TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NeuromancerLV Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by NeuromancerLV on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

District records indicate that Eicher was previously accused of physically abusing students in 2015 and 2019, but in both cases, investigators concluded that the allegations against her were unsubstantial. After getting away with it twice, she probably thought it would go away this time too.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 06:19 PM
1

Not Arya's finest hour
/r/MensRights26/09/19 02:37 PM
414

Social services have been widely criticized for failing to protect Mikaeel a report by child protection chiefs confirmed that Mikaeel Kular's death could not have been predicted. Nothing shady going on here! We thought we did everything right and we found that we did!
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:05 PM
1

The Bottineau County prosecutor and Sheriff’s Office did not return calls to the Herald by press time. An affidavit of probable cause, which ordinarily details the allegations against the accused, was not filed with the district court as of Tuesday. Hopefully this doesn't mean they are just waiting to come up with a justification for letting her off without charges.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 05:19 AM
2

My comment may have been an "attack" in your mind, but what you said about me was definitely an attack and you knew it. Also, you can't attack me because other users are giving you "a vast majority of circle-jerky responses". I actually have nothing to do with what other users post.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:43 PM
2

I literally attacked the presentation of the idea, not the poster. Clearly poster made a typo, which I joked about. Not attacked him for. For which you immediately attacked me as being angry, upset, and frustrated...
/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:06 PM
6

You said it yourself, he was razing a point instead of raising it.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:51 AM
1

Probably the exact same career sacrifice a stay-at-home dad makes. If someone is home taking care of the children, they can't exactly work all day.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 01:58 AM
1

Thanks for the info differentiating the two terms for me. I didn't know that chevaliers were horsemen, however. I know its pronounced 'chev-all-E-A' but I thought it meant protector or bodyguard.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 08:09 AM
1

I completely agree with everything you said, except the D&D remark. I'm not trying to sell my Game of Thrones fan fiction here. Chivalry was a thing. and over time it was co-opted into the "men covering puddles with their coats" trope.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 12:32 AM
1

No one should ever have their money taken away by a non-contributing ex-spouse. You are right. However, this is the law. And as long as the law says that the partner with more money owes the partner with less money, it should apply regardless of gender. As far as I'm concerned, we should just do away with alimony. You can't tell someone to go fuck themselves and still have a relationship with their money. That is something that should be considered first.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:55 PM
1

Yeah I agree with that too. The term was taken over by feminists to define a "good guy". I was only pointing out that, originally, Chivalry had little to do with women and much to do with acceptable ways for men to kill each other for honor. That doesn't mean that I've been "exposed to too much dungeons and dragons" like I'm describing something in Game of Thrones instead of actual historical fact.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 03:47 PM
1

Nothing to do with fantasy realms. You believe that knights, royals, peasants and the like didn't exist? Check out this link to a great D&D website I know https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Ages Just because 'today's usage' is different doesn't suddenly change the original definition. Chivalry was a code of honor for knights.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 02:23 PM
3

By 'deadbeat' you mean unemployed. By that logic, every housewife who ever got alimony is a deadbeat who needs to get a job.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 02:19 PM
3

I agree with the second part, but he is not 'a dick' because he is entitled to alimony. If u made that same comment about a broke ex-wife feeling entitled to alimony, then you would be a horrible person. Women are adults, not children. They too can get a job and support themselves. But you can say that a male is a dick for asking for cash. Alimony is a fucked up system, but it is the current law. As long as Alimony is a thing, it should be applied equally. If this guy is a dick, then every man a…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 02:18 PM
2

But when the man is the moneymaker, and the woman wants to get at his assets so that she won't have to get a job, that is totally acceptable right?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 02:11 PM
2

Chivalry is an ancient code of conduct for knights of their realm. Most of it are rules pertaining to things like "It is not honorable to fight from horseback with a 10 foot lance when your opponent is on foot with a dagger." At the very end, it speaks of general courtesy. Basically, don't go to an inn and fill your stomach, sleep for the night, and then refuse to pay. Don't knock on some villagers door and announce that his wife belongs to the knight that evening. Things like that.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 01:08 PM
3

You left out the worst of all, mansplaining!
/r/MensRights03/12/15 01:01 PM
81

He should of thought of that before being born male.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 05:08 AM
2

So I guess all the comments in the SRS post about this matter, in which everyone has a good ol time laughing over it and freely admitting that they were involved... that just doesn't count, ignatiusloyola?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 01:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter