TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NeverVoteAgain Archive

View 0 posts and 66 comments by NeverVoteAgain on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Buzzfeed's mission: "We strive to connect deeply with our audience, and give them news and entertainment worth sharing with their friends, family, and the people who matter in their lives." I just send the article to my mom. Thanks Buzzfeed!
/r/MensRights13/04/17 08:30 AM
3

Be nice or the bogeyperson will come and get you!
/r/MensRights13/04/17 08:24 AM
53

If you think it's not an issue, you haven't been reading Huffington Post. :)
/r/MensRights13/04/17 05:59 AM
8

It's still so silly that it hurts. It reads like a parody but it's a seriously written editorial. And nothing to do with MRA.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 05:14 AM
1

It surely was true in the past when people were more trusting. But that's a good point that surely most pedophiles try to avoid situations where they might get tempted. But those who don't are more likely psychopaths and thus more dangerous.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 07:00 AM
1

You think it's 98% because you live in a bubble. If you didn't, you'd know that there is a big and growing number of people, bot men and women, who think that boys and men don't have the same quality of life rights and privileges as women have but and that fact should be discussed.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 06:16 AM
1

You sound like you hadn't reach high school yet
/r/MensRights11/04/17 06:12 AM
7

A lot. Women also use men to kill other men.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 03:46 PM
1

People avoid hitting women the same way they avoid hitting children - or avoid kicking kittens. It must partly biological.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 11:32 AM
9

Because you like to live in your bubble? any of us do but that's not necessarily good for you. Ignorant people get used.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 09:35 AM
15

You represent a typical person who thinks she knows about these things because the society/culture tells us lies and many people tend to believe what they are told and feels right. The evil people use you guys.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 09:31 AM
-6

A typical ad hominem from a person who has nothing else to say. I bet you,re a feminist, the stupid kind probably. :)
/r/MensRights10/04/17 07:46 AM
-4

This sub seems to have quite a few "high-school kids" who haven't yet distanced themselves from the black-and-white thinking that tends to dominate young minds. They read about all the disgusting things that feminists do and don't necessarily stop to think that maybe not all feminists are evil or crazy. Older ones know that there are all kinds of feminists although the most powerful ones are more often than not either evil or particularly stupid. Like the pig above, the Spillar characther, sprea…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 07:20 AM
2

Yeah, it's another world created by feminists, a world of lies and hate.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 07:03 AM
1

Many men and women on the left as well as men and women who were building nationalism were willing to give both men and women the right to vote quite early on. In the end almost everybody agreed. And, yeah, many feminists, too, but not all of them. The right-wing feminists didn't like the idea of suffrage.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 03:49 PM
1

Mantrum got 33 000 hits in my Google. Soon it'll be in the dictionary soon after mansplaining.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 05:50 AM
3

I told my son to think twice when he told about his dream job which included working with children. Why get into a field where your sex is a liability when there are jobs where it isn't (hopefully)? Now he's studying computer science. I don't know if my opinion influenced him, probably not much, but I'm glad he made, what I consider, the right decision by removing the children from the future job equation. It's sad, too, but what can one person do to change the way we are - or have become in thi…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 05:45 AM
1

If they were, they would disappear off the radar altogether, goes the argument against holding them accountable.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 06:07 PM
1

The left pushes men's issues away form their platform. The only place to go, if you want to find allies, is on the right. Unfortunately.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 06:04 PM
0

Where on earth did you get the idea that I'm delusional? Because my question was based on the fact that in many primitive cultures women were treated badly? You don't have to read much anthropological literature to find out it's actually true. There are many "primitive" cultures where women can be hit - and are hit - without moral sanctions. Start here if you're interested in facts instead of idle speculation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yanomami_women#Violence
/r/MensRights08/04/17 07:36 AM
1

My honest question was: when we know that it's genetic that we want to protect women, why were/are women often treated badly in "primitive" cultures (like Yanomami)? I was hoping for an enlightened explanation or speculation. The fact that men were beaten for various reasons is not an explanation, nor is the fact that life used to be (and can still be) nasty, brutish and short for everyone.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 07:27 AM
3

Patriarchy is a fringe theory within the scientific and critical circles. If you believe it's a valid worldview, you could as well believe in the Jewish world order.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 06:42 AM
-2

As I wrote women are/were often treated violently, beaten, whipped and so on. The power relation between the husband and his wives is/was often determined by violence or the threat of it (yes it was, I know what I'm talking about).
/r/MensRights07/04/17 04:51 PM
-6

If treating women well is in our genes, why so many "primitive" cultures treat women badly. It's mystery to me because I tend to agree that women are "made" to look vulnerable and even childlike in order to make us all want to protect them. And in all likelihood all cultures do protect women. But at the same time there arethses primitive and traditional cultures where, for example, men are allowed and often do beat women.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 02:28 PM
5

I couldn't find any evidence for the claim in the article (yes, there is a vague correlation but it could mean anything). Please downvote unless I just happened to miss the evidence.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 12:03 PM
8

'There is this presumption that a man with a female child might be up to no good and it doesn’t work the other way. 'These attitudes are out of date and increasingly fathers are becoming more involved parents.' The gender of the child doesn't really matter and these attitudes are not old but, rather, produced by rather new developments in the media and feminism, for example. I'm in my fifties and I'm pretty sure that the distrust, which probably has always been there, has strengthened remarkably…
/r/MensRights05/04/17 04:31 PM
3

Maybe it's not true. I mean, it sounds like a Feminist truth. But, for example, doctors earn nowadays less because they work less because it's become a female dominated occupation. Their wages have been going up, though.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 04:52 AM
-16

Yeah but women do earn about 20% less.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 03:21 PM
1

Women are more afraid and that makes it better for business to make them feel protected. Id not, they won't show up. Men are different.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 03:13 PM
-23

Women do earn about 20% less, it's not a myth.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 09:42 AM
5

Pretty stupid to upvote a single opinion - and of a person who apparently have personal problems.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 03:47 PM
3

There seems to be a fourth cop, a man, who can't cope with the aggressor either and leaves after a while. The only one who can and is willing to stand up to this guy seems to be an outsider - whom one of the police woman then leads away. Whats strange is that the police women don't use hand cuffs or pepper spray - or perhaps they do?
/r/MensRights03/04/17 09:14 AM
1

There was this Feminist stand-up comedian who said that the only people who she makes fun of are white straight men. I asked her that if she saw homeless white men on the street how did she know which ones are straight. I mean, wasn't there a possibility that she'd make fun of a gay homeless white guy by mistake and then feel really bad afterwards.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 08:55 AM
-1

The guy in the picture is actually rearranging the ropes in Wichita for the next lynching of some poor women.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 08:42 AM
4

Fact #22: A University of Pennsylvania research study found that domestic violence is the leading cause of injury to low-income, inner-city Philadelphia women between the ages of 15 to 44 - more common than automobile accidents, mugging and rapes combined. In this study domestic violence included injuries caused by street crime. Yeah, domestic violence is something that happens outside your home. Of course. We are, after all, talking about a Feminist study and they do whatever is needed - manipu…
/r/MensRights03/04/17 08:34 AM
2

Demonizing men and portraying women as eternal victims is a big business. Where would all women's study graduates get employed if it didn't exist?
/r/MensRights03/04/17 08:06 AM
0

Stop talking to women and, vóila, the problem disappears.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 03:45 PM
3

Soccer is among the most dangerous sports in the world when it comes to injuries, particularly long-term ones.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 09:12 AM
5

At the same time women and men compete together in the American Ninja! But women can never(?) compete for the highest prizes. That must be frustrating - and explain why there are so few women competitors. Then again, I think there isn't anything, where individuals compete against each other, that wouldn't have a clear male majority at the very top. So, either you have to let women compete with each other and that way let them win as often as men or you just have to accept that there are only a f…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 08:42 AM
10

Its very unlikely that women with their naturally smaller size, less "masculine skull" and weaker muscles and bones could stand long without an severe injury in any men's soccer league. Actually, few men, if any, survive soccer without injuries. It's a risky business - more so than, for example, hockey. But men's injuries tend to be less severe because evolution has made their bodies more suitable for rough physical contact. It could be, of course, that FIFA is too cautious. But, then again, is …
/r/MensRights02/04/17 07:35 AM
3

Only in the US where bipartisan smearing campaigns have become a norm and where religious - Christian - prudence is among the highest values. Or am I wrong?
/r/MensRights02/04/17 07:13 AM
3

Surely universities- and CNN - would welcome software registering false rape accusations, too. :P Nope, they would argue that it can't be sure whether accusations are false or not outside the courtroom.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 07:29 PM
11

The beginning and the end must be from different articles. The beginning deals with how certain boys had seen men treated unfairly and wondering if women have more rights than men. The rest is vague talk about how boys (and girls?) have to be taught to think the way the society (and women) wants them to think.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 07:09 PM
2

If you were satisfied with the standard of living they had, say, in the the 50s in Britain, you could still get by with one salary. There is evidence that there has been some real stagnation during the last decade or two. But saying that it's because of the increased size of the workforce (women, immigrants) is just silly. And it's beyond silly to say that the wages have halved since (middle-class) women started to work in greater numbers.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 06:49 AM
1

“By going out to work they halved the male wage, so a male wage no longer supported a family,” she said. How on earth did they do that? I guess economics isn't her strongest suit.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:00 PM
3

Women's workout pants have looked like leggings for a couple years now, as everybody knows. They are very tight and sometimes they are fully or partly transparent. It's hard go out without noticing this fashion because many women seem to be walking, not just running, around in their underwear - which I, at least, find somewhat disturbing. Surely we are talking about those an not actual pantyhose or leggings? Then again, googling for "transparent workout pants" makes me thing that perhaps I live …
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:16 AM
1

It can be argued that across all three major causes of men dying earlier than women—accidents, suicide and heart disease—men are wholly responsible for their own early graves: male life is cheap because that’s how they act. While such an attitude probably explains the overwhelming social indifference to the gender death gap, it doesn’t make it right. Social indifference is great in all "gaps" where men are disadvantaged. So, no, that doesn't explain it. EDIT: a bit more context: Education gap(s)…
/r/MensRights31/03/17 06:19 AM
5

It is hilarious because Wu believed she was talking to a member of a group that that can be treated badly but then it turned out she was talking to a member of a group that should always be treated with respect. Ha!
/r/MensRights31/03/17 04:48 AM
2

Honestly, I've no idea what the downsides are of femininity. Couldn't tell you, never had to experience it. You could start studying the subject by reading some classic novels. They are often great because they don't see women all good (or men all bad) the way not so great works of art can sometimes do. And because they can tell us about the special vices and antisocial behaviors of both sexes. And my advice is to do it unless you want to remain silly perhaps for the rest of your life.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:53 PM
1

If there was this research field studying honestly and critically men and women - like something called "gender studies" - this would not have been a surprise. Why not make it happen! Then we would slowly start to learn about the problems men and women have as similar but also different groups.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:16 PM
5

In fact, rape is the crime that has the highest false accusation rate by far.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 06:42 AM
2

Wasn't she a girl actress who was very cute and earned a fortune but then ended up playing the role of a not cute woman instead of a hot girl? I mean, that's a path that can leave you with pretty strange ideas of the world. Particularly if you're a Feminist on top of that.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 06:35 AM
4

Women call all men at least sometimes boys and young women girls. Men call women ladies and men guys. That's the most common pattern in my experience. No?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 06:14 AM
6

So your idea of a social policy is to find out what is the most hurt population (even when the broad classifications are by necessity more or less arbitrary and dismiss huge numbers of people who don't fit) and forget everybody else. Nice, are you working for the Swedish government? And there is at least few studies indicating that boys are treated more violently. But - because boys aren't that important - there is no big body of evidence And you didn't prove that the source was not Feminist. It…
/r/MensRights29/03/17 07:35 PM
9

But its for those who study to become doctors/nurses and lawyers who handle cases of domestic abuse. its mostly targeted towards mens violence against women because it tends to be more severe. Really poor excuse. Really poor. "We don't have to protect girls because boys are hit more often in homes". That would never ever fly in Sweden, Feminist Sweden. But because it's men they are exluding, it's OK. Besides I don't believe your figures unless you can prove that they are not from a Feminist sour…
/r/MensRights29/03/17 07:04 PM
16

There are many Feminists who think that men use violence to control women and children and that women don't do it. Just another lie, nothing new. In fact, women have the power more often than men in relationships, but who needs facts when you can lie and nobody cares.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 06:08 PM
3

I don't think it's real. It once was but not anymore in government jobs and the like (though I know that discrimination is real in the sense that men are discriminated against in many "female jobs" while women are not anymore in "male jobs"). And no article by the Guardian (for heaven's sake) about professional musicians can change my mind. It would be silly if it could. What I furthermore know is that women are not as interested as men in politics or the society at large. But if they are, they'…
/r/MensRights28/03/17 07:27 PM
2

The Feminist agenda is founded mostly on lies. Why? Because they just can't find big enough problems that would justify the huge power they have. And many of them are stupid, of course.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 07:05 PM
5

Men, as a class, don't want to start a class struggle against women. It's pretty impossible; men aren't a class in that sense. If anything, men want women to have better lives. It gives many men a reason to aspire to higher things and work more. But young men are starting to opt out from government jobs and politics. Why engage in battles that you don't have to fight, if you just keep out of the government- and big consumer-centered companies.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 05:53 PM
6

You can always run yourself. Very theoretical option taking into account that even talking about theses things can, and often do, lead to censorship and even banning in the mainstream media (like Reddit). Even populist parties avoid talking about men's issues because it just doesn't sound right. The angle that's missing is not, for example, education in general but the poor performance and discrimination against boys. But you just can't say that. Not the discrimination part, at least.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 03:47 PM
80

"Females have always been high achievers. It's just now we get the opportunity to be high achievers behind the scenes to influence decisions," she said. What hindered you before men got discriminated against? Anyway, my sincere belief is that women tend to advance what's good for women and girls even more than men. That will slowly but surely erode the foundations of all democracies. We already see education systems that favor women hugely, we see how the health care institutions invest much mor…
/r/MensRights28/03/17 12:20 PM
1

My sister managed to "trap" his husband's ex-wife by calling her over and then secretly recording her usual madness. They didn't have to fight the case in the court because the recording was so damaging that she backed down and let the father have the kids. (Unfortunately the son was already pretty messed up after living with the crazy mother for a couple of years. The daughter was OK, tough.) Later on it turned out that the recording would probably have been dismissed in the court, because reco…
/r/MensRights28/03/17 10:57 AM
15

Is it dementia or what that makes this anthropologist have so low view on men (and, in fact, humanity)? Of course men can control their impulses. If they couldn't, we would not have a´civilization where people - more men than women - are building better lives for those who come after themselves by working long hours and inventing new ways to improve the society.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 10:41 AM
4

Wikipedia's articles (or parts of them) can be divided into those that raise political passions among morally corrupt people (like Feminists) and those that don't. Though the grey area in between is quite large, there are lots of articles (or parts of them) that don't deal with "tautological issues" (like mathematics) and can still be trusted. For example I would never ever trust the Wikipedia article on domestic violence. But, then again, I wouldn't trust right away any mainstream media outlet …
/r/MensRights28/03/17 07:56 AM
2

How about this: any democracy in a wealthy, militarily safe place will always end up putting the well-being of children and women first.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 05:56 PM
1

Earlier I had on principle when it came to voting: no racists, no feminists, and no communists. But now that I've decided to stop voting it really doesn't matter any more. (Racists I didn't vote because they tend to be idiots, Feminists I didn't vote because they tend to be idiots and a big threat to the civilization. Communist I didn't vote because they are a big threat to the civilization. )
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter