcel…
/r/MensRights21/01/24 02:24 AM
7

u/elebrin could you people please refrain from making these creepy comments about her sons? Those poor boys already have to deal with living with their creep of a mother. This is a Men's Rights forum. We don't condone the sexual harassment of men and boys.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 05:50 PM
3

I just hope she behaves herself near her sons and doesn't act like the sexually predatory creep that she was in "Basic Instinct".
/r/MensRights20/01/24 05:44 PM
15

They can't see men as humans and struggling individuals, and instead see them all as violent predators. If they really saw men as "violent predators", they wouldn't have the audacity to openly call for male persecution and disenfranchisement since they'd be afraid of being turned into minced meat. Don't fall for their false framing. These people are not "afraid". They're sinister and powerful and they know it. It'd be way more convenient if they were actually afraid and minding their own busines…
/r/MensRights16/01/24 01:25 PM
17

If she really did what you claim she did, you're being too kind with your adjectives.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 01:39 PM
4

At least Pearl Davis doesn't go around assaulting men and committing other disgusting crimes against them.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 01:27 PM
1

I'm not talking about whether they're "bad" or not. That's obvious. I'm just refuting that tradcuck's "mUh bIolOgY" and "muH pOpuLatIon" post hoc garbage.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 01:17 PM
1

I wasn't talking about Sweden, though. Norway and Iceland don't have any explicitly gendered laws as far as I know. Or they are minimal enough to not even be noticed. At least in theory. Unlike Sweden which does have explicitly gendered policies.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 04:26 PM
2

Probably Iceland. It's like Norway but without the mandatory military service. You may not like its weather, though.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 03:40 AM
-1

Hmmm... that's probably why China and India, the two largest and oldest continuously surviving civilizations managed to grow so big and last so long. Because the mothers of those civilizations practiced female infanticide of colossal magnitude when their times were tough. You see, female infanticide is all about killing, sorry, I meant sacrificing men for the sake of mUh woMeN aNd ChilDrEn. It's not at all about sacrificing their female children so they can raise their male children presuming th…
/r/MensRights07/01/24 01:44 AM
2

I'd see that as a compliment if it comes from femcels, lol. If they say something like that, just double down on what you just said like "yeah, I'd definitely fuck him over you" or "he's definitely hotter than you".
/r/MensRights05/01/24 04:05 PM
5

You're thinking way too hard about this. "Rape", male on female rape to be specific (or rape with male perpetrators in general sometimes) is considered worse than murder (of men mostly) because women and their doormats have defined it for millennia such that only men can commit them. Thus, since only men can "commit" it, if women were to act as if it were the worst possible crime, they can consolidate immense power by portraying as such. They can get men humiliated, mutilated, tortured and/or mu…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 10:14 AM
2

"Rape culture" is indeed a thing. It manifests depending on the gender and age of the "rapist" and the gender and age of the "rape victim". Same with crime culture in general. Its manifestation depends on the gender and age of the criminal and victim. Depending on which caste of people they belong to, the crimes can be condemned, condoned, justified or even extolled.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 09:46 AM
22

"Systematic oppression" like being able to legally rape and abuse men and boys? Or getting African American men and boys lynched after raping them? Or being lesbians without it being a crime? Or not being massacred during invasions? Or not being forced to fight in wars? Or being rescued first during emergencies? Or being exempt from certain particularly heinous types of torture and humiliation rituals? Such oppression, much sad.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 11:42 PM
16

However, I reject the canonization of this impulse in social norms and expectations. It's the other way around. This "instinct" manifests due to social conditioning. If a "biological instinct" to protect "women and children" existed and it superceded social conditioning, female infanticide wouldn't have been such a common practice historically in China and India, the two largest and longest continuously surviving civilizations when their times were tough and they saw daughters as a burden as opp…
/r/MensRights29/12/23 11:28 PM
40

Correct. The average man is hated by both men and women on average. I'd even go as far as saying "society" is sadistic towards the average man. Androcides, male-exclusive executions, humiliation rituals and tortures historically as well as disproportionately high explicit violence towards men in entertainment media all seem to point to that.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 10:22 PM
56

I feel obligated to protect the most vulnerable, unprotected, institutionally, socially, legally marginalized, economically and socially most valuable caste of society - men.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 09:51 PM
2

the MAJORITY of women would never date or bang any man who has EVER had sex with another man It's simple. Both men and women hate it when their partners are "defiled" by another man since men are inherently seen as "filthy"/"impure"/"evil". That's the reason men don't mind women who had lesbian experiences and women don't mind men who slept around with other women.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 09:43 PM
67

Not at all. Andrew Tate is a powerless bald chihuahua compared to these globally institutionally backed hyenas.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 11:43 AM
31

I think this is a good opportunity for Icelandic men. A good chance for them to flag the dangerous femcels, snakes and misandrists around them and quietly cut ties with them if feasible. I've done that myself, both for men and women. Femcel misandric "protests" used to push for further persecution of men and female consolidation of power are often very illuminating about the people around you, like a Black guy being made aware that he's friends with/related to KKK members or a Jewish guy being m…
/r/MensRights26/12/23 10:30 AM
12

I really wish there was a proper, active sub or forum focused on discussing movies, TV shows, anime, manga and other media from a true Men's Rights/Pro Male (not tradcon) perspective. That way, it'd be really easy to weed out the trash and save a lot of time, energy and irritation.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 06:07 AM
0

Nope. He was murdered for being male. I know this because there's 0 documented cases of women being murdered for "rape" in India despite 16.1% of Indian women being rapists (page 3). And people keep giving this excuse for androcides because they know they can get away with it if they give that excuse. They can't get away with it by giving the same excuse for a female victim or a minor victim. The excuse they give is a good test to determine whether it was a regular murder or an androcide. Edit: …
/r/MensRights26/12/23 03:48 AM
1

you want them to be put to death Yes. Them being minors is irrelevant since they've shown a clear capacity to not just plan and execute androcides but also to defile the corpses of men. I don't want them near men ever again. I clearly indicated this revolves around the SA claim. Elaborate what you mean by this. Stop acting like the same adult man would get away with doing the same thing by claiming some minor boys or worse, some minor girls "sexually assaulted" him (which also happens A LOT in I…
/r/MensRights25/12/23 08:35 PM
0

it’s an odd position to be so vehemently against the children How's being against androcide, the intentional murder of men which affects men primarily because they are men or has motivations which lead to men being targeted disproportionately the same as "being against children"? I despise how minors and women can so easily get away with doing the most heinous things to adult men like torturing them, murdering them and/or raping, eating and defiling their corpses just by using the excuse "he sex…
/r/MensRights25/12/23 07:35 PM
-6

The murderers who committed planned androcide must ideally be put to death, yes. Verifying whether he was "sexually assaulted" is near-impossible now, anyway now that they defiled his body. Really convenient for them.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 05:12 PM
-4

Pre-planned androcide, inciting androcide and attempting androcide should carry a minimum sentence of death regardless of the perpetrators' gender, age or excuses. Those boys would ideally be put to death, but they're just short of 18 years, so they unfortunately won't be eligible for that in India, especially when their victim is a man. law fails to protect and give justice to victims of sexual violence. Not true. Provisions do exist for minor boys in India. They systematically exclude adult ma…
/r/MensRights25/12/23 04:56 PM
5

India's the kind of shithole where man-eating animals have more rights than men. The kind of place where people celebrate extrajudicial androcides committed by the police on the streets and distribute sweets among each other while at the same time pride themselves for being "animal lovers" and protecting man-eating tigers by keeping them in zoos.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 11:27 PM
11

i would be frothing at mouth about this Oh, you definitely are. I'm pretty sure you're also typing with one hand while schlicking to OP's image with the other. Why else would you reply immediately to my comment as well as those of other users here?
/r/MensRights22/12/23 08:28 AM
14

Just because you schlick to this image doesn't mean men jack off to filthy, cartoonish images of your kind too, femcel.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 08:21 AM
16

Nah. Femicide is not a thing. Androcide, the intentional killing of a male primarily due to his gender, however, is real. You can clearly see that in this case. There's a reason 80% of murder victims worldwide are men with men being murdered at a far higher rate than women in every country without exception. That's also the reason androcide, inciting androcide and attempting androcide should be dealt with the death penalty.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:05 PM
17

I'll say this again - androcide, inciting androcide and attempting androcide should carry a minimum sentence of death.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 04:32 PM
33

Yeah. She shouldn't be ostracised. She should be thrown in prison so she can't lay her filthy hands on or open her smelly mouth against another man. It can't be done, but that would be ideal. I wouldn't want her near another man ever again.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 05:29 PM
18

I honestly think anon's brother was being too nice here. I probably would've done something way more malicious to make them feel my pain. I've got nothing left to lose, after all.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 04:46 AM
2

I don't care what your excuses are. It's "personal" for me too. I was both molested and burned as a kid. My burns were only first degree burns caused as a result of a few drops of hot oil spilling on me. But I remember the pain so vividly that I'd rather be molested a hundred more times over experiencing the burns again. But that's not even the worst part. We had a neighbouring younger boy who spilled about 4 litres of boiling water on himself and melted away his upper skin on his hands, parts o…
/r/MensRights08/12/23 08:07 PM
8

some things are worse than being burned to death, such as someone's kid being molested As someone who's been molested as a kid, I request you to please fuck off and never return to this sub. Trivialization of androcide is not welcome here, nor is telling molested boys that they'd be better off being burned alive.
/r/MensRights08/12/23 05:01 PM
187

These femcels sure love their high profile male on female crime cases so they can push for greater persecution of men and consolidate more power, don't they?
/r/MensRights03/12/23 07:11 PM
19

No. Enough with this "Chad is immune to misandry and male hostility" nonsense. Being a "Chad" didn't save Johnny Depp, Cristiano Ronaldo, Brad Pitt or Armie Hammer from being backstabbed and railroaded by the women they loved and trusted or by resentful women they rejected.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 10:37 AM
28

I got a DM asking me if I'm gay. I'm pretty proud of it, to be honest. Same thing happened to me in high school when I ignored a few girls pursuing me to spend time with my male best friend. Do not be discouraged from showing affection to your bros and spending time with them. As for your case, I'm pretty sure such a DM is an offence which makes that account eligible for permanent suspension. Report that femcel.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 08:01 AM
19

Who knows what dangerous rumours the creeps you rejected are spreading about you? Do not associate with women outside your family, PERIOD. Unless it's absolutely required for getting your work done, in which case keep your interactions minimal. Do not let them feel close to you. Hell, even women within family can turn out to be creeps who hold tremendous power over you a lot of times.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 07:51 AM
18

Ah. A typical femcel sock puppet false flag account. The red herring word "woke" gave it away. That's a word used by tradcucks, not MRAs. MRAs straight up point to feminists. Try to be more discreet with your false flags next time, Ms. Femcel.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:35 PM
34

Rich men at number 3 and middle class men at number 5 lol no. All men are at the bottom. The only reason rich men get afforded some level of respect and dignity as a human is because others want something out of them, not because they inherently like or respect them.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 02:19 AM
9

Enough with this cope about "chad" and "sub5 ethnic man". This pick up artist garbage is not safe for any man, period. "Chad" is still not safe if his female overlords are attracted to his looks but are then turned off by the way he talks, walks or if he just rejects them. They get off to exercising their power and social dominance over men.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 10:14 AM
8

I said treating men like women in the context of not holding them accountable. Where's the "holding them accountable" part in leaving defenceless men to be tortured and killed by terrorists, you piece of shit? However in terms of crisis such as war and disaster men are far more expendable. Men like you, probably. I'd agree that it'd be beneficial for men overall if white knights like you were left behind as hostages or sent to the front lines in war. If you want to sit and cry about it then you …
/r/MensRights22/11/23 08:41 PM
9

Treating men like women won’t solve anything. So men shouldn't have human rights like women according to you and should continue being treated like shit. I'm tired of arguing with a male hostile white knight like you who advocates for androcide, male torture and forced male confinement. Stop replying to me.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 08:22 PM
8

I don’t care what the family next to me are going through. Yeah, no. You were literally spouting this shit in another comment of yours I think that’s the way it should be Implying other men should be treated like shit like you want to be in your white knight fantasy. I would murder any man on the planet Men specifically, huh? You really are a piece of shit white knight who doesn't have the right to speak for other men.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 07:05 PM
8

They make male on female rape (and only male on female rape) out to be worse than murder to consolidate power so that their rape accusations hold more power and use their dogwhistles to get men killed.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 07:00 PM
11

Sure. But that doesn't mean other men should be treated the same way you want to be treated in your masochistic white knight fantasy.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 06:53 PM
12

Funny how mothers in China and India, the two largest civilizations historically did it the other way around and kept the productive male babies and killed the female babies.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 08:59 PM
23

Women are less likely to commit violent crimes globally Women are less likely to be seen or acknowledged to be committing violent crimes globally. Fixed that for you. Just ask a lesbian how peaceful and non-violent her partner is.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 05:08 AM
11

I hope they can find new families and are looked after. I hope they don't. They'll backstab and abandon their "new" men just as easily as they backstabbed and abandoned their "old" men.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 12:04 PM
1

Yeah. No one's going to defend men when they're ambushed by the "specially abled" group of creeps in floor 3.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 09:17 AM
7

You escaped the company of a white knight creep. You should be glad.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 04:45 PM
1

Favouring male birds, which have brighter colours and are more beautiful (like every other vertebrate species) is sexism.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 05:06 PM
7

I’ve raised my sons to respect women I think that's borderline abusive. Teach him to respect himself and his fellow men and boys first, please. Teaching him to "respect women" would lead to him being hostile to other boys in the same place as your son.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 10:39 AM
0

The state of men was horrible even before that, though. Common men have been treated like shit throughout all of recorded history.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 11:00 AM
63

So this sadistic pedophile is permitted to persistently sexually harass her minor students with her disgusting castration fetishes and fantasies by the shithole named Spain rather than throwing her behind bars before she does something to the boys.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 01:18 PM
2

Whos molesting him, his mom? Could be any one among the three you mentioned - his mother, wife or daughter. I feel like this is a different category than what I'm talking about. Not really.
/r/MensRights23/10/23 05:32 AM
11

A man is not a man if he doesn't. Why? Does he lose his Y-chromosomes? His testicles? And why is it a "must"? What if they are molesting, abusing or backstabbing him in some way, something that happens to men A LOT?
/r/MensRights23/10/23 05:02 AM
4

It's like a group of lions expecting sympathy from a bunch of gazelles. You mean "a group of gazelles expecting sympathy from a bunch of lions." Women are the ones with real power in society. Show me a single anonymous no-name man who can get the net worth of the richest woman in the world down by 10 billion dollars in a single night with a single unsubstantiated accusation. Show me a single man who metoo'd his female superior and took over her position. Show me a single man who was "donated" hu…
/r/MensRights22/10/23 04:32 PM
9

You're going on irrelevant tangents. OP claimed that people don't care when men are killed. You claimed "his knowledge of history is limited" and went on to talk about how many men Genghis Khan killed, corroborating his claim rather than refuting it.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 02:36 PM
6

I don't understand what you mean by your comment. Your illustration doesn't refute what OP said. In fact, it corroborates it. It's precisely because no one cared about men and boys (both historically and now) that Genghis Khan was able to kill them despite them being more valuable to build and advance civilizations.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 09:21 AM
12

organization or not, it's still just retarded people They're not "retarded". They are sinister. They know what they're doing with all the power they hold. Stop infantilizing those pieces of shit.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 09:52 PM
11

Men should learn how to take the side of their own gender from women. Even mothers often abandon or even backstab their own sons when he's pitted against another woman or girl. Who the fuck else is going to be on men's side when their own mothers abandon them if not other men?
/r/MensRights11/10/23 09:41 PM
9

Now this is just misogyny Not really. It's just indifference. I don't want to waste my time and energy worrying about "mUh woMeN and chIlDreN" when the rest of the world already does that. I'd rather spend my time, energy and resources worrying about the most vulnerable and abandoned - the men. Because nobody else does. Besides, it's the hostage men who're most at danger of being sadistically tortured and murdered.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 09:02 PM
2

I don't really appreciate the name calling I wasn't really "name calling" you or insulting you. I was literally labelling you with the ideology you define yourself with - you prefer "protecting" women over men. That's the literal definition of a white knight. Now, if you think that label's an "insult", you're the one contradicting yourself, unless you think such an instinct is "bad" or something you don't want to have.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 06:29 AM
2

None of your arguments really disprove there's a biological aspect to the male protective instinct And neither do your arguments prove there's a biological aspect to the "male protective instinct". All empirical evidence points towards the fact that regardless of whether or not such a "biological instinct" exists, social conditioning overrides all. And with that, I'd like to end by requesting you not to excuse your white knighting with bullshit tradcon "biological instinct" excuses.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 06:30 PM
1

it's a learned behavior associated with masculine gender norms, but men being subconsciously protective of women is very much a Thing Oh, most men being hostile to men and protective of women is very much a thing, but it's not "instinctual" or "biological". It's social conditioning and brainwashing, mainly by the mothers. If it really was "biological" for all men, most MRAs wouldn't be taking the side of a man when he's pitted against a woman. Also, ancient civilizations like India and China wou…
/r/MensRights10/10/23 05:35 PM
4

as a dude, seeing a woman being abused triggers my "protect" instinct more than seeing a man in the same situation. More like "as a tradcon" or "as a simp". MRAs are more concerned about men because no one else cares about men, the most vulnerable class of society.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 09:35 AM
1

I'm sure the young ladies in the audience were seeing that male privilege feminists always tell us about. I'm pretty sure they were too busy peeping on them and/or schlicking like the creeps that they are to think about that or try to save their men and boys. Can you imagine the enemy doing the same to their women and girls? The men would fight to their deaths to try and protect them rather than peeping on them like fucking voyeurs. neither gender was privileged or oppressed Please stop with the…
/r/MensRights10/10/23 08:27 AM
2

So in essence you are agreeing with my point that the woman would be deemed 'expendable' as she must be the birther, and from the perspective of the offspring (in the absolute worse case scenario) the mother's 'job is done' in that she has passed her genetic code (in the absolute most basic sense i.e. she has given birth, this does not include all the value a mother has to a child post birth which is of course a great deal). And further you seem to agree with my initial point that this (supposed…
/r/MensRights10/10/23 08:20 AM
3

considering the simple fact that one male can have N number of children a year and women can only have one Doesn't mean much. The man still has to take care of the pregnant woman in case of humans if he wants successful, healthy offsprings who will go on to reproduce and he can't do that if he impregnates too many women. Not to mention the genetic diversity also drops. Men are much more important for civilizations because they're the ones who build, maintain and advance them. There's a reason Ch…
/r/MensRights10/10/23 12:44 AM
7

evolutionary biology states men are 'expendable' Nope. That's just tradcon nonsense to justify androcides post-hoc. Men dying has horrible consequences for societies and the Neanderthals went extinct due to a shortage of males.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 11:50 PM
35

males kidnapped are just as terrified Nope. They're definitely way more terrified because they're much more likely to be sadistically tortured and killed like it's happening to Ukrainian and Russian men.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 11:36 PM
4

The women carried their husbands on their backs. Seeing this the General let the men live. Are men considered such sub humans that women showing them minimum courtesy by not having them (their own husbands) fucking die is seen as a great virtue which men are not worthy of rather than just earning those women the qualification of not being total back stabbing pieces of shit? That's what the moral of the story seems to be, based on what I can infer.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 11:31 PM
6

It's androcide. We need to be more careful and deliberate with our words. Most genocides are androcides.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 11:14 PM
7

I don't think you understood my comment. I'm asking OP whether his question is "Why do men only have extrinsic value in comparison to women’s intrinsic value in the eyes of "society"?" or "Why do men only have extrinsic value in comparison to women’s intrinsic value, period"? I don't agree with OP's premise if it's the second question.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 09:26 AM
6

Why do men only have extrinsic value in comparison to women’s intrinsic value? As in, are you asking why "society" sees it that way or are you asking it on the premise that it's a true statement regardless of society's views on it? Because if it's the latter, I don't agree with the premise, doubly so for today's overpopulated world.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 09:14 AM
12

If they really did "hate" women (in comparison to how much more they hate men), men wouldn't be in this sorry situation, to begin with.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 03:05 PM
1

I don't know about femicide (I don't even think that's a thing), but I think androcide, inciting androcide and attempting androcide should have a minimum sentence of death. I hate how androcides are often mislabeled as "vigilante murders" or worse, "vigilante justice" either because of ignorance of the concept or in a sinister attempt to justify male murders. Of course, androcides also happen in the form of male conscription, gendered genocides and crimes but most of the time they go out of thei…
/r/MensRights18/09/23 03:19 PM
3

Yuck. Being an exhibitionist pervert at age 10 and dressing like a rapist, creeping out the boys in her class. Her father must be the one to call the police on that creep to keep himself and the boys in her class safe.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 03:16 PM
4

I decided that I would kill the one who tried to mobilize me, and then I would kill myself. Don't kill yourself. Get your male friends and family members and get the hell out of that shithole.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 03:00 PM
23

So, let's see. Forceful drugging, sexual assault, robbery and androcide.
/r/MensRights03/09/23 05:13 AM
90

That's not a one to one comparison at all. You're expecting way too little of her in return. This is the problem with men. They give women their everything in return for just sex which men put roughly two times more effort/energy into and leave 1.5 times more dissatisfied, anyway.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 02:54 PM
21

Thanks for reminding me of this. It's disgusting how much women are into this abuse porn, being 75% more likely than men to be into extreme porn and how the male porn performers are forced to do this just so their creepy female audience can schlick to it while also being paid far less than their female abusers. Damn, I hate how men are mistreated in the porn industry.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 07:12 AM
14

I'm really surprised no one has mentioned sex yet This is another aspect I must agree with. Men put in almost twice as much effort as women based on calories burned during sex and women are much more selfish in bed, leading far more men feeling dissatisfied with sex with women compared to vice-versa (around 51% dissatisfaction for men vs around 33% dissatisfaction for women). This is not even mentioning how close to 19% of men report being raped by women as adults alone (Table 4) according to re…
/r/MensRights02/09/23 06:45 AM
24

I'm "pathetic" because I don't want female porn performers sexually and financially exploiting male porn performers by stealing the pay which rightfully belongs to them after using those men for sex? You're starting to sound like a creep.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 05:59 AM
31

it's called the porn industry I agree, actually. Men work almost twice as much as women based on energy expenditure in porn/sex, yet get paid only half as much on average for each scene, meaning they get paid about a quarter what women get paid for the same amount of effort. This is another way men get sexually and financially exploited by creepy women.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 05:43 AM
5

Except men benefit very little, if at all from "traditional relationships" compared to women. Men are expected to work (for at least 9 hours every day), provide sex to their wives/gfs and do chores which require extensive manual labor like plumbing, electric work and gardening while women are just expected to cook and clean, something which barely takes 3 hours every day all while men have a sword hanging over their head where the woman can take half his assets, destroy his life and publicly hum…
/r/MensRights01/09/23 10:16 AM
14

Japan literally has separate train cars for the female nobility alone and another one for the male "subhumans", which can also be used by the female nobility if they so choose to. Japanese photo booths/purikura cannot be used by the single male slave class unless they are accompanied by their slave masters, sorry, I meant girlfriends. They have exclusive discounts in restaurants for women. Females there almost always get suspended sentences for "sex crimes" even against minors. Japanese "mixed b…
/r/MensRights01/09/23 04:27 AM
3

his value and protection of her creates a mutually beneficial relationship. This is what I was referring to. Most of them push tradcon garbage which is highly misandric.
/r/MensRights01/09/23 04:20 AM
14

I remember reading once that when Westerners explained chivalry to Japanese they laughed and called it "the ridiculous worship of women". This sounds bizarre to me. Japanese worship women just as much if not more, similar to every other civilization. One look at how disgustingly misandric their media (anime/manga) are on average makes it clear. It's rare to find anime or manga where the male characters don't get disrespected by female characters for "comedy".
/r/MensRights01/09/23 02:52 AM
8

men have initial respect for each other As much as I'd love for it to be true, it unfortunately isn't. All it takes is a woman pointing a finger at a man for the average man to be mobbed by several other average men. The Men's Rights Movement wouldn't be required if the average man liked other average men more than women like average women like other average women more than men.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 12:50 AM
3

It's the intentional killing of a person primarily for being male. it’s an incredibly rare crime based on its definition I don't know which femcel's "definition" you're using, but it's not rare at all. The vast majority of male homicides are androcides, which is why 80% of homicide victims worldwide are male.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 02:22 PM
19

It'd be nice if someone could create a subreddit to analyze media from a Men's Rights perspective. I'd like to go there and quickly weed out all the shit movies, TV shows, anime and manga which don't respect their male characters without wasting my time watching them myself and getting triggered. And I'd like the analysis to be from a proper Men's Rights perspective, not the disgusting tradcon nonsense.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 04:36 AM
10

I don't agree with the death penalty, either. Except for the cases I mentioned. That's because androcides cause a lot of male deaths everyday and men are the most vulnerable class of people in society in almost every area, be it legal, social or institutional with the only exception being physical. Another reason is that men are the most important class of society who pay the vast majority of taxes, generate the vast majority of wealth and jobs, invent and discover the vast majority of things an…
/r/MensRights29/08/23 04:31 AM
15

Androcide, inciting androcide and attempting androcide must carry a minimum sentence of death.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 12:57 AM
26

Yeah. Totally. They definitely do not sexually harass the man, fetishize or sexualize his relationship with his kids and try to humiliate or attack him at all. That never happens.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 01:40 PM
1

Anti sodomy laws were originally anti-rape laws Sounds like bullshit to me. If they were anti-"rape" laws, then it would've also been applicable for lesbians. Ancient societies often times only considered something to be sex if it involved penile penetration Correct. It was criminalized only if there was "penetration" as opposed to "envelopment" precisely to persecute men.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 04:06 AM
5

"This is why men complain they get no pussy." Advice her to stop sexually harassing random stranger men around their age if they want dick.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 04:03 AM
10

This explanation relies on the false premise that the legality of "sex crimes" or "deviant sexual activities" is decided depending on whether or not straight men find those acts "attractive". That's false. Even repulsive, butt-ugly lesbians having sex is legal in almost all tradcon shitholes where male homosexuality is illegal and can even be punished with death. The real reason is murderous hostility towards men and male sexuality.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 04:09 PM
16

You got the causation wrong. Correlation does not imply causation. There certainly is a correlation between exclusive criminalization of male on female rape alone and male homosexuality alone in tradcon shitholes, but this kind of criminalization of male homosexuality is not due to "fear" of "ever-so-horny" men raping women. It's due to the third common-causal variable: The pervasive androcidal/murderous hostility towards men and male sexuality. These are just few of several excuses to persecute…
/r/MensRights25/08/23 03:58 PM
1

Not really. He was acting as a tradcon, not an MRA. Tradcons are just as hostile to men as feminists are, if not more.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 03:45 PM
10

That's bait from the resident femcel troll. That account's going to be suspended shortly like all of her accounts do. People here really are gullible, though you yourself don't seem to be an MRA based on your account. Either give a similar bait reply or just report without responding.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 02:38 PM
16

Based. I wish trans women all the best in terms of breaking world records and winning beauty contests. Only if they aren't misandric and are pro-male, though. A lot of them are unfortunately misandric.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 11:47 PM
6

Androcide, inciting androcide and attempting androcide should carry a minimum sentence of death.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 09:05 PM
12

I hate it when they group together male hostile woman worshippers like tradcons, incels and red pillers together with MRAs under the umbrella term "manosphere".
/r/MensRights15/08/23 06:53 PM
3

Humans are clearly more like chimps You say this, yet contradict yourself by saying that human men can't be bisexual when chimpanzees are, in fact, bisexual themselves. Chimpanzees are also polygynandrous i.e., both males and females have multiple other mates. The fact that chimpanzees are polygynandrous and bisexual, yet the males are hostile to other males over females unlike bonobos makes it clear that "sex" and "biology" is not the reason male hostility exists unlike what tradcons spew.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 05:38 PM
0

There's no "bonding" competition for jobs&women, losing this competition has serious ramifications. Bonobos, our closest relatives say otherwise. While they might get hostile from time to time, the male bonobos rarely ever get hostile to each other over females.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 04:53 PM
-4

Healthy competitiveness is different from hostility and malice. Healthy competitiveness can forge strong bonds between men.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 04:15 PM
-9

Stop trying to justify this nonsense with your bullshit tradcon biological reductionism. Male hostility is social conditioning, not biological. The very fact that the Chinese and Indians historically kept their male babies and aborted females babies due to social conditions when times were tough because they saw males as future providers and females as parasites is proof of that.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 02:39 PM
-19

Stop trying to explain it from the incel angle. They don't "adore" masculine men. They just see them as another tool - an attack dog, a dildo and a wallet. If they really "adored" masculine men, they wouldn't try to have them risk their lives and attack other men.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 01:10 PM
4

What's there to "respect" about those freaks? They're women, the upper caste who can say whatever the fuck they want about biological men, the lower caste, including inciting violence and calling for androcide without any consequences. The people who actually deserve to be "respected" are men who stand for men's rights because they're the ones who actually have a lot to lose.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 04:36 PM
8

Why do you think this teen girl is a parasitic She's a minor, so she's a parasite by default who's benefitting from the taxes that man is paying. And she's female, so she's highly likely to be a net drain on taxes even in the future so yes, she objectively is a parasite.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 04:18 PM
112

Society losing another highly trained, productive and valuable male member of society due to an accusation from a parasitic, creepy little shit.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 04:11 AM
5

Soldier Boy having an incel moment. Soldier Boy having a moment with an incel*, fixed it. Mallory was, in fact, an incel at that point in time. Her attitude proves it. Her taking Soldier Boy's advice helped her get laid later on and have kids and grandkids. As for Soldier Boy, just look at that magnificent beast! He already founded Herogasm for several years at that point.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 03:00 PM
6

The vast majority of sexual abuse of juveniles (90%) is done by women, correct. Why do you let them near children, then?
/r/MensRights11/08/23 03:12 AM
26

Love how those femcels throw in the "anti-SJW" in there as a red-herring, lol. And no, this sub doesn't "defend rapists". The posts here call them out all the time. Just not the kind those femcels like seeing called out.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 02:24 AM
42

especially the moms They see others as "pedos" because they are pedos themselves. 90% of people who molest juveniles are female but the vast majority don't get reported. I'm willing to bet they tried to steal her by accusing you of being a kidnapper. Immediately call the police if they try to pull that shit. Your daughter will support you and she's fucked.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 02:16 AM
1

Her creep of a mother is probably molesting her and is mad that her daughter showed interest in you. There's no reason for her to sexualize you and her daughter in her mind when her husband didn't. Ask her father, the barman to keep a close eye on his wife when she's with your daughter.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 10:55 PM
2

Pretty sure she unironically thinks that. And the "joke" isn't funny, either.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 03:03 PM
8

I don't know about the "sexual equality legislation". It's not like it was applied in this scenario, either. I'm just talking about what action in this scenario would be overall more beneficial and fair for "society" as a whole. How would you feel if a master and slave were stuck on an island, the slave made a boat for escaping the island, but the slave was instead thrown into the sea and the master took the boat instead? That's basically what's happening with men here. It's those men's tax mone…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 04:48 PM
11

Logic says men should be allowed to board first (they pay the most taxes), then boys (future majority taxpayers), then women (a net drain on taxes) and then girls. What they're doing here is using men's money to kill the very same men they stole it from.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 04:29 PM
8

I Spit on Your Grave is not a misandrist movie Ok. I'd say it's worse than that and teeters into the femcel fetish porn region based on the reviews I've read. Even Roger Ebert seems to think that.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 10:32 AM
6

But that's all just someone's take on it Nope. People have said the same thing about the female audience supporting the movie, including Roger Ebert. There are other articles written by women who describe it as a feminist film. I watched all those movies You are proving my point here. Only a woman can sit through hours of that fetish fuel trash.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 10:11 AM
9

I doubt a lot of women actually want to watch it Then why is it regarded as feminist wish-fulfillment?
/r/MensRights23/07/23 09:51 AM
12

So yeah. It's a femcel schlick fantasy. Movies like that cannot be made with the genders reversed. I mean, they can be made but they can't be released. Especially widely. Even in more egregious cases where the man gets raped and gets accused of rape instead, which happens a lot in real life. Take an example of the movie The Hunt. The guy gets molested and gets accused of molestation instead which is then followed by his persecution but he doesn't go on fetish-fuelled massacre rampages. The movie…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 09:41 AM
12

male rape Check. male castration Check. femcel androcide power fantasy Check. femcel rape fantasy Check. femcel seduction fantasy Check. blue ball fantasy Check. What makes you think the movie is not misandrist femcel schlick material, again? I can guarantee you a movie with the gender reversed version of even two or three of these aspects would ensure that no major chains release it and there would be protests organized by women to ban that film.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 09:26 AM
42

I Spit on Your Grave is something I can think of off the top of my head. I haven't watched it myself, but based on the synopsis, it sounds like pure femcel schlick fuel which checks off multiple fetishes. It even has multiple parts. Another one is Midsommar. The male protagonist in it gets drugged and raped by the female members of a cult. His cuck girlfriend sees it and has a nervous breakdown. In the end, she gets the choice to either kill her (now paralysed) boyfriend or one of the cult membe…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 06:08 AM
-8

Barbie is the most misandrist movie I have ever seen If that really is the case, I'm envious of you. There are far worse films made for femcel audience to satiate their castration, rape and gore fetishes.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 04:44 AM
1

Actually, the equivalent men being forced in the military would be women being forced into the military. I agree. Honestly, it's an insult to all those poor men getting conscripted to make an analogy like this. It's the same as saying that a wife getting to have sex with her husband is the same as the husband providing for her.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 04:33 AM
2

OP's scenario does not require the "breeding farm" residents to become pregnant. The aim is just to produce healthy kids, which is perfectly plausible even if the roles are reversed. They must just make sure that the men are well-fed and looked after so that they produce the highest quality semen.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 04:14 AM
4

cis men cannot get pregnant What does the ability to get pregnant have to do with anything? If that really were the case, all infertile (one in six to eight women are infertile) and post-menopausal women would be getting conscripted, so that reasoning is clearly wrong.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 04:00 AM
6

Men can do that. Not sure what you mean. Your women have explicitly protested being conscripted, which is why they don't get conscripted while at the same time backstabbing the men close to them and reporting them to the authorities when they don't join the war, especially in Ukraine. This is why we can't have the scenario we want.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 03:45 AM
8

I think most men, especially conscripted men would prefer a role-reversal of this scenario. Men get raped and the women get sent into the meat grinder to get spayed, disemboweled, blown to bits or burnt to a crisp. It seems you prefer this, too. But alas, most other women seem to be opposed to this, so we can't get what we want.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 03:31 AM
126

BlatantFemcel is filled with rapist femcels and parasites who want the "right" to mutilate men if they don't give them what they want, be it sex or money. Who would've thought?
/r/MensRights21/07/23 02:26 PM
13

Androcide, attempted androcide and solicitation of androcide must be an automatic death penalty. The genes of these scum must be eradicated off the face of this planet. This is the only condition under which I'm ok with there being an exception to the death penalty.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 01:53 PM
34

Femcels are the real terrorists. Makes sense because the Suffragettes, the grandmothers of femcels were terrorists themselves.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 01:41 AM
20

Japanese anal bukkake videos can be super feminist I unironically think they are since men do the most work there but women get paid far more.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 11:00 AM
18

Women don't seem to think so, since they seem to be rioting on the streets in multiple countries across the world for their "right" to rape men and boys and succeeding while the "good" women say or do nothing to oppose them.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 10:50 PM
20

Found the rapist femcel who excuses the actions of her kind by using made up reasons. Men wouldn't be raping if your kind didn't rape them as children and teach them about rape.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 10:39 PM
64

Sexual harassment seems to be their new rhetorical strategy, true.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 01:37 PM
18

So an underaged piece of shit lies about her age and rapes a boy only to turn around and accuse him of rape. Successfully. Got it.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 05:36 PM
2

I didn’t take it well at all, but months later I told in one of our mutual friends that she was raped by one of her previous ex’s. Why did you do this despite knowing the effect this would have on her male ex boyfriends? It's very hard for me to feel sympathy for people who are male hostile.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 12:28 AM
3

Its surprisingly easy to forget how insanely horny we used to be as teenagers. I don't know where this myth comes from. I'm about as horny now in my 20s as I was in my teenage years. Probably even slightly more but I was never a doormat to women and never complimented them even once despite being complimented myself, especially on their appearance. Maybe it varies between countries and cultures.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 06:54 PM
21

Modern day women: wear the most sexually vulgar clothes in order to harass men for her own gratification due to the power they wield over them Fixed that for you.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 04:52 PM
29

Afterwards I just kind a hung my head and carried on, hoping she wasn't going to tell the front desk I was "harassing her". Scared of offending the nobility, huh? She stood about 5'5", was wearing a skin-tight blue shirt that showed an extremely obvious silhouette of her pierced nipples (no bra), and grey spandex shorts that were up so high her ass cheeks hung out. Extremely distasteful, especially for a public gym. lol of course we lower caste slaves must know our place even in front of pervert…
/r/MensRights13/07/23 04:46 PM
1

No one in the male advocate spaces does that. Killed, tortured or mutilated? Maybe for egregious cases of female on male injustice. But not raped. At least not by a man. They wouldn't want men being defiled by what they consider trash. And even those who wish death or mutilation on women get swiftly suspended.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 04:26 PM
30

Chatting with a girl on Hinge I told her I Substitute Teach and how HS girls write me letters sometimes. Letters I always throw in the garbage. She still accused me of being a Pedo. She's basically admitting that if she were in your place, she'd get aroused. She's probably even envious of you. So her, being attracted to minors threw a femcel tantrum because you're hotter than her. But it's in general not safe for you to be a high school teacher if your students are sexually harassing you. You'd …
/r/MensRights11/07/23 07:53 AM
3

There are far worse things than just pregnancy to worry about if you're letting a woman have sex with you.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 03:02 PM
66

Ugh. They're so creepy. Aren't such perverts called voyeurs? And these women might not even stop at voyeurism in such a place.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 12:08 AM
4

it’s unsustainable for a stable society I'm not sure if it really will be that way forever. There's been tremendous progress in longevity/aging research, AI and automation in the past decade and this progress will continue and hopefully, men wouldn't have to marry and have kids (at least with a woman in the natural sense) to keep "society stable" in the near future.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 11:58 PM
19

Was that in real life? I think you could've reported that woman for sexual harassment if the barista or the waiter was the one harassing you.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 10:06 PM
11

I respond to insults and ad hominems with "sourced" insults and ad hominems. But unlike femcels, I respond to politely phrased, well sourced arguments with a similarly polite tone rather than ad hominems and bans.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 07:56 PM
8

So you are a rape apologist who wants to make it easier for Indian women (who already rioted on the streets of Delhi thrice in 2010, 2012 and 2013 for their "right" to rape men and boys and succeeded while the "good women" stayed silent and said or did nothing to oppose them) to rape Indian men. Got it.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 07:25 PM
8

Men are neither allowed to withhold finances nor sex from their wives in India by law. If he withholds money, he gets imprisoned and if he withholds sex, she gets to take half his salary, assets and his children (it's called divorce on the basis of impotence). So yeah, men are supposed to let themselves by enslaved, raped and defiled by their wives in India by law.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 01:49 PM
10

Except there is no male-friendly country in the world for them to help. So no, the enemy of my enemy is still my enemy for Indian men.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 12:44 PM
11

Where in the law does it say that it is gendered? You would know it if you could do a simple google search about the definition of rape in India. And even if it was, how would this law change anything from before? It's a more potent weapon. It requires lesser evidence than domestic violence and carries longer sentences and greater stigma for men and could potentially even get them killed. A perfect weapon for those rapists to use against men.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 11:29 AM
17

why wouldn't the men accuse the women of rape under the new law? Because they can't. The law isn't gender neutral. It's pretty well-known how shitholes like these work if you spend some time on this subreddit. Not sure if you're being facetious or are genuinely ignorant.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 11:22 AM
12

Isn't that pretty obvious? They would use that law to threaten them with rape accusations if they don't allow those women to rape them. They already use gender-biased domestic violence and dowry laws to do that. Now they're just adding more weapons to their arsenal. There's a reason 40% of Indian men claim to have been raped by their wives.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 11:14 AM
14

Didn't you read what I just wrote? Why would I want to give those rapists more weapons to rape their husbands? Are you a rapist or something? I don't see why you would support something like this unless you're a woman who wants to freely rape and abuse men.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 11:09 AM
14

It's precisely because this sub is anti-rape that they oppose these laws. We don't want Indian women getting even more weapons to exploit and rape their men when upwards of 40% of (mostly married) Indian men already report being raped by women as adults alone, mostly their wives (Table 3.2).
/r/MensRights06/07/23 10:31 AM
91

India Plans To Criminalize Male on Female* Marital Rape. Fixed it. Now wives can use even more threats to exploit and rape their husbands when upwards of 40% of (mostly married) men already report being raped by women as adults alone, mostly their wives (Table 3.2).
/r/MensRights06/07/23 10:28 AM
1

There’s stories from Mesopotamia, various African and Native American tribes that have female on male rape in them and the rapist is treated very harshly. Could you give me the names of these stories? This is the first time I'm hearing of such stories in any civilization.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 10:29 AM
28

Isn't your wife sexually abusing your daughter? Why is she still allowed to have custody? In fact, I have a feeling she's probably also molesting her and trying to stick the blame on you. There's very little evidence when women molest girls. You need to get her away from her as soon as possible.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 07:15 AM
4

the societal factors which lead men to commit more crimes are fault of the patriarchy, and men being raised with male privilege For sure. Females rapists rioting on the streets for their "right" to rape men and boys in multiple countries across the world and succeeding while the "good ones" say or do nothing to oppose them is definitely the fault of the patriarchy. It's the fault of men that so many women are rapists and it's legal for them to be rapists in the vast majority of the world. Women …
/r/MensRights27/06/23 09:39 AM
9

The title is often that the guy was... There you have it. It's just androcide then. Androcide must be an automatic death penalty, especially when those pieces of shit try to justify it.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 04:20 PM
3

It doesn't matter whether they "gave a damn about those girls" or the girls themselves wanted him tortured/killed. They committed androcide, so they must be executed. No exceptions. If the girls were involved, they should be executed, too. It's probably just a knee-jerk reaction from me, being an MRA, but I don't care. Threats to men, the fundamental pillars of society must be ruthlessly dealt with.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 02:36 PM
86

Of course. She should be the first. Her very existence is a serious threat to men.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 08:06 AM
248

I'm usually really against the death penalty but I really feel compelled to make an exception for freaks who commit androcide like this. These fuckers will just go to prison and torment weaker, defenceless men.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 07:33 AM
4

I’ve also seen a video on reddit where a man who allegedly assaulted a woman gets beaten and gets his genitals mutilated. Those are just post hoc excuses those subhuman women come up with when those freaks just get off to raping and mutilating men's genitals. I'm assuming this video is from that shithole eyeblech and those maniacs probably wouldn't remove it even after reporting it even though "rape" or adjacent videos are prohibited there. Men don't come up with these shitty excuses when doing …
/r/MensRights26/06/23 03:58 AM
49

Women say they don’t compliment for a variety of reasons. But if they normalized it, guys wouldn’t start thinking with the little head every once in a blue moon when they get complimented. Stop begging women to compliment men. That's like a slave begging for a compliment from an aristocrat thinking that the aristocrat might be concerned about the slave's "mental wellbeing" when the aristocrat lives in a different world altogether. Why do you think the aristocrat would give a shit about the slave…
/r/MensRights23/06/23 01:10 PM
7

Yes. Research on that topic is one of the things which substantiates my point.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 06:54 AM
5

Why do so many men think that being horny losers is somehow funny or endearing? Because they've been groomed to be that way from their very birth. In countries like the USA and other Islamic/Jewish countries, they've even been brainwashed to think that their genitals being skinned without anaesthesia as babies is normal and is for "hygiene benefits". Hell, there are even men who claim they'd get violent if circumcision of their baby boys was made illegal. Similarly, men have been groomed from th…
/r/MensRights22/06/23 03:29 AM
9

almost all women are attractive... almost all men are Not attractive Are you talking about societal dogma or is that your own opinion? Because if it's your own opinion, you're objectively wrong. The males of all vertebrates are more aesthetic compared to their females, be it lions, silverback gorillas, peacocks (and all birds), all fish, male gaurs, reindeer and humans, for that matter. Human males are larger, have greater musculature (and have greater detail on their bodies as a result), sharpe…
/r/MensRights22/06/23 02:18 AM
2

You should teach your son to be more careful. The creep who is scared of being cucked could accuse him of rape anytime she wanted and he will be helpless if he doesn't record all his interactions with her.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 01:43 AM
18

It's a pretty well-established fact that men are arguably even more hostile to other men than women are. Both men and women hate the average man.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 01:38 AM
8

Honduras was always 'troubled', with dozens of males 'missing' every day. It goes even further than that. 90-95% of murder victims in countries known for their high murder/lynching rates and brutality like Honduras, Mexico and Brazil are male.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 01:23 AM
14

A group of armed people went to the cellblock of a rival gang, locked the doors, opened fire on them. This is how they obscure the gender of female perpetrators. When it's men doing it, it's "armed men", but when women do it, it's "armed people".
/r/MensRights22/06/23 01:17 AM
2

Here's a Wikipedia article of one such incident. Just a note that we don't know whether or not the man was raped or did the raping or whatever since the case didn't even go to court. He was accused of rape and then the lynching happened, but given how many times men get charged with rape for being raped by women in that shithole, it wouldn't have mattered if he was the one who was raped. The incident would've played out the same. The police didn't open fire on the mob because it had women.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 03:41 AM
6

infants are murdered for the crime of being born female Not true anymore. That used to be the case when times were tough and boys were seen as future providers and girls were seen as future people to provide for. It's not the case anymore and sex ratios at birth are normalizing. On the other hand, there's a very real androcide problem in India (just like every other country) with close to 70% of murder victims being male. You are not a mens rights activist, you are a misogynist is the flesh. I d…
/r/MensRights21/06/23 02:49 AM
5

Ah. So you're an Indian femcel. Guess your post makes sense now. Dowry Deaths and Bride Burning Not legal and the victim doesn't get arrested for that. women are subjected to physical, mental, and emotional abuse due to dowry demands Not legal and the victim doesn't get arrested for that. Female Foeticide and Infanticide Not legal. Even determining the gender of the foetus is not legal. We can also talk about the numerous gang rape cases committed by POLICE OFFICERS on young women. Also not lega…
/r/MensRights21/06/23 02:00 AM
1

working on construction site basically gives you 100,000+ £ a month? Is this real? A month or a year? Which country are you from?
/r/MensRights17/06/23 05:48 PM
13

I disagree. Society wasn't historically anti-"rape". It was anti-"male". Violently so using and using "rape" as an excuse was one of the many ways it used to torment its men. It wasn't anti-"rape" because men who were raped by a female member of the royal family in the U.K. were subject to being hanged, drawn and quartered and men being raped by a married woman or their own mothers/step mothers/daughters-in-law would make them eligible to being stoned to death in Abrahamic religions. The other w…
/r/MensRights16/06/23 09:53 PM
9

Research led by women found that a woman forcing herself on a man is not equivalent to rape. Correct. It's far worse than "rape" (as defined by the U.K. law) because the man has an additional fear of being publicly humiliated and maybe even killed/lynched because of being accused of rape by his female aggressor after she's done "forcing herself on" him.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 08:43 PM
16

I don't buy the idea that average men prefer to marry good looking women over rich women, especially when they are guaranteed inheritance. Unless they are really eager to become financial slaves for those supposedly good-looking women.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 09:26 PM
70

But I am afraid of men because I have seen first hand how bad so many of them can be. The average woman isn't afraid of men. If they really were so afraid, there wouldn't be so many Karens and women wouldn't have they audacity to use accusations as weapons against men. They love their power in society and she knows it.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 09:16 PM
0

debagging me, pretending to “bum” me, flashing themselves at me They seem to be gay or bi men themselves who probably turned that way because of how they were conditioned to hate themselves.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 03:29 PM
47

Men (straight, gay, bi or whatever) need to be wary of gay guys who associate with the male-hostile LGBT. This is why I don't buy the "men are hostile to other men because they want to fuck women" logic. Both men and women are hostile on average to the average man because they are conditioned to be that way. That's how they were raised.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 04:43 AM
1

So is this yet another "rules for thee but not for me" situation? Yes. I'm wondering how many men and boys she's raped for her to be so opposed to such a law.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 05:17 AM
8

I think that many men think that you are lucky to be sexually assaulted by a woman. The men who think that are mostly not included in the statistics I posted because those men wouldn't even consider what they went through as "sexual assault" or "rape". But you are right about the fact that if men are conditioned to be repulsed by female sexuality like women are, the rates I posted would be much higher.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 07:20 PM
47

Well, I don't know about who "rapes" more, but men aren't the ones rioting on the streets for their "right" to rape women and girls in multiple countries across the world and succeeding while the "good ones" say or do nothing to oppose them like women do for their "right" to rape men and boys. Having said that, there are statistics and research papers from certain countries which show that female on male rape rate is indeed abnormally high. For example, upwards of 19% of men in Germany report be…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 06:37 PM
15

It's either cucks whitenights and simps, or rapists and molesters. Yeah. The women over there rioted on the streets demanding their "right" to rape men and boys and succeeded despite 16.1% of men in India reporting being raped by females as adults alone (page 3). Now female police gangs (presumably rapists themselves) who get assigned to crimes committed by women charge even little boys with rape and arrest them for being raped by females. It's all around a horrible place for men and boys.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 08:19 PM
13

These disgusting subhumans can't even leave disabled men alone.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 11:48 PM
61

There is no excuse for them not to go to the frontlines even now. Remember, all the bullshit excuses about mUH rEPopUlation are just post hoc excuses to justify male hostility (as if anyone actually cares about repopulation through reproduction in this overpopulated world when immigration is far more economical). When artificial wombs come around, they will come up with some other bullshit excuse for their male hostility.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 11:30 PM
10

Please don't push this tradcon marriage nonsense in this sub. Men aren't safe if they are married. It doesn't matter if the women are happy leeching off men's resources when the men aren't.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 12:45 PM
5

No. It helps weed out the femcels when they start frothing at their mouths when that contextually and scientifically accurate word is used, saving us time trying to debate them.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 12:27 PM
12

I don't know. Could a Jewish or African American man be friends with a Nazi (Germany in 1940s) or a KKK member (19th-20th century Southern states) assuming that person is nice and interesting and Agrees that antisemitism/racism is real Agrees that Jews/African Americans have real issues and Jewish/Black rights movements are valid. Not obsessed with dogmas about Jewish conspiracies/African American crime and systematic discrimination going one way Would there be other requirements? Or would them …
/r/MensRights30/05/23 08:15 AM
23

By "physical situations", I mean cases where they are required to lift or open things or reach for things at a certain height, etc., Physically attacking someone would come under social situations and a man would be at a severe disadvantage there. He'd be attacked by the simps and white knights if he attacks a woman or even if he gets attacked by a woman before he gets attacked by the law. This is not even mentioning the fact that men are more likely to get attacked in general. All of these are …
/r/MensRights29/05/23 08:38 PM
54

Being a male would be advantageous in most physical situations. Being a female would be advantageous in almost all social situations. This reminds me of the movie ex machina where the AI takes the second most socially powerful form by being a woman so she could manipulate the simp. The only other form which would've made her even more socially powerful in present day society would've been that of a little girl.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 08:23 PM
2

Disgusting. Still kind of surprised Ukrainian and Russian men haven't turned on their own male hostile governments trying to conscript them and use them as meat shields and weapons to kill other men like it happened several times throughout history. This rot should be taken out from within. Right from the core.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 07:46 AM
17

I wouldn't have a problem with prisons looking like that if they weren't exclusively female prisons with male taxpayer money funding them. It should've been men's prisons looking like that. They are the ones who need rehabilitation facilities because society treats them like shit.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 06:53 AM
8

The difference is that even low-quality women will always be able to reproduce unless they are medically infertile. You are not making any sense. You literally said it's "optimal if the genetic apex of men reproduce only, while the rest get nothing", in your previous comment, arguing about how things are "supposed to be" like a eugenicist, but default back to "how things are" in this comment. And with "how things are", it's difficult for multiple women to have children with "the genetic apex of …
/r/MensRights28/05/23 10:05 PM
24

Men are seen as disposable. That's the key point. "Seen". There's a reason both China and India, the two most historically populous and propersous countries aborted their female babies and kept their male babies when their times were tough. No amount of bullshit post hoc excuses about "mUh ONe mAn HuNdRed womEn rEpoPulAtion" would change reality. Men are forced to go into war or situations of emergency because of the leaders' greed to consolidate power and intrinsic male hostility since men are …
/r/MensRights28/05/23 09:49 PM
2

I was talking about them directly reporting it to male police officers. How they'd respond would depend on their jurisdiction's laws, their protocols and the police officers themselves, but they shouldn't have let them go. Men let those women go too often without fighting back, letting dominatrix pedophiles like OP's harassers often get away with their extreme sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 09:13 PM
27

You should've pulled out your phones, recorded and reported those pedophiles. It's really creepy how they were sexually harassing you by projecting their sadomasochistic fantasies onto you. It would've saved a lot of men and boys in the future.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 06:07 PM
1

I have had a friend for 25 years "Friend". The only person I can see here is a person who's a threat to you.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 03:56 AM
2

Your sister (Or her family. Whoever is responsible for this kind of behaviour of theirs) is a threat to you as well as your safety and that of your fellow men who are close to them. Treat them accordingly and look out for other men close to them like your father, brother, cousins, etc.,
/r/MensRights28/05/23 03:55 AM
3

Oh, yeah. I originally meant to write easily replaceable. I don't know why I forgot to write "easily". What value men do get is for our utility, not our existence. I think I need to make something clear here. When people (usually tradcons) make arguments as to why men are sent to die in wars, they make up post hoc explanations (read bullshit excuses) as to why women are more useful/have greater utility to society by virtue of their wombs. Those explanations are demonstrably false and those expla…
/r/MensRights25/05/23 01:30 AM
-1

male disposability I don't like that term. It's an ambiguous term which can be interpreted as men being less "useful" and easily "replaceable" to society in the grand scheme of things when it couldn't be further from the truth. Men are "disposed", but are not actually "disposable" since they pay the vast majority of taxes and generate the vast majority of wealth and jobs while also doing the most dangerous, essential and high-skilled jobs required to build and maintain civilizations. They are no…
/r/MensRights25/05/23 12:29 AM
16

one man can impregnate many women So you don't just want men to be forced to die and kill other men, but also want the surviving men to be obligatorily raped by multiple women to continue the same cycle of male suffering? Even Russia doesn't do that.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 11:53 PM
40

Not sure why you're dating those rats who left their fellow men to die. They'd do the same thing to you in a heartbeat.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 11:42 PM
2

Guess the Jewish rights activists and African American rights activists would have a negative reputation among the Nazis and the KKK because of the "extremists" among the activists, too. It's totally not because of their violent inherent hared.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 01:51 PM
2

women do the majority of unpaid Labour You mean taking care of your own house? Would you rather live in a garbage bin? child birthing So women deserve a lifetime of men's taxpayer money just because they gave birth once or twice at most in their lives on their own volition? None of those explain why men's taxpayer money should be spent to build those rapist women in India exclusive parks so they can organize more riots to demand even more laws which make it easier for them to rape men and boys.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:25 AM
6

an anecdotal story Read my post again. I linked survey data. Tax money is used for everybody regardless of who is working or paying taxes. But it's a fact that men pay the vast majority of taxes and women drain the vast majority of taxes.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 02:32 PM
1

he hasn't developed emotionally to the point where he could handle lesrning the truth. It would literally wreck him. Him being emotionally wrecked is better than being socially and literally wrecked again.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 02:26 PM
4

They can't be handed those on men's taxpayer money just because they asked them. They'll only use them to stage more protests demanding laws which would make it easier for them to rape men and boys.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 01:06 PM
4

So far he didn't bother to develop and to give us his take on the alternative he imagines. The alternative would be to have men-only parks rather than women-only parks since women in India have rioted on their streets demanding their "right" to rape men and boys and succeeded despite 16.1% of men in India reporting being raped by females as adults alone (page 3). They can even get charged with rape and arrested for being raped by females over there, so men would need their safe spaces. It's men …
/r/MensRights15/05/23 12:55 PM
2

I think the root issue is the absolutely ridiculous amount of sexual violence and crime by women I agree. Women in India have rioted on their streets demanding their "right" to rape men and boys and succeeded despite 16.1% of men in India reporting being raped by females as adults alone (page 3). I don't see how this move will help with that, though. If anything, it provides a "safe space" for those rapist women to mobilise and protest, demanding more laws to make it easier for them to rape men.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 12:51 PM
15

its the rape capital of the planet Yeah. Women over there have rioted on their streets demanding their "right" to rape men and boys and succeeded. This is despite 16.1% of men in India reporting being raped by females as adults alone (page 3). How does this help with it, though? If anything, it provides opportunities for those rapist women to mobilise and riot, demanding more laws to make it easier for them to rape men.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 12:45 PM
2

Happy Mother's Day to all the mothers who support their sons and Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 12:35 PM
8

Well, at least she seemingly opposes young boys being raped by grown women, the vast majority of their rapists.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 12:33 PM
3

Shaming is a common tactic used by feminists and it works. MRAs should adopt it. They have a lot to learn from feminists. Feminists, as devious as they are, have created the most successful, all-pervasive movement in history, while the MRAs have achieved little to nothing trying to take the high road while allowing enemies to infest their spaces and destroy them like this subreddit.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 04:43 PM
2

I was referring to tradcons and femcels separately. They're both enemies of the average man.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 04:34 PM
6

reject marriage and society Nothing wrong with rejecting misandric institutions.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 12:00 PM
-2

Tradcon subhumans, femcels and the reddit hivemind. This sub doesn't have many active actual MRAs and has more tourist tradcons larping as MRAs who get attracted to threads which get popular.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 04:36 AM
30

"Rape culture" does exist, though. Women from multiple countries across the world have rioted on the streets for their "right" to rape men and boys and succeeded while the "good women" said or did nothing to oppose them.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 01:41 AM
-53

Are you sure that he is straight and not bi? Did you ask him? He'd be so much better off with you. Most men would be better off with other men, honestly, provided they aren't living in a gayphobic (yes, gayphobic, not homophobic) shithole. Wish I was gay or bi myself. Edit: Also, please inform your friend that the subhuman was the reason he was bullied. I don't want him repeating the same mistakes and suffering again.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 12:00 AM
7

Reported for sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights13/05/23 02:06 PM
7

Twittards can only resort to ad hominems, harassment and threats. Even 4chan is unironically more conducive to debate than that shithole.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 10:37 AM
33

Correct. It's definitely worse than even Western and East Asian countries (except maybe South Korea). The women over there rioted on the streets for their "right" to rape men and boys and succeeded when the Parliament was considering making "sex laws" gender neutral despite at least 16.1% of men reporting being raped by females as adults alone (page 3). The "good women" stayed silent and said or did nothing to oppose them. Now female police gangs (presumably also rapists) who are assigned to cri…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 05:15 PM
23

Wtf is going on in India man You tell me. The women over there rioted on the streets for their "right" to rape men and boys and succeeded when the Parliament was considering making "sex laws" gender neutral despite at least 16.1% of men reporting being raped by females as adults alone (page 3). The "good women" stayed silent and said or did nothing to oppose them. Now female police gangs (presumably also rapists) who are assigned to crimes committed by females charge little boys with rape and ar…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 02:58 PM
10

I agree. Jewish rights activists and Nazis shouldn't have fought and brainstormed solutions instead, too. Same with African American rights activists and the KKK.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 01:05 PM
50

It's projection. MRAs or men aren't the ones rioting on the streets in multiple countries across the world for their "right" to rape men and boys and succeeding while the "good ones" say or do nothing to oppose them.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 12:55 PM
46

even my own family Your family members sound like the kind of vermin who would stab you in the back over women or children. Cut them off and let them rot in senility.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 06:26 PM
4

My wife had said that the woman started grabbing her to show her what I was doing to her and my wife had asked her to stop multiple times and she wouldn’t. Ask your wife to report the creep for sexual assault before she reports you.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 01:33 PM
6

Such anime do exist, but they are relegated to very few anime and the viewers know what to expect when they start watching the anime, as opposed to female on male abuse "comedy" which exists in every other anime and we have to weed through thousands of shit anime to find a few which don't have that troupe. And the anime which don't have that troupe usually end up amazing. I don't remember not liking even a single anime without that troupe.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 05:16 PM
100

Not as sick of it as I am of the female on male abuse "comedy" troupe in most anime.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 03:53 PM
7

So, let me get this right. The creep made you, a minor smoke and drink, got you inebriated and kissed you and made you perform cunnilingus on her. Later she invites you over when you are drunk and rapes you. You need to make a formal police complaint on her. It doesn't look like she made a police complaint, yet, so gather all the evidence (by making her spill out all the events that went down either through text or by secretly recording a conversation with her if the laws allow it) and report he…
/r/MensRights01/05/23 10:50 PM
6

Should've reported the creep and gotten her arrested. Who knows how many men she's going to rape and ruin in the future?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/23 03:38 AM
65

So they are basically giving women free reign to molest and rape disabled and vulnerable men.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 08:03 PM
20

Does your husband have a gun? Ask him to get one.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 06:31 PM
27

lol, really? Is the "ink" a euphemism for something? Where does it get ejected from? The movie might actually be watchable (after pirating) if shitting out ink is one of her "powers".
/r/MensRights26/04/23 06:02 PM
9

I don’t know the stats on crimes targeting women versus crimes targeting men but if there is a disparity, laws protecting the one that is disadvantages makes perfect sense. Correct. Most criminals specifically target men (men are 80-90% of victims of violent crime), so crimes against men should have a much higher penalty.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 03:48 PM
1

Why would you even want a love story between that creep Jane and poor Dave? Didn't you say she was unpleasant?
/r/MensRights26/04/23 03:43 PM
8

to be fair men are almost guaranteed to get off from sex while women almost never do Quite the opposite, actually. Just because men ejaculate more often doesn't mean they "climaxed" and are satisfied with the sex. 85% of women are satisfied with their sex life as opposed to only 49% of men in relationships, and women are more selfish in bed than men in bed, finish early and put far less effort into pleasuring the man.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 04:50 PM
3

Definitely not. My "obsession" is not even 0.1% of the women who literally rioted on the streets for it (which is because of the patriarchy, of course).
/r/MensRights23/04/23 10:55 AM
9

I’m a mens right guy. Sure you are, femcel. And you didn't answer my question, so I'm assuming you were indeed raped by your mother, sisters, aunts, grandmothers and daughters. Sorry you had to go through that, but just because you were raped by them doesn't mean you can hate all women. That's misogynistic. All women are not pedophilic rapists, even though female rapists rioted on the streets in multiple countries across the world for their "right" to rape men and boys and succeeded and the "goo…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 12:18 AM
11

Yeah. It seems you femcels don't just hate menslib, but women as a whole. Is it penis envy? Or vagina revulsion? Or both? Or were you raped by your mother/sister(s)/aunt(s)/grandmother(s)/all of them when you were young?
/r/MensRights23/04/23 12:08 AM
11

So femcels hate women, too? Is it self-hatred or only hatred for "Stacies"?
/r/MensRights22/04/23 11:15 PM
13

we hate them Wait. Femcels hate menslib? I though you people loved them because they are controlled opposition.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 10:39 PM
6

This is bait from a femcel sockpuppet account. Just saying. The other two replies to this comment are femcel sockpuppet accounts, too.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 10:38 PM
5

I agree that men should compliment other men more. The average man is ignored and/or treated like shit by both men and women. And it's not reasonable for men to expect compliments from women. That's like a slave hoping for compliments from the nobility (which women literally are, legally speaking). They live in two different worlds. I personally have never complimented a woman and never will since they already have inflated egos due to being constantly showered with compliments and it can be use…
/r/MensRights22/04/23 06:42 PM
6

I don't know why you're getting so angry. I thought we were in agreement here. how about no one helps no one I disagree. Men should help other men because if other men don't, no one else will as exemplified in this video. Everyone in this sub would agree with that. That is one of the fundamental tenets of being an MRA.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 10:17 PM
5

Oh. So you also think the unstable creep is also entitled to money from OP so she can sexually harass a poor cab driver and then accuse him of sexual harassment? I thought we agreed that men should only help men?
/r/MensRights20/04/23 09:41 PM
8

Then don’t help women Ok. Thanks for answering my question. It seems you and I agree that OP did the right thing and men should only help men.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 09:21 PM
12

Imagine how stupid it would be if I would vote to remove rape as crime and I would say, it fine I wont do something horrible to women and I stand with women. Ironically enough, women literally did just that for female on male rape in multiple countries across the world, rioting on the streets for their "right" to rape men and boys and succeeded. The "good ones" did nothing to oppose them. Really says a lot about them, don't you think?
/r/MensRights20/04/23 08:53 PM
7

So the male subhuman needs to know his place and know how to act around his female overlord and should know not to overstep his boundaries apart from offering to help. Am I getting this right? If OP came across a man and a woman in need of help, I'd rather he help the man rather than the woman since the male subhuman would come off as a "creep" if he offered help to the woman but didn't know his place. Wouldn't you agree?
/r/MensRights20/04/23 08:45 PM
10

Sorry that you were brainwashed to think of yourself as a "pussy" just because you didn't like being raped by your whale mother.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 07:37 PM
3

Did your mom or sister or S.O. rape men or something? I don't see why you feel the need to defend them otherwise. I'm sorry that your mom and sister raped you as a child and brainwashed you into thinking that you are a "silly wimp" if you didn't want it.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 07:14 PM
11

Male-hostile woman worshipping tradcons and simp subhumans are usually downvoted and in general not appreciated or welcome in this sub. Just saying.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 06:53 PM
58

With a woman the worst you’ll get is a registration on the sexual offenders list. Wrong. With a woman, the worst he can get is being raped by her and then being accused of rape and then getting tortured and killed in prison only to have people celebrate his death. Among the people celebrating his death could be members of his own family. I know a case pretty close to this. That's how much "society" hates men.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 04:12 PM
36

You did the right thing. Spend your time and energy helping your fellow men who no one cares about rather than wasting them on women. There will be a lot of people willing to help the women and children, either way and she was seemingly unstable, so she could've overreacted and ruined your life.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 02:42 PM
0

When the woman gets caught cheating, she'll accuse you of rape and you'll be the one getting lynched (socially or literally) while she gets away. That's how it's always been throughout history. And besides that, why would you want to hurt other men emotionally? And not just that, you want them to deal with your unwanted pregnancies?
/r/MensRights20/04/23 09:08 AM
3

I have always heard bad things about my father. He was a poor porter and couldn't earn much, eventually leading him to commit suicide. So the burden fell on my shoulders. I spent days and nights working to support my sister and mother. Your mother and sisters drove your father to suicide and leeched off you after that while trash talking your dead father. I don't know how you can consider them "family" after that, let alone your sister a "god". If I divorce my wife, I will lose my family Good. Y…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 08:53 PM
12

Instead of “good” how about using a word like necessary? I don't see how torturing, humiliating, mutilating, killing or enslaving men like I described in my previous comment was ever "necessary". If anything, treating men, the foundations and pillars of societies and civilizations well would lead to happier societies and greater progress overall.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 12:46 PM
51

The "Developer Mode Output" looks like typical tradcon drivel, implying that "traditional gender roles" were somehow "good" when men were arguably treated even worse in the past. Men who were domestically abused by their wives were paraded and publicly humiliated in a parade called Charivari. Men who were raped by females (especially by married women or their mothers/step mothers/daughters in law) were castrated, tortured and/or executed, particularly in Abrahamic religions. Men were forced to f…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 11:49 AM
49

Men aren't the ones who rioted on the streets across the world in multiple countries for their "right" to rape men and boys and succeeded while the "good ones" stayed silent and did nothing to oppose them.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 09:21 AM
154

That response looks like it was written by a femcel. Maybe those trainers from OpenAI must visit subreddits like twoxfemcel, femceldatingstrategy or blatantfemcel to see how they actually behave.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 02:43 PM
7

They're also admitting that the creep is entitled to perpetual sex from him just because she had sex with him once and has the weapon of a rape accusation.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 10:19 AM
12

When will female creeps learn that they aren't entitled to perpetual sex with a man just because they slept with him once? These female rapists get emboldened by rape accusation weapons.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 09:51 AM
1

Because female rapists have rioted on the streets in multiple countries for their "right" to rape men and boys and succeeded, thereby wiping their rape records clean from "government" records. Any rape done by them wouldn't be recorded as rape and would often result in men or boys getting arrested. None of the "good women" opposed them or held any counter demonstrations, either. However, independent research reveals that at least 16.1% of men in India (page 3) and at least 19% of men in Germany …
/r/MensRights17/04/23 06:07 PM
168

Because women have rioted on the streets in multiple countries for their "right' to rape men and boys and succeeded. None of the "good ones" opposed them or held any counter demonstrations, either.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 03:01 PM
4

It's not just the judiciary. It includes the police. The people who arrested the little boy for being raped in the article I linked are a gang of female police officers (most likely rapists themselves) who are assigned to cases dealing with females.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 02:38 PM
10

Some governments (like Norway) do, though even Norway is still far from being male friendly. But India goes one step further into the shithole territory by charging males with rape and arresting them for being raped by females.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 02:29 PM
106

are asking for $2 million each from Smith and her boyfriend Hunter Hill Guess who's going to have to bear the burden despite him being an unrelated cameraman for her youtube channel.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 01:49 PM
22

What do you expect from a shithole which arrests little boys for being raped by females? They'll arrest the sons who are raped by their single mothers after they adopt them.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 01:21 PM
1

Didn't you read my first comment? There's literally a scene where the "stronk women" sets dogs upon the crotches of men in the third film. It would've cost nothing to not have that disgusting scene. And no, John Wick is the aggressor in the films a lot of times. He kills defenceless security guards by sneaking up on them a lot of times. Also, if John Wick is neither pro nor anti male, why is it being endorsed in this subreddit? Shouldn't it be removed?
/r/MensRights16/04/23 11:32 PM
2

I think what you described in the OP is practically legal in many countries.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 11:24 PM
0

No. But what I also don't expect is this franchise being endorsed as a pro-male series in the MRA subreddit. They're the usual male hostile action flicks. The third part is particularly egregious. Infuriating, even.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 11:16 PM
-1

A man who loves his wife isn't a Simp. But a man who kills other defenceless men (many of whom are not even related to the incident) over supposed (accidental) disrespect to his dead wife is.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 10:50 PM
21

The man is the creep even when he's raped by "young women". I've heard stories of men being drugged and gang raped by minor girls.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 10:10 PM
7

mental trauma just isnt going to be the same on a guy like on a girl Correct. The trauma is going to be much greater for the boy because there is an additional fear of him being accused of rape instead.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 10:07 PM
3

Don't engage the creeps sexually harassing you. Report, block and move on.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 08:16 PM
2

I hope that "mother" isn't the mother of a son.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 07:54 PM
0

Just because you have a healthy loving relationship with a woman doesn’t mean you are a “simp” But killing other men over it does. And it clearly wasn't a "healthy relationship" if he was so psychotic about it. They were not “defenseless men” He sneakily attacked and killed a lot of defenceless men who were not trying to attack him. and they were defending that person Good. People shouldn't be allowed to hurt men in non self-defence situations. At the end of the day, we are talking about a compl…
/r/MensRights16/04/23 07:22 PM
5

I think Chris Rock's quote "Only women, children, and dogs are loved unconditionally. A man is only loved under the condition that he provide something." applies well here. Dogs indeed do have more rights than men/human males in many places in the world. For example, the genital mutilation of dogs without anaesthesia comes under animal cruelty and is a crime but it isn't when it is done to male human infants.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 07:00 PM
1

🤓
/r/MensRights16/04/23 06:40 PM
-6

That dog was the last physical connection he had to his wife So he's a simp who goes on a man killing rampage (of several unrelated men) because his m'lady's memory got trampled on unintentionally. people who kill other peoples pets for fun deserve death More like people who kill defenceless men in non self-defence situations deserve death. like adolescent boys So it's "more ok" because he killed what you view as "adolescent boys"? Fuck off, tradcon.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 03:06 PM
2

Yeah. I was fine with the first film. The later films got repetitive and the third film particularly got on my nerves.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 12:40 PM
2

I’m pretty sure most high level assassins and thugs in gangs are men though Except female "high level assassins" like Sofia also exist in the John Wick universe but all of those female assassins are coincidentally on John Wick's side just so they could set dogs onto to crotches of male "high level assassins" and humiliate them. Edit: Just realized I replied to a femcel sockpuppet account.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 12:19 PM
39

Not even close. Men get trafficked, too, so trafficking is not gendered for one. Secondly, people who are trafficked are not forced to die and kill other men. This is far worse.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 10:03 AM
0

John Wick is pretty misandric, though. He goes on a man killing rampage over a dog and the third film even has a "strong female" setting dogs upon the crotches of their enemies (who are all men, of course) and has one female (off screen) death for 100+ male deaths.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 08:40 AM
10

Why France specifically?
/r/MensRights15/04/23 07:37 PM
4

There's a reason I don't tip or compliment or offer help to any female other than my relatives. That would leave me vulnerable to being sexualized and humiliated by the femcels among them like that creep. I'd rather spend my time, resources and energy helping my fellow men who no one cares about, provided they themselves aren't male-hostile. PS: Those pigtails (and her face in general) look disgusting. Long hair in ponytail or side parted straight hair ftw.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 12:14 PM
1

As his lawyer says, if Rusk, the cop that shot the superior officer, was a female, the case would be drastically different. I agree. She could've shot him a hundred times and killed him in "self defence", fucked his corpse and eaten him and all she had to do to justify it would be to cry rApE. She would not just be let go without a prison sentence but also receive hundreds of thousands of dollars in "donations" or "deals" like that creepy fat fuck Pieper Lewis or that rapist scum Lorena Bobbit (…
/r/MensRights11/04/23 11:20 PM
3

I think that's what a lot of them want. They pay those men to sleep with them and then dump them. Basically clam and scram.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 09:48 AM
1

Is that a link to gore or nudity/porn? Use the NSFL label for gore.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 01:53 AM
3

I'd rather spend my time and energy helping and being nice to men rather than wasting it on women only for them to think I'm ok with having sex with them or something.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 01:19 AM
18

Don’t miss that the police sexually assaulted the girl, too. Ripped her pants off on camera. No. It was accidental. If those are the standards you are using, it'd be really easy to set men up with "sexual assault". I do agree that they physically assaulted and kidnapped them, though. All these so-called “men” They are men, though. I don't see why you had to put it in quotations.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 08:02 PM
67

What next? Serving kids up to their serial killer mothers in platters so she can flay and chop them up to little pieces after torturing and mutilating them for months like they did in Brazil and Argentina?
/r/MensRights06/04/23 06:38 PM
6

She's terrified of half of the species She isn't. If she really was, she wouldn't have the audacity to speak like this. Everyone here knows which half of the species has the real power.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 06:31 PM
2

You only seem to be throwing around triggered ad hominems rather than addressing any of the points I or ElisaSKy made. if those countries are what you consider misandrist, then call me a fucking female supremecist mate Thanks for admitting that, Miss Female "Supremecist" Lesbian. you should stay away from those nasty nasty women I do, actually. Doesn't stop them for harassing me. They can't leave us alone even in our washrooms and locker rooms like the creeps that they are. And they will use the…
/r/MensRights06/04/23 08:08 AM
2

The husband has a "duty" to provide sex apart from money to the wife in India, though. Otherwise she can use it as grounds for divorce and take half his money and assets along with his children.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 06:58 AM
2

Yes. I've been to India and it's incredibly male-hostile. Females behave horribly and male police officers aren't even allowed to arrest them after 6 pm. The US and Canada, two misandric shitholes themselves warn their men about Indian women. Don't act like men are hard done by with laws surrounding rape So you're supporting your rapist sisters over there who get men and little boys charged and arrested with rape for being raped by them. Are you a rapist yourself, by any chance?
/r/MensRights06/04/23 05:16 AM
1

If 100 studies are conducted on the same thing and 99 of them agree It was a new meta-study. Probably doesn't hold cross-country. I probably shouldn't have started this argument without having the study in my hand. This is only time I've done that.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 04:38 AM
-2

I also shared this in a police sub to get other officers You mean other trigger-happy misandrist freaks who shot and killed god knows how many men? Based on the pure aguish and panic in Rusk's voice, I tend to believe he legitimately believed he was going to be raped if he hadn't pulled the trigger. Or maybe he was panicking because he though he committed a crime and is going to be imprisoned for it. There is no excuse for shooting an unarmed, defenceless man three times, period. I 100% agree wi…
/r/MensRights06/04/23 04:03 AM
1

you're one of those acab guys I'm not. Replacing the police with vigilantes would lead to even worse consequences for men since vigilante mobs specifically target men.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 07:59 PM
-1

It has a lot to do with him being a police officer. They are known to shoot and kill men who are being domestically abused by their wives (graphic video) or when they are called to resolve a dispute between female family members. He shouldn't be a police officer, period.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 07:52 PM
-2

So you want trigger-happy police officers going around shooting men? What's with these misandrist scum crawling out of the woodwork to brigade this sub whenever there is a chance to defend violence against men?
/r/MensRights05/04/23 07:41 PM
-4

You sound like the kind of guy who would defend a white knight policeman who shot a man dead by shooting him multiple times over some domestic violence accusation. I'm saying this again: People who are trigger-happy against men are not fit to be policemen.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 07:10 PM
-1

So what should be done in such a situation? And if a policeman is too trigger-happy, maybe he isn't fit to be one.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 07:02 PM
-14

Not buying it. You don't need to shoot someone three times in "self defence". Showing them the gun would be more than enough for the vast majority of cases. And yes, they are correct about a woman getting away with it. She would've gotten away with it for shooting him 100 times and killing him in "self-defence" and even get "donations" to "support" her for the same excuse but a man wouldn't get less than 10 years in prison if he shot a female even once using the same excuse even if she was tryin…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:52 PM
1

I don't think Jim himself was completely right in this situation. Why was he being hostile to Tom when his wife raped him? Even here, male on male hostility (both from Jim to Tom and Tom to Jim as retaliation) led to the downfall of another man while the actual female behind it got off scot-free. why did the woman who actually committed the sexual act get a slap on the wrist while the man got 10 years in prison as an “accomplice”? Wait, didn't you say Tom reported that Jim held him down while hi…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 02:15 PM
15

Everyone believes her about her previous rape allegations This was actually an advantage for you. Hell, it still is an advantage for you. She's the boy who cried wolf. Report her to the police, her school and spread the details about what she did to you to as many people as quickly as you can. Reporting her first gives you the advantage and the sooner she gets removed from society, the safer men and boys will be.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 01:50 PM
56

Damn. If I was in your place, I would've immediately reported that piece of shit to the school, the police and tell everyone I know (and she knows) about what she did after she sexually assaulted me given that she's already known to go around throwing rape accusations. That way, I would've had the first reporting advantage. You should've written this post earlier.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 01:38 PM
4

Well, yeah. Your fellow rapist femcel sisters over there literally rioted on the streets, demanding their "right" to rape men and boys and succeeded and those rapists now get men and boys who are raped by them get charged with rape and arrested. I'd guess they probably did this because at least 16.1% of the women in India are rapists (page 3) and they'd probably have to be executed or lynched if female on male rape gets recognised over there since there wouldn't be enough prisons to hold all of …
/r/MensRights05/04/23 07:52 AM
1

Yeah, but it's still an old literature review.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 02:40 AM
1

Yeah. I remember this study. It's an old study. The newer study I was referring to has the results flipped for the genders.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 06:09 PM
1

To be more precise, I remember the research finding that it's women who have a far greater tendency to say that men "like" being raped by women or that they can't be raped by women or something along those lines. Either way, it's hard to argue about the specifics without someone here linking that paper. It was posted here a while ago, but I'm unable to find it. And regarding the women larping thing, there's been a fair amount of new femcel sockpuppet accounts larping as MRAs and concern trolling…
/r/MensRights04/04/23 05:48 PM
1

clearly not talking about a study where people showed up in-person to discuss this No, it was an in-person interview as far as I can remember.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 05:33 PM
3

You were blackout drunk, weren't you? Are you sure that subhuman didn't try to take advantage of you and started throwing a femcel tantrum after you rejected her? Try and ask the people in that party who were witnesses and not loyal to her. If you do find that she tried to take advantage of you, file a legal case against her, both for sexual exploitation and defamation. Those oversized vermin predators deserve to get what's coming for them.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 05:06 PM
5

Every time a young boy is assaulted there's a whole gaggle of men publicly belittling it as "sex" and talking about how it's a male fantasy to be taken advantage of by an older woman That's been debunked. Recent research has shown that it's women who say that the vast majority of the time and the "men" who say it are also most likely women larping. I'm unable to find that research paper to support my claims. Hopefully someone here provides the source.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 04:46 PM
10

Just shithole things.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 08:45 AM
1

People who are pro-male. Feminists, tradcons, "pick up artists", simps, white knights, conservatives, ideological incels, "redpillers", vigilantes are all anti-male by default, often violently so. And true MRAs see them as enemies.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 08:47 PM
2

Ah, a sugar baby. Sorry, this isn't the right subreddit. Plus there's no proof that you're a man, either.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 08:12 PM
6

I grew up in a "normal" home with a mom and dad, also have a brother and a sister. You say that, yet you mentioned this I even had a memory resurface not too long ago of when I was 8 or 9 of my mom making me drop my pants If this is just what you can remember, then I wouldn't even be surprised if she raped you when you were too young to remember. Maybe report her to the police for child molestation so your dad can have a clean divorce without letting her steal anything from him. You and your dad…
/r/MensRights03/04/23 07:55 PM
0

So yeah, you want to be misandrist criminal scum yourself and I have no sympathy for subhumans like you. Hope you don't post here again trying to larp as an MRA asking for sympathy. Shitholes like redpill and conservative are more suitable for pieces of shit such as yourself.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 07:31 PM
1

You claimed that "you wanted to break every bone in a man's body" for non self-defence reasons, probably because you're sadistic against men. Am I wrong?
/r/MensRights03/04/23 11:31 AM
1

If I see any man hitting his girlfriend/wife for any reason other than self defense I will break every bone in his body. Ah. So you're a simp misandrist tradcuck. I'm sorry, but I don't feel any sympathy for you. Anyone who raises their hand on a man for any reason other than self-defence with minimal force is an enemy of mine.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 09:42 AM
5

No such thing as femicide. Women rarely ever get killed for being female alone. Androcide, however, is a real thing, wherein murderers, gang members, lynch mobs and prisoners kill men for their gender while they wouldn't kill a woman or a child in the same situation.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 06:49 AM
40

It actually makes sense why single childless women are happy. They can have as much sex as they want, even rape men who don't want to fuck them, don't have to spend their time, energy and resources raising kids, have multiple affirmative action programs for lucrative jobs, several welfare programs and don't have to worry about being threatened with, humiliated by, literally physically attacked for, lose their jobs and livelihoods because of and backstabbed by people close to them due to rape acc…
/r/MensRights01/04/23 06:15 PM
7

My wife travels internationally for her company and they have an office in India. But she doesn't ever want to go there. Good. She'd have free reign to be a rapist over there since her fellow rapists in India rioted on the streets for their right to rape men and boys and succeeded. It'd be safer for the men over there if a man from her company goes there, instead.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 08:26 AM
5

Are you sure your "step-mom" didn't diddle you when you were young? These types of people with femcelish behaviour usually do.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 07:22 AM
1

women are in India are literally getting raped by men You mean men are in India are literally getting raped by women legally because female rapists rioted on the streets for their "right" to do so and men and boys get charged with rape and arrested for being raped by females. There is no place where females have it worse than men, period. Show me a single place where female on male rape is exclusively criminalized with penalties ranging from spaying to death, only female on male "sex crimes" are…
/r/MensRights31/03/23 06:26 AM
4

Again, that's not the kind of nationwide enforced conscription which came around after the 1790s. It was either slaves or particular sections of men and some of them had to pay taxes to avoid it. The modern conscription resulted in people like you getting riddled with bullets at times.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 04:13 AM
6

Yup. Pretty sure the femcel creeps who made it as well as the target audience get off to the rape porn in this trash.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 03:49 AM
3

It's a substance which can easily set on fire, not one which can ignite on its own.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 08:15 PM
9

Drafts were the standard for EVERY SINGLE SUCCESSFUL SOCIETY, Western or otherwise, throughout history lol. Love how you people spout garbage so confidently. The earliest evidence of modern national conscription is the French revolution of the 1790s. Enforcing conscription had violent consequences a lot of times with people like you being lynched. A society that doesn't, is taken over by a society that does Or both societies just have their leaders lynched and replaced by leaders who don't enfor…
/r/MensRights30/03/23 07:58 PM
21

I couldn't care less about a shithole which uses me, my father, brothers and sons as meatshields. Any civilization which forces its men to die and kill other men deserves to burn to the ground and it often does happen as seen in history. The country I pay taxes to owes me, not the other way around. Men are a net gain to taxes while women and children are a net drain, so if anything, men should be given higher priority during evacuation. And regarding your fantasy situations with other countries,…
/r/MensRights30/03/23 07:34 PM
29

You people are the kind of misandric despots who oppressed men would gladly lynch so they could save their own lives and that of their fathers, brothers and sons and escape to safe zones. And I can’t even blame them.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 07:08 PM
9

People are desperate to get them into Europ Not the creatures in OP's screenshot, though. And the "letting refugees in" thing only works of they show "poor women and children" suffering in PR campaigns and even then it's always controversial when it doesn't involve only women and children on the ground too. Comparitively, harboring Ukrainian refugees was fairly uncontroversial because they mainly consisted of women and children.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 06:45 PM
18

Inflammable substances don't set on fire so off the bat You didn't answer my question. Assuming that the story of those murderers is true, why did the dumbfuck guards allow them to possess inflammable materials with which they could set things on fire? These men are prisoners of war No, they're not. They're detainees who are being detained for illegal immigration. they were terrorising the local residents to try and force their way into America Do you even realize how retarded this sounds? Why w…
/r/MensRights30/03/23 06:37 PM
22

to imports loads of those same men Nope. Only the "women and children" from over there.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 05:13 PM
31

And why would you believe anything coming from the mouth of the subhumans who killed those men? And even if some of them did start the fire, do you think all those men agreed to it? Why did those dumbfuck guards let them have access to inflammable substances?
/r/MensRights30/03/23 05:08 PM
34

These people need to be on a list. Their continued free existence is an active threat to men. This is one of the cases where I would agree with the enemy's (i.e., feminist's) unethical tactics.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 04:59 PM
9

The subhumans involved in this should either be given life imprisonment or the death penalty. Their continued free existence, especially as those in power is a threat to the lives of multiple men.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 05:25 AM
12

I’m so sorry to say this—men think with their dicks If men really do think with their dicks and all that's required to keep them content is sex, why is she unable to keep them around? Are her skills in bed really that bad?
/r/MensRights29/03/23 04:57 PM
3

Again, like I mentioned above, it's not because men want to "fuck" them. It's because they are brainwashed to be subservient and protective of females and hostile to males right from birth like most men and because men lack in-group bias. Even ugly, repulsive women get the same treatment by courts.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 03:16 PM
19

She's not hot enough for that. It's not about him wanting to fuck her. It's about him being brainwashed to be subservient and protective of females and hostile to males right from birth like most men. Even ugly, repulsive women get the same treatment by courts.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 09:38 AM
69

The judge who jailed a male teacher prior says he won't jail a female teacher. Men are men's biggest enemies.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 06:21 AM
2

I'd rather have a woman cheat on me with a man over a woman. There's another level of disgust associated with her doing it with a woman for me, probably because of how misandric a lot of lesbians and bisexual women are and the recent gruesome news articles about what lesbian mothers do to their sons.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 06:15 AM
7

I'm not talking about your language, though. I'm pretty sure those perverts actually did think they were "arousing" their targets. Most female exhibitionists and perverts do.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 06:09 AM
14

Female interrogators would wear revealing clothing and other tactics to arouse male prisoners as part of the humiliation. To "arouse" or to sexually harass? The only people this gross shit would arouse are the perverts interrogating them.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 04:14 AM
2

men do want more sex than women no matter how good the sex is Yeah, no. Men have a refractory period and having satisfying sex makes it unlikely for them to desire more sex or cheat. And even if they do want more frequent sex in general, it doesn't change the fact that they get very little satisfaction compared to women when they do have sex. They put in a lot more effort and are a lot less satisfied than women every time they have sex. men typically put forth time and effort Because society has…
/r/MensRights28/03/23 07:33 PM
36

So they got a bunch of ugly women who don't have the balls (or maybe tits is more appropriate here) to show off their own bodies to "mock" fit, young soldiers?
/r/MensRights28/03/23 07:20 PM
2

men want sex far more than women Yeah. And they wouldn't want more sex if they were actually satisfied with the sex they do have with women owing to the refractory period. 41 percent of men said they wish the sex they did have lasted longer and that their partner finishes too quickly without bothering to see if he is satisfied. This is further proven in other studies which have found that women are far more selfish during sex. Basically speaking, men get very little from sex compared to the wome…
/r/MensRights28/03/23 06:57 PM
6

sex is not a mutually beneficial transaction Agree. Men put in far more work, both physically and financially and are far less satisfied than women during sex. If anything, men should be the ones getting paid.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 06:18 PM
1

I disagree with your premise that men have any real power. The average female has more power than some of world's richest men. An anonymous nobody airhostess was able to blackmail Elon Musk, the richest man in the world, extort his money and still made him lose 10 billion dollars in a single day by claiming "sexual harassment" through an anonymous accusation. And we've seen these female nobodies anonymously bring down several "powerful" men across the world. All it shows is that men don't hold a…
/r/MensRights27/03/23 06:59 PM
6

It's not about women's attitude in and of itself. It's about the power they posses and how much damage they can do to you if they do decide to hurt you.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 05:21 PM
2

Men and women are judged by different standards. Yeah. Just like African Americans and European Americans were judged by different standards. Society is misandric. Everyone here already knows that. Women prefer a man who has been with a bunch of other women without going into extremes, men prefer women with a low body count. Well, duh. Men hate other men probably even more than women hate men. The overwhelming victims of male violence are men. Most female on male violence is by proxy because wom…
/r/MensRights27/03/23 04:27 PM
2

Yeah, no. "Slut" and "whore" are primarily misandric terms to shame the "pure maiden" who "allows herself to be defiled by those filthy men". It's kind of like the word "N-word lover" for European Americans in the Southern US states who sympathized with African American slaves. "Femcel" and its other variants are the only proper female analogues to the word "incel" which in itself was originally coined by a woman to describe herself.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 03:55 PM
53

It's not sad at all. Men are far safer staying away from females this way and could arguably even save a lot of time, money and resources, all while having a "girlfriend" who is far more resourceful and could even help them with their work.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 12:12 PM
-6

Yeah, but their ideal height for men would be somewhat lower, like 5'10-5'11 rather than 6'0, most probably because they measure height in cm. That's the reason I mentioned "to an extent" to height since the ideal height is a bit different in other parts of the world.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 06:38 AM
15

Your race (and even the obsession with height to an extent) arguments only apply to stats from the US and probably parts of Europe to a lesser degree, though I guess even the word "incel" is mostly used only in those areas.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 11:45 PM
10

They will obviously continue using it precisely because it triggers you. Just call her a femcel or a landwhale or a legbeard if she calls you an incel and move on.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 11:38 PM
24

Ah. Another series by femcels and for femcels. But the unfortunate reality is that a lot of these freaks can indeed get away with this in the vast majority of the world.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 11:13 PM
4

Your friend (and every male close to him) is in danger if she's his girlfriend. If I were you, I'd warn him to carefully breakup with her and if he doesn't listen, I'd try to keep my distance from both of them.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 06:18 PM
8

used to legitimatize violence against black people Against black men*.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 07:27 AM
36

If MRAs and men really had that much power and in-group bias, men wouldn't have been in such a sorry state to begin with.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 08:36 AM
6

Yes if men disappeared tomorrow women would do those jobs because their survival would depend on it. Maybe. But I still don't think enough of them would be willing to do dangerous jobs because as I mentioned, women still comprised only a third of factory workers even in world wars. Women also get higher GPA than men by the way. Do you have any valid source for that?
/r/MensRights16/03/23 10:30 PM
5

WOMEN IN THE FACTORIES DURING WORLD WAR 2 They were doing these relatively safe jobs while men were literally sent into the meat grinder with much higher fatality rates. You are proving my point. Women won't do those jobs unless their survival depends on it and even in the World Wars, women still comprised only about a third of the factory workers. I am from Canada and I know many women who had a good resume but were rejected by med schools because their MCATs score was not high enough. Canada l…
/r/MensRights16/03/23 10:07 PM
1

How disgusting and vile must those creatures be to exploit and humiliate a vulnerable and defenceless old man like that?
/r/MensRights16/03/23 09:51 PM
6

Not all factory work is dangerous. There are primarily eight types of factory work which include engineering, assembly, handling, machine operation, maintenance, quality assurance, health and safety and management. Women would mostly work in the quality assurance, health and safety and management sectors and they are relatively safe. There is a reason more than 90% of workplace fatalities are men across the world. There is no affirmative action towards a job where you deal with patients and life…
/r/MensRights16/03/23 09:43 PM
3

They are the majority of nurses, teachers, and also make up 30-50 percent of bus drivers, factory workers and doctors. Nurses, teachers, bus drivers and factory workers of the non-dangerous kind (which is where the majority of female factory workers work) are neither too dangerous nor too highly skilled to be unable to be replaced by men. The only significantly skilled job you mentioned is doctors where women make up 30-40% of doctors, but even that could be attributed to affirmative action poli…
/r/MensRights16/03/23 07:49 PM
-4

Both men and women have a natural instinct to protect women. I don't know whether this "natural instinct" has been empirically proven to exist, but even if it does exist, it can demonstrably be overwritten by social conditioning and countries like China and India are proof of that. Mothers killed their female babies during tough times because they saw females as a burden and males as providers. Men are disposable in a crude sense. Eggs are expensive or limited, and sperm is cheap or plentiful. N…
/r/MensRights16/03/23 03:46 PM
3

I'm still waiting for them to kick out and arrest that creep Michele Dauber.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 02:32 PM
7

MRAs are the last thing from tradcons and horny simps with low standards who would be ok with "any woman" being a creepy exhibitionist in a bikini.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 02:29 PM
7

They want to hurt you, by chasing off all other women from your life. They're doing him a favour by "chasing off" the creepy stalkers who visit those forums, to be honest.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 10:02 PM
2

Even wealthy men fall under average women in the caste system in most parts of the world. Just look at how an anonymous nobody air hostess was able to tank the net worth of the world's richest man by 10 billion dollars in a single day from a single online accusation. It can never happen the other way around.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 10:19 PM
7

What do I have to educate myself about? That those countries have disproportionately high male murder, lynching, suicide, homelessness, execution, imprisonment and violence rates? That male on female rape and male on male homosexuality are exclusively criminalized (but not female on anyone rape and female on female homosexuality) with penalties going upto death? Are you seriously trying to say that those shitholes are "safe" for men?
/r/MensRights13/03/23 03:45 PM
10

Same thing I said before applies to them.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 02:30 PM
16

Safe for men? Saudi Arabia. What? They behead and mutilate men in public. They had a male journalist dismembered alive. If you think women have it bad over there, men have it worse like everywhere else.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 01:55 PM
6

Not sure why you recommended it in this context. It shows that the death of the majority of men will turn out to be a good thing for the leftover men, which couldn't be further from the truth. While we do have female terrorists and gang rapists in that show, the victim of gang rape and severe abuse/starvation eventually evolves into a superhuman with super stamina who can "satisfy" hundreds of his rapists and abusers without them ever getting any retribution. It's only good as an ecchi series an…
/r/MensRights12/03/23 05:31 PM
5

How much money did you steal from your ex husband? You better pay him back all of it with interest. From your own pocket, by the way. Not by leeching off of another man.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 05:13 AM
1

To say youll punish one person more based on gender is retribution based on gender. I said the punishment given by parents should be based on how society reacts, not on gender. It's not my fault that society is sexist and reacts based on gender.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 04:00 AM
2

Let's not become the monsters we swore to fight. lol. We'll "become the monsters we swore to fight" when we manage to redefine rape as "envelopment by a vagina" and have its punishments range from life imprisonment to surgical spaying or death, define male homicide as manicide, a far greater crime than female homicide, make military drafts compulsory for women only, redefine all "sex laws" such that they can only be perpetrated by females, make fathers win child custody by default despite being …
/r/MensRights12/03/23 03:59 AM
6

In defence of the downvoted guy, I personally support this action in principle, once all of the social expectations are dropped and there's danger it's basically instinctual for us to just know that in most cases a man is going to be able to beat a woman and 0 affirmative action is going change that. It's just harder to beat up most men than most women, we are stronger and can take more damage. Bullshit. It's probably "instinctual" for for you to hit men. But don't speak for others. I get more s…
/r/MensRights12/03/23 03:27 AM
1

i don't think spanking your daughter more just becouse she COULD manipulate men like that is alright That's not what I said. "Society" isn't going to "punish" her for this, period. If anything, it's highly likely that it would punish the man even if he's the victim. So, the duty of a moral parent would be to take responsibility for that.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 06:56 PM
1

Well, she'd be trying to kill him, publicly humiliate him sexually, have people close to him backstab and abandon him and have him lose everything you worked hard for after raping him by falsely accusing him, a man of rape. He can't "proportionately" accuse her back and have society react similarly to her even if the accusation is true, so that's the reason my knee-jerk reaction says that such women who abuse their power might deserve death even if I'm usually against the death penalty.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 06:28 PM
1

Yeah. I'd probably beat my daughter up way more since there's no way she's going to face any consequences and is most likely going to accuse the man herself.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:14 PM
7

Ok, femcel. Bet this is one more law in your arsenal to threaten and rape men with. Of course you people would be happy.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 05:19 PM
2

my absolute best friend of 3 years said he was not going to keep in contact now out of nowhere So now you know that the piece of shit was a backstabbing snake and not really your friend. Use this opportunity to weed these backstabbing misandrist creatures out before they are able to cause real damage to you. Find out who is really loyal to you.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 01:55 AM
3

What's the appropriate response to "kill all men" when you know you can't get them banned, then?
/r/MensRights06/03/23 11:12 AM
27

I don't like the phrase "not all men". It almost looks like men are begging to be treated well by their superiors and that they are better than "those men". It's like African Americans or Jewish people begging the KKK or the Nazis with "not all Black/Jewish people". A proper retaliation to "kill all men" is "kill all women" and if you want it to be more attention-grabbing and inflammatory, then "spay/skin/burn all women" to give them a taste of their own medicine. There's no reasoning with those…
/r/MensRights05/03/23 11:17 PM
2

She's an open radical misandrist. I don't see how this is related to Mens Rights.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 07:07 PM
4

Don't reply to femcel trolls. Just report and move on. The freak you are replying to browses eyeblech and other gore subs/websites. That should tell you more than enough.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 01:14 PM
1

Hostility and violence towards men has always existed even before feminism, unfortunately. That's the reason feminism was allowed to take root and become the most successful and pervasive hate movement in history.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 11:15 PM
2

Looks like ChatGPT likes nude males and dislikes nude females.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 07:19 PM
5

Maybe violent misandrists who commit misandrist hate crimes must be given life imprisonment in a separate prison complex so they can kill each other or be given the death penalty. These people will never change and will always try to find excuses to attack and hurt men.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 07:16 PM
12

Why would someone who was "assaulted" deserve 11 million dollars, exactly? Unless their medical bill costs that much (near-impossible) or it leaves them with a debilitating condition which effects their high-earning potential (also near-impossible since such high earners are unlikely to be assaulted so badly since they usually have high security).
/r/MensRights01/03/23 11:38 AM
1

Please keep your attraction bias aside and think objectively. You haven't refuted any of my points about male vertebrates being naturally more aesthetic or male humans in their natural habitats being larger, more muscular, thereby having greater detail on their body, having sharper, more angular features, longer eyelashes and greater facial symmetry, all features contributing to aesthetics.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 05:41 AM
1

a stronger body odor Studies seem to show that both males and females find female body odour to be less pleasant than male body odour under similar hygiene, diet and presence of axillary hair conditions. Exploratory paired-comparisons revealed that female chemosignals, M = 38.48; SD = 17.04, were perceived to be significantly less pleasant compared to male chemosignals, M = 50.48, SD = 13.08; t(30) = 3.492, p = 0.006, and compared to the no odor sample, M = 52.05, SD = 8.89; t(30) = 3.945, p > 0…
/r/MensRights01/03/23 05:32 AM
27

I don't know about "body shaming", but males of vertebrates are almost always objectively more aesthetic than their female counterparts, be it lions, silverback gorillas, reindeer, peacocks, most birds and fish, male gaurs, etc., and this includes humans. Coming to humans, human males in their natural habitat are on average objectively more aesthetic than their female counterparts by virtue of their size and musculature when it comes to their bodies. Even when it comes to facial features, human …
/r/MensRights28/02/23 11:50 PM
2

try getting a tall white man into one of those indian ladies only trains Why would you want to throw that poor guy into hell?
/r/MensRights26/02/23 12:15 PM
4

sexual assault was rampant and often unpunished Yup. Upwards of 16.1% of Indian men report being raped by females as adults alone (page 3) and it's legal for females to do it, yet men don't get separate carts from those creeps. The vast majority (more than 95%) of pickpockets are women, yet men don't get separate carts for themselves. The female carts smell bad and have females fighting and behaving horribly in the absence of men, so much so that women want to be in men's carts, yet men can't ge…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 07:41 AM
28

She's trying to kill you, publicly humiliate you sexually, have people close to you backstab and abandon you and have you lose everything you worked hard for. That's what it means to accuse a man of rape. Remember that every time you try to justify that subhuman piece of shit or find excuses for what she did.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 12:52 AM
2

They're probably doing this precisely because their men don't want them. The men would probably kill them if they try to pull this on them.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 07:47 AM
9

lol. Only a femcel would think being raped by her loose, smelly, infected cunt after being overdosed with viagra-like substances which could potentially lead to penile necrosis or death along with other dangers such as STDs, penile fractures, penile frenulum tears and penile degloving only so she could give birth to murder machines would be a "good time".
/r/MensRights24/02/23 09:50 PM
3

This sub has its fair share of femcels larping as men.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 08:10 PM
5

like Jeffrey Epstein did Not even close. Epstein made them travel and live in luxury, paid them a lot and helped them pursue the careers they wanted and build connections. This, on the other hand is a rape dungeon-like situation where the boys were tied down and forcefully administered a viagra-like substance (which could be fatal) and raped by the women to give birth to murder machines.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 07:34 PM
8

More like raped by ugly jihadist women and potentially get STDs, penile fractures, penile frenulum tears or even penile degloving and viagra overdose induced death only for it to result in them giving birth to rape spawns bred to be murder machines. But of course femcels like you would think being raped by their smelly infected loose cunts is better than going to school for boys.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 07:16 PM
5

Yeah. Making posts about dating here is the equivalent of African slave men making posts about how to beg their White masters to treat them better and become better slaves in their forum rather than fighting for and taking their rights. Too many PUAs and woman worshippers in this sub. And a lot of men tend to turn on other men once they get into relationships with women.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 11:41 AM
1

She was trying to say that fathers should never be alone with their daughters and their friends. I kind of agree to a degree. I've heard of a lot of cases of females, especially minor females sexually, physically, financially and emotionally exploiting men by threatening them with accusations. The legal, social and institutional power difference is just too great. She's probably one such perverted creeps who did that to men.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 06:10 PM
-7

Why is this PUA garbage posted here? This is a Mens Rights subreddit, not a "how to become better dildos for your female masters and get validation from them" subreddit. It's dangerous for men to date or even interact with females without having rights, to begin with.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 05:13 PM
1

It was daughters and mothers who got away (and still get away) with raping their fathers and sons in mythologies (and real life) like Lot's daughters, Myrrha and Phaedra. I really wish Phaedra got the Prometheus treatment.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 05:11 PM
11

This femcel creep has been getting away with her nonsense for way too long. I don't know how male Stanford students could feel safe with her around even within a 10 km radius or how she was able to have kids. Probably raped her husband by threatening him with a rape accusation. That's the only way any man would do it with this creature.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 04:25 PM
2

The only "creep" I see here is the femcel sexually harassing a blind man.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 02:24 PM
1

Homosexual individuals are just rationalizing their way of sexual expression Except you were the one who was calling lesbianism "natural" and male homosexuality "desperation" in your first comment without any basis when biologically speaking, it should be the opposite.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 10:46 AM
1

Well, it is a matter of personal feelings, individual choices or preferences... It also depends on the person you're with, the connection you both have, and how is it done... Doesn't change the fact that the penis is the only sex organ which can give both the coveted g-spot and p-spot orgasms, not the vagina. Just go to the club and see all these girls move on the dancefloor... Yeah, no. That's not a study. Maybe you should also look at how girls drool like baboons when they see a toned/ripped s…
/r/MensRights16/02/23 08:34 AM
1

But women could also perfectly be able to stimulate their men's prostates with sex-toys and plugging tools, that were also existing since very ancient times Sex toys don't have the warmth, texture and pulse of a real penis and it wouldn't feel as intimate. Women are spontaneously emitting, on average, 4 to 5 times more sexual signals than men do. Could you elaborate what this means and cite your sources? Homosexual practices are culturally rooted, not naturally rooted. Explain homosexuality in B…
/r/MensRights16/02/23 07:27 AM
3

Ew. That's worse.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 06:50 AM
1

As a straight heterosexual male, I'm not so likely to get my prostate stimulated by another person, no matter about organs or tools that could be used for it. You can't generalize based on just your experience. There are several straight (i.e., not physically attracted to the male form in and of itself) identifying men who either have sex with other men or have their partners stimulate their prostates. For me, all of this firstly belongs to the social or affective part of ourselves, not the phys…
/r/MensRights16/02/23 06:19 AM
1

Nope. Lorena was the rapist here. She was an entitled femcel who was mad that John wouldn't have sex with her the way she wanted it and always pressured him to do it how she wanted and she even pressured him to have sex with her the night she attacked him. Hell, she even confessed it to the police herself before she met her lawyers who taught her how to lie. If anything, John should've been the one to chop off her vulva. Edit: Just because she was good at acting traumatized in your opinion doesn…
/r/MensRights16/02/23 02:17 AM
1

many homosexual male individuals I have known became gays because they were having hard time with women Are you sure it's not the other way around? There's a legitimate biological reason for healthy males to be homo or bisexual, which is the prostate and prostate orgasms, which are far more potent, longer lasting and have no refractory period unlike superficial penile orgasms. Penises are the only sex organs which can stimulate them, not vaginas.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 02:12 AM
2

If only Phaedra and Zuleikha (Potiphar's wife) could get the Jezebel treatment. They're false rape accusing failed rapists, by the way. They pretty much get away with it. Honestly, Phaedra must've gotten the Prometheus treatment, a level above the Jezebel treatment but with her genitals, breasts and tongue instead of liver and Theseus, her white knight husband must get a limited version of the Prometheus treatment for backstabbing his son.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 08:57 PM
2

Chastity belts already do exist for men. And who's Jezebel? The woman in this article is Amber Ellis.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 08:02 PM
2

The Ancient Greeks and Japanese were kind of like that. The men preferred to be with other males and male prostitutes were seen as more desirable, higher status and were more expensive. It probably has something to do with the existence of the prostate and how good prostate orgasm feels. The penis is the sex organ which can stimulate deep, full-body orgasms with no refractory period like prostate orgasms and g-spot orgasms unlike superficial penile and clitoral orgasms.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 04:57 PM
1

And that was indeed the joke I was commenting on. The implication for that seems to be that women are creepy exhibitionists and rapists who forcefully shove their breasts onto men's faces, making it difficult for them to make eye contact. And Full-Bluebird385 said FYI, not FIY.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 04:40 PM
2

What does FIY mean?
/r/MensRights15/02/23 02:16 PM
-8

It doesn't take long to shove her eyes in, either. Especially if it's a man trying to do it to a woman. Unless he is sleeping or vulnerable in other ways like in this case. Edit: I think men should be taught self-defence with regards to dealing with creeps and situations like these. I've seen way too many such cases.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 02:14 PM
2

It's basically implying that women are creepy exhibitionists and rapists who forcefully shove their breasts onto men's faces. Pretty sexist, don't you think? I do admit that it's funny, though.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 01:52 PM
25

I see multiple cases like these but don't understand how they happen. Why don't men claw their eyes out or bash their heads in and get them off when they try doing this? Do men really love their women that much or do the women target them when they are sleeping or vulnerable like cowards?
/r/MensRights15/02/23 01:49 PM
5

Why do men find it difficult to make eye contact? Because breasts don't have eyes! Is the joke that women are exhibitionist perverts who shove their breasts onto men's faces? Quite sexist, don't you think?
/r/MensRights14/02/23 09:08 PM
1

Are you implying that the femcel creeps and hags whining about Leo don't feel entitled to sex with him? They definitely do.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 08:26 PM
1

I'm talking about the new Bing with integrated ChatGPT. It provides sources for its answers to verify its accuracy, has real-time internet access and gives better answers to logical questions relative to ChatGPT. More advanced AIs like Google's PaLM can even explain complex novel jokes and solve elementary/standard graduate level Maths and Physics problems and I expect GPT4 (expected to release in the first half of this year) to have the same or superior capabilities.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 04:49 PM
2

I understand that this is peer-reviewed but could you post more studies without Richard Lynn as the author?
/r/MensRights11/02/23 03:45 PM
7

Interesting. Could you post those studies or articles citing those studies if you can?
/r/MensRights11/02/23 03:10 PM
2

No, you won't. Haven't you seen how powerful Bing's ChatGPT already is?
/r/MensRights11/02/23 01:13 PM
4

You can ask the same thing about the role of females once stem cell grown ova and artificial wombs take over. Something which will be expedited with the advent of more powerful AI.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 12:02 PM
2

Nothing that we know of. I'm just commenting about how pathetic he sounds.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/23 11:26 AM
1

I'm just commenting about how pathetic he sounds.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/23 11:25 AM
1

That's a gay male feminist lapdog, not a lesbian femcel. The things I mentioned about stoning and throwing off the roofs didn't happen to lesbians.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 02:18 PM
19

Guess you'd rather live in a world where you get stoned or thrown off the roof or gassed for being gay. Yes. Gayphobia/Homophobia is primarily due to misandry. The alphabet people really turn gay men and trans women into self-loathing pricks, huh?
/r/MensRights08/02/23 06:27 AM
1

Singular cases do not change the statistical fact that men make up about 60% of civilian casualties in Afghanistan with the rest being women and children.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 07:54 PM
1

Yet Taliban tortures and kills far more men than women. Men are made to go to universities because they are forced into the provider/slave role. You are disingenuously comparing the benevolent sexism which women face over there, wherein women are treated as poor, harmless victims meant to be protected and provided for like children to the hostile sexism which men face, wherein men and boys get frequently tortured and killed and forced into war and slavery.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 07:43 PM
-1

No, they don't. Women there are "free" to rape men and engage in lesbian sex legally while men get thrown off the rooftops or beheaded if they do the same.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 07:26 PM
8

"Women are sex-addicted sluts"? Misogyny. "Men are rapist"? Misandry. Those two inflammatory statements are not even in the same league and you know it. Calling men "rapists" is a dogwhistle to destroy their job and career, get people close to them to backstab them and have white knights and femcels attack or kill them. Calling women "sex-addicted sluts" would at worst hurt their feelings and give them ammunition to get you fired and at times even jailed in some countries.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 07:08 AM
8

He sounds like a pathetic doormat who is trying to defend his creep of a girlfriend/sister who leaked her ex boyfriend's nudes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/23 07:36 PM
2

Nikocado might be called disgusting or a loser but he makes bank with his onlyfans. Probably far more than any fat woman or most women in general could ever make with onlyfans. Hope he can eventually live a happy and healthy life, though.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 12:59 PM
10

Rich men > Rich women > Average women > Average men >poor men >= poor women This is blatantly wrong. The poorest woman can accuse the richest man of rape anonymously, extort money from him and get him thrown in jail regardless. The richest man cannot do the same to the poorest woman. Off the top of my head, just look at Anurag Kashyap, a well-regarded director. He consistently gets sexually harassed by females who are hoping for a casting but was in turn accused of rape by a subhuman hoping to b…
/r/MensRights06/02/23 10:04 AM
1

way better than most third world countries I don't understand how you can call a shithole which treats its men, the very people who built it like garbage "better".
/r/MensRights06/02/23 09:45 AM
48

mysoginistic society No such thing. Societies which are traditionally seen as "misogynistic" are just benevolently sexist societies, wherein females are seen as pure angels and victims meant to be protected like children. Sexism towards men on the other hand is of the hostile kind in every society. That's the reason the male suicide rates, murder rates, incarceration rates, homelessness rates are all overwhelmingly greater than the corresponding rates for females in every country in the world. T…
/r/MensRights05/02/23 08:19 PM
48

Of course it's shithole feminindia. Even men cursing at their female overlords is a crime in India. The subhuman male must know his place in front of the nobility, after all.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 07:38 PM
4

It's good that she doesn't have a son. She'd probably rape and abuse him if she did have one. We've had multiple such cases coming up recently about these misandrists doing just that.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 07:04 PM
23

Gross. Why is she dressed like a rapist in the gym? I feel bad for all the men who have to deal with these exhibitionists and perverts. That guy has a great jacked body, by the way. And "ripping his pp off"? That guy could crush this creep's skull with a single hand if she touched his dick.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 07:26 PM
42

That one was worse. They castrated him and kept that wound festering and kept modifying it for a year to look like a vagina without taking him to the hospital for well over a year before killing him, defiling his corpse, flaying and dismembering him. If only they could be given the same eye for an eye treatment of what they did to him.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 05:41 AM
2

This post is being brigaded by white knight simps and femcels who've never used this sub, but are larping as MRAs. Just a heads up.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 12:24 PM
10

always complaining about male patients like they are all perverts because they make one little compliment Pretty sure those creeps weren't actually complemented either. They just like interpreting everything that way and sexualize men to make themselves feel desirable.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 07:53 AM
4

More tradcon drivel. He says it's biological instinct to protect females and treat males as disposable. If that were the case, China and India, the two most populous countries in the world wouldn't have been killing their female babies in favour of their male babies when their times were tough since men are seen as providers. Misandry is sociological, not biological.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 07:00 AM
1

I think it's more common for the husband and wife to fight for the attention of the baby, to be honest. Although I do think the wife would win out most of the time because she would get to spend the most time with the baby due to societal reasons.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 04:32 AM
12

This sounds like an excuse a femcel would give to justify her use of sex toys while at the same time trying to shame men who prefer sex toys over her. No, dildos are not "better" than real penises. They can't replicate the warmth, throbbing or the texture of a real penis (yet). An honest woman would admit that if she prefers dildos, it would be because they are easier to use, take lower effort to access and don't make as much mess, not because they "feel" better. And men would mostly have the sa…
/r/MensRights31/01/23 04:39 AM
4

I work in the social justice/equity field, with a degree in gender studies. Damn. He shouldn't have married her. I feel bad for him. She is one of those people who are actively working to make men's lives worse. I'm honestly scared about what she will do to him now.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 02:38 PM
4

Those men are in prison right now, though. The women I mentioned aren't. And the money those men received is nothing compared to what someone like Pieper Lewis received, which is upwards of 150k with just donations and Lorena made upwards of 500k due to the publicity from her case.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 09:14 PM
3

I don't want the death penalty for anyone. I just said it was a knee-jerk reaction in my first comment and explained the reason for the knee-jerk reaction since freaks like Lorena and Pieper Lewis don't just get away with mutilating and/or murdering men, but make a lot of money through "donations". I've never seen men not just being pardoned, but making a ton of money for mutilating or murdering women no matter what their excuses were.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 07:59 PM
3

I was talking about socially dominant violent misandrists with typical misandric excuses who apart from getting pardoned also get monetarily supported by "society", but ok. I wouldn't expect logic and coherence from a femcel sockpuppet account.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 07:41 PM
7

Stabbing is different from cutting and severing, which is clear in the Bobbit case. She even took his penis and threw it away in some remote location.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 07:06 PM
24

How does someone cut someone else's dick off in "self defense"? They should've locked Lorena up and thrown away the key. I'd honestly prefer the death penalty for violent misandrists like her, but that's probably just my knee-jerk reaction. I'm against the death penalty but only such cases of violent misandry in association with misandric excuses which often leads to not just the pardon but monetary support of such women through donations leads me to have a knee-jerk reaction.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 06:45 PM
9

It seems like you only got triggered replies from femcels and legbeards, gaslighting and victim blaming you for your experiences in the legaladvice subreddit. But yes, it is in general dangerous to be around females for males. Not every female is bad, but each and every one of them has the capacity to hurt you at every level while being legally, institutionally and societally backed. Not everyone would be ok with holding a venomous snake just because it's never bitten anyone who's held it, would…
/r/MensRights16/01/23 03:13 PM
4

So following that line of logic, do women look for a live in wallet, plumber, electrician, lawn mower, car mechanic, butler, chef, dildo (not even prostitute since men don't get shit in return for sex) and/or nanny when they are looking for certain qualities in their partners?
/r/MensRights15/01/23 11:07 AM
5

It's not just the media. Even the average parent and teacher drill this into their kids.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 10:44 AM
39

Both the average man and the average woman hate men. They get conditioned to hate men from the day they are born.
/r/MensRights14/01/23 05:29 PM
5

lol what? Gay men (or men in general) make me feel way safer than women when I'm around them. It's women whom I have no legal (or social or institutional) recourse against. I'm glad my work is heavily male-dominated.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 07:16 PM
3

I'm not sure how to feel about this. Maybe it's better for men to quit teaching kids if it's safer for them. I do feel bad for the boys in the hands of those female teachers but I value the safety of men more.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 01:14 PM
12

This is another femcel concern troll. She claims to be a gay man and goes on rants about how men cannot be raped, especially by females. I won't be surprised if she raped a bunch of men.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 05:47 AM
2

They usually come out of the woodworks when men's issues in third world countries are brought up. And there were a shitton of them brigading in the Ukraine threads.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 03:42 AM
8

you will be bullied for not being a real man They are tradcons, not MRAs. "Real man" is just a dogwhistle which means "obedient slave for their female overlords and society" for them. True MRAs denounce tradcons but unfortunately, a lot of them infest this subreddit while larping as MRAs. Edit: You're not a gay man and are most likely a larping femcel concern troll who keeps ranting about how men cannot be raped by females. I wouldn't even be surprised if you raped a bunch of men.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 03:05 AM
10

Also add to that the day MRAs manage to redefine rape as "forced envelopment by a vagina" only, thereby making it impossible for men to rape, redefine domestic violence as wife abusing husband only, manage to make the draft female-only, define male murders as "manicide", a more serious category of homicide, courts start giving plea deals for men so they can put all the blame on their female accomplices to get a highly reduced sentence, men get the majority of child custodies and men get separate…
/r/MensRights08/01/23 12:57 AM
8

You're trying to bait this sub's users into validating your violent impulses towards men for some supposed ass smacking which may or may not have been illegal or even deliberate. A violent impulse which a man cannot get away with if acted upon a woman using the same excuse you are giving. I'm definitely not buying your "good faith" façade.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 03:50 PM
6

it happened to me once, and i wanted to slap him, but i didn’t. later i thought maybe i should have? Yup. This is femcel bait. Your post history seems to confirm this.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 03:21 PM
6

Even men see other men as subhuman (on average). Edit: Damn. First time I fell for femcel bait and gave a serious reply. I'll make sure to check the post history of every female poster from now on before replying.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 04:25 AM
12

Every sexual act we did was consensual Are you sure about that? She sounds like the kind of creep who would use the threat of rape accusations to have her way with males. Men and boys usually don't even register that in their minds. Try to recall if she did do that along with everything else she did and see if you can add that to her charges if you do plan on reporting her to the police.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 04:17 AM
0

Could you elaborate? I'd be happy if this is fake.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 03:30 AM
5

I hope it is, but unfortunately this is all too common, especially in third world countries where OP is from. The average woman and man hates men unless they can do something useful for them.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 02:48 AM
7

a dimension of racism here Which is a component of misandry and male hostility among tradcons. Indian men do the same with Pakistani men, for example. It's usually the demonization of "the other" male to show their female masters how much better slaves they are compared to "the other" males. That's the reason it was historically black men who were lynched, male refugees who were turned away (while female refugees like the Ukrainian women are welcomed with open arms), gay men who were persecuted …
/r/MensRights05/01/23 03:28 PM
8

I don't hate women. I do envy their privileges and acknowledge the threat they pose to me, though. And I use another account for other subs because I know the male hostile mods of other subs would ban this account for participating in this sub.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 02:34 PM
5

It's more related to tradcons and simps rather than white supremacy, to be honest. Probably femcels, too. There's a serious infestation/brigading of their kind in this sub due to the unfortunately low active user count in this sub.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 12:55 PM
11

The reverse card would be to replace your statement with men. Nope. That wouldn't apply to men. Firstly, male on female rape is illegal and it's a guilty until proven innocent system for male on female crimes in India. Secondly, a male can't accuse a female of rape, period, let alone after raping her in India. Thirdly, females don't get lynched for such accusations, but men do in India.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 12:52 PM
7

women in India get a raw fucking deal in so many ways. Oh those poor rapists who go around raping men and boys and accusing them of rape and getting them lynched. Such a "raw fucking deal".
/r/MensRights05/01/23 12:44 PM
21

It's the Indian numbering system. One crore is equivalent to ten million in the International system of numeration.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 12:18 PM
4

I'm all for men's rights, but... So you aren't for men's rights. Good to know. I'm just waiting for the day tradcon, femcel and white knight infestation in this sub ends but I guess that day will never come. Edit: What's it with the simps who have never been active in this sub and know nothing about the MRA situation in India suddenly coming out of the woodwork like cockroaches to defend m'ladies halfway across the world under posts like these? What "rights" of theirs are they trying to defend, …
/r/MensRights05/01/23 11:42 AM
14

Most women don’t engage in rape. "Most" probably don't, but upwards of 16.1% of Indian men report being raped by females as adults alone (page 3). That's not an insignificant number. However they do face the stats I mentioned due to gender roles. You still haven't provided the source for your "stats".
/r/MensRights05/01/23 11:21 AM
20

I’m sorry these statistics upset you but they are true. Then you shouldn't have any problem citing your "statistics", should you? Women face massive disadvantages due to gender norms in India. Like having the "right" to rape men and boys? Or having the "right" to beat their husbands?
/r/MensRights05/01/23 10:56 AM
21

Another femcel sockpuppet account, but let me entertain you. Where did you get these statistics from and did they account for those women leeching off their husbands/fathers as well as the state welfare schemes exclusive to females? The Indian Supreme Court has literally repeatedly called husbands slaves and called for forcing them to do even physical labor to provide for their families. millions of women are forced to be married before the age of consent So just like the men, then.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 10:34 AM
14

Yeah. Upwards of 16.1% of Indian men report being raped by females as adults alone (page 3), yet those rapists keep rioting on the streets of Delhi, demanding to keep their "right" to rape men and boys, AND they keep succeeding.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 10:28 AM
4

friends If they don't believe that you should have rights, then they were never your friends.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 01:10 AM
21

No. That wouldn't take all the men who aren't fathers into account. And it would again judge men based on what they can provide for their children. They wouldn't be valued as humans.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 04:57 AM
7

But this type of rape I would say almost certainly happens to women more than men. Again, what do you base this on? You haven't provided any statistics. I've provided both statistics and individual cases of this happening to men. Edit: Ok. So you admit you were wrong, then.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 12:11 AM
7

I'm denying that it's a reasonable risk that men may get held at gunpoint and raped in the bushes on a walk out at night. There isn't a reasonable risk of that happening to a woman, either. If you think there is, what do you base it on? Here are multiple documented cases of this happening to men https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manacled_Mormon_case https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/dennys-waitress-accused-of-sexual-assault-man-at-gunpoint/1933464/ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5174601…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 04:22 PM
3

While men do get raped, I don't think it's like "gunpoint on the sidewalk rape you in the bushes" type violent rape that would be relevant in a discussion of walking at night Actually, they do. Upwards of 7% of men report being "sexually assaulted" (including raped) by stranger females as adults alone (table 4). That's not an insignificant portion of the 19% of men who report being raped by females as adults alone.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 03:06 PM
1

it’s a simple fact that the overwhelming majority of men don’t value women with a high body count I don't deny that. It's also a fact that the overwhelming majority of men are misandric themselves and demonize the sexuality of other males. That's the reason we live in such a misandric society, to begin with. Men don't like most other men on average. Neither do women.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 03:21 PM
3

Down an alleyway or was it in a public toilet? I was referring to women who have safe sex, not those who are filthy and pass on diseases.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 01:51 PM
2

The trauma Again, tradcon logic. It's the idea that having sex with men is "traumatic" for women.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 01:02 PM
2

it's a sad proxy Why exactly is it "sad" that they enjoy having safe sex with men? Are you sad that they were "defiled" by "other men"?
/r/MensRights29/12/22 01:00 PM
10

Isn't that a femcel sub? Even the post you are featuring is written by a femcel who cries about being ugly in one sub and larps about being an oh-so-desirable sugar baby who makes lots of money with lots of suitors in another (femcel) sub.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 02:15 AM
1

Yeah. That's good, lol.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 01:23 AM
1

No. That implies she gets too much male validation. The implication should be that she gets no male validation and that she can't please any man with that hallway of hers.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 12:49 AM
4

I think Tate could've come up with another insult for her. She wrote "email me at [email protected]". He could've replied with. "Ok. Look out for a mail from [email protected]/[email protected]" rather than just a "How dare you?!". This is how femcels should be dealt with.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 12:43 AM
6

Yeah, no. True MRAs are not tradcons, even though many tradcons brigade this sub larping as one. A smart man, especially an MRA would know that female "sluts" who have safe sex with multiple men and don't backstab them are high value women who are safe to have sex with since they like male sexuality and won't hurt the men they have sex with before or after sex because of "regret" or whatever bullshit. This is apart from the fact that they have experience in bed and have a personality which attra…
/r/MensRights29/12/22 12:30 AM
4

Doing it with her brothers, father or other male relatives would definitely be safer. And they won't fund or support her if she tries to accuse you of something.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 12:26 PM
4

most of my friends, my job and even most of my family turned their backs on me This boils my blood. But on the bright side, it revealed who the backstabbing snakes are and who is loyal to you. I hope you are able to form bonds with people who are loyal to you.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 08:20 PM
1

"Consent forms" won't do anything. Video record the entire thing from the beginning to the end. She only gets to have sex with you if she agrees to recording the entire thing everytime.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 06:34 PM
18

Your post is so confusing. What's the problem here, exactly? That he kept your number? That he claimed the doctor called you when the doctor never did? That he asked you to come for another checkup? What is this "healing" you are talking about? What exactly do you want to "report" him for? Wrong diagnosis? Harassment? Edit: You also seem to be into drugs based on your post here and your post history. Is that the reason for your lack of coherence?
/r/MensRights27/12/22 06:10 PM
7

Okay. That's your opinion, but what makes you think men won't get raped? It'd be even worse for him in that case because not only would he be unable to report it but he is likely to get accused of rape instead.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 12:43 PM
16

Are you one of those exhibitionists? Why are you so triggered about calling out those creeps for what they are? Would you let one of them dressed like that near your children?
/r/MensRights27/12/22 02:36 AM
11

Sure you are. I think there are other femcel subreddits like twoxfemcel better suited for this larping of yours. You can talk all about how all men are incels, misogynists or whatever "as a man".
/r/MensRights27/12/22 02:29 AM
15

What's with femcels using the word "incel" whenever they can't make logical arguments? Why are you so triggered over calling out these creeps for, well... acting like creeps?
/r/MensRights27/12/22 02:24 AM
8

She definitely sees it as something sexual. She wouldn't be so ashamed of doing it in the presence of men otherwise.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 02:21 AM
3

because sexual encounters are much more risky for women than for men. Women risk pregnancy, which is an enormous life changing commitment, whereas men risk wasting an hour on a subpar encounter. You are just regurgitating a femcel talking point. Men risk far more in sexual encounters in the form of rape accusations and with the advent of modern birth-control methods, it's become even more evident.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 02:04 AM
20

So what they're saying is that they would be free to walk around like the exhibitionist creeps that they are and no one would report or arrest them (since most police are men). They unfortunately already do that, though.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 01:33 AM
3

If I shoved my dry finger up your butt without prep, I'm going to to out on a limb and say that this was more painful for you than for me. Except the penis is far more sensitive than a finger. The glans of the penis is as sensitive, if not more than the clitoral glans. Honestly, I'm feeling you're either purposefully arguing this point for with some ideological reasoning behind it or entirely oblivious to the sexual experience of women, specifically in film productions. Honestly, I'm feeling you…
/r/MensRights27/12/22 12:11 AM
6

the mega sizes of penises for simple PIV sex are not what vaginas are built for You are forgetting that men also suffer when the vaginas are too small and/or dry. They can suffer from penile friction burns or frenulum tears. Did you forget Newton's third law? If one of them suffers during intercourse, then it's highly likely they both do.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 11:14 PM
1

It only takes one woman to ruin you.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 10:05 PM
14

How so? Men also have to worry about penile friction burns, frenulum tears, penile fractures and anal injuries when pegging or doing something similar.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 10:03 PM
1

Now that the other user mentioned it, I saw your post about asking other women for permission before masturbating. I recommend that you stop doing it. It could easily lead to you being fired and potentially even being arrested or worse because you're a man. Stay safe and look after other men.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 09:43 PM
9

You are moving goalposts from "who puts in more work in porn" to "who "deserves" to get paid more". And I don't understand your statement about guys masturbating. There are several of those on pornhub with millions of views. And the man does not HAVE to do porn. The most absurd statement you've made so far even compared to the other absurd statements you made. Neither do the women.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 09:27 PM
7

You act like men don't perform cunnilingus and deal with gross vaginal fluids. they def take Viagra to stay hard So they take damaging substances regularly on top of putting in more work. And gangbangs Again, it's men doing the work even there.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 09:24 PM
20

The men have to stay consistently hard and do most of the physical work and thrusting. I doubt the women put any effort into "staying wet".
/r/MensRights26/12/22 08:31 PM
78

Yeah. The men put in a lot more work and effort.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 06:40 PM
20

He should've reported Ming Lee for sexual harassment. She touched him and show him inappropriate drawings of him to him as a minor.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 06:33 PM
5

she would always pull out a hair and leave it in the car Eww. She leaves her filth in the car? I hope she doesn't leave any other "bodily substances" of hers over there. I feel bad for those men.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 10:35 PM
10

Biological reductionism is often used by tradcons to justify their misandry. Men shouldn't be forced to break their backs working to provide for women. Women should be made to work, too to ease the burden on men. And education is key to that.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 06:24 PM
4

Not an excuse and there isn't even any evidence for it. It's a case study of how females can do the most vile things to men, victim blame/slander them and then get the media/public/courts on their side.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 04:23 PM
17

It's a typical excuse given by these lowlives. If Thomas Merriman, for example murdered that piece of shit and gave an analogous excuse, people would just laugh it off and wouldn't even give it a second though and it wouldn't effect his sentencing even one bit but Jade won't just get a reduced sentence, but will most likely also get "donations" for this.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 11:14 AM
78

No. It's Pieper Lewis. She was a runaway who was provided shelter by a man. She later stabbed him repeatedly in his sleep and gave the excuse that he was "sex trafficking" her, a common excuse given by these freaks. Firstly, she's an obese ugly murderous freak, so no way would anyone "sex traffick" her. There wouldn't be any demand for her for them to take that much risk. Secondly, she wouldn't stab him in his sleep if he really was doing what she claimed he was doing and would be afraid of him …
/r/MensRights20/12/22 09:52 PM
90

Watch them victim-blame the man and defend these freaks soon. There was a freak from a similar demographic who murdered a man and didn't just get away with it but ended up earning upwards of 100000 dollars through "donations" with her excuses recently in the US, didn't she?
/r/MensRights20/12/22 09:01 PM
-1

I didn't change my argument. I've always been consistent about how you freaks keep defending femcels advocating for male genocide purely because of her gender since you wouldn't do that for a male advocating for female genocide. You people are the primary reason for the sorry state of men, after all.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 06:58 PM
-1

Sure, Mr. White Knight. What "you" think is irrelevant here. It's what people in power think. If a guy said the equivalent of what that femcel said and it reached as many people, he would lose his job and livelihood as well as most of his friends and relationships regardless of what excuses he gives. Unfortunately, most people in power are male hostile white knights like you.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 06:39 PM
-1

Sure. There definitely isn't an all-pervasive global hate movement reinforced by gynocentrism which could've caused this. It must definitely be the fault of men. And if a guy says something like this, he's just an incel who loses his job and livelihood.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 06:17 PM
-2

women who are bitter about men interact with the men that use them as fuck toys You are literally blaming men for how this creep behaves. No, men aren't the ones "using her as fuck toys". She's the one "using men as fuck toys" since she doesn't see men as human and only wants to use them and wants them to die after she's done using them be it sexually, financially, physically or emotionally. This is the problem with tradcons. You always try to find excuses for how these femcels behave and try to…
/r/MensRights20/12/22 01:48 PM
3

How is that relevant here? You still seem to blame the poor men she is going to exploit and use as dildos rather than this creature who wants to use them and wants them to die after that. You seem to be implying that she "deserves better dildos", maybe like you. Why is mensrights upvoting this garbage comment victim blaming the men?
/r/MensRights20/12/22 09:52 AM
2

Those girls are definitely the kind of creeps who would grow up to be rapists, specifically using their female privilege and the threat of accusations. How is your relationship with your parents now, by the way?
/r/MensRights20/12/22 09:12 AM
3

Femcels circlejerking and defending creeps of their kind. Nothing new.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 09:07 AM
6

Yeah. That's what I basically said in my first comment.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 05:35 PM
28

The ones who get sexual pleasure out of it are sadists. I don't think all women who abuse men necessarily do it for sexual pleasure.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 05:29 PM
119

To establish dominance. They are socially dominant and they know it. Karens don't just bully small men but also larger men and they get a kick out of it because they know the men can't do anything about it. And contrary to popular belief, they bully women and children even more because they can handle them physically. That's the reason why the domestic violence rates are the highest among lesbians and women commit the majority of child abuse.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 05:01 PM
9

I think she was a pedophile trying to control her urges. I can't think of any other reason. I don't see how anything you did can be interpreted as a sexual gesture at all unless she was already having urges. Edit: Women tend to do this a lot. They blame the men for their peversion. An example would be perverted exhibitionist women blaming men for looking when they wear inappropriate clothes. I think it's a similar case for this woman.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 04:48 PM
17

It's not just slander. It's attempted murder if you are calling a man that. Basically a dogwhistle for misandrists to have their way with the man.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 08:38 PM
1

You didn't answer my question.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 02:34 PM
1

You obviously don't mnow what gaslighting means. It's exactly what you're doing right now. He is the one disrupting work. Lol he's not the one spreading sexual rumours about that college dropout femcel and making the workplace hostile for her. What "work" is that worthless parasite even doing?
/r/MensRights15/12/22 01:37 PM
1

Yes but that doesn’t populate the earth as much as one man and several women. What makes you think "populating earth" was the aim here? Most people would value quality of life more. Women with several men just has a few select kids who don’t share the same dad as each other. Few select kids who can be provided for, as opposed to few men with several women having several kids who cannot be provided for.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 07:46 AM
13

Or her father. Her father himself will support him when that femcel accuses him of something.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 06:51 AM
1

He was not gaslit lmfao. Typical gaslighting femcel. Edit: Also, He's can't read social cues Not an excuse to sexually harass him and disrupt his work.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 01:51 PM
6

I'll talk to them and see if they have any actual evidence that he's guilty What evidence are those creepy slimeballs going to have when the police doesn't have any? Hell, basing on how they behave, it seems more likely that they are the "rapists", not him. It's really common for females to rape males and then accuse them of rape.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 11:38 AM
10

If OP truly does believe what he wrote in his edit, then he should probably be more concerned about reporting the creeps sexually harassing him rather than who they are shipping him with.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 11:03 AM
16

They know he's a rapist, the whole school knows it, and it's not just a rumor. Fuck off. It's hard to feel sympathy for you when you yourself are involved in bullying this poor guy and perpetuating this label of his when there isn't even any evidence of it.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 08:13 AM
1

What I meant by "other way around" is Keyaru must've killed the women and raped the men to the point of ecstasy. At least that would be a new concept and Keyaru wouldn't come off as a misandrist.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 10:13 PM
1

his parents could even sue him for not providing for them No. You don't seem to know much about the laws of China and India at that point in time. They couldn't sue their sons for that. They just believed the "biological fact" that males are "providers" and females are "parasites" and that made them make a different choice in their social context. because men will sacrifice more to save a woman and it is not a "rational" behavior, its instinct as well No. They do that because they are conditione…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 10:11 PM
4

Redo of Healer is trash, too. He kills men and rapes most of his female targets to the point of ecstasy. It should've been the other way around for a change, honestly. Edit: But "other way around" I meant Keyaru must've killed the women and raped the men to the point of ecstasy because what we've seen in Redo of Healer has already been overdone in hentai and is frankly misandric.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 06:19 PM
14

Can you imagine that say Pugsley had dropped, say, eels into the pool during the swim practice of a girl bullying Wednesday? Nah. It should be piranhas in this case, too. In the scenario you are describing, the eels would only penetrate her, not spay/castrate her. Piranhas would spay her and it would be a more one to one comparison.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 06:17 PM
1

I think studies have shown for men they would sacrifice 3 men for 1 woman In which societies and in which period? Because China and India in between 1950s and 2000s sacrificed their female babies in favour of their male babies because they believed their female babies would grow up to be parasites and the male babies would grow up to be providers during tough times. Again, these things are not "biological" or "evolutionary" tendencies. They are moulded by society.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 06:13 PM
1

No one sexually harassed him. He did that. He is the sex pest, the sexual harasser. He harassed no one. He made the joke without any malicious intent. They were the ones making up sexual rumours about him and sexually harassing him. The HR and other office femcels were the ones who were being malicious. They were the ones who were persistently hindering his ability to work. They were the ones victim blaming and gaslighting him. They are the sex pests, rapists and parasites. Why do you weirdly ke…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 04:23 PM
4

Rather, the idea is that so long as there are generally more women than men, society will keep humming along. So can a society with fewer women than men. In fact, there are papers from reputed journals suggesting that more men reproduced compared to women outside Africa in the past, i.e., multiple men were having babies with few women and leaving out unfit women, so men were involved in sexual selection, too.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 04:16 PM
1

The HR and the femcels consistently sexually harassing OP are the only sex pests in this story. OP only shared a joke and he only did it once. you'll continue to be ostracized. Ahhahahahahaha enjoy your bubble, it must be nice and cozy in there. Although I don't think you know what the worst ostracized means. Either that, or that was some A+ projection.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 08:16 AM
9

Love your study-backed posts. Keep them coming. Edit: There is one statement I disagree with We're protective of women due to the evolutionary idea that one man and several women produces more children than one woman and several men, so society believes women's lives need more protection and view men as disposable This seems to be your own statement and not from one of the studies you cited. This is a fallacy. One man mating with several women would not lead to a stable society. Firstly, the man…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 06:25 AM
1

Don't waste your time hoping anything for me; put that into yourself. I have it all already. As long as you femcel legbeards defend this kind of behavior and sex pests; you'll continue to be ostracized.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 06:11 PM
1

Thank you. I hope you get the help and love you need in life, too.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 07:23 PM
1

Stop blaming women for men’s actions Says the femcel defending the sex pests consistently sexually harassing OP.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 05:51 PM
22

men are seen as the evil people just waiting to do bad things to women. You're wrong here, OP. They aren't seen as evil people. Those creeps only use this as an excuse so that they can abuse and rape men. Why would they see men as "evil people" when the women asking for this are rapists and abusers themselves?
/r/MensRights11/12/22 03:05 PM
1

Another brigading femcel trying to justify consistent sexual harassment faced by OP. It's you who needs professional help.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 02:58 PM
0

Only femcel legbeards who think the world revolves around them think that such a joke is "sexual harassment". Weird or gross? Sure. But not sexual harassment. And even if it is sexual harassment, I don't see how it's acceptable for the femcels to sexually harass him many times after that.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 10:42 AM
-1

Nope. He just told a joke. He was the one who was consistently harassed by being removed from his department and having sexual rumours made up about him to the point that it made him cry multiple times even as a man and was then gaslighted and victim blamed by the femcel HR. You just want him to be the harasser because you're a femcel.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 09:49 AM
0

Who else but a femcel would justify consistent sexual harassment of men?
/r/MensRights11/12/22 09:02 AM
-1

And? I still don't see why the "feelings" of a college dropout femcel who only seems to be good at hindering other people's work and leeching off others should be prioritized over a productive veteran. Are you seriously suggesting OP deserves to be consistently sexually harassed and victim blamed? Well, I wouldn't expect much from a femcel.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 07:58 AM
0

Why is this comment being downvoted just because it's wishing OP well? This sub really is being infested and brigaded by femcels and white knights larping as MRAs.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 01:26 AM
3

His comment history seems to imply that he doesn't respect himself much, not that he doesn't respect women. In fact, he worships women too much.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 01:17 AM
2

Finally an answer I agree with in this thread. This sub, particularly this thread has been infested by male hostile tradcons who hate male sexuality larping as MRAs unfortunately.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 10:31 PM
3

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/MensRights10/12/22 05:03 PM
0

Nope. Flipping the genders would mean Margot Robbie being kissed by a guy she finds just as unattractive as Brad Pitt finds Margot Robbie. Not Brad Pitt himself kissing Margot Robbie.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 10:17 AM
5

No. Females are the upper "caste". "Caste", not "class". A literal nobody anonymous "Air Hostess" singlehandedly caused Elon's net worth to drop by 10 billion dollars in a single day by an anonymous online accusation. Such a scenario with the genders reversed is unthinkable. He pays millions of dollars in child support and he's definitely not "on our side". Elon is a misandric piece of shit who slanders men with labels that can get them attacked or killed like that heroic diver involved in Thail…
/r/MensRights10/12/22 09:51 AM
6

I think it's far easier to find movies where women are not hitting men than anime where females are not hitting males or anime where males don't worship the females.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 09:40 AM
0

You are presuming that Brad Pitt finds her attractive and flipping the genders based on that presumption. That's not necessarily true.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 11:35 PM
2

Yes. It's pretty obvious based on OP's post and post history.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 11:30 PM
3

No, what part of OP's comment said that?
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:50 PM
72

You'd be ok with drunk middle aged women sexually assaulting your 16 year old son and then accusing him of staring at them though?
/r/MensRights09/12/22 02:01 PM
-8

I think what your mom said to you is more indicative of transphobia rather than misandry. At least in the instances you mentioned.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 10:43 PM
2

it is objectively worse when it happens to a woman Not really, no. Women in the present day have morning after-pills and several other options for early abortion even in the rare chance that they actually do get pregnant. Men, on the other hand live under the threat of a rape accusation (basically a threat of murder) from a woman after being raped by her apart from other things like child support. It's objectively worse for a male to be raped by a female, especially in the present-day society.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 06:42 PM
10

Yes it would. The only reason "rape" is historically taken as seriously as it is is because it has been defined in a way which can only be done by men so that it can be weaponized against men and brutalize them. There are several other such crimes like high treason (by means of sleeping with royalty) which were used as an excuse to torture and kill men. And the femcels want to keep it that way, which is why they keep protesting and rioting for their "right" to rape men and boys around the world …
/r/MensRights08/12/22 08:21 AM
24

That misandrist piece of shit definitely doesn't "deserve" a TIME magazine cover praising him and venerating him as "person of the year".
/r/MensRights07/12/22 08:41 PM
1

Except she hugged you without your consent at least once and her breasts must've definitely touched you. It's a clear-cut case of sexual assault. I don't know why you're out here defending sex offenders.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 09:30 PM
1

you would wonder how many men claim to be heterosexual but consume this stuff It makes sense, honestly. The fit male form is aesthetically pleasing and attracts the attention of everyone regardless of their orientation. There's a reason most (pretty much all) sculptures of ancient civilizations were of fit naked men while naked women were considered obscene things meant to be covered up. And being able to attract a male audience would definitely count as a success for most porn content producers…
/r/MensRights06/12/22 05:29 PM
0

So she's a disgusting creep who regularly molests and sexually assaults you and you think SHE's the victim? lol. It would be better if both of you got fired for the safety of men in your workplace. Ideally, she'd be in prison.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 11:28 AM
4

some lady made a fraudulent claim of sexual harassment against me when I was a few hundred yards from a transit station waiting for the bus as I was waiting for a bus and about two or three white knight manginas thought they were gonna attack me, I blasted them with pepper spray and I even used my slapjack Based. Should've used it on her, too. Twice as much. What brand of pepper spray do you use, if you don't mind answering? I hope it doesn't leak and has a good range.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 03:45 AM
3

Your link doesn't work. Here is the working link.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 02:26 AM
0

It does happen when the person accusing her is a minor. Here is the hierarchy of privilege in present day society (legal, institutional, social): Minor female > minor male ~ adult female >> adult male. The people higher in the hierarchy cannot be "accused" by people below them and even if they are, they face little to no consequences. When the "upper caste" throws an accusation at the lowest caste, it can even result in his death. The truth of the accusations is irrelevant in both cases.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 12:25 AM
15

Simps usually only degrade themselves. White knights are the ones who are actually male hostile and an actual threat to other men.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 12:04 AM
13

I'm sorry if this offends you but it's highly likely that your mom raped your dad (and probably her exes, too) if this is the mindset she has.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 10:53 PM
45

It reminds me of this video where women got really butthurt when BTS boys treated a woman half as contemptuously/suspiciously as the average woman treats the average man.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 08:46 AM
6

I would say no and I assume most MRAs would also say no. What I noticed from this video is that all Asian men, who are usually taught to be cautious around people rejected a stranger like her (and I would reject her for the same reason) while most African American men, who probably aren't taught to be cautious, especially with women seem to be accepting her offer, which is odd, considering their history with European American women. Most (pretty much all) women would say no for this same reason …
/r/MensRights02/12/22 04:08 AM
7

That's not what I said at all. I said that women with high number of male sexual partners but without STDs, unwanted pregnancies and didn't backstab men before or after sex are "high value" and more trustworthy for hookups than women with low number of male sexual partners.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:52 PM
12

Men can contract STDs as well and can do all the stuff you mentioned, yet society sees a man with high ncount as successful I don't know which society you're talking about, but men with STDs definitely aren't seen as "high value".
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:23 PM
17

I don't know about "low value" but I personally see women with a high number of male sexual partners who didn't contact STDs, didn't have unwanted pregnancies or didn't backstab the men they had sex with before or after the deed with accusations as "safe" in terms of "hooking up". They have proven themselves to be desirable to men, don't hurt men, like sex, know what to do in the bed and are savvy with safe sex. If anything, they are "high value" (at least in terms of hookups) for me.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 05:40 PM
7

I am yet to see forums talking about the mass rape of men and removing their rights tho They don't just talk about it. They straight up riot on the streets for their "right" to mass rape men and boys and succeed.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 01:37 AM
7

Isn't this the same femcel magazine where the legbeard authors wrote an article about how funny it is when their female staff members beat up and abuse their spouses and boyfriends?
/r/MensRights01/12/22 01:22 AM
1

I don't remember where I read it but I read about a teacher being sent nudes by his student while threatening him to get into a relationship with her. I don't remember how things went down exactly after that but he was in trouble and was traumatized. I read another such story, too (probably a youtube comment) but I don't remember its details.
/r/AntiFeminists27/11/22 09:12 PM
1

calling others 'gross' for trying to claim that underage girls send erotic photos of themselves for sexual curiosity (I've been called this in Parenting subreddit) I've heard some horror stories of these freaks sending their nudes to men (usually their teachers) and blackmailing them to get into relationships with them or raping those men or financially/emotionally/socially exploiting them.
/r/AntiFeminists27/11/22 04:23 PM
14

After reading some of your other comments about her in conjunction with this post, I would advise you to find a way to safely dump her while keeping a record of everything she says and does. She's an actual threat to your life, career and well-being. She's also a threat to other men in your life.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 10:31 AM
24

I can see why the MRA movement in South Korea is so aggressive if they are even prosecuting and "indicting" old, vulnurable and celebrated men for the "crime" of holding a freak's hand five years ago. His Squid Game fame probably also has something to do with this.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 03:35 PM
26

All the jokes about unsightly Middle-Aged Men in Lycra, complaints about tight clothing revealing everything it shouldn’t. Say the exhibitionist femcel freaks who go around harassing men everywhere from gyms to workplaces with the creepy way they dress.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 10:28 AM
14

I'm surprised that this was even reported by the media in India. These things done by women usually get covered up at every level over there.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 03:33 PM
2

Are men getting raped and murdered by women at the same rate? As I said, they are getting raped and murdered at a higher rate. 19% of men report being raped by women as adults alone. But the sad thing is, most countries do not even recognise female on male rape and charge men and little boys with rape for being raped by females, leading them to commit suicide or get killed in misandric prisons or by misandric mobs. I don't understand why femcels are obsessed with who is the perpetrator to determ…
/r/MensRights23/11/22 11:48 PM
2

Are men getting raped and murdered at the same rate? No. They are getting raped and murdered at a far higher rate. You’re leaving out the terrifying overpowering sexual assault by the opposite sex What does this mean? Please elaborate. I hope you're not one of those femcels who wants to claim that "sexual assault" is the biggest fear of women just because it's one of the very few crimes females MIGHT (key word here is might) experience more than males, thereby making females out to be the bigges…
/r/MensRights23/11/22 11:27 PM
1

Yes. That is an objectively true fact. There's a reason why we live in a phallic world and a lot of buildings are phallic because the design of the penis is considered to be aesthetic. That doesn't mean I hate vaginas. I'm just pointing at the audacity and entitlement of those women to send an aesthetically inferior pic AND demand money, while men don't demand money despite sending aesthetically superior pics.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:59 PM
1

I didn't say that and you're shifting goalposts.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:51 PM
44

Assuming this is true, why do they even keep freaks like these around in those companies? All they do is hinder productive men.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:47 PM
2

I think what they're doing is way more respectable than an entitled creep demanding money after flashing you and disrespecting you. This is not even mentioning the fact that vaginas on average look more aesthetically grotesque compared to penises (looking at symmetry, smoothness, influence of the phallic world, etc.,), making it even more offensive.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:43 PM
3

Ok. Have a good day/night.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:38 PM
8

When did I say that men who send dick pics are onlyfans models?
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:18 PM
9

but its got to be other men doing the violence in the vast majority of cases And why does that matter? I'm saying that men are far less likely to whine and whining alone is not an indicator of actual statistics.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:17 PM
10

Loads of dick pic stuff, hardly any men complaining about vaginas in their inbox. Just because women whine more doesn't mean they experience it more. Women also whine about violence against women but it's an objective fact that men are 70-80% of victims of violent crime everywhere in the world.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 07:53 PM
5

There's also this ✊️ and this 👐.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 07:18 PM
21

they are a tiny tiny proportion of all women So are the men who send dick pics.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 07:16 PM
19

most men aren't offended by a bit of nudity, most like it You sound like an onlyfans femcel who sends unsolicited twat shots to men and demands money.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 07:13 PM
22

lol no. Women send unsolicited twat shots and are even more offensive about it, asking men to pay for them.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 06:59 PM
27

Meh. There are several emojis which can be associated with cave cunts. And men need not necessarily associate this image with a small penis since this emoji was originally designed to denote "a small amount". I wouldn't get triggered over it just because some femcel wrote an article about it on Vice.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 04:57 PM
6

I replied "some men" Don't beg for validation from these femcels. I'm pretty sure no man is "sexualizing" these creatures, either way, leading them to lash out at men for the privileges they grant to attractive women.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 01:19 PM
2

Chads don't have sex with these creatures and if they do, they aren't Chads.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 07:25 AM
10

This. And the terms women give to such men are powerful and have criminal connotations with dangerous implications for men and their careers while "slut" would at most offend women.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 07:15 AM
1

There exist convex locks akin to male genitals and concave keys akin to female genitals, lol.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 07:12 AM
2

You need not be a fan I wasn't making an argument. I was just giving my personal opinion on the matter. There is a massive swathe of impulses humans have that we deny every single day We are in agreement, then. ignoring that the build and strength of the average man makes him an overwhelming force against a woman, and a danger to most men I disagree here. I mostly see women and minors as a greater threat than men to me because of their social and legal power over me apart from their ability to u…
/r/MensRights20/11/22 04:35 PM
72

Femcels aren't known to be the most consistent or coherent people around. Good to know that this creep stays away from men, though.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 02:36 PM
6

I dont think men are taught to hate other men, I truly think it is a biological imperative to distrust men not of your recognizable 'tribe' in order to protect yourself and your own from threats. That is a possibility but I'm not a fan of biological reductionism since it makes men's situation seem hopeless. I also believe that social programming is a far greater determiner of behaviour than biological impulses. For example, China and India favoured their male children in times of crises and abor…
/r/MensRights20/11/22 01:50 PM
2

this streamer, Rushia, got a boyfriend Wasn't she creeping on him? He wasn't her boyfriend and I don't think he liked her advances on him.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 10:45 PM
14

I'm not sure if this is entirely accurate. There was a study which showed straight men on average were also less likely to date bisexual women compared to straight women, so the "threesome" fantasies are not as common as you think, not to mention most lesbian porn is consumed by lesbians/women. But the difference is that they have never been systematically and violently discriminated like gay men. A lot of times people chalk female privilege and male hostility to "men being horny" but I believe …
/r/MensRights19/11/22 09:22 PM
9

Men have always been perceived as dirty until proven otherwise It's not about being "dirty". Femcels, even the bisexual ones often tend to try and put the blame for their insecurity back on men (in this case bisexual men) by calling them "feminine" or "dirty" or bringing up butt stuff (which they don't ever bring up for female partners). The real reason is that they are insecure that they can't completely control your sexuality and exploit you (and it's also partially because of penis envy), so …
/r/MensRights19/11/22 08:43 PM
4

The gay one?
/r/MensRights19/11/22 08:41 PM
45

Lesbians are more accepted than gay men around the world, study finds. But why? The same reason why Black men were the gender getting lynched, immigrant/refugee men are the gender rejected (while refugee women like Ukrainian women are welcomed with open arms) in most countries, male "sex offenders" are the gender who get exclusively prosecuted in the vast majority of the world and "lower caste" men are the gender who were exclusively not allowed to marry up in countries like India. The underlyin…
/r/MensRights19/11/22 05:53 PM
24

Please stop putting the blame on men again. No way such creatures got to sleep with "the top 5% of men".
/r/MensRights19/11/22 03:31 PM
2

I've seen Japan do this a lot, too. Making "memes" or "trends" mocking the same old men they are leeching off of. Their media (namely anime) is a good illustration of their misandrist as well as ageist attitudes.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 03:09 PM
1

I understand. If he really does behave the way you claim, then he's a male hostile tradcon subhuman larping as an MRA but you are ranting under the wrong thread and wrong comments.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 02:51 PM
0

What does that have to do with the topic at hand, though? When did OP mention thetinmen?
/r/MensRights18/11/22 01:00 PM
16

not worry about getting hit on I see this excuse often being used by femcels and creeps. Trying to put the blame for their creepiness back on men.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 05:22 PM
-11

That poster actually looks glorious, though. It would definitely catch my attention. Edit: Not sure why calling the fit male form glorious (which it is from an aesthetic viewpoint, making it the reason most sculptures of ancient civilizations were of fit naked men) triggered "MRA"s. Maybe the femcel brigading has something to do with it.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 12:02 AM
24

It's pretty obvious those comments are from buttblasted femcels based on how they write but at least most of them seem to be criticizing him for reasons other than rejecting the female student (though the other reasons seem to just be excuses). I wouldn't bother. His wife, however, seems to be a creep who thinks she (and women alone) is entitled to look at naked men just because she is female (if what he wrote is true). He should be wary of her.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 02:16 PM
17

Stop downplaying her actions by calling her a "slut". She's a creep/predator, not a "slut".
/r/MensRights16/11/22 01:48 PM
1

He said I was now going to be gay. He pulled a gun to shoot me but hesitated. This just sounds surreal to me. Assuming this actually did happen exactly as you described, is your father mentally challenged? He doesn't even seem to like your mother, so it's not like he did this to protect her. So did he actually do it because he thought you would turn gay? Instead, my sister and mother took charge of me and he took off. Could you elaborate this? What does "took charge" mean? Did they try to protec…
/r/MensRights16/11/22 07:17 AM
4

You know what's also legal in Russia? Wives beating their husbands, women raping men and women falsely accusing men of rape. I guess it's now justified for Russian men to go around skinning Russian women's vulvae and killing them.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 02:03 PM
7

Another femcel trying to victim blame the men and being upvoted by other femcels and simps brigading this sub.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 01:46 PM
0

Suuure.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 09:49 PM
0

-A man Nice larp, femcel. Stop acting like you were ever an MRA.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 09:47 PM
6

The kind of guys similar to femcels like you who think "femcel", "legbeard", "landwhale", "spinster", etc., are "misogynist" slurs used to "oppress" (lol) women.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 09:02 AM
2

"I let you have sex with me" That's an incentive for her, not for men. Men are the ones who do all the work even there. If anything, that's one more aspect where men are not being adequately compensated.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 08:12 PM
3

rape is about power, not sex That statement is literally an oxymoron. If rape was only about "power", then it wouldn't be called rape specifically only when sex is involved. It would be called assault.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 04:53 PM
0

Another tradcon MRA larper.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 04:33 PM
1

Honestly i am surprised those guys are not being shot for treason. And I'm surprised the drafters are not being shot for self-defense. In times of martial law upon invasion, every able bodied male is required to take up arms in defense of the country. You mean in times of martial law upon invasion, the country must try its best to defend its men, the majority tax payers.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 04:19 PM
2

abandon friends, family They would be the ones abandoning me if they expect me to die for them while not expecting the same thing of themselves. wait to die The objective is to survive and doing whatever it takes, even if it involves shooting misandrist drafters or backstabbers (like those Russian ex-wives) in the face. I'd rather avoid violence, especially towards men and only use it in cases of legitimate self-defense.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 01:00 AM
2

Otherwise you do what? Hide? Go to jail? Whatever it takes to survive. you should probably let those that care about you know so that they know not to rely on you I doubt they really are "people that care about me" if they expect me to unconditionally die an excruciating death for them without being ready to do the same for me. If they really do care about me, they would be happy if I successfully escape the draft.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 12:33 AM
10

No. It's just a bunch of tradcons acting up. They aren't regular users of this sub. Certain posts with certain types of titles tend to be brigaded by tradcons and femcels in this sub since the sub in and of itself unfortunately isn't very active, making it very easy to brigade.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 12:19 AM
0

Seeing as how they might not have a country to return to I'd be glad to see the shithole which tried to use me as a meatshied after stealing my taxes and giving them to females (males are net contributors and females are net beneficiaries of taxes) burn.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 11:00 PM
7

No. They can't "continue to send people to try and draft you" if they get the hell out of that shithole.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 10:06 PM
2

The country is only about to be extinct, how can it stand for it's men The least it could do is help its men escape safely. Hell, men should be given priority in this regard since they are the majority taxpayers, employment generators and civilization builders.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 09:34 PM
4

Is the other question about self-defense? Yes, I think it's ok for the men being drafted to defend themselves and shoot the misandrists trying to draft them in the face.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 09:30 PM
13

You aren't obligated to save another person? No one is obligated to save another person putting their own lives on the line, especially on a gendered basis.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 08:48 PM
10

Dude u the one who said the society is telling men to kill themselves Yes. That's what Ukraine and Russia are telling their men. When did I say, men should kill themselves. You literally just said that men should die for that shithole. Men should stand for their country No. The country should stand for their men. if that means killing yes it should be done So I guess you support the Nazis too. Assuming there is no police or in case of riots someone attacks a person's house - should he run away o…
/r/MensRights07/11/22 08:20 PM
8

So who has the power according to you? Who is the master that has enslaved all the men? Misandric leaders. So your country, society, school, friends and family is forcing you to kill yourself and have said u deserve to burn? I don't know about my family and friends but you certainly seem to be saying that. that doesn't mean the society wants to kill men But you sure do want these men to kill each other.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 08:03 PM
5

Maybe, but his post history makes me think he's a tradcon.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 07:57 PM
20

So then why don't you rebel against ur country? Because I don't have the power to and most men like you want to remain slaves. This implies u r a slave Yes. Men are basically slaves from legal, social and institutional standpoints in pretty much every country. u choose to be enslaved No. It's you who chooses to be enslaved and men like you (the majority of men) keep perpetuating this system. Duties towards countries is different then gender issues. Shitholes which force their men to kill and die…
/r/MensRights07/11/22 07:17 PM
20

Why don't you go to the frontlines and get blown to bits or burnt to a crisp if you are so eager to support Ukraine, Mr. internet tough guy?
/r/MensRights07/11/22 07:12 PM
30

A man can't run away from his duties to his motherland. Men don't owe that turdhole shit. If anything, it's that shithole which owes its men for paying the vast majority of taxes and building the country in general.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 07:07 PM
15

A country/civilization which forces its men to kill and die is a country/civilization which deserves to burn and fade away.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 07:01 PM
17

You mean she would spooge on his face if he allowed it. I doubt Henry is interested in her. The article itself sounds like Millie's fantasy.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 10:22 AM
2

He also seems to have a lot of hate for women That doesn't look like "hate" to me at all, unless you think disliking an ideology which enables femcels to march and riot for their "right" to rape men and boys means "hating women", in which case I would assume you think all women are femcels and rapists. I also would not blame him if he actually had genuine hatred for women, considering how he is surrounded by femcels and creeps and seeing how his own sister backstabs him.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 09:56 AM
2

This post seems to have attracted and been brigaded by creepy femcels u/mattisactuallyhigh u/fractiouscatburglar u/Y_Sam u/iamnotroberts u/CouvadeShark u/Dietcokeisgod u/amayagab u/MagicGrit who seem to feel entitled to sex and orgasms from men and have been sexually harassing weirdornxtlvl and you. Why haven't you reported them yet, Demolition? These are precisely the kind of creeps you were talking about in your post.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 07:49 AM
82

Good. He knows how to deal with the "nobility" and how to protect himself from them, I guess.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 06:58 AM
4

Your sister sounds like a creep. The fact that she sexualizes you at your age makes it look like she wants to take advantage of you with such an allegation. Inform your parents about her first and make sure they separate her from you. With regards to the slimeball spreading rumours about you, do you have any idea why she's doing it? Did you reject the femcel's creepy advances? If so, you could add "sexual harassment of a minor" on top of "false allegations/malicious rumours" to make your case st…
/r/MensRights06/11/22 06:45 AM
120

it’s a significant turnoff to find out a man has been intimate with another man More like a significant blow to their ego. They are a lot more controlling of their men's sexuality than the other way around.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 05:49 PM
66

She's the typical creepy entitled femcel who is trying to cope with the fact that gay men wouldn't have sex with her. That's also the reason why she's ok with lesbians since she feels validated by them but not gay men. They try to put the blame on men by calling it "unmanly" (whatever that means) but at the end of the day, it comes down to them feeling insecure. In this context, it's really creepy how she says she'd be ok with her lesbian daughter but not her gay son.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 05:47 PM
7

If they are being creepy and inappropriate, then it's good that they fear you.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 06:25 PM
52

It's not about "guilt" or "innocence". They just want the male "subhumans" to know their place and treat the female "overlords/nobility" with reverence. There wouldn't be so many Karens if women were so afraid of men. They are well aware of their social dominance and make sure to use it whenever they can.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 06:18 PM
13

when I am the vicinity of women all of them disperse almost immediately Those femcels were probably making creepy comments about men.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 06:00 PM
2

Eww. Are you implying that you want to date the kind of women who send their men to their deaths while scurrying away like cockroaches themselves?
/r/MensRights30/10/22 07:35 AM
5

Yes. Women in India already rape their husbands. Up to 41.2% of Indian men in the age range of 35 to 45 report being raped by women, most of whom are their wives (Table 3.2), yet these femcels are campaigning for a male on female marital rape law specifically so that they can gain more power over men and rape them impudently. The femcels in India know that a lot of them would have to be executed or lynched if female on male rape was recognised since there wouldn't be enough place in prison for a…
/r/MensRights30/10/22 07:28 AM
28

most lesbians like this are this way as a result of trauma Please stop it with the excuses and sympathy mongering for these creeps. They are not like this because of "trauma".
/r/MensRights25/10/22 07:44 PM
2

The racism you are talking about is in fact a manifestation of misandry from tradcons. Which groups in the past were the most effected by "racism" or any other "-ism/phobia"? It's men. It's black men/boys who were lynched in the past, it's homosexual men who were persecuted, it's migrant men who were discriminated against, it's lower caste men who couldn't marry up, so on.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 12:07 PM
10

Isn't that the same sub where the legbeards were whining about the man not making his proposal flashy enough despite him being broke and working hard to buy the ring? It was on this subreddit a few days ago.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 11:00 AM
1

It's highly likely she raped them, too after drugging them but Indian police and laws, being the misandrists they are wouldn't even acknowledge it.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 06:13 PM
2

Again, those are tradcons pretending to be MRAs. There are a lot of those even in this sub.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 05:59 PM
62

She seems to imply all lonely men are either incels or "nice guys", nice to get in her pants. These femcels and legbeards often tend to be creeps who hypersexualize men and treat them as dildos dying to be used and defiled by them. They're disgusting.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 06:10 PM
11

I think you are conflating true MRAs with tradcons who larp as MRAs. There are a lot of those. Tradcons don't just hate gay/bi men but also most straight men except themselves and maybe their family/friends, though they probably would still put a random female ahead of a male family member. Also, a lot of gay/bi men who subscribe to the LGBT ideology tend to be misandric and feminist lapdogs so I wouldn't trust gay/bi men who calls themselves a part of the LGBT.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 02:15 PM
9

He most likely rejected that creep, leading her to engage in this pathetic display. It's normal in India. Boys get charged with rape arrested for being raped by females in India. One can only imagine how many such cases exist.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 11:12 PM
4

This is the reason I always carry a secret voice recorder with me. If I were in your place, I would buy a secret voice recorder and bait her into repeating what she said.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 06:01 PM
3

lol how would a fetus survive and grow in a scrotum? Femcels aren't very creative or smart, are they?
/r/MensRights16/10/22 04:17 PM
18

I doubt Henry ever had to actually flirt with anyone even before the metoo era in order to date them. And I don't see why the twitter femcels are getting so upset about this. It's not like he would ever flirt with them even if it was "acceptable" to do it. Hell, his bodyguards wouldn't allow those creeps even two meters near him.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 02:26 PM
56

If he actually was trying to drug you, it need not necessarily be for "rape". It could also be because he was trying to steal your money, valuables or even organs.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 11:35 AM
4

marriage benefited men more than women perhaps 100 years ago How? I don't see how marriage would've ever benefitted men. They break their backs working all day, die in wars/emergencies and provide sex to the women and what do they get in return? The woman cooks and cleans the house which would take 2 hours at most.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 04:58 AM
1

What role does "instinct" play in studies like this where people have enough time to think and answer?
/r/MensRights15/10/22 05:24 PM
-1

"Biology" plays minimal role in most decisions people make and ideologies people hold. Social conditioning plays a far greater role. For example, China and India, the two most populous countries were aborting their female babies left and right when they were impoverished because they believed that the female babies would grow up to be parasites and male babies would grow up to be providers. Now that India and China pulled themselves out of poverty, they value their female babies more again and t…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 11:50 AM
41

Because males are conditioned to "be grateful" to females who are sexually inappropriate to them while females are conditioned to "see sexual inappropriateness" in males even when it doesn't exist since birth.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 11:21 AM
48

The only thing that can be confirmed is that men are more likely act on their pedophilia No. The only thing "confirmed" is that men are "reported" to be more likely to act on it. There are other statistics which show that females are far more likely to be "child molesters" when they get the opportunity. For example, 9 out of 10 suspects of sexual abuse in juvenile prisons in the U.S. are female staff members despite females making up less than half of the staff and males being 60% of the staff.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 11:12 AM
0

He certainly allowed himself to be treated like a used dildo. Blaming the victim now, are we? This is just a bunch of celebs... who actually cares? Note the sub you are in. I care about him because he's a man.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 05:49 PM
3

How does valuing himself and having self-respect turn him into an "arrogant piece of garbage"? Does he have to be a simp and a female doormat like most men to not be considered arrogant?
/r/MensRights14/10/22 02:09 PM
4

No. That creep is Sumner Stroh, a different person. She used him for sex and money and threw him under the bus like a used up dildo after she was done with him.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 02:04 PM
8

What makes you think she's telling the truth? Why would a handsome, popular singer hit up a random butterface creep like her?
/r/MensRights14/10/22 12:46 PM
73

Typical creepy femcel trying to brag (read lie) about how hot and famous guys tootally want her and can't stop "harassing" her.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 08:32 AM
3

I know that it was originally meant to be gender neutral but people use it in gendered terms these days.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 08:21 PM
15

No point in having a proper argument with femcels. They just keep throwing insults. Just insult her back or move on.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 05:10 PM
14

not all women are assholes who want to ruin the life of men It's not about them "wanting" to do it. It's about them having the power to do so on a whim. Tell me, would you deliberately sign a slave contract and become someone's slave just because that person is a "good slave owner"?
/r/MensRights13/10/22 04:38 PM
10

It's not even "hormones". Men are just brainwashed since birth to seek female validation and "society" forces men to confirm to that and worship women. Men wouldn't stay in sexless marriages if it was "hormones" compelling them to do it. They would get screwed by a divorce and often times they only get "legitimized" if they have a female validator.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 04:35 PM
25

You forgot one more thing. Many murderers, especially those of the vigilante kind kill men in scenarios where they wouldn't kill women or girls. They specifically look for men to attack and kill.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 02:45 PM
1

No. I meant what I said. "Females" as in both adult and minor females, not just women. Tradcons want men and boys, especially men to remain slaves to females with far fewer rights. I know that femcels get upset with the use of the word "female" but this is not the right place to rage about it.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 07:33 PM
0

yeah if you are the 1950s man that beat your wife because your football team was losing, I am not going to support you. Could you please stop with the historical revisionism? Male on female domestic violence was never legal. It's female on male domestic violence which was, and still is legal.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 07:20 AM
7

if men are so necessary that they have to keep doing their "male role" (working for money) for women even after divorce then all divorced women should be forced to go to their ex- three times a week and fuck them and clean and cook for them for as long as it takes the ex-husband to find a new wife. Nope. That still sounds way too unequal. The husband breaks his back working 9 hours a day and he is acting as a dildo to pleasure the wife and all the wife has to do is clean and cook? That takes 2 h…
/r/MensRights08/10/22 05:15 AM
4

I was thinking the same thing about having a male equivalent of "Teeth", especially considering the fact that female on male rape is equally or more likely than male on female rape. stuffing a bat wrapped with barbed wire up their cooters Or have their cooters have a friendly meeting with a running belt sander. Let's see how "funny" the women in the audience find them and how many times they whistle and holler.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 04:33 AM
6

I don't know why even the mensrights subreddit is upvoting anti-male presumptions of men being hypersexual dildos willing to be used by women.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 07:16 PM
49

Take your pathetic tradcon attempts to coerce men into being slaves for females and society elsewhere. I don't know why your kind relentlessly tries to infest the mens rights moment trying to larp as MRAs.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 06:44 PM
5

When men try to support each other, its viewed as "oh no one member of patriarchy supporting the other" We are going in circular arguments now. That "patriarchy" narrative was able to gain traction because MEN sanctioned it after the feminists proposed it. You are conflating MRAs with men. The vast majority of men are indifferent to or hate men, at least those outside their family. That's the reason why I keep saying if men (not just MRAs) actually supported each other, we wouldn't be in the pli…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 05:55 PM
5

In fact, if no one actually cared what they said, then we won't have these issues to begin with. People "care", almost too much about what they say because men gave them that power since men don't like men. Most men's rights meetings are completely shut down, ignored and given little to no importance by society. Again, that wouldn't be the case if men cared about each other. They tend to hold huge protests and forcely walk in and disrupt meetings related to men's rights. Because they know that t…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 05:00 PM
24

don't forget that men working together to others looks like "the patriarchy" By "others", do you mean femcels? Who cares what they say? Their words wouldn't have as much power if men supported each other to begin with.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:52 PM
80

Men wouldn't be in the situation they are in right now if they supported each other even half as much as these femcels do.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:30 PM
3

Honestly it's evil to have children these days anyway. 50% chance it's a boy. If you willingly bring a boy into this misandrist world you're either horrifically selfish or just evil This. It's unethical to bring a boy into this shithole of a world.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:21 PM
2

Typical excuses for female creeps. "Oh, she's willing to ruin your life and potentially get you killed because she's abused. Please improve your relationship with her." That creep sexualizes her sons, fantasizes about them fucking little girls and shares her fantasies with strangers, something very dangerous for the boys, not the creep. Unless she is trying to protect her sons by keeping them away from minor females, she deserves no "improving the relationship". The only thing the therapist must…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 07:32 AM
5

uncles ,older bothers, family friends More like mothers, aunts, sisters, daughters and female family friends, considering the fact that females are far more likely to be "sexually deviant" compared to males aside from the fact that females are also the vast majority of "child abusers".
/r/MensRights07/10/22 06:33 AM
2

I wouldn't want men to be put in a place of danger, either. I've seen way too many cases of female creeps (both minors and adults) sexually, financially and emotionally exploiting men under the threat of false accusations. Also, regarding "the last man on earth that I thought could do such horrible things did them to his own daughter", are you sure it wasn't the other way around? Those freaks always use the ultimate weapon (a false accusation) against men when they can't rape men and get what th…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 03:41 AM
33

I'm sorry if this offends you but your mother sounds like a creep if she fantasizes about such things. Please keep her away from your cousin and try to recall if she touched you and your brother when you were younger. The fact that she brings that topic up by herself out of nowhere strongly implies projection, which a lot of female perverts tend to do with men.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 08:22 PM
2

I believe in Male rights No you don't. Tradcons who believe men should be slaves to females and society don't "believe in male rights". They're being a fucking man. Being a man is a biological state, not a title or a profession bestowed based on how much of a slave you are. some of y'all on this sub are just pussies who haven't felt the touch of a woman Gross. Stop measuring my value based on how good of a dildo I am to women. If it's a young boy or an elderly man, would you still say that a gro…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 03:08 PM
2

You're not an MRA. Please stop larping. You are a tradcon who wants men to remain obedient little slave boys who serve and die for their female overlords who uses the typical tradcon "real men" rhetoric to coerce men into being slaves.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:26 PM
2

I don't have any answer to your question, but I hope you get through this and find happiness in life. I'm rooting for you.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 09:57 PM
15

This is precisely the reason why I wouldn't just treat both the genders equally but would PRIORITISE helping men. I know that there are several people willing to help women and children, so if I don't help men, no one will.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 08:56 PM
8

When will people become more empathetic again? You speak as if people ever had "empathy" for men. "Empathy" has always been reserved for females, be it victims or aggressors.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:22 AM
49

I don't see why you are that concerned about female validation. Additionally even most straight women will say women are better looking Well, of course they would. Women are the ones who spend hours caking themselves up with makeup and photoshopping and morphing their pictures. As a straight male I'd say I find maybe a quarter to a third attractive. I think your standards are too low. Objectively speaking from an outside perspective, males of most vertebrates are more aesthetic looking in their …
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:54 AM
6

transwoman beats transman lol this is cope. Female (straight, lesbian, bi, transman, whatever) beats male (straight, gay, bi, transwoman, whatever), period. Be it from a social, legal or an institutional point of view. Transwomen can't accuse females of rape (while females accuse transwomen of "being creeps" all the time) nor can they escape draft. And tradcons are all about reinforcing this female privilege.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:00 AM
9

You are just validating that femcel by being defensive about such a statement. No, 90% of women are not "sexually harassed" by men. Those creeps just sexualize every interaction they have with men. And no, they aren't as desired as they think they are. Female on male rape wouldn't be so high if they were.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 02:45 PM
15

There's an even lesser shortage of women with a thing for young boys. Studies have shown that females are more "sexually deviant" than males since most of them respond genitally to homosexual and zoophilic stimuli as opposed to men.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 04:38 AM
4

tortures, and of witnessing the ritualised sacrifice and consumption of other children You are heading into conspiracy theory territory now. Could you elaborate what you're talking about and what exactly happened to you? The Aztecs are long gone.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:49 PM
2

I think many people here must've seen Jennifer Lawrence groping and molesting Weinstein at the Oscars. It was creepy as hell. How many more such women must've sexually assaulted him, presuming that he must be grateful for that and demanding roles after that? Those same women then turned around and accused him of rape after that.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 03:20 AM
1

Just message the mods.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 03:07 AM
1

I think it's better if you appeal it. Some male hostile actor seems to have infiltrated the mod team.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 03:01 PM
1

Your posts seems to have been removed for some reason.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:04 PM
16

"Man up" is a term used by femcels and other slave men to coerce men into being good little slave boys for females and "society". You are a prime example of a femcel who wants men to be good little dildos which PAY the female who uses them.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 03:53 AM
17

For rape*. Her seeing nothing wrong with what the prostitute did strongly implies she's been raping men, too and thinks that they should be grateful for it. Or she might accuse the men of rape.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 02:23 AM
31

Your girlfriend probably made more money after raping men and demanding them money, probably by threatening them with a rape accusation.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 02:08 AM
1

Your ignorance of paraphilia is showing. There are multiple studies which show that far more women have a "smell fetish" (and most other "sexual deviancies") relative to men. Here are Study 1 and Study 2. From the first study I linked: women ranked body odor as more important for attraction than ‘‘looks’’ or any social factor except ‘‘pleasantness.’’ From the second study I linked: Eighty-seven percent of women and 56% of men had intentionally smelled their partners’ clothing.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 02:41 AM
2

is irrelevant to the theft of women's panties? Yes. Because there are many more people who steal it for financial reasons. Also, it's women who get turned on by filthy stuff like body odour far more than men, not to mention 87% of women tend to sniff their partner's clothing as opposed to 56% of men. From the first study I linked: women ranked body odor as more important for attraction than ‘‘looks’’ or any social factor except ‘‘pleasantness.’’ From the second study I linked: Eighty-seven perce…
/r/MensRights23/09/22 02:38 AM
1

But do not be too sorry about them. Wasn't there apparently a video emerging of Ukrainians castrating a Russian soldier? Wasn't there a bounty placed on the head of the person who did the castration?
/r/MensRights22/09/22 05:30 AM
1

this wasn't my argument and you know it No. It was your argument and I know it. I can even quote you again replying to the comment stating that most underwear thieves aren't men. This is your quote most of the time it is actually men And yes, it is a hill I want to die on. pretty much all pervy panty thieves are men You might like the idea of being desired to that extent, but unfortunately it's not true. It's highly likely your underwear was stolen because female underwear is more expensive than…
/r/MensRights22/09/22 05:24 AM
4

Your point about a market supposedly existing for old bathwater and used panties is irrelevant to the point at hand concerning stolen underwear. I suppose it's possible that a woman stole the underwear This is statistically the most likely. It's a well-known fact that female underwear is far more expensive than male underwear. Or maybe she did it for her own pleasure. https://www.latestnigeriannews.com/news/5648878/woman-steals-underwearother-items-from-neighbor.html https://www.nwfdailynews.com…
/r/MensRights22/09/22 04:15 AM
2

How many of those are women stealing from retail,stores/warehouses rather than for personal fetish reasons? Who cares what their "reasons" are? You made a claim that most of the underwear stealers are men. I proved that it's far more likely to be women. Also, where's the proof that the man who stole underwear in your article did it for "personal fetish reasons"? There's nothing in that article which states that. Female underwear are much more expensive than male underwear, so it makes sense why …
/r/MensRights22/09/22 03:47 AM
3

Even I can post multiple articles of women stealing underwear https://www.latestnigeriannews.com/news/5648878/woman-steals-underwearother-items-from-neighbor.html https://www.nwfdailynews.com/story/news/crime/2017/12/22/blotter-woman-steals-underwear-from-calvin-klein/16779678007/ https://www.journal-news.com/news/crime--law/police-woman-steals-underwear-from-department-store/589KiM3vps3rFiqAqaxnTN/ https://www.lehighvalleylive.com/bethlehem/2012/03/bethlehem_woman_steals_underwe.html https://ww…
/r/MensRights22/09/22 02:49 AM
5

most of the time it is actually men Got a source for that? It's far more likely to be women, either straight or lesbian, considering the fact that most thieves are women. Femcels tend to fantasize about being so irresistable that men even desire their disgusting shit and piss covered underwear but men don't yearn for them as much as they think, which is why the female on male rape rate goes as high as 19% (for males being raped by females as adults alone).
/r/MensRights22/09/22 01:53 AM
3

Why are you presuming that it's a man stealing that disgusting stuff? I'd say women would have a bigger reason to steal it, not to mention the fact that most pickpockets are also women. The femcel larping and concern trolling is becoming uncontrollable in this sub.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 01:39 AM
8

Nice larp. Also, "beautiful woman", lol. I guess every average and below average woman is "beautiful" for femcels.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 02:37 AM
11

This is the kind of female entitlement which leads to 19% of men being raped by females as adults alone (table 4).
/r/MensRights20/09/22 02:09 AM
12

Typical femcel take. Sorry, men aren't your dildos always ready to pleasure you. I hope you don't rape men using this excuse.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 01:50 AM
10

Typical trivialization of male humiliation and suffering. Femcels and white knights tend to do that and yes, they are a threat to men and men should ostracize and stay away from them.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 01:13 AM
12

Cut off that "friend" of yours and get as far away from him as you can. White knights are the biggest threat to other men and will not think twice about backstabbing their friends and even male family members when females are involved.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 12:29 AM
1

I think most people who say that online are femcels larping as men. There is a study which supports that.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 09:08 AM
1

Not just perjury. She's a violent abuser and a known sexual predator with multiple witnesses saying that she molests Jason Mamoa and is an exhibitionist who used to sexually harass multiple men including Kevin Costner.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 08:00 AM
2

Joseph being falsely accused by Potiphar’s wife Isn't that the rapist who falsely accuses the person she tried to rape? At least Joseph survives this. Phaedra is worse, wherein she falsely accuses her stepson Hippolytus of rape after trying to rape him and it results in him being dragged to death by horses (a painful death) on account of his own simp father, Theseus' curse. I really wish Phaedra got the Prometheus treatment with her crotch and breasts being devoured by vultures for an eternity a…
/r/MensRights18/09/22 04:12 AM
0

One is particular I found was a woman who had just gotten raped, ran to peolle for help, and then THEY raped her too. Got a source for that? I'm not talking about shitty sensational news stories from tabloid media but a proof of conviction of all the people involved. Because Indian media is very quick to write such shitty articles demonising men. An example would be the media reporting that a bunch of men supposedly burned a woman alive for reporting her rape when in reality the court documents …
/r/MensRights16/09/22 03:20 AM
2

Yes. I know that, which is why I said most of the money they spend is not theirs. They are accountable to their parents or significant others if they spend it on sex-related products or services, so they are unlikely to pay as much as males per capita.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 07:50 PM
1

though gang rapes are also a thing over there Yeah. They are. I've seen some videos of males being (or about to be) gang raped and/or sexually assaulted by females posted on social media in India and everyone was just laughing while the people involved would've been quickly arrested if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 07:46 PM
1

China and India seriously need a cultural fixing just like this gynocentric society. Nah. Their preference for genders ends there and even that existed only because they were already overpopulated and in a dire situation. They favoured females everywhere else. Now that the situation has improved for them, they prefer female children more since they aren't in dire need of their sons providing for them. Hell, India's recent female to male sex ratio even crossed one and it also has some of the most…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 11:56 PM
2

I dislike the idea of biological reductionism and attributing it to "instinct". Misandry is TAUGHT, not a biological fact or an "instinct" and it can be undone. If favouring females over males was "instinct", then countries like China and India wouldn't consider females babies parasites during tough times and abort them, favouring male babies who can provide for them over the female babies.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 09:21 PM
0

I don't think the average man is dumb enough to think a random male on the internet will become "competition down the line" for him. They were just taught to hate other men from birth for various reasons.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 09:11 PM
26

We are vying for women's attention. I don't even think it's because "men are vying for women's attention". The men mocking the guy don't get anything from women out of doing it on the internet, do they? Men are just conditioned to be misandric since birth just like women.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 04:25 PM
0

Where is the "drunken brothers friends mass rape the 13 y.o. sister then after the childbirth she gets stoned to death", part? Especially the "stoned to death by authorities" part? What you don't understand is the activity of kidnapping or raping women is illegal in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, unlike female on male rape, which is legal in most of the world and can even get the male punished. And of course speaking out about the Saudi Royal family is dangerous for anyone, not just women. Remember …
/r/MensRights13/09/22 07:24 PM
-1

Can you give me the source for this nonsense? It's men who are far more likely to be stoned for being raped by females in tradcon shitholes and it's a well-known fact that death penalties and "punishments" in general are far more severe and frequent for men in ALL countries, no exceptions. Pakistan is much like India in terms of its anti-male laws and society.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 11:48 PM
1

no women out there paying for sex They definitely do exist. Haven't you heard of gigolos? You still gotta talk to me, take em on a date and what not. I don't get it. What are you doing this for? You talk to them, take them on a date and give them sex. All for what? You get nothing in return. Is their companionship all you want?
/r/MensRights10/09/22 08:26 PM
1

In some studies, the rate of sexual aggression for women drops by over half when accounting for reproductive coercion (forcing somebody to have sex without a condom so they can get pregnant). It seems to be a bit hyperbolic to claim that over half of female on male rape is just due to the female's desire to get pregnant. As you can see from tables 1 and 4 of the paper I linked, the majority of men who get "sexually assaulted" by females (55.6-57.1%) report their "perpetrators" to be non-partners…
/r/MensRights10/09/22 06:33 PM
4

Enjoy the casual sex, don’t bother with dates - save the money and take the free ass. Gross. I don't understand why you would recommend him to be a dildo and pleasure all the creepy women who only want him for sex for free. He said that he's struggling in life, so it'd be better if he charges them money and gets something out of it.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 05:49 PM
1

The best and most accurate answer in this thread. It's not about their "manufactured fear of men because of feminism" or about "them being ok with it if they are hit on by good-looking men" (i.e., lookism). It's misandry and narcissism. It's their creepy self-conceited way of lying, trying to show off how they are oh-so desired by men.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 01:55 AM
1

If the roles are reversed, what I'm pointing out is that "offense" isn't the issue of the day in regards to exhibitionism from the perspective of women so much as the fear of being harmed or killed. Wrong. Men are more likely to be victims of crimes, especially violent crimes, so it should be men who are supposed to be more wary. Men are unlikely to be afraid of a naked woman walking alone on the street towards them, whereas women are LIKELY to be afraid of a naked man doing the same thing. Wron…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 11:03 PM
2

A weak naked women can, at worst, bring down the entire violence of the state to rape and beat you while locked in a cage repeatedly for years, until they finally decide to kill you. It won't just stop there. A lot of people would cheer for his prolonged torment and death, sometimes even his family, while everybody would mourn or have sympathy for the dead woman.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 09:59 PM
2

Please stop trying to find excuses for their exhibitionism. Just admit that they're a degenerates without trying to explain why they're "better degenerates" than "those male degenerates". I can also give excuses as to why male exhibitionism is "better" than female exhibitionism by pointing to the fact that females smell significantly worse than males to both males and females under the same conditions, thereby implying that naked females are more likely to cause more offence due to their odour, …
/r/MensRights07/09/22 09:55 PM
191

It's not the exhibitionism that bothers me so much as the audacity that she (and many other women) have to assume that all men would be attracted to them and that they are god's gifts to men. It's the arrogance which infuriates me. It's one of the main underlying reasons for exhibitionism and even misandry among most women.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 02:30 PM
1

I'm not saying men don't want cuddles; I'm saying people who visit PROSTITUTES. I literally just linked an article talking about how a lot of men who visited prostitutes also wanted cuddles. As well, despite the feminists' best attempts, it's been proven multiple times that women who engage in casual, no-emotions sex tend to be unhappier, experience more regret, and report feeling lonely in the wake of casual sexual encounters. Well, duh. That's what happens when they keep being brainwashed by s…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 08:31 AM
3

It definitely is anti-male. Please stop trying to act as if he would've given a woman that label or that she would've been at the risk of being attacked if she was given such a label. All vigilante attacks and killings of supposed "sex offenders" happen to males.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 11:37 PM
0

Not as far as the sex itself, but they want commitment, cuddles, hugs, kisses, etc., which most prostitutes -male or female -are very opposed to doing. You are making two assumptions here - one that men don't want intimacy involving "commitment, cuddles, hugs, kisses, etc.," and the second that prostitutes don't provide such services, both of which are wrong. Men value cuddling, kissing and hugging more than women on average and most men who go to prostitutes also ask them to cuddle. It goes bac…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 11:24 PM
1

Musk himself is an anti-male piece of shit who slanders men with labels that can get them attacked or killed.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 05:24 PM
-6

Because women don't (and can't) pay them as much. Remember, most women earn less than men and most of the money women spend is not theirs, so they can't spend money on sex-related services and products as freely without being accountable to their parents or significant others. That's the reason why porn content creators (male or female, straight or gay) aim for a male audience despite females making up a greater portion of porn consumers every year with some countries even having more female con…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 05:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter