TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Nevarinin512 Archive

View 0 posts and 388 comments by Nevarinin512 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I think it's quite interesting that I didn't even made that argument and yet this person keeps pretending I did. It's quite the head scratcher, tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 12:08 AM
1

🙄 Are you the final boss in strawman's adventure or do you lack basic reading comprehension? I am still not the person who wrote that comment. I have a completly different username, lol. I never even said anything about women's preferences. I simply asked why you chose to be disingenuous by interpreting everything in an extreme hyperbolic way. I've never even state my personal opinion, ergo you literally cannot know. That's even worse than what I assumed you said previously. So you fully admit t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 12:00 AM
0

My god, calm the freak down. What is wrong with you? I am saying this? I didn’t even write that comment and I certainly never said women should accept men they don’t want. I, very clearly, asked why you are interpreting the previous comment on such a hyperbole way and I think I got my answer. There is quite the gap between what the previous comment said, which is a lot of women want to apply uncompromising and unyielding expectations onto men that they can’t remotely fulfill themselves and how y…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 09:14 AM
-1

Is this really how you understood the previous comment? Like, really?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 01:10 AM
19

Exactly, no man appreciates it and frankly, it’s quite stupid. Only logical explanation is to create plausible deniability, which begs the question: why does one need that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/23 07:32 PM
1

It’s fairly obvious when you read the post..... And yes, one can sound smart and be an idiot. Glad we agree, lel :> And you are being a real class act for pretending I am mad about not being Pascal when called out for being wrong and jumping to conclusions. It’s not like you couldn’t have just verified aka asking for clarification instead of being a dick. :> In the end you just sound like an arrogant twat, which usually isn’t the smarter person. Enjoy your day bro PS: you should re-read your las…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 02:38 PM
1

Well, at least I usually realize what and who others are talking about before insulting them. I was talking about OP, not Blaise Pascal. Fairly obvious, as it can be read easily, unless one likes to pretend others aren’t able to distinguish the words „justice“ and „fair“ or can’t distinguish those two words themselves. And I don’t regard American values as particularly valuable and I have no clue what US bases have to do with anything. Random info dumb my dude. Not everyone on reddit is from the…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 07:18 AM
2

I don’t think this person even realized what their whole argument of “the world doesn’t need to be fair” really entails. Pretty dangerous argument to make tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/23 11:11 PM
2

Stop making shit up. I never asked women to do anything in my comment, especially nothing like women should pull out a tooth or two to diminish their natural advantage. lmao I just pointed out you aren’t in a position to complain about men not acknowledging their advantages and engaging in black/white thinking when you aren’t able to accurately determine advantages yourself and engage in black/white thinking yourself. You are just projecting that I am complaining. If you read closely, I didn’t c…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 02:59 PM
3

How come a significant portion of men say themselves they don’t like women with a lot of Make-up and/or prefer women without? Also, you are completely failing to acknowledge that the women who don’t wear makeup do so out of choice, a choice that doesn’t exist in the same capacity for men as it is generally not socially as acceptable to wear makeup as a man, especially in the context of wanting to date heterosexual women. The option to beautify themselves with makeup still generally exists for wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 02:47 PM
0

Possible, but that’s not the same as laughing at him for shooting his shot. Disrespecting her based on that assumption alone would also be pretty lame tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 10:53 PM
3

What exactly do you mean by that?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 03:29 PM
5

While I can understand resentment and it is valid to a degree, all you are really saying is that you aren’t able to distinguish between women as a group and women as individuals. Just an example: A man in his 20s is treated badly by women for not being attractive. Stuff like laughing at him when he attempts to approach them in a club for example or whatever. I am sure we are all aware of the multitudes of disrespect women can dish out in such scenarios. In his 30s he is more successful because h…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 11:11 AM
–

I very accurately said “being sick CAN be based on choice”, which isn’t the same as “being sick IS based on choice.” Does this sound like I am not aware that not all conditions are based on choices or are you simply being a bit defensive? My other comment made that rather clear I think.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 07:18 AM
–

I just made an argument for consistency’s sake as the above statement is de facto not true. My own grandma smoked 2 packs a day for almost 30 years. Sounds harsh, but no one was exactly surprised when she got lung cancer. She herself wasn’t even surprised. I still loved her very much. It’s a bit weird to me people immediately bring the downvotes when it’s just a fact that choices can influence your health. I didn’t even say people should just leave their partners over it. Being jobless for long …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 11:39 PM
–

Well, being sick can be based on choices, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 11:06 PM
6

oh so you are just completely unaware of how the human psyche works? ok...
/r/MensRights03/06/23 12:20 AM
–

What does an incline of natural disaster not being a coincidence have to do with the biological drive to procreate? Literally nothing. Again, I am am not denying climate change. Why you kinda pretend I do, especially since it has nothing to do with the topic at hand? Also, you are yourself not sure if global population is increasing (it is?! how can’t you know and tell me overpopulation is the reason) and at the same time tell me you are aware of the global population limit? Both cannot be corre…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/23 01:12 AM
–

cause the drive to procreate actually doesn’t account for overpopulation. what you saying is kinda arguing that the drive to procreate should have a brain and realize it’s enough now, on a level that would technically require every individual of our species to be constantly aware of our global population and all the variables that have an influence on how many of us “our” planet can support us. this doesn’t exist. and I was talking about all organisms. bacteria will multiply until the environmen…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/23 12:50 AM
–

completely unrelated to the drive to procreate.... I never doubted that all organisms on this planet are connected. In fact, I am fully aware. what are you even on about? 😅 they still gonna procreate, regardless of interconnection...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/23 12:28 AM
–

name on organism that hasn’t an ingrained desire to procreate, regardless of earth dying or not. pretty much all organisms will procreate until they max out the environment, even if this leads to overpopulation and then population decline, even humans. I think this is just a fact we have to accept. it just is that way. I doubt evolution planned to balance this basic trait with our outcomes of climate change...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 11:52 PM
–

No, cause I didn’t defend Maslow hierarchy of needs but asked if there is anything better yet and received just personal anecdotes about someone’s personal life not needing theories, which is entirely irrelevant to the question at hand....
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 12:28 AM
1

so what? At least I make a more complete comparison than your surface level analysis (if you can even call it that).....it’s not my fault you can only think till the next corner... I never said makeup is free either. literally a straw man.... you also forget all the other points. just focusing on the price isn’t the same as actually bringing a counterpoint to my whole argument. all you did was focus on price and pretend you made some valid counter point that proves they are equivalents. one stil…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 11:40 PM
–

pure status quo argumentation. aka an completely empty argument, doesn’t explain shit nor represents an actual argument ....congrats.....you just don’t have an argument lol
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 11:15 PM
–

your personal necessities for living your life have nothing to do with your argument. it’s completely detached from the whole conversation.... you don’t need newtons equations to live your personal life decently. doesn’t make them useless or wrong... and we do make laws and policies based on scientific theories all the time. what are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 11:12 PM
2

your point doesn’t stand at all.... look up the average price for both and try to explain how both are equally accessible. also one requires you to literally permanently alter your body, undergo a lengthy procedure and has a significantly higher risk of complications than the other. please explain how this is as accessible as going to a store, spending 100$, trying it and just removing it when you don’t like it anymore. also, having some form of beard, no beard or one which makes you attractive …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 11:05 PM
–

because it’s not universally accepted? you’ve said so yourself....
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 10:52 PM
0

love it lol
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 10:46 PM
1

and that somehow makes beards, only obtainable by genetics or hair transplants, and makeup, which can be bought and comes in almost unlimited facets, somehow the same? makeup is most definitely more accessible cause you can exchange currency for it, beards are only accessible via genes or hair transplants. all you’ve said is that it isn’t always working so well that everyone can be attractive by just using makeup. so one parameter is true for both, but the rest isn’t, therefore it a far stretch …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 10:44 PM
1

where do get your beard from if you can’t grow it? Sephora or Douglas?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 10:29 PM
4

actors , newscasters and whatnot have nothing to do with men usually walking the streets. makeup there is mainly a tool, it is necessary because of how lighting has to be done. you ever seen a model on set or actor on set IRL? that make up doesn’t look that great when up close. it looks entirely different than on camera and not in a flattering way..... this doesn’t proof it is socially accepted for men to wear make up. It only proofs men who’s job is to appear in front of a camera use it as a to…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 10:23 PM
–

World War 2 weren’t „all the men“ and it wasn’t sustainable. You can only do that for a short amount of time and surely not with all men. It’s not sustainable in the broadest sense of the definition of sustainable.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 02:02 PM
–

Its not the basis of society. The basis of human society is human cooperation, especially cooperation of the genders. Even today society would collapse in the blink of an eye if I remove 80% of men. It’s completely unrealistic to expect all the things to continue to work without them. Without them, women will die in droves until a sustainable equilibrium is reached again. Society is 100% not able to continue if either genders population gets reduced by a large percentage.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 01:46 PM
–

Yes one man could impregnate 50 women, but this is significantly less useful than people think. If we reduce the male population to 20% of current levels, we can technically repopulate, but all this genetic material is gone for good, which for us as a species is actually pretty bad. People really underestimate the amount of men needed to keep our species going. I keep hearing these examples all the time. “If almost all men of a tribe died, it wasn’t such a big deal as the few men could just impr…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 01:28 PM
1

Doubt there is a study proving this exact same thing if they are just now putting their suspicions on it. Science takes time....
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 02:47 PM
1

What are you even talking about? We are tracking estrogen levels in our water for decades and we know they are rising because of hormonal birth control. I just explained the scientists DID NOT make a definitive statement. If you keep listening to “young men” instead of science, that’s a you problem lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 02:35 PM
2

I didn’t defend it nor do I believe it. There isn’t “believe” in science. I explained that just be a use an effect is found later, doesn’t disprove nor prove anything, which is what you initially said. And that my friend is believe, and not prove.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 02:29 PM
0

I didn’t make a claim, therefore I don’t need to provide studies lol. I explained how science works, not how hormonal birth control changes mating preferences in women. Two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 02:23 PM
2

Because you are no science guy is also why you have reached that conclusion. Just because an effect has been noticed 6 decades after first use of a medication, doesn’t mean the reasons are made up just because you find issues later. That’s not even uncommon.....especially with medication. There are more than enough examples of previously unknown effects of medications. Good and bad... Also, OP said scientists are worried and they suspect an effect. There was no argument about the quantity nor th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 02:21 PM
0

Yes, that may be beneficial, but that’s not inherently the result of men being providers. Ones father can provide all they want, you won’t have a good upbringing if significantly more conditions are also met that don’t revolve around men being providers. Men being providers doesn’t inherently cause good upbringing of children in a society.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 09:23 AM
0

Doesn’t answer the upbringing question. Won’t give purpose by default. Relies on the theory that responsibility grows ethos. It doesn’t inherently....
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 09:17 AM
-3

I fully agree with the first part. I don’t really get the second part. Paying for your family doesn’t somehow magically create purpose or meaning nor automatically guarantees any type of upbringing. And even if you pay 50/50, the purpose/meaning wouldn’t even change....especially now that most households need two incomes anyways....
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 08:34 AM
2

You didn’t answer my question :) How do I know? Common sense and knowledge of statistics. The vast majority women aren’t sex workers. The average sex worker isn’t an escort. If escorts aren’t even common in a minority group such as sex workers, it makes no sense to assume a large portion of the population are escorts. The average lifetime partner count for women isn’t even close to 20 and you talk about 100+. It makes no sense so assume there are tons of ex escorts in the dating pool. They exist…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 04:13 PM
3

No, but since your example is so hyperbole it isn’t even representative and therefore worthless. Would you date a virgin with an IQ of 5 and no teeth? She’s a virgin no? Wouldn’t you date here? Be honest.... That’s about how representative your question was....
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 01:46 PM
4

Hyperbole example much? The amount of n=100+ ex escorts roaming the dating market isn’t high enough to matter to begin with. Their actual influence on the dating market as a whole is probably very tiny.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 01:42 PM
6

No, you clearly just don’t understand what is meant....
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 01:12 PM
1

because i don't care. you clearly don't know enough about psychopathy or sociopathy for me to give an f....
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 12:10 AM
1

or actual evidence suggests you are delusional? nothing supports the argument that the fast majority of women are psychopathic or sociapathic in nature. going by evidence is the most proven way to figure out the truth, going by your personal bias isn't even on the list.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 12:01 AM
–

Yes, but now we are bordering actual psychopathic and sociopathic territory. This would be akin to claiming most women who lie are in said territory, which is scientific nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 08:53 PM
1

I can agree, but I think one should be careful dismissing such a strong biological imperative just by declaring it not being necessary for survival. It’s obviously true, but realistically speaking a lot of people do a lot of things for this one thing that we most definitely don’t need for personal survival. That tells us clearly that even though it is not necessary for survival, humans are still strongly driven towards it. We shouldn’t underestimate that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 05:22 PM
1

If true that men lead women on more often than not, then it’s fairly easily to explain. I assume you are a woman. You know you can find a new fwb (quickly probably) and you have to do very little for it, compared to a man at least. For men that is very different, they lose more as they have to work significantly more (remotely) get the same access to sex and it will usually also take time and mean months of no sex. That’s why they lie. Doesn’t make it morally acceptable, but the reasons/incentiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 05:11 PM
2

baseless claim. The person literally said they’ve used people and didn’t return the favor, you just rationalize it by claiming they didn’t lead them on. You think these men weren’t lead to believe she would return the favor, lol? How would you even know? A bit too naive imho
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 04:56 PM
3

You just claim this and explain literally nothing. Explain WHY instead of just throwing out claims. I’ve read some more of your comments and you also simply claim that the men make it about themselves. How is a woman who wants to wait not about herself? Isn’t she waiting because of her worries and preferences? How isn’t that exactly the same, aka making it about oneself. I mean, it’s perfectly fine imho, but she is clearly doing it for herself and not the guy lol. You also seem to have some othe…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 04:43 PM
1

Sounds reductionist....there is quite a bit more to being resistant to manipulation than age..... I’ve met more than enough people older than me who can be manipulated easily because they are naive, ignorant, have low social skills or are just stupid. Young people not having grit or bite is just your personal bias imho. Not very convinced that young women have somehow no value.....at least not by this explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 03:49 PM
3

for example
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 11:58 AM
1

Huh, why are young women (what ages are we even talking about?) without value per se?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 11:56 AM
3

But there most certainly is a point when some are willing to overlook that.....
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 11:26 AM
1

“truth” lol :)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/23 08:18 AM
16

Balanced opinions are against the sub rules!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 03:04 AM
1

No the logic behind it is not solid at all. There is no real reason to assume a stranger (first date) will treat you better than the same person later in a relationships. You’ve also said nothing to support this idea of yours while I brought up multiple logical leaps and holes. No clue why you’ve convinced of this absolutely ridiculous logic lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 09:59 PM
1

You do realize what you you have said initially entailed the argument that a man treats a woman he knows and bonded with, possibly for decades, always ,100% of the time, worse than when they went on their first date....as strangers.... yes? Does common sense really tell you this? And in this comment you bring up something else, though. I don’t think you are right here either. I’m not sure you’ve noticed, but you use rather absolute statements. I personally would actually still prefer the coffee …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 11:07 PM
1

For someone who thinks “males” miss all nuance you got quite the unnuanced opinion....
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 12:49 PM
3

oh, but that’s not what you’ve said, lady. You’ve said “if you are a beggar you get scraps.” You can try to change this now to “not caring” but you still said it and that phrase alone is petty, which is what I was referring to very clearly. It’s also distinctly different from “not caring.” Don’t play dumb now by changing your story :) PS: doesn’t make me feel bad. why should it? I think that is also a very surface level analysis of “reality”
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 08:17 PM
4

And your husband is relevant how? His opinion doesn’t change that your basic attitude is one of pettiness, which has nothing to do with some arbitrary responsibility to feel sorry about them. All you’ve really said is that your husband is as petty as you. Congrats, I guess? Doesn’t make you a catch :)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 02:52 PM
5

you clearly a catch it this is your basic reaction to the less fortunate, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 12:30 PM
3

No, you clearly used the concept of a thought crime as the thought of him thinking she is a slut was your issue, nothing else. If they don’t slut shame them mentally, they aren’t lying, aren’t they? You just assume they are lying and have these views by default. Also, get a grip yourself. Calling an attitude of yours authoritarian isn’t the same as pretending you are an authoritarian government.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 12:08 PM
3

Ehm, I don’t view PUA as unproblematic, but I see more problems with the concept of „thought crimes“ you seem to just have used. You know there is almost nothing more authoritarian than the concept of thought crimes, yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 11:52 AM
2

Valid, but you didn’t in your first comment, which was about how women are to blame for this.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/23 04:09 PM
7

Dude, instead of trying to justify your bs strawmen by going on tangets about biology, the subs goals and whatnot, you could just use common sense and realize what this person essentially said and it has nothing to do with elephant seals or women per se. The person clearly complains about men being described as sex obsessed dogs by society (thats probably why they didnt mention women specifically). You may expand on this yourself, but you may not pretend OP said something they didn't. You explic…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/23 01:25 PM
3

Your entire argument relies on that statement being true, which I don’t think it is. There is 100% no general rule that the first dates are the best treatment a man is ever going to give to a woman. That believe also has a lot of logical holes....
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/23 11:59 AM
5

Sure, but let’s not pretend most unwanted pregnancies occur because contraceptives don’t work well enough. The amount of unwanted pregnancies that stem from failed contraceptives is probably pretty damn close to <1% of all unwanted pregnancies....
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/23 11:54 AM
6

The simple desire to do something cannot be framed as obsession as the definition of obsession isn’t simply the want to do something. Unless what you want to do occupies your mind continuously to the point of intrusion, you are not obsessed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/23 11:42 AM
16

The word women doesn’t even exist in OPs post .... He literally said “the people who say these men” and NEVER mentions women specifically. Strawman much?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/23 11:38 AM
2

And did I say that? No. Good talk, moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 08:04 AM
4

Mh, guess women who die during birth or severely damage their health because they can’t afford proper medical care are also then just a bunch of lazy fucks, yes? Everybody who can’t afford something can only not afford it because they are lazy fucks, yes? Once you start this game you are already losing. Everybody can make the same argument about literally everything, which makes it a pretty bad argument. If the vast majority of the population can’t afford something then it is systemic. If you be…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 01:19 PM
1

“Let me propose a sugar baby website as a solution even though 95%+ of men can not afford it and most men complain about having to have transactional relationships as their only option”
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 01:07 PM
4

nope. I clearly explained that the issue is non-transactional sex. You are the one who keeps bringing up transactional sex. Both are not the same, ergo I don't acknowledge having parroted your points back to you. you can think so, that doesn't make it true. You telling me that contrary to popular believe not all women are sought after like this is nothing but you trying to put me in a box based on your assumptions and it is dismissive of my actual point by building a straw man, as i've never sai…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 03:37 PM
5

I haven’t just repeated what you’ve said to me. You just didn’t listen.... Also, you don’t get to complain about my dismissive tone when your very first response reeks of dismissal. I simply mirrored you. Don’t wanna be treated like that? Maybe don’t treat me like that and you’ll get a different experience. I am quite confident that you didn’t read the actual studies about the orgasm gap as you would have known that their definitions and conclusions leave a lot to be desired. Like seriously, tak…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 11:27 AM
1

What do you want us to say? Obviously you should report it, but that doesn’t change the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. I can totally understand the frustration when one knows for a fact one is telling the truth, but that’s not a good enough argument to throw away the presumption of innocence anyways. This also has nothing to do with FB groups slandering men. All you’ve said is it is not slander if it is true. Yes, IF it is true, which no one knows, but somehow most people act like…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 10:04 AM
6

Hmpf, so it’s the classic “not all women drown in sexual attention you dummy” spiel again. The orgasm gap study isn’t particularly meaningful and was pretty flawed. Furthermore are sexual urges not only and always fulfilled just because one had an orgasm. I can orgasm just fine, but if I did all the work to get there it’s simply not nearly as fulfilling as it being given freely to you because someone wants to. And paying is by far the worst option when it comes to this. Also, your argument of ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 09:46 AM
8

It’s significantly easier to behave that way when you know you can scratch your urges when you need to. I’ll never understand why this basic fact is so tough for almost everyone to understand. Is this really such a foreign concept?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 09:23 AM
0

Pretty random claims my dude. 0.o All of them are dudes? All of them are probably underage? Ehm, everybody knows human trafficking and ladyboys are a thing there, but you entered ridiculous hyperbole ground to support your argument. Also, why do they seem more immoral than western women to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/23 02:26 PM
1

Its faulty logic to think association makes somebody something. It’s maybe an indicator, but you don’t have to belong to a group to be in a space that a group frequents....
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 02:43 PM
1

so that’s why you here? ok then, each to their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 12:23 PM
6

It’s not even particularly common in the netherlands....
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 12:07 PM
0

You describe perceived value influenced by quantity and not meaning itself. This analysis also completely leaves out the fact that women on average receive a lot of sexual attention, therefore valuing it less than the average men would. (Sexual) attention isn’t meaningless for mental well being. You might think so, but psychology kinda disagrees with you on this one. This should be obvious when thinking about the fact that even women will show a worse mental status when they perceive to be perce…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 02:29 PM
1

Never....,but how does this relate to being excluded from aid just for your gender unless you are lucky enough to have a family? It’s still discriminatory and it’s based on gender. Ergo it fits all criteria for sexism. ps: single women or single mothers?
/r/MensRights28/03/23 12:25 AM
69

How come you think they can recognize bigotry? Most seem to have trouble with recognizing bigotry in any shape or form unless it is easy enough to parrot some hyperinflated wannabe social justice take they barely understand themselves. Analysis is basically dead to them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/23 07:26 PM
2

Different values created by different incentive structures, correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 04:27 PM
6

Do a significantly larger portion of initiation (any type), don’t ask me to “impress” you with behavior that is most likely stupid if you think about it, pay on dates, be stoic asf, conform in general to male gender roles, don’t expect me be your emotional rock when I won’t receive even remotely the same support back. Essentially most things that are transactional in nature. I don’t want to constantly have to proof my worth just to get some basic intimacy. And I don’t need coochie as an incentiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 03:42 PM
3

If I placed you on carbon copy earth for 25 years with no sexual attention given to you at all unless you perform a certain way, are you 100% confident you would have turned out the same woman with the same views on this? So how relevant do you think your current view on sexual attention being meaningless for you personally is on the overall discussion? Just to be clear, the positive and negative effects on mental well being when being given (sexual) attention or not are pretty clear. It’s an ob…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 02:52 PM
6

Don’t expect me to be a traditional man and do traditional man things when you aren’t a traditional woman. Personally, I am not a traditional man and really don’t care about you being a traditional woman, but stop asking me to sit tightly in my traditional male gender box and be happy about it when you don’t wanna sit in yours either. Not gonna happen and the request is utterly ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 02:13 PM
11

It’s only meaningless attention because it is abundant for you. Sexual attention is, in the grand scheme of human psychology and human mental well being, not meaningless at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 02:01 PM
6

The point is the option generally exists for women and not that most women most definitely want to do the exact same....
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 01:58 PM
1

Comparing an female elite athlete with an average man makes zero sense. Take her and compare her to her male counterparts. Pretty obvious what is going on and what exactly is being compared. 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 01:48 PM
11

You clearly don’t know shit about IQ. Above 145 already makes you top 0.1%, 130 top 2.1%. You ain’t just barely good enough to kiss ass at 130, wtf are you talking about? Most people in all professions have below 130, even professors. It’s a ridiculous claim that somehow only professors can be above 160, which is so rare to begin with that we couldn’t have academia if that were true. Also trying to infer IQ points by profession must be a joke. Claiming people below 160 are dumb is just ridiculou…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 11:30 AM
6

Why exactly shouldn’t one judge the relationship of their own parents? Especially when abusive?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 11:18 AM
6

Why you building obvious strawmen?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 09:12 AM
54

Thinking is in fact the issue. People who hold those opinions simply end the thought process after the first corner. You can see it everywhere in more casual dialogues about equality. It is mostly people parroting talking points they read somewhere and those opinions are also supported by everyone around them, and as such they easily believe them as the “obvious” truth. It’s not that they have actually sat down and thought about these talking points. These talking points are easy and usually ins…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/23 02:31 PM
1

My comments content: not only ad hominem, Previous comment: only ad hominem. Very comparable, obviously the same for you. 🙄I “cried” very much indeed as can totally be seen in my comment.🙃 Do I think writing down numbers is a grand slam or is it simply you assuming that I must think that? Was I even the only one doing it? Am I blind on one eye or is it you? Saying men couldn’t vote even though women also couldn’t does help my argument actually. The same is true for saying that most men and women…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 07:42 AM
1

;)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 06:22 PM
2

Ad hominem arguments are worthless. Good talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 04:40 PM
2

You are embarassing yourself. I have no clue why you thing you can hang here besides you suffering from the dunning kruger effect. Taking apart your insanly weak argumentation is literally childsplay. I cant even feel smart about it.... You are unable to detect that you are attempting to mix multiple things and timeframes into one. Historical deathrate, studies by insurance companies (that dont measure historical death causes?!), childbirth = infections, ergo is childbirth the leading cause of d…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 05:54 PM
27

Listen, people who tell people in a cPTSD sub to „just not be afraid because it is irrational“ are insanely low empathy and you can and should disregard their opinions cause they clearly aren’t coming to you in good faith (or they are downright stupid). A fear of false accusation isn’t irrational to begin with as they obviously exist and the consequences are obviously pretty bad even if you can proof in court that you didn’t do it. It’s the unaffected telling the affected how to feel. One should…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/23 01:52 PM
2

She also thinks poor men could generally vote in the past. She has no clue
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 09:29 AM
8

Yes, childbirth is and was a vector for disease. Thank you captain obvious. That still doesn’t mean childbirth is the leading death cause for all of humanity throughout history. 🤦‍♂️ Your attempt at making both statements somehow an equivalent is the true face palm here. It’s a bit funny when you wanna compete via medical knowledge, yet you seem to have no clue about the fact that there are obviously more vectors of disease that are more significant, even for women. Don’t come at me with out of …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 04:27 PM
8

Show proof that childbirth is historically the most common death. I doubt it. Most likely it’s neither war nor childbirth. It’s probably exposure and general life health issues that arrive outside in nature. Edit: I just checked historical causes of death. Number one, by a large margin, are infections. Neither war nor childbirth are even in the top 10. You loose :) Then, not every birth results in horrible birth injuries. The again a birth injury isn’t the same as dying. Furthermore the death ra…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:30 PM
6

The vast majority of men couldn’t vote throughout history, but still had to do military service. It’s a myth that the majority of men was able to vote throughout history and shows pretty clearly you either have no actual clue. For your statement to be true you would have to cherry-pick not only pretty short timeframes, but also cherry-pick location. It’s very detached from your rather universal claim. Then you claim “men suffered less.” Please propose a objective measurement for that lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 11:04 AM
1

I mean I agree that the redpill is mostly pretty obvious advice, but why do you think it is lame to value being able to attract a partner? Literally every living being on the planet values that and it is one of the major biological imperatives we have. I wouldn’t call it lame, I would call it necessary. Lame is reeking of desperation, which usually makes people less attractive. No offense, but that just sounds like you are unable to put yourself in their shoes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 09:36 AM
1

Could be. I am also not sure. My guess is that redpill knowledge isn’t as mainstream as it may seem when one looks online. I doubt most of the population could tell you what redpill es or bluepilled even means. It’s probably only gonna be younger people, if even that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/23 05:46 PM
4

That’s a valid point, but I think we gotta keep time in mind. Previous generations basically never heard the red pill stuff in their forming years. All that stuff started maybe 10 years ago. Dudes who are 25 now still have been told that stuff for 15 years. Dudes who are 35 habe been told that stuff for 25 years. Dudes who are now 15 probably don’t get told the same, especially since most of these things are now happening online.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/23 01:21 PM
1

Doubt it when I see their general attitude towards women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 09:30 AM
1

Isn’t that how it should work for passportbros, at least in theory? They leave and gain status through coming from a wealthier country than they are going to. Kinda doubt that Thailand or the Philippines are suddenly gonna be overflowing with high status, good looking man, especially when all the locals cannot acquire the same wealth as easily. They won’t come all from outside.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 09:27 AM
2

Huh? How is that not the exact opposite of your previous comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 08:45 PM
3

Depends strongly on your definition of quality woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 08:13 PM
1

You would be right if this wouldn’t be a public online forum with the intended functionality to comment everybody else’s comments. It’s literally one of the purposes of Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 01:56 PM
2

We = everybody here. Plenty obvious. If you ask a question that logically puts you on the exact same spot as you tried to put me, who’s the idiot? Why you even so hostile?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 01:52 PM
1

Who are you and why we gotta care what you say?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 01:48 PM
0

That looks like valid and well thought out criticism for you? That’s a pretty low standard I gotta say....
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 01:35 PM
0

Learn how to find real scientific sources rather than memorizing terms like „simp“ and „incel“
/r/MensRights02/03/23 08:30 AM
7

Well, then i would recommend to ignore buzzfeed. It’s not like they can even remotely be considered a reliable source of anything factual. It’s just opinions.....
/r/MensRights01/03/23 09:44 AM
2

Find me a group that discusses social identities that isn’t at least 75% bad faith talking points once you look at their conversations.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/23 07:07 PM
4

And you don’t seem to get that you claim to speak for all women, but you mostly speak for yourself. Yes, weirdo 55 year old men thinking they are Gigachad, cause “they aged like fine wine”, are obviously delusional, but you greatly underestimate the amount of girls between 23-28 that are totally fine dating a man in his early/mid 30s. Literally all my female friends had something with a (or multiple) 30+ man when they themselves were 25-ish. It’s not even rare to see outside my personal social c…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/23 07:05 PM
2

I don’t really get you here. This is very easy to explain actually. These guys don’t use condoms not because they don’t care about STDs/pregnancy, they just care more about the feeling during sex. (Dumb, but true) Now give the same dude the option to have sex with no condom AND no chance of pregnancy. Why wouldn’t he take it? It’s literally what he ideally wants. No condoms and no babies. Two things he wants with no downside compared to condoms. (from their point of view as STDs are probably not…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/23 06:07 PM
12

Ah yes, getting into a relationship for financial reasons only doesn’t sound toxic at all. 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/23 01:51 PM
1

No, that’s just bare minimum.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/23 01:38 AM
28

Statistics =/= statistics It completely depends on the study and their methods. A lot of people don’t even read actual studies nor do they understand them correctly. Methodology matters a lot, how the study defines something matters a lot and often those definitions have very little to do with how the same words might be defined in a casual conversation.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 09:43 PM
1

All of them did then. Even the hair color is the same besides the black guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 12:41 AM
4

Reading this dudes post about going for women outside the west to leverage wealth for sex makes it pretty clear that he probably doesn’t have female friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 12:35 AM
1

Aight, got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 12:14 AM
3

Your statements reads like patriarchy = women < men < higher position men Is that what you meant? I would like to ask you to proof that women are generally below men in a patriarchy, especially women of the economical elite. The gap between the economical elite (man or women) and the average man or woman is larger than the difference between the average man and the average women, by a ridiculous margin. E.g. the lowest 50% of earners in the US own a measly 3.2% of the total wealth while the top …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 12:07 AM
1

Pure ad hominem argumentation..... Americans being overly concerned about wealth isn’t exactly inaccurate
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 11:00 PM
2

troll or real?0,o
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 10:29 PM
3

As an engineer myself: this depends mainly on your social competence and less on your engineering degree. the issue is most engineers or people interested in engineering don’t tend to have that much social competence, which is pretty common in people mainly interested in things and not people. obviously you usually won’t find large amounts of women in engineering courses, so I would say the best route to improve that is to have friends from other courses. it’s really not the degree and more the …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:06 PM
4

with such a strong need for a reaction, I kinda doubt that :)
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:41 PM
3

If that helps you sleep at night.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:13 PM
3

Yes, women (and men) want their partners to be attractive. Every moron can deduct this. If you are receiving criticism for this post, maybe it’s because it’s repetitive, low effort and contains a smugness that seems to indicate some pride in this little, unoriginal thought of yours. Aka, maybe the issue is you and not the sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:40 PM
0

My my, you really put some effort into this one. No one here heard this one before.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:22 PM
1

How did you not miss the point if you think the point was to perpetuate body shaming? You just seem to change the story now...
/r/MensRights30/12/22 08:47 PM
5

Showcasing a double standard when it comes to shaming of genitalia with regards to their size. The redditor didn’t say it’s ok to do. They just gave an equivalent to showcase that it is wrong. That isnt the same as perpetuating anything. In my opinion that was VERY obvious by them pointing out that it is hypocritical to think one is ok and not the other. If you disagree, please quote where the previous redditor said otherwise. If you can’t, then maybe you just jumped to conclusions that are simp…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:57 PM
21

Kinda doubt that that was the point being made....
/r/MensRights30/12/22 07:45 AM
1

Or he simply wasn’t in the country for a while. At this point it’s all speculation anyways.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 12:40 AM
18

that’s a bit rich coming from someone who has nothing to offer but reductionism and strawmanning.....
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/22 11:31 PM
2

Yes, but so much poorer they can’t detect a 33% discrepancy? Doubt it. That’s a huge error....
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 10:20 PM
2

It’s not the same at all actually. Even though both have a 2 inch difference, one is a 33% discrepancy and the other is about 3%. I can totally understand not accurately judging within 3%, actually that’s my lived experience. Funny enough just the inverse. Women told me repeatedly that I am NOT 6‘0, but 5‘10. I am actually exactly 6‘0. Only reason I can think of why this is happening is because of what you’ve stated. I just don’t think both are very comparable.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 10:19 PM
7

Why would you need a ruler at hand to half-decently judge a 2 inch difference? If you have a rough idea of dimensions, it should be relatively obvious, at least to the point that I doubt a huge % of women aren’t able to tell a roughly 33% discrepancy in length.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 08:51 PM
1

To me it seems you have trouble understanding. This also isn’t the first time I have that feeling with you. You make two claims at the same time. A hierarchy isn’t the same as not supporting one party. Your very first claim was that the system isn’t supporting victims. So what is it? Either it is a hierarchy, in which victims do get supported even if you don’t like that they are below the accused in that hierarchy or the system doesn’t support victims. You make both claims at the same time, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 07:46 PM
1

So victims are supported in general?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 07:14 PM
5

It’s funny that you claim you are trolling me while apparently totally unable to detect that I am trolling you since my first comment. It’s especially funny that you took my last comment serious somehow. It was pretty obvious.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 02:58 PM
4

I like how you try to justify yourself in front of me. You may continue to appease me.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 02:48 PM
8

god, I can’t stand your whining. please leave. =)
/r/MensRights26/12/22 02:36 PM
11

*whines about having to hear people “whine” about real issues
/r/MensRights26/12/22 02:25 PM
1

Your first claim is one of mutual exclusivity. Protecting the accused and not protecting the victim was your claim. That statement IS mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 10:49 AM
1

Choosing not to punish people without proof isn’t the same as not protecting victims. A hierarchy there doesn’t even closely match any criteria for mutual exclusivity, which is what you claim, but it is not true. If you disagree, please proof mutual exclusivity. And again, without proof, you cannot know if the accused or the accusor are the victim. It’s not possible. For your second part: None, accused shouldn’t be held accountable if there is no proof. Why should they and what for exactly? You …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 12:50 AM
20

Wasn’t that a pretty obvious result of applying positive discrimination? Only people who have 0 social competence could have thought that this wasn’t gonna happen. Humans just don’t work that way.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 11:44 PM
9

Red pill =/= men’s rights Redpill refers mainly to personal relationships regarding women. It usually revolves around dating. Men’s rights revolves mainly about how societies view and interact with men and men specific issues, such as homeless, draft, incarceration etc. I’ve observed the red movement since it’s start and not everything the red pill says is necessarily wrong, but there are many who are mainly guided by bitterness. My advice is to be mindful when consuming red pill media. There is…
/r/MensRights25/12/22 11:41 PM
1

Protecting the rights of the accused =/= not supporting victims. If the rights of the accused aren’t protected, what you get is an easily exploitable legal system in which accusation (of any crime really) becomes a perfect tool to harm others. In that case the accused is the victim, so I don’t understand why you think protecting the accused is the same as not protecting the victim. You don’t know who’s the victim unless you look at evidence. That balance is probably the toughest challenge of set…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 04:29 PM
1

What system again? You keep talking like it’s obvious, but it isn’t. You just vaguely say “the system”. You quote half of what I’ve said, using misrepresentation. I clearly said if this system isn’t working well enough it’s time to change it. However, that’s not the same as requesting that social media groups run by randoms on the servers of private companies getting free reign when it comes to rights to privacy, laws against slander or doing trials by public opinion. Furthermore you don’t seem …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 10:41 PM
1

Misrepresenting my argument won’t win you internet points. What system? FB groups aren’t part of the legal system. FB is literally a private company. You can’t verify any claim there. There is a national sex offender registry. Women still have the legal system available and if that doesn’t work sufficiently it’s time to change that, but FB groups for sure aren’t part of a real solution. All you are really saying is that you are fine with violating others rights without proof and that you don’t g…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 07:55 PM
1

How is it unrealistic if people got killed for accusations in the past? It’s not a hypothetical...... Also please explain how smear campaigns are a hypothetical.These things also happened already, you just choose to ignore it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 07:39 PM
1

Truly spoken like a unaffected person hahaha. It’s simply not true and you have literally no arguments, mainly because this idea of yours is stupid asf.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 11:52 AM
3

That’s slander, by definition, regardless of you agreeing or not I am afraid. Also, nothing bad will happen if someone is accused of being a rapist? lol? people got killed for just accusations, but sure, it’s “nothing”. Obviously it’s only nothing when it doesn’t involve you, yes? You not being able to see this being abused is hella naive. I guarantee an exploit that is so obvious and has almost no risk for the perpetrator IS 100% being exploited by people.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 01:55 AM
3

Multiple people that claim to be victims or victims? Can you tell the difference on a freaking fb post? I doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 01:44 AM
11

Called out? If you call others a rapist or whatnot with no proof whatsoever and post it for 100k+ people to see that’s literally the definition of slander, regardless of gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 12:32 AM
6

And you are completely neglecting the basic functionality of a tap. If you don’t like what comes out of the tap, you can simply close the tap? What’s the huge struggle here? Ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 11:50 PM
2

Ah true. Guess I misread that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 02:03 PM
1

I’ve seen less men than women get offended when they got approached by someone they don’t find attractive. Yet I wouldn’t feel confident enough to claim a massive (gendered) generalization, especially on personality traits that both genders clearly have. The larger contributor to your claim is personality, not gender. Assholes be assholes, with or without a dick or vagina is pretty irrelevant. What you are doing is asking super obvious questions with the aim to extrapolate the answer to a genera…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 01:54 PM
1

Yes, but that’s was clearly not the comparison that was being made.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 10:41 AM
9

Women don’t feel personally offended by men they aren’t attracted to nearly as often? Press X for doubt
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 10:33 AM
0

I think what is meant here is biological age. Easy example: Two geneticallly identical twins/clones are both 40 years old. #1 spend his twenties partying heavily, including drugs, not enough sleep etc., while #2 slept enough, never did drugs, blah blah. Both had the same lifestyle in der thirties, which we call average just for examples sake. In this scenario #1 and #2 are obviously the same age and even their genes are identical, but their biological will vary, with #2 being biologically younge…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 03:57 PM
2

really? Never? What would they have to gain from not supporting contraceptives, abortion and safe sex? Even from a purely egoistical standpoint it makes sense for them to support it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 07:37 PM
3

Getting the heavy equipment out to dig an even deeper trench ey? :)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 05:24 PM
19

Your comment totally doesn’t sound like an entrenched perspective....
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 10:53 AM
6

True, but this works both ways. A term also has to be accepted by the mainstream if you want it used by the mainstream. I could easily say the same with equal validity about feminism being renamed to another, non-gendered term. You want it to stand for equality, why can’t they compromise? However this would probably be perceived as a disingenuous attempt at changing the meaning of feminism, no?
/r/MensRights04/10/22 04:24 PM
7

Finding a more appropriate and less inflammatory term isn’t the same es disregarding actual toxic masculinity, though? It’s just finding a better term and improving its definition, something we constantly do with other terms, but somehow when it’s about “toxic masculinity” everybody fights so freaking hard to keep that term, even if it costs valuable and necessary discussion/discourse about gender issues, simply because the term is so easily misunderstood? I don’t get it. Is that term as it is r…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 04:13 PM
1

You claim a correlation. That’s not an objective measurement yet. That is why I asked how you measured your findings. Also, like I said before, you focused only on the English language. If your theory holds true and the numbers of slurs correlate directly with oppression, then cultures which use language that have a lower number of slurs for women than english or and equal number of slurs for men and women, then it should follow that they are technically less oppressive for women than english sp…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 04:46 PM
2

uhm, really? First of all it is super odd to count slurs and attempt to even correlate that with oppression. I mean, how do you measure that and what is your actual theory behind that, because if it’s just number of slurs = oppression points then that is more than lackluster, because that theory begins to crumble the second you gotta actually proof slurs result purely from oppression. And that’s not even the only issue with such a gross simplification of oppression and the development of languag…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 03:44 AM
7

And the men committing the crimes are the same as the men who are victims or what is your point here?
/r/MensRights14/09/22 10:40 AM
0

Not really. That’s literally your view of the world and not the state it is actually in. You view men and women that way. It’s nothing but a huge generalization. Generalizations are nothing but approximations to make decisions, but scale is pretty important to make those approximations useful to begin with. The scale of generalization you chose is so large that it’s usefulness is near 0.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 12:53 PM
16

Nah man. I am as against the notion that women can do no wrong as anyone, but you gotta admit that type of power isn’t relegated to women only. It is often people within certain structures that seem to be designed by people who don’t understand the concept of an exploit. Just look at cops for example, heck just look at politicians.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 03:09 PM
3

:-)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 03:56 AM
2

Undertone, per definition, is something that wasn’t actually said.....
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 03:33 AM
2

Dude is apparently banned from Facebook and Instagram now. Don’t know the exact reason so I suggest people who are interested check it out themselves. My opinion on him: He’s obviously a scam boi. His program is probably (never checked it out) the classic advice “hustle and work and you’ll be as rich as me”-bs that sadly a lot of people believe and buy for a lot of money. Anyone could create a program like that with a little research. It’s BS and I am 99% sure without ever seeing the program tha…
/r/MensRights19/08/22 08:17 PM
2

Sounds like a roundabout way of asking the same question. That’s just an extra step for the same interaction really. If someone gives me a list of 20 preferences that they obviously can’t match themselves and therefore I think they are entitled, I’m not going for a 20 point list of preferences myself just for the lulz. Doubt anyone does this. Point is: if someone is asking you “what do you bring to the table?” that person already established that they think you are entitled and can’t pull what y…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 10:55 PM
1

Yes, but my dude here apparently doesn’t care about that, which I can totally understand. I also don’t want to take care of a woman. If that means I miss out on women expecting me to finance their life’s, cool I don’t want them anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 11:15 AM
5

you ain’t really wrong, but you are being pedantic imho. do you really need links to be convinced that ANY social media offers misandrist (or even misogynistic) content? Really? Stuff like that is so common, it’s almost akin to asking for pictures of the sky when someone claims that the sky is blue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/22 11:01 PM
1

Not to be offending, bu I think you are mixing up quite some things and it’s confusing. being emotionally unstable isn’t a crime nor dark triad 90% of murders being done by man doesn’t change a ratio rating sex as being better isn’t the same as having more access to sex What exactly is your point and please be a bit more precise. Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 04:39 AM
1

At the same rate? If it’s well documented you should be able to prove that easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 04:13 AM
1

And tons of studies show male criminals and physically violent men having more sex partners than men without those traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 04:06 AM
1

For being a (serial) killer or for being a decent looking woman? Did she become MORE successful in dating after killing? Is killing the driving factor here? Because that’s the case for male serial killers. I didn’t even argue that female criminals don’t get sex, I argued that being a criminals doesn’t improve their chance to get sex, while being the opposite for male criminals. Your example doesn’t even disprove that. Find a couple cases of confirmed female serial killers getting a large male fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 04:04 AM
1

wtf? Data literally suggests the opposite. We’ve all heard of male serial killers having a surprisingly large female following. This is pretty much nonexistent for female serial killers. There are almost 0 instances of crime making women more successful dating wise. There are tons for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 03:43 AM
9

Sure, but an awesome personality isn’t average. Often what people mean by that isn’t just being a fun and kind guy, no you gotta be quite charismatic and so on. What you are saying is just another version of “be above average” and men are tired of that, especially when it comes from just as average women with just as average personalities. The alpha/beta stuff is a gross approximation at best anyways and anyone who applies it to the real world in such a binary way is nuts in my opinion, but ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 03:26 AM
1

You’ve essentially said nothing. Having rules, regardless of the amount of rules, are useless if they don’t vet for what you are actually looking. That is also true if there are people who fake certain characteristics to bypass those rules. Just having more rules won’t mitigate that problem one bit. Same as having those rules, if they don’t actually accomplish what you want them to accomplish. Rules that are bypassed or simply aren’t able to actually quantify the characteristics you are looking …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 03:02 PM
10

Are you misunderstanding the point on purpose just to say that? Cause it really looks like that when that was so obviously not the point being made....
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 11:27 AM
12

Not to crush your spirit, but I don’t see young women doing much better. People in general seem deluded asf when it comes to the opposite gender. It’s all stereotypes maxed out combined with resentment. Makes me wonder why they all wanna date to begin with....
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 12:35 PM
5

lol, did I say basic attraction or did I say “she’s a convenient fuckhole?” Furthermore, a dude who is looking for a relationship with a woman and the dude who sees her just as a convenient fuckhole both have the same basic attraction towards her, true. That’s why women still need to vet their options and no one said otherwise. To be specific: That is literally what I just mentioned. Doesn’t negate having a foot in the door, though. Stop attempting to misrepresent everything that is being said. …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 12:12 AM
6

How does that change the fact that you have at least a foot in the door/more chances to find someone without having to put as much effort compared to men? It doesn’t. Yes you still have to do some vetting, oh noes. The argument isn’t that it’s just a “women don’t have to do anything”-world, just that you start ahead slightly cause you don’t have to put as much effort to create basic attraction (which is at least a start). It’s not a hard concept, really. When I read your replies I get the feelin…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 11:50 PM
1

Not really. I was a feminist myself for about 15 years. I am fairly educated about the topic. The problem is that a dictionary definition is useless if I can describe multiple, and often opposing, views by the word „feminism.“ The very point of a definition is to be clear and not ambiguous so people can communicate efficiently. Furthermore a dictionary definition should not take precedence over real life results. Everybody can call themselves something, it doesn’t have to apply and fulfill the d…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 09:46 AM
1

The dictionary definition of feminism is useless for years now, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 01:08 AM
1

One study. N=379 bro....
/r/MensRights08/07/22 07:30 AM
0

What evidence can you show for your initial thesis? It is an equally valid question on where your evidence is that “a lot of dudes simultaneously want to be accepted for being average, while also being perceived by their women as the best/hottest.” I mean I get it your point and I can agree to a degree, but the way you attempt to discuss is honestly not that great and doesn’t exactly inspire wanting to discuss. You ask for evidence, but don’t produce evidence of your own. Only demanding evidence…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 12:08 PM
1

Point 1 is wrong. Conscription is not disbanded, it is officially paused. Furthermore women cannot be conscripted to bear arms. Article 12a Grundgesetzes für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 01:57 PM
1

It’s not the same side effects. Read the study and not some article and you’ll see the difference. The pill is out since 1955 or so and was improved multiple times. The whole mechanism behind it is totally different.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:41 PM
0

I doubt their vetting skills are particularly good since most of them seem to have joined because of bad experiences. Raising the criteria doesn’t improve that, especially when the list of criteria are 90% simply unrelated to commitment. External nice to haves don’t improve commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 08:49 AM
14

Give an example of a more neutral sub please. In my opinion there isn’t something like a neutral sub anymore with these types of topics. The ones that try never manage to stay neutral long and the others are just going nuts over having to make the tiniest concessions that men/women/etc could have it harder in any way.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 01:25 AM
1

Equally ridiculous to me. I try to steer clear of both types.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 12:11 PM
2

Yes, a couple. I wouldn’t say they are very common though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 11:11 AM
1

Not true. Where I am from a pretty normal job can make you independent already. Not rich, but independent. I wouldn’t call that having a career. That is precisely why I asked if you meant women with jobs or with a career. Being strong doesn’t have anything to do with having even a job in my opinion either. It also still stands that I wouldn’t say no career women nor women with jobs as a group don’t expect the gender roles I was taking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 10:58 AM
1

I’m not sure I can say most career women don’t rely on gender roles that I find dumb, e.g. men always pay for dates. That notion doesn’t seem to rely that much on having a career, even though a career makes one independent financially. There are also more ways for individuals to be independent/strong than having a career.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 10:51 AM
4

Define career woman. I don’t wanna have to assume you just mean women with jobs. PS: I’m not “honey.” Would be nice to discuss eye to eye ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 10:36 AM
1

Not necessarily.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 10:26 AM
3

What’s telling is that you think you can trick the most developed brain on the planet into its biological needs and core objectives being fulfilled by an easy to spot replication, which is nothing but a substitute. A substitute isn’t bad, but it is still just a substitute and the human psyche will know the difference. It will never give the same satisfaction, especially psychologically, as the real deal. Regardless of all those dating issues men may face. Humans are crazy good at spotting fake h…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 12:41 AM
16

I think the issue isn’t that men don’t want that. I think the issue is that ALOT of women who say they are strong and independent women aren’t exactly what they claim they are. Strong and independent individuals don’t have to tell everyone all the f*cking time how strong and independent they are. The women I personally know that I could categorize as strong and independent are not even remotely insufferable and don’t depend on dumb gender rules like “men always pay for dates” cause they are actu…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 12:28 AM
2

So I have to watch his videos to realize he is a porn actor when that’s very obvious? My whole argument doesn’t even rely on Owen Gray in particular, it relies on the definition of porn actor and porn actress. They act. That’s what they do. I don’t need to know specifics to know that. They will act even if they are not particularly into something. That’s what acting is. How about you at least attempt to make a point then? If I go watch 5 of his videos, am I suddenly qualified, even though my poi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 01:33 PM
2

Glad we agree. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 11:38 AM
3

Makes 0 sense man. It’s not like porn is some study of human mating behavior....
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 11:31 AM
8

So you look at a pornstar and his acting and go: “see how he does it? Clearly the women are enjoying it so we as men should all emulate it!” And you call that proof for what exactly? That they like this type of sex or that it is realistic sex? I mean obviously it’s physically possible as we can see in videos I guess, but when people refer to porn not being real they usually refer to it not being done in a realistic scenario and not that it’s physically impossible anyways. What you are looking at…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 11:16 AM
–

Stats for income also actually exist...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 01:26 AM
0

Why wouldn’t it apply? You did dig your own grave by not reading the post correctly (your glasshouse). It was clearly stated that there where witnesses of her BS before the knife incident. That thought was basic asf and you didn’t manage to do it, but I am the stupid one? Ok lol.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 01:13 AM
20

The rebuttal reads like it’s written by someone who is incapable to understand individual oppression. Example: Obviously no one argues that disabled men are less oppressed than non-disabled men just because non-disabled men are drafted. This however doesn’t just erase the oppression of being drafted. If I remember correctly feminism introduced the idea of intersectionality. Seems like that one gets magically thrown out the window whenever anyone mentions draft.🤷‍♂️ Furthermore most countries did…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/22 12:27 AM
11

Sitting in a glass house throwing stones today, huh?
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:11 PM
5

What’s so scientific about that blog post? It’s literally an opinion....no hard data there.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:08 PM
2

The vast majority isn’t and some reptiles and insects practice cannibalism, a lot of insects die directly after reproduction and some even get eaten by their young, etc. Case in point: you are desperately trying to find ways to make your argument work, yet you can’t remotely explain what your initial point even has to do with humans who obviously are not any of this. Humans are neither reptiles, birds, fish, insects or anything that is even remotely capable of parthenogenesis nor is our social b…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 10:05 AM
1

Limited and most reptiles are sexual dimorphs and not bisexual. This doesn’t support your initial argument at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 11:15 PM
1

hen and egg problem. men offer only x cause women only offer y. women only offer y cause men only offer x. same same, but different, but still same. I don’t think there is even a real gender difference when it comes to this. The incentive structure seems locked for both genders with regards to this topic, it has nothing to do with simply being uncomfortable. Or at least appears locked for most people. The easiest way out is both genders start offering both. This restricting your offer to get a b…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 11:11 PM
1

Most species you refer to are most likely insects. So yes, there is a pretty big gap in mental capabilities between mammals and insects. They don’t even have a brain....
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 11:03 PM
3

Totally agree, especially the last sentence. Most of the women who put a huge emphasis on the financial means of a man are also the ones who tend to be the one who complain the most about men wanting sex in return. Obviously it is absolutely fine to find that disgusting, but if everything is an exchange of resources for you, why be surprised men who want to exchange resources often match up with you? You want money, he wants sex. Literally one of the oldest exchanges of resources between men and…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 08:10 PM
3

Most, probably all, of those species are not mammals. This comparison is crazy surface level and doesn’t really allow for any logical conclusion regarding humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 12:05 PM
3

With the same logic men can also complain about providing. It’s like a hen and egg issue almost. You don’t wanna provide, but be provided for -> you get men that feel no incentive to do more than provide, because what do you bring to the table if you need a provider and a nurturer? If you don’t start providing you won’t ever create the incentive to put more effort into all non-provider traits you are looking for. Same as most men do too. I don’t even see a real gender difference here. Men want w…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 11:21 AM
6

Not more or less than you did, but at least I am smart enough to also state the consequences are unknown and therefore I am at least aware I am speculating. This really wasn’t any type of “gotcha” lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/22 10:21 PM
9

STDs that are only curable because we have a society. I doubt human civilization would have developed like it did without monogamy. Consequences are literally unknown.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/22 08:42 PM
10

How does a competitive edge sound unhelpful? I get that you might not think it’s that great, but factually it is quite useful. It becomes less useful at the extremes though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/22 09:39 AM
2

And that means I automatically agree with OP because I said your comparison is off?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:54 PM
1

Did I say that marriage is worthless, forced or that I think like OP? I think not. Maybe learn to differentiate?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:46 PM
1

So you have to heavily constrain your argument in an attempt to make it look like a good comparison? Good talk I guess....
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:39 PM
1

Weird comparison as the stakes are so different. The worst that is gonna happen if you won’t get accepted at Uni is that you can’t go to that specific Uni. You don’t actually lose anything, you can only gain. Marriage/divorce are quite different.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:36 PM
9

I advice you to read up on MGM and FGM. You’ve got some typical half-knowledge there. There are multiples types of FGM/MGM and they are not all equally invasive and therefore your assertion of one being by definition worse than the other is factually incorrect.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/22 07:59 PM
1

Well, to be honest I wasn’t particularly friendly and it’s not that rare that people online don’t seem to have any semblance of nuance. Discussions like this usually are heavily binary, which I think is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 04:12 PM
1

Age of consent and being a minor are not the same thing just because they overlap. Age of consent according to you is 16 in philly, right? Is 16 not a minor suddenly? Can they go vote and are legally adults? Why would I argue this way if, according to you, I think we got a moral superiority over you guys, when our age of consent is lower? Makes 0 sense. I have a whole comment laying out the exact laws and why I think it’s better as it allows great freedom, but also protection. It’s a better and …
/r/MensRights22/05/22 10:56 AM
0

lol, why are your quotes always missing key words? Why are you arguing age of consent even? I didn’t argue about age of consent. Maybe, just maybe I get annoyed having to explain over and over that I am not even talking about what you keep rambling on about and you keep trying to win this discussion with disingenuous quotes in which you leave very important context out? So ya, go mh mh mh yourself, surprised clownboi. PS: age of consent in Germany is 14. the fact that you keep repeating what’s t…
/r/MensRights22/05/22 08:11 AM
0

Maybe read my first comment?! “How do you proof consent when there is a clear power imbalance like teacher/student?” Reason why it’s illegal by default. We can’t simply assume consent in a minor towards their teacher. This doesn’t mean this headline is or isn’t rape. “Where I am from it is literally illegal to give grades to a (university) student you have a sexual relationship with because of this pretty obvious conflict of interest. You can do it, but you can’t stay their teacher/prof.” Does t…
/r/MensRights21/05/22 03:41 AM
3

What nonsense. I argued morals and why laws are made like that in pretty obvious general sense and additionally it is completely possible for the student to consensual have sex with their teacher BUT it still being illegal because of the implications. Maybe your issue is that you argue in binary options only, huh?
/r/MensRights21/05/22 03:25 AM
3

Obviously most people won’t just say they won’t do it with you, but if that’s the case, most likely they will stay silent about it, which is why I basically said: people need to talk about it and if they don’t, don’t expect it to just be ok. Also, no offense intended, but you seem to work of a lot of assumptions. You don’t really know that most of the time there was insecurity in the past and you also don’t know if most guys think.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 03:18 AM
6

lol, are you really so naive that you don’t realize it doesn’t have to be said to still have an effect? Like, for real? What if the student suddenly doesn’t want anymore? Clearly that created a vulnerable position? Also, I never said this specific case is de facto rape. If you look closely there isn’t even the word rape in my comment.... Also, you quoted me wrong. I talked about the country I am from and why it’s like it is. I didn’t talk about legality in Pennsylvania and it’s completely irrele…
/r/MensRights21/05/22 03:05 AM
5

To make it super simple: Legit reason=ok reason is she doesn’t want it specifically with you = creates reasonable doubt about their attraction towards the man. If there is a legit reason the woman should simply state that reason instead of asking her man to be super humanly resistant to basic human psychology. If he’s being an ass about a legit reason, that opens the question of he’s a good enough man anyway. It’s not like the woman loses something here. It’s a bit intellectually dishonest to ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 02:19 AM
17

*sigh you don’t know what I thought (I don’t even need to prove this lol) and I never dodged your question. You believing that doesn’t make it true. I clearly explained my position relates to certain situations, which funny enough you agreed with previously. You accusing me of some random feminist BS doesnt make it true and the funny thing is you don’t even seem to get I am not pro-feminism and my biggest issue with them is mainly the irrational use of power/privilege, which is exactly why I foc…
/r/MensRights21/05/22 01:12 AM
0

Which opinions on Twitter, of all places, are solicited? Isn’t the point of Twitter literally to tweet whatever you wanna say?
/r/MensRights21/05/22 12:36 AM
38

No I am not, but you seem to be on the trip to interpret it that way. I clearly made an argument about teacher/student relationships or to be even more clear and how it is actually phrased in law where I am from: You cannot have sex with someone who you are a form of guardian to. There isn’t a better translation as English lacks that word. Clearly what is meant is situations like Teacher/student Nurse or doctor/patient Prison guard/ detainee Police officer/ detainee or victim Social worker/ soci…
/r/MensRights21/05/22 12:23 AM
93

How do you proof consent when there is a clear power imbalance like teacher/student? Where I am from it is literally illegal to give grades to a (university) student you have a sexual relationship with because of this pretty obvious conflict of interest. You can do it, but you can’t stay their teacher/prof. And this makes perfect sense and is pretty damn rational if you ask me.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 11:59 PM
7

Your personal standard is fine as this is your own, but the definition clearly makes 6’0 above average. Your personal standard is irrelevant in this regard. Definitions matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 07:45 PM
9

Most men are short? That’s literally an oxymoron....
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 05:36 PM
3

You are discussing multiple things, but treat them as one. Pedophilia rate between genders Assault (I assume sexual assault) Men being more criminal in general, but that isn’t an indication than men abuse children more. So clarify first what you want to discuss before you ask for stats. Furthermore what you’ve linked aren’t research papers, but a website article and an info pdf. How would you know if they actually talk real points and not just their interpretation of it, unless you read the actu…
/r/MensRights15/05/22 03:36 PM
1

Depends strongly on your definition of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 02:15 PM
2

Ostensibly means as it appears. So it might appear like it’s only men to you, but that’s just your own bias if you ask me. You not being able to recognize how men are oppressed and how women contribute to societys oppression is your own failure. If you look at human history oppression is pretty damn universal. Sure there are specific gender differences, but to claim some male peasants 200 years ago were not oppressed would make you look like a fool. Also, what do you think about pro-life women? …
/r/MensRights15/05/22 12:43 PM
3

The rate of pedophilia for men and women is the same, it’s literally just bias that makes people more weary of men.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 12:31 PM
1

Society as a whole and not just “men.”
/r/MensRights15/05/22 12:25 PM
1

Not necessarily, but would I be surprised? Nope
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/22 04:28 PM
1

No no, I clearly disagree. you simply didn’t get that my initial point isn’t that none of these pockets ever exist, but that they are actually quite rare; which is most definitely far apart from a lot. You’ve just catched up. I never changed my viewpoint during our “discussion.”
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 04:23 PM
1

Yes and you can also go to MENSA and meet other IQ individuals, but that’s literally the definition of selection bias. Let’s be real, unless you specifically select for high IQ, 120 isn’t exactly what one would consider “average.” I also said almost no social pocket, no that they don’t exist, ergo what I said is still correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 03:18 PM
1

120 as an average exists in almost no social pocket. Even the average university student is „just“ between 112-115. 120 and above means your IQ is higher than that of 90.87% of the population. 130 IQ -> 97.725% and 140 -> 99.617
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 01:21 PM
2

Yes, what a dodge. If you have to misrepresent the initial argument, you are the one dodging. I don’t need to substantiate how as it was already done, you just chose to misrepresent the topic and made it about safety, which is clearly not the topic. How do women have it objectively harder in dating if we leave the topic of safety out of the discussion and discuss options, which is the actual topic if you read OP? It’s literally mentioned multiple times in OP. It’s pretty obvious it’s not about s…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 07:25 AM
0

Why do you think you created some compelling argument? It’s pretty clear what is meant here and it’s not about how it’s harder to not get assaulted, but more like basic attention/connections people want. So nice whatsboutism or severe lack of reading comprehension 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 04:22 PM
1

Not everyone of above average intelligence is short, ugly and non-neurotypical. What you describe is more of the classical ugly nerd theme. Intelligent, but socially very awkward. Those people definitely exist, but it’s not necessarily true to the extend you might think it is. And chemistry doesn’t really have a shortage of these people either. As does engineering and most of STEM to be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 12:59 PM
3

Intelligence is a byproduct AND a coping mechanism? What’s that shitty hand one has been dealt when above average intelligence?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 11:10 AM
2

it’s not null, as your own statement shows. access is not always guaranteed just because something is supposedly free. Your opinions read like the opinions of a simpleton. You can’t seem to think about any situation in which your little birth control seems to be not working.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 11:50 AM
4

And your phrasing proves you think in boxes. Who exactly is “you guys?”Be specific. I am now a MRA by association or what? You literally just assumed my position without ANY evidence or even a hint. Surely this is super useful in bringing men and women together. 🙄
/r/MensRights07/05/22 11:45 AM
5

Guess you haven’t seen the threads in here calling out exact that behavior? Something I’ve rarely to never seen in feminist subs/forums in over 14 years, so at least a counter action inside the group exists. Maybe 5 minutes isn’t that much time to accurately observe over 320k people and form an informed opinion? Just saying.....
/r/MensRights07/05/22 11:34 AM
3

Yes, but there are many conditions that make it free of punishment. It’s not just plainly illegal in Germany. And I heavily agree that a working healthcare system would do a lot.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 10:58 AM
2

It also fails sometimes and not everyone has equal access. Not really a good argument.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 10:54 AM
13

It’s not moving the goal post if the definition is off. That’s a common issue with studies. People assume definitions fit the standard/“casual” meaning of a word, but that’s not really the case. Not saying that’s how rainn operates, but if it does define it like the previous redditor claimed, then those studies are essentially worthless in this context.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 02:38 AM
3

Feels like this person is mistaking non-neurotypicality with neuroticism. But reading studies doesn’t make one severely neurotic either. It’s just a bogus claim and most definitely unscientific. If you look further down the thread you can find this gem of pure rational logic from the same redditor: ⁠Most people on dating apps aren't meeting up ⁠It's probably because most men on okccupid are probably just incredibly unattractive. There have also been a lot of issues with that study. ⁠The opinions…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 10:21 AM
26

It’s still a double standard. When women do things just saying „I’ve seen it“ is literally not enough. I don’t have doubts that socially vulnerable people are in danger of these people, but especially with human trafficking we’ve seen a surge in female accomplices the last decade. The data is there, so to pretend it’s only single men is just....unwise. It’s not even decent advice if you leave half the truth out just because it’s not politically correct to state these things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/22 08:00 PM
1

I didn’t make any statement. I said what you said isn’t what the previous Redditor said. I am not the same person.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 12:19 PM
2

Funny attempt at turning this around. The burden of proof is on you as you are making this statement and not me. I can’t ask a more specific question besides „what is your argument besides it being not true?“ because you haven’t made one. „It’s not true from a woman’s perspective“ is de facto not an argument, but just a statement, which by itself is worthless. If you want to assert your opinion and be taken seriously, it’s is your responsibility to assert it, which you haven’t done. How can I as…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 12:09 PM
3

All you are saying is „it’s not true“ but you don’t elaborate at all why that is the case. All you do is follow up your non-argument with assumptions. PS: who is „you“?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 11:50 AM
9

haha what type of reductionism and low effort reading was that? That’s not what was said at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 11:29 AM
19

Depends what you mean by that. I’m not from the US and we don’t do bipartisanship. In US terms probably all quite liberal, but there isn’t a large difference on that topic between conservatives and liberals as they simply don’t seem to drop their dissonance anyways.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/22 01:39 AM
25

Nah man, this happened before feminism and also with non-feminist women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/22 12:39 AM
43

You know whats the best about all of it? I’ve literally expressed that thought when my female friends complained about a guy like that or they wondered why so many handsome guys don’t think they are handsome and they look at me like I’m solving a fucking triple integral in my head. And they are not too dumb to understand it at all, it’s just a huge chunk of very persistent cognitive dissonance. They don’t want it to be true because it destroys their view on masculinity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/22 12:37 AM
84

Dude I feel this so hard. Society expects men to be super confident while simultaneously doing almost everything to keep that from happening. There is practically no positive reinforcement happening AT ALL, but we gotta be super confident without any positive feedback whatsoever. Then people go completely nuts and sometimes complain guys are too full of themselves, which is literally a symptom of what I stated above, because how do you get super confident while getting no positive feedback besid…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/22 11:28 PM
12

Just shows that they are not only low empathy, but also uneducated about what depression even is. Literally stupid talk.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/22 01:56 AM
2

I’ve observed it long enough, probably longer than most people here. Sure, quite a lot of people here are like that, but that is not the same as your original statement being true nor accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 02:18 PM
5

it’s downright unintelligent to say any man who knows about X does so because of Y. It’s also logically incongruent to say “any man” and follow up the reasoning with “usually” which clearly doesn’t mean “any man.” So ya, low value logic right there.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 12:55 PM
4

low value logic as it’s not congruent.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 12:11 PM
15

I always lol. It’s almost fascinating if it wouldn’t be so frustrating to hear. It’s like those people don’t actually know a man IRL and only read about them in books.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 07:45 PM
1

Ok, so what should she do? Start dating from IQ 100? Maybe she does, who knows? It’s not like most people run around asking for IQ test if they deem the person intelligent enough already.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 10:48 PM
2

Obviously she is limiting her dating pool,but I didn’t disagree? All I said was that an IQ of 112 isn’t thaaaat outrageous, especially if you narrow it down to something like university. The average IQ of people attending university is in fact roughly 110-115. I get that quite a few women have dumb standards that basically only cover 0.1% of the population, but her particular standard regarding intelligence isn’t even close to outrageous, especially if her IQ is in the same ballpark.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 02:36 PM
4

Top 20% IQ is just 112 and up. 112 IQ isn’t that crazy. Pretty ok chances to find someone at university around that ballpark.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 09:16 AM
1

Are they met? Cause a lot of people keep rambling on about their standards and what they apparently deserve, but a quick look into their dating history shows none of these really exist. Heck, I wouldn’t be surprised if half the women who think guy A is not tall enough for them had sex with guys shorter than that guy and didn’t even notice cause they were attracted to them which clearly wasn’t height.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 09:07 AM
2

So now it’s about equality and not equity? Nah you have no clue cause clearly nothing you’ve said so far about me was even remotely correct lol. If you’ve actually read my post history you would have know I was a feminist for a decade plus, but guess that slipped by your impeccable observation skills. 🙄
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:33 AM
1

I never asked that and I told you to pay attention. Like, take 30 seconds, lol. I asked why equity and not equality?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:30 AM
1

Haha spoken like a true simpleton again. Do you always think in binary? 0 or 1. You know the world is more complex, no? No I am not anti-feministic. What is feminism even to you? Define it, and don’t give me the run of the mill bs I googled 2 minutes pep talk everybody knows. Be specific 😉
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:29 AM
1

Well I can and I seem to have a proven track record of doing so. You can’t seem to and have a track record of not being able to. Please use some equity and give me what I need (hint 🙄)to have a proper discussion and answer questions with the same good faith that I actually do. You are actually really boring cause you have 0 input it seems. Assumption ain’t input and I do like political discussions and not monologues.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:26 AM
1

Look, this ain’t Simon says. Contribute to the discussion. I have absolutely no incentive to answer such dumb questions when we both seem to know the difference. So, why equity? You the real chicken now? Cause the trend is that you can’t or won’t answer questions but keep asking yourself. Surely this ain’t equality nor equity.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:18 AM
1

You assume again that I just chose this forum. I told you repeatedly that I am also in other subs. Can you at least pay attention lol? Yes, also gender equality, but not limited to that. Why equity? You know that’s not even remotely the same as equality, right?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:15 AM
1

Politics isn’t specific? Fine I like to talk about politics, especially human rights, equality and all issues encompassing that.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:10 AM
1

You are too chickenshit to ask a question cause it might show how you are wrong lol. Why not ask an honest question and get an honest answer back? Also, why would I be worried about work? My job isn’t really concerned with this shit and most of my office doesn’t even know Reddit exists. This ain’t Canada or the US. Stuff is different here, you finally get that? My boss 100% doesn’t know about Reddit I already told you quite a bit. You think I’d do that cause I am scared of losing my job? In my f…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:07 AM
1

Haha, so you are the liar and claim everyone else is lying? Kinda figured when you claimed to have 3 kids and a wife of 20 years. Like some Canadian 50+ boomer writes like a 16 year old edge lord. Be specific? Why, so you can move the goal post again? Nah You ask a specific question and I’ll answer instead of your rather boring assumption game.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:33 AM
1

Assumptions again? It’s not even predictable anymore. How can your mind operate under this amount of assumptions? Is it to protect your ego cause technically you can never be wrong cause you simply assume and go with that? Does Canada suffer this much under stereotyping? Honest question lol. I am baffled and semi-amazed actually. Why do I have to think men’s rights are under a threat to be here? Cause you think that’s the only valid reason to be here? I mean you also think everyone here thinks t…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:26 AM
1

Also told you. Are you sure you ain’t the one lying about your life? How can you be an English major with 3 degrees, which is quite impressive, but got such poor reasoning AND such spotty reading comprehension. Almost feels like I am the English major here....
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:02 AM
1

I told you I am 75% German, 25% native. I told you I have a masters in engineering (mechatronics to be exact), I do have a job, I do not lie about my belief and I have a gf. Already told you. Pretty spotty reading comprehension from an ex English teacher.... And a pretty wannabe “gotcha moment” but ok. 5/7 for effort.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:59 AM
1

I answered your questions for a long time and asked the same in return. There is no „your turn“ lol I already answered
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:54 AM
1

Not really, that’s literally why I said it doesn’t matter what ethnicity I am to call out your xenophobic trash talk? It’s amusing how you keep looking for shit you somehow can’t manage to find....ever. Why is it so tough for YOU to admit shit? All you focus on is moving the goal post of me admitting shit. If I don’t admit to something, cause frankly it’s nonsense, you immediately jump to the next thing YOU claim about me that I have to somehow admit. It’s fairly predictable at this point. I don…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:48 AM
1

I didn’t grow up there, I don’t have a passport and culturally I am German. Why would I claim to be American? wtf? Genes are not nationality, but ethnicity. „American“ isn’t an ethnicity.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:40 AM
1

It’s like globalization or planes don’t exist for you. Are you really this dense? Mixed people are a new concept for you or what?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:17 AM
1

Now you are simply making stuff up lol. This is gold lol. You are so biased you literally made yourself belief I am an American red piller who fakes being a progressive German who’s disappointed in the left which he belongs to politically. For what? Make it make sense? To impress some random wannabe edgelord online like you? haha höhö I don’t have a US passport nor do I want one. Should I send you a pic of my passport? Why do you think I am American or red pill? I post regularly in German subs e…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:15 AM
1

How is per se even an indication? Literally means by itself or intrinsically, so what I said is 100% correct. Also, funny how we go to me admitting shit I got nothing to do with while we discussed what you most definitely said and somehow can’t admit. Sitting in a glass house throwing rocks eh? Please point to ANY sexist shit I said. I know you can’t find shit cause it’s not there. Didn’t you ask me if women should vote? Wasn’t my answer yes? Come on now. Prove your assumptions or maybe just shu…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 12:57 AM
1

Still got a masters in engineering so take a guess if I got a job lol. I am also not anti-feminist per se or red pill. Again pure assumption. Why even red pill? Are we in red pill? Is using red pill language to communicate with others in that space automatically an admission of believing the same crap? Doesn’t this look like bias 101 to you? I mean come on lol. Whats this here? Obviously you don’t have to care about shit, but you are literally the idiot here if you are too dumb to realize not ev…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 12:42 AM
1

I never said Canada sucked, but your claim that Canada is the only sane country is obviously dumb. Finishing that off with that xenophobic BS and a bunch of hahahahas that make you look like a 16 year old edge lord makes you look even dumber. Also, I AM literally that guy and I AM 25% native and guess what, I don’t have to be of an ethnicity to criticize xenophobic bs towards any ethnicity. It’s completely irrelevant what my ethnicity is in that context. And btw? Who is „you guys?“ This is a sub…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 12:31 AM
1

„Are you American? How are Indigenous people doing there? LOL Do you even have a job? Hahahahahahahahahahah“ This comment ain’t yours? You are not making fun of US natives not having jobs to own someone? Please explain then.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 12:08 AM
1

You still made fun of US natives not having jobs due to oppression and you tried to own someone using it. Being dumb enough to miss my ethnicity doesn’t revoke that at all. Still showed your cards. Nice try indeed. Nice self own btw
/r/MensRights19/03/22 12:03 AM
1

Who cares about feel good school classes and TV networks when you still get f**ked in real life? That’s really the best you came up with after your ehm, pretty xenophobic comment about me not having a job cause you assumed I am native and as such I can’t have a job? Oh and I forgot the many hahaha‘s cause that would be so funny.... I mean you showed your cards here already.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 11:55 PM
1

Alright. My apologies. What exactly is it that you don’t understand? Does it have to do with the draft or is it something else I’ve said?
/r/MensRights18/03/22 09:54 PM
1

Ahahaha I am German and 25% native with a masters in engineering and since you seem to have the mental capacity of a Lemure I am sure I got a significantly better job than you. Jokes on you, it was pretty obvious I am located in Germany. It’s funny when idiots think they are smart and start acting smug ^^
/r/MensRights18/03/22 07:01 AM
1

That started to conversation for you. I simply said if feminism wouldn’t constantly try to have the image of helping and supporting everyone and being THE social movement by also blocking other movements progress, maybe people wouldn’t dislike you so much when everybody notices feminism isn’t actually doing what they claim they do. Feminism caused this itself by its own behavior. This doesn’t mean I am personally upset by the draft. Stop being such a simpleton.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 06:58 AM
1

What you mean no one says that? Literally thousands of feminist say exactly that daily. And I am not contradicting myself. You just don’t seem to get that I don’t have to be told that it’s not feminisms responsibility and men should start their own movement of they desire social change. I never disagreed?! The easy but rude way to say it: No one fucking asked you to take responsibility to begin with, but feminism claims to support such causes, hence the questions and hence the constant „not our …
/r/MensRights17/03/22 09:24 PM
1

You talk like an absolute doofus about politics, no offense. Canada is the only sane country? Bitch pls, how about you start treating natives like people before talking that shit? Why the sudden question if women should be able to vote there? Yes they should? What does that have to do with your uninformed ass not knowing about drafts and presuming the rest of the world operates like Canada? Canada had a draft and you better expect conscription again if Canada ever has to defend itself like Ukrai…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 09:17 PM
1

So? How does that change your argument?
/r/MensRights17/03/22 08:58 PM
2

Why do you have to say it’s not your responsibility? Because you get asked what feminism did to abolish the draft. Why do people ask these types of questions that basically always get a reaction from feminists about it not being their job/responsibility to help men? Because feminists constant claim to support those causes, but when pressed all we ever hear are excuses and silence instead of „here is a list of what was done or tried“ even though they are one of the most powerful and resourceful s…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 08:55 PM
2

Only “sane” countries, right? *laughs in progressive german Pretty much all countries have a draft. And the countries that don’t, never abolished it and just paused it. It’s literally in the German constitution that women cannot be drafted. You literally have no clue. And the argument that it’s just fantasy is nonsense. What makes you say that, besides that you live in a cushy first world country? Fantasy quickly turns to reality, which makes you still sign up for the oh so fictional draft. Actu…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 08:38 AM
5

No one would have asked if feminists wouldn’t claim to massively support men constantly. Self made problems.....
/r/MensRights17/03/22 08:21 AM
4

The term incel was literally created by an involuntarily celibate woman. Not really a ridiculous concept unless you are not able to realize outliers exist. 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 02:59 PM
3

If you would truly be a slave you wouldn’t be able to say that openly. Pretty excessive hyperbole....
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 12:59 AM
4

If they change their listeners mindset towards more misandry, aren’t women on average becoming more sexist then? I mean...that’s kinda the direct consequence, regardless if it was achieved through free will or manipulation, the result is the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 12:55 AM
6

You also mentioned nice only in quotations while pretending to talk about actual kindness being the easy way out. Basically, you didn’t even make a proper argument. Apart from that your “argument” (yes “”) doesn’t even put kindness or niceness in a context, you simply declare it as weak. All in all you seem to have pretty poor reasoning skills, mixed with broad generalizations and absolutely no feel for the nuances the world actually operates in. You just think you said something smart, but you …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 02:13 AM
10

Isn’t that the usual modus operandi? Seems to be a quite common thought pattern regardless of gender...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:34 PM
5

What are you on about? You know bones are still cells and as such their DNA can be determined. So intersex people can be identified by their bones. DNA extractions from bones are most definitely a thing and have been for quite a while actually. I don’t really understand why you would think human bones won’t let us identify such basic information when we have so many more options than just looking at their shape or whatever. Furthermore, intersex humans are quite rare and apart from those outlier…
/r/MensRights26/02/22 06:41 PM
2

I’ve casually scrolled through this thread an you by far stand out the most by talking absolute nonsense and attacking people seemingly in a frenzy. No one here is pro martial rape or forcing women to have sex when they have legitimate health issues that make sex painful. No one here said anything like this as I’ve scrolled through. Did you ever consider your outbursts happen because you interpret everything in some ridiculous over the top way? Problem seems to be clearly with you here.... I sug…
/r/MensRights01/02/22 04:18 PM
1

I am sensing desperate grasping at straws since your whole point rides on changing the narrative of the original post. It was pretty clear what OP meant here and it’s not dudes who write poetry about a girls, take them out, tell her she’s his soul mate and introduce them to their moms just to smash. Pretty obviously it wasn’t about anything you just talked about, so how about you stop trying to create a point just to have one? Ya, sure, quite a few men are lying to secure a piece for a month or …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 06:06 PM
2

Your example literally only works if the man is lying to get in her pants. OP literally specified that she thinks his gestures mean something they don’t, aka not lying. In any other case besides the man lying to get in her pants your argument falls apart completely. Sorry, not an equivalent situation to what OP was talking about. Your argument is inferior in this case and possibly in most cases. :p
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 05:02 PM
–

I’m not telling you to settle but FDS is literally about not giving those qualities you might or might not have back in most cases. The general idea there seems to be to receive more than to give back so if you follow that advice, how are any of the things you could bring to the table actually ON the table if you keep them locked away 90% of the time? Makes 0 sense like I said. And don’t tell me that’s not how it is, I follow FDS since it’s existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 01:25 AM
–

So how is that working out so far? Are you in a happy and fulfilling relationship? Maybe you don’t get what you need if you don’t offer anything in return and that’s the main issue with FDS. FDS wants to create something out of nothing. May work short term if you at least offer really great looks, but long term? lol literally a dumb approach
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 01:13 AM
–

FDS is a bunch of entitled low value women pretending 99% of men are low value to feel better about themselves. Nothing on that forum is sane or smart. It show insane standards and why do they think high value men would care for women being entitled and not giving much back when they can get their pick of the litter anyways? Makes 0 sense and for sure not smart. If these women would be as successful as they claim in securing a high value male then why would they even join FDS and talk crap while…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 12:47 AM
1

It’s been pretty obvious what I mean, but ok. What is imposed on men? The law. If you reverse the genders in the exact same situation you should get the same results, in theory. Actually being a woman in divorce court is most likely better than being a man. Her opinion on what goes into marriage or what they agreed on is irrelevant if the prenup gets tossed because it’s not up to standard, whatever those currently are. This happens all the time to men, even if they agreed to something in the pre…
/r/MensRights13/01/22 01:22 PM
2

Ok, but I don’t see how her not agreeing is relevant here. There are laws for that, no? Seems pretty similar to what is imposed on men.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 10:24 PM
3

How isn’t it exactly what is imposed on men? It’s literally the exact same laws at play....
/r/MensRights12/01/22 05:08 PM
1

Your claim that you close your eyes for the reasons you stated is literally demanding beauty? You literally claimed to have been disappointed... Also, fact: women and men demand beauty. Also another fact: ye, most men are overweight. So are most women nowadays. Have you followed obesity stats, like the last 50 years? Literally all of humankind got fatter, even children. It’s not only men, you just focus on men cause that’s who you have sex with I guess. The way you talk let’s it shimmer through …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 06:02 AM
1

lol lol your claim was about closing eyes closing your eyes can enhance other senses, like touch. Pretty important when enjoying sex, no? Closing ones eyes can also be a tell of pleasure. It’s not always about disliking what you see. You have an insanely limited perception about what closing your eyes can mean if you truly believe it’s only ever about what you see. you talk like all women are the same. They ain’t, that’s a fact. It’s like you’ve never seen someone close their eyes while experien…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 05:48 AM
2

Still a weird comparison. You see, we as humans are very good at overcoming biological hurdles. This is why we got what you see when you look outside the window. Essentially, we developed so far that we literally overcame our own biology to a degree (the pill/iboprofen for example) and made the importance of biological advantages, like strength, basically completely irrelevant. In today’s society we overcame exactly those advantages that men benefit from, like enhanced physical capabilities, bes…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 05:39 AM
1

Period? Who the f are you even, speaking for all women? Maybe some close their eyes when they particularly enjoy something, maybe some like to stare into the mans eyes? How would you even know, besides the ridiculous assumption that all women are the sameas you? lol’d hard at the lack of logic and misplaced confidence in being correct by 100%
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 05:19 AM
4

Your example is too simplified I think. How do you know when someone complains about that it is JUST the number they whine about and not the behavior too? Seems a bit like an assumption that this is the most common scenario. Even if it would be, it doesn’t cover all other scenarios. Maybe 8 sexual partners isn’t that crazy either, unless one is quite young. For me, as I care about LTRs mainly, I wouldn’t want someone, let’s say exceptionally promiscuous, not really cause they had sex, but it mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 03:47 AM
3

On a more general note: People don’t always grow from their mistakes and if they keep repeating them too much it’s a bit naive to expect them to immediately be successful the very next time they are challenged.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 03:33 AM
10

I personally don’t care about n-count so I don’t have skin in the game here, but logically your statement is odd. How was that number achieved? By the way you acted. The number is just the result, but it cannot be logically argued that it’s “just a number” that is entirely disconnected from ones past behavior. It’s literally the numerical representation of some behavior patterns in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 03:21 AM
1

How can one baby trap women when women are literally not legally obligated to carry a baby to term nor legally obligated to keep a child via giving the child up for adoption or use a baby hatch? Legally, men cannot do any of these things so your little theory with one anecdote is just that, one little anecdote and a rather illogical theory based on really nothing. I mean, I agree this specimen isn’t exactly a grace to our race and she did him a favor by actually being willing to carry it to term…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 10:26 AM
1

It’s up to you to use your brain and realize that your one time experience getting rejected isn’t the equivalent of experiencing men’s dating woes at all. Like for real, I am having trouble believing you are that socially ignorant so I just think you are trolling. 😅
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 02:57 PM
1

Makes perfect sense unless you are conflating basic human decency with respect, which is what I think you are doing here. What you are talking about is basic human decency, which everyone is entitled to in my opinion. People who don’t show basic human decency to everyone equally are maladjusted to me. But that is not the same as respect, which is something usually granted to individuals who did something for others or their community or made other accomplishments, AKA it is earned.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:44 PM
3

Oh I should go by what she actually typed? Sure thing. “What makes you, a man who is not close to any women and women largely don’t seem to want to be around or interact with in any way (gee I sure wonder why), more knowledgeable on this topic than an actual woman?” “No wonder you guys have zero success in dating....” After that a bunch of other insults that pretty much aimed at making the person she is discussing look like a sexless fool who hates all 3+ billion women on the globe. Pure ad homi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 03:42 PM
-1

Women want more than just “a relationship.” They want sex. Some of them want to have sex as part of a romantic relationship and some just want sex. These statements are true for women too, but somehow no one assumes that the main goal of women is now only sex. You start at that assumption and you are surprised that you end at that end-point where it’s all about sex. All you did was throw out some VERY generic observations that apply to 90+% of humans and then you pretended those are somehow only…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 10:32 PM
8

Most of your comments in this thread are whining about how annoyed you are with this sub and how you hate hypocrisy. Time to take your own advice and stop being a hypocrite: Shut up with your whining about your frustration with the sub and stop visiting as you clearly got the power to fuck off.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 01:55 AM
2

Ehm? I clearly commented on a comment about this, which itself was, let’s say tangent to the main topic, and I made that clear. So how exactly am I trying very hard to force this into a topic of that just isn’t related while simultaneously telling people exactly what I commented about and even stating that it is only related in a tangential manner? Seems like you are just letting it get to you that whataboutism is a big thing on reddit. I don’t necessarily disagree with you on that one either. S…
/r/MensRights16/06/21 04:03 PM
0

I was clarifying a sub-point that was made. You are the second person who asks me this even though there is no indication of it. Why? I don’t speak for “all.” I don’t assume it spiked as much. Since the amount of men dying of suicide is 2x-4x higher than women, men are clearly more disadvantaged in this than women to begin with. Even a 50% change for women won’t change this. Showing only a change in % is statistically worthless (and borderline dishonest) if it isn’t brought together with the tot…
/r/MensRights16/06/21 11:26 AM
6

You don’t seem to get that I was simply explaining a sub-point that was made. And you asked for different data than the actual claim you apparently wanted to discuss.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 10:26 PM
6

It wasn’t my claim. I just explained it. Additionally it’s insanely easy to verify. Gender Differences in suicide When I read further down the comment chain I get the feeling you are more interested in discussing in bad faith. Using google once in a while if you wanna inform yourself isn’t really such a task to ask, but you seem more interested in proving someone wrong. I might be wrong. We’ll see.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 10:07 PM
0

I agree that it needs to be discussed.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:37 PM
66

In simple terms: the reason why suicide attempts are lower for male (ergo higher for females) is because males tend to be more successful with their attempt. Dead people don’t show under attempts, because it isn’t an attempt anymore. More men end up dead by suicide than women, women have statically higher numbers of attempts, but not deaths.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:05 PM
2

Then put some curtains, like most hospitals got?🤷‍♂️ There is no logical need to have a whole center for women only and exclude men of your community when all you really need are some curtains and the issue of not wanting to show any amount of skin in front of strangers is done.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 12:13 PM
1

What’s up with that dumb rhetoric question and your hyperbole interpretation of my comment?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/21 08:35 PM
2

You aren’t making sense. I never even said anything about feelings. Not my feelings nor your feelings nor anybody’s feelings. Exactly the same way I also never said you hate men. I don’t even think you hate men. Nothing you said would make you hate men. Maybe don’t jump between so many discussions if you continuously confuse people for other people? That’s what I am trying to tell you for a while now. Start paying attention. Not everyone is out to get you. Actually read what I wrote. You can’t e…
/r/MensRights02/06/21 07:32 PM
1

It doesn’t matter how real the stats are that you are using if they don’t even have anything to do with the topic.... It’s like saying bananas are yellow while we are talking about helicopters. It’s not wrong, just dumb and pointless. The fact that you still don’t get that while believing you are smarter is hilarious. r/iamverysmart lol
/r/MensRights02/06/21 11:01 AM
1

How dense can one person even be? I never argued against feminism in any of my statements. 🤷‍♂️ I never said you hate men. You are probably mistaking me right now.🤷‍♂️ I told you that repeatedly.🤷‍♂️ You just have the self awareness of a rock and didn’t notice you just discussed only yourself.🤷‍♂️ You can’t „win“ against an argument that was never even made. 🤷‍♂️ Enjoy your „win” ey 😉
/r/MensRights01/06/21 03:19 AM
1

Seriously? I don’t know what the heck you are even talking about. It’s like we are having two different conversations. One, in which I am apparently downplaying feminisms accomplishments just for disagreeing that it is not the holy grail of what made life better for humankind and one where I am simply disagreeing that it is the holy grail, but can still recognize feminisms ( and also other) movement’s accomplishments. Take a guess which one I am trying to have? You are literally making it a piss…
/r/MensRights01/06/21 12:34 AM
8

Where does she hit him first? I mean, I am not really against this sub, but all she did in this video seems the push/hard tap on his back and be angry, however unreasonable that might have been. I clearly don’t see her hitting him in a any capacity that justifies the massive slap to the face. I don’t know, maybe I missed something. The second arm move from her is unclear, but at least from this viewpoint it is quite arguably if this was her hitting him.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/05/21 01:21 PM
1

What a bold assumption that the education system failed me, when you are quite literally in an enraged stupor that inhibits all your reading comprehension simply because someone didn’t immediately and unconditionally agree with you. You didn’t even get what we disagree on.... I have a masters in engineering and work in the semiconductor industry. lol Some of the parts I designed literally made the chips you are using now to embarrass yourself. Like, LITERALLY. Those women you quoted actually wro…
/r/MensRights29/05/21 01:47 AM
1

Ah the random assumptions of sexism again, how tiresome. If you actually read what I wrote you will see that there isn’t even a hint of your accusation. No I am not forgetting female scientists or any gender for that matter. None of that has any influence on the science done anyways so people who are bothered that a women figured something important out are just....dumb. I respect the shit out of any scientist who advances humankind. I am also probably above average informed about female scienti…
/r/MensRights28/05/21 04:25 PM
1

lol? What history have you been following? Feminism wouldn’t even be possible if not for humankinds scientific advancements. They clearly improved the world in more significant manners than pretty much anything else. Actually, none of the liberties we have today would be possible without those. People seem to forget that it wasn’t that long ago almost everybody was still a peasant. 4 years of elementary school put you above the average, by like a significant margin. Reading and writing was consi…
/r/MensRights28/05/21 12:28 AM
2

The source for you is soy? My dude, there is no scientific consensus that isoflavones got any significant influence on testosterone levels. We got a higher chance to suffer from low testosterone from estrogens (etc) in the water supply because of the anti-baby pill, because our water plants can’t effectively remove it, than soy, and even that is not even proven (yet). What is proven however is that the amounts of estrogen in the water is climbing steadily and I don’t think that’s going to be so …
/r/MensRights15/05/21 04:10 AM
17

ah, of course, the great analogy between soy in food and cutting around at someone’s genitals who cannot consent with no medical benefits and a bunch of risks. Maybe you should check your dietary mercury levels before worrying about soy. Seems to be a bigger issue for you. 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:47 AM
14

Man, I am so tired of this assumption that I do not know what feminism as a definition stands for. No offense, but I’ve checked out basically all groups and tangents/oppositions of feminism for the last 14 years. Like literally, I’ve seen almost every prominent space dealing with these topics from redpill, mgtow, mra, menslib, feminism,twoX, female dating strategy, radfems, terfs, you name it. I’ve attended multiple feminism groups in real life as I did with some MRA groups. No I don’t conflate …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/21 06:45 PM
13

There are tons of pushes almost entirely made by feminists that are harmful, so that tiny violin they occasionally play to shut everybody up isn’t exactly the same as the claim that men should look towards feminism to solve their problems. If push comes to shove, I would not expect feminists to come to Men’s Aid, unless it solves their issues as a byproduct and even then they often seem to struggle quite a lot with empathy towards others they regard to be of certain groups. It’s not a good look …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/21 05:22 PM
1

I don’t even get a prompt....
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/21 12:13 PM
4

How is it censored? For me it seems to work just fine. Is there something I don’t notice?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/21 01:17 PM
1

Uhm, I think you don’t know how averages work honestly. Also #notallwomen should be your new flair.
/r/MensRights04/03/21 10:31 AM
1

*nervously laughs in german
/r/MensRights26/01/21 11:20 PM
0

;)
/r/seduction21/12/20 05:10 PM
1

Lmao. Thats true, but it’s a bit funny that you apparently didn’t read WHAT I wrote and just act like it matters more WHERE I wrote it, like this means anything. It also doesn’t change what YOU wrote, which even if I would be the type of person you think I am, is still pretty fucked up and disgusting. You attempt to justify your fuck ups by looking for fuck ups in others, which is exactly what you are criticizing in me, but haven’t even asserted yet. Pretty hilariously low levels of self awarene…
/r/seduction21/12/20 02:31 PM
1

„Hurr durr I don’t acknowledge the fact that a significant portion of sex traffic victims are boys to make a gendered argument in an attempt to win a reddit discussion after I victimblamed someone who expressed his experience of gendered violence because I am a petty fuck and can’t accept women not being victims in every single instance“ - You You are just a wannabe social justice warrior at best and an incel trying to white knight in the hopes to get laid at worst. Ridiculous
/r/seduction21/12/20 03:44 AM
3

One user posted this, not the whole sub. Did you just judge 288k users by one post that no one even agreed with yet, while another user pointed out that he lied 10mins before you posted? Are you literally not smart enough to know that you can find trash in every sub? Lol. Alright then.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 07:05 PM
1

Essentially it works like a chemical castrations, but it also adds hormones, e.g. testosterone to counter balance the ill effects. This is obviously a very simplified version of what is going on exactly, but I guess it gets the point across.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 10:22 PM
1

I don’t think you really got my comment.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 04:15 PM
6

Mh, I thought there is a wage gap, ensuring men get so much more money apparently, but somehow women are also outperforming men in education/jobs, yet they can’t find „financially suitable“ husbands? So what is it now ? And does it really matter when the people who wanna get married the most are women anyway? They make it difficult for themselves as far as I see the marriage discussion. 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights04/12/20 03:40 PM
1

Sure man, whatever.
/r/MensRights19/11/20 06:15 PM
1

Cool story bro? You patted yourself on the back after essentially „rambling unintelligibly“ yourself, because you literally said absolutely nothing? I am assuming? Where? You aren’t even giving a reason why this seems healthy to you and finish with more of nothingness that seems more like a front of knowledge than actual knowledge. I know, I know, we peasants can’t even imagine what you, our special boi, heard women say. 🙄
/r/MensRights18/11/20 11:48 PM
2

So it’s healthy if a woman needs to be told to snap out of her bs to then have a productive conversation what led to it, WHILE she seems fully aware that her irrationality and bs is exactly what led to it? Literally stirring up shit to get attention in the form of domination to then „have a productive conversation“ about it? I am sorry, but I think there is reasonable doubt such a person can actually hold a productive conversation as the only productive conversation to be held here is to discuss…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 09:35 AM
8

Ya, would be very careful shilling AfD just because they did something that should be expected of every party in Germany one time.... The majority of men in Germany don’t vote right wing, if by right wing you mean AfD type parties. If CDU is „Right wing“ for you, I would first like to know what a centric party is for you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/20 01:55 PM
13

Yes, but women don’t have to serve as long, so it’s not really equal at the end of the day 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights20/10/20 02:42 PM
1

A bit odd comparing the ability to drive, which is also a function of economics, which India is lacking behind in general, therefore also applies to men there, with not being able to be charged with rape. I mean, priorities, really.
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/20 07:32 AM
3

to say this as a programmer is rather surprising. When dealing with humans, the amount of parameters needed to even attempt to describe one person with any significant accuracy can easily be in the thousands. Now do that with like, 100 million people, who all have some common parameters, but also unique ones. If politics and especially conflict was so damn easy to solve, it would have been a long time ago.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 01:11 PM
1

Gönnte wohl jemand nicht
/r/MensRights11/05/20 02:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter